20211460 Ver 1_More Info Received_20211207

Strickland, Bev
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:47 AM
To: Cohn, Colleen M
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Emailing: SAW-2020-00351 ADMIN FILE 10_
06_21.pdf
Attachments: Willis Crossing supporting Information.pdf; Construction Plans 11-16-21 to Chris.pdf;
Additional info 12-7-21.pdf; Revised PCN 12-7-21.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Colleen
Good morning, thanks for your comments. I'm answering each below and providing attachments.
1) Attached
2) Impact 3 is a utility crossing, I have attached a revised PCN impact table and revised PCN front page adding
NW 12 for the sewer impact. (see revised PCN attachment).
3) This is a permanent impact. The sewer easement permanent impact corridor is 20 feet wide noted on the 12-
7-21 additional information attachment (also sent through laser fiche today).
4) We don't have any temporary impacts.
I hope this clears everything up, if not don't hesitate to contact me.
thanks
Wyatt
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:12 PM Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]> wrote:
Good afternoon, Wyatt,
I have begun my review for the Willis Crossing project, and in order to complete my review, some additional
information is required:
1. Please provide the Division with a copy of your response (the roadway crossing details/plans) to the US
Army Corps of Engineers requests for additional information on November 16, 2021, and December 6, 2021.
[15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
2. As Chris asked, it appears that Impact 3 is for a utility crossing, but it is listed as a culvert in the Impact
Table. Can you please provide some additional information on Impact 3 and, if necessary, provide an updated
impact table? [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
3. For Impact 3, is this a permanent impact? The Impact Map says "Sewer Line Construction" . What are the
construction corridor and permanent maintained access corridor widths for this impact area? [15A NCAC 02H
.0502(c)]
I.

4. Are there any temporary impacts? [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
Thanks,
Colleen Cohn
Environmental Specialist II
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
380o Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office: 919-791-4258
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Wyatt Brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 1:55 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Emailing: SAW-2020-00351 ADMIN FILE 10_06_21.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Chris
I asked the engineer for them again this morning, he said soon. I'll get them to you hopefully soon.
Thanks for your help.
2

Wyatt
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Pres., Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
[phone]
On Dec 6, 2021, at 1:43 PM, Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
Wyatt:
Circling back on this one to see if the driveway details are available? If you already sent those,
I'm sorry. Colleen asked which NWP to use and I noticed when I looked at it that I didn't cc her
on my request.
Please reply all so we both get the same information.
Thanks!
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
0: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your
3

web browser: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ Thank you for
taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 1:30 PM
To: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Emailing: SAW-2020-00351 ADMIN FILE
10_06_21.pdf
Hey man — absolutely. Call whenever on my work cell number below (my personal one is
temporarily off-line).
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
0: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your
web browser: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ Thank you for
taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 12:51 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Christopher. D. Hopper@usace. army. mi l>
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Emailing: SAW-2020-00351 ADMIN FILE 10_06_21.pdf
4

Chris
Can I call you in about an hour to be sure I'm on the right track?
thanks
Wyatt
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:04 PM Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
My pleasure, Wyatt:
The plans (unless I'm reading them wrong?) appear to be for utility installation. I'm asking for
details of the road crossings of wetland areas. I need to ensure minimal burial to document
there is no concern for drainage of upslope resources.
That is — deep culverts in wetlands tend to head -cut up the valley — head -cuts turn into drains,
wetlands dry out, etc.
Thanks in advance!
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
0: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
5

We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your
web browser: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ Thank you for
taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 9:59 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Christopher. D. Hopper@usace. army. mi l>
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Emailing: SAW-2020-00351 ADMIN FILE
10_06_21.pdf
Chris
Its attached, if possible please stipulate anything you need added in your approval and we'll get
it back to you.
Thanks for your help with this.
Wyatt
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:16 AM Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
Hey Wyatt:
The 18 is for a maximum of 0.1 acre, not 0.01 acre — I think an 18 would probably cover
everything.
Do you have an exhibit to show the road crossing cross -sections (specifically culvert
installation, location, burial depth, etc)?
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6

Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
0: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your
web browser: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ Thank you for
taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 8:50 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Christopher. D. Hopper@usace. army. mi l>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Emailing: SAW-2020-00351 ADMIN FILE 10_06_21.pdf
Chris
Hope all is well, (the wheels are turning in my mind) On Willis Crossing SAW-2020-00351,
could the impacts from the access road and parking (wetland impacts 1&2) be handles under a
NW 14 for linear transportation and the sewer impact (wetland impact 3) be handled under a
NW 18? I know a NW 18 must be <0.10 acre and this is. But the wetland impacts 1&2 do
push the total impact > 0.10 acre, but the NW 18 is for < 0.01 acre impact.
I attached the impact map for your quick referral. (I sent the PCN package you requested this
afternoon by email and Laserfiche, let me know if you don't get it).
thanks
Wyatt
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:37 PM wyatt brown <[e-mail]> wrote:
Chris

I'm pretty sure I attached the supporting information with the original submittal, its so large it
might not have gone through. I'll try it like this and through Laserfiche. Water Quality
number is 20211460.
thanks
Wyatt
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:31 AM Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
Hey Wyatt:
See the attached submittal for Willis Crossing. I don't see any impact exhibits - is it possible
they got lost in the process somewhere?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
8

Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
9

Table of Contents
1)Agent Letter
2) Maps
3) Project Drawings, Impact Map
4) Endangered Species
5)SHPO Documents
6) Preliminary JD Approval

1/3/20
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Andy Williams
Re: , Johnston County
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described (Pin # 169600-54-0851) for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Also, Mr Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.

OHN3PON
9UNT
NORTH•CAROLINA •
* * * DISCLAIMER
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Scale: 1:4828 - 1 in. = 402.29 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 112 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
January 4, 2020

10/6/21, 11:18 AM
The National Map - Advanced Viewer
Help Data Download Services
4
i
/ 1`
NI R T H-----v ___--};
% 5 l'r
‘RYbLINA
f /
.-1. / I f 5 l5. +r
600ft
-78.342 35.575 Degrees
Find address or place
R�
USGS The National Map: National Boundarie
https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ 1/1

qX
\ N/ n
\ PINt�,0-45-3393
1
. \ n/L
/ 1 N NM.: w189810,5-s„b
/ 1 N
Pina.�ta�9's-.e-59a3
WETLANDS
WETLANDS IMPACT AREA
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA it
AREA (ACRE)
1
0.011 AC.
2
0.010 AC.
3
0.017 AC.
TOTAL
0.038 AC.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG'
1,7u,°woi2i IM RE":w4µTOTTW
TEN (10)
North Carolina One -Call
Center, Inc.
1-800-632-4949
wn w-zoloo
m ® J ® ® aw our-a%so
P011„,:06:4-99-6873 07 /
7S
001Ga // PN«� 1a9e19-a9-�29 //
Nx 69a�9711E7 P
ay N$so,a
aM4e
/ PARRISH. Ur
nuB: 796,a
vwwe,E wiorw PER NT ,rtwn EASE T
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #2 (ROAD
o CONSTRUCTION)- 0.010 ACRE
((MR
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #1 (ROAD
CONSTRUCTION)- 0.011 ACRE
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #3 (SEWER
as a �r - LINE CONSTRUCTION)- 0.017 ACRE
,.N7¢9e-ea9 e/
nor /
1 oNWsrox NioSEvnrba.IR
P100 124nb0o—sa—b0z1
SCALE 60'
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
FOR
WILLIS CROSSINGS
WILSON'S MILLS TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
Dalton Engineering
and Associates, P. A.
446 East Main Street
P.O. Box 426
Clayton, NC 27520
(919(550-4740
Fax [phone]
Job: 17039
Date: 8/24/21
Revision:
File:170NWAS,ERa[v
Drawn: WJB
Sheet: 1 OF 1

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
IPaC resource list
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as criticilabitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and WildlifeService's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project arebiut that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project areJdowever, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resourcelypically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) andproject-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS officeWith jurisdiction
in the defined project area.Please read the introduction to each section thafollows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additionainformation applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
‘S\ \‘'
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
4.144
1++.:rrr, Ur
\C)
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFPO00/resources 1/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
'. [phone]
fi [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1111A
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 2/10
Is,04
0�5
�O

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also consideredAn AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstrearrI3ecause species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project areTak
fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Actrequires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills
this requirement canonly be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your pro. ct.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species' and their critical habitats are managed by theEcological Services Programof the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisherii)s
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries arnot shown on this list. Please contactNOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction
,n\
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 3/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. Species listed under theEndangered Species Actare threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for IistingSee the listing status pag_efor more information. IPaC only showsspecies that are
regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi 1\11,Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
OCI\k
available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
STATUS
Endangered
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources
4/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is
not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Critical habitats
Proposed Threatened
Endangered
101
tos\CI
STATUS
ii>440.
Candidate
1043,
Rive-
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
Vairra-
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABIT S AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
gri
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 5/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty A4tand the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Actof 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actof 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concernhttp://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.hp
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birdittp://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/ N/44.-
conservation-measu res.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds & tillibilisic
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
THERE ARE NO MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 6/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and click the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore
energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 7/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
i
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence"
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
,c11\
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 8/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by thd\lational Wildlife Refug_esystem must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory,i>401°115:\
Impacts to NWI wetlandsand other aquatic habitats may be subject to regul.Qtion under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
4
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the loc .D.S. Army Corps of Engineers District
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of dateWe are currently working to update our NWI data setWe
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
Nape
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHx
A full description f'or eachwetland code can be found at thNational Wetlands Inventory website
Data limit ns
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFP000/resources 9/10

10/1/21, 6:53 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in
polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
.C�
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/UVJZRM5VZFD5RH2OZIOKKFPO00/resources 10/10

■ em
■■ • NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■ as NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■ia
October 1, 2021
wyatt brown
Brown's Environmental Group, inc
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
RE: Willis Crossing
Dear wyatt brown:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-15892
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
i) 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGH_ NC 27603 • 1E51 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

a)
U
a)
O
0
a)
_C
O
V)
CC
a)
E
C
0
C
n3
O cy)N
:O
c • N
(0 O
7 _0
c .L O
U
• >• O
(13
Z
vi
a)
U
C
w
U
U
0
c
a)
E
W
a)
(13
Z
CO
L()
W
p a3
Z Q
U
Z Ni
O
a
a)
_c
O
7
0
a)
c
0
C
L
a)
J-+
m
E
U
O
p
a)
U
C
i
7
O
E
w
C
(13
U
_0 C
O (6
cn
a)
4
Fd
(I) u)
v)
CU ai
• 0)
LL
U
U
U
a)
▪ U
C
a) a)
a) U
W O
0
• rip
• a)
_Q
O
C
O
E
E
4-4
C
a)
0
c Q
O 0
(''
a)
a) 3
O
S
a)
d
O
O
N
Somatochlora
C
0)
O
a)
M
0)
M
Threatened
3-Medium
W
2014-07-18
Notched Rainbow
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
0 a
a) +
+' c
C a)
a) U
E
: a) OD
O E O_
p (0 0
Z U
v
(6 n3
L
� a)O
Q Q U
-o -o c
(1) a) O
0) 0) V)
(0 ( C
C C _C0
City of Raleigh Open Space
a)
N
a)
a)
N
0
)
N
0
0
Z
U
Z
N
2
0
V)
M
0
N
a)
(0
0

.;^
(1)
O
L
0
co
N
0)
co
W
0
Z
0
Z
N
O
N
O — O
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ ❑ 171
8

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-00351 County: Johnston U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Selma
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Owner: Kenneth R. Jones Real Estate
Kenneth Jones
Address: 801 Swift Creek Road
Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
Telephone Number: 919-934-2188
E-mail: [e-mail]
Agent: Brown's Environmental Group
Wyatt Brown
Address: 242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, North Carolina 27576
Telephone Number: 919-524-5956
E-mail: brownenvgrp(a,gmail.com
Size (acres) 10.5 Nearest Town Smithfield
Nearest Waterway Neuse River River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.57615
Longitude: 778.34567
Location description: The Kenneth Jones Property site lies south of an existing railroad corridor paralleling Uzzle's Pond Road,
and north of Wilson's Mills Road Extension. The site has road frontage on Main Street and Wilson's Mills Road Extension.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters
have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 04/13/3030 and 1/3/2021.
Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements,
and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and
wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal
Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by
contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over all of the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggest you have
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are
subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Christopher Hopper at [phone] (x35) or
christopher.d.hopperAusace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the approved jurisdictional determination form dated 2/3/2021, and the
attached exhibit, "Kenneth Jones Property Preliminary Wetland Map".
D. Remarks: The Approved Jurisdictional Determination applies to the area outlined in yellow and
labeled, AJD Review Area on the attached "Kenneth Jones Property Preliminary Wetland Map", dated
4/13/2020 and 01/03/2021. All other resources on this exhibit are documented in the Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 03/03/2021.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
DAILEY.SAMANTHA.J.1 38
DAI LEY.SAMANT 7567948
HA.J.1387567948 2021.02.03 07:35:42
Corps Regulatory Official:-05'00'
Date of JD: 2/3/2021 Expiration Date of JD: 02/3/2026
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=13 6:4:0

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
PROCESS AND
Applicant: Kenneth R. Jones Real Estate, Kenneth Jones File Number: SAW-2020-00351 Date: 2/3/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
r
SECTION
Additional
or the
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
However, you may provide additional information to clarify
record.
review of the administrative record,
the Corps memorandum for the
officer has determined is needed to
or analyses to the record.
is already in the administrative
information that the review
Corps may add new information
the location of information that
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
the appeal process you may
Appeal Review Officer
South Atlantic Division
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Christopher Hopper
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process.
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi
and any government
You will be provided a 15-day
ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Christopher Hopper, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 2/3/2021
ORM Number: SAW-2020-00351
Associated JDs: N/A
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Smithfield County/Parish/Borough: Johnston
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.57615 Longitude -78.34567
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑ There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review
area (complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A.
N/A. N/A
N/A.
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1 waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
N/A.
N/A. N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Tributaries ((a (2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
N/A.
N/A. N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
N/A.
N/A. N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
N/A.
N/A. N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
2 If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
Dug Pond No
0.226
acre(s)
(b)(1) Lake/pond
Dug Pond No Outlet does not meet the definition
Outlet
or impoundment
that does not
contribute surface
water flow directly
or indirectly to an
(a)(1) water and
is not inundated
by flooding from
an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water in a typical
year.
of an a(1) water. It does not contribute surface
water flow to a water identified in paragraph a(1)
in a typical year either directly or through one or
more waters identified in paragraph a(2), a(3),
or a(4). It is not inundated by flooding from a
paragraph a(1) through a(3) water in a typical
year.
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: Wetland Determination Data Form
DP UP2, exhibit Kenneth Jones Property Preliminary Wetland Map, and Johnston County GIS contour
mapping.
This information is sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial: Undated NC OneMap aerial image
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: 12/29/2020
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
❑x Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
❑ USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ USFWS NWI maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ USGS topographic maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
Farm Tract Number and 2021 Program Year report
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
State/Local/Tribal Sources
Johnston County GIS topographic contour and parcel maps
Other Sources
N/A.
Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2
Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
B. Typical year assessment(s): The APT Tool was run for this property for the date of the USACE site visit
(12/29/2020). At the time of the visit, the site was in a Wetter than Normal condition with the 30-day rolling
total approximately 0.9 inch above normal range.
C. Additional comments to support AJD: The feature labeled Dug Pond No Outlet' is a rectangular pond
surrounded by spoil berms on two sides. It is surrounded by uplands on all sides and, even during the
wetter than normal condition at the time of the USACE's site visit, displayed no surface connection to
downstream a(1) through a(4) waters. The feature is excavated within active agricultural land designated
as Farm 18531, Tract 9826.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 01/02/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Kenneth R. Jones Real Estate, Kenneth
Jones, 801 Swift Creek Road, Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Kenneth Jones Property,
SAW-2020-00351
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Kenneth Jones Property site lies
south of an existing railroad corridor paralleling Uzzle's Pond Road, and north of Wilson's Mills Road
Extension. The site has road frontage on Main Street and Wilson's Mills Road Extension.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Johnston City: Smithfield
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.57615 Longitude: -78.34567
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
N Field Determination. Date(s): 12/29/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resources in
review area
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
Wetland A
35.57446
-78.34376
0.78 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
35.57550
-78.34485
0.153 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland BB
35.57319
-78.34386
0.451 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland C
35.57583
-78.34435
0.1 ac
Wetland
Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
© Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Kenneth Jones Property Preliminary Wetland Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
❑X Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data:
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name•
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑X Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Undated NC OneMaps Aerial Photo
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify): Site visit conducted on 12/29/2021
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
DAILEY.SAMAN DAILEY.SAMANTHA.J
THA.J.13875679.1387567948
2021.02.03 07:34:56
48-05'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
2/3/2021 impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

!yon
Dug Pond
No Outlet
0.226 acres
Excluded
4.4 5J
AJD Review Area
D P U P2 414.
Wetland C
0.10 acres
—5ftwide
Wetland B
0.153 Acres
4),
BROWN'S
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.
Wetland BB
0.451 Acres
00 100 0 200 Fee
4
a
Data UP
Wetland A
0.664 Acres
Kenneth Jones Property
Preliminary Wetland Map
4-13-2020
Drawn by Wyatt Brown
4-13-2020 / 1-03-2021

N
Pipe #1
60.00 LF -
18" RCP o 0.83$
\ W/ FES EACH END
\ INV.1N-203.10
INV. OUT-202.60
\ DA= 1.88 AC
/
N /
NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
CONNECT PROPOSED 6" PC WATER UNE
TO EXISTING 16" DIP WATER MAIN WITH
1-16"X6" TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE ASSEMBLY.
/
60 LF OF 1
RCP 01.0%
INV. IN-203.10
INV. OUT-202.60 /
\ / ,
240
230
220
210
200
190
18
17
/co
/^
/�}
/
PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50'
/
/
EX MH #432
10'X70' SIGHT
TRIANGLE (TYP.)
NTO CONTRACTOR:
INSTALL 54'-16" STEEL ENCASEMENT
PIPE BY DRY BORE AND JACK AND
UNDER SR 1913 WILSON'S MILLS ROAD
\\
0
1 -6"X6" HYDRANT TEE
1-FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
O
M
II
I
l
\
1
Ih
" / ,
-- DLO OFFPERMAN A6SEMBLY
M 8` / / � ' ?
2Oy\
' I III MH 2 I \II\IliiI(
l_
III
- Ill
1-6"X6" TEE �7
; G
1
SEWER LATERAL, (TYP)I--
II
z
W
--
W • W W
O V>>
r-
Fo
• > 0 0
vace
<a
MI43I `N'.
l
O
+N
O
No
N O
W O
N +
N O
0
of +
2 S
t0 +
N
206.95
2+50
207.32
3+00
207.69
3+50
208.07
4+00
,ti'0l
ncron7
N
co
.M
M
iI
u
N
O
II n
Qmn
- 16" STEEL
MH 1
Cit+Nrn n
+II �
¢gd
LISTING GROUND
ROADWAY
CENTERLINE
N�nll
FIIx
cn
W
ro
EM�yacNT
plcL
2.00%
UNDER
SR1913 BY
DRY
BORE
0.75%
-�
_---
- ---
-2.009
-_ - — -
18" RCP
._._.
6" PVC WATER
LINE (31 -MIN
MUM COVER)
y
_ _ _._,_,_,_._.-
®0.40%
"
sW.47 e
0 0.40%
271
L.F. - 8" PVC
(SDR-35
C
18'-6" D.I.
UNDER STORM
SDR-35
;WATERLINE CENTERED
DRAINAGE
..C-CI
to
_
(24" MINIMU'4
SEPARATION)
NI = 197.82 (M111
N
O
II
_
°
II
F
a
cn
cn
II
>
z
Z
--
Z
p
N
to
p
N
Obi
6
N
0+00
PROFILE SCALE:
HORIZONTAL 1" = 50'
VERTICAL 1" = 10'
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
4+00
BLUE OPAL CROSSING DRIVE - 50' ACCESS / PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF
THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY OWNER NOT LESS
THAN TWO (2) BUT NO MORE THAN TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION
North Carolina One -Call
Center, Inc.
www.ncocc.org
1-600-632-4949
40
30
220
210
200
190
180
170
NC
SO
RAI
1-6"X4" 11
1-6" GATE
1-4"GATE
VAL
uE
Plpe #'2
41.92 LF -
36" RCP 0 1.19$
W/ FES EACH END
INV /N-201.00
INV. OUT-200.50
DA= 2.55 AC
\1-3/4" WATER SE
WITH METER B'
SITE DATA TABLE:
DEVELOPMENT NAME• WILLIS CROSSINGS
OWNER. KENNETH R. JONES
OWNER ADDRESS. P.O. BOX 208
WILSON'S MILLS, N.C. 27593
NCPIN• 169600-54-0851; 169614-44-5963
TOWNSHIP. WILSON'S MILLS
INSIDE CITY LIMITS. YES
ZONING. SFR3; SFR2
SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE NUMBER. SUP0602 (NO CONDITIONS)
SITE ACREAGE 11.41 AC.
EXISTING USE VACANT
PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (DUPLEX)
NO FLOOD PLAIN ON SITE PANEL 3720169600K
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE DISTRICT. NO
IMPERVIOUS ALLOWED- 1.71 AC. (15% W/0 ATTENUATION)
IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED. 1.68 AC. (14.72%)
ASPHALT (STREET & PARKING). 1.00 AC.
ROOF• 0.63 AC.
SIDEWALK. 0.05 AC.
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED. 1.312 AC. (11.5% OF SITE)
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED- FEE IN LIEU
PARKING REQUIRED. 2 SPACES / UNIT (48)
PARKING PROVIDED' 48 SPACES
TRASH COLLECTION. INDIVIDUAL ROLL OUT CONTAINERS
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS.
STREET YARD. TYPE C BUFFER (4 SHADE, 6 ORNAMENTAL / 100')
LINEAR FEET OF STREET. 1.221 L.F.
SHADE TREES REQUIRED. 52
SHADE TREES PROVIDED. 52
ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED. 78
ORNAMENTAL TREES PROVIDED. 84
/
/ /A
2" PERMANE▪ NT s \
BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY -• ` \ - \
/9f/
Ppe ;yX3
51.15 LE -
36" RCP 0 0.59$
W/ FES EACH END
INV 1N-200.30
INV OUT 200.00
DA= 2.98 AC
10'X70` S
TRIANGLE,'
-6"X6
FIRE HYD''W LSEM
6"X4" RED CrR
NENT
ASSEMBLY
PVG WA EK
INFINITY CIRCLE - 50'
PRIVATE ACCESS / PUBLIC
;UTILITY EASEMENT
t1i
(SEWER LATERAL,
'MH 8
6' WHITE VINYL FENCE
/
/
/
/ /
/ f
/
//1/
ANHOLE No. 435
//
240
230
220
210
200
190
18
17
O
O
,M O
N O
ri O
N 7
10 0
N
205.41
2+00
0
N N
S
M
i�f1
tel
S
d'
S
O
Oo
O M
')
a
x
g
STA 0+00C
RIM = 2 .
D DEPTH 6.
n
MH 7
STA 1+66.7
RIM = 205.
DEPTH 7.2'
,
pp'
2
STA 2+85.75
Rim = 2r13 O'S
DEPTH 5.7'
CT)
=‘,
IM = 202.13
EPTH 5.6'
MANHOLE No.
N col
MN
o
WI
F2'
OS
EPTH 7.3' -_
L
—
..-._..... _-NTERLINE
.00%
-3.50%
EXISTING
GROUND
LC r
/
_
—
•s�•1_�,
r,_.
..
.��
117.98' - 8" PVC
---
—
___
1, ,�
36" RCP�.
)0
157 L.F. - 8"
PVC (SDR-35)
0 0.50%
193 LF.
- 8" PVC (SDR-35)
0 0.50K
o
iii
2
4" PVC WATER
(3' MINIMUM
18'-6" D.I.
LINE
COVER)
WATERLINE
N
m
ei
a
2-
-
II
j
OZ
ca CENTERED
N STORM DRAINAGE
N MINIMUM
II
UNDER
(24"
SEPARATION)
OUT = 198.08
J = 197.47 (MI-
N
r-
Or
II
j
x
.
in
•0
rn
�I
II
N
a
r-
0
ui
II
n
n
—e
Zr»
I
202.88
202.68
cor7
N0
202.51
0
"
N
0
N
R.
N
o
N
os
N
al
al'n
N
N
N
O
NI
Y
O
°
17
O
cq
- -- .. ,,,. . , c., g.i_fn F+Fn F+nn 6+50
0+00
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
40
30
220
210
200
190
180
170
INFINITY CIRCLE - 50' ACCESS / PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
PLAN AND PROFILE
BLUE OPAL CROSSING DRIVE & INFINITY CIRCLE
FOR
WILLIS CROSSINGS
WILSON'S MILLS TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
REVISION 003: ADDRESSED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE REVIEW #3 COMMENTS - 11/2/21
REVISION 002: ADDRESSED TOWN OF WILSON'S MILLS REVIEW COMMENTS - 9/17/21
REVISION 001: ADDRESSED TOWN OF WILSON'S MILLS PLANNING COMMENTS - 3/15/21
SEAL "
16282
•
••,,, ,I• Dt. I
1
Dalton Engineering
and Associates, P. A.
446 East Main Street
P.O. Box 426
Clayton, NC 27520
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Job: 17039
Date: 1 / 12/21
File:17039-MASTER_REV Drawn: WJB
Revision: 003
Sheet: 4 OF 10

M
N
0
N
cr
c
0
m
a.
1CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF
`$' THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY OWNER NOT LESS
THAN TWO (2) BUT NO MORE THAN TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION
North Carolina One -Call
o
Center, Inc.
www.ncocc.org
1-800-632-4949
2' PERMANENT
BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY
PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50'
240
230
220
210
200
190
180
170
/
-3/4' WATER
Pipe#2
41.92 LF -
M[TEB 36" RCP 0 1.19%
W/ FES EACH END
/NV /N-201.00
/NV OUT-200.50
DA=2.55AC
II
ANCHORS R DGE DRIVE - 50' PRIVATE "EL
ACCESS / PUBL C UTILITY EASEMENT
--I - d }' t-
H 3
HYDRANT
HYDR T.
205
0
6" #VC WATER NE
}
1-6" GATE VALVE
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
VARIABLE WIDTH PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT
T '
/
��• '+" GRANT TEE
HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
�1-6-X4' REDUCER
10'X70' SIGHT
TRIANGLE
x—
f i
I/
/A
2PERMANENT
BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY
\ \\
\ \ \\ \
1 \\ \\
\\ \
Pipe ,{3
51.15 LF -
36" RCP 0 0.59Z
—W/ FES EACH END
' /NV /N-200.30 \
/ INV OUT-200.00 \
DA= 2.98 AC \
✓// \\\
r / \\\ /\ \
/ / \ \\
\ \ \\\
\ \
\ \
0
+
208.70
0+50
.Y o
+
N -
oN Inin
t
N
207.95
2+00
207.70
2+50
207.45
3+00
207.20
3+50
206.95
4+00
206.70
4+50
206.45
5+00
206.20
5+50
en O
O +
N O
O
No
N
in
+
co
205.45
7+00
0
g �
goo
a
to
1,M
NON^l*ri
=H20-
2
DI CCO
re)
24�ij
ftnEo
+
el II
ROADWAY
QENTERLNE
Y
=
RIM =20
DEPTH 6.
N�
=FaCI-
MUIK0
ka
"+n
II
-�
v
W
-0.50%
f
EXISTING GROUND
1-6"X4"
REDUCER
6" PVC
_�
WATER LINE (3
MINIMUM COVER)
—
R-35 O 0.40
<
=
D40
L.F. - 8' PVC
(SDR-35) 0
0.40%
o�
titi
x
m
L.F. - PVC
4" PVC WATER
(3' MINIMUM
3DR 35
LINE
COVER)
0.10%
O
rn
M
197 L.F.
- 8" PVC (S
m
°'
II
?u
o>
co
Cr)
"
os
0
II
1.-
8z
o
CO
ll
4VOUT 200.
NV IN = 200.26
INV OUT = 2
zz
>>
»
zz
--
N
205.44
204.73
204.43
co
O
1n
V
N
N
.4N
O
203.80
203.45
203.07
202.74
202.56
0)h
o
O
N
0
0+00
PROFILE SCALE:
HORIZONTAL 1" = 50'
VERTICAL 1" = 10'
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
3+00
3+50
4+00
4+50
5+00
ANCHORS RIDGE DRIVE - 50' ACCESS / PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
5+50
6+00
6+50
7+00
240
230
220
210
200
190
180
170
PLAN AND PROFILE
ANCHORS RIDGE DRIVE
FOR
WILLIS CROSSINGS
WILSON'S MILLS TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
REVISION 003: ADDRESSED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE REVIEW #3 COMMENTS - 11/2/21
REVISION 002: ADDRESSED TOWN OF WILSON'S MILLS REVIEW COMMENTS — 9/17/21
REVISION 001: ADDRESSED TOWN OF WILSON'S MILLS PLANNING COMMENTS — 3/15/21
SITE DATA TABLE:
DEVELOPMENT NAME WILLIS CROSSINGS
OWNER. KENNETH R. JONES
OWNER ADDRESS. P.O. BOX 208
WILSON'S MILLS, N.C. 27593
NCPIN• 169600-54-0851; 169614-44-5963
TOWNSHIP• WILSON'S MILLS
INSIDE CITY LIMITS. YES
ZONING. SFR3; SFR2
SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE NUMBER. SUP0602 (NO CONDITIONS)
SITE ACREAGE 11.41 AC.
EXISTING USE• VACANT
PROPOSED USE• SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (DUPLEX)
NO FLOOD PLAIN ON SITE• PANEL 3720169600K
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE DISTRICT:NO
IMPERVIOUS ALLOWED' 1.71 AC. (15% W/0 ATTENUATION)
IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED. 1.68 AC. (14.72%)
ASPHALT (STREET & PARKING). 1.00 AC.
ROOF• 0.63 AC.
SIDEWALK 0.05 AC.
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED. 1.312 AC. (11.5% OF' SITE)
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED. FEE IN LIEU
PARKING REQUIRED: 2 SPACES / UNIT (48)
PARKING PROVIDED. 48 SPACES
TRASH COLLECTION. INDIVIDUAL ROLL OUT CONTAINERS
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS:
STREET YARD. TYPE C BUFFER (4 SHADE, 6 ORNAMENTAL / 100')
LINEAR FEET OF STREET. 1,221 L.F.
SHADE TREES REQUIRED. 52
SHADE TREES PROVIDED. 52
ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED. 78
ORNAMENTAL TREES PROVIDED. 84
REVIEW ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Dalton Engineering
and Associates, P. A.
446 East Main Street
P.O. Box 426
Clayton, NC 27520
Job: 17039
File:17039—MASTER_REV
Date: 1 / 12/21
Drawn: WJB
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Revision: 003
Sheet: 5 OF 10
BOX (TYP)

N
O
O
Z
03
m
cc
J
5
w
0
N
N
O
U
0
O
i
N
N
N
c
E
0
0
i
m
7-
N
0)
3
U
/
/
/
220
210
200
190
180
/
SEWER LATERAL, (T(P)
6' WHITE VINYL FENCE
/
PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50'
/
/
\\Pipe#2`
+�\ 41.92 LF —
\ 36" RCP ® 1.19Z
W/ FES EACH END
18 I INV 1N-201.00
/NV OUT-200.50
DA= 2.55 AC
Y
— —202—
Y
l'J
13
Thriri
�I cam-
Pipe #3
51.15 LF —
36" RCP 0 0.599
W/ FES EACH END.
INV. 1N-200.30
INV OUT-200.00
DA= 298 AC
i
tio9:
*
9
9
*
9
4
Pipe
41.92
36"RCP 01.19X
kV/ FES EACH
INV. 1N-201.00
#2
LF —
END
-
Pipe #3
51.15LF—
36" RCP 0
W/ FES EACH
0.59X
END
_
INV. IN-200.30
INV. OUT-200.00
DA= AC
INV. OUT 200.50
DA=
AC
m
0
N
203.48
0
0
N
202.80
0
0
N
202.32
202.15
202.01
0
3
201.44
co
0
0
0+00
PROFILE SCALE:
HORIZONTAL 1" = 50'
VERTICAL 1" = 10'
0+50
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF
THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY OWNER NOT LESS
THAN TWO (2) BUT NO MORE THAN TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION
North Carolina One -Call
Center, Inc.
www.ncocc.org
1-800-632-4949
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
3+00
LINEAR WETLANDS
3+50
4+00
4+50
5+00
5+50
6+00
220
210
200
190
180
PLAN AND PROFILE
LINEAR WETLANDS
FOR
WILLIS CROSSINGS
WILSON'S MILLS TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
Dalton Engineering
and Associates, P. A.
446 East Main Street
P.O. Box 426
Clayton, NC 27520
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Job: 17039
Date: 12/6/21
Revision:
File: 17039—MASTER_REV
Drawn: WJB
Sheet: 1 OF 1

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
Juno 1, 2021 Ver 4.4
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you Kish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a Zink to the online help file.
http:,. ccocs.dec.nc.gov;WaterResources/0IedacI624704'PC1„20Help 7u20File'4%20201 B- t-30.pd1
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Protect*
r'Yes RNo
add Yes, edy it NSW a the Spica* a coap{kat
Is this project a public transportation project?*
t- Yes a No
Tits a any pmdy funded by mnc[IA,stalc a f Waal funds mad rel. eirpon Pampa —talon pram.
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
17 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
f No
lb. What type(s) of permlt(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
CYes (: No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
12 sewer line
ust al NNrnntxrs you are epptyng ttr not m to troy down Ist
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
shad. el tat apply
I 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
29 - Residential Developments • NW 12 tor sewer line (Wyatt Brown 12-7-21)
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Epress
r Riparian Buffer Authorition
Before submitting this form please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as we wifl not be able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing
Meeting Request Form is used in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the
certifying agency" and in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5) all certification requests shall include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying
authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Click here to read more information on when this form is needed prior to application submission or here to view the form.
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
r Yes l No
IDq Version

"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a_ Site #* ',
2a1 Reason*
2b. Impact type *
2c, Typo of W.*
2d. W. name*
2o. Forested*
2f. Typo of:
Jurisdicition*'''
2g. Impact
area*
Impact i
culvert
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.011
._,t
Impact 2
culvert
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.010
acres)
Impact 2
eelaeH
sewer line
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
No
Both
0.017
,vest
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.038
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.038
2i. Comments:
Correction in red on Impact 2 by Wyatt Brown, 12-7-21.
Due to required minimum separation of buildings and setbacks the impacts are unavoidable.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The Town of Wilsons Mills has required spacing between the buildings and minimum setbacks. We pushed these required standards as much as was
allowed to minimize the impacts as much as possible on the wetland impacts. I questioned the engineer about moving the buildings farther back and
closer together to avoid and or minimize the impacts. The engineer minimized and avoided as much as possible. Email from Dalton engineers states
'We have the units spaced at the town minimum distance apart and as close the street intersection as the town will allow. So as It stands right now we
cannot shift them any further down.'
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
The wetlands lull be marked and protected by silt fence prior to construction. Care well be taken to avoid all wetlands except those permitted for
impact. Care wtll he taken not to allow tne wetlands be damaged by sedimentation. Care will be taken not to work near the wetlands in times of wet
weather or when precipitation is expected.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes r• No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation. explain why
Permanent impacts do no meet the 0.10 threshold.
NC Stream Temperature Classdication Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington Districts RIBIT S website.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
"" Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or Is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
✓ Yes (-' No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click
If no, explain why.
There are no riparian streams located on the project area as deemed by Gary Kreiser on 3/10/20.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOTs Individual NPDES permit NCS0002507*
r Yes t' No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)7*
✓ Yes t No
To look up low density requirement click here 17,4 NCAC /2H. Iu03i2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?*