20071392 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20140225

",*V -
Stem
Iaim £ n�.�
PROGRAM
February 21, 2014
0
Eric Kulz �c,%� 1�
Division of Water Resources �v
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center ,-�
C
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650 � HR a �.V.
Re: EEP Project Monitoring Reports
Dear Mr. Kulz:
Please find the enclosed monitoring reports for EEP projects, and let me know if you have any
questions.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely
et�
Lin Xu
Aga
I CDENR 1.
►a Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27649 -1652 % 919 -715 -0476 1 www.nceep.net

t I - 1 3 c� '--
Cat Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 71
Monitoring Contract Number: 004490
Monitoring Year 4
2013 Final Report
AWL
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 2014
rA -I-
' o'- titem
s
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
DO
FE
DrENR - NNAMR OUALITY
RECEIVED FEB 0 7 2014

Monitoring Firm
EQUINOX
ENViRoNM11.NrrAi,
CONSULTATION a DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Hunter Terrell
Email: hunter @equinoxenvironmental.com
FFR
i
C k "dart aJ VVATE� I

10
20
30
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
2013 Monitoring Report (MY 4)
Table of Contents
Executive Summary / Project Abstract
Methodology
References
Page 1
Page 3
Page 4

Appendix A. Pr,
Figure 1
Table 1 a
Table 1 b
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Appendices
:)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Project Components
Component Summations
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table l 1 a Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table 11 b Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30th and 701h Percentiles for
Macon County, NC
Precipitation and Water Level Plots
Table 13 Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Appendix F Wetland Boundary Delineation Data
Wetland Determination Forms

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Cat Creek Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2007) are as follows
Project Goals
• Provide a stable stream channel for the main channel and the unnamed tributaries to Cat
Creek that neither aggrades nor degrades while maintaining their dimension, pattern, and
profile with the capacity to transport their watershed's water and sediment load
• Improve water quality and reduce erosion by stabilizing the stream banks for all streams
by improving riparian vegetation
• Improve aquatic habitat of the main channel and tributaries with the use of natural
material stabilization structures such as root wads, rock vanes, woody debris, and a
riparian buffer
• Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation or
enhancement of a riparian zone
• Create contiguous wildlife corridor and provide diverse amphibian habitat with added
topographic and wetland features
• Provide shading and biomass input to the stream and mast for wildlife when vegetation is
mature
• Enhance wetland biochemical and geo- chemical processes over an extended area
Project Objectives
• Restore or enhance over 8,881 feet of Cat Creek and its tributaries
• Restore a natural riparian buffer
• Restore or enhance 7 97 acres of swamp forest bog complex wetlands
• Plant native trees and shrubs throughout the site
The monitoring year four (MY4) vegetation plot data indicates that the site averaged 393
stems /acre across all plots Although no interim criteria is established for MY4, the average
number of stems is well above the MY3 interim criteria of 320 stems /acre and is on track to meet
the MY5 success criteria of 290 stems per acre. However, plots 2, 7, and 10 stems /acre were 202,
202, and 121, respectively, which fail to meet the MY5 success criteria Of the planted stems
recorded within the monitoring plots, nearly 10% were reported as dead or missing When
planted and natural stems are combined, the average stem density is 1,425 stems per acre, which
is well above the minimum established criterion, of note, the additional stems were
predominately alder (Alnus serrulata) and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) The site includes a
diverse assemblage of 16 planted species of native trees and shrubs Planted species range from
2 to 7 per plot with 3 to 11 species observed when volunteers are included. An initial treatment
of exotic invasive vegetation was performed in 2013, and isolated patches of high threat invasive
plant species will be treated in winter /spring of 2014 Dominant invasive non - native plants
include multiflora rose (Rosa multiora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera7aponica), privet
(Ligustrum sp ), and kudzu (Pueraria montana var lobata)
Stream longitudinal profiles have remained relatively stable among monitoring years One area
of bed scour and two areas of deposition were the only significant differences between MY3 and
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

MY4 longitudinal profiles Deposition from high winter /spring flows in early 2013 affected
several of the monitored cross - sections Both XS -1 and XS -2 in the Swartwout reach showed
deposition on the left and right descending banks, respectively, resulting in reduced bankfull
widths and reduction in width/depth ratios and increased entrenchment ratios Similarly, XS -2
on UT1 had large deposits on both the left and right descending banks, resulting in a reduced
bankfull width Stream issues identified during MY4 visual assessments were minimal and
consisted of one area of degradation, one area of aggradation, one undercut area, one area of
mass wasting, and seven bank erosion areas These unstable areas represent less than two
percent of the project and are, with the exception of UT4, located within enhancement reaches
Automated groundwater gauges were downloaded and checked for proper function on a monthly
basis during the growing season Groundwater monitoring station data indicated that all 18 wells
met and exceeded the eight percent hydroperiod success criteria during the MY4 growing season,
including MW7 which failed to meet the success criteria the previous three years During
normal rainfall years all groundwater gauges are expected to meet criteria Precipitation data,
collected using an on -site rain gauge, indicated that June and July were above average rainfall
months Based on the presence of wrack lines and crest gauge monitoring, two bankfull events
occurred in January, and one between April and August of MY4
In December 2013, wetland boundary delineations were performed to confirm the boundary of
wetland features on the project site A Level -Il Routine Determination method, as outlined in the
USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987), was used to identify wetland boundaries Data
points within wetlands were co- located with wetland gauges in order to provide relevant
hydrology data Using plant community and soil data characterized at data points, the interface
of wetland and non - wetland plant communities and soils was identified and determined to be the
wetland boundary A total of 9 06 acres of wetlands were delineated within the project site,
including 7 64 acres of restoration and 1 42 acres of enhancement The MY4 wetland boundary
delineation indicates a 1 09 acre expansion in total wetland area compared to the original
baseline delineation of 7 97 acres The shift in acreage is a result of a 0 04 acre and 0 02 acre
loss on the Swartwout and Cat Creek Preserve tracts, respectively, and a 1 15 acre expansion on
the Parker tract The 0 04 acre loss on the Swartwout tract failed to meet the hydric soil field
indicator The 0 01 acre loss on the Cat Creek Preserve tract failed to meet hydrology success
criteria 3 of the 4 monitoring years Most of the expansion on the Parker tract was along the right
and left descending banks on the upstream end of the tract, as well as several marginal areas
along the periphery of previously delineated areas
Summary information /data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment, statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements, and
data related to wetland boundary delineation can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports
can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on ESP's website All
raw data supporting tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
Additionally, due to inconsistencies with previous thalweg stationing, the baseline thalweg data
and 2010 aerial imagery were utilized to apply the corrected stationing for the project site
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY4 replicate those employed during the
previous monitoring year and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
(Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the
standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et al 2008) Wetland
hydrology was considered established if groundwater monitoring data indicated saturated soils
within 12 inches of the soil surface for 8% of the growing season The growing season for the
site was based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) data set for Macon County
(NRCS 2011)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

3.0 References
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) 2007 Cat Creek Stream
and Wetland Restoration Macon County, North Carolina Restoration Plan Raleigh
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) Accessed June 2012 Climate Analysis
for Wetlands by County http //www wcc nres usda gov /climate /wetlands html
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, Colorado
USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ Wilmington District
U S Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y -87 -1
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

` ''.3Pk 'a,,, �• :�•
1 , l :; � • y due � � f$ ,$ ,�-., ` ) `' c / �,' I t `� l
•y r 4ej °� r 5 -k � � ^', �'�ti J!rf �r .'Jy � - .'4 w` , ;
�M i;. _ -(\'` I �1��. -r- _�- •ti".� v %�- t l', + �� �4' � \,/ ( t jli �` e'Ca ' �
f
4.
40 U4,
A
,
� (.t e I j � 1 �: t•. � _ ! ) � / � ' ?i,. � dj { K1 � � Mo119�Bpriti�pt � � •a . I .� _ `r ..,\ ..
V.
• ` J' , r - �(µ Eo-`ji '�-� ` zsr ' '�'J�/ ( �.- �f �`yo,.. - �/ J 1, � � �.� �\ �1 1� � �:, e� w ) "
amt % � �L� X � X' %r �`,v+ 11 .: / �i �,`�, �, o I - � . •••. i.'1 •\ , t i A�\t�. _ ! ` `, i tli F �)� �
,v:+'�t •.,r M � �, i�• •c��ad *' _,tea7 - I � ��.' .\ t i ! I _ � \ � f.�! !I ,/ JI•.
rte.
1••$'v r 1 ^f, t ..-�% r ` 'eta "^ i \ !1 \1 , IJ �.�'1 r �� i %il ' llf l
A9/ 4f/ '! v j. '\ •.•,�4 �i` _i'Jl �� ')r � t�•, •ter n f r, Apo'.
,, Cat Creek Stream t
& Wetland Restoration Site
!
ire 1 � r•Urfut' r ,, , ^, � � -�J, - � .' I, � -
17 �.. M r i l `> 1 r:
' i'I ( ti _ 6 I
's� d tgslrip S� r�• '`:Ti.r. /} ` Lt 't•
e}S 4 _. �% ^.� / �. •� '.,, //•�' ��r r � � ,fv � �' yl �Jl Ir %'a Ii �4` - ry i1/ ( I 5 ; \\``�
S I{.,..yr �','•1 .,.�.' � t I i •:'I, ''.t ` n•w$�. .- i - I',�[ \1(�I•Y:�, Uf,. .irk. •.�•1 ,r' � ,"yam %l t 7�� -+ �1'�'
' i �a - , F � {d,fPr park 1 _ •/;• '✓i ", ,. , J / I C I ..
�C. !x � � � � > >,_�' •M••' f �/ �.,i nlii r i .!� % 1' -B( ��.�1 .. �.�% � �j (t 1._r J\
/ •..� + , r / i / l nra , -..'b i / ) ,�� J tI i��}--ah
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map �-
Cat Creek Stream & EQUINOX ECO Stelll
,brc +ue J.f^ `Waver �rw,rrharua
:prMY � � Y. ,4 �- CatCraex - a°., Wetland Restoration Site °•-' ° °•••• �'_ ellle t AM
.�� -,� Stream Restoroon Slle - LY.
C­", Ooanly Project No. 71
0 0.25 0.5
Directions: Front Raleigh. proceed west on I-40 towards Knoxville, Mlles
TN. Merge onto US -74 (Exit 27) toward Waynesville. Follow US-
74 to exit gl US -23 /US -441. Proceed south on US -441 for 17 miles Macon County North Carolina
to Cat Creek Road e
Turn left onto Cat Creek Rd. and follow -I mile
to Ferguson Road. Tom left on Ferguson and continue -0.5 mile to 7.5 Minute Series Corbin Knob
the bridge crossing Cat Creek. The project site is upstream and
downstream of the bridge. Quadrangle

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
S =rvon Applicable
• see Appendix B Fig 2 Stationing Was Realigned in MY to Acematel) Depict the Stream Reaches (Sec Executne gunman Page 2)
-Station ur g Includes a 25 Foot Crossing
IAcreage updated based on MY4 Wetland boundan delineation
Cat C«
gores] b. m en umma ions
e S & RM et I and / ect o. 7
.abi
la Pivlect
Components
Riparian Wetland
(Ac)'
Non -
Riparian
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac) BMP
Gat Creek
Mime am&
etla /Bro ctNa
7d
Project
Restoration
4,066
Footage
764
Mitigation
Component or
Existing
Restoration
Approach or
n
Mitigation
Units
"Stationing
BMP Elements Comment
Reach ID
Feet /Acres
Level
Ratio
® 1
Enhancement 11
2,454
Acreage,
(SMUS/WMUs)
®
®®
Preservation
Lnestock inclusion
Cat Creel, Upper
HQ Preservation
bur planting bank
ffe
w art, out
900 If
E2
90011'
El
2 5 1
360 00
) - 09 +00
(X)+()()
stabibiation to 3
1
I
locations
Ca[ Creek Loner
770 If
R
Pi 818 If
11
81800
09+(X) - 17 +18
0
0 2
Se anW out
6,6216
836
Cat Creek Upper
Equipment crossing Ln estock esolusion
Waldroup
14381f
E2
14391f
251
57560
••17 +49 32 +13
and W merle statons buffer plarittrus
Lnestock exclusion
Cat Creek Lover
Cattlecrossmgand buffer planting and
Waldroup
482 If
EI
4821f
El
151
32133
34 +37 -39 +19
latenngstations structure to proxtde
I
I
I enhanced profile
Cat Creek Parker
1750 If
R
P1 1871 If
11
187100
39}+19 -57 +90
Gradecontrol turbulent
nnles to add habitat
Cm Creel. Presen a
1765 If
E
18791f
151
125267
599+24 78 +03
bufferplantmg and
mx asn a species
management
Lnuffer entings
UTI
100U
E2
IIS If
251
4600
I(X) +00 101 +I5
buffer planting
UTI
363 If
R
PI 458 If
11
45800
101 +15 105 +73
— —
UT2
2101f
R
PI 381 If
1 t
381 00
200+00 203 +81
UT3
1651f
R
PI 294 If
1 1
29400
300+00 302 +94
UT4
110 If
R
Pi 244 U
1 1
24400
400 +00 - 402 +44
R
107
11
107
--
SW an W oul
Livestock exclusion,
Wetlands
E
051
2 1
026
remora) of dram pipe
planting
R
5 88
1 1
5 88
Parker Wetlands
E
025
21
0 13
—
Presm a Wet lands
R
0 69
I I
0 69
— —
E
066
21
S =rvon Applicable
• see Appendix B Fig 2 Stationing Was Realigned in MY to Acematel) Depict the Stream Reaches (Sec Executne gunman Page 2)
-Station ur g Includes a 25 Foot Crossing
IAcreage updated based on MY4 Wetland boundan delineation
= Non - Applicable
1Acreage updated based on MY4 wetland boundary delineation
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cat C«
gores] b. m en umma ions
e S & RM et I and / ect o. 7
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Riparian Wetland
(Ac)'
Non -
Riparian
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac) BMP
Riverine
Non- lbvenne��s®
Restoration
4,066
764
Enhancement
142
Enhancement I
X�ET,36)1
® 1
Enhancement 11
2,454
Creation
®
®®
Preservation
HQ Preservation
®
®�
Length/Area Total
1 8,881
906
0
0
0 2
Mitigation Unit Total
6,6216
836
= Non - Applicable
1Acreage updated based on MY4 wetland boundary delineation
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Pro ect No. 71
Designer
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr , Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Primary Project Design POC
Ron Johnson (919) 854 -6210
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsk (919) 605 -6134
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P O Box 1 197
Fremont, NC 27830
Planting Contractor POC
Charlie Bruton (919) 242 -6555
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsk (919) 605 -6134
Seed Mix Sources
Mellow Marsh Farm, Inc
1312 Woody Store Road
Stier City, NC 27344
(919) 742 -1200
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Stream Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson (919) 854 -6210
Monitoring Performers (Y1) - 2010
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr , Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Stream Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson (919) 854 -6210
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitonn g POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Ve tation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3)- 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville North Carolma 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Ve etation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Kevin M itchell (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y4)- 2013
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Ve etation Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y5)- 2014
St team Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wet land Monitoring POC
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4. Project Attributes
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Project No 71
Project County
Macon
Ph sto ra hic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecore ton
Blue Ridge Mountains - Broad Basins
River Basin
IAtlle Tennessee River
USOS HUC
06010202040010
NCDW Sub -Basin
04 -04-01
Within Fxtent of EP Watershed Plan
Franklin to Fontana Planning Area
W RC Class
Cold
% of Pro ect Easement Fenced or Demarcated
1001/.
Beaver Activity Observed Dung Desi n Phase
Yes
Restoration Component Attnbutes
Cat Creek
UTl
UT2
UT3
UT4
Drainage Area s nu)
36
09
05
02
02
Stream Order
Third
Second
Second
First
First
Restored Length feet
-7389
573
381
294
244
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed LULL Distribution
Forest
Pasture/Managed Herbaceous
Other
70%
70%
50%
90%
20%
30'/0
301/.
50%
10%
80%
01/6
0° /a
01/6
01/.
01/6
Watershed Impervious Cover
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
NCDW AU /Index Number
2 -234
2 -234
2 -234
2 -234
2234
NCDWQ Classification
C
303d Dsted
No
Upstream of303d Listed Segment
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
Total Acreage oMasement
389
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
389
Total Planted Acreage as Pan of Restoration
20
Ros en Classification of Pre asting
CA
Cb4
Ros en Classification of As -Bwlt
C4
C4
C
C
Cb
Valley Type
VII
VII
Vil
VII
VII
Valley Sloe
00062 -0015
0023
0013
0013
0048
Valley Side Slope Range
15 -301/.
15 -301/6
15 -30%
15 -30"/0
15 -301/.
Valley Toe Slope Range
2 -3%
2 -3%
2 -3%
2 -3%
2 -3%
Cowardm Classification
Trout Waters Designation
No
Species ofConcenn Endangered Fie
No
Dommant Sod Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Nikwasi
Reddies
Nikwasi
Nikwasi
Udonhents
>60 inches
>60 inches
>60 inches
>60 inches
>Winches
5 -180/6
1 -I8%
5 -I8%
5 -180/6
N/A
05-20
05-20
05-20
05-20
N/A
3
3
3
3 000
N/A
N/A Item does not apph
• stationing Includes a 25 Foot Crossing
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Prepared for
rA Y
En as emnt
PROGRAM
Project: Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 4 Monitoring
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 3
Date
December 2013
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Project Number
NCEEP # 71
Prepared by
EQUINOX
ENV RONMENTAL
aewwu� new � renew

2. lnteurated Utirrent Condition Plan View Dral't
Prepared for I Project,: Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration I Notes: l) 2010 Aerial Photo I Prepared by
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
Year 4 Monitoring
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 2 of 3
Date
December 2013
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Project Number
NCEEP # 71
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL
<sw<mnnex a e.<�sw

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View Draft
L �� S•� y1! i Y
M
'mow W
.�� r�`
#�! t
Cat Creek (Parker) ,-
R Longitudinal Prorile Reach_ —
""""
_
c
.f
hr
I 4L
f�
\
4
r '� . .. of
:
.♦ ::. ? LT 4
X
.::..; :,......
Hsu - 2
..► •
J `, .� =
,.•
'
, .. .�.. -- .._ . • -�" �, UT3'\ -
/ .. :`� —�_" `
• " • ' �"' "" ' �
Legend
Easement Boundary
_.___
Stream Alignment
'��
•
♦ '
a 1�'
/ / / /// ��
Roads
" ::: ' ^ •
! "
—� Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
f
/
'
nS
Year 4 Conditions Vegetation Plots
Cross Sections
Lo Vane
s
I•
Criteria Met MY4
4 Criteria Not Met MY4
Cross Vane
Hook
Root Wad
.,. a Welland
_ ,•
teGa Megt MY4
Cat Creek (Preserve)
�` Rock Sill
/ Control Points
��
Criteria Not Met MY4
• Crest Gauges
.�•�.
.
o
Bank /Bed Conditions
Bed Aggradation
Bed Degradation
Rain Gauge
Photo Points
Wetlands
a
�Bank Erosion
Mass Wasting
'
® Creation
- Undercut
Vegetation Problem Areas
Enhancement
Restoration
a
- rn
Preservation
i `
Low Stem Density
0 165 330
® Treated Invasives - Dense
B MY4- Expansion
Treated Invasives - Present
® MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
Prepared for
Project:
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 4 Monitoring
Macon County, North Carolina
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Prepared by
�'
1t�
Sheet 3 of 3
,Fosystem t
EQUINOX
FNV RONMFNTAL
Date
Project Number
PROGRAM
- '
December 2013
NCEEP # 71

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stabdity Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 71 - Cat Creek
Assessed I.e th 7.389 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Numher
Total
Numberof
Amountof
%Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub-Category
Performing
As-built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I Awadatton - Bar format ton /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
I
I 1
100%
1 Vertical Stability
flow lateral) (not to include point bars)
2 Deeadation Evidence of downcuttmg
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 RiMe Condition
1 Text Riffle maintains coarser substrate
43
43
100%
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth a 1 6)
42
42
100%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
42
42
100%
I T halweg cent ering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
42
42
100%
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalwegoentermgat downstream of meander bend (Glide)
42
42
100%
2 Bank
1 Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
7
194
990/0
6
80
990/0
scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wastingappears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1
15
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
1
21
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
9
230
98%
6
80
999/.
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
21
21
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
13
13
100%
2a Piping
Structures lackmgany substantial flow underneath sills or arms
18
18
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
17
17
100%
15%
15
Pool forming structures maintaining' Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
Pool
4 Habitat
Ratio ? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow
14
14
I00%
N/A - Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT1
Assessed I e nath 573 feet
Number
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Major Channel
Channel
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Category
Sub Category
Metric
Ps
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
As built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
Intended
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow lateral) not to include point bars
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcuttmg
0
0
100%
2 Riffle Condition
I Texture/Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate
7
7
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1 6)
6
6
1001/6
Condition
2 Lenysh ap prop nate (>30% of centerlmedistance between tad of
upstream nffle and head of downstream nffle
6
6
100%
1 Thalweg centenng at upstream of meander bend (Rim)
6
6
100%
4 Thalweg Position
1000/
2 Thalweg centenng at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
7
7
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
0
1001/6
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slump mg calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
1000/0
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
1000/0
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anus
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3
3
1000/
exceed 15%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean
F41H abita[
B Depth Ratio? 16 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
base -Flow
N/A - Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stabdky Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 71 - UT2
Assessed Le ngth 381 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number to
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Ps
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intennter ded d
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Aiigradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Dwradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
5
5
100%
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth ? 1 6)
4
4
100%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Leneth appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle
4
4
100%
I Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
4
100%
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centenngat downstream of meander bend (Ghde)
4
4
100%
2 Bank
1 Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
N/A
N/A
N/A
exceed 15%
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio? 16 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N/A
N/A
base -flow
N/A - Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetiand / Project No. 71 - UT3
Assessed Le ngth 294 feet
Number
Number
Footage
Adjusted
Mayor Channel
Channel
Slade,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Category
Sub Category
Metric
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Awadatton - Bar formation/growih sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars
0
0
I00
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Deeradahon - Evidence of downcuthng
0
0
100%
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
4
4
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth Z 1 6)
3
3
100%
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30% of centerhne distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle
3
3
100%
1 Thalweg centenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
3
3
1000/0
4 Thalweg Position
100%
2 Thalweg centenng at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
3
3
2 Bank
i Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wastmg appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
1000/0
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
N/A
N/A
N/A
exceed 15%
Pool forming structures maintaining" Max Pool Depth Mean
F4H,b,,,,,
Bankfull Depth Ratio> 16 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N/A
N/A
base -flow
NSA Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT4
Assessed Le ngth 244 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Perform,
ing
rform'
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I Aeeradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100%
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars
2 Dearadation - Evidence of downcuttmg.
1
50
80%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
5
5
100%
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 2 1 6)
4
4
100%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Lenigh appropnate (>301/o of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle
4
4
1000/0
1 Thalweg centenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
4
1000/0
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centenng at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
4
4
1001/0
2 Bank
I Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
0
1001/0
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
1001/0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
1001/0
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
2
2
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3 Bank Protection
exceed 15%
2
2
100/
Pool forming structures maintaining` Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
2
2
100%
base -flow
N/A - Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Planted Acreage 20
Number of
Combined
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
N/A
0
000
0%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3,
Stipple
6
010
<1%
4, or 5 stem count criteria
Orangp Dots White Background
Totals
6
010
<1%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
igiven
N/A
0
000
0%
the monitoringyear
Cumulative Totals
6
010
<1%
Easement Acreage 38 9
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Cross Hatch
43
676
17%
(Red - Dense(Yellow - Present)
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or pomts (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
0
000
0%
Purple Dots White Background
N/A - Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 3 +65 - Downstream
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 6 +30 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F B -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 3
Station 15 +98 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland I
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 34 +70 - Downstream
B -I 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 5
Station 50 +20 - Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 57 +36 - Downstream
B -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 61+43 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
UT4 — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 402 +08 - Upstream
B -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 65 +80 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 67 +88 - Downstream
B -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Cat Creek / Project No. 71
Vegetation Plot
ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
71%
2
No
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
No
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
No
1 l
Yes
12
No
13
Yes
14
Yes
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 12
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 13
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 14
Monitoring Year 4 — August 20, 2013
C -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table•8. ,CV,SWegetatlontP_lotA 6tadata
l aWireek PPi6jectAo. 71
Report Prepared By
Hunter Terrell
Date Prepared
11/5/2013 9 24
Database Name
E uinox- 2013- A- CatCreek -MY4 mdb
Database Location
Z \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitonn \Cat Creek \CC -MY4- 2013 \Data \Ve
Computer Name
FIELDTECH2 -PC
File Size
156651776
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN)THOWbOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data
Prol, Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes live stakes
Prol, Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vn or classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
lot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PROJECT, SUMMARY
Pro ect Code
71
project Name
Cat Creek
Description
River Basin
Little Tennessee
Length(ft)
Stream-to-Edge Width ft
Area m
Required Plots calculated
Sam led Plots
14
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
C -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix C
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Spedes by Plot with Annual Means)
EEP Proled Code 71. Proleet Name: Cat Creek
Vegetation Assessment Data
uirements by lu%
uirements, but by less than 10%
Falls to ttteet requirements, by less than 10%
-nowt requirements by more than 10%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
C -10
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Current Plot Data 2013)
Annual Means
lczmiii
ICNE iii
i iii
IKOHMOE
NEREEM
i �
MGM i
i iii:
i i iii•
i �i i
i i ii
i ii
i�
i ii
��
lilt I III I 91M.,
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)�
Species count
uirements by lu%
uirements, but by less than 10%
Falls to ttteet requirements, by less than 10%
-nowt requirements by more than 10%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
C -10
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
2113
2112
2111
w 2110
C
O
CO
2109
w
2108
2107
2106
0+0(
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 11 + 16
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0 +55
Station (feet)
• As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/11/2012 —,0—MY4 4/1/2013 -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
2107
c
0
2106
UJ
2105
2104
2103
0+0(
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 12 + 86
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
- - As -built 2010 VlN'I 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 VIY3 4/11/2012 --O--Ml'4 4/1/2013 - - -= Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
w 2107
0
w
2106
W
2105
2104
2103
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 13 + 50
0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0 +45 0+50
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 M)'1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 ` MfY3 4/11/2012 —'O-- N1Y4 4/1/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2078
2077
2076
2075
a�
w
G
0 2074
a�
W
2073
2072
2071
2070
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Station 40 + 96
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MYI 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 Ml'3 4/11/2012 — O--MY4 4/1/2013 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 1 D I U Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -I I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2076
2075
2074
w
w 2073
a
0
tu 2072
W
2071
2070
2069
0+00
Stream Sur�c� Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
Station 44 + 04
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0+55
Station (feet)
—• — As -built 2010 MYl 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 - ` MY3 4/11/2012 " MY4 4/1/2013 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
2076
2075
2074
2073
W
w
c
.0 2072
v
2071
2070
2069
2068
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 6 - Pool
Station 45 + 06
0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0 +55
Station (feet)
- -As -built 2010 MY1 12 /2010 NIY2 5/25/2011 NIY3 4/11/2012 —,*—° MY4 4/1/2013 - - — - Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2074
2073
2072
2071
w
c
0 2070
ee
a
2069
2068
2067
2066
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Station 48 + 31
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0+55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY] 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/12/2012 —"G— MY4 4/2/2013 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2072
2071
2070
2069
v
w
c
0 2068
i
67
W
2067
2066
2065
2064
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 51 + 17
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
• As -built 2010 NINA 12/2010 MV2 5/26/2011 MY3 4/12/2012 `--- N1Y4 4/2/2013 - - -' Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 Janua ry 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2071
2070
2069
2068
a�
w 2067
0
0
ro
2066
w
2065
2064
2063
2062
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 54 + 10
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 1VIY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 —.__ MY3 4/12/2012 MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2069
2068
2067
y 2066
e
0
ca
v 2065
W
2064
2063
2062
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 10 - Riffle
Station 55 + 48
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 MYI 12/2010 NlN'2 5/26/2011 MY3 4/12/2012 Ml'4 4/2/2013 - - -' Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
D -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
D -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
2068
2067
2066
w 2065
c
0
ea
a 2064
w
2063
2062
2061
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 11 - Pool
Station 56 + 22
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MYl 12/2010 N1Y2 5/26/2011 -` W3 4/12/2012 • MY4 4/2/2013 - -_ Bk'
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -31 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 11 —Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 2, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2111
2110
2109
w 2108
C
O
r+
C�
2107
W
2106
2105
2104
0+00
Stream Survey Data
UT 1
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 102 + 68
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
�— As -built 2010 NIl 1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 – +– MY3 4/11/2012 -0- MY4 4/1/2013 - -- BkI
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT 1 Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
UT 1 Cross - Section 1 —Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT1 Cross - Section 1 —Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
UT Cross - Section 1 —Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
21ox
2107
2106
w
as
w
c
0 2105
a�
W
2104
2103
2102
0+00
Stream Survey Data
UT
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 104 + 09
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0 +45 0+50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MYl 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/11/2012 —Is— W4 4/1/2013 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland I) -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT 1 Cross - Section 2 —Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
UT 1 Cross - Section 2 —Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Cross - Section 2 —Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
UT Cross - Section 2 —Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — April 1, 2013
D -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

R
0
N
7
E
b
M
O +
L L 1
3a�
+
1 r 0
� � C
O
U
x
a
Q
In e� ,., o� r In 1►,
r. r.
N N N N N N N
(;aaj) UOIJUAala
1h�
U
N
r
F
ti N
0
c a
O
c -�
0
s
3
a
�O
c
0
U
_R
Y
0]
�v Y
07
p
w.
8
�
C
�
LU
�
x
c
N
N
Q
WC,
W
1h�
N
r
F
O
s
3
�O
Y
0]
O
N
Q
L
1
1
C
O
yr
c
N
N
Q
s
�O
11
s
N
N
r
F
3
:C
L
F
0
0
S
R
L
F
CI
0
0
m
Q
�O
a r
0 0
N N N
b
c
@
v
3 '^
w
E
V
0
yz

Appendix D
2a
R
2(
2072
2070
w
c
0
R
2068
W
2066
2064
2062
•
XS6 -P
Cat Creek- Parker
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 40 +35 - 57 +07
Average Bankfull Slope
•
•
i
® 1
Stream Survey Data
2060 ' 1
1
1
>t�XO
>t�XOo
96Y&o
y�X00
soY*o
s2�0 s9X190 s6Y*0
19
Station (feet)
–�— As -Built 2010 Thalweg MY1 12/2010
• Bkf N'S Structures MV2 Linear (Bkf)
Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011
Thalweg M1"3 4/12/2012
Thalweg MN 4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
D -41
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No. 71
Janua ry 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
2115
2113
2111
2109
2107
w
e
0
e�
2105
W
2103
2101
2099
2097
IO
1�
O
Stream Survey Data
UTI
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 101 +59 - 105 +53
ror�O ,ter O 10�X&0 10 0 jo
p�O 10 0 losXOO 1OS O
Station (feet)
— +— 'As- Built2010 ThafwegMY112 /2010 ThalwegMY25 /26/2011 Th alweg MN 3 4/11/2012 — ThalwegMY44 /1/2013 • Bkf N'S Struc[uresM12 Linear(Bkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No. 71 Janua ry 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
}.r yaJd',1 Cat�Cree 'kiStrea><n &Wetlana�7S: "•fit-
)PebbleCount Summary "
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
5
50%
5%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
00%
5%
fine sand
025
0
00%
5%
medium sand
050
8
80%
13%
coarse sand
100
0
00%
13%
very coarse sand
200
19
190%
32%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
2
20%
34%
fine gravel
57
3
30%
37%
fine gravel
80
3
30%
40%
medium gravel
113
10
99%
50%
medium gravel
160
6
59%
56%
coarse gravel
223
3
30%
59%
coarse gravel
32
4
400/.
63%
very coarse gravel
45
4
40%
67%
very coarse gravel
64
2
20%
69%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
30%
72%
medium cobble
128
13
129%
85%
large cobble
180
14
139%
98%
very large cobble
256
1
100/0
99%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
000/0
99%
small boulder
512
0
000/0
99%
medium boulder
1024
0
000/0
99%
large boulder
2048
0
000/0
99%
very large boulder
4096
0
00%
99%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00%
99%
TOTALS
100
100%
1 99%
Summary Data
D50
11
D84
120
D95
160
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Unt Creek - sweulwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross- Section 1- RIMe
Stream Survey Data
F: 1'i 11 - - z _ :O .1 1. Y a R m $ y, - - m y
0 0 ,
Pwtide size 4rn
—X Brtk694010 -- Mi121610 --51Y2 5,261011 — MY36'21IOU
lw
J.�
90•
80•
ro•
r
60•
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
dD•
l
:o•
:o•
10•
cN.
F: 1'i 11 - - z _ :O .1 1. Y a R m $ y, - - m y
0 0 ,
Pwtide size 4rn
—X Brtk694010 -- Mi121610 --51Y2 5,261011 — MY36'21IOU
—M iN 262013
CatCreek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross- Section 1- Riffle
s(
't
6(
4(
-
3(
2(
Ag
- >lt
V
G f4 eV r_,.' 4-1 ^^l -r �'z ON � 00 N NZ v,
o �
Paj -dde Size (min)
C O d O
•, ea -t
QU
■As -Built 6'9 ?2010 El 1\1Y11212010 0 MY2 5,26 ?2011 ■MY3 6 11.1012 ■AIY 48 +20 +201
r
L
i
r
w
v
04
A�
6
10
v
A
O�
a
6b
6
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
CatiGq, kistreWetla�nd %ProjectNo 7 ;1�
�n ` a,�._
' Cat�Creeka.�Swa>rtv�iit Cross- Sectton�2�- ,�Pool� ,
�Petitile�Cou t�S ` *u�iary , '
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
39
390%
39%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
00%
39%
fine sand
025
7
70%
46%
medium sand
050
14
140%
60%
coarse sand
100
6
60%
66%
very coarse sand
200
4
40%
70%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
00%
70%
fine gravel
57
0
00%
70%
fine gravel
80
0
00%
70%
medium gravel
113
2
20%
72%
medium gravel
160
2
20%
74%
coarse gravel
223
2
20%
76%
coarse gravel
32
7
69%
83%
very coarse gravel
45
7
69%
90%
very coarse gravel
64
5
50%
95%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
30%
98%
medium cobble
128
3
30%
101%
large cobble
180
0
00%
101%
very large cobble
256
0
00%
101%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
00%
101%
small boulder
512
0
00%
101%
medtmn boulder
1024
0
00%
101%
large boulder
2048
0
00%
101%
very large boulder
4096
0
00%
101%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00%
101%
TOTALS1
101
1 101%
1 101%
Summary Data
D50
0 062
D84
35
D95
71
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swarhvout
Pebble Count- Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
100%
–
90%
r�
80%
— -
ZOO
60% y
50 %lz
40% v
30 %t
OW
20 %=
M
10%
0% CJ
00 � �,^. N N �r, `7 O 00 O �D N N �f 0'� �O
G O •�+ N R
— As- Bui1t6 /9/2010- 1%/1Y112 /2010 —NIY25 /26 /2011
—IVIY3 6/21/2012 —NIY4 8/20/2013
Cat Creek - Swarhvout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross- Section 2 - Pool
70%
60%
500
'C
400i�
a
30°C
a
- - _ – 10%
r4 Ir i 4f
O O O r1 N `T
Pai, ide Size (mm)
■ As- Bttilt 6/9/2010 ■ AlY112 /2010 ■ 1VIY2 5/26/2011 ■ lvIY3 6/21/2012 ■ MY4 8 /20/201
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat,CreekwStreamt &-�Wetlandl/ Project -No. 71
Cat,0vek - PSwaitvw�at � Cross- Sectlonr3 Rile
POWICoaut Swiunary
D50
Monitoring Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sildclay
0 062
5
50%
5%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
00%
5%
fine sand
025
20
200%
25%
medium sand
050
14
140%
39%
coarse sand
100
3
30%
42%
very coarse sand
200
4
40%
46%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
2
20%
48%
fine gravel
57
0
00%
48%
fore gravel
80
1
10%.
49%
medium gravel
113
7
69%
56%
medium gravel
160
6
59%
62%
coarse gravel
223
6
59%
68%
coarse gravel
32
10
99%
78%
very coarse gravel
45
9
89%
87%
very coarse gravel
64
3
30%
90%
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
50%
95%
medium cobble
128
5
50%
99%
large cobble
180
5
50%
104%
very large cobble
256
0
00-/.
104%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
00%
104%
small boulder
512
0
00%
104%
medium boulder
1024
0
00%
104%
large boulder
2048
0
00%
104%
very large boulder
4096
0
00%
104%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00%
104%
TOTALS1
105
105%
1 104%
Summary Data
D50
87
D84
56
D95
130
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
('at Creek- Swartwout
Pebble Count- Percent Cumulative
Cross- Section 3 - Riffle
— - - -- — - -T, 100IRO
- = 90%
80%
Q -�
"0 %i7
60% at
ya�+
°io
,40 W
40%5d
30 %9
20 %a
�
-
R
10%s
C
0% V
(-I W7 V� �!� -�I N T �D 00 \O PI r•1 I T f� 00 O b N N T 00 \D
00 If
hl M V, O O O O
p � N T
—As-Built 6 /9/2010—h'1Y1 12/2010 °+ - n W2 5/26/201 1 14
—IVIY3 6/21/2012 — o—hiY4 8/20/2013
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-Section 3 - Riffle
`0%
60%
50 -A?
.b
40
301 z
i
2001
10%
°/0
0
('J v, Vi Ito -, CA rt 14 00 \-O N 4-1 Ito -r C:� 00 O �O N N rt 00 �O
-T tp ON 00 N %0
b
v! O O d
O G
Particle Size (mm)
■As -Built 6/9/2010 0 W1 12/2010 0 XIY2 5 /26/2011 ■ 1V1Y3 6/21/2012 ■ IVIY4 8 /20/201
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream* Wetlandk /Project No., 71
Cat Creek - -- Parker- ��Cross.Sectfon�4 - �Pool-
Petible,Countvgii mum ry
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
7
7%
7%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
4
4%
11%
fine sand
025
3
3%
14%
medttun sand
050
4
4%
18%
coarse sand
100
7
7%
25%
very coarse sand
200
2
2%
27%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
0%
27%
fine gravel
57
0
0%
27%
fine gravel
80
4
4%
31%
medium gravel
113
9
9%
40%
medn.un gravel
160
10
10%
50%
coarse gravel
223
10
100/0
59%
coarse gravel
32
15
15%
74%
very coarse gravel
45
14
14%
88%
very coarse gravel
64
10
10%
98%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
1000/0
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
1000/0
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100 ° /a
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0 °/U
100%
TOTALS
101
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
16
D84
41
D95
57
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
C ross- Section 4 - Pool
-- - -- -- - - -
-- — �'
100%
Ir
90%
80%
r
70% F'
V
d
C
60% iz
d
50% V
a
40% >
a
30%
e
U
20%
10%
0%
7
m
Particle Size (mm)
BAs -Built 6/9/2010
— - MY1 12/2010 °- MY2 5/26/2011
MY3 6/21/2012
MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-Section 4 - Pool
- .
-
o
70%
60%
50%
7
40
C
d
u
30% u
a
20%
10%
ILL'
0%
O
C -
N M N O
O O O
9
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built 6 /9/2011
■MY112 /2010 ©MY25/26/2011
■ MY3 6/21/2012 ■MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek_Stream,& Wetland;/ ProjectWo. 71
Cat Creek -,Parker -- Cross4ectionES°- Ai81e
Pebtile'Count Summary
D50
Monrtormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
2
2%
2%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
5
5%
7%
fine sand
025
1
1%
8%
medium sand
050
3
3%
11%
coarse sand
100
8
8%
19%
very coarse sand
200
1
1%
20%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
21%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
23%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
25%
medium gravel
113
9
9%
34%
medium gravel
160
5
5%
39%
coarse gravel
223
9
9%
48%
coarse gravel
32
16
X16%
64%
very coarse gravel
45
11
11%
75%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
81%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
82%
medium cobble
128
5
5%
87%
large cobble
180
6
6%
93%
very large cobble
256
3
3%
96%
Boulder
small boulder
362
2
2%
98%
small boulder
512
2
2%
100%
medtun boulder
1024
0
0% 1
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
1
100
100%
100%
Summary °Data
D50
23
D84
100
D95
230
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross-Section 5 - Riffle
-
100%
90%
—
80%
c
m
L
F
70%
L
C
�
60 % [i•.
e
u
50
40% >
a
30% E
U
20
10%
0%
O O O
N T
7
C1
Particle Size (mm)
BAs -Built 6/9/2010
"" MY 1 12/2010
MY2 5/26/2011
_MY36/21/2012
MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
- -
- - - - -- -
80%
70%
60
50
40
c
u
`u
30%
a
20%
10%
h
L L
0%
O p
N M V7 O
O O O
V
m
Particle Size (mm)
■As-Built 6/9/2010
®MYl 12/2010 ®
MY2 5/26/2011
■MY36/21/2012
■MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Streamp &'Wetlands / Prroject No:,'7�1,
Cat,Creek - ;,Parker,- Gros s- Section,6 =Pool`
Pebble Count.Summary
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
stidclay
0 062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
5
5%
9%
fine sand
025
5
5%
14%
medium sand
050
13
13%
27%
coarse sand
100
10
10%
37%
very coarse sand
200
7
7%
44%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
0%
44%
fine gravel
57
1
1%
45%
fine gravel
80
5
5%
50%
medium gravel
113
12
12%
62%
medium gravel
160
13
13%
75%
coarse gravel
223
11
11%
86%
coarse gravel
32
10
10%
96%
very coarse gravel
45
2
2%
98%
very coarse gravel
64
0
00/0
98%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
00/0
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0 °/U
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0 °/U
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
00/0
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
8
D84
21
D95
31
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 6 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
C
70%
Z
F
u
_
60%
e
G.
C
W
50%
is
d
a
,�°�
40%
>
C
m
30%
E
20%
0
10%
O .N. N O —
� N r, .t O O � 0p
1/ `O .-• N
0%
7 P
O O
Ci
Particle Size (mm)
—'—As -Built 6 /9/2010
MYl 12/2010
MY2 5/26/2011
T MY3 6/21/2012
MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 6 - Pool
-
80%
70%
60%
o
50%
40%
9
C
V
30%
d
a
20%
01A
10%
.1
0%
O 00 O
�O N N 7
00 O Y
O p
N M Vi O
O O O
cc
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built6 /9/2010
13MY112 /2010 ®MY25/26/2011
■MY36/21/2012
■MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek •Stream; &`WetlkndkJ-Project�No. 71
Cat Creek —Parker - ,Cross- Section,7 -Riffle
Pebble, Count�Summary
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
5
5%
5%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
1
1%
6%
fine sand
025
3
3%
9%
medium sand
050
7
7%
16%
coarse sand
100
11
11%
27%
very coarse sand
200
11
11%
38%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
00/0
38%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
40%
fine gravel
80
3
3%
43%
medium gravel
113
13
13%
56%
medium gravel
160
13
13%
69%
coarse gravel
223
6
6%
75%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
76%
very coarse gravel
45
0
00/0
76%
very coarse gravel
64
3
3%
79%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
80%
medium cobble
128
5
5%
85%
large cobble
180
7
7%
92%
very large cobble
256
5
5%
97%
Boulder
small boulder
362
2
2%
990/0
small boulder
512
1
1%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100 ° /a
Summary Data
D50
95
D84
120
D95
220
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
- -
— -- --
- - - -- - -- - - -- - -
- - --
100%
90%
80%
C
F
--
70%
60% Gi
0
u
50% w
u
G.
40% >
a
/
30% E
U
20%
Zs
10%
e
0%
O O
N Q 7
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
— As- Budt6/9 /2010
MY112/2010
MY25/26/2011
MY3 6/21/2012
MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
70%
60%
50%
7
40
e
V
30% u
G.
20%
j AL
10%
0%
ao o
It 10 O1 OD
.o N N_ w
h a
oo 10 �d
O p
^
N M V1 O
O O O
O O
N Q 9
d
CC
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built 6 /9/2010
MMY112 /2010 ®MY25/26/2011
0 MY36/21/2012
■MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat,Creek Stream= &,Wetland,/ Project +No. 71
,Cat Creek - Parker —�Crog §s= Secti6n- - Riffle
Pebble Cotmt;SUwmary
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very free sand
0 125
2
2%
3%
fine sand
025
1
1%
4%
medium sand
050
9
8%
12%
coarse sand
100
7
7%
19%
very coarse sand
200
2
2%
21%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
5
5%
25%
fine gravel
57
7
7%
32%
fine gravel
80
11
100/0
42%
medium gravel
113
16
15%
58%
medium gravel
160
10
9%
67%
coarse gravel
223
6
6%
73%
coarse gravel
32
4
4%
76%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
76%
very coarse gravel
64
2
2%
78%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
78%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
800/0
large cobble
180
14
13%
93%
very large cobble
256
2
2%
95%
Boulder
small boulder
362
4
4%
99%
small boulder
512
0
0%
99%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
99%
large boulder
2048
1
1%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00/0
1000/0
TOTALS1
106
1 100% 1
1000/.
Summary Data
D50
94
D84
140
D95
240
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
-
_ - - --
- --
-.—.
100%
90%
80
c
R
F'
70%
L
V
r.
60%
s'
v
50
u
a
—
40% >
30% E
0
U
20
10%
a�
^
0%
O
N
O V
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
�^As-Built 6/9/2010 MY1 12/2010
MY2 5/26/2011
MY3 6/21/2012
+ MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
- -- - -
-
-
80%
70%
60%
50%
9
40
0
u
V
30% y
a
20
0
or
iuLd.
Adel
a 'fl M
a
10%
0%
a
to V7 N
O V
V
m
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built6/9 /2010 11MY112 /2010 13 MY2 5/26/2011
■MY36/21/2012 ■MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream& Wetland/ Project`,No. 71
Cat Creek - Parked- iCross= Section�9�- �P,00l
Pebble ,CouneS`ummal y
D50
Monitoring Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
3
3%
4%
fine sand
025
0
0%
4%
medium sand
050
8
8%
12%
coarse sand
100
32
32%
44%
very coarse sand
200
15
15%
59%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
5
5%
64%
fine gravel
5 7
11
11%
75%
fine gravel
80
12
12%
87%
medium gravel
113
7
7%
94%
medium gravel
160
5
5%
99%
coarse gravel
223
1
1%
100%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
00/0
100%
large cobble
180
0
00/0
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0 °/U
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
13
D84
74
D95
12
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -59 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
a
L
F
70%
C
60%
f&
e
d
50
d
L
40%
>
30%
E
0
U
20%
10%
^ ^
N M1 v O Z
N
0%
Z -
T
Particle Size (mm)
�
T-As- Built6 /9/2010
— MY112 /2010
MY25/26/2011
— MY3 6/21/2012
MY4 4/3/2013
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross -Section 9 - Pool
80%
70%
60%
50%
e
9
40
G
V
30%
d
a
20%
I
for
0%
r�
�D N N G
N f7 R O A � O
tA N N O
V7 b ^ N
b Y
01 V
w.
M O O
V�
0
O C
7
L
m
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built6/9/2010 ■MY112 /2010 0 MY2 5/26/2011
■MY36/21/2012
■MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Streams &-Wetland',/ Proje0Nw'71
Cat Creek - Parker- Cross'- Sectiowl0 -Riffle
Pebble Count'Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
stldclay
0 062
7
7%
7%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0 °/U
7%
fine sand
025
2
2%
9%
medium sand
050
14
14%
23%
coarse sand
100
8
8%
31%
very coarse sand
200
1
1%
32%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
4
4%
36%
fine gravel
57
0
0%
36%
fine gravel
80
5
5%
41%
medium gravel
113
6
6%
47%
medium gravel
160
4
4%
51%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
58%
coarse gravel
32
5
5%
63%
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
68%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
74%
Cobble
small cobble
90
7
7%
81%
medium cobble
128
9
9%
90%
large cobble
180
6
6%
96%
very large cobble
256
2
2%
98%
Boulder
small boulder
362
2
2%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
mednurn boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
1000/.
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
15
D84
100
D95
170
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
100%
90%
tr
80%
C
W
F
70%
u
c
60 % is
e
v
50 % is
S
40% >
W
30% E
0
U
20%
10%
0%
9
v
CO
Particle Size (mm)
—As -Built 6/9/2010
MY1 12/2010
MY2 5/26/2011
—'—MY3 6/21/2012
MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
--
--
80%
70%
60%
50
V
40
C
V
a
20%
i
R.
10%
0%
N VI if V;
— ri 7 O 30
O N N Vi K O 00 O
D N N O
00
O Y
O
V
to
Particle Size (mm)
NAs -Bu0t6 /9/2010
OMY112 /2010 ®MY25/26/2011
■ MY3 6/21/2012
■ MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat -Creek, Streams &,�Wetlandi %FProjec'_t4 No.* 71
'Cat Creek- aP,arker -:Gros Sectioid�l4l� —Pools
Petible +Co1,'i' 5u�ary
D50
Monttormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sddclay
0 062
6
6%
6%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
6%
fine sand
025
18
18%
24%
medium sand
050
13
13%
37%
coarse sand
100
23
23%
60%
very coarse sand
200
4
4%
64%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
10
10%
74%
fine gravel
57
6
6%
80%
fine gravel
80
4
4%
84%
medium gravel
113
7
7%
91%
medium gravel
160
3
3%
94%
coarse gravel
223
2
2%
96%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
97%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
98%
very coarse gravel
64
1
1%
99%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
1000/0
medium cobble
128
0
0%
1000/0
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
mednun boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS I
1
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
074
D84
8
D95
19
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -63 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Momtonng Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -64 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 11 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
m
r
70% E'
�
t
e
—
60%
e
d
a
o.
—�
40% >
m
30% E
0
U
20%
—
-
10%
0%
L
5
Particle Size (mm)
—i'As-Built 6/9 /2010
MY112 /2010
MY25/26/2011
— MY3 6/21/2012
MY4 4/2/2013
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 11 - Pool
80%
70
60%
50%
'o
9
40
c
u
30%
0.
20%
10 %
03
JLII�.
C6
0%
N 1n V1
N 7 D OC —
R O 00 O
tO N N of
10 N M V'i
00
O
a, Y
O O
O O O
N
V
9
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built6/9 /2010
®MY112 /2010 0 MY25/26/2011
0 MY36/21/2012
0 MY44/2/2013
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -64 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek1,Streamp &IWetlandj/ Rrdjec*No:.71
�+ b4-,,,Cnnss= Sectignd - �Ridle,
whsle :Count?Sanimary
D50
Monitormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0 062
0
00%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
00%
0 °/U
fine sand
025
5
50%
5%
medium sand
050
10
100%
15%
coarse sand
100
3
30%
18%
very coarse sand
200
14
140%
32%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
30%
35%
fine gravel
57
3
30%
38%
fine gravel
80
3
30%
41%
medium gravel
113
5
50%
46%
medium gravel
160
8
79%
54%
coarse gravel
223
5
50%
59%
coarse gravel
32
10
99%
69%
very coarse gravel
45
15
149%
84%
very coarse gravel
64
11
109%
94%
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
50%
99%
medium cobble
128
4
40%
103%
large cobble
180
1
10%
104%
very large cobble
256
0
00%
104%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
00%
104%
small boulder
512
0
00%
104%
medium boulder
1024
0
00%
104%
large boulder
2048
0
00%
104%
very large boulder
4096
0
000/0-
104%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00%
104%
TOTALS
105
105%
104%
Summary Data
D50
15
D84
51
D95
88
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -65 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -66 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
UT 1
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 1- Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70 %,.C°�.
F
60%
50 %2
40%5
30 %w
20 %z
L-
10%
j
0% C
M R 1O ON N X Vi 14
C O
•� N R
— As -Btd1t 6 /9/2010 -- 1V1Y112 /2010 —*— MY2 5/26/2011
—MY3 6/21/2012 --s.—MY4 8/20/2013
ITT 1
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Crow, Section 1- Riffle
-
80%
'0%
60%
500
O
4001*
b
30°C
200
0.
JA
10%
IWAA
"o
0
WJ WJ rl N R 'O 00 rl 'O N N WO R O 00 O �O N N
�D N N Q rl �--I N � " r �O C1 N 00 kro b —4
R 00
NO
d "i d
O O
.4 ..1 N I' W)
O O
•-� N
O
`T
O
Particle Size (min)
L■As
6/9/2010 M MY112 /2010 ■ MY2 5/26/2011 ■1VIY3 6/21 /2012 ■ AIY4 8/20/201
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -66 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat,C><eek�Streame &ewltk andtfftoj VM.71-
°IPT �1F Cross= Sectiori�2-Pool" "
Pe lblile �Cou>dt�S�iuninaiy
D50
Momtormg Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
60
600%
60%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
7
70%
67%
fine sand
025
35
350%
102%
medium sand
050
3
30%
105%
coarse sand
100
0
000/0
105%
very coarse sand
200
0
000/0
105%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
000/0
105%
fine gravel
57
0
000/0
105%
fine gravel
80
0
00%
105%
medium gravel
113
0
00%
105%
medium gravel
160
0
00%
105%
coarse gravel
223
0
00%
105%
coarse gravel
32
0
00%
105%
very coarse gravel
45
0
00%
105%
very coarse gravel
64
0
00%
105%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
00%
105%
medium cobble
128
0
00%
105%
large cobble
180
0
00%
105%
very large cobble
256
0
00%
105%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
00%
105%
small boulder
512
0
00%
105%
medium boulder
1024
0
00%
105%
large boulder
2048
0
00%
105%
very large boulder
4096
0
00%
105%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00%
105%
TOTALS1
1
105
105%
105%
Summary Data
D50
0 062
D84
0 062
D95
0 062
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -67 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -68 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014
UT 1
Pebble Count- Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
—
100 %
90%
80%
r
r
70 %.0
60% a�
50 %m
r`
r
40 %u v
30%0%
20 %=
R
10%
O
0% u
—As -Built 6/ 9/ 2010 - N11Y112/2010 -*- 1\/IY2 5/26 /2011
— Y3 6/21/2012 +h'IY4 8/20/2013
UT 1
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 1- Riffle
80%
.0oo)
60%
500e
r
4001*
a
30 914C
200/
a
1000
d A
o%
N V�
Of, h4 N N v) O 00 O
O G
Particle Size (inin)
NM-Built 6/9/2010 ■ W1 12/2010 M MY2 5/26/2011 ■ BJY3 6/21!2012
■ NIY4 8 /20/201
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -68 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Swartwout 926 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
IL
AI.
F4
Min
Meaul
Med
I Max
I SD
N
I Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
I Min
IMean
Med
I Max
I SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
175
197
229
1 1 1 8
162
1081
1 1 7
126
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
13320
>36 0
450
460
470
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
08
14
22
1 1 3
14
07
08
09
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
20
28
3 8
2 1
20
1 2
1 3
14
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'-
16 7
283
403
15 3
224
79
99
118
Width/Depth Ratio
84
159
23 7
9 1
118
134
141
147
Entrenchment Ratio
1 6
4 3
6 9
28 1
>2 2
-
3 9
Bank Height Ratio
1 3
1 14
15
10
1 0
1 I
10
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
61 0
742
949
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 006
016
0 030
0 011
0 017
0 021
00111
0 017
0 020
0 013
0 019
0 024
Pool Length (ft)
57
237
[0
467
130
180
209
29 7
43 3
50 2
26 7
39 8
57 1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
3 1
2 1
2 5
3 0
Pool Spacing (ft)
254
595
1089
79 5
88 2
97 0
110 0
126 0
134 0
76 4
106 9
141 1
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
-
-
220
372
57 1
300
510
780
600
750
1000
Radius of Curvature (ft)
180
250
428
240
340
580
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
1 5
2 1
36
-
2 1
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
786
1071
1499
1070
1450
2050
2000
2540
3400
Meander Width Ratio
1 9
3 2
48
19
3 2
48
56
64
79
Trans rt Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft'
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4 - G4
E4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
Valley Length (fl)
200
690
682
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
288
832
926
Sinuosity
1 01 - 1 06
144
1 20
1 36
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0006-0015
0 012
0 012
0 014
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0 013
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metnc
Channel Stability or Habitat Metnc
Biological or Other
- miurmaiion mavauaoie
Non - Applicable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -69 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,820 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre- Eaasting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
--tor Baseline
Dimension& Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
185
260
21 5
180
21 4
244
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
1400
2000
2800
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
22
25
1 8
12
13
1 5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 8
-
26
1 9
22
26
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'-
403
650
390
223
28 5
330
Width/Depth Ratio
85
104
1 1 9
139
163
213
Entrenchment Ratio
5 7
5 0
>22
68
94
107
Bank Height Ratio
1 4
10
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
31 8
629
1168
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 009
0 007
0 016
0 009
0 010
0 010
0 005
0 007
0 009
0 011
0 017
0 035
Pool Length (ft)
177
292
407
539
90 5
158 1
394
574
667
448
82 1
1 12 1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
-
26
36
47
Pool Spacing (ft)
543
723
902
-
158 1
1470
1670
1780
990
1680
230 0
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
71 0
91 3
1180
40 0
680
1040
530
880
1250
Radius of Curvature (ft)
236
483
730
327
45 6
778
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft )
09
1 9
29
-
21
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
820
2050
4840
1430119
0
2730
1850
2590
3450
Meander Width Ratio
27
3 5
45
6 7
9 0
12 7
2.9
4 1
5 1
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ftZ
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power Transport Capacity) W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4
C4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
2,150
142
1,480
1,120
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,280
271
1,809
1,820
Sinuosity
1 06
190
1 22
1 63
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0 006
0 010
0 005
0 006
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
0 007
Bankfull Floodp lam Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable
Non - Applicable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -70
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Pro' ct No. 71- Cat Creek UTl 457 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension &Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
I N
I Min
Meaul
Med
I Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
I Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
160
1 1 8
150
16 6
Floodprone Width (ft)
540
3320
>33 0
850
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 3
1 3
1 3
08
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
22
2 1
1 8
1 6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'-
202
15 3
189
131
Width/Depth Ratio
1 1271
9 1
119
21 0
Entrenchment Ratiol
I
1
1 34
1
1 28 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 >2 21
1
1 5 1
Bank Height Ratiol
I
I
1
1 14
1
1
1
1
1 1 0
1 10
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1 10
1
1
1 -
Proflle
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
190
290
45 1
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 009
0040
0 100
0 011
0 017
0 021
0 011
0 018
0 021
40
C 029
0048
Pool Length (ft)
99
130
162
130
180
209
275
40 1
465
19 3
330
49 1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
-
2 1
23
27
Pool Spacing (ft)
434
688
91 7
795
882
970
1020
1170
1240
45 1
65 3
956
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
220
372
57 1
280
470
720
350
490
550
Radius of Curvature (ft)
180
250
428
228
1352
543
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
1 5
2 1
36
-
90
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
786
1071
1499
990
1310
1900
129011550
1800
Meander Width Ratio
1 9
3 2
48
1 9
32
48
30
-
Trans rt Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ft'-
M ax Part Size (mm) M obilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m'-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Cb4
E4
Cb4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
440
200
490
400
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
470
288
581
457
Sinuosity
1 06
140
1 20
1 14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0 021
0 012
0 013
-
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
0 015
Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat M etnc
Channel Stability or Habitat M etnc
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable
Non - Applicable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -71 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 11a. A onitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Diinenslodal Parameters - Cross-Sections)
Cat Creek Stream, &iWetlandJ -Project No. 71- Cat Creek Swartwout (810 feet)
*Cross- Section 1
Riffle
*Cross - Section 2
Pool
*Cross- Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2109 5
2109 5
2109 8
2109 8
21098
2106 8
2106 8
2107 0
2107 0
2107 0
2107 6
2107 6
2106 5
2106 5
2106 5
Bankfull Width (ft)
108
120
127
129
98
183
220
186
184
86
126
133
127
149
112
Floodprone Width (ft)
450
450
>1000
>1000
>100 0
600
600
>1000
>1000
>1000
450
450
>1000
>1000
>1000
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
07
06
06
05
05
1
09
08
08
07
11
09
09
08
06
07
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
12
12
1 1
10
10
22
27
2 1
22
2 1
14
15
14
14
14
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 11 2
79
76
70
59
49
170
169
142
12 8
97
118
120
104
9 1
79
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
147
187
23 1
283
198
197
286
243
266
76
134
148
15 6
243
15 8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
42
38
>7 9
>7 7
>10 2
33
27
>5 4
>5 4
>11 6
36
34
>7 8
>6 7
>8 9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
10
1 1
j 1 1
10
10
10
-
-
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft)
-
-
72
60
49
142
12 8
97
-
-
10 4
92
79
d50 (mm)
050
1930
150
650
11 00
021
006
047
200
006
030
0 19
400
740
870
- nuormanon unavauaoie
'Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -72 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014
i

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table Ila. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71- Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet)
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Cross - Section 5
Riffle
Cross - Section 6
Pool
Cross - Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
20750
20750
20755
2075 5
20755
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2071 1
20712
20712
20712
20712
Bankfull Width (ft)
249
260
313
322
314
244
24 1
260
255
24 1
28L
286
279
282
285
225
240
230
23 1
23 1
Floodprone Width (ft)
800
800
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
1800
1800
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
1600
1600
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
—
2400
2700
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
12
1 1
12
12
10
12
1 1
1 1
10
09
17
17
16
16
15
15
15
14
14
15
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
25
25
30
31
1 30
1
19
1 19
20
20
1 19
1
33
33
33
34
35
26
27
26
29
28
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
289
282
382
376
326
282
266
278
258
227
479
480
45 5
445
439
330
348
333
335
335
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
215
23 8
256
276
303
21 3
21 7
243
253
25 6
168
170
171
179
186
153
165
160
160
159
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
32
3 1
>6 4
>6 2
>6 4
74
75
>7 7
>7 8
>8 3
5 6
56
>7 2
>71
>7 0
107
113
>8 7
>8 7
>8 7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
10
10
10
-
-
10
10
1 0
-
10
10
10
-
-
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
-
1
382
376
326
-
-
278
258
22 7
-
-
45 5
445
439
-
364
365
335
d50 (mm)
036
0 14
044
170
1600
046
024
890
920
23 00
0 29
0 14
056
190
800
1 80
0 11
0 06
6 60
950
N/A Item does not apply
Information unavailable
Table l la. Momtoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional P,arameteis - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wedaud / Project No. 71- Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet)
Cross - Section 8
Riffle
Cross- Section 9
Pool
Cross - Section 10
Riffle
*Cross- Section 11
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
20684
2068 7
2069 2
2069 2
2069 2
2066 5
2066 5
2067 2
2067 2
2067 2
2066 1
2066 2
2066 4
2066 4
206641
2065 2
2065 2
2065 7
2065 7
2065 7
Bankfull Width (ft)
180
207
326
324
325
15 7
185
306
297
285
206
236
259
267
257
236
23 7
373
359
347
Floodprone Width (11)
1700
1700
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
2600
2600
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
1400
1400
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
1400
1400
>200 0
>200 0
>200 0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
12
1 2
1 1
1 1
10
16
16
13
12
12
15
12
13
12
12
14
14
12
12
13
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
20
23
1 26
26
1 26
1
29
31
1 37
36
1 38
1
24
1 22
1 25
24
24
28
1 27
1 31
31
35
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
223
23 8
35 5
347
339
25 7
29 7
408
369
340
304
288
33 2
315
30 1
330
324
450
427
447
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
145
180
299
303
312
9 7
11 5
23 0
239
239
139
194
203
226
218
169
173
31 0
302
270
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
94
82
>61
>6 2
>6 2
166
14 1
>6 5
>6 7
>7 0
68
59
>7 7
>7 5
>7 8
59
5 9
>5 4
>5 6
>58
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
10
to
10
-
-
10
10
10
-
10
1 0
10
-
-
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft'-
-
-
355
347
339
-
408
369
340
-
-
354
33 1
301
450
427
44 7
d50 (mm)
—1-33—T
2 00
200
600
940
034
026
041
063
130
0 45
3245
730
2200
1500
0 18
005
036
1 130
074
Information unavailable
-Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -73 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 14 a. Monitoring.Data - DimensibnalaMbcphblogy,- Summary _
(DimensionaleParametert "s -.Cross = Sections)
Cat CreeklStream & Wetland /° Prof "ect�Nb,.7�1­Cat+CreekVTt1u '396 feet
*Cross - Section 1
Riffle
*Cross - Section 2
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2107 9
2107 9
2108 6
2108 6
21086
2105 8
2105 8
2106 2
2106 2
2106 2
Bankfull Width (ft)
166
209
195
189
197
166
179
163
168
73
Floodprone Width (ft)
850
850
>1000
> 100 0
>100 0
2000
2000
>1000
> 100 0
>100 0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
08
08
08
08
07
08
06
07
07
1 3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
16
1 8
19
1 6
17
22
1 7
2 1
2 1
2 l
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
13 1
15 8
163
154
143
12 1
11 1
120
1 115
98
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
210
275
23 3
232
27 1
21 8
289
222
244
5 5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5 1
4 1
>5 1
>5 3
>5 1
12 1
112
>6 1
>6 0
>13 6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
10
10
10
-
-
10
1 0
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (fl)
-
163
154
1 143
-
145
127
98
d50 (mm)
0 19
2495
490
1500
1 1500
0 11
006
033
044
006
- Intormation unavailable
'Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
D -74 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
1 1:
I
1 ...�. .... •.... •..�
�mm©
momOm�mOmmmOmOm���m00mm0m00���me
• ��
��_�__
I I I
11
11
__
� 11'
: 1
�
11
��
: 1 1
®���0
I 1 1
1:
11
®''
1 I
�______
I. /A Inlormallon does not ePPIY
RI =ILfBe /Ru - Run /P- Pool /G- Gbde /5 =Scp
SC- SII C1,, / S4 - Snd / G- Grevel / C = Cobbic / B - BouW, / Bc - Bedrock
•PaccNagcs based on nflk and pool pebble counts
Inm�annn una. allude
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -75 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
--Tablellb. Jim Da
,
,.,..;'.:,•, ::.,..
m�moem�mmoom�mmmom�m
©mo�mm
®oemmo
®mo
:,
mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmo
®mmmmo
®��
®mommmm�m
®m�m�mm
®mmmmm
®mmmom®
®mmom
®mmmommmm�m
m
®�m�mmmm
®mmmmmmmomm
®mmom
®
®mmommmm�m
_
®�mmmmmmmmmmm
®®
®mom
®
®
®mo
®mtmtm.
®ommmmmm
mmm
®mmmmm
®mmmm
®mmommmmmom,
®
®
®mmmmmmmm
•
mmmmmmmmm
®mmm
®
®mmomm
®mmo
®mtmtm.mommmmmm
•:
����mmmmmmmmmmmm
ommmm
ommmmmommmmm�
•
mmm
mmmmmmmmm®
®mmm®
®mmmm
®mtmmmmmmmmmm
mmm
®mmm
®mmmm®
®mmm
®mm
®mmmmmtmm®
®mmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmommmmmmmmmmm�
mmm
mm��m�mmm�
®
®mo��m�
mom
®
®
®mmmmmmmm
�
�
®mmS
o®
®®mmmmmm��
•
• : �,.
mmmmmm�omo
®
©mmmmmo�m
®
®����
®����
®mmmm
mmmmmm��
®m
®mmmmmo
©
®
®�
®��MEN
®
®
®
®
®®
®mmm
EMEM
mmmmmmmmmmmsmmmmmmmmmmmmm
tmtmtm
.
mmmmmmmm
m®®®®®®®®
m
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm,mtmtm.mmmmmmmm
, ,: .
m®
t�■®®®
®�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm���m.mmmmmmmm
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -76 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
WA Inr— I— d- -apply
R P,MB /Ra =Rim /P= Pail /G= Glick /S =Rep
X =511 Cley /SA =S d /G =Cre,el /C- Cnhblc /B =Bnalder /B,= Bedrock
•Percem ages based on raffle and pool peMle coimi s
Mrarmmion �mevadablc
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -77 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
= a �
mmmm®
ommmm�ammmm
®ammmm�ommmm
®o������
� • •
mmmm®
ommmm�ommmm�ommmm�ommmm
®o������
• •
�����������ommmm�ommmm
®ommmm
®o������
••'
� -�
�
®�
®��m
®�m��mmmmmom
®
®mmo
®m
®gym
©������.
WA Inr— I— d- -apply
R P,MB /Ra =Rim /P= Pail /G= Glick /S =Rep
X =511 Cley /SA =S d /G =Cre,el /C- Cnhblc /B =Bnalder /B,= Bedrock
•Percem ages based on raffle and pool peMle coimi s
Mrarmmion �mevadablc
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -77 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification ofBankfi ll Events
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No.71
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo #
(if available)
No Events in 2010
No Events in 2011
3/29/2012
11/28/2011
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
1/23/2013
1/17/2013
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
4/2/2013
1/30/2013
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
8/20/2013
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix E
12.0
10.0
8.0
C
O
cv
fl. 6.0
L
a
4.0
2.0
0.0
Monthly Precipitation Data compared to A... anti Ill "" Percentiles for Macon Lounty, NU
Jan -13 Feb -13 Mar -13 Apr -13 May -13 Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 Dec -13
2013 Rainfall 30th Percentile ......••• 70th Percentile
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
uu -1 Yreclpltation ana Water Level not
Hydrologic Data
50 - - - -- I - ���_. - - - - -- - - -- - 100
Ma5d�mua uu m #-- o f,Go- n-- s�cuh_veD a..y_ts >..w1,a2u' t, c..1a_ 8.,.6
olduin Hdr 1OFxQ> m% µn"a } i! I oHn ;
i
4 5 - =�� . -s- r `Goun`c1Su%f�aoe 5 0
35 e t� 1' ,r �.s� r ° ;4 quriem- �0 C
fiA '` 1 Depth
k -10 0
0 , e3
`M
TWA _tn
25 Growing Season, 3
"N" - - - - �_ I - -200
20
LW- r `'x - - w - � ;, `Gro" mnglSeason -250 +�+
CL
1 5 G.
q
-
'� 1y,l.�l �_ i L r � .._ 1 .-., -Y ry ry ♦ vc`�V ± � "9 L y'. - I"' -
10
�
-350
0 5 f Y m
� /� j^ '7 N � +I � ti t � 5� 4 -77 � S 1
�F �� SIB+ �`a rx� �p - - X00
00 .� r -450
M M M M M M M M CO) M M M M CO) M M M M M M M M M M M M M
M M M N �0 M M O. lT0 f�0 7 7 7 3 d 00 7 V O O d d d
r N M O N M O
N N N N
N M r M
r
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix G Hydrologic Data
CC-2 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland E -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January
2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
5.0
4.5
M m Da 1 2 ":r
axr ic um #c of Cr on secr u tiv e ys >r 6 5
% ofHydroperiod During GrowingSeason :35.1
Ground
1-0. 0
5.0
4.0
0.0
3.5
Malfunction
Required
-5.0
:C
,
Depth
'
^Oa
10. 0
4)
C
3.0
M
L,
C
0
-15.0
Beginning of
2.5
Growing Season
.
April
-20.0
tJ
2.0
End of
O
Growing Season
-25.0
�z
October 17
1.5
CL
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
M M
r
M
r
Cl)
r
M M M M M M M
r r r
M M
M
M
M M M M
r r r r
Cl) M
r r
a
> m
> ca > a
> > 7 >
tT
>
>
o o m
u
m a,
u � a
a
X 7 7
Q
z z 4
4 4
Ln N
r N N O
N
I
M
r-
14
u9 M M
1`
N �
N
r
r M
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland E -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January
2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
,
2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
CC -3 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
50
-
-
100
Maximum #ofConsecutive Days >12" 42
% ofHydropenod
During GrownngSeason
227%
'
45
Ground Surface
50
'
\a
0
0
40
3 5
'
;
Required
-5 0
C
Depth
L.
�.
-100
�
C
�
ea
:..
30
C
-150
Beginning of
25
Growing Season
;
7
April 1
:
;
-20 0
�
CL
0
t�
20
;
End of
O
L
Growing Season
-250
++
a
October 17
L
�+
15
-300
y
0
1 0
-350
OS
-400
00
.450
M
T
M M
T T
M
T
M Cl) M
T T T
M M
T T
M
T
M M
T T
M M M M M
M
T
M
T
M M
T T
M
T
M M M
T T T
M M
T T
c c I
c !C N W
�
o
�
cc
c I
M >
C' 3' 7 I I a
> 0
I n
7
0 v I
0 > I
O >
0 I I
0
aaC9
N O
Q
Q
Z
4 Q
T
in 0
N
CO N cc
n
T -4
0o M
r-
O
V
CD M
N T
T N
T
N T N
N
N
T T
N
T
N
N
T
T M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
UU-4 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
50
45
'
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12"
% of Hydropenod During GrowngSeason
186
100%
_
Ground Surface
100
50
40
,
00
35
Required
0
C
v
Depth
L
30
C
0
-150
Begmrnng of
2 5
G�ovnng Season
ApFil 15_
-200
.V
20
'
;
End of
0
Growing Season
-250
(L
'
'
October 17
15
4
I
�0 0
4)
G
10
'
-350
05
_ a ,�
'
'
-
-400
r P
00
.450
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M M
T T T T
M
T
M
T
M M M M M M M
T T T T T T T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M
T T T
M M
T
c c
c
a M M a
CL
rcc a
> c
>
cc
>
a
o
I
> > v tI o
0 0
v d I
r
v d
N
S
C
w
7r 4
G G
CD
N
w N
N
N to
M M
N
,
N T
N
T
T M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
uu -!) rrecipitation ana water Levei riot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014
50
-
-
100
Maximum# ofConsecutrveDays >12"
186
% ofHydroperrodDunngGr ,,owmgSeas_on
100%
4 5
I
— - `
—_ -- r "-
-
�
- --
-'
I Ground Surface
50
1
,
'
00
40
__
35
_
h
I
1 Re quired
'Depth
-50
C
...
_
`
L..
30
tl
p
I
I
-150
2 5
innm of
8e9,- __ 9_ I
Growing Season ,
I
C
C
.V
Y
Apnl'15 '
I
'
'
1
-200
L
20
;
�
1
i End of
1
dr Wing Season
-250
�''
6dt66& 17
.0
15
fl.
�
�
x
.300
�
y
10
a
-350
os
a
moo
�
"': �
� (• � � iii �
t
,
f� y,
,
, r
_
�
j
I (.
�
I
I
0 0
.450
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M M M M
T T T T r T-
M
T
M
T
M M
T T
M M
r T
M M
T T
M
r
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M M
T T r
M
T
M
r
I
��
I
I I �
-,
U. `d,' 4
I
>
10
t
`°
I I
I
3�
I I
3
I
I
I
I
Q
r
I I I
Q z
I
I
o
N
a',
a',
r
in
Of
N t0 N �O 0 M
pp
M M
O
O
N N of M
N
r
N
T N r N N
N
r
T
N
r
N
r
r
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

0 o w
� n
s2
tro �
A
o �
m
0C
M
CD5'
0
x
m
0
0
n
3
n
c
C
17
0
ti d
w �
0 CD
w =
N
O 5
A n
A tr
V1 O
0
o
063
03
c �
w
m
G7
m�m
'm
&4
m v
w
O I�1
w�
0
L7
0
ra
C c
i
c
`C
A�
0
a
�s
r
A
`C
O
a
�a
a
m
N
Precipitation (in.)
O
UI O CII O CT
O UI O
1 titan -13
G
15-Jan-13
0
29- Jan -13
0
12- Feb -13
26- Feb -13.`
12- Mar -13
inm'
0
26- Mar -13
I
9- Apr -13
23- Apr -13
7- May -13
21- May -13
4,Jun -13
18,Jun -13
2- Jul -13
16tilul -13
30- Jul -13
13- Auq -13
27- Aug -13
10- Sep -13
24- Sep -13
8-Oct-13
22 -0ct -13
5- Nov -13
00
19- Nov -13
to c
3- Dec -13
0
17- Dec -13
I
31- Dec -13
U1
O U1 O C11 O (71
O � O
O
O O O O O O
O
Depth to Groundwater
(in.)
A tr
V1 O
0
o
063
03
c �
w
m
G7
m�m
'm
&4
m v
w
O I�1
w�
0
L7
0
ra
C c
i
c
`C
A�
0
a
�s
r
A
`C
O
a
�a
a
m
N
�
O
G
0
0
v

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -7 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
50
4 5
-
'
-
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12"
%ofHydjr pe*btl!DdnngGr_ovwngSeason
- -� " AL
41
222%
'
Ground Surface
100
5 0
40
,
,
00
Requtred �
-50
C
•L
35
-
Depth
C
'
-
:_.
30
M
C
-15 0
*;,
F- -gmnmg of
;
C
M
25
Growing Season
O
CL
A hl 15
-200
"V
20
End of
O
Growing Season
-250
'w
a
,
October 17
I
15
�
_
'
'
a
'
-300
d
'
1
-
-350
1
r
V
t
'
1
05
X00
I,
I
00
J
,p
.450
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M M
T T T T
M M
T T
M
T
M
T
M M M M M M
T T T T T T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M CO)
T T
M M M
T-T
M M
T T
I
c
I
c
I
c
I I I
M, ) ,`a M
1
a a
I
I
I I 1 I I
> > > > > ;
I
I
4ai
1
Q
I I
U 0
I I r
0 0 m
1
m o
7
??
U. LL 2 ?
a 4
g
? ?? a
a
&?
Q Q
z o
o s
T
I[1
01
N
N CO N <O
Of M
N
^
T
40 N �10 co M
P
O
O N
N
M (P
T
T N T N
N
T T
N
T
N
T
T M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
UU -8 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
50
45
_
Maximum #ofConsecutive Days >12"
% ofHydroperiod During GrowingSeason
186
100 %.
1
Ground Surface
100
so
40
-
00
3 5
�
'
Regwred
-5 0
Depth
L
C
_
-100
:-.
30
M
p
-15 0
M25
Begin ning of
Growing Season
C
�I
CL
April 15
-200
�
V
2 0
'
End of
Grow AjS ason
4"
CL
;
;
Octotier 17
-250
15
a
moo
0
1 0
-350
05
'
-400
,
00
X50
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M M
T T T T
M
T
M
T
M M M M M M M
T T T T T T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M
T T T
M M
T
I I
C C
1
C
I
d
I I I I
Q L
�o �a
I
a
C
I
�Sa
r
I 1 I I
> > > > > >
I
3
d
I
m
I
"
I
1^yi
I I I
o o m
r I
m m
N
C
O
D D
W)
ONE
to N N
N
N M M
ti
N
C4
r.
N T
N
N
T
T M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
CC -9 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
•E -1 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014
50
-
Maximum
#of
Con seartnre
Days
>12"
- -
186
100
45
% ofHydropenodDunngd-o_wingSeason
-
-
- "—
-
-^'^"-
-
--
- -
0%1
- --
Ground
Surface
50
r1A
40
,
,
00
'
Requi
-50
C
35
;
Depth
red
:..
�
,
L
30
3
C
O
'
-150
'0
of
'
C
25
_Begmnin
r GrgIng8eason
7
�'Apnl
^15�
CL
'V
_
\
-200
2 0
,
-
;
End of
O
O
L
;
;
Growing
Season
-250
r
d
;
;
October
17
15
'
O
,
-300
10
d
-350
05
r
;�
a _
4
-400
,j _
00
.450
M
r
M l'9
r r
Cl)
r
M�
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
(n M
r r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M M
r r
d
V
ti
O
O
GOf
uL
uL
g
N
4
4
'?
'?
4
4
4
0
0
Lt) N
N
N
N
O
N
M
M
II
O
N
1rf
Of
M
ti r
N
N
N
N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
•E -1 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix E
CC -10 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014
50
45
-
y
1
-
_
Maximum #ofConsecutrveDays >12"
ofFlydropenodDunngGrowing Season
-
94
50$%
;
1
-
-
Ground�oe
100
5 0
40
'
00
'
-50
Required
35
I
,
Depth
'
-10 0
C_,
30
-150
C
I
M
25
Beginning of
GrowngSeason
_
-200
C
G
Apnl 15
L
"V
20
-
'
End of
-250
0
L
-
-
--
` - --I-
i
_
,
,
GroHnng Season
+�
d
;
October 17
-300
1
-
/
+�+
a
1.5
1
1
r
I
1
-350
Q
10
-400
05
x
-450
1
1
�
,
1
00
_
X00
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M
T T T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M M M M M M M
T T T T T T
M
T
M
T
M
T
M
M
T
M M M
T T T
M M
T T
e
o
rd
y ` m
a
a
r
R 3 > > >
>
m
n
r
o o 4)
0) 4)
u
7
g
q
z z o
4 4
T
N
N
N N N
O
N
F-
N M
O M
r-
CIO
N
N Of M
r- T
T
N
T
T M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix E
C.C. -11 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014
50
-
-
100
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12" 61
;
% of Hydropenod
During Growing Season 33%
;
45
Ground Surface
Malfunction
`Gauge
�
40
<�
00
35
Required
-50
.0
Depth
100
:-.
30
3
C
p
'
-15 0
�
.0
Beginning of
;
C
0
M
25
Growing Season
' a
.�
April 15
;
,
-20 0
L-
20
End of
p
L
;
GrowmgSeason
-250
+-'
Q"
October 17
r
�-
1 5
'
'
�0 0
4)
D,
10
-350
05
1100
00
115 0
Cl)
M M
M
M M M
M
M
M
M M
M M M M M M M
M
M
M
M M M
M M
C
c c
a
C C
�
>
�
c
� 7
, , , ,
c > > > a rn a
7 7 3 G7
n
N
0 >
O O d
d
4
4
410
`g�
N to O 4 4 �?
�?
Go
Q
4
4
N to
N
t0 N
Of
M
Cl)
N
M M
r M
r N
r
N r N
N
N
V- N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix E
CC -12 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland E -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Protect No 71 January
2014
Momtonng Year 4 of 5
50
45
40
�
'
'
Maximum #ofConsecutrve Days >12"
%ofHydropenodDunngGroHnngSeason
166
100 °�
;
f
GroundSurfaoe
100
50
00
�
C
35
Growmg�Season
Octobe�d;7
Required
-50
F ,
•-:
,
Depth
,
L
4)
C
-10 0
:_.
3 0
3
C
O
.a
Beginrnng of ;
-150
C
M
25
GronnngSeason
C
:L'
April 15
C-
-�
-200
20
d
-250
fl-
1 5
-30 0
C
10
-350
05
-400
00
.450
co)
M
M
M M M M M
M
M
M M M M Cl) M M
M
M
M
M
M
M M M
M M
eta m
w
d d i`a i`a a
a
M
R > > > > > >
>
m
ani
u
u
0 a�i
a�i
N 4 � � I
�
� ? ? N O Q
Q
VT
�
�
7o
T T Q
Q Q
1�r1
O�f
M
^
two
M
N
N
N
N
M r M
r
M
r
N
r N r N
N
N
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland E -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Protect No 71 January
2014
Momtonng Year 4 of 5
�
Growmg�Season
Octobe�d;7
� F
F ,
,
,
,
2014
Momtonng Year 4 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -13 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland E -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Protect No 71 January 2014
Monitoring
Year 4 of 5
50
45
40
I
Maximum #ofConsewtNe Days >12" 186 ;
°� ofHydropenod Dunng G�oHnngSeason 100% ;
1
Ground Surface
�GaugeyMalfunction�)�
100
50
y
1
1
,
,
00
,i
1
1
1
G
3 5
Required
-50
g Season
I
October 17
D "epth
1
4 �
1 ,
L
C
�
Mt
dM
I
I
1
1
-100
:..
30
I
,
3
C
�
O
+,
1
- Begmrnng of
1
-150
C
25
-
GroHnng�Season
"a
_
_ Apnl15
O
"L
�
1
-200
(;
20
1
,
End of
r
Growin
CL
-250
t
15
C"
-300
G
10
-350
05
-400
00
-450
M
M
M
M M M Cl) M M
M
M M
M M M M M M M
Cl) M M M M M
M M
c
7
c
-7-7
c
M M
M ea d
4 4 4
>
M
1 ,
>� c
is =
, , , , 1 ,
c a tM a
= 7 7 3 7 7 0
? N w 0 4 4 T
,
n .. �' > > V
d V V 0 0 01
02 4 4 4
0 v
0
4
N
r
M
N
N W N <D O) M
T- N r N N
h
�-
N
CO r M M N O
T r N
N 1r9 Cf M
N N r
P r
r M
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland E -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Protect No 71 January 2014
Monitoring
Year 4 of 5
g Season
October 17
1 4
4 �
1 ,
, 3
�
Year 4 of 5

s=
w �
CD
C J CD
CO w
A 9
o R°
w
a.
m
a
M
5'
c
x
M
a'
0
n
c
0
E3
0
c
�a
w O
c �
a
N'
O �r
A P
Precipitation (in.)
O O N N W W A A Cn
O Ln O UI O 0 O 0 O N O
1,Jan -13
15,Jan -13
29-Jan-13
12- Feb -13
26- Feb -13
12- Mar -13
26- Mar -13
9- Apr -13
---------------------- - / --- 23- Apr -13 n
7- May -13
A
21- May -13
A
4-Jun-13
18-Jun-13 W
0
2,)u l-13
0
16-Jul-13 =
30- Jul -13
13- Aug -13 C.,
27- Aug -13 C
10-Sep-13
0
24Sep -13
8-Oct-13
22 -0ct -13
5- Nov -13
19- Nov -13 CL
I— F , / 3- Dec -13
17- Dec -13
31- Dec -13
J� JL liJ W N N I& � in O 9
cn o to o cn o to o c o o °
Depth to Groundwater (in.)
0
cn � o
3°
xx
C'.
a
v
a
m
S
a
0
0
w
�
i o c
vo
7 H
f�
G)
o �-
� m
H
V
N
O
0
47
o F
o��
� .�
vc
�
a
;
a
v
a
m
S
a
0
0
w

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -15 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
50
Maximum #ofConsewtroe Days >12°
ofHydropenodDunngGro�nnngSeason
- - - - - -
186
100%
-
Ground Surface
I
I
� Regwred
100
"Depth
r
I
1
,
,
�
,
eegmrnng of
,
1
Gro�nnngSeason
April
_ �
1
End�of
Growing Season
45
-
� October 17
-
a
I
I
f
,
I
50
I
�
,
1
J
U l♦`
I f - 1
1
00
40
35
-50
C
:..
_
-100
L
30
M
C
O
-150
V
C
M
25
•a
-ZO o
O
•v
�
20
O
d
-25 0
=
1 5
C'
30 0
10
35 0
05
-400
00
.450
M
CO)
M
M M CO) M M M
r T
M
r
M M M M M M M
T T T T T
M
T
Cl)
T
M
T-
M
r
Cl) M M M
r T T r
M
r
M
T
r
r
r
r r r r
S S da I
S S
I
w
r r
I I I I
&
M > > 7 > > 7
7
I
41
I
G1
I
V
I I I I
V C C 61
^
1
I
Gf
T
.4 M
4
O
v
7 7
� 4
T
1n
M
N to N 10 Of M
GOD N (0 M
0
OTf
ti
r
N
T N r N N
N T r
N
T
N
r
r
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
,
,
Maximum #ofConsewtroe Days >12°
ofHydropenodDunngGro�nnngSeason
- - - - - -
186
100%
-
Ground Surface
I
I
� Regwred
"Depth
r
I
1
,
,
�
,
eegmrnng of
,
1
Gro�nnngSeason
April
_ �
1
End�of
Growing Season
-
� October 17
-
a
I
I
f
,
I
I
�
,
1
J
U l♦`
I f - 1
1
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
uu -16 Yreclpltanon and Water Level YIOt
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
50
400
Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12"
186
;
-
;
%ofHydropenod
During GrowngSeason
100%
;
350
45
'
300
250
40
200
..
35
150
v
,
,
L
'^
100
d
C
Gfound Surfaos
M
:..
30
so
C
-
++
25
-
Beginnmg,of
Reqwred
00
C
GrowmgSeason
Depth
-50
C
Q
April 15
,
L
.V
20
-100
CL
'End of
-150
t
l
Growing Season
`
a
1 5
October 17
-200
'
-250
1 0
'
-
-300
05
r
-350
-400
00
E
-450
M
M
M
M M M
M
M
M
Cl)
M
M M Cl) M Cl) M M
M
M
M
M M M Cl)
M M
M
0 d
M
M
> > > > > >
ani
an
�
o
0
a�i
m
7r
�cc
S`a`a
4
�N
i
(9
T
00
Q� 7T
Q Q
ucc i
Of
N
i0
O
M
-7 pp M I--
O
V
7 f
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N r
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
UU -17 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014
60
-
100
Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12"
186
;
%ofHydropenbdDii-ringGrow+ngSeason
100%
;
Ground Surface
50
50
MAW—
00
�
Required
-50
"L
40
Depth
C
,
,
-100
3
O
-15 0
Beginning of
C
3
M
30
GrowngSeason
April 15
;
-200
a
End of
p
Growing Season
-250
r
d
2 0
October 17
CL
300
0
1 0
�5 0
'
-
-400
�
00
.450
M
M M
M
M M M
M
M
M
M M M M M M M
M
M
M
M
M
M M M
M M
d
d
=
a
R
A 3 7 7 7 3
3
0a1
d
V
V
O O d
d d
N
t
'f � N M 4
0
Q
W
4 4
N
N C4
N
t�0
4
M
N r
N
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
E -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CU-18 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
50
45
1
Maximum #ofConsecutive Days >12"
% ofHydropenod During Growing Season
22
119%
;
Ground Surface
,
100
50
40
00
35
1
Required
-50
C
:..
Depth
100
:..
30
C
O
I
-150
C
M
25
Beginning of
GrownngSeason
Malfunction
L
.Ei
April 15
\ 1
Gauge
-20 0
�
20
1 End of
O
L
Growing Season
-250
d
October 17
15
1
1
I
-
1
I
�0 0
�
p
10
_
1
1
�
1
1
1
-350
q
1
1
05
1
_
-40 0
IL
1Y
1 .
00
-0 50
Cl)
r
M
r
Cl)
r
M
r
M M
r r
M M M
r r r
M
r
M M M
r
M M M
r r r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M M M M M M
r r r r r
M M
T
c I
C
C
.
c r r
r
" 0
o o 0
r V
d
V m
7
7
4
4
�
?
Q T7
N 4
N
0
N
O N
0 M
00
N
M
M
t :
O
V N Of
r
N
N
N N
N
N
N N r
T M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Success Criteria Achiewd/Nlax Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge m
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Yes /31
Yes /42
Yes /186
CC -1
Yes/ 35 Percent
16 8 Percent
22 6 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /37
Yes /26
Yes /65
CC -2
Yes/ 16 Percent
20 0 Percent
14 0 Percent
35 1 Percent
Yes /24
No/ 13
Yes /42
CC -3
Yes/ 8 Percent
13 0 Percent
7 0 Percent
22 7 Percent
Yes /88
Yes /64
Yes /186
CC4
Yes/ 35 Percent
47 6 Percent
34 4 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /50
Yes /52
Yes /186
CC -5
Yes/ 32 Percent
27 0 Percent
28 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /25
Yes /18
Yes /61
CC-6
No/ 2 Percent
13 5 Percent
9 7 Percent
33 0 Percent
No/ 12
No/ 12
Yes /41
CC -7
No/ 0 Percent
6 5 Percent
6 5 Percent
22 2 Percent
Yes /39
Yes /65
Yes /186
CC-8
Yes/ 33 Percent
21 1 Percent
34 9 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /186
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -9
Yes/ 22 Percent
100 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /97
Yes /72
Yes /94
CC -10
Yes/ 9 Percent
52 4 Percent
38 7 Percent
50 8 Percent
Yes /27
Yes /40
Yes /61
CC -1l
Yes /11 Percent
14 6 Percent
215 Percent
33 0 Percent
Yes /50
Yes /46
Yes /186
CC -12
Yes/ 41 Percent
27 0 Percent
24 7 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes/ 118
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -13
N/A
63 8 Percent
100 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /26
Yes /65
Yes /186
C C -14
Yes /30 Percent
14 1 Percent
34 9 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /88
Yes /73
Yes /186
CC -15
Yes/ 33 Percent
47 6 Percent
39 2 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /139
Yes /186
Yes /186
C C -16
Yes/ 100 Percent
75 1 Percent
100 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /117
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -17
N/A
63 2 Percent
100 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /23
No /4
Yes /22
CC -18
No/ 3 Percent
12 4 Percent
2 2 Percent
119 Percent
N/A - Information does not apply
Hydrology Success Criteria = 8%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5

Appendix F
Wetland Boundary Delineation Data

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PIJ,)x1151a. 41 (14 e t aglcoilir) t ", u r m- Sampling ogre I NI r a l! ?
Ap0hcaiv0Aixx- , A, !s stole. -a L senrrAIN Palm do)
nm'-11 torl5y S sry 5acum, Irvansnlp Range,
Lm1dl9fm41Y1IM41e tenaCe erc.l. r", tit- I'�. Irfe 4.aca1 reliaf Iconca4e,00rnrr. mrol t �� 510pe(%l-
Sulxegrm(LRROrMLRA)J'Y -21 r 1 Lill 4 4.Zir Lnng Wilim ••' a'pd
5ull Map Wit Nance NWI clamAicadan,
Ale CtmallC l Iryivoog)e ColtdWrLS on the snet)pxa for this tune at yenrl Yrn Y Na (g no oxpfairl M Ram(rk5 )
Meve9er3m) 1-1 $al — orFryL1rob11Y ,IprlllcnrrtyUmur0ndt !Ve- Nmmnlcacumsarrei; p;i"Qnn Yc, ="- No
Are VegamaWa J 50i ti' Or l -hoobp � "� naturally pro11/anetCA (II netrow. enpum tiny an sonars at Rarnmks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
1ty #c{inyut vlxlafeleuu Pr �eqn? Yes )L Nu Is the Sampled Aran
Ityriir;SdIYmtiam7 Yf., Nu within aWatlend7 Yes t No
WC4WO Hyoralogy Wesam' Ye; No
Ruiivks
HYDROLOGY
Wedmnd Hydra/agy InrbcatrirYr
Senotwlio inak.alor�tmnm 114..11 Sit iW
Prrninry Indcatars (mioinmm_ W�Itcd r_oyunad
e1Y�cA all tlua uL'yjy1
_ Surface Sol Gecks 0881
_ Sixtom Water (Alt
— TiuL AquuhL Planes (844)
, Spinsely vegeta w CWr2n* Swluce last
Flip wain Tnhtn IA21
— Igobgenr Sullde Oaw ICI)
— Df=06 -4 Patimilb (0101
' tiatwz%Wn JAM
% Ociduee Rhiiosphwes tin trnny
Room 101 _ Moss Phn Lines 10 16t
_ VLYnr Makti (0 1)
_ Pr WnLLof RetluLW Iran (C4J
_ Dfy- Season WAIL+ Idble 1C:)
_ Sixtrnorn Lwpo•n% 101)
_ Ilecera hall Reductlw i to Tiled SWs (CGI _ Crayfish Our taws 1Ca)
_ Cull VoVvxt, IBdy
nmr fAuLk SwfaCL412)1
, SaIutalWn Vlsbk wr Aerh,l lrrmyery ICs)
_ A11pt Mat w <:MI (134)
,�• Oaits 1Exiftit in Retnurks)
swilled a stir Plains (D7)
_ Inm urpu,aq roJ)
GeaurxuPhic- Pusiliun (DZ)
_ InimusWnvisi lemtA 111ImngetyIB71
_ stfuliowAquawd101)
_ Vera SwIned Lw, om (09)
, Ml fmipagraphic Relief (041
_ Agwlic Fauna (1i13)
FAC Newtl Tesi,(DS)
Field observations
Surface hater i>reseeY7 Yes _ Nu = Depth 0ihes),
Watef Tank Ptes&ir7 Yes �„- No
` DapUl (0:11e5),
Saunatmn Prtacra? YeL ! NO
Depth (nxtiasl'
Welland HydittIM ihesent? Yes— No
irtdir<Iw captht - e
Da5or Ue Rec*'deo Bata (stream gauge moiinormr) wall Limit phaln, prtrrimr, nr,(xrdiomc), d nvalkrtin
-
Retmki
US Army Corps of Cngrvws
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
F•azim Malmialns and hraamom - wysmn ? 1)
F -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point a
US May Corps at Gigrreers
�rellrtrn Mmmi t ni, and Fleomunt - VArshxl 1 n
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
AbsOAlaa DOmaunt Indwor
C
nano Tact work at
Tree Stratton (Plot stre. 1 %Camr 3Z f
1. t... \a. Is' � -, ✓ FAC
,wrbor rjt Lk Iro3ni 5po61o5
Thm Are 03L FACLV, ur FAC` �_ w
Tcw1 HwNier a1 Don llcaro
5peeie5 Across All Swa: b_ rat
2. �. ... ti , . , lr I.. l _ I FAC O
3 C • 1�._�� .. to JZO—L-
PISCLIi al Dat11IILh11 SrIeCL^t
is /rAIN)
m
rinl Are081, FACW, or FAC:
r
Prevalence Index warfisheet.
laud % Cm" oh 0. ldwaV IM
rrnal C"
50% of load caves• --1 20% 01 Mill L1YIW B-_
oB sP8CleS 1*015100 K iii _ --3g
6404 Kr2� -2 Si
SduintYShruh
Strolwr 00 site-
FACW spoons V1brJ15)
t'ACspodes x3-
FACU specas ,S K a - V7
UPI -tWiea Kb-
CohrmnTu(MI; l(, (Al :10';_ 18)
Prevuhatte WdaK - a!A- (. �t Y_
J
3 R.��1 K' 1 ✓ TAW
_�
A
J.
s
—
Hydrap"Ile Vdgetatim IrAftatofi
r
I - Rapid Tint fhr HydraphyUc Vegeiafloo
a
X 2 Dotninenc a Test is -50S&
�r 3- Prevalence lnaeKis001
9
rwUl CIYun
110% at twee com k D 247E ul 101111 LWLr!{_
4 IAarpholo jcal AdafttatmnS' (PMI.W? 5up1>ar1rrl9
'-
herb Slunlnn (pint •Pi 5 i G
data In Rsnarks fir an u separate She+dl
1_
/r
.....► a r•••trf bG ✓ i u�
_ RoblernakIlyaraphy lkvegetation'fEapF�ftn
11rKliostoruof hytiricsall anti wudund Ir)tir M nest
tie presem, urdess disurtim orlrr V aw
a
3, l- •. 1a , + 1 i • ., l� .. c
_
ao! nitk ms at Four Vogotodan 5"0:
Tree - Woody p10nt5,ekdidingWnes.3tri V5 con) ar
Ita a in dlameer at brave he° ht (DOH), regardless at
G
T
halghL
a
SepthnyShrub a Woody plart%, eKLludirlg vnrt less
9
Ilion 3 to OIIII urvi gFrctorllasn or i7ymi to 3 28 h is
ml [till
Horb- All hintnwirs Mot woodyl plen4 rslnrdle` ,
14,
11
t °"
• tool Cowo
arsite and woody planes loss Ihvi 3.'2s R tall.
50% of wto Coat al IrAnl crrr.R; J
WOady vino - All woody usuis grt'ater than 3 26 it In
Woody
I,
V1nw 54rau,m IPIa pax I
2
3.
4
Hydraphytk
5
Vegetation
Presents yes A— Poo
- TOO Clymt
50%of10Iycomp 2t3%afanalcorer
Rixriurks (hicludepiiatci iuRnl>Qr5 t>efa ar qt 0 separata shad,
US May Corps at Gigrreers
�rellrtrn Mmmi t ni, and Fleomunt - VArshxl 1 n
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5

SOIL
SAmpiing Poem. .-') %
Profile Descripdonr (Describe to the depth needed to downtien the indicator or cwdlrm the nLsenon of inrluaatom,►
Cu Ira, M,erlx
Rutfox FoglunR
(Kirtumil C w 4lnont) `hi
Coil, (Irrrrst► iti, i ynlit l:iT Fn RIIfC` Rnfr lfkG
r `a hL lJ(F ,k.
„ek S -a Yc
'r e. GCan enlratial D- Dopleum RM-Rixluud Maim, MS�LU!An*d Sand Greuit _ 'Lor_a1_Iwt_ I'L -Nine wring M.Waru_
ftydrlc Sort Indkworv.
Indicators for Probiw atic Hy04c Sods',
_ Htswral (A1)
_ Dark b4AJaca (Sr)
_ e cm Muck 010I (M4.RA 147)
_ Hisar Epipedon IA21
_ Po"alue Dalaw Surt a (SB) (A1LRA 147, 1481
_ Coast Prairie Redax (A 16)
_ Bieck HsS: Wk3i
_ TNn Dark Sw }ace IS914MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147,140)
_ Hyt roger SU$de 4A4)
_ Loaray Gie jerl ►Aamx ;F2)
_ Plednlwll Fhwapinin Sa1N (I ;1 Fn
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
DeWed MaIrm (173)
4MLRA 180,147)
s 2 tin 10100 (A I D! (LRR NJ
RLKJox owk surface (rEl
a Vrty 51riiw Dmk SUrfacr (TF 1 n
= DeH4eted Below Dail 5urtuce IA 111
„ DeploW Dark Surface IF?)
� 011wf (Cxpluln in Rwnutiml
Tlnl.k D;ak SurfaU! tAl2)
i Redux DLIx :Swjm IFS)
_ S-;ndy Mucky Mrtlyal (S1) 4LRA N
u Tian Mandnlly a WmLn. (F'121(LRR N.
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 1301"
_ ',.sfuly Glewil Maim IS4I
_ Un3aa Swtsce (F 13) (MLRA 136. 122)
lln rinttam ul kpmapmyaK % "atmtnn and
_ "ndy Hrd,x (S9)
_ Faedvewl Flmept un Suilu (F19L (MLHA 148)
wuunnn trf[ DINY must 00 Farf,era
_ Striplxd Matra (SW
_ Rrd Parent Material LF21) Oi1LRA 127, 1421
unle . dvaurbcd of proMbmonc
Rest rA ve Layer (Lt ouservad►
1}Tre
lhpth lulcW%J
Myd►rc Soil Present? Yee No
krpntttle
US Army Coq)s of Lrgrlaer5
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
k'nwrn Mourram and Nwamant - Vemrn 7 n
F -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

I
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastem Mountains and piedmont Region
I'rojcDSle < C.ItylCamny 's t ,t .� Sampling Date ) /r i
0.pIMIwnNTAner i' Strte wf .- Slurping PLNIY: ( zr z
InVn>tlg ?tar15)- ,"'.� "Seldiink TErvrnrinp, Rug-,
I,mxilorm Ilillt u;, nr•rnirr, ac )u _ nit,t,19 r. p4" s •`^ Lmnl tand (amcnou, cunrvnx, untne) t' e ^^•" Slopa 1%). t:J
Suirmirmi(I13uarMLHA1 t (r RrJ IeL Luixl ' ;- S4'nint Dawn
SWIM'tl lima N°irran, r } 't wn S r fPtVl clo5sll�trJotL r+ `U
Ain rtrmtlr i Iw 111Y ltnit: of VW'7 Yu an No,_, (ir rin etilioin iti REMAIi LI
Arnvcrymntan 1 4al ­1 .orIfyduak* d SignifintiflycislLabed2 Are 'I nt.4Cirwn1uanCes, lYmeril? Yes? No
Are Vetlutown .'s . ;,ul ,.-) , tr l lydrel0tjy�nulutaQy puahleour11c7 Ili nuc°du4 CX {NUin any anx tr5ln RennnrlS,l
SUIYIMIAKY Uh VINUINGS - MUM site map snowing sampling point iocallons, transecls, Important tealures, etc
H)dropinync Vegetation Preset%? Yes Nci Is the Sampled Area
tfddde SW Proem? Yps K No within a Welland? Yes ND
W&Und II/dfelDgy Pfe3EMI? Yes t+ r``o
HYDROLOGY
Vietland Hydrology Indicators,
smon4my hlud ntaa frtdnitrwn D(tac tcymeun
Dinintylilch=its frrinlili m at onr is mmlrm
chock :il Ihnt nntalyll
_ Scufam SW GAde. Wt;)
Surface Yiater(A 11
_ into Apuahc PL^ms (014)
_ SNtast4y VeVIlteti Concave Sonata 4881
. likJhWhierf &l0(Adl
_ HydrngnntiullidCi)drF(CI)
_ manngeP.tlaameIal01
Saturation fA3)
_ OmdaM Itlnmsphon •. an Living RmI•. tCJ)
_ 1.1os, tiltn Lure.(8261
Writai Marks (131)
_ kownrn of Rnrtrtcrd lion (('a)
_ bq-sub' Un Wrdrx lyd7 : 10)
_! Seolnte»I DepoSns (82)
_ Recpnl hum Rtlancuunm filled Snd•. fC L)
_ GraylNsi 8lrrruws fceb
_ Utia LKVfAlls 4831
_ flin lA ck horfixei (4r))
_ Satunurxr Vrsbb on Arad tmrlgrry IC%
_... Adyal Mat at Cfwa (841
_ (Ylrer (1:xo.Nn In Hnrnorks)
_ SWnten to Sv=ed PlurC. (DI)
Iran LN4ro -J6 (851
_ C,u'irnQMl%ln Hrllrnn (DA
kruraletifin V15AIe on AiMlal 41189Xy (a7)
_ Sholkrty Atluxtsd I04
_ SVater S7WuLd Leas Sag)
_ hlkroCgttxpapWc Read (D4)
e Aquatic fauna (0131
-
_ FAC.Neuaal 1'es; I05)
— - - - - --
Flctd Observidtans
Strfacu WmarPrasenO Yes_
No Y Depth Ifrtetres)
Walcr TnUir Pwirra> Ya• '
?(a_ Dgnh rmfies)
Sa1uralM Present? Yes
No _ Dgdh linatu y U Welland Hydrology Prmew Yes >� Ra
hl a
e(rndu�CagdP
Lasr'rbe RiacrXCC -1 4puHle. nin itantig v&L imial phows pfwrlut5 nSPoCeon51 Y avall7dp
1
Rtvwikt
U5 Arlr v Caps of Cortnorxs Ustam Whiulns ind rntamnni - Voisian :,o
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scicmtifie names of plants.
Sampbnq Polnu , � Z
US At illy Cal ps'd Ulglfttrt�
Lasipm Mrxthiorm liorl 11kunlunl - Varsran LO
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
A[solue Domindnl thtlrallm
Dominance reAwroli Sheet
iree Shnu vn
II'�sstx.• Y
W. I HIV l .SIIL�'eV Slatyi
Wilb.Y Of Dutrurant 5prxfe.
1 r• r
c
Tha1NuO01 rACW,ot AC_ (n)
`
itatll Nutrbn of Umnmmu
J
Spcim Aanis All Sims,
4
FlelGtlq el Llnntnhhl SI70GC5 'Sol,
5
-
rhttl No 01711. FALW.ih FAf. tqB)
7
Prevdlence Index worksheet•
= ltftnl Cevm
rMlll A'. Covtx tit. fAillim tr,
W% of I= alyu
20 N Of total arval,
UllL 5Pet5e•. I`' 1 ti xc l . 30
l- t %fiRtLf�
I
S I (Plu:ut. S
Ei4C.W`.�il•CIIt9 >. 2ua
—
'J�1Fi pa A�
- ✓ F�
FAc s rie Iy
! 1 ! .^ n.
e _ II
r ODL
FACU •,pecuy lri &4r loo
rlizu
UR ;.teems , 5=
a
1 FAG
Cdtntmtank, I ", fAl kLU le)
FA GW
Yravnlltn at Ireltr>' = 7. Lb
wA = f
b
M)ttlOPhyIEC VogtataliMl Pntl CtAr)ni
r
_ t liapld'inst <nr H)htoahptr Yopmar,h
lkttmtunco Ium rc'50%.
9
� i Plwnlmxu IrxMx
w`5 of Intst co�v_I
- Tul.d Cow r
q 1
t � 91Y16 ul tUlril IYn4n i
• to 530`
rt m 0 IAorpitWugral Aanpulhurlu' iYlevdn mppamn
Hmh Shalom
(Ylm vtc, ` i
✓ f" u/
dola, et ttrhrrxks or ml n:epnrnW rJuicil
Prtiltlmrloli_ IlyrLnplrylL. Vegrtmihn' fultwi
1 _
r• r r c
, ,�
'611rnlor, of riyaw snd torn wnCand hlcltaYi[iy tm,ts+
ea pntletu unN•sn drlutbed or pmhlm r-
a _ s f n • t FAKAI
Defln tMns of Four VeSelialtlon Strata
,t
0
Tree - Woody plenly. tntlu8ng vines 3 n, (r E, cm) or
more in dLmrtmtel at beast tteigltt I01M) n•gun0mt;�,al
t
helglt
a
Soplingl5)wb- Wnoay jY'stis erchxirly vnn5 le:.
'I
than 1 to QM ;auk "lot Ihnr or ttlpml is 3 713 II (t
m) tall
t p
t f
Mer0 - An plants, (Not Hass
i = rolal LOwI
of size aria woody pWfas lass awd 3 20 it tall
Wilt, d Iota ccawrw
21Ytb N Imal ravm- Iy
Wordy Vlnn Stnhm Ihhx Ftr .L) l
i
Woody virnl , All wvotly vuus ytt ulur awl a2s If in
rtaWlx
i
i
ilydrophytic
A
4
Vegatahwl 1
present, Yes_ No
- fetalCo.•ht
w%d lmd cove.
20%ul Wlnl I. vn
R�nuukv (atclude lkwlo ht.rnB�s here r✓ al u sRporale 5haet )
US At illy Cal ps'd Ulglfttrt�
Lasipm Mrxthiorm liorl 11kunlunl - Varsran LO
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sarriong Pon, —yiL-
PtofflaDescription. (Qescribe to tha
pt" floodail to documant tho indicator or confirm the obarneo of indlcataml
Ugnfl Mmn?,
Rednx Fn vrtx
fm!W - -0— Calaf i/llaf!.1► , Color tMewl
fl awn linnlnrkL
0- B 11.0. f t= -,
�� r 11
ape C•Calletyltreaaa Qs ledon, RM_ReWCed Maet. MS= 1A71,%s0 Sarld Gmuvs
ILWc1116ry PI -1'0(0 Lrnn hl•Malnc,
Hydncnc it lndicalow
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Sods
_ f11510 -03 (A1)
_ Undi Svdm L (S7)
_ 2 em Welt (A101 VALRA 1471
_ F6511c Eptptdan IA21
_ Pnlpidue de:ktw Surlanit (S6) (KLRA 147 188) Ccwst Prukm RL-Ikw (A16j
_ Black KS119 fA31
_ thin Dam Sarlarl: (SNS (MLRA 147 t4AI
RRLRA 147. 1461
_ It)OrogenSutflde4A4)
_ 1onmy01ryerltAnllr JF4
_ Pwofnuru Rcmdpktnsoli-IIPl9l
5118111100 Ltlyers WR
Y Dnpinlod t aInDr IV-i)
4ktLRA 196, 147)
_ L cm Muck (Atli) ILRR IVf
_ Pocdo- Dark 41sfno0 (rP,)
Very Sf lbaf (Milk SLYIACG (TFl ?I
_ Deplelecl Below Dark StMaco 1A1 1)
_ IkrpinfW Dark SurinLO (r)i
— Opus (E)gMn ai Reatfak9)
s. Thick Dark Surfave, (At 2)
._ IiGxlnr Mptrr am '. I I Al
Sandy Mucky Mineral t-1 1) (LRR W.
_ Iran wnfpn re Ma'.Srl.', (r 1o) (LRR fd,
MLRA 147.14M
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy GleyedMaelx (54)
_ Umtx4 Surface IE'a31 (MLRA 136. 122)
hrldrsmr -al nyllm"Ic wpwalmn and
_ Sandy RedoxJS51
_ RteMldm n000laig Sots (1.19) (MLRA 146f wot:yM hyOmkW must be r<r wni.
_ Suplped WVx (SO)
_ Red Parem hialprial (0111 (MLRA 127,147)
wires dnlwbtit ar tunhhumur
Restr ctiw Layor ill observed)
1)w
Unplh (inchor Il
Hydric loll Presem? Yes? No —
R,mwcka
I_5 Arrm Carrr. r t E mjnorm
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
E win lAwnralns and Rrclmml - Vnrxln 7dl
F -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
n
t'Igeet r 151rc t r n+ �✓ t 1� Gty1L ^alnl }, r` r Sionpi g Omu r'
Apl.00 VOvnlel SanlplhlgPonu -
111*5IIg3I0rt4) Stu:Uun 7uwtlslrP Rrtl'+ge
LdluSornl arllswe tatwe. err 11 I' r •110 15V" fowl renal Icolxave CptYrej� none)- ' " Slupc I'h).
5trora91bl tl RR ar M JtA! I t' k rJ I :a. *,,z k12-.U% L119. y + � Y ° °r, Datu ill
yrd Mop 1-ina reams, . J • .v r t ry NVA C1556111MIllia, r e i✓ .51
Are contain; i h)tnosoglc wndticeK on the Brit ryptar for this ort1e at) "Dt i fey Nu (II n5 eaplein 41 Rwis$ s I
.1%mvepawwrl Sol ) at ilyarniogy '1 ylnrilicamy dr=aimad+ AM- Narmal Chrurn5lattc(.,5'pr!aeM? YI,y t No
Are VLKr-W Drr � Saq . nr 1yarMr�) - i rourally pradtmaeL7 IN needed eiplan any art' wefs in Renlmks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach sne map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc
flytoWtIVIM blxltral an Pn-uxll l Yom. `Y No
N drk. $ail Ikusor4 r 'o, �— Nn 15lltu SaMiad Aron 'y
y � wlHdn a weltnMl7 Yes No
Wolllmd I'te500 r YCS N9 '
ttlkuluks
ttr • (`rr. t.. ) ss � , 1011,1
HYDROLOGY
FV1111111Y 1"Oftata1411ar1t114111 t1 art4•IJUV 1 .
1.11K.Irl Mll 11141 1=111 I
— 50411.1 Al 011do 1136)
Surlam tVatat IA I I
Truce Aqualn. Mures (al'1)
_ SprW -I VegalnlLd CtiaLtw r Surlam lWJ
;f I (igh Walla Tt1W1• 4t*)
I lybogeil Sullldc OJ4r (C i I
Ulattage Pueaule (870)
,r Snttrawn (A3)
4„ Cidi& d Rhitosph'aes Orr Llvn4 Ruins (C3J
_ Alass Trutt Lulrlx(816)
_ 1Vatar MmVs (at)
_ Prw ienwof Redut.ei) lion 4C4)
_ 01pSot!ku1 Wain Tobb? IC2)
_ Sadtnrllt OrpaslL& (tie)
Rnaeld ittin Rt i lCUUn In ruled Silly (CGJ
Cta)lril amlarn (Cal
_ W1 Or•prats I01
_ Fiat Mi k SWInt1_ (C))
_ Saltunutxl Viuble oil Acu9tntagwy (C.9)
_ Algal EN4 Or Lru• I (H4)
_ Calwi ICxpLvn to Retr.Nits)
Stunted CC Saes.'a:d Pea tx 1611
_ Iron 01'(m'4' 1`$14
Gailamptic 14rd'nn fOyl
_ intindaaon "Ibit•, on A4rud Ilmil(1,YV (H 1)
��rLarrl 1.,.•,•r_u.r� ..,-In,.ler
_ '1hlllktw Jkluilltrri ttlt)
_ 1Vorur- 5tarlud Lero, AM
� �
_ Mkrwop07*11C R61 -i Ilno
_ AquoiL I alrnn (0 13)
_ F'AC Nrtttm! 1 ry (n1.)
SwN.lcrWmrlPresetth
f1.. No
D4111linchesl.,
'A'Aler TaLkr Pfesenl?
Ve. Nu_,__,
tJepnr U17uh %!.
sane -oJan Prew9n?
Yc-- No!
Oajrin r Mhas! t
Wetland Hydrology PrewM7 Yes_ W—Z-
011i4daSll'lpl�l�l'�t1I1R1'Lt1�
D CIDP R8Car1]ed 0047 `WCRIm qa4¢! Rgaini.ln Walt and n$ rhnins prnVnllr t11'111`tdrtni!
d avidlatih
11
rM11JJ
a(, 6 t +oil, yr.
+1t 1�- AI', I t I4
Renlnrk -1
(�v,� r <� I:JIr
j(��'1td�fl
��rLarrl 1.,.•,•r_u.r� ..,-In,.ler
.v.ww 1.._ t.k'11 �v, .pert"
1. r .
� �
i t ( .131.13 •> . u J Ir t..
_r
--Vr I� l � s- 1'P�,rr i. I ,, II
U•, Art", Carers al Crtgn+.:we
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Ea9fern Mauaallll, end P1walon1 - Wirsiall 2 D
F -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of, plants Sampling Point.
Au• nlrtF. nrIInm7nl Intllt tlir Damnnanca Ust work+fiaal-
'irar Slr.num I'Pkn •crn ='rJ ) CgAY Sptsim.'t atu•. Idrmlxn rn GGnlmarX Sprxra; t'
1 'F� e - A fir,. - ti ` f,, At0 tAm Art, OHI,. PAr,W, ar FAr (A)
rn
rcrwlfdllnomof onmino
A. NEW SpadnS AgrosS AA Strobel S' {H)
Pet unt at ocminorn ,pales
Thal fu OBL. FACW, at me O Q' /. (AM)
lG =fatal cos r TON %Cbvt. (Y ►filacPr by
504E coklmll cover _L 20`c at 4ata9 coven I y OBL species
wtl�lea;dl<131 sltrtwtl (Plot site I rACw species 12 .
i . L It',! , i.{ ,1` ,tc i u a FA[: Spode, A?.
2 —' FACU sp,-tles X4-
3 LM apat:us X6.
4, Gdlumn rolnis IAl fBl
Prrrr:(rlrn indu. = H?A =
T
_ 1 Raptd Test for Hydropl'yllc VegLixion
8'
k - pownnnce restis.5o?u
o Mmphcopimil Ataptuntim' (Pmvndo st p1mining
��
7_ z Total
7nX
5996 d torsi<avdr;
!jrTb 4tawni (Ptnt slit )
nP torn ccclwornvur .
data In Remarksorm c sirporotf ;heel)
Ptoblornmic Hyaropbptlf, Ve
im itrin` (Etfalnl
3 ,
rOw"COS01 11101% ballano Nrdand h3y1rologe 11%151
C�r)
beptesent. unlpssdiswite satpronlennro_
9. ?A ' ✓P'
1 —.L�f
`SIT^ cKL
tldtntbans of Faur Vegetation Strata`
e
True -Woody pants okclu*ng vines Z In Q 6 o n) or
morn in dlarnew al breast holglx 100HI regardless (it
r
nrfghl
a
Seplingi5hrub- .'AoodTple+d.9, erttl.>frry vlltes, ros
9
titan 3 to DBK and peoter then at equsl to 3.29 11 11
t p
rrq tell
1 t
herb a All Itabaceaus bwnwuory) plmrtr regdrdlesv
Irk 3 21111
i
fowl coven
of site, and gooey Wants than tell
504E of lotatcover F•
20% of iotai covor, Z U
WAY vGtn- All vwuay vinra yraalu dun 3 28 b lu
��Y RV_ (Plot size 1
1
msgtn.
3
Nydrophytic
w ag station
Tatalcowlr Present? yes No
5r,% ry total cover 2n9r, tit intid 40wpr
numberrn nut. or tm n 5alrelue elttll.•t.l
115 Array Corp%dt Frajmecrc
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
Eastan1 A9au'cauls am Pledrntau -WNW 2.0
F -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

SOIL
SalnpOng Point S f
Pmtdo Dascnpiran• (Doscnbo to the depth needed to documm4 tho Indicator or omtfrnn the ab urt" of Mdicahw-.)
ae{uh Millm kedix F P-tita g
inxhr,! C I m 9r. Cohu Imam -Il 96 � or tfwtkvr Rlrrzrkc
"�-' `1
i
7, vet. C.CnnLi4 mkin. D -Denle iai. RM- ULdULI'd lt=X. MSAta ACH2 SUM L,raer. hex.mttnt 11 .fkue IJA—. tA,t/:dna
_ IW033 d1A I)
Bede Eppedoo 4A2)
Rluck IBSm (A31
It)docyun SIM& 04)
_ Slmllnud Lnyva IASS7
_ 2 cm Mick {AI6) (I-RR f4)
_ Dnpktu.d Debw Dmk Swims IA I I I
_ Thick Dak ;tnfat r (A19)
_ $nrdyNUryy IAnwA 13111LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
_ bmxiy Gklyrxl Mora IS41
Sontly Redo,( (55)
_ Shipped It= 1561
I JP'r
Depth jbclwf )
U5 Nniy Ct41r >nl Enom -w5
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
_ Dmk Surlixe (57)
Pulywfue Rebw SurfaoL (58) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Tign Dark Staface IS91(MLRA 147 1481
Lmuny GifyW MaUrx 4F?)
D�plctadMc�x (I 31
RI'tfax Dark Smim.r_ (NJ
Dapped Datk SURafe IF?)
Redox Delnelsnms IFM
_ imn fAdn(ptrx v' r.L asm IFVI (LRR W.
MLRA 116)
_ Umtnr °;ut;ya (1- I t) (MLRA 136 12x)
_ Ptodmant Floodplmn Sells (1-111) UdLRA 1481
_ Roc Parant MMOFInl (1-71) a1ILRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problenralle Hydit Sc
2 cut Met* (A10I MRA 147)
_ Qm!a Ptame Roctex (Aid)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Rudrrrnttt rload(xnm soft (I 191
(MLRA 11G, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dari<Sutfoun (1 F171
Oliun (I_XIA.11I1 m Rrnudks)
4nnwniorsnt h)dr Itytmc vNewinn amt
wmiand hytim"y nest. oe pre-sent,
MOM e1S Med ar randemauc
Hydrme Sod leresem7 Yes - 1. No
I;mYmmm N'numirt-- r d Pladnrrrn - Varann 7 U
F -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
r
"rCIGIn _ rA i rr• Sdrrprn.J DO. j
Apphcmnluvincr J-r' ;� r, Sure .-J/ Samplingpotm pfd*;"
tmrarrlmrr{��� :�" 1 $colon Tewreildp Rtaiy3
WmrYvrrn Ittil-.Wo trsran r, rlt. )t i' /-LC�._ On 44n .-, Lu.hl tetel (ivnu&va Convex tame) 1, Ln.: Sage t`ZI' °1
Suaivynn II Rft at MI 11A), S V l✓ Let Z C ! l
_ '4 941 Lm1 x ' 3J5? `'- -7 Datum —) A CIA
Sol Map unit Nnrnn, -J , W 2 i I _ -- -___ INA -1 rlossCrafan $---10 . A
fuerintuuCl"ftaatgr cantfllum(Htete cite iyoul lot dritsarne at )ew? Yes 1' Nn_ pt no eKplam in Rmarksl
Arevrgsaaan •J Sad j =� urlyardiogy '-J s,gnllkomlyaswt6af+ Are'Nnmatlflicion incrrs'"prrnrm? Yrr• � 14n _
An: V09WIlk n N_ Sal r,11 tr riytaoiogy l -1 ttmeirdw prghtemmb'? (a (woopd, Rlalpm any rmwMrsm Rea ak-;'l
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing' sampling point locations; Iranseets, important features, etc
}lylat"s,tc Vegetnaon Presanl7 Yns x Nn Is the Sampled Area
Ilydrk. Sotlpres_1117 Yos No wittvn a WatlernP Ye4 h No
Wntiaral I lyrkduyy Preswil? Yes Y Na
Ranurl5
HYDROLOGY
Rnmaly lnaicaters lmnrnum at nno r rnnunnn.
chock nil that nnujyl
s Surface Sea Cracks (88)
_L Slaioce Water IA1)
_ rniq Agiutlir NMI-. tR141
� Sparstdy VkgwffledCnnCOVe SLJICM (80)
IVi Watet Table 1A21
_ Ity4m9on Sulfina Oam 101)
� Dranege Pailerr9taWl
® Saauatmn (AJ)
_ Di durxl Witymphmm on trrinl Route iC31
Moss john Utter (8111)
_ Water Marks (8i)
_ Pttr oMM of Reduced trim (C4)
i Dry Seasan W tei lable (C71
_ Sadmila Deliauls 184
_ ltprwm Iran Rrduuum m Tiled nih (CGI
_ C(ayh¢.ii Dutows (Ca)
_ Dtut Deposits 163)
_ Itun rhtcr Surf= (01
a Soltnoarm Visible on Aiulol hrwgery (C9)
_ Algal Mal or Cnist (1341
_ 01ho IFlp:rn In RtYnurk,4
T xufvea at S tessed roar is (1311
_ lion Deposes 165)
!; Gemini lW Poston (D4
F Iwitr aon Vlsible sn Appal Irrioporl' IB71
Shallow ACUbatd tD31
m IffteenSteYned Leaves (lls)
_ Mwtnpoiltaphic Relml ID4)
Agiadu, rlrunu (8131
_ FAC- Neutral Tt -A (D5j
Stulace water lve - -tim? Ya"u } Nn_ Duptrt(ntfti!S)
Waiit- toot- Prau"Vo Ya% A' No_ aqui(inches)
Sawarilonpresenl? Ye, X No_ OLIVI (eHfik.) Welland Hydrology present? Yes No
finclucim cadlwry bogie)
W%piha Rr=dcd D.atu Itihcam tpluhw morthcringwell. Rena/ pnglas, prrNntts InVnrurml It rvALibk
US Armf Corps rf Enalnees Vistern AMtimpats and ('teamnnl - Vontnn? o
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
5ampling Paint I t J
Rom 5hiiw 1plat sae U 'N, com nriir! nLL
h\antxs Of I)Rnm-im ypnw
ITlnl Aml7Hl, FACW a FAt- r? (A)
Tatnl Nilorbar of nantrmrx
l ' Species Across All tinata SH>
n
- - fk-rcan[ of Gamrlolu Species b ,
That Are OaL, FACW, of FAC US i SA161
0
+ Provolotlw IIWOiI warlttrratru
Total COVIII ttnift'A t arero Niit[iN by
50A',Umtllevwu I ? Zo %a(toleicoVer % OBLgcJripa (7=
!„ Stirib Sir lum I?Ina 7ri• S r FAUN Spedun x2=
t _ c F� M U •" „ __ 1' r J FAG Spams a 3=
'D FACU spenes x 4 c
J UPLSpcwas )15
,i Coturref Taal, (Al (Hl
a
PrOt..tlOnClr rridex = F'!A =
t
_ I Rn& 1esi Icr Hydmplrjvt, V%t4nllnn
N
X 1 CommriCn -Im k 55".
y
_ 3 Provitonre Index I-. 13A'
7 D Total Gom eb
_ 4 A(nrlllydopkml Annpllttam' IPmnoir aiW�rq
Wk CA loud moo
_! _ 2a% of tau oaVef
in Od In Remark,, Of on 5ep.' rmu 5houl)
11nm SPMtfm IFiol r.1Sn
PfabicirG'uG Hydroph)% Vegsxahoul' it'.xp1Pnl
1nd4 oe 17y(l c t by nnH
3 n c
De p rserit, r1095s dtstu rofuc of pio h:aec:
4
�-�
tJefintheris of Four Vegetxtlan Strata_
5
�-
IT
TreO - Woody pIINF axzWinq Arlo %, f m 1; Ir rmt or
maN In dortgrCrt 71 wkTA h4fghn p)tiH), m¢atrl - Of
helgtr
8
sap3lnwslrub - %Vaixty plorLt i-xclamlO vile, 1C35
°,.-,
own 3 ifs oBti,am greeter llran or equal rn 3 28 11 41
Ta
M) rau
ttr
Here. Alnidibaet-ous t41on,Ywo4 yl pIFIILLS, fE-9ardle55
ialat Ginu
of sue and woody pinrYS (� if= J 20 it fall
?(1'X ul irrifll etyrd D
5vit, at too" CMXT.
C
Woody vfu - At wuntTy v nos yl I.uu'f dwn S 211 fr w
'Anwy Veen Irlrrm 11 `11111
+m 1
)yt
J
t
a
H)drophync
�,
Vegalntlon
- ki13l Crntfr
PreseM7 yes No
4n4i, at a16mt lnVai
2U9h of Wad Lty" ,
Rlsnarks (hn:ludla p`iura
rrarnlxv, here cr c� a SaRaraoo s pill )
U3 /vroy (°caps iX raajifttils
F&Eaefil INJaT7ila15 1110 PIec111WU11 - VI.Ihw Z.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -I 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sempkng Point- e,F L1
Pm iW Description_ (Dest rme to t71e depth needed to doctura3 a the indicator or confirm tho abscnso of indlcatom)
Dt1id1 Mnitra
Rpdnx FM 1122
'flM1Ju',il.__ COIOr (MOISIJ 9.
Colo( (mr,Krl 9 i art Lnr' ln.glrn hmm�tk't
)Y/, %s t C
`TYUe� C- COncenuadotl D-Deeladon R)/ =RLxiuceti Meini. rnS =hia .ked Sind Gmittr 11 malign PL -Pmt Lerrig hl -Mnai�
Hydne Sail Indicatorn•
MplIcatom for fkotilenlalk Hydrlc, Sat15��
_ I Ir,Iasoi (A71
_ Dmk Swfaee IS' I
_ i chi IAids WO IMLRA 147)
_ HiW EPipedon IAtI
_ Palyvalue Hdrm Sufat:e (SG) (FAAAA 147 1491
Cxjasl PtehVc Redw 4A16),
_ Black Hisd. (A3)
_ That Onrk Surfitr . (S<i) Q11LRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147 1461
_ Hyartw" Sullkle 04)
_ 1 nnmy Giryva Mmnr IF1l
_ PiLcimcm rbodplirt Sal.- Intl)
_ Srratfibd Layers (A5)
_ Ilapinlrul Munro Jr.!)
(MLRA t30 1471
2 ac, Muck (A10) (LRR N1
±, Rixloa D,U,ak wtlitcn IFG)
_ Upy Shallow Dark Stul.icu FlT121
_ Oepleted Wow Dark Surface (Ali)
_ I1C19wed Dark Stare (1'11
_ Qihm IExptarn m RmtAuk'i)
_ Tl ick Dark Surloce (A112)
_ rbAoK rlgpm•,�iom (1-9)
Sandy t Ucky MillEfal (S I) (LRR N.
_ Iron fMn'wrira W,,st' ^. (1`17) (LJRR N,
PALRA 147,148)
MLRA 1361
Sandy Gleyed 1Aalx (54)
_ Irmbrit Surfuro ft't3) Q ILRA 136, 1Z21
`tndtrmw'.ai hyth.iphyCtvugmiaan and
_ Satrdy Redoit (55),
_ Piedmont Floodplom Sai6IF7J1 IMLRA 1460
rxdlnnd hydmk,gy mini be prccm,
_ Satlpped Wi0irL1 (S61
_ Red ParerY Ata5mtt11F71I IMLRA W. 147)
unluss dhowtbed lir ptabimunir
Restdchve Layer Ir1 Ginumn
type
DOIAI (mchusl
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No_
Rernnik.
115 Army Carat o1 V i-alu rims
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
En dmn Mai tritium and rk- thnmii = Vasinn 7 0
F -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
1'ruler.IGI,- r*' ti J t t tt l alyi'LrAmly C Sarnpiny We- f rr '
AfaptLdrWOW1119 f sinle, Samplm(rPoall -
lmmtc)ulu'(5) "' - tirlrurFr Iwnn�litlr,ItmW
I r5rl11rolru 111iblupo tol-Cm t& it t -* -�, I - Loral rullul Ir ravtivl convla nano)
r�
SrGiter)fuil ILRR cf MLRhJ 1 r- {. 11..% ' Lat1 �+ •, l `t ti G `r I unit T'' �'' O n 0.Twn -1
Scd Kip I Irel Norm IJ V "J. .. NYJY cs7 �frnunn, f�a . t
Fail clink-Ac f (ryumftxJr- txilit[Wits url IN, ate typical for this Iilne of yaar7 Yi , No _ lV no r pi:rn in krxlizk�l,j
An Vr rpSrafull r� „ Soil - (Jl k"doyy n % of Nllcarnly dIsTlnbed7 Nn `Nnrmm Cncrmn lmrll , tuwA!nI,' Yom, _ Nu _
t
ArR Votpi.ahnn S,.1a _ , _ _ w 11yo Wogy Fr rivurelly prmbin iw; (II neadad, gepinm ,sly ntr am -,1n ktmvk , )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc
HydioMy9K Yeoulatlhll lYawnl; Yu, gNi_ Nq Is the Sampled Area
tlydrM Soli NeseMR7 i`ot, No anhin o Watinnd7 Yes j� No
Wudailld Holalogy Pre5rlTt7 Yn6 No
HYDROLOGY
I't mnry Indta+tai, (mlrimtnr ul LilI I tt lllgLf p sp6
_ Stelaco Yralar 011
HI(ln Walet Tahlo (A!)
Ssinrm(nn IA3) '
_ Walat Ms+kS(Bll _
5edlowm Deposit, (B:) _
T DNI Deposits (B31 _
/Vol Mat or rtu51 (m) _
rmn Deposlls iM:
= IknuiLhulon VhWe,un A01,11 haary:ry (1111J
_ Willer 5191neo Leaivs III%
kquauc Twin (8131
13 that nipw
Tnle Aqunllc Plmns (B I A)
1lydreuen sulfide Odor (Gil
4,1frlized Rhizostlriere%m Llutrlp Rgois (0)
PrLkSe led of RLtdaLed flail (Gnl
Ruclj" trun ReWellonln NILtd Soils (C6)
Thn Mud* Sutfaca (C11
Collar (falpfsrl in Ranoutls)
Stekicq walpt Fm7mill" Ya- _ Nu __ Oaplh pnylaS)
Wa11T IWAI 131c. 17 Yes x Na GnrMes) _
Satu mI'ro5r-nI Ye, k Nn_ DurRl6nelies)
(mcludaSCap10.nry61n;1n1 _
Dv5Li Rct wtkLod W" (stream !puggee montnrtrip vm1L amid phmos prm aus tree
�{�i t 1 11 = Y
US AmYr fops n Frgllmxa>
_ 5121noo Sol *—idm 011)
_' ipat'i0yV419onlRdComfivrS1111111cl iHBI
Dranapti vnumc Mull
_ Mnci: rrim I huts (H i61
_ Dry- Seaurn WatarTnlAe l(•7)
_ Crayll•h BuTHrrr ILS1
_ SaWrallm WSiM en Aenat Imagery lGIl?
_ SNlved or SSessed rinrtc(Dlp
Getimorphlr Paeillor. (D71
_ Shallrtw Aqutwd (1713)
_ NVWXopaprapri*, rW of t04)
_ rAC- N@ulral Tesl (051
Welland Hydrology Pimssent? Yes ''" No
W earl Mrruulaua and PL+d lvill - V1' +510112 fi
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific namos of plants
Samphng Point: r
Abs uvt DOndttsit t1t8c8tur
Dorninance re5t,warpshoot'
rrroSlralm
(PIOtStzv '�=� J Coy 5' SI�W.,
M"Ixr at Gnmrmn; bpoom
` l
G
�Ll
-ihal Aar flHl • FAi W, nr rAr,
7.
tovll Mifter,all Dtmtloat i i
•I
5pecles Across NI Strni (N!
d
pwen1 w ountrunY 5110trr
Mat Are oaL, I ACW, at PAC 10D Z (Aral
I"MRtenCe Irddex *wItStwet
Twnl5r, rawer It( Maly Irr
5'
T
ia1.11I,m'er
so% d wtm cavnr � 5 2iyJ( QI lotn1 d'a'rn �
OW speoes x •1 -
sr n11nQ Wy(�
S,t mxu (Plot s1io.,�1 ,ter i
rACW rpoctea %2-
E. �; X 08�
PAC - pnrtri• x 3 -
PArljf 5purten x n -
2. k I ° ,� �� I tS �J,(U
j P !t
,..t tr r°) A �•z .. �t
I(PI.W- 195
d T
- - -- -- -j • , ,, , _ " td
(.nlunm IoW's IA) lu)
tfirllaHince Index = arA -
L
H tic VegMatlon Indxocors
7.
I -Rapid Test tar Ilycrraphy'le vegcwuml
B
� 7 - tiomnara:e is i is >5DX
4
45 Crmx
3 - Rovefenne InW-K 613 0'
-'craft
5D% at tonl wvc bZ 20W, d total rrvaa
_ a _ Mnrplr doglcnl Ai7puaJUns' (Pttrndc 5np1lxuny
Lf aG Snnlurn
(Plat Stu r )
dw In Retnarksai (Ioa selm,mdslterl)
u5l_
_ Pmtknutic Hydrophyt vcr_.eennn' rExp'nm)
1° �~ i tA•
hualcat(us Of I it. wil and molund L dank not ,t
c r ° , G c�
e ,ma L4 °e4i Pl1t1�
tepre5em utes tIdAw#u darpraUrmnor
wildtfans O Four Va®elatian Strata
lroo - WOSidy p ants uxtadtty vtnu. l ht I1 0 an) at
6
mac tod4imeter en I're2=1 hetL7I11(OP1i) reyarditiss ad
7
Ix3ptrl
a,
5
SapllnWShrub - Woatry pttaiu• erdudrtB vuit9,'e.%
Ilun 3 In DBI I ant) (pclamr than ai etpol m d 78 n 11
In
rN tool,
n
rxro - AD hevac�arttg pion xo•1tri+j rylry rt'pnnuus, -,
-and
V4U
-Taml c(wer 0
stN�S d taltp errlKn' p 71Y1d aI 10110 cowl
ar5ize, Woody tftds It= than m A tail,
QYttY.�Rn' alum (Plat v,c� � t + I
Woolly vino -All nonuy vanr�ccpontar Ikon 3 75 tt m
!!M Ix
� - L
I - --
Hydrpptryllc
$
Ua(ptsiton
= total errhl
present? Yes No
60'6 at wal crmT ?(ips of renal Gryim
Rarixffk. tlndude pMlo numbers hate man a separ812ShIRM)
U., Army Cwpb at EagUlnrm. EaWin hintadnins mid l+sdrrnnl � Var -inn 7 (1 '
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sarnpllng Point. 4 S
ProRla Descnpuont (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicalw or confirm the absence of Uwcaim )
Da3Ll1 IM7 N
SMx Fvgw1j%
frldtl l _calin Ila1nt57I— 5b
— �j�F1'.- _1de— le+lt i Rltlhll)ty,
Ll
�I
�•
1 P? _
ptf- 46' 75 L L
"rye- C«Crna.e awion, D,Deoku{an, RM
=Reduced Metnx MS =Maskeo send Gtalm °Lma orl Pl. -f"ate Linng MWairit
Hydrlr Soil Ind=tnrs,
lndkmU" for Problemultc Nydric Sods'
_ H190501 (AI)
_ Dvk Swf,,t m is 1)
_ 2 un Mrak (A 101 (MLRA 1471
_ Hism Eppwive (A21
_ Nnlywilur R.tkaw Surlrsr 151!) (Ma.RA 147 1413)
_ Coe 1 Pruun- RLdas 1A101
_ PII rk HktL (A3)
_ I tm L\-uk Sentarn (;:91 (tALRA 147, 1413)
41dLRA 147, 1481
Hydrogen SLthda (A41
I emmy C Uycd Wmrx (F')
_ Pleemnre Hultdpbr1 tiuh it Al
_ WaUwd Ltrsas IA51
Depleted Mmix (h31
(MLRA 176,1471
_ 2 wi WLk (A10] (LRR N)
_ Radex Dail, Surlaw if 61
_ Vnry btraw Gark burtaco Il F 1))
DeoiYwdfl- low Dail, 5uAate(A11)
_ DepWudD.vkSllrtarVI"I
_ all" (CxphtnmRomirkq)
TIsLk Dade Surface IA 121
Redax Depressiotl5 (Fal
_ 5nntr Mucky FAnwal [%11 MRR N.
atei manganese Mosses tF 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 101
MLRA 136)
31 nvy (h-}rd Malrrx IS 41
_ umhit Surface Jr 131 (MLRA 178, 121)
'Ir4x<..ors of hyrorophyl% "elaw awl
Fx nd) Redox (S5)
_ Pl amwt n000plan Sdis (r 18) (MLRA 148)
wLV.:rW hy0faiall) must be presLVn
_ Stripper! Mulch (5111
RM Parom MalMol (Q1) (MI RA 127, 147)
urdess dskubee, or prohinmalin
i6S1rksivo Lvyw a w udl
Gypr.
Fmolt
k
Depth Illmho.t
Soil Present° Yes (11th —
Rernari:,
In Army t,nrir ,d Lngmrw.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Ea' Mocmtans and P1e4mona - Vemon ),S1
F -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and PiedmonbRegion
Pn>lrzuSde. f tlytt ounly. Sampfing laaea
AppllcnNlO mt r +� Z i r �� Slate Samp]rg Path, J b
Irrm,hgatorlstu T T7 ✓a' rr &rhan lowmiltp rzrir n
l.erttYmm IFtll5loln., tt�rau�, etc ). .j t,. , ,i �F' , . is luntl rulkrl ((xrnrm) 51inm., nu m)
Suilu,gnrt (I Wk cc MI RAI. 1'� fi N I,tu J . t '� ri G, tai qt 1a) S , �5 0 5 'I
Sri Mail troll Nnmo. U - ) J. s 1 Ai .Y I.Je s NVq Glasslllraavr, IS w• t
Nr chmnnr (hyctralar -}c cnanpnnrtiS an ihn vIG fmirnl Irr I}r}, rfmr n(yr,(vd' Vn . Y NU _ `II np aif* >t In Ruwilial
Art- ViVintwur 'I Suil f! - orHydmlorpr n% rgntlirrtNryptiUnhnrl" Ara 'NMnrt(;Ircintt5tantie5"pmsena7 Yes dC Nu
An- vr9mumn rd Still of cr Hydm" rat if needad or slain any answers In Remarks )
i
aurwnnnrctr ur rnrrumnuzi -owacn site map snnarmgtsampung potm Iocaoons, irensecrs, rmporliant rearures, etc
Hyrhopriyllr V( lImrjnan I'resarl5 Yes A No M the Sampled Arno
Hyarlr5dl Pmseta7 Vos No A`
wrdirn o Ulelland7 Yes No
Wallane Hyttrology Prasonr7 Yes V Na
HYDROLOGY
Prinaly tnoiratary Innninnm rd anar, ranukaa,
drunk at that inrW
_ Sttdacd Sal cracks-m6j
_ 5urtace V7atar (Al)
_ -True Ai(uerlk Plants IB14)
_ Sparsely Vagelaten Cbn -.rve Surrace (Bh)
H,gP Vlamr TatM (A.2(
_ Hydrogen Sundo Odor (Cll
_ Oravinge Pcoems (B(Oj
Saturation (!mi)
rbid(Ied RhLZOV .re50n Llvrrg Roars (CJ)
Moss Phi Uoes (B]ol
1Varar A4vks (B1)
_ Frew -Vice 01 Rnnueod Yon (r-p
_ Dry Season Winer rnW%- W21
SCi1toete Depo5ts Ir121
,e Recern Iron Reaacuan In rr1)adSolis ICG1
_ Ctayfim Blrrlrr -. (C8)
(hill 0epnsd5 (83)
_ Than Muck Suct4ce tC-I)
_ Sauualiun Viuhki tin Arml Irrmgr ry (0)
— Algal rdnl m Crust 041
_ other (CrpleW In Rtnerksl
_ St ulued cc Strei ed Plain:, (01)
o lean 0Lpuslty (➢5)
Geuttrr:uptrk Pomllren 1D2)
— Inund'+swil Visit* an Aed.J Irnageiy tB71
_ Shallaw Ayultard (03)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (BG)
_ MkiamcgWhlc R" (04)
_ Aquatic Fauna IS 131
_ FAGNeutral Test (05)
Sudnt P W ntct Prmone? Vta _ Nu X Oe Yh (Irrcttrl).
Walcz 1 taro Prrvsrart? Yes X tta, 011pal (mc(ta3) �i-
!waxamtn Prrnrml? vas V tin _ Oaryh (mctua)� f3 Wollorrd Hydrolo9y Present? Van No
(Includes cardinry -Triune)
DesulbeRecurdalDM(sveatngeuge nrxrtat�lgwell,ailtalphaM { Yrtt.(W511Ya{RCIIOnSl,dnvnitaWa
iJ5ArinyCrrpsaIEngine r-,
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
F- ran rAnumunn and "awnnnt- wren /o
F -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use sclentilffc names of plants
Sampling Point
AtYSM O D�orntr'tte�Sr'g InIftiMot Dominance Test warkshoat
Tres SMI (ptrn size t 1 4 CW01 �T �' _:�JwaA Nutmeat of Dmnumra Spa-
t .>±rdL TIM Ann 0131„ FACW or FAC L'l (At
2
Tutd Number of Uomlttartl
3 Spinit . Aa s AS Saran (al
0
Vmrrm M Dominant $pea%
5 Ihot Am ORL FACW or rAC r_, VVUl
0
T Prevalence Index wwkshaet.
S V ��
h�
Total C04LI Present? Yet+ No
aR% iN :old crnrn, 7rA6 ul total cacr
Itgm.ah;• (TrltAtde Ghat) twmhrag re or an o seyarale sheet)
USMmy Qvir, ofttngtsjers
I, a orn Mratni-aisdno Pwonwrl - Vetstun z4
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
7 t - i Wei I.UYL'1
rU1U 96 GIY/IY Uf lAtttlMr IA
StYIE IY tatd coven ^
m% of Idal oovut
ORL spockts x l -
SaelmdSftrub Sunrum (Pk i slu3. ' t
me W Wmitm x?-
A Pbl
rAC )pride, rte -
2_ '� It r o- .s•�y �r • ,r
! fJ� iW
FACl1 spttlLx
UFIsvoum
A i.. •, t ...u.� �St,.irard'
t V
t
ColunirTotttn: ,At fAl
5 c, Rt,bty Pt'r" S
I0 V
9 —'T-
Prevalene Fttdaa • 8M -
T
Hydropfrglfe Vegetation latdicabors
a
— I • Rand Test for Hydtnp1W Vtttlrtzttrn
9
7 Odrnnnrrw lost k s54R5
_
pa Total Covet
_— ! P,CNdYslt.c indri r, s3�ty'
50%dtorte)crnnr ` '��
-
z69S 011ual C9Vdr, �_
_ ArMmph000glc ,UAd.10alions'flsmv,dnsuppormIt
Wart, Strmim (MM sue, T '
d-An In Rnmarfu5 w rm a suparoto shrof)
1. 1 - r r
— Ptuhfernmic Hydrotthytm Vagoolgan" (FMIntry
z 5"A_ —
f f;
3 it ,...r . ,�'
I D Ey „r
Itildicnturs d hyntC wir mn vinitarn) hyTIrology mlrf
7
-fkw
tf %vtl
Le pre -em utdrys rLshatxtd or problomatc
r
Rlinillons of Fav Vegetation SVeta.
5
8
Tree - Woody plonm uouduae wren a In (l IS cm) at
more In diriRwrn al taoasi 1%1411 (DISH) mgwdlrss 4
r -
_
neigh
8
Saplingi'Shrub - Woody plorm oxckiding vnes, Wes;
Ilion 3 In 00H and grnctrtr dtat at awril to 3 Re It Ii
to
ml Lill],
t t,
Herb -All tcstrucremtn Uron vxaotly) palms, rety3rdless
- 1 anal cover
of rare and woad} pions Itn s Innn 3 28 n lal
50% of Mal LY.rr _' •
RYA of trial cover ?,o
}Vl)Qyy_lrtra 9frntum IPyd szW � 0 )
Vlaady vrrw - A11 Y,DaB/ YIr+BS qRraler man 3 711 It rt
I 1
z
S V ��
h�
Total C04LI Present? Yet+ No
aR% iN :old crnrn, 7rA6 ul total cacr
Itgm.ah;• (TrltAtde Ghat) twmhrag re or an o seyarale sheet)
USMmy Qvir, ofttngtsjers
I, a orn Mratni-aisdno Pwonwrl - Vetstun z4
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sampling PaIr 5 17 d'fl
Pro1He Duy(rlpuont (Describe to the depth noindod to docomorn the Indicator or confirm the Ab-Ame of inthcato(s 1
Depul MdRtK
Rndw Frriturm
t' t Ir -
(Fluty _ n ,,kx
-V S' ! �L
7
ru7R N H 5
-
"ply
tt
s•� /1 f!►
0••®t
�ilpe. C�COnr.emraoarh OeOdWcoon RIA- Radtxstl tdahlx fd5- A1alkrttt Strut Grrna
rLuLLliet7 PL +Prae Li�trlt�. AI -Meelc
Hydric Soil Ino(cator8
IndicaWs for Probbdmot(c Hyaric Stuts't
_ H15nisal (A 1J
_ ftltsuflaw (57)
_ tfm 1`40 IA1(1) (MLRA 1471
_ Hisik EpipeUo'I (A2)
_ PelyuoWe Ee�Wk SutfULe IS814MLRA 147, 148) Coest tr wlu Redo( IAl6)
_ Blaa tllsill (Al)
_ thm OUrk Surface (S4) (hLLRA 147.14BI
(MLRA 147,1481
_ by Bogen Shclido (AH
_ Loutny Cieyad M;Yjix (Ul
_ Fleditum FL7tlaplakI Soils (f 19)
_ S11aidw W ywJ51A.51
X Oeplated Matrix (1791
(MLRA 129,147)
_ 2 cm Muck IAW) (LRR N)
_ PcftK Dntkswiaco (F6)
_ Very 5nallew nark Slxlata (TFV1
_ 0%knad Hdow Mark Sefrion (All 11
_ Deplezea Dark sulfuue (r?)
_ Other fE(plan in Ramarks)
_ thck Oar1 SudD6r (A171
_ Rv1ox DeprLWSiUns IF8)
Sandy Mucky ksneral IS1I ILRR N
_ Imn Mamptusr Atesves (r -12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
"A 119)
Sandy Giayed Malritt (541
_ (►mbnr SWtxl (1.13) (kt1RA 116,122)
'Indicators of hyultpnyilesr8uauen nrrl
_ Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Flooepea[n Sale (F191 (MLRA 148) weuend I1yt7rdogy must bopresem,
_ ShµxPeo M911h fW
Red PUrm tdatLitnl (F21) f111).RA 127,147)
urdess dlstumdd or pmUluneUC.
Resbocwm t.ayet Of abservod)
ryr.�
I,Hydnc
Drpti (m -hurl.
Sell Pronertt9 Yes No
Rcmarks
US Anry Crri>s or Engnuet s Canteen Mountains and nlddmnnt - Verstm 7 n
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland - F -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Region
I�lufer Usiw � Tee �C r p n I ° / /f / f Clycour(y /yi A SarmLrYJ Date,
ApptLarllfOnnlci Nt ' ' siara Al G samplVRP4arlt '>P0
11T.m tryalar(s) ^r t11 ' 50CWn TcrAnhp Range
I.afudwmg111slope armLU atel Floe lkrn
La :af relief lcalcave,carnek,rwne), � 5lopeM), 42
Swit"itinILRRatMLRA) LICK LM' Long Daum, 4A083
SIXI tAIIP Our Name Ah Vvfft WWI LIOSSdk511011,
An• clmubc t nyurWpglc alnclua/yti on Iln sta tY1.eL01 ten das IftrlO IN ye,n? Ycs NO 11111@ CxplRin in Remarks I
Art, V.,yudllmn_sua /' .nityttd0yy ylgnlliLrornlydislullfed7 A♦e'NUnr2lClrwmsrances'IxesL YesLNU
Art- Vryx,iInn N SaL at lydrdugy lif ffually prrdilernalle? 111 neLaded explain my/ a tismas of RumarRs }
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach sito map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
HpUlollrytr Vagola[bn Wr754tN7 Yet No is dre Smnplad Area
Hydrt 500rero5ert7 Yea No w illnaIvellair r Yes [Y Wo
Wellaritl k)txology P'r.rWnr I Ye' _� NR
RrmOrkz
HYDROLOGY
wedand HV&IAM Indicators
Seeondafy (nalaatol5 nnirilinarn of tea reaormdl
Ftlrrnlly Indknlar immlmisn Ib une a cLVlwfell;
tltkLk a11.1110La0)7('d
_ SLrfaca Sail Cocks (061
_ Sullorn Warm LAt)
_, True lu1uMIc PlarYS LBI.1)
S()arsely Yagalttted CanC1fW SuIlaLO IOal
_X High Warar i alt0a (fir)
_ 14ydtagla15u0'kle Com (c t )
Draifaga Pallwas (010)
S91fx00on (AJI
X pzrdlrud RhaaSpherc-. an LIVVIg RWnt (CJ)
_ Mass Trim Lines 10101
_ [voter Marks (01)
_ Prwgmm of Retimud [hill 1C4)
_ DipSman We[& Id(11E (0)
_ mig" mi Deposes 1021
_ Rarrra Iran Reduc=n in nikvl Sulh t(.6)
_ Gaytien aurlaws ice)
_ Drn Deposals IB3)
_ Ihm Muck Swlor,4 K.7)
_ Satuf ulian Youiala Lin Aarwl hrmyLyy (129)
_ Algal kfat rr Cnrt JBAI
_ briar (F cplam in Ro <.k .)
_ Swmaa rr sire+5cd Run,. (111)
_ IrOn Deposits (85)
GLxlmmplac Ptxdlnn (W)
IIIUABI100 Vabban AOrial Ilnd(Ilrry fall
_ Shelkiw Ayuimd (03)
_! Watrq 5i"m Lorlym 1891
_ McrnhylotRaplic Ralall (1),71
_ Aquatic Farina (013)
_ FAC.Nwlild le 9 (MI
Fldd 6bsarvahorrs
$udarn Wnlm Pra..LVd? YI » Nit Deptif (Inches),
Wnln1 I Abla prt-Awl I Yeti Na_
Depolpachest:
tailw aorl Prim at! YL: X No
_ r1Lym lulthasl Wealmtd Hydrology Prosent? Yes 'r— No
Ilnrlfrdas cajillary fringol
UL.eribt. ReLaded Data I50t.Wi gauge mordtonnrg v%vii aeml photo% jfrmnmi iwra;3amsl Q avatifibbs
krrnark
t15 Piny Corps IN Engtnters
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
rftler11 Nutinuillis al'4t picdt11N11— Ve15ful 2 it
F -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific namos of plants
Sampling Point S,') -
I
AMOVe WtIinnnl InLtCntnt
nonlinanco TeSt Vlorkaheel
fircia StrNitlm [PICA Sim t
i�lgIra
..r51.�cc� .fr! S to
!(
Number of Dattirwit Slimim
Qat-
ThillAfe0131..FACW,niW IAj -
7.
Total Nuirbot of DtYnnuird
SaLtiw/luow NI Sfmw J flit
4
Ptntrxrt rid Darrimrit SQacfas ���
e
Ttsm Air OAL f-A� W, W, or , , W'36
r
PrevaWf a Index vlmksheett
�_- Ynlrlt Cryn,r
TataI %Crrtnreh M1deldvhv-
,
t
"Orb 011061 covati i l
20% Of Wild camr �
OUL specia5 — K 1 -
Sa, do r,t: I 1 ol fv artL i S' I
'
FAL W SQPCleS r 2 = -
/_ E d{
t n %' At.
I At, species -
1 S41 M Ir '-
10 l obt
rncu spales � A4-
J We
57 f,Icu
IFPLSpecies i5_ -
4 f��AtK
_�- P&L
LrMnnTWIE. fAl [f!1 -
5 5 ah �cVS S�.
ti V
A
Provalomellidox =I3fA+ -
T
Hydraphyfic veg"on bftacalors
A,
_ 1 Napid lest for Hptropnylle VmyelAdan
7L°
- t - uommamcoTestis >SD%
9
_ 3 Psr?nar±nce friwk rs s9 0'
nl IrNal cover. l,f
- 1 uL•1 Ciwc.
21yY 6f Inlnl CnYrl
d MorQMloglcal Adsptauae4' IPrrnirfi;gippuitaiq -
c1tilY3G
Hrrti htrnttim IPta sue � t
aa� In RemaiYa cu an a a,parmn sfineU
'TI I ReAkir Sn
- a G �( f p4w
_ Prohtenadr Hordl)I c Vurp.nlusn' (Fxpinm)
2- t vtfruS R �`+
-] D X 0%14
I 'INAN 1 Al f -5
r?
�mw
SGI
4 y nil^
_
FALL
hc11M ar.VIgMfdMtulr6rdMPiatdnmi
Dcfintbmn cif Folu Vegetation Strata
h
-
a
Troo - 'Noddy plains eAeludng yams 3 in, (7 b rntj ar
7
room in M131rie.er at tlteu4l holgid ID11M. regwdk -io at
—
hnl�ht
A
y
SaplingNirub - %VOO.ty plrm;i mcludN vrms lass
then 01,013H find LVitalnt Ilan rr INIIal In 3 2A b (1
10,
ml tar
herb -All 1"bauaua f Inn Woody) tAvIs rarWdfoss
0
100 - Tsai Cava
7'D
M sits siad wtmrif phnts htis than 32911 tat
50% of tmsl rrnnr.
Yltxrdv Vinn 4rrawrit (Platsf2r 3Ot t
M of idal rarer
,
vine- NI witty vn*na grater Dian 3,29 it in
bWoody
2,
3
4
-
5
Hydrophytic
vogataNan
- Total Cony,
l
Preeant7 yes .e No
`AA-d Ir I Cover;
20% of tmil corwx
Fieflk7di5, IIIhHudm pima rnmi _ nara or on a 4mvnratm 5 rni't
l
� I
US ArmV Gaps of ❑lp ierm
rasirrn Mainlnlm onrl Ploamam - VL(Ulfali 2 0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
F -20
1�3
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71
January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL Sarnplaig Point L C i
Pr011t8 DoecnPllom (Dnserlbe to the deplh needed to documanl the ouSLaWt or confmn the OSonce of indicators)
DayllI Matrix Redm I L131U
f, txlWsl r _ color J 9t, I n � _ Iwialn Rraarck.
0�-�f I�� -) 15 YK 114 FL
I ypa, C_-t axnn nWil, G— Dopktunn RM- RcduLed Msula, MS- alw9wo Saito Gtaltis 'LoLal4un
PL =Pram LJnt M -Mijob
Nydr)c Sall Indicatory
lndicalors for Problomaac Nydrtc Stals'
_ I Iwct".ul IAII
_ Dal Solace (57J
_ I rtr. Muck (A101 (MLRA 147)
_ I lhuc Elspeucal IN)
_ Palyaai u! below Soo "ISIiJ (MLRA 147. 149)
_ Cora Praino Itodna (A161
_ Mick Hriuc 03)
_ 7lsn Daak S.Idoce )50) (MI-RA 147, 149)
(MLRA 147. 1481
I lydtogim SUIldL (A4)
Laanty Gleyed V.Xf q (t 2)
_ IrindtnNU 1 halatrPm'Ws IF 151
_ Simi, reed Ltry�s IASI
'� Deykied Menu (1 3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 7'r" IAILk (AW) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dais Surletr (r6
_ Vary SI:Yft w Dnrk yudaro 111 17)
_ IJe)'Jrt4d Hotew DmkSudnLU JAI 1)
_ DLxdwed Dad Suilace In
_ Qhot 4hKI nlnin Ramrvksh
_ Thick Mok Sitdnce (A17)
_ RLYk1x DepresslorLS (F8)
_ Sansj Mul.ky Mnaral (Sl l (LRR N,
_ km Mnru)nnt,& Masi -, (r12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 145)
MI-RA 158)
s Sandi GILy?b Alairll (541
_ IItramr Surtaco (1713) (MLRA 138, 121)
'1111 calot3 M hydroppi: vegoawa nrdl
SandJrRedox (55)
_ Feamonr Hwilplart Sa). (FISI (MLRA 141)
waftin hydmlagyniusf be Ixes&a
suippm h1n11IK 1551
_ knd F'srYd Mnlmnl (172)1 41ALRA 127, 1471
ulln»i9 rfsuul,eaut Vollkatylr:
R941nclnm Laycr (II observed)
Typ'
Depth fircheq)
Mydnc Sod Present" Yes No
US M Ily Ccrin of Gtgl lulus
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
I
Epstein tAiuruws alit) P _dnwi — Verson ' 0
F -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastem Mountains'ahel Pledmant,Regtan
NrcjccwSOr_ P -A- (-. v ?'14 1 ik• C,o Ih Smrpirlrl 1?-A ,6 y
AlydtcaiWOertrr- fJ C. ! r 10 stela sJa 511111nlmgFUmt SPA
_
Irrxrrngzmil -) 'S !r,T P Nl 4, y 1 St."u t Tiwisillp, Rartge,
wadtrxintiftope tetra -e erc-1 !y= 1_...,�il7L�_.� I0k:41001CwIL0dV, Lortyex rrmr)I J. }n -0 Slope Ift b
Suhrr•giun (I RR v MLRA} „�, 1af� y �. t 1 a i'Sq `J lo CFtnnrn; 'I'D
52i1 M. ;r I tnn ffam41 .,a ._I/ ....� -r MVI f Itts511K,tttbn �" a �°I
Me climatfr. J I"isogic uvivibait, and* see gpcM for Ihls ume or yaW Yes Plo III nri axpintn In Rmuirks,l
AreVuyr.ttsnm1, a Sn6.J ooHyttrougy'r' slgnlicarItiYUtslurttod? Arerf&nmalCrrurnyAnLas'prrrfml! Ycs NO
!ue vaytstulmi _.-" Sflll ur HytYUUyy nolftally pr"rtol>ie 1 (It nratrdatl, Rapryrt my in ;erjtr; In Rnm lrs.)
SUMMARY OF FINUING51- Attacn sne map snowing
tiyrxaphyllr vngrtatinn Ilrq" i Y., %� Na
Hp3rir sod Present? Yea �� Na
'Mittamf Hydrology Prusonr'J Yes "t tta
HYDROLOGY
ifimary Ind,twvc Irrfnirmurt ct arat n require
_ 5 owl VARRr (Ail
_ Hlgn Water Table (A?)
X Saluratten IA31
_ Waier"Its.JBT)
_ 5aamrmt rmpnsra ltwa
_ nnit nolmgs (a3)
_ A11}a1 Alat(v C.nrA IS41
_ Imn naprislls (B5)
_ InunWilarn Vt5bM en Arrtiall tm-,gmV (H J)
_ Walef•54alnld Leavrs 1831
_ AquaW Fauna 1811)
polntaccatton,5, transects, important features, etc
Is ate Salnplod ARer
Wrlhln a Wollanrrt Yas i NO
IILCk a9 Rnti aupb)
_ True Agtrfltc Pli , @14)
_ Hydtggen Sul%je Odor (C11
X Oaidrzrd Rhtrusphcru, un Liviny Rouu IC3)
_ Prtxserrce al ReduLmid Iran IC4)
_ Remn Iron wfrmmkin fwnilea s4is (cel
_ Thn Mwk Swim a (C7)
_ Cthrr (rxplanl in Ra,whs)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (0e1
5pmsely vegeuieed Concave surface (90)
Dialange PILlteut5 (B10)
_ Moss Tilm Llttes IS1e1
ON season Wotel TWO (C21
Craylis(I Buraws (C0)
5aitraaodt visible on Aerinl Imagary (C91
Starred or'&Wwd Mains (131)
Gearrxaplue Posidan (04
Sha(iaw Aquino (03]
® MlrrompugyapPre Rebel Jodi
_ rAC Netmal Test (D51
Sulow Worn present? Yes _ No—X— C"In llrichasJ
lNeW lalifia p.mwW Yu No! 0ta)rlh Ilnchesl. Id
=ILIat I'resert ? Yts X No— Depth [Inches); Vlottand Hydrology Prmcuntl Yes No
Ilnclud� -c By trl r
13GSCra1a FLeaWdetl Data jstro,m (ywrp], rmnittnng vick aer(,'tl pH mz. ptrwrmr, nspc, 7,nnM) d Anwnbte
5f r nceni 4'b /nIJ7 - Pn,'1rd tWf -
RFinnrAs
r r4r- ..
r✓�t,/ . ++Ya* v.t' ., �, rVr� �A rf�,I �, f�, eJ r�U r%Y .% G.a� rM io-�l fret. V
i
05 Army Calls of tnglnrlcos
Easter" Mourratns and Awrnpnt - vry^,um 7,11
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

e�
1
r,
r
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling PUlnt.
1 (Pictsize .= I
>t f
.31r &Ir4.L. '?
'?
rW �
1 SqI
� C�
ThIll Aloe HL VA ut Fl�s
rnm are oeL. rAt;�N ur me rAl
7
i`
TOM NitMet Id Oomumw r
7
-�
SpetfesAaom NI Slrnln Ir;)
A
Percent ul OattinatH S=12 ��,� ,�
-
---
Thnt Ate OQL, FACW ofFA.0 YL JAM)
1,
r
ol"mWonce IndOrt tworitshem
itltPJ Cover
Total % Laver nl, MIII11MV Jyj
5tFlS 111 ILTAl atvtu,
_ 20%01 w1al camas �
OHL ,p�stec x 1 -
5:4allnu15luua air drm lYiit 511e E7
4
FAM jPuin
I.'5!3Ht rlt lq
5 (j,�
FAC:.pr[it;, x3=
: r}L+J
PAC III ylyppr}c 4 c _
fi RP
10 c-
UPL- 'Paces M ss
,1 cornus gvla dM
- -1
r;eptmn latms (Al (B)
11 vbd ®4rn/n `A
_
+ICJ
—1
r�
_jlL_
I"fV alencu indm - 81A a
t.
Hyifrophytia ve"aWn Irloamars
0
T trttpld -reit lot Fiydrapnyat. Vegelstcm
9
>t 2 DOmmoCtae lest 's .50%
_. 3 Trovrtlence Index o s3 0'
htY» od uNaI Gavel
3 7 Tnlnt t rrna
20%al tdml cn.�
_ 4 Alarplml11gcal Adopimxnts" (Prmidu supprnmq
rj
Hnrh titiltuni (Pkil yin! 1
a
dale nt ReotarkE m an a ..srimrnto- :tint tl
I fA--,f 1
1 r,-r
_ Ptob>:maa,. Hyfl"I]tFC Uagt911110ft' 11T.W.71)
2
-Apo_
J i't Slcv lc,
7 n r„�,,
'fWca Ots(it nyllrlc sail Laid nYlWnd hydralogy must
1.
A ci s t�A.� i J�D� C 5n t'p}I�Ytth
..�—
5 MC
bt9 ptesenl, uWess dr5tuttmd at ptntdumnth
c�rty �f'
S lid
Dersrrcltarm or Few vagalnt on Strole
6
Tray- Woody plam., omr -ludi l vme5, 3 in, Ci,6 un) a
7
mire in diumilier oft oma5t IsaiSIN IpBHI rughfiffels U
- --
iurgist
n
9
SaplinIVShrttb - Woody planes eAell,drtg vims M -s
dmn d In- ntw and qr"w dterl Of LgLW m 3 28 11111
14 _
mp roil,
11
Herb- AnlYatbacC+S is Gttm Woody) Wom5 mpartiltt5s
01 size and WaLdy plants Icss umn 12% it 1,111
-AL - Total Cum
50% d "S,L) umn
4fa :6A: 01 luml wvrx ��
ytaldfv Vino- SIM I m Ii'v 57ce t7r , I
wady Vb* - All vM;y times 4tuoter low. 325 n m
I�ItL
i
3
A
5
HydrophyUe
U ; Art y f al , rf Fngnect
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vllgatntlon
Tnt,1i Cr Presettl7 Vca _ Ho
!,G% d total wvatl 20% of Inlnl raxt
Is 0010 or m a selortrsn J- xM )
CH91vn Mwiti mr. and YG•Ilstnru - vtta iom 2,51
F -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

SOIL SaMling Point S P$
ocpih HIOTIR —
- ReAdUL 'e tuim
4indlecl coicy frinalsil _
_� iYGO Irn:• leaura
Rpnnll h
0 -6 10"K Lt ?
&20A LIlk 5` PZ
b- I L I n`IR 4/�
1, S / �I /6 �_ PL
1
Typal C_Gonounumbn D- Deplmlon. RM•ReduLed MSVili MS_- Mrrha_d SM'd Gmn.i rltttaubn, PI- POMILido Nrkttmn
Hydrte Sail en I tam.
tndicaturs for PraWamatic Hyanc Solis
11151mai JAI)
_ 04HIL Sutfr%kl (57)
_ 2 unMuLk (Alb) CMU A 147)
I uS1x. EpipUMn (0)
_ VOirw 0.u! Below Surtm,e (581, WLRA 147, 146)
Comm Prarta Rndok [A 16)
_ l3i Lk+t :6r. (A3)
_ Thin Dirk 5tutactr (56) (MLRA 147,146)
(MLRA 147, 140)
_ I lydt iVen Sulhd_ [PAJ
Loamy flayed Mmlix (F2)
_ Redtrtan Flutxiplatn S(N; (h ill)
_ Suffilri if Uyam {AO)
Y Deplettad WITIX (r3)
(MLRA 136,14?)
_ 2 on Aluck JA10) (LRRN)
_ Idedat Mali Slnince (F6)
_ VuySttniknv Itak S rf m (IT121
_ UepCLned Uehm Dark Sidi= (Al;)
_ Ilepl U Oark SlataDe (1­71
_ Met Mwpz* m Rmnidt9)
_ I hick Utrk Sisfnai (A17)
_ Rvdox Depressktr>6 (r9)
_ Sn" MmIry MiruTil (5)) CLRR N
_ Ito MAanganL-A l4a5ses (rl2) (I-RR K
!LIRA 141, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sanityaoyad M,mlx (54)
Umlxt Surface (1-131 (MLRA 1]6.122)
'trulictunrn td hyttrctppi: vegelaotio and
Antly Urdai (55)
_ Platai am Rolldaleln Sots (rig) ("A 146)
mAlund hydtalotJir rtNSI hit lyese tl,
_ Strippad Matrix (Sb)
_ Rai Paront Afawiial (F21J (MLRA 127,147)
utitas dmubed tv rxrWvnAmK,.
RestrIetive Layer (it Observed)
Type
Depth ptthesu
Hyttric Soil PraseW Yes I. _
US Army Corps 01 Et girlth rs EaMcrn Maumnitr, aid Rednwni - Vixswn 7,0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PivierIF-Ain Cg4 Crtt K QYWOWWyr Al 5enlplinyoule. all 113
ApRtramr(wrnor NC f7E, P Snow
7 % �N samping polar. 5 7
hv,ega"sy P A Socuurk Taa'lldlt Rmg,
L uldr(rml (lutvoph rorrncn, mt,) '� �Oa rijl tu�nl Iut .-I (twlx r a i!aIV a Ilrnn:J llpf)k' S'upe M, C3
Sutna(pan ILRR wAQRA)l t,a 35- 11$14 Lwly 13. 3.7 fi; f Dalurn
561 Map unt Nawr hi W,1' 1 NWi ditS�RLawxl
Are dnnalic 1 tgwo"e- rongwwJ7 on mI nde lyplrla i I ll= arw• al your? Yet � Nu RI I o_e. )ahrl In Renwiks )
AIe Vogmo1llur Soil !" rx Hyviroblrl vglydlculwy dsaahed7 AIC'fJwnwl Cuclulwl� lee. ^pIr_salg? Yew '1r, No_
Are Veymululn Soil - , nr HydroblPr T nanlmpy probhxnaac? la rtmaW rapluel my arawer In Relnaftj
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc
Hymopyllc Vmjvul in Pm%LnV Yer K Nu is rho 1,amplad Arco
Hydrtr Sail Pnnaia? Ye, k No within a Wadond? Yea No
wownldHydrr4ogyPrmanl?
RemarAs
HYDROLOGY
Uimpl y Incirmars frrJn man al gin is mrnuadi
rlrnrlk NI IhM amilyi
" SurTet.e Sall Cracks (86)
m, Sufa:e Willer (Al I
_ IIUo Arpnuc Ptvn -. (Ha41
_ SW!Idy Vr_III!UdeLl Con1JIVL SWhILe (BU)
104)1 Waler Table tA2)
_ Hyormyn ;ulpaa Udor ICl)
_ Druirr tie PUncarn 1010)
Satualnay IA3)
OslrtirnW Rtvzoq innrns on I" Rants IC31
_ Mp}S Trim Una% (a16)
Wmer Walks (811,
_ Pirm%enco of Rodocad Iran (C4)
_ Day Sene,ml Walln Table 4C7)
r S all neat Deposal (B2)
_ Rac> nt tron RrWUCUOn in doa Sa3ti (CEI
_ f nvifmh Hanvmr (C81
_ Daft Daijaslis (1331
_ Thn IA O Suf aw 1C71
_ Srrrmrhan Vniblo an Aannt Imagery IC5)
_ Agar Mitt of CJU•,t 19 1)
_ 011a3 (EApbin In Remarkgl
_ Slanlrlil ra Smrza(J Plain-. IUi l
_ Iran DWrovls (01)
_ r,aomorp w Po rhxro (1)71
_ InunrJ.rwn Vi- ,'Wile on Mw it 6swyer) 1071
_ L hatl m kpillaro 0)3)
_ Wraar 1;1runod I wnrn (6B)
_ 1lttrolopognphlr Rohr IN)
_ Aquas: (6131
_ FAC Nnu7M Imp I(35)
Slrlarce Mar Irreser*7 Yea_ No Dal>th(incrics)
11 met Talk, preserrl? YaS No Ualm(alehe3) f,
52wuteWetl I'resatW t Yin Y rm _ Dulxh (etcll�i) � Weadrrd Hyttrobogy Presem7 Yes_ No
ororrded Mira (haeanl yeu��yjp- nlarrworlll Well 1Y'net phoraS pinvdHl i IrTjpnfllanG)it ni<ibin
111JIVIA *l'
WN Army k.ula al Laynersl
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Ensityn Mukrlllnns and PICdrIlu t - Vuslwl d 0
F -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants' Sampling Point° =?'�
' ���
Ateti:%a Damm -l"I analculor
Dominance Teatrimkshftci.
,ji, 2 DfmrufrxbT4r-a t -i W%
rrae Snmrnl {Plot ruC• I
I Sala 411>]/
.�; y�itrn;mt7 whfc
`Mfg -W
NumMrM DamrwfltS lux 4••.
- nVAAl.091,FACN,ar0AC,
/
b IA)
ncr� Pu
(S X AC
t at 54CIR 7 p �( t✓i1 t,1
= Problemmir tt aifhylfr V139111 san' (Erpialn)
e c! 3 IML
'Ind�alaM
TiNtd Number at pfmfriara
d lfydtlr -Wi ma unrUerld h)dVmjy must
A - C>Irfy
y, pr�j1 f q r A
be prMwif tmh„.w dsluilm or problemaik-
Spr:elrl, Atnf•; , All Straw
(al
Tree - Woody plarvs r xt.Iumng rimes, Sim (M cml of
r
r11MYf In "tw4w a1 ♦Yana Wrghl (t )BII), fe(ptrdm at
>,
I�
8
PMUM 0 Dorau®It 5paCiaS
ilia! Are 0aL FACIN, orrAC
.1.a° f (A)w
SatiMnglShrub - ftodyplants,excludingvines less
llwl 3 to Deli nndquiller than or a ,ual to 7.28 n (t
to
7, PreValer= Inda: Work, ,
3S - Irnia1C4wm Talnl %Covelal 1411111M by
_AYbof tonal cown I�r' Wh of lWal"MTn-7 OaL si tlaa rt -
` 6t+�1{I!$rIIl IP<ot s rr_ 12 I rACW specim lit.
f* of FAG specs x 3 -
2 6�z FACU VeLira x4-
J, )•�,Jh�trk !�/ ,i�IL'1C1vw �_ �rJ�(� UPI-species xS-
CalumnTotrls 40%) 15)
5,
F Piw alenu= Indox - QIA -
r
NyflrepbyllcVagabftmnl tors
B
t - RdPW T&u fair Hyrtro"Ic.Vngetallon
Y
,ji, 2 DfmrufrxbT4r-a t -i W%
Cavci
3 - Pre retoWn collar * 5311'
_G-'rolal
MV4n Iota cor"I I� W% tit IRa)coyenf slz
tAalplu�lOpfrll Artv2uahrals'IPnINWC SI.�lpralllY�
St
�S1IDlyJiq (Plat sr�c )
Oau m RmnnrAs or an a wperato sllee9j
t at 54CIR 7 p �( t✓i1 t,1
= Problemmir tt aifhylfr V139111 san' (Erpialn)
e c! 3 IML
'Ind�alaM
Well 1) s t
d lfydtlr -Wi ma unrUerld h)dVmjy must
A - C>Irfy
y, pr�j1 f q r A
be prMwif tmh„.w dsluilm or problemaik-
Dallnitims e! Four Vegatation Stralu
F,
Tree - Woody plarvs r xt.Iumng rimes, Sim (M cml of
r
r11MYf In "tw4w a1 ♦Yana Wrghl (t )BII), fe(ptrdm at
height.
8
p
SatiMnglShrub - ftodyplants,excludingvines less
llwl 3 to Deli nndquiller than or a ,ual to 7.28 n (t
to
rf> tall.
t
Nab- All herb�S Imftaruo(rj) pffirr, ttyian4esa
nl
- Total covet
SQ X, at total euver_ 416 Tn56 19
;rrq, end wv" Mains lass uwn 3.28 n tall
fN tarot trncry
t� um (Plal Sixr,, i At )
Woody Vine- All VMaly Vine-1 glMlcr Ihnn.3 r 811 in
r 1 n•U v>�ron,rs is G
- -
3,
A
s
Nyrtrophytic
-- �I`�— total Cover
wit
Vegetation
Pieserd? Vas No
) of unaf ccmdw' �GXS ad IrYYtI rlveri —
Remrsks (Inchwo ptmtn numbers here lit an n Saparmn 5tmeLl
05 Anly Corps of Fm(mfrr,
Easrrefn t ulflinls find Avdmnm- Vraaon Y h
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Momtonng Year 4 of 5
1
i
I

SOJL
Samptntg P01111 -SIP I
Prordo Dasalpllan- (Dascnbe to the dopth nodded to document tho indicator or confirm tbo nbsimm of Indicntom)
INVO1 IA" R4100K Flilrdwirm
hx
f es) C W_ (:ale lmnisi) 'r Imr toe Ymnue RummkS
0-6 /aV iTil a 40 7eSVk'1 /( 10 1: PL
6_!r- 1011 o lo`IR /+ _ a'1n F12
4,-1 b 10YR 4/;? 5$
_ HlslrhMthtt
_ HISIIr Eplpedal 02i
BLaek IIISIY W3)
_ HyufuganSuIlkleIA41
511s1ilied Layers U5)
t i rn Muck 4A 10) (LRR N)
,o UtVieled Belo% Owk Swfa. a (A111
_ Ill&* Dark Surtax IA12)
_ SwdyWexyMlntsat(SIIILRRN
IMLRA 147, 140)
_ saltily Gleyed Ma lix (S4)
_ Sandy Re din (SS)
_ ShippodMaMlx(sQ
Dep]1(n+ches)
I)y Army Corps w F,rgnn�rs
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
_ Da* buAUCe 1571
_ PoPpolixi Be(arA Sunace 150) QNLRA 147, 140)
fiin Dark Suface (SL) QALRA 147 140)
Loamy G(dyea MmIx (f1)
Depleted hialfix (1-3)
RedoW Dark Sd1lal.12 I+b)
Depleted Muk Srurace(f 7!
_._. Redfu Depwlsians 4178)
_ humfAanggnL-c )N1stiws It• 12) ILRR N
1NLRA 136)
_ Units k^ Swface (riJ) (MLRA 130. 122)
_ Pludmrsn fbariplu n Suits (F19) IMLRA 140)
_ Rod Pureed Mauna 071) CMLRA 127 147)
tndleMors for Problemsbc Hyalrfc Sc
_ 2 cm Murk (AIM NLRA 147)
_ C009 Prekie Reaox (AIG)
MILRA 147,140)
_ PiLiftnrtodnoodldwn;afls(ft9)
QMLRA 1311, 147)
_ Vuy Siwlluw Omk SudnLV (rF 171
_ Cum (Eipinue in Rrmnrits)
111dit"Iev- cd Il- )&OFlryd6 Vg0tinlon Jill)
eaailad I ldn7(plly rruv no rumnl
rri= diMwocu ur prMNGmnllr
MydrwsouPresent7 Yes No_
Ea nirrn MnurMuns nnrt Plmirwril - Vnslnn ! 0
F -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM'— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
R[rWMSdr. . Cott Gref1y At /O^ Sumpllnyaace• rZ�l B I3
APPIL&WOrrtlet f4c6EP S. -C SarnixirrgPunxS )o
uwmaymur(s) iflTo 01t / Sncllnty Iirwremhp, Rnrzau
Larn1I&m(hlI5WL Ierraw Nz.h fIVIAp 14 L[xsd[e-136(WI=VL• mttAmHorn) /ICh(g Sbrs_'l7)•
SubegbnURRarI4tRA)I ILAN wt, '1511,53839 Lund $3•)775 Casual: N4D83
Soil IMpUrIll Nerve- NYAOaSsiucadon
Ate cllmaac f hydrabr7c roodillai�• an this Nla lyplcnll I /ppQrrf Itirs erne al gent: Yu:{ No (II na, e[plsn m Remarks )
Ara VegLN.elbn Sall !� or Hyi6kw I vgnllf[.aWy HYlwtn.d7 /Vr'SJtflnw (;hcloflslnncevl)iese"17 Yes y Nn_
Ala VayLraaan Soli rN or HydrviM y n uItumby pnxldlnnrefc7 (u nv tled' expit al tiny ulkiwiats In Re"AS,l
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showdngjsarspling point tocadons,'transacts, Important features, etc
Hyltmphvw VaVnam Pru. VIV Y. � Na Is Iho Sampled Arca
Hydw Sail Prrisont+ Vrs 1 No withinaWatl=0 Y" M1 No
Wululrxl f ysi[tngy Rrrrrrl f Yra , Na
HYDROLOGY
Wattand Hydra"y Imtieftars
Somntinry_lrglrchtur5 (mlalnini of two (ttourt�A
Wrnnry OrlrreatQS Itnrrmutn of_a_ne is raouaee.
chock all Oust nonWl
_ SufaCe's0ol r}OLAS IR61
_ Smlare Wales (Al I
_ Tnin Arpmer. Ptanl -, (1114(
_ Sparsely VegtxuuYJ Camew- S(alau laal
Ro Wutm Table IA2)
Hydrogen bt/fido Oaar (C1)
_ Manage Pasterns (aim
_
_ Swuaaan (AS)
OxIslized Rlizosptamas an W nq Rnoh IrA
_ Moss Trite. Lmea (0161
_ WrIal MarM9 (BI)
_ Presarrn of hoot== am (Ca►
_ �DrpSeawn Writer Tag)a (C2)
_ Secrmmtt Depusib"187l
_ Recurs, Imn Itallurtum mTifbd Snu;. (C6)
_ Qthyfieh 13unben ;CO)
_ Nils Oupatxs (031
._ Trial Muck 5laface (('7)
_ Sminisourt Yambd3 an Aerwil hnagety (C9)
_ Algal ?Ant Q Cruet Ills)
_ outer IErDIa1n (M1 Ramrrkcl
_ Slunlod it Sarmied Plnm•i (07)
_ Iran uma ,as (115)
_ Grizma pmc Pa Aucin (D9)
_ Itlmdmor; Viru to an Amr.J (migmy
(p7)
_ Shrrilm Acl urrnf (D3)
_ Wa:a 5t fined 1 onLro -, (H9)
_ Mrcmlapagrmphlr Renal (p /l
_ AquallL Fnma I513)
— FAC NatrrU Tm, (139)
Reld Observallom*
Slrinoe Water Presm7 Yes _
No_
Caput pnrtras).
Vr.:.0 Taal Poem -.IV Yes_
No_
eLSrm Ilnctaad_
SalwmranPrLfmtt7 Yes _
No_
Omits llnrlm:)c
Welland Hydrology Presenl9 Yes No
(lyduatmLa an huuala
Dascnbe RDbardatl fyatn 1'•tmnm rptrga,
rnoMQrnq iad1. m.icll plwlos, (uevlol6 nspecr,lons) I avdlnasr
Wrtualm
l)ti Arr y Crum nl Engmeets
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
ESULMn Misiseelrls roan Po�dmna - Versolin 7a
F -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: r;1Q
trey 5v tPllx v71d
3D' Atrwiutu Domnant inE -wo
wJtwil 7
Doamftance Test warkshect
t Fr Pfe
-a"
1'Q FA2 y
Nutntmf of Dormant Specie-.
y
Tlltl Pan 094, FACW or FAI (AI
Tolai Manher of Pommnaax
Slxxir_s AYroc, All Strati S tit)
Furcont of tiotnnain Species /►
Q r
A
5
that Pre OBI. FACW or FAC r JAM)
r•
Prevatarxo fildox work
-Tool % Cam of 1101011ply Irr
= Total CGIL9
031- .podati r I -
50`k, dlc`ctial cavo- _7tow 4f total cost, 2
32n!haf$hab $lfalunl (Plot •a n- + J 1 /
PE
FACW npwks
1 Fr
�
FAC species
/t! FACV
FACU3)uraea
3
UPL spL�s x ; -
Cothim Total,,, (Al (9)
s
5
6
P(LMr3ICM.'L Index - 9fA -
fydrap ybc Vegotattpn Indicato(5`
7
6
t • Rapid Tr31 flit H)T*nphytir vegletalkni
--
2 Dominwco1!eit *,9V,,
n
�(i Tots1 C
1 • PievAlanco Indpc Is s; 0'
YIl'I t(
d; nu td 11 S 0
4 , My ila ral Arla mnn ( Pmvdo 51
Pp�l�
Hrlt� SLmLT.! tPlut ,itl
rintn m Rrymrksarttn i soparalLt sheptl
• t glrjrJt SP
pp 1,
lt� %� F
_ Probluriu>exe Flytlrnptrtec Vogglnl(nnt IErWael)
^
3 Lltr L� e
C q %S FA —
�Inrbceca!T of ItrWtr -, till ord ae)land hyltraingy Il ust
bit prmam ar(M-. dfsrult)(1d of pf01nen11111L
4
Definitlom of Fauf Vagellation strata
5
6
Tree - Woody pleas =Iudnp ewes, 3 In, Q 6 cfN a
7,
It intha n het at broal hoylht (D9H) tegaidle55 Lif
tll�n
9
0
SapllngliShrub- Woody ldaras mcludrig vines. kiss
IRirt 3In, DDI drrd gemnr Ihrin r oqu4to 3 28 it ft
1U
m) IN
71
total Cover���
Herb. An herba" -ous (im woody) padnls fNerdlL'95
of -Am tend woody plalas less than 3 28 It tall
Ul's, at tat cuvel I AYA ca tmni riwff - -.al1�
2ro yYm SMim 1phx
vzr gio )
Woody one -An Woilay .ve5 gteexi elnrt 1211 N in
t In f rPCertblx
�fati� ID 1fi
j-
1
n
a
Nydrophybc
Vegetation
Prcteftt? YPS , Re
W = ToIW Cb&r
WX 1.1 Iota Covet _ l0k of wind cow _� 1
Remala:. Dn4nalu pharo ntimuLSS lienf rr nn o soltaete shFei )
115 Anny Cp1pu of Lrlgmmm
P iISWn MfIUIIIRnS told Piatinmlr Wnmon 1_d
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

W41,01111
Sampling Point. 51'10
Profile Desalptlon, (Descnbo to the dopih needed to document tlm Indicator of oonarm Om absence of tndlcators,t
DLpti1 4/01"A
Redox Fasales _
fitklri,— color tmalsil =
Calm (I atut) ml,yl_ 7eaturF Ronxoks
D -'/ IV If /of 10a
1-12 IDYK
_ __—
JaV .� �1
Pin �•, ;S€'�
GCurxawadat D= Daplaoon RM- Ironttatn htntra MS- MawkLW S5rN1_ Gi_etn5 'Location, PL =Pow Loint, M -MWIK
Hydrie Soil trrdleamrs
tttdlemors for Problumatie Hydric Soils
_ HISIVd (All
_ Dark Surface (57)
_ 2cm Mutt 019) OMLRA 147)
_ tllsm Lti ptmea (At)
POtpalua B&Ow SuAaGe 1581 (MLRA 147, 148)
_ tint Praise Rerh1Y fAIit)
_ 81aalt W51a; (A3)
71tin Dark Surface (56) (MLRA 147, 148)
OMLRA 147, 140)
_ ilyorogon SO= IAtI
Loamy Glayed Meofx (1121
_ Rrabtsna Flurtdplakt Sots 41-19)
_ 5lraiillyri I a)UM (AS)
DtipWwd Matrix (F31
(MLRA 138,147)
_ 7 ern Much IA1% (LRR N)
, Redor Dailk Surace (F6)
_ Very Slmaow Dark Sutfacu (rri,
_ ncpkvccl HO►iw OakSLefaou (A 11)
_ Depteted Dark &afnLa (F7)
_ Ottlrr fGolam in Remo05)
_ -1 h" Mix SLatore JAI ?I
— Redox Deprnsstons IFa)
_ Sandy Nkaky Wamr.111S11(LRR N,
— Iron Matiganase Massns {F121 (LRR N.
MLRA 147.148)
MLRA 13110
_ 5endy GlLryvd Matrix IS41
_ tlmmic SUrtaco (F13) (Ml RA 136, 122)
tlndcitrmr rd hyL4rap.tytfr ver- Utioxr am
s 5orWy Redox (S5)
_ ROdttwat rl000puri Solis IF 19) (MLRA 148)
weliarrd Nydwilogy trim to picseM,
s Sltitporl fAdtnx 1551
_ Rhd Parent IMILOnI (F21) pMLRA 127, 147)
uNa,s nt lumcd orprubremtu,=
RosOnctlw Layor Of observed)
Depth Ittrhos)i
ftytlrrc Soil Prescott Yes No _
Rrtratk,l
u5fumy catpv M rngaatds
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Edwrn Mm annmR can Purefirtonl Vvfimn Y1r
F -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Roglon p
rrd{erlrata <-� 4 C if e c j l� edy)CONI nY -e' 1 ° I Fes' SaagAuty uaie,
Applrnmltlymri 'left, P. _ Size NG SunwhvAPIMnt.:k
lrym Ixjalni(q Jilt 1, P Socllnrt town, 11111, Nmnge.
1amtivrnl0iiNtp]L tuir,3W Mel ' ° sal fga/1 yLocalmlgl rxUT -Mm nCraex llevio1 flan slawvy�)' -y
Siaeeglmr 1LRk el MI-RA) L'R�FIr� Leh a i' • aL07l twirl `• �_ • _$'! [ - Dduun,/ d$5
Sul Map ilnt NLrne A 1 K W 1 SI NVA classillcaiian
Are clutotrc 1 I"ulagle I axlrons on the rW lyplctd Iry tluc emu at )vm7 You No _ 10 no eAplann In Ron,Irks I
AIeVeg"i'llun r ,loll A OF1"oingy ^ I,LjnllliarslydauaaLd7 A111 'NatmalCin,lan5lnnerte[xt►,r)ml Ye, _Mi
Ale Veil oliIii) Sail Or Hydrology t,swnlay proutsilak— 11 Item L e Mri urry answom In Rotor" I
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
rlvar"yor. Vrgcullinn Pre I-"1° Yeti 1 Nu Is the Sampled Area
Hyar" ;Sail Pra'aml? Ye, No within a Welland? Yes No
Wathrul Hydrology Prmrrnt Yes Nu--.V-
HYDROLOGY
rrrmvy lndQ-ItgqS Inrnen` m aI mtL I`1 wituilla,
gl]"k 81 mat nlXtyt
_ Sulwe Soil crat" (Be)
$rarjx it Wator JAI
_, Iwe AgUUIIL PlnniS (814)
_ Sp` finely Vegewwd Clneave Surr&A IBe)
_ High Water IalteIA21
i Hydrog0n,5ulllde Mot (L11
_ CaerwgepulayrtStotal
5alurnlIM (A3)
; Godited Rnizaspruit05 rn I ivmq Rnm . lCJ)
IALS: RIII1 Lines (BI O)
wrnel Mark. (Fill
_ liesencc of Radurad Iron 144)
_ Or} Seeson Ytater Tatdlt 4r2l
_ 5crflrrwfu fkl11o:-A% IB21
_ RLLisnt Von R11AUrilan In I dlnr Smty ICS)
s c4iryftsh Bunorm (C81
_ tltfl oamso (83)
_. Thn lArck Slalacn (Ctl
_ Saturalfan Vi&Ve on Aerial Imager) (L VI
Algal Mnl is CATS ID41
_ ovier (F>rpa rn in Rurmiksl
_ Swirled Or Sdessad I'41nis 011
iron uaposrla (Fi61
u Gearmephic Pusillon ID21
_ In r irrean V rAhL- tin Atued tinagiay 157)
,�
Shallow AglALvd 103)
_ Wa%w $tamrxl I rave`; 4041
a N%aotxlpographle R1alr4 (04)
_ Arli alic fauna 11113>
rAC- Nailfal Tost 1051
Suilai.L lVnter rrestvrl9 ti,.— tw x i5epal(1101L,
1 NU1i:I TaOie ReS1111117 tle:_ Ne Depth(Pdles),
Saluralton dtewlvrl Yer_ No Ctupdt (IIIG19S) Welland Hydrology [resent! Yes_ Na }
IXIUdeS 013118IFY ftIrMi
Lk*znnc Rmxadcd Daw (sue9nl gw9pi rrvonno(ngw /ail, aCrntplrr7lo`:, pttaveus Inspuc'Ioas) II rwaiatllu
r [� �, I v ti4 ! I I� C.' C r A r�` 9.r. � u•/ I . �
IrRnlalksl
us Angry Cuba Of Grlirweta
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
J
F at run 14midaim and Pk dnwul - Vi rSUn 2 0
F -31 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Samduria Point._ �a�il3
n
True_ hum um (PlelSIZL A 1
ALrahlle Iwminal
Ctnrs lspmmal
law
rIc
nanllrurrim Task wwkshoet
1
fdlmbeir of Do"Miartspecies
that Alp OSL rACH or rACI IAl
101131 Winner of Dfruillout
Species ACIDS!, All Strata III)
PWCOni 01 013minallLSpedes X33%
that ArQOBLt FACW, or FAQ IAtOl
Petwaiance Indent workshecl:
TiXUI !K Cuvnr al rAurbprr by
7
+
a
n '
7
raw Gwer
SWSL Ci t of uwu,
:?G%;71 ttaatw
l Cr_{
OBL Species. 1 -
S
St U6 SYahtm fPltn Wae�_ d
i
FACW 3pHc3 -s r ?-
1
f4jQJ4 d
J
FAC specros .3-
2.
(e". --R g y 01) sfslr js-a
YEA
-Z
,►t
FACtl sperws . 41 -
3
!
IQ I- Nn' -lilt
D %
V
UPL 5i7aa1s5 r5-
GolurrrlToliwi IAI IB)
4, tAd ,Fat,S--42 'SI1='"-Q', �! Y ,ptAJ
5 �40l.J rtL d �_ a1,
r
g
PcovvaWco Anoet =81A.
!
"y" 60c Vegetation Indies ors
T Roof" In H)Vimphyllo ylvoillm
H
R
r 1•CkltrertaaCr, I es; is"50'ib
�� . raldCarr
PrQWmno Irxlnx h -13 n'
WY1.rdielnlrrmx
0 20%Uf10I&Ctnr
• .
— M supporting
anla RQmarkS
aILM r^ I ifat Sim 1
--�'aI"
m x rX1a Uatfl18IQ 51'�t�all
au' �r a� f �r
1 ^
fa) r,
_ Plahlmm�hc Fiyttr�hylt VQr7aratnn' (Gxpinin
'wknimr, nt hyrim w unit wetland hyorellm ntUsl
3 ySOGA 14 a Qrfl aV
I•h
hQr* =nr, tmla;- 0sluheo or Itmh(emoul;
Vallinlolotris W Four Vegawftri SUeta
Troa - Mody pin+vsv at"Ing vUILy 3 m (r 0 an) or
7
mpw m 012VIr tar 31 beast hefgh COBH). w9rudle' S W
nova
a
5spbaplsbrub- Weedy ptanis exchNrtgvtiL% ft_ss
p'
than 3 •t PNH AIM Iitaarer Mill) of orilsal m 3'26 II it
ut,
ml Ira
11
Herb- A)1 helbacecois Clan -Away) pitles, tLVIdh ss
`0 i Inl
- TaW ruvea
of size, a1M 0100 fy p!ml% Insi Uwe 3 ?0 It tall
rr�rr,
20% of URAI cavmr
yMoth
1✓
Vim Slnutm Ifitx Site 1
woody vine - All noebr Votes gtealm 1ltart 3 20 it n
hWN>f
t
o g
10
u
a,
Hydropignic
5_
Vageutuan
k
= ICttl Corm
Praseet? yes No
504Eotuitstwiw
"'I% ImalCQVtnt
Z
r2nryllRs^ ITnLArUniUlMrlrnttabt 'rshmartrfTraSaQaraltashQt�LI
11S Army Corral a Ellrf4 s
Ftworn rrrrunazre antf ileahtlanl- vta9otl 2 a
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sampling F'Ul(1L 'S
Vm-ti n noycii p1 en (D4saribu to ttvr depth needed m document Ilm in6cet*f w cwdirm the absence al Mdicators,l
nutxn tR. +lx
on +-, elm IM9101
Rudox f uutun
& C y Y R .7]t�' . . � ` :_ i
aR� s PL
*TJpa GCmc6ntrtltr+n d -po k;twn, RM•luxluu. -u Muuu, MS- Mn:ae.n! Sund Grnru kataWw PL -Pure Lsinit, MuMbOix
Itydric Sod Ird+cetnrs
Indicators for Problevnstk Hydric Swis'
y Mrrswanl (Alf
_ n@rA Sucher+ (ti ))
_ d em M.uclt IA161 RNLRA 147)
M60L Eppcmoa (A2)
_ PalyV4AID Mlow SO= (Se) WLRA 147, 1481
_ Cau6t kume Ralux (At L)
fReck Iime (A71
_ Iran r7arA SlutncP IS91 (MLRA 147, 146)
41ALRA 147 1410
Mydrepen SUflde (M1
_ I ozrmy ("I4y111 Mnl+er Ih2)
_ PWdmiin rimillllnin Sorh (r- -191
SeDWled La)Y45(A.51
fxpl fad "IX (1-11
4MLRA 126,147)
?an Whick 1A10) (LRR N)
Rodw Linik SLrtncc (i 61
_ vuy Sl,sluaDurLSUrGrcr (1 121
Deplapa Behm Dark SuriacoiAl l) _ ngiMigd M.uk Sur(nco I'F7)
_ DlUrr (Exiieel in RerieniS)
TIUCA Witt StdlaeeiA121
_ laciox0e)xovionrrF01
Sandy MUCky Mfxual 1511 RRR N, _ IronWitri runs, Afa*= 1021 ILRR N.
MLRA 147, 1481
MLRA 126)
_ Sand) GILIod Mnilu IS41
_ Umtim `+udnu• 4V%J14MLRA 126,1221
'11711=11M Of 11Y410phyuL ft-gntuUar Mud
„ Sandy RLMnx E55)
_ Pniftwin+lmdphri Sals,ll 16) CMLRA 146)
NL�Jr+d Irydialao nWS ijpt,JJL
_ Suipped Mulrtr 1561
_ Rrd Par mi wiciiW (r21) OALRA 127, 147)
uu1L5d draLzbeft Or piuMavnuniL
Restrictive Layer 4d observed).
Iypi-
th,
tx:pin lmLHasL
tlyrinc Sall Presom7 Yes \ No
Rflinuils
US Ainiy Lrspc at Fngirscrn
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
I;.Wom rM.uvnms and Nofamm —Wrmwn 2 0
F -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - EastermMowtwins and Piedmont Region
p a x p o ; = m C A 1 L fee qny Cuunty iJq &PA Snmpin6 tint- d Ii;'f o r P
AppinanlM1Ownrr A0011 011 5161L- - sampf la Petal �..
utvr..5gnan(ly -1 ii it Saar A. TuyarniW, RafVe
Lurdlan(hill.IL re tefwceetc)u ��° M1 Ltxilfr�7af Wncuve.cor.'It�.urals�)-T�7��• M"1 Slopei'Y+)-
%Uegtm ILRR or fALRA }! o i, (A Lit - • s74 i's' Long ' +► `? 1 1 � ^Datum P Fr.`;
So6 Map UritName, RtjC►r4St a NJMCtasdf nlron
Am daiatk i lypk aglc nondaans on ft Sm t*9I for tors uan nt Vuar7'vfr. �! flit (II r St, rtplpin m Rpm xfrni)
Me Vergainlion _ 5.11 r HyarclDgy � lrgndu:mlly drUfurtrrxlr Aea'NUmrt� Cucunstnrtctn,'pocarnte Vm r t1h
Are Ver)gtalion 11 boo r' . at HyOTAg,gy " mthmrly pro6k,mwic-4 (11 ne -eded, ewh n a yarnwam in Rerrakt )
SUMMARY1017 FINDINGS - Attach site map Showing `sampling point locations, transects,.important features, etc,
Hyc rdphylk Vctletallon 1'r -mmV Yes No is the Sompled ken
Hytrlc Sall Pre5ara7 Yes No ulthin a Watlend4 Yes � No
WeCand Hydrology Present? Yes No
Rnmuk,
HYDROLOGY
Wetlmtd Hydrology radlcatws
Socandaryinden mmc ornmu n n r mod
lal 1 of arle
r
_Sudoce Soil Cnirk,(MI)
Statace Wafer JAI)
15r;i MIN Table (A?I
True Aquatic Plart15 'BI 41
Hyanogarl SWfide Oder (01
_ SparWl, vagt Ialao1`onraln -IW( t (111)
_ Drainage Pa Lunn, JUIU)
Safaaft% W)
Ondrted RhImphams on I rvnq Rnedn 1(. 1)
_ Mass Trtrtt Lrrm (016)
_ V1Nde1 fAa*s(BI)
_ Presence at Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Ury-Stn zm Wut-STahle (L'71
_ Sedmem DepmUS (021
_ Remnt bon !)Baiaion to ftlian Soft 100
_ CruyfiKh Btntox, (CB)
00111 DeposnS (13-47
!_
_ 1 h W k Surincr- (CII
_ Sa azaba VISI51e on Aami Imugray (C91
Algal Mat of Cnro IW)
_ 011ter (EMpieot al Reaulks)
� Shoed of Stressed PI-Ms (DI I
_ Iran Depoclls (U$I
Gaoonrplru Pos�ffw M2)
_ Irrifloaaon VlFrllhtnn Anrcll ban" IB71
_ Sh9low AgAintl (D3J
_ Winar Shined Lf ayes (99)
_ (/ UDIDpagIlli' 1: Re11n1 (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (013)
_ VAC rdautrul test (05)
Field ObserveMonst
Surface Waer Prowl? Yes rW_
Dnplh fortm.h A
WakerTdnIePmson17 !e5 X No_
Deplif.WJ .Si, 1h
Saruart6a Prewnt'r Yns ?t t
— Depth inshu d 0
vv
Wetland Hyd -logy present? Yes— No
OrtchrdeS C8D31ar Inn
L''er-Axit q kro:mdrd Onto isaeuln gouge, rr¢vtronng well, aerial lilialos, pfeVlous impertionsi. It aya" o-
Rorrr�rrr,
US Army Cor(l5 of Enginom
Ea5larn h1Dltrrimrr, ena Pkitlmenl - Vm -,.rnt in
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
r

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific Ramos of plants
Sampling Palrst• !&F' 1
US Al 1171 L OV.. of F'.ngmers
F a1larn Motmtains ant) Piofinao i- Version 2 I)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Absolute Dotvtmrrl OrdkeHw
Dmidilm a Test woMshoeo
1 rue stralu (Pto size
541.4 n., IF •�
1 % r4 1 .5101uS
Imo,
NWfOL4 a(DIY7rAC
I
� �_
of FAG
Thal Are OBL rACW at FAC (AI
3
Torsi Number of Dondimni
SpLnxls A=s AA Stan- y N;
pereattaf 0oftiolw 5peoes
Tho -Al.OBL rACW or rAC _A
Ptovalenco irtdOw
Tolal % Collor of flttontr tn•
d
5.� - --
6
7
�-
Total (bums
5
WX id rnfnl Collar; 7 20'16 of 10IM cum 3
0aL spami x 7 =
�t (per t;,a l
FACYYrouw x z -
n
T fI1U Mw`tt%" 10 X, �
FACsptxw:s x!.
by _i' ci �•
'*♦S �.o Y OqL
FACU apacies x4.
UPI s;Ife -den x 6 -
Colaao TLYa6. (A) ID)
PTevelence hider flrA
4
I�
7
Hydtophytie Vegetation bulicators
B
I - Raw Test ILV Hydraphytt VM meoen
� 2 - Damunelrcc TOA Is .5096
5
_ 3 Wev�Iw.r�indeaiss34'
,�
mal
L[74 of irglll rrv,H lU - tnicouOVar M
20^•6 0(10471 mvm
_ 4 MorpttologtcslAdaateuons' IPraviues *parong
Herb Srtalum tPlol sigcc
,e
I
me in Ramos Or On a sepecme sD&AI
1 t: lP •lajy F Q 1
Uiyj.
_ RoHHmatic Hydn:fpW rir, VgWtalan' (rWWn)
4r�r�ti5 K
r4tti ,1�
Fryf
hraicnnrsarlydricwilondwoda7ndnyd "ymust
be proserr, urinss drorbad or p Ifancm
naftnifflons Of FOIO Vege"00" strat8
4
6
1 M - Woody piom excluding velum, 3,11, (16 Call or
InoM fn dlatnotar of breast t *g111 QW0, r 1sidlessal
7
htogm,
9
SaplinWShtulr-Woody plerts, excluding vrna, Ims
Ihar 3 M MH and ginatar Than m equal lu 3 28 tr (I
TO
"NI
Tool C.
Herb - Alt bnitwceo:is (non twedyl P�Wnm, dedpr(lWLa,
of and tens Ihan 3128 b
'U
silo, woody PTSnts rat.
Ync . d {Plot size
5rH6 al Iranl Ldrwcr 7� 2M 01 Ictal cover
Woody vats - All xooay rinvs yreaw [iron 3 28 It �
i f
! `,
heifift
2
3
d
Hydimphytic
5
VegtlNion V
pre"M' Yam NO
Iof*cov,
50% of W121' LIWO r .%at total cvmr(�
Rarnskm (IncLinO prdcro numtWf's IwnL ur an v mcpnrine s t )
US Al 1171 L OV.. of F'.ngmers
F a1larn Motmtains ant) Piofinao i- Version 2 I)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL Sampling Point �- ( e
ce Prolta Desop W nbe to the d4�1 Itaedod to aticurawl ttta ruacatar arc rm t absen of Indicators
Minh MOM
(tabus! —. r'alur n
RKlad Fet arm
C_ Twg 7rtfiad_
` 1 C�C.n . atretnn Daoa t RM=f iltxod fAHlt MS- Meshed sitar Quay. `Lountatc PL -Pare Llnl M -Maalx
Mydtic Soil Indit ators
Indicators far Problematle Hydex Soils
N6tASW CAI)
_ 0�71t StataG0IS7)
_ 7 cm Muck 0101 R&RA 147)
_
4is.c Eplpedan (A21
_ PotivWue 6070 Surfaw (58) (MLRA 147, 146)
_ SAW Prnhie Redoa KIN
829& Hryllc (")
Thin Dark Stafam (591 (MLRA 147 146)
�_
(MLRA 147,1481
Hyaro9on'Suffice (M)
Loamy Myud Mdatr W2)
_ tishmnl rinodpLit4 sGi . IF191
Stranthtd Layers IA5)
oep mrM Mawit (p3)
(MLRA 176. 147)
_
7 can Muds (Al o) (LRR NO
_ Rcdox Dirk Swim) IFh)
_ Vury Shallow 1>~rk Suread (1T12)
_
_ 171 plcL J Ruby Dark Sufaw (All)
_ naplatLd Dart 5enfaca U"7)
_ Other (Ecptnrn in Remarks)
rhlLk Oad; Surface 0171
_ fleduL Ddptrs.)ons 1"I
_
_ Sandy Mucky herveral tS114LRR N.
_ Imo Mangene a Mas5r-% IF121 ILRR N.
k(LRA 147,140
M RA 1761
Su" ('ileydd Mateit (b41
_ limb riL Sluiaw WI. %1 UMLRA 178,122)
ttHWcbras at erydroplrlw. vugalulon and
_
Sartify Redox (5%
_ Wcclmaru Floociploln Sacs iri 9) (MLRA 148)
tvarand hydrology mreube pre5en4
_
_ Stripped Wait% 156)
_ Red Pwu11 Minatxd IFCt) (MLRA 127. 147)
untassdrAidand of problematic,
Restrict w yer (if ob5er"M
Ty n ,
p hrshLS)
Hydot: Soil Pmsont7 Yes No
Rtntuta 5'
US Army frups of Fm4neer, Easlarn MDurdamn and Piedtllrtrtl - VotVan 2 0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

WE It AND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Roglott
:aunplmc} ualr _ -
ApplK,ltby)'Afn-
IIIYt!SIIljdcx l�1 � j _ �i I:Clldh IoAt b'll {I. r{JfllJt' __
Lma11a1nI (111NUW. SLYItiLL W 1 ,1 , _ . 7ill rclkl 1yurlL01V co1TAM Isrlei. 1 Ilk t Sion: 1'):).
SuhrHOat ItkR ar M(.RAi J I ac • 'l�
SW Mar, Urit Nam-, d
Arc clink-11K ! lrookgL :Md n%Oft IN-- JILL IylKill lal thle 1.11MI W ylnl � Ve, . F` No _ pf nu, explain w Rerwii 5.1
,at h
Arr VOgi tahrx7 'T `JUG x . w HydluNtyy ylw0(m draly Uw"Alle, Are 'N(umal Cal :umttonce;' (Neser++ Yc'S } NI;
Arr VrrK•lallnn l_i. Sall y5 cx HyWWagy IiquiMy (.(ouc Ildw 111 naeaw -q*-An any xtsxc+•:In IYcnala; I
SIAMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing Sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hylrlxlhy{a. VlnpSnhan lvoraml'' YI ^. _ X W_. —.. Is Ilw SartIpNIAm G A
HyuU: tial mrrsu -� Y� . ` 1w wlthil" a We al"r? V. '1 NO
Wretlana Hymolrzly Frrnrr4 Y, N.1
HYDROLOGY
waK" Hydrology Indicators.
Seomtrtary
uxscalnrs imlmnxm or Ion rnuuwtrctl
Pmm�ry Inds nof; rmrvlrt,lm M Ixlr r. rmuemi um.: ul t lgt alIN,
`ahracn tiM t l r.-; IH61
T-
_ Slrta"rt W:nlr iAl l
_ 1 rear Aytrrllr Ptmta ;B 111
_ ti[tAfvlly VaglaJftel C:vv'.en% tilrl:rn 115N;
v tiyl 5h'akr T,rtle ih71
I"lydriwn suoue (3w, IC I;
_ nraivagn Pai{nrn•: (8I0)
r Sawitalxtfl IA3)
_' pxNlcetJ RrhtuwhHF i.1 Lvu.J Routs (G31
_ &40Fi lllm I wez 181FI
_ Wcau/ Wrat 1111
_ FieselweCA R-mytd Ilml1CAI
_ Dry Swasp+ Willer 1nt'1e I1:'li
_ "Mirilrml urpmuh. LB?,
_ RLr:tol iron Relarrh :n in 7 tlFcl Not-, (('61
_ Cfayll nh ikVrr'v, ICU)
_ lldl Deponls (831
_. TIYn Mlrx Sixlarr i1'r:
_ S41U .-ano Vlamxl on hmul llrsxlefy (tbl
_ Nc01 UAA u C1;151 (Ba)
_ Ovwf (1' xplalr In lirmarx•.I
_ SAL"Vo ul 511es5tJ FUM I D I I
_ Itm ck!tw t� 165;
_ ienrnaplx wwlxl lug?
Inun dalwn V,e.We wi !u_7ml Ill .1w y 1 »l :.
Shiskm Aytared (DJ I
Waler 51:9ned Ledres IMI
MWIUle{xxJWolk Relief (1311 j
Aquats- Faith (B'�)
(:AC twulral Teyl 051
FqW 0059rVJdonx:
11rl.t'i+ W.11Cf r'rrllfd'f Yr- NI: _
_ (%iylln IIRr.
Viola IAM PfcrAvil'• Yom- No .
rAmrl luSm .I
$J1lxallon RmL111V Yt._ - No
_ DtgNh IJxnr%E 'Natland Hydrology PresatV Yes _- No
irx:ixins raplL•e�6.xlJ-. Fl.
�_
Desnlbe Rectrta?d Darn (-4-elm gimp. Ioalxrrrlrq well aerxrl rrlaloS prav1,0511tiWLIIUnS). a dV4d le
', Relhllfa:
:I', A.my t.olps Lf L ugrwIl
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Lslum K„ama.n anD Pt•alrtiml Vie+un r J
F -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
January 2014

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Semolina Point
115 Artily crup" LY Dginetaq
Faslcyn Wwritins and P�cklraora - Version 2 a
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
A6whtlt• t DattIMMI Fatdlrulrr
Oonvnancit Yost front,
iEP_E Sirnh_ im I�I63izn, )
SL' �.:n'1:Ri " � 1 u'
plumhr.7 d G=Mhnl SpU38S
1'
Thai At OM 0ACW rr FAr_ IM �
2
IM3I Numhce cd
Sperm" . Anto55 All Strata, 18)
--.-
0
S
Fh--rrnl d CnprMMV Speogs
ThaAmOBL,Fr1CW orFAI,, IAIBI
Pmvafeme Indefl wort siwet
Tnlal 9%con 'o. MwIlply Ire
it
r Tcoal Crier
SryK al toles ctnel
2D% n( I11101 mvrt
C1HI *0t:IC 11 t =
Si}trllnm'ShruU:�tmtum(Phi,rro
J`
}
FAMS�ww X2z
I fnlnNTj cl' .J
X fyt'&
I'aC;,pnrtos x a
FACU ,pmus KAY
_
2- Iii 1A). 9r M- -9 ALL
UPI dies K 5 -
rdumn final.^ (A1 IB)
s
5
Ptuvali.4rce Index t 11fA -
7
Hydrophybe Vegetation hrdicamrm
I - Rapid T" lot I lyMaWia VPlWnhnl}
fi
2 t 17ominanoe Tesiliq i50%
0
_ 3- PffvalencelrraeKt%S30'
� i0G Cover
— A - MXMIMPigicrilAdapimmitsl iPruvidnmgilxvwV
a[Fi6 ul haul Dauer_
Hrm Neat u l fptpr .2n, y
ftyN pl tOtcl currcr,
dam In Remans or Elf a separate shem)
ITl
y l� j
— hrMliatt" Hydreph)tsc VegC4mkln' (Lrphdt%)
IIIdS£m dl IT)(h1G Sall RM WL1Wnd II)XII6bgy IElu91
1µ
CiLl y.�� i} •+ y; `
ba pinr�wa, litiri55dl5Aln{atl Ot plOafallAillL
ovartillOh6 at Few Vegetation StTa1a.
5,
h
Tree - VMody ptanm el%tudrrg Ows 3 at Q D ctn) M
;rare in ctarnete! ti hreaEr height =1q, rrgutdhs. of
!
IKaml
Sapangr5ttfub- VIUDdyprllil5 ev.lur9 gVS)t.n �ss
Ihan 3 Mh OBII and C) vwer Ihim or v4phl In i 29 II f 1
IN Iall
H
,n
11_
1 00 • r s Ctwnr
Herb -All hetbacLa3 -a itirt vmodyl pGmn, mgtrrdlr..
ar SIM dud V o d IGSn than 9 2911
o t a
!D
m y Nlnras t.,&
',D%.f weal U.e,
20 nr meat 4 > 20
IVoodv u 5Maum (Pb1 .Itc )
Woody vine -AD wtuxly vr)u lm.m r rnnn 3,78 it in
I
hillom
2, _
3
E
5
`�--
Ilydropflyht
V r
TotalCm,r
Present? Yes Rio
50%OfIM 1cmvr-
&A cd lixal covar
RLMhetts MCAraa photo Wien - Farr ar pn R snvan[a shrK.n,)
115 Artily crup" LY Dginetaq
Faslcyn Wwritins and P�cklraora - Version 2 a
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sampling Puim
Prellie Desaipllonl (t)BSCnDo io um depth needed to ducumeM the Indicotor at conlmn ilm o9sancn olirMecators
Duvil r.1 mA $ F[Lylut Ld
SctNnr
j_ in"s* _'A.
-Cot* (1 �l nr 1pawe Rmnark•, _
% - P y
pinfr� 5-0I S
' lvpR- C�Cpn¢miirauyL O- DLp1eU(kl Fgd.Reatlaau
611mx MS= tA7sW1 timid [,rain• kaumut PL -?rare Lh6na 7tWMo6n
H)rdric SW Indicators
tndicatore tcir Probiarnatic Hydrlc Sails'
_ HIM0601 (At)
_ Omk Sufack kS7)
_ /faiMuck fAH{) WLRA 147)
_ Hisho EptptUCn (A2)
_ fkllyitdije Below Sw(dcu (5NI IKLRA 147, 14B)
_ 1.Naa Nmnr Rrtfoa IA16)
_ BLn* HISW: (A31
_ 71dn O91k Suduee 4S9) JFARA 147, 146)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydwgo) Su111de (A4)
LUWiIy Ginfed N1161A T4
_ Ptaftim"11 "00dp1t1111 SLd!r irlyl
_ spaidieo Laytas JAS)
'4 OLIA06d WAI(4 (1-31
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 1 (in Mu.k (A1i7) (I.RR N)
_ RL'dnx Dalk Sulaw CTBJ
_ Vrry Slvllaw DwkStsiSOr tT121
Depleted Below )aatk Stafn -t 1A11)
_ OLpkALd Daik Sudure (1-7)
_ Lnho (Lxpinm in Rnmalks)
_ FllrkCIrk SthiecniA121
_ RcLklx Oeptisvolb 11'W
_ Surcy Mucky Mnoral ISII (LNR n,
_ bw M.vtgwwL -�r_ #Arises 1F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147,146►
MLRA 136)
_ SandyGley,V Wirt.IS41
_ UmWtcSullaeeIF13)(MLRA136,122)
'Indr tnr-. athyaroilityacveli"mmnemu
_ Sarkly Rudix (SS)
_ Pw -dmor► Fbo blare Solis If 191 (MLRA 148)
%icdand hydioktgy lrxt5t he tae5inl
_ Slrgpod Minx tS6)
RE+d Pe:omi Maroniii W71) QVILRA 177, 147)
urleris UatuD'd u prlwic nosh.
Restrictive Layer (If OOSe )-
Ilpp
Wpth linrhR ,I
Hydric
Sell Ptesern'7 Yes No
Reph3lks
I IR army L.lxllr 01 Empnr as
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Ensiom N<Lmlmrr. and M"Imran - Vmrinn ? Q
F -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
January 2014

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PrgocuSnF !!/ � r L:ayiY:ounty. SamlAry Date -
AppxlnX)Anir r'�tLf : t l' Statn, AJ C sampurl Pdnr
Iffir% igtititt(s): _ 11 ei Seeeiron frnsisiup, t�mgo.
Lana form IhlMwe. lerraw. oc) Lucid ie1c4 (urmare, citrr rt thine ?. tr" � @ Slope 1'A)
Swegrei (LRR or MLRA) Lat
Sal Map Ural kanw %bil NWI Clas4.Lewfi
Art, Ckfiall0 hNYokpc coMesonfs on IM sto typal to Its= ttoe of year? Y,-, —IL No _ lit nil, asIanin la Reinarks.l
Ate wgetati rt —4— Sox! r . or Hyvaogy SWIlKaMly d,11,1 -000 A,, *Nor" Cocunis;Lwces' pieseiV Yrs No
Ain.Vegetaoorl 1L. 5oa �_ Of Hyorol" h naauaty Ivoalemoc : ;It rieedea. eiiplatn arty answrs In 4einailis i
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations transetxs, important features, etc.
flydopnytic VeyetftfI RL-went? Yei r Na Is the Swr4Md Arwa - - -._ —__
tq*IL Sod I"Iesent? Vft ��. No_.
iAallllrl rr WMItelA7 Ye9 NO
VhOaw Hyrbuloyy Present? Ye No--_
Rriacts ,: —
HYDROLOGY
Pilntaly IrlgIL19lik Imn turf of Ono n Immyed:
check a1 thal avow
_ Surber Sea Cracks (136)
_ Suface Water (At)
_True Aquallc Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegelated CLYturva SuluLe 1881
A Hqi Wake Tablo (2l
Hydrogon 5(atde Odor (Cl l
_ Df ahLlgn Patterns, (81101
58turatkln (A3)
MOM Rhizospheres on Uw)q Roots (C31
_ Mass Trrn Unes 1816)
_Water Marli9(Bt)
_Prdsanebat Rao4tW'hon(CAI
_MV- Seasnn'Weler Table (C2)'
_ Sedrnerc DePW ;B2)
_ ReCent Iron Rc rwlion in filled SoK ir-61
_ rrayfish Brows (C8)
_ nrllt OepositS (83)
_ 11tvn Mwk SuHxo IC 1)
_ Saorrawn yrsible on Aerial otvgery ICO)
_ Algal Mat or Crud 1114)
_ O&w (F iiplau+ in WffmvM.)
_ SlurUtd or Strossod P1.Yils In 11
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ f- 0Qo n0g4w' NasNon 102)
_ I"aeaon VV-abe on Awief enogmy (H7)
_ Stmllow Aqutard (03)
_ W"- Slanea Leaves (Ir)
_ Mlr7r4opwpaphr Ratio ((?tl
_ Aqu11K Fauna (813)
_ FAC Neutral Iasi (115)
SuddCL• Water Presew Yes No,AL_ oe w Un[hes)
Water 1.� Piese tt?
yes No _ Oepdi IlnrhLZl
Satria"I Resent? Yes No_ Depth (Inchc -sl �_ Weiland Hydrolopy Present? Yes y No
t1('fSCrdte RpCowd nala ( =narn %ILW,, mOnlrving wrq. mfull phoun, finnnow" irnprlkx s), a malihle
US ArnvCahs W Enquuc+� F nSlrm lAr><Intvr iird Paiarn�nl Ylialn' D
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 January 2014
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Poinv,
IA Allay Carps 01 Engineer.
6iFytmn 1pmmG�tls rind Piaatrmnt - Vcrsan20
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5
Intl_ I��It�ol
Test wt L
Tim Sn:num Qlkn site � -1
I-
,M Cmw w
Nwr�er of Danrwnt Specirs
Number at Spec
TnetPoe OBL, rncw, or FAC (A)
Tate$ Nurtitier of Dornlrwm
Spettes Act ass lUl Sri nib, (0)
Percent of Clain naw Species
Mill Are OBL, fACW, or FAC ��� f/UUj
PrawMnco Inax worksmootl
e,
5
6
7
- Total Ctynx
Taeal % Cover al Aluttlnly nv
sr7ta rr! lot fW.1131
20% at total Corer
001. spas
52RtJ ,i` hLw (Plot mm•
t rTaJm • fEf°tL -i Ts>i>\.
X L
rncwVooioL
FAC speaas a 3 .
FACU Sperdes It 4 -
l Q law ;,-y fV6 5$ °R _ o8L
S
UPL speckib x5.
4
Cofulmt T°lafs aU (UI
Prmlattnlce Inaw _ WA =
u
Hydro;MIR!e Vegelatillin tndlestms
u
i RapW Test for Hyoropl)tre Voriutsrvcm
2 Darnrinnce rest Is -50%
r�
7 Tnrnl t
— T Prevalence Inac�x Is 13 01
m,or "!
50 1 vnnl cover ern 20% of 1m�1 co%w 1
_ 4 Malpn rnelbrl5 (rnin tJ( Seppanmg
MLL15onrum (Pitt 5a )
armor s rj
dare m Rnmtalis rA nn a sEtpantm Shah)
I i tF-2, 4 15
r
•d � ,.J
_ Pioldtnnnac Rorphytir. Ve�(lelatai`INpwod
3 in t( s
�`
rUMicmQS ri hymn sM an" weteinu hy"rigy rMisr
1 f {C CT1 • I �,
AL
Ur preLenk unless d• hirbad ai riniLfstmtir
DOfhllrl Ml Few Vegetation SUate
Tree —woody plurxs, exclwling rues, 3 lit. l7 0 r.m) Or
more In dlatneter at t least hi3gitl (081 q, teyxidUgs d
--F=
t� �!
°—�
r
._
nMglq
II
8
SaplinillSlimb -Woody plenty, exdUding,nnrs, kiss
mnn T in n8H and nroater bran or emiol to 3 20 R Ci
mF tall
10
I I
Herb -An licrrbacuars Lnorwwo plants, requidess
i rS �Q - Tram Cavm t
V 1
0 CIO rind avodir Plants less than 3 28 1`1111111.
5M al Oat rover
WanMV'rn5trnnmi (PlatsiH•_ I
20% or total cover
VPOOtly urn° - All n+oaoy trines greater Ulan 3 28 h hr
hn t
1
7_
t
Hydrophytk
u
Vegetation
- ratai (,over
Present9 Yes X No
5D% CA MS Lorist
M% of term riNM
rtmiarks (Include ptrit o rwnbeis hrxr rr i a separate SPWAL)
IA Allay Carps 01 Engineer.
6iFytmn 1pmmG�tls rind Piaatrmnt - Vcrsan20
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 January 2014
Monitonng Year 4 of 5

SOIL
Sampltnq Point ap
Profile Deswiptioni R)escnbo to the dopth needed to doctanam the indicate of coMitm the absence of fadleataiQ
Drpnt Matrix
Rvd'o!Fcufuat
Jl L Color Inxosti _
WE I !Z 7S
Calm (A nral) ]vt L� +111QL_ Reawlis
i tEYR G %^
fz:lL Piz Surd 11;
lavk ly
tT C-Cw Leillattot 0 lellm WzRetti"d
Maim MSOAakxod Saw Crams, k6cmrar PLaPae LVdn M- MERFIX
h)Vft Soft Indcatora
Indicators for Protrwmatic Hydric SolW
_ HtstaGol (At)
_ Dak Stafaw (S7)
_ 2 cm WA [A1W VVILRA 1471
_ Hlsda Fptpedan IA4
_ Pciyvdlue Balaw Surface (Sit) (MLRA 147. 148)
_ Coast Wairlo Radw IA181
_ Black Hlstr IA31l
_ ThWOwk SuNaw (59! UNLRA 147,148)
W"A 147, 148)
_ HydrW SulSde 04)
Laatrry Cl& jefd Melttt (F2)
_ Pirtdmnra Flaudplaln Salk IF191
_ Strafdcyl Lnynra jAS)
Depleted Maob (F7)
(MLRA 158, 1471
_ 7 cm Muck (A70) ILRR M
—X Redow Dark Surinat (Ffil
_ Very Shaflaw Dark Surface f1r12)
_ Depicted Below Dat4 Surface (A11I
_ Deplatod Mirk Smince, (1:71
Od1er [EV do is Rernailis)
_ Huck Onrk Surlace (Al 2)
_ Rader Depmsdmr. (FNI
_ Swidy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR W.
_ Iron lAangrgm m W r-, s (F16 (LRR N.
MLRA147 1481
MLRA 136)
_ S,vcly Gkyed MWix (54►
_ Umtxic Suriacn IF191(MLRA 130,124
Yndidalas d hydta[Yrytr +egefaclmr UnU
_ Sindy P stax ISS)
_ Ptedmnrd Fk dplam SO, IF 119) (MLRA 14M
wettatd IrJuratoay must be preserri,
_ sevped Atdtra (Se)
_ Rod Parent Matraml IF21) (MLRA 127, 147)
ur83SS dlsluawd or prummrwtk
Rnatrlctive Loyer 11 0
T)pa1
OBfghl },
HpdrfeSalPresent?
Yore Nun
t28frtiiks
US"Carps rd Enlimrw,
Lesion Nnunrais and PiOMnonl - V&SW 20
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
January 2014