Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout740019_Inspection 2021_20211019FacilityNumber 9 'Division of VIWater Resources Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Ai;enc) -Ty pe of 4 isit: ■ Compliance inspection 0 Operation Re.~ 0 Structure 0 Technical Assistaneniedce a Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 C ontplaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Fmergenc. ()Other 0 Date of Visit: } ,.{ � Farm Narne; 4 1 "okr""`•,~ &V 0.-- O" ner Email: Owner Name: �1 �i 1?ll' ti 1, A p 9 Phone: Mailing Address; „T Physical Address: Facility Contact: t tti [ Tide: Phone: 'frs-�►�p Integrator: SIN'yisrt Onsite Representative: r Certification Number: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Longitude: Location of Farm: r - - Design Current Swine Capacity Pap. i1 can to Finish. Wean w Feeder Feeder to Finish it !arroyo to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other LI Latitude: Design Current Design Cu Wet Poultry Capacity Pop, Cattle Capacity Pop. 1'tt-I dk�r Design Current Fault. Ca+acity Po Discharges and Stream Imuacts I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure Q Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters oldie State (gallons)'' d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? Of yes, notify DWR 2. 13 there evidence ora past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'' Page 1 of .f Din Cam Utiry ('JIF I)a�n Heifer I)n l'r}yy Non•1)3in_ Beef Stocker Beet Feeder Beer Brood Cow ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE ❑ } es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA Q NE ❑ 4es ❑No ❑NA El NE ❑ yes .Q4 ❑ NA 0 NE O Yes o [] NA 0 NE 5112/2020 Continued 1'acilitti Numhcr: _ 1� I date or -inspection: 10 - _T1 Waste Collecting & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Icss than adequate' ❑ `s a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? El Yes Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in); Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the inte�rit}� of any of the structures observed? [11 Yes No ❑ NA 11] NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc•] 6. Are there seructtues on -site which are not properly addressed and%or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 mere answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or enviironmen I threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N 0 NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ' o 0 NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks. andior wet stacks) 9_ Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks. or compliance alteratives that need ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE [] Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn. etc) I ❑ PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate ManurelSludgc into Rare Soil [] Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Arra 12. Crop Type(s): tSC.ut t , 13. Soil Type(s): 14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? D Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop andior land application site need improvement' ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 'o El NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Eri❑ NA 18. ]s there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA Required Records & Documents 19_ Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 1fyes, check the appropriate box. ❑WEEP ❑Checklists ['Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agrcements ❑other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box bclo►sw. ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Anal}sir ❑Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code 0 Rainfall ['Stocking ❑ Crop Yield D 120 minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections( ['Sludge Survey I,I 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. Ef selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain raiobreakers an irrigation equipment? Page 2of.1 N ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ Yes L o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ad No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE 5/12/1010 Continued 1Facilitt lwiumber: riq - I (Date of Inspection: J O —1 rj -TM 24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pernw'? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA For sludge levels ❑, Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge`! 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 2R. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard pmblems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/inspector Fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a Follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes D Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Ycs ❑ Ycs ❑ Yes ❑ Ycs ti.Y ❑ ti,4 ❑ N> No ❑ NA ❑ NE No ai No Er/No 2/No No 13/No No EfNo DNA DNE El NA El NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE El NA ❑NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facilit} to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). 14. 0n5t I ]- irt— ,(r OuircL ceck4 C[aQ ur.d6 C rc .e 1 iL,ic 1t��1� LT2_ - '' • Ckl Reviewer/Inspector Name: Rev'iewerflnspectar Signature: Page 3 of 3 Date: id - 1r a\ 5/I2/202f1