Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140196 Ver 1_Application_20140226“No Historic Properties Present” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups 11-08-0084 PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: Str.700144 County: Pender WBS No: 17BP.3.R.20 Document: PCE or Min. Criteria Checklist F.A. No: N/A Funding: State Federal Federal (USACE) Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP3 or NWP14 Project Description: Bridge No. 144 on SR 1102 (Morgan Road) over Colly Creek is to be replaced in kind while making use of an off-site detour. There will be minor ditch-line impacts. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) should be 75’ either way from the centerline of the bridge and 300’ from either end of the bridge. The bridge was originally built in 1945 and is in poor condition so it has been selected to be replaced under the State Funded Bridge Replacement Program-Design-Build Year 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) reviewed the subject project and determined: Historic Architecture/Landscapes There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project’s area of potential effects. There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the project’s area of potential effects. There are no properties within the project’s area of potential effects. There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not meet the criteria for listing on the National Register. All properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered and all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed) Archaeology There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project’s area of potential effects. No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project. Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. All identified Archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed) Project Tracking No. (Internal Use) NO PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT/AFFECTED FORM “No Historic Properties Present” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Thursday, September 1, and Friday, September 2, 2011. A comprehensive archaeological survey at this particular bridge location has never been conducted; however, five (5) archaeological sites have been recorded within one (1) mile of the proposed project although four (4) of those sites are submerged resources along the banks of the Black River. The other remaining archaeological site is located directly north of the proposed project on the upland terrace above Colly Creek. Digital copies of HPO’s maps (Point Caswell Quadrangle) as well as the HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) were reviewed on Thursday, September 15, 2011. There are no known histor ic architectural resources located within the project area that may have intact archaeological deposits within the footprint of the proposed project. In addition, topographic maps, historic maps (NCMaps website), USDA soil survey maps, and aerial photographs were utilized and inspected to gauge environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric settlement within the project limits, and to assess the level of modern, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other erosive-type disturbances within and surrounding the archaeological APE. As stated in the Survey Required Form for this project, “Based on soils information, contours, and the presence of an archaeological site on the terrace overlooking Colly Creek on the North side, the southern terrace of Colly Creek may have the potential for containing intact archaeological materials. Although there currently is no design for this particular project, areas within the APE can be written off based on the presence of wetlands and inhospitable soils conditions. With these areas removed from the APE, what remains to be surveyed is the terrace along the southern edge of Colly Creek, which appears to be relatively level and wooded at this time . It should be noted that north of, and presumably outside the APE, may be structures associated with Colly Mill as depicted on the 1912 Pender County Soil Map. It should also be noted that Moores Creek National Military Park, commemorating the battle site of a 1776 American victory over Tory Highland Scots, is located approximately 3 miles Northeast of the proposed project. Therefore, an archaeological survey is recommended for this project. A visual inspection of the entire corridor should be conducted first, followed then by archaeological investigations along the southern terrace overlooking Colly Creek paralleling SR 1102. Should the description of this project or design plans change prior to construction, then additional consultation regarding archaeology may be required.” Field investigations of the APE were comprised of a pedestrian survey and subsurface testing to locate and assess potentially significant archaeological remains that could be damaged or destroyed by the proposed bridge replacement project. The pedestrian survey and subsurface testing were conducted on the terraces adjacent to Bridge No. 144. No remains of mill structures or other associated mill dep osits were observed North of the project area. Subsurface testing in these alluvial settings was accomplished through the placement of four (4) shovel tests, two (2) in the SW quadrant and two (2) in the SE quadrant, with a 30-m interval. Testing did not occur within the NW or the NE quadrants based on the presence of standing water and riverine swamp forest. The subsurface tests were placed along the outer ROW for SR 1102 (Morgan Road) on the first terrace overlooking Colly Creek. Within the ROW, there is a buried fiber optic line located about nine feet off the edge of pavement within both the NE and SE quadrants. There is a small unnamed tributary of Colly Creek running parallel to SR 1102 in the SW quadrant, the presence of which explains the soil conditions within that particular quadrant and further suggests that the SW quadrant is subjected to a great deal of flooding. There is a difference of at least 10’ in elevation between the levels of the road surface and both southern quadrants. Overall, no archaeological deposits were identified within the proposed APE. Thus, no archaeological sites were identified, and no further archaeological work is recommended prior to construction. A finding of “no historic propertie s” is considered appropriate in association with this bridge replacement project. Should the description of this project or design plans change prior to construction, then additional consultation regarding archaeology may be required. Shovel Test Pit Discussion (see map for spatial reference): STP 1: 0-27cmbs, 10YR 2/1 SA SI, loose root mat; 27-36cmbs, 2.5YR 2.5/4 SA; 36-53cmbs, 7.5YR 5/6 SA; 53-76cmbs, 10YR 6/3 Coarse SA. Edge of terrace, sparsely wooded. Moisture increased with depth. No cultural material. STP 2: 0-90cmbs, 10YR 2/1. Loose root mat at top, with the amount of sand and moisture increasing with depth. Unnamed tributary located very close, which may explain the mucky nature of the soils throughout the shovel test. No cultural material. STP 3: 0-11cmbs, 10YR 2/1 SA, loose root mat; 11-32cmbs, 2.5YR 2.5/4 SA; 32-85cmbs, 10YR 6/3 Coarse SA. Edge of terrace, sparsely wooded. Moisture increased with depth. No cultural material. “No Historic Properties Present” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups STP 4: 0-26cmbs, 10YR 2/1 SA, loose root mat; 26-40cmbs, 2.5YR 2.5/4 SA; 40-58cmbs, 10YR 6/3 SA. No cultural material. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: Figures, Photos Signed: November 17, 2011 Cultural Resources Specialist, NCDOT Date Figure 1: Point Caswell, N.C. (USGS 1983). Areas Investigated “No Historic Properties Present” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups Photo 1: Southeast Quadrant, looking North. Photo 2: Southwest Quadrant, looking North. “No Historic Properties Present” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups Photo 3: Northwest Quadrant, looking North. Photo 4:Northeast Quadrant, looking North. ! !! ! stp 2 stp 1 stp 3 stp 4 Mk AnB Lu Riverine Swamp Forest Riverine Swamp Forest Ut Colly Creek Colly Creek MORGAN Bridge No. 144 on SR 1102 Over Colly Creek Pender County !STP Streets HYARUT Soils_All con_pender_02 Wetlands_polys Named_streams Pender_2010Parcels ¯ 06012018024030 Feet Proj ect Tracking No. (Interna l Use) 1 11-08-0084 I NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM _1 PROJECT INFORMATION Proj ect No: Co unty : Brunswick WBSNo: 17BP .3.R.20 Do cum ent : PCE F.A . No : Funding: I:8'l State D Federal Federal (USACE) Permit Required? I:8'l Yes D No P ermit Typ e: NWP 3 & NWP 14 Proj ect D escription : Replace Brid ge No . 144 over Colly Creek on SR 1102 SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Briefd escription ofr eview activities , results ofreview, and conclusions: Review ofHPO quad maps , relevant background reports, historic designations ro ster, and indexes was undertaken on September 8, 2011. Ba sed on this review, there were no existing NR , SL , LD , DE, or SS properties intheArea of Potential Effects(AP E). Aerial photographs andHPOGIS indicates thereareno structures intheAPE of the bridge replacement project. Survey Site number PD126B ethlehem Baptist Church is located more than 2000 northwe st ofthe bridge on NC 210 , well outside the project APE. BriefExplanation ofwhy th e available information provides a reliable basis for r easonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: Using HPO GIS website and Google Street view provide reliable information regarding the structures in the APE . These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: Maps FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED 8-Wl Date "No S urvey Required"f orm for Minor Tran sp ortationProje cts a sQualified inthe2007Prog rammatic Ag reement . NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Group s so - <.9 o o, >­..... C :::J o o l- Q) "'0 C Q) Q.. I Lyon Swamp Canal Buckle Swamp Creek BRIDGE 144Colly C r e e k B l a c k B ig B ranch R i v e r SR 1102 (Morgan R d) S R 1 1 0 4 ( C a n e t u c k Rd) P oint Caswell R d Bridge 144Pender County North Carolina SHEET 1 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Express Design - Build Bridge ProgramDivision 3 NCDOTDivision of Highways Wilmington Boiling Spring Lakes Oak Island Northwest Surf City Bolton Belville Shallotte Leland Sandyfield Caswell Beach Bald Head Island Navassa Holden Beach Sunset Beach Southport East Arcadia Carolina Beach Wrightsville Beach Topsail Beach Holly RidgeSaint Helena Bolivia Varnumtown Kure Beach Sandy Creek North Topsail Beach BRUNSWICK VICINITY MAP Colly Creek NC 210 Pender 144 Project SR 1102 Morgan Road 1102 1 1 0 4 Morgan Rd NC-210 C a n etu c k R d NC-210 210 Pender Bridge 144 Replacement ProjectAerial Photo MapPender County ¹ 0 750 1,500 2,250 3,000375Feet Colly Creek NC 210 Pender 144 Project SR 1102 Morgan Road 1102 1 1 0 4 Morgan Rd NC-210 C a n etu c k R d NC-210 210 Pender Bridge 144 Replacement ProjectTopo MapPender County ¹ 0 750 1,500 2,250 3,000375Feet B S 4 2 5 0 7 4 7 . 0 4 4 0 2 2 5 4 9 2 9 . 7 8 8 4 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 B S 3 2 5 0 5 9 9 . 2 6 0 1 2 2 5 4 9 0 5 . 7 3 2 0 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 B S 2 2 5 0 7 5 0 . 3 1 9 8 2 2 5 4 9 0 3 . 7 9 9 5 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 B S 1 2 5 0 6 0 3 . 4 0 8 7 2 2 5 4 8 8 0 . 1 3 5 9 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 D 6 2 5 0 7 4 8 . 9 8 1 8 2 2 5 4 9 1 7 . 3 0 4 8 1 4 . 4 5 7 2 L o w B e a m D 5 2 5 0 6 0 1 . 3 7 1 9 2 2 5 4 8 9 3 . 3 1 2 7 1 4 . 6 4 2 7 D 4 2 5 0 7 4 7 . 1 6 0 1 2 2 5 4 9 2 8 . 5 2 4 6 1 4 . 3 4 6 3 D 3 2 5 0 5 9 9 . 6 0 6 9 2 2 5 4 9 0 4 . 6 8 6 9 1 4 . 3 4 4 0 D 2 2 5 0 7 5 1 . 0 4 5 5 2 2 5 4 9 0 5 . 0 4 2 6 1 4 . 4 2 9 7 D 1 2 5 0 6 0 3 . 3 6 9 7 2 2 5 4 8 8 1 . 3 1 9 9 1 4 . 5 2 1 3 P o i n t N o r t h E a s t E l e v a t i o n B S 4 2 5 0 7 4 7 . 0 4 4 0 2 2 5 4 9 2 9 . 7 8 8 4 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 B S 3 2 5 0 5 9 9 . 2 6 0 1 2 2 5 4 9 0 5 . 7 3 2 0 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 B S 2 2 5 0 7 5 0 . 3 1 9 8 2 2 5 4 9 0 3 . 7 9 9 5 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 B S 1 2 5 0 6 0 3 . 4 0 8 7 2 2 5 4 8 8 0 . 1 3 5 9 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 D 6 2 5 0 7 4 8 . 9 8 1 8 2 2 5 4 9 1 7 . 3 0 4 8 1 4 . 4 5 7 2 L o w B e a m D 5 2 5 0 6 0 1 . 3 7 1 9 2 2 5 4 8 9 3 . 3 1 2 7 1 4 . 6 4 2 7 D 4 2 5 0 7 4 7 . 1 6 0 1 2 2 5 4 9 2 8 . 5 2 4 6 1 4 . 3 4 6 3 D 3 2 5 0 5 9 9 . 6 0 6 9 2 2 5 4 9 0 4 . 6 8 6 9 1 4 . 3 4 4 0 D 2 2 5 0 7 5 1 . 0 4 5 5 2 2 5 4 9 0 5 . 0 4 2 6 1 4 . 4 2 9 7 D 1 2 5 0 6 0 3 . 3 6 9 7 2 2 5 4 8 8 1 . 3 1 9 9 1 4 . 5 2 1 3 P o i n t N o r t h E a s t E l e v a t i o n DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS -L- STA. 12+23.75 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA. 13+76.25 END BRIDGE SHEET 1 OF 8 PERMIT DRAWING WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS NSRS 2007NAD 83/ NSRS 2007NAD 83/ DHV D T V = = = = = % % MPH ADT % * STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 1/ 2 / 2 0 14 R : \ H y d r a u li c s \ P E R M IT S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l\ D r a w i n g s \ 7 0 0 14 4 _ h y d _ P E R _ T S H . d g n F k e y s C O N T R A C T : A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA SPORT T IO N T A TEOFN RT CAR O LI N A RESURFACING GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES AND VICINITY MAP PROJECT LENGTH LETTING DATE: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FOR CONTRACTOR : SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. HYDRAULICS ENGINEER RIGHT OF WAY DATE: DESIGN - BUILD TEAM 1-888-521-4455 OR 919-878-9560 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 350 RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN55 * TTST =3%DUAL 3% 17BP.3.R.26 C 2 0 2 9 4 2 6 SUBREGIONAL TIER MARCH 29, 2012 Corporation S. T. Wooten WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894 3801 BLACK CREEK ROAD P.O. BOX 2408 S. T. WOOTEN CORPORATION GRAPHIC SCALES SR 1102 (MORGAN RD) 210 C O LLY C RE EK SR 1102 (MORGAN RD) 50 50 50 50 PROFILE (VERTICAL) 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 0010 2010 0 PLANS 0 0 PENDER COUNTY 190 TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 700144............... LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 700144....... LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 700144........100 100 -L- STA. 15+26.25 END PROJECT TO NC 210 TO NC 11 STILL BLUFF Bla ck Rive r B R I D G E 7 0 0 14 4 -L- STA. 10+50.00 BEGIN PROJECT 4BRIDGE NO. 700144 SR 1102 (MORGAN RD) BRIDGE 700144 OVER COLLY CREEK ON Bridge No. 700144 N/A N/A PROJECT ENGINEER Michael T. Merritt, P.E. PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER Virginia Mabry, P.E. NCDOT CONTACT: B. Keith Skinner, P.E. 0.090 mi 0.029 mi 0.061 mi 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 17BP.3.R.26 PE, ROW, UTIL. & CONST. -L- MARCH 29, 2012 PRIORITY PROJECTS ENGINEER LOCAL * FUNC CLASS = 11 P E N D E R C O U N T Y B L A D E N C O U N T Y SR 1102 Morgan Rd. SR 1547 Longview Rd. LONGVIEW S R 1 1 0 1 P oi nt Cas well Rd. SR 113 0 Be the l C h u rch Rd . 53 11 53 Colly C re e k SR 1104 C anetuck Rd. OFFSITE DETOUR 2. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. 1. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE NOTES: DATE: 11-15-2013 SUBMITTAL NO. S-118R1 RIGHT OF WAY PLANS WOODS WOODS C O L L Y C R E E K BS4 250747.0440 2 2 5 4 9 2 9 . 7 8 8 4 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 BS3 250599.2601 2 2 5 4 9 0 5 . 7 3 2 0 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 BS2 250750.3198 22 5 4 9 0 3 . 7 9 9 5 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 BS1 250603.4087 22 5 4 8 8 0 . 1 3 5 9 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 D6 250748.9818 225 4 9 1 7 . 3 0 4 8 1 4 . 4 5 7 2 L o w B e a m D5 250601.3719 225 4 8 9 3 . 3 1 2 7 1 4 . 6 4 2 7 D4 250747.1601 2254 9 2 8 . 5 2 4 6 1 4 . 3 4 6 3 D3 250599.6069 2254 9 0 4 . 6 8 6 9 1 4 . 3 4 4 0 D2 250751.0455 22549 0 5 . 0 4 2 6 1 4 . 4 2 9 7 D1 250603.3697 22548 8 1 . 3 1 9 9 1 4 . 5 2 1 3 Point North Ea s t E l e v a t i o n BS3 D3 D5 BS1 D1 D4 BS4 D6 BS2 D2 EO I WILLIE EVANNA HEIRS ET AL T C BROWN JR MTL MTL 18’ BST TO NC 11EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0. 0 0 ’ 6 0 . 0 0 ’ WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS NC 11 TO T C BROWN JR ET AL SR 1102 MORGAN RD R/W EXISTING HEIRS ET AL WILLIE EVANNA . 0 2 5 2 0 ’ 8:1 2 0 ’ 8:18 :1 8:1 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 5 .0 4 .0 1 .0 0 .0 3 . 0 2 .0 1 E XI S T . . 0 1. 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 5 E XIS T. TO EXIST. 50’ TAPER TO EXIST. 50’ TAPER . 0 2 5 . 0 2 + 6 1.6 0 TYP 29’+ 9 5 TYP 29’ + 8 2 .7 5 SHEET 2 OF 8 PERMIT DRAWING WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF CLEARING DENOTES MECHANIZED* * * * *** ** * * WETLANDS FILL IN E E IN WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN 15’ EXIST. U/G FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE CABLE PROPOSED BRIDGE OPENING = 1,571.4 sf. PROPOSED LOW CHORD = 12.5 ft. EXISTING BRIDGE OPENING = 1,545.0 sf. EXISTING LOW CHORD = 12.4 ft. CABLE BORED 1’ INSIDE R/W NEW U/G FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE CLEARING MECHANIZED IN WETLANDS EXCAVATION IMPACTS SURFACE WATER 1"=40’ SCALE 1"=40’ SCALE CLEARING MECHANIZED FILL IN WETLANDS CABLE BORED 1’ INSIDE R/W NEW U/G FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE V = 37mph EL = 12.55’ -L- STA 10+50.00 BEGIN GRADE EL = 12.26’ -L- STA 15+26.25 END GRADE -L- STA 12+23.75 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA 13+76.25 END BRIDGE V = 35mph V = 41mph PI = 10+90.00 EL = 13.08’ (+)1.3300% VC = 80’ K = 54 PI = 11+75.31 EL = 15.47’ (+)2.8000%(-)0.3000% VC = 90’ K = 29 PI = 14+12.00 EL = 14.76’ (-)2.1900% VC = 90’ K = 48 BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN FREQUENCY DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN HW ELEVATION 100 YEAR DISCHARGE 100 YEAR FREQUENCY 100 YEAR HW ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,500 = 25 = 100 = 7.3 = 10.2 YRS CFS FT CFS FT YRS CFS FT YRS STR #700144 Sta. 13+00.00 -L- NWS ELEV SURVEYED = 09/24/2012 NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 1.7 FT = 100+ = 9.02 = 2,855 = 2,000 NWS 1.7’ 100 YR 9.02’ CONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTINGCONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTING EL. 2.90’ -L- STA. 12+00 LT END NATURAL CHANNEL -L- STA. 11+00 LT PI @ EL. = 2.50’ -L- STA. 11+50 LT PI @ EL. = 2.30’ (-)0.04% (-)2.00% (+)1.20% EL. 3.00’ -L- STA. 10+65 LT BEG. NATURAL CHANNEL -L- STA. 10+80 LT PI @ EL. = 2.90’ (-)0.67% GRAU 350 TL-3 F F F F F GRAU 350 TL-3 1 5 "2GI F PLANS PREPARED BY : 900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 (919) 878-9560 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 1/ 2 / 2 0 14 R : \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ 7 0 0 1 4 4 _ h y d _ W E T _ p s h 0 4 . d g n F k e y s 4 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 ROADWAY DESIGN R/W SHEET NO. HYDRAULICS SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 15+00 0 10 20 NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) -10 10 0 16+00 SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE 20 -10 700144 -L- STA. 15+00.00 TO 15+26.25 STA. 10+50.00 TO 11+00.00 MILLING LIMITS: RR SPIKE SET IN 14" OAK -L- STA. 12+20.51 75.40’ RT. BM#1 EL = 3.38’ R e v i s i o n s : R i g h t o f Wa y R e v i s i o n o n P a r c e l 14 4 - 1 d u e t o u p d a t e d d i t c h p e r S t o n e y M a t h i s . RE VIS IO N S WATER LEVEL - SOUNDINGS EXIST. GROUND - SOUNDINGS EXIST. GROUND - 12.42’ RT EXIST. GROUND - 12.42’ LT V = 37mph EL = 12.55’ -L- STA 10+50.00 BEGIN GRADE EL = 12.26’ -L- STA 15+26.25 END GRADE -L- STA 12+23.75 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA 13+76.25 END BRIDGE V = 35mph V = 41mph PI = 10+90.00 EL = 13.08’ (+)1.3300% VC = 80’ K = 54 PI = 11+75.31 EL = 15.47’ (+)2.8000%(-)0.3000% VC = 90’ K = 29 PI = 14+12.00 EL = 14.76’ (-)2.1900% VC = 90’ K = 48 BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN FREQUENCY DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN HW ELEVATION 100 YEAR DISCHARGE 100 YEAR FREQUENCY 100 YEAR HW ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,500 = 25 = 100 = 7.3 = 10.2 YRS CFS FT CFS FT YRS CFS FT YRS STR #700144 Sta. 13+00.00 -L- NWS ELEV SURVEYED = 09/24/2012 NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 1.7 FT = 100+ = 9.02 = 2,855 = 2,000 NWS 1.7’ 100 YR 9.02’ CONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTINGCONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTING GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 15 144-1 144-3 144-2 144-3 15" RCP-III 15 "2GI 2GI W/5 SY FIL FAB 1 TON CL B RIPRAP RO D & LU G 2 ELB O W S SEE DETAIL A TYP. BOTH SIDES DISSIPATOR PAD DECK DRAIN ELB ELB 3’ ON CENTER 8"x4" DECK DRAINS FROM STA. 13+52 TO STA. 13+70 LT & RT FROM STA. 12+27 TO STA. 12+60 LT & RT DETAIL A GEOTEXTILE GROUND PLAN VIEW PROFILE VIEW DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD *NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS PAD DISSIPATOR ( Not to Scale) SEE DETAIL B DESIGN NATURAL CHANNEL -L- STA. 11+50 NATURAL CHANNEL LOW POINT OF 3: 1 B ( Not to Scale) FLATTER3:1 OR NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN DETAIL B Ground Natural Slope Fill 3: 1 Bench Floodplain W 1’ 10+80 5.00 2.00 2.90 11+00 5.00 4.00 2.50 11+25 4.00 5.00 2.40 11+50 4.00 4.00 2.30 11+75 4.00 2.00 2.60 12+00 4.00 0.00 2.90 STATION B (ft.)W (ft.) 10+65 5.00 3.00 3.00 L 4 . 0 ’ 1. 0 ’ BOT. of CHANNEL ELEV. (ft.) FLOODPLAIN BENCH ONLY LINER TYPE: COIR FIBER MATTING ON BANKS AND SEE DETAIL C DITCH PLUG EMBANKMENT ONLY 30LF CLASS I RIP RAP 3:1 EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED FILL SLOPE CLAY PLUG 1.0’ BELOW EXIST. STREAMBED 4’ TYP. EA. SIDE GEOTEXTILE MATTING MATERIAL DETAIL C ( Not to Scale) DITCH PLUG Geotextile= 10 sy Type of Liner= 5 tons CL B Rip-Rap L= See Stationing Below F F F F F F F F F F F 0 5 10 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 1010 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1010 10 WOODS D4 BS4 WOODS C O L L Y C R E E K BS4 250747.0440 2 2 5 4 9 2 9 . 7 8 8 4 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 1 2 . 9 1 4 5 BS3 250599.2601 2 2 5 4 9 0 5 . 7 3 2 0 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 1 2 . 7 9 8 2 BS2 250750.3198 22 5 4 9 0 3 . 7 9 9 5 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 1 2 . 9 0 6 6 BS1 250603.4087 22 5 4 8 8 0 . 1 3 5 9 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 1 2 . 8 8 6 1 D6 250748.9818 225 4 9 1 7 . 3 0 4 8 1 4 . 4 5 7 2 L o w B e a m D5 250601.3719 225 4 8 9 3 . 3 1 2 7 1 4 . 6 4 2 7 D4 250747.1601 2254 9 2 8 . 5 2 4 6 1 4 . 3 4 6 3 D3 250599.6069 2254 9 0 4 . 6 8 6 9 1 4 . 3 4 4 0 D2 250751.0455 22549 0 5 . 0 4 2 6 1 4 . 4 2 9 7 D1 250603.3697 22548 8 1 . 3 1 9 9 1 4 . 5 2 1 3 Point North Ea s t E l e v a t i o n BS3 D3 D5 BS1 D1 D4 BS4 D6 BS2 D2 EO I WILLIE EVANNA HEIRS ET AL T C BROWN JR MTL MTL 18’ BST TO NC 11EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0. 0 0 ’ 6 0 . 0 0 ’ WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS WOODS NC 11 TO T C BROWN JR ET AL SR 1102 MORGAN RD R/W EXISTING HEIRS ET AL WILLIE EVANNA . 0 2 5 2 0 ’ 8:1 2 0 ’ 8:18 :1 8:1 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 5 .0 4 .0 1 .0 0 .0 3 . 0 2 .0 1 E XI S T . . 0 1. 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 5 E XIS T. TO EXIST. 50’ TAPER TO EXIST. 50’ TAPER . 0 2 5 . 0 2 + 6 1.6 0 TYP 29’+ 9 5 TYP 29’ + 8 2 .7 5 SHEET 3 OF 8 PERMIT DRAWING WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF CLEARING DENOTES MECHANIZED* * * * *** ** * * WETLANDS FILL IN E E IN WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN 15’ EXIST. U/G FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE CABLE PROPOSED BRIDGE OPENING = 1,571.4 sf. PROPOSED LOW CHORD = 12.5 ft. EXISTING BRIDGE OPENING = 1,545.0 sf. EXISTING LOW CHORD = 12.4 ft. CABLE BORED 1’ INSIDE R/W NEW U/G FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE CLEARING MECHANIZED IN WETLANDS EXCAVATION IMPACTS SURFACE WATER 1"=40’ SCALE 1"=40’ SCALE CLEARING MECHANIZED FILL IN WETLANDS CABLE BORED 1’ INSIDE R/W NEW U/G FIBER OPTIC TELEPHONE V = 37mph EL = 12.55’ -L- STA 10+50.00 BEGIN GRADE EL = 12.26’ -L- STA 15+26.25 END GRADE -L- STA 12+23.75 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA 13+76.25 END BRIDGE V = 35mph V = 41mph PI = 10+90.00 EL = 13.08’ (+)1.3300% VC = 80’ K = 54 PI = 11+75.31 EL = 15.47’ (+)2.8000%(-)0.3000% VC = 90’ K = 29 PI = 14+12.00 EL = 14.76’ (-)2.1900% VC = 90’ K = 48 BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN FREQUENCY DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN HW ELEVATION 100 YEAR DISCHARGE 100 YEAR FREQUENCY 100 YEAR HW ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,500 = 25 = 100 = 7.3 = 10.2 YRS CFS FT CFS FT YRS CFS FT YRS STR #700144 Sta. 13+00.00 -L- NWS ELEV SURVEYED = 09/24/2012 NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 1.7 FT = 100+ = 9.02 = 2,855 = 2,000 NWS 1.7’ 100 YR 9.02’ CONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTINGCONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTING EL. 2.90’ -L- STA. 12+00 LT END NATURAL CHANNEL -L- STA. 11+00 LT PI @ EL. = 2.50’ -L- STA. 11+50 LT PI @ EL. = 2.30’ (-)0.04% (-)2.00% (+)1.20% EL. 3.00’ -L- STA. 10+65 LT BEG. NATURAL CHANNEL -L- STA. 10+80 LT PI @ EL. = 2.90’ (-)0.67% GRAU 350 TL-3 F F F F F GRAU 350 TL-3 1 5 "2GI F PLANS PREPARED BY : 900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 (919) 878-9560 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 1/ 2 / 2 0 14 R : \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ 7 0 0 1 4 4 _ h y d _ C O N _ p s h 0 4 . d g n F k e y s 4 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 ROADWAY DESIGN R/W SHEET NO. HYDRAULICS SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 15+00 0 10 20 NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) -10 10 0 16+00 SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE 20 -10 700144 -L- STA. 15+00.00 TO 15+26.25 STA. 10+50.00 TO 11+00.00 MILLING LIMITS: RR SPIKE SET IN 14" OAK -L- STA. 12+20.51 75.40’ RT. BM#1 EL = 3.38’ R e v i s i o n s : R i g h t o f Wa y R e v i s i o n o n P a r c e l 14 4 - 1 d u e t o u p d a t e d d i t c h p e r S t o n e y M a t h i s . RE VIS IO N S WATER LEVEL - SOUNDINGS EXIST. GROUND - SOUNDINGS EXIST. GROUND - 12.42’ RT EXIST. GROUND - 12.42’ LT V = 37mph EL = 12.55’ -L- STA 10+50.00 BEGIN GRADE EL = 12.26’ -L- STA 15+26.25 END GRADE -L- STA 12+23.75 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA 13+76.25 END BRIDGE V = 35mph V = 41mph PI = 10+90.00 EL = 13.08’ (+)1.3300% VC = 80’ K = 54 PI = 11+75.31 EL = 15.47’ (+)2.8000%(-)0.3000% VC = 90’ K = 29 PI = 14+12.00 EL = 14.76’ (-)2.1900% VC = 90’ K = 48 BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN FREQUENCY DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN HW ELEVATION 100 YEAR DISCHARGE 100 YEAR FREQUENCY 100 YEAR HW ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,500 = 25 = 100 = 7.3 = 10.2 YRS CFS FT CFS FT YRS CFS FT YRS STR #700144 Sta. 13+00.00 -L- NWS ELEV SURVEYED = 09/24/2012 NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 1.7 FT = 100+ = 9.02 = 2,855 = 2,000 NWS 1.7’ 100 YR 9.02’ CONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTINGCONCRETE SLOPES MAINTAIN EXISTING GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 15 144-1 144-3 144-2 144-3 15" RCP-III 15 "2GI 2GI W/5 SY FIL FAB 1 TON CL B RIPRAP RO D & LU G 2 ELB O W S SEE DETAIL A TYP. BOTH SIDES DISSIPATOR PAD DECK DRAIN ELB ELB 3’ ON CENTER 8"x4" DECK DRAINS FROM STA. 13+52 TO STA. 13+70 LT & RT FROM STA. 12+27 TO STA. 12+60 LT & RT DETAIL A GEOTEXTILE GROUND PLAN VIEW PROFILE VIEW DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD *NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK DRAINS PAD DISSIPATOR ( Not to Scale) SEE DETAIL B DESIGN NATURAL CHANNEL -L- STA. 11+50 NATURAL CHANNEL LOW POINT OF 3: 1 B ( Not to Scale) FLATTER3:1 OR NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN DETAIL B Ground Natural Slope Fill 3: 1 Bench Floodplain W 1’ 10+80 5.00 2.00 2.90 11+00 5.00 4.00 2.50 11+25 4.00 5.00 2.40 11+50 4.00 4.00 2.30 11+75 4.00 2.00 2.60 12+00 4.00 0.00 2.90 STATION B (ft.)W (ft.) 10+65 5.00 3.00 3.00 L 4 . 0 ’ 1. 0 ’ BOT. of CHANNEL ELEV. (ft.) FLOODPLAIN BENCH ONLY LINER TYPE: COIR FIBER MATTING ON BANKS AND SEE DETAIL C DITCH PLUG EMBANKMENT ONLY 30LF CLASS I RIP RAP 3:1 EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED FILL SLOPE CLAY PLUG 1.0’ BELOW EXIST. STREAMBED 4’ TYP. EA. SIDE GEOTEXTILE MATTING MATERIAL DETAIL C ( Not to Scale) DITCH PLUG Geotextile= 10 sy Type of Liner= 5 tons CL B Rip-Rap L= See Stationing Below F F F F F F F F F F F SHEET 4 OF 8 PERMIT DRAWING STA 10+50.00 BEGIN PROJECT 00 00 1010 1010 2020 2020 3030 3030 4040 4040 5050 5050 6060 6060 7070 7070 8080 8080 9090 9090 100100 100100 110110 110110 120120 120120 130130 130130 140140 140140 150150 150150 1/ 2 / 2 0 14 R : \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ 7 0 0 1 4 4 _ h y d _ P E R _ x p l _ L . d g n F k e y s 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 10 10 20 20 0 0 10+00.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 10+50.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 10+80.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 11+00.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 11+25.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 11+50.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 X-1700144 -L- 5 10 10+65.00 12.14 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS 12.55 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS 0.027 0.006 WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS PROP. ROW 12.89 0.020 0.016 3:1 S.S. 6.04 6: 1 3: 1 3: 1 2.90 3:1 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW PROP. ROW 13.14 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW S.S. 13.11 0.020 0.020 3:1 S.S. 4.52 3:13: 1 2.50 3: 1 3: 1 PROP. ROW PROP. ROW 13.51 4 :1 0.020 0.020 3:1 S.S. 4.18 3:13: 1 2.40 3: 1 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW PROP. ROW PROP. ROW 13.80 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW 3: 1 S.S. 7.68 0.020 0.020 3:1 S.S. 4.50 3: 1 3: 1 2.30 3:1 PROP. ROWPROP. ROW 12.71 3: 1 S.S. 11.18 0.020 0.0113:1 S.S. 11.66 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW 3.00 3: 1 3: 1 5.7:1 PROP. ROW SHEET 5 OF 8 PERMIT DRAWING STA 12+23.75 BEGIN BRIDGE 11+75.00 00 00 1010 1010 2020 2020 3030 3030 4040 4040 5050 5050 6060 6060 7070 7070 8080 8080 9090 9090 100100 100100 110110 110110 120120 120120 130130 130130 140140 140140 150150 150150 1/ 2 / 2 0 14 R : \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ 7 0 0 1 4 4 _ h y d _ P E R _ x p l _ L . d g n F k e y s 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 10 10 20 20 0 0 12+00.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 12+25.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 12+50.00 0 0 10 10 20 20 -10 -10 13+00.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 X-2700144 -L- 5 10 3: 1 S.S. 5.26 0.020 0.020 3:1 S.S. 4.40 3: 1 3: 1 2.60 3:1 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS 14.01 PROP. ROW PROP. ROW 14.26 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS3: 1 S.S. 3.57 0.022 0.022 3:1 S.S. 4.06 3:1 2.90 3: 1 PROP. ROWPROP. ROW 0.025 0.025 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS14.63 PROP. ROW PROP. ROW 3:1 3: 1 4.66 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS 0.025 0.025 PROP. ROWPROP. ROW -7.50 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW 0.025 0.025 PROP. ROW PROP. ROW SHEET 6 OF 8 PERMIT DRAWING STA 13+76.25 END BRIDGE STA 15+26.25 END PROJECT 13+50.00 00 00 1010 1010 2020 2020 3030 3030 4040 4040 5050 5050 6060 6060 7070 7070 8080 8080 9090 9090 100100 100100 110110 110110 120120 120120 130130 130130 140140 140140 150150 150150 1/ 2 / 2 0 14 R : \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ 7 0 0 1 4 4 _ h y d _ P E R _ x p l _ L . d g n F k e y s 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 10 10 20 20 0 0 14+00.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 14+50.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 15+00.00 10 10 20 20 0 0 15+50.0010 10 20 20 0 0 10 10 20 20 0 0 10 10 20 20 0 0 X-3700144 -L- 5 10 2.31 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS 0.025 0.025 WETLANDS PROP. ROWPROP. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS 13.84 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS S.S. 2.40 0.025 0.025 3:1 S.S. 2.31 3: 1 PROP. ROWPROP. ROW 13.03 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS 3: 1 S.S. 2.75 0.026 0.011 3:1 S.S. 2.53 PROP. ROW PROP. ROW 12.57 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS 0.037 0.0064:1 S.S. 11.95 3: 1 S.S. 12.49 PROP. ROWPROP. ROW 11.85 EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW WETLANDS WETLANDS