310084_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220112

Division of Water Resources
Facility Nu4mber ® Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency'
type of Visit: �& Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
2eason for Visit: cQ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �Arrival Time: , , , �� Departure Time: C:4Z!gc-) County:
Farm Name:fv� `�nowner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Phone: 9 ( Q 2g-':� (egg
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current . Design Current
%.Swine: _ ' Capacity .Pop.. � � . Wet Poultry. Capacity Pop.. � Cattle:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other, ..
Layer
Non -Layer
DesignCurrent _
Dry Poultry Capacity . Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Capacity. - .Pop' .
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
._ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No 6<A ONE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No ZNA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
O NA
E:N.
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection: [ 2 2 Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ZXNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
Structpurre�I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 25 d? L+ t 13
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
:0>0
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
t eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
/NoNA
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes:;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
0 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yesr]'T,�Too
NA
0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections "El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No ElIZA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Z -
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes zro_❑NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA eNE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
ICJ 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
' ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r1j,ZJ
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020