Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310200_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220127. _ . Division of Water Resources - Facilityliimber3 1 C3 Division of'Soil and Water Couservatron'e �-�o 0- Other Agency .. .. IType of Visit: `(WCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: 1 27 -L Arrival Time: �-=! Departure Time:Ft C) `' County: Farm Name: �" iy'vl"- Saw Owner Email: Owner Name: ° Phone: Mailing Address: Region: Physical Address: Facility Contact: kAj I'Iff'7 �� Title: Phone: � � d �1 1 7S_7 Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Desighe, .Current . Design .Current Design Current` Swine Capacity Pop: WetPouTtry, Capacity Pop. Ca{tle ; "' A Capacity = Pop..:. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish O o Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Vp t3� Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other" Layer Non -Layer Design- Current D� y'Poultr Capacity . ` Popi a Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:]Yes [—]No ❑ NE P b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes yl$rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: k 2�1 22 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Structure 1 Identifier: i Spillway?: Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 2 Designed Freeboard (in): _ Observed Freeboard (in): _ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? VN EKo❑ NE ❑ No ❑ NE Structure 6 ❑ Yes �NoEj ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes d No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o i NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o . ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did .the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes _ /No, ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes D,lo ❑7NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes [—]No ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facijity Number: jDate of Inspection: 't V7 24. id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Oyes ❑/No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:�t v- , 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No L• J A ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ Yes -' No ❑ NA ❑ Yes 0 No/❑ NA ❑ Yes El ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE E NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Date: l � S/ 212020