19970506 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20140304

Lenuel Chamberlain, Chairman
Bobby J. Matthews, Vice - Chairman
Jo R. Linville, Secretary- Treasurer
0 F+ — (D'� _--, 0 (p
Van Hemric, Member
Grady Shore, Member
Yadkin Soil and Water Conservation District
December 11, 2013
Ms. Sue Homewood
585 Waughtown Street
Winston - Salem, NC 27105
Dear Ms. Homewood:
We have enclosed copies of the 2013 inspection reports for the Dinkins Bottom and Effie
West/Carl Shore mitigation sites for the Deep Creek 5D project. This is the final report
for Dinkins Bottom site. We have one additional year for the Effie West/Carl Shore sites.
Please let us know as soon as possible if you need any additional information for this
proj ect.
We appreciate all of your help throughout this entire project!
Thank you,
Jason Walker
District Director
Yadkin Soil and Water Conservation District
Ltvl R O - VVATFF -
Veliand�_ St9gr. . !r a:aci�
209 East Elm Street ♦ PO Box 8 ♦ Yadkinville, NC 27055 ♦ 336 - 679 -8052 ext.3

q -1 -off
YEAR 4 (2013) Monitoring Report
Deep Creek Watershed Structure 5D
Mitigation Project
Carl Shore ,Stream Restoration
And
Effie (Jr. West Stream Enhancement
Yi1 <lkul G'01111t1' X61 th 011-oliml
November 2013
Prepared for:
t IS Ariny Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage 'tirade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Prepared by:
Yadkin Soil and Water Conservation District
P. 0. Box 8
Yadkinville, NC 27055
In cooperation with:
I1SDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
1

YEAR 4 (2013) Monitoring Report
Deep Creek Watershed Structure 5D
Mitigation Project
Carl Shore Stream Restoration
And
Effie G. West Stream Enhancement
Yadkin County, North Carolina
November 2013
Prepared for:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Prepared by:
Yadkin Soil and Water Conservation District
P. O. Box 8
Yadkinville, NC 27055
In cooperation with:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Project Overview 1
1 1 Protect Goals and Objectives 1
12 Project Location 2
2 0 Monitoring Success Requirements 2
2 1 Morphologieal Parameters and Channel Stability 2
2 1 1 Dimension 2
2 12 Pattern and Profile 3
2 13 Substrate 3
2 3 Reference Photograph Points 3
2 4 Maintenance and Contingency Plans 4
3 0 Year 4 Monitoring Results 4
3 2 Stream Assessment 4
List of Appendices
Appendix 1 - Figures
Appendix 2 - Monitoring Data
Appendix 3 - Reference Photographs
List of Figures
Figure 1 - Protect Vicinity Map
Deep Creek Watershed Structure 5D Mingation Project
Carl Shore and Llfie G Wcst Stream Mitigation Sites
2
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
Novcmbei 2013

10 Project Overview
The Deep Creels Mitigation Project (Site) is located in Yadkin County, North Carolina within the
Northern Inner Piedmont Eco- Region of the Yadkin River Basin (USGS HUC 03040105) The
Site consists of three separate mitigation projects that are a component of the mitigation plan to
address wetland and stream impacts resulting from the construction of the multiple- purpose
Structure 5D The Structure 5D is part of the Deep Creels Watershed Work Plan that was
apps ovcd for operations on January 3, 1958 The project was authorized through the Watei shed
Protection and flood Prevention Act - Public Law 83 -566, as amended (US U S C 1001 - 1008)
The project sponsors are the Yadkin Soil and Water Conservation District and Yadkin County
Board of Commissioners
Structure 5D is a multiple- purpose structure that was designed for flood prevention and
municipal/industries water supply in the Deep Creels Watershed The Structure 5D is located on
South Deep Creek immediately upstream from old US 421 and has a drainage are of 25 1 square
miles (sq mi ) The surrounding land use consists of forestland, cropland grassland, and
miscellaneous or built -up land Approximately 15,000 linear feet (11) of stream were inundated
due to the permanent pool of Structure 5D. T lus included 10,000 if of South Deep Creels and
5,0001f of unnamed tributaries Both stream and wedand mitigation issues were addressed within
°this project
1 1 Protect Goals and Objectives
The following mitigation goals were established within the Deep Creek Watershed to compensate
for the unavoidable loss of streams
1 Restore approximately 1,437 If of stream along Carl Shore,
2 Enhance approximately 351 if of stream along Carl Shore,
3 Preserved approximately 883 if of stream along Carl Shore by fencing out livestock
from accessing the stream project area,
4 Enhance approximately 585 If of stream along Effie G West, and
5 Improve floodplain and streambank vegetation along Carl Shoic and Effie G West
The Carl Shore and Effie G West stream channels were designed and constructed as B -type
channels In- stream structures, such as rootwads, log vanes, and cross vanes were used to control
streainbed grade, reduce stress on streambanks, and promote bed form sequences and habitat
diversity Strcambanks were stabilized using a combination of erosion control matting, seeding,
and livestakes A total of 1,437 if of stream was restored, 351 If enhanced, and 88311 preserved
within the Carl Shore site and approximately 585 if was enhanced along the Effie G West site
This report serves as the Year four 2013 annual monitoring report of the five year monitoring plan
for the Carl Shore Stream Restoration Site and the Effie G. West Stream Enhancement site of the
Deep Creels Mitigation Protect
Deep Creek Watershed Strructurc 5D mitigation Protcct Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Rcpoi t
Carl Shore and Effie G West Stream Mitigation Sites November 2013
3

12 Project Location
The Carl Shore Stream Restoration Project and the Effie G West Stream Enhancement Project
are located west of the Town of Yadlunville The projects are located in the Yadlun -Pec Dec River
Basin Catalog Unit 03040105 with a watershed land use dominated by rural pasture land and
forest Carl shore is a second order streann with an approximate drainage area of 3 69 square
miles Effie G West's unnamed tributary is a first order stream with an approximate drainage aica
of 0 53 square miles
To access the site from Charlotte, North Carolina, take Interstate 77 North for approximately 62
miles and lake exit 73A (US -421 South) Take exit 263 (US -21) toward Jonesville /Statesville and
turn left onto US -21 at the end of the exit ramp Take US -21 approximately 15 miles and turn
right onto Longtown Road Approximately 1/2 mile down Longtown Road turn right onto Ireland
Road The Carl Shore strewn Restoration Project will be on your right approximately 0 7 miles
down Ireland Road The Effie G West Stream Enhancement Project will be on your right
approximately 12 miles down Ireland Road Please refer to Figure 1 for a location map of the
project sites
2 0 Monitoring Success Requirements
Annual monitoring will consist of collecting the morphological and vegetative data to assess the
project success based on the restoration goals and objectives Specifically, the success of the site
will be assessed using measurements of the stream channel's dimension, pattern, profile, substrate
composition, permanent photographs, and vegetation sampling The sites will be monitored for
five years (beginning in 2010) with an annual monitoring report submitted to the corps within 30
days of the monitoring activities
2 1 Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several months that follow
construction and some change /variation subsequent to that is also to be expected Over tune this
variation should demonstrate maintenance around some acceptable baseline with maintenance of
or even a reduction in the amplitude of variation There should be no trend toward aggradation or
degradation over the course of the five year monitoring period
2 1 1 Dimension
Cross - section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross - sections, however,
sonic change is natural and expected Any changes that occur will be evaluated to determine
whether the adjustments are indicative of movement toward an unstable condition or whether it is
natural and something to be expected The following thresholds will be considered indicators of
instability if 1) W/D ration increases by more than 10 to 15 percent,2) BHR increases by more
than 25 to 30 percent, or 3) change in stream classification (for example a change from a C/E to a
F/ G)
Deep Creek Watershed structure 5D Mitigation Protect Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
Carl Shore and Effie G West Stream mitigation Sites Novembci 2013
4

2 12 Pattern and Profile
The Channel's profile should not demonstrate any trends in thalweg aggradation or degradation
over any significant continuous portion of its lengd -i Annual measurements should indicate stable
bed features with little change from the as -built ranges Riffle /Pool facets and pattern features
should illustrate minimal adjustments over the five year monitoring period Although a pool cross -
section may experience periodic infilling due to watershed activity and the timing of events relative
to monitoring, the majority of the pool cross - sections need to be maintained over time and the
rates of lateral migration need to be minimal The following thresholds will be considered
indicators of instability if 1) facet slopes increase by 50 percent, 2) Riffle /Pool bed feature spacing
shifts are greater than one bankfull width, and 3) the longitudinal profile water surface slope
increases by more than 20 percent
2 13 Substrate
Substrate measurements should indicate the progression towards, or the maintenance of the
known distributions from the design phase The D50 and D84 should coarsen over the live year
monitoring period Generally riffles will cont,,un coarser material and the fines will deposit in the
pools Fluctuations in the substrate composition may occur over the five year monitoring period
Any change should be evaluated as to wheather is a localized change or something larger out of the
project area The following threshold will be considered a cercern 1) the D50 increases by 30
percent and 2) the substrate composition has an increase of silky and /Or sand by more than 50
percent
2 3 Reference Photograph Pomts
Pci manent photographic reference points established along the channels will be used to suppoi t
the qualitative visual assessments for the annual monitoring and subjectively evaluate channel
aegradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of
erosion control measures Reference photographs looking upstream and downstream were taken
at each photo point Subsequently, assessments following the year one survey should capture the
same reference photograph
Deep Creek Watershed Structure 5D Mitigation Project Year 4 of 5 Monitou ng Report
Cai 1 Shore and Lffic G West Stream mitigation Sites November 2013

2 4 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
Potential problem areas, such as streambank instability, aggradation /degradation, or unsuccessful
vegetation establishment will be evaluated during the annual monitoring I1, during the annual
review of the strewn reach, a failure is noted, the areas will be evaluated and discussed with
appropriate personnel to determine if remedial maintenance measures are required to resolve the
problem 11 remediation of an area is required, a proposal will be submitted for the needed work
3 0 Year 4 Monitoring Results
Results from the 2013 stream monitoring effort indicate that the Carl Shore and Ellie G West
sites are maintaining vertical and lateral stability with minimal bank erosion Although some areas
are illustrating minor erosion, visual assessments along the channel indicated that there are no
mayor advancements toward instability within the sites
3 2 Stream Assessment
Cv/Sholc Slrearri RcsioraLlon
Overall, the present stream dimensions along Carl Shore appear to be stable The average
bankfull area is 35 9 sq ft of the surveyed cross - sections, the proposed was 47 Oft The average
surveyed mean bankfull depth is slightly lower (1 48 ft) than the proposed 2 1 ft The surveyed
bankfull widths and depths lead to an average Wrdth/Dcpth (W /D) ratio of 18 02 with
a sinuosity of 1 24 The thalweg profile appears to be stable, and was characterized by well- defined
riffle and pool features The average water surface slope and the average bankfull slope were very
similar for the surveyed reach, 0 0058101, and 0.0033ft /ft The substrate analysis illustrates a
diverse and stable substrate material and available habitat with little fine deposition occurring
Based on the above defining stream dimension characteristics from the 2013 monitoring year, the
stream was classified as a B4c The log structures are stable and functioning as constructed
Deep Creels Watershed structure 5D Mitigation Project Year 4 or 5 Monitoring Report
Carl Shore and Elfic G West Stream mitigation Sites November 2013

r
Elric G Wcsl Streian Enku2cemenl
Based on the current stream dimensions along Effie G West,, the enhancement, area appears to be
stable The average bankfull area (16 25 sq IL) and the average mean banklull depth (0 1 18 It) of
the surveyed cross- secuons are both within the proposed ranges of 114-17 3 IL and 0 79 -1 24 It,
respectfully The surveyed ban1dull widths and depths lead to an average Width/Depth (W /D)
ratio of 12 6 with a sinuosity of 123 The thalweg profile appears to be stable, and was
characterized by well - defined riffle and pool features The average water surface slope and the
aveiage banldull slope were very similar for the surveyed reach, 0 0145ft /ft and 0 0152 ft/IL,
respectively The substrate analysis illustrates a diverse and stable substrate material and available
habitat, with little fine deposition occurring Based on the above defining stream dimension
characteristics from the 2013 monitoring year, the stream was classified as a B4
In summary, the Carl Shore and Effie G West, sites have met the stream mitigation goals for
monitoring year 4 The pattern, profile, and dimension of the restored channel and the two
streams appear to be maintaining vertical and lateral stability with stable structures and minimal
bank erosion A few problem areas were observed, such as moderate bank erosion and beavei
damage at. Shore site (7 beaver were removed) However, these areas of stream instability do not
appear to be trending towards instability These areas will continue to be monitored closely for
shifts in IuLure monitoring years The background information provided in tlus rcporL is
referenced Irom the mitigation plan Please refer to Appendix 2 for more detailed stream data
tables and plots for monitoring year four and Appendix 3 for representative photographs
Deep Creek Watershed Structure 5D Mitigation Protect
Carl Shore and Effie G West stream Mitigation Sites
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
November 2013

APPENDIX 1 - FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Vicuuty Map
Deep Creek Watei stied Structure 5D Mitigation Protect
Carl Shore and Eific G West Stream Mitigation Sites
0
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
November 2013

Ai
V
Effie G. West '
- Stream/River %
1,000 500 0 1,000 PROJECT VICINITY MAP
MEMEMENER— �Weet DEEP CREEK WATERSHED STRUCTURE 5D STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
1 inch = 1,000 feet CARL SHORE AND EFFIE G. WEST STREAM MITIGATION SITES
YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
to
N
0AVIE
FORSYTH
FIGURE I
NOVEMBER 2010
r
Irb 1 `1
7i
toz
0
Carl Shore
ee
Ilk
.4
LEGEND.
R CE RD—if
Project Location
Ai
V
Effie G. West '
- Stream/River %
1,000 500 0 1,000 PROJECT VICINITY MAP
MEMEMENER— �Weet DEEP CREEK WATERSHED STRUCTURE 5D STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
1 inch = 1,000 feet CARL SHORE AND EFFIE G. WEST STREAM MITIGATION SITES
YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
to
N
0AVIE
FORSYTH
FIGURE I
NOVEMBER 2010

Carl Shore Site IIW
�'w
F
Effie West Site
Site Location Map
4r
OP

APPENDIX 2 - MONITORING DATA
Longitudinal Plots
Cross- Section Plots
Pebble Count Plots
Deep Creek Watershed Structuie 5D Mitigation Pioject Year 1 of 5 Monitoring Report
Cail Shoie and Effie G West Stream Mitigation Sites November 2010

i
Carl Shore Site
Stream Mitigation
)eep Creek W/S r•
Yadkin County, NC i:�
. .. �� "!F •'S. sJ' t�'' Pit .v to (�,• ..a€
�C. C
f0! T;ai• ±.�"' z s � r1y �i�, �. �r',� 'iii.
•Wr
Legend
�„ z.• � 4*r`� '� i Vii. *. � � -
A Survey Hubs
;j X- Section Points
Photo Locations
FAI
�, ►' V
AN
XV
ITi
�}
C�
r
.YYS a�
a L
'100
IS
s t .
1 �.�
T. j
1'� 3
Et M.f s fif.�
10
r
¢�
Oz
�. AAA. a
• A
,�•r ; �� R ' -Ti Y
200 300 400
Feet
- -�— -- --
n� ; T
FAI
�, ►' V
AN
XV
ITi
�}
C�
r
.YYS a�
a L
'100
IS
s t .
1 �.�
T. j
1'� 3
Et M.f s fif.�
10
r
¢�
Oz
�. AAA. a
• A
,�•r ; �� R ' -Ti Y
200 300 400
Feet
- -�— -- --

.., - .• e• .1. h
Effie G. West
ment
Stream Enhance
Yadkin County, NC
•�r ���"' °L't -' \) \t�IT /•. `:t . i..[F wp 't4,.y.` -r „r�t�+
LEGEND
cations
Photo LO
1 i `3s. r�� .. - t.. �yi._ � � ✓� +� �' yip
e - :Y
Syr.- . f q• -. \!. a ..
S , \_ •� 1 1 \ 'A (rt i1jO1 tT- Y1f��'/4 'l, R
�ti'G �y _ ,a \� - '1Y'`, ♦_ .. � �� C ,i ,��? -T•" � .�Y, \. ..ail
tO
v�c �ki i ?n
.iii ) 1� ) ';� - •_t _ -'- ] - t - 1 \' \ .� ' - _

EA
874 - -- n
-- - - - -
e
Carl Shore Mitigation Site 0
Longitudinal Profile
872 z
2013 Monitoring Year
A
870
- 1 ` v
o
868 - - o
fD
A
A
v
A. A 3
A ♦ A. �
866 - - ._ A:
o,
o.
u
864
o— Thalweg
—a —Water Level
m
862 ♦ Bankfull -- - -
F• Cross Section Locations
j I rD
860 v
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Q
i

Yadkin County, NC Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
877
876
875
874
873
872
871
870
869
868
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
X- Section #1, STA 2 +19, Riffle
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Nov -11
Aug -12
Aug -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft2)
48.35
45.74
27.2
19.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.15
27.5
23
20.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.72
1.66
1.18
0.95
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.86
2.67
1.88
1.32
Width /Depth Ratio
16.37
16.57
19.5
22
Entrenchment Ratio
1.69
1.64
1.35
1.2
Stream Type
B
64a
B3
Sinuosity
1.24
1.25
1.25
Channel Materials D50 size in mml
15
22
90

Yadkin County, NC
877
876
875
874
873
872
871
870
869
868
867
Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
866 -- -- i- - - --- - -- .
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
X- Section #2, STA 2 +52, Pool
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Nov -11
Aug -12
Aug -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
57.92
58.1
52.6
54.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
26.85
26.5
26
25
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.16
2.19
2.02
2.19
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.68
3.63
3.55
3.42
Width /Depth Ratio
12.43
12.1
12.87
11.4

Yadkin County, NC Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
878
877
876
875
874
873
872
871
870
869
868
867
866
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
X- Section #3, STA 5 +77, Riffle
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Nov -11
Aug -12
Aug -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft2
48.66
48.48
34.2
35.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
27.65
28.5
22
23
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.76
1.7
1.55
1.51
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.74
2.92
3.1
2.51
Width /Depth Ratio
15.71
16.76
14.2
15.2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.77
1.93
1.7
1.2
Stream Type
B
B4
B4
Sinuosity
1.24
1.25
1.25
Channel Materials D50 size in mm
13
45
44

Yadkin County, NC Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
870
877
876
875
874
873
872
871
870
869
868
867
866
865
864
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
X- Section #4, STA 6 +01, Pool
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Nov -11
Oct -12
Oct -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft2)
47.1
41.85
46.8
47.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
29.98
27
28
27
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.57
1.55
1.67
1.77
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.41
3.42
3.64
3.64
Width /Depth Ratio
19.1
17.4
16.8
15.3

Yadkin County, NC
873
872
871
870
869
868
867
866
865
864
863
0
Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
X- Section #5, STA 10 +52, Riffle
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Nov -11
Aug -12
Dec -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
37.94
30.44
41.6
23.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.76
25.3
30
17.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.47
1.2
1.39
1.33
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.57
2.31
2.83
2.58
Width /Depth Ratio
17.52
21.08
21.6
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio
> 2.2
2.98
2.6
4.4
Stream Type
C
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.24
1.21
1.22
Channel Materials D50 size in mm
11
10
13

Yadkin County, NC Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
873
872
871
870
869
868
867
866
865
864
4 ._� .
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
X- Section #6 , STA 10 +90, Pool
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Nov -11
Oct -12
Dec -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft2)
47.42
34
28.8
34.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
43.97
43.3
44
31
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.08
0.78
0.65
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
3.07
3.21
2.76
Width /Depth Ratio
40.71
55.64
67.7
31

Yadkin County, NC Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
Pebble Count - Carl Shore Site, Riffle - X- Section # 1, STA 2 +19
100
90
c
s 80
70
w
60
50
E 40
0
30
20
10
0
0
100.0
4111f
c
t 80.0
70.0
w
d 60.0
m 50.0
= 40.0
v
30.0
20.0
10.0
N
Co! "Nes Boulder, Bedrock
Particle Size (mm)
Pebble Count - Carl Shore Site, Pool - X- Section # 2, STA 2 +52
Sands Gravels cobbles Boulde S Bedrock
Particle Size (mm)
9
Im

Yadkin County, NC Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
III
4
C
t 80
70
w
d 60
2 50
40
U
30
20
10
0
0
100.0
41x(
c
80.0
= 70.0
d 60.0
m 50.0
40.0
U
30.0
20.0
0.0
0
Pebble Count - Carl Shore Site, Riffle - X- Section # 3, STA S +77
, .. Cobbles Boulders Bedrock
Particle Size (mm)
Pebble Count - Carl Shore Site, Pool - X- Section # 4, STA 6 +01
Me
cobbles Boulders Bedrock
Particle Size (mm)
Ills]

Yadkin County, NC
100
90
c
t 80
r
L
70
w
d 60
2 50
40
U
30
20
10
0
0
100.0
"11111
c
t 80.0
w
L
70.0
t�
d 60.0
50.0
40.0
U
3 0. 0
20.0
Carol Shore Stream Mitigation Site Deep Creek Watershed
Pebble Count - Carl Shore Site, Riffle - X- Section # 5, STA 10 +52
Sarin Gra;ei_ Cobbles Boulders Bedrock
10.0
0.0
n
Particle Size (mm)
Pebble Count - Carl Shore Site, Pool - X- Section # 6, STA 10 +90
ail
Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock
Particle Size (mm)
oo

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
X- Section #1 - Riffle
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep-1 0
Oct -11
Aug-1 2
Aug-1 3
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft2)
17.15
16.06
12.8
14.8
Bankfull Width ft
17.65
22
16
17
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.97
0.73
0.8
0.87
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.96
1.75
1.57
2.2
Width/Depth Ratio
18.2
30.1
20
19.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.93
1.95
2.5
2.35
Stream Type
B4
B4
B5
Sinuosity
1.3
1.4
1.25
Channel Materials D50 size in mm
25 mm
19 mm
0.7 mm

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
0 min
Iva rl. III
. , N 1i1111111 �I:: l
1 0.2 104 malls
mini,
so on
r■0 min EN i°
n6..sC.C�
iiiiiiion
■■■■■■■■■■■■
m■m■■■■■mm■m
m■m=■■■■■mnm
■■■ ■■■■■■■■
one non an
omnmm■■■■■ ■
soon
ml.■'n.n .■i
11�■■�
onmroiiiii ■
............
886
885'
0
Effie G. West Site - Pool
Cross Section #2, STA 3 +29
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
X- Section #2 - Pool
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep-1 0
11 -Oct
Aug-1 2
Aug-1 3
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft2)
16.77
11.6
18.8
16.8
Bankfull Width ft
13.89
11.5
15
12
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.21
1.01
1.25
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.26
2.07
1.85
2.43
Width/Depth Ratio
11.45
11.4
12
b _57
Entrenchment Ratio
3.15
3.35
2.87

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
X- Section #3 - Pool
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Oct -11
Aug -12
Aug -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
16.77
10.8
15.6
19.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.89
15
15.2
15.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.21
0.72
1.03
1.27
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.26
1.56
2.19
3.5
Width /Depth Ratio
11.45
20.8
14.76
12.13
Entrenchment Ratio
1 3.15
1 1.91
2.3
2.2

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
895
894
893
892
41
V91
w
c
0890
m
89
888
887
886
885
0
Effie West Site - Riffle
Cross Section #4, STA 6 +50
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Station in feet
X- Section #4 - Riffle
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
Sep -10
Oct -11
Aug -12
Aug -13
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
14.58
10.03
11.4
13.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.85
12.5
13.8
11.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.87
0.8
0.83
1.17
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.33
1.17
1.38
1.69
Width /Depth Ratio
19.4
15.6
16.6
10.2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
2.0
2.3
2.2
Stream Type
B4
B4c
B4
Sinuousity
1.3
1.4
1.21
Channel Materials D50 size in mm
32 mm
19 mm
i 11 mm

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
XIII ME
MEM
= i:ell :� chi: €iron 111:�I
• E:E� =_IIIi i:�Ei:'-' =. �E���II1� E€ °:I11� = == E €::C�� °: EE�IIN
1
NO MEN 11HIM11 MEN 1111101111111 I'll 111111111E111 111111Ili
' ' ; ®® E1lliii��® l�I�ai��E��llll® IE_�iI1IlI��i�E����II��sEglllil
� ®E=E�1111 ®���illll� �E111I11��E €�!lIII ®E �E6�Ill1�= �E��IIII
��E�€ Ili! ��' E�9IiII��E�lli11 ®�E��lilll�i9E ®Illli�= SEE €IIII �
1
' ®EEEEeei�E�SEI�eeE�i�il� M E�aEEEIi €iE =E=
- 1 1 1 1 11 111 1111
Ffi;r West -R;f a Particle Size(mm) Total ## % Cum. Cumulative (finer than)
X- Section =1
Sgt/Clay
0.062
10
9.1
0.062
S
N.ery Fine
0.062 -0.12
7
15.5
0.125
A
N
Fine
0.125 -0.25
10
24.5
0.25
Medium
025 -0.50
17
40.0
0.5
D
Course
0.50 -1.0
23
60.9
1
Very Course
1.0 -2.0
12
71.8
2
G
R
A
v
E
L
Very Fine
2 -4
14
84.5
4
Fine
4 -5.7
3
87.3
5.7
Fine
5.7 -8
5
91.8
8
Medium
8 -11.3
1 2
93.6
11.3
Medium
11.3 -16
1
9.1.5
16
Course
16 -22.6
0
94.5
22.6
Course
22.6 -32
3
97.3
32
N7ery Course
32 -45
1
98.2
45
Verb' Course
45 -64
98.2
64
Small
64 -90
98.2
90
e
Small
90 -128
1 1
99.1
128
e
Large
128 -180
0
99.1
180
Large
180 -256
1
100.0
256
o
°
Small
256 -362
100.0
362
Small
362 -512
100.0
512
Medium
512 -1024
100.0
1024
`
Large -Vry Lrg
1024 -2048
100.0
2048
Bedrock
X2048
1 100.0
1 3000

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
•, , E6111i1����1�ill® ��ail�l��e6e !llii�16'S���61i��e��iE1111
® 6611l I��E�i�Ili� 'aiE��llll�lSEB�i11i��IN U EE Ili
1 1 �� 11� rmC�' %'�EE I i6 � -eE ! :� ® 11i - - ■�E _ ® :�
- - -•1 - -• ►ice E ■:a �� - -�11: -- I -BE. lil
Mpg III iii�III MOR ■ II 111
.1 1 6E:1 p ►,, 1: �::e = m ■61Im1: 2: � =1� °■EE :1 !
� E ■ ■Ill���i�a�lll■�e ®E5:ill 111/110111 ■i��■ mill il� ■: 3■ ■1111:
=Ell el E� 1 :1 =° - 6 1:
MEN ■..11..:J6��11.a edE ■■:161��_6�Ill. i� ■g.e6:..-- Ee��li!
1 1 D■ ._W ■■ D ■ o ■ ■III : 'm!
E.91111m�E_ ■'E,Ilic��ee�111 e:E =�llli
11 m '�1e111�6�l.l
1 1 ® ill H M= MEN
�lllli� E @IIlII� " �:�BII�i� :EE6�1C�1
1 1
111111111 M■ __ ■ ...___ .� --0I1 - e■:... - - -e ....
1 1 :6�llll��e��lllla�E�11111�� E�!llRM1111: 111M11E 111
- 1 1 1 / 11 111 1111
Effie West -Pool
X- Section =2
Particle
Size(mm)
Totals
%Cwn.
Cumulative (finer than)
Silt Clay
<0.062
20
19.S
0.062
S
A
eery Fine
0.062 -0.125
12
31.7
0.125
Fine
0.125 -0.25
11
42.6
0.25
N
Medium
0.25 -0.50
13
55.4
0.5
D
Course
0.50 -1.0
16
71.3
1
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
14
S5.1
2
G
R
A
V
E
L
Very Fine
2 -4
9
94.1
4
Fine
4 -5.7
4
9S.0
5.7
Fine
5.7 -S
1
99.0
8
\Medium
8 -11.3
1
100.0
11.3
\Tedium
11.3 -16
1
100.0
16
Course
16 -22.6
100.0
22.6
Course
22.6 -32
100.0
32
Very Coarse
32-45
100.0
45
Very Coarse
45 -64
100.0
64
0
e
Small
64 -90
100.0
90
Small
90 -128
100.0
128
6
Large
128 -180
100.0
180
Large
180 -256
100.0
256
o
L
D
Small
256 -362
100.0
362
Small
362 -512
100.0
512
\tedium
512 -1024
100.0
1024
Large XryLrg
1024 -2045
1 100.0
2048
Bedrock
>2048
1 100.0
3000

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
., , ���EE6lIli�EEllll����ae ��llE����E !�9iI��E���lIIl�E�i�Ellil
��ilil���® �EElliiil��iiiilll�i ®iEEI;III�EEi_�EEIII�E�iEE�III
11 ��E6"• • :��i���lIII��EE:IIII��EEE1::ll I:JEEEI:I�eI:�E =EEII:
.1 1 ::: �El €E =0sE ■ 3•�EE= MI :'� °II - -EEESEall
I
.... ...7 11 ■ 111 -- ... - --•
1 1 �eEEF.:::�,= �EEE��7��EEE3�: CO EI�:C CEE EE:1'.: ■�e:E C■:
� ®Elllll���_ EEE' II��iEEllll ®�aEEi!III ®E�EElIa���E�alElll
��iillll� '- �EEEIIII��EiEilll ®�Eili;ell�EEiiEEa::�EEEEEEiII
IEEE p B EE =E_'; E ""gB:: EE= :
1 E611= =E =:E I �E_= -!:: :E_EE9 : :: : =_E. �
EE eEa�0�J5EEE�EII��CEEE I SEE °I;a =1�iEEEEEEa::EEEEE�I =�
11 ® EEe��II��EEEiIaI�e�Egill il ® ®EEE1sa1I�EE ® ®EE�9!�EEEEEI�iI
1 1 1 1 11 111 1111
Effie West -Pool
Particle
Size(mm)
Total=
4o Cum.
Cumulative (finer than) i
X- Section #3
Silt'Clay
<0.062
20
20.0
0.06211
S
A
N
D
Very Fine
0.062 -0.125
14
34.0
0.1251
Fine
0.125 -0.25
21
55.0
0.2511
\Tedium
0.25 -0.50
20
15.0
0.5
Course
0.50 -1.0
1 16
91.0
111
VervCoarse
10. 0 -2.0
4
95.0
211
G
t'ervFine
2.4
3
9S.0
4i
Fine
4 -5.7
1
1 99.0
5.71
R
A
V
E
Fine
5.7 -S
1
100.0
8
\Tedium
8-11.3
100.0
11.31
\Tedium
11.3 -16
100.0
161
Course
16 -22.6
100.0
22.61
L
Course
22.6 -32
100.0
321
Very Coarse
3245
100.0
45
Very Coarse
45 -64
100.0
64%
c
Small
64 -90
100.0
901
0
e
Small
90 -128
100.0
128'
e
Large
128 -180
100.0
180;
Large
180 -256
100.0
256
o
Small
256 -362
100.0
3621
D
Small
362 -512
100.0
5121
\Tedium
512 -1024
100.0
102411
LareeXry Lrg
1024 -2045
100.0
204811
Bedrock
>2048
100.0
1 300011

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
= N
=111 0
�ii!®_ ���iill��e:° �ill���r6i :�il��9�■eeEl�Eiie��teii
-1:11
CCC ®eii -� 8 ! ■ _ : .��o ■r :i: gE ■�1BiEEEE ■eEEEE1t
• 1 1 ��EoE�ii��� ®Ei:laE :i��= a ■EEo.ii
1 1 I���5low!I -iE�E_eiil���FE-E_Eii!
1 1 0000 �: •- -:3:1: - e:
�111411i ®oESE ®EE1.i �� -�Eii
11 ::■ ®= iiieo :lElsii :� ®�== ■_ ■e Iii e� E ■N: :I
- •0000 ::. =e "�C -� :
11 onE' :i� @E11���il
Mi mill!!!
11 1 1 11 111 1111
Effie Rest -Riffle Particle Size(nun) Total ii % Cum. Cumulative (finer than)'
k- Section = 4
Sflt'Clay
<0.062
1
0.9
0062,
S
N'ery Foie
0.062-0.125
11
10.3
0.125;
A
N
D
Foie
0.125 -0.25
26
32.5
0.251
Medium
0.25 -0.50
2
34.2
0.5'
Course
0.50 -1.0
6
39.3
1
Vern Course
1.0 -2.0
10
47.9
2
G
R
A
V
L
L
N'ery Fine
2 -4
2
49.6
41
Fine
4 -5.7
1
50.4
5.7
Fine
5.7 -8
3
53.0
81.
Medium
8 -11.3
6
58.1
11.31
Medium
11.3-16
7
64.1
16
Course
16 -22.6
10
72.6
22.6
Course
22.6 -32
3
75.2
32
Very Course
32 -45
4
78.6
45;
Very Course
45 -64
15
91.5
641,
SmaU
64 -90
4
94.9
90
0
e
B
Small
90 -128
2
96.6
1281
Large
128 -180
4
100.0
180;
Large
180 -256
100.0
2561.
o
°
Small
256 -362
100.0
362 i
Small
362 -512
100.0
512;
Medium
512 -1024
100.0
1024
Large-Vrv_ Lrg
1024 -2048
100.0
2048
Bedrock
>2048
100.0
3000

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Mitigation Site August 29, 2013
Stream Channel Classification
Stream
Name:
Wbkf
Effie G. West Site - Cross Section # 4,
Riffle
Basin
Name:
Deep Creek W/S
0.16
Drainage
Area
276
Ac.
0.43
S .Mi.
Location:
Yadkin County, North Carolina
GPS
36 8'21.824" N
80 462.166" W
Observers:
K. Kroeger
D Wiles
L Calloway
8/28/2313
Bankfull WIDTH
Wbkf
11.9
Ft.
D16
0.16
Maximum DEPTH dmbkf
1.69
Ft.
% Gravel
D35
Mean DEPTH
Ddkf
1.17
Ft.
Bnkfl. X- Section
AREA (bkf) 13.9 Sq. Ft.
Width / Depth Ratio Wbkf / Dbkf
10.2
% Sand
D16
0.16
Maximum DEPTH dmbkf
1.69
Ft.
% Gravel
D35
WIDTH of Flood -Prone Area Wfpa
26
Ft.
10
% Cobble
Entrenchment Ratio ER
2.2
mm
Ucc
0
% Boulder
Channel Materials D50
19
mm.
mm
Water Surface SLOPES
0.020
Channel SINUOSITY K
1.21
D95
100
mm
Stream Type
B4
47
% Sand
D16
0.16
mm
N
42
% Gravel
D35
0.5
mm
10
% Cobble
D50
11
mm
Ucc
0
% Boulder
D84
50
mm
0
% Bedrock
D95
100
mm

Yadkin County, NC Effie G. West Stream Enhancement Site Septemeber 29, 2013
893
892
Effie West Site
891
Longitudinal Profile
•
890
889
'•
—Channel Bottom
—Water Surface
-6— Bankfull
888 -
�— Cross Section
887
v
w
c
0 886
4
•
Y
u' 885
884
883
882
881
880
879
200 300 400 S00 600 700
Station in feet

i '1 t+f
!t t 1 Among
d s�,x1 �'na ,G � : •
..� S' rA t � P �, / r / C Via. 'LAS•:+ �-n�
Ks:! • � . � a � � ,� 1 ' ' 1 ; � �� t '' yam. 1 -'r7. �
- , l - /�,�;J�x• �,, ri-� �i, 79S !�'S�yS � Y t � i I � ('' ;� p�,.
4 �
r
+ I• ' � �:-� ' �r .:.:fir

` �,. 7.. - ` i'•, jIra ji �r/d l��� � h •.iT� �1' 1. .,\ ,
fit
1 :jo J
rA
NO
zu
Ala
,; � � � �iti � ti � � ��� . , �'�Q eat, � �d -`'a " � : • z �,
T S C
Ir
-, - I villi
IF
�\ !iY it �F• t \4 �'.�f �, Vii! � � � �+ a: �. .°:, :� � ,
'icy `-�- -_ ,. i �, Y• "\ _ :, — �', - .
�� Y� -� -� "��- �- Al /r ' .'• .
14,
i
I •y • � ��, - - - - - .. T;y� -,:f '��f_ .fir • J• ', � - - � .. . :1 ='j' -
! _ ✓{,.. y' f _ai.�J '6 �•. " �� _ _ "Qi y ,Zr
` `� 1 [ -�. �•` ^?"M'�•Mi` -iL ! S�r' �,. l
ys. .r'� ate: ".� "y✓•'KG". =1?�+ - }' .�`•'�tr...�•`+ _ ce y•u 7i '._ _',
"ter lot I ;
• � a�t. ." '�`�� • j• Ye�'�''� :S,•�v'j�� Z� � 4 _� n' u;rA;t_�'.! ,fir •r_ � -�i - - �• � — ^ ='T -�,
AL

i•.
,�' '�l:. .;�:kil "c:x�ii���6� 1iY�i�..'°�4e►£r'�W „'1� `r�!X 1
u
�7
O

A
At
14 1a j
Al
1w
ew,
'IWO
, r

'P # -Dy-gy;
Ij

Iew,
•
4'4

4

w ,f
CPO. It
1 � I � •� � �� � � .cam .
• � sr
ice• �Y+ _

Ir
F.
G
J,
J
ln.
r� '� � �a„��,h1'
t•��•� 1
•Y• pal
it
...�- ., k "•
•X'
Yr
n
•iy 'lt
S .
��� \ice!
f+ ,y ' `
, lti �� ., • �
i'r
_���s
r,
'
'
RR�;
�ljj••.�.I 1177 1 IPA ,
, -�' 1`
' 4'-
.fix•.
i• :' _,i�
s, �

" wo -rd
i""i
M
lt.-.Zt
fl
rAnm

4 %f
sh6ye-
1
41
4 %f
sh6ye-

e
f ,
1 5' 1• rr
t•
4y9FE 1pp`a�1F'" L��f�,�
AC
MAW
R � � I' t . � 4;1#w ( l <:
...ii0" � r r, ! . J f . � ; 8 s �} i 11 0:�� i • 2cit:
++tip �` � �• I� . ' �j � ��' � v
� of , � � ' •
}
i
ff OA ,
le
.sic � � - ��,�.� \ 1 �•.,� `, iR'�
y
i•

S' -%

6' 2!

4.2
I
OA- 1!
-71
I
OA- 1!

I�
J 14
kar� l
1� r
1 A
i
Aw
c.`,'PI %�• -:sky '
r
' F
' - ,4,111 � I`'� �.. � ; t � •,� � , - '?
Wyk
1 1(/ } '� �, � � f t' ,kit � ��.>• u rG 1 � °I. .� ' .\ �'

.gyp t f
a t •. - iAb.,• 1. F ,�'�11 1
. _ ♦ jp t ! at p "{
•.. '� i< i,� � a i. 'r'�►{��"ijr.� 1 r�s�r,�, .'A;f _'.*
f +.
PDX
Nr
F! .�• .,L, T ' " S� 1 �g7i� P� tia .tom+ ►. % _
..� �: .:• per•- ;`ar� y. /.• �rr�. • -1 •, % . � <� � �.al:"•
IL

L,
I
.! , br . i � %. , � f�r�r.. R,+. �:�� A� rt.�JrlMts• �Ji4l.L r� � �` � i
i � �i�!�: �! "P�+'rr ' ��r"� N / a• �„ /�'i �'s f .v�� ✓4. jr/ l^
r 1' lSC' �. !� ',/ r J r �I. •p Y !� � mss' !I;��r // ✓� J ° s� + i' rs
��, j , y., rTj . ll , /�/ � - + - ' +�+' � �,,,,,�.. -,r'.,+i� /�� 4 ✓y i��' , ./�,�p _fir,.
;r
/y per, yYrt4 r, /. {•i�jy�... /;. y ~�f .{�., .. i �, ..
YA
AW
i
r
r r•
t
f /
71
•
J
,
r -)
r
.r it P
7
' �' ,t: ✓. .:r r � � 'f' rM!'1Y{ �'�� �� t � it rb�''• _
oil
I- r � "s •�I ,�'i, rl> �,. j' � ,� ,,,111 ..,,, ,u _
. r i
' E , .ultl�•
Adbk;rl;e"
f r

$:� 7

6 7'

Y,
1411 F
6-C-l"t
VI.-M lip'
Al
wf'-
jift-
AW