310347_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211220

Division ,of Water'Resources .
Facility' Nuinberg ` �' - F d Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency'
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
treason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 'LJ Arrival Time: b_,s Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �-� dj-- �� rr—� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 7b'-OL HV a C uk�' Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone: 9 ( Z6 �? 1 0 j
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design., Current ' �' ° °Design p Current a
Swine - ° Capacity ° Pop, Wet Poultry Capacity • `Pop. s Cattle
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 'Z
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry ° b Canaci£v Pon:
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
:Design Current:
Capacity. s ' PoA-
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts ap,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
©'NO ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
0 Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NoEl;A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0" ❑ NA
rrNo
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 31 - ';'47 1 1Date of Inspection: U Z1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes , o ❑ZA
0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes ❑ No �0 NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ffTNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E-eo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ao ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�[:] NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
L Q 1;o ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
/
20. Does the facility fail to have all co 1Sonents of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall tocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ��No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

li acility Number: - Date of Inspection: (Zile,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:]Yes 1:2 lac NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ N ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No rNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
f' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[21/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
E3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: '� Ci �j ��f, j I 0
Date:
511212020