20220170 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization_20220201

L,_
(4Itivers ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date 1/14/2022IJob No. 2021058
TO: Karen Higgins
NCDWR- 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch ATTENTION: Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 [SUBJECT:
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
Stream Bank Stabilization
Lenoir County NC -
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU 2 Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover via mail the following items:
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of Letter ElChange Order ❑ Other driveway permit
COPIES DATE No. DESCRIPTION
3 12/13/2021 Riparian Buffer Authorization form
3 12/13/2021 attachment for B 3f and C 2e
3 I 12/13/2021 1 USGS Topo site map
3 12/13/2021 J recorded final plat
3 12/13/2021 I latest NRCS soil report
3 12/13/2021 W-3952-A Streambank Stabilization plan
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
Q For Approval ❑ Approved ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
0 For Your Use ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Disapproved ❑ Return copies for approval
❑ For Review and Comment ❑ Other
REMARKS RECEIVED
F
P!"r-WATER RESOURCES
F=R PERMITTING
Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or need any additional information.
252-752-4135
With best regards,
COPY TO File SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once Stu C. B ick, PLS
sbarwick(a�riversa ndassociates.com
107 E.Second Street, Greenville,NC 27858 • PO Box 929,Greenville,NC 27835 • Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
NCBELS Lic.No.F-0334 www.riversandassociates.com NCBOLA Lic. No.C-312

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B.0233(8)(b), .0243(8)(b),.0250(11)(b),.0259(8)(b), .0267(11)(c),.0607(e)(2)-Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Project Information Stream Bank Erosion Mitigation
la. Name of project: Stream Bank Stabilization
1 b. County: Lenoir
1c. Nearest municipality: Kinston
1 d. Subdivision name: N/A
1 e. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, answer 1 f below.
1f. Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal Management Area of ❑ Yes ® No
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Owner Information
2a. Name on Recorded Deed: Lenoir County
2b. Deed Book and Page No. 728/609
2c. Map Book and Page No. 21/44
(include a copy of the
recorded map that indicates
when the lot was created):
2d. Responsible Party Lenoir County
(for Corporations):
2e. Street address: 130 South Queen Street
2f. City, state, zip: Kinston, NC 28501
2g. Telephone no.: 252-559-6450
2h. Fax no.: 252-526-6554
2i. Email address: [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant is: ❑Agent ® Other, specify: Director/Lead Tech
3b. Name: Jesse T. Thompson
3c. Business name Lenoir County SWCD
(if applicable):
3d. Street address: 2026 Hwy 11/55
3e. City, state, zip: Kinston, NC 28501
3f. Telephone no.: 252-526-9799
3g. Fax no.: n/a
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a. Name: Stuart C. Barwick, PLS
4b. Business name Rivers&Associates, Inc
(if applicable):
4c. Street address: 107 E. Second Street
4d.City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27858
4e.Telephone no.: 252-752-4135
4f. Fax no.: 252-752-3974
4g. Email address: [e-mail]
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 4

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 27232
1 b. Site coordinates(in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.241412 Longitude: -77.618652
1 c. Property size: 16.75 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Peter Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw,NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
Heavy erosion of the stream bank, and is the site of Lenoir Co. Co-op extension.
3b. Attach an 8 '/x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location
of the site attached
3c. Attach an 81/x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site attached
3d. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial)on the property:
486+/-LF
3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To eliminate stream bank erosion.
3f. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
see attached
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this Comments:
property/project(including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name(if known): Other:
4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach
documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
for this project(including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain and detail according to"help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 4

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
la. Project is in which protected basin? ® Neuse 0 Tar-Pamlico 0 Catawba
0 Randleman ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
1 b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form.
Buffer impact Reason for Type of impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number— impact (exempt,allowable, mitigation impact impact
Permanent(P) allowable w/ required? (sq ft) (sq ft)
or Temporary mitigation)
(T)
B1 ❑ P ®T To stabilize revegetate Peter Creek 0 Yes ® No 15,100 9,430
bank
B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑ P ❑T ❑ Yes ❑ No
B5 ❑ P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No
B6 ❑ P ❑T ❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
1c. Comments: stabilize bank, revegetate established buffers
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
revegetate all disturbances expanding buffer
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques. begun construction outside normal water
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that 0 Yes ® No
requires buffer mitigation?
2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC DMS 0 Yes ® No
proposed?
2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC DMS.
2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
see attached
2f. Comments:
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 3 of 4

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of ® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be [' Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC C Stormwater BMP
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ® Yes ❑ No
use of public(federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered"yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an ❑Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
lc. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document been finalized by the State ❑ Yes ❑ No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated ❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Stuart C. Barwick j2/i3/ti
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent by For government transportation projects sent by
First Class Mail via the US Postal Service: delivery service(UPS, FedEx, etc.):
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699- 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail via For all other projects sent by delivery service
the US Postal Service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
Karen Higgins Karen Higgins
NCDWR—401 & Buffer Permitting Branch OR NCDWR—401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 4 of 4

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3f. The existing stream is adjacent to the Lenoir County Ag Extension Building off NC Hwy
11-55. The stream has a confluence in the southeast corner of the property. The property has
been managed to within 10 feet of the existing top of bank. Severe vertical erosion is taking
place along the portions of the stream that abut this property. The project is to slope the banks
back from the edge of normal water line to the existing grade at a more stabile 2:1 slope and
install an erosion resistant product that will support live staking of willow trees. This will also
increase the existing buffer from the normal water line. An excavator will be utilized from the
existing high ground to slope the banks from normal water to existing grade. There will be no
encroachment into the stream bed as a part of the operation of equipment.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
2e. The current buffer has a large area of managed grass. The erosion is vertical to the
managed area in many cases. Stabilization will occur by expanding the buffer zone with
unmanaged vegetation via"live staking" and revegetation.

IlIII ! I II 1 t i1} 1 "'hIA„
.1 , \
I 4' 4 i 4( .4, - ----I
21 11I } J _ ; ' i 11 } ! 1I , i ,
r - - 1 111 ,
} \ ' 1 1 ...1„ . i (t1 ` } „ y, i1 1., 1i,•" - �,
',,, ' 4.'z/`1, 1 1 ! , I I •Qt4
�i ! "' ,
1 #� yq
Q 111 i11 1 �
o ,O f ' , 1 (-• ! 1 I tf _
2Cn 111 i} I �) 1 1 ' 1 \ 1
: s.. i 1 () 1' 1 i 1 p.
n � ? moo ' YI IA)/ oit
1 l , Ci'd`' \ i i "\
i I }I # t
T 1 111 t1 t1 , 11 ,1� ,
I _J7 I t,J 1 } ' ! _
1 / / 11 �� 1
,' '
J )7,/(
. 4-7-4 I • f7 it t $ \\----/' /
4 ' I
in.../113 1d. '� 111 #
47/ l e
/
+ rD01ao,aw -1 1 1 ,
--ff 4 1 1 I
/I` J-1 r , , !1 1 ! 1/ I1 r 1 •
/ :4 to `}l I f11 }
r �' _ I ,1 1
1 1
� �' +! ' � 11 ; 1
ac 3 • �_ 1 11 y
p
H\ oo +%Y'` 1 L \� .
a •
Oo ° �.w 11s ,11 `F
ce
a r1� !' !1i ' \\
1a.1 O
W rl �H C7 . . Y
cc
tu
•CD 1 4
6 i AfY '� e 1 1 #
lal
..„,...,\\ ,,,, . ii , i
„.
::,
=., co* L. ,,,, ._.,i I • 1 \/
ki 1 . 1
t' ! y1 \t 1 , 4,,,,,,,,, 3 :11 ( ii i E '
` _�' ip I 1tp iI r ty ► 1 1
r g 6 Wge

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
\ RCS States Department of
Agriculture and other Lenoir County,
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment North Carolina
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
lio , •
k1F
�. ._
r,
j/././- - \ , .,,'ir*
N . , it
' t
S a h I
Miriam St - , t• a•r
pi I 200
December 3, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers,foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments(http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/)and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS)has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination,write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone](voice)or(202)720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 6
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 0
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Lenoir County, North Carolina 13
Ke--KenonmviUa loamy sand, Uto8 percent slopes 13
Lu--Lumbem sandy loam 14
RwYmmmncea iG

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area.They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes;the general pattern of drainage;the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock.They observed and described many soil
profiles.A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil.The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock.The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate,water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses(USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate,and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model,of how they
were formed.Thus, during mapping,this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change.To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless,these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied.They
noted soil color,texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction,and other features that enable them
to identify soils.After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties,the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes(units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits.The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile.After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area,they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components;the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit.The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data.The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping,design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements,such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components.The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records,and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area,they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit.Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest,a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map.Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
26'650 26167, 261690 261710 261733 261753 261770 261750
35' 1-31 P; . O 35"14'31'N
+ + • 88j
$
.a('.,,, ‘"ri ' /7/'. /No Sk/
•
'. . '.\714% 7k:1”401. ' ' e'#' '1' -4Ir N..:e';::: ,'.., 1
,, •
. , * .. ,
$ 1 w
. 4.=, __Ail
- .
1 ,.. ' .. .
. ..., . ., ,
. . I I,
O ,. 4 �1 1 4'fr
/ ir t •
i pi.,'-+ ' � Y•��
a vs "` 1.1.y�S /)`
lr
v' 1 ` �r .\\\ . r1
1.
\ y .<
ti4' 1H
35°14'25"N 35°14'2S N
1 261650 261670 2616R 261750 251770 261790
3 3
b 1•,
Map Sale:1:1,020 if printed on A portart(8.5"x 11")sheet. 'A
N - Mew s
N 0 15 30 60 0
jFeet
0
0 45 90 180 27
Map.ixje :VVeb Mercator Cnmer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:WM Zone 18N WGS84
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
-1 Area of Interest(AOI) 1:20,000.
d Stony Spot
Soils
CO Very Stony Spot Map may Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil not be valid at this scale.
r7 Wet Spot
.� Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
• Soil Map Unit Points '' PP 9
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
V Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
® Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements.
• Closed Depression Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
411, Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
O Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Lenoir County,North Carolina
4. Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 21,Sep 2,2021
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Nov 21,2018—Nov
34, Slide or Slip 28,2018
fp Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AOl
Ke Kenansville loamy sand,0 to 6 0.0 0.1%
percent slopes
Lu Lumbee sandy loam 0.9 99.9%
Totals for Area of Interest 0.9 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas.A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements.The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition,thickness,and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity,degree of erosion,and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series.The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example,Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas.Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately.The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar.Alpha-Beta association,0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform.An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them.Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Lenoir County, North Carolina
Ke—Kenansville loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wq2
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville and similar soils:90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position(three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E-8 to 24 inches: loamy sand
Bt-24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC-36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C-42 to 84 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Lu—Lumbee sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wq8
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lumbee, drained, and similar soils:85 percent
Lumbee, undrained, and similar soils: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lumbee, Drained
Setting
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
E-6 to 14 inches: sandy loam
Btg- 14 to 36 inches: sandy clay loam
2Cg-36 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification(irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Lumbee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
E-6 to 14 inches: sandy loam
Btg- 14 to 36 inches: sandy clay loam
2Cg-36 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding:Occasional
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification(irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification(nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
15

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes.ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M.,V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M.Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy:A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
h ome/?cid=nres 142 p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
17

r----- ._.___ - .. _
Page 1 of 1 — '
• NORTH CAROLINA: Laxoia Co. I % L/ » !%!'/�,A;� �/ - ��
The foregoing certificates of . . e�l�F P. oL__ ,
!, are certified to he correct --. - .
Piled for registration a* '-••'cioe1__M this-.___—day o -
� _' //,^�� wxxx Rouse,'Rer I Deeds��
�P/v■+�./ �� By_� �� ---- i,uNW00A E STRot>D,certify that under my
�____.__ /itO r<� j Oirsation and supervision this map was drown from
/ / an actual field land survey of(g Dart of)the property
ta141/ ��,�,
i ps recorded In Deed.Book492.Pops331,Lenoir County
//��/ph,
•
T `� Registry; that the Error.of Clapxi as calculated
/ • / .
e by.latitude and departures b I;1I�SO Mat '' '
/ .S43 12'4S E'-ST.3S' - - �.
/// /// 5 IRON STAKE SET `lie alorrarleritti have.been placed as shown; that this ,:..;k ,�, ,
•
Mop was prepared in accordance with G.S.47-30. k-' ..; --' ''' •+
//`/ i `' t ore amended. • ,
r� ,
( // , i� WITNESS my hand and seal this i doy of 4p[ AD.19, ••.' `
/ ). V•3 S d
// / p►G G� IRON STAKE SET � e G.w{�j�[-•lG���'W-/��
t: S E:
/ / * CONC.3MON FOUND �I 0t5 g.GK/01° e% L ..._..__._._ .. .. __..... Unwood troud p .st��
•
�•� •�/ m VpiE��gOOP Ss6°IZ'1's"E-42.40_ — , 3� .. .
• .-/' J - a . N �a CM 0 Po- �3$ ' -�� cowc.MON.Ofi BANK _, _ . Sworn.to.aid_subscribed before.me_this-74.dayot4n/19.Z{� �}'' /; •
/ / 0 4' IRON STAKE IN CANAL. ' •• f
�ONC.MON.FOUND c O� a� S A9 ,41.'SAI sd.0.. -`�!` Notary-KPPubik ...r
a ��AS E•, My Corrwnielori Expires.S yf• 1 .!99 9 it 1! �f l:i;, �-
• Oi-S a 5A ��/• 1RON_STAKE_SEt__.. .._
qe, is. •s ,d-SO'' IRON STAKE SET , ��.c
",�_ _
QUO coNc.MON. =' Sy �° • ... CANAL ..
A•a IRON STAKE FOUND $�06.45„ ""�. IRON_STAKE.SET.. ____.-. _.
I I ray N56°I0'11"E -40.0o f '26:\. �x
4f m •
IRON STAKE SET LENOIR CO. LIVESTOCK " I Aoi
a
I °i DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION 4.f$ °!!° K I
r I PROPERTY r;0 c \l'A
•
I'� N ry .00 ACRES �
ILa TRACK Z -. STAKE SET la •• I A*pwn o e7R S.R.J3s8
(I to n : �1 1
a `�[ I
. .__.___.._.._._._._ ____._. S 7T°35�00."W _t6tr4.46_—_ I Pt. OF BEG.
•
•
IRON STAKE SET- _-- --• s--r__ ,.�
S 77°38 00".W.'604.44' " ,-___.691.00 �' FAIRGROUNDS ROAD. '_. - 'I CHOP-FOUND IN rG OF. PAVEMENT •
' C.B.BROOKS PROPERTY »,
MOFOUND• 41 I I DITCHES.LY INTERSECTION OF TWO
II
'1 KINSTON JUNIOR CHAMBER OF • I 1 -
COMMERCE PROPERTY_ • .
1
'1 •
DIVISION.. OF
• .
_ � ENOIR:.COUNTY _LIVESTOCK:DEVELOPMENT . ASSOCIATION
•
• _ . .: _. . . -PROPERTY.
• 200 100. 0 200' 400. AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 492 PAGE 361
GRAPHIC SCALE
MEUSE TOWNSHIP, _.LENOIR. CO.,N.C.
Y---- - - APRIL_26,197.6_ SCALE!'r■2OOr
S -76_ Pjw

C •CO GI VJ H 07
t+7 r a.. i a..
CE0 6? O V
z 4.) col• Ill :
CIVIL. EltiGINEER J �
OWNER /DEVELOPER Q ce
© d y
Rivers & Associates , Inc . Q
Greenville, NC LENOIR COUNTY a)
130 SOUTH QUEEN STREET to
(PO BOX 3289) o 8 co
KINSTON, NC 28502 Lo
�, Cr?
• PHONE [phone] to i
11114 "livers
-0 O 0 r7
00c a) Z r
N
& ASSOCIATES, INC. . w C `�
Since 1918
I > I' Cll N
r� �
s. T V
Six Forks Place III
353 E. Six Forks Road
Suite 230
Raleigh , NC 27609
Contact:Stephen Janowski, PE off,, �CARO; ,,///
[e-mail] �.;oF SS/p,9+ ;+
(252)-714-3002 _ 41AL
1 324
-.;• . ,(s. 4... ----
REVISIONS:
m
w
LENOIR COUNTY
0
STREA - N S An ILIzATIO1 N
IIP
is
z
0
cr
o
u)
w
d
.•tit
d
z
C) J
cc
Sheet List Table
0 (1
itAiralill lilt/
iok r)‘
r, Sheet cc:
NUI'1'lbGrS�"1rv'et TitlE'4
0vi i rl 111 4 ,1I�g�` �II� 1 C-1CUVR SHEET I .
EI. *VS
�j� .r� 1�#in, .� , 1111,esti& M1 i 41 I FA Ittawsow40,Jr4"11h611.11111111**11141,411*\
EC-1 STREAN'I BANK STABILIZATION N -
♦ hr•1/ ..Aim„,4teirif,,,,
♦ 2:-.L,
W
m =
CO
)0, PROJECT LOCATION . f , 4
'L.Zv
KINSTON , NC 9\}
k re
0
0 LEI
LENOIR COUNTY '77) ,---. ‘ K >
m
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) Q 0
Z 0
0, re
z
z
. (I) 0
N
c,
Q
UJI ..c..
U
O
�, ...i 1
a„
ti
.4
O
N
r DATE:
6
co
DESIGNED BY:
U
DRAWN BY:
-
CHECKED BY. -
a
it
PROJECT No. 2021 058
DRAWING No. W-3950-A
-.I
w
SCALE: AS NOTED
a SHEET No.
OI
I
5
Cal

f
X / , '='
wv, It
inn
SECTION 1042 / -'
RIP RAP MATERIALS / 15.6' CIP / 6" WI1C._ONCRETE 1 z a_ �-
s� HEADLLi II; v
9 ' USE FIELD STONE OR ROUGH UNHEWN QUARRY STONE FOR PLAIN RIP RAP. USE STONE THAT IS SOUND, '!( © o03
a
o�+� lb�'�'� TOUGH,DENSE,RESISTANT TO THE ACTION OF AIR AND WATER AND SUITABLE IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS x o.00 N/F I o vo
+� ���� FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. 04 ,i, ii -.. cn
�� �� �rfi�= ����1 / i 37, r SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN CHURCH yq'i�� i a
'
�ellylkilliWi \AT i 111',t SECTION 1043 ( i� ••72 PARCEL , 27235 I °� °'
�,�. ii� iirsare #111, ALL STONE SHALL MEET THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. WHILE NO SPECIFIC GRADATION IS REQUIRED, / J 4� BEGIN CRUCTION "�j
�000f
S � �� �. � � I (NO DEED REFERENCE) �'""''
�rl �� THERE SHALL BE EQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE VARIOUS SIZES OF THE STONE WITHIN THE REQUIRED SIZE '� h '� l y ail
' nt RANGE. THE SIZE OF AN INDIVIDUAL STONE PARTICLE WILL BE DETERMINED BY MEASURING ITS LONG I rto;
a�
.,�� DIMENSION.STONE OR BROKEN CONCRETE FOR RIP RAP SHALL MEET TABLE 1042-1 FOR THE CLASS AND `� •• 3.82 4 i'I o
` SIZE DISTRIBUTION. \ DD RETAINING WALL illiiiii CO
♦ ,,� 0 G �G �� \32.55 UJCJ� NSITE ,,` rABAND ST1 �G ---+. k�5.. - .i \ AsACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR R!P RAPAND STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL * T ` 4• , �� \ -0 o CJ m`� REQUIRED STONE SIZES(INCHES) P \ f• % co r, Mr CLASSMINIMUMMIDRANGEMAXIMUM11f ry • . \ \ ;3 1•' — y �A 2 4 6 tk .\\ \ X 0 32.50 1 va '151017 ,, ,\ � LLIc� r-
ii 2 9 14 23 ��, \\\ \ � � -_ ,3,� '�� �� r^ A
Auk
,
V � Mir � om `Nr'
TD �� � \\- - - '��g�' II�'li�-„� � � r
::
VICINITY MAP (NOTSCALE) A N.; _ /
PROJECT LIMITS A +f ,; `rait�� " — — //A Ill END CONSTRUCTION F;'I'll
LIMITS OF DISTURB AI, "� 1 31.80 iil Yy
00 � ✓ ( `�1\`,
ilII IIck
ttt111t1!/�t�
RIPARIAN BUFFER i`:r-1� -,\ •', \\\\' II i 1., ♦♦`' �CARO;f;
ZONE 1 -30' .1. \ \�\\\ 1 EXISTING VAGETATION G I �� (I ' ,
ZONE 2 2(7' yyv y.��v,A �� �! ' • - Ss.
atai
LEGENDto
AV\i“ • 1 4 v. .:1 1 l � . ,.TBM . ', TEMPORARY BENCHMARK IBM :' F .�tom:-51-� ( } It; 32.13 N/F ,�s�.,.�y�i _«.. ♦♦.
---�-50�"--- CONTOURS R/W RIGHT OF WAY /L DITCH i �q I LENOIR COUNTY •,r�', 11.......\ oN
E!P EXISTING IRON PIPE = ` 11�11 DB 1212, PG 751to
PL NOT SURVEYED EIR EXISTING IRON ROD FILTREXX EDGE SAVER STREAM / ' 1 i ll 1\
RIGHT OF WAY / ��''
EIA EXISTING IRON AXLE BANK STABILIZATION SYSTEM / / 1 1
WOODS LINE CPP CORRIGATED PLASTIC PIPE WITH REINFORCED RIPRAP TOE �( 32.33 / / it I'1' I�II \ 1' 32.11
all n... ® 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE
PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET // 41,` 1 > 1l \\,
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
DITCH so.o ,#2•.: l(TO xroE TOE OF BANK / , I �� 32.34
--—-—-—-—---— DITCH (TDB) so.a
\ \ P fI
' / •+ :' REVISIONS:
xrc NATURAL GROUND cOTTOM OF BANK\\ \� < •` • �\ }
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE so.D
BOTTOM OF BANK XCLo CENTERLINE OF DITCH \ \ \7 •<.s. . \\\
x7V° TOP OF BANK VA \ \ `-, \A m
— —G— GAS LINE (MARKED BY NC811) \ �` -
50A0 �7.84� � \\
OHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EDGE OF PAVEMENT �\ 20 \\
xTA.DO TOP OF ASPHALT -���"�" ,-4 •. `'�
BUILDING so.00 �, '�� fir\ \ y \ 32.15
rc TOP OF CONCRETE
ASPHALT x50.00 � � �\ \ \\Zeg \
BC BACK OF CURB
50 00 y-'It-- � V
ON v
- _ xrw TOP OF WALL ���, , \\\ \vy �.CONCRETE PIN PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ilk� _ �<<,.32 �M.B. MAP BOOK
D.B. DEED BOOK 1 ���� \NN \ \ �t 32.33 -- Z
I I CITY OF KINSTON STREET EASEMENT PG. PAGE NOTES ~ _O
t I (D.B. 398 PG, 237)
- - 1.0 GENERAL \_ �\ �,89 �-
CONC, CONCRETE '. .. \ ' ,RN`I a.
CATCH BASIN (CB) 1J THIS GUIDELINE COVERS GENERAL INSTALLATION OF G£OTEXTlLES IN RIPRAP APPLICATIONS. -- 3 c ` ~,. \ �
RIP-RAP
CBBC CATCH BASIN BACK OF CURB 2) WHERE CONTRADICTIONS OCCUR FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 'h\-vSs �`, - \ \ 20 32.91 U)
B/8 BACK TO BACK 2.0 PREPARE SITE y:".1<tc ��1 j r O
.r. ., v. CLF 1) SMOOTHLY GRADE THE SURFACE AS APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. � \ �\\' y , �R
CENTIPEDE SOD �i ` S
S SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 2) MAKE SURETHESURFACEISSMOOTHANDFREEOFDELETERIOUSMATERIALSSUCHASSHARPOBJECTSOR EXISTING' t���� \!-\' 32.17 i pN , IR/W )
0GUIDING N/F `��. \\\ \ i4AR �Llc sO
LARGE PROTRUDING ROCKS AND GRUBBED TO REMOVE ALL ROOTS AND VEGETATION. ' \ (PU
LENOIR COUNTYN1114,811t �'�,:
3) COMPACT ANY FILL MATERIAL TO THE DENSITY OF SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED SOIL. DB 728, PG 609 \ \-
*`i`` -\� 1
o 4) MAKE SURE TO EXCAVATE DEEP ENOUGH FOR BOTH FILTER AND RIPRAP. �� ,��\ \ ` \\ J I O
o a 3.0 GEOTEXTILE ��N 2 \ 32.9 34.14 Z
a x 0 PROJECT LIMITS AND `��\J.. \`
a 1) USEA NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEVIII ` ,i`V : 0 ,00 \�\\\ wol Q
VARIES `' EXISTING TOP 4.OPLACEGEOTEXTILE r>��� i\ '�\\ 32.59 '�
OF BANK RIPARIAN BUFFER .. _ ,, i \ '\ , CI
0
R ,1) PLACE THE RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE WITHOUT WRINKLES OR FOLDS. ZONE 1 -30' ► ter, ■ '\ O
a ZONE2-20' � � . "''� �- \ \. N/F CC
v A) AVOID STRETCHING AND TEARING THE GEOTEXTILE. ���t�\ \\ \�,\\ LEON H. LANGSTON 0 CI Z
% ���li` \ \�
4.0 ORIENTATION °� \ •\ \ '
LIANA28.57\ \ \\ DB 1036, PG 124
z PROPOSED ;, R 1� • \ \
- TOP OF BANK '' 1) ALWAYS ORIENT THE GEOTEXTILE WITH THE MACHINE(ROLL)DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF WATER
J ✓ F FLOWA41 ���1� ji \ I ,,\ 00
0
EXISTING
�'� ;,.f
BANK EXISTING --- Y . `r EXTEND GEOTEXTILE A) FOR EROSION CONTROL RUNOFF AND WAVE ACTION:TYPICALLY PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE. ``� I `' \\ ! 0,00 O
�~/��7\7 \\/ > BANKai a\/ FABRIC 5' BEYOND r�!�i : �� \\) tf
\/\/\/\/\/ /'\ ¢ r: :.;,✓`\Z /\,, ILTREXX ROCKSOXX B) FOR STREAM BANK AND CHANNEL PROTECTION:TYPICALLY PARALLEL TO THESTREAM OR CHANNEL. •;, ;t .00 el-
IR
//%/�/ / / / � /' O -K. \ /7N\ 2) 1F REQUIRED, USE KEY TRENCHES OR APRONS AT THE CREST AND TOE OF THE SLOPE TO ANCHOR THE ENDS OF THE �!A�/ .' / ✓(j`-/ 7
\%\\1/\\//\\//\\//\\//\\�j J ,' `O %'j\\/\\ �\//\ GEOTEXTILE. _� 'i�j 2 �7/ y 33.69
k
\ \ \ \ \ -' \ \ \ \ AJ USE 181NCH ANCHORING PINS TO EXPEDITE CONSTRUCTION. �I�ff' /i f x 33.43
/\/\/\/\\Al C7 / 'e - \\\r\/\\f\� B) THE KEY TRENCH SHOULD BE EXCAVATED INSTABLE MATERIAL. EXISTING VAGETA " J �'r ' / // /
\\ \\ \\ \ \\n` �i, ',,‘, .,(/sr \R\ \ \ \\f CJ KEY TRENCH SHOULD BACKFILLED WITH SOIL AND COMPACTED ON COMPLETION OF THE GEOTEXTILE INSTALLATION, I 1 �' ,4 '/ 9. S�199
�.. 5.0 JOINING ADJACENT SHEETS �*� 7 / I Elm CO
l0
T 4' II
\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\7 4. EXISTING GRADE 1) USE SOILCBRI-3MINIMUMOVERLAPSOF2-3.25FEET t �� CO <
b.0OVERWPING PARKING LOT RELOCATEPAVED --'11411 j.�j� '' /, // Q
Z 11111.
2 - 1) SUCCESSIVE SHEETS OF RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE MUST BE OVERLAPPED UPSTREAM OVER DOWNSTREAM AND/OR OVER EXISTING LP TAN✓ E ��;✓/+ ` f /"/ / BOTTOM OF BANK
GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC DOWN SLOPEINA `SHINGLE EFFECT". 1,- ",98 .' /, I k
FILTREXX BANK TOE ROCKSOXX 7.0 UNDERWATER APPLICATIONS s ��"'` / // I
TYPICAL (LOOSE STONE WRAPPED IN FABRIC) �`�''� / // I (/) D co
L,J 1) OVERLAPS UNDER WATER MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET. 1/ /• 33 9�
CROSS-SECTION A) REFER TO OUR INSTALLATION UNDERWATER GEOTEXTILE INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR MORE INFORMATION. fAt // ;r. /,/- / / �j0 Z
ce N.T.S. B) FOR UNDERWATER APPLICATIONS,PLACE THE GEOTEXTILE AND BACKFILL MATERIAL ON THE SAME DAY. �� - 'f,/�"' /f /j / /
LLI R 8.0 RIPRAP PLACEMENT
i`� a` �p�' // J �F 33.85cr.) 0 <
Q NEW 50' VEGETATED BUFFER 1 BEGIN THE RIPRAP PLACEMENT AT THE TOE AND PROCEED UP THE SLOPE. c�+ I ` /// /' '/ / / L
_J J 50`X12' 7 ,� /�, / / TOP OF BANK CO
J A) RIPRAP WEIGHING 2201BS.OR LESS MAY BE PLACED DIRECTLY ONTO THE RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE. CONSTRUCTIONAP' '4,r /,,P//
<r �.li? 8 /,- / _ /L DITCH �`
X SEEDED FILTREXX® GROSOXX TN' i) CANNOT BE DROPPED ONTO UNPROTECTED GEOTEXTILE. ENTRANCE/EXIT �k ���
cc 2
Ce 8" OR LIVE PLANTED (SEE NOTE 5) ! t •_ �.f- .I►p 4 i ---- •
0 B) RIPRAP WEIGHING 220/BS.OR LESS MAY BE DROPPED FROM A HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 3.25 FEET 1F i-ice• r • • *�� •�r r 29.54
LIVE STAKES OR PLUGS OF WILLOW, _ - • • s • • s s s • s s • ! •= EXISTING �' -�"` ���4j �� {3it
= POPLAR, MAPLE, COTTONWOOD, SYCAMORE - \'-- ` THE GEOTEXTILE IS PROTECTED BYA6 INCH AGGREGATE BEDDING LAYER. 1 a• • • s i • • s = r /V /J (/7 ME
OR DOGWOOD---- -~~ Fes.//. .t• • # i r • •i • t�i •= `" j/ / ' / 0 28.08 k.
C) DO NOT PLACE RIPRAP HEAVIER THAN 220 IBS. n'�r r� �� / /
FLW 35 GEOGRID WRAPPED AROUND FILTREXX® -- -- �` I •-� =�•-•" ' M �1 "rdeir7,--y
/�`P / Cl)ROSOXXTM FASCIA OR OTHER STRENGTH -- -+ -�, �' )► \ `+ D) INSTALLATIONS EXCEEDING THESE GUIDELINES NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNLESS PAST EXPERIENCE OR /l I " •l- ( ' FIELD TESTING HAS DEMONSTRATED THE GEOTEXTILE WILL NOT BE DAMAGED./ / \ 0 CC
/J ' , ~
FACE BATTER (2:1) I ti
J 1, -.. � j/// / i' oLlialm
t
- y :'.." E) FIELD MONITORING MUST BE PERFORMED IN ALL INSTANCES TO VERIFY THAT THE RIPRAP PLACEMENT ,J •';< ./ / / // I ZJ
M EXISTING \ -� }:, \'• ',I"f s / / /
_ CLASS I RIPRAP r ;; ,';,- / /r / O VJ
BAN K / 1 DOES NOT DAMAGE THE GEOTEXTILE. f f,'
_4 y. , 1,'> ,- ,<':`,. -"::.:.'`''::";,'; F) DO NOT ALLOW RIPRAP WITH A MASS OF MORE THAN 220 IBS. TO ROLL DOWN THE SLOPE. �E 33'0 "% / / // \;/lLill
24; _K`�j ,; . : . 5 - 5� // // �l'0
'' • ) .,.:,, : ..-: .:,-.: EXISTING GRADEAl
G) BACKFILL ALL VOIDS IN THE RIPRAP WITH SMALLER STONE TO ENSURE THE GEOTEXTILE IS FULLY Y V
o � �,� , U L COVERED. / / /,f t 0
l
/
7.-NORMAL WATER LEVEL =�_�--�:��... �i y:,,'\";•::';;..;, .;..:`.`..,':; : 2) PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP, VOID ANY GRADING ABOVE THE GEOTEXTILE THAT RESULTS IN MOVEMENT OF J AFTER AP A .� '� / ,�' �
p t.I� \ :, THE RIPRAP, // \ //
/
J
CREEK
- 9.0 REPAIR
BED
S
1C35,10 /
DATE:
- 1.
END CONSTRUCTION
IN LIEU OF SPECIFIC PROJECT GUIDELINES, S
O G DEL ES OVERLAP ANY DAMAGED GE TEXTILES AMNI O Y MINIMUM OF 3 FEET IN ALL
4.
DIRECTIONSWlrH THE REPLACEMENT PIECE .r4 C''F.
R E E REN E .CS NOV 2021
8
ge
10057'ORAGE DB 728, PG 609 DESIGNED BY: JSJ
GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 1) RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE ROLLS ARE WRAPPED INAUV PROTECTIVE COVER. DB 1212, PG 751
FILTREXX EDGESAVER STREAM DB 1036, PG 124 DRAWN BY: CB/SB
FILTREXX BANK TOE ROCKSOXX ? /� 2) IF STORED OUTDOORS FOR A PROLONGED PERIOD, GEOTEXTILE MUST BE ELEVATED FROM THE GROUND AND N/F DB 1602, PG 545
(LOOSE STONE WRAPPED IN FABRIC) BANKSTABILIZATION SYSTEM COVERED WITH A TARPAULIN OR OPAQUE PLASTIC.AJ ` LENOIR COUNTY FAIRGROUND PARCEL 27235 CHECKED BY: JSJ
NOTES: f^� WITH (� A) CONTRACTOR MUST INSURE ROLLS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM: PROJECT No. 2021058
1, ALL MATERIAL TO MEET FILTREXXTM SPECIFICATIONS, (REINFORCED RIPRAP TOE) ASSOCIATION
2, GROSOXXTM FILL TO MEET APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS. i) MOISTURE r ' DRAWING No. W-3950-A
3. ALL GROSOXXTM TO BE SEEDED PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS. DB 1602, PG 545 O V V N ER■
1' 4. BACKFILL TO BE PLACED PER ENGINEER'S REQUIREMENTS. N.T.S. ii)ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
5. GEOGRID STRENGTH, LENGTH AND VERTICAL SPACING TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. GEOGRID - NO STRANDS 0,00 LENOIR COUNTY SCALE: AS NOTED
ARE TO BE CUT DURING PLANTING, ETC. WE RECOMMEND BI-DIRECTIONAL STRENGTH FOR CONSTRUCTION EASE. iii)CHEMICALSTHATARESTRONGACIDSORBASES
k 6. NATIVE AND DRAINAGE BACKFILL TO BE SEPARATED BY NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC. iv)TEMPERATURES IN EXCESS OF140°F �' C) 1 5` 0 60' 130 SOUTH QUEEN STREET SHEET No.
7. MAXIMUM HEIGHT RECOMMENDED: TEN FEET EXPOSED HEIGHT. _-.- (PO BOX 3289)
9. CUTREXXTM BANK NO SOXXTM TEEPER THAND�ONVAPPORAST�EPN EIIZE DEPENDENT EMBANKMENTS,ON REFERJTOTGREENLOXX SYSTEM. vJANIMALDESTRUCTION \ 11111111111111111111
KINSTON, NC 28502
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 30ft PHONE [phone] EC. ii