NC0005321_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_19990326

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL. OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY:
•
March 26, 1999
Mr. Eric Bolin, Environmental Manager
Buckeye Lumberton, Inc.
1000 E. Noir Street
Lumberton, NC 28359
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Buckeye Lumberton, Inc., WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0005321
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Bolin:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection conducted March
18, 1999.
As part of the inspection a tour of the Wastewater Treatment Plant was
conducted. All observations and recommendations are in Part D. Summary of
Findings/Comments of this inspection report. Please remember it is priority to
discharge a good quality effluent which will not pose any problems to the receiving
stream.
Please review the attached report. If you or your staff have any questions do
not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
/bsh
Enclosures
cc: Beth Walls, USEPA, Reg.IV
•
Belinda S. Henson
Environmental Chemist
Sincgrely,
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE,I NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL -OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5596 RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NPDES COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office.
Section A. National Data System Coding
Transacti6riCode: N NPDES NO. NC0005321 Date: 990318
Inspector: S
Facility Type: 2
Facility Evaluation Rating: 4 BI: N QA: N
,Section B: Facility Data
Name. and Location of Facility Inspected:
Buckeye Lumberton, Inc., WWTP
Entry Time: 10:00am
Exit Time/Date: 1.:45pm/990318
Name(s), Title(s) of On -Site Representative(s):.
Eric Bolin -(Certified Grade IV) -"Environmental Manager"
Ronald Radford -(Certified Grade IV)-"ORC"
Phone Number(s): [phone]
Name, Title and Address of Responsible Official:
Mr. Eric Bolin
1000 E. Noir Street
Lumberton, NC 28359
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
(S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N = Not Evaluated, N/A
; Inspection Type: C
Reserved.
Reserve&
Permit Effective Date: 9810119
Permit Expiration Date: 991130
Contacted: yes
Not Applicable)
Permit: S
Records/Reports: S
Facility Site Review: S
Flow Measurement: S
Laboratory: S
Pretreatment: N/A
Effluent/Receiving Waters: S
Compliance Schedule:
N/A
Self -Monitoring Program: S
Operation & Maintenance: S
Sludge Disposal: S
Other:

Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments:
1. The influent flow is adjusted for pH by a carbon dioxide system. The influent tank appeared to have
mounds of hardened cotton fiber floating on the wastewater. The floating fibers could be eliminated
by a type of mixing system in this area.
2. The Aerobic selector has been installed at the aeration basin to reduce filamentous bacteria and
improve settleability. This component of the wastewater plant has been in operation for few
months. The aeration basin appeared to have adequate aeration. Ammonia and Phosphorus are
added to the aeration basin to give added nutrients necessary for better wastewater treatment.
3. The clarifiers were checked for sludge depth and the following results are as follows: Clarifier #1-10
feet of a 15 feet clarifier, Clarifier #2-11 %z feet of a 15 feet clarifier,'and Clarifier #3-5 feet of a
10 feet clarifier. Catwalks and handrails appeared to be in need of painting. Maintenance of this
nature could eliminate future major repairs.
4. The effluent appeared to be brown in color which is normal forthis type of wastewater. The present
piping which supplies passage of the effluent to the Lumber River will be replaced in the near future.
5. The effluent sample refrigerator did not appear to have thermometers in them for temperature
monitoring. The composite sample temperatures should be maintained at 4°C or less during
sampling.
6. Sludge is transported through a sludge press where it is dewatered and pressed in a cake to be land
applied to permitted land(550 acres).
7. The NPDES permit was available upon request.
8. The effluent flow meter was last calibrated August 8, 1998 by this facility's instrumentation
technician. It is advisable that the flow meter calibration document contain the % error before and
after calibration in the future by the technician.
9. Laboratory data was reviewed for the months July and December, 19918. All data appeared to be
correctly reported. Most NPDES required parameters are analyzed by the on site laboratory. Listed
is the following parameters and the name of the laboratory analyzing them: Test America -Ammonia,
Burlington -Chronic Toxicity and Triangle Lab -Dioxin.
10. A compliance evaluation for the period February, 1998 through January, 1999 concluded that this
facility was in compliance with no violations.

Name and. Signature of Inspector Agency/Office/Telephone
Belinda S. Henson
Name and Signature of Reviewer
Paul E. Rawls
Action Taken
DENR/Fayettevill e/(910)48 6-1541
Agency/Office/Telephone
DENR/Fayetteville/[phone]
Regulatory Office Use Only
Compliance Status
Noncompliance
_Compliance
Date
Date

VERIFICATION, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING EVALUATION CHECKLIST
A. PERMIT VERIFICATION
Mailing Address:
•
lobo j. iiOicr S+ree*
LAni eri-bi'1 At 559
•
Brief Facility Description:
C Ofkm u c 4 o o f trai- e a L. 7 Yn (en
ca,c,u41 C�115 S4-; r1gJ Nc nc.(eeY1 Dd" ) or;'� 'rev nbJal-
pf mat C1ar►�;1 4-'Leon) ecual.'za-�;on %cLi'rtj Oer-aAc n
w1141 e;ent qo 4-;erl 4 ;..nqJ ct0.11 a421_011y lud,je hold; n9
4c n $ and 51 t& ci e
tJ'E- no4 eJalka'ted
QQplrc-a.blc
NEC) No
N/A
1.
Inspection observations verify information contained in
permit..
NEc No
N/A
2.
Current copy of permit on -sits.
N/A
3.
Correct name and mailing address of permittee.
NE GI. No
NE -No
N/A
4.
Facility as described In permit.
.
NE 'e No
N/A
S.
Notification given to EPA/State of new different, or increased discharges.
NE No
WA
6.
Accurate records of i t volume maintained, when appropriate.
NE Ca No
N/A
7.
1
Number and location of discharge points as described In permit.
NE CD No
N/A
8.
Name and location of receiving waters correct.
NE 0e No
N/A
9.
All discharges permitted.
NE Yes No
N/A
10.
Federal Construction Grant funds used to build plant.

B. RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING EVALUATION
NE®No N/A
i. Records and reports maintained as required by permit.
NE No N/A
2. All required information available, complete, and current. ,
NE cp No. N/A
N'E Ye
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
3. Information maintained for 3 years.
N/A
4. Analytical results consistent with data reported on Dgits.
No N/A
No N/A
No N/A
No N/A
No WA
No N/A
No N/A
S. - Sampling and analyses data adequate and include:
a. Dates, times, and location of sampling.
b. Name of individual performing sampling.
c. AnalyticaI methods and techniques.
d. Results of analyses and calibration.
e. • Dates of analyses.
f. Name of person performing analyses.
g. Instantaneous flow at grab sample stations.
NE No N/A
NE No N/A
NE CO . No N/A
6. Monitoring records adequate and include:
a. Flow, pH,DO, etc., as required by permit.
b. Monitoring charts kept for 3 years.
Flow meter calibration records kept..
NE 'e No N/A
7. Laboratory equipment calibration and maintenance reco ids adequate.
NE VIP No N/A
NE C, No N/A
NE 6 No N/A
N-E,No NIA
NE Yes No
NE Yes NoOD)
NE Yes No N/A
NE Yes No N/A
NE Yes No N/A ,
8. Plant records* adequate and include:
a. O8MManual
b. "As -built" engineering drawings.
c. Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance repairs.
d. Equipment supplies manuaL
e. Equipment data cards.
* Required only for facilities built with Federal Construction Grant Funds.
9. Pretreatment records adequate and include inventory of industrial -waste
contributors, including:
a. Monitoring data
b. Inspection records
c. Compliance status Tecords
d. Enforcement actions 1

C. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE STATUS REVIEW
NE Yes No
1. Permittee is meeting compliance schedule.
-. -.
NE Yes No N/A
2. Permittee has obtained necessary approvals to begin construction.
NE Yes No . N/A
3. Financing arrangements complete. .
NE Yes No N/A
4. Contracts for engineering services executed.
1\E Yes No INT/A
S. Design plans and specifications completed.
NE Yes No N/A
6. Construction begun.
NE Yes No N/A
7. Construction on schedule.
NE Yes No N/A
8. Equipment acquisition on schedule.
NE Yes No N/A
9. Construction completed.•
NE Yes No N/A
10. Startup begun.
NE Yes No N/A
11. Permittee requested an extension of time.
NE Yes No N/A ,
12. Permittee met compliance schedule..
,,.

D. POTW PRETREATMENT REQUIREMNTS REVIEW
NE Yes No I)
THE FACILITY IS SUBJECT TO PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS
1. Status of POTW pretreatment program
-
NE Yes No N/A
- a.
The POTW pretreatment program.has been approved
by EPA.
.
' -.
(If not, is approval in progress?
)
?SE Yes No N/A
b.
The POTW is in compliance with the pretreatment
program compliance
t...
schedule. (If not, note why, what is due, and intent
remedy.)
of the POTW to
j
1
•
2. Status of Compliance with Categorical Pretreatment Standards
NE Yes No N/A
a.
How many industrial users of the POTW are
pretreatment standards?
subject to Federal or State.
NE Yes No N/A
b.
Are these industries aware of their responsibility
application standards?
to comply with •. -•
NE Yes No N/A .
c.
Have baseline monitoring reports (403.12) been
industries?
submitted for these
-
L Have categorical industries in noncompliance
submitted compliance schedules?
(on BMR reports)
ILHow many categorical industries on.compliance
meeting the schedule deadlines?
shcedules are
I
NE Yes No N/A
d.
If the compliance deadline has passed, have all
compliance reports?
industries submitted 90-day
.
NE Yes No N/A
e..
Are all categorical industries submitting the required
semi-annual report?
NE Yes No N/A
L
Are all new industrial discharges in compliance
pretreatment standards?
with new source
g.
Has the POTW submitted an annual pretreatment report?
NE Yes No N/A
h.
Has the POTW taken enforcement action against
users?
noncomplying industrial
NE Yes No N/A
1.
Is the POTW conducting inspections of industrial
contributors?
NE Yes No N/A
NE Yes No N/A
3. Are the industrial users subject to Prohibited Limits (403.5)1
and Local Limits more.
stringent than EPA in compliance?
(If not, explain why, including need for revision of limits.)
1 i
Comments:

FACILITY SITE REVIEW' CHECKLIST
A. OPERATION A1'D MAINTENANCE EVALUATION
NE Yj No N/A
1. Treatment units properly operated and maintained.
NE Yes No ®
2. - Standby power or other equivalent provision provided.
NE ®e No N/A
3. Adequate alarm system for power or equivalent failures available.
r ..
NE �e) No N/A
NE ( No N/A
4. Sludge disposal procedures appropriate:
a. Disposal of sludge according to regulations.
b. State approval for sludge disposal received.
i
{.
,
NE 1T�e No N/A
5. All treatment units, other than backup units, in service.
'!
NE t No N/A
6. Procedures for facility operation and maintenance
followed.
NE No N/A
7. Sufficient sludge disposed of to maintain treatment
I
process equilibrium.
taNt Yes No N/A
8. Organizational Plan (chart) for operation and maintenance
provided.
NE (EP No N/A
9. Operating schedules established. 0
i
NE t 'e No N/A
10. Emergency plan for treatment control established.
, .
NE (Y:3) No N/A
NE Yes No CO?
t►TN Yes No NIA
NE t • No N/A
NE lir' No N/A
NE No N/A
NE () No N/A
11. Maintenance record system exists and includes
a. As -built drawings
. b. Shop drawings
c. Construction specifications
d. Maintenance history
e. Maintenance costs
f. Repair history
g. Records of equipment repair and timely return
.I
•
to service
NE CD No N/A
12. Adequate number of qualified operators on -hand
NE V No N/A
13. Established procedures available for training newt operators.
NE CO No N/A
14. Adequate spare parts and supplies inventory main' tained.
NE St No N/A
15. Instruction files kept for operation and maintenance
equipment.
of each item of major
NECONo NIA
Operation and maintenance manual available.
16. Op 1 �
17. Regulatory agency notified of bypassing. (Dates ! - i
NE ea' No N/A
NE Yes No fM"
NE Yes N 4:ffl
NT Yes ()CgriP
18. a. Hydraulic overflows and/or organic oveiloads'experienced.
b. Untreated bypass discharge occurs during power failure.
c. Untreated overflows occurred since last inspection.
Reason:
NE Yes No 42L'
NE Yes No eisa.
NE Yes' No t
d. flows observed in overflow or bypass channels.
e. Checking for overflows performed routiinely.
1. Overflows reported to EPA or to the appropriate State agency as
specified in the permit. I 1 ,

B. SAFETY EVALUATION
(Any No answer will be discussed in the Comment section of the report.)
NE Yes Q , N/A
1. Undiked oil/chemical storage tanks used at facility.
NE ®e No N/A
2. Up-to-date equipment repair records maintained.
NE es No N/A
3. Out -of -service equipment documented with DWQ.
•
J''E d No • 1 N/A
4. Routine and preventive maintenance scheduled/performed
on
time. •
NE No ' N/A
f..
S. Personal protective clothing provided (safety helmets, ear
goggles, gloves, rubber boots with steel toes, eyewashes
protectors,
In labs).
NE 4, No
NE % No
NE CIO
NE 11410, No
NE a No
NE CD No
1\'E Yes No
1\E Yes No
NE © No
NE 'e No
NE Git No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
®
CR20
N/A
N/A
N/A
6. Safety devices readily available:
a...., Fire extinguishers
b. Oxygen deficiency/explosive gas indicator
c. Self-contained breathing apparatus near entrance
d. Safety harness
e. First aid kits
f. Ladders to enter manholes or wetwells (fiberglass
electrical work)
g. Traffic control cones
b. Safety buoy at activated sludge. plants
L Life preservers for lagoons
J. Fiberglass or wooden ladder for electrical work
k. Portable crane/hoist
to
orwooden
I
chlorine room
for
NE (43 No f N/A
7. Plant has general safety structures such as rails around
pits, or wells.
1
or covers
over tanks,
NE ® No N/A .
& Emergency phone, numbers listed.
NE ')No N/A
9. Plant is generally clean, free from open trash areas.
NE CONo N/A
10. Portable hoists, for equipment removal, available.
1 •
'
NE Yes No
11. All plant personnel immunized for typhoid and tetanus.
NE Yes No I (NA)
12. Gas/explosion controls such as pressure -vacuum relief
values, no smoking
signs, explosimeters, and drip traps present near anaerobic
enclosed screening or degritting chambers, and sludgepiping
structures.
digesters,
or gas -piping.
NE & No N/A
13. All electrical circuitry enclosed and identified.
i
NE Ye No N/A
14. Personnel trained In electrical work to be performed as
procedures.
wellies safety
NE er,No
N/A
16. Chlorine safety: oft. SSA but not u.Seek. 4-or
a. NIOSH-approved 30-minute air pack
b. All standing chlorine cylinders chained in place
c. All personnel trained in use of chlorine
_ d. Chlorine repair kit available
e. Chlorine leak detector fed into plant alarm system,
ck'S'ittee#:on
gc- e. LA.ant

PERMITTEE SAMPLING INSPECTION CHECKLIST
A. PERMITTEE SAMPLING EVALUATION
NE No ! N/A
1. Samples taken at sites specified in permit.
NE No N/A
NE Yes ®; NI
Locations adequate for representative samples.
3. Flow proportioned samples obtained when required by
permit.
NE St No N/A
NE No i N/A
NE Sit No
N/A
4. Sampling and analysis completed on parameters specified by�permit.
NE Ca. No ! N/A
NE To No I N/A
ICE No N/A
NE 'e No N/A
. Sampling and analysis done in frequency specified by permit
6, Permittee uses method of sample collection required by permit.
Required method(s): (1_-Grab (4}-Composite
If not, method used is: ( ) Grab ( ) Composite
I
7. Sample collection procedures adequate:
a. Samples refrigerated during composting
b. Proper preservation techniques used
c. Containers and sample holding times before analyses conform to 40
CFR Part 136.3
d. Samples analyzed in timeframe needed (same day, etc.)
NE No N/A
8. Monitoring and analyses performed more often than required by permit. If
so, results reported in permittee's self -monitoring report.
NE Yes 01 N/A
NE Ye No NIA.:
NE Yes No 'I
-40
9. Samples contain chlorine..
10.. Contract laboratory used for sample analysis.
11. POTW collects samples from industrial users in pret Ieatment program.
B. SAMPLING INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND OBSERVATIONS
NE 4i No N/A
NE Yes No N/A
1. Grab samples obtained.
2. Composite sample obtained.
Compostting frequency: i Sompkksl hr. Preservation: oe-
NE D. No N/A
3. Sample refrigerated during compositing.
NE Yes
N/A.
4. Flow proportioned sample obtained.
NE ©e No N/A
5. Sample obtained from facility sampling device.
NE otNo N/A
6. . Sample representative of volume and •nature of discharge.,
NE Yes No
7. Sample split with permittee.
NE Ye No N/A
g. Chain -of custody procedures employed.
NE (9 No N/A
NE Yes (IN-3,' N/A
9. Samples collected in accordance with permit.
10. Excessive form, grease, floating solids observed at the outfall..
Pretied

FACILITY SITE REVIEW CHECKLIST
OPERATION EVALUATION •
i
NE U) No N/A
1. Treatment units properly operated and maintained.•
NE Yes No N/A
2. Standby power or other equivalent provision provided.
- 'i-
NE (a No N/A
3. Adequate alarm system for power or equipment failures mailable.
NE la No N/A
f•
4. Sludge disposal procedures appropriate: •
a. Disposal of sludge according to regulations.
b. State approval for sludge disposal received.
NE 0 No N/A
5. All treatment units other than backup units, in service.
NE e) No N/A
6. Sufficient sludge disposed of to maintain treatment process
equilibrium.
NE EP No N/A
7. Adequate number of qualified operators on -hand.
1
NE ®e No N/A
8. Established procedures available for training new operators.
;
NE 0 No N/A
9. Adequate spare parts and supplies inventory maintained.
•
10. a. Hydraulic overflows and/or organic overloads experienced.
b. Untreated bypass discharge occurs during power
c.. Untreated overflows occurred since last inspection.
Reason:
failure.
NE Yes No (Jt'TA)
NE Yes No 0.);)
NE Yes tan VW.
NoPlant
� N/A
hasgeneral safe structures such as rails around or
11. t?
pits, or wells.
covers
over tanks,
NE © No N/A
12. Plant is generally clean, free from open trash areas.
• •
NE Yes No ON
.
13. Screening:
a. • Manual
b. Mechanical
c. Buildup of debris
d. Screenings properly disposed
`
NE Yes ® N/A
14. Excessive organic content in grit chamber.
NE Yes ® N/A
NE Yes •a N/A
NE Yes ® N/A
NE Yes b N/A
Yes No N/A
NE Yes CD N/A
NE Yes CSb N/A
NE Yes ® N/A
NE Yes ® N/A
15. Primary clarifier:
: a. Excessive gas bubbles
b. Black and odorous wastewater
c. Poor suspended solids removed
d. Excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular
e. Weirs level
f. Weir blockage -
B. Evidence of short circuiting
b. Lack of adequate scum removal
i. Excessive floating sludge
clarifier
t
F;
NE Yes N/A
NE Yes ® N/A
NE Yes 1' N/A
NE Yes ag N/A
NE Yes 49 N/A
16. Activated Sludge Basins
a. Dead spots
b. Failure of surface aerators
c.. Air rising in clumps
d. Dark foam or bad color
e. Billows of white foam
. .

OPERATION EVALUATION (continued)
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
17.
_
Chlorination Basin, Feed and Storage Area
a. Sludge buildup In contact tank
b. Gas bubbles
e. Floating scum or solids . .
•d. -Inadequate ventilation of chlorine feed room
e. • NIOSH-approved 30-minute air pack
f. All standing chlorine cylinders chained in place
Z. All personnel trained in the use of chlorine
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
r
CDi>
N/A
N/A
N/A
18.
Aerobic Digester
a. Excessive foaming in tank 1
b. Noxious odor
c. Mechanical aeration failure
d. Clogging of diffusers
• -
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
•
ZA
19.
Anaerobic Digester
a. Floating cover tilting
b. Gas burner not burning
c. Supernatant has a sour odor
•
N/A
N/A
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
NE Yes No
20.
Sludge Drying Beds .
a. Poor sludge distribution on drying beds
b. Vegetation in drying beds
c. Dry sludge remaining in drying beds
d. Dry sludge stored on site
N/A
N/A
N/A
NE 'e No
N/A
21.
SampIing
a. Are samples collected as specified in permits?
b. Are refrigerated samples kept at 40°C?
c. Samples shipped to certified labs are iced and kept at 410° C.
•
Comments;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A NE
©e No N/A NE
Yes Now NErr 4.
No N/A
Yam' No N/A
NE
NE
V3NoN/A NE
Ye No N/A
NE -
NE 1. Compliance status for all monitoring requirements conta ined;in the permit
during the last 12 month.
2. Compliance status with monthly and weekly averagesldaily Maximum limits
during the last 12 months.
3. Toxicity tests submitted as required? .
Annual Priority Pollutants Analyses results submitted?
5. Are•DMRs signed by the ORC and the permittee?
6. Is the ORC certified at a level equal to or greater than the clalssification of
the facility?
7. Is the facility operating under an SOC or JOC? If so, address compliance
with schedule dates and limits. Include next milestone date contained in the
order.
8. Is the BOD incubator temperature maintained at 20 +/--1° C and is the
• temperature maintained in a Iog for every day of operation? 1
Yes No '/ NE 9. Is the fecal coliform incubator maintained at 44.5 +/- 0.2° C and is the
temperature maintained in a log for every dat of operation?
No N/A NE 10. Is pH, conductivity, temperature, DO taken on -site? Are calibration logs
kept?
Yes No N/A NE
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A_
Yes No N/A
No N/A
Yes No '/
11. Check at least one month of DMR data against the lab sheets or reports from
commercial labs for correctness.
NE., 12. Ask about the method of sampling, mixing, preservation and shipment.
Check the chain -of -custody procedures.
1\
T'E
13. Appearance of effluent/receiving stream.
•
14. Method of sludge disposal
NE 15. Flow meter calibration date (minimum of once per year). Perform
instantaneous readings if possible and compare to mete . Must be less than
10% variation.
I'E 16. Compare flow reading to capacity of facility for the average of the last
calendar year. Greater than 80 to 90%? Include new regulation language If
applicable.
NE
NE
NE
17. Check certification of laboratory performing the analyses.
18. Are ORC visitation logs available and current?
19. Is the facility meeting 24 hour, seven day per week operation ;requirement 11
greater than 5 AMGD? Is there a certified operator on each shift?

No N/A NE
RECORDS AND REPORTING EVALUATION CHECKLIST
1. Are record and reports maintained as required by the permit/consent order?
Y No N/A NE 2. Is a current copy of the permit/consent order on site?
Yoe. No N/A NE 3. What is the expiration date of their permit? t J ue rn btr 30) tlet
Yes N N/A NE ' ' 4. Is the permittee on a compliance schedule and, If so, Is the schedule being met?
5. Are analytical results, consistent with data reported on DMMRs? (Select random
DMRs and compare results to bench sheets for possible discrepancies or
omissions even if reports are prepared using a computer.)
6. Are strip chart recordings and DMRs maintained forthree years and sludge use
and disposal activities maintained for five years?
No N/A NE
No N/A NE
0 No N/A NE
an N/A NE
'e No N/A NE
'e No N/A NE
Yes No N/A NE
Yes N/A NE
No N/A NE
No N/A NE
Yes No CD, NE
(EP No N/A NE
Y No N/A NE
No N/A NE
'e No N/A NE
No N/A NE
63No N/A NE
7. Do sampling and laboratory analytical records clearly identify dates, times, -•
locations and names of individuals performing the sampling and analyses?
8. Are composite and/or grab samples being collected as required by the permit?
9. Are DMRs complete and include all parameters require by the permit?
10. Are the DMRs signed by the ORC and the permittee?
I1. If the limited inspection indicates omissions, laxity or discrepancies in the
preparation of records and data, an in-depth investigation should follow.
12. Is there evidence of falsification of data for DMR reports?
1
13. Are laboratory equipment calibration and maintenance records adequate?
14. Are detailed maintenance records kept for mechanical equipment such as
pumps, motors, aerators, etc.?
15. Are pretreatment records adequate and include permits, monitoring data, and'
inspection reports for industrial user activities?
16. Are flow meter calibration records kept and are accurate records maintained of
influent or effluent flow volumes?
17. Are sludge use and disposal activity records maintained?
18. Do operators meet certification requirements?
19. Does the permittee report noncompliance Information to the regional office
within 24 hours?
20. Is the laboratory certified for all parameters being analyzed?
21. Do operators keep required logs to document required visitation to the facility?

INSPECTION REPORT
UPDATE OPTION: TRX: 5IF KEY: NC0005321INSCEI 990318
SYSMSG: *** DATA ADDED SUCCESSFULLY ***
PERMIT--- NC0005321 REG/COUNTY-- 06 ROBESON_.
FACILITY-- BUCKEYE LUMBERTON, INC. LOC-- LUMBERTON
INS TYPE
CEI
NEXT PLANNED
INSPECTION INSPECTED BY:
DATE: 990318 HSB
REPORT INSPECTION DMR RESPONSE RECEIVED
DATE STATUS STATUS DUE DATE DATE
990326 C C
COMMENTS: