HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140236 Ver 1_Application_20140311.��
� ��� �
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
March 11, 2014
Mr. Steven Kichefski
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
ANTHONYJ.TATA
SECRE]'ARY
SUBJECT: Pipe ReplacemenUSecondary Road Paving, 55`h Ave.1VE (SR 1697), Catawba CounTy
Dear Mr. Kichefski:
The North Cazolina Department of Transportation (NCDO'1� requests authorization to replace an 18"pipe
in conjuncfion with a secondary road paving project on SR 1697 (55`h Ave. NE) in Catawba County.
At station 6+ 50, NCDOT proposes to replace an existing 28-foot, 18" RCP with 40-foot, 30" RCP.
NCDOT proposes to replace the deteriorating 28 fooT, 18" RCP with a 40 foot, 30" RCP. The existing
pipe is perched and on a 3.5% slope. The stream is piped immediately upstream and downstream of the
road crossing. Due to the existing site conditions, the new pipe will be placed at existing stream bed
elevation and a�5 foot rock ladder will be constructed aT the outlet for limited aquatic passage. Five feet
of Class II rip rap will be placed azound the pipe inlet and outlet for sttucture stabilization. A
jurisdictional ditchline is located on the south side of The roadway. Due to minor road realignment, the
jurisdictional ditchline will be filled, which will result in an additional 60 feet of impacts for the road
paving projecY. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the
construction site, as needed. Areas affected by temporary cofferdam sysYem wil1 be restored to pre-
project condirions.
The scope of work will permanently impact 82 feet of two unnamed tributaries to Lake Hickory, which is
classified as a WS-V & B waYershed by the N.C. Water Quality Secrion.
The project is not located wiihin % mile of any crirical watershed area nor is SR 1697 a rural or urban
arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin checklist.
The proposed project has been reviewed for cultural resources (ProjecY Tracking # 12-09-0021) -
l0/18/12(Archaeology) and 9/26/12 (Historic Architecture).
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project threaYened/endangered species. The
federally listed species for Catawba County (USFWS listed date September 22, 2010) include dwarf
SR 1697, 55�' Ave. NE
Page 2
March 12, 201A
flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan�ora) and schweinita's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). National
Heritage Program records document the nearest heartleaf location 3.2 miles southwest of the proposed
project area. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the
oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy azeas near springheads. There is no suitable habitat in The
proposed project area and no heartleaf species was observed within the project footprint Natural
Heritage Program records document the nearest Hellanthus Schweinitzii location approximately 16.5
miles southeast of the proposed project area. Although Yhe survey was conducted outside of the opfimal
survey window, no plants were observed and the site is located in a regularly maintained NCDOT right of
way in a residential neighbarhood; therefore, no impact on the species is anticipated.
I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned acrivities, and locarion
maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150460-55120000-12.2 0 1 821-3 1 26
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
Reuben Chandler, P.E.
Acring Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: ��i� �c�Lfi�t—�
l
Trish Beam
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
o� fwnrF9pc
v�� iv
7 ��
Q T
Office Use Only:
Corps adion ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10.2008
Pre-Construction Noti�cation PCN Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certifcation:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1697
2b. County: Catawba
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hickory
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 12201821
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Reuben Chandler, Acting Division Engineer
4c. Busines s name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: rchandler@ncdot.gov
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Beam
5b. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
Sd. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: pdbeam@ncdot.gov
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.809 Longitude: - 81.245
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: <.10 acres permit site; secondary road paving = 1.9 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Ut to Lake Hickory
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classifcation of nearest receiving water: WS-V & B
2c. River basi n: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A deteriorating perched pipe on a unpaved secondary road. Landuse is mostly residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace the deteriorating pipe and bring the unpaved road up to paved road
standards for the safety of the travelling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace the deteriorating 28 foot, 18" RCP with a 40 foot, 30" RCP. The existing pipe is perched and
on a 3.5% slope. The stream is piped immediately upstream and downstream of the road crossing. Due to the existing
site conditions, the new pipe will be placed at existing stream bed elevation and a-5 foot rock ladder will be constructed
at the outlet for limited aquatic passage. Five feet of Class II rip rap will be placed around the pipe inlet and outlet for
structure stabilization. A jurisdictional ditchline is located on the south side of the roadway. Due to road realignment, the
jurisdictional ditchline will be filled, which will result in an additional 60 feet of impacts for the road paving project. A
temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the construction site, as needed. Areas
affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored to pre-project conditions. The Project will be constructed using
typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.)
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or o6tained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by
Division 12 DEO.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. Ifyes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction
number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ Na ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3 b. 3c. 3 d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, Width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 � P � T Increase in culvert UT to Lake ❑ PER � Corps 1.5 12`
length Hickory � INT � DWQ
Rock
LaddedRiprap for UT to Lake ❑ PER � Corps
S2 � P❑ T Structure Hickory � INT � DWQ 1.5 10`
Stabilization
S3 ❑ P� T Cofferdam bypass UT to Lake ❑ PER � Corps 1.5 60
pumping Hickory � INT � DWQ
S4 ❑ P � T Fill (Jurisdictional 2nd UT to Lake ❑ PER ❑ Corps 1 60"
Ditch) Hickory � INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts `82
3i. Comments:'Total Permanent Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑P�T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4£ Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. Sc. 5d. Se.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (far DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
To bury the pipe per regulation would result in an extreme pipe slope, which could destabilize the stream; therefore, the new
pipe will remain perched to maintain a stable channel and a rock ladder will be constructed at the outlet to dissipate energy
and to provided limited aquatic life passage.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? NA
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to t he above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA f nal approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in
additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater generated from project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
Sb. Have you checked with the USFVIIS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
Sc. If y es, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database and field site visit.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project was reviewed/cleared by Cultural Resources (Project Tracking # 12-09-0021) 10/18/12(Archaeology) and
9/26/12 (Historic Architecture).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number:3710373500E
'� 1,���°a�/� ��> ��` '� 3 l� ��
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(Agenfs signature is valid only if an authorization letterfrom the applicant
is rovided.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pipe Replacement/Secondary Road Paving
55th Ave, NE (SR 1697)
Catawba County
N
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
I i i i I i i i I
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: � � County: ('atawha Project ID: 12.201811
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA
Route: SR 1697
Water Quality Criteria:
Stream: UT to Lake Hickorv
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS
ORW
WSI
Yes No
I jM
i�
�. �
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r' �
Roadwav Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban - >�
Arterial Rura1 - '"�
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
- ;�+
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
�
�
�
�
.
V
N
�
•�
�
�
W
O'
�A
l
a
n
N
m
C
�
M
N
U
Q
Vicinity Map / ; w �,� - �
�
� � q Site "
-�\ � ,_,
�- � �,
_� � . ,
� �n_ ,,,o
Catawba Countv t�I.C.
► � � � � �. � � ���� �� ��' � �� � ��' �� � . � .� �
�� � � � . � �� ��� �� � � �-� � �-� �� � � �
���� ��� I�� (�) ��C ��' ��e « �� i�> � �i b
I:I'�(��I(��:��� � �(��. .I I'�A�I.
SR 1697 (SSth Ave.11lE)
Catawba County
�
GRAPHIC SCALE
u0
I8�
PLANS
I�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
u0
'�b�
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
ROADSIDE ENVlRONM6NTAL UNIT
DIVISION OP HfGfIWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLLVA
THESE EROSION AND SEDIAIENT CONTROL PLANS GOMPLY
WRX IHE REGULAilONS SEi FORZH BY THE
NCG010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTfON PERMIT EFFECITVE AUGUST 3, 20➢
ISSUED BY TH6 NORTN GAOLINA DEPARTMEM OF ENVlRONMENT AND
NATURAL ItESOURCES DfVfStON OF WA18R pUAl[iY.
P�epored in iM 0(flce of:
DIVISION 12 - DISTRICT 3
1031 E. GASTON ST.
LINCOLNTON� NC 289092
2012 ST.4NDARD SPECIFICATIONS
EROS[�N AND SED[MENT C�NTR�L MEASURE�
Sed R D...:., .. o , ,
1630.03 T�A�...�SileD:a�L__________ ,n
1630A5 T�mpo...� Di.�.dm _ ,y �
1605.01 T�mpe...�StleF�o��__________��
1606A1 Sp«�.1 S�d:aa�t Co�t.al F���� ____�
1622.01 T�m�...y B�.m..�d Slop� D..:�.________
1630.02 S�IeB..:�1'rn�6_______________� �
1633.01 T�mpo...� Ro�k SiIkCA«4 T�prA________ �
T=mpo...> Ro=k Sile CF«k T�p=-A .deF O
M.ui�s .�d Pele.=n1.A:d� (PAM2 _ _ _ _ _ _' _' �
1633.02 T�m�...y Ro�k S:IeCFa4 T�prB____.�
W.eel�/Ca. F�6�. W.eai� �
W.et1�6Cof. F:6�. W.eel� O
.de6 Pol�.�.�l.a1d� (PAM)_ _ _ _"' _ _ _' _ _ _ _ _
1634A1 T�mpo...� Re�k Sedim��t D.m T�prA_____.
163A.02 T�m�...� Ra�4 S�d�m��e D.m TrprA _�
1635.01 Re�kP:p�I�l�aS�dim=�rTe.pT�p=-A______e�
1635.OR Ra�4 Rp� [�l�[ S�diA��e T..p T�prB_ __y�
1630.04 Se06�aB.A�'""__'_"__'___"__'_'_.�
1630.06 Sp«:dSGIB.aB..i�______'_____'_'�
Ra�k [�I�t S�d3A�ot T..p:
1632.01 T�pe A A �
1632.04 Tm�g____________'_'_"__"' B�
1632.03 Typ�C C�
54imme. B..in �
T:�.�d S6:mmee B..io �
InGltr.6uu B.dn �
TI-IIS PROJECT CONfAINS
SR09ION WNTROL PLANS
FOR CLRARIlVG AIVD
GRUBBIlVG PHASE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
Ito.dweySmndwd Drmrinyy
TLe following rovfivey e�qlieM1 smndv�d� xs uppew �� "ROUdrvry Smndeed D'uwiogs'- Roudwes Desigp
Uo@ - N. C.O.yarenmo ofT�vnspo�teuon - Ralei�L, N. C., dered Jxnuery 2012 and fia lems�
au tLerero are vppG<abie m thie prajett and Av �J=«�« hcrchy w.. ��n.idunl u vW� nf
tbnee plo.n.
1604.01 NeJ.oed F.onio� Covo-ol Oeiwl 1632.01 Rock L�let SeAweut'4ap 'qPe A
iGOa-01 "1'emvor�y SA[ Rn��r 1632.02 Rook iole[ 6edime�rc Trep lyye B
1606.01 6vad�19nJimrnt fmwol F�m 1fi32.03 Ruck Ivlco Betimeut Trnp 1'ype C
160].Ol Grevd Gmvuctian Eno-ance 1433.01 'femporuvy Rack Sd[ Chwk Tmc A
1622.01 1'emparey eermv a�d Slov= Mel�s I633.02 Temporxry Rack S�tr Che.k Tm= B
1630.01 Riser Beeiu Ifi34.0 Tampomrg Ibul� 6ndimauc Dvm Tmc A
163U.U2 Sil[ Besi� Trve B 1634.02 Temporen� Roek Sedimenv De�u Type B
1G3LLU3 Temvo�eq�SJ011i[eL IG35.U1 Ro�kWpel..IecSWim�mtTmpTyucd
1630.04 %Oiog Roe�n 1635.U2 Rock P'�pe Ideo Sedimmv Trep "fype N
1630.05 T�mpn�u.y Oke.efno 1640.01 Cd� FLce BoHlc
1630.U6 Sv�� Stilli� Bssin 1645.01 'fempu.nry Sne.m C.uesng
/431.01 hlamng Insrelleuan
J
60 day option
REQD. STORAGE
+/— 175 CF
PLAN STORAGE
+/— 1250 CF
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTALj
Q
� PROFILE (VERTICAL)
0
+
0
z
C
n
/ �
/ �
/
/
� �
�
� �
� �
� I
�
_ — — — — — — I / — — — — — — — — —',
— — — — — �
I Helen I,
Helen Steele I
Steele i ,
� I�
i 2 z 4 z 3 I
with 6aHle
ITemPa�ary Roak I
- � —� — � — ` \ snrcn.a rm� n
J is x...�.nrianr
60'R\W }urnouf
1 i +La% � � 78 3+00 \,
is° waa�, o. \J\
Type A Check+�
sa ,pod�e
\\V°�
Plure nP .aP in !
permavmtdirchline�
Hugh � 3 x 6 x 3
with 6affle
Huffman R� a,,,,,,,,�,,,,,
�
" Place weephalu in
silrfence ns needed. �I
\ �� I
�� �kaQ '--��
�o nol FII
� ^ dislurb a
s.\ � e "��
i 7
i
� — � 4 x 8 x
� — — � with baf
� � � 60 day op
� — — — Linda r°'"
sxc
Huffman �.' f
SOIL STABILIZATIOIV TIMEFRAMES
SIrE OESCR/PT10N STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
vEA�uE*ca oixes swa�es,o�*cxES nxo s�aaES � oars uaHE
HIGH OIIALIiY WPiEfl MOW)30NE5 > �dYS NONE
SLOPES STEEPEP iHAN 3:1 1 OPYS IF SLOPES PFE 10'pP LESS IN LENGiN LN� APE
NOi SiEEPEF iN4H 2J.i9 �AYS ARE ALLOWEO.
SLOPES 3:IaR FldiiEF � �DYS GOP SLOPES LFFAiEN THpN 50'IN
LEN6iH.
LL OiHEP APEAS WIiH SLOPES FLAiiEP iHAN 4:1 19 OPYS YONE.E%CEPi FOP PEPIMEiEPS PNO XOW ZONES.
Lake Hickory
/
Charles R.
� Hoke
/
.'�
/ �
, \
� \
\
\
� \
\ \��
/'
� Morlene / i
Berry /
� /
� � / �
\
, �
� \� � �
\ /
� /
� \
\ � �
Marlene
6erry /
' „ Place weePholu in / /
silifence os needed.
' � /
,( \ �
,"\ \ \ \ '�xOp / /
� �
I � Madene \ � � � � /
� Berry
/ \
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
g ryll \ 6+5o II \
le Short a�+�.�4"
` MCP nd piuce R��e m jlowa6le
� 1 nP +aP in hote. �1 e�isc IS" MCP
amry 0.eck
mrk Trye A �
eirhei9M \
/ � �
/ \ James I
� 1 Cleary I
` �
� �
� — � _
xbz
� A
+
�.// a
+
waalu or
A Check
Plo�e nP raP in
p¢�mn�n� di�aF/ine
Wolier
Ikerd
i
�-y
35' \ }urnou}
13+50
50' r,maa�n
_ � siu cne�k Ti
is n..�„�
3 x 6 x
18° Watt/es or
Type A Chea/u
100'+Pm^s
Duke Energy
942
940
938
936
934
932
930
IO
942
948
938
936
934
932
930
EXISTING 18" RCP
PVL.EMISi1NG IIPSiPEPM LPP�I4Ni =] ��O W-� RVG E%ISiIHG DOVMiPEPM GfiP01PM = i
Type = Reinforced Concrete
Invert Elevation = 937.40'
Outlet Elevation = 936.40'
Total Length = 28.0'
Existing Gradiant = 3.5%
PROPOSED 3�" RCP
PV4E%ISi1NGI1P5iflEPM6PMI4Ni=] FLOW~ 9VGE%ISiING�VH5TPE9MWP01PM=i
B+Bm 0+25 0+58 m+75 1+m8 1+25 1+50 1+75
Type = Reinforced Concrete
Invert Elevation = 937.50'
Outlet Elevation = 936.40'
Total Length = 40.0'
Proposed Gradiant = 2.8%
GTO7
rp
57ATE
Slte
Sketch
S �� � Avg. WoSer Elev. = 934.00'
Nf'� i Full Pand Elev. = 934.3� ;�
La9ce /
\ vassr� � Nickory ��
///�\\ �, �\ /,' �s.s
y0� � \ 93�5' 9.�] t _� I
� 3 �so� � �1�p� � I
912.00' l ?�0 93d'16' I
/ �
� �°° �'•�� Buffer 1 �� ` �
\' � 9]9.3i' 93�31'
� t ti I{I/
f\ 9 '�L."' +.ti 9'J955 39 .�,i,... ^"�" t(.
19 °�-+.., Ll�«' r
� �, � � � ���� f
� �� z � �
J `\ Q.m�" Buffer 2 �'
� � �-- "� 0��9>�
.
`�'3�I � ` k�o. � `��y .-
J 1 ` � x
� � . o,n\ -...,, II'
J I � 56, IB•11CP rr�saos�
Idn 9 95 8'%5"SCOII� II+6
Q-18'deep +oa3'
v9�5' I�\ \ Iu66• \ � 9]9.9' 9]B.0'�-��iO'�M1\er \ �
' �{.i_ 'I Inb( -
� � � � 93�.]�'
I GN II \ \GF � � ` � � ` _ 9ae�' .
I � '/.ea � Ee 90�NIe�
� I � \ �� � vB Sf�� Rg �4•
� \ 9NO' _
'\ � ` _� �� � 9.,,, _:
\ �' �, �v.,EVPo'sro„a qa }
), `-�-�o., �
\ , e� �
91330' , ��,
\ ,, ° I
FIRamova approxa�
Of Oz3T.2�'NCP __ _ hll
* _ - _ _ . mi.�ox
.�w
Note: FuIlPOnd Elevotion is based on
avg. GPS water elevation of 932.00'
observed on 3/4/14 at which time
Duke Energy reported actualfull
pond as 230'above the current
lake level.
{fYCf fOCk
GpyOk LO' M1}.
_�� --- e_
91��� 9151]'
—r_'__ ___'
PROJE�
�'
/
�
� LL
L
L L e �� �p;,m
o��- —� � � � � /
�a Remove or fawade '
enex�ar�nq4' -'-"�'��
Aemove aOprot.p'
\ o} BzBT.J'PYC Linp
11/0 SCCIIe
PIPE REPLACEMENT
55th Ave, NE SR 1697
Catawba County NC
•• NOTES
1.PUMPWG SYSTEM TO BE OSEO TO �IVERT STREPM FiROUN� THE
CONSTftUCTION AREA AS NEEOE�.
2. ANV CONTaMIN/aTEO WlaTER WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION SITE TO
eE auwaEO iNro a si�T eac.
3.SI�T FENCE TO BE PLFCEO laR0UN0 THE STOCKPILE P.NO PROJECT
!+S NECESSFaftY.
4.UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT /+LL SILT FENCES ARE TO 8E
PLFCEO AS NEEOEO.
5.laLL OISTURBED FREAS WILL BE SEEDEO laN� Ml1LCHE� 11PON
PROSECT COMPLETION.
6. ELEVP.TIONS ARE BASED ON R T6M INAfU IN THE BASE OF !a
POWER P�LE HHVING HN RSSIGNE� ELEVATI�N OF 5a0.00'.
�
�
74-16'
////\\//// — — — �
28' of 18" RCP 3.5%
Inlet Outlet
937.40' FL 936.40' FL
EXISTING ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
�
4'
5"
�
�'�I
� 40' of 30" RCP ~
Inlet
937.50' FL
4'
slope
tlet Derched
approx. I.0'
-- --- ?'/
2.8 % grade
Outlet� Rock Latlder
I.0' ht.
936.40'
PROPOSED ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
NO SCal2
Proposed Pavement Stucture
4" Asphalt Base Course, Type B 25.0B
I" Asphalt Sur-Face Course, Type SF9.SA