20110877 Ver 2_401 Application_20140214

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
(704) 525 -3953 fax
North Carolina Division of Water
Resources
401 /Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
DATE: 02.24.14
JOB NO: 1357.14.008 Ph 01
ATTENTION: Ms. Karen Higgins
RE: PNG Wilson L40A Renewal
�1- 08IY') va-
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Draft
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report
the following items:
❑ Specifications r�
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
5
02.24.14
1
Copies of PCN
1
02.24.14
2
CD copy
1
02.24.14
3
Check for Processing Fee
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
❑ For approval ® For your record
❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FORBIDS DUE: _ /_ /_ ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS: Karen: Please find attached PCN. Please do not hesitate to call us at 704.523.4726 with questions.
Thank you — Joey
SIGN:
h
�. /
„ d,4��R

ItS &ME
February 24, 2014
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Mr. Thomas Brown
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC No. 3884
PNG Wilson Line 40A
Wilson County, North Carolina
SAW 2011 -02239
DWR Project No. 11 -0877
S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S &ME, Inc. (S &ME) hereby submits this
application for re- authorization of a previously- approved Nationwide Permit (NWP) and
the corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884, which
have expired prior to the project's construction. PNG, the project sponsor, will continue
to be considered the applicant. The project will involve replacement of approximately
2.4 miles of aging natural gas pipeline in Wilson County, North Carolina, and will
involve minimal loss of waters of the U.S.
The project was originally authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on
December 1, 2011 (SAW 2011 - 02239) and by the N.C. Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) on November 22, 2011 (Project No. 11- 0877). The project was delayed due
to changes in the changes in the anticipated demands of the service area, which required
PNG to conduct an engineering e- evaluation the proposed replacement project. Based on
that re- evaluation, PNG determined that the size of the replacement line as previously
proposed would not change, but that construction of a regulator station and its associated
30' x 60' earthen pad would be required near the junction of the existing pipeline right -
of -way (ROW) and an existing sewerline ROW. Construction of the regulator station
will impact an additional 1,690 square feet (sf) of previously - logged, scrub -shrub
wetlands north of Industrial Park Drive.
S &ME, INN / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd/ Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 / f 704.525.4929/www.smeinc.com

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
In support of this application, please find enclosed the following:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) and 2010
Aerial Photograph (Figure 3);
• Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN), Authorization to Act as
Agent and Original Permit Authorization Letters;
• Appendix II: Wetland, Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impact Tables;
• Appendix III: Site Photographs;
• Appendix IV: Request for JD
• Appendix V: Jurisdictional Boundary Drawings (1 -8) Typical Wetland /Stream
Construction Drawings (1 of 1); and Regulator Station Drawings (1 -2)
• Appendix VI: Original Agency Correspondence
• Appendix VII: Restoration Plan and Mitigation Payment Receipts
This PCN is being provided to the USACE for approval, and complies with all applicable
conditions of NWP No. 12. Written concurrence from the NCDWR is also required.
Please note that the proposed project does not meet two general conditions WQC No.
3884, but justification for each is provided below:
The proposed gas line will not cross all streams within the project corridor at a near -
perpendicular angle because much of the project will parallel existing utility
corridors. Because the existing utility corridors do not cross all streams within the
tolerance identified in the aforementioned WQC, the proposed project will also not
meet this requirement.
• The proposed project will require permanently- maintained rights -of -way (ROW) that
exceed 15 feet in width at some locations. The general WQC includes an exemption
for natural gas pipelines, provided that mitigation is offered for conversion of forested
wetlands to herbaceous wetlands due to the additional maintained width. To meet
their operational requirements, PNG is requesting an additional 15 feet for a total
maintained width of 30 feet at stream and wetland crossings. This is the minimum
width required to support: 1) leakage surveys from ground mobile units or aerial
technology; 2) aerial patrolling for possible encroachment activity near the pipeline;
3) accurate identification of possible repairs and maintenance; 4) promotion of
damage prevention in that the ROW can be more easily identified by the public; 5)
minimization of potential canopy encroachment, which creates visibility concerns,
and; 6) minimum turn - around requirements for mechanized mowing and side -
trimming equipment.
The project will also affect streams subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer rules. All
buffer impacts resulting from the proposed project are considered "allowable" per the
buffer rules.
2

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
PNG plans to replace approximately 2.4 miles of aging 4 -inch natural gas line in Wilson
County, N.C. The pipeline will originate at an existing meter station located south of the
intersection or Butterfield Lane and Martin Luther King Parkway (35.7100 °N,
77.8861'W) and extend approximately 2.4 miles south and west to its terminus at a PNG
"city gate" station located west of Baldree Road (35.6952 °N, 77.9186 °W). The location
of the project corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), portions of the
appropriate USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), and an aerial photograph dated 2010
(Figure 3).
Replacement of existing gas line involves excavation of the old 4 -inch line and
replacement with new line of the same diameter. During routing review for the planned
replacement, areas of encroachment by local municipalities were discovered, facilitating
the need to obtain new ROW (parallel to the existing ROW) and abandon those sections
where encroachment has occurred. PNG has routed the new gas line such that it parallels
or is installed within existing natural gas ROW within the project corridor.
In uplands, PNG plans to remove and replace the existing line within the existing 30 -foot
ROW. To minimize disturbance to jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., PNG plans to leave
abandoned pipeline in place in areas of encroachment. At bore locations, PNG also plans
to abandon the existing line in place and install a new line in an additional 10 -foot of
proposed ROW adjacent to the existing 30 -foot ROW. Of the 40 -foot ROW in areas that
will be bored, only 30 feet will be permanently maintained. In areas where local
municipalities have encroached within PNG's existing easement, the old line will be
abandoned in place and a new 40 -foot ROW acquired. Of the 40 feet, only 30 feet will
be permanently maintained, while the remaining 10 feet will consist of temporary work
space (TWS). Wetland and stream crossings that will be installed via conventional
methods will be installed within the existing ROW and no additional permanent
conversion of vegetation will occur in these areas. Disturbance at wetland and stream
crossings will be limited to 40 feet in width (combined permanent and temporary ROW)
during construction.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
Construction will first involve identification of the clearing limits, followed by removal
of aboveground woody vegetation from the proposed ROW and TWS either by
mechanical means or hand - clearing, as appropriate. Efforts will be made to remove trees
in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor, and prevents exposure of soil.
No grubbing or belowground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands, or along
streambanks outside of the temporary crossing footprints. Select portions of the ROW
and TWS may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to
prepare a suitably -level work surface. Appropriate sediment and erosion control
measures will be installed following initial soil disturbance as the project progresses.
Where wetlands or streams will be crossed, the width of the ROW subject to vegetation
removal will be dictated by the method employed to construct the pipeline:

Pre - Construction Notification S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
• Method 1: Horizontal Direction Drill (HDD) or bored crossings (collectively referred
to as "trenchless crossings ") will involve aboveground removal of vegetation within
the proposed corridor that will not exceed 40 feet in width. A temporary equipment
crossing will be installed along one side of the ROW to facilitate equipment passage
and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in wetlands and streams.
Streams will be bridged by use of bolted timber mats, modified railcars or similar
measures that limit temporary bank impacts. No other impacts will be associated
with this type of crossing.
• Method 2: At wetland and stream crossings that will be constructed using traditional
trenching methods, vegetation will be removed within the 40 -foot combined ROW
and TWS corridor. Timber mats /bridges will be employed for equipment to work and
travel on. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be installed at all
crossings to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features as a result of
construction. Removal of vegetation from wetlands and streams will be conducted in
such a manner as to minimize ground disturbance to the extent practicable. In areas
where crossings will be installed via conventional methods, clearing will be
conducted with mechanized equipment and disturbance to soils minimized to the
extent practicable. Streambank vegetation within the corridor will be hand cleared,
and introduction of logging debris into streams or wetlands will be avoided to the
extent practicable.
In general, the pipe will be trucked to the site from a temporary storage yard, strung along
the ROW and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to
bend individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The
pipe segments will be welded together, x -rayed and inspected for structural integrity, and
then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may require dewatering or
"padding" to prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe.
Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench
backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required (wetlands),
the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -
grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent
seeding and mulching to restore the ROW as closely as possible to pre- disturbance
contours and conditions.
Areas within wetlands that are disturbed will be seeded with a customized wetland seed
mix. Areas outside of the permanently maintained ROW will be allowed to revegetate
naturally. Streambanks temporarily affected by trenching or placement of the equipment
bridge will be stabilized with a separate native seed mix specifically designed for riparian
areas, placement of coir matting, and installation of native woody plantings (livestakes or
tubelings) where Neuse River buffer rules apply, otherwise stream banks will be matted
and seeded with the wetland seed mix only. Previously forested portions of the protected
riparian buffer used as TWS will also be replanted with native woody species.
Construction of the regulator station will occur within previously - logged, scrub -shrub
wetland area north of Industrial Park Drive, directly adjacent to the existing ROW.
4

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
Impacts will occur through placement of earthen fill and concrete sub nodes to support
aboveground piping associated with the station.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
General land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists of a mix of low density
residential areas, pasture, forest, and clear -cut areas. Portions of the project corridor are
located close to areas composed of commercial and light industrial development.
Vegetation observed within primary land use and /or habitat types within or adjacent to
the project corridor is identified below, and photos of the project corridor are included in
Appendix III.
Existing Maintained Utility Corridors
Commonly observed species occurring within the maintained utility ROWS included
winged sumac (Rhus copallina), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), blackberry
(Rubus spp.), trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum),
partridge pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), wild
geranium (Geranium maculatum), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), mapleleaf
viburnum (Viburnum acerfolium), blue -eyed grass (Sisyrinchium spp.), wild onion
(Allium sp.), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale),
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), common boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum),
broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), bedstraw (Galium
spp.), Virginia strawberry (Fragaria virginiana), common sheep sorrel (Rumex
acetosella), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), giant cane (Arundinaria
gigantea), porcelain berry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata), Japanese stiltgrass
(Microstegium viminium), hop sedge (Carex lupulina), soft rush (duncus effesus),
jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon),and other various
grasses (Festuca spp.).
Maintained Yard
Species occurring within maintained yards included fescue (Festuca spp.), Bradford pear
(Pyrus calleryiana), dandelion, and creeping buttercup.
Hardwood Forest
Commonly observed edge species and species occurring within hardwood forest habitats
included water oak (Quercus nigra), willow oak (Q. phellos), white oak (Q. alba),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifZua), hickory (Carya spp.), red maple (Acer rubrum),
American holly (Ilex opaca), tulip poplar (Lirodendron tulipifera), blackgum (Nyssa
sylvatica), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), and Japanese honeysuckle.
Planted Pine Stand
Species observed within planted pine stands and along their edges included loblolly pine
(Pious taeda), coral honeysuckle (Lonicera sempervirens), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia
virginiana), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), baccharis ( Baccharis halamifolia),
Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), mimosa (Albizia
julibrissin), Japanese honeysuckle, greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), muscadine grape
(Vitis rotundifolia), and Chinese wisteria (Wisteria sinensis).

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
Floodplain Wetland
Species observed within floodplain wetlands included cinnamon fern (Osmunda
cinnamomea), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), tulip poplar, greenbriar,
jewelweed, giant cane, trumpet creeper, Japanese honeysuckle, lizard's tail (Saururus
cernuus), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), blackgum, red maple, redbud (Cercis
canadensis), and pokeweed (Phytolacca americana).
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
S &ME wetland professionals delineated waters of the U.S. within a majority of the
project corridor in May 2011. Additional field visits were subsequently conducted to
delineate re- routed areas. The delineation was conducted utilizing currently accepted
methods for wetland determination, as set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, which states that under normal circumstances, an area must
demonstrate the presence of three components to be considered jurisdictional: 1)
hydrophytic vegetation, 2) hydric soils, and 3) wetland hydrology. When necessary,
stream assessments were conducted in accordance with NCDWR and USACE guidelines.
Field review identified 6 jurisdictional wetlands and 7 jurisdictional streams within the
project corridor. One of the wetland areas and two of the streams will be avoided
entirely. A Request for Jurisdictional Determination package was included with the
original submittal and approved by the USACE on December 1, 2012. However, the
Preliminary JD expired on March 18, 2012. Accordingly, the request for Preliminary JD
information has been included in Appendix IV for re- authorization.
NCDWR (Martin Richmond) visited the project site in May 12, 2011 to determine which
streams within the project corridor were subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer rules.
NCDWR determined that two of the subject stream channels (S2 and S5) were not
subject to the buffer rules. A copy of NCDENR's July 5, 2011 letter is included in
Appendix IV.
The boundaries of jurisdictional areas were identified in the field using conventional
surveying equipment or Global Positioning System (GPS) units capable of sub -meter
accuracy. Jurisdictional features are depicted on the Jurisdictional Boundary drawings,
included in Appendix V (Sheets 1 through 8).
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
The proposed project involves primarily temporary wetland impacts that will occur as a
result of trench excavation, temporary sidecasting of material and placement of
temporary crossings for the equipment access. The project will result in conversion of
forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands, but aside from construction of the meter
station, will not result in a loss of waters of the U.S. As previously mentioned,
temporarily- impacted wetlands, along with the TWS used during construction, will be
restored to their original grade and contour. Approximately 1,690 sf (0.039 acre) of
scrub -shrub /emergent wetlands will be permanently impacted to construct the meter
station.
C.

Pre - Construction Notification S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
Wetland, stream, and riparian buffer impacts are identified in their respective tables in
Appendix II.
Project -wide impacts (combined temporary, permanent and conversion) will be 1.97
acres, much of which consists of herbaceous wetlands located within existing ROW. Of
those total impacts, maintenance of the new ROW will result in conversion of 0.69 acre
of forested wetland to herbaceous wetlands. The 10 -foot TWS will be restored, seeded
and allowed to return to its pre- disturbance vegetative condition, and will not result in
conversion, as future mowing or maintenance will not occur in the 10 -foot TWS
following construction.
As previously- mentioned, revisions to the originally - permitted design will result in an
additional 0.039 acre of permanent impact. Construction of the meter station will occur
within previously - logged, scrub -shrub wetland area north of Industrial Park Drive,
directly adjacent to the existing ROW. Impacts will occur through placement of earthen
fill and concrete subnodes to support aboveground piping associated with the station.
Details of the station site construction are included in Appendix V.
The project will result in temporary impacts of 204 linear feet of stream through
placement of equipment bridges and isolation crossing methods (dam and pump or dam
and flume) around a segment of bank that will be excavated to accommodate placement
of the pipe. The project revisions will not result in stream impacts beyond those
originally permitted.
With respect to the riparian buffers, the project will cumulatively result in 17,676 square
feet (sf) of impact to Zone 1. Of that impact, 10,132 sf will be permanently- maintained.
Of the remainder, currently forested portions that will not be maintained will be replanted
with woody species, and those that are not currently forested will be seeded with a native
riparian mix, but not planted with woody species.
In Zone 2, 16,375 sf will be impacted, of which 9,026 sf will be maintained. Both
permanently- maintained and temporarily- impacted portions of Zone 2 will be seeded
with a native riparian seed mix.
Typical stream and wetland crossings details are depicted on Sheet 1 of 1 in Appendix V.
Following construction, temporarily- disturbed wetlands within the permanent ROW will
be restored to an herbaceous state, while those within the TWS will be restored and
allowed to return to a forested condition. Affected streambanks will be reconstructed to
their pre- disturbance dimension and profile, and stabilized using coir matting and
vegetative plantings, without use of riprap or hard armoring.
PROTECTED SPECIES
In connection with the original permit authorization, and to comply with applicable
sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531- 1543), S &ME
conducted field reviews of the project corridor. Results of the assessment were presented
with the original application, and a copy of the original PCN package was mailed to the

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) in Raleigh, North Carolina. In addition, S &ME
initially provided scoping packages to the USFWS and the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program ( NCNHP), requesting that each agency review records they may have
had relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species, or high quality natural
communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide comment.
The NCNHP responded with a May 3, 2011 letter stating that the project as proposed was
not likely to impact threatened or endangered species and that review of their database
did not reveal the presence of protected species within or near the project corridor.
The USFWS responded with a May 12, 2011 letter in which they stated that the proposed
project was unlikely to affect federally - protected species, and that they believed the
requirements of Section 7(a) (2) of the ESA had been satisfied.
The project corridor was also reviewed at that time for the presence of protected species
identified to have populations within Wilson County, North Carolina.
No areas of potential red - cockaded woodpecker foraging or nesting habitat were
observed. No mature pine stands suitable for cavity trees were identified on or adjacent
to the project corridor. Similarly, no bald eagle nests or individuals were seen during
field surveys of the proposed corridor.
It should be noted that one aquatic species, dwarf wedgemussel is listed for Wilson
County. Dwarf wedgemussel typically requires fast flowing, well oxygenated streams,
with a sand, cobble and gravel substrate. As previously stated, S &ME did not conduct
sampling for this species, but did observe streams within the corridor for potentially
suitable habitat.
Some of the streams that cross the project corridor within may provide potentially -
suitable habitat for dwarf wedgemussel. Most streams located within the project corridor
were considered unsuitable due to low flow, degree of suspended silt observed, and
adjacency to highly agricultural or industrial areas (Streams 2, 3, and 7). Two streams
will be avoided as a result of route planning, Streams 4 and 5. Streams 1 and 6 may
contain suitable habitat; however crossings of these streams will be installed via
trenchless construction methods avoiding potential impacts to dwarf wedgemussel or its
habitat.
Although potentially - suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac was present within portions of
the project corridor, no individuals of this species were observed during the field review.
One Rhus species winged sumac, was observed; however, no individuals of the protected
Michaux's sumac were observed.
Copies of the NCNHP and USFWS correspondence are included in Appendix VI.

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
In connection with the original permit authorization, the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) provided May 17, 2011 letter stating that they were unaware
of historic resources within or near the project corridor and therefore had no comment on
the project as proposed. Correspondence from the SHPO is included in Appendix VI.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PNG has
proposed to install the new gas pipeline parallel to an existing, maintained pipeline ROW
wherever possible. Two streams and one wetland area within the project corridor were
avoided by strategic alignment. Direct impacts to two streams and two wetlands will be
avoided by using trenchless construction methods.
Where streams are trenched for pipe installation, impacts will be minimized by
stabilizing the temporarily- affected banks with coir matting and deep- rooted vegetation
rather than riprap. Stream sedimentation impacts will be minimized through the use of
the dry -ditch construction methods, such as bypass pumping though silt bags or
temporary de- watering structures, or by use of dam and flumes. Wetland impacts will be
minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench
plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that
equipment necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities.
Wetland vegetation will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to
promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from
the underlying subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing
water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Within wetlands, yearly
vegetation maintenance will only be conducted within a 30 -foot corridor centered on the
new pipe. Remaining portions of the proposed 40 -foot ROW in wetlands will be seeded
with a wetland seed mix and allowed to revegetate naturally.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
The project will comply with all applicable conditions of NWP 12 and WQC 3884, with
the exception of those noted previously. The combined width of the TWS and the
permanent ROW will not exceed 40 feet in wetlands and at stream crossings, 10 feet of
which will not be maintained following construction. The proposed alignment makes use
of existing ROW to the maximum extent practicable.
All Stream work will be performed "in the dry" by isolating the work area through use of
dam and pump- around or dam and flume systems.
Following construction, stream and wetland crossings will be restored to original grade
and contour. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre -
construction elevation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
will be removed to a high ground disposal area. Cleared areas will be restored in
accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix VII) following completion of
the work.
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts authorized under NWP
No. 12, it is our understanding that impacts to streams and wetlands resulting from
construction of the proposed project will be considered temporary if these areas are
restored to original pre - construction contours once construction is completed, and do not
involve the permanent placement of hard armor in streams.
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices outlined in the most recent version of
the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and
approved by the local governing authority shall be in compliance with specifications
governing the proper design, installation, operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices to comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
Sediment and erosion control measures placed in waters will be removed and the original
grade restored. Appropriate measures will be taken during construction to allow flow and
circulation patterns of waters of the U.S. to remain unaffected.
MITIGATION
Wetland and buffer mitigation was satisfied in connection with the original permit.
Receipts from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (Wetland Conversion
Mitigation) and Greene Environmental Services (buffer mitigation) are included in
Appendix VII.
Please note that the permanent wetland impacts associated with the station site (0.039
acre) that were not authorized in connection with the previous permit constitute the only
loss of waters of the U.S. Because these impacts do not exceed 0.10 acre, we do not
anticipate that PNG will be required to purchase additional wetland mitigation credit
beyond that it has already purchased in connection with the original permit.
Please note that mitigation has also been provided by avoidance and minimization
procedures implemented during the design phase of the proposed project. Impacts to
streams and wetlands within the project corridor will be minimized by: 1) use of the
existing, maintained ROW; 2) extensive use of trenchless crossings; and 3) by reducing
both the temporary construction and permanently maintained corridor widths to the
minimum necessary to adequately construct and maintain the project.
SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The primary purpose of the proposed pipeline is to replace a segment of aging natural gas
pipeline with a new pipe of the same diameter. Accordingly, the project should not be
considered growth- inducing in that it is unlikely to serve as an impetus for expansion of
development, and should not result in secondary impacts, or contribute to cumulative
impacts.
10

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 24, 2014
CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written
concurrence with this NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need
additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME
D&, A P44��
Darrin Peine, Q.E.P.
Natural Resources Scientist
[e-mail]
Z.
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager
[e-mail]
Senior Reviewed by Julie Bennett - Hudel, P.G., LEED AP BD +C
Attachments
11

FIGURES

. "NI
r } \a5'o. �d� �. r6'�, j� � � � %�; ��.� � J;`� F. 2 � �� \moo ��ero��' �`v`I,�''�ike •�, °<�p F
RobesonStr'�.. V/f �.�,,�J,qt /aht /c �h:St �S,r •' r
5 9gs g fir.. mf a ��
iq �i 2 a
�� odard'
gopla S Stephe nsF._on gt o
�ycock.St ° 5� metery St
�' Ce "Me
I N : �d`5, I� 'c, _ "` �P`� ��Z ?rah. rtih, • ' �
o @New St�
13a A+
� Ir� I ,fi i f 1 �° +� � �° � � c� �r �� .'�hyp��• �Sct�
65:, Y
eElvie =St 32_
�• -Elvie St
7r,- rggs St � vi s >
a �� 5 �L °incoln'St I_ a
'o Yf 1J Jr`:.N Rest HBUP�� \ \iC v
�� I, I Hicks Cen°t,
it '
�GTh mSti�_Qe� Oaf
plph SQ �_ Stream -S'1
�s �DavieSt�t ( "NpOa l31 uY+A4y�1
Granger '� t;.parkGt.Va9 u�4, Wetland A .
St / posa
Wa`rdtBlvd�War
St Wetland" B
�alston�� �
��
k'' ? Trail D<
C� ^Q� Stream S2�`
co
. .dr^� \ , Stream S4
t F�
c_-2 e,9...4 . r 6 L /
� %4
ry t
4F +
a � . W.etland� \C
`Wetland D Stream �aTnbutaryNl DD S3 ,
ohR MacLaga:Rd 4
`� Charleston�St
{ WetlandtF i _
�I
FStream SS6
Stream.S6t
Stream S7
1 it x I -j
L
S L St f-
i r
Purdi „
.. I I 7 /(JAI � \ ` —. �7 ✓ { _.
Co Relatively Permanent Water (RPM, Seasonal f 5 �} _, ,��• ,"
A Tributary Jurisdictional Ditch (JDD), Seasonal h `' 123
C1 RPW, Year -round
O Wetlands
T- Approximate Proposed Alignment i LL cam" +
_. -- - -- Sewage. DTs o
REFERENCE: USGS 2001 WILSON [NC] QUAD SHEET. PLEASE SEE JURISDICTIONAL f
BOUNDARY MAPS 1 -8 FOR ADDITIONAL MAPPING OF THESE FEATURES. '
THE ABOVE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE USDA GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY WEBSITE. PLEASE
NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY ""' ^""'{ `
OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY S &ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY °0 "` -�� ,000 2,000 3,000
FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
' Feet
SCALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP NO.
DATE: 02.19.14 S&ME
PNG Line 40A
DRAWN BY: DDH /CJF == Wilson County, North Carolina
CHECKED BY: WWW.SMEINC.COM
JoL PROJECT NO: 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01

APPENDIX I:
COMPLETED PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN),
AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS AGENT AND ORIGINAL PERMIT
AUTHORIZATION LETTERS

QaeWAr,R7
� r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
PNG Wilson Line 40A
2b.
County:
Wilson
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Wilson
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
3f.
Telephone no.:
704.731.4375
3g.
Fax no.:
704.731.4098
3h.
Email address:
bob.cisneros @piedmontng.com
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Company
4b.
Name:
Roberto Cisneros
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
4f.
Telephone no.:
704.731.4370
4g.
Fax no.:
704.731.4098
4h.
Email address:
bob.cisneros @piedmontng.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S &ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.604.6474
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
jlawler @smeinc.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project is a linear utility line
Latitude: origin:35.7100; terminus: 35.6952
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Longitude: - origin:77.8861; terminus:77.9186
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
Approximately 12 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Hominy Swamp
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Varies along route. Hominy Swamp is classified as
WSIV; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse 03020203
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the project will occur within or adjacent to existing, mainatined utility corridors. General land use in the
vicinity of the project corridor consists of mix of light industrial, residential areas, active farmlands, forest and clear -cut
areas. Primary natural habitat types consist of maintained utility corrdiors, pine and hardwood forests and floodplain
wetlands. A variety of other land use areas are located along the project corridor, and include landscaped or maintained
lawns, roadway rights -of -way (ROWs) or lightly - developed areas.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 12 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 400 linear feet
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of this project is to replace a seection of aging gas line within the corridor. Additionally, PNG has
discovered that some area of existing easement have been encroached upon by local municipalities. In these areas, it is
necessary to obtain new ROW for safety purposes.
The project was originally authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on December 1, 2011 (SAW 2011-
02239) and by the N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) on November 22, 2011 (Project No. 11- 0877). The
project was delayed due to changes in the changes in the anticipated demands of the service area, which required PNG
to conduct an engineering e- evaluation the proposed replacement project. Based on that re- evaluation, PNG determined
that the size of the replacement line as previously proposed would not change, but that construction of a regulator station
and its associated 30' x 60' earthen pad would be required. Construction of the regulator station will impact an additional
1,690 square feet (sf) of previously - logged, scrub -shrub wetlands north of Industrial Park Drive through placement of
earthen fill and a concrete pad to support aboveground piping associated with the station.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replacement of existing gas line involves excavation of the old 4 -inch line and replacement with new line of the same
diameter. During routing review for the planned replacement, areas of encroachment by local municipalities were
discovered, facilitating the need to obtain new ROW (parallel to the existing ROW) and abandon those sections where
encroachment has occurred. PNG has routed the new gas line such that it parallels or is installed within existing natural
gas ROW for its entire route within the project corridor.
In uplands, PNG plans to remove and replace the existing line within the existing 30' ROW. To minimize disturbance to
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., PNG plans to leave the abandoned pipeline in place in areas of encroachment or areas
that will be bored. At bore locations PNG plas to install a new line in an additional 10' of proposed ROW adjacent to the
existing 30' ROW. Of the 40' ROW in areas that will be bored, only 30' will be permanently maintained. In areas where
local municipalities have encroached on PNG's existing easement, the line will be abandoned in place and a new 40'
ROW acquired. 30' of the newly- acquired ROW will be permanently maintained. Disturbance at wetland and stream
crossings will be limited to 40' in width during construction. At crossings that do not involve HDD /bore, a trench will be
excavated to install the pipe. Within wetlands, stump removal or light grading may occur outside of the trench line only if
required for safety reasons, and toposil and subsoil excavated from the trench will be segregated. The pipe will then be
lowered into the trench, and the trench backfilled, with the toposil replaced last. Affected wetland areas and stream
crossings will then be restored to pre- disturbance contours, stabilized and seeeded with specialized, native seed mixes.
Affected portions of the TWS will be allowed to revegetate naturally, and temporarily- impacted Zone 1 portions of the
Neuse River buffer will be planted with native woody species. Streambanks temporarily affected by trenching or
placement of equipment bridges will be stabilized with coir matting and native woody plantings.
The project will terminate at an existing city gate station located west of Baldree Road. Industry- standard earthmoving
and pipelining equipment, such as bulldozers, excavators, dump trucks and sidebooms will be used to conduct the work.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: S &ME, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: See attached Wetland Impact Table
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: See Attached Stream Impact Table
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open -water impacts will occur.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Riparian Buffer Impact Table.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project was designed to parallel existing utility ROW. Wetlands and streams were delineated within an approximately
300 -foot wide corrdior and avoided where practicable. The combined width of the permanent ROW and TWS will be not
exceed 40 feet at stream and wetland crossings. Efforts were made to site extra TWS needed for bore or drill setups away
from wetlands and streams.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project will make use of horizontal direction drill (HDD) and conventional bores (collectively referred to as "trenchless"
crossings). Crossings where trenchless methods will be employed include Sandy Creek and Hominy Swamp.
Where streams are not bored or drilled, isolation methods (dry construction with clean water dam - and -pump or dam -and-
flume) will be used. Impacts will be minimized by stabilizing the temporarily- affected banks with coir matting and deep- rooted
vegetation rather than riprap. Wetland impacts will be minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at
crossings and trench plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that equipment necessary for clearing,
construction and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to
promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the underlying subsoil in areas
disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Within wetlands,
yearly vegetation maintenance will only be conducted within a corridor that is not greater than 30 feet wide. Remaining
portions of the proposed 40 -foot ROW will be seeded with a wetland seed mix and vegetation allowed to return to its pre -
construction growth stage.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP)
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Riparian
Quantity 0.75
3c. Comments: Mitigation was purchased in connection with the original permit authoruzation. A receipt from NCEEP is
included in Appendix VII.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4h. Comments: Mitigation was purchased in connection with the original permit authoruzation. A receipt from NCEEP is
included in Appendix VII.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
® Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Mitigation was purchased in connection with the original permit authoruzation. A receipt from Greene Environmental
Services is included in Appendix VII.
6h. Comments: See Attached Riparian Buffer Impact Table
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project is a linear utility constructed belowground. With the exception of
❑ Yes ® No
a concrete pad at the station site, the ROW will remain grassed with no imperveous
surfaces.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
[E:'1
Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is a linear utility constructed
belowground. With the exception of a concrete pad at the station site, the ROW will remain grassed with no imperveous
surfaces.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other: N/A
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments: N/A
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
N/A
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered a "growth- inducing" in that the primary purpose of the pipeline is to replace existing line with
pipeline of the same diameter.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project is a natural gas pipeline and will not generate waste water.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NCNHP and USFWS were provided with scoping letters and project maps on 04.25.11. The USFWS requested that
field assessments of the project corridor be conducted. S &ME conducted a pedestrian assessment of potential federally -
protected species habitat between 05.01.11 and 05.03.11. The assessment determined that the project was unlikley to
affect federally - protected species or potential habitat.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
In response to a scoping letter sent to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on 04.25.11, the
SHPO responded that no known historic reources occur within or near the project corridor, and thus had no comment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project will comply with all FEMA regulations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Available FEMA mapping
Joey Lawler
02.24.14
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant nt s Signature
ge
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: 02.21.2014
Project Information
S &ME Project Name: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 40
Type of Project: Permit Re- authorization
Location: Wilson, NC
Property Owner /Representative Information
Business Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Agent Information
Business Name
Street Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
704.731.4370
Roberto Cisneros
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
Joey Lawler
Authorization: I, Roberto Cisneros of Piedmont Natural Gas
hereby authorize S &ME, Inc. to act as agent with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources pursuant to
obtaining the necessary Section 10/404/401 /Buffer permits , as
applicable, related to the above - referenced project.
Signature: a, lam, *�e'-,
S &ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

T.S. AMY COIN'S OF ENGINEERS C 0
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW- 2011 -02239 County: Wilson
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mara Sikora P.E. Piedmont Natural Gas
Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte. NC 27210
Telephone No.: 704 - 731 -437
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The 2.4 mile linear project runs from an
existing meter station located south of the intersection of Butterfield Lane and Martin Luther Kina Parkway, and
extends approximately 2.4 miles south and west to its terminus at the PNG "city Gate" station, located west of
Baldree Road, Wilson County, NC.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes temporary impacts to 1.93 acres of wetland, and 204
linear feet of stream. 0.69 acres of wetland will be permanently converted from forested to emeraent. SEE
ATTACHED SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 12
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and /or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and /or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Thomas Brown at telephone number 919 -554 -4884 extension 22.
Corps Regulatory Official ��� Date: December 1, 2011
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2012

Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the US and /or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:
This jurisdictional determination is only for the waters /wetlands proposed for impacts associated with this Nationwide Permit
and does not include any other waters /wetlands that may be located on the property.
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If You request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Thomas Brown, Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by January 30, 2011.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official: �� !
Date December 1, 2011 Expiration March 18, 2012
Copy Furnished:
Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28723

`VILMINGTON DISTRICT
POST - CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE FORM
Permit Number: SAW - 2011 -02239
Permit Type: NW12
Name of County: Wilson
Name of Permittee: Piedmont Natural Gas
Date of Issuance: December 1, 2011
Project Manager: Thomas Brown
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this
certification and return it to the following address:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attention: CESAW -RG -R
3331 Heritage Trade Dr. Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27591
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced pen-nit has been completed in accordance with
d required mitigation was completed in accordance with the
the terms and conditions of the said permit, an
permit conditions.
Signature of Pennittee Date

Applicant: Piedmont Natural Gas File Number: 2011 -02239 Date: December 1, 2011
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
permission)
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pen-nit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and /or the appeal process you may contact:
may also contact:
Thomas Brown
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Jason Steele
Administrative Appeals Review Officer
919- 554 -4884 x22
60 Forsyth Street, SW (Room 9M10)
Atlanta, GA 30303 -8801
404 -562 -5137
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers persomlel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations. '
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Thomas Brown, Project Manager, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Dr, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD- ET -CO -R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta, Georgia
30303 -8801

Action ID: 2011 -02239
County: Wilson
SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS
Requiring payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program:
In order to compensate for impacts to 0.69 acres of unavoidable conversion impacts to wetlands the permittee
shall make payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount
determined by the NCEEP, sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.69 acres of Riparian wetlands in the Neuse
River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020203). Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin
only after the pennittee has made full payment to the NCEEP and provided a copy of the payment
documentation to the Corps, and the NCEEP has provided written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to
accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, ire compliance with the NCEEP In -Lieu Fee Instrument,
approved by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District on July, 28, 2010.

400
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
November 22, 2011
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Subject Property: PNG Wilson Line 40A
Hominy Creek [030407,27-86-8, C; Sw; NSW]
Dee Freeman
Secretary
DWQ Project # 11 -0877
Wilson County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill or otherwise
impact 1.93 acres of temporary 404 wetland impacts, 0.69 acre of conversion wetland impacts, 204 linear feet of
stream channel (temporary impact), 7,819 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer
(temporary impact), 10,132 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected buffer (permanent impact), 7,349
square feet of Zone 2 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer (temporary impact), and 9,026 square feet Zone
2 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer (permanent impact) to replace an existing gas line, as described in
your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on September 26, 2011 and additional
information received by DWQ on November 8, 2011 (dated November 4, 2011). After reviewing your
application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3819
(GC3819). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Perinit(s) NW12 when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to
the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
YOU must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of
stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval
requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed
below.
NorthCarolina
Natcrrallry
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper

Page 3
5. Buffer Mitigation
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of mitigation
to compensate for impacts to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers is 20,421 square feet as required
under this Authorization Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B .0233. We understand that you intend to
purchase credits from the Contentnea -Little Contentnea Creek Mitigation Bank in Greene County as
described in your application to meet this mitigation requirement. Our records show that the Contentnea -
Little Contentnea Creek Mitigation Bank in Greene County has sufficient credits available for release for
your project. This contribution has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. Until the Contentnea -Little Contentnea Creek Mitigation Bank receives and
clears your check, and proof of payment has been provided to this Office, no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate
authorizes payment into the Contentnea -Little Contentnea Creek Mitigation Bank to meet the
following compensatory mitigation requirement.
6. Diffuse Flow
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non - erosive velocities through the protected stream
buffers and will not re- concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233(5)
7. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or
similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer,
wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15 NCAC 2H, Section
.0500.
8. Notification of Project Commencement
Please notify Lauren Witherspoon at (919) 791 -4251 or [e-mail] of the proposed
start date of the project.
9. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of
completion to the Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater, Compliance and Permitting Unit (WeBSCaPe), North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and /or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the
404 or CAMA Permit.
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is
considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The

APPENDIX II:
WETLAND, STREAM, AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
TABLES

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland
ID
Sheet
No.
Classification
Impacts
Crossing/impact T e*
Type*
Vegetative Type
Relation to
Waterbody
ora Tem
Temporary
Conversion
Permanent Fill
sf
ac
sf
ac
sf
ac
A
2 of 8
Emergent /Forested
Riparian
14,638
0.336
2,936
0.067
0
0.000
Trenchless
B
3 of 8
Emergent /Forested
Riparian
37,047
0.850
15,899
0.364
0
0.000
Conventional
B
3 of 8
Emergent /Scrub -shrub
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
15,899
0.364
Fill placement
C
5 of 8
Forested
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
D
6 of 8
Emergent /Forested
Riparian
13,335
1 0.306
21734
0.063
0
0.000
Conventional /Trenchless
E
7 of 8
Emergent /Forested
Riparian
13,978
0.321
41585
0.105
0
0.000
Conventional
F
8 of 8
Forested
Riparian
4,954
0.114
4,070
0.093
0
0.000
Conventional
Totals:
83,952
1.927
30,224
0.693
15,899
0.364
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the wetland.

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
Classification
Temporary Impact
Crossing Type*
If
sf
S1
2 of 8
Perennial RPW
89
737
Trenchless
S2
4 of 8
Perennial RPW
36
125
Conventional
S3
5 of 8
Seasonal RPW
40
160
Conventional
S4
N/A
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
S5
5 of 8
Seasonal RPW
0
0
Avoided
S6
7 of 8
Perennial RPW
37
1,302
Trenchless
S7
8 of 8
Perennial RPW
2
5
Conventional
Total:
204
2,329
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the stream.

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the jurisdictional feature.
** Mitigation already satisfied during initial permit authorization process
Zone 1 Impacts (sf)
Zone 2 Impacts (sf)
Post - Construction Status
Mitigation Requirement **
Stream
Sheet
Perpendicular
Crossing
Crossing
Mitigation
Total Area (Zone 1 +
ID
No.
Crossing?
Type*
Notes /Justification
Permanently-
Permanently-
Required?
Total Area (Zone 1)
Zone 2) to be
Wetland Area
Net Area
Credits
Total Area
Total Area
to be Replanted
within Zone 1
Required (Net
maintained
maintained
Permanently
(sf)
(sf)
(sf)
Area x 3)
Maintained sf
S1
2 of 8
No
Trenchless
Route existing
4,915
1,214
1,950
541
Yes
0
1,755
182
1,032
3,096
DWQ detremined that
S2
4 of 8
Yes
Conventional
only a small portion of
2,551
871
2,542
611
Partial
250
0
0
238
714
parallel impact to Zone 1
will require mitia tion
S3
5 of 8
Yes
Conventional
Not subject Per DWQ
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
S4
N/A
N/A
N/A
Avoided
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
S5
5 of 8
N/A
N/A
Not subject Per DWQ
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
Route parallels existing
S6
7 of 8
Yes
Trenchless
ROW; DWQ determined
2,953
726
1,969
341
No
48
1,067
N/A
0
0
that no mitigation is
required
S7
8 of 8
No
Conventional
7,532
7,321
9,914
7,533
Yes
211
14,854
1,784
5,537
16,611
Totals:
17,951
10,132
16,375
9,026
509
17,676
1,966
6,807
20,421
Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the jurisdictional feature.
** Mitigation already satisfied during initial permit authorization process

APPENDIX III:
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

View facing west from project origin.
View of the forested portion of Wetland A.
View of existing ROW, includes emergent portion of
Wetland B.
View of Stream 1 (Sandy Creek).
i
r
�
View facing west from project origin.
View of the forested portion of Wetland A.
View of existing ROW, includes emergent portion of
Wetland B.
View of Stream 1 (Sandy Creek).
View facing northwest along the proposed pipeline.
View of typical maintained area along the proposed
pipeline.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Piedmont Natural Gas – Wilson Line 40A
- Wilson County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01 1 PHOTO PAGE 1
i
View facing northwest along the proposed pipeline.
View of typical maintained area along the proposed
pipeline.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Piedmont Natural Gas – Wilson Line 40A
- Wilson County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01 1 PHOTO PAGE 1

vt.8
v fvftj
View of Wetland B facing northeast, note logged area.
View of Stream 3.
View of Wetland E.
View of Stream 2.
View of the emergent portion of Wetland D.
F
Stream 7, facing upstream.
REPRESENTATIVE SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Piedmont Natural Gas — Wilson Line 40A
Wilson County, North Carolina
j. No.: 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01 1 PHOTO PAGE 2

APPENDIX IV:
REQUEST FOR JD

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 02.24.14
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
JOEY LAWLER, PWS
S &ME, INC.
9751 SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28273
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: PNG WILSON LINE 40A
C. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
PNG PLANS TO REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 2.4 MILES OF AGING 4-
INCH NATURAL GAS LINE IN WILSON COUNTY, N.C. THE PIPELINE
WILL ORIGINATE AT AN EXISTING METER STATION LOCATED SOUTH
OF THE INTERSECTION OR BUTTERFIELD LANE AND MARTIN LUTHER
KING PARKWAY (35.7100 °N, 77.8861 °W) AND EXTEND APPROXIMATELY
2.4 MILES SOUTH AND WEST TO ITS TERMINUS AT A PNG "CITY GATE"
STATION LOCATED WEST OF BALDREE ROAD (35.6952 °N, 77.9186 °W).
THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT CORRIDOR IS DEPICTED ON THE
SITE VICINITY MAP (FIGURE 1), PORTIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP (FIGURE 2), AND AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DATED 2010 (FIGURE 3).
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NORTH CAROLINA County /parish /borough: WILSON
City: WILSON
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format):
Lat. SEE ABOVE N, Long. SEE ABOVE
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N, NAD83 NC STATE PLANE
Name of nearest waterbody: HOMINY SWAMP
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: SEE TABLE
Cowardin Class: SEE TABLE
Stream Flow: SEE TABLE
Wetlands: SEE TABLE

Cowardin Class: SEE TABLE
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters: NONE
Tidal: N/A
Non - Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s)
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement

action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that
apply) - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant: SEE ATTACHED FIGURES
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name - WILSON, N.C.
1:24,000
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
WILSON COUNTY, NC.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of
1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): SEE ATTACHED FIGURES
or ® Other (Name & Date): SEE S &ME REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:.
® Other information (please specify): SEE ATTACHED WATERS UPLOAD
SHEET AND USACE WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
See attached Agent Authorization
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)

USACE Waters Upload Sheet
PNG Wilson Line 40A
Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
02.19.2014
Waters Name
Cowardin Code
HGM Code
Area
(acres)
Linear (ft)
Waters Types
Latitude
(dd nad83)
Longitude
(dd nad83)
Local—Waterway
Wetland A
PFO /PEM
DEPRESS
0.25
RPWWD
25.70720
- 77.88771
UT to Hominy Swamp
Stream 1
RIVERINE
100
RPW
35.70761
- 77.88750
UT to Hominy Swamp
Wetland B
PSS /PEM
DEPRESS
0.50
RPWWD
35.70468
- 77.89275
UT to Hominy Swamp
Stream 2
RIVERINE
100
RPW
35.70206
- 77.89728
UT to Hominy Swamp
Stream 3 (JDD)
RIVERINE
100
RPW
35.69869
- 77.89988
UT to Hominy Swamp
Wetland D
PFO /PEM
0.50
RPWWD
35.69801
- 77.90991
UT to Hominy Swamp
Stream 6
RIVERINE
100
RPW
35.69783
- 77.91075
UT to Hominy Swamp
Wetland E
PFO /PEM
0.25
RPWWD
35.69738
- 77.91211
UT to Hominy Swamp
Stream 7
RIVERINE
100
RPW
35.69661
- 77.91567
UT to Hominy Swamp
Wetland F
PFO /PEM
0.25
RPWWD
35.69663
- 77.916022
UT to Hominy Swamp

USACOE Aid # DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _40
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Piedmont Natural Gas 2. Evaluator's name: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
3. Date of Evaluation: 5/2/2011 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:12:37
5. Name of stream: Stream 2 6. River basin: Contentnea
7. Approximate drainage area: > 100 acres 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 feet 10. County: Wilson
11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): NA
Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.70176 °N Longitude (ex. - 77.55661) 77.89693 °W
Method location determined ✓ GPS ✓ Topo Sheet ✓ Ortho (Aerial Photo /GIS) ✓ Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location):
Stream 2 is a modified stream channel, ditched, within an agricultural field.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): utility
15. Recent weather conditions: sun
16. Site conditions at time of visit: same
17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey:
0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 90 % Agricultural
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Forested 10 % Cleared /Logged 0 % Other
22. Bankfull width: 5 feet 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 3 -6 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 -2 %) Gentle (2 -4 %) Moderate (4 -10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2):
Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the
same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under
review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to
evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 26 Comments: Stream 2 is a perennial channel.
( V
Evaluators Signature: Date: 5/2/2011
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement.
Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION
POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 -6
0 -4
0 -5
1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
1
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.�
5
Groundwater discharge
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
3
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
0
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 -5
0 -4
0 -2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 -6
0 -4
0 -2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
0
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 -4
0 -5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
4
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
2
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
0
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0 -3
0 -5
0 -6
1
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
1
P
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 -4
0 -4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
0
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
26
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

USACOE Aid # DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _40
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Piedmont Natural Gas
2. Evaluator's name: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
3. Date of Evaluation: 5/2/2011
4. Time of Evaluation: 1:28:41
5. Name of stream: Stream 3
6. River basin: Contentnea
7. Approximate drainage area: 2 acres
8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 feet
10. County: Wilson
11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees
11. Subdivision name (if any): NA
Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.69844 °N
Longitude (ex. - 77.55661) 77.89957 °W
Method location determined ✓ GPS ✓ Topo Sheet ✓ Ortho (Aerial Photo /GIS) ✓ Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks
and attach a map identifying stream's location):
Stream 3 is located adjacent to the rail road at intial proposed crossing.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): utility
15. Recent weather conditions: sun
16. Site conditions at time of visit: same
17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey:
0 % Residential 10 % Commercial 80 % Industrial 10 % Agricultural
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Forested 0 % Cleared /Logged 0 % Other
22. Bankfull width: 4 feet 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): .5 -1 foot
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 -2 %) Gentle (2 -4 %) Moderate (4 -10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2):
Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the
same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under
review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to
evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 2$ Comments:
C�l
Stream 3 is an intermittent channel.
Evaluators Signature: Date: 5/2/2011
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement.
Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION
POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 -6
0 -4
0 -5
1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.�
5
Groundwater discharge
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
2
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
0
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 -5
0 -4
0 -2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 -6
0 -4
0 -2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 -4
0 -5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
4
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0 -3
0 -5
0 -6
0
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
1
P
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 -4
0 -4
1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
1
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
28
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

USACOE Aid # DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _40
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Piedmont Natural Gas 2. Evaluator's name: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
3. Date of Evaluation: 5/2/2011 4. Time of Evaluation:2:35:20
5. Name of stream: Stream 5 6. River basin: Contentnea
7. Approximate drainage area: 2 acres 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 feet 10. County: Wilson
11.Site coordinate(if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): NA
Latitude (ex. - 34.872312) 35.6977 °N Longitude (ex. - 77.55661) 77.90009 °W
Method location determined ✓ GPS ✓ Topo Sheet ✓ Ortho (Aerial Photo /GIS) ✓ Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream's location):
Data point taken downstream of culvert at railroad crossing.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): utility
15. Recent weather conditions: sun
16. Site conditions at time of visit: same
17.Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation reach? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey:
0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
21. Estimated watershed land use: 100 % Forested 0 % Cleared /Logged 0 % Other
22. Bankfull width: 5 23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 6
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 -2 %) X Gentle (2 -4 %) Moderate (4 -10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instruction for completion of worksheet (located on page 2):
Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the
same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under
review (e.g., the stream flows from the pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to
evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 41 Comments:
C�l
Stream 5 is an intermittent channel.
Evaluators Signature: Date: 5/2/2011
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement.
Form subject to change - version 06/03. To comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION
POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 -6
0 -4
0 -5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.�
5
Groundwater discharge
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
2
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
1
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 -5
0 -4
0 -2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 -6
0 -4
0 -2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 -4
0 -5
1
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F'.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
3
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0 -3
0 -5
0 -6
1
(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
2
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
4
P
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 -4
0 -4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
41
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Wilson L -40 City /County: Wilson Sampling Date: 05.02.11
Applicant /Owner: PNG State: NC Sampling Point: WB
Investigator(s): JOL /CJF Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope ( %): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 133 -A Lat: 35.7039 Long: - 77.8939 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Raines NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
A portion of Wetland B (WB) has been recently logged. Adjacent vegetation indicated hydrophytic
vegetation is the reference condition.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑High
Water Table (A2)
I--I Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑-f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
1
I--I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑✓ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
0_
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 1 -3
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is evident.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Plants observed in the portion of WB not affected by recent logging. Plants listed represent the
reference condition prior to logging. Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Pinus taeda
90
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
20
N
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
3 Acer rubrum 10 N FAC
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A /B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
120
60
= Total Cover
24
FACW species 4 x 2 = 8
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
50% of total cover:
30' )
20% of
total cover:
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
1 Persea burbonia
60
Y
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 9 (A) 23 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.56
2 Vaccinium corymbosum 50 Y FACW
3 Clethera alnifolia 30 Y FACW
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
E✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
El 2 - Dominance Test is >50 °k
8.
El 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
140
= Total Cover
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 70
20% of total cover:
28
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1 Wisteria frutescens
80
Y
FACW
2 Vitis rotundifolia 20 N FAC
3 Smilax rotundifolia
20
N
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
120 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 60
20% of total cover:
24
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Plants observed in the portion of WB not affected by recent logging. Plants listed represent the
reference condition prior to logging. Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Lo C2
Texture Remarks
0 -1 10YR 3/1 100
Mucky loam
1 -12 10YR 4/1 100
Sandy Clay Loam
12 -16+ 10YR 5/2 100
Sandy Clay Loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T�❑I---II
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
F] Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
.❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
.❑
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Red Parent Material (TF2)
.F]
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑✓
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑✓
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil is hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Wilson L -40 City /County: Wilson Sampling Date: 05.02.11
Applicant /Owner: PNG State: NC Sampling Point: WD
Investigator(s): CJF /JOL Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Stream Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 133 -A Lat: 35.697 Long: - 77.911 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WD is a floodplain wetland of Stream 6 (Hominy Swamp)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑High
Water Table (A2)
I--I Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑-f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
1
I--I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
0_
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 1 -5
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is evident.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
40
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2
Nyssa sylvatica
35
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
3 Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A /B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
OBL species 1 x 1 = 1
95 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47.50
20% of total cover:
19
FACW species 3 x 2 = 6
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
FAC species 6 x 3 = 18
1
Ligustrum sinense
60
Y
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: 10 (A) 25 (B)
3
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.5
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
E✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
El 2 - Dominance Test is >50 °k
8.
Z 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
60
= Total Cover
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover:
28
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
40
Y
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Osmunda cinnomomea
20
Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.-
Woodwardia areolata
20
Y
OBL
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
80
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover:
16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1
Wisteria frutescens
80
Y
FACW
2 Vitis rotundifolia 20 N FAC
3
Smilax rotundifolia
20
N
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
120 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 60
20% of total cover:
24
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Lo C2
Texture Remarks
0 -8 10YR 5/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M
sandy day loam
8 -12 10YR 5/2 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M
Clay Loam
12 -16+ G1 6N 90 10YR 4/6 10 C PL
Clay Loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T�❑I---II
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
�✓ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
.❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
.❑
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Red Parent Material (TF2)
.F]
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil is hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Date: 5/2/2011
Project: PNG Wilson Line 40
Latitude: 35.70176 °N
Evaluator: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
Site /Stream ID: Stream 2
Longitude: 77.89693 -W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 27.5
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Stream Determination:
Perennial
County:
Wilson
Other e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (subtotal = 12 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwe
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool
ripple-pool sequence
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 )
4. Particle size of stream substrate
3
5. Active /relic floodplain
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
3
8. Head cuts
0
9. Grade control
0
1
10. Natural valley
0
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a. artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of baseflow
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
boil based evidence ot high water table'?
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 )
18. Fibrous roots in channel
3
19. Rooted plants in channel
3
20. Macrobenthos
21. Aquatic mollusks
0
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
*perennial stream smay also be indetified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream 2 is a perennial channel.
Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Date: 5/2/2011
Project: PNG Wilson Line 40
Latitude: 35.69844 °N
Evaluator: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
Site /Stream ID: Stream 3
Longitude: 77.89957 -W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 21.5
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Stream Determination:
Intermittent
County:
Wilson
Other e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0.5
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0.5
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool
ripple-pool sequence
0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
5. Active /relic floodplain
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
20. Macrobenthos
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
21. Aquatic mollusks
2
8. Head cuts
0
22. Fish
0
9. Grade control
0.5
0
10. Natural valley
0.5
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
25. Algae
a. artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of baseflow
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
14. Leaf litter
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
boil based evidence ot high water table'?
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in channel
2
19. Rooted plants in channel
2
20. Macrobenthos
0
21. Aquatic mollusks
0
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
*perennial stream smay also be indetified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream 3 is an intermittent channel.
Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Date: 5/2/2011
Project: PNG Wilson Line 40
Latitude: 35.70154 °N
Evaluator: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
Site /Stream ID: Stream 4
Longitude: 77.89635 -W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 30
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Stream Determination:
Perennial
County:
Wilson
Other e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (subtotal = 14.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0.5
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwe
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool
ripple-pool sequence
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 )
4. Particle size of stream substrate
2
5. Active /relic floodplain
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
8. Head cuts
0
9. Grade control
0
1
10. Natural valley
0
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a. artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of baseflow
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
14. Leaf litter
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
boil based evidence ot high water table'?
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in channel
2
19. Rooted plants in channel
3
20. Macrobenthos
0
21. Aquatic mollusks
0
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
*perennial stream smay also be indetified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream 4 is a perennial channel.
Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Date: 5/2/2011
Project: PNG Wilson Line 40
Latitude: 35.6977 °N
Evaluator: S &ME (Crystal Fox)
Site /Stream ID: Stream 5
Longitude: 77.90009 -W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 27.5
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Stream Determination:
Intermittent
County:
Wilson
Other e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (subtotal = 15.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0.5
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwe
0.5
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool
ripple-pool sequence
Yes = 3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
5. Active /relic floodplain
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
8. Head cuts
0
9. Grade control
0
1
10. Natural valley
0
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a. artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of baseflow
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
14. Leaf litter
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
boil based evidence ot high water table'?
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 )
18. Fibrous roots in channel
1
19. Rooted plants in channel
3
20. Macrobenthos
0
21. Aquatic mollusks
0
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
*perennial stream smay also be indetified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream 5 is an intermittent channel.
Sketch:

APPENDIX V: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY DRAWINGS (1 -8)
TYPICAL WETLAND /STREAM CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (1
OF 1); AND REGULATOR STATION DRAWINGS (1 -2)

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
\� \\ \111111111 / / //Z DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
CARR
SEAL
L-4649
* L- 46 49
SURV��oIL�`��
.A. • G\,P.�`�
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES, EXCEPT WHERE
NOTED.
O
PIN: 3731 -94 -4314
WILSON CEMETERY COMMISSION
DB 499 PG 353
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PIN: 3731 -04 -1329
BENSON RENTALS, LLC
DB 2009 PG 451
PB 23 PG 91
I LOT 114
I
I
VICINITY MAP
ZZI /1 /1111111 \ \ \� v. .� .v .v �. �. •v 1 I
(NOT TO SCALE)
• W W I
I 14
1 1p ILI PIN: 3731 -04 -2412
BENSON RENTALS, LLC
W w w y N: 714,333.49 \ 2? 50' ZONE 2 DB 2009 PG 451
E: 2,330,206.22 Z2 Z2 BG PB 23 PG 91
J I I w �`• \ ��FP LOT 15
w I i WETLANDS AREA A 2� ?2
/ .�, ,(THIS AREA WILL BE DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED TO MINIMIZE IMPACT), u, �\ STREAM S1 AREA \
v v i I I w v w v N y ,I, .I I t\ t i• TO BE DISTURBED \, Z1 NEZI
\\y 27 30' ZO
�
L21 Ll L18
. .......... ----- . ...............................
.PROPOSED 10. ............ - 77777. _
.............................
.............
/ .1.............. ...'.'.'..' ................... 4'.'.'.'.'.ti .'.'.'.'. PROPOSED 4" GAS LINE•'.% %'. o Q.'.'.'.'.'.a'.'.'.'.'.:t .' ;' ;' :`4•'G'•'•'.'.'. t. � •....... � —..�
:��.'_�y,,.w's3�.S— �.r�.• -.. GAS ESM•T ..................... �.'...�� .. „� :•,�...... ;..'"^r. `-....... .'....
G ��
'.
...
'.'.'.'.'. + cfi....... $ -Fr. •.... ..CY -` 6- .��4:4k'G-- rPI•�; • :- �.G.:. •, ..6- -. - - --•ice • .. .
..............
....................
............
v... .�.'....Y......... .....'... .w. v..... I.. .. w.. .. '\ ..............y..... .......W.. ..N .......... .............., �.>.4....... .
w.............
..............
'.
... N,• .....' .•
o....EX. 30' GAS ESMT Wx?... w•,•• ....................
.............................
v y N �...... ..... DB 709 PG 127 r.
�...... ..... �. a ........ ....................
. . •�
r W. :� ..... I .....:�'..... w ..'... w ................. - -.. --
'•' w s.
.............
- - - - - -- — v — --� —' •..•fir = �' —y-'_ L' ..�i_, — .. 2T'
...... ........
v v , . - . , L1 w v w u w w v \ �?> 30' DISTURBANCE j . — —
LEGEND ` _ ^ 22 CORRIDOR THROUGH I N
. REBAR FOUND - � ''�
i \ '� �, ... 2? 21 Z1 AM BUFFER
� —' •� �' ••WETLAND AREA A `I' � �
Q FOUND IRON PIPE y y �.� ' I 2? 1 I N I
G--
• COMPUTED POINT
PERMANENT CONVERSION
�.._..�
�� \ 22
TEMPORARY IMPACT
14,638 SQ FT
12
PROPOSED GAS LINE
4,915 SO FT 1
1,950 SO FT
REPLANT AREA 0
22
o i
I
I PIN: 3731 -04 -3422
BENSON RENTALS, LLC
� G G
cn
N '
� DB 2009 PG 451
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
PB 84
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT
oN
mj l
LOT 17
\
BOUNDARY LINE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
WETLANDS A IMPACT
PERMANENT CONVERSION
2,936 SQ FT
0.067 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACT
14,638 SQ FT
0.336 AC
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM S1
ZONE 1 Z
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION 1
1,214 SQ FT 5
541 SQ FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT 4
4,915 SO FT 1
1,950 SO FT
REPLANT AREA 0
0 SO FT 0
0 SQ FT
30 AREA OUTSID OF THE PEMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER �g3 � \
— Z7 — Z1 *REPLANT AREA IS ALL WOODED TEMPORARY IMPACT .� RF NP \
50' ZONE E 2 BUZZER AREAS UNLESSEPREVIOUSLY RPERMIT7ED �N AN S EXISTING
TREE LINE EASEMENT. NC
.'TEMPORARY IMPACT'.'..•.•.
PERMANENT CONVERSION
� WETLANDS �
STREAM No 1 LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 1.03' N85'28'52 "E
L2 45.43' N46'58'49 "E
L3 25.66' N28'01'03 "E
L4 16.86' N64'26'18 "E
L5 11.72' S24'587
09 "W
L6 5.46' S62'2201 "W
L7 23.42' S26'56'23 "W
L8 50.63' S44'52'05 "W
L9 9.75' 587'27'39 "W
L10 10.32' N24'58'09 "E
WETLANDS A LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L11 19.16' N80'30'47 "E
L12 25.92' 586'01'05 "E
L13 401.61' 524'58'09 "W
L14 6.08' N73'34'53 "W
L15 41.67' NO3'01'41 "W
L16 34.33' N00'06'40 "E
L17 314.45' N24'58'09 "E
BOUNDARY TIE
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L18 49.97' 524'58'09 "W
L19 20.61' N63'05'20 "E
L20 55.62' N63'05'20 "E
L21 27.33' S24'58'09 "W
89' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 30' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 737 SF
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WlsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -2.dwg 8/24/2011 10:53:14 AM EDT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
Land
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 8
N.C. License No. C -1362
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
TREE LINE EASEMENT. NC
.'TEMPORARY IMPACT'.'..•.•.
PERMANENT CONVERSION
� WETLANDS �
STREAM No 1 LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 1.03' N85'28'52 "E
L2 45.43' N46'58'49 "E
L3 25.66' N28'01'03 "E
L4 16.86' N64'26'18 "E
L5 11.72' S24'587
09 "W
L6 5.46' S62'2201 "W
L7 23.42' S26'56'23 "W
L8 50.63' S44'52'05 "W
L9 9.75' 587'27'39 "W
L10 10.32' N24'58'09 "E
WETLANDS A LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L11 19.16' N80'30'47 "E
L12 25.92' 586'01'05 "E
L13 401.61' 524'58'09 "W
L14 6.08' N73'34'53 "W
L15 41.67' NO3'01'41 "W
L16 34.33' N00'06'40 "E
L17 314.45' N24'58'09 "E
BOUNDARY TIE
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L18 49.97' 524'58'09 "W
L19 20.61' N63'05'20 "E
L20 55.62' N63'05'20 "E
L21 27.33' S24'58'09 "W
89' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 30' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 737 SF
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WlsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -2.dwg 8/24/2011 10:53:14 AM EDT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
Land
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 8
N.C. License No. C -1362
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
WETLANDS A LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L11 19.16' N80'30'47 "E
L12 25.92' 586'01'05 "E
L13 401.61' 524'58'09 "W
L14 6.08' N73'34'53 "W
L15 41.67' NO3'01'41 "W
L16 34.33' N00'06'40 "E
L17 314.45' N24'58'09 "E
BOUNDARY TIE
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L18 49.97' 524'58'09 "W
L19 20.61' N63'05'20 "E
L20 55.62' N63'05'20 "E
L21 27.33' S24'58'09 "W
89' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 30' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 737 SF
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WlsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -2.dwg 8/24/2011 10:53:14 AM EDT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
Land
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 8
N.C. License No. C -1362
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L18 49.97' 524'58'09 "W
L19 20.61' N63'05'20 "E
L20 55.62' N63'05'20 "E
L21 27.33' S24'58'09 "W
89' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 30' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 737 SF
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WlsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -2.dwg 8/24/2011 10:53:14 AM EDT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
Land
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 8
N.C. License No. C -1362
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
89' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 30' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 737 SF
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WlsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -2.dwg 8/24/2011 10:53:14 AM EDT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
Land
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 8
N.C. License No. C -1362
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011. y
`\` \`\\�. CAR0�,, JE F Y S, ITH PLS L- 464
QFE'ssloy ,
��SEAL `
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES, EXCEPT WHERE
NOTED.
FRY S .
1� I`81
f 7 1
WOODFIELD SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS B LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
Ll
27.92'
N12'23'31 "E
L2
42.36'
N36'20'23 "E
L3
49.71'
N57'20'12 "E
L4
21.39'
N51'15'13 "E
L5
14.79'
N15'38'14 "E
1-6
291.18'
N54'31'01 "E
L7
56B.59'
N67'24'22 "E
L8
57.40'
N66'49'26 "E
L9
13.62'
576'07'25 "E
L10
15.57'
560'40'07 "W
Lll
44.06'
572'39'28 "W
L12
33.64'
S14'09'12 "W
L13
45.66'
N70'58'00 "W
L14
39.75'
S15'06'55 "W
L15
7.OB'
S43'1 6'43 "E
L16
497.02'
S67'24'22 "W
L17
379.83'
S54'31'01"W
L18
50.30'
S54'31'01 "W
L19
30.01'
S33'55'57 "E
L20
54.16'
S54- 31 -01 "W
L21
21.92'
N4818'20"W
L22
12.86'
N12-23'31; ;E
EAST TRAIL DR
50' R/
264
PG
PB 23 ��-
r31 - 'Z_><
� �
f y i 1t y
I 1 N: 713,011.11 - N
/ _ o
I IE: 2,328,240.55 t� --/ - "' �� 20' DRAINAGE E 4 T ��
1 I -, = 1 ,_ ._.""` _� �_Y � - -� fir.,= - 'd" 'L6 ,�.: 4r.^.�•' • • c•
=�� _ — f •L3� L4 .. e,.•'... SED. 4�.A'•'•w' :' :v : :.� {',':':':• y w
r'
_ 4 w w.. C : :: v' : ::• ::
• :w : :i.'..'.:' yr y OPbSED 40 w w
w� .1.:'. {:' ....... :...r.....;. ..rL17 p GAS ES T
24��}"''�,1 -t
G G 1 YV{'......•'.'.�w w w w W w
� G � .ate'•;.:.:...•.
+_ w L20 PROPOSED 30'X60'
1$ STATION SITE ESM'T
PIN: 3721 -82 -1872
SCHWAN'S SALES
ENTERPRISES, INC.
DB 1393 PG 259
PB 18 PG 142
LOT 2
LEGEND
REBAR FOUND
Q FOUND IRON PIPE
• COMPUTED POINT
PROPOSED GAS LINE
G G G
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
TREE LINE —
.'TEMPORARY IMPACC'.'.'.'
w WETLANDS w
1
4�
1
I�
1 0.364 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACT
37,047 SQ FT
1 0.850 AC
PERMANENT STATION IMPACT
1 1,690 SQ F7
u �?
REVISED; 2 18 14
DRAWN BY:
RC
\
4
INDUSTRIAL PARK DRNE
60,S /WPB18 PC 142
17
PIN: 3721 -83 -4042
S. CHRISTOPHER WILLIFORD
DB 1891 PG 315
PB 18 PIS 142
LOT 3
BOUNDARY TIE LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH I BEARING
L231 91.97'1 S33.39'33 "E
L24 18.40' N54'31'01
"E
WETLANDS 8 IMPACT AREAS
PERMANENT CONVERSION
15,899 SQ FT
1 0.364 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACT
37,047 SQ FT
1 0.850 AC
PERMANENT STATION IMPACT
1 1,690 SQ F7
\
REVISED; 2 18 14
DRAWN BY:
RC
\
BOUNDARY TIE LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH I BEARING
L231 91.97'1 S33.39'33 "E
L24 18.40' N54'31'01
"E
WETLANDS 8 IMPACT AREAS
PERMANENT CONVERSION
15,899 SQ FT
1 0.364 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACT
37,047 SQ FT
1 0.850 AC
PERMANENT STATION IMPACT
1 1,690 SQ F7
1 0.039 AC
PIN: 3721 --83 -5785
CITY OF WILSON
DB 487 PG 430
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TITLE I R
Ra ti\ oy
DATE VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Zi_� ---'- -
�Y EX. 30' AS
v` DB 707 ESM T
w w ur w aik plc rV
L1 O n
WETLAND AREA B 11�`
•'• w w w w w w W w -
W w w w •\4. _
w w
It
15
PIN: 3731 -G2 -8956
,TAMES GORDON WRIGHT
KENDALL WRIGHT SHARPE
DB 1700 PG 576
16
PIN: 3721-82-8979
S. CHRISTOPHER WILLIFORD
DB 1891 PG 315
PB 18 PG 142
LOT 4
100
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
400
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 3 OF 8
N.C. Llceose No. C -1362
Reglonal Land Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
jm .1194.00 1 DRAWN BY: RC
DATE: 08 -01 -2011 1 CREW CHIEF: MP
REVISED: 8 26 11
DRAWN 8Y:
RC
REVISED; 2 18 14
DRAWN BY:
RC

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
\ \ \ \\\%%IIIIIil1 /,77,
CAR04 /'''.
Sl
SEAL
* L -4649
��i, 0`9tip S U RN E����\��
/lln
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
STREAM No 2 LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
11.75'
S46'05'02 "E
L2
18.99'
S27'48'28 "E
L3
4.63'
546'09'57 'W
L4
20.40'
N26'31'53 "W
L5
10.54'
t!46. ?2'08'W
L6
3.81'
N46'09'57 "E
36' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 40' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 125 SF
BOUNDARY TIE LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L7
54.05'
SO4'54'32 "W
L8
8.36'
S02'51'49 "E
L9
24.38'
S27- 55 -43 "E
L10
37.25'
S20'13'17 "E
L11
26.23'
S23'31'36 "E
L12
33.94'
S19'29'16 "W
Ll 31
16.83'
S01'59'47 "W
Ll 41
73.74'
S20'04'50 "W
Ll 51
68.88'
S46'09'57 "W
22
PIN: 3721 -61 -7785
MINSHEW FARMS, INC.
DB 1135 PG 277
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES, EXCEPT WHERE 30' DISTURBANCE
NOTED. / CORRIDOR THROUGH
STREAM BUFFER
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM S2
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION
871 SO FT
611 SO FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT
2,551 SO FT
2,542 SO FT
REPLANT AREA
250 SO FT
0 SO FT
* REPLANT AREA IS ALL WOODED TEMPORARY IMPACT
AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERMANENT CONVERSION
AREA, UNLESS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED IN AN EXISTING
EASEMENT.
�. HEHLANI AKEA
.' %'. •. •. •, •, •, •, • •. •. •. • .'.'.'.'ti.•.'.'.'. ZB !v X1.5 /
ti.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' .'...'.' �j....... , v /
�.....
/ p x 1%...... G'.'.'...' .'.'.'
0.
.•....... �
•�, STREAM S2 AREA ^'` .•.•.•,'•.• c `Sep 4"
— .. TO BE DISTURBED / ti � tiry \ � SCllye
0,00 �OJ� L -_ /"'�4j��
�G-
GAS 30'
/
/
cb
v,
0. -/
/
N: 712,524.14
E: 2,327,508.99
20
PIN: 3721-72-6570
ERADER A. MILLS, JR.
DB 2342 PG 71
LEGEND / / / / 21 Ch
PIN: 3721 -71 -7573 /ly
REBAR FOUND PRODEV XIX. LLC c�
Q FOUND IRON PIPE / / / / / / DB 2174 PG 891
• COMPUTED POINT N�� /
/ 4
PROPOSED GAS LINE / LS S FS� 1�6 / / CORPS ACTION I.D.
s G —G ® / 'Ce VG / THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT 1` is eg N$ / / ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE q CO
/ ' • / JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN I
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT / / \ / WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED O
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
BOUNDARY LINE / LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
/ STREAM S4 DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY / / \ OUT SIDE OF BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
/ DISTURB LIMITS FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
30' ZONE 1 BUFFER
/ �/ WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS GRAPHIC SCALE
Z1 Z1 / \ WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
50' ZONE 2 BUFFER \ • • \
Z2 Z2 \ 40 0 20 40 80
TREE LINE NAME
PORARY ,IMPACT : TITLE
PERMANENT CONVERSION DATE ( IN FEET )
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WilsonCo_Une40— PNG \dwg \119400— W -4.dwg 8/26/2011 7:37:24 AM EDT 1 inch = 40 ft.
1/m
c
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
\ JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 4 OF 8
160
Land N.C. License No. C -1362
Regional Surveyors, Ine.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
S I pjyq<� Y 'ii
SEAL =
*
L-4649
Q 9YO SU RV.y���\`\�
yo .A ..
��ll /llllllll \ \�\
/� aw//
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES, EXCEPT WHERE
NOTED.
LEGEND
• COMPUTED POINT
PROPOSED GAS LINE
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
TREE LINE
23
PIN: 3721 -60 -0786
CARR AND CARR PROPERTIES, LLC
DB 2061 PG 613
— — — — — — — — —
TITLE
I I
DATE I I
S: \CURRENTPROJ \119400- WilsonCo- Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -5.dwg 8/26/2011 7:49:20 AM EDT
COASTAL CAROLINA
RAIL ROAD
150' R/W
U)
� J
UI
V
m
E: 2,326,736.81
N: 710,673.80
S52'47'1616 =W
143.18'-
IV
\ \
WETLANDS AREA C
OUT SIDE OF \
DISTURB LIMITS \
I IN 22
STREAM No 3 LINE TABLE
LINE
EX. 30' GAS ESM T
_------
L1
(DB 709 PG 292)
- - - - -- — —
— — — — — — — — — —
-�G _,G �G --G �G �G
PROPOSED 4" GAS LINE
..��G �G —G —G �G
L3
3.99'
CORPS ACTION I.D.
I m
10.93'
S37'07'37 "E
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
o X
I
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
LA
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
-u a / ,•
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
REGULATIONS, LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 04 JUUR SDICT10N MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
L �\
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
I . • 'f . • STREAM S5
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
, • OUT SIDE OF
DISTURB LIMITS
NAME
TITLE
I I
DATE I I
S: \CURRENTPROJ \119400- WilsonCo- Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W -5.dwg 8/26/2011 7:49:20 AM EDT
COASTAL CAROLINA
RAIL ROAD
150' R/W
U)
� J
UI
V
m
E: 2,326,736.81
N: 710,673.80
S52'47'1616 =W
143.18'-
IV
\ \
WETLANDS AREA C
OUT SIDE OF \
DISTURB LIMITS \
I IN 22
STREAM No 3 LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
28.81'
N38'17'58 "W
L2
11.20'
N37'07'31 "W
L3
3.99'
N52'52'23 "E
L4
10.93'
S37'07'37 "E
L5
29.07'
S3817'44 "E
L61
3.99'
S52'47'16 "W
PIN: 3721 -61 -7785
1 MINSHEW FARMS, INC.
DB 1135 PG 277
r,.
I
40' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 40' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 160 SF
I J
EX. 30' GAS ESM'T
30' yl (nR 711 Pr, F ,1
1 PROPOSED 40'
— GAS ESM'T
C
=G — G � G — G G � G — G
\ STREAM S3 AREA
TO BE DISTURBED
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 5 OF 8
Land N.G. Lloense No. G -1Gtl1
Regionai d Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEA11ON
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011. 30 ^ \ J/ �&
PIN: 3721-31-9016
8�Z9 /I MARY ELLEN JOHNSON
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649 '� D PB 26 84 PG 1019 PG
/ A.
\ \ R FSMT
J
EX. 3' 0' GAS ESM'T� T ; \`\
v DB 709 PG 296
��� \� CARO/
"SN �Oe' S I
SEAL
L-4649
* L- 46 49
��i 9YD SUR ...,
//ni1110\ \ \�
.i / ..G'• • •'•'•����.'.''f y65 \ 3S X76+
\ / ...... I.. y:� �\ v\ qS FQ
o \
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TI TLE
29 DATE
PIN: 3721 -40 -0887
J.P. WEAVER, INC.
DB 1547 PG 154
PB25PG4
28
PIN: 3721 -40 -2784
WP2, LLC
DB 2018 PG 193
ILI
.'.'.'.<$ .'•'••'•'... N . • w �GOpNG I w \\ v \ \ SF` c R ESM'T
� \ • SE`s
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
V" ..:
z
PROPOSED
GAS \ \'•'•' '•'•'...'.'..: // \ PFIEPO \O !A w w \ ^o \ \ N: 710,765.80
v, r;, (77 "•'.'.'.:w.'.' ✓��5 \� v y •w j0' ` \ \ [6. E: 2,324,391.33
27 ESM'T Al hf l OR �^� 6 �0 0qS \�\ \\ \ \ \ I ��.' ..... ....'.'.w..
�� .`5y w e OG Fsdj• \`\ \ \ \ G.. -, ®G ®G ®G
h
IN sti F M ss
7 \
2
J, y W Z2
y WETLANDS E
LEGEND
Q FOUND IRON PIPE
• COMPUTED POINT
PROPOSED GAS LINE
�G G
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
30' ZONE 1 BUFFER
Z1 Z1
50' ZONE 2 BUFFER
Z2Z2
TREE LINE
.'TEMPORARY •IMPACT' :'
PERMANENT CONVERSION
WETLANDS
31
PIN: 3720 -39 -5115
PAULINE HOWELL WOODARD ET AL
DB 1162 PG 756
PB 14 PG 48
LOT 3
WETLANDS AREA D LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
I BEARING
L1
140.32'
N87'54'09 "W
L2
46.50'
N59'17'16 "W
L3
47.33'
N63'01'55 "E
L4
10.99'
559'17'16 "E
L5
54.27'
S87'54'09 "E
L6
13.32'
S75'06'1 6"E
L7
32.07'
555'26'57 "E
L8
31.76'
560'35'23 "E
L9
9.23'
S53'06'36 "E
L10
197.44'
S65'58'15 "W
Lll
50.01'
N60'54'40 "W
L12
231.70'
N65'58'15 "E
L13
26.70'
S32'52'00 "W
L14
31.22'
S59'31'45 "E
^�ti 296) \ \ \ - y
w w....... •...... u . <g —�
l -- - �_arY..w•••,•w•.... f .....w......... �9- _ _ LS03'28'19 "W
WETLAND AREA D _
L1 34.82'
N87.54'09 "W \� - -' _ - - - - - -- 72.71
85 "W N`'
w
-— w_ w_ _ w w • • 55.92' -
t IP w WETLAND AREA D
� lL
N: 710,687.93
E: 2,323,839.65
20' SEWER ESM'T lj Q,
PB 25 PG 40 \ \
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
\� \ PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 6 OF 8
PIN: 3720 -39 -9127
ROBERT RIGHT, ET AL
DB 2034 PG 448
WETLANDS AREA D IMPACT
PERMANENT CONVERSION
2,734 SQ FT
0.063 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACT
13,335 SQ FT
0.306 AC
S: \CURRENTPROJ \119400 — Wilson Co—Lin e40— PNG \dwg \119400— W -6.dwg 8/26/2011 7:50:57 AM EDT
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120 240
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 60 ft.
Land 11,1;, UCense no. c —iaoz
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

32
PIN: 3720 -29 -9145
JAMES W. WOODARD, JR.
DB 1162 PG 766
PS 14 PG 48
LOT 2 & 2A
\ W
LEGEND
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
�N C�<
*: SEAL
L-4649
SURN..o'N <�
� I IAI I I11 P\`\\\
/�QL�i�C 8%z9/I I
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
w �
PIN: 3721 -31 -6166
PLT UTILITIES, INC.
138 2049 PG 377
PS 31 PG 38
LOT 3
N: 710,838.26
E: 2,323,600.76
w w (THIS AREA WILL BE DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED TO MINIMIZE IMPACT)
�•.w d..+- i . .. ^. v v . '. .':.r.. ....yv., — ..G.w , b ., — . , . v• . ' — •, • 'w i�• —• � ". , . w .' .. ++W ar w . . �w w . ..w — w. •. ; �W ' -,� ..yw am .
Y . . w v
✓ ..... ,L w
i • �
STREAM ..
S6
A
w w WETLANDS AREA E TO BE DISTURBED
PROPOSED 10' .
\
GAS ESM'T r L L18
�L . �.—. — -
P 1 —
' . . . .. . _.' . .......... : s •• •.... .......
; ' ;::::. "�
.... :' Cr s s 6 . Y..'.. ,yC.r.'.. . a ,77 ®- • - - G '.
v
0
Ll L17 w.'...'..V ....... .............. . ....... . :'
v w w•.. .�'. ...w......�...' .. .. ............ r...........................
�.....
6
o..... .' ............................. 0 .. L2
w..... w......w.....:v......i.:.:.. ;.: v..;.;. ;.:. ;... :' : ::�: ''..:�......v.:... ;..., v,,, •�..... y.....w.....w............� '''''y'••'•'•'•'�'.....v...... o ......... t -...__ .......
.......... ............................... _
..:::_..:: : : : ::: :: :: .............
......... .........
` ?..
N w w w w v w w w w L13 w w w w v -,,— L12 30' DISTURBANCE
N: 710,580.76
E: 2,323,209.44 V� v v v v v v v y v v v w w w w EX. 30' GAS ESM'T w CORRIDOR THROUGH \
\ (DB 707 PG 115) 1- .�. v fir, STREAM BUFFER
w y w w
wWETLANDS AREA E
v w v w w w w w v w v v v v S0. IAO
PIN: 3720 -39 -5115
\ w w w w v w y PAULINE HOWELL WOODARD ET AL, �\ i\
\v DB 1162 PG 756
v v, w y w v v PB 14 PG 48 w
NOTE:
LOT 3
w w w w w w v' w
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES, EXCEPT WHERE v w v v P \
NOTED. w w w � \
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT \
REBAR FOUND
Q FOUND IRON PIPE
• COMPUTED POINT
PROPOSED GAS LINE
®G — G
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
30' ZONE 1 BUFFER
Z1 Z1
50' ZONE 2 BUFFER
Z2 Z2
TREE LINE
.'TEMPORARY IMPACT' ::' :':•:
PERMANENT CONVERSION
w WETLANDS y
WETLANDS E LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
3.01'
S76'17'13 "W
L2
16.87'
N39'33'43 "W
L3
14.54'
N68'38'39 "E
L4
276.51'
N68'38'39 "E
L5
14.38'
S56'34'36 "E
L6
32.91'
N47'43'36 "E
L7
36.18'
N68.38'39 "E
L8
4.30'
N65'58'15 "E
L9
31.56'
S84'00'23 "E
L10
20.08'
S37'59'24 "E
L11
5.41'
S05'07'04 "W
L12
34.78'
S65'58'1 5 "W
Ll 31
263.57'
S68'38'39 "W
L14
3.10'
N62'35'06 "W
L15
29.32'
S76'1 8'22 "W
Ll 61
35.66'
N83'49'49 "W
1171
32.55'
S7039'57 "W
WETLANDS E IMPACT
PERMANENT CONVERSION
4,585 SQ FT
0.105 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACT
13,987 SQ FT
0.321 AC
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM S6
LINE
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION
726 SQ FT
341 SQ FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT
2,953 SQ FT
1 1,969 SQ FT
TREE REPLANT AREA
1 48 SQ FTI
0 SQ FT
' REPLANT AREA IS ALL WOODED TEMPORARY IMPACT
AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERMANENT CONVERSION
AREA, UNLESS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED IN AN EXISTING
EASEMENT.
STREAM No 6 LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L18
15.44'
N65'58'15 "E
L19
37.51'
S60'54'40 "E
L20
44.42'
S65'58'15 "W
L21
36.32'
N58'20'33 'W
L22
26.95'
N65'58'15 "E
37' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 30' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 1,302 SF
S:\ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WilsonCo_Line40 - PNG \dwg \119400- W -7.dwg 8/26/2011 7:51:41 AM EDT
BOUNDARY TIE LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L231
19.90'
S35'43'08 "W
L241
53.65'
S59'23'1 2 "E
L251
24.71'
N00'23'27 "W
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
s
lko.
? v.
\�o \y v
'6�v w TBGw
B
�
............... ...... rC'.... .. G � G l�
�w
v ..
/ �... /
/.'.'.'.' • •W.'.'.'.'.'. '.
.. .
..... .'y ....'. ..... .:' w v
J_ - - -
w
\w w \ w
REPLANT AREA
•, v. w w w w
PIN: 3721 -31 -9016
\ MARY ELLEN JOHNSON
DB 2384 PG 379
\ ` PB 26 PG 101
w w
w v
v'
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 7 OF 8
Regional Land Surveyors, In e.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
160
THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES, EXCEPT WHERE
NOTED.
\ Z
\ \ \ ( IN FEET)
\ \ 1 inch = 40 ft. o
\ \\ \ \ \ \\ /t2 /2 ?\2 ?\ 9tio11°
\ i 22 ti
X21 \ \22 PIN: 372340 -9409 °mac,+°
NATHAN L. NEWSOME, JR. LLC . ry
®G \\ /T \ \21 �� DB 1819 PG 182 N ^'
LO
®c N \ STREAM S7 AREA \ 27 \ ro / ti a
\ TO BE DISTURBED °o V� a
...... �... L9 X111 .. j2
........
\ /
`.:.:....:... �r 10 �....'.. X76' ' w \ :, •\ \ \ \ \ 21 \ 22 /
�`.
..........: .......REPLANT AREA • •�.:...�.... <ls \ \ \ \ \2? / ti°
AV
`;' ......... . .
..:.....� '.'.:'.:'.'.'.'. \• . .: •,•,.... MO \ �� 30' ;:....'.'.../
\ \ ' . ' • • • :Z�': : :::' .'.: :::. 3 \ :: :' :.'... e CAS
PC
1� W WETLANDS AREA F� SF 's...' ..... ... 89)
`..........'�<:':'.'.'.'.' .. \ /// tip. ti
.. \......... '..........'...C+....'.'.'.'... X.
WETLANDS F IMPACT
PERMANENT CONVERSION 4,070 SQ FT 0.093 AC
TEMPORARY . '
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM S7
ZONE 1 Z
ZONE 2
IMPACT
4,954 SO FT
0.114 AC
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM S7
ZONE 1 Z
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION 7
7,321 SO FT 7
7,533 SO FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT 7
7,532 SO FT 9
9,914 SO FT
'... •
/ STREAM BUFFER \.... '.'.'.'.'.'.'. ?T.�'.z�...G.....
« REPLANT AREA IS ALL WOODED TEMPORARY IMPACT ,1, ,�, \•,• ..... , , . , , , , • •
AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERMANENT CONVERSION y,•,••••• • • ........ , , • , , , , , ,
AREA, UNLESS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED IN AN EXISTING "". „,•,••••
EASEMENT.
LEGEND
0 FOUND IRON PIPE
• COMPUTED POINT
PROPOSED GAS LINE
� G � G
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
30' ZONE 1 BUFFER
z1 z1
50' ZONE 2 BUFFER
- Z2 Z2
TREE LINE
.'TEMPORARY ,IMPACT; ...; :::•:
PERMANENT CONVERSION
� WETLANDS �
STREAM No 7 LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L13 2.78' 514'17'39 °E
L14 3.26' N71'01'47 "E
L16 4.11' 56633'12 "E
2' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 40' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 5 SF
7'39 °E
L14 3.26' N71'01'47 °E
L15 111.58' S66'33'12 °E
/• �Z2\ z2 �;Z2..
WETLANDS F LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 9.09' 527'10'41 "W
L2 37.82' N60'44'16 "W
L3 30.53' 574'01'24 °W
L4 12.56' S49'26'18 °W
LS 5.17' S14'25'05 °E
L6 154.37' N66'33'12 °W
L7 21.32' N72'32'1 7 "E
L8 22.82' S75'03'42 °E
L9 25.75' S73'47'09 °E
L10 21.92' N78'38'21 °E
L11 11.21' N75'24'58 °E
L12 11.75' 566'33'12 "E
L13 2.78' 5141
S: \ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WilsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W- 8- REV.dwg 8/29/2011 7:17:15 AM EDT
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE
YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN
N: 710,105.23
E: 2,322,252.92
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
.0 N CARo
SEAL =
*
L-4649
SURNF''
o•
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
co /
M /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
33
PIN: 3720 -29 -4104
EDWARD WOODARD FAMILY TRUST
� DB 1745 PG 359
PB 14 PG 48
LOT 1
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 8 OF 8
Regional Land Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
2' LF OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT IN A 40' CORRIDOR.
AREA: 5 SF
7'39 °E
L14 3.26' N71'01'47 °E
L15 111.58' S66'33'12 °E
/• �Z2\ z2 �;Z2..
WETLANDS F LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 9.09' 527'10'41 "W
L2 37.82' N60'44'16 "W
L3 30.53' 574'01'24 °W
L4 12.56' S49'26'18 °W
LS 5.17' S14'25'05 °E
L6 154.37' N66'33'12 °W
L7 21.32' N72'32'1 7 "E
L8 22.82' S75'03'42 °E
L9 25.75' S73'47'09 °E
L10 21.92' N78'38'21 °E
L11 11.21' N75'24'58 °E
L12 11.75' 566'33'12 "E
L13 2.78' 5141
S: \ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WilsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W- 8- REV.dwg 8/29/2011 7:17:15 AM EDT
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE
YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN
N: 710,105.23
E: 2,322,252.92
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
.0 N CARo
SEAL =
*
L-4649
SURNF''
o•
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
co /
M /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
33
PIN: 3720 -29 -4104
EDWARD WOODARD FAMILY TRUST
� DB 1745 PG 359
PB 14 PG 48
LOT 1
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 8 OF 8
Regional Land Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
/• �Z2\ z2 �;Z2..
WETLANDS F LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 9.09' 527'10'41 "W
L2 37.82' N60'44'16 "W
L3 30.53' 574'01'24 °W
L4 12.56' S49'26'18 °W
LS 5.17' S14'25'05 °E
L6 154.37' N66'33'12 °W
L7 21.32' N72'32'1 7 "E
L8 22.82' S75'03'42 °E
L9 25.75' S73'47'09 °E
L10 21.92' N78'38'21 °E
L11 11.21' N75'24'58 °E
L12 11.75' 566'33'12 "E
L13 2.78' 5141
S: \ CURRENTPROJ \119400_WilsonCo_Line40- PNG \dwg \119400- W- 8- REV.dwg 8/29/2011 7:17:15 AM EDT
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY
BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FIVE
YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN
N: 710,105.23
E: 2,322,252.92
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE DELINEATION
EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S & M E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN MAY OF
2011.
.0 N CARo
SEAL =
*
L-4649
SURNF''
o•
DAVID A. CLARK PLS L -4649
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
co /
M /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
33
PIN: 3720 -29 -4104
EDWARD WOODARD FAMILY TRUST
� DB 1745 PG 359
PB 14 PG 48
LOT 1
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 8 OF 8
Regional Land Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

LEGEND
NEW GAS LINE
®G �G ®G
EXISTING XISTINGGAS LINE
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMP—WORKSPACE-
EXISTING PNG EASEMENT _
\ �.e
NOTE:
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 40' IN WIDTH
WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AND 30' WITHIN
BUFFER ZONES.
s �PM/J
\ z
0
—G Mm G G
ce Uj :TEMPORARY
w.� BRIDGE) I
w ¢ �\ SILT BAG
U'
--- -, - -- -- ----,�--'--- N - -- - -- - --
�G A— G —� 6
cT
PROPO D 10'
GAS EAEMENT
0
� N
\2� SILT FENCE &
� LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
1 EXISTING 4" GAS LINE
q G G —G
EXCAVATED
5' DITCH
�8 EGG S L— I� 6 -�-6-
-- ---MINIMUM 5' R�714ATCHED AREA DELINEATED
IL STREAM DISTURBANCE I
\ � I
TYPICAL STREAM CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
oz
G Mg —G G G
0 U)
zQ
�w
w
9
NEW 4" GAS LINE
MINIMUM 15' COVER "
Q
J
/ J
SILT FENCE &
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING 4" GAS LINE
G G G G G
HATCHED AREA DELINEATES
COIR MATTING OR ENKAMAT
ALONG DISTURBED BANKS
mmmm-6 � =mw-G -�
PROPOSED 10' I I SILT FENCE TO REMAIN UNTIL
GAS EASEMENT cn. GROUND COVER IS REESTABLISHED
D
TYPICAL STREAM CROSSING REPLACEMENT
G — I- 75(1! — G G —
0 N
zQ
F Uj
-- - -- -NEW 4" GAS LINE - - - - - - -
�-G 6—�-Cr�G 7 G ` 1
- - - - - -- - -- MINIMUM 5' COVER- -BENTONITE /
•WETLAND
�
1
P'L4.
�' TEMPORARY
BRIDGE OR MATTING
---H--- AR--------------------
HATCED EA - DELINEATES
PROPOSED 10'
GAS EASEMENT
WETLAND I
SILT FENCE &
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING 4" GAS LINE
—G G G G
SPOIL
�, PILE
EXCAVATED
5' DITCH
---------------------------
---H--- AR--------------------
HATCED EA - DELINEATES
WETLAND DISTURBANCE
TYPICAL WETLAND CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
CROSSING DETAILS
WILSON LINE 40A
PROJECT# 2738933
PIEDMONT NATURAL
GAS COMPANY, INC.
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET' of 1
N.C. License No. C -136
2
Regionai Land Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
Job :1194.00 1 DRAWN BY: RC DATE: 09 -08 -11 CREW CHIEF: MP
r.\rvinnru+ .\1-1— "m___n., i:....In_o \­­\ 11 n MnJ Aw.. � /O /Onit 1n•SD•57 Akl rnT

1' -6" Typ 2' -0" Typ 5' -0" Typ
N
4 , (2) Plcs 1 (2) Plcs �12 O2 i 2 (2) Pics CL
21 F-
� / %; �, 0 b 2' -0"
t� N 1' -011
24 23 23 23 34�
s. 4. C8 \/3�3 13 - 34 15 O 6 A CJ (D 13 33 13 O7 13
19 1
(16 4' Q 4" 4" 4" (7� �8 6. 6. 6" B,
G 4" O
E
a" =/ 1/ L 12 33
r L
6- U') 2 C 4• q-
13 2 �I 23 23 34 15 1 4.
g
L X33 34 -
00 00 IF
f 3 37 9 -
ti X3 4•
io
Plan View
A
20 Section G -G to
3' -0" Field Dim
Station Bypass Valves
I--- --{
2 0
4'
a"
G G
J
0
33�
3
35 14 9,. Typ �-�i
\1 (2) plcs V -0" Typ
33 4„ Typ 6" Typ (4) pICB 6" Typ (2
4 Ics
(2) plcs (4) plcs 1'-0�� TYP 33 () P
X33) (2) plcs 33
IT �� a• s" s• + _0E
o`o zt �1
C) Q �� 31, 32 N 2" above
N u, N M finished
0 4• T_ o grade
25 LL- 255 zo ( /
'' • -
E t "~ •% �:. _ - �' 12 "0x2'0 "min
concrete- filled
22 o
_,.: -, Sonotube for 4"
�:, support
6"
18"0 x TO" min
2 6 �--- 4' -0" for 6" support
4" 4" 4" 4" g• s• O 6• O 6" 4"
"U 21 ` e
O Pour concrete pad Pipe Support Detail
�% to support riser ' 4" & 6" EZ -Line Pipe Support
Elevation View Min 12" x 12" x 18" H
Sense lines not shown for clarity) ection A -A
y> Relief Valve
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
1 12/10/13 Station redesign - load increase from 70,000 cfh
NOTES:
1. Any change to this design required due to field
conditions must be approved by the Engineering
Department.
2. Above ground installation not to be located near
intake vents.
3. Vertical components of assembly to be level.
4. Pipe and assembly not to come in direct contact
with concrete or rock. Night caps must be used on
all sections that are not tied in.
5. Pipe to be wrapped with a double layer of
tapecoat 20 or Engineering approved equivalent
where in contact concrete or soil. The coating
should extend above ground.
6. In areas of solid rock, pad dirt shall be used for
back fill to 12" above pipe and 6" below pipe.
7. Pipeline components and station must be tested
with air or nitrogen to a pressure range of 1,550 -
1,650 psig for 1 hour. The fitters and regulators
must be replaced with pipe spools before testing.
Supply the Engineering Department with a copy of
the pressure test report.
8. Operator /Monitor Set -up:
Primary run set points for the 1st regulator
(Operator) is 60 psig and the 2nd regulator
(Monitor) is 65 psig. Secondary run set points for
the 1st regulator (Operator) is 55 psig and the 2nd
regulator (Monitor) is 65 psig.
9. Relief valve set pressure shall be set at 70 psig.
Set pressure is defined as the pressure at which
the main valve begins to lift. This ensures
wide -open relief capacity at 71 psig .
10. Taps for sensing lines shall be drilled; not cut
with torch.
11. The welding procedure forthe highest yield
strength must be used when welding pipe and /or
fittings with different yield strengths.
12. All underground piping must be coated and
Contractor maybe responsible for installing CP and
grounding mats as shown on additional supplied
designs.
13. All above ground piping shall be painted ANSI
49 Gray.
14. Contractor responsible for geotech fabric, stone
and fencing all above ground facilities with 6 feet
fencing.
PIPE REQUIREMENTS:
6"x 0.280" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14495
6" x 0.280" WT API -51- Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 15980
4" x 0.237" WT API -51- Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14048
4"x 0.237" WT API -51- Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 16049
2"x 0.154" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14160
+ - Indicates electrically isolated flange makeup.
r611 Piedmont
Natural Gas
Wilson Industrial Park
Regulator Station
Industrial Park Dr. @ Line 1190, Wilson, NC
Tarboro Resource Center
STATION ID: 85 -T -93- TAR -1552
DESIGN INFORMATION
1000 PSIG
DIST ALLOCATION
Design Pressure
275 PSIG
7/16" - 1'40"
Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAOP)
275 PSIG
DRAWING BY
Maximum Actual Working Pressure of Main
175 PSIG
10700
Minimum Expected Operating Pressure of Main
60 PSIG
PROJECT NO.
Required Delivery Pressure
250,000 CFH
Anticipated Load
DRAWING NO.
226 -2013
Rate Schedule
METER:
N/A
CFH Capacity @
PStG Inlet
REGULATOR:
261,632
CFH Capacity @
175
Inlet
60
Outlet
420,302
CFH Capacity @
275
Inlet
60
Outlet
Automatic Shut -off Setting
—
RELIEF:
226,808
1 CFH Capacity @
71
PSIG Inlet
NOTES:
1. Any change to this design required due to field
conditions must be approved by the Engineering
Department.
2. Above ground installation not to be located near
intake vents.
3. Vertical components of assembly to be level.
4. Pipe and assembly not to come in direct contact
with concrete or rock. Night caps must be used on
all sections that are not tied in.
5. Pipe to be wrapped with a double layer of
tapecoat 20 or Engineering approved equivalent
where in contact concrete or soil. The coating
should extend above ground.
6. In areas of solid rock, pad dirt shall be used for
back fill to 12" above pipe and 6" below pipe.
7. Pipeline components and station must be tested
with air or nitrogen to a pressure range of 1,550 -
1,650 psig for 1 hour. The fitters and regulators
must be replaced with pipe spools before testing.
Supply the Engineering Department with a copy of
the pressure test report.
8. Operator /Monitor Set -up:
Primary run set points for the 1st regulator
(Operator) is 60 psig and the 2nd regulator
(Monitor) is 65 psig. Secondary run set points for
the 1st regulator (Operator) is 55 psig and the 2nd
regulator (Monitor) is 65 psig.
9. Relief valve set pressure shall be set at 70 psig.
Set pressure is defined as the pressure at which
the main valve begins to lift. This ensures
wide -open relief capacity at 71 psig .
10. Taps for sensing lines shall be drilled; not cut
with torch.
11. The welding procedure forthe highest yield
strength must be used when welding pipe and /or
fittings with different yield strengths.
12. All underground piping must be coated and
Contractor maybe responsible for installing CP and
grounding mats as shown on additional supplied
designs.
13. All above ground piping shall be painted ANSI
49 Gray.
14. Contractor responsible for geotech fabric, stone
and fencing all above ground facilities with 6 feet
fencing.
PIPE REQUIREMENTS:
6"x 0.280" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14495
6" x 0.280" WT API -51- Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 15980
4" x 0.237" WT API -51- Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14048
4"x 0.237" WT API -51- Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 16049
2"x 0.154" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14160
+ - Indicates electrically isolated flange makeup.
r611 Piedmont
Natural Gas
Wilson Industrial Park
Regulator Station
Industrial Park Dr. @ Line 1190, Wilson, NC
Tarboro Resource Center
STATION ID: 85 -T -93- TAR -1552
SHEET(S)
1 OF 2
DIST ALLOCATION
27
SCALE
7/16" - 1'40"
AREA CODE
5215
DRAWING BY
EJP
ACCOUNT NO.
10700
DRAWING DATE
12/10/2013
PROJECT NO.
2738933
ENGINEER
EJP
DRAWING NO.
226 -2013
CHECKED BY
LT
APPROVALS
DATE
ALQNATUqE r
REGIONAL ENGINEER
t r
D T
SI
MANAGER - TECHNICAL
p
RESOURCES & STANDARDS
TE �+
SI URt `
P.RWCIPAL ENGINEER
Copyright 2013 - Piedmont Natural Gas Company
4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Drawing Contains Proprietary and Confidential Information.
All Rights Reserved.

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
0 0
U
C U
C
w w
0
o
N
N
r
1'-6" Ty 2' -0" TYp 5' -0" TYp
v (2) Plcs (2) Plcs n
(2) Plcs � T W
0
r 5' , N
X y x
s" 10'-6" Min a^ s' A7 o
R. 6" I--- 7 -0 --� �-- 2 -0'
a.. 0 N. a.. 6" s' e' 6"
6. I- 4' -a' x
T
X 6" X
a°
co ao
a"
io
X Plan View x
o F-
in o
i10
X � 3' -0" � Field Dim x
a.. a„
G G
x A x
x x
X x
X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
60' -0"
Property Fence (Approximately 60'x 30)
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
1 12/10/13 Station redesign - load increase from 70,000 cfh
NOTES:
1. Any change to this design required due to field
conditions must be approved by the Engineering
Department.
2. Above ground installation not to be located near
intake vents.
3. Vertical components of assembly to be level.
4. Pipe and assembly not to come in direct contact
with concrete or rock. Night caps must be used on
all sections that are not tied in.
5. Pipe to be wrapped with a double layer of
tapecoat 20 or Engineering approved equivalent
where in contact concrete or soil. The coating
should extend above ground.
6. In areas of solid rock, pad dirt shall be used for
back fill to 12" above pipe and 6" below pipe.
7. Pipeline components and station must be tested
with air or nitrogen to a pressure range of 1,550 -
1,650 psig for 1 hour. The fitters and regulators
must be replaced with pipe spools before testing.
Supply the Engineering Department with a copy of
the pressure test report.
8. Operator /Monitor Set -up:
Primary run set points for the 1st regulator
(Operator) is 60 psig and the 2nd regulator
(Monitor) is 65 psig. Secondary run set points for
the list regulator (Operator) is 55 psig and the 2nd
regulator (Monitor) is 65 psig.
9. Relief valve set pressure shall be set at 70 psig.
Set pressure is defined as the pressure at which
the main valve begins to lift. This ensures
wide -open relief capacity at 71 psig .
10. Taps for sensing lines shall be drilled; not cut
with torch.
11. The welding procedure for the highest yield
strength must be used when welding pipe and /or
fittings with different yield strengths.
12. All underground piping must be coated and
Contractor maybe responsible for installing CP and
grounding mats as shown on additional supplied
designs.
13. All above ground piping shall be painted ANSI
49 Gray.
14. Contractor responsible for geotech fabric, stone
and fencing all above ground facilities with 6 feet
fencing.
PIPE REQUIREMENTS:
6" x 0.280" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14495
6" x 0.280" WT API -5L Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 15980
4" x 0.237" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14048
4" x 0.237" WT API -5L Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 16049
2"x 0.154" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14160
- Indicates electrically isolated flange makeup.
Piedmont
Natural Gas
Wilson Industrial Park
Regulator Station
Industrial Park Dr. @ Line 1109, Wilson, NC
Tarboro Resource Center
STATION ID: 85 -T -93 -TAR -1552
DESIGN INFORMATION
1000 PSIG
DIST ALLOCATION
Design Pressure
275 PSIG
3/8" - 1'-0"
Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAOP)
275 PSIG
DRAWING BY
Maximum Actual Working Pressure of Main
175 PSIG
10700
Minimum Expected Operating Pressure of Main
60 PSIG
PROJECT NO.
Required Delivery Pressure
250,000 CFH
Anticipated Load
DRAWING NO.
226 -2013
Rate Schedule
METER:
N/A
CFH Capacity @
PSIG Inlet
REGULATOR:
261,632
CFH Capacity @
175
Inlet
60
Outlet
420,302
CFH Capacity @
275
Inlet
60
Outlet
Automatic Shut -off Setting
—
RELIEF:
226,808 1
CFH Capacity @
71
PSIG Inlet
NOTES:
1. Any change to this design required due to field
conditions must be approved by the Engineering
Department.
2. Above ground installation not to be located near
intake vents.
3. Vertical components of assembly to be level.
4. Pipe and assembly not to come in direct contact
with concrete or rock. Night caps must be used on
all sections that are not tied in.
5. Pipe to be wrapped with a double layer of
tapecoat 20 or Engineering approved equivalent
where in contact concrete or soil. The coating
should extend above ground.
6. In areas of solid rock, pad dirt shall be used for
back fill to 12" above pipe and 6" below pipe.
7. Pipeline components and station must be tested
with air or nitrogen to a pressure range of 1,550 -
1,650 psig for 1 hour. The fitters and regulators
must be replaced with pipe spools before testing.
Supply the Engineering Department with a copy of
the pressure test report.
8. Operator /Monitor Set -up:
Primary run set points for the 1st regulator
(Operator) is 60 psig and the 2nd regulator
(Monitor) is 65 psig. Secondary run set points for
the list regulator (Operator) is 55 psig and the 2nd
regulator (Monitor) is 65 psig.
9. Relief valve set pressure shall be set at 70 psig.
Set pressure is defined as the pressure at which
the main valve begins to lift. This ensures
wide -open relief capacity at 71 psig .
10. Taps for sensing lines shall be drilled; not cut
with torch.
11. The welding procedure for the highest yield
strength must be used when welding pipe and /or
fittings with different yield strengths.
12. All underground piping must be coated and
Contractor maybe responsible for installing CP and
grounding mats as shown on additional supplied
designs.
13. All above ground piping shall be painted ANSI
49 Gray.
14. Contractor responsible for geotech fabric, stone
and fencing all above ground facilities with 6 feet
fencing.
PIPE REQUIREMENTS:
6" x 0.280" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14495
6" x 0.280" WT API -5L Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 15980
4" x 0.237" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14048
4" x 0.237" WT API -5L Grade X -52 CFB ERW
- Catalog Number 16049
2"x 0.154" WT API -5L Grade X -52 Bare ERW
- Catalog Number 14160
- Indicates electrically isolated flange makeup.
Piedmont
Natural Gas
Wilson Industrial Park
Regulator Station
Industrial Park Dr. @ Line 1109, Wilson, NC
Tarboro Resource Center
STATION ID: 85 -T -93 -TAR -1552
SHEET(S)
2 OF 2
DIST ALLOCATION
27
SCALE
3/8" - 1'-0"
AREA CODE
5215
DRAWING BY
EJP
ACCOUNT NO.
10700
DRAWING DATE
12/10/2013
PROJECT NO.
2738933
ENGINEER
EJP
DRAWING NO.
226 -2013
CHECKED BY
Ais
APPROVALS
DAVE
GNATU� E I .
RJEGIONAL ENGINEER
r i
'
1 r,
w. � t
�'F o
D E
SIG
MANAS31ER - TECHNICAL
RESOURCES & STANDARDS
ATE
SI O)RE
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
Copyright 2013 - Piedmont Natural Gas Company
4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Drawing Contains Proprietary and Confidential Information.
All Rights Reserved.

APPENDIX VI:
ORIGINAL AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue Division of Water Quality
Governor Coleen H. Sullins
Director
July 5, 2011
Crystal Fox
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
BASIN:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
NB /RRO# 11-117
Wilson County
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) ❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
® Ephemeral /intermittent /Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: PNG Line 40 — Wilson Count
Location/Directions: Subject property is a proposed gas pipeline project extending from
approximately east of Lane Street to north of Wilco Blvd in Wilson, NC
Subject Stream:
UT to and Hominy Swam
Date of Determination: May 12, 2011
Feature E/I/P* Not Subject
Start@
Sto p@ Stream Soil
Subject
USGS
Sl
p X
Throu out
Form Pts. Surve
To o
S2
P X
Throu out
X
X
S3
I X
X
X
S4
P X
S5
1 X
SW Outfall
S5'
P X
Fla 55.04
S5
P X
Throu hout
S7
P X
Throu out
X
X
11P =
Ephemeral/Inter,- nittent /Perennial
X
X
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wilson County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale.. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Di may
vision of Water Quality.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the
drolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quali QiurAy
Internet: www.ncwater uaii o ty Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (9I9) 791 -4200 Customer Service
q1 r9 1628 Mali Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper

PNG Line 40 Wilson County
Wilson County
July 5, 2011
Page 2 of 2
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian McMillan, DWQ Wetlands /401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1650.
If you dispute the Director's determination you may file a petition for an administrative hearing. You must rile the
Petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the receipt of this notice of decision. A
petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours.
The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00
pm, except for official state holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714. The petition may also be
faxed to the attention of the Office of Administrative Hearings at (919) 733 -3478, provided the original and one (1)
copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) days following the date of
the fax transmission. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o Mary
Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This
project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)- 807 -6301, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office) at (919)- 544 -4884.
/Respec?hmon�d
Martin
Environmental Specialist
cc: Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1650
RRO /SWP File Copy

LY3ti�;iFi?1V
CF
CD
CD
p C �
mO
E
0
n�o
m
� y Ifl _-
p 40
m � � � #, �,_` �• ./ \ � _ s`!o,, ' --:sex +""..
u
or
P
doom
IL�p 3.� T 3b p � � I!h � �•
� j R N N O U C � � '✓ i sy �.A- -_
a'--<tnw—p°rory f p.
j
1I C \
�t
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULE s or.it_
S &ME ,1'500' 06.13.11
� m APPLICATION MAP
i PROJECT NC DRAWN BY,
PNG Une 40 1357 -11 -008 CJF
Wilson County, North Carolina WWW.SM EINC.COM CHECKED BY
JQL

m 0 O y
COO f� dyBPy f
y I rr
xaOti I �5 } f
CD
sum n
A crab ` I v ~�•
one
x
t
Z
x.>T�
boa- .c��amm
y c3i���v�dm oc S A. j�il_ f- coo i
a 43 3
It 2- _1P _
� �dy�9O�Zro
ay''°dr /
-
w all Y
IS m
b) �
� I c
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULE SCALE opTE NIS
N APPLICATION MAP *S&ME -500 06"13.11
= PRpJECT Np: 6RAMq BY'
PNCy Line d0 1357 -11 -006 CJF
Wilson County, North Carolina VWJW- SMEIIYC.0 ®M QHEcKEp aY:
JOL

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
May 12, 2011
Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Re: PNG L -40 Project (S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008)
Dear Mr. Lawler:
This letter is to infot-rn you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: //Nvww.fws.gov /raleigli. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally - protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are lalown to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non- federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fiilfrll that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
' The term "federal species of concert" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we reconunend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing Linder the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we reconunend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page usefiil and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jolul Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
6A � 9 —
PetVeenj am in
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
M
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

1 M4 L
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Conservation, Planning, & Community Affairs
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Linda Pearsall, Director
May 3, 2011
Mr. Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Dee Freeman, Secretary
Subject: PNG L -40 Project — Replacement of Segment of Natural Gas Pipeline; Wilson, Wilson County
S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008
Dear Mr. Lawler:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, significant
natural heritage areas, or conservation/managed areas at the site nor within a mile of the project area.
Although our maps do not show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not
necessarily mean that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The
use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the
project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or priority natural
areas.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at www.ncnhp.org for a listing of
rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map. Our
Program also has a new website that allows users to obtain information on element occurrences and
significant natural heritage areas within two miles of a given location:
<http://nhpweb.enr.state.nc.us/public/virtual—worlcroom.phtml>. The user name is "guest" and the
password is your e -mail address (see instructions on log -in screen). You may want to click "Help" for
more information.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919 - 715 -8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Ha rr} LeGrand Jr. Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: 919 - 715 -3060 Internet: www.oneNCNaturally.org
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
aturullty
Natural Resources Planning and Conservation

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Claudia Brown, Acting Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Division of Historical Resources
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary David Brook, Director
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
May 17, 2011
Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Re: PNG L -40 Project, Wilson, S &ME 1357 -11 -008, Wilson County, ER 11 -0721
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Thank you for your letter of April 25, 2011, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Claudia Brown
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Ralcigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

APPENDIX VII:
RESTORATION PLAN AND MITIGATION PAYMENT RECEIPTS

Greene Environmental Services. LLC
90 Ham Produce Rd.
Snow Hill. NC 28580
RECEIPT
RIPARAN BUFFER CREDITS
DATE
Project Name: Wilson County L40A (Pipeline)
Project Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas
Project Location: Wilson, NC
DWQ Number (if known):
Greene Environmental Services, LLC has received payment for 20421 Riparian Buffer Credits
for Wilson County L40A (Pipeline). This receipt serves as notification that Greene
Environmental Services, LLC has debited the Riparian Buffer Credits for this project from the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank in accordance with
the Mitigation Banking Instrument approved by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality on
01/03/2012.
Jeffrey Becker, Project Manager
Greene Environmental Services, LLC

Mara Sikora
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Project:
County:
DWQ#
COE #:
EEP #:
Amount Paid:
Check Number:
PNG Wilson L -40A
Wilson
2011 -0877
2011 -02239
20650
S27,171.00
1102540
1.-
E amement
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
December 30, 2011
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404 /CAMA Permit(s) issued for the
above referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements assigned to
NCEEP associated with the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other
conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this
activity including SL 2009 -337, An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks, as amended by
S.L. 2011 -343.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements indicated below associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as
specified in the permit. Mitigation responsibility assigned to the NCEEP is nontransferable. The mitigation will be
performed in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement
Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
River Basin
Stream Credits
Wetland Credits
Buffer I& II
HUC
(linear feet)
(acres)
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non - Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Neuse
0
0
0
0.69
0
0
0
03020203
Refunds of payments made to NCEEP are only approved under certain conditions. All refund requests must be submitted in
accordance with EEP's refund policy at www.nceep.net. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact Kelly Williams at (919) 716 -1921.
Sincerely,
Michael Ellison
Deputy Director
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Thomas Brown, USACE - Raleigh; Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Joey Lawler, agent
File
R stDY .. E .. PV'DtEGt D�t,>r✓ Stag DEN
�• � NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919 - 715 -0476 / www.nceep.net

RESTORATION PLAN
PNG Wilson Line 40A
Wilson, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan is
proposed for implementation to restore temporarily- affected wetlands and streams. This
plan entails restoration of temporarily- disturbed areas to their original contours and
conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion. Further, it specifies that
disturbed wetland areas and streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native
vegetative cover, and affected streambanks planted with woody species. The measures
outlined below will be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of the
proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities include removal of temporarily- placed fill material and
restoration of original pre- disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to
the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an
upland site. Excavated topsoil shall be stockpiled separately and then replaced uniformly
over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in
Table 1 below shall be utilized within temporarily- disturbed portions of the corridor
comprised of wetlands.
Table 1: Wetland Seed Mix
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
Elymus ripanus
Riverbank wild rye
20
Agrostis stolonifera
Creeping bentgrass
15
Carex vulpinoidea
Fox sedge
12
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Poa palustris
Fowl bluegrass
15
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deer tongue
08
Bidens aristosa
Bidens
04
Juncus effusus, NC Ecotype
Soft rush
04
Aster lateriflorus
Calico aster
03
Sagittaria latifolia
Duck potato
02
Saururus cernuus
Lizards tail
02
100
Wetland Seed Mix to be applied to all wetland areas extending five feet landward following construction.
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre.
The Wetland Seed Mix shall be applied to all wetland areas extending five feet landward
following construction. The recommended application rate is 20 -25 lbs. per acre.

Restoration Plan S &ME Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 2014
At temporarily- affected streambanks, the native riparian seed mix specified in Table 2 below
shall be utilized.
Table 2: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
15
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Agrostis stolinifera
Creeping bentgrass
10
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype
Black -eyed Susan
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lance leaf tickseed
10
Panicum clandestinum
Deer tongue
10
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
05
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
05
Echinochloa muricata
Awned barnyard grass
05
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
05
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
05
Tripsacum dactyloides
Gamma grass
05
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
100
Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending five feet landward following construction.
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables I and 2 should also be augmented with
the appropriate cover /companion species, as identified in Table 3.
Table 3: Cover /Companion Crops
Species
Common
Season
Mix
Notes:
Secale cereale
Ceareal or
Early Spring
30 Ibs /acre
Grows 3 -4' tall, but not a strong a
Winter rye
or Fall
competitor.
Lolium
Spring,
Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years,
perenne
Perennial rye
Summer
20 -50%
then dies out.
Foxtail or
Spring,
Good germination; dies off with
Setaria italica
German
o
20-50%
Millet
Summer
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
Use of annual rye ( Lolium multiflorum) is not recommended, as it competes with native
grasses for water and nutrients.
Additionally, affected banks of stream crossings shall be stabilized with coir matting and re-
vegetated using native woody species. In the event that restoration of the temporarily -
impacted streams occurs during the dormant season, woody plantings should consist of a
combination of livestake and bare root species (Table 4). In the event that restoration takes
place during the growing season, plantings identified in Table 4 should also include an
appropriate mix of containerized species (Table 5).

Restoration Plan SWE Project No. 1357 -11 -008 Ph 01
PNG Wilson Line 40A February 2014
Table 4: Live Stake and Bare Root Species*
Species
Common Name
Plant Spacing
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
2 feet on center
Physocarpos opulifolius
Ninebark
3 feet on center
Salix caroliniana
Carolina willow
1 foot on center
Salix nigra
Black willow
1 foot on center
Salix sericea
Silky willow
2 feet on center
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
3 feet on center
Symphoricarpos orbiculata
Coral Berry
2 feet on center
'For use when planting during the dormant season. Select at least three of the listed species.
Table 5: Containerized Species Composition*
Species
Common Name
Plant Spacing
Alnus serrulta
Tag alder
5 feet on center
Aronia arbutifolia
Red chokeberry
5 feet on center
Callicarpa Americana
Beautyberry
5 feet on center
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironwood
5 feet on center
Cercis canadensis
Redbud
5 feet on center
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
5 feet on center
Fraxinus caroliniana
Carolina ash
5 feet on center
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
5 feet on center
Ilex verticillata
Winterberry
5 feet on center
Sambucus Canadensis
Elderberry
5 feet on center
'For use when planting during the growing season. Select at least two of the listed species.
Appropriate native substitutions to the species identified in Tables 4 and 5 may be made
based on availability and approval of S &ME.
North Carolina Suppliers of native seed and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
plants plantnative.net