NC0000311_Permit Issuance_20010402

NPDES DOCIMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0000311
M-B Industries WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
April 2, 2001
This document is pi -fated on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resrerse side

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
April 2, 2001
Mr. Edwin E. Morrow
M-B Industries, Inc.
P.O. Box 1118
Rosman, North Carolina 28772
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
Permit NC0000311
M-B Industries, Inc.
Transylvania County
Dear Mr. Morrow:
Division of Water Quality (Division) personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North. Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9,1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Please note the following changes from the draft permit:
• Part A. (1.) of the draft permit contained an error in the toxicity requirement. The requirement has been changed
from "Chronic Toxicity" to "Acute Toxicity."
• A new section of effluent limits, Part A. (3.) has been added to the permit. It specifies flow and -pollutant limits for
the proposed discharge of remediated groundwater from outfall 003.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you
have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request
must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is
made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other
permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local govemmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this permit, please contact Natalie Sierra at 919-733-5083 extension
551 or via e-mail at: [e-mail].
cc: Asheville Regional Office/Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit .9
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Point Source Compliance and Enforcement Unit
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED SY
®ILL REID
Kerr T. Stevens
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748

10.
Permit NC0000311
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
M-B Industries, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
M-B Industries Wastewater Treatment Plant
U.S. Highway 64
West of Rosman
Transylvania County
to receiving waters designated as the West Fork French Broad River in the French
Broad River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective May 1, 2001.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2005.
Signed this day April 3, 2001.
ORIGINAL SIGNED SY
SILL RED
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

•
Permit NC0000311
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
M-B Industries is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.030 MGD physical/chemical treatment facility
for the treatment of metal fabrication wastewater (001) and to discharge non -
contact cooling water (002) from facilities located at M-B Industries, Inc., U.S.
Highway 64, west of Rosman in Transylvania County, and
2. After obtaining an Authorization to Construct (ATC) from the Division of Water
Quality, operate a 0.1 MGD groundwater remediation system for the treatment
and discharge of contaminated groundwater through outfall 003.
•
3. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into West Fork French Broad River, which is classified C-Trout HQW waters
in the French Broad River Basin.

Point of Discharge
NC00000311 - M-B Industries
Latitude:
Longitude:
Quad #:
Stream Class:
Receiving Stream:
Permitted Flow:
35°08'15"N Sub -Basin:
82°51'00" W
G17NFJRosman
C-Tr-HQW
West Fork French Broad River
001: 0.030 MGD 002: not limited
04-03-01
003: 0.10 MGD
M-B Industries, Inc.
NC0000311
Map Not to Scale

Permit NC0000311
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001— METAL FINISHING. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
FFLUENTRA, ` .
�� x
"' y�•k , .1 4� .
�� : � ., � � � LIMITS �._ Y� �
L�t� . -�.�:y ,,,. ,L , � , .
. 3ti.{{�� 1` �::'^ �:. ]..'{ j�r\.7.:.y ��t g�] ..5;.. .S s9 t
_ R`. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS �T
� �lML:
�� >" , r ' -}'. , , . -.t ; - �
F� }' M. 4 .-i' :.�.k 1 - .,� Y ��`...��. c.+s�tk . -:i. ��i;L
C : ARACTERISTICS. " �`
yF1�R .. 3 �.r' •R: _T�'.. ��.. .,ice 'Y�``�`;f�
�.`�' 74�+U�+�}..^'ni��%'.- �?C;i11•f'yk`:1�
�a,`` r- ._ f ' :
� > r :..,
tp,.�t ta r ,ii.:, rt?� v!,
� �� �_- ..., • .. .:, �
-:F
Monthl Avera eY
�, Yr r �
,;.V , q�j� f l�'h'�t '^,.i:t=� ° �
; 4. � �4f;
��.� ,..�. •
Dail",Maximum
_.�� Y ::
"r *�Z .?k'�hi c :,rHt a.
��,t.� , �;; _
Measurement
^ Frequency✓
Y Sam le T e.
is YP
. '•. rim'
:s_ .,,.. �.
.re
i r- q.'Simi*
'�. "" 'Sam' Ie� '.
�: .
, :Locatio � a.,t.
Flow
0.030 MGD
Weekly
Instantaneous
Influent or Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
31.0 mg/L
60.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Oil and Grease
26.0 mg/L
52.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Phenols
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)2
Weekly
Grab
Effluent,
Upstream,
Downstream
Total Toxic Organics (TTO)3
2.13 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Acute Toxicity4
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Cadmium
0.240 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Chromium
1.71 mg/L
2.77 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Nickel
2.38 mg/L
3.98 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Copper
2.07 mg/L
3.38 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Cyanide
0.65 mg/L
1.20 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Lead
0.43 mg/L
0.69 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Silver
0.24 mg/L
0.43 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Zinc
1.48 mg/L
2.61 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
Sample Locations: Upstream — Upstream 50 feet, Downstream — Downstream 50 feet.
2 The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than 0.50C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed
20°C.
3 In lieu of monitoring for TTO, the permittee may submit the following certification statement: Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit
limitation for total toxic organics, I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of
concentrated toxic organics into the wastewater has occurred since the filing of the last discharge
monitoring report.
4 Whole Effluent Toxicity will be assessed using the Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow) Pass/Fail at
90% test. See part A.(4.).

Permit NC0000311
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 002 - NON -CONTACT COOLING WATER ONLY.
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT'�'' aY
, . a,x - -
;CHARACTERISTICS la
i°i�ti,; X. (�F
y� <.
,..:0: ,A, � .,.,,a;�
-- . LIMITS - •`
��1s� ."; r'
r:-.
'a�aar.i? .
,
#�` MONITORING REQUIREMENT S�cYi
,,°1. ..,: *c t.4,4mr7M . •
N,.93,e,trO,'6%tS.1:;�
,=i•6i^1i� �.w� ' alt""f' �"
, MonthlyAverage
a'4��. .ate
A.N'� fY1 ;��� 1,�r
:mil:DailyMaximum
,, ..,4Y���"t�
-,4v-,I
= Measurement
.- .=-4.1
�Frequency
Sam Ie TYpe
T <, .,
-.�
- Sam le :;
'.�,;-1,d.,1'Yi,t;
�o ;,
Flow
Semi-annually
Estimate
Effluent
Temperature, OC1
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine2
Semi-annually
Grab
-- Effluent
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE COOLING
WATER EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL COMPOUNDS
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
1 The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than O.50C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed
20°C.
2 Monitoring requirements only apply if chlorine is added to the treatment system. Discharges shall
be required to meet a daily maximum discharge limitation of 17 µg/ L.
The permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division of Water Quality prior to utilizing
any biocide in the cooling water.

Permit NC0000311
A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 003 — GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
u 5
EFFLUENT wt
CHARACTERISTICS
{ 1 • � , ry rye
^rAv x.. ., 7
Yr L �.-r 4.
a:. ... {
a+ a• a
° G L t, s LIMITS' 9, :: j•
_
m �.
'T MONITORING. REQUIREMENTS'. 4•
,
. MonthlyWeekl�y�`�
: i.i»r+ .Gf,
t ry
Average .. d
T �,j4>� it-.. r
.i.`.. s4lt�- ..
.., Average :
Daily'� :
�' Ar
.'''�ba e r
Maximum`
'., Measurement ;
s s t' K.+e 2- r?^ K^
T.n�S" �. "'.�"'�"�.
4.., Frequency;- ,
:k' Sample
C kl� �' �
� iy > �4k, . r..,
, •. TYpe34°-'.
b ` :Sam Ie< t {.
�.�%.•.L� a, r5:, •iCt•
� ., �.,
, - Location
Flow
0.10 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
Cyanide
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Cadmium
2 ug/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Chromium
1022 ug/L_
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Zinc
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Arsenic
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Lead
34 ug/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Selenium
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Silver
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Cis-1,2 dichloroethene
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Trichloroethene
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Tetrachloroethene
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Chloride
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Acute Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
Notes:
1 Whole Effluent Toxicity will be assessed using the Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow) Pass/Fail at
90% test. See part A.(4.).

Permit NC0000311
A. (4.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL LIMIT (Quarterly)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity
In A Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised -July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring
shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. The effluent
concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as
treatment two in the procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be
obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The tests will be
performed during the months of March, June, September and December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGE6C. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation, of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing,
this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may
be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month
following the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (5.) BIOCIDE CONDITION
The permittee shall not use any biocides except those approved in conjunction with the permit
application. The permittee shall notify the Director in writing not later than ninety (90) days prior to
instituting use of nay additional biocide used in cooling systems which may be toxic to aquatic life
other than those previously reported to the Division of Water Quality. Such notification shall include
completion of Biocide Worksheet From 101 and a map locating the discharge point and receiving
stream.

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
CLIPPING OF LEGAL ADVERTISING
ATTACHED HERE
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT
RALEIGH, N.C. 27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF
INTENT TO ISSUE A NPDES
WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough
staff review and application of
N.C. General Statute 143.21.
Public law 92-500 and other
lawful standards and NPDES Permit Number
regulations, the North Carolina NC0000311, M-B Industries
Environmental Management (Mitchell Bissel), P.O. Box
Commission proposes to issue a 1118, Rosman, N.C. 28772 has
National Pollutant Discharge applied for a permit renewal for
Elimination System (NPDES) a facility located in
wastewater discharge permit to Transylvania County
the person (s) Iisted below discharging treated wastewater
effective 45 days from the into West Fork French Broad in
publish date of this notice. the French Broad. River Basin.
Written comments regarding Currently cadmium are water
the proposed permit will be quality limited. This discharge
accepted until 30 days after the may affect future allocations in
publish date of this notice. Allthis portion of the receiving
comments received prior to that stream.
date are considered in the final NPDES Permit Number
determinations regarding the NC0051021, Eagle's Nest
proposed permit. The Director Foundation Camp, 43 Hart road,
of the N.C. Division of Water Pisgah Forest, N.C. 28766 has
Quality may decide to hold a applied for a permit renewal for
public meeting for the proposed a_ facility located in
permit should the Division Transylvania County
receive a significant degree of discharging treated wastewater
public interest. into Little River in the French
Copies of the draft permit Broad River Basin. Currently
and other supporting fecal coliform and total residual
information on file used to chlorine are water quality
determine conditions present in limited. This discharge may
the draft permit are available iaffect future allocations in this
upon request and payment of !portion of the receiving stream.
the costs of reproduction. Mail NPDES Permit Number
comments and/or requests for
q : NC00048658, Blue Mountain
information to the N.C. Utilities, Inc. (Sherwood Forest
Division of Water Quality at the .' ; WWTP), 1 King Road, Pisgah
above address or call Ms. Forest, N.C. 28768 has applied
Christie Jackson at 919-733- for a permit renewal for a
5083, extension 538. Please facility located in Transylvania
include the NPDES permit; County discharging treated
number (attached) in any wastewater into the Little River
communication. Interested in the French Broad River
persons may also visit the Basin. Currently total residual
Division of Water Quality at chlorine are water quality
512 N. Salisbury Street, limited. This discharge may
Raleigh, N.C. 27604-1148 affect future allocations in this
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. portion of the receiving stream.
and 5:00 p.m. to review m1/29/Itc
information on file.
NORTH CAROLINA
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of sal(
County and State, duty commissioned, qualified, an
authorized by law to administer oaths, personall
appeared David Phillips who being first duty sworr
deposes and says: that he (she) is Advertisini
Manager (Owner, partner, publisher, or other office
or employee authorized to make this affidavit) o
The Transylvania Times, published, issued, ani
entered as second class mail in the Town of Brevar(
in said County and State; that he (she) is authorize(
to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that thi
notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy o
which is attached hereto, was published in Th(
Transylvania Times on the following dates:
January 29, 2001
and that the said newspaper in which such notice
paper, document, or legal advertisement wa
published was, at the time of each and every suc]
publication, a newspaper meeting all of thi
requirements and qualifications of Section I-597 c
the General Statutes of North Carolina and wa
qualified newspaper within the meaning of Sectici
I-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This
Sworn
day of,
day of -1-0., , (A.et,f (t , 2009//
\ A-2 U.-(> i i /\i-AAle:}04
(Signature of person making 'affidavit
h
subscribed before me, this
, 2004Y
r.
(
is
Notary Publi
My Commission expires: r,s
I�TT,1Tfl TV -

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Mitchell -Bissell Industries
GW Remediation (003)
NC0000311
Time Period Jan 1998 thru Oct 2000
Qw (MGD) 0.1
7QIOS (cfs) 27.9
30Q2 (cfs) 47.4
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 93.8
Reeving Stream W. Fork F. Broad
Summary for 0.100 MGD
« For Instructions, See RED TAB (cell Al).
WWTP Class 1
!WC (%) @ 7Q1OS 0.6
30Q2 0.3
QA 0.2
Stream Class C-Tr
PARAMETER
TYPE*
STANDARDS 8
CRITERIA
NCWQS % FAV
PQL
REASONABLE
POTENTIAL
RESULTS
PRELIMINARY
RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
n = 12
MaxPredCw «Allowable Cw
Cyanide
NC
2.5 22
Max Pred Cw 15.8
Allowable Cw (acute) 22
MONITOR?
Monitor quarterly to collect data for RPA
at next renewal
Allowable Cw (chronic) 453
MONITOR?
n = 29
MaxPredCw «Allowable Cw
Cadmium
NC
02 2.1
1
Max Pred Cw 17.2
Monitor 2/Month
Allowable Cw (acute) 2
DAILY MAX. UMIT
Limit to 2ug/L daily max
Allowable Cw (chronic) 36
MONITOR?
n = 41
MaxPredCw «Allowable Cw
Chromium
NC
25 1.022
5
Max Pred Cw 12357.4
Umit to 1,022 uglL daily max
Allowable Cw (acute) 1,022
DAILY MAX. LIMIT
Monitor 2/month
Allowable Cw (chronic) 4,525
WK. AVG. LIMIT
n = 40
MaxPredCw > Action Level
Zinc
NC
25 67
Max Pred Cw 31991.7
Require monitoring 2/month (POC)
(AL)
Allowable Cw (acute) 67
DAILY MAX. LIMIT
No limit at this time since no standard in place.
Allowable Cw (chronic) 4,525
WK. AVG. LIMIT
Re-evaluate when new plant comes on-line.
n = 26
MaxPredCw > 1/2 FAV
Arsenic
NC
25
Max Pred Cw 28.6
Allowable Cw (acute) WA
MONITOR?
Monitor quarterly to collect data for RPA
at next renewal
Allowable Cw (chronic) 4.525
MONITOR?
n = 40
MaxPredCw < Allowable Cw
Lead
NC
13 33.8
5
Max Pred Cw 657.4
Umit to 4 ug/L daily max
Allowable Cw (acute) 34
DAILY MAX. LIMIT
Monitor 2/month
Allowable Cw (chronic) 2,263
MONITOR?
n = 26
MaxPredCw < Allowable Cw
Selenium
NC
2.5
Max Pred Cw 2.500
Allowable Cw (acute) N/A
MONITOR?
Monitor quarterly to collect data for RPA
at next renewal
Allowable Cw (chronic) 452.500
MONITOR?
n = 26
MaxPredCw < Allowable Cw
Silver
NC
0.03 1.23
Max Pred Cw 2.5
Monitor quarterly to collect data for RPA
(A.L)
Allowable Cw (acute) 1
DAILY MAX. LIMIT
at next renewal
Allowable Cw (chronic) 5
MONITOR?
n = 37
axPredCw > NCWQS (narrative)
cis-1,2 dichlorethene
A
1.0
Max Pred Cw 16.1
Allowable Cw (acute) N/A
MONITOR?
Monitor quarterly to collect data for RPA
at next renewal
Allowable Cw (chronic) 606
MONITOR?
n = 40
MaxPredCw = NCWQS
Trichloroethene
C
5.0
Max Pred Cw 210.2
No limit at this time -
Allowabte Cw (acute) N/A
MONITOR?
Allowable Cw (chronic) 1,534
MONITOR?
Require monitoring 2/month (POC)
n = 39
MaxPredCw > Action Level
Tetrachloroehtene
A
8.85
Max Pred Cw 3010.0
Require monitoring 2/month (POC)
Allowable Cw (acute) N/A
MONITOR?
Allowable Cw (chronic) 5,364.5
MONITOR?
n = 10
MaxPredCw > Action Level
Chloride
NC
230000
Max Pred Cw 304800.0
Allowable Cw (acute) N/A
MONITOR?
Monitor quarterly to collect data for RPA
at next renewal
Allowable Cw (chronic) 41,630,000
MONITOR?
Legend:
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
"Freshwater Discharge
NC0000311 gw, X- MGD
3/30/01

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET ADDENDUM FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0000311
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
NC0000311 — M-B Industries
Applicant Address:
Mr. Edwin E. Morrow, P.O. Box 118; Rosman„ North Carolina 28772
Facility Address:
U.S. Highway 64 west of Rosman
Permitted Flow
0.10 MGD of remediated groundwater
Type of Waste:
Contaminated Groundwater
Facility/Permit Status:
Class II, Active; Renewal
County:
Transylvania
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
West Fork French
Broad River
Regional Office:
Asheville
Stream Classification:
C-Tr-HQW
State Grid / USGS Quad:
G7NE/Rosman
303(d) Listed?
no
Permit Writer:
Natalie Sierra
Subbasin:
04-03-01
Date:
1/10/01
Drainage Area (miZ):
27.2
-.
Lat. 35° 08' 15" N
•
';
Long. 82° 51'00" W
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
27.9
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs)
Average Flow (cfs):
93.S
IWC (%):
(1.6
BACKGROUND:
During the draft period of NC0000311, an application was received requesting permission to discharge treated
groundwater from the site through a third outfall 003. Preliminary scans show the water to be contaminated with PCE
(tetrachloroethene) and TCE (trichloroethene) for which a shallow tray air stripper has been recommended by the
consultant as a treatment system. The Groundwater section in the ARO is strongly urging the facility to move forward
with groundwater cleanup measures.
PERMITTING STRATEGY:
Based upon available data from recovery wells, a reasonable potential analysis was run on an array of metals and other
contaminants. Reasonable potential was found for the following:
• Chromium
• Cadmium
• Zinc
• Lead
• Silver
• PCE
All of the above will be limited except zinc and silver, which are action level pollutants.
Based on detection, monitoring will be required 2/monthly for the following:
• TCE
• Zinc
The following will be monitored quarterly to collect effluent data for RPA at the next renewal:
• Arsenic
• Cyanide
• Selenium
• Cis-1,2 dichloroethene
• Chloride
• Siler

t.
An acute toxicity test will be required quarterly. This test is of the same form as that performed on the effluent from
001.

Permit NC0084344
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample Location
Flow1
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
Arsenic
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Chloroform
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Lead
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Mercury
0.012I.ig/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Tetrachloroethene
8.85 µg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Toluene
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Trichloroethene
81 µg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
EPA Method 6210D
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity2
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
pH
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. This facility has been approved as a non -discharge facility with the option of an emergency discharge should
the infiltration gallery fail to handle the load of the treated groundwater. If an actual discharge does not
occur during a month, then report such on the monthly monitoring reports. Sampling only needs to be
completed at the time of a discharge.
2. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) Quarterly, Pass/Fail, 90%; See A.(2.).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months
of February, May, August and November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
88
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum,
in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of

Permit NC0084344
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity
monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the
aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number,
county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area
of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the
address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

\-� 1N-Dvs-rnnES
`KeEQv EXP.AIAS 0 4N-1
EA A
`NC -Fo{ ` fnP %1qq, 62L4
-PJ C I,,��� " A G31 11 t ---ShhhO S cin de eiGlAfik_ ✓
rs 7u\ \/WL NT + i E -ae:G- NO 1 NCLJ )] 4 .
NF--vC- Q S1v;S
C SC v I T?
VOl-w-t & CP,vz k J') "TCx:
2 2o7m 3 3 , 1-1
3 zor ;() G
Onl-11 2 1 I-SLI s9 0
Viu E WOL,; ► ,5
,
TCE- III__
TR Poste 5 ��� -j — s c,MA i AinS-hr K-
-Or `m-avemiccly Ad -
;eves h q�-��q�
b,(e vaa
.31ST ?G41-� 1. oA
7l21� c D 1)15Pos-A L - ! oq and
TW o oPilQv S
s\) WAY- ,s- IS��EJ

Feb. 02 2001 10:39AM Waters Edge Environmental
919-855-9930
p.2
Shallowfray+
I ow profile air strippers
System Performance Estimate
Client and Proposal Information:
Waters Edge Environmental, LLC
4901 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Untreated Model 3611
Contaminant Influent Effluent
Effluent Target Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
Tetrachloroethylene 569 ppb
1 ppb
Trichloroethylene 4 ppb
1 ppb
4
18 ppb
0.017915
96.9900%
<1 ppb
0.000125
95.8285%
Model 3621
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
removal
0.0184 8
99.9094%
<1 ppb
0.000130
99.6260%
Model Chosen:
Water Flow Rat
Air Flow Rate:
Water Temp:
Air Temp:
NW Ratio:
Safety Factor:
Model 3631
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibslhr)
% removal
0.018500
99.9973%
<1 ppb
0.000130
99.9927%
65.0 gpm%
0-cfm
55.0 F
50.0 F
103.6
None
Model 3641
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
<1 ppb
0.018501
99.9999%
<1 ppb
0.000130
99.9997%
Vrotod
rvvor)
d1,
Model 3651
Effluent
Water
Alr(Ibs/hr)
removal
<1 ppb
0.018501
100.0000%
<1 ppb
0.000130
100.0000%
This report has been generated by ShallowTray Modeler software version 2.1 W. This software Is designed to assist a skilled operator
In predicting the performance of a ShallowTray air stripping system. North East Environmental Products, Inc. Is not responsible
for incidental or consequential damages resulting from the improper operation of either the software or the alr stripping equipment
Report generated: 217J200i
Copyright 1995 North East Environmental Products, inc. " 17 Technology Drive, West Lebanon, NH 03784
Voice: 603-298-7061 FAX: [phone]' All Rights Reserved.

Feb. 02 2001 10:39AM Waters Edge Environmental 919-859-9930 p.1
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
4901WATERS EDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27606
W [phone]
FAX [phone]
FAx TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE: 2. 1 21 0 � JOB NUMBER:
FAX To: 1VQrkCt�1t. 1t'crot
FAX NUMBER: `133 - r-‘ k
FAX FROM: P\rc(\ VCx\cr
SUBJECT:
Number of pages to follow:
ha l l6°3 -Tca- � �I Cb "V\ ()t"e
does not include cover)
m3
COMMENTS: -I a'CY1 5 e,n C\ c t. ply O'
t k arirl Sc,c A-Ne Q trm.k
J
PlYpx-NcYkl_ \e.as 1c �� s 1rKrouJ 'i \ our
'aveYr .. oar e(n acre 'r t01 \iic\c
o.nd \r\ e cyb6 u) ee..\ct.nc . .
NOTICE: The information following this cover sheet is intended to be confidential to the person
to whom it is addressed. Any informationfollowing is subject to copyright protection. li you are
not able to deliver this communication to the intended recipient or if you are not an agent of the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy or use this information in anyway. Please notify the
sender immediately by telephone at [phone].

MB Industries 00311
Subject: MB Industries 00311
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 16:48:17 -0500
From: Kristie Robeson <[e-mail]>
To: Natalie Sierra <[e-mail]>
Hey Natalie.
I have reviewed this draft and the only error I found was on the limits
page for tox. In the table on that page it list chronic tox and that
should be changed to acute tox.
Thanks.
1 of 1 3/19/01 12:28 PM

rul
fal
Put
fulq
fog
Pit
cog
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
4901 WATERS EDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100 • RALEIGH, NC 27606 • PHONE [phone] • FAx [phone]
February 2, 2001
Ms. Natalie Sierra
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Reference: NPDES Permit Application Addendum
M-B Industries, Inc.
US Highway 64 West
Rosman, North Carolina
Waters Edge Job No R1-17
Dear Ms. Sierra:
Based upon our February 1, 2001 conversation, your have requested a couple additional
items to be addressed as an addendum to our January 22, 2001 NPDES permit submittal
by Waters Edge Environmental, LLC (Waters Edge). Based upon our conversation, we
have provided the following information.
Net Present Value (NPV) of Selected Option and Feasible Alternative
You requested a net present value calculation for the pump and treat alternative (selected
option) as well as the pump and haul alternative which was the only other remotely
feasible options discussed in the NPDES permit. The calculations for both pump and
treat (selected option) and pump and haul (other remotely feasible alternative) are shown
in Appendix A using 9% cost of capital and 5% inflation. Due to the astronomically high
cost of pump and haul, only limited cost estimation was provided in the NPDES permit.
For purposes of submitting NPV estimations, we also attempted to calculate a cost to
contain the water at the facility, which will approach 100,000 gallons per day as well as
costs for disposal. Again, we would comment that the pump and haul option is
essentially infeasible to consider seriously. Finally, since both options will involve the
same amount of ground water monitoring, these were not included in the calculation.
The NPV of pump and treat is $194,524 and pump and haul is 63,551,179.
FOR

all
INN
Mil
mg
Illt
NM
NPDES Permit Addendum
M-B Industries
February 2, 2001
Page 2 of 2
`a Summary Listing of Constituents of Concern and Predicted Removal Rates
Table 2 in the NPDES permit provides all of the historic results for all monitoring wells
"' at the site. You have requested a summary of the constituents of concern (COCs). The
COCs at the site are primarily tetrachloroethene (PCE) with minor concentrations of and
trichloroethene (TCE). Based upon the anticipated flow from the respective wells, we
N. have a predicted influent concentration of 569 ug/L PCE and 4 ug/L TCE (see
calculations in Appendix B). The predicted VOC removal for the shallow tray system
proposed for the site is rated at 99.973% for PCE and 99.9927% for TCE at 65 gallons
"'" per minute which is the expected flow from the four wells (see Appendix C). Therefore,
we can comfortably estimate that removal of VOCs will be less than 1 ug/L, which is far
below the practical quantitation limit of SW-846 Method 8260B.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at
919.859.9987.
Sincerely,
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
Phillip L. Rahn, PG
President
cc: Edwin Morrow — MB Industries
•. 01-029/PLRJaht
MI

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-B Industries Project Analysis
Net Present Value of Cost
Pump and Treat Option
Average Cost of Capital =
Annual Capital Outlay
Real Estate Value
Salavge Value
9%
Annual Appreciation =
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
5%
2006
2007
Year 1 Year 2
Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
$115,600 $15,600 $15,600 $15,600 $15,600
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PV of Cash Flows Out $194,524
PV of Cash Flows In $0
NPV of Project ($194,524)
$15,600
$0
$0
$30,600
$0
$0
Note(s): This analysis does not account for any tax consequences or anticipated lease payments from tenants.
The estimated cost of ground water sampling events is considered equivalent between options, and therefore is not included

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 ➢ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
M-B Industries Project Analysis
Net Present Value of Cost
Pump and Haul Option
Average Cost of Capital =
Annual Capital Outlay
Real Estate Value
Salavge Value
9%
Annual Appreciation =
5%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year 1
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
$11,664,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,579,560
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PV of Cash Flows Out $63,551,179
PV of Cash Flows In $0
NPV of Project ($63,551,179)
Note(s): This analysis does not account for any tax consequences or anticipated lease payments from tenants.
The estimated cost of ground water sampling events is considered equivalent between options, and therefore is not included

M-B Industries, Rosman, NC
Cost Analysis
Pump and Haul Option
Year One
Installation and Startup
O&M
,aft Electricity
Transport
Disposal
Total
olat
O&M $3,600
Electricity $3,600
Transport $2,432,360
Disposal $9,125,000
Total $11,564,560
$100,000
$3,600
$3,600
$2,432,360
$9,125,000
$11,664,560
Years Two through Six
rat
Year Seven
System Decommission $15,000
tut O&M $3,600
Electricity $3,600
Transport $2,432,360
riot Disposal $9,125,000
Total $11,579,560

M-B Industries Cost Analysis
fast Annual Cost Estimations
Pump & Haul Option
Annual Costs
Transportation
Gallons produced per day
Truck capacity (gal)
Number of trucks per day
100,000
6,000
17
Cost per loaded mile I $2.80
Total miles to Charlotte, NC 140
Total cost per truck per day $392.00
'o" Total cost per day $6,664.00
Total cost per year $2,432,360.00
Disposal
Gallons produced per day
Disposal cost per gallon 2
Disposal cost per day
Disposal cost per year
100,000
$0.25
$25,000.00
$9,125,000.00
Operations
Electricity costs per year 3
O&M costs per year °
$3,600.00
$3,600.00
Total Annual Cost $11,564,560.00
InitiaUFinal Costs
Year One
Pump systems and Temp Storage 5 $100,000.00
Final Year
System decommission $15,000.00
1 = From Shamrock Environmental, Inc., Greensboro, NC
2 = Standard disposal cost per gallon
3 = Operation of extraction wells and temporary storage transfer system
4 = Maintenance of extraction wells and temporary storage system
5 = Installation of extraction wells and 400,000 gallon (minimum) temporary storage pond

PEI
M-B Industries, Inc
Untreated Influent VOC Concentrations
Calculation from Simple Proportional Comparison
WSW-2
Anticipated Volume (GPM): 20
Average 1
Proportional
Amount 4
PCE Concentration (ug/I)
TCE Concentration (ug/I)
33.4 668
0 0
WSW-3 Anticipated Volume (GPM): 20
Proportional
Average' Amount 4
PCE Concentration (ug/I) 506.3 10127
Fir TCE Concentration (ug/I) 13.0 259
1.4
EW-11 2 Anticipated Volume (GPM): 20
Proportional
Average 1 Amount 4
PCE Concentration (ugll) 134.9 2698
TCE Concentration (ug/I) 0 0
REM
EW-19 3 Anticipated Volume (GPM): 5
Proportional
Average' Amount 4
PCE Concentration (ug/I) 4700.0 23500
ism TCE Concentration (ug/I) 0 0
•, Totals Anticipated Volume (GPM): 65
WSW-2 4 WSW-3 EW-11 EW-19
PCE Concentration (ug/I) 668 10127 2698 23500
raul TCE Concentration (ug/I) 0 259 0 0
1 = Mean average of previous 3 sampling events (only 1 event for EW-19)
2 = Proposed extraction well in vincinity of MW-11
3 = Proposed extraction well in vincinity of MW-11, Analytical data for MW-11 used
4 = Proportional amount based on anticipated volume from each respective well
mit
[Proportional Amount = Average (ug/I) * Anticipated Volume (GPM)]
TOTAL
569
4

MR
fER
M-B Industries, Inc
,▪ , Untreated Influent VOC Concentrations
Mean Average for Respective Extraction Well locations
ow WSW-2
MA
Sampling Event
PCE Concentration (ug/I)
TCE Concentration (ug/I)
8/9/99 2/24/00 10/13/00
33 26.2 41
0 0 0
Average 1
33.40
0.00
gel
WSW-3
" Sampling Event 8/9/99 2/24/00 10/13/00
real
PCE Concentration (ug/I) 700 309 510
TCE Concentration (ug/I) 14 6.9 18
Average 1
506.33
12.97
ma MW-11 2
WI
PER
Sampling Event 9/17/99 2/24/00 10/12/00
PCE Concentration (ug/I)
TCE Concentration (ug/l)
Average'
12.7 142 250 134.90
0 0 0 0.00
EW-19 3
mi Anticipated Volume (GPD): 5 Average 1
tog
PCE Concentration (ug/I)
TCE Concentration (ug/I)
4700
0
4700
0
cal
1 = Mean average of previous 3 sampling events (only 1 event for EW-19)
2 = Proposed extraction well in vincinity of MW-11, Analytical data for MW-11 used
poi 3 = Proposed extraction well inside the western portion of the facility
FM
for
Mil
MI

rat
PIM
5hallowTr
low profile air strippers
MEI
System Performance Estimate
Client and Proposal Information:
Waters Edge Environmental, LLC
4901 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Untreated Model 3611
Contaminant Influent Effluent
Effluent Target Water
`"m/ Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
,—Tetrachloroethylene 569 ppb
1 ppb
ram
Trichloroethylene 4 ppb
1 ppb
F•,
fml
fon
1
18 ppb
0.017915
96.9900%
<1 ppb
0.000125
95.8285%
Model 3621
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
0.0184 8
99.9094%
<1 ppb
0.000130
99.8260%
Model Chosen:
Water Flow Rate:
Air Flow Rate:
Water Temp:
Air Temp:
A/VV Ratio:
Safety Factor:
Model 3631
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
<1 ppb
0.018500
99.9973%
<1 ppb
0.000130
99.9927%
3600
65.0 gpm
900 cfm
55.0 F
50.0 F
103.6
None
Model 3641
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
<1 ppb
0.018501
99.9999%
<1 ppb
0.000130
99.9997%
Model 3651
Effluent
Water
Air(Ibs/hr)
% removal
<1 ppb
0.018501
100.0000%
<1 ppb
0.000130
100.0000%
This report has been generated by ShallowTray Modeler software version 2.1 W. This software is designed to assist a skilled operator
min predicting the performance of a ShallowTray air stripping system. North East Environmental Products, Inc. is not responsible
Dr incidental or consequential damages resulting from the improper operation of either the software or the air stripping equipment.
. teport generated: 2/2/2001
copyright 1995 North East Environmental Products, Inc. * 17 Technology Drive, West Lebanon, NH 03784
foice: 603-298-7061 FAX: [phone] *All Rights Reserved.
r•�

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary December 18, 2000
FACILITY RHQUIREMENf YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Mayodan WWTP Perm chr lim: 6% if pf >1.25
NC0021873/001 Begin:3/I/1997 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec
County. Rockingham Region: WSRO Subbasin: ROA02
PF: 3.0 Special
7Q 10: 75 IWC(%) 6 Order.
+ NonComp:Single
1996 Pass Pass - - Pass - Pass - - Fail
1997 Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Psss
1998 - Pass - - Late Pass -- Pass - - Pass
1999 - - Pass -- -- Bt --- -- Pass - - Lato
2000 Pass - Late Fail 8.5 17 -- - Pass -
MB Industries Penn 24hr prf ac lint: 90% Mc! Y 1996 - - Pass - - Pass - -- Pass - - Pass
NC0000311/001 I3egin:2/1/1996 Frequency: Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 - - Pass - Pass --- Pass --- Pass
County: Transylvania Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB01 1998 - - Pass - -- Pass - --- Pass --- -- Pass
PF: 0.030 Special 1999 -. - Pass - - Pass --- Pass - -- NR/Pass
7010: 27.9 IWC(%):0.17 Order: 2000 - - Pass - - Pass NRIPass -
Mebane WWTP Penn chr lirn: 90%
NC0021474N01 I3egin:4/I/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct
County Ala once Region: WSRO Subbasin CPF02
PF: 2.5 Special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%):100 Ord.:
NonComp:Single
Y 1996 Pass - - Pass - - Pass Pass ---
1997 Pass - - Pass - Pass - - Pass - .-.
1998 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - Pass - --
1999 pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
Metal Industries PERM 48HR LC50 AC LIM: 77% (GRAB) Y 1996 <12.5 >100 17.68 18.95 <12.5 54.96 22.53 17.68 Late 18.95 17.68 <12.5
NC0057819/001 Begin6/1/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:SINGLE 1997 17.68 <12.5 <12.5 81.111 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5
County: McDowell Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB30 1998 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 17.7 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12S <12.5
PF: 0.01 Special SOC:3/99-10/I/2000 48hr LC50 ac moni M (1.5,3,6.12.5,25) 1999 12.4.0.5t <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 >25 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5
7010: 2.0 1WC(%):0.77 Order: 2000 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 >25 >25 >25 NR H H H
Muter Brewing Co. Perm chr lint: 2.I% 1996 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - Pass
NC0029980/001 Begin:3/I/1997 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1997 - Pass Pass Pass - Pass -- - Pass
County Rockingham Region: WSRO Subbasin ROA03 1998 - Pass -- - Pass - - Pass - -• Pass
PF: 5.2 Special 1999 - Pass - Pass Pass - -- NR(Pass
7Q10: 313 IWC(%)2.51 Order: 2000 - Pass - Pass - - 131 - Pass
Mocksvlle WWTP Bear Creek Perm chr lim: 37% Y 1996 - Pass - -- Pass - Pass -
N00050903/001 Begin:I/1/2000 Frequency: Q P/F Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1997 - Pass - NR/Pass - - NRJFail NR
County: Davie Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO6 1998 - Pass - Pass - - Pass -
PF: 0.25 Special 1999 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 0.65 IWC(%):37 Order: 2000 - Pass - - Pan - - Pass -
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Mocksvlllc WWTP Dutchman's Cr. PERM CHR LIM: 7% Y 1996 Fail,Pass - - NR Pass - Pass - - Pass
NC002149I/001 Begin:7/1/I994 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:SINGLE 1997 Pau - Pass - - Fail NR/Fan NR Pass
County. Davie Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADOS 1998 NR/Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 0.68 Special 1999 pens - Pass -- - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 15.0 IWC(%)5.57 Ord.: 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
Monarch Iloslery Peml24hrp/faclim: 90% Y 1996 - - NR Pass - Pass - - NR/Pass -- 81
NC00012I0/001 Begin:2/1/1996 Frequency: Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - --. Pass
County Alamance Region: WSRO Subbasin: CPF02 1998 - - Pass - Pass Pass - -- Pass
PF: 0.05 Special 1999 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -- Pass
7Q10: 47.8 IWC(%)A.16 Order: 2000 - - Pass - Pass -- -- NR/Pass -
Monroe W WTP PERM CIIR LIM:90%; PF NOT TO EXCEED I lMGD 1996 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - Pass
NC0024333/00I Begin:12/1/1994 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:SINGLE 1997 - Pass - -- Pass - - Pass.Pass -- - Pass
County: Union Region: MRO Subbasin: YAD14 1998 - - Pass - - Pass - Pass - Pass
PF: 9.0 Special 1999 - Pass - Pass - Pass - Pass
7010: 0.43 IWC(%):96.18 Order. 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
Alonsantorou 1,un2 Penn 24hr p/fac lim: 90% Rhd (combined outfall) Y 1996 - Pass Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0003719/002 Begin: I/1/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp: Single 1997 - Pass -- Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Cumberland Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFIS 1998 - Pass -- Pass -- Pass - -- Pass
PF: 1.3 Special 1999 - Pass - Late Pass - Fail Pass.Pass - Pass
7010: 791.0 IWC(%):0.25 Orden 2000 - Pass - Pass -- - Pass -- -• Pass
Moore County WWTP Penn chr lim: 41%
NC0037508/001 Begin:6/1/2000 Frequency: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp:Single
County Moore Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM50
PF: 6.7 Special
7Q10: 15.2 IWC(%):40.54 Order.
Y 1996 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - Pass
1997 - - Pass --- Pass - - Pass - Lath
1998 Pass - Pass -- - Pass - -- Pass -- Pass
1999 - - Pass -- Pass - Lato Pass - Pass
2000 - - Passsig - - Pass - - Pass -
Y Pre 1996 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM - Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually, A• Annually, OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin - First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) +- quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur • ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Permitted flow (MGD) IWC%= Instream waste concentration P/F = Pass/Fail test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
Data Notation: f- Fathead Minnow; • • Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P • Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit: bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: - = Data not required; NR - Not repotted Facility Activity Status:1 • Inactive, N - Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; f•More data available for month in question; • = ORC signature needed
31

NID t,sNC 00 00 3(
HA I t- t N ci AiteEss = uv4( ('4 st'
4- Ko c N-t C>-N 1 N C 1 l 2
— -NI S LV A(' IA CoO y
7n &) c? NFL S-i-A P , 1-kajl r-e- ram
L% S r Crts t W i,
-Pe0C-C S ;STIAA Pt —
----Dici-A2t,Es- -To :
cc4-s 1ct).) v\i,-s)
ot030
-Te-e\r- C)ERA--1
--- N
1-S\L�,��`
062 his
LtNr-c��s;�
?ti-°N d1- Mali -fur cup
a�
Lv0r ;
.l619 L 371.. s-4\ols
L>" 1 V i\e.T 011 I\) oqw bigpmcf
1 's) SS

NEDOo s )
ac-4 a wL; 2
\NJgcttye_ r/
TNEL.fpiNT Ce )* Cam. 1,
Ts
2,00 c�
+ c c
U& s 0`JSA1) t osai
•
CAS
M --►-r;
LAT - .3S n CA'
8a° 51• 6C3
�..� r--t 1'70c
Ov6M2 hiLml To
Df (iTQ
rku
ISS V(
Pos.
/ToX
t-e14.D 1l! GL-AT/6K) Uri
--t- Aiv_y Hitpd
rye kL �t l4-SSS��
f*°)°16 IA/ La
m ov l Ile
CerECK
ekkANato
(106-Q-3"-b-
� NCI sot -DetA
(N 5TVtAti P.
S �E
t/
-wvw w�pp �
- r y

Ntoflov3,1
ifrao,
,ia 14,J;j -vC/iiir_ p ce_o oraLpik li/2�G l/c
L40 Lrr._
I i 1 i A CC.cle_ 7 i N Ci L'I
CPC-V)T-' \ \-AA cl
CMS
o, H 3 -f
c`( ,2U
ea. t3
7-
1--t t-L.`-c R VCR (I&5
p,(2.A PA C-M712 i tS 1)( rtae (r r (15 pe121\--1 7 T-
1 C A1)N11 ut`1) () > -A Ti,y �-(4x o 1 o. Z`t o f I L
Lutfq
re I p CCF' C . F e-01-A t €---P'S _ Pa
1 S , ©(Lk 1 L --� t ctT_ E Sne
s* .
'l
> --� NC sT)S r- � 5

N _ S 2 i tZc-N 1 c,7v) ; --M P �-1--�T��v p �7LL1off 11 ,4k cue,' ' 2 cl'C pan
• ylw ,L1 t2t ee ic.e. i a 5`C
( rat C CA-c ec. k,r i c
rIcq
& ( 9�}-u,v4 ^7 t g
LL �U S. `�
t{
- —7.5

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Prepared by: Natalie Sierra, 1/9/01
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
Qw (cfs) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
!WC (%) =
M-B Industries
NC0000311
0.03
0.046416
27.9
0.17
Parameter
Chronic CCC w/s7Q10 dil. Acute CMC wino dil.
FINAL RESULTS, ug/I FINAL RESULTS, ug/I
Phenols
Max. Pred Cw 410.3
Allowable Cw 0.0
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw 64.0
Allowable Cw 240.4
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw 2666.4
Allowable Cw 30050.0
Lead
Max. Pred Cw 544.0
Allowable Cw 15025.0
Copper (A.L.)
Max. Pred Cw 88.8
Allowable Cw 4207.0
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw 1065.4
Allowable Cw 52888.0
Silver (A.L.)
Max. Pred Cw 338.2
Allowable Cw 36.1
Zinc (A.L.)
Max. Pred Cw 1526.2
Allowable Cw 30050.0
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw 1530.1
Allowable Cw 3005.0
Oil and Grease
Max. Pred Cw 60.3
Allowable Cw 15626.000
Total Residue
Max. Pred Cw 23.3
Allowable Cw NA
Modified Data: Use 0.5 Detection Limit for non -detects
360
15
1022
34
7.3
261
1.2
67
22
NA
NA
Frequency of Detection
#Samples # Detects
93 41
93 6
93 90
93 4
93 15
93 2
93 17
93 88
93 88
92 74
93 28

WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
4901 WATERS EDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100 • RALEIGH, NC 27606 • PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
January 22, 2001
Mr. David Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Reference: NPDES Permit Application
M-B Industries, Inc.
US Highway 64 West
Rosman, North Carolina
Waters Edge Job No R1-17
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
Waters Edge Environmental, LLC (Waters Edge) is pleased to submit the following
NPDES permit application for the above referenced facility.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at
919.859.9987.
Sincerely,
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
Phillip L. Rahn, PG
President
cc: Edwin Morrow — MB Industries
01-004/PLR/aht

2 Engineering Alternatives Analysis
I. General Information
A.
B.
Facility Name
County
Facility Address
Facility Telephone Number
Report Preparer's Name
Report Preparer's Address
NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
01-004
M — B Industries, Inc.
Transylvania
US Highway 64 West
Post Office Box 1118
Rosman, North Carolina 28772
[phone]
Waters Edge Environmental, LLC
4901 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
The subject M-B Industries, Inc. (M-B) owns and operates a metal
working/fabrication facility located along US Highway 64 west of Rosman,
Transylvania County, North Carolina. Typical processes at the facility include;
chrome plating, zinc plating, cyanide brine heat treating (ceased in December 1980),
and various machining activities. Presently, wastewater is treated by a permitted
wastewater treatment system that discharges to the West Fork of the French Broad
River. M-B is currently classified as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The primary hazardous
materials shipped off site are F006 wastes associated with electroplating operations.
M-B also generated solvents from cleaning activities (F001 wastes) in the past. M-B
presently uses a Safety-Kleen application for cleaning activities at the facility.
On August 16, 1995, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR), Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) conducted a RCRA
inspection of the M-B facility. Laboratory analytical results from four water supply
well (WSW) samples obtained on September 29, 1994, by the HWS indicated that
WSW #1 and WSW #2 demonstrated elevated levels of trichloroethene (TCE) and
tetrachloroethene (PCE). However, samples obtained on August 16, 1995, by the
HWS indicated that WSW #2 and WSW #3 had elevated levels of TCE and PCE,
similar to the September 1994 laboratory results. Based on the RCRA inspection and
WSW analytical results, a Notice of Violation (NOV), dated February 22, 1996, was
issued. As a result of the NOV, Aquaterra Engineering, Inc. (Aquaterra) commenced
site analysis activities in March of 1996.
Page of

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
01-004
During the initial site investigation, performed on May 21-23, 1996, twelve soil
borings were advanced in regions designated as potential source areas in the NOV.
Further inspection of the soil in two areas of concern was performed on October 10,
2000. Historic soil concentrations for the constituents of concern (COC) at this site
indicate high levels of PCE in an area inside the southwestern portion of the original
building, in an area formerly used for drum storage. More detailed information
regarding the soil sampling events can be found in Table 1.
During the initial site investigation in May 1996, each of the four WSW were
sampled, and effluent samples were obtained from each of two septic systems located
on site. Subsequent studies have been performed on the four WSW on March 3,
1998, August 9, 1999, February 24, 2000, and October 13, 2000. As a supplement,
ten shallow and four deep monitoring wells were installed on the site between August
1999 and February 2000. Each well was sampled shortly after installation, with a
complete sampling event performed on October 12-13, 2000.
An analysis of the most recent analytical results for the ground water sampling event
on October 11 & 12, 2000, indicates the continued presence of PCE in WSW #2 and
#3, as well as an apparent migration downgradient to encompass monitoring wells
MW-8, MW-10, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, and MW-17. The highest concentration
of PCE, 510 µg/L, was found in well WSW #3. The continued presence of TCE has
been detected in wells WSW #3 (at a concentration of 18 µg/L) and MW-13. Further
information regarding the historic ground water analytical results can be found in
Table 2, with the analytical report for the results from the most recent sampling event
presented in Appendix A.
Following the decision by Aquaterra to cease all environmental consulting activities
within North Carolina, the responsibility for managing the remediation of the M-B
facility had been transferred to Waters Edge Environmental, LLC (Waters Edge).
Waters Edge agrees with the original Corrective Action Plan and Corrective Action
Plan Addendum set forth by Aquaterra, in which remediation of the site will be
achieved through the use of a pump and treat system, supplemented by an additional
soil vapor extraction (SVE) system (Appendices B and C).
The design of this remediation system is based on the hydraulic conductivity of the
subsurface soil and partially weathered bedrock (PWR), the chemical properties of
the compounds to be removed, and the air and water discharge requirements. The
hydraulic conductivity of the PWR was estimated using data from the October 12,
2000 pump tests performed on WSW #2 and #3.
As shown in Figure 2, the pump and treat system will utilize four extraction wells. Of
these wells, two will be new ground water extraction wells: EW-19, a shallow well in
the source area in the southeastern portion of the original building which will be set at
Page4of8

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
01-004
the partially weathered rock interface (estimated at a depth of 40' below ground
surface (bgs); and EW-11, a new deep extraction well (approximately 100' bgs) with
a 30 to 50 foot -screened interval located near monitoring well MW-11. Two of the
existing water supply wells will also be incorporated into the pump and treat system;
WSW #2 and #3 (See Figure 2). Waters Edge feels that this will both target the
source area and limit the downgradient migration of the COC. Based on Waters
Edge's knowledge of this site, along with the pump tests and experience with
chlorinated solvents, each extraction point is estimated to have an effective radius of
influence of approximately 100-150 feet; however, this will be verified by a limited
drawdown test conducted during system startup. The ground water with elevated
VOCs will be sufficiently encompassed by the radii of influence. It is anticipated that
this initial action will reduce the PCE concentrations in the downgradient wells
sufficient to eventually allow natural attenuation supplemented with carbon filtration
systems attached to several of the existing private supply wells to reduce VOC
concentrations to below North Carolina Groundwater Standards (NCGS).
The pump and treat system will utilize a shallow tray aeration treatment system, with
an initial throughput of approximately 60 gpm, with a maximum capacity of 160
gpm, should adjustments be deemed necessary from subsequent sampling events (see
Manufacturers specifications in Appendix D). Waters Edge has proposed this
reduction from Aquaterra's original 250-gpm capacity system to more reasonably
reflect field experience with pumping capacity for multiple wells located within the
same aquifer. The system is being designed to provide for the efficient removal of
PCE, thereby eliminating the need for secondary carbon treatment to meet the
NPDES discharge limits (Appendix E). Treatment system upgrades such as bag
filtering to remove some isolated incidents of elevated chromium and lead
concentrations may be added at a later date pending evaluation of additional ground
water sampling data.
To supplement the active removal of the COC in the source area, Waters Edge will
install a Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) system in the delineated source area in the
southeastern portion of the original building (Appendix C). The SVE system will
initially consist of two SVE wells installed approximately 25 feet apart (See Figure
2). The wells will be 2 inches in diameter, drilled to approximately 2-feet above the
water table (approximately 8-feet bgs), and screened a minimum of two feet above
the water table. Based on data from the boring logs included in Aquaterra's
Corrective Action Plan and Addendum (Appendix B and C), it is assumed that a 25-
foot radius of influence can be achieved by these SVE wells. This will also be
verified by a pilot test conducted during installation.
The SVE system will consist of a Roots 36 URAI 10 HP blower (or equivalent),
moisture separator, vacuum relief valve, Warrick level switches, and inline
filter/silencer, and transfer pump from moisture separator to air stripper. The blower
and motor has been sized to produce 200 ACFM airflow at 12" of Hg. The S V E
Page 5 of 8

C.
D.
NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
01-004
system is oversized to allow for additional SVE wells to be installed if warranted.
Based on worst -case soil data and air emissions calculations from the system, the
SVE system will not require an air permit. From 15A NCAC 2D.0518, total volatile
organic carbons must be less than 40 lbs./day. Air emissions presented in Aquaterra's
Corrective Action Plan Addendum were calculated to be less than 15-lbs./day total
VOCs. All liquid produced by the SVE system will be discharged to the air stripper
for treatment.
The piping from the wells to the SVE will be Schedule 80 PVC and will either be
trenched under the concrete slab or piped along walls and/or overhead pipe racks
throughout the interior of the building. Upon reaching a point of access to the
exterior grounds, the piping will be trenched across the remaining distance to the
treatment system according to accepted procedures. Each SVE effluent pipeline will
be constructed with a ball valve and vacuum gauge, located at the system manifold
connection. This will serve as a throttling device for the vapor recovered from the
SVE points, to allow for precise adjustment of the flow rates.
Existing facilities will not be used in conjunction with the pump and treat or SVE
systems.
The pump and treat and SVE systems will not be constructed in separate phases.
II. Evaluation of Disposal Alternatives
A. Connection to a Sewer System
A.1 Rosman, North Carolina
The Town of Rosman does not provide water or sewer services to the
facility, as it lies outside the municipal boundary (see Appendix F).
Furthermore, it is not feasible to construct a connection to the nearest
available spur at a distance of approximately 4 miles from the facility
through mountainous terrain. Regardless, the Town of Rosman would not
be capable of handling the increased load, as they are currently operating
at 90% capacity.
A.2 Haul and Discharge to a City that Will Accept Ground Water
Since the Town of Rosman does not provide an outlet for the treated
ground water, another alternative is to employ a permitted transportation
company in the service of hauling the treated groundwater to a city with
the capacity to accept the discharge. Waters Edge has obtained an
Page6of8

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January.22, 2001
01-004
estimate from Shamrock Environmental from Greensboro, North Carolina
to remove the water at a cost of $2.80 per loaded mile, to Charlotte, North
Carolina for disposal. Based on the proposed output of 100,000 GPD,
utilizing 6000 gallon tank trucks for transport, approximately 17 loads
would need to be transported approximately 140 miles to Charlotte. This
results in a daily cost of approximately $6,664. The estimate for seven
years of treated water disposal is approximately $ 17,026,520. As such,
this is not a feasible option for the disposal of the treated groundwater at
this facility.
B. Land Based Disposal
B.1 Disposal on Land Currently Owned by the Facility
The property on which the M-B facility is located encompasses 26.93
acres. The soils present consist of loamy fine sand underlain by cobbles
and gravel at a depth of approximately 6 to 7 feet below grade. According
to the Soil Survey of Transylvania County, North Carolina performed by
the US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service & Forest
Service in 1974, the Suncook loamy soils located in this area have a low
available water capacity, with a shallow water table (averaging 3 feet
below grade), and are subject to frequent flooding. As a result, an
infiltration gallery in this area is not feasible for the disposal of 100,000
gpd.
a. A description of the facilities including a site plan can be found in
Figure 2, and Appendices B and C.
b. See Soils Report in Appendix G.
c. Due to the site characteristics, calculations of infiltration rate are
not applicable.
d. A reduction in design flow has been implemented, resulting in a
proposed discharge of 100,000 gpd. Aquaterra's Corrective Action
Plan and Corrective Action Plan Addendum for M-B Industries,
Inc. initially proposed a discharge of 250,000 gpd (Appendices B
and C).
a. A Present -Value -of -Costs Analysis for land -based disposal is not
feasible due to the volume of water produced. Therefore, we feel that
this calculation is not warranted.
Page 7 of 8

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
01-004
B.2 Acquisition of Adjacent Lands
There is not sufficient land available for purchase adjacent to the project
site to support land -based disposal methods. As the site is located within
mountainous terrain, little adjacent land is available in which an
infiltration gallery could realistically be installed.
C. Wastewater Reuse
A portion of the wastewater generated by the remediation system will be required by
M-B to maintain current operating procedures. This results from the incorporation of
WSW #2 and #3, which normally provide water for a number of manufacturing
processes, into the remediation system. Of the overall discharge, approximately
25,000 gpd will be reused by the manufacturing processes.
D. Surface Water Discharge
1. 7Q10 = 25 cfs / 30Q2 = 43 cfs. Information provided by Curtis Weaver, North
Carolina DENR for the West Fork of the French Broad River at Rosman,
upstream from the confluence with the North Fork of the French Broad River.
Site I.D. # 04338881. Drainage area = 29.4 sq. mi.
2. Discharge with and without tertiary filtration. The shallow tray stripping
systems is more than adequate to treat the VOC affected ground water. No
tertiary filtration system is necessary as no solids are generated in manufacturing
or during wastewater treatment.
3. See Appendices B and C
4. See II. B. 2 above
5. Present Value of Costs analysis- Due to the infeasibility of the other stated
options and the excessively high costs, calculation of a net present value does not
appear to be warranted.
E. Disposal Combinations
See discussions above. The most economical option that results in minimal
environmental impact is discharge to the West Fork of the French Broad River.
Page 8 of 8

MW-6
Ground Water Remedlatlom Building
and Soil VApor Extraction System
BOWL V0\
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
•
q
4O /
Existing Waste/Sater •
Treatment Plant / /
/ Gj
/ �O
•
•
MW-10
•
/ O
sting/futfgll /
osed DuXall
NOTE'
Discharge from the Ground Water Treatment
Building (GWT-BLd) will be connected to
existing discharge from the Waste Water
Treatment Plant (WWTP)
/
a es tm
Scale In Feet
LEGEND
AVE Proposed SVE Point Location
4 Soil Boring Location (19%)
•SB-9 Soil Boring Location (2000)
Deep Well (Top of Bedrock)
WSW
Water Supply Well
Shallow Well
XProposed Recovery Well
Air Distribution Line
Groundwater Distribution line
Property Line
River Bed
Former River Bed
Author
mbb
Drawing
201400
Layers
Date
11-6-00
Title
Pump & Treat Recovery Wells
Outfalls & SVE Point Locations
Job No.
201400
Revision
11-6-00
Figure
2
Scale
1"= 10o'
Project
M-B INDUSTRIES
Transylvania County, North Carolina

Table 1. Soil Laboratory Analytical Results - M-B Industries, Rosman, North Carolina
May 22,1996 Soil Boring ID (Sample Depth)
Parameter
SB-1 SB-1 SB-2 SB-2 SB-3 SB-3 SB-4 SB-4 SB-5 SB-5
(0-1 ft) (4-5 ft) (0-1 ft) (1-2 ft) (0-1 ft) (1-2 ft) (0-1 ft) (4-5 ft) (0-1 ft) (3-4 ft)
Inorganics (mg/kg)
Aluminum 8,600 7,600 9,490 5,700 6,800 5,600 9,800 8,200 8,700 10,000
Total Cyanide 0.66 <0.10 0.43 0.31 0.39 1.02 0.05 0.23 0.47 0.12
Zinc 66 39 35 32 110 480 23 24 26 26
Arsenic <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Barium 37 27 32 20 28 21 29 39 27 42
Cadmium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1
Chromium 40 6.6 53 34 20 31 7.4 8.2 7.8 8.4
Lead 16 3.9 8.5 9.3 6 4.8 5.1 4.3 4.3 4.4
Mercury <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Selenium <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Silver <1.0 <1.0 <I.0 1.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
SVOCs (pg/kg) No Compounds Detected Above Method Detection Limits
VOCs (pg/kg)
Tetrachloroethene <7 <7 19 11 8 <6 <7 36 <7 <6
Oil & Grease (mg/kg) 34 27 29 <10 70 <10 <10 <10 <10 41
SB soil boring
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram or parts per million
pg/kg micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
fi feet below ground surface

Table 1 (cont.) Soil Laboratory Analytical Results - M-B Industries, Rosman, North Carolina
May 22,1996 Soil Boring ID (Sample Depth)
Parameter
SB-12
Duplicate
SB-6 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 of SB-11 BG.1
(0-1 ft) (2-3 ft) (1.5-2 ft) (3-4 ft) (3-4 ft) (3-4 ft) (7 ft) (7 ft) (1.5-2 ft)
Inorganics (mg/kg)
Aluminum 10,000 11,000 4,300 10,000 8,300 12,000 10,000 11,000 14,000
Total Cyanide 0.27 0.14 0.15 0.16 ND 0.72 ND 0.29 0.22
Zinc 29 36 24 48 52 53 86 100 55
Arsenic <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Barium 28 29 27 34 29 40 36 35 35
Cadmium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Chromium 41 24 3.4 8.8 17 63 8.3 10 8.1
Lead 5.6 5.6 2.2 7.9 5.6 12 4.9 4.8 16
Mercury <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Selenium <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Silver <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
SVOCs (pg/kg)
Di-n-octyl phthalate <330 <330 <330 <330 460 <330 <330 <330 NA
VOCs (pg/kg)
Tetrachloroethene <7 <6 <6 <8 <7 <6 <6 <6 NA
Toluene <7 <6 <6 <8 11 17 <6 <6 NA
Oil & Grease (mg/kg) 68 52 <10 <10 <10 <10 16 302
SB soil boring
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram or parts per million
µg/kg micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according 10 SW-846 Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
ft feet below ground surface
NA not analyzed

� � 3
Table 1 (cont.) Soil Laboratory Analytical Results - M-B Industries, Rosman, North Carolina
October 10, 2000. Soil Boring ID (Sample Depth)
Parameter
P-1
Soil
(8-9 ft)
Water
P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5
Soil Water Soil Water Soil Water Soil Water
(5-6 ft) (5-8 ft) (4-5 ft) (6-7 ft)
Inorganics (mg/kg) (µg/L) (mg/kg) (µg/L) (mg/kg) (! -) (mg/kg) (µg/L) (mg/kg) (1 -)
Chromium 120 5.4 250 31 87 12 20 0.38 17 0.24
Lead 24 0.88 7.5 0.72 8.8 0.41 9.3 0.25 10 0.16
VOCs (!ig/kg) (Pg ) (µgik8) (AWL) (ug/kg) (µme-) (u£ 8) (PGA-) (1-t8/k8) (µeL)
Tetrachloroethene <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6000 4700 740 500
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 100 <5.0 <54 <5.0
Total Xylenes <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 200 10 <54 <5.0
P = Probe Designation
mg/kg (L) = milligrams per kilogram (liter) or parts per million
pg/kg (L) = micrograms per kilogram (liter) or parts per billion
VOCs = volatile organic compounds according 10 SW-846 Method 8260
fl = feet below ground surface

)
Table 2. Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results - M-B Industries, Rosman, North Carolina.
)
Sample ID
Sample Date
Alwninwn
Total
Cyanide
Zinc
Arsenic
Inorganics (mg/L)
Barium Cadmium Hexavalent Chromium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
VOC's (pg/L)
cis-1,2 Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene
diehloroethene
SVOC's
(pg/L)
WSW-1
3/3/98
<0.05
0.002
0.032
<0.005
<0.010 <0.010
NA
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<5
<5
<5
ND
8/9/99
<0.25
<0.002
0.022
<0.01
<0.005 <0.001
<0.05
<0.005
<0.01
<0.02
<0.002
<2
Q
<2
NA
2/24/00
<0.20
NA
0.25
<0.005
<0.01 <0.001
NA
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
<0.10
<0.005
<0.005
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
WSW-2
3/3/98
<0.05
<0.002
<0.01
<0.005
<0.010 <0.010
NA
0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<5
<5
53
ND
8/9/99
<0.25
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005 <0.001
0.13
0.12
<0.01
<0.02
<0.002
<2
<2
33
NA
2/24/00
<0.20
NA
0.022
<0.005
<0.01 <0.001
NA
0.125
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
26.2
NA
10/13/00
<0.10
0.13
0.07
<5.0
<5.0
41
WSW-3
3/3/98
0.08
0.002
3.6
0.008
<0.010 <0.010
NA
0.011
0.21
<0.005
<0.010
<5
5
150
ND
8/9/99
<0.05
0.003
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005 <0.001
<0.05
<0.005
<0.01
<0.02
<0.002
<2
14
700
NA
2/24/00
<0.20
NA
<0.02
<0.005
<0.01 <0.001
NA
0.03
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
6.9
309
NA
10/13/00
<0.10
0.012
<0.005
<5.0
18
510
WSW-4
3/3/98
<0.05
<0.002
0.08
<0.005
<0.010 <0.010
NA
<0.010
0.043
<0.005
<0.010
0
<5
<5
NA
8/9/99
<0.25
<0.002
0.016
<0.005
<0.01 <0.001
<0.05
<0.005
<0.01
<0.02
<0.002
<2
<2
<2
NA
2/25/00
<0.20
NA
0.089
<0.005
<0.005 <0.001
NA
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
Not Sampled
WSW-5
3/3/98
<0.05
<0.002
0.043
<0.005
<0.010 <0.010
NA
<0.010
0.018
<0.005
<0.010
NA
NA
NA
ND
(Duplicate
of WSW-4)
8/9/99
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NC Ground Water Quality
Standard
NA
0.154
2.1
0.05
2 0.005
0.05
0.05
0.015
0.05
0.018
7
2.8
0.7
NA
WSW water supply well
mg/L milligrams per liter or parts per million
p g/L micrograms per liter or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
NA not applicable
ND non detect
Numbers in bold indicate concentrations over the NC Ground Water Quality Standards

Table 2 (cont.) Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results - M-B Industries, Rosman, North Carolina.
Sample ID
Sample Date
Aluminum
Total
Cyanide
Zinc
Arsenic
Inorganics (mg/L)
Barium Cadmium Hexavalent Chromium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
cis-1,2
dicldoroethene
VOC's (pg/L)
7iichloroethene Tetrachloroethene
SVOC's
(pg/L)
MW-5
8/18/99
0.225
<0.010
<0.020
<0.005
0.141
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
2/23/00
5.6
NA
0.025
<0.005
0.095
<0.001
NA
0.007
0.007
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
0.17
0.041
0.056
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
MW-6
8/18/99
0.196
<0.010
<0.020
<0.005
0.016
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
Q
<2
<2
NA
2/23/00
49.3
NA
0.132
0.007
0.0821
<0.001
NA
0.027
0.074
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
0.19
0.05
0.13
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
MW-7
8/18/99
0.269
<0.010
<0.020
<0.005
0.028
<0.001
2.00
2.18
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
3.9
NA
2/24/00
7.35
NA
<0.02
<0.005
0.054
<0.001
NA
0.199
0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/12/00
<0.10
1.3
<0.005
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
MW-8
8/18/99
<0.05
<0.010
<0.020
<0.005
0.018
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
58.3
NA
2/23/00
90.8
NA
0.325
0.012
1.84
0.002
NA
0.048
0.08
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
0.60
0.14
0.19
<5.0
<5.0
30
MW-9
9/17/99
0.326
<0.010
6.31
<0.005
0.123
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
0.022
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
2/25/00
0.096
NA
1.21
<0.005
<0.01
<0.001
NA
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
4.9
<0.005
0.008
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
MW-10
9/17/99
0.553
<0.010
0.18
<0.005
0.028
<0.001
<0.01
0.006
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
4
48
515
NA
2/23/00
0.085
NA
0.138
<0.005
<0.01
0.005
NA
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
9.7
NA
10/12/00
<0.10
<0.005
<0.005
<5.0
<5.0
19
MW-11
9/17/99
6.27
<0.010
0.043
<0.005
0.035
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
12.7
NA
2/24/00
16.40
NA
0.034
<0.005
0.075
<0.001
NA
0.012
0.01
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
142
NA
10/12/00
0.15
0.030
0.046
<5.0
<5.0
250
MW-12
9/17/99
1.57
<0.010
<0.020
<0.005
0.04
<0.001
3.7
2.74
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
7.7
8.2
20.8
NA
2/24/00
51.2
NA
0.077
<0.005
0.167
<0.001
NA
2.26
0.028
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/12/00
<0.10
1.9
0.046
<5.0
<5.0
8
WSW water supply we!!
mg/L milligrams per liter or parts per million
pg/L micrograms per liter or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8270
i'OCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
NA not applicable
ND non detect
Numbers in bold indicate concentrations over the NC Ground Water Quality Standards

Table 2 (cont.) Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results - M-B Industries, Rosman, North Carolina.
Sample ID
Sample Date
Aluminum
Total
Cyanide
Zinc
Arsenic
Inorganics (mg/L)
Barium Cadmium Hexavalent
Chromium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
cis-1,2
dick loroethene
VOC's (pg/L)
Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene
SVOC's
(pg/L)
MW-13
11/17/99
4.75
<0.010
0.04
<0.005
0.051
<0.001
<0.01
0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<2
6.9
83.7
NA
2/24/00
0.15
NA
0.125
<0.005
<0.01
<0.001
NA
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
5.8
61
NA
10/12/00
<0.10
<0.005
<0.005
<5.0
8
100
MW-14
11/17/99
15.8
<0.010
0.075
<0.005
0.082
<0.001
<0.01
0.018
0.014
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
46.6
NA
2/24/00
64.0
NA
0.356
0.009
0.38
0.004
NA
0.069
0.053
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
57.5
NA
10/12/00
0.16
0.038
0.038
<5
<5
130
MW-15
11/17/99
6.4
<0.010
0.045
<0.005
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.007
0.004
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
Q
NA
2/24/00
11.5
NA
0.123
<0.005
0.098
<0.001
NA
0.014
0.009
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
<0.10
0.009
0.008
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
MW-16
11/17/99
1.42
<0.010
0.025
<0.005
0.018
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
223/00
11.1
NA
0.44
<0.005
0.117
<0.001
NA
0.009
0.01
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/13/00
0.27
0.052
0.094
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
MW-17
2/25/00
0.95
ND
<0.02
<0.005
0.01
<0.001
ND
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
6.4
NA
10/12/00
<0.10
<0.005
<0.005
<5.0
<5.0
12
MW-18
2/25/00
2.42
ND
<0.02
<0.005
0.019
<0.001
ND
<0.005
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<2
<2
<2
NA
10/12/00
0.17
0.032
0.024
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
NC Ground Water Quality
Standard
NA
0.154
2.1
0.05
2
0.005
0.05
0.05
0.015
0.05
0.018
7
2.8
0.7
NA
WSW water supply well
mg/L milligrams per liter or parts per million
pg/L micrograms per liter or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
NA not applicable
ND non detect
Numbers in bold indicate concentrations over the NC Ground Water Quality Standards

TOWN OF IZOSMAN
POST OF FI(`F, BOX 636
ROSMAN, NC 2 772
828-881-6859
December 21, 2000
Mr. Jared Edwards
Waters Edge Environmental
Via Facsimile — 9l9-R59-9930
Dent Mr. Edwards,
Per your request 1 submit the following information.
The availability for water and sewer service.,, at this time, extend to the recognised limits
olour lbws
We are in the process of upgrading our wastewater facility with funding to be received
from the Federal Government, with additional monetary ai 1runce from the state we
would he able to extend uur yet vices beyond our limits and accommodate your request of
un uddittonal 100,000 GPD
Should you have any further quest.ionN, or need additional information, please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF ROSMAN
Johnny H Rogers
Mayor

AriF
TeB1.,
82.5 000 FEET
CtIF
eve
BvE AnF TsD
FaF
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 33
.
TeD BvE +4, TeD
Z.7 VE
, -
An F
AnF / BvE
•CeG
\ "
r m, Aft
TLFF
WaF.
AtiG
FaF
AeF
. FaF TsE
LL
/ •
• •
aE
FaF
TsE
(Joins sheet 27)
FiF .
r
'FAF
a
Tc0 =

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
U. S. FOREST SERVICE
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
SOIL LEGEND
The first capital letter is the initial one of the soil come. A second capitol letter, A, 8, C, D,
E, F, or G, shows the slope. Most symbols without o slope letter ore those of nearly level
soils, but some are for .and types that hove a considerable range of slope. A final number, 3,
in the symbol indicates that the soil is severely eroded.
SYMBOL NAME
AeD Ashe fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
AeE Ashe fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
AeF Ashe fine sandy loom, 25 to 45 percent slopes
AhF Ashe stony sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
AhG Ashe stony sandy loam, 45 to 70 percent siopes
Ar•.D Ashe and Edneyville soils, 6 to 15 percent slopes
AnE Ashe and Edneyville soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes
ArrF Ashe and Edneyville soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes
AuA Augusta fine sandy loam, cool variant, 1 to 4 percent slopes
BrF Brandywine stony soils, 15 to 45 percents lopes
BrG Brandywine stony soils, 45 to 80 percent slopes
BvB 8revard loom, 2 to 6 percent slopes
BvC Brevord loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
BvE Brevord loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes
BvF 8revard loom, 25 to 45 percent slopes
ByG Burton stony loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes
CdE Chandler loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
CeG Chandler stony loom, 45 to 70 percent slopes
C1F Chandler and Fannin soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes
ChD Chester fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent shapes
ChE Chester fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
ChF Chester fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
CrE Chester stony loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
CrF Chester stony loom, 25 to 45 percent slopes
DeB Delanco fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
EdG Edneyville stony loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes
FaE Fannin loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
FaF Fannin loom, 25 to 45 percent slopes
FoG Fannin loom, 45 to 70 percent slopes
FfD Fletcher end Fannin soils, 6 to 15 percent slopes
FfE Fletcher and Fannin. soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes
HaD Hoyesville fine sandy loom, 6 to 15 percent slopes
HaE Hoyesville fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
HoF Hoyesville fine sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes
HcE3 Hoyesville clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded
HdE Haywood stony loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
HdF Heywood stony loom, 25 to 50 percent slopes
Pm Ponzer muck, cool variant
PoE Porters loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
PoF Porters loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
PrF Porters stony loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Rk Rock outcrop
Ro Rosman fine sandy foam
Rs Rosman soils
Sc Stony colluviol land
St Stony land
Su Suncook loomy sand
Tab' Talladega silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
TcG Talladega channery silt loom, 45 to 70 percent slopes
Tee Tote fine sandy loom, 2 to 6 percer.: slopes
TeD Tate fine sandy loom, 6 to 15 percent slopes
TeE Tare fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Tn Toxaway silt loom
To Toxaway soils
Tr Transylvania silt loam
TsD Tusquitee loom, 6 to 15 percent slopes
TsE Tusquitee loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
TuD Tusquitee stony loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
TuE Tusquitee stony loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
TuF Tusquitee stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
WcD Watauga loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
WaE Watauga loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
WaF Watauga loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
WORKS AND STRUCTURES
Highways and roads
Divided
Good motor
Poor motor
Trail
Highway markers
National Interstate (�
U. S. Y
0
State or county
Railroads
Single track
Multiple track
Abandoned
Bridges and crossings
Road
Trail
Railroad
Ferry
Ford
Grade
R. R. over
R. R. under
Buildings
School
Church
Mire and quarry
II 11 N 11 11
+ -1- -1- —I- —H
a
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
BOUNDARIES SOIL SURVEY DATA
National or state. .... Soil boundary
County — . and symbol
Minor civil division Gravel
rS 4
Reservation, stony Q
Stoniness 'b 9
Land grant Very stony
v
Small park, cemetery, airport... _ Rock outcrops r
I
Land survey division corners .-, I _ Chert fragments °°>
Clay spot X
DRAINAGE Sand spot ..
Streams, double -line Gumbo or scabby spot b
Perennial Made land =
Intermittent .--''�"'� ,,.� Severely eroded spot
Streams, single -line Blowout, wind erosion v
Perennial _— ---'—.�•^ Gully rWvwu
Intermittent Soil sample site Q
Crossable with tillage
implements
Not crossable with tillage
implements
Unclassified
Canals and ditches
Lakes and ponds
Perennial
Intermittent
Falls and rapids
Marsh or swamp
Wet spot
R Drainage end or alluvial fan
Gravel pit 5P
Power line
Pipeline
Cemetery
Dams
Levee
Tanks
Well, oil or gas ................
Forest fire or lookout station ...
Windmill
Tunnel, road
H t --{ I-•i H I--1 1—
I
8
n
RELIEF
Escarpments
Bedrock
Other
Short steep slope
Prominent peak
Depressions
Large Small
Crossable with tillage a"rtr
implements �t•t"r� o
Not crossable with tillage EP1�
implements '.w3 9
ravr
Contains water most of
the time e�` 4

{) SOIL SURVEY
t10IR 5/2) mottles in lower parts; massive; very
friable; common flue mica flakes; strongly acid:
clear, smooth boundary.
IIC4-50 to 60 inches, stratified sand and gravel; single
grain; strongly acid.
The Rosman soils are 35 to 60 inches thick and are under-
lain by unconforiuing material. The A. horizon is flue sandy
loam and loam 1.0 to 20 inches thick and is very dark grayish
brown to dark brown. The C horizon is loam, fine sandy
loam, or silt loam 25 to 40 inches thick and is brown to dark
yellowish brown. Pew to many gray mottles occur at a depth
below- 20 inches in places. The IIC horizon is stratified sand,
loamy sand. silt, and gravel or stones.
Rosman fine sandy Ioam (Ro).—Tills nearly level soil
is on stream flood plains. The areas are irregular in shape
and are between the stream and adjoining uplands or
the stream and a more poorly drained soil..
This soil has the profile described as representative of
the series. The surface layer is very dark ;grayish -brown
or dark -brown fine sandy loam 10 to 30 inches thick.
The next layer is brown or dark yellowish -brown loran,
line sandy loam, or silt loam 25 to 40 inches thick.
Included with this soil in mapping were small are.as of
similar soils that are somewhat poorly drained.
Most of the acreage is cleared and is in pasture, or culti-
vation. This soil is easy to keep in good filth and can be
worked throughout a wide range. of moisture content.
It is well suited to most locally grown crops. The major
limitation to the use of this soil is very frequent flooding
(lig. 6). (Capability unit IIw-1; woodland suitability
group 1; wildlife suitability group 3)
Rosman soils (Rs). —This undiderentiated group consists
/� of nearly level soils on stream flood plains and along
tIr;rinageways. It occurs as long, narrow strips 4 to 12
acres in size. More than 40 percent. of the unit is Rosman
soils, which have a -very dark grayish -brown to dark -
brown file sandy loam and loam surface layer 10 to 20
fin hes thick. Below this is brown to dark yellowish -
brown loam, fine sandy loam, and silt loam 25 to 40
inches thick. The rest of the acreage includes soils that.
are similar in texture but are somewhat poorly drained
:mil poorly drained.
I:winded with these soils in mapping were small areas
r l oxaway soils.
o �;s
-44,414
:'igurf' 6.-1•'luu(liug in a field of young pole beans. The soil is
Rosman fine sandy loam.
More than half the acreage is in pasture or cultivation,
and the rest is in woods. These soils are fairly well suited
to most locally grown crops. The major limitations in
using these soils are very frequent flooding and seepage
water from adjoining slopes. Artificial drainage is needed
on the wet areas. (Capability unit IIw-1; woodland suit-
ability group 1; wildlife suitability group 3)
Stony Colluvial Land
Stony colluviul land (Sc) consists of areas in which 25 to
70 percent of the soil mass is made up of stones. It. occurs
in coves and on toe slopes in association with steep,
stony upland soils. The soil material filling the spaces
between the .stones is dark -brown to yellowish -brown
loam, fine sanely loam, or clay loam.
Stoniness makes this land type unsuitable for cultiva-
tion. It is fairly well suited to pasture grasses, but .mtur-
agement that requires the use of equipment is unpractical.
It is practically all in forest, predominantly yellow -
poplar, yellow and black birches, and northern red oak.
(Capability unit Vs-1; woodland suitability group 11;
not placed in a wildlife suitability group)
Stony Land
Stony land (St) consists of upland areas where exposed
bedrock or loose stones (fig. 7) cover 25 to 00 percent
of the surface. It is Mostly on the, steeper slopes in the
more mountainous areas particularly along the southern
rim of the county and the northern section.
Stones and rock outcrops are sufficiently numerous to
snake the areas unsuitable for cultivation. The soil be-
tween. the stones varies in thickness, but in most places
it is thin.
Most of the acreage is in trees, primarily low -quality
hardwoods. A good use for this ]and type i.s trees or wild-
life. (Capability unit VIIs-1; woodland suitability
group 11; not placed in. a wildlife suitability group)
Suncook Series
The Suncook series consists of excessively drained,
nearly level sails nn stream flood. plains. They are sub -
Figure 7.—An area of Stony land.

TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY,
j� very frequent flooding of very brief duration. They
formed .in recent alluvial deposits. Depth to bedrock is
more than 5 feet. The seasonally high water table. is at a
depth of about 3 feet.
In a typical profile, these soils have a, dark -brown
loamy :sand surface laver about 6 inches thick. The under -
.lying layers, to a depth of more than 50 .inches, are dark
yellowish -brown an.cl Clark -brown loamy fine sand and
tine sand. They are underlain at some depth by gravel
or stones.
Suncook soils are very low in. natural .fertility and low
to mediurn in organic -matter content. They have low
available water capacity and a low shrink -swell. poten-
tial. Permeability is rapid.
Most of the acreage is cleared and used for pasture
or crops. The major .limitations to the use of these soils
are very frequent flooding and droughtiness.
Representative profile of Suncook loamy sand, 0.5 mile
cast of Penrose Post Office, 1,000 feet east of bridge on
State Road 1c:r28, in cultivated field. 10() feet. north of the
French Broad River:
.4)--0 to ti inches, dark -brown (10]1{ 4/31 loamy sand; sin-
gle grain; loose ; strnngty acid; gradual. wavy
boundary.
f-:1-6 to 12 inches, dark yellowish -brown (10YR 4/4) loamy
fine satin: single grain; loose; common mica:
strongly ,Acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
C2-1.2 to :art inches. dark -brown (T.:FYil. 4/4) line sand;
single grain; loose; common mica; strongly acid.
:the A horizon is 6 to 1.2 inches thick and is dark brown or
johark yellowish brown. The c'; horizon is loamy fine sand or
.rtay sand to rind 30 to 75 inches or more hi thickness and
dark brown or dark yellowish brown to yellowish brown.
These soils are underlain at some depth by gravel or stones.
Suncook loamy sand (Su). —This nearly level soil is on
stream flood plains and is subject to very frequent flooding
of very brief duration. It has a surface layer of dark -brown
to dark yellowish -brown loamy sand. 6 to 12 inches tltick.
In places the surface layer is sand and is very dark gray-
ish ltrown. The underlying lavers are dark -brown to
yellow-1,rowll loamy fine sand or loamy sand to sand
30 to 75 inches or more thick.
The soil is -fairly easy to keep in. good tilth and can be
worked throughout a wide range of moisture content.
A large percentage of the acreage is in pasture. The
rest is in row crops or trees. s. This soil is only fairly well
suited to locally grown crops. Very frequent flooding and
droughtiness are major liniitat ions to the use of this soil.
(Capability unit IIIs--l; woodland suitability groth'! 3;
wilder le suitability group 3)
Talladega Series
The ':ITalladega, series consists of well -drained, steep to
very steep soils on narrow convex ridgetops and Uneven
side slopes. '.i'Itese soils formed under forest vegetation
in residuum from schist. Depth to bedrock is 1 to 4 feet.
The seasonally hi; -h water table is below 5 feet.
In a typical profile, these soils have a surface layer of
dark -brown and dark yellowish -brown silt loam about
.1 itAto4s thick. The subsoil is strong -brown, friable chan-
nel it loam or channery- silty clay loam about 14 inches
thick. Below this layer, to a depth of about. 40 inches, is
strong -brown. channery silt loam.
NORTH CAROLINA
Talladega. soils are very low to low in natural I'.::s:
and low to medium. in organic -matter content. "flee•;
low in ava.i]able water capacity and have a shall
moderately deep effective root zone. They lt:t
crate permeability and low shrink -swell potential.
Most of the acreage of these soils is in foreti, 1, e
dominantly low -quality hardwoods and scattered %%lire,
pitch, and shortleaf pines. Slope and droughtiness :t t•.•
the major limitations to the use of these soils for crops.
Representative profile of Talladega silt loam, 25 to -I..
percent slopes, 5 miles northeast of Brevard, 1.6 mile,:
north of 1.S. highway No. 64, in wooded area, 30 feel
south of State Road 150 i :
02-1 inch to 0, decaying leaves and twigs; mass of abun-
dant small roots.
A1-0 to 2 inches, dark -brown (10YR 41:;) silt loam: mod-
erate, fine and medium: granular structure; friable:
litany small and medium roots; 3 percent small hard
schist fragments: very strongly acid; clear, smooth
boundary.
• 2-2 to 4 inches, dark yellowish -brown (10YR 4/4) silt
loam ; moderate. line aucl medium. granular struc-
ture: friable: anany small and medium roots; 5 per-
cent small hard schist fragments; very strongly
acid: Cleo r, wavy boundary.
1a2t-4 to 18 inches. strong -brown (7.5YR 5/0) channery silty
clay loam: weak. medium. subangular blocky struc-
ture; friable; common small roots; thin, discontinu-
ous clay flints; 40 percent conrse hard schist
fragments; very strongly acid; clear, irregular
boundary.
C-15 to 40 inches, strong -brown (7.5X1t 5/6) weathered
schist that crushes easily to charmery silt loam;
rock structure; friable; 60 percent coarse schist
fragments; very strongly acid; clear, irregular
boundary.
R-40 inches -j-, moderately hard schist rock.
The solum ranges from 10 to _'s inches in thickness. The _l
horizon is silt. loner or channery silt loam 3 to 10 inches thick
and is dark brown to dark yellowish brown. The B horizon
is 7 to 18 incites thick and Is channery silt loam or channery
Silty clay loatn that conaauas many coarse schist fragments. It
is yellowish brown to yellowish red. The G horizon consists of
yellowish -brown or strong -brown to yellowish -red channery
silt loam or channery silty clay loans in crevices between
weathered schist fragments.
Talladega silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes (TaF).--
This soil is on uneven mountain side slopes. Areas are
irregular in shape and are 6 to 50 acres in size.
This soil has the profile described as representative for
the series. The surface layer is dark -brown to dark
yellowish -brown silt loans 3 to 10 inches thick. The sub-
soil is yellowish -brown. to yellowish -red channery silt
loans or channery silty clay Baum t to 18 inches thick. It
contains many coarse schist fragments.
Included with this soil in mapping were areas where
the slope is less than 25 percent. Also included were sinall
areas that have a channery surface layer, as well ii areas
of ltoc.k outcrop.
Practically all of the acreage is forested..i\ small per-
renlige is cleared and in pasture. :Because. of slope and
low available water capacity, this soil is unsuited to culti-
vation and poorly suited to pasture. A good Ilse. for this
soil is trees. (Capability unit Vile-1; woodland suitabil-
ity group 1); wildlife suitability group 2)
Talladega channery silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes
TcG1.—This soil. is on mountain side slopes. 'Thin, flat
schist fragments make up 13 to 50 percent of the surface

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-5
Project Name
Project No.
Geologist
Start Date
M-B Industries
8201400
Erik Svenson
8/17/99
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments Water detected in 7 foot zone. French Broad River is approximately 20 feet to the southeast of boring.
FID/PID
(ppm)
© Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 4"
0' - 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
1'-4'
Brown, silty weathered rock, moist
Diameter 2"
4' -1 S'
Brown, silty weathered rock, becoming more moist
Screen Type PVC
15' - 22'
Same as above but wet
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0' - 7'
Boring terminated at 22'
Screen Interval 7' - 22'
Ground water encountered at 15'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0'- 1'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 1'- 3'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 3' - 22'
Total Depth 22'
RP. Elevation
Datum
•
Water Level Information
_
Date
W.L. Below RP.
8/17/99
10.01
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /Well Construction
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-6
Project Name M-B Industries
Log
Project No. 8201400
Geologist Erik Svenson
Start Date 8/17/99
Complete Date 8/17/99
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FED /PIED
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia. 4"
0' to 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
1' - 13'
Brown, silty fine sand, moist
Diameter 2"
13' - 17'
Same as above but wet
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2"
Boring terminated at 17'
Riser Interval 0' - 2'
Ground water encountered at 13'
Screen Interval 2' - 17'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0.5'- 0'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 0.5'- l'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 1' -17'
Total Depth 17'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
8/17/99
11.00
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style I.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-7
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist Erik Svenson
Start Date 8/17/99
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments H 2 S smell
FM / PM
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 4"
0'to 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
1'to 3'
Brown, silty fine sand, moist
Diameter 2"
3' to 15'
Brown, weathered rock with sandy clay
Screen Type PVC
15' - 20'
Same as above but wet
,
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0' - 4'
Boring terminated at 20'
Screen Interval 4' - 19'.
Ground water encountered at 13'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0' - 1'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 1= 2'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 2' - 20'
Total Depth 20'
R.P. Elevation
-
Datum
-
Water Level Information
-
Date
W.L. Below R.P.
-
8/17/99
8.85
-
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

/-st
Boring/Well Construction
Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-8
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist Erik Svenson
Start Date 8/17/99
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FID/PID
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 4"
0' to 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
1'to 5'
Brown, silty fine sand
Diameter 2"
5'to 7'
Same as above
Screen Type PVC
7' to 20'
Same as above but wet
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0' - 5'
Boring terminated at 20'
Screen Interval 5' - 20'
Ground water encountered at 7'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0'- 1'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 1 = 3'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 3'- 20'
Total Depth 20'
RP. Elevation na
-
Datum na
-
Water Level Information
-
Date
W.L Below R.P.
-
8/17/99
6.75
-
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-9
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist Chris Randazzo
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 9/13/99 Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments Hit bedrock at 19, set 6" casing at 21'
FID / PID
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8"
0' to 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type metal
1 ' to 5'
Brown, silty sand, some gravel
Diameter 6"
5' - 19'
Same as above with rounded cobbles (creek rocks) •
Screen Type na
19'to 25'
Bedrock
Diameter na
25' to 183'
Brown mud
Riser Interval na
Screen Interval na
Boring terminated at 183'
Slot Size na
Ground water encountered at 10'
Grout Type na
Interval 0'- 21'
Bentonite Type na
Interval na
Filter Pack na
Interval na
Total Depth 183
RP. Elevation
-
Datum
-
Water Level Information
-
Date
W.L. Below RP.
-
9/17/99
8.85
-
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

(mir
Boring /We11Construction
Log
Well Construction Permit Number
I. D. Number MW-10
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist Chris Randazzo
Start Date 9/13/99
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary and hollow stem auger
Comments Did not hit any solid areas down to 100'
FID/PID
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
(ppm)
@a Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8"
0' to 1 '
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
1 ' to 10'
Brown, silty sand, some gravel and weathered rocks
Diameter 2"
10' - 60'
Brown mud, no bedrock yet but many rounded cobbles
Screen Type PVC
(creek rocks)
Diameter 2"
60'to 130'
Brown mud
Riser Interval 0' - 120'
Screen Interval 120' - 130'
Boring terminated at 130'
Slot Size 0.2
Ground water encountered at 10'
-1
Grout Type na
Interval 0' - I10'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 110' -11 S'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 11 S' - 130'
Total Depth 130'
RP. Elevation
-
Datum
-
Water Level Information
-
Date
W.L. Below RP.
-
9/17/99
9.59
-
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /We11 Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-11
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist Chris Randazzo
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 9/13/99 Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FID / PM
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8"
0' to 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
1'to 3'
Brown, silty sand, some gravel
Diameter 2"
3' -10'
Brown, silty sand, wet
Screen Type PVC
10' - 22'
Brown mud
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0' - 12'
Boring terminated at 22'
Screen Interval 12' - 22'
Ground water encountered at 10'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0' - 7'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 7' - /0'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 10' - 22'
Total Depth 22'
RP. Elevation
-
Datum
-
Water Level Information
-
Date
W.L. Below RP.
-
9/17/99
8.82
-
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring/Well Construction
Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number. MW-12
Project Name
Project No.
Geologist
Start Date
M-B Industries
8201400
Chris Randazzo
9/13/99
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Bill Lambert
Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FltD/P D
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
(ppm)
(Qa Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8"
0'to 1'
Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC
6'to 10'
Brown, silty sand, some gravel
Diameter 2"
10' - 25'
Brown mud
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2"
Boring terminated at 25'
Riser Interval 0' - 15'
Ground water encountered at 10'
Screen Interval 15' - 25'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0'-10'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 10' -13'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 13' - 25'
Total Depth 25'
RP. Elevation
-
Datum
-
Water Level Information
-
Date
W.L. Below RP.
-
9/17/99
9.56
-
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /We11 Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-13
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201401
Geologist
Start Date
Erik Svenson/Tiffany Whitson
11/15/99 Complete Date
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Todd
11/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary/Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8" to 34' bgs
Comments Air Rig from 34' to 135' bgs
Grass Surface Cover
FID / PID
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
(ppm)
aQ Depth (ft.)
Borehole Dia. 6 5/8
0' to 5'
Dark brown silt
Riser Type PVC
5'to 10'
Dark brown sandy silt w/gravel & cobbles (wet)
Diameter 2"
10' to 15'
Water encountered at 13' during drilling
Screen Type PVC
15' to 20'
Same as above
Diameter 2"
20' to25'
Riser Interval 0' to IIS'
25'to 30'
Screen Interval 115'to 135'
30'to 35'
Slot Size 0.010"
35' to40'
Grout Type Portland cement
40'to 45'
Same as above
Interval 0' to 106'
45' toSO'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
50'to55'
Interval 106' to III'
55' to 60'
Filter Pack Filter sand
60'to 70'
Interval 111 ' to 135'
70' to 80'
Same as above
Total Depth 135'
80' to90'
R.P. Elevation
90'to 100'
Datum
100' to 120'
Waxer Level Information
120'to 130'
Date
W.L. Below RP.
130' to 140'
Encountered bedrock @ 135'
11/17/99
6.54'
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-14
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201401
Geologist Erik Svenson/Tiiiany Whitson
Start Date
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Todd/Mark
11/15/1999 Complete Date 11/15/1999 Equipment Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger Rig to 20'
Comments Grass Surface Cover
FM / PM
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 6 5/8
0' to 5'
Dark brown sandy silt; moist
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2"
5' to 10'
Same as baove w/cobbles
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2"
10' to 15'
Brown/grey coarse sandy silt
Riser Interval 0' to 10'
Screen Interval 10'to 20'
15' to 20'
Same as above: water encountered @ 16' during drilling
Slot Size 0.010"
20'
Boring terminated @ 20'
Grout Type Portland cement
Interval 0' to 6'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 6' to 8'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 8' to 20'
Total Depth 20'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
11/17/1999
7.57
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring- /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-15
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201401
Geologist Erik Svenson/Tiffany Whitson
Start Date
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Todd/Mark
11/15/1999 Complete Date 11/15/1999 Equipment Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8 to 25' bgs
Comments Top of bedrock well; up gradient
Grass surface cover
FID / PID
(PPE)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 6 5/8
0' to 5'
Dark brown sandy silt
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2"
5' to 10'
Brown/dark/light coarse sand silt w/ pebbles and stones;
Screen Type PVC
moist
Diameter 2"
10' to 15'
Same as above
Riser Interval 0'to 10'
Screen Interval 10' to 25'
15' to 20'
Light brown sandy silt; water @ 15'during drilling
Slot Size 0.010"
Grout Type Portland cement
20' to 25'
Partially weathered granitic rock
Interval 0' to 6'
25'
Boring terminated @ 25'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 6' to 8'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 8' to 25'
Total Depth 25'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L Below RP.
11/17/1999
3.91
`
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type H - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /We11 Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-16
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201401
Geologist Erik Svenson/Tiffany Whitson
Start Date
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose Monitoring Wells
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No.
Driller Todd/Mark
11/15/1999 Complete Date 11/15/1999 Equipment Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8 to 16' bgs
Comments Top of bedrock/Shallow well
Grass surface cover
FID/PID
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 6 5/8
0' to 5'
Dark brown sandy silt w/ cobbles
Riser Type PVC
_
Diameter 2"
5' to 10'
Same as above
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2"
10' to 15'
Same as above
Riser Interval 0' to 6'
16'
Auger refusal at bedrock contact; No water encountered
Screen Interval 6' to 16'
during drilling
Slot Size 0.010"
Grout Type Portland cement
Interval 0' to 2'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 2' to 4'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 4' to 16'
Total Depth 16'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
11/17/1999
8.44
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Leve

crift
Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-17
Aquaterra, Inc
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201401
Geologist Cliff Lundgren
Start Date 2/24/00
Purpose Monitoring Well
Contractor Geologic Exploration
Registration No 1175
Driller Todd
Complete Date 2/24/00 Equipment Auger B-58/Air Rotary
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8" to 15.5' bgs Air Rotary-8"from 15.5' to 122' bgs
Comments Surface Cover Cleared - Sand
20' from bank of former river channel
subsurface material description based on driller's and/or geologist's observation
of drilling equipment resistance to penetration
MD / PID
(1)Pm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 8 "
0' to 7'
Dark brown silty micaceous fine to medium sand
Riser Type PVC
7' to 13'
Dark brown silty sand w/gravel & cobbles (wet)
Diameter 2"
(Water encountered at 12' during drilling)
Screen Type PVC
13' to 15.5'
Partially weathered rock - Auger refusal at 15.5'
Diameter 2"
15.5' to 17'
Boulder/rock lens (Begin air rotary)
Riser Interval 0'to 112'
17' to 78'
Partially weathered rock described as brownish tan silty sand
Screen Interval 112' to 122'
(drillers describe as sanstone)
Slot Size 0.010"
78' to 115'
Partially weathered rock described as grey
Grout Type Portland/Bentonite
w/rock fragments, harder drilling
Interval 0' to 107'
(water/bearing zone beginning at 78 , est. 5-10 gpm)
Bentonite Type Holeplug
115' to 122'
Hard rock described as grey biotite/granite gneiss
Interval 107' to 110'
rock fragments, hard, fresh (assume bedrock)
Filter Pack Filter sand
122'
Boring terminated @ 122'
Interval 110' to 122'
Total Depth 122'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information -
'
Date
W.L. Below R.P.
2/25/00
7.60'
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL = Mean Sea Level

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
L D. Number MW-18 Purpose Monitoring Well
Aquaterra, Inc.
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201401 Registration No.
Geologist Cliflundgren Driller Todd/Mark
Start Date 2/24/00 Complete Date 2/24/00 Equipment Air rig
Drilling Method Auger Rotary to 20'
Comments Surface Cover Cleared - Sand
20'from bank offormer river channel
15' southwest ofMW-17
FID / PID
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 8"
0'to 7'
Dark brown silty micaceous fine to medium sand
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2"
7' to 16'
Dark brown silty sand w/grovel & cobbles (wet)
Screen Type PVC
(Water encountered at 12' during drilling)
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0' to 10'
16' to 20'
Partially weathered rock/oulder/rock lens
Screen Interval 10' to 20'
Slot Size 0.010"
20'
Boring terminated @ 20'
Grout Type Portland/Bentonite
Interval 0' to 6'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 6'to 8'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 8' to 20'
Total Depth 20'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below R.P.
2/25/00
8.47'
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmar
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
= Mean . ea

0
Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc
I. D. Number P-1 Purpose former cesspool soil & water samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundgren/Lonny Clark Driller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 8'-9'
water sample interval 8.5'-12.5' VOC (8260) and Pb, Cr (6010B)
sample time 11:50
Well Construction
Information
Borehole Dia. 2"
Riser Type
Diameter
Screen Type
siameter
Riser Interval
Screen Interval
Slot Size
Depth
From - To
0'to 0.5'
0.5 to 5
5'to 8'
8'to 10.5'
10.5'to 12'
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
concrete
fill- clay,sand,silt
residual - BN Si fine to coarse sand w/rock
gravel, wet
sapprolite
01,0 PID
(ppm)
® Depth (ft.)
1.0' 1ppm
3.0' ND
5.0' ND
7.0' ND
9.0' ND
11.0' 6ppm
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
10/10/00
8.5'
R.P. = Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM m Temporary Benchmark MSL = Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.

a
Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
I. D. Number P-2
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist
Start Date
Cliff Lundgren/Lonny Clark
10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00
Aquaterra, Inc
Purpose former cesspool soil & water samples
Contractor Probe Technologies
Registration No.
Driller
Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 5'-6'
water sample interval 8.5'-12.5' VOC (8260) and Pb, Cr (6010B)
sample time 12:25
(I / PID
(ppm)
® Depth (ft.)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 2"
0' to 0.5'
concrete
1.0' 0.2ppm
•
Riser Type
0.5 to 5
fill- clay,sandsill
3.0' 0.2ppm
Diameter
5' 10 8'
residual - BN Si fine to coarse sand w/rock
5.0' 0.6ppm
Screen Type
8' to 12'
gravel, wet/rock fragments
7.0' ND
iameter
9.0' 0.2
Riser Interval
11.0' 0.4ppm
Screen Interval
Slot Size
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below R.P.
10/10/00
8'
R.P. = Reference Point
W.L. = Water Level
TBM = Temporary Benchmark
(iliNefer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
MSL Mean Sea Level

fok-
Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
I. D. Number P-3 Purpose former cesspool soil & water samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundgren/Lonny Clark Driller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Conunents
soil sample interval 5'-8'
water sample interval 9.5'-13.5' VOC (8260) and Pb, Cr (6010B)
sample time 1300
Well Construction
Information
Borehole Dia. 2"
Riser Type
Diameter
Screen Type
(on'ameter
Riser Interval
Depth
From - To
0'to 0.5'
concrete
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
PID
(ppm)
Q Depth (ft.)
1.0' ND
0.5to5
5' to 8'
8'to 11'
11'to 13'
fill- clay,sand,silt
residual - BN Si fine to coarse sand w/rock
Pwr/rock fragments - wet
sapprolite
3.0' 0.4ppm
5.0' ND
7.0' ND
9.0' ND
11.0' ND
Screen Interval
Slot Size
13' ND
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
10/10/00
8'
RP. = Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM = Temporary Benchmark MSL = Mean Sea Level
defer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type 1I - Style 1.

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number
I. D. Number P-4
Project Name M-B Industries
Project No. 8201400
Geologist
Start Date
Cliff Lundgren/Lonny Clark
10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00
Aquaterra, Inc.
Purpose former black oxide finishing area samples
Contractor Probe Technologies
Registration No.
Driller
Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 4'-5' Also: 140m1 at 1'
water sample interval 8'-12' VOC (8260) and Pb, Cr (6010B)
sample time 1400
FI / PID
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft)
Well Construction
Information
Depth
From - To
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
Borehole Dia. 2"
0' to 0.5'
concrete
1.0' 200ppm
Riser Type
0.5'to 1.5'
dark brown fine sand
3.0' 100ppm
Diameter
1.5' to 6'
tan fine to medium sand
5.0' 100ppm
Screen Type
10.5
Ayr/rock fragments
7.0' 80ppn:
Nameter
11'
wet
9.0' 60ppm
Riser Interval
11.0' 2ppm
Screen Interval
Slot Size
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
10/10/00
8'
R.P. = Reference Point
/"Ae1
1.efer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.
W.L. s Water Level
TBM — Temporary Benchmark
MSL = Mean Sea Level

(sit
orin /Well Construction Log
g
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc
I. D. Number P-5 Purpose former black oxide finishing area samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundgren/Lonny Clark Driller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 6'-7'
water sample interval 8'-12' VOC (8260) and Pb, Cr (6010B)
sample time 1435
Well Construction
Information
Borehole Dia. 2"
Riser Type
Diameter
Screen Type
`3iameter
Depth
From - To
0'to 0.5'
0.5'to 1.5'
1.5'to 6'
10.5
11'
Soil / Rock Description / Comments
concrete
dark brown fine sand
tan fine to medium sand
Pwr/rock fragments
wet
/ PID
(ppm)
@ Depth (ft.)
1.0' 90ppm
3.0' 30ppm
5.0' SOppm
7.0' 70ppm
9.0' lOppm
Riser Interval
11.0' ND
Screen Interval
Slot Size
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
RP. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date
W.L. Below RP.
10/10/00
8'
RP. = Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM = Temporary Benchmark MSL = Mean Sea Level
f
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II - Style 1.

Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NCDENR / Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Date: March 14, 2000
Subject: Permit Renewal Permit # NC0000311
Dear Mr. Weaver,
M-B Industries, Inc.
PO Box 1118
Highway 64 West
Rosman, NC 28772
M 1
MAR 1 6 2000
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Please accept my apology for the tardiness of this Renewal Application. During
physical year of 1999 there were no changes made to the waste water
treatment facility.
All sludge passes through filter press, dried to a powder consistency, then
barreled ready for shipment to landfill. All sludge is labeled F006 under RCRA
requirements.
Could someone in your office please send to me Appendix A to Title 40 of the
CFR Part 122.21 so that we may gain an understanding of Priority Pollutant Analysis.
Upon receipt of that information we shall complete that requirement. If you have any
questions please call me at 828-862-4201 and/or Fax [phone].
Sincerely Yours
Edwin E. Morrow
Vice President
enc.