960119_Inpsection 2021_20211119

Facility Number r c - EM
Type of visit: • f❑rnpliance Inspc-ttion
Reason for Visit:
Is Routine 0 Complaint
Date of ti isit:
Arri►al Time:
Div isinn of N1 suer Resources
0 Div esion of Soli! and ‘► tier t oricen arias
D Other Agent"
Operation Re►lea Structure Fsaluatian
Technical %A.i.tanrr
0Referral QEmergency 0 Other i.limierl A.ec-ey.
..._._.]
Departure Time; LILL, Counts • 1 )
Owner Erma^��
Phone:
Q Folloss-u
Farm Name: C dr dti 3
()issuer Name:
Mailing Address: '1O C�1A �w,]rGo(C 5 ,Di. a C. P 5,53
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1f A.R... 0. Title:
Phone:
Integrator: l SAY4
Onsite Representatise:
Certified Operator: Certification Number;
Back-up Operator: Certification Nunther:
Location of 1` arm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:: r~.t've<
Gr A.,(' Lj\ \' O 131
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean )4-103
Farrow in Feeder
Farrow to Finish
[.ilt.
Other
1 I 1
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
.iy Ci
Non•l ;3yer
Design Current
•Puultry Capacity Pop.
I .Iyers
ITueiy
T urkr3
1 urkey Pooh!,
t 1lher
Cattle
Design t ui rem
Capa,it) [•e,l,,
13.ui' 4 alfMEI
■ �_
IIIEDEEMMIIIMI
Beef Iln+od L na
I)iyehartirs and Stream Impacts
1- is any discharge observed from any part of the ,peratinn''
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field
❑ t lihcr
❑ 1 es 0
❑N.4 UNI
0
a, Was the conveyance man-made'' DYe% El No El NA NI
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State" 4If yes. notify DMZ) 1 El Yes Nu ❑ NA NI
e. What is the estimated *volume that reached waters of the State igallonsl? _ -
d- Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? Of yes. notify DWR) ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NI
?, is there ey idencc of a past discharge from any part of the operation'' ❑ }" 11 ❑ NA !~..1 Ni
potential adverse impacts to die 54:1SCr5 Yer CI NA © NI
3 ►h'ere there any observable ar}►eras impacts or �
of the State other than From a discharge?
page lof
541/2020 Curtllto ire d

F>;eillty Nun - \ 't 1 IDate or In%pecrion:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus hea,} rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
Yes
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑NE
(i.e., large trees. severe erosion. seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑Yes 1+10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or Closure plan'
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat. ratify [MR
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ .A D
No \I
❑NA til
Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit". ❑yes
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Dues any part cif the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
14. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Ycs o ❑ NA ❑ NE
rn tinter:riser or inipro ventent?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes. check the appropriate box below. [! Yes ❑X10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Cirnund ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu. /.n. etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN ' 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate ?Manure Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of W'tnd Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s1: _
14. Do the receiving crops differ tiom those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1 K. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment"
il.er ulrcol Reeurdy & D amen
I't I h i the!Licit'', itfail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available',
❑Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
2tt. Does the !will) I.u1 to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Ycs �1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropti.ne box.
❑w1.1 ['Checklists ❑Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑thhrr:
21. Does record keeping need improvement'' If yes. check the appropriate box below. o
y
es [Nu ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑ Sol! Analysis ❑ Wasle Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 1«0 Minute lnspeeiions ['Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections ['SludgeSuruey
❑ Hainfal I Yes
22. Did the facility
fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23, if selected• did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Yes a ❑ NA 0 NE
5/12r2�2D f u►rlinrred
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes LJ"o 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes d N"
❑ Yes
0 Yes
❑ NA
[] NA
❑NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
o ❑ NA EH'
a ❑ \.4 ❑ NI

y u
z z
❑ ❑
i
ra
24 IN
cu u w uL n:
z z z z z z r_
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
z z z z
r
Z z. f
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
\ti t6))6
G u G d
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
%Ali 24 hours and or document
7i
❑ ❑ ❑
Rc� iewer Inspector N
ignai