NC0024911_Insteam Assessment_19890510

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNIN` COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0024911
MSD Buncombe County WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
May 10, 1989
This document is printed an reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reverse aide

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 10, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: Max Haner
THROUGH: Tom Stockton1-S
Trevor Clements
FROM: -
SUBJECT: Proposed JOC Amendment (#88-26 Ad)
Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe Co.
NPDES No. NC0024911
The recommendations made for the MSD of Buncombe County JOC
were reexamined upon receipt of your memo dated May 1, 1989. We
appreciate your suggestion that we use influent concentrations in
our models for instream assessments when no ammonia limit exists
and the efficiency of treatment is in question. This method will
be considered in future situations when similar circumstances are
present. When the maximum monthly average influent ammonia con-
centration (approximately 9 mg/1) measured during the summer of
1988 by MSD is used, the increase in the BOD JOC limit is not
expected to violate JOC criteria. Therefore, the proposed change
in JOC limits (BOD, = 60 mg/1, TSS = 75 mg/1, Fecal Coliform =
10000/100 ml) can be processed.
You were also concerned about the reaeration prediction meth-
ods employed in the modeling analyses. Some of your concerns
would have been alleviated if you had phoned me rather than writ-
ing to the administration that the results were "less than sup-
portable." The O'Connor -Dobbins reaeration formula probably pre-
dicted reaeration fairly well. The formula was developed from
streams 1 to 30 feet deep. It was based on streams which had
lower velocity than that predicted for the French Broad River, but
most of the reaeration formulas used in QUAL2E result in similar
predictions for reaeration (see attached spreadsheet results).
With regard to the Ecusta Study, the facility is located 50 miles
upstream of the MSD outfall where the slope is higher. Therefore,
one would expect the reaeration to be lower downstream of the Bun-
combe County discharge than that determined in the Ecusta study.
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this
matter.
CC:
Kent Wiggins
Dennis Ramsey
Roy Davis

Reaeration Worksheet 05/10/89
Modeller: RAC
Stream Name: FRENCH BROAD RIVER
Reach Number: 1
Reach Length: 14 MI
Calib or Alloc: ALLOCATION
Ave. Vel. (fps): 2.2
Ave. Depth (ft): 4
Temp (C): 23
Manning Coef: 0.025
Flow (cfs): 526
Slope (ft/mi): 20
Churchill et.al.:
O'Connor -Dobbins:
Owens et.al.:
Thackston-Krenkel:
Langbien-Durum:
Tsivoglou:
Level B Tsivoglou:
2.5 /day
2.4 /day
2.8 /day
0.3 /day
2.7 /day
2.2 /day
38.7 /day

Reaeration Worksheet 05/10/89
Modeller: RAC
Stream Name: FRENCH BROAD RIVER
Reach Number: 2
Reach Length: 4 MI
Calib or Alloc: ALLOCATION
Ave. Vel. (fps): 1.9
Ave. Depth (ft): 4.5
Temp (C): 23
Manning Coef: 0.025
Flow (cfs) : 567
Slope (ft/mi) : 11
Churchill et.al.:
O'Connor -Dobbins:
Owens et.al.:
Thackston-Krenkel:
Langbien-Durum:
Tsivoglou:
Level B Tsivoglou:
1.7 /day
1.9 /day
2.1 /day
0.2 /day
2.0 /day
1.2 /day
18.4 /day

I
Reaeration Work -sheet 05/08/89
Modeller: RAC
Stream Name: FRENCH BROAD RIVER
Reach Number: 1
Reach Length: 14 MI
Calib or Alloc: ALLOCATION
Ave. Vel. (fps): 2.2
Ave. Depth (ft): 4
Temp (C): 23
Manning Coefo 0.025
Flow (cfs)o 526
Slope (ft/m1): 20
Churchill
O"Connor-Dobbinsm
Owens et. al.x
Thackston-Krenkel:
LangbienrDurum:
Tsivoglou:
Level B Tsivoglou:
2.5 /day
2.4 /day
2.8 /day
0.3 /day
2.7 /day
2.2 /day
38.7 /day

Modeller: RAC
Stream Name: FRENCH BROAD RIVER
Reach Number: 2
Reach Length: 4 MI
Calib or Alloc: ALLOCATION
Ave. Vel. (fps): 1.9
Ave. Depth (ft): 4.5
Temp (C)o 23
Manning Coef: 0.025
Flow (ofs): 567
Slope (ft/mi): 11
Churchill et.al.:
0"Connor-Dobb1nso
Owens et.al.:
Thackston-Krenkel:
Langb1en-Durum:
Ts1voglou:
Level B Tsivoglouo
1.7 /day
1.9 /day
2.1 /day
0.2 /day
2.0 /day
1.2 /day
18.4 /day

3.,;ic_olritx.: co - HD
e.tick.(81/1a' ex-t
Nc1302-
m443 - _Lay;
AY5p1JF7gach_froad_____Rixcr
(aube_d_ dakt- of 63k -11q.ax LF-c. 6LLoad gob etj-iziep.34) 41o.:02*
421-7`, _/Ooi Cji 0(4 _fi)( A01011); et- - 1-'984,1
JL3SCLCLIL I-13 a)043 (ct.1-- 2°( 1_7,2)
rhallvIL) 109 1522 h, conue,ti- 01-1 a%)
5e)- i.22
0 Tre....%) Lthfi_Ce. •
up ,•-• '<AO; (4:5
Cup
C21LL) 213 6 D 60J d (J()c Rot())
ea) wii(102/c,
ggc./ 50i r.
Cd= 1,
Cup 0
(q1e6eth )(0 orisi ,e) (57) isb)(Z)--- (51a),1 )(1,22/
c•-i2LL _if
aye_ Cap Lamb, 031qmNo
NUL I cr,5K1L_= i5lutticrA)1_1,2_2_ 11)
y /LmIJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Ann B. Orr
Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 1, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Through: Roy M. Davis, Regional Supervisor jj J
Division of Environmenta Management !�
From:
Kent Wiggins, Coordinator
Enforcement and Emergency Management
Forrest R. Westall
Regional Water Qual
ervisor / ARO
Max L. Haner, Environmental Chemist
Water Quality Section / ARO
VACA-e-tait
Subject: Review of Instream Model Projections
Proposed JOC Amendment (JOC #88-26 Ad)
MSD of Buncombe County
NPDES Permit No. NC0024911
The instream DO model prepared by Tech Services in consideration of the
request from MSD of Buncombe County (NPDES Permit No. NC0024911) to
amend its existing JOC properly evaluated current MSD flow conditions
(26.6 MGD) as well as the maximum allowable flow under this Order (32.3
MGD). Ammonia projections based upon maximum daily compliance data at
13 mg/1 is a worst case concentration since this number represents a
single weekly test result reported in the April 1988, monthly monitoring
report. More importantly, however, is the influent data which should be
used in the model projections to represent worst case conditions with
the RBC system. Use of an effluent ammonia concentration of 20 mg/1 in
model projections for this discharge is not supportable based on a
review of influent self -monitoring data. Review of these influent data
over the past 14 months (ending 2/89) show the highest ammonia reported
by weekly analysis as 13.4 mg/1 (copies attached). A recent PAI
conducted at this facility on 1/25/89 in conjunction with laboratory
certification procedures lend credence to these results in that the PAI
showed no deficiencies with MSD's ammonia procedure. Use of worst case
conditions based upon influent ammonia data project no WQ problems for
this proposed JOC amendment.
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Fnue,al {l.•..,r,t.,

Kent Wiggins
Memorandum
May 1, 1989
Page Two
Review of the instream DO projections raises questions as to the
applicability of the O'Conner-Dobbin formula to this discharge in the
French Broad River. My understanding is that this formula is basically
used for deep water streams unlike the French Broad River; therefore,
rendering these MSD projections less than supportable. While use of
the Ecusta Study also would not be a perfect match to 7Q10 flow
conditions in the French Broad, projections using this study would
appear more realistic. Even using the O'Conner-Dobbins formula with a
13 mg/1 ammonia concentration at 32.3 MGD shows compliance with the
dissolved oxygen water quality standard.
Finally, both acute and chronic toxicity monitoring requirements are
contained in Attachment A together with influme DO monitoring. These
requirements are consistent with the draft NPDES Permit using the 3/89
WLA prepared as part of the permit process.
Considering the above review and discussion, it is recommended that the
interim Limits contained as Attachment A in the proposed JOC amendment
remain unchanged and that the document be processed accordingly. Should
you have additional questions, please advise.
MLH
Enclosure
cc: Dennis Ramsey
Trevor Clements

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 25, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: Forrest Westall
Dennis Ramsey
THROUGH: Randy Dodd `LUj
Trevor Clements
Ken Eagleson 1�-
FROM: Ruth Clark IZCD '....- PAL
SUBJECT:
Proposed JOC Amendment (#88-26 Ad)
Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe Co.
NPDES No. NC0024911
Background
The Metropolitan Sewerage District (MSD) of Buncombe County has
requested an amendment to its JOC to increase its BODS limit from 40 mg/1 to
60 mg/1, its TSS limit from 40 mg/1 to 75 mg/1, and its fecal coliform limit
from 1000/100 ml to 10000/100 ml. The amendment is requested since it was
necessary to remove portions of the activated sludge system to complete
construction of the RBC/microscreen facility.
Analysis and Discussion
MSD discharges to the French Broad River, a class C stream. At the
outfall the stream drains an area of 966 square miles and is characterized
by an average flow of 2140 cfs and a 7Q10 flow of 466 cfs. Level B model
runs were performed at the current monthly maximum flow (26.6 MGD) and at
the JOC flow limit (32.3 MGD). Two sets of reaeration rates were input
based on studies upstream by DEM (approximately 8/day) near Ecusta and
calculations using the O'Connor -Dobbins formula (approximately 2/day).
Effluent DO (2/mg/1) and ammonia (13 mg/1) concentrations were input based
on compliance data. An effluent ammonia concentration of 20 mg/1 was also
evaluated since it was unknown if the conversion to the RBC/microscreen
would affect nitrification. A total of eight model runs were completed, and
the results are given in Table 1. The results indicate that at critical
conditions (7Q10 stream flow, JOC flow, low reaeration, and NH3 = 20 mg/1)
the stream standard for dissolved oxygen may be violated. Further model
runs indicated that a JOC limit of 5 mg/1 DO, 18 mg/1 NH3, or a flow limit
of 30 MGD will protect the DO standard.
Dilution calculations were performed to estimate the instream fecal
coliform level. Upstream fecal coliform concentrations taken at ambient
station E4280000 during flows less than 600 cfs since 1985 were averaged to
obtain a background concentration. The analysis predicted an instream fecal
coliform concentration of 1070/100 ml during 7Q10 conditions.

Recommendations
Since the DO stream standard may be violated during critical condi-
tions, the JOC should contain instream monitoring requirements near the
dissolved oxygen sag point (14 miles downstream). The monitoring point
should be located at the first accessible point upstream of Ivy Creek. In
addition, a JOC limit of 5 mg/1 DO, 18 mg/1 NH3, or 30 MGD of flow should
protect the DO standard.
The actual discharge point for the facility is a hydropower flume.
Water quality impacts in the flume are currently unknown. Fisheries studies
have documented fish populations in the flume. A wasteload allocation was
completed in March, 1989 with an acute toxicity requirement and effluent and
flume DO monitoring (attached). It is recommended that toxicity and DO
(upstream and downstream in the flume) monitoring also be included in the
JOC.
Please advise if questions.
RC:gh
cc: Kent Wiggins
Steve Tedder
Bob DeWeese

Table 1: Predicted DO minimum
Qw = 26.6 MGD, Effluent DO = 2 mg/1
Ka: Ecusta Study Ka: O'Connor - Dobbins
6.13 5.53
6.13 5.22
NH3 = 13 mg/1
NH3 = 20 mg/1
Qw = 32.3 MGD, Effluent DO = 2 mg/1
Ka: Ecusta Study Ka: O'Connor - Dobbins
NH3 = 13 mg/1 6.d6 5.18
6.06 4.80
NH3 =:20 mg/1

MEMO.
TO: %,^^( 6-0- CCZ
DATE•
SUBJECT:
"
,„l Qo cs- ?' v.
�,�,`LD q c - See c-�S
r NAs L�
3 60 -v of
J •
1
5 e CAA--- ,-
--e4S110 c,LeQ.3 (,c„,.t..e -1-0 s41,zt.
(, LA 1
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 11, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Through: Roy M. Davis, Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
Kent Wiggins, Coordinator
Enforcement and Emergency Management
Forrest R. Westall
Regional Water Qualupervisor / ARO
From: Max L. Haner, Environmental Chemist
Water Quality Section / ARO
4:0
%1 j
• Subject: Comments and Recommendation
Proposed JOC Amendment (JOC #88-26 Ad)
MSD of Buncombe County
NPDES Permit No . NC0024911 O��+0302. L fir, c�d i��v�
The proposed JOC amendment (attached) for MSD of Bunccmbe County (NPDES
Permit No NC0024911) was developed through review of those treatment.
problems beginning to surface at the MSD wastewater treatment facility
during the final stages of construction/conversion of the existing
activated sludge system to the RBC/microscreen process. As you are
aware, this facility is being expanded from 25 MGD to 40 MGD: Current
JOC interim limits are monthly averages of 40 mg/1 for both BOD and
TSS. The final completion and compliance dates.currently are March 1,
1990, and July 1, 1990, respectively. The amendment will change both
the interim limits (BOD 60mg/1, TSS 75 mg/1, Fecal Coliform 10,000/100
ml) and the final completion/compliance date in the JOC; July 1, 1990,
and October 1, 1990, respectively.
In a meeting on March 22, 1989, MSD demonstrated that compliance with
the existing interim JOC limits was not feasible due to treatment
problems which resulted when it became necessary to take units specific
for the activated sludge system out of service for replacement with the
RBC/microscreen facility. These compliance problems were not
anticipated to this degree when the initial JOC was developed. The
February, 1989 DMR (attached) shows the compliance problems beginning
on or about mid month when conversions away from the activated sludge
system actually began. Adjustments have not been fully successful in
remedying the problem. Compliance with the fecal coliform limits in
the permit are also anticipated due to work on the disinfection
system. Also, the contractor has experienced reasonable delays
necessitating a four month extension of the compliance schedule.
Even though additional flow for this facility under 67(b) guidelines is
not being requested and a new flow allocation letter will not be
necessary for. this amendment, I am requesting by copy of this memo that
tech services review the proposed interim limits increase at this time

Kent Wiggins
Memorandum
April 11, 1989
Page Two
relative to instream water quality concerns in the French Broad River.
The results of this evaluation should be placed with this file for
review should additional flows to the MSD system be requested before
expiration of this JOC.
Also, please note that the JOC amendment includes those effluent
monitoring requirements consistent with the proposed NPDES permit
reissuance.
It is recommended that the proposed JOC amendment be processed as
rapidly as possible Should you have questions or wish to discuss this
matter in more detail, please advise.
MLH
Enclosure
cc: Trevor Clements

MSD
Metropolitan Sewerage District of
Buncombe County, North Carolina
W. H. Mull. P.E., Engineer -Manager
P.O. Box 8969, Asheville, N.C. 28814
Telephone: Area Code 704-254-9646
Telecopier [phone]
John S. Stevens, General Counsel
Mr. R. Paul Wilms
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources & Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Subject:
Dear Mr. Wilms:
Frank S. Smith III. Chairman
M. Leon Williams. Vice -Chairman
Steven T. Aceto
Walter T. Bans
Walter J. Boggs
Charles M. Dent
E. Charles Dyson
M. Wayne Edwards
George E. Ivey
Jackie W. Pope
Marvin E. Waddey
March 27, 1989
RECEIVED
Water ('tf?llty Section
MAR 2 8 :989
.Asheville Regional Vice
,Asheville, North Carolina
MSD of Buncombe County Wastewater
Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0024911
JOC No. 88026
The Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, North Carolina,
hereby requests a modification of a Consent Judgment filed June 30, 1988, in
Buncombe County Superior Court. The modifications are required due to
construction and operation of additional wastewater treatment works at the
existing MSD Wastewater Treatment Plant. More specifically, the first
modification requested is a "revision of the effluent limitations referred to in
Stipulated Term 9(a) and defined'on Attachment A incorporated by reference as
follows:
Interim Discharge Proposed Discharge
Effluent Characteristics Limitations Limitation
BOD, 5 Day, 20°C 40 mg/1 60 mg/1
TSS 40 mg/1 75 mg/1
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 1,000/100m1 10,000/100m1
The reason for this request is that the required construction sequence
for modifying the existing treatment works requires MSD to take a portion of the
treatment works out of service to allow additional equipment to be placed in the

Mr. R. Paul Wilms March 27, 1989
Page 2
same space. This increases loading on the remaining portions of the biological
treatment process above the ultimate design capacity, leading to elevated BOD
and TSS effluent concentrations. As a by-product of elevated TSS concentrations
and replacement of existing chlorination equipment, the effluent concentrations
of Fecal Coliform will be above the existing interim limits. The existing
treatment plant has been and will continue to be operated to its maximum capacity
during this interim period and all feasible activities will be undertaken to
provide the highest level of treatment possible, but we do feel that the existing
interim limits cannot be continuously met with the required construction
sequence. MSD has purchased and installed additional aerators to improve BOD
removal, and rerouted flow to improve TSS removal and Fecal Coliform reductions,
but little else can be done to improve treatment efficiency without completion
of the construction.
The second modification requested is a revision of the time schedule
defined in stipulated term 9(b) as follows:
Activity
1. Complete construction of
proposed additional treatment
facilities
2. Achieve Compliance with
final effluent limitations
Existing Proposed
JOC Dates JOC Dates
March 1, 1990 July 1, 1990
July 1, 1990 October 1, 1990
The existing approved contract for additional treatment facilities has
a completion date of February 19, 1990. Republic Contracting Company has
requested a time extension of 72 days due to coordination and delivery of
equipment. Although this time extension has not been granted, some contract
relief is justified if it is allowable under the judicial order. With full
approval of the request, the modified completion date would be May 1, 1990 and
this does not include any subsequent delays which may come up in the next year.
Therefore, and to prevent further modifications to the JOC, we request a
completion of construction date of July 1, 1990. If this date is approved, a
reasonable amount of time is required to allow the treatment process to achieve
compliance with final effluent limitations. We propose that this date should
be October 1, 1990.
We respectfully request that you review this request to allow MSD to
achieve compliance with the judicial order during this difficult time of
construction. A one hundred dollar check payable to the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development for administrative
fees has been requisitioned and will be forwarded this week.

Mr. R. Paul Wilms March 27, 1989
Page 3
If you have any questions, or require further data, please let us know
at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
METROPOLITAN S7WERAGE DISTRICT
OF BUNCOMBE 0 NTY, NORTH CAROLINA
By
WHM:m
W927- ar.27M
cc: r. Forrest R. Westfall, P.E.
Willia. Mull, P.E.
Engine=r Manager

MSD
Metropolitan Sewerage District of
Buncombe County, North Carolina
W. H. Mull. P.E., Engineer -Manager
P.O. Box 8989, Asheville, N.C. 28814
Telephone: Area Code 704-254-9648
Telecopier [phone]
John S. Stevens, General Counsel
Mr. Max Haner
Environmental Chemistry Consultant
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Dear Mr. Haner:
Frank S. Smith III, Chairman
M. Leon Williams, Vice -Chairman
Steven T. Aceto
Charles M. Dent
E. Charles Dyson
M. Wayne Edwards
George E. Ivey
Richard P. Maas
Diane K. McDonald
Jackie W. Pope
Marvin E. Waddey
March 28, 1989
f ECE!Vf D
Water Quat f t Sect;: n
MAR 2 8 1989
Ashevilha - ,:. _Office
.Asheville, 11 ;rtii Car LI na
As you are aware, the Metropolitan Sewerage District was
out of compliance with its' NPDES Permit limits on TSS and
Fecal Coliform during February, 1989. The purpose of this
letter is to summarize the problems that led to our noncom-
pliance.
Beginning February 15th, the plant's flow configuration
was changed to accommodate the construction of RBC Basins #2
and #3. Since these future RBC basins will occupy the same
space as our present activated sludge system, one half of the
activated sludge system had to be taken out of service.
About 60% of the Primary Microscreen effluent was treated by
RBC Basin #1 and the Secondary Microscreens. The remaining
40% of the flow was treated by our one remaining activated
sludge basin and secondary clarifier. The secondary clari-
fier effluent was mixed with the RBC effluent as it entered
the secondary microscreens.
The problem has been the inability to pass an adequate
amount of flow through the 21 micron secondary microscreens.
The excess flow that can't be treated through the 21 micron
screens passed into the four 149 micron screens. The 21
micron screens give adequate TSS removal but the 149 micron
screens cannot produce a low TSS effluent. It is the water
that passes through the 149 micron screens that has kept the
plant from meeting its' TSS limits.

March 28, 1989
Mr. Max Haner
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
Page 2.
To reduce hydraulic load to the secondary screens the
secondary clarifier effluent was rerouted directly to the
effluent launder. The additional benefit from this rerouting
has been an improvement of our effluent due to the lower TSS
coming from the secondary clarifier.
We have taken measures to force as much flow as possible
thru the 21 micron mesh screens. We have further reduced
total flow to the secondary screens by sending more flow to
our activated sludge system.
The higher effluent TSS and BOD since February 15th,
increased our chlorine demand to the point of our inability
to feed enough chlorine, and so our Fecal Coliform counts
have been high. The A Broker chlorinator from February 21st
further worsened this particular problem. The chlorinator
has been repaired, but the part needed for repair took three
weeks to arrive.
The 21 micron screens still cannot treat all of the
secondary microscreen flow but the measures we have taken
haveimproved the situation. Our most recent effluent TSS
analyses have shown an improvement in our effluent.
We will continue to make every effort to bring our
effluent into compliance despite the current circumstances.
Due to the high water levels in the French Broad River
during this period, I don't believe our effluent would have
impacted water quality standards in the River.
Please advise me if I can provide further information.
Sincerely,
4401E/
E, arc Fender
EMF/cnr

SUMMER
QW=26.63 MBD, BOD5=60, NH3=20
Beg # ( Reach # ( Beg Ili D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow �
1 1 0.00 5.97 26.25 8.24 507.28
J. 1 0.50 6.06 26.02 8.15 508.61
1 1 1.00 6.14 25.8D 8.06 509.95
1 J. 1.50 6.21 25.57 7.97 511.28
1 1 2.00 6.27 25.35 7.88 512.62
1 1 2.50 6.88 25.14 7.80 518.95
1 1 8.00 6.38 24.92 7.71 515.29
1 1 3.50 6.43 24.71 7.63 516.62
1 1 4.00 6.48 24.49 7.54 517.96
1 1 4.50 6.52 24.29 7.46 519.29
1 1 5.00 6.56 24.08 7.88 520.63
1 1 5.50 6.59 23.87 7.30 521.96
1 1 6.00 6.63 23.67 7.22 523.80
1 1 6.50 6.66 23.47 7.14 524.63
1 1 7.00 6.69 23.27 7.06 525.97
1 1 7.50 6.71 23.07 6.99 527.30
1 1 8.00 6.74 22.87 , 6.91 528.64
1 1 8.50 6.76 22.68 6.83 529.97
1 1 9.00 6.79 22.48 6.76 531.81
1 1 9.50 6.81 22.29 6.69 532.64
1 1 10.00 6.83 22.10 6.61 533.98
1 1 10.50 6.85 21.92 6.54 535.81
1 1 11.00 6.87 21.73 6.47 536.65
1 1 11.50 6.89 21.55 6.40 537.98
1 1 12.00 6.91 21.36 6.33 539.82
1 1 12.50 6.92 21.18 6.26 540.65
1 1 13.00 6.94 21.01 6.20 541.99
1 1 13.50 6.96 20.83 6.13 543.82
1 1 14.00 6.97 20.65 6.06 544.66
1 2 14.00 7.00 20.09 5.91 561.66
1 2 14.50 7.06 19.93 5.86 562.99
1 2 15.00 7.11 19.78 5.81 564.38
1 2 15.50 7.15 19.63 5.77 565.66
1 2 16.00 7.20 19.47 5.72 567.00
1 2 16.50 7.23 19.32 5.68 568.83
J. 2 17.00 7.27 19.18 5.68 569.67
1 2 17.50 7.30 19.08 5.58 571.00
1 2 18.00 7.32 18.88 5.54 572.34
Beg # 1 Reach # | Beg Ili D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |

-1 «
/
|
| SUMMER
` QW=26.63 MGD, BOD5=604 NH3=20
---~-�---- 1`1100EL RESULTS --------^--
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD
Receiving Stream FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 7.32 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 18 88 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 5!.54 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l) Mil' oint Reach # (mg/l} (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
- —~------- -----~-
Segment J. 5.97 0.00 1
Reach 1 300.00 90.00 0.00 26.63000
Reach 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000
-~

t .3
** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger ° BUNCOMBE MSI) ubbEtSif t 040302
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Cass% C
Summer 7010 Winter 010
Design Temperature: 23.
I LENGTH I SLOPE! VELOCITY 1 DEPTH I Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 6:H 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft ;design! 320* ldesignl 320° Idesigr,: an. Idesignl 320°
Segment 1 1 14.00 20.001 2.192 1 4.00 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 9.07 1 8.501 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reath 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 4.00 11.001 1.877 1 4.49 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 8.43 1 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 10.00 I
Reach 2 1 1 1 I
1 Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOt) 1 D.O.
1 cfs 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1
Segment 1 Reach :I.
Waste 1 41.276 1300.000 0 R 0 (l t„t , 0.000
headwater a 1466 .. 000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 6.500
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1 .000 17720.
* Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 17.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff flow is in i cfs/mile

BUMMER
QW=32.3 M8D, BOD5=60, NH3=20
| Seg # | Reach # | Seg Ili D.O. CBOD ( NBOD Flow |
1 1 0.00 5.87 30.91 9.63 516.07
1 1 0.50 5.93 80.64 9.53 517.40
1 1 1.00 5.98 30.3B 9.42 518.74
1 1 1.50 6.03 80.12 9.32 520.07
1 1 2.00 6.08 29.86 9.22 521.41
1 1 2.50 6.12 29.61 9.12 522.74
1 1 3.00 6.16 29.36 9.02 524.08
1 1 3.50 6.20 29.11 8.92 525.41
1 1 4.00 6.24 28.86 8.83 526.75
1 1 4.50 6.27 28.61 8.73 528.08
1 1 5.00 6.30 28.37' 8.64 529.42
1 1 5.50 6.83 28.13 8.54 580.75
1 1 6.00 6.36 27.89 8.45 532.09
1 1 6.50 6.39 27~65 8.36 533.42
1 1 7.00 6.41 27.42 8.27 534.76
1 1 7.50 6.44 27.19 8.18 536.09
1 1 8.00 6.46 26.96 8.09 537.43
1 1 8.50 6.49 26.73 8.00 538.76
1 1 9.00 6.51 26.50 7.92 540.10
1 1 9.50 6.53 26.28 7.88 541.48
1 1 10.00 6.55 26.06 7.75 542.77
1 1 10.50 6.57 25.84 7.66 544.10
1 1 11.00 6.59 25.62 7.58 545.44
1 1 11.50 6.61 25.40 7.50 546.77
1 1 12.00 6.63 25.19 7.42 548.11
1 1 12.50 6.65 24.98 7.34 549.44
1 1 13.00 6.67 24.77 7.26 550.78
1 1 13.50 6.69 24.56 7.18 552.11
1 1 14.00 6.70 24.86 7.11 553.45
1 2 14.00 6.73 23.69 6.92 570"45
1 2 14.50 6.80 23.51 6.87 571.78
1 2 15.00 6.86 23.33 6.81 573.12
1 2 15.50 6.92 23.15 6.76 574.45
1 2 16.00 6.96 22.97 6.70 575.79
1 2 16.50 7.01 22.79 6.65 577.12
1 2 17.00 7.04 22.62 6.60 578.46
1 2 17.50 7.08 22.45 6.54 579.79
1 2 18.00 7.11 22.27 6.49 581.13
� Seg # | Reach # I Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow �

J.
,
Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMER
QW=32.8 MGD, BOD5=60, NH8=20
---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
: BUNCOMBE MSD
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 7.11 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 22.27 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 6.49 mg/l.
WLA
DO Min CBOD
(mg/l) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l�
---- ~------
Segment 1 5.87 0.00 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
300.00
WLA WLA
NBOD DO Waste Flow
<mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
90.00 0.00 32.30000
0.00 0.00 0.00000

1• 1
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD ubbitsi n n 04030P
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: Cr
Summer 3„• 7f } n Winter 7Q(} ::
Design Temperature: 23.
!LENGTH! SLOPE 1 VELOCITY : DEPTH: Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft ldesignl 320° tdesign1 220* :design: i80¢ !design: ?204 1
Segment 1 1 14.001 20.001 2.219 1 4.01 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 9.07 1 3.501 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.898 1 4.50 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 8.43 1 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 13 1
1 Flow 1 Ci { 0 L) 1 1{ B 0 D 1 D.O.
1 cf '. 1 fits/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1
Segment I Reach I
Waste 1 50.065 11300.000 i 190.000 1 0.000
f• .r C:i { `� i •te r 1 }' 47 C..? n {«} f «} {..} 1 tr }'a.} €..} r 1.000
1 6.500
Tributary 1 0.000 1 P„ 000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Runoff 1 r } �" r"} �" "}t:}r"} 1 1.000 7.720
n w 1 2n M 1
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 f«} rr i„};"} {„}
Tributary 1 17 n 000
* Runoff 1 2.670
0n000 1 0.000
f „ }: 0 1 1.000
2.000 1 1.000
* Ruoff flow is in c:.fs/mi.1 r
0.000
7.
720
'720
7.720

8UMMER
| Seg # | Reach # Seg Ili D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow <
1 1 0.00 5.74 86.99 11.45 528.00
1 1 0.50 5.76 36.68 11.33 529.34
1 1 1.00 5.78 36.87 11.21 530.67
1 1 1.50 5.81 36.06 11.08 532.01
1 1 2.00 5.83 35.75 10.97 533.34
1 1 2.50 5.85 85.45 10.85 534.68
1 1 3.00 5.88 35.15 10.73 536.01
1 1 3.50 5.90 84.86 10.62 537.35
1 1 4.00 5.92 34.56 10.50 538.68
1 1 4.50 5.95 34.27 10.39 540.02
1 1 5.00 5.97 33.98 10.28 541.35
1 1 5.50 5.99 33.70 10.17 542.69
1 1 6.00 6.01 33.41 10.06 544.02
1 1 6.50 6.03 33.13 9.95 545.36
1 1 7.00 6.06 32.85 9.85 546.69
1 1 7.50 6.08 32.58 9.74 548.03
1 1 8.00 6.10 32.30 9.64 549.36
1 1 8.50 6.12 32.03 9.53 550.70
1 1 9.00 6.14 31.77 9.48 552.03
1 1 9.50 6.16 31.50 9.33 553.37
1 1 10.00 6.19 31.24 9.23 554.70
1 1 10.50 6.21 30.98 9.14 556.04
1 1 11.00 6.23 30.72 9.04 557.37
1 1 11.50 6.25 30.46 8.94 558.71
1 1 12.00 6.27 30.21 8.85 560.04
1 1 12.50 6.29 29.96 8.75 561.88
1 1 13.00 6.31 29.71 8.66 562.71
1 1 13.50 6.83 29.46 8.57 564.05
1 1 14.00 6.85 29.22 8.48 565.38
1 2 14.0O 6.39 28.42 8.26 582.38
1 2 14.50 6.47 28.20 8.20 583.72
1 2 15.00 6.54 27.99 8.13 585.05
1 2 15.50 6.60 27.78 8.07 586.39
1 2 16.00 6.65 27.57 8.00 587.72
1 2 16.50 6.70 27.36 7.94 589.06
1 2 17.00 6.75 27.15 7.88 590.39
1 2 17.50 6.79 26.94 7.81 591.73
1 2 18.00 6.88 26.74 7.75 593.06
Seg # 1 Reach # | Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |

SUMMER
QW=40 MGD, BOD5=60, NH3=20
--�--�---- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 6.83 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 26.74 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 7.75 mg/l.
DO Min
(mg/1) M1lepoint Reach #
Segment 1 5.74 0.00 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg /l) (mg/1) (frig /l) (mgd)
300.00 90.00 0.00 40.00000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

* * MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger u BUNCOMBE MSD SubL <•• s i. n u 04030P
Receiving Stream a FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer r 701.0 Winter '7Q1.0 n
Design Temperature: 23.
LENGTH; SLOPE! VELOCITY 1 DEPTH1 Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 3
3 ii1e 3 ft/ail fps 1 ft 1design: 820° Idesign: 020° tdesignl 320° :design: 820°
Segment 1 : 14.00: 20.001 2.256 1 4.02 3 0.45 3 0.39 3 9.07 4 8.501 0.63 1 0.50 3 0.63 3 0.00 1
Reach 1
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.928 1 4.51 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 8.43 1 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 3
Reach 2 1 1
1 Flow 1 GIcaD 3 NBOD 3 D.O.
1 cfs 1 mg/1 3 mg/ 1 1 mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 1.
Waste: 1 62.000 1300.000 1 90.000 0.000
Heady ater-ss t 4t66 00}0 1 2.000 1 1.000 t 6.500
Tributary : 0.000 1 2.000 000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runof 1 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0 000
Tributary 1 17.000
* Runoff 1 P.670
11
1
}
1
I
0.000 1 0.000
2.000 1 1.000
2.000 : 1.000
* Runoff flow is in c•i s/mi J.e
I
I
III
1
0.000
'7.720
7. JE0

SUMMER
QW = 26.63 M8D, BOD5=60, NH3=9
O"CONNOR DOBBINS
Seg # | Reach # | Seg Mi | D.O. CBOD NBOD | Flow �
1 1 0.00 5.97 26.25 8.24 507.28
1 1 0.50 5.83 26.02 8.15 508.61
1 1 1.00 5.69 25.80 8.06 509.95
1 1 1.50 5.57 25.57 7.97 511.28
1 1 2.00 5.45 25.35 7.88 512.62
1 1 2.50 5.33 25.14 7.80 513.95
1 1 3.00 5.23 24.92 7.71 515.29
1 1 3.50 5.12 24.71 7.63 516.62
1 1 4.00 5.03 24.49 7.54 517.96
1 1 4.50 4.94 24.29 7.46 519.29
1 1 5.00 4.85 24.08 7.88 520.68
1 1 5.50 4.77 23.87 7.80 521.96
1 1 6.00 4.70 23.67 7.22 523.30
1 1 6.50 4.63 28.47 7.14 524.63
1 1 7.00 4.56 23.27 7.06 525.97
1 1 7.50 4.50 28.07 6.99 527.30
1 1 8.00 4.44 22.87 6.91 528.64
1 1 8.50 4.39 22.68 6.83 529.97
1 1 9.00 4.34 22.48 6.76 581.31
1 1 9.50 4.30 22.29 6.69 532.64
1 1 10.00 4.25 22.10 6.61 533.98
1 1 10.50 4.22 21.92 6.54 535.31
1 1 11.00 4.18 21.78 6.47 536.65
1 1 11.5O 4.15 21.55 6.40 537.98
1 1 12.00 4.12 21.86 6.33 539.32
1 1 12.50 4.09 21.18 6.26 540.65
1 1 13.00 4.07 21.01 6.20 541.99
1 1 13.50 4.04 20.88 6.13 543.82
1 1 14.00 4.02 20.65 6.06 544.66
1 2 14.00 4.14 20.09 5.91 561.66
1 2 14.50 4.13 19"93 5.86 562.99
1 2 15.00 4.18 19.78 5.81 564.33
1 2 15.50 4.13 19.68 5.77 565.66
1 2 16.00 4.13 19.47 5.72 567.00
1 2 16.50 4.18 19.32 5.68 568.33
1 2 17.00 4.18 19.18 5.63 569.67
1 2 17.50 4.13 19.08 5.58 571.00
1 2 18.00 4.14 18.88 5.54 572.84
Seg # | Reach # | Seg Ili I D.O. CBOD | NBOD Flow |

Discharger
Receiving Stream
GUMMER
QW = 26.63 M8D9 BOD5=60, 1\11-i3=9
O"CONNOR DOBBINS
---------- MODEL RESULTS -------�--
: BUNCOMBE M8D
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 4.14 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 18.88 mg/l.
The End NBO%) is 5.54 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 4.02 14.00 1
Reach 1 300.00 90.00 0.00 26.63000
Reach 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger n BUNCOMBE 1' B M3I? Subbasin p 040302
Receiving Stream H FRECH BROAD RIVER :R Stream Class: C
Summer 70.10 n Winter 7Q10
Design Temperature: 23.
:LENGTH: SLOPE► VELOCITY 1 DEPTH: Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft :design! 320° !design: 320° :design! 320° !design! 320° 1
Segment 1 1 14.00 20.001 2.192 1 4.00 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 2.555 1 2.391 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.877 1 4.49 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 1.98 1 1.861 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1
1 Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOT)
1 c": 1 mg/1 1 mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste" 1 41 .276 1300.000 1 90.000
Head vaa t er s 1 466.000 1 2.000 1 1.000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000
* Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000
D.O.
mg/1
0.000
6.::.i00
7.720
7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 1.7„000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 '7H'720
* Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7. 720
Runoff flow is it i fs/mi. ie

8eg # Reach # | Seg 111 D.O.
1 1 0.00 5.87
1 1 0.50 5.69
1 1 1.00 5.52
1 1 1.50 5.37
1 1 2.00 5.21
1 1 2.50 5.07
1 1 3.00 4.94
1 1 3.50 4.81
1 1 4.00 4.69
1 1 4.50 4.57
1 1 5.00 4.47
1 1 5.50 4.36
1 1 6.00 4.27
1 1 6.50 4.18
1 1 7.00 4.10
1 1 7.50 4.02
1 1 8.00 3.94
1 1 8.50 3.87
1 1 9.00 3.81
1 1 9.50 3.75
1 1 10.00 3.69
1 1 10.50 3.64
1 1 11.00 3.59
1 1 11.50 8.55
1 1 12.00 3.51
1 1 12.50 3.47
1 1 13.00 3.44
1 1 13.50 3.41
1 1 14.00 3.38
1 2 14.00 3.51
1 2 14.50 8.50
1 2 15.00 3.50
1 2 15.50 3.49
1 2 16.00 3.49
1 B 16.50 3.48
1 2 17.00 8.48
1 2 17.50 3.48
1 2 18.00 3.48
| Seg # | Reach # | Seg Mi D.O.
�
SUMMER
OW = 32.3 MGD, BOD5=60, NH3=9
O'CONNOR DOBBIN8
CBOD NBOD | Flow |
30.91 9.63 516.07
30.64 9.53 517.40
30.38 9.42 518.74
30.12 9.32 520.07
29.86 9.22 521.41
29.61 9.12 522.74
29.36 9.02 524.08
29.11 8.92 525.41
28.86 8.83 526.75
28.61 8.73 528.08
28.37 8.64 529.42
28.13 8.54 530.75
27.89 8.45 532.09
27.65 8.36 533.42
27.42 8.27 534.76
27.19 8.18 536.09
26.96 8.09 537.48
26.73 8.00 538.76
26.50 7.92 540.10
26.28 7.83 541.43
26.06 7.75 542.77
25.84 7.66 544.10
25.62 7.58 545.44
25.40 7.50 546.77
25.19 7.42 548.11
24.98 7.34 549.44
24.77 7.26 550.78
24.56 7.18 552.11
24.36 7.11 553.45
23.69 6.92 570.45
23.51 6.87 571.78
23.83 6.81 573.12
23.15 6.76 574.45
22.97 6.70 575.79
22.79 6.65 577.12
22.62 6.60 578.46
22.45 6.54 579.79
22.27 6.49 581.18
CBOD NBOD Flow

SUMMER
OW = 32.3 MOD, BOD5=604 NH3=9
O'CONNOR DOBBINS
--- MODEL RESULTS ---------~
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is
The End CBOD is
The End NBOD is
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
3.48 mg/l.
22.27 mg/1.
6.49 mg/l.
DO Min
(ring/1) Milepoint
Reach #
3.38 14.00 1
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) (mg/l) (mg /l} (mgd)
300.00 90.00 0.00 82.30000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : BUNCOMBE IISD Subbas i n : 040302
Receiving Stream n FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7010 n Winter 7G1:L 0
Design Temperature « 23,E
:LENGTH! SLOPE VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ft/ii1 fps 1 ft ldesign1 320° design n0° :design: 3c20° :design: 1R0° 1
1
Segment 1 1 14.00 20.001 2.219 1 4.01 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 2.56 1 2.391 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 1 _ 1 1
1
1 3
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.898 : 4.50 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 1.99 1 1.861 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1
Flow 1 CBOD 1 i'II30D
1 c f 1 mg/1 1 mg/ 1
Segment I. Reach 1
Waste 1 50.065 1300.000 1 90.000
Heads. aters 1466.000 1 2..000 1 1..000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000
* Runoff 1 2.670 0 1 2.000 1 1.000
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 I' 0.000
Tributary 1 17.000 1 2.000 1 1.000
Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000
* Runoff flow is in c s/mii1e
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
i
i
1
i
1
11
1
D.O.
(.)r000
6.500
7.720
7.7P0
0.000
7.720
7.720

IL'
~
Seg
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
� SEq
# | Reach #
1
1
1
#
2
2
2
n3 n-j re ru
2
|8egM
0.00
0.50
1.00
1 1.50
1 2.00
1 2.50
1 8.00
1 3.50
1 4.00
1 4.50
1 5.00
1 5.50
1 6.00
1 6.50
1 7.00
1 7.50
1 8.00
1 8.50
1 9.00
1 9.50
1 10.00
1 10.50
1 11.00
1 11.50
1 12.00
1 12.50
1 18.00
1 18.50
1 14.00
2 14.00
14.50
15.00
15.50
16.00
16.50
17.00
17.50
18.00
i D.O.
5.74
5.51
5.80
5.10
4.91
4.73
4.56
4.40
4.25
4.10
3.97
3.84
3.71
8.60
3.49
3.39
3.29
3.20
3.12
8.04
2.97
2.90
2.84
2.78
2.72
2.67
2.63
2.59
2.55
2.70
2.68
2.67
2.68
2.65
2.65
2.64
2.64
2.63
| Reach # I 8eg Mi | D.O.
CBOD
36.99
36.68
36.37
36.06
35.75
85.45
35.15
84.86
34.56
84.27
83.98
88.70
33.41
33.13
32.85
32.58
32.30
32.03
81.77
31.50
31.24
30.98
30.72
30.46
30.21
29.96
29.71
29.46
29.22
28.42
28.20
27.99
27.78
27.57
27.36
27.15
26.94
26.74
CBOD
NBOD
11.45
11.33
11.21
11.08
10.97
10.85
10.73
10.62
10.50
10.39
10.28
10.17
10.06
9.95
9.85
9.74
9.64
9.53
9.48
9.33
9.23
9.14
9.04
8.94
8.85
8.75
8.66
8.57
8.48
8.26
8.2O
8.13
8.07
8.00
7.94
7.88
7.81
7.75
NBOD
SUMMER
QW = 40 M8D, BOD5=60,
DOBBING
Flow |
528.00
529.84
530.67
532.01
533.34
534.68
536.01
537.35
538.68
540.02
541.85
542.69
544.02
545.36
546.69
548.03
549.36
550.70
552.03
558.87
554.70
556.04
557.37
558.71
560.04
561.38
562.71
564.05
565.38
582.38
583.72
585.05
586.39
587.72
589.06
590.89
591.73
593.06
Flow |
NH3=90

N. "
Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMER
OW = 40 M8D, BOD5=60, NH8=90
O'CONNOR DOBBINS
-----~---- MODEL RESULTS ----------
: BUNCOMBE M8D
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 2.63 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 26.74 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 7,75 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepo1nt Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) <mg/l) (mgd)
Segment 1 2.55 14.00 1
Reach 1 300.00 90.00 0.00 40.00000
Reach 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0"00000

11.
Discharger
Receiving Stream
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
EcLJNC(JMEcE I'ISD
FRECH BROAD RIVER
Summer 7Q 1. 0 .".
Design Temperature: 23.
Subb is i. n n 040302
Stream -, C
Winter 7QJ.0
:LENGTH: SLOPEI VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 OR 1 KNR
1 mile ftlmil fps 1 ft !design: 080° !design: 020° !design! a120° :design: 380° 1
Segment 1 1 14.00 20.001 2.256 1 4.02 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 2.57 1 2.401 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00
Reach 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1
Reach 2
1 4.00 11.001 1.928 1 4.51 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 2.00 1 1.871 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
3
,
Flow
1 cfs
Segment 1 Reach :1.
Waste 1 62.000
i-1ee clzrvaters 1466..000
Tributary 1 0.000
* Runoff 1 2..670
1 CBOT
1 mg/1
1300.000
1 2.000
}
,
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1
Tributary 1 17.000 ,
Runoff 1 2.670 1
2.000
2.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
1 NBOD
mg/1
* Runoff flow is in cfea./mi 1e
90.000
1.000
1..000
1.000
,
}
,
0.000 1
1.000 1
1.000 1
D.O.
mg/1
0.000
6...5:f0ti3
7.720 f
7.rl 2 :.I
0.000
}}
'7 . 'wi 20
'i.r720

'
.'
^
SUMMER
QW=32.3, 1)0=2, NBOD=90
INPUT KA
| Beg # Reach # Seg M1 D.O. CBOD NBOD | Flow |
1 1 0.00 6.06 16.36 9.63 516.07
1 1 0.50 6.18 16.22 9.53 517.40
1 1 1.00 6.29 16.08 9.42 518.74
1 1 1.50 6.39 15.95 9.32 520.07
1 1 2.00 6.47 15.81 9.22 521.41
1 1 2.50 6.55 15.68 9.12 522.74
1 1 8.00 6.62 15.55 9.02 524.08
1 1 3.50 6.68 15.42 8.92 525.41
1 1 4.00 6.74 15.29 8.83 526.75
1 1 4,50 6.79 15.16 8.73 528.08
1 1 5.00 6.84 15.04 8.64 529.42
1 1 5.50 6.88 14.91 8.54 580.75
1 1 6.00 6.92 14.79 8.45 532.09
1 1 6.50 6.96 14.66 8.86 533.42
1 1 7.00 6.99 14.54 8.27 534.76
1 1 7.50 7.02 14.42 8.18 536.09
1 1 8.00 7.05 14.30 8.09 537.43
1 1 8.50 7.08 14.18 8.00 538.76
1 1 9.00 7.10 14.06 7.92 54O.10
1 1 9.50 7.12 13.95 7.88 541.43
1 1 10.00 7.15 13.83 7.75 542.77
1 1 10.50 7.17 13.72 7.66 544.10
1 1 11.00 7.19 13.61 7.58 545.44
1 1 11.50 7.20 13.49 7.50 546.77
1 1 12.O0 7.22 13.38 7.42 548.11
1 1 12.50 7.24 13.27 7.34 549.44
J. 1 13.00 7.25 13.16 7.26 550.78
1 1 13.50 7.27 13.05 7.18 552.11
1 1 14.00 7.28 12.95 7.1-1 553.45
l 2 14.00 7.80 12.62 6.92 570.45
1 2 14.50 7.35 12.58 6.87 571.78
1 2 15.00 7.40 12.43 6.81 573.12
1 2 15.50 7.44 12.34 6.76 574.45
1 2 16.00 7.47 12.25 6.70 575.79
1 2 16.50 7.51 12.l5 6.65 577.12
1 2 17.00 7.54 12.06 6.60 578.46
1 2 17.50 7.56 11.97 6.54 579.79
1 2 18.00 7.59 11.88 6.49 581.13
Beg # | Reach # | Beg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |

~ 'r
,
A
Discharger
Receiving Stream
MODEL RESULTS
: BUNCOMBE M8D
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 7.59 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 11.88 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 6.49 mg/l.
SUMMER
QW=32.3, DO=29 NBOD=90
INPUT KA
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
Segment 1 6.06 0.00 1
Reach 1 150.00 90.00 2.00 82.30000
Reach 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD Subbtosi n n 04030P
Receiving Stream a FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 701. 0 Winter 7010 n
Design Temperature: 23„
!LENGTH! SLOPEI VELOCITY 1 DEPTH: Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR
rile 1 ftimil fps ft :design! 320° :design! 020° !design: 120° !design: 220° 1
Segment 1 1 14.001 20.001 2.219 1 4.01 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 9.07 1 8.501 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00
Reach 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.898 1 4.50 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 8.43 1 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1
Flow CBOD 1 NBOD 1 D.O.
1 cfs mg/I 1 mcj/1 1 r31q/1
Segment 1 Reach :1.
Waste 1 50.065 1 150 „ ^? 0 0 1 90.000 1 2.000
He d tee" r;1 r366„ jr?tf 1 P.000 1 1.000 1 6.500
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.7P0
* Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2 1
Waste 1 0.0"?0 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0. 000
Tributary 1 17.000 1 2.000 1 1 .000 1 7.720
Runoff 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff •f flow is in c:f ss/ m i i e

/
1 Seg # Reach it | Seg Mi
1 1 0.00
1 1 0.50
1 1 1.00
1 1 1.50
1 1 2.00
1 1 2.50
1 1 3.00
1 1 3.50
1 1 4.00
1 1 4.50
1 1 5.00
1 % 5.50
1 1 6.00
1 1 6.50
1 1 7.00
1 l 7.50
1 1 8.00
1 1 8.50
1 1 9.00
1 1 9.50
1 1 10.00
1 1 10.50
1 1 11.00
1 1 11.50
1 1 12.00
1 1 12.50
1 1 13.00
1 1 13.50
1 1 14.00
1 2 14.00
1 2 14.50
1 2 15.00
1 2 15.50
1 2 16.00
1 2 16.50
1 2 17.00
1 2 17.50
1 2 18.00
1 Seg # | Reach # | Seg Mi
SUMMER
QW==32.3, D0=2, NBO0=59.41
INPUT KA
D.O. CBOD NBOD | Flow |
6.06 16.36 6.67 516.07
6.21 16.22 6.59 517.40
6.34 16.08 6.52 518.74
6.45 15.95 6.45 520.07
6.55 15.81 6.38 521.41
6.64 15.68 6.31 522.74
6.72 15.55 6.25 524.08
6.80 15.42 6.18 525.41
6.86 15.29 6.11 526.75
6.92 15.16 6.05 528.08
6.98 15.04 5.98 529.42
7.02 14.91 5.92 530.7�
7.07 14.79 5.86 532.09
7.11 14.66 5.79 538.42
7.14 14.54 5.73 534.76
7.18 14.42 5.67 536.09
7.21 14.30 5.61 537.43
7.23 14.18 5.55 588.76
7.26 14.06 5.49 540.10
7.28 13.95 5.43 541.43
7.31 13.83 5.37 542.77
7.38 13.72 5.32 544.10
7.35 13.61 5.26 545.44
7.36 13.49 5.20 546.77
7.38 13.88 5.15 548.11
7.40 13.27 5.10 549.44
7.41 13.16 5.04 550.78
7.43 13.05 4.99 552.11
7.44 12.95 4.94 558.45
7.45 12.62 4.82 570.45
7.49 12.53 4.78 571.78
7.53 12.43 4.74 573.12
7.57 12.34 4.71 574.45
7.60 12.25 4.67 575.79
7.63 12.15 4.63 577.12
7.65 12.06 4.59 578.46
7.67 11.97 4.56 579.79
7.69 11.88 4.52 581.13
D.O. CBOD | NBOD Flow

SUMMER
QkV=32.3, DO=2, NBOD=59.41
INPUT KA
---- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 7.69 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 11.88 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 4.52 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l) M1lepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
6.06)
A.00 1
150.00 59.41 2.00 32.30000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA s ***
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MSD Subb i„t » 040302
Receiving Stream „ FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7010 Winter- 7010 n
Design Temperature: 23.
!LENGTH! SLOPE! VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft !design: 3204 ;design! H20° ;design: 320° :design: 204 1
1 1 1
Segment 1 1 14.00 20.001 2.219 1 4.01 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 9.07 1 8.501 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 : i 1
Segment 1 1 4.00 11.001 1.898 1 4.50 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 8.43 1 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1
1 Flow 1 CBOD : NBOD 1 D.O.
1 c►„s 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1
Segment it 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 50.065 1150.000 1 59.410 1 2.000
1"1e :. dt. aters.w 1 466 n 0c„}{„} 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 6.500
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1 .000 1 7.720
* Runoff 1 2.670 1 P.000 1 1.000 1 7.7P0
Segent en•t; 1 Reach S
V' as to 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 17.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff 'i' 1 2.670 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.72�.0
• Runoff f •f'1c1w is in cfs/rni I

SUMMER
QW=82.3, DO=24 NBOD=59.41
O'CONNOR-DOBEll NS
8eg # Reach # | Geg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |
1 1 0.00 6.06 16.36 6.67 516.07
1 1 0.50 5.99 16.22 6.59 517.40
1 1 1.00 5.93 16.08 6.52 518.74
1 1 1.50 5.86 15.95 6.45 520.07
1 1 2.00 5.80 15.81 6.38 521.41
1 1 2.50 5.75 15.68 6.31 522.74
1 1 3.00 5.70 15.55 6.25 524.08
1 1 3.50 5.65 15.42 6.18 525.41
1 1 4.00 5.60 15.29 6.11 526.75
1 1 4.50 5.56 15.16 6.05 528.08
1 1 5.00 5.52 15.04 5.98 529.42
1 1 5.50 5.48 14.91 5.92 530.75
1 1 6.00 5.45 14.79 5.86 532.09
1 1 6.50 5.41 14.66 5.79 533.42
1 1 7.00 5.38 14.54 5.73 534.76
1 1 7.50 5.86 14.42 5.67 586.09
1 1 8.00 5.83 14.30 5.61 537.43
1 1 8.50 5.31 14.18 5.55 538.76
1 1 9.00 5.29 14.06 5.49 540.10
1 1 9.50 5.27 18.95 5.48 541.43
1 1 10.00 5.25 13.83 5.37 542.77
1 1 10.50 5.24 13.72 5.32 544.10
1 1 11.00 5.28 13.61 5.26 545.44
1 1 11.50 5.21 13.49 5.20 546.77
1 1 12.00 5.20 13.38 5.15 548.11
1 1 12.50 5.19 13.27 5.10 549.44
1 1 13.00 5.19 13.16 5.04 550.78
1 1 13.50 5.18 13.05 4.99 552.11
1 1 14.00 5.18 12.95 4.94 553.45
1 2 14.00 5.25 12.62 4.82 570.45
1 2 14.50 5.26 12.53 4.78 571.78
1 2 15.00 5.26 12.43 4.74 573.12
1 2 15.50 5.27 12.84 4.71 574.45
1 2 16.00 5.28 12.25 4.67 575.79
1 2 16.50 5.29 12.15 4.63 577.12
1 2 17.00 5.29 12.06 4.59 578.46
1 2 17.50 5.30 11.97 4.56 579.79
1 2 18.00 5.31 11.88 4.52 581.13
Geg # | Reach # 1 Seg Mi | D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |

Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMER
QW=82.3, DO=29 NBOD=59.41
O'CONNOR-DOBBINS
---------- MODEL RESULTS -----�----
: BUNCOMBE MSD
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 5.31 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 11.88 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 4.52 mg/1.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg /l) (mg /l) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 5.18 14.00 1
Reach 1 150.00 59.41 2.00 32.30000

*** MODEL SUS MARY DATA * **
Discharger p BUNCOMBE MSD Subb.:.cs:1 n : 04030E
Receiving Stream „ FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7010 n R
,.. .. Winter 7010..
Design Temperature: E.T.
ILEN8THI SLOPE1 VELOCITY s DEPTH! Kd I Kd ! Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR E
mile i ft/mil fps 1 ft :designs 320' :design; 320e ldesign; 3E0° !design! 320' I
Segment 1 1 14.001 20.00! 2.219 # 4.01 1 0.45 ► 0.39 ; 2.56 1 2.39! 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 : 0.00
Reach 1 I
Segment 1 1 4.00 11.001 1.898 } 4.50 i 0.35 10.30 ; 1.99 = 1.86: 0.38 10.30 ► 0.38 ; 0.00 t
Reach 2 : 1
i Flow I CEIOD I I` BOD D.O.
cfs. 1 mg/ 1 mg/ 1 f mg/ 1
Segment 1 Reach 1.
Waste I 50.065 1150.000 ; 59.410 1 2.000
ffr cdteaatere:466„000 I P..000 1.000 i 6.500
Tributary I 0.. 000 1 P. 000 1.000 s 7.720
* Runoff 2 .670 ; 2.000 1.000 ; 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste i 0.000 4 0.000 ; 0.000 t 0.000
Tributary 1 1.7.000 I "ryy..000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 2.670 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cis/mile

�
,
SUMMER
QW=32.3, DO=2, NBOD=90
O"CONNOR-DOBBINS
1 Seg # Reach # | Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD | Flow |
1 1 0.00 6.06 16.36 9.68 516.07
1 1 0.50 5.97 16.22 9.53 517.40
1 1 1.00 5.88 16.08 9.42 518.74
1 1 1.50 5.79 15.95 9.32 520.07
1 1 2.00 5.71 15.81 9.22 521.41
1 1 2.50 5.63 15.68 9.12 522.74
1 1 3.00 5.56 15.55 9.02 524.08
1 1 3.50 5.49 15.42 8.92 525.41
1 1 4.00 5.43 15.29 8.83 526.75
1 1 4.50 5.37 15.16 8.73 528.08
1 1 5.00 5.32 15.04 8.64 529.42
1 1 5.50 5.26 111,91 8.54 530.75
1 1 6.00 5.21 14.79 8.45 532.09
1 1 6.50 5.17 14.66 8.36 533.42
1 1 7.00 5.13 14.54 8.27 534.76
1 1 7.50 5.09 14.42 8.18 536.09
1 1 8.00 5.05 14.30 8.09 537.43
1 1 8.50 5.02 14.18 8.00 538.76
1 1 9.00 4.99 14.06 7.92 540.10
1 1 9.50 4.96 18.95 7.83 541.43
1 1 10.00 4.93 13.83 7.75 542.77
1 1 10.50 4.91 18.72 7.66 544.10
1 1 11.00 4.89 13.61 7.58 545.44
1 1 11.50 4.87 13.49 7.50 546.77
1 1 12.00 4.85 18.3B 7.42 548.11
1 1 12.50 4.84 18.27 7.34 549.44
1 1 13.00 4.83 13.16 7.26 550.78
1 1 13.50 4.81 13.05 7.18 552.11
1 1 14.00 4.8012.95 7.11 558.45
1 2 14.00 4.89 12.62 6.92 570.45
1 2 14.50 4.90 12.53 6.87 571.78
1 2 15.00 4.90 12.43 6.81 573.12
1 2 15.50 4.91 12.34 6.76 574.45
1 2 16.00 4.92 12.25 6.70 575.79
1 2 16.50 4.92 12.15 6.65 577.12
1 2 17.00 4.98 12.06 6.60 578.46
1 2 17.50 4.94 11.97 6.54 579.79
1 2 18.00 4.95 11.88 6.49 581.13
| Seg # ( Reach # Seg Mi D.O. CBOD 1 NBOD Flow |

/
`
SUMMER
QW=32.3, DO=2, NBOD=90
O"CONNOR-DOBBING
---------- MODEL RESULTS -~--------
Discharger : BUNCOMBE MGD
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 4.95 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 11.88 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 6.49 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
DO Min
(mg/1)
4.80
Milepoint Reach #
14.00 1
W L A WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) (mg /l> (mg /l) (mgd)
150.00 90.00 2.00 32.30000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger n BUNCOMBE MSD Subbasin N 040302
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class„ C
Summer 7t110 Winter '7Q 1. 0
Design Temperature: 23.
►LENGTH; SLOPE VELOCITY s DEPTHS Kd Kd ; Ka S Ka 1 KN ; KN I KNR ; KNR t
mile I ft/rail fps I ft :design: 320° (designs H0° 1design: n0° ;design: 80° S
Segment 1 i 14.001 20.001 2.219 14.01 1 0.45 S 0.39 S 2.56 1 2.391 0.63 ; 0.50 10.63 1 0.00
Reach 1 I 11
1 1 1 1 : : 1 : 1 1
Segment 1 I 4.001 11.001 1.898 14.50 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 1.99 ; 1.861 0.38 1 0.30 ► 0.38 : 0.00 S
Reach 2 1 1 1 F 1 1 1 1 1
Flow s CE{OD t I BOD I D.O.
4 r:fe. E mg/1 I mg/1 mg/1 y
Segment 1 Reach 1
+5 .�
Waste 'i; !='' i iL} n ��} `u' i '�"� L} .. ��} �'.�.} ir} } ��} . ;.� E.r ;.� i 2 .000
Hea7dwaters i t1•66„000 1 P,.000 i :1...000 i 6,.500
Tributary i 0.000 i 2.000 i 1.000 i 7.720
* Runoff S 2.670 I 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 0.000 0.000
Tributary # 17.0 2..000
Runoff 1 'f i 2.670 0 2.000
* Runoff flow is in c f s/ rat i i e
0.000 ; 0.000
1.000 ; 7,.'120
1.000 1 7.720

k. #,
`
SUMMER
QW=26.63, DO=29 NBOD=90
O'CONNOR-DOBBINIS'
Geg # | Reach # | 8eg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow �
1 1 0.00 6.13 14.04 8.24 507.28
1 1 0.50 6.06 13.92 8.15 508.61
1 1 1.00 5.99 13.81 8.06 509.95
1 1 1.50 5.93 13.69 7.97 511.28
1 1 2.00 5.86 13.57 7.88 512.62
1 1 2.50 5.81 13.46 7.80 513.95
1 1 8.00 5.75 18.35 7.71 515.29
l 1 3.50 5.70 13.28 7.63 516.62
1 1 4.00 5.65 18.12 7.54 517.96
1 1 4.50 5.61 13.01 7.46 519.29
1 1 5.00 5.57 12.90 7.88 520.63
1 1 5.50 5.53 12.80 7.30 521.96
1 1 6.00 5.49 12.69 7.22 523.30
1 1 6.50 5.46 12.58 7.14 524.63
1 1 7.00 5.43 12.48 7.06 525.97
1 1 7.50 5.40 12.37 6.99 527.30
1 1 8.00 5.38 12.27 6.91 528.64
1 1 8.50 5.35 12.17 6.83 529.97
1 1 9.00 5.33 12.07 6.76 531.31
1 1 9.50 5.81 11.97 6.69 532.64
1 1 10.00 5.30 11.87 6.61 533.98
1 1 10.50 5.28 11.77 6.54 535.81
1 1 11.00 5.27 11.67 6.47 586.65
1 1 11.50 5.26 11.58 6.40 537.98
1 1 12.00 5.25 11.48 6.33 589.32
1 1 12.50 5.24 11.89 6.26 540.65
1 1 13.00 5.23 11.29 6.20 541.99
1 1 13.50 5.22 11.20 6.13 543.32
1 1 14.00 5.22 11.11 6.06 544"66
1 2 14.00 5.29 10.83 5.91 561.66
1 2 14.50 5.30 10.75 5.86 562.99
1 2 15.00 5.31 10.67 5.81 564.33
1 2 15.50 5.32 10.59 5.77 565.66
1 2 16.00 5.33 10.51 5.72 567.00
1 2 16.50 5.34 10.43 5.68 568.33
1 2 17.00 5.35 10.35 5.63 569.67
1 2 17.50 5.36 10.27 5.58 571.00
1 2 18.00 5.37 10.20 5.54 572.34
| Sen. # | Reach Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow �

Discharger
1--4ece1ving Stream
---------- MODEL RESULTS
: BUNCOMBE MSD
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 5.37 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 10.20 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 5.54 mg/J...
DO Min
(frig /l)
Segment 1 5.22
Reach 1
Reach 2
Milepoint Reach #
14.00
1
SUMMER
QW=26.63, DO=24 NBOD=90
0'CO1\11',4OR-DO8BIN8
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l) (frig/ l) (mg/1) (mgd)
150.00 90.00 2.00 26.63000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger W BUNCOMBE NSD
Receiving Stream : FRECH BROAD RIVER:
Summer r 7010
Design Temperature 23..
Subbasin : 04030P
Stream Class: C
Winter 701 0
1LEN1THI SLOPE; VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ftlmi: fps 1 ft :design: 82O' :design: H2O° :design: 82O° :design: 820° 1
r
Segment 1 1 14.00 20.001 2.192 1 4.00 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 2.55 1 2.391 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reath 1 1 : 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 4.00 11.001 1.877 1 4.49 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 1.98 1 1.861 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1
r Flaw
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 41.276
Headwaters:466..000
Tributary > 00.000
* Runoff 2.670
CBOD
mg/ I
1:1 '.) . 000
1 2.000
1 2.000
1 2.000
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste r 0.000 r
Tributary 1 1'7n000
* Runoff 1 2.670 :
0.000
2.000
2.000
r
r
r
r
* Runoff flaw is in ci"s/fibi1e
NBOD
mg/1
90..000
1.000
1.000
1.000
r
r
r
1
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
0.000 1
1.000 :
1.000 r
D.O.
mg/1
2.000
6..500
I .7.2.0
20
7 .. •720
0..000
7.720
7.720

`
�
°
| Seg It | Reach # | 8eg M1
1 1 0.00
1 1 0.50
1 1 1.00
1 1 1.50
1 1 2.00
1 1 2.50
1 1 3.00
1 1 3.50
1 1 4.00
1 1 4.50
1 1 5.00
1 1 5.50
1 1 6.00
1 1 6.50
1 1 7.00
1 1 7.50
1 1 8.00
1 1 8.50
1 1 9.00
1 1 9.50
1 1 10.00
1 1 10.50
1 1 11.00
1 1 11.50
1 1 12.00
1 1 12.50
1 1 13.00
1 1 18.50
1 1 14.00
1 2 14.00
1 2 14.50
1 2 15.00
1 2 15.50
1 2 16.O0
1 2 16.50
1 2 17.00
1 2 17.50
1 2 18.00
Seg # | Reach # | 8eg Mi
SUMMER
QW=26.63, DO=24 NBOD=59.41
O'CONNOR-DOBBINS
D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow �
6.13 14.04 5.75 507.28
6.08 18.92 5.69 508.61
6.08 13.81 5.63 509.95
5.99 13.69 5.57 511.28
5.94 13.57 5.51 512.62
5.90 13.46 5.45 513.95
5.87 13.35 5.39 515.29
5.83 13.23 5.38 516.62
5.80 13.12 5.27 517.96
5.77 13.01 5.21 519.29
5.74 12.90 5.16 520.63
5.71 12.80 5.10 521.96
5.69 12.69 5.05 523.80
5.67 12.58 4.99 524.63
5.65 12.48 4.94 525.97
5.63 12.37 4.89 527.30
5.62 12.27 4.88 528.64
5.60 12.17 4.78 529.97
5.59 12.07 4.78 531.31
5.58 11.97 4.68 582.64
5.57 11.87 4.63 533.98
5.56 11.77 4.58 535.31
5.55 11.67 4.53 536.65
5.55 11.58 4.48 587.98
5.54 11.48 4.44 539.32
5.54 11.89 4.39 540.65
5.58 11.29 4.34 541.99
5.58 11.20 4.30 543.32
5.53 11.11 4.25 544.66
5.60 10.83 4.15 561.66
5.61 10.75 4.12 562.99
5.61 10.67 4.09 564.33
5.62 10.59 4.05 565.66
5.63 10.51 4.02 567.00
5.64 10.43 8.99 568.38
5.65 10.35 3.96 569.67
5.66 10.27 3.93 571.00
5.67 10.20 3.90 572.34
D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow I

Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMER
QW= E6 .. 63 ;1 I)D= 2 , NBOD= 9 , 4 I
O ' CONNOR-DOBB I NS
-__-__.....- -._.- MODEL RESULTS _._______.,.___......_......
u BUNCOMBE I"!SD
FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 5.67 mg/l
The End CE{0�D'� is 10.20 rnq/+1
The End NBOD is 3.90 mg/1.
DO Min
(rrg/l) I"lilepoi.nt Reach *1
Segment 1 5.53 14.00 1
Reach 1
Reach 43
L.
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
150.00 59.41 2.00 P6 63000
0„00 0„00 0u00 0„00000

CI
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger a BUNCOMBE I'ISD Subba in 04030P
Receiving Stream „ FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class„ C
Summer 7G!:I.o n Winter '7(;.10 n
Design Temperature: 23.
:LENGTH! SLOPE: VELOCITY I DEPTH: Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
I mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft :design! 380' 1design1 320' !design! 920° :design: i20° !
1 1
Segment 1 : 14.001 20.00: 2.192 1 4.00 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 2.55 1 2.391 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 : 0.00 I
Reach 1 I 1
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.877 4.49 1 0.35 1 0.30 ! 1.98 1 1.861 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reach 8 1 1
1 Flow 1 C}30D NI3O13 1
1 rfs 1 f'ii c� / 1 m g/ 1 1
Segment I. Reach 1.
Waste 1 41.276 1150.000 1 59.410 1
Headwaters1466.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1
«I s' i L) a s` 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1
Runoff 1 2.670 1 P.000 1 1.000 1
D.O.
mg/1
2.000
6.500
7.720
7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 17.000 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff 1 2.670 2.000 1.000 1 7 .'720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

'J-
/ Seg
1
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
| 8eg
#|Reach #|SegM1|
1 O.00
1 0.50
1 1.00
1 1.50
1 2.00
1 2.50
1 3.00
1 3.50
1 4.00
1 4.50
1 5.00
1 5.50
1 6.00
1 6.50
1 7.00
1 7.50
1 8.00
1 8.50
1 9.00
1 9.50
1 10.00
1 10.50
1 11.00
1 11.50
1 12.00
1 12.50
1 13.00
1 13.50
1 14.00
2 14.00
2 14.50
2 15.00
2 15.50
2 16.00
2 16.50
2 17.00
2 17.50
18.O0
#| Reach #|GegMi|
2
D.O.
6.13
6.27
6.40
6.51
6.60
6.69
6.77
6.84
6.90
6.96
7.01
7.05
7.10
7.18
7.17
7.20
7.23
7.26
7.28
7.80
7.33
7.35
7.36
7.38
7.40
7.41
7.43
7.44
7.46
7.47
7.51
7.55
7.59
7.62
7.65
7.68
7.70
7.72
CBOD
14.04
13.92
13.81
13.69
13.57
13.46
13.35
13.23
13.12
13.01
12.90
12.80
12.69
12.58
12.48
12.37
12.27
12.17
12.07
11.97
11.87
11.77
11.67
11.58
11.48
11.39
11.29
11.20
11.11
10.83
10.75
10.67
10.59
10.51
10.48
1O.35
10.27
10.20
CBOD
�
SUMMER
QW=26.63, DO=24 NBOD=90
INPUT KA
NBOD | Flow (
8.24 507.28
8.15 508.61
8.06 509.95
7.97 511.28
7.88 512.62
7.80 518.95
7.71 515.29
7.63 516.62
7.54 517.96
7.46 519.29
7.38 520.63
7.30 521.96
7.22 523.30
7.14 524.63
7.06 525.97
6.99 527.30
6.91 528.64
6.83 529.97
6.76 581.31
6.69 582.64
6.61 533.98
6.54 535.31
6.47 536.65
6.40 537.98
6.83 589.32
6.26 540.65
6.20 541.99
6.13 543.32
6.06 544.66
5.91 561.66
5.86 562.99
5.81 564.33
5.77 565.66
5.72 567.00
5.68 568.38
5.63 569.67
5.58 571.00
5.54 572.34
NBOD | Flow |

~ � ^
Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMB�
QW=26.639 DO=24 NBOD=90
MODEL RESULTS ----------
: BUNCOMBE M8D
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 7�72 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 10~20 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 5.54 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
DO Min
6.13 0.00 1
M1lepo1nt Reach #
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l} (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd>
150.00 90.00 2.00 26.68000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger a BUNCOMBE MSD E ubb :sin : 040302
Receiving Stream p FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7n 1. 0 a Winter 70.10 :
Design Temperature: 23.
:LENGTH; SLOPE: VELOCIIY 1 DEPTH: Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I KN I KNR I KNR I
1 mile ft/jai: fps I ft :design: 020' :desigrd 020' :design: 880' :design! 320' 1
Segient 1 1 14.00 20.00! 2.192 14.00 0.45 1 0.39 19.07 I 8.501 0.63 1 0.50 10.63 1 0.00 I
11
Reach 1
Segment 1 I 4.00 11.001 1.877 14.49 0.35 10.30 18.43 I 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 10.00 I
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1
1 Flow I C {OD 1 N1301) 1 D.O.
I cfs. I ,mg/1 I mg/1 I mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 1.
Waste I 41.276 1150.000 I 90.000 I 2.000
Headwaters1466.000 i2.000 i 1.000 1 6.500
Tributary I 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 : 7.720
?. Runoff 2.670 1 P.000 I 1.000 1 7..7 •'c'f
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.000 00 I 0.000 1 0.,000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 17.000 I P.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Runoff 1 2.670 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfss/mi1cj

SUMMER
QW=26.63 DO=29 NBOD=59.41
INPUT KA
| Seg # | Reach # Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD ( Flow |
1 1 0.00 6.13 14.04 5.75 507.28
1 1 0.50 6.29 13.92 5.69 508.61
1 1 1.00 6.43 13.81 5.63 509.95
1 1 1.50 6.56 13.69 5.57 511.28
1 1 2.00 6.67 18.57 5.51' 512.62
1 1 2.50 6.77 13.46 5.45 513.95
1 1 3.00 6.86 13.35 5.39 515.29
1 1 3.50 6.93 13.23 5.33 516.62
1 1 4.00 7.00 13.12 5.27 517.96
1 1 4.50 7.07 13.01 5.21 519.29
1 1 5.00 7.12 12.90 5.16 520.63
1 1 5.50 7.17 12.80 5.10 521.96
1 1 6.00 7.22 12.69 5.05 523.30
1 1 6.50 7.26 12.58 4.99 524.63
1 1 7.00 7.80 12.48 4.94 525.97
1 1 7.50 7.33 12.37 4.89 527.30
1 1 8.00 7.36 12.27 4.83 528.64
1 1 8.50 7.89 12.17 4.78 529.97
1 1 9.00 7.41 12.07 4.73 531.31
1 1 9.50 7.44 11.97 4.68 532.64
1 1 10.00 7.46 11.87 4.63 533.98
1 1 10.50 7.48 11.77 4.58 535.31
1 1 11.00 7.50 11.67 4.53 536.65
1 1 11.50 7.52 11.58 4.48 587.98
1 1 12.00 7.53 11.48 4.44 539.82
1 1 12.50 7.55 11.89 4.39 540.65
1 1 13.00 7.56 11.29 4.34 541.99
1 1 13.50 7.57 11.20 4.30 543.32
1 1 14.00 7.59 11.11 4.25 544.66
1 2 14.00 7.59 10.83 4.15 561.66
1 2 14.50 7.63 10.75 4.12 562.99
1 2 15.00 7.67 10.67 4.09 564.33
1 2 15.50 7.70 10.59 4.05 565.66
1 2 16.00 7.78 10.51 4.02 567.00
1 2 16.50 7.75 10.43 3.99 568.33
1 2 17.00 7.77 10.35 3.96 569.67
1 2 17.50 7.79 10.27 3.93 571.00
1 2 18.00 7.81 10.20 3.90 572.84
| Seg # | Reach # } Seg Mi I D.O. CBOD � NBOD Flow |

Discharger
Receiving Stream
MODEL RESULTS
: BUNCOMBE MSD
: FRECH BROAD RIVER
The End D.O. is 7.81 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 10.20 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 3"90 mg/l.
SUMMER
QW=26.63 DO=2, NBOD=59.41
INPUT KA
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg /l) Milepoint Reach # (mg /l) (mg/l) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 6.13 0.00 1
Reach 1 150.00 59.41 2.00 26.63000
Reach 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

t
•
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger n BUNCOMBE MSD Cc..{bbasi •; n 040302
Receiving Stream n FRECH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7010 W Winter 7010
Design Temperature: 23.
!LENGTH; SLOPE1 VELOCITY 1 DEPTH1 Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 ftlnril fps 1 ft !design! 820° :design: 820° ldesignl 320° !design! 220° 1
1
Segment 1 1 14.001 20.001 2.192 1 4.00 1 0.45 1 0.39 1 9.07 1 8.501 0.63 1 0.50 1 0.63 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 1 1
Segment 1 1 4.001 11.001 1.877 1 4.49 1 0.35 1 0.30 1 8.43 1 7.901 0.38 1 0.30 1 0.38 1 0.00 1
Reath P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3
1 Flow 1 C i.J I? 1 N E3 tJ D D.O.
1 cfs 1 m{ I 1 mg/1 S-rr{g / :I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 41.276 1 :t 0.000 1 59.410 1 2.000
HeadwatersI466.000 1 2.000 i 1.000 1 6.500
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.. 720
Runoff 1 2.670 1 R.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach i 2
Waste 1 0,.000 0„000 1 0..000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 17.000 P.000 1 1.000 1 7„720
Runoff ; 1 2.670 2.000 1 1 .000 1 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mi ie

DO (n(1)= 6F212-5-
vU 4, a
mbD

• -,‘Cului,c uzzd 0.33 (t)4y2.6-1 n
a- Connor -DobbtnS
irecol 61-uth_j 6b,d-a)
oti7.113 0(__Yzb

RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY
04/21/89
10:38:14
yes
WHAT RESTRICTIONS ??
ENTER RESTRICTIONS OR "GO"
go
E4280000 FRB034A 03451500
STORET System
35 36 32.0 082 34 41.0 1
FRENCH BROAD R @ASHEVILLE NC CROSS REF-E3420000
37021 NORTH CAROLINA BUNCOMBE
SOUTHEAST 040302
FRENCH BROAD
21NCO1WQ 06010105021 0006.020 ON /TYPA/AMBNT/FISH/STREAM/SOLIDS
DEPTH 1
31616
DATE TIME DEPTH FEC COLI
FROM OF MFM-FCBR
TO DAY FEET /100ML
72/07/04 1400 0 1100
73/09/06 1510 0 210
74/12/12 1045 0 590
75/01/15 1600 0 180
75/02/10 0925 0 460
81/05/13 0945 0 2200
81/06/19 1200 0 1400
81/08/04 1730 0 7000
81/09/11 0930 0 850
81/10/21 1110 0 1500
81/11/20 1100 0 830
81/12/03 1115 0 2900
82/01/19 1230 0 600
82/02/10 1115 0 2300
82/03/02 1120 0 570
82/04/14 1015 0 410
82/05/18 1140 0 580
82/06/03 1110 0 860
82/07/12 1050 0 77000
82/08/23 1000 0 400
82/09/03 1200 0 3500
82/10/18 1000 0 1100
82/11/09 1530 0 380
82/12/30 1450 0 700
83/01/13 1545 0 110
83/02/02 1215 0 11000
83/03/24 1100 0 710
83/04/13 1030 0 1700
83/05/09 1100 0 6500
83/06/14 1100 0 190
83/07/15 1130 0 220
83/08/10 1230 0 240
83/09/12 1130 0 1100
83/10/21 1010 0 390
01 i1 1 /n1 1 9nn n 2 fl

83/12/06 1530 0 9100
'84/01/05 160C 0 110
84/02/15 1145 0 1200
,84/03/12 0930 0 150
84/04/12 1130 0 650
84/05/15 1400 0 630
84/06/18 1100 0 3400
84/07/24 1100 0 4500
84/08/14 1300 0 13000
84/09/25 1230 0 200
84/10/19 1445 0 55000
84/11/16 1520 0 3400
84/12/10 1610 0 610
85/01/24 1500 0 620
85/02/26 1530 0 6400
85/03/11 1320 0 330
85/04/12 1415 0 390
85/05/03 1115 0 830
85/06/07 1215 0 2000
85/07/26 1200 0 8300
85/08/27 1300 0 3100
85/09/18 1200 0 210
85/10/09 1000 0 620
85/11/08 1115 0 630
85/12/09 1000 0 160
86/01/10 1500 0 190
86/02/20 1120 0 930
86/03/20 1510 0 4700
86/04/07 1040 0 230
86/05/12 1530 0 120
86/06/19 1230 0 220
86/07/25 1500 0 250
86/08/07 1110 0 2200
86/09/12 1120 0 720
86/10/15 1440 0 1700
87/05/20 1130 0 730
87/08/14 1115 0 230
87/11/05 1240 0 140
88/02/22 1130 0 120
88/03/22 1550 0 10K
88/05/31 1915 0 60
88/06/30 1930 0 100
88/10/31 1020 0 10K , �,J 5Ci
88/11/16 1400 0 10K
88/12/13 1220 0 180
ENTER PARM CODE, "NEXT STATION", OR "ALL"
61
PARAMETER NOBS AVE MAX
MIN BEG -DATE END -DATE
61 STREAM FLOW, INST-CFS 80 1899 17000
410 81/05/13 88/09/27
PRINT DETAILS FOR THIS PARAMETER ? (YES OR NO)
yesx
WHAT RESTRICTIONS 7?
ENTER RESTRICTIONS OR "GO"
go
E4280000 FRB034A 03451500
STORET System
35 36 32.0 082 34 41.0 1
FRENCH BROAD R @ASHEVILLE NC CROSS REF-E3420000
37021 NORTH CAROLINA BUNCOMBE
SOUTHEAST 040302
FRENCH BROAD
21NCO1W'Q! 06010105021 0006.020 ON /TYPA/AMBNT/FISH/=TREAM/SOLIDS•
DEPTH 1

00061
DATE TIME DEPTH STREAM
? FROM OF FLOW,
TO DAY FEET INST-CFS
81/05/13 0945 0 1300
81/06/19 1200 0 987
81/07/07 0940 0 887
81/08/04 1730 0 680
81/09/11 0930 0 573
81/10/21 1110 0 410
81/11/20 1100 0 481
81/12/03 1115 0 1320
82/01/19 1230 0 1060
82/02/10 1115 0 3010
82/03/02 1120 0 2180
82/04/14 1015 0 1390
82/05/18 1140 0 1340
82/06/03 1110 0 1860
82/07/12 1050 0 1300
62/08/23 1000 0 970
82/09/03 1200 0 1060
82/10/18 1000 0 910
82/11/09 1530 0 1050
82/12/30 1450 0 2900
83/01/13 1545 0 1700
83/02/02 1215 0 17000
83/03/24 1100 0 3840
83/04/13 1030 0 5570
83/05/09 1100 0 2430
83/06/14 1100 0 1530
83/07/15 1130 0 695
83/08/10 1230 0 731
83/09/12 1130 0 880
83/10/21 1010 0 984
83/11/03 1200 0 1090
83/12/06 1530 0 7900
84/01/05 1600 0 2190
84/02/15 1145 0 8570
84/03/12 0930 0 2510
84/04/12 1130 0 5340
84/05/15 1400 0 3280
84/06/18 1100 0 2130
84/07/24 1100 0 1710
84/08/14 1300 0 3230
84/09/25 1230 0 870
84/10/19 1445 0 1 850
84/11/16 1520 0 1040
84/12/10 1610 0 1360
85/01/24 1500 0 1060
85/02/26 1530 0 2350
85/03/11 1320 0 1290
85/04/12 1415 0 1120
85/05/03 1115 0 1200
85/06/07 1215 0 800
85/07/26 1200 0 1500
85/08/27 1300 0 2040
85/09/18 1200 0 812
85/10/09 1000 0 723
85/11/08 1115 0 2150
85/12/09 1000 0 1800
86/01/10 1500 0 1050
86/02/20 1120 0 1770
86/03/20 1510 0 2730
Rr/nk/n7 1nL.n n 1o5n

i86/05/12 1530 0 650
86/06/19 12301" co 734
86/07/25 1500 0 5.82''
'86/08/07 1110 0 723
86/09/12 1 1 20 0 690
86/ 1 0/ 1 5 1440 0 1 654
86/11/06 1430 0 1156
86/12/30 1350 0 2287
87/01/13 1320 0 1526
87/02/09 11330 0 1829
87/03/30 0930 0 2287
87/04/14 1140 0 2397
87/05/20 1130 0 1697
87/06/26 1400 0 2733
87/07/15 0915 0 1263
87/08/14 1115 0 825
87/09/30 1010 0 937
88/07/28 1800 0 573
88/08/18 1440 0 489
88/09/27 1700 0 449
ENTER FARM CODE, "NEXT STATION", OR "ALL"
end
READY

MOY 'F 'auncombe C.
IreGmiecal__._Ctueta. _Aims c%v Raj 6Ey28apOo)-cUccS_J101ioo m
(Lxer aaccchecf_) L- --- uildu cevo crs-- -
Oco =- 3z., 3 mbp -- n-v: 005 cis
it
--- -1 -_ ____F Fecal = /c�,-vo_v_l i00 mt
'7Q0 = </(e Le des
&OCR cFs)( IfU ILQOml ) f _(50 U05 c_13_ )povo_c>%0v__cnt)5/Z