Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310347_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211220Division ,of Water'Resources . Facility' Nuinberg ` �' - F d Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency' Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance treason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: 1 'LJ Arrival Time: b_,s Departure Time: County: Region: Farm Name: �-� dj-- �� rr—� Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 7b'-OL HV a C uk�' Title: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Phone: 9 ( Z6 �? 1 0 j Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design., Current ' �' ° °Design p Current a Swine - ° Capacity ° Pop, Wet Poultry Capacity • `Pop. s Cattle Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish 'Z Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dry Poultry ° b Canaci£v Pon: Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other :Design Current: Capacity. s ' PoA- Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts ap, 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ©'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NoEl;A ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0" ❑ NA rrNo ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 31 - ';'47 1 1Date of Inspection: U Z1 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes , o ❑ZA 0 NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes ❑ No �0 NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ffTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E-eo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ao ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �[:] NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes L Q 1;o ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes' o ❑ NA ❑ NE / 20. Does the facility fail to have all co 1Sonents of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall tocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ��No ❑ NA NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued li acility Number: - Date of Inspection: (Zile, 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:]Yes 1:2 lac NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ N ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No rNA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes f' No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [21/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE ❑ Yes E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: '� Ci �j ��f, j I 0 Date: 511212020