NC0088528_Permit (Issuance)_20070925

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING: COVER :SHEET
NC0088528
Hillcrest Subdivision, Well #3
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
September 25, 2007
This documLerit is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content an the reYerse side

of WATER
■ J r NCDENR
=1
Gary Moseley, Manager
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, North Carolina 28037
Dear Mr. Moseley:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
September 25, 2007
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0088528
Merest Subdivision — Well #3
Surry County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
This final permit includes no major changes from the draft permit sent to you on June 20, 2007.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this
letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land.
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at telephone number
[phone], extension 594.
cc: NPDES Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office / Surface Water Protection
J. Thurman. Horne P.E.
Horizon Engineering and Consutling, Inc.
2510 Walker Rd., Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Coleen H. Sullins
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748

Permit NC0088528
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Hillcrest Subdivision — Well #2
Lynnewood Drive
Mt. Airy
Surry County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Champ Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II,
III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective November 1, 2007.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 28, 2009.
Signed this day September 25, 2007.
J
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0088528
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this
permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive
authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and
provisions included herein.
Aqua North Carolina, Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a water treatment plant with discharge of filter backwash located at the Hillcrest
Subdivision — Well #3, Lynnwood Drive, Mt. Airy, Surry County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into
unnamed tributary to Champ Creek, a class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

Latitude: 36° 31' 49"
Longitude: 80° 34' 16"
USGS Quad #:_ BI6NE
River Basin #: 03-07-03
Receiving Stream: UT to Champ Creek
Stream Class: C
Nt
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Hillcrest Subdivision — Well #3
Water Treatment Plant
Surry County
NC0088528

Permit NC0088528
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning upon the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Parameter
Limits
Monitoring Requirements
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location
Flows
Monthly
Instantaneous
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine2
17 µg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Fluoride
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Iron
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
_Total
Zinc
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Manganese
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
pH
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard
units
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. For instantaneous flow monitoring, the duration of the discharge must be reported in
addition to the total flow.
2. Limit takes effect May 1, 2009. Until then, the permittee shall monitor TRC [with no
effluent limit]. This time period is allowed in order for the facility to budget and
design/construct dechlorination and /or an alternative disinfection system.
The Permittee shall collect all samples from a representative discharge event.
The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.

DENRJDWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0088528
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Aqua North Carolina, Inc/ Hillcrest Subdivision — Well #3
Applicant Address:
4163 Sinclair Street, Denver NC, 28037
Facility Address:
Lynnewood Drive, Mt. Airy, North Carolina
Permitted Flow:
N/A
Type of Waste:
Water TreatmentlGreensand filters
Other Permit(s):
N/A
Facility / Permit Status:
Class II/ New
County:
Surry County
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
UT to Champ
Creek
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Stream Classification:
USGS Topo Quad:
B 16NE
303(d) Listed?
Subbasin:
No
03-07-03
Permit Writer:
Date:
Sergei Chernikov
May 15, 2007
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs) :
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
N/A
0
N/A
30Q2 (cfs) :
Average Flow (cfs):
IWC (%):
0
N/A
N/A
Lat. 36° 31' 49" N Long. 80° 34' 16" W
BACKGROUND:
Hillcrest Subdivision — Well #3 is a Class II, greensand water treatment plant that provides potable water
for 192 customers in the residential subdivision. There are currently 3 greensand filters, and a fourth will
be added soon. The filters are backwashed approximately once every 3 days. The backwash rate for 4
filters will be 1,680 gallons. Well #3 is approved for 32 gpm, which is sufficient to serve the
subdivision. The subdivision is fully developed and there is no potential for increased flow.
Effluent limitations are implemented based on the new Guidance for Greensand Water Treatment Plants.
The Division has determined that the existing Water Treatment Plant is necessary to accommodate social
and economic growth in the area and that it will not result in contravention of surface water quality
standards or loss of designated uses in the receiving stream.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: June 20, 2007 (est.)
Permit Scheduled to Issue: August 30, 2007 (est.)
NPDES CONTACT:
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
Sergei Chernikov at [phone] ext. 594.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0088285 Page 1

cc: Central Files
WSRO
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Application # NC0088528
To: Point Source Branch - SWP
Attention: Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Date: June 29, 2007
County: Surry
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Permittee Address: Aqua NC, Inc.
Hillcrest Subdivision — Well #3
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, NC 28037
2. Date of Investigation: June 26, 2007
3. Report Prepared by: Mike Mickey, Environmental Specialist
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: No one present.
3UL 3 2007
5. Directions to Site: Hillcrest Subdivision is located north of the Flat Rock area off McBride
Road. After turning onto Lynnewood Drive the well site is located on the left adjacent to the
road and just past the first street to the right.
6. Discharge Points(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 36° 31' 49" Longitude: 80° 34' 16"
U.S.G.S. Quad No. A-16-SE U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Mt. Airy North
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Well # 3 is located on Parcel No.
5031-12-85-5691 and consists of 1.0 acre.
8. Topography: The well house sits right beside the road.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Numerous houses are located within 100 yards of Well # 3.

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T. to Champ Creek.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-07-03
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The exact
location of the outfall pipe could not be located in the woods below the well house.
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: The system is backwashed approximately
once every three days with an estimated flow of 1,260 GPD (to increase to 1,680
upon addition of the fourth filter).
b. What is the permitted capacity of the well system? The Colonial Woods water
system serves 192 customers and is approved for 32 gpm (maximum yield) by the
Public Water Supply Section.
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility? See above.
d. Date(s) of AtC's issued in the previous two years. NA.
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: There is no treatment. The discharge is generated when the
green sand filters (3) are backwashed with potable water (plans are in the works to
add a fourth filter).
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities. N/A
g.
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: The following chemicals are used:
Potassium Permanganate (for iron and manganese removal), chlorine (for
disinfection) and caustic soda (for pH adjustment).
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): NA
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: None generated.
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds (municipals only)? NA.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: NA.
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: NA.
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: No other disposal options available for this type of
operation.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
WSRO recommends issuance of the permit for the de minimis discharge created from
backwashing of the green sand filters at Well # 3 serving the Hillcrest Subdivision.
Report Preparer & Dat
SWP Regional Supervisor & Date
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
-7
Page 3

•
•
•r• •• •
0
••\ q� •
••
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.
•
i/., Ftippil
Hillcrest Subdivision
Well #3
•
/•
1
?265-1'
•
• /(;;
f(,/�

Four (Three existing
and one proposed)
Potassium
Permanganate
Feed Tanks
(One each to each
green sand filter)
To Hillcrest Subdivision Water System
==>
Four Green Sand Filters
(Three existing and
one proposed)
(In parallel)
Chlorine & Caustic
Addition
Well Water
=>
Backwash
Discharge to
unnamed tributary
to UT to Champ
Creek
Hillcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
Existing Well System - Process Flow Diagram
Mt. Airy, NC Scale: NTS
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007
1

Surry Co., NC -- Printable Map
http://arcims.webgis.net/nc/surry/printable.asp?process=id&x2=1538618.91693251 &v2=1...
Parcel ID: 5031-12-85-5691
Owner:
HEATER UTILTIES INC
4168 SINCLAIR ST
PO BOX 859
DENVER,NC 280370859
Deed Book: 0736 Pg: 0684
Plat Book: 009 Pg: 0173
Surry Co., NC
Parcels
Subdivision: LYNNEWOOD-S1
Township: MOUNT AIRY
Calculated Acreage: 1.00LT
Building Value: $0
Outbuildings Value: $0
Land Value: $10,000
Deferred Value: $0
Assessed value: $10,000
Other Attributes
at point 1538619, 1015656
1 of2
6/28/2007 5:33 PM

NORTH CAROLINA
FORSYTH COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly
commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally
appeared D.H. Stanfield, who being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is
Controller of the Winston-Salem Journal, engaged in the publishing of a newspaper
known as Winston-Salem Journal, published, issued and entered as second class mail
in the City of Winston-Salem, in said County and State: that he is authorized to
make this affidavit and sworn statement: that the notice or other legal advertisement,
a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Winston-Salem Journal on
the following dates:
June 23, 2007
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal
advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a
newspaper meeting all the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the
meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 25th day of June, 2007
(signature of person ,making affidavit)
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 25th day of June, 2007
My Commission expires: September 28, 2010
KIMALEY JOHNSON
NOTARY PUBLIC
FORSYTH COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAR
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
PUBUC NOTICE ;, •
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION/NPDES UNR , •
1617 MAIL SERVICE. CENTER.: r
RAUDGH. NC 27699.1617 •
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE!
A NPDES-WASTEWATERPERMIT
On the basis ot.'thorough `staff review and
•
application of NC General Statute 143.21. Public law
92-500 and other lawful standards and regulations,
the North Carolina- Environmental Management
Commission proposes, to issue a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) wastewater
discharge permit to the •person(s) fisted below
effective _ 45 days from the publish . date of this.
Written: corimients" regarding the proposed permit
will be accepted until days after the publish date
bf this notice. All comments received prior to that
date are considered in the final determinations
regarding the proposed permit The Director of the
NC Division of Water Quality may decide to hold a
public meeting for the proposed permit should the
Division receive. a significant degree of. public
interest
•
•
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting .
information on file used to determine conditions
present in the draft permit are available upon
request and payment of the costs of reproduction.
Mall comments and/or requests for Information
to the. NC Division of Water Quality at the'
above address or call Ms. Frances Candelaria
[phone]. extension 520 at the Point Source
Branch. Please Include the NPDES permit number
(attached) . In any • communication. Interested
persons may also visit the Division of Water Quality
at 512 N. Salisbury' Street. Raleigh. • NC 27604-1148
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to
review information on file.
Aqua North Car+oBna,' Inc. (4163 Sinclair Street,
Denver, NC 28037) has applied for a new NPDES
permit NC0088528 for the Hilicrest Subdivision Well
#3 in Surry County. This permitted facility will
discharge treated filter backwash to UT to Champ
Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently
l suspended solids and total residual chlorine'
tota
are water quality limited. This discharge mayaffect
future allocations in this portion of the Yadkin -Pee
Dee River Basin.
Aqua North Carolina, Inc. (4163 Sladalr Street.;
Denver. NC 28037) has applied for a new NPDES'
permit NC0088552 for the Coionlal Woods Subdivi-
sion Well #2 in Surry County. This permitted facility
will discharge treated filter backwash to UT to Bail
Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently
total suspended solids and total residual chlorine
are water quality limited. This discharge may
future allocations in this portion of the Yadkin -Pee •
Dee River Basin.
Aqua
n North Carolina. Inc. (4163 NC 28037) has applied for S� NPDES

Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
Mr. Macon C. Sammons, Jr.
County Manager
Surry County
118 Hamby Road
Dobson, NC 27017
Subject: Request for Local Government Review
NPDES Permit Application
Existing Well Backwash Discharge
Hillcrest Subdivision
Surry County
Dear Mr. Sammons:
2510 Walker Road
Mt, Pleasant, N.C. 28124-8567
704-788-4455
Fax: [phone]
March 27, 2007
Attached is a copy of an application for permit signed by Aqua North Carolina, Inc. This
application is for a permit for the continued discharge of backwash from filters installed on an
existing potable well which serves the Hillcrest Subdivision, located outside Mt. Airy off
McBride Road. I have also attached a map to indicate the existing location.
As part of the application process, the state requires that we notify the local government and ask
that they complete the attached form which indicates whether the local government has a zoning
or subdivision ordinance and whether the continued discharge is consistent with that ordinance.
This is an existing groundwater well that filters water through a series of filters before the water
is distributed to the Hillcrest community. The filters are "backwashed" with water approximately
once every three days and approximately 1,680 gallons of water is then discharged into the
nearby stream.
This has been in service for a number of years and we are not aware of any environmental
concerns over this discharge, other than that the state has advised that we must apply for a
permit.
As the state has instructed, we are trying to file this application as soon as possible. If you could
complete, sign and return this form, it will be very helpful.
We apologize for the necessity to ask for this assistance but I hope that you can appreciate our
dilemma. If you have any questions or if there is anything we need to discuss, please call me
(704-788-4455.)
Since
se
`�--.,
urnitHome, P. E.
C:
Gary Moseley
NC DENR

Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the issuance
of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
ement
Commission (LMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge fiicilitManayuntil it has
received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the
proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or county has a
zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is consistent with the
ordinance. The EN-.IIC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has determined to be
inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is, determined to have statewide
significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
•
• Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
• If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed for
m, rm, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
▪ As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit a
copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local governments) failed to respond within the
15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the Iand on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [,41 No [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [wr No [ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes [ ]
•No [f
Date 3/1/101667
State of
On this
name
Afttriii
1441-
Signature
(City Manager/ ounty Manager)
day of
, County of
, personally appeared before me, the said
to me known and known to me to be the person `described in
and who executed the forego document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in the
foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires 3 15.0?0!! .(Signature of Notary Public)
OFFICIAL SEAL
DEANNA D. HENDERSON
Notary Public -North Carolina
SURRY COUNTY
My Co Is i nE ire
js
Notary Pub l jE (Official Seal)

Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
Ms. Susan Wilson
Supervisor, Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699 - 1617
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
Existing Well Backwash Discharge
Well No. 3
Aqua, North Carolina, Inc.
Hillcrest Subdivision
Surry County
Dear Ms. Wilson:
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124-8567
704-788-4455
Fax: [phone]
March 27, 2007
APR p 200/
CILIALITY
EIRANCH
Attached are four (4) copies of the applications for NPDES permit signed by Aqua North
Carolina, Inc., four (4) copies of the Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) and a check for
$ 715 (application fee.) This application is for a permit for the continued discharge of backwash
from three (3) existing and one proposed, green sand filters installed on a potable well which
serves the Hillcrest Subdivision, located outside Mount Airy, N.C. The EAA contains maps
which indicate the existing location.
This is an existing groundwater well that filters water through a series of green sand filters before
the water is distributed to the Hillcrest community. The filters are "backwashed" with water
approximately once every three (3) days and approximately 1,680 gallons of water (1,260 gpd
from existing three wells, 1,680 gpd after the fourth filter is added) is then discharged into the
nearby stream.
This well has been in service for a number of years and we are not aware of any environmental
concerns over this discharge.
We appreciate your consideration of our application for permit. If you have any questions or if
there is anything we need to discuss, please call me (704-788-4455.)
Sinc
C:
an Horne, P. E.
Tamara S. Taylor
Robert Midgette
Gary Moseley
Mike Melton

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
Mail the complete application to: + �:_ ij «/ L}
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources-- ---
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit i
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 APR r 2007
NPDES Permit Number
NC00 g$ 5.2 $
r . _ QUALITY
BRANCH
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Facility Name Hillcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
Mailing Address 4163 Sinclair Street
City Denver
State / Zip Code NC/28037
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
e-mail Address [e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road
City
State / Zip Code
County
Lynnewood Drive
Mt. Airy
NC/27030
Surry
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
4. Ownership Status:
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver
NC/28037
[phone]
[phone]
Federal ❑ State ❑
Private ® Public ❑
Page 1 of 3
C-WTP 03/05

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
5. Type of treatment plant:
❑ Conventional (Includes coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation, usually followed by
filtration and disinfection)
❑ Ion Exchange (Sodium Cycle Cationic ion exchange)
® Green Sand Filter (No sodium recharge)
❑ Membrane Technology (RO, nanofiltration)
Check here if the treatment process also uses a water softener
0
6. Description of source water(s) (Le. groundwater, surface water)
Groundwater well
7. Describe the treatment process(es) for the raw water:
Green sand filtration using potassium permanganate. Chlorine added for disinfection.
Caustic soda added for pH adjustment.
8. Describe the wastewater and the treatment process(es) for wastewater generated by the
facility:
Wastewater discharge is the backwash of the green sand filters. Discharge rate is
approximately 1,680 gallons, once every three days.
9. Number of separate discharge points: 1
Outfall Identification number(s) 001
10. Frequency of discharge:
Continuous ❑ Intermittent PD
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: 3 Duration: approx. 20 min.
11. Plant design potable flowrate 0.046 (Max. well yield) MGD
Backwash or reject flow 0.00168 MGD
12. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude
an unnamed tributary to Champ Creek (Yadkin River Basin)
Page 2 of 3
C-WTP 03/05

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
13. Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals, that have the
potential to be discharged.
potassium permanganate
chlorine
caustic soda
14. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
15. Additional Information:
> Provide a schematic of flow through the facility, include flow volumes at all points in
the treatment process, and point of addition of chemicals.
• Solids Handling Plan
16. NEW Applicants
Information needed in addition to items 1-15:
• New applicants must contact the NCDENR Customer Service Center.
Was the Customer Service Center contacted? ® Yes ❑ No
• Analyses of source water collected
• Engineering Alternative Analysis
• Discharges from Ion Exchange and Reverse Osmosis plants shall be evaluated using a
water quality model.
17. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Gary Moseley Manager, Western N. C.
Printefl name of Person Signing Title
S� Vl�4i'J'rrr
SignafiN of Applicant Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
Page 3 of 3 C-WTP 03/05

IER
Existing Wastewater Discharge
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Hillcrest Subdivision Well No. 3
Mt. Airy, N.C.
Surry County
Applicant : Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, N.C. 28037
Ph: 704-489-9404
Contact: Gary Moseley
Facility
Prepared by:
m" Pi scA-Pit-jfe-
Hillcrest Subdivision Well # 3
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Lynnewood Drive
Mt. Airy, N.C. 27030
Ph: 704-489-9404
Contact: Gary Moseley
J. Thurman Horne, P.E.
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124
Ph: 704-788-4455
Date: March 27, 2007
URM Pr

3
MEI
FM
riEl
Mel
Section 1: General
1.01 Introduction:
Aqua North Carolina, Inc. (Aqua NC) currently owns and operates an existing well
water system serving Hillcrest Subdivision (Hillcrest), located northeast of Mt. Airy,
N.C. in Surry County. Well #3 of the water system uses an assembly of green
sand filters in the treatment of groundwater prior to distribution to the Hillcrest
community. There are currently three (3) existing filters and a fourth will be added
to improve the consistency of the quality of the water being provided to the
community. These filters are backwashed, using potable water, approximately
once every three days. This backwash is a relatively small volume, currently
approximately 1,260 gallons but will increase to approximately 1,680 gallons with
the addition of the fourth filter. The discharge leaves the well house via a 2" PVC
pipe and is released into an intermittent stream that is an unnamed tributary to
Champ Creek in the Yadkin River basin.
The well has a good overall history of compliance with water supply regulations,
but is required to obtain an NPDES permit for the continued operation of the
existing backwash discharge.
The Hillcrest water system currently has 192 customers. Well # 3 is approved for
32 gpm. No expansion of the capacity of this well is planned and the system is
sufficient to serve the subdivision. Whereas the subdivision is fully developed and
since no expansion of the subdivision or service area is planned, there is no
potential for any substantial population increase to affect the existing rate of water
use or backwash discharge flow (1680 gpd/3 days.)
The review of this source and the consideration of alternatives is being made with
inclusion of consideration of the guidance contained in "Permitting Strategy For
Greensand Filtration Water Treatment Plants - January 2004")
1.02 Scope:
The scope of this project is limited to the investigation and evaluation of
alternatives for treating and/or disposing of the existing green sand filter backwash
1.1 from Well # 3 at Hillcrest Subdivision. This includes consideration of the feasibility
of continuing the existing discharge and options for eliminating the existing
discharge.
IIIP
Section 2:
Mg
MI
Background Information
2.01 Project Area:
The existing service area is limited to the Hillcrest Subdivision. All homes are
single family residences. There are no commercial or industrial customers. All
wastewater is typical backwash from green sand filters.

4
MIR
IMP
PEI
The existing discharge coordinates are: Longitude: -80 deg. 34 min. 16 sec. W
Latitude: 36 deg. 31 min. 49 sec. N
2.02 Site Characteristics:
The subdivision is located in a rural portion of Surry county, outside any municipal
limits and remote from public water and/or sewer. The nearest existing sewer is
approximately 1.4 miles away.
The general area has soil characteristics which are limited to the possibility of on
site treatment and disposal.
Terrain is generally rolling but has been graded level at the existing well site.
2.03 Receiving Stream Characteristics:
The receiving stream is intermittent in nature and is an unnamed tributary to
Champ Creek, which is C waters. The receiving stream is obviously a zero flow
stream (7Q10 and 30Q2 = 0) but since the wastewater discharge is not oxygen
consuming, discharge into the zero flow stream should be allowable under state
procedures.
This receiving stream has no known outstanding features or characteristics that
should preclude the continuation of the existing discharge. There are no known
endangered or threatened species and these are not threatened or impaired
waters.
Section 3: Existing Utilities
3.01 Public Facilities:
The nearest existing public sewer is located approximately 1.4 miles south of the
existing well near the junction of McBride Road and Champ Creek. There are
plans to eventually extend the sewer out McBride Road to a point that would be
closer to the existing well. The distance that would be required for sewer force
mains to be installed to connect to this proposed extension would be
approximately 1.0 miles (5,300 ft.) This would be the route that appears to be the
most practical from an engineering perspective to take advantage of following
existing highway right of way and have minimal impact to adjacent property
owners.
Mr. Jack Gardin, Surry County Water And Sewer Projects Coordinator, was
consulted and has advised that, although the proposed extension has no
established time table, it could be constructed within the next five years, or it could
be beyond five years. For the purpose of making a best case evaluation of this
alternative, the estimates will be based on connection to this sewer after the
extension is complete.

5
IMO
3.02 Private Facilities:
There are no known existing private sewer utilities within any reasonable proximity
of Hillcrest Subdivision that would be available for consideration as a possible
alternative. A review of available records did not reveal that there are any private
sewer facilities within a two and one quarter mile radius.
�— Section 4: Alternatives For Service
4.01: On site surface and/or subsurface disposal:
PIM
PIO
PIM
Subsurface Disposal:
Appendix E contains portions of soil survey reports that provide insight as to the
suitability of the soils for subsurface disposal. As described in the report, these
soils are mainly Woolwine Fairview -Westfield soils with characteristics that are
somewhat limited to very limiting with respect to the potential for subsurface
disposal. In addition to researching the information available from NRCS soils
maps, the engineer consulted with Mr. Johnny E. Easter, RS, Surry County
Environmental Health Director concerning the possibilities of subsurface disposal.
Mr. Easter suggested that, for purposes of evaluating this based on the limited
information available, an application rate of 0.25 gpd/SF would be a reasonable
assumption. Of course, before a final design and/or approval could be given, an
actual on site soils evaluation would be required. For the purposes of evaluating
this as a possible option, a design application rate of 0.25 gpd/SF will be used.
Subsurface disposal requires buffers and land for the drainfields as well as equal
areas of suitable soil, be available and maintained as potential repair/replacement
areas.
Aqua North Carolina only owns a one acre lot around the well. Whereas the well
must have a 100 foot buffer to any disposal site, this would necessitate that Aqua
North Carolina acquire additional property to allow for the possible subsurface
disposal site, repair/reserve area and buffers.
Given the limitations described in the attached soil survey and discussed above, it
is doubtful that this is a viable option. A full and extensive soils investigation of
potential sites would be necessary to confirm if useable areas are available. In
keeping with the state guidance for alternatives evaluation, the cost effectiveness
of this alternative is further evaluated to determine if a detailed soils analysis is
appropriate. The costs associated with this option are estimated in Appendix A.
This option would require that the existing discharge be conveyed to an acquired
site having sufficient area for subsurface disposal and a suitable reserve area of
equal size, and that these areas include adequate buffers from property lines,
homes, wells, etc.

6
Surface Irrigation:
Disposal by irrigation requires storage capacity for periods of inclement weather
when application is not allowable. Therefore consideration of this as a possible
alternative must also include the provision of storage of the backwash waters
during periods of inclement weather.
As noted earlier, the soil surveys for this area have determined this to have limited
to severely limited potential for on site subsurface disposal. Consideration of this
alternative is based on an assumed allowable application rate of 0.20 inches per
week which is based on a typical range of 0.15 to 0.25 inches per week for this
geographic area and the soil conditions generally described in the soils survey.
Storage requirements for this area are typically in the range of 45 to 90 days. For
purposes of this assessment, a storage requirement of 60 days will be assumed.
Considering the relatively benign nature of the current discharge it is not expected
that any additional treatment would be required for surface application. Although
the additional cost of conveyance and the additional costs for on site disposal
should readily be recognized as a significant cost increase as compared to the
alternative of continued discharge, an estimate of the costs for this alternative is
included in Appendix A for comparison.
The evaluation is based on a very conservative assumption that the nearest
available lands that could be reasonably used would actually be available. A
comparison of the costs were made first, using the best (lowest cost) reasonable
assumptions. It would obviously be necessary to perform a more detailed site
investigation and ascertain if the property owner would consider allowing these
lands to be acquired for this purpose.
4.02: Wastewater Reuse
Options for reuse of wastewater for this area are essentially nil. Reuse is usually
associated with non -potable uses such as irrigation. This becomes potentially
more viable if there is a need or outlet for reuse such as irrigation of a golf course.
The volume of this discharge is very low and would have little attraction as a
source for recycle purposes. This area does not have a golf course, nor are there
any other viable options for reuse associated with the subdivision or in the
surrounding area.
4.03: Surface Water Discharge
This is the current method of wastewater disposal. There is no anticipated need to
add any new facilities for additional treatment.

7
ant
An estimate of the costs for the continuation of this alternative is included in
■- Appendix A for comparison.
Nil
MP
PER
4.04: Combination of Alternatives
Alternatives to discharge that may be technologically feasible, such as connection
to the nearest public sewer, subsurface disposal and/or surface irrigation, could
not be employed in conjunction with the current method of disposal (surface water
discharge) and yield any reduction in total capital or operating expenditures. The
evaluation of alternatives shows that these alternatives are clearly not viable due
to the overwhelming magnitude of associated cost.
Combining one of these alternatives while continuing the periodic discharge, yields
no reduction in the cost for non -discharge alternatives and merely increases the
overall costs. There would be no reduction in capital costs for any of these
alternatives and the operating costs for combining surface discharge with either of
the other alternatives would be greater than for any single alternative that might be
selected.
In short, whereas the conclusion that continued surface discharge is the only
viable option due to the overwhelming differential in capital and operating costs,
any addition of an additional alternative would merely make the cost differential
worse.
Section 5: Summary and Conclusions:
As can be seen from a comparison of the net present value of the various
alternatives, there is a wide difference between the cost estimate of the option of
continuing discharge and options to eliminate the discharge.
Compared to the cost of the next most cost effective and reliable alternative
Mil
(subsurface disposal) the estimated Net Present Value is approximately 938 %
greater. This represents a difference of $ 608 NPV per customer.
In Tight of the financial impracticality, it is not necessary to further pursue whether
connection is politically acceptable to the POTW or whether land based disposal
.0 options are workable.
By far, the most practical and cost effective and reasonably practical alternative is
the continued discharge of the relatively benign filter backwash waters.
FM
MIR
Section 6: Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
Based on the findings of this evaluation, it has been concluded that the most
economical and practical alternative is to continue discharge to surface waters.

9
13.111
..
PM
PM
Plul
1. Surface Water Discharge at 1,680 GPD Flow Rate:
Whereas this is the existing method of disposal and considering that no additional
treatment is expected as a consequence of any forthcoming permit, there are no
estimated additional capital costs.
The only anticipated increase in operation and maintenance costs are those associated
with the collection, analysis and reporting of effluent discharge samples as required by an
NPDES permit.
Capital Cost:
Operation & Maintenance Cost
Total Capital Cost = $ 0.00
0. (Present Value, 20 year life, 5.875% interest):
RIII
PM
AM
Annual Cost
Operation & Maintenance
($ 100/mo. X 12 mo/yr)
Total Annual Cost = $ 1,200
PV Annual Cost = $ 13,905
Total Net Present Value
$ 13,905
$ 1,200

10
Mil
MP
FUR
2. Connection to POTW Sewer System at End of Future Proposed Extension on
McBride Road :
Install new lift station to collect discharge and convey by force main along existing high
way right of way to junction with existing municipal sewer.
Distance = approx. 5,300 LF
Begin elev. = approx. 1190.0
Highest elev. = approx. 1270.0
Lift station Avg. flow = 1,680 gpd = 1.2 gpm
Peak flow = 2.5 x 1.2 gpm = 3.0 gpm
Pump Design
Use 1" Sch. 40 PVC, approx. 5,300LF
FH @ 3.0 gpm = 0.68 ft/100 ft = 36.0 ft.
SH = 80 ft (approx.)
Use TDH = 120 ft.
cm
Use dual effluent pumps (rated at 120 ft. TDH at 3 gpm) OSI P501512 or approved equal
f'' Capital Cost:
Item: Quantity: Unit Cost: Cost:
rim
1" force main sewer 5,300 LF $ 8 $ 42,400
Air release 3 Ea. $ 2,500 $ 7,500
Pump Station 1 Ea $ 35,000 $ 35,000
Manholes 1 Ea $ 1,800 $ 1,800
,.., Tap Fee 1 Ea. $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Wastewater Capacity Use Fee 1 Ea. $ 2,500 $ 2,500
Road Crossings 1 Ea $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Mil Creek Crossings 1 Ea $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Metering Station 1 Ea. $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Tie to exist. MH 1 Ea $ 1,000 $ 1,000
WI Erosion control LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Surveying 2 days $ 1,500 $ 3,000
Easement/Right of Way 200 LF $ 10 $ 2,000
Mg Clearing (approx. 0.3 acre) 0.3 acre $ 6,500 $ 1,950
Electrical LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Legal LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Sub -total $ 160,150
NW Engineering 15 % 24,023

11
CIIPI
Operation & Maintenance Cost:
Local government sewer fee
Annual sewer charges
GER
Total Capital Cost = $ 184,173
= $ 3.44/1000 Gallons
$ 3.44/1000 Gal x 1,680 gpd x 122 day/yr
= $ 705
p^ Annual electrical charges = $ 100/month X 12 mo/yr = $ 1,200
Annual sample analysis charges = $ 100/mo. X 12 mo/yr = $ 1,200
POT
Annual repair and maintenance = $ 100/mo. X 12 mo/yr = $ 1,200
Total annual costs = $ 4,305
(Present Value, 20 year life, 5.875% interest)
Present Value Annual Cost
$ 49,883
Total Net Present Value = $ 234,066

12
fOR
FOR
3. Land Based Disposal:
3A. Subsurface Disposal:
Based on the soil survey information and the engineers field observations, the soils in this
area appear to be limited to severely limited as a medium for subsurface disposal. In the
event that it was found to be apparently a cost effective alternative, an in depth site
specific soil investigation would need to be done to confirm that the soils could in fact be
used. However, for the purpose of comparing the potential alternatives within the scope
of this evaluation, it will be assumed that a typical low design loading rate would be
workable. Therefore, it will be assumed that a loading rate of 0.25 gpd/sq. ft. is
acceptable.
Therefore, based on the design flow, the area required for subsurface disposal is:
1,680 gpd / 0.25 gpd/sq. ft. = 6,720 SF
Whereas it is required to maintain an equal size area as a reserve for future repair, the
required area is 13,440 SF. Appendix D contains a map, which delineates the area that
might be available for subsurface disposal.
Assuming a roughly rectangular field (135 ft x 100 ft. for the initial drain field plus repair
and In order to maintain the required buffer to property lines), the minimum estimated
land required is 18,600 SF or .43 acres.
Capital Cost:
Item:
Quantity: Unit Cost: Cost:
4" sewer drain in 3' trenches 2,240 LF $ 12 $ 26,880
Site Clearing .2 acre $ 6,500 $ 1,300
fmil
Land .43 acres $ 15,000 $ 6,450
1" FM 200 LF $ 8 $ 1,600
., Pump Station 1 Ea $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Surveying 2 days $ 1,500 $ 3,000
Soils Investigation 1 day $ 1,500 $ 1,500
.7 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment LS $ 2,000 $ 2,000
Erosion control LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Electrical LS $ 3,000 $ 3,000
I. Legal LS $ 2,500 $ 2,500
Sub -total $ 73,230
Engineering 15 % 10,985
Total Capital Cost = $84,215

13
WI
MI Operation & Maintenance Cost (Present Value, 20 year life, 5.875 % interest):
WM
MR
Annual Cost
O & M of drain field,
Pump station and force main = $ 2,500/yr
Annual electrical charges = $ 125/month X 12 mo/yr
$ 2,500
= $ 1,500
1-+ Total Annual Cost = $ 4,000
PV Annual Cost = $ 46,349
Total Net Present Value = $ 130,564

14
MI
PIM
FM
IM
3B. Surface Irrigation:
Surface irrigation preliminary design is based on an assumed allowable application rate
of 0.20 gpd/sq. ft. and a required storage basin for 60 days design flow. Based on the
design flow of 1,680 gpd, this results in an estimated disposal area of 8,400 SF. Allowing
a recommended 50% repair area, the required total area is 12,600 SF. Assuming a
roughly rectangular field (415 ft x 415 ft. for the initial spray field plus repair and in order
to maintain the required 150 foot buffer to property lines), the minimum estimated land
required is 172,225 SF or approximately 4 acres.
CM Capital Cost:
Item:
EM
Quantity: Unit Cost: Cost:
100,800 gal. storage basin (1) $ 19,500
Surface irrigation system 8,400 SF $ 0.35 $ 2,940
fPal Monitoring wells 4 ea $ 4,000 $ 16,000
Land 4 acres $ 15,000 $ 60,000
Fencing 2,000 LF $ 6.00 $ 12,000
pm 2" FM 1600 LF $ 8.50 $ 13,600
Manholes 1 Ea $ 1,600 $ 1,600
Pump Station 1 Ea $ 35,000 $ 35,000
M' Surveying 3 days $ 1,500 $ 4,500
Soils Investigation 3 days $ 1,500 $ 4,500
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment LS $ 3,000 $ 3,000
''' Erosion control LS $ 8,000 $ 8,000
Electrical LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000
MI
Legal LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000
MI
Engineering 15 %
Total Capital Cost
mu, (1) Storage:
Excavation 625 cu. Yds. @ $ 6.00/yd = $ 3,725
Compaction and Lining 4,500 SF @ $ 3.50/SF = $ 15,750
F., Sub -total = $ 19,500
Sub -total $ 190,640
28,596
$ 219,236

15
PR
Operation & Maintenance Cost
(Present Value, 20 year life, 8% interest):
Annual Cost
O & M of spray field,
Pump station and force main = $ 3,500/yr $ 3,500
Annual electrical charges = $ 250/month X 12 mo/yr = $ 3,000
run Annual sample analysis charges = $ 100/mo. X 12 mo/yr = $ 1,200
Total Annual Cost = $ 7,700
Mit
Foil
roil
PV Annual Cost = $ 89,222
rim Total Net Present Value = $ 308,458

North
+
Hillcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
USGS Map - Existing Well Location
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007
Mt. Airy, N.C. Scale: 1" = 1,600

Exist. property Tine,
North
l lillcrest Subdivision - Well tt 3
Aerial Photo - Existing Well Location
Mt. Airy, N.C. Scale: 1" -= 330'
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007

PIM
PEI
Hillcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
Possible Location Route for Connection to Public Sewer
Mt. Airy, N.C. Scale: 1" = 1,600'
Nearest Location of Exist. Sewer
Horizon, pgineerina & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007

• - '
r'•• • , •
•••••, : ,
•".;
• •/.1
• •'•11-'''' •
• • • •.••?... •
/
f
" \ Prop. Subsurface Disposal
.„ (Property must be acquired)
• ,, r)/-•
•
,1
•
•
•
• • t
1C0f1
••••
. •2,2.C.,
17-
-;•itr; •••"FItt..,
r
•• \
North
Flillcrest Subdivision - Well it 3
Possible Location for Subsurface Disposal
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007
Mt. Airy, N.C. Scale: 1" = 110'

North
1-1illcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
Possible Location for Surface Disposal
Mt. Airy, N.C. Scale: 1" = 330'
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007

North
Hillcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
NRCS Soils Map
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007
Mt. Airy, N.C. Scale: 1" = 875'

a•4
IMP
aan
n�a
Sewage Disposal
Surry County, North Carolina
[The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the
potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional
limitations]
Map symbol
and soil name
Pct.
of
map
unit
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
BbB:
Braddock 99 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited
Slow water 0.50 Seepage 0.98
movement Slope 0.32
BbC:
Braddock 97 Somewhat limited
Slow water
movement
Slope
Very limited
0.50 Slope
Seepage
0.16
CsA:
Colvard 49 Very limited Very limited
Flooding 1.00 Flooding
Seepage, bottom 1.00 Seepage
layer
Suches
DeF:
wq Devotion, very rocky
REP
MIR
Rhodhiss, very rocky
39 Very limited
Flooding
Depth to saturated
zone
Seepage, bottom
layer
Slow water
movement
Very limited
1.00 Flooding
1.00 Depth to saturated
zone
1.00 Seepage
0.50
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
32 Very limited Very limited
Slope 1.00 Depth to soft bedrock 1.00
Depth to bedrock 1.00 Slope 1.00
Seepage, bottom 1.00 Seepage 1.00
layer Depth to hard 0.84
bedrock
26 Very limited
Slope
Seepage, bottom
layer
Slow water
movement
Very limited
1.00 Slope
1.00 Seepage
0.50
1.00
1.00
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit. Others may exist.
Tabular Data Version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 03/08/2007 Page 1 of 4

Sewage Disposal
Surry County, North Carolina
Map symbol
and soil name
Pct.
of
map
unit
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
Rating dass and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
DeF:
Bannertown, very rocky
FsE:
Fairview
Stott Knob
21 Very limited
Slope
Depth to bedrock
Seepage, bottom
layer
60 Very limited
Slope
Slow water
movement
28 Very limited
Slope
Depth to bedrock
Seepage. bottom
layer
Slow water
movement
FuB2:
Fairview, moderately eroded 57 Somewhat limited
Slow water
movement
Urban land
Ud:
Udorthents, foamy
31 Not rated
85 Very limited
Seepage, bottom
layer
WfB2:
Woolwine, moderately eroded 48 Very limited
Depth to bedrock
Slow water
movement
Fairview, moderately eroded
34 Somewhat limited
Slow water
movement
Westfield, moderately eroded 17 Somewhat limited
Depth to bedrock
Slow water
movement
Very limited
1.00 Depth to hard
1.00 bedrock
1.00 Depth to soft bedrock
Slope
Seepage
Very limited
1.00 Slope
0.50 Seepage
Very limited
1.00 Depth to soft bedrock
1.00 Slope
1.00 Seepage
Depth to hard
0.50 bedrock
Somewhat limited
0.50 Seepage
Slope
Not rated
Very limited
1.00 Seepage
Slope
Very limited
1.00 Depth to soft bedrock
0.50 Slope
Seepage
Somewhat limited
0.50 Seepage
Slope
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.71
0.98
0.32
1.00
0.68
1.00
0.68
0.50
0.98
0.68
Somewhat limited
0.86 Seepage 0.98
0.50 Slope .0.68
Depth to soft bedrock 0.61
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit Others may exist.
--� Tabular Data Version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 03/08/2007 Page 2 of 4

MIR
a.v
11E1
rint
1114
Sewage Disposal
Surry County, North Carolina
Map symbol
and soil name
Pct.
of
map
unit
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
WfC2:
Woolwine, moderately eroded 50 Very limited
Depth to bedrock
Slope
Slow water
movement
Fairview, moderately eroded
32 Somewhat limited
Slope
Slow water
movement
Westfield, moderately eroded 13 Somewhat limited
Depth to bedrock
Slope
Slow water
movement
WoD:
Woolwine, stony
Fairview, stony
Westfield, stony
WoE:
Woolwine, stony
Fairview, stony
53 Very limited
Slope
Depth to bedrock
Slow water
movement
26 Very limited
Slope
Slow water
movement
13 Very limited
Slope
Depth to bedrock
Slow water
movement
47 Very limited
Slope
Depth to bedrock
Slow water
movement
24 Very limited
Slope
Slow water
movement
Very limited
1.00 Depth to soft bedrock
0.63 Slope
0.50 Seepage
Very limited
0.63 Slope
0.50 Seepage
Very limited
0.86 Slope
0.63 Seepage
0.50 Depth to soft bedrock
Very limited
1.00 Depth to soft bedrock
1.00 Slope
0.50 Seepage
Very limited
1.00 Slope
0.50 Seepage
Very limited
1.00 Slope
0.86 Seepage
0.50 Depth to soft bedrock
Very limited
1.00 Depth to soft bedrock
1.00 Slope
0.50 Seepage
Very limited
1.00 Slope
0.50 Seepage
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.98
1.00
0.98
0.61
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.98
1.00
0.98
0.61
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.98
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit. Others may exist.
Tabular Data Version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 03/08/2007 Page 3 of 4

Sewage Disposal
Surry County, North Carolina
Map symbol
and soil name
Pct.
of
map
unit
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
WoE:
Westfield, stony
10 Very limited
Slope
Depth to bedrock
Slow water
movement
Very limited
1.00 Slope
0.86 Seepage
0.50 Depth to soft bedrock
1.00
0.98
0.61
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit. Others may exist.
Tabular Data Version: 9
"--aW1 Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 03/08/2007
Page 4 of 4

+=I
DA I'E SAMPLE COLLECTED
7,f
j
E %BAN 16 vac 2
\rib_ — <IC L.C. Mai zji
l 1 '��� 1 �yy-\,i�"° j 1
1 1 19(114t-)C6-,1
MI j/84
• DATE SAMPLE RRCCEJVED_.____ 11/20/84
_-__..._.- DATE SAMPLE. ANALYZED
11120-1.216/84
1�2/7/S4
�,._..............�,.., DATE; OF REPORT
-
00427 �... - iNP+i.irSt:i PERFORMED BY Surings,tie�lster/Lynch/I/ad
JOB NUMBER _____,__ ---•-� ____ `�
Al \,(-L \., t. kTr--e- rl ci(5 >,, AJ` ' f)�/
r / '{i ��,�SPi.E
•
RESEARCII & AN1yTicAL
LPSbORATORIESLAbORATORiESe INC.
P.O. eon 473 106 Sho+t Sired
Korn ersville. North tornl'no 27284
T.I.phnne 919.996-284I
Surry Water C mpatly_
P.O. Box 1307
;fount Airy, N 2703CI ^ __
Attention:
PARAMETER
Chloride
Color
STOt4ET
NUMBER
00940
L eY ("I s
m 4? 1
3313
3314
t 50 0.50
00030 .0@.115.0tL3
pH
Fluoride 00951 mg/ 1. 1 - 0.11 (0.10
Hardness, Tat:. 00900 11:g/' -.. , 37
.. ..__ ►�_.------
Nitrate Nitrogen 00620 ,:1!1 0. 0 2U I
0,25
Dissolved So:.ids 70300 :mgT1 r 122 `
Surfactants 38260 :�2 / 1 { 0.11. ji 0 „�6
-I
Sulfate 00945 K- 3- 9.0 ..._.�. 2.0
Arsenic, Tot. 01002 /-1„_.„„. _< 11
Barium. Tot. 01007 ,01._
Cadmium, Tot. 01027 1.:g/l. { < 2.0
ChroWium, Tot. 01034 TZ ___�._ . �55 :
3
�
Coppery 01042
Iron, Tot. 01045
Lead, Tot. 0105].
Manganese, Tot. 01005
Mercurv, , Tot .
Selenium, Tc t .
1,800 -
�.g/1 96
71900 1.10 / 1
01147
(CONTWJED ON N
CL1ENra
NJi
<11
<68
• 0.30 `0030
< 3.0 <3.0
Nxr PAGE.)
L VNE UOOD 1-V1N OAKS
SUBDTVIS r0
r+A1,CC0+.tin1
vw.1 7c•CI JA. 7/17/Pfl

d'rr;'1 f
it
•11'i
r
NMI
PE5EARCh & Al iAIN' T Cid
LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. ec z 473 106 jhort Slroot
K.rn.rsvillo. North Corolino 2713A
Tvlvph'n. 919.996.2841
um,
Sum, Water Camj;any
imp
,,r"10.CE1 V,
('JAN 10 1965
m
fiS
\ / a*w
DATE SAMPLE.MPLE COLLECTED _....1.'./19/S4_
O , • . Box 1307 DATE SAMPLE R :CE1VED
Mount Airy, NC 27030
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED
DATE OF REPORT _..
11/20/S4
VINT...$4
11 /20-12/6/S4
2i 7I84
Y
i1
•
00427 ANALYSES P
JOB NUMBERAFCflIED oy 4ebs ter/Springs aynch/veden
(CONT'D.
FROR NEVIOUS PACE)
PARAMETER
t" Silver, Tot.
Sc+dium, Tot.
'' Zinc, Toc.
STORET
NUMBER
01077
UNITS
uE/1
2.2 a a.
,1
00929 r;F/ 1 L.: . 7 '... 6
r
-7
-_ ____r_________
CiLIENrS
c. a 1•f1• •111A*LVVI
vra
t
L NNE W10OIU TWIN OAKS
I !1l17 / 1 7 IC(

•
Four (Three existing
and one proposed)
Potassium
Permanganate
Feed Tanks
(One each to each
green sand filter)
To Hillcrest Subdivision Water System
==>
Four Green Sand Filters
(Three existing and
one proposed)
(In parallel)
fi
Chlorine & Caustic
Addition
fi
Well Water
=>
Backwash
Discharge to
unnamed tributary
to UT to Champ
Creek
Hillcrest Subdivision - Well # 3
Existing Well System - Process Flow Diagram
Mt. Airy, NC Scale: NTS
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 March 27, 2007
1

24
fuNI
Residuals Management Plan
Prepared by: J. Thurman Horne, P.E.
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
Residuals Management Plan:
11.1 The proposed continued surface water discharge will have no impact on existing residuals management.
There are no wastewater treatment facilities.
.-► The nature of the operation (backwashing of green sand filters) is such that only minor amounts of solids
(less than 30 mg/1) are released with the discharge.
There is no generation of any grits, sludges or residuals for removal or disposal.
This project does not increase or alter the amounts of sludge produced or impact the current methods of
disposition.

Hillcrest Subdivision Well # 3
Raw Water Analysis Results
(results assembled 09/11/2007)

Hillcrest Subdivision Well # 3
Raw Water Analytical Test Results
Field Test Results — Analysis performed by Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Note: Results on this form are transposed from attached Chain of Custody Form
TRC = 0.0 mg/I
PH = 6.6 s.u.
Temperature = 16 deg. C.

Aug•24. 2007 10:20AM
RESEARCh & ANALyTICAI.
L.AbORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
Aqua NC
P.O. Box 4889
Cary, NC 27519
Attn: Rene Miller
Date Sample Collected
Date Sample Received
Date Sample Analyzed
Date of Report
Analyses Performed by
Lab Sample Number
596401
No.0529 P. 5
CO0,011111.180
`a +o
j�
C: ;.;# NC3T101
7.
r
;h.
p.
,r' ti
2; •
08/15/07
08/15/07
08/15/07
08/17/07
SW
==O..o..s.ecoca===C=C=.======ma=m=m=s.===_=C=
Parameter Storet # Results
SALINITY
Clients Sample Source
Number
Time Collected (Hrs)
0.1 ppt
HILLCREST
P.O. Box 473 • 10S Short Street • Kernersville, North Carolina 27284. 336-996-2841 • Fax [phone]
www. researchandanalytical.00m

Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
www.encolabs.com
Monday, September 10, 2007
Aqua NC - Denver (AQ004)
Attn: Debbie Gentry
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, NC 28037
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: [none], Project Name/Desc: NPDES Hillcrest
ENCO Workorder: C711950
Dear Debbie Gentry,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Monday, August 20, 2007.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without
the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
g/i/
Link Thrower
Operations Mgr
Enclosure(s)
The total number of pages in this report, including this page is 17.

AP.x.tAignSsIlkellaw-,..A.. Aki,(011-411-Str;
,
Parameter
EPA 160.1
EPA 160.2
EPA 160.5
EPA 180.1
EPA 200.7
EPA 245.1
EPA 300.0
EPA 310.2
EPA 335.2
EPA 350.3
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 365.4
EPA 420.1
SM 234013
SAMPLE SUMMARY/LABORATORY CHRONICLE
Weift6tgeRiarjtAb's „
Hold Date/Time(s) Prep Date/Time(s)
08/27/07
08/27/07
08/22/07 10:50
08/22/07 10:50
02/16/08
09/17/07
09/17/07
09/03/07
09/03/07
09/17/07
09/17/07
09/17/07
09/17/07
09/17/07
02/16/08
08/23/07 08:58
08/22/07 11:17
08/22/07 09:39
08/22/07 11:47
08/23/07 11:11
08/29/07 10:03
09/08/07 11:34
08/28/07 12:44
08/28/07 12:48
08/23/07 09:34
08/23/07 11:25
08/22/07 13:53
08/23/07 11:25
08/23/07 09:46
08/23/07 11:11
www.encolabs.com
lagaiatitom,„0,..osiganin
Analysis Date/Time(s)
8/24/2007 14:00
8/23/2007 10:55
8/22/2007 09:39
8/22/2007 12:25
9/4/2007 14:33
8/30/2007 13:25
9/8/2007 17:33
8/28/2007 15:22
8/28/2007 20:50
8/23/2007 09:34
8/24/2007 11:07
8/24/2007 13:22
8/24/2007 12:55
8/24/2007 05:50
9/4/2007 14:33
Page 2 of 17

www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY
cif n iD. r '; Atha G t , 74 MM;°MM's°
Sn: �. �,< •wt. �¢
rye+} k y.�'j Yy y
F.�f}+�' Via., r? Z^4J Y
Analyte
Results
Flag
MRL
Units
Method
Notes
Ammonia as N
Barium
Calcium
Copper
Fluoride
Hardness
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
Phosphorus
Total Alkalinity
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Kjetdahl Nitrogen
Total Suspended Solids
Turbidity
Zinc
0.037
5.50
17600
1.60
0.24
51.1
5480
1750
172
0.031
0.028
50
120
0.059
5.0
20
306
J
J
J
0.10
10.0
100
10.0
0.10
0.67
50
100
10.0
0.10
0.030
15
10
0.050
1.0
1.0
10.0
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
NTU
ug/L
EPA 350.3
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 300.0
SM 23408
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 353.2
EPA 365.4
EPA 310.2
EPA 160.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 160.2
EPA 180.1
EPA 200.7
Page 3 of 17

Description: Hil!crest Well 3
Matrix: Waste Water
Project: NPDES Hii!crest
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab Sample ID: C711950-01
Sampled: 08/20/07 10:50
Sampled By: William Young
www.encolabs.com
Received: 08/20/07 17:18
Work Order: C711950
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
* - ENCO Cary certified ana/yte [NC 591J
Apalyte [CAS Numberl Results Flea Units DE MU MU Retch Method Analyzed Re Nato
Antimony [7440-36-0] * 2.0 U ug/L 1 2.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Arsenic [7440-38-2] * 2.0 U ug/L 1 2.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Barium [7440-39-3] * 5.50 3 ug/L 1 0.20 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Beryllium [7440-41-7] * 0.70 U ug/L 1 0.70 1.00 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 30H
Cadmium [7440.43-9] * 0.50 U ug/l. 1 0.50 1.00 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 30H
Calcium [7440-70-2] * 17600 ug/L 1 7.00 100 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Chromium [7440.47-3] * 2.0 U ug/L 1 2.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Copper [7440-50-8] * 1.60 3 ug/L 1 0.60 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Iron [7439-89-6] ' 5480 ug/L 1 20 50 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Magnesium [7439-95-4] * 1750 ug/L 1 20 100 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 30H
Manganese [7439-96-5] * 172 ug/L 1 1.4 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Mercury [7439-97.6] * 0.11 U ug/L 1 0.11 0.20 7H29006 EPA 245.1 08/30/07 13:25 3DH
Nickel [7440-02-0] * 2.0 U ug/L 1 2.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Selenium [7782-49-2] * 2.0 U ug/L 1 2.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Sliver [7440.22.4] * 2.0 U ug/L 1 2.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 30H
Zinc [7440-66-6] * 306 ug/L 1 1.0 10.0 7H23013 EPA 200.7 09/04/07 14:33 3DH
Page 4 of 17

Description: Hillcrest Well 3
Matrix: Waste Water
project: NPDES Hillcrest
Lab Sample ID: C711950-01
Sampled: 08/20/07 10:50
Sampled By: William Young
www.encolabs.com
Received: 08/20/07 17:18
Work Order: C711950
Classical Chemistry Parameters
* - ENCO Cary certified ana/yte (NC 591)
Apaiyte ICAS Numberl &BIM Eaa Units RE fen MU Rath Metes Maim! @x &gas
Ammonia as N [NA]' 0.037 J mg/L 1 0.030 0.10 7H23008 EPA 350.3 08/23/07 09:34 CKN
Hardness [NA] * 51.1 mg/L 1 0.10 0.67 7H23013 SM 2340E 09/04/07 14:33 JDH
Nitrate/Nitrite as N [NA] * 0.031 3 mg/L 1 0.0066 0.10 7H22023 EPA 353.2 08/24/07 13:22 MIF
Total Alkalinity [NA] * 50 mg/L 1 5.2 15 7H28013 EPA 310.2 08/28/07 15:22 PEV
Total Dissolved Solids [NA] * 120 mg/L 1 10 10 7H23006 EPA 160.1 08/24/07 14:00 PEV
Total Settleable Solids [NA] * 0.10 U mL/L 1 0.10 0.10 7H22005 EPA 160.5 08/22/07 09:39 PEV
Total Suspended Solids [NA] * 5.0 mg/L 1 1.0 1.0 7H22013 EPA 160.2 08/23/07 10:55 IOC
Turbidity [NA] * 20 NTU 1 0.50 1.0 7H16007 EPA 180.1 08/22/07 12:25 001 Q
Page 5 of 17

Description: Hi!!crest Well 3
Matrix: Waste Water
Project: NPDES Hillcrest
Lab Sample ID: C711950-01
Sampled: 08/20/07 10:50
Sampled By: William Young
www.encolabs.com
Received: 08/20/07 17:18
Work Order: C711950
Classical Chemistry Parameters
* - ENCO Orlando certified analyte[NC 4241
Anaiyte I'CAS Number] Bests Elm Unita RE MU NRI. Batch Mimi rya ilk Kolas
Cyanide (total) [57-12-5] * 0.018 U mg/L 1 0.018 0.040 7H28002 EPA 335.2 O8/28/07 20:50 AH
Fluoride [16984-48-8] * 0.24 mg/L 1 0.05 0.10 7I08003 EPA 300.0 09/08/07 17:33 RSA
Phenolics [NA) * 0.02 U mg/L 1 0.02 0.05 7H22007 EPA 420.1 08/24/07 05:50 CAS
Phosphorus [7723-14-0] * 0.028 3 mg/1. 1 0.020 0.030 7H23004 EPA 365.4 08/24/07 12:55 NS
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen [NA] * 0.059 mg/L 1 0.043 0.050 7H23002 EPA 351.2 08/24/07 11:07 NS
This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.
Page 6 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H23013 - EPA 3005A
Blank (7H23013-BLK1)
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:11 Analyzed: 09/04/2007 13:01
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
LCS (7H23013-BS1)
2.0
2.0
0.20
0.70
0.50
7.00
2.0
0.60
20
20
1.4
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
10.0
10.0
10.0
1.00
1.00
100
10.0
10.0
50
100
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:11 Analyzed: 09/04/2007 13:08
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Matrix Spike (7H23013-MS1)
Source: C711948-01
0.3
0.5
0.52
0.26
0.26
5.06
0.5
0.25
5
5
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.05
0.5
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.001
0.100
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.250
0.500
0.500
0.250
0.250
5.00
0.500
0.250
5.00
5.00
0.250
0.500
0.500
0.0500
0.500
104 82-119
104 82-117
104 72-125
102 75-121
103 72-120
101 81-111
101 78-119
102 80-117
101 84-133
110 81-117
99 76-123
103 78-116
108 82-127
100 80-128
99 80-120
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:11 Analyzed: 09/04/2007 13:39
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Antimony
Arsenic
Banum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcum
Chromium
Copper
Iron
0.3
0.5
0.54
0.26
0.26
36.7
0.5
0.26
5
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.001
0.100
0.01
0.01
0.05
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.250
0.500
0.500
0.250
0.250
5.00
0.500
0.250
5.00
-0.001
0.002
0.01
-0.0006
-0.0005
32.3
-0.006
-0.0006
0.4
103 38.138
104 64-126
105 74-119
104 70-131
103 68-121
88 63-131
101 73-120
103 75-123
101 48-144
Page 7 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H23013 - EPA 3005A
Matrix Spike (7H23013-MS1) Continued
Source: C711948-01
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:11 Analyzed: 09/04/2007 13:39
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Matrix Spike Dup (7H23013-MSD1)
Source: C711948-01
8
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.05
0.5
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
5.00 3 107 59-129
0.250 0.2 97 55-146
0.500 -0.001 104 64-126
0.500 0.001 108 65-129
0,0500 -0.0007 98 69-121
0.500 0.01 99 63-131
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:11 Analyzed: 09/04/2007 13:46
Analyte
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Batch 7H29006 - EPA 7970A
Blank (7H29006-BLK1)
Spike Source %REC RPD.
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.3 0.01
0.5 0.01
0.54 0.01
0.26 0.001
0.26 0.001
36.3 0.100
0.5 0.01
0.26 0.01
5 0.05
8 0.1
0.4 0.01
0.5 0.01
0.5 0.01
0.05 0.01
0.5 0.01
mg/L 0.250 -0.001 105 38-138 2 30
mg/L 0.500 0.002 104 64-126 0.08 12
mg/L 0.500 0.01 105 74-119 0.3 11
mg/L 0.250 -0.0006 104 70-131 0.1 21
mg/L 0.250 -0.0005 103 68-121 0.5 12
mg/L 5.00 32.3 79 63-131 1 22
mg/L 0.500 -0.006 101 73-120 0.1 10
mg/L 0.250 -0.0006 103 75-123 0.3 16
mg/L 5.00 0.4 100 48-144 0.7 23
mg/L 5.00 3 106 59-129 0.7 22
mg/L 0.250 0.2 97 55.146 0.5 19
mg/L 0.500 -0.001 103 64-126 1 12
mg/L 0.500 0.001 108 65-129 0.1 10
mg/L 0.0500 -0.0007 102 69-121 4 12
mg/L 0.500 0.01 98 63-131 1 24
Prepared: 08/29/2007 10:03 Analyzed: 08/30/2007 12:25
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury
LCS (7H29006-BS1)
0.11 U 0.20 ug/L
Prepared: 08/29/2007 10:03 Analyzed: 08/30/2007 12:28
Analyte
Mercury
Matrix Spike (7H29006-MS1)
Source: C711086-03
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
5.24 0.20 ug/L 5.00
105 85-115
Prepared: 08/29/2007 10:03 Analyzed: 08/30/2007 12:34
Analyte
Mercury
Matrix Spike Dup (7H29006-MSD1)
I'age8of17
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
5.11 0.20 ug/L 5.00 0.11 U 102 70-130
Prepared: 08/29/2007 10:03 Analyzed: 08/30/2007 12:37

QUALITY CONTROL
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H29006 - EPA 7970A
Matrix Spike Dup (7H29006-MSD1) Continued
Source:C711086-03
Prepared: 08/29/2007 10:03 Analyzed: 08/30/2007 12:37
Analyte
Spike Source 0/ABC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury
Post Spike (7H29006-PS1)
Source: C711086-03
5.17
0.20
uq/L
5,00 0.11 U 103 70-130
Prepared: 08/29/2007 10:03 Analyzed: 08/30/2007 12:45
Analyte
Mercury
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
5.02 0.20 ug/L 5.00 0.002 100 0-200
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 7H16007 - NO PREP
Blank (7H16007-BLK1)
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:47 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 12:25
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Turbidity
LCS (7H16007-BS1)
0.50
U
1.0 NTU
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:47 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 12:25
Analyte
Turbidity
Duplicate (7H16007-DUP1)
Source: C712007-01
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result 0/ABC Limits RPD Limit Notes
21
1.0 NTU 20.0
104 91-116
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:47 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 12:25
Analyte
Turbidity
Batch 7H22005 - NO PREP
Duplicate (7H22005-DUP1)
Source: C711988-01
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
3.1
1.0 NTu
3.3
Prepared & Analyzed: 08/22/2007 09:39
Analyte
Total Settleable Solids
Batch 7H22013 - NO PREP
Blank (7H22013-BLK1)
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Hag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
2S
0.11
U
0.11 mL/L
0.11 U
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:17 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:55
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result 0/ABC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
LCS (7H22013-BS1)
1.0
U
mg/L
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:17 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:55
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Page 9 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H22013 - NO PREP
LCS (7H22013-BS1) Continued
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:17 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:55
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
Duplicate (71122013-DUP1)
Source:C712219-01
89
1.0
mg/L
00.0
111
82-119
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:17 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:55
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
Batch 7H22023 - NO PREP
Blank (7H22023-BLK1)
360
1.0
mg/L
360
Prepared: 08/22/2007 13:53 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 22:41
10
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
LCS (7H22023-BS1)
0.0066
u
0.10
mg/L
Prepared: 08/22/2007 13:53 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 22:43
Analyte
Nitrate/Nittnte as N
Matrix Spike (7H22023-MS1)
Source: C712264-01
Spike Source M REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
1.2
0.10
mg/L 1.25
93 80-120
Prepared: 08/22/2007 13:53 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 23:34
Analyte
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
Matrix Spike Dup (7H22023-MSD1)
Source: C712264-01
Spike Source ° oREC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
QM-07
3.2 0.10 mg/L 1.25 2.6 45 80-120
Prepared: 08/22/2007 13:53 Analyzed: 08/22/2007 23:37
Analyte
Nitrate/Nitrite as N
Batch 7H23006 - NO PREP
Blank (7H23006-BLK1)
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
3.3 0.10 mg/L 1.25 2.6 52 60-120 3 25 QM-07
Prepared: 08/23/2007 08:58 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 14:00
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Dissolved Solids
LCS (7H23006-BS1)
10
10
mg/L
Prepared: 08/23/2007 08:58 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 14:00
Analyte
Total Dissolved Solids
Duplicate (7H23006-DUP1)
Source: C711948-01
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
330 10 mg/I. 330
111
Prepared: 08/23/2007 08:5B Analyzed: 08/24/2007 14:00
Page 10 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H23006 - NO PREP
Duplicate (7H23006-DUP1) Continued
Source: C711948-01
Prepared: 08/23/2007 08:58 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 14:00
Analyte
Total Dissolved Solids
Batch 7H23008 - NO PREP
Blank (7H23008-BLK1)
Result
170
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
10
mg/L
160
%REC
%REC Limits
Prepared & Analyzed: 08/23/2007 09:34
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
10
Analyte
Result
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
%REC
%REC Limits
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
Ammonia as N
LCS (7H23008-BS1)
0,045
0.10
mg/L.
Prepared & Analyzed: 08/23/2007 09:34
Analyte
Ammonia as N
Matrix Spike (7H23008-MS1)
Source: C711850-01
Result
50
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
0.10
mg/L
53.0
%REC
%REC Limits
101 80-120
Prepared & Analyzed: 08/23/2007 09:34
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
Analyte
Ammonia as N
Matrix Spike Dup (7H23008-MSD1)
Source: C711850-01
Result
47
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
0.10
mg/L
50.0 0.13
%REC
%REC Limits
94 80-120
Prepared & Analyzed: 08/23/2007 09:34
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
Analyte
Ammonia as N
Batch 7H23013 - EPA 3005A
Blank (7H23013-BLK1)
Result
Si
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
0.10
mg/L
50.0 0.13
%REC RPD
%REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
131 a0-120
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:11 Analyzed: 09/04/2007 13:01
25
Analyte
Result
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
%REC
%REC Limits
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
Hardness
Batch 7H28013 - NO PREP
Blank (7H28013-BLK1)
0.10
0
0.67
my/L
Prepared: 08/28/2007 12:44 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 15:18
Analyte
Result
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
%REC
%REC Limits
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
Total Alkalinity
LCS (7H28013-BS1)
5.2
15
mg/L
Prepared: 08/28/2007
12:44 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 15:19
Analyte
Total Alkalinity
Result
88
Spike Source
Flag MRL Units Level Result
15 mg/L
100
%REC
%REC Limits
88 80-120
RPD
RPD Limit Notes
Page 11 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H28013 - NO PREP
Matrix Spike (7H28013-MS1)
Source: C712066-04
Prepared: 08/28/2007 12:44 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 15:27
Analyte
Total Alkalinity
Matrix Spike Dup (7H28013-MSD1)
Source: C712066-04
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
220 15 mg/L 100 220 5 80-120
Prepared: 08/28/2007 12:44 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 15:28
QM-02
Analyte
Total Alkalinity
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
220 15 mg/L 100 220 4 00-120 0.6 25 Q9-02
OUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 7H22007 - NO PREP
Blank (7H22007-BLK1)
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:30 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:40
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Phenolics
Blank (7H22007-BLK2)
0.02
U
0.05 mg/L
Prepared: 08/23/2007 09:46 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 05:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Phenolics
LCS (7H22007-BS1)
0.02 U 0.05 mg/L
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:30 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:40
Analyte
Phenolics
LCS (71122007-852)
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.47 0.05 mg/L 0.500
94 79-104
Prepared: 08/23/2007 09:46 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 05:50
Analyte
Phenolics
Matrix Spike (7H22007-MS1)
Source: A704126-06
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.48 0.05 mg/L 0.500
96 79-104
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:30 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:40
Analyte
Phenolics
Matrix Spike Dup (7H22007-MSD1)
Source: A704126-06
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.45 0.05 m9/L 0.500 0.02 U 50 79-104
Prepared: 08/22/2007 11:30 Analyzed: 08/23/2007 10:40
Analyte
Phenolics
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.46 0.05 mg/L 0.500 0.02 U 92 7 9-104 2 10
Page 12 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H23002 - NO PREP
Blank (7H23002-BLK1)
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 10:53
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
LCS (7H23002-BS1)
0.043 U 0.050 mg/L
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 10:56
Analyte
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Matrix Spike (7H23002-MS1)
Source: A704727-01
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
100 85-108
2.5
0.050 m9/L 2.50
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 10:58
Analyte
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Matrix Spike Dup (7H23002-MSD1)
Source: A704727-01
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.050 mg/L 2.50 0.85 98 86-108
3.3
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 10:59
Analyte
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Batch 7H23009 - NO PREP
Blank(7H23004-BLK1)
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
;
3.3
0.050 mg/L 2.50 0.85 99 55-105
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 12:36
Analyte
Phosphorus
LCS(7H23004-851)
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.020
0.030 mg/L
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 12:44
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
96 89-107
Phis; h0rus
Matrix Spike (7H23004-MS1)
Source: A704727-01
2.4
0.030 m9/L 2.50
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 12:46
Analyte
Phosphorus
Matrix Spike Dup (7H23004-MSD1)
Source: A704727-01
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
0.030 mg/L 250 0.050 97 89.107
2.5
Prepared: 08/23/2007 11:25 Analyzed: 08/24/2007 12:47
Analyte
Phosphorus
Batch 7H28002 - NO PREP
Blank(7H28002-BLK1)
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
2,5 0.030 mg/L 2.50 0.060 96 89-107 - 10
Prepared: 08/28/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Page 13 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
1 1 C-.1 '...- Is.
�4,
www.encolabs.com
Batch 7H28002 - NO PREP
Blank (7H28002-BLK1) Continued
Prepared: 08/28/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide (total)
Blank (7H28002-BLK2)
0.018 U 0.040 mg/L
Prepared: 08/28/2007 12:48 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide (total)
LCS (7H28002-BS1)
0.018
U
0.040
mg/L
Prepared: 08/28/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide (total)
LCS (7H 28002-BS2)
0.20
0.040
mg/L
0.200
99
84-113
Prepared: 08/28/2007 12:48 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide (total)
Matrix Spike (7H28002-MS1)
Source: A704744-01
0.22
0.040
mg/L
0.200
109
84-113
Prepared: 08/28/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide (total)
Matrix Spike Dup (7H28002-MSD1)
Source: A704744-01
0.22
0.040
mg/L
0.200
0.018 U
110
84-113
Prepared: 08/28/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 08/28/2007 20:50
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide (total)
Batch 7108003 - NA
Blank (7108003-BLK1)
0.22
0.040
mg/L
0.200
0.018 U
108
04-113
2
Prepared: 09/08/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 09/08/2007 12:31
1C
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Fluoride
LCS (7108003-BS1)
0.05
U
0.10
mg/L
Prepared: 09/08/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 09/08/2007 12:49
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Fluoride
Matrix Spike (7108003-MS1)
Source: A704340-01
5.1
0.10
mg/L
5.00
102
81-117
Prepared: 09/08/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 09/08/2007 13:07
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Fluoride
5.0
0.10
mg/L
5.10
0.05 U
99
3:-117
Page 14 of 17

QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
' I s� 11. cs t.
��'--�" , J
ad:..�,......,.....�.....e
www.encolabs,com
Batch 7108003 - NA
Matrix Spike Dup (7I08003-MSD1)
Source: A704340-01
Prepared: 09/08/2007 11:34 Analyzed: 09/08/2007 13:25
Analyte
Spike Source %REC RPD
Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Fluoride
4.9
0.10
m9/L
5.10
0.05 U
97
81-117
2
16
Page 15 of 17

www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank. .
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
J The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
Analysis performed outside of method - specified holding time.
The RPD and/or percent recovery for this QC spike sample cannot be accurately calculated due
to the high concentration of analyte inherent in the sample.
QM-07 The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The batch was
accepted based on acceptable LCS recovery.
Q
QM-02
Page 16 of 17

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LABORATORIES CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
10775Cet4xtPoaDr. 4510Extsat3ntPoi Court. Sues211 1014Pas ttriWrl
Govan 37421 1ttksona , FL 2.22164A9 Gary. NG 27113
twigs -mu Fax (WI MOO MD IS X07 fa. (OO) 296 2;0 0191 M-1& Fat 0191117t9S05
lictiocstta0 00446111
Aqua NC Denver'(AQ004)
Med rtarbec
[none]
Page of
4163 Sinclair Street
copluzu
Denyer, NC 28037
iN
[phone]
Savptt(i)fisFa, N4'tabon 1Pt1
Sarr4t(s)
Fax
[phone]
PropCt 11 se
NPDES Hilicrest
POKI[RIM Wo
Debbie Gentry
1ebbbie Gentry
Fatal a01knktiees
ti
Raque&It}d Tvittatlhsgd
Tunes
NctoclRus,roastscapita to
nmt atattytottaaej
Standard
Expedited
Due 1___ _1
Sarni m trem 1rbM&tl ael
NlI itzt+xt.Well 3
Ccae i mDub
Cnitasr t
. Carp fGab
UF{ate
( coded
w
18W A of
Ccrisisvi
•
c-. Thal # of Con1ainf
r
X,
•
.i>
Sample Comments
wt itwca sr
{te:t�3l,
esa»T,
cf"• Iii
�
e PI
togrem
ttoa.:w O
23^11a'-J t 1 ? ; -i 8 f C VD•
;>~+art to;
tastra,ntts• 0
iv p. G
1 Z. p i
f,
/�Ie
u jsicrt
.:
,odnv
ikstrrm
1Lru+•alay
t d.etry
admiral=eq
oaten Kre
itecemtaUr
Dadra*
�t 'ts S Toro cr Fimapi
i tier �e t1v+�0�11 Q'��
U1 144'1.4
— Unacceptable
nnrn,.�ta5.
M
Whiz :GWGrurdi r SO. -Set Sa wt Sri,&,tazeMier vceszti_t,'141Yr dCBicr ferallammaas$1 Nwt N 1 1?ttk0(f t
Pulp :1T soC1ea tutosiiral to VICO Lobo gm et• ottorttare.ost the Wins atd conitere I ottd on Mt mono of Mils km, Wins vice ustsm votr otta oxist