SWA000119_Response To Comments_20220201 (2)

Naik, Panth
From: Landon Chandler <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 9:57 AM
To: Naik, Panth; Bill Dreitzler
Cc: Jensen, Robin; Keeny, Jeremy
Subject: RE: Duncan's Creek State Stormwater Comments
Panth,
We would certainly be fine with the State reviewing the project in it's entirety. Our watershed regulations closely mimic
what the State has on several levels so I personally don't have any reservations there. I have copied our engineer, Bill
Dreitzler, so that he is also in the loop and provide any additional comment. Let us know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Landon Chandler
Senior Planner
Harnett County
910-893-7525 opt. 2
From: Naik, Panth <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 11:46 AM
To: Landon Chandler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jensen, Robin <[e-mail]>; Keeny, Jeremy <[e-mail]>
Subject: Duncan's Creek State Stormwater Comments
F
N: Thisemail originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
and know the content is safe.
Hello Landon,
I hope you have been well since our last correspondence.

I am emailing in regards to the Duncan's Creek Project. We recently received comments from the State on the
Stormwater Application and would like to touch base with you regarding one of their comments. They have asked us to
coordinate with Harnett County regarding the small piece of the property within the water supply watershed
(northeastern corner of the site). They would like to know if the County is OK with the State performing the review for
the entire Site( including the watershed piece) or if the County would like to do a concurrent review. Subsequently, they
have asked us to verify with the County and provide the Counties response in our resubmittal. Could we receive
feedback regarding this matter? Please see below for a snip of the comment for your reference.
?. Part C2 — Please indicate the appticable stormwater past -construction prour.,
project. It appears as though the majority of this site is subject to the Phase
however, there appears to be a small portion of the property (the northeaster
the properly near lot 1) that is located within a water supply watershed. Plea
to Harnett County to see if they will need to also review the post- con structi(
for this project (In situations like this where the majority of the site is locate
North Cardina Department ofErrvircmmentalQuality I DlvisoonofEnergy, A 1nerai i
512 North Salisbury Street 1 I612 i~.+lail Service Center I Ralelgh, North Carolina 270
ID E Q �J
n�
919,707.9200
tate's jurisdiction, a portion of the site is Ioeated w iihin a local jurisdiction
are fairly similar between the two jurisdictions, the local jurisdiction may be
the State performing the review, but they may also require that they do a coi
review. you need to verify with them). Please provide Harnett ounty's resl
inquirer with the resubinisiol).
Look forward to hearing from you!
Best,
Panth Naik, EIT I Senior Project Designer
-� 4 , MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES OF NC, PC
--� 5605 Chapel Hill Road, Suite 112, Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: [phone] www.mragta.com
Services: Planners • Architects • Landscape Architects
Civil & Structural Engineers • Surveyors
Offices: Abingdon, Baltimore, Laurel & Towson, MD
Leesburg, VA • Georgetown & New Castle, DE • Raleigh, NC
2

MRA - Since 1979
1n ,