The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20060200 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20140226r 1�1 _�j Year 1 of 5 Monitoring Report FINAL Five -Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration, Iredell County NCEEP IMS ID# 92185 DENR Contract # D05013S Prepared for: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh, North Carolina January 2014 J Vlfr TAR nCr r RECEIVED FEB 0 5 201 RECOVER FEB 2 1 2014 NC ECOSYsTr PO EMIA14 EMENT PROGRAM Year 1 of 5 Monitoring Report Five -Mlle Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration NC Engineering License # C -1869 NC Surveying License # C -1869 Prepared for NCDENR -EEP Prepared by ARCADIS G &M of North Carolina, Inc 801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300 Raleigh North Carolina 27607 Tel 919 854 1282 Fax 919 854 5448 Our Ref NC604017 0000 Project Manager Robert Lepsic Date January 2014 This document is intended only for the use of the individual or entity for which it was prepared and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is strictly prohibited Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Methodology 6 1 1 Cross Section Surveys 6 12 Vegetation 6 13 Hydrology 6 1 31 Wetland Hydrology 6 1 3 2 Stream Hydrology 6 2. References 8 r Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Stream Current Condition Plan View Figure 3 Project Components Appendices A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables B Visual Assessment Data C Vegetation Plot Data D Stream Survey Data E Hydrology Data F Photographs Five We Branch FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co Executive Summary Goals and Objectives The primary goals of this restoration project focus on the following • Increase bank stability, nutrient filtration and aquatic habitat • Reduce sod disturbance and nutrient inputs to stream Improve sod physical and chemical properties in the near term • Improve hydrologic connectivity with floodplam • Attenuate site impacts of storm flows • Restore ground water hydrology to pre - agricultural levels • Restore wetland and riparian habitat These goals were accomplished by • Establishing a minimum 50 -foot buffer consisting of a mix of native species representative of piedmont/mountain bottomland hardwood forest The planted species were selected by evaluation of adjacent reference sites and reviewing species listed in Classification of Natural Communities of North Carolina Third Approximation (Schafale and Weakley 1990) A total of 1 9 acres of bottomland hardwood forest were preserved through land ownership or conservation easements Land preservation reduced soil disturbance and nutrient input to the streams • Grading stream banks, installation of in- stream structures, and removal of an adjacent berm increased bank stability, improved in- stream habitat diversity and improved the hydrologic connectivity with the adjacent floodplam Gently sloped, vegetated, stream banks in conjunction with in- stream structures increased bank stability The in- stream structures all increased stream habitat diversity by establishing riffle -pool sequences and establishing stable woody debris Removal of the berm reduced the water surface elevation required to reach the floodplam • Fill existing drainage ditches and excavating floodplam pools restored groundwater hydrology to pre - agriculture conditions, in -turn restoring wetlands and riparian habitat Fwe Mle Branch FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co • Ripping floodplain soil prior to planting to reduce ground compaction cause by past agricultural practice and allowing water infiltration The Five Mile Branch Mitigation site was selected for stream and wetland restoration originally by the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) then transferred to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) The purpose of this restoration project was to restore, enhance and preserve streams and wetlands within the site Beaver and Fifth creeks are the primary stream within the site There are five unnamed tributaries that were preserved The site's original design was developed while the protect was under NCDOT auspices and was a i very sinuous, priority 2 stream restoration with a great deal of structure, which presented concerns in terms of cost and stability (risk/cost-benefit) The proposed alignment also led to retrospective concerns of hydrologic trespass by NCDOT for the 1-40 right of way Collectively, this prompted an enhancement approach to the stream channel through stabilization, improvement of the profile, and the removal of berms to provide additional floodplain connection (NCEEP 2013) The Five Mile Branch Site (site) is east of Statesville in Iredell County, southeast of Interstate 40 (1-40) and northwest of US Route 64 The site is in the Township of Cool Springs on the Statesville East, NC, 7 5- minute U S Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map (Figure 1) and the Yadkin 02 (03040102) cataloging unit The Site comprises 12 adjacent parcels totaling approximately 229 acres (92 67 ha) It is bordered to the north by 1-40 and to the south, east, and west by various forested, pasture, and residential properties Swann Road (SR 2167), running north and south, bisects the site Chimney Lane dead -ends on the site west of Swann Road The site was broken into three stream reaches for restoration purposes Reach 1 is Beaver Creek with a drainage area of 10 76 square miles Reach 2, Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek has a drainage area of 13 93 square miles Reach 3, Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek, has a drainage area of 26 05 square miles The restoration strategy implemented on Beaver and Fifth creeks consisted of Enhancement Level II Both streams were stabilized in their current locations Their north banks were re- graded to a flatter slope and boulder grade control structures were installed No work was performed on the unnamed tributaries They were preserved through conservation easements or property purchase Wetland restoration was accomplished by filling in the drainage ditches, grading floodplain pools and replanting with native vegetation Through these practices 12,085 linear feet if stream were enhanced, 890 feet of stream preserved, 48 6 acres of wetland restored and 1 9 acres of wetlands preserved Fwe We Breach 2 FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co Vegetation monitoring was conducted on October 1 and October 3, 2013 When tallying only planted stems, two of the 23 vegetation monitoring plots are meeting the established year three success criteria of 320 stems per acre, plot 6 with 445 stems per acre and plot 9 with 324 stems per acre Overall, there was a reduction in planted stems surviving within the monitoring plots Baseline counts totaled 143 stems, year one totaled 90 stems In April 2013, it was observed that two adjacent property owners mowed a portion of the buffer area, one parcel at the western end and one parcel on the eastern end See Figure 2 CCPV This resulted in 100% mortality of planted stems and a significant reduction in stem count totals given that plot 1 was located in the eastern parcel Plot 1 stem counts were reduced from 10 planted stems at baseline to zero stems during year one No vegetation monitoring plots are located in the eastern mowed parcel NCEEP and NCDOT have made contact with the landowners The landowners have been notified of the property violation and have been asked to stop mowing this area NCDOT owns the western parcel fee simple and purchased an easement on the central parcel The areas will be replanted in the 2014/2015 dormant season once the encroachments have been rectified When considering volunteer stems, all but five plots (1, 13, 14, 16, and 18) of the 23 are meeting the established success criteria Plot 17 is located in a young stand of existing sycamore and river birch There was no grading within plot 17 and it was not planted This plot was selected to monitoring the performance of existing, established vegetation Six invasive areas of concern were identified in the project area Invasive species present are Chinese privet (Ligustrum smense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), all listed as "threat to habitat and natural areas" in NCDOT's Invasive Plants of North Carolina The highest density of privet is located easterly of Chimney Lane An estimated percent coverage is 20% This area was not impacted by construction activities However, the contractor did conduct privet removal operations (cut and treat) in this area Japanese honeysuckle is sparsely located throughout the site in areas that were not cleared It highest density (10 %) is easterly of Chimney Lane, the same location as privet Thick stands of Lespedeza are located northerly of Fifth Creek upstream and downstream of Swann Road Coverage is near 100% in these areas It maybe outcompeting vegetation planted onsite Five We Branch FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co Cross section surveys were conducted at 13 permanent cross sections Most of the measured cross section parameters changed from the as built conditions However, it is too soon in the monitoring period to identify any patterns or trends in the stream cross sections Based on visual observations and best professional judgment, the streams appear to be stable Several areas of bank stress were identified See CCPV The areas are relatively minor and not a concern at this time Bank deposition was observed on the arms of several structures and graded banks This is not a concern at this time either The deposition is occurring in areas that it is expected to s occur and is not threatening the integrity of the project When looking at the plotted cross sections, several of the year one cross sections do not align with the as -built condition and several appear to have significantly changed from the as -built condition, most notable cross section 5 These apparent changes may be the result of the lack of detail in the as -built channel survey The as -built cross sections were generated from the surface contours created from the as -built field survey, which was not surveyed by ARCADIS staff The year one cross sections were surveyed in the field by ARCADIS staff and are likely more accurate These discrepancies were not noticed until the year one cross sectional survey was overlaid on the as -built drawing Several of the cross sections do align well (3, 9, 10, 11 and 13) Three bankfull events occurred in 2013 (7/6/2013, 7/27/2013 and 11/27/2013) These events were documented by the HOBO® pressure sensor gauges installed within the stream channels Wetland hydrology was monitored for the entire growing season (April 18 — October 17) in the year 1 monitoring term Of the 30 gauges on site, all but one (gauge 17) are meeting the established groundwater success criteria of ground water within 12 inches of the ground surface for 9 consecutive days in the growing season (5% of 183 days) Gauge 17 recorded groundwater within 12 inches of the surface for a maximum of 4 consecutive days (2 2 percent) during the growing season Wetland hydrology at gauges meeting success criteria ranged from 100 percent (183 days) of the growing season at gauges 8, 10, 21, 22 and 23 to 7 7 percent (14 days) of the growing season at gauge 28 There was inconsistency among the gauges in their performance For example, during one downloading event a gauge would not download During the next event, the gauge would download properly with no data lost This made it difficult to determine when a gauge was no longer functioning properly and when to replace it Typically, if a FNe We Branch 4 FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co z gauge failed to download on two sequential downloading events, it was replaced Several gauges were reprogrammed during the year one monitoring term All gauges were programmed to record once daily at 8 00 AM Several gauges faded to accept this programming and were reprogrammed during download events At approximately 1 30 PM, during the 5/29/2013 downloading event, ARCADIS staff members were l involved in a vehicle accident and were not able to return to the site to complete downloading the remaining gauges Only gauges west of Chimney Lane were downloaded during this event Gauges east of Chimney Lane were downloaded on 6/4/2013 The Meazura TM handheld malfunctioned during the 8/20/2013 downloading event Gauges 1 -14 were downloaded The remaining gauges were not downloaded due to the potential of losing all gauge data using a malfunctioning handheld In the office, all software was reloaded onto the handheld fixing the problem Summary information /data related to the occurrence of such things as beaver or encroachment, and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request Fwe We Branch 5 r 1. Methodology 1 1 Cross Section Surveys Cross sectional surveys were conducted by ARCADIS staff on August 8, 2013 using Topcon total station 12 Vegetation Vegetation monitoring followed Carolina Vegetative Survey Level 2 All planted and volunteer stems were tallied 13 Hydrology 13 1 Wetland Hydrology Wetland hydrology was monitored using RIDS Ecotone ® WM Water Level Instruments (gauges) The gauges were programmed to take one reading daily at 8 00 AM EST Gauges were downloaded approximately monthly using a MeazuraTm handheld device manufactured by ACEECATm Data from the handheld device was then transferred to a Lenovo laptop computer and processed using MicroSoft Excel software 1 3 2 Stream Hydrology Stream flow depth was documented several ways Originally, two stream crest gauges were installed on site, one on Beaver Creek upstream of Chimney Lane, the other on Fifth Creek downstream of Swann Road Readings were attempted during groundwater gauge downloading events The resulting measurements were ambiguous due to debris around the gauges, the wooded staff in the gauge rotting or the gauge being damaged FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co A secondary method to identify bankfull events is visual observations The presence of wrack/debris lines and sediment on the floodplain also indicated flows higher than bankfull It does not provide an estimated water surface elevation, only that an overbank event occurred Sediment within the other monitoring devises (groundwater and rain gauges) also documents an overbank event It also gives an estimate of stage given the height of the other monitoring devises Several rebar corners of the � C Fwe Mle Branch 6 FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co vegetation monitoring plots were buried 6 inches by sand The source of the sand was form over bank events The final method to document stream water depth was with the installation of HOBO pressure sensor gauges manufactured by onset ® Three HOBO® devises were installed at the Five Mile Branch restoration site, one on Beaver Creek upstream of Chimney Lane, one on Fifth Creek upstream of the confluence with beaver Creek and one on Fifth Creek downstream of Swann Road The dataloggers were downloaded during the groundwater gauges downloading events F.e Mle Branch 1 7 FINAL Year One Monitoring Report Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co. 2. References North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2008. Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. Prepared by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCDENR) 2010. Baseline Monitoring Document Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, Version 2.0, October 14, 2010. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCDENR) 2012. Monitoring Report Template, Version 1.5, June 8, 2012. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2013. Letter dated February 28, 2013. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). 2008. Invasive Exotic Plants of North Carolina. Schafale, M.P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, A Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2003. April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2011 Soil Survey of Iredell County, North Carolina. (Available online at http: / /soils.usda.goc /survey. printed surveys) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1964. Soil Survey, Iredell County, North Carolina. Joel W. Cawthorn and V. S. Jenkins. Five We Branch 8 Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Directions: Take 140 west out of Raleigh to US 64 west (exit 162) toward Cool Springs. Turn left onto US 64. Turn right onto Swann Road. Swann Road crosses the Site just before 140 r OM& '%\ 1Project Area o/ �,- ----ti_ till / �"�► I / i 1: f ON 0 .p W 0 N V The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement J' Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land < under private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or along the easement ° boundary and therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees /contractors involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activities requires prior coordination with EEP. 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 " Feet C59" SCALE: 1:24,000 W E Source: USGS Quadrangle Maps Statesville East and Cool Springs, NC s Prepared For VICINITY MAP Figure No. Five Mile Branch �C�S�'Sten7 Stream and Wetland Restoration Site 1 Iredell County, North Carolina Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Mitigation Credits Stream Riparian Wetland Non - riparian Buffer Nitrogen Wetland Nutrient Offset Nutrient Offset Type R RE R RE R RE Totals 5,9247 1425 480 04 - - - - - Project Components Restoration - Restoration Project Component -or- Reach Stationing /Location Existing Approach or- Footage or Mitigation Ratio ID Footage /Acreage (PI, PH etc) Restoration Acreage Equivalent Reach 1 - Beaver Creek 10 +87 03 PRBVR to Fifth 6,1337 E II R 5935 38* 21" Creek Reach 2 - Fifth Creek upstream 1 -40 to Beaver Creek 1,5267 E II R 1,5267 2 1* of Beaver Creek Reach 3 - Fifth Creek Beaver Creek to 78 +60 00 5,3333 E II R 4387 26* 2 1** downstream of Beaver Creek PRFTH Reach 4 - Beaver Creek Property line to 10 +87 03 1930 Pres RE 1930 101 (Upstream) PRBVR Reach 5 - UT to Beaver Creek Property line to Beaver Creek 1801 Pres RE 1801 101 (Upstream) Reach 6 - UT Property line to Beaver Creek 2204 Pres RE 2204 101 Reach 7 - UT at Chimney Lane Property line to Beaver Creek 1395 Pres RE 1395 101 Reach 8 - UT at Swann Road Property line to Fifth Creek 5200 Pres RE 5200 101 Reach 9 - UT at Freeze Within the Conservation 1720 Pres RE 1720 101 Property Easement Wetlands Throughout the site 480 Rest R 480 1 1 Wetlands Throughout the site 19 Pres RE 1 9 11 Component Summation Restoration Level Stream Ripanan Wetland Non - riparian Wetland Buffer Upland (linear feet) (acres) (acres) (square feet) (acres) Rivenne Non- Rivenne Restoration N/A 480 N/A N/A N/A N/A Enhancement N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Enhancement I N/A Enhancement II 11,8493 Creation N/A N/A N/A N/A Preservation 1,4250 1 9 N/A N/A N/A High Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preservation * Difference between existing and restoration footage is due to a section of stream preservation at the the upstream limit of the project and the absence of ownership of both side of the stream at the downstream limit of the project * *due to the near systemic nature of the improvement to the channel cross - section and the localized improvements to the profile /in stream habitat, a credit ratio of 2 01 is being used r Y Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Five Mile Branch Stream Rpatnratinn_ FFP IMS In# 094Str, Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan Dec -09 Dec -09 Final Design — Construction Plans Nov -10 Nov -10 Construction Apr-71 Apr-1 2 Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring — baseline Jun -12 Mar -13 Year 1 Monitoring Dec -13 Dec -13 Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring_ f I i f I I� f' Table 3. Project Contacts—Table Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Designer ARCADIS G &M of NC, Inc 801 Corporate Center Dr, Suite 300, Raleigh NC 27607 Primary project design POC Robert Le sic 919 - 854 -9812 Construction Contractor North State Environmental 2889 Lowery Street, Winston Salem, NC 27101 Construction contractor POC Michael Anderson 336- 245 -1253 Survey Contractor North State Environmental 2889 Lowery Street, Winston Salem, NC 27101 Survey contractor POC David K Alley, PLS 336- 250 -9225 Planting Contractor Southern Garden, Inc PO Box 808, Apex, NC 27502 Planting contractor POC Todd Laasko 919 - 362 -1050 Seeding Contractor Canady's Landscape and Erosion Control 256 Fairview Acres Road,Lexington NC 27295 Contractor point of contact 336- 236 -1182 Seed Mix Sources Green Resource, Colfax, NC 27235 336- 855 -6363 Nursery Stock Suppliers Foggy Mountain Nursery 336- 384 -5323 Claridge Nursery 919 - 731 -7988 Brook Run Plantation 434 - 292 -1677 Monitoring Performers ARCADIS G &M of NC, Inc Baseline and Year One 801 Corporate Center Dr, Suite 300, Raleigh NC 27607 Stream Monitoring POC Robert Lepsic 919 - 854 -9812 Vegetation Monitoring POC Robert Le sic 919 - 854 -9812 Wetland Monitoring POC Robert Le sic 919 - 854 -9812 Table 4. Attributes Five Mile Branch Stream Rpctnratinn_ FFP IMS Int! a2iRr% Project Information Project Name Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration County Iredell Project Area (acres) 229 Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 035° 50' 40 18" N 0800 46'27 37" W Project Watershed Summary Information Physiographic Province Piedmont River Basin Yadkin -Pee Dee USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 3040102 DWQ Sub -basin 03 -07 -06 Project Drainage Area (square miles) 26 Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 10 -20 CGIA Land Use Classification Heavily developed, cultivated, herbaceous and ishrubland, forest land, water bodies Reach Summary Information Parameters Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Length of reach (linear feet) 6,134 1,527 5,333 Valley classification VIII VIII VIII Drainage area,(square miles) 107 139 26 NCDWQ stream identification score 12- 108 -13 -1 12- 108 -13 12- 108 -13 NCDWQ Water Quality Classification Class C Class C Class C Morphological Description (stream type) E5 E5 E5 Evolutionary trend Underlying mapped soils Codorus loam Codorus loam Codorus loam Drainage class somewhat poorly drained somewhat poorly drained somewhat poorly drained Sod Hydric status Yes Yes Yes Slope 0 -2% 0 -2% 0 -2% FEMA classification Zone AE Zone AE Zone AE Native vegetation community Bottomland hardwood Bottomland hardwood Bottomland hardwood Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation 1 <5 1<5 1 <5 Wetland Summary Information Parameters Wetland 1 Wetland 2 Wetland 3 Size of Wetland (acres) 480 Wetland Type (non - riparian, riparian nvenne or riparian non- nvenne Riparian nvenne Mapped Son Series Codorus loam Drainage class somewhat poorly drained Sod Hydric Status Yes Source of Hydrology groundwater, precipitation and overbank flooding Hydrologic Impairment Ditching Native vegetation community Bottomland hardwood Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation <5 Regulatory Considerations Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Waters of the United States — Section 404 Yes Yes Restoration Plan Waters of the United States — Section 401 Yes Yes Restoration Plan Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Restoration Plan Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Restoration Plan Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act CAMA No N/A N/A FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes Yes Restoration Plan Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A t_ Appendix B Visual Assessment Data I *1 R � , • I d �• •. Xi, l � � f n 2A � 4 e I �< t � h! oel• t,4� //� • i1Y, /// 't •t. ^ � Od Ike ag t � h! oel• 4 � 4 * .., i T t \ 1 V A ol 41 -411 ZZ `, Il Pro, tv, •ti 0 0 0 All 4&6� iD 0 , , 2,l t _ r r 1 _ y y ` , \' +,• �� ,` i.�s ter. • { look Y' 35 .� > 10 ;d qn 13 41 13 ,� •:r �r gat ��}, • •—• 1F.� ` Jt. �• 13 12 Reach 2 lifth Creek 4 10 7. ♦. �./ �#5 _ Reach 3 Fifth Creek 4 jr Reach 7 *2 LIT @ Chimney Lane Al Legend 1 cr• i • , : r a P � Si / o Reach 4 Beaver Creek VD GA RE • r r� • / /• ,F +! fl�� 1 ►1• N"'• � Srµ i - BO Reach 5 UT • - -- 1 Table 5a Reach ID Assessed Length Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Beaver Creek oqa hna— roof Major Channel Channel Sub-Category ry Metric Number Stable Performing as Intended Total m As -built Number of Unstable Segments Amount of Unstable Footage % Stable, Performing as Intended 1 Bed 1 Vertical Stability Riffle and Run Units 1 Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow lateral) not top include point bars 0 0 100% 2 De radation - Evidence of downcuttin 0 0 100% 2 Riffle Condition* 1 Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate N/A N/A N/A 3 Meander Pool Condition ** 1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 51 — N/A N/A N/A 2 Length sufficient ( >30% of centerline distance between tad of upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle) N/A N/A N/A 4 Thalweg Position— 1 Thalweig centering at upstream of meander bend Run N/A N/A N/A 2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander Glide N/A N/A N/A 2 Bank 1 Scoured/Erodinq 2 Undercut Bank lacks ve etabve cover due to active scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is expected Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and are providinq habitat 6 220 96% 0 0 100% 3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 'J 3 Engineered Structures 1 Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 24 t3 24 6 220 96% 0 100 /o 2 Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 4 4 100% 3 Engineered Structires (cont'd) 2a Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or arms 20 20 100% 3 Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15% See exhibit descnbm bank influenced b vane arms 20 18 90% Stream is a sand bed 4 Habitat stream No suhstratP snrhnn Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1 5 Rootwads /lo s rowdm some cover at low flow is nrri innn 8 8 100% ** The stream is not a meandering stream No meander pools exist Page 1 of 1 Table 5b Reach ID Assessed Lenath Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1 r9A I.nnor fnnf ** The stream is not a meandering stream No meander pools ewst Page 1 of 1 Number Mayor Channel Channel Sub-Category ry Metric Stable Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Performing in Unstable Unstable Performing as as Intended As-built Segments Footage Intended 1 Vertical Stability 1 Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect 1 Bed Riffle and Run Units flow lateral) not top Include point bars 0 0 100% 2 De radation - Evidence of downcuttin 0 0 100% 2 Riffle Condition* 1 Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate I! N/A N/A N/A 3 Meander Pool Condition ** 1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 51 — N/A N/A N/A 2 Length sufficient ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle) N/A N/A N/A 4 Thalw Position" 1 Thalw centenn at u stream of meander bend Run N/A N/A N/A 2 Thalwe centenn at downstream of meander Glide N/A NIA N/A 2 Bank 1 Scoured/Erodinci Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion 1 30 98% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is 2 Undercut expected Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and 0 0 100% are rovidin habitat 3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 1 100% 3 Engineered 1 30 98% ° 100 /o Structures 1 Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 6 6 2 Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 1 2 50% 3 Engineered 2a Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or Structires (cont'd) arms 3 3 100% 3 Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15% See exhibit descnbinq bank influenced bv vane arms 3 3 100% 4 Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1 5 Rootwads /lo s rovidin some cover at low flow 5 5 100% * Stream Is a Sand hAd AtrPArtl Mn c..hefrnfn a rf.nn .c ** The stream is not a meandering stream No meander pools ewst Page 1 of 1 Table 5c Reach ID Assessed Lenath Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek A QA7 bring fnnf Major Channel Category Channel Sub - Category Metric Number Stable Performing as Intended Total Number m As -built Number of Amount of Unstable Unstable Segments Footage % Stable, Performing as Intended 1 Bed 1 Vertical Stability Riffle and Run Units 1 Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterall not to include oint bars Iii 0 0 100% 2 De radation - Evidence of downcuttm 0 0 100% 2 Riffle Condition" 1 Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 Meander Pool Condition *" 1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 5) — N/A N/A 2 Length sufficient ( >30% of centerline distance between tad of upstream nffle and head of downstream riffle) N/A N/A NIA 4 Thalweq Position ** 1 Thalweq centering at upstream of meander bend Run N/A I N/A N/A 2 Thalweq centenna at downstream of meander Glide N/A N/A N/A 2 Bank 1 Scoured /Erodin 2 Undercut Bank lacks ve etative cover due to active scour and erosion Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is expected Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and are Drovidina habitat NPIR 3 100 0 0 98% 100% 3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 3Mss 3 Engineered 1 Overall Integrity Structures 1 3 100 20 98% Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 20 100% 2 Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 2 3 67% 3 Engineered Structres (cont'd) 2a Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or arms 20 20 100% 100% 3 Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15% See exhibit describina bank influenced bv vane arms 20 20 *Stream Is a sand hed 4 Habitat stream Nn ci ihct Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1 5 RootwadsAo s Providinq some cover at low flow 9 9 I d - 100% ** The stream is not a meandering stream No meander pools exist Page 1 of 1 1` f Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Planted Acreage R7 1 Vegetation Category Definitions in Mappg Threshold CCPV Depiction Number of Polygons Combined Acreage % of Planted Acreage 1 Bare Areas Very Limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material 0 1 acres None 0 0 0% 2 Low Stem Density Areas* Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria. 0 1 acres None 0 042 <1% * AceranP IS nnnlhinarl nrnrnnn -f.1-1 . .,e►.,6......... 3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year 0 25 acres None 0 0 0% 99 W r\-_luau= 44J7 Vegetation Category nvasive Areas of Concern Mapping Definitions Threshold reas or points too small to render as polygons at map scale) 1000SF CCPV Depiction Grassland/ Green Number of Polygons 6 Combined Acreage 287 % of Planted Acreage 40% 5 Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points (if too small to render as None polygons at map scale) Open Pasture /Green 2 2 1 30% * AceranP IS nnnlhinarl nrnrnnn -f.1-1 . .,e►.,6......... - ----.�- -- - - -a" •••••••••••`��,y rlvw fwi fncculfy AUI.%,"CAD GIIlt71Id Page 1 of 1 1 A Five Mile Branch Bank at 27 +50 BVR 12/5/13 Bank at 29 +00 BVR 12/5/13 Bank at 31 +25 BVR 12/5/13 Bank at 34 +50 BVR 12/5/13 Bank at 59 +00 BVR 12/5/13 Bank at 66 +25 BVR 12/5/13 Page 1 of 2 Five Mile Branch Bank at 22 +00 FTH 12/5/13 Bank at 52 +50 FTH 12/15/13 Bank at 54 +25 FTH 12/15/13 Bank at 67 +00 FTH 12/15/13 Page 2 of 2 Appendix C Vegetation PlotData Five Mile Branch ( #29185) Year 1 (01- Oct -2013 to 08- Oct -2013) Vegetation Plot Summary Information Stream Vegetation Totals (per acre) Stream/ Success Wetland Criteria Plot # Ste M52 Volunteers3 Total4 Met? 1 0 0 0 No 2 202 2630 2833 No 3 283 3116 3399 No 4 283 2145 2428 No 5 202 1942 2145 No 6 445 0 445 Yes 7 283 162 445 No 8 81 2266 2347 No 9 "n241 445 769 Yes, barely 10 162 1983 2145 No 11 243 1821 2064 No 12 121 1659 1781 No 13 81 162 243 No 14 81 162 243 No 15 243 1821 2064 No 16 121 162 283 No 17 0 2833 2833 No 18 0 0 0 No 19 81 1740 1821 No 20 81 486 567 No 21 121 3278 3399 No 22 162 5180 5342 No 23 40 1052 1093 No Project Avg 158 1524 1682 No 2Stream/ Wetland Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines 3Volunteers Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines. 4 Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines. EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch 29185 -01 -0001 29185 -01 -0002 29185 -01 -0003 29185 -01 -0004 29185 -01 -0005 29185 -01 -0006 29185 -01 -0007 29185 -01 -0008 PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Acer negundo boxelder Tree 4 11 13 1 34 Acer rubrum red maple Tree 1 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 1 1 1 Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 1 1 1 Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 3 3 3 1 1 1 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree Ilex decidua possumhaw shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 34 38 37 34 2 Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 28 38 1 3 3 3 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 16 Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Stem count 0 0 0 5 5 70 7 7 84 7 7 60 5 5 53 11 11 11 7 7 11 2 2 58 size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0 0 4 4 6 3 3 5 4 4 8 +32-0-2.31 4 7 6 6 6 2 2 S 2 2 6 Species count 0 0 0 202.3 202.3 2833 283.3 283.3 3399 283.3 283.3 2428 202.21459x4.2 445.2 445.2 283.3 283.3 445.2 80.94 80.94 2347 Stems per ACRE EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch Current Plot Data (MY12013) 29185 -01 -0009 29185 -01 -0010 29185 -01 -0011 29185 -01 -0012 29185 -01 -0013 29185 -01 -0014 29185 -01 -0015 29185 -01 -0016 PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Acer negundo boxelder Tree 9 41 10 36 2 3 Acer rubrum red maple Tree 3 31 5 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 3 3 5 1 1 1 Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 1 1 1 Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 6 1 1 6 1 1 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 5 1 1 1 1 Ilex decidua possumhaw shrub 3 3 3 luglans nigra black walnut Tree 1 1 10 1 1 1 2 22 Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree Morus rubra red mulberry Tree Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 2 4 1 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 1 16 1 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 5 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 4 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 7 1 1 1 Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub 1 Stem count 8 8 19 4 4 53 6 6 51 3 3 44 2 2 6 2 2 6 6 61 51 3 3 7 size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 size (ACRES) 3 3 6 4 4 8 3 3 9 3 3 6 2 2 5 1 1 2 3 3 8 3 3 5 Species count Stems per ACRE 323.71 768.9 161.9 161.91 2145 242.8 242.8 20641 121.41 12141 1781 80.941 80.941 242.8 80.94 80.941242.81242.81242.81 20641 121.41 12341 283.3 EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Acer negundo boxelder Tree Acer rubrum red maple Tree Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 29185 -01 -0017 29185 -01 -0018 29185 -01 -0019 29185 -01 -0020 29185 -01 -0021 29185 -01 -0022 29185 -01 -0023 MY2( ? ? ? ?) PnoLS P -all IT 1 31 PnoLS P -all T PnoLS 1 P -all 1 T 2 3 PnoLS 1 P -all 1 T 3 PnoLS P -all T 6 PnoLS 11 P -all 1 T 3 8 6 PnoLS P -all T 8 4 PnoLS P -all T Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 Carpinus caroliniana Celtis laevigata American hornbeam sugarberry Tree Tree 3 3 2 1 1 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub Cornus amomum silky dogwood common persimmon Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana 1 1 1 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree Ilex decidua possumhaw shrub 2 Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 311 2 69 106 5 Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 2 2 2 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 35 31 1 7 6 9 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree Ol Ol Ol 0 0 2 2 45 1 2 11 2 4 14 3 3 84 4 4 132 1 1 27 0 0 0 Sambucus canadensis lCommon Elderberry Shrub Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.57 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 2 7 2 2 5 3 3 5 3 3 7 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 2833 0 0 0 80.94 80.94 1821 80.94 80.94 566.6 121.4 121.4 3399 161.9 161.9 5342 40.47 40.47 1093 0 0 0 EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type MY1 (201122 MYO (2012) PnoLS P -all noLS P -all T Acer negundo boxelder Tree 1 Acer rubrum red maple Tree Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 2 2 2 Betula nigra river birch Tree 16 16 19 19 50 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 2 2 4 4 4 Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 4 4 5 5 9 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 7 7 9 121 12 12 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 11 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 17 2 21 3 Ilex decidua possumhaw shrub 12 121 12 14 14 14 Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 3 31 7 15 15 15 Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 393 Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 61 6 159 5 5 37 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 4 41 4 15 15 15 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 22 22 24 24 24 24 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 6 6 6 10 10 10 Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub 3 3 28 5 5 5 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 90 90 956 1371 137 206 23 23 0.57 0.57 14 141 19 1L 151 16 158.4 158.4 1682 241.1 241.11 362.5 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #1 5/29/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #2 5/29/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #3 5/29/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #4 5/29/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #5 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #6 5/30/2012 Page 1 of 4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #7 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #8 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #9 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #10 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #11 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #12 5/30/2012 Page 2 of 4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #13 5/30/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #14 5/31/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #15 6/1/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #16 5/31/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #18 6/1/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #19 6/1/2012 Page 3 of 4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #20 6/1/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #21 6/1/2012 s , y 2. t i Vegetation Monitoring Plot #22 6/1/2012 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #23 6/1/2012 Page 4 of 4 Appendix D Stream Survey Data 0 ARCADIS ARCOS GO a North Cw*w Inc. 801 Corpoole Cenlr pne. 51de 300 Rokq NC 17607 19 1c1: 9- 854 -1282 For 919- 854 -5448 wco66— uLcorn DATE DESCRIPTION Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Iredell County, NC NCEEP IMS ID¢# 92185 DESIGN PROF. SE NUMBER DRAWN BY NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 75C - 745 .745. - .. .; ... ..... _ 740 - - - - - - 735 .735 - - 730 NKFULL ELEV. Crass Section #3 �7286 .. - 775 725 _ - 725. 772 n2 720 ?2c 49 +80.00 715 710 40 .750 .750 745 .745 ... _ . 740 740 735 .735 -. 730 .730. .�- .�.-�_.____ -- '. HANKFULL ELEV. 730.6 _.:. - ... _ - -- -` - -- _".` - Cross Section #2 725 ns n3 723 724.24 7N > 44 +00.00 - .. .715 715 _710 .710 0 ARCADIS ARCOS GO a North Cw*w Inc. 801 Corpoole Cenlr pne. 51de 300 Rokq NC 17607 19 1c1: 9- 854 -1282 For 919- 854 -5448 wco66— uLcorn DATE DESCRIPTION Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Iredell County, NC NCEEP IMS ID¢# 92185 DESIGN PROF. SE NUMBER DRAWN BY NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 734 75;7 7.5q ,77C BANKFULL ELEV. 726.7 =75 .725 777. Cross Section #7 _ _ 723 740 740 719.77 735 21 +40.00 '15 715 _ FTH 71C 73C 770 ....... ..... 7C5 .7M Cross Section #6 NKFULL ELEV_ 728.1 75;7 7.5q 745 745 _ - - 740 740 735 735 73C 770 ....... ..... Cross Section #6 NKFULL ELEV_ 728.1 725 .721.•3 72C 771.33 721.33 720 715 715 _ .... ... 11+4 0.00 '. FTH 71C .71c LEGEND [YEAR —BUILT 1 Y n p !1 O � & V PROJECT MANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER LEAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED KEYPIAN ARCADI S Five Mile Bronch Streom and SHEEP TITLE TASK/PHASE NUMBER DRAWN BY Wetland Restoration Iredell County, NC PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 801 ca,,wote came, o �sute 300 N CEEP I M S I D# 92185 Rolrgh, NC 27607 T6 : 919- 854 -1282 For: 919 -854 -5448 REV.ISSUED OATEDESCRIPTION ..•.orco?s- us.com I and Substrate - Riffle Bankfull Width (ft) 510 Roodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 4�_M 27 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 33 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz) 1393 WidditDepth Raba 188 Entrenchment Ratio Bank Height Raba 14 14 Rd6e Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft) Pool Length (ft) Pool Max Depth (@) Pool Spacing (ft) �r Pool Cross Sectional Area 012) Channel Beltwldth (ft) Radius of Curvature (ft) Rc Bankfull Width (fffft) Meander Wavelength (ft) Meander Width Ratio Sittistrate'}�bedand {ranspo° e R% /Ru % /P % /G% /S% SC% / Sa% /G % / C% / B% / Be% 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / di" (mm) Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /f2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream power (transport capacity) W /m2 Drainage Area I Impervious cover estimate ( %) IMM Rosgen Classification B Bankfull Velocity (fps) 39 Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 5399 Valley length (ft) Channel Thaiweg length (ft) IBM Sinuosity (ft) EM Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0 0032 BF slope (ft/ft) - Bankfull Floodplane Area (acres) _ A,ditionaiyReach P,arameta� rst Proportion over wide ( %) Entrenchment Class (ER Range) Incision Class I Range) BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% Channel Stability or Habitat Metnc Biological or Other Exhibit Table 5a Baseline Stream Data Summary Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,622 feet 3lonal Curve Pre - Existing Condition I References Reaches) Data' Design As -Built / Baseline Equation Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD 41 9` 202 267 263 352 4 3 48 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 207 276 388 241 295 263 381 75 1000 1800 - 2500 - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1000 1800 2500 >200 - 00 22' 33 45 45 59 05 48 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33 42 50 35 42 44 47 06 i r a —a.r„r � 5 0 6 9 69 81 07 48 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46 59 72 64 68 70 71 40 929— 797 1194 116 9 1760 229 48 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 750 1155 1632 1054 121 1 1245 1334 143 R NNW 44 60 59 91 12 48 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 66 95 55 73 56 109 31 1% 46 FEW 82 - 109 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 36 64 90 52 70 76 83 16 10 WIM 12 15 - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - 10 - - 10 - - 00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A �'s 3n io sa r .9 ''.s c,�:d - 9+ 4 "+e wi , e s+a a� 02 0 � V: -�T' .1, 'N +sm ,mss . °��'- 'r'943 aw1i,:Cai N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - - - - 0 0 0 0020 0 0014 0 0094 0 003 26 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 00 00020 00094 - 5 5 25 7 19 1 161 9 27 5 34 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 257 1619 47 67 66 78 09 13 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 47 67 78 43 43 43 43 0 20 6 1767 191 7489 275 34 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 206 1767 7489 - - - - - 80 9 1006 - 1198 N/A N/A I N/A N/A N/A 809 1006 1198 1 74 4 404 404 521 165 4430 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 470 2350 4430 470 2350 4430 47 0 2350 600 35270 1140000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 600 35270 140000 600 35270 140000 27 1618 6422 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 1278 5072 22 1278 5072 5750 13800 21320 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5750 13800 21320 5750 13800 21320 263 633 --T-978 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 208 500 772 208 500 772 N/A - N/A �itsivriss9g�.� > 2 0 mm N/A 043 035 031 T 33 0 240 227 158 13 129 NXI 1076 N/A 10 -20 N/A E5 N/A E5 E5 41 " *" 38 s 37 36 379 2" 4537 _; N/A N/A - - 1 07 N/A 107 107 00016 N/A 00016 00014 _ N/A - - �, N/A N/A N/A ` N/A N/A N/A fASfitli7>� N/A NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010 NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006 —*Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 1 A singulare reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project 2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11 i� ii M 0 and Substrate . Riffle Pre - Existing Condition Bankfull Width (ft) 51 0 Roodprone Width (ft) Design Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 27 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 33 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe 1393 Width/Depth Raao 188 Entrenchment Ratio 14 Bank Height Ratio 14 Rd le Length Riffle Slope Pool Length Pool Max Depth Pool Spacing Pool Cross Sectional Area (I Channel Beltvndth Radius of Curvature Rc Bankfull Width (f Meander Wavelength Meander Width Po Substrate, bed a d,tianSp° ort�parame RI % /Ru % /P% /G %/: SC% / Sa% /G % / C% / B% / Be 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / dl'° (mi Reach Shear Stress (competency) It Max part size (mm) mobilized at banks Stream power (transport capacity) Wh Drainage Area (SM) t>' Impervious cover estimate (%) Rosgen Classification B Bankfull Velocity (fps) 3 9 41 "' Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 539 9 466 8'" Valley length (ft) Channel Thalweg length (ft) Sinuosity (ft) r Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0 0032 BF slope (ft/ft) - Bankfull Floodplane Area (acres) Addition I;ReachPa a stars Proportion over wide ( %) Entrenchment Class (ER Range) YAM WM Incision Class (BHR Range) Now low BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% IN= SON Channel Stability or Habitat Metric am= Ow Biological or Other Exhibit Table 5b Baseline Stream Data Summary Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS lD# 92185 Segment/Reach Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,251 feet Ponal Curve Pre - Existing Condition References Reach(es) Data' Design As -Built I Baseline' Equation Min Mean Mad Max I SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Max Min Mean Mad Max SD 46 0' 239 307 303 403 48 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 251 290 330 242 Ft r7r t �A - >200 0 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - >200 0 >200 0 - 2 3' 38 42 42 50 04 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 38 41 46 43 +#� 67 78 79 91 06 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 64 74 83 77 112 5" 940 1301 1282 1764 48 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1045 1197 1447 1042 w 5 3 70 71 84 1 0 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 70 86 56 a - - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - 65 - 83 ' 1 1 L02 1 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 10 10 10 - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A e_`a'+',^' °' 'r`yy7a •"tl' ^ -+ -IM" 4MaMI 'PRO i`F`a'PRO ' �i _ -_ •u *.. -T�rt'C `K. +_.r`( = J?t�`%� =. t�f' i'� ^�i5�. '+^`- 4 4e�i' 'l, "n`�`ii �"tf } L+n� -. �'d..AA L'i'i �Ei+'4ti Wig= p2MI _ _ _ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A i,qMQWMlOOOOg 00010 00010 00011 000011 2 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 00009 00010 00011 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 81 2 1128 1443 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 75 78 80 72 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2720 2970 3220 _ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1045 1197 1447 1363 48 0 6390 15660 480 6390 15660 6390 115660 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 480 1275 0 269301 3800 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12750 26930 38000 12750 26930 38000 496 1048 1 - 147 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 496 1048 1478 496 1048 1478 44640 461801 4771 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 44640 46180 4771 0 44640 46180 47710 1737 1797 1856 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1737 1797 1856 1737 1797 1856 - N/A NOUN N/A _ >20mm N/A 038 03 037 280 170 279 136 146 179 �r ° INF 1, - 1151111111,21 1393 N/A 10-20 N/A E5 N/A E5 E5 34 , 34 39 4423 P _ N /Ait" _ N/A - 104 N/A 104 1 04 00013 N/A 00013 000171 _ N/A - - _ N/A "• Tl p�ye —_ S'� +r3'�NtY.7N' "p'V:4�'s.•- � +b._ �ke'��"�u'��:i'�#e'a.i. s_ — .31A ?'�J ft-� .l _ N/A i N/A N/A f N /A, _ N/A N/A NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS Draft 1/2742010 NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Suny County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006 "'Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 1 A singulare reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project 2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 Z A Exhibit Table 5c Baseline Stream Data Summary Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 4 377 feet Parameter Gau e3 Regional Curve Pre- Existing Condition References Reaches) Data' Design As -Built I Baseline Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Equation Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Mad Max SD n Min Mean Mad Min Mean Med Max SD n Bankfull Width (it) 51 58' 279 356 347 441 39 127 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 263 334 408 284 341 322 417 69 3 Floodpmne Wdth (it) 250 316 7 - 4000 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - >200 0 - - >200 0 - - - - Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) xv N 27 2 8' 45 53 51 68 05 127 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 40 47 57 40 43 41 47 04 3 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3 3 "' �� 5 8 7 6 7 2 9 3 0 7 27 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 66 78 56 63 63 71 08 3 Bankfull Cross sechormi Arra (fix) 139 3 179 2" 192 6 202 5 175 5 222 2 22 27 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1203 1578 2027 115 3 1435 1502 1652 256 3 wxitn/Deptn Ram 188 �. ��' 4 7 6 6 6 8 8 2 1 0 25 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 2 7 1 8 8 6 9 8 1 6 9 10 4 2 3 Entrenchment Ratio 1 4 ` 7 1 8 6 - 10 8 - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - >6 5 4 8 6 0 6 2 70 1 1 3 Bank Height Ratio 14 _ �A= 13 1 5 - 17 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - 10 - 10 10 10 10 0 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A t t� `_m' ar.'.:Y"a��,3 � OUW d50 (mm) ' - - 0 2 ""'� -'.` - - - - y ^ r :'v''J`z• '8 r Z`'h ' v ,' ,.,.. 'i'r"f'`.'^ xLy4 R� Riffle Length (ft) - - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Riffle Slope (it) ffJMJS;JW " 00 0 0017 0 002 0 004 0 18 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 00022 00026 0 003 - - - - - - Pool Length (fl) V,4OWJCMJM 152 30 275 698 15 19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 812 1128 1443 - - - - - - PoolMaxDepth(fl) 8 94 95 114 1 1 15 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 75 78 80 61 64 62 70 05 3 Pool spacing (ft) 623 2563 1506 1206 298 18 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Al 2720 2970 3220 - - - Pool Cross Sectional Ara (fl2) 1990 - - - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Al 1203 1 1578 2027 1483 1699 1522 2092 341 3 -� p m � ; ` Channel BeWdth (ft) 48 639 1556 N/A N/A I N/A I N/A N/A I N/Al 48 639 1 1556 48 639 1556 Radius of curvature (ft) 1275 2693 - 3800 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I N/A 1 1275 2693 3800 1275 2693 - 3800 - - Rc Bankfull Width (fl/ft) 34 7 73 4 - 103 5 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 496 734 1138 382 806 - 1138 - - Meander Wavelength (ft) 4464 4618 - 4771 - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N!A N/A 4464 4618 1 4771 4464 4618 - 4771 - - Meander Width RatomFoi 121 6 1258 130 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1737 1258 1 469 14 191 469 nsporxparameters Sub' stiatebed�a�ndtra 1:2111111 io - N/A Ri % /RU % /P % /G % /S% _ SC% / Sa% /G % / C% / B%/ Be% N/A d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di / dil (mm) > 2 0 mm N/A Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /f 046 0 35 0 36 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 35 law 20 271 Stream power (transport capacity) W /m2 276 1 06 149 Adilifional LR ®a h�Parameters vred� W, RNOW Drainage Area (SM) pall 2605 N/A Impervious cover estimate M 10 -20 N/A OWN E5 Rosgen Classification 13 E5 N/A E5 Bankfull Velocity (fps) 39 4 3"' 52 39 37 Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 5399 7721— 11663 Valley length (ft) - N/A Channel Thalweg length (ft) N/A Sinuosity ft 104 N/A 104 104 �' WAR5 AdditionRe caca hParametets d <_ �� BF slope (ft/ft) - N/A Bankfull Floodplane Area (acres) N/A - - Proportion over wide ( %) N/A Ulm Entrenchment Class (ER Range) N/A Incision Class (BHR Range) N/A BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H % /VH % /E% Rum N/A Channel Stability or Habitat Metric N/A Biological or Other N/A ix�xzva NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010 '• NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS Draft 3/16/2006 —Bankfull Discharge/Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 1 A singulare reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project 2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11 t i Exhibit Table 6 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters —Cross Section) Five Mlle Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 SegmentlReach Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,622 feet Dimension and substiate MMMMMOMMI 1 ' �r- :., -. 5 � }4: hY '• 1.. t A r. "` ?. .tom _ .. ., .. f m ------- -------------- -------------- .i - ---- -- -------- ---- -- -------------- ------- -------------- -------------- - _. -:.. ------- -------------- ---------- ---- - ---- -- ---------------------- ------ - - - --- t rye' _-------- --- "'-- ---- � - - - - -- la 247 7.7- mm Exhibit Table 6 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section) Five Mlle Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS IN 92185 Segment/Reach Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek Cross Section 8 (RRfla) Croas Section 9 (Pool) Cross Section 10 (RdBe) Cross Section 11 (RRtle) Croas Section 12 (Pool) Dtrnensbn and suhsttate `K'r � heed on Iixod bes90(1e b'eT1�4 I r'1 �iK °K, _ e� BeNduO Width (R) Base Pj 322 MY1 345 MY2 I MY3 MY4 MYS MY. Baae 337 My1 388 MY2 MY3 I MY4 I MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 awa MY4 MYS My. Base 417 MY1 349 I MY2 MY3 MY4 I MY5 MY+ I Bess W1 I MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY. 284 340 388 430 FioodPran Width (ft) 2000 2000 2000 200 0 2000 2000 2000 20001 1 12000 2000 Bank}ull Maan Depth (11) 47 49 44 45 41 48 40 49 42 43 BenkNA Mex Depth (ft) 71 88 81 72 58 59 83 57 82 75 Benkfu0 Cross Sectional Area (ft') 150 2 170 2 148 3 166 8 115 3 182 8 —1651 1707 152 2 183 2 BenkN4 WIOWDep6F Ratio 88 70 77 82 89 71 71 88 100 BenksID Entrantlmant Rat. BankkM Bank HelpM Ratio 62 10 5 8 10 5 9 1 n 5 4 1 D 7 0 ... 5 9 . ,. j04 . _ 5 7 _ 5 5 4 7 ----- ------- ------- ------- ------- �t ^�24,�'w ��„Y'rk la 1i :•4{f^ �� "'k�'t r5��t �\ js ��. �--��.'-'��'�'� ®®-----�---_==ED------�------ ^ ------ . 1 mmmmmmm mmmmmm. mmmmmmm mmmmmm. mmmmom. Cross Section 1 12/5/13 Cross Section 2 12/5/13 Cross Section 1 12/5/13 Cross Section 3 12/5/13 Cross Section 2 12/5/13 Cross Section 3 12/5/13 Page 1 of 5 Cross Section 4 12/5/13 Cross Section 4 12/5/13 Cross Section 5 12/5/13 Cross Section 6 12/5/13 Cross Section 5 12/5/13 Cross Section 6 12/5/13 Page 2 of 5 W& iw, Cross Section 7 12/5/13 Cross Section 8 12/15/13 Cross Section 7 12/5/13 Cross Section 9 12/15/13 Cross Section 8 12/15/13 Cross Section 9 12/15/13 Page 3 of 5 K S. Cross Section 10 12/15/13 A .. Cross Section 11 12/15/13 Cross Section 10 12/15/13 Cross Section 12 12/15/13 1 Cross Section 11 12/15/13 Cross Section 12 12/15/13 Page 4 of 5 Cross Section 13 12/15/13 Cross Section 13 12/15/13 Page 5 of 5 Appendix E Hydrology Data r I r l � t Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration NCEEP # 92185 Date of Data Date of Method Photo # Collection Occurance 5/30/2012 Unknown Debris on floodplain In asbuilt report 10/8/2013 7/6/2013 Stream gauge Stream gauge and silt inside of 10/8/2013 7/27/2013 rain gauge 3 71 inches of rain 12/5/2103 11/27/2013 Stream gauge I Table 13 Wetland Gauge Attainment Data Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration NCEEP # 92185 Gauge Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage) Year1 2013 Year 2014 Year 2015 Year 2016 Years 2017 22 Yes /183 days (100 0 percent) 23 Yes /183 days (100 0 percent) 24 Yes /31 days (16 9 percent) 25 Yes /98 days (53 6 percent) 26 Yes /100 days (54 6 percent) 27 Yes /30 days (16 4 percent) 28 Yes /14 days (7 7 percent) 29 Yes /123 days (67 2 percent) 30 Yes /37 days (20 2 percent) i 1 Number Seriel Number 1 13D413648 2 14E14322 3 1314FC9A 4 13D49A3B 5 14E16DC9 14E1A3C5 13D4CA32 6 7 8 13D49BC4 9 13666377 13D413632 14E178FC 14E13DAE 10 11 12 13 13D4A9D9 13D4C9C5 A28138513 14 15 16 11312139E 17 14E16DE5 18 13153397 19 14E15453 20 9DE6C32 21 9DE6D1 F 22 EBD1038 23 13D41361D 24 A287DCE 3/20/2013 ok Reprogrammed due to inconsistent logging interval Faded ok ok Reprogrammed due to not downloading ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok Faded ok ok ok ok ok ok 4/3/2013 ok Replaced with 12D4C9D ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok Faded ok Replaced with 13D493A ok ok ok ok ok ok Table 14. Groundwater Gauge Downloading History Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration NCEEP # 92185 Download Event Date 5/29/2013 6 6/4/2013 Faded N No attempt 8 o ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt ok N No attempt m ok N No attempt m ok N No attempt m m 9 N No attempt due to accident N No attempt Could not locate m No attempt due to accident o ok m m No attempt due to accident o ok m m No attempt due to accident o ok m m No attempt due to accident o ok m m No attempt due to accident o ok m No attempt due to accident o ok m Ifunctioning handheld 12/5/2013 Replaced with EBD3010 faded Replaced with 13152502 ok ok ok ok ok Replaced with EBD20139 ok Replaced with EBD074F ok ok ok No attempt No attempt Submerged No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt 12/15/2013 No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt No attempt ok ok ok ok ok 70 LI 0 Precipitation (inches) N !n E W -n c z eta CD CD �3 �m wW C) A, 00 JUI -l2 D G) 'a 70 T- Aug -12 _ 0 � I I n to on _ . C7D N I Sep -12 V z Oct -12 Nov -12 Dec -12 I n Jan -13 -_ v - Feb -13 c� Mar -13 rn - m < v � °= L - Apr -13 j May-13 -_- Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 N ? O N N N O 00 rn .A N O GW Elevation (inches) E W -n c z eta CD CD �3 �m wW C) A, 00 EI a� t c 2 0 m .Q U P CL X 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 .� m -6 c -8 0 -10 -12 w -14 MCI -18 -20 -22 -24 Five Mile Branch Gauge #2 13134C9138 GROWING SEASON April 18 - October 17 I v N N N N N M M M M M M M M Cl) r T T 1 6) Q :3 Qi U 0 N io N m Q Q U O z o i U- Q �' Q (n Date Precipitation GW Elevation 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 .� m -6 c -8 0 -10 -12 w -14 MCI -18 -20 -22 -24 Five Mile Branch Gauge #3 1314FC9A 4 GROWING SEASON 6 April 18 - October 17 4 2 xkvj 0 -2 s -4 N � c � - - - ------ - - - - -- c r -10 c�a m CL - - — t -112 -14 -16 - - - — - -- - — -- - — — -18 JL L -20 y G 0 N N N N N ILL �&:l N M M M M M M Co -22 M Co 75 Q N U O Q (A O Z O m O m Q- Q LL 2 Q 1 m Q Q (A Date � Precipitation GW Elevation O Jul -1 Aug -1 Sep -1 Oct -1 Nov -1 Dec-12 Jan -13 ID 0. Feb -13 S vI 0 Mar -13 au I � Precipitation (inches) N M Apr -13 M • v May -13 Sum o' Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 Precipitation (inches) N M N N & (5) .4 N O N A O N O c0 O A N O GW Elevation (inches) 0 T c c U3 cfl ic w W D0 w=r Cu • Sum IN !-Row N N & (5) .4 N O N A O N O c0 O A N O GW Elevation (inches) 0 T c c U3 cfl ic w W D0 w=r Cu i Five Mile Branch Gauge #5 14E16DC9 0 N m t v c 0 2 r m a` w cv N N N N M M M M M (7 M M M m M > U C U -0 O O ( i m i C Q LL .j i Q (n 0 Z Date Precipitation GW Elevation 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 c -20 ' m -22 ID -24 w -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 -42 -44 Five Mile Branch Guage #6 14E1A3C5 4 GROWING SEASON 6 April 18 - Octobe 4 2 -2 -4 - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- _ -6 -8 -10 t- - — - - -- - -- - - - - -- _ - .. -- _- -- - - „ -12 -14 �- -16 c 2 — - - -- - - - - — — -18 0 -20 a Q- -22 i -24 W -28 -30 -34 -36 -40 y -42 N N N N N N M M M M M M Co Co Co Co Co U% Q V Q (n O � U L L CIO z 0 2 Q ca C � 0 z � U) VJ Date Precipitation GW Elevation rd W t c 0 2 r .Q m a x Five Mile Branch Guage #7 13134CA32 l V 7 "' k14 iv cV N C7 M M M Co Co Co Co M Co M 07 CL > U C Q i i i �'. N U O N (0 O (� Q 7 O Q Co O Z Q -� U Q g —' Q o7 O Z Date � �redpitafi=on77 GW Elevation 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 = 0 -20 -22 _W -24 w -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 -42 -44 Five Mile Branch Gauge #8 131349BC4 4 6 GROWING SEASON 4 April 18 - Octob 2 -- -- - _. -- - - - - -- -- — - - -- 0 - -2 -4 — - - - - -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- - - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- -6 -8 -10 - - - -- -- - - -- -' - - -- - -- - - - - -. - - - -- _ -12 - - - - -- - - -- - -14 -16 S 0 2 -18 0 - -20 d _> -24 W IL -26 -28 -30 -34 -36 -40 -42 0 �,,', ;; N Co M Co Co Co c'7 Co M Co Co -44 Co i O O Q U) LL LL Q cc U- U i O > Q z Date EmmPrecipitation GW Elevation Five Mile Branch Gauge #9 136B6377 4 6 GROWING SEASON 4 April 18.- October 17 2 -2 -4 - — - — - — - - - - - - -6 -8 _ -10 �' -- -- -- _ -12 y -14 -16 o 2 — -18 0 -- -- a -20 'a -22 -24 w CL -26 -28 -30 -34 -36 -40 -42 0 j ��i N N N CO M Co M M r- <- T- -44 MI CY) 6) Q (/J U m LL cv � O Z Q Q 3 to Date Precipitation GW Elevation N M qrl t cC cm L Cd 0 L LL � m 0 ICT N (sayoui) uoi;elidi:)aad i (say3ui) u01;ena13 ME) CO h N O N (D 00 O N d (D 00 O N N N I - £ l-AON I - £ HOO £ � -daS £ � -6ny £ 6-Inf ' £ l -unr 0 £4 -AeW a w -_ £ 6 -ady 0 d I cc I cc a d - I - £ [ -uer I Z � -Oaa I I Z � -nON j Z x-100 I z 0 Z [ -daS O z oo Z 6 -6ny t�7 Q ZL-Inr ICT N (sayoui) uoi;elidi:)aad i Five Mile Branch Gauge #11 14EI78FC 4 MF 6 GROWING SEASON 4 April 18 - October 17 2 -2 -4 — — -6 - -- - -- - — - -- — — - -8 -10 H - - -' - ^ N m -16 o 2 -18 c - - -- r -20 ca ii -22 m -24 w CL -26 -28 -30 -34 -36 -40 -42 -44 N N N N N N M M M M T- .-- M M r r M M M 75 Q% Q U L L Q N U O N t6 O f4 Q- Q cA O Z 0 LL ¢ 1 1 O r 1 6) O 3 Q (4) Date � Precipitation GW Elevation Five Mile Branch Gauge #12 14E13DAE 4 8 GROWING SEASON 6 April 18 - Octo 4 -- 2 0 -2 -- - - - - -- -4 — - - -- _ -6 _ -8 -10 y -12 s -14 c 0 2 -- -16 -_ -18 -20 EL •� -22 w - -- - -24 3 CL -26 0 -28 - - -- - -30 -- -32 -34 -36 0 1'� -40 _CY) !�+ , 44 N N N N N Cy Ch �) C7 � M M M C7 M C) L L Q U) ® Z Q g - O Q (n r Date Precipitation GW Elevation Precipitation (inches) Q N Jul -12 D M O Aug -12 CO z Om r+ m Cr Sep -12 LA O z Oct -12 i Nov -12 Dec -12 - Jan -13 ' Feb -13 U2 <' 0 Mar -13 v I w °•.•' w W I I 0 O Apr -13 D 0 M CO CD May -13 o � I Jun -13 PE: Jul -13 Ir, I j Aug -13 Sep -13 11 1 Oct -13 Nov -13 I i I N N N O I i CO O) A N 00 O O . N O N A O GW Elevation (inches) 4 Q s c C 2 :.1 ea c. m CL` 0 N • V l V l V t4 Q CO ® Z D U- Date C) CO Cr) M C7 M M M L Q Q 1 I D 1 1 Q 1 (A 1 O 0 z � Precipitation GW Elevation 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 N -12 s -14 c -16 = -18 -20 > -22 w -24 R.. -260 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 -42 -44 Precipitation (inches) O N A Jul -1 I Aug -1 E Sep -1 Oct -12 Nov -12 Dec -12 fu T C 0, Jan -13 C. �3 0 cr co' Feb -13 I CO CO 7 � Mar -13 N m W CD v Apr -13 May -13 Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 00 A N O N A O N N N O W O 4 N O GW Elevation (inches) E Precipitation (inches) O N Jul -12 D Gl O Aug -12 = z O 0 rn m O Sep -12 1-" 2 v Oct -12 Nov -12 Dec -12 Y 0 Jan -13 v Feb -13 W N � O :E Mar -13 -_ C1 m CD w = � Apr -13 = May -13 = Jun -13 - Jul -13 = Aug -13 Sep -13 j OD O -p N 00 O N O N A O N N N O GW Elevation (inches) I CD n v' o' c� M v 0 O Jul -1 Aug -1: Sep -1; Oct -1 Nov -1 Dec -1 Jan -1' Feb -12 v Mar -13 m Apr -13 May -13 Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 Precipitation (inches) N III as W W W W W N N N N N 00 N O N A O A, N O m m� N O of O 4 N O m W A" 0 GW Elevation (inches) ca < c� cfl 3 V i. �Ca m' o� v3 m cn . •. . 111. 41 - 0 > pa as W W W W W N N N N N 00 N O N A O A, N O m m� N O of O 4 N O m W A" 0 GW Elevation (inches) ca < c� cfl 3 V i. �Ca m' o� v3 m cn N O N t, m N O CO O) A N O GW Elevation (inches) Precipitation (inches) O N Jul -12 Aug -12 _ - Sep -12 D G1 O 0 Z O G) cn C O z - v Oct -12 Nov -12 Dec -12 Jan -13 CD Feb -13 - 0. Mar -13 o fu I G) Apr -13 M CD May -13 c -n CD CD CO w W 0 C4 o' I Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 _ Oct -13 Nov -13 i N O N t, m N O CO O) A N O GW Elevation (inches) m Five Mile Branch Gauge #19 14E15453 4 6 GROWING SEASON April 18 - Octob 4 2 0 -2 -4 -- -- -- - - -- -6 -8 -10 AU -12 -14 -16 o 2 — - -18 c e� -- — -20' � a -22 m - - -24 w CL - - - -26 -28 -30 -34 -36 - -.=.r. - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -38 -40 -42 0 -44 N N N N N N M M M M M M M CO (f) M M N U Q (n O o (0 a) m Q D :3 D N U 0 z C) U- Q 7F O Q cn z Date � Precipitation GW Elevation Five Mile Branch Gauge #20 9DE6C32 4 6 GROWING SEASON 4 April 18 - October 17 2 -2 -4 _ -6 -8 ... _ - .-. -12 N _- -16 o 2 - -18 c -- a -20' � w EL -22 m m -24 w a - -- -26 !9 -28 -30 -- - - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- -34 -36 - -- -- - - - -- - - -- -40 _ _:,: :. -42 0 -44 N N N N N M (7 r M M � r M M _ 6) L 1 :3 ' ) V Q V J O U L L O (Q N cm a- Z —i G Q 1 Co -7) r r 1 1 1 � /�� Q (n Date � Precipitation GW Elevation N N , L 00 & �, N O N A O N O 00 O N O GW Elevation (inches) �r Ln LA A:- ®ice • _ -�.. N N , L 00 & �, N O N A O N O 00 O N O GW Elevation (inches) Precipitation (inches) O N .A, Jul -12 �• O J � Aug -12 00 z 0 N C D Sep -1 N O z Oct -12 Nov -12 Dec -12 - Jan -13 m Feb -13 n a' � �D Mar -13 N CD' 3 ° 99 rnW I W Apr -13 0 03 w CD May -13 00 v o' Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 I I i if Oct -13 Nov -13 N N N O CO O -A, N 00 O O A N O N O CO GW Elevation (inches) -c CD n -o' v o' Af ►. M CD v o' m Jul-12 Aug -1 Sep -1 Oct -1 Nov -12 Dec -1 2 Jan -13 Feb -13 Mar -13 v Apr -13 May -13 Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 N N L L L L L 00 & il N O N A O N O 00 O 4�-, N O GW Elevation (inches) rd to d t v C o 2 G. L 0 Five Mile Branch Gauge #24 A287DCE GROWING SEASON April 18 - October 7 CY) 07 M M M M Q (n z 0 '� LL Q g - Q (n O z Date � Precipitation GW Elevation CY) 07 M M M M Q (n z 0 '� LL Q g - Q (n O z Date � Precipitation GW Elevation O Jul -1 Aug -1: Sep -1: Oct -1: Nov -1: Dec -1 Jan -1: CD Feb -1: o Mar -1 " = v I Apr -1 CD May -13 v 0 = Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 Precipitation (inches) N N .A A A W W W W W i N i N N N L L L L - 0 W .A i O N O 4�-. N O m O A N O m O-N N O w W 1. N O GW Elevation (inches) 0 T c N 3 �W w� Wn �r M =J� '=-=Mmm .A A A W W W W W i N i N N N L L L L - 0 W .A i O N O 4�-. N O m O A N O m O-N N O w W 1. N O GW Elevation (inches) 0 T c N 3 �W w� Wn 0 ca ..1 .Q a� CL GROWING SEASON April 18 - October 7 4 2 - -- — - — 0 -2 -4 - — - -- - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - -- .. - - -- - - - - - -- - — - - - -- - - -- - - - - -6 - -- - -8 -10 • .-. -12 -14 -16 v -18 c -20 -22 d -24 W _ -26 -28 -30 -34 -36 - - -38 -40 -42 N N N N N N M Co M M T T T T T T T T T T M M M Co Co M M T T T T -44 T T T 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I L L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U O (0 N (0 j � U 0 Q cn 0 z Q g 0 Q cn z Date � Precipitation GW Elevation Five Mile Branch Gauge #27 14E13D38 4 6 GRO ING SEA N Apr' 6er 17 4 0 -2 N � m = 2 -- c o - _ -8 0 °- -10 d a i V - -12 -14 -16 -20 0 ;. „ -22 Co .- M r Co ch (h M r Co L Q Q (a ' r Q U Q Q r O (n Z Date Precipitation GW Elevation O Jul -12 Aug -1 Sep -1 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan -1 -c CD Feb -1 ? v Mar -13 Ca m v � I Apr -13 G) May -13 v 0 Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 Precipitation (inches) N e1 .4 i � �- W W W W W N i N i i N i i i i i i i i O N W 00 N�� A N O 00 O N O 00 W I N O OD W N O GW Elevation (inches) 0 0) -n C cD C. �3 N —• CO -h W A� Md V 0 3 w n Ca m .4 i � �- W W W W W N i N i i N i i i i i i i i O N W 00 N�� A N O 00 O N O 00 W I N O OD W N O GW Elevation (inches) 0 0) -n C cD C. �3 N —• CO -h W A� Md V 0 3 w n I v rn n v 0 I G7 M CD v 0 O Jul -1 Aug -1: Sep -1; Oct -1: Nov -1 Dec -1 Jan -1; Feb -1 Mar -1 v Apr -1? May -13 Jun -13 Jul -13 Aug -13 Sep -13 Oct -13 Nov -13 Precipitation (inchel) N 0 � W W W 6 W N N N N N L L L& 6�, N O N� O � N O M O� N O M O A N O OD O N O GW Elevation (inches) S T C _ cQ <� N 3 M -4n 4 n 0 Ln on ■ � W W W 6 W N N N N N L L L& 6�, N O N� O � N O M O� N O M O A N O OD O N O GW Elevation (inches) S T C _ cQ <� N 3 M -4n 4 n 0 m r o 2 ea L m CL` Five Mile Branch Gauge #30 13D4CA00 8 GROWING SEASON 6 April 18 - October 7 4 JA 2 0 -2 -4 _ -6 -8 -- -- _ -10 N -12 r -14 c -16 = -18 .° -20 > -22 w -24 -26 C7 -28 - -- -- - - - - - - -- -30 -32 -34 -36 -40 -42 -44 N N N N N N Co M M m M M M ch M M Co 75 0) Q� Q C/ O i U L L 1 I 1 - 1 z o -� LL 2 Q c6 � O z G Q U) V/ Z Date USGS Precipitation GW Elevation Appendix F Photographs Beaver Creek Photo Point 1. Boulder Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 1. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 2. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 3. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 4. Floodplain looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 4. Boulder Vane 12/5/13 Page 1 of 13 Beaver Creek Photo Point 5. Cross Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 6. Boulder Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 7. Boulder Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 7. Floodplain looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 7. Floodplain looking west 12/5/13 Photo Point 8. Floodplain pool looking east 12/5/13 Page 2 of 13 Beaver Creek Photo Point 9. Cross Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 10. Cross Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 10. Floodplain looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 10. Floodplain looking west 12/5/13 Photo Point 11. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 12. Floodplain looking west 12/5/13 Page 3 of 13 Beaver Creek Photo Point 12. Floodplain pool looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 13. Floodplain pool looking west 12/5/13 Photo Point 13. Floodplain looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 14. Floodplain pool looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 15. Floodplain pool looking west 12/5/13 Photo Point 15. Floodplain looking east 12/5/13 Page 4 of 13 Beaver Creek Photo Point 16. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 16. Looking upstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking west 12/5/13 Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking north 12/5/13 Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 18. Cross Vane 12/5/13 Page 5 of 13 Beaver Creek Photo Point 19. Boulder Vanes 12/5/13 Photo Point 20. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 20. Looking upstream 12/5/13 Page 6 of 13 Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek OF Photo Point 21. Rootwads 12/5/13 Photo Point 21. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 22. Cross Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 23. Boulder Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 23. Fallen tree 12/5/13 Photo Point 24. Rootwads 12/5/13 Page 7 of 13 Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek Photo Point 24. Looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 25. Cross Vane 12/5/13 Photo Point 25. Cross Vane. Left arm scour. 12/5/13 Photo Point 26. Rootwads 12/5/13 Photo Point 26. Floodplain looking downstream 12/5/13 Photo Point 27. Floodplain pool looking west 12/5/13 Page 8 of 13 Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek Photo Point 28. Floodplain looking west 12/5/13 Page 9 of 13 Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek Photo Point 28. Confluence looking east 12/5/13 Photo Point 29. Looking downstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 29. Floodplain looking east 12/15/13 Photo Point 30. Cross Vane 12/15/13 Photo Point 31. Floodplain pool looking northwest 12/15/13 Photo Point 31. Floodplain looking east 12/15/13 Page 10 of 13 Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek Photo Point 32. Looking downstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 33. Floodplain looking west 12/15/13 Photo Point 34. Boulder Vane 12/15/13 Photo Point 34. Boulder Vane 12/15/13 Photo Point 35. Boulder Vane 12/15/13 Photo Point 35. Boulder Vane 12/15/13 Page 11 of 13 Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek f� 1 .� EG 5 Photo Point 36. Looking downstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 36. Looking upstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 37. Floodplain pool looking north 12/15/13 Photo Point 37 Floodplain looking east 12/15/13 Photo Point 38. Cross Vane 12/15/13 Photo Point 38. Looking south 12/15/13 Page 12 of 13 Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek Photo Point 39. Looking upstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 39. Looking downstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 39. Floodplain looking east 12/15/13 Photo Point 40 Cross Vane 12/15/13 Photo Point 40. Looking downstream 12/15/13 Photo Point 41. Floodplain looking west 12/15/13 Page 13 of 13