740011_Inspection_20211013

Facility Number
f 1
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agenc►
Type of Visit; O Compliance Inspection • Operation Re%iery 0 Structure Evaluation
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Eollow-up 0 Referral 0 Emerf;encv
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Farm Name: CAv ryrt c^ - c ina6 A I v \ckr bra.
Owner Name: , ? Ct C) Y1 1af t-•Q-
;Nailing Address; k 4 Wont vAoor
I I0,Ld5 ----1
Owner Email:
County:1
Q Technical Assistance
Q Other 0 Denied Access
Region: `x °
Phone:
b I GreenQ;II , 7 5CF
Physical Address:
Faciliq Contact: ?t--r.C*A. \LIZST., Title:
�7 41(i V.0 Qi1_Q_,
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude_
Integrator:
Phone: _
n1I -C)C (GA
Certification N u tuber;
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
4Vean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
)(Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
95Z
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
l3oars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle
layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Cgpaeity Po
Layers
.
Non•Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poulis
Oilier
Design Cnrrcnt
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Co.
IUairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Corr
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Reef Brood Coy,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ t Mier:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page ! of 3
❑ Yes
❑NA LINE
Et Yes El No ❑NA El NE
❑ v,s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2620 Cannnurd

FaCiht Number: N
V4'aste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
[Date of inspection: 1 D-I2—a / I
Identifier:
Spillway?;
Designed Freeboard (in):
Obsened Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
Er ❑ NA 0 NE
No El NA j]NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes []• No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.. large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 4 „ 7\n ❑ NA 0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered '-es. and the situation poses an immediate public health or cm irunrncn[al threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement,'
Waste Application
I0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
allo Q NA
No ❑ NA
IZ(No El NA
❑ Yes EZNo 0 NA
❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 14%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate ManureSludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAcceptableCrop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. CropType(s): r39 , 5E
13. Soil Type(s):
[] NE
❑ NE
NE
O N1
❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
l5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
C7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Cs there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the Facility fait to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ W U P ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement'? 1 f yes, cheek the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ['Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ I20 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a ram gauge? ❑ Yes
❑ Yes
?3, tf selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment:'
Page 2 of 3
El Yes
0 Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
['Other;
!! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
,�
LJNo
7
❑ NA ❑tiE
❑NA ❑NE
No
❑ NA El NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
«No ❑NA ONE
❑ Yesfo 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
['Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
IDate of Inspection; iio- 13-2 t
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit''
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT), certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofdead animals with 24 hours and'or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30• Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e_, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes. check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field
❑ Lagoon.Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
▪ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34• Dues the facility require a follow-up visit hti ilie same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ItNo El NA Er NE
['No ❑ NA [] N 1.
ErNo ❑NA ❑NE
allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
13<a ❑ NA ❑ NE
[?No ❑ NA ©NE
Comments (refer to question 4): Explain any YES ans►►ers andfor an additional recommendations or any- other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
s rsa-yiS
So; ' � - a - s -' 2,4C
2' ueJ -&5 ]t','(rvl
CAL b-: r Carey?L .
Slay- Suwil
Cramp v d r s yell c
Vet7,21300,A PcLia.Lt
5-2`6-21
k /
Revi .er'Inspectar Name:
Re%sewer Inspector Signature:
Page 3 4f
S, I
Phone,
�. - ciLln7-0031
Date: 10 - 13 . 1
S/i2/20?0