The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140226 Ver 1_401 Application_20140307;' `.,,,� .� — '�_ ,� l,f <.. � %' F �' ,., •� ^o ;l ��,� ! �S' ... �� i � �� , ., ;: • ��: �' 4�P' % �� ' r; "; !�� ,;:,,`` • r,, 4� Y� !� �, t�` l. �i `a�e.. e STATE C�F NQRTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSl�(JRTATICJN PAT IV1c�RC7RY P. O. Bax 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611-52Q2 TCJNY TATA GO�'VERNOR F'H(JNE: � 19-7�3-2520 SECIZETARY March �, 2014 Mr. Andy Wi1l�ams tJ. S. Ar�ny Corp►s of Engineers R.aleigh Regulatary Field C�f�ce 3 3 31 �Ieritag� Trade Drive, �uite 1 QS '�iVake Forest, N� 27587 Subj ect: Nationwide Permit # 14 Replace Bridge #28S an SR 1310 w1�th �CBC Ashe County, North Carolina Proj ect Number; 17BP.11.R.55 (L1WQ Permit Fee: ��70) Dear Mr. Williams: The North Carolina Department af Transportation is scheduled to replace Bridge #�85 with a double barreled 8'x 6' RCBC at the same locatio�. Th� existing br�dge is 20' la�g x�4' wide and has a steel plank flaar on steel I-beams v�ith timber abutments encased in concrete. Proposed culvert length is a little longer than narmal due ta skew. The culvert will be buried 1' into the streambed and flaw will be isolated to one barrel to maintai� aquati� life passage. Mitigation will be provided through EEP (72' x 2:1). No on-site deiour is proposed. �tream impacts are tabulated below. Stream Impacts: Proposed Riprap Total Impacts Station Existing �tructure Ternparary Impact� at �this �tation Number Structure Si�e Si�e lJe�aterin feet feet 20' long x 24' 2�� 72'x 8'x Brid e#285 wide brid e 6' RCBC �0 140 232 Perm. Fill/Riprap Impacts Ta�al �'roj ect Stream = 212 f�et Im acts = 232 feet The replacement of the existing bridge �vith tl�e �roposed new culvert vvi11 require temporary dewatering. An impervious di1�e will be constructed upstream of the exis�ting siructur� to create a small pool. Clean wat�r vvlll temporarily be pun�ped around or piped thrc�ugh the constructia� area and w111 be discharged dovvnstream. Any dir-�t� ,water located inside the c�nstruction area 1'. O. Box 250, N. WILKESB(JRO, NC 28659 F'HONE (33�) 667-9111 Fax (336} 6b?-4_549 Mr. Andy Williams Bridge #285 an SR 1310, Ashe Page 2 March 7, 2014 wi11 be pumped into a silt bag if necessary. Once the new structure is 1n place, the �mpervious dil�e vvi11 be removed and preconstruction streambed el�vations w�ll be restore�. Canstruction af this proj ect will require impacts to Wa�ers of the T.Jn�ted �tates in the Ne�v R�ver B�sin. The exlsting bridge crosses Litile Laurel Cr�el� (Class: C, ORW). Th�s �r�aject vvas reviewed far the presence of threatened and endanger�d specles a�.d will have �.o effec� o� a�ny federally listed threatened or endangered species. �u�tural res�urce complia�.ce work has bee� completed (see attached). The proj ect impacts should not remove ar degrade existing water quality uses. Stormwater will be routed through grass or rack lined ditches, d�pending on the ditch lir�e slope. T'otal �and disturba�ce will be less than 1 acre. Pipe sizes used will be the minimum r�ecessary to creaie a safe roadvvay. By utilizing the erosion contro� measures outlined in the attachmer��s to this application, downstream water quality standards wil� be protec�ed. All appropriate BMPs wi11 be used during constructlon. By capy af this electronic letter, it is requested that Mrs. Marla Chambers with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission commer�t directly ta yau concerning th� 4�4 Nationwide Per�nit application with a copy s�nt to me. By capy of this electronic letter, it is requested that the I�ivision of Water Quality, 4� 11Wetla�ds Unit, issue the approprlate p�r�nit for constructlon c�f this praject. It is requested th�.t any comments related to the 401 certi�cation be forwarded directly to me wxth a copy sent to the �TS Ar�ny �orps of Engineers. We would l�ke to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information 1S �"�C�L11�'�C�., please let me knovv. Your early review and consid�ration will be appreclated. Sincerely, � � � � �� '�� Heath Slaughter I�ivision Envlronmental (J��'�cer Enclosures cc: And� Williams, US .�r�ny Corps of Enginee�s Mar1a Chambers, NC�►TR.0 Amy Chapman, Divis�on of Water Quality Dave Wanucha, L)ivision of Water +Quality Mike Pettyjohn, PE, Division Engineer David Wayne, PE, Bridge Maintenance Engin�er Jami Gu�nn, Di�isia�. Bridge Program Manag�r Heath Slaughter, Di�isian Environmental C3ffi�er Neil Trivette, Roadside Environmental F�e1d C�perations �ngineer �� C�ffice Use Only: �. � ��` k�- Corps action 1 D no. � � > � -=-� f"'1 � 6 ;, �G4 �` t 9 , M1 s�' ' ' �4 \ � � � � � � � �� C)UVC� prC}��Gt nt7. ; ;. i,, � �� ``�`�'� ��j �� orm Versian 1.3 D��ec 1�0 �(108 Pre-�onstruction Notificaiion ��P(�N) Farm A. A��►licant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought fror�n the � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit Corps: 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General �ermit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP ar GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes 1 d. Type(s) af approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply). � 401 Water Quality Gerkification -- Regular ❑ Non-4�4 Jurisdictional General Permi� ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification -- Express ❑ Ripari�n BufiFer Autharizafiion 1 e. Is this notification solely far the record For the record anly for DWQ 401 because wrifiten approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No 1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-Iieu fee pr�gram proposed for mitigatian of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigatiQn bar�k or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. 1 h. Is the project located within a R1C DCM Area of Environmental Cor�cern (AEC)? 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge #285 on SR 131� �b. County: Ashe 2c. Nearest municipality / tawn: Ashland 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 1?BP.11.R.55 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT 3b. Deed Boak and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LL.0 if applicable): 3d. Street address: 801 Statesville Raad 3e. City, state, zip: North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 3f. Telephone no.: 336-903-9242 3g. Fax no.: 336-�67-4549 3h. Email address: hslaughter�C�ncdot.gav ►1 . For the record only for Corps Permit; � Yes � No � Yes 0 No ❑ Yes (� �1a ❑ Yes � Na Page 1 of 10 PCN F�rm -- Version 1,3 December 10, 2008 Versic�n 4. Applicant Informatian (if different from owner) 4a. Appiicant is: ❑ Agent [� Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, �ip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if appiicable} 5a. N�me: 5b. Business name (if appiicable}: 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone nr�.: 5f. Fax na.: 5g. Em�il address: Page 2 of 10 ' PCN F�rm -- Version 1.3 December 1�, ��8 Versiar� B. Project Information and Pric►r Project History 1. Praperty Iden�ification 1 a. Property iden�ification no. (tax P1 N or parcel I D}: 1 b. Site coordinates in decimal de rees : Latitude: 3�.4626� Langitude: - 81.65571 � 9 ) {QD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)' 1 c. Property size: 0.1 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name c�f nearest bady of water (stream, river, etc.) to Li�tle Laurel Greek prapased project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving w�ter: C; CJRW 2c. River basin: New 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the generai land use in the vicinity of the �roj�ct at the fiime of this applicatian: Substandard bridge to be re�laced in a rural area 3b. �ist the total estimated �creage of all existing wetlands on the property: � 0.1 acres 3c. List the tot�l estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perenni�l) on the property: � 25Q linear feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the praposed project: Upgrade su�standard stream crassing 3e. CJescribe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: See attached cover letter. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdicfiional wetland or stream determinatians by the Corps or St�te been reques#ed ar obtained for this property 1 ro'ect includin all priar phases in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknawn p J t � ) Comments: 4b. If the Corps m�de the jurisdictiona{ determination, what type of determin�tion was made'? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consult�nt Campany: Name (if known): C)ther: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinatians or State determinations and atta�h documentatiar�. 5. Prr,�ect History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for �� o I�n�nawn ' this ro ect includin all rior h�ses in the ast? � � � p 1 � 9 K� p ) p 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No �b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN F�rm -- Uersion '! .3 December 1 Q, ��08 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory �. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were campleted below for your project {check all that apply): [� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries 0 Buffers ❑ C.�pen Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland lmpacts if there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdictic�n number -- Type of impact Type of wetland Far�sted (Carps - 4a4, 10 Area af impact Permanent (P} ar (if known} DWC� — non-4�4, other} (acres) Tem orar T ❑ Yes ❑ Carps W1 ❑ P � T No DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W2 ❑ P❑ T No DWQ ❑ ❑ � Yes ❑ Corps W3 ❑ P❑ T Nc� DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ Carps W4 ❑ P❑ T N� ❑ DWQ ❑ � Yes ❑ Corps W5 ❑ P❑ T Nc� DWC� Q ❑ ❑ Yes � �orps ' W6 C] P❑ T Nc� �WC� ❑ ❑ Zg. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments. 3. �►tream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then cnmplete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. ' Stream impact Type af impact Stream name Perenniaf Type of jurisdiction Average ��p�G� number - (PEFZ} ar {Corps - 4�4, 10 stre�m length Permanent (P) ar ir�terrr�ittent pW� �. nnn_q,04, width (linear� Temporar`Y (T) (I NT)� other} (feet) feet) RCBC, Riprap & � P�R � Carps S1 � P� T Dewaterin Little Laurel Greek �Ni �J DWQ � �� ❑ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S2 ❑ P❑ T I NT 0 DWQ ❑ ❑ PER ❑ Gorps S3 ❑ P Q T I NT DWQ � 0 [] PER ❑ Corp� S4 QP�T ❑INT [�DWQ ❑ PER (� Corps S5 ❑ P❑ T [] I NT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER C] Corps S6 C� P � T ❑ I NT [] DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 232 3i. Comments: 72 R�BC, 140 riprap, 20 dewater Page 4 of 10 PCN F�rm -- Version 1.3 December 14, 2Q08 Version 4. Open 'Water Impacts ' If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atl�ntic Ocean, ar �ny other open w�ter of the IJ.S. then individually list all op�n water impacts belaw. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Gtpen water Name of waterbody impact number -- (if applic�ble) Type af impact Waterbady type Are� of impac� (��r�e�} Permanent {P} or Tem c�ra T 01 QP❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑ P [.� T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Tatal open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or L.ake Construction If and or fake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts {acres} Stream Impacts (feet) Upl�ind Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flaoded Filled Exc�vated Flooded Filled Exc�v�ted Floaded P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: N/A 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required'? ❑ Yes �(�o If yes, permit I D no. 5i. Expected pond surFace area {acres): 5j. Size afi pond watershed (acres); 5k. Method of canstruction: 6. Buffer Impacts (far DWQ) If project will impact � protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all bufFer impacts belaw. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill Qut Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ C)ther: Praject is in which protected basin? ❑ Gatawba ❑ Rar�dleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6�. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zon+� 2 imp�ct Permanent (P) ar for Stream name mitig�tian (square feet) (squ�re feet) Tem arar T im act re uired? � Yes B10P❑T �NQ o ��S B2 ❑P❑T �N� B3 ❑P❑T ❑ Y�s � �1a 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 c�f 10 P�N F�rm -- Version �.3 December 1�, 2408 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avaidance and Minimizafiion 1 a. Specifically describe me�sures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing praject. The cuivert length is the minimum needed to improve safety at this location. 1 b. Specificaliy describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the propased imp�cts through construction techniques. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts ta VUaters of the U.So or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for (� Yes ❑ No impacts ta Waters of the U.S. or Waters af the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): Q DVVQ � Cor'ps ❑ Mitig�tian bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ro'ect? � Payment to in-lieu fee pragram � 1 ❑ P�rmittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigatian Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee pragram is attached. � Ye� 4b. �tream mitigation requested: 144 Iine�r feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool �cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Nan-ripari�n wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigatian requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Ptar� 5a. If using a perrnittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigafiion plan. Page 6 �f 1 n PCN F�rm — Versian �.3 L7ecember 10, 2�a8 Version _ 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Reguiated Riparian Buffer Rules) -- required by DWC,� 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected ripari�n buffer that requires 0 Yes � Nc� buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify �he square feet of imp�ct to each zane of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calcul�te �he amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitig�tic�n (square feet} (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 far Catawb�) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is pr�posed (e.g., payment �o private mitig�tion b�nk, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments. Page 7 of 10 P�N �c�rm -- Ver�ion '4.3 CJecember 1a, 20�8 Versi+�n E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse F1c�w Plan (required by DVi/Q) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Daes the prajec� include or is it adjacent to protected riparian bufFers identified within one af the NC Riparian Buff�r Pratection Rules? 1b. If yes, then is a difFuse flow pian included� If no, explain why. �omm�nts: ❑ Yes � f�o ❑ Yes 0 Na 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes � No 2c. If this project DCJES NC�T require a Stormwater Management �'lan, explain why. Disturbing less than 1 acre 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, n�rrative descrip�ion �f the pl�n: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. in which Icacal government's jurisdiction is this praject? 3b. Which af the following loc�lly-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? 4. DWQ �tormwater Proqram Review ❑ Cer�ified Local Government � DWQ �tormw�ter F�rograrn ❑ DWC� 401 Unit ❑ Pha�e II ❑ NSW ❑ lJ SN1 P ❑ Water Supply Watershed [� CJther: ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Coast�I countie� ❑ HQw 4a. Which �f the fallowing state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � C}RW (check �I! that �pp�Y): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ CJther: 4b. Has fihe appraved St�►rmwater Management Plan with praof of approval been attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a� Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropri�te requirements`? 5b. Have all of the 441 Unit submittal requirements been met? [�] Yes 0 No ' ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes 0 N o Page 8 af 10 P�N F�rm -- Versian 1.3 December 10, 2�08 Versic�n F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement� 1 a. Does the praject involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ��,�� o use of public (federalistate) land? 1 b. if you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation af an environmental dacument pursuant to the requirements of the �latianal or State C] Yes j� No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAiSEPA)`? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the �tate Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes [�,] No Comments: 2. Vic�latians (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is th� site in violation af DWQ Wetland Rules {15A NCAC 2H .�50�}, Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .13(�0), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetiand Standards, [� Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .4200)'? 2b. Is this an �fter-the-fact permit appiication? [� Yes j� No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of �he above questions, provide an explanation of the vialation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project {based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �,�s No ' additional develo ment, which could im act nearb downstream vvater ualit ? � � p P Y q Y 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accor�ance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a shart na�rative description. 4. Sewage Dispasal {DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and dispasition (nan-dis�harge ar discharge} ofi wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of fihe subject �acility. N/A Page 9 of �n PCN Fc�rm -- Versic�n 1.3 December 1 Q, 2�48 Versic�n 5. Endangered Species and Designated Criticat Habitat (Cor�s l�equirement) 5a. Wil{ this praject occur in ar near an area with federally protected species or Yes No habitat? � � 5b. H�ve you checked with the USFW� concerning Endangered �pe�ies Act Yes No i m a cts? ❑ � P ❑ Raleigh 5�. If yes, indicate the USFWS Fie1d Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use ta determine whether your site wauld impact Endangered Species or Designated Cri�ical Nabit�t? GI� and visuai observation ' 6. Essential Fish Habitat {Gorps Requirement) 6a. Will thi� project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site wo�ld impact E�sentia! Fish Habitat? WRC will comment 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requir�ment) 7a. Will this project occur in ar near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation Yes No status e. . National Historic Trust desi natian or ro er.ties si nificant in � � C�= g P P g North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site wo�ld impacfi histo►ric ar archeological resources? Project was reviewed by the OHE. 8. Fload Zane Designatian (Carps Requirement} 8a. Wilf this project occur in a FEMA-designated 140-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? J. �-Ieath �lau hter ��°� 3/7/� 4 � � o� � Applicant/Agen�'s Printed Name pplicant/Agents �ign re Q�� (Agent's si nature is valid anly if an authoriZa ' letter from the appl�cant is provided.} ' Page 10 of 14 PGN F�rm -- Version 1.3 December 10, 2�48 Version Consulting Engineers Middlesboro, Kentucky 606 248 6600 Copyright 1994 Vaughn & Melton, Inc. All Rights Reserved c 865 546 5800 South Carolina 864 574 4775 Spartanburg, Asheville, North Carolina 828 253 2796 PROJECT ENGINEER FRANK GIOSCIO, PE ASHEVILLE NC, 28806 1318-F PATTON AVE. PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS NCDOT CONTACT: Prepared in the Office of: VAUGHN & MELTON C O N T R A C T : 17BP.11.R.55 17BP.11.R.55 17BP.11.R.55 N/A N/A P.E. ROW, UTIL Tri-Cities, Tennessee 423 467 8401 Charlotte, North Carolina Tennessee Knoxville, 704 357 0488 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA S T R U C T U R E : C 2 0 3 0 4 7 TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE PLANS FOR PROPOSED HIGHWAY EROSION CONTROL GRAPHIC SCALES 0 PLANS 40201020 NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 Certification Number: 302 Date Expires: December 31, 2013 Date Issued: May 2, 2007 Aaron C. Carver, P.E. Level III-A: Designer of Erosion and Sediment Control Plans AARON CARVER, PE EC-1 LOCATION: STRUCTURE NO. 285 OVER LITTLE LAUREL CREEK ON SR 1310 (LITTLE LAUREL ROAD) ASHE COUNTY -L- STA. 10+75.00 BEGIN PROJECT 040285 -L- STA. 13+50.00 END PROJECT 040285 (LITTLE LAUREL RD) -L- SR 1310 TO BIG LAUREL RD. TO PA R K ER R D. S R 1 3 1 1 L ITTLE LAUREL CREEK -L- STA. 11+97.18 BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 12+25.51 END CULVERT -L- STA. 12+11.57 CL RCBC 0 4 0 2 8 5 THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY NCG-010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011 WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE ISSUED BY THE NORTH COROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY. 17BP.11.R.558 VIRGINIA MABRY MANAGER OF THE PRIORITY PROJECTS OFFICE Temporary Silt Ditch DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type A Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type B Temporary Silt Fence Roadway Standard Drawings The following roadway english standards as appear in "Roadway Standard Drawings"- Roadway Design revison thereto are applicable to this project and by reference hereby are considered a part of these plans. Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type A 1634.01 1634.02 1635.01 1605.01 1630.01 Temporary Berms and Slope Drains 1606.01 1622.01 Special Sediment Control Fence Riser Basin 1635.02 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type B 1604.01 Railroad Erosion Control Detail 1607.01 Gravel Construction Entrance NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY. ISSUED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NCG-010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011 WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY Unit - N. C. Department of Transportation - Raleigh, N. C., dated January 2012 and the latest 1630.05 Temporary Diversion 1630.04 Stilling Basin 1630.03 Temporary Silt Ditch 1630.02 Silt Basin Type B 1630.06 Special Stilling Basin 1631.01 Matting Installation 1632.02 1632.01 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type B Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type A 1632.03 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type C 1633.01 1633.02 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type B Temporary Rock Silt Check Type A 1640.01 Coir Fiber Baffle 1645.01 Temporary Stream Crossing STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES CONSTRUCTION. GRUBBING PHASE OF FOR CLEARING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS THIS PROJECT CONTAINS Temporary Silt Fence Silt Basin Type B Stilling Basin TDTemporary Diversion Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-B Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-A Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-A Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-B Type A Type B Type C A B C Temporary Silt Fence TSD Std. #Description Symbol Temporary Berms and Slope Drains Rock Inlet Sediment Trap: 1630.03 1630.05 1605.01 1622.01 1633.01 1634.01 1634.02 1635.01 1635.02 1630.04 1632.01 1632.02 1632.03 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type-A Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type-B 1606.01 Special Sediment Control Fence Skimmer Basin Tiered Skimmer Basin Infiltration Basin Special Stilling Basin1630.06 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-A with Matting and Polyacrylamide (PAM) Wattle/Coir Fiber Wattle Wattle/Coir Fiber Wattle with Polyacrylamide (PAM) 1630.02 1633.02 EW CFW STANDARDS. SENSITIVE WATERSHED BEEN DESIGNED TO THIS PROJECT HAS High Quality Water Zone(s) Exist From Sta. to Sta. Refer To E. C. Special Provisions for Special Considerations. HIGH QUALITY WATER(S) EXIST ON THIS PROJECT for Special Considerations. Refer To E. C. Special Provisions ON THIS PROJECT SENSITIVE AREA(S) EXIST ENVIRONMENTALLY 11+97 12+25 DATE: 11/22/13 CONSTRUCTION RELEASE FOR 10 4-1 P OT S ta . 10 + 0 0 .0 0 10 P C S ta . 10 + 8 8 .4 5 P T S t a . 12 + 12 .5 1 P O T S t a . 14 + 2 1.2 3 - L- STA. 13+50.00 END PROJECT 040285 - L- STA. 10+75.00 BEGIN PROJECT 040285 -L- STA. 11+97.18 BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 12+25.51 END CULVERT PI Sta 11+51.18 D L = 124.06’ T = 62.73’ R = 340.00’ SE = .06 RO = 116’ -L- CURVE DATA T O PA R K E R R D. TO BIG LAUREL RD. TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 BRIDGE REMOVE SR 1309 SR 1130 R=125’ SHOP CURVED 10 POC -L- STA. 11+63.00 - Y 1- -L - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+80.52 END CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+00.00= R=20’ CURVED SHOP ENTRANCE CHURCH PAVE 4-1 RELOCATE EXISTING 3SBW 1S B K LITTLE LAUREL RD. SR 1310 19’ BST LI T T LE LA U R E L R D. SR 1310 S H E D M T L G R H TR GR EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W SHELTERPICNIC C ONC W AL L 3S B W 18" C MP 3SBW 6 0 . 0 0 ’ CR EEK LI TTLE LA U R EL B S T S GATE MTL GRASS WOODS T T MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 PATSY L. PATRICK DB 388 PG 1529 HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 WARNER ROARK HEIRS DB G-3 PG 244DOUGLAS & ELEANOR MAHALA DB V-5 PG 236 2-E 1-E 3-E 4-E 5-E 2-E DB G-3 PG 244 METHODIST CHURCH LITTLE LAUREL G R A Y B E A L H O L L O W R D . S R 13 11 B S T GRASS 67.07’ +00.00 47.72 +95.00 62.00’ +55.54 EX R/W +25.00 EX R/W +8.18 EX R/W +25.00 EX R/W +74.50 48.81’ +96.37 63.00’ +88.00 EX. RW +25.00 EX. RW +07.56 47.00’ +52.00 148.18’ +02.08 183.51’ +00.01 85.71’ +06.55 86.31’ +96.94 EX R/W +21.23 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.57’ +79.03 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.72’ +81.94 90.00’ +71.00 84.00’ +01.00 74.00’ +88.00 EX. R/W +64.00 EX. R/W +84.00 47.00’ +52.00 59.00’ +79.00 147.00’ +70.00 127.00’ +42.00 143.00’ +24.00 THIS TUE HAS TO SHOW ON R/W DRAWING PLANVIEW PLEASE NOTE TUE IN THE GRID AREA FFF F F C C F F F F F F C F F F F F F F F N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS DIKE IMPERVIOUS PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN Temporary Silt Fence1605.01 Wattle/Coir Fiber Wattle with Polyacrylamide (PAM) Wattle/Coir Fiber Wattle1633.02 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-A1633.01 1606.01 Special Sediment Control Fence 1635.02 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type B F L O W THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY NCG-010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011 WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE ISSUED BY THE NORTH COROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY. 1633.01 on Slope as Work Allows. Place Matting for Erosion Control PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WORK SITE AND SHALL BE DEWATERED WITH SPECIAL STILLING BASINS. UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION TO CONTAIN THE ALL PHASES: IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BRIDGE REMOVAL DOWNSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE SOUTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 4: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 3: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT UPSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE NORTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 2: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT THE NORTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 1: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS Middlesboro, Kentucky Tri-Cities, Tennessee All Rights Reserved Charlotte, North Carolina Tennessee Knoxville, South Carolina Spartanburg, Asheville, North Carolina Copyright 2006 Vaughn & Melton, Inc.c 704 357 0488 423 467 8401 865 546 5800 606 248 6600 864 574 4775 828 253 2796 Consulting Engineers Scale : 20 10 ’ 10 ’ 8 .6 ’ 9 .4 ’ 10 ’ 10 ’ 9 .3 ’ 10 .1’ SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ASHE COUNTY BRIDGE # 040285 040285 B 1606.01 1606.01 1606.01 EC-4/CONST.4 1S B K LITTLE LAUREL RD. SR 1310 19’ BST LI T T LE LA U R E L R D. SR 1310 S H E D M T L G R H TR GR EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W SHELTERPICNIC C ONC W AL L 3S B W 18" C MP 3SBW 6 0 . 0 0 ’ CR EEK LI TTLE LA U R EL B S T S GATE MTL GRASS WOODS T T MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 PATSY L. PATRICK DB 388 PG 1529 HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 WARNER ROARK HEIRS DB G-3 PG 244DOUGLAS & ELEANOR MAHALA DB V-5 PG 236 2-E 1-E 3-E 4-E 5-E 2-E DB G-3 PG 244 METHODIST CHURCH LITTLE LAUREL G R A Y B E A L H O L L O W R D . S R 13 11 B S T GRASS 67.07’ +00.00 47.72 +95.00 62.00’ +55.54 EX R/W +25.00 EX R/W +8.18 EX R/W +25.00 EX R/W +74.50 48.81’ +96.37 63.00’ +88.00 EX. RW +25.00 EX. RW +07.56 47.00’ +52.00 85.71’ +06.55 86.31’ +96.94 EX R/W +21.23 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.57’ +79.03 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.72’ +81.94 90.00’ +71.00 84.00’ +01.00 74.00’ +88.00 EX. R/W +64.00 EX. R/W +84.00 47.00’ +52.00 59.00’ +79.00 THIS TUE HAS TO SHOW ON R/W DRAWING PLANVIEW PLEASE NOTE TUE IN THE GRID AREA FFF F F C C F F F F F F C F F F F F F F F 18 " R E MO VE P OT S ta . 10 + 0 0 .0 0 10 P C S ta . 10 + 8 8 .4 5 P T S t a . 12 + 12 .5 1 P O T S t a . 14 + 2 1.2 3 - L- STA. 13+50.00 END PROJECT 040285 - L- STA. 10+75.00 BEGIN PROJECT 040285 -L- STA. 11+97.18 BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 12+25.51 END CULVERT PI Sta 11+51.18 D L = 124.06’ T = 62.73’ R = 340.00’ SE = .06 RO = 116’ -L- CURVE DATA T O PA R K E R R D. TO BIG LAUREL RD. BRIDGE REMOVE SR 1309 SR 1130 10 POC -L- STA. 11+63.00 - Y 1- -L - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+80.52 END CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+00.00= ENTRANCE CHURCH PAVE 4-1 RELOCATE EXISTING 3SBW N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS DIKE IMPERVIOUS SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ASHE COUNTY BRIDGE # 040285 040285 PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN F L O W DIKE IMPERVIOUS on Slope as Work Allows. Place Matting for Erosion Control PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WORK SITE AND SHALL BE DEWATERED WITH SPECIAL STILLING BASINS. UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION TO CONTAIN THE ALL PHASES: IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BRIDGE REMOVAL DOWNSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE SOUTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 4: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 3: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT UPSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE NORTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 2: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT THE NORTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 1: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: EC-5 / CONST.4 N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS Middlesboro, Kentucky Tri-Cities, Tennessee All Rights Reserved Charlotte, North Carolina Tennessee Knoxville, South Carolina Spartanburg, Asheville, North Carolina Copyright 2006 Vaughn & Melton, Inc.c 704 357 0488 423 467 8401 865 546 5800 606 248 6600 864 574 4775 828 253 2796 Consulting Engineers Scale : 20 10 ’ 10 ’ 8 .6 ’ 9 .4 ’ 10 ’ 10 ’ 9 .3 ’ 10 .1’ SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ASHE COUNTY BRIDGE # 040285 040285 B 1606.01 1606.01 1606.01 1S B K LITTLE LAUREL RD. SR 1310 19’ BST LI T T LE LA U R E L R D. SR 1310 S H E D M T L G R H TR GR EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W SHELTERPICNIC C ONC W AL L 3S B W 18" C MP 3SBW 6 0 . 0 0 ’ CR EEK LI TTLE LA U R EL B S T S GATE MTL GRASS WOODS T T MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 PATSY L. PATRICK DB 388 PG 1529 HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 WARNER ROARK HEIRS DB G-3 PG 244DOUGLAS & ELEANOR MAHALA DB V-5 PG 236 2-E 1-E 3-E 4-E 5-E 2-E DB G-3 PG 244 METHODIST CHURCH LITTLE LAUREL G R A Y B E A L H O L L O W R D . S R 13 11 B S T GRASS EX. RW +25.00 EX. RW +07.56 85.71’ +06.55 86.31’ +96.94 EX R/W +21.23 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.57’ +79.03 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.72’ +81.94 90.00’ +71.00 84.00’ +01.00 74.00’ +88.00 EX. R/W +64.00 EX. R/W +84.00 47.00’ +52.00 59.00’ +79.00 THIS TUE HAS TO SHOW ON R/W DRAWING PLANVIEW PLEASE NOTE TUE IN THE GRID AREA FFF F F C C F F F F F F C F F F F F F F F 18 " R E MO VE P OT S ta . 10 + 0 0 .0 0 10 P C S ta . 10 + 8 8 .4 5 P T S t a . 12 + 12 .5 1 P O T S t a . 14 + 2 1.2 3 - L- STA. 13+50.00 END PROJECT 040285 - L- STA. 10+75.00 BEGIN PROJECT 040285 -L- STA. 11+97.18 BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 12+25.51 END CULVERT PI Sta 11+51.18 D L = 124.06’ T = 62.73’ R = 340.00’ SE = .06 RO = 116’ -L- CURVE DATA T O PA R K E R R D. TO BIG LAUREL RD. TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 BRIDGE REMOVE SR 1309 SR 1130 R=125’ SHOP CURVED 10 POC -L- STA. 11+63.00 - Y 1- -L - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+80.52 END CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+00.00= R=20’ CURVED SHOP ENTRANCE CHURCH PAVE 4-1 RELOCATE EXISTING 3SBW N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS DIKE IMPERVIOUS SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ASHE COUNTY BRIDGE # 040285 040285 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 3 F L O W DIKE IMPERVIOUS on Slope as Work Allows. Place Matting for Erosion Control PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WORK SITE AND SHALL BE DEWATERED WITH SPECIAL STILLING BASINS. UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION TO CONTAIN THE ALL PHASES: IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BRIDGE REMOVAL DOWNSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE SOUTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 4: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 3: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT UPSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE NORTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 2: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT THE NORTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 1: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: EC-6/CONST.4 N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS Middlesboro, Kentucky Tri-Cities, Tennessee All Rights Reserved Charlotte, North Carolina Tennessee Knoxville, South Carolina Spartanburg, Asheville, North Carolina Copyright 2006 Vaughn & Melton, Inc.c 704 357 0488 423 467 8401 865 546 5800 606 248 6600 864 574 4775 828 253 2796 Consulting Engineers Scale : 20 10 ’ 10 ’ 8 .6 ’ 9 .4 ’ 10 ’ 10 ’ 9 .3 ’ 10 .1’ SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ASHE COUNTY BRIDGE # 040285 040285 B 1606.01 1606.01 1S B K LITTLE LAUREL RD. SR 1310 19’ BST LI T T LE LA U R E L R D. SR 1310 S H E D M T L G R H TR GR EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W SHELTERPICNIC C ONC W AL L 3S B W 18" C MP 3SBW 6 0 . 0 0 ’ CR EEK LI TTLE LA U R EL B S T S GATE MTL GRASS WOODS T T MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 PATSY L. PATRICK DB 388 PG 1529 HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNER DB 295 PG 357 GRASS MARION OSBORNE DB P-5 PG 251 WARNER ROARK HEIRS DB G-3 PG 244DOUGLAS & ELEANOR MAHALA DB V-5 PG 236 2-E 1-E 3-E 4-E 5-E 2-E DB G-3 PG 244 METHODIST CHURCH LITTLE LAUREL G R A Y B E A L H O L L O W R D . S R 13 11 B S T GRASS 67.07’ +00.00 47.72 +95.00 62.00’ +55.54 EX R/W +25.00 EX R/W +8.18 EX R/W +25.00 EX R/W +74.50 48.81’ +96.37 63.00’ +88.00 EX. RW +25.00 EX. RW +07.56 47.00’ +52.00 85.71’ +06.55 86.31’ +96.94 EX R/W +21.23 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.57’ +79.03 (MAINTAIN LIMITS) 12.72’ +81.94 90.00’ +71.00 84.00’ +01.00 74.00’ +88.00 EX. R/W +64.00 EX. R/W +84.00 47.00’ +52.00 59.00’ +79.00 THIS TUE HAS TO SHOW ON R/W DRAWING PLANVIEW PLEASE NOTE TUE IN THE GRID AREA FFF F F C C F F F F F F C F F F F F F F F 18 " R E MO VE P OT S ta . 10 + 0 0 .0 0 10 P C S ta . 10 + 8 8 .4 5 P T S t a . 12 + 12 .5 1 P O T S t a . 14 + 2 1.2 3 - L- STA. 13+50.00 END PROJECT 040285 - L- STA. 10+75.00 BEGIN PROJECT 040285 -L- STA. 11+97.18 BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 12+25.51 END CULVERT PI Sta 11+51.18 D L = 124.06’ T = 62.73’ R = 340.00’ SE = .06 RO = 116’ -L- CURVE DATA T O PA R K E R R D. TO BIG LAUREL RD. TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 TYPE TL-2 GRAU 350 BRIDGE REMOVE SR 1309 SR 1130 R=125’ SHOP CURVED 10 POC -L- STA. 11+63.00 - Y 1- -L - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+80.52 END CONSTRUCTION POT -Y1- Sta. 10+00.00= R=20’ CURVED SHOP ENTRANCE CHURCH PAVE 4-1 RELOCATE EXISTING 3SBW N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS DIKE IMPERVIOUS SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ASHE COUNTY BRIDGE # 040285 040285 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 4 F L O W 1633.01 DIKE IMPERVIOUS on Slope as Work Allows. Place Matting for Erosion Control EC 7/CONST. 4 PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WORK SITE AND SHALL BE DEWATERED WITH SPECIAL STILLING BASINS. UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION TO CONTAIN THE ALL PHASES: IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BRIDGE REMOVAL DOWNSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE SOUTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 4: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT THE SOUTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 3: WITH TRAFFIC ON NORTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT UPSTREAM HEADWALLS AND THE NORTHWEST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS, AND PHASE 2: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT THE NORTHEAST SIDE WINGWALL. OF (2) 8’x6’ REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH SILLS AND PHASE 1: WITH TRAFFIC ON SOUTH LANE CONSTRUCT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: N A D 8 3 N S R S 2 0 0 7 (2) 8’ X 6’ RCBC W/SILLS Middlesboro, Kentucky Tri-Cities, Tennessee All Rights Reserved Charlotte, North Carolina Tennessee Knoxville, South Carolina Spartanburg, Asheville, North Carolina Copyright 2006 Vaughn & Melton, Inc.c 704 357 0488 423 467 8401 865 546 5800 606 248 6600 864 574 4775 828 253 2796 Consulting Engineers Scale : 20 10 ’ 10 ’ 8 .6 ’ 9 .4 ’ 10 ’ 10 ’ 9 .3 ’ 10 .1’ B 1606.01 1606.01 r ii � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. �'�� p• � 040285 4 XO �Qj' EST. 7 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP '�� p X (STRUCTURAL PAY ITEM) �, ww SHEET NO. \ EST. 9 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP �O EST. EXCAVATION = 8 CY �2" SPIKE IN ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS y`O � TWIN POPLAR ENGINEER ENGINEER �'�, Lj (STRUCTURAL PAY ITEM) „`O' ��E -L- STA. 13+02.92 '��, � EST. EXCAVATION = 3 CY Lj 91.16� �T + 00.00 ''�, Zy QO QC� 67.07' RELOCATE EXISTING 3SBW '�RION OSBOR��+� ��-;�� T��'1[][�]L]E ]E ][�]L��T� � 4 �"� `�-� �'� :� � .,. `; IID� N�°lf° gJ�IE 1F�lE� % W A��TISI°J[°I�N I'�, cp �-E , � + 71.00 TVE 84 00� N �, c,� O N 90.00 � ��$.��T �$.� ��A�T� 'I, <.� _\ PATSY L. PATRICK �� , �� 62.00' N W '`J� � � �� N��° �� v��rc°�a�z�T � 2 DB 388 Pr ��`� ° PpF � � � G �- ' : , ' � , �� + 95.00 cRASS � j 88.00 `-' `� � '� ti � ; 47.72 , �'�, �w�t � . � 74.00 � � ao �TO,� ,� ° ; ��:� � END CULVERT ,� � Charlotte, , , _ , � � 0 ❑ Nor�l-h Caroltna � � S' 'v9 ' �UI(iif �. �c ��4F��V� � �� ' ��3° ��R'�D � S TL .� '°o REMOVE -L- STA.12+25.5/ k �B 295 Pc = � 704•357•0488 �'� ' ° yED �' + 25.00 F Tri-Cities, � �' �F BRIDGE � , � ❑ Tennessee ' EX R/W 4-1 + 8.18 W ~ ' � k p Vaughn ac Melton 423•467•8401 , , � �--_ __ �II S ; , � � � � Knoxville, �� ° ' EX R/W + 64.00 � + 84.00 ; ° Consulting Engineers ❑ Tennessee \� �5�� „,� l ' ��,u s5o Ex. �w � E/VD PROJECT 040285 865•546•5800 , 3 _ Ex. �w � '' A � ASheVllle, Middlesboro, F � n�E T�-2 0 -- :- � - L- STA.13+50.00 C ° � �t` - �� k ■ North Carollna � Kentucky I = �- �� ,,, � � ----- � ` � -"� SHOP CURVED � � 828•253•2796 606•248•6600 � \\ � � N � R=125' Spartanburg, � , , o F ----- ---------- F , ❑ South carollna i � � �� . . �� . _- C -� � 'i� 25 TAPER TO Copyright �R ghts Reserved Melton, Inc. ----� r --��_- F N 864•574•4775 � � � � � o o �� ;�� F o EXIST (LT & RT) � � i\ �, O � � � o n� o c� (2) 8 X �� / � II � k� F ��.� ,_ � � � �• _ RCBC W ILLS TYPE TL50 \\��✓�/ ' �� '� � � , � -� F , , � -� � s �k _ , �, _ - --------- �, �., o � ,�, � I � 2S Tq� �F\\\ o o ° o o e /► ° _ O� � s s8 3� 29.4 E -L- CURVE DATA � F�-�S,T E , � �I BEGIN PROJECT 040285 _ k _ . � R ro o �, �c, ro ei� �auRE� Ro. � � � SR 1I30 � _ 0 0 � '�� L- STA. l0�'75.00 �� k � �__� � r� o° � �o F� o 0 0 0 0 0 _ o 0 0 � Pl Sto 11+5/.l8 � o. .08 �,• , � �= 2 0° 5 4' 2 5. 1" l L T) '�� '�.� �k , I \k X � ��\\ TYPE TL50 /O -� 19.39' F � ----- `�; � _ �� 'J`�� 6.�n ,'ll � \ � 01 F � ----------- F � L = 124.06' ---- F � T = 62.73' '� ��. +25.00 �� ` -�- s�rA. �2+c�r � �� +74.50 +96.37 � � EX. RW F�� 2i.43' RT T-1 � SHOP EX R/W 48.81� R= 340.�� C U RV E D r R� _��6 � \ � EXISTING R/W SE - .O6 '��, BEGIN CONSTRUCTION �'� �2 00 _ �F R=2o �PS o402� '�� POT -Yl- Sta.10+00.00= � `�J `�=�� +3 U! � _ �\�, �, � � ��o !� -� 02 +07.56 ,o� AO �_E -�- sra. �s .. ; � POC L- STA.Il-f-63.00 \ � EX. RW F � u�.�� u �'�, �o�s � � o � �v + 21.23 ; N OSBORNE � F� o► � - EX � DATUM DESCR I PT I ON ' PG 251 HUGH E. & KAREIS D. WAGNEF ' 1 = +25.00 p THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT �'�, BEGIN CULVERT , 03 �. EX RNV �F DB 295 PG 357 �� -L- STA.Il+97.�5 � w �= IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY � �� +52.00 � �� NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "040285-2" '�, ��1 02 PAVE S`\ 47 00 ' I�ITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF � CHUR H-� --. EST. 1.5 TONS CLAS II RIP RAP NORTHING: 997822.1343(ft) EASTING: 121998.7865(ftl �'�, � 04 ENT RA CE � +88.00 F � STRUCTURAL PAY ITEM ELEVATION: 3068.2o12cft) �', END CONSTRUCTION � 028 42 + 81 4 � �',, '�'-' 63.00' '� � 9 ��-� EST. EXCAVATI O N= 4 CY THE AVERAGE COMB I NED GR I D FACTOR USED ON TH I S PROJ ECT �'�, POT -Yl- Sta.��'8�.J2 F12•72� ~ +79 � THEONND.TOLAMBE�RTIGRIDOBEARING5AND MAIN IN �I TS � 5-E EST. 6 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP �'� +79.03 � � 59" (STRUCTURAL PAY ITEM) LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM : ' � g' g � ' � � +96.94 � 4-E "' � "040285-2" TO -L- STATION 10+75.00 IS '�, C 4 O 2 g 5- I g� i 9 7� O � 7� 3 I� I g I 7 C o g 2 O � O�� 0 5 2 3_�¢ MAINTAIN7 LIMITS 86•31 � ��i�NER ROARK HEIRS EST. EXCAVATION = 6 CY o , „ , � N 46 51 56 � 130.34 '�� 0�0285-2 997g822o13q� 192189�9807865 3068020' �� E �AuRE� � � �B c-3 Pc z44 � , � � DOUGLAS & ELEANOR MAHALA � � + 06.55 �{ q��THODIST CHURCH,� �� ALL L I NEAR D I MENS I ONS ARE LOCAL I ZED HOR IZONTAL D I STANCES I, B�-3 9979963��956 1g218y8�9�7421 _�073044' �� -� Pr� a�� ,_, 85.71 " � � �, � �� ERTICAL DATUM USED IS NA�D 88 ,e _ � ��__��_____�_______��-------------��____________�� , : : : : : -�� °- �:� , . BEGIN GRADE , . . .. , . . _ _ ,. .: . . . .__ ;. ... _ . Yl- STA. l0+10.39 E D GRADE , _ �� . � � 3,076 _' EL = 3,07/J2' - l- STA.1Of80.52 ; 3,076 _ : o . - _ ' _�_ : I - _ _ , BM#1 �� - � _ � � _II _ EL - 3,068.50' � '�, � - N 997889. E 1219135. i �� C L STA 12 + 11.5 7-L- ��- _ _ Pl - 10+20.00 _ _ � � : , , _ �- EL = 3,07/.l7' Pl = 10+55.00 _ �' ELEVATION - 3073.49' �� . Ir� Q� (2)8 x6 RCBC WiSILLS _ � �'�, 12" SPIKE IN TWIN POPLAR I --- -- - - �'I, l� ° VC = l8' EL = 3,069.24' , ' - 'I, O � . SKEW = 37 � � ; - 3,072 K= 3.0 VC = 50' 3,072 '�, � . . , : . - � � � - GP = 3069.96 K = 19.6 _ � BEGIN GRADE - o � e �,� �� -------- - -------__ _ QQ� r+�o.�sooi ss,s2i , ''�� - � -L - ST Ae l0 f75°00 - � � � - � - -�_`-�._,'_° '�� 3 0 7 8 � _ � � - Pl = ll f25°00 � , -------r � , ;. EL 307/a87 ; � . , , � 3,068 �2.��ooi 3,068 , EL = 3,070097' i � � _�� _ ��, _ _ ' �l��l - -- _ � �- --- - - � �-- � - � �� VC 60 i i _ � Pl _ l2 35a00 � � ��,, - K = 8607 � � � _ � ; EL - 3,069076 �� 3,074 . ! . PROPOSED VC = l00 - 3,064 10 + 00 �� 10 + 50 3,064 � � ��. , � �� , I ; . --- - _ --- : _ i _ i � K 67 9 � � �� , _.o-- G RAD E _ �•��.��, . . . . . ° I I , - - - i �� , _ � END GRADE �_ � ��, _ ( -Jlo1076% - � � (-)le1076% (�2e -L - ST Ae l3 f50a00 3, 0 70 5 -.- --- -- '�, 3,070 -�- -, -, - --� -� � (-)1o8000j --�..._��_ 8� o � ' � 0/ --- � - � ------__- __ , EL - 3066e79 , '�, _ PROPOSED l8" P/PE --- --- -------N__ _ _ _ - � _ _ _ -----�--�. � ---- EXISTING l8" PIPE � ''--- - - --- - � , � - - ---- � -- � �'�, 3,066 - ; , , -; _ � �, j � ; ' _ �_ -- --- � � °-----_--�__ � 3,066 ae , � , - � _ . _�_ _ ,-__ ___ _ � �__ . �-___ __ ___ ----- ------ - ° � _ ' � '�, STRUCTURE HYDRAUUC DATA � �' ' - DESIGIy DISCHARGE = 550 CFS E/V D CULV ERT - _ �'�,, DESIGIy FREQUEIyCY = 25 YRS I �� - L- ST Ao /2 f25oJ�I � PIPE HYDRAULIC DATA � �, 3,O(�2 DESIGIy H� ELEVATION - 3068.5 FT �, � BEGIN CULVERT __ �, ExisTiN� �ROUN� !, #4-, 3 062 '�, BASE DISCHARGE = 800 CFS � DRAINAGE AREA = l.8 AC 'i - L- ST Ao ll �97o�S -: :------ _- ___ �_ �_._�_ �_ �_ �_ �_ -_ _ �_ �_ II DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS '�� BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS ' LOV y FLO� S/ LL �, BASE Hy� ELEVATION = 3069J0 fT �ii '��, OVERTOPPI/yG DISCHARGE = 650 CFS � ` DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4.0 CFS W SEL = 30660� DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 3070.00 fT '�� 3 OJ� H OVERTOPPIIyG FREQUENCY = 50 +/�'RS �i � V o= 3062042 _; �� I ��, � OVERTOPPIIyG ELEVATION = 30688 fT � OS�O9�2OI2 �` _� I! l00 YEAR HW ELEVATION =�OJ6 fTS � 3,�58 _ , OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY = 100+ YRS �'�, ', DATE OF SURVEY = N/A II ! �NV o- 306/042 OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 8.0 CFS H�GH FLOW S�LL 01/ERTOPPING ELEVATION = 3070J fT '�� , - �s.EC�vArioN ' - l V o = 3063042 - - - --- - - - - T D TE OF SURVEY = 3066J fT I! N I _ - �� 3, O 5 4 DRAINAGE Af�EA - 1024 ACRES �� ' � � . �, I � 5 � ' ' _ _- - . �_�___� - -- -- ,, , � _�_�_� �_�__ � �_�_ _� �_� _ �___�_� I I I � ; I I � I I � � � : : ; , v --- -- - _ , , : , . I I i I i i i i i I i i.. i i i i i i p i �, i ij i � i; i� i � i i i� �, i� i � I i � � � i � � i � � � i � � � i � i � I +, � � I � I i , I I I P 1 P I I 1 I P I I P 1 P � ; I '�, 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 �'II � r i �i � i � �i � �i C�l � `,I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ', fA ', � ii {f} � � �� +f: �� ff� '� � ', �F? ', �i; ', {fl �� f� �� {�; �� 7. ' L; i fJ-? �. � �� {� . i � �. 0} � �� i W {�; W �i Z fii � �� ` fFi Q �� C� �fi Z �i � � � '� C/� ffl W ', {�} �A U� '� b? +f�� +t} fi3 � �� ff} {1� �} �i {��r`� I f�} ffi �� ' r i �i � i � �i � �i C�l � `,I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ', fA ', � ii {f} � � �� +f: �� ff� '� � ', �F? ', �i; ', {fl �� f� �� {�; �� 7. ' L; i fJ-? �. � �� {� . i � �. 0} � �� i W {�; W �i Z fii � �� ` fFi Q �� C� �fi Z �i � � � '� C/� ffl W ', {�} �A U� '� b? +f�� +t} fi3 � �� ff} {1� �} �i {��r`� I f�} ffi �� ' r i �i � i � �i � �i C�l � `,I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ', fA ', � ii {f} � � �� +f: �� ff� '� � ', �F? ', �i; ', {fl �� f� �� {�; �� 7. ' L; i fJ-? �. � �� {� . i � �. 0} � �� i W {�; W �i Z fii � �� ` fFi Q �� C� �fi Z �i � � � '� C/� ffl W ', {�} �A U� '� b? +f�� +t} fi3 � �� ff} {1� �} �i {��r`� I f�} ffi �� ' r i �i � i � �i � �i C�l � `,I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ', fA ', � ii {f} � � �� +f: �� ff� '� � ', �F? ', �i; ', {fl �� f� �� {�; �� 7. ' L; i fJ-? �. � �� {� . i � �. 0} � �� i W {�; W �i Z fii � �� ` fFi Q �� C� �fi Z �i � � � '� C/� ffl W ', {�} �A U� '� b? +f�� +t} fi3 � �� ff} {1� �} �i {��r`� I f�} ffi �� ' r i �i � i � �i � �i C�l � `,I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ', fA ', � ii {f} � � �� +f: �� ff� '� � ', �F? ', �i; ', {fl �� f� �� {�; �� 7. ' L; i fJ-? �. � �� {� . i � �. 0} � �� i W {�; W �i Z fii � �� ` fFi Q �� C� �fi Z �i � � � '� C/� ffl W ', {�} �A U� '� b? +f�� +t} fi3 � �� ff} {1� �} �i {��r`� I f�} ffi �� ' r i �i � i � �i � �i C�l � `,I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ', fA ', � ii {f} � � �� +f: �� ff� '� � ', �F? ', �i; ', {fl �� f� �� {�; �� 7. ' L; i fJ-? �. � �� {� . i � �. 0} � �� i W {�; W �i Z fii � �� ` fFi Q �� C� �fi Z �i � � � '� C/� ffl W ', {�} �A U� '� b? +f�� +t} fi3 � �� ff} {1� �} �i {��r`� I f�} ffi �� ' Hand Existing Existing PermanentPermanentTemp. Temp. ExcavationExcavationMechanized ClearingPermanentPermanent Temp. Temp. ChannelChannelNatural SheetSiteStationStructureFill InFill InFill InFill Inin in Clearingin SW SW SWSWImpactsImpactsStream No.No.(From/To)Size / TypeWetlandsWetlandsWetlandsWetlands Wetlands Wetlandsin Wetlands WetlandsimpactsimpactsimpactsimpactsPermanentTemp.Design (ac)(sq ft)(ac)(sq ft)(ac)(sq ft)(ac)(ac)(ac)(sq ft)(ac)(sq ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) 41-L- 10+75 to 13+50 (Existing Bridge #285 Site) 2 Barrel 8'x6' RCBC w/Sills 71'- 8" LF of Structure 0.012543.00 71'-8" Structure 140'-4" Rip Rap SHEET TOTAL:0.012543.00212' ATN Revised 3/31/05 SHEET 1 of 1 6/26/2013 WBS - 17BP11.R.55 (04-0285) WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS Ashe COUNTY NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS