HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0062413_Wasteload Allocation_19841109NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0062413
Linville Ridge Country Club WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
(Wasteload
Allocation
)
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Determination
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
November 9, 1984
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
contest on the reirerse reside
Ith4e.: Al GVL i9 tom.{ 903 Wes cooleS ed. tea, A4 i t d,re.ti•wloc - /di, wIsf Foc .Claw•/& Ziv e.0
lea 9-46e /07/ •
NPVES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION •
Facility Name: /4/IVt�/1� V tc, Date: VAS/89
E
0
0
23
c
w
4-0
CA
0
0
CH
a,
c)
GA
y
CO
C
CIA
Existing
Proposed
0
Permit No.: Pipe No.: 490 %
Design Capacity (MGD) : 0. 0/5'Mc11 Industrial (% of Flow) : A03
County: Oqb
Domestic (% of Flow) : /IO
Receiving Stream: 44T 4 O LiwifULJErty4 Class: C-O7a. Sub -Basin: 113.10
Reference USGS Quad: AlbLiA &/Av (Please attach) Requestor : /rlAtkX- Regional Office ddutodk, •
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: Drainage Area: Avg. Streamflow:
7Q10: Winter 7Q10: 30Q2:
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): Slope:
Velocity (fps): Kl (base e, per day, 20°C): K2 (base e, per day, 20°C):
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
Prepared By:
0
tS
e9J24/'(-Pe oLA
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
--ILUe Q.40
Reviewed By:
Date: (( I eJ
T
. ,'
"�. 444.44
No_ ._ ACA's C cx .� � e_ _ { e C
•
Reo//est Nn, : 1071
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
Facility Name LlNVILLE RIDGE CLUBHOUSE
Type Of Waste DOMESTIC
Receiving Stream UT-LINVILLE RIVER
Stream Class C-TR
Subbasin 030830
County AVERY
Regional Office ASHEVILLE
Reouestor MIKE PARKER
Drainage Area (so mi) ^02
7010 Qfs) O
Winter 7010 (cfs) O
3002 (cfs) 0
RECOMMENDFD EFFLUENT LIMITS
COMMENTS
F4.ow
BASED ON DRAINAGE AND -CITE CHARACTFRISTJCS, TECH. SERVICES
RECOMMENDS THAT NO WLA BE DEVELOPED FOR THJS SITE.
FACILITY IS IS ! PROPOSED ( - / EXISTING ( ) NFW ( )
LIMITS ARE t REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PRFVIDUS| Y ISSUED
RECOMMENDED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SUPERVISOR, TECH* SUPPORT
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
Aej
Approval is (by) preliminary ( ) final
PERMITS MANAGER
'
�