20140163 Ver 1_401 Application_20140214

e _ ;
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone]
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
2/17/14
S &EC Project # 12218.W2
N.C. Division of Water Resources
Surface Water Protection Section (SWPS)
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 9'" Floor
512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604
From: Kevin C. Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. C-, -, �
Re: BioMerieux Line 4 expansion _ _. . P Y
Durham, Durham County, NC
On behalf of the owner, BioMerieux INC., please find attached a complete application and supplemental information
requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that the activities proposed below
may proceed under Nationwide Permit 39 and providing a courtesy notification tiThe Division of Water Resources for
our client's intention to utilize General Water Quality Certification 3890.
BioMerieux is currently in the design and permitting phase for a planned 36,530 SF building expansion. The project
has been named the Line 4 expansion. The building is being expanded to allow for an increase in production to meet
projected sales volumes and will result in 44 new positions. The proposed building will house a formulation and
filling, cGMP compliant facility capable of producing in vitro infectious disease diagnostics at their manufacturing
plant in Durham, NC that produces the company's BacT /ALERT reagent product for the world -wide market.
The site plan is currently being reviewed by the City of Durham and Durham County for compliance with the Durham
County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The UDO provides development regulations for zoning, parking,
land use, buffer, setbacks, etc. In addition, Durham County is reviewing the plans for compliance with the latest
stormwater, erosion control ordinances and NPDES regulations.
The current application requests to impact 0.012443 acres of headwater wetlands. The site was originally developed in
the 1980's. The best we can tell, there were impacts to two jurisdictional areas at the time. These were at two road
crossings and impacts at each crossing appear to have consisted of roughly 80 linear feet of 2' wide unimportant stream
channel. At that rime, the agencies only accounted for impacts by square footage (i.e. not stream linear footage) and so
it has been the practice to account for such impacts only in square footage from a cumulative impact standpoint. In
2007 the Corps issued a Nationwide permit 39 to impact 32' linear feet of unimportant channel for a road widening
project. Therefore, prior to this application, our best estimate of cumulative impacts is 384 sq.ft. (0.0088acres) of
jurisdictional waters including 32' of unimportant stream. If the proposed impact is granted, project cumulative impacts
will equal 0.021243 acres of jurisdictional waters including 32' linear feet of unimportant stream. Therefore cumulative
impacts are below the thresholds where either agency would require mitigation, so none is proposed.
Please contact me at (919) 270 -7941 or at kmartinAsandec.com if you have any questions or require additional
information.
t 1f

t
PROTF.C'T ST TMMARY
Project Name
BioMeneux Line 4 expansion
Wetland Impact (acres)
0 01244 ac
Owner / Applicant
BioMeneux INC
County
Durham
Nearest Town
Durham
Waterbody Name
UT of the Flat River
Sub -basin
030401
Index #
27-3-(9)
Class
WSIV, NSW, CA
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201
iMPAC'T SI IMMARY
Stream impact (acres)
0
Wetland Impact (acres)
0 01244 ac
Open Water impact (acres)
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres)
0 01 244 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet)
0
Attachments
Signed and completed PCN form
USGS topo map
Durham County Soil survey map
Photo titled "wetland at edge of woods"
Signed Agent Authorization form
Overall Existing Conditions Plan
Enlarged existing conditions plan
Site Plan showing proposed expansion and related wetland impact
Grading plan for building expansion
Utility Plan for Building Expansion
Wetland data form for impact area
Email From Danny Smith DWR -RRO verifying the impact area does not contain Neuse riparian Buffers

X-
y�o� W AT F9�v
r
o <
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 14 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been venfied by the Corps?
© Yes ❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
© 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes Q No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1 h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
BioMeneux Line 4 expansion
2b
County
Durham
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Durham
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
BIOMERIEUX INC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Deed Book 003133 Deed Page 000047 Plat Book 000117 Plat Page 000163
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Brian Riley, Site Director Durham Operations
3d
Street address
100 Rodolphe St
3e
City, state, zip
Durham, NC 27712
3f
Telephone no
919 - 620 -2235
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
© Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Kevin C Martin
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Sod & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c
Street address
8412, Falls of Neuse Rd, Unit 104
5d
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e
Telephone no
919- 846 -5900
5f
Fax no
919 -846 -9467
5g
Email address
kmartin @sandec com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
PIN #0855 -03 -15 -5210
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
I Latitude 36 0995 Longitude -78 8248
1c
Property size
997 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
unnamed Tributary to the Flat River
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WSIV, NSW, CA
2c
River basin
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The 99 acre site currently consists of 13 57 acres of existing site development including roads, parking and buildings An addition 144 acres is being
developed as part of the expansion The remainder of the site (approximately 84 acres) is undisturbed forest land The Corps has not venfied the
overall site JD so acreage of wetlands and linear feet of streams on the entire 99 acres is unknown
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The building is being expanded to allow for an increase in production to meet projected sales volumes 44 new positions will be created
3e
A planned
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
36,530 SF building expansion Typical grading equipment will be used for site preparation and budding construction
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary © Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company John R McAdams Co
I Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
2008 JD submittal for entire site never acted on by the Corps NWP 39 verification on 7/27/2007 to Organon Teknika, which included a JD verification
for the impact area only (widening an existing drive) (Corps ID# 2007 -1099) Feature in question was determined to be unbuffered NBRRO 08-141
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
®Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
NWP 39 verification, Corps ID# 2007- 1099,for 32' linear feet of permanent impact to an unimportant stream associated with widening an existing drive
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes Q No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetfand
No
Corps
0012443
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts
0 012443
2h Comments
Wetland appears to be "man made" resulting from a storrnwater outfall discharging onto compacted expansive clay soils in a "flattened area" see
photo titled "wetland at edge of woods" attached to PCN
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
82 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivi ually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary T
01
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Pond ID number
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
purpose of pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitiqlation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer Impact
Reason for impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary T
feet )
feet
131
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
133 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
135 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts-
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1
Avoidance and Minimization
1a
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
lb
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
2
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes © No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required.
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project Include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified
❑ Yes Q No
within one of the NC RI anan Buffer Protection Rules?
1b
If yes, then Is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
151%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
Durham County, a delegated municipality, is currently reviewing the plans for compliance with the latest stormwater, erosion control ordinances and
NPDES regulations DWR will be provided with a copy of the approval from Durham once it is received
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plans
Durham County
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction Is this project?
Durham
9 Phase II
X❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply)
X Water Supply Watershed
®
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes X❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply)
HSession Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X❑ Yes No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
Q No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑Yes
❑ No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter )
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
❑ Yes
❑X No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
Q No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Connection to existing Durham municipal sewer utility line
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes Q No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
No issues were raised during processing of previous nationwide permits and a buffer variance
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No issues were raised during processing of previous nationwide permits and a buffer variance
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes Q No
status (e g , National Historic Trust,designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to,determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
No issues were raised during processing of previous nationwide permits and a buffer variance
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑Yes Q No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Appropriate FIRM maps
Kevin C Martin
A
q _
2/17/2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 110

a
Fairntosh
FAIRNTOSH RD
i
C
\ F OLP"
1
`o
o
`Z
c'
r
► v
U �
/ Q
/ i0 111
�Y I
Q m
1
c O�v
o
a`Iz
� Q
cia
J.
c
Project No. USGS Vicinity Map 0 2,000 4,000 8,000
12218•W1 Feet
Project Mgr.: BiomerieuX Site
KCM
Durham Co., NC
Scale: •
1" = 2,000' • Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2013 Northeast Durham
9412 Palk o! \rinc Read. %utl. IuJ. Ralrigl�. \C ?7f.15 • I'Inna•: 191'71 %46-5900 • Fay: (9 1')) &Jf- 9JG7
2014 -02 -12 USGS Quadrangle ^d -- on,

y �
r �
1 �
s �•
•
r
i l
5 r W !t
AL
jr
lk
MAIN
�, l

I
6r4w
r.

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone [phone]
cmidec com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name Brian Riley
Address: 100 Rodolphe Street
Durham NC 27712
Phone- 919 - 620 -2235
Pioject Name/ Description- bioMerieux Line 4 Addition
Date- 02/05/2014
The Depai tment of the Army
U S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn Eric Alsmeyer
Field Office Raleigh
Re- Wetlands Related Consulting
To Whom It May Concern.
I, the current io er owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent, in the processing of jurisdictional determinations and permit applications
(if needed), and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of determinations, etc.
from this day forward The 5th day of February 2014
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S &EC staff. You should call S &EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Brian C. Riley
Site Director
glarham 0pQr00rys
Print Property Owner's Name
cc
NCDENR - DWQ
Prop Owner's Signa e
cc 1. Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA

D8 3852 Pc 256
P8 158 PG 139
PB 158 PG 141
ZONED - SRP k RR
�• \�Nr
� 0 1
w
rift
` \
\ \
\ I
RODOLPHE STREET (AKA ♦ \
ISO- P ((PPB 117 PG 163)
I\
♦
N \
TREYBURN CORPORATE PARK, Ll.0 s�
PLAT+BOOK 158 PAGE 139 \\
OEM BOOK 3852, PAGE 261
\
\
\
I
—may
Iffl-
a '!
0
EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND
A&IM
r'
/ / I
/ /
—
EDGE OF GRAVEL
I
I I I
•
EDGE OF RIPRAP
1 I II
-r-
CURB & GUTTER
°
1
4
CREEK / DITCH CENTERLINE
�a
I Ic
TREE LINE
EXISTING CONSTRUCTED
—�
CHAIN —LINK FENCE
WETLAND
I
WALL
UTILITY POLE
8IOMm;mux
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
DECIDUOUS TREE
1 -25-11
PANUTroN
MOUUSE
UE
U/G ELECTRIC LINE
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
(PB 117 PG 1
— — UE —
— U/G ELECTRIC LINE (DATUR)
LINE 4 PROJECT AREA
G
U/G GAS
ELECTRIC HANDHOLE
GAS TEST STATION
— — G —
— U/G GAS (DATUR)
W
U/G WATER LINE
— —W—
— U/G WATER LINE (DATUR)
SEWER MANHOLE
BOOK 111, PAGE 116
ZZ? BOOK
DEED BOOK 3133, PAGE 47
— _W —
— U/G FIRE WATER LINE (DATUR)
o I
"ARRIS CEMETERY TRACT
A SURVEY CONTROL POINT
A&IM
r'
UNITED STAj%FOF AMERICA /
PIN / 0855 -04 -38 -1620
DEED BOOK 998, PAGE 902
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN \
SCALE 1" = 200'
® 2009 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
PIN f 0844 -02 -69 -1136
D8 988 PG 902
ZONED - RR -3 END OF SIGNAL (SUE)
—� DESTINATION UNKNOWN
LINE CONTINUES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. THIS MAP WAS CREATED TO IDENTIFY THE PROJECT
LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY. SEE JSK -004 THROUGH
JSK -007 FOR WETLAND LOCATION.
w
m
OZ
cok�
z
Wa
Z
C,
4Z~
Z
n OZ
LLI 0
LLI
2 it
m Z 0
J
cl) U)
Z�
O?I-
�3�
Z W
�a
O Z �
~~O
Z ~ W ILL
�cr0
Ix a. 7
J0Q
Z
wg�
°3
FIGURE
JSK -0031
/ / I
/ /
(w)
WATER METER
I
I I I
•
BOLLARD
1 I II
-r-
SIGN
°
1
4
FLARED -END SECTION
�a
I Ic
LIGHT POLE
1
I
`a,
UTILITY POLE
/
/
O
DECIDUOUS TREE
m
I
❑Q
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
I
A
UTILITY TEST HOLE (SUE)
I I
I
®
ELECTRIC HANDHOLE
GAS TEST STATION
SEWER MANHOLE
BOOK 111, PAGE 116
ZZ? BOOK
DEED BOOK 3133, PAGE 47
/ /
/
O•
SEWER CLEANOUT
"ARRIS CEMETERY TRACT
d.b
FIRE HYDRANT
UNITED STAj%FOF AMERICA /
PIN / 0855 -04 -38 -1620
DEED BOOK 998, PAGE 902
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN \
SCALE 1" = 200'
® 2009 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
PIN f 0844 -02 -69 -1136
D8 988 PG 902
ZONED - RR -3 END OF SIGNAL (SUE)
—� DESTINATION UNKNOWN
LINE CONTINUES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. THIS MAP WAS CREATED TO IDENTIFY THE PROJECT
LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY. SEE JSK -004 THROUGH
JSK -007 FOR WETLAND LOCATION.
w
m
OZ
cok�
z
Wa
Z
C,
4Z~
Z
n OZ
LLI 0
LLI
2 it
m Z 0
J
cl) U)
Z�
O?I-
�3�
Z W
�a
O Z �
~~O
Z ~ W ILL
�cr0
Ix a. 7
J0Q
Z
wg�
°3
FIGURE
JSK -0031
/ / I
/ /
(w)
WATER METER
�
8
WATER VALVE
/ I
POST INDICATOR VALVE
EVERGREEN TREE
/
/
O
DECIDUOUS TREE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A
UTILITY TEST HOLE (SUE)
UNITED STAj%FOF AMERICA /
PIN / 0855 -04 -38 -1620
DEED BOOK 998, PAGE 902
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN \
SCALE 1" = 200'
® 2009 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
PIN f 0844 -02 -69 -1136
D8 988 PG 902
ZONED - RR -3 END OF SIGNAL (SUE)
—� DESTINATION UNKNOWN
LINE CONTINUES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. THIS MAP WAS CREATED TO IDENTIFY THE PROJECT
LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY. SEE JSK -004 THROUGH
JSK -007 FOR WETLAND LOCATION.
w
m
OZ
cok�
z
Wa
Z
C,
4Z~
Z
n OZ
LLI 0
LLI
2 it
m Z 0
J
cl) U)
Z�
O?I-
�3�
Z W
�a
O Z �
~~O
Z ~ W ILL
�cr0
Ix a. 7
J0Q
Z
wg�
°3
FIGURE
JSK -0031

PATP C \Users \k,nots \Desk too \Wetland Moos
NM
D X
M �
r �uu
Y
0
v
0
z
Ln
i
W
I
�g
TIC
6
0
-� V \
� % a
■
a
I
`l
g
V
a
CR,� e4
« R
t
I'� I
FBI
f
e
e
z
c�
O
z
C
v
I
UE \ \� \ -C N,LLRR
r W W
` � �c ,i� • _• / D
,`O.L.• Y ' / // % 4r�
—-. Mf7A♦, as � I /�� / �i � ^ / C
cworr Q /
-11,
,--,
� ° r En
•a � ��s n \ /l��
L •
ale\
-_
Cj) T GRADING PLAN BIOMERIEUX J�COBS
c WETLAND PERMITTING DRAWINGS LINE 4 ADDITION
O m REV A ISSUE FOR PERMIT DURHAM, NC CONT4 ADDRESS
ONT4C7 NUMBERS FAX NUMBER
(STATE] REO NO [111,0]

O
SITE PLAN
SCALE 1" = 40'
T
`a
0 2014 JAC0BS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
BUILDING
FFWie W
(AVERAGE)
&,
EXISTING CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
L
WAREHOUSE
2 STORY
CONCRETE
u •L
aaJx ��
ROOF-35&4
AS IMT
►
I ►
► NON - JURISDICTIONAL
I I DITCH
I I
► I
I I
► I
I ►
II WETLAND TO BE REMOVED
I,rZQ� = 542 SF
CI
SITE PLAN LEGEND
OVERHEAD LIGHT
BUILDING PERSONNEL DOOR
• BOLLARD
• SIGN
PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT
L BUILDING ADDITION LIMITS
p p AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
O1 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
O2 PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
O3 PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
OPROPOSED CONCRETE STAIRS
O5 MAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTING CONCRETE PAD
I I
4. I . �, •• .y •, 41 ..•.
•�
I STORY
CONCRETE
•b • of �•
FiF 7i � GubRg � 1• • ; wt t� ,f ` �" • • • • . A. J • `
GOOK ti y + • • L '� J .
LAW & MCC Dock
• J iµ
-5 Aw"ALTS
AS WT
a
W
Oz
x Z
ct
K "
W O
z
�QZW
0
�Ijz¢
Z
w
p z
o2
Lu<m
C ,zr Q
m Z a
J
Z�
W
CL
Zacr
gt=0
0-2 'L
W
� d cf)
Z
ga
cr
FIGURE
JSK -005

EXISTING CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
®®
RFr51G510
INDUSTRIAL/,
BUILDING
FMlf�
(AVERAGE) 1
931611
1
799
® J/317
F1E
1 1
GRADING PLAN
SCALE. I"= 40'
?009 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROU' INC
r�
N �
+ / I
T �
ASPHALT
T `1'111111' l
1
� w III1;1111 �
W � 11111 I II
� II 11 l
� / I
l � �
x.
\\
PR¢VIDE POSITNE DRAINA E \\
TT EXISTING 241 RCP CUL
I I I I
ION- ]URISD70 I
\ DITCH
WETLAND TOIBE REMpVED�-- 542 SF
3 pJ 7 -
l 1w
>a�, _ �F l 1
3 nZ
4\.64
a 3167e BW 315.50 901 3 4!
LONDING DdOC `' \ 31.67
®.117 E7 \ \ \ \ 9s%
® 31757 31 &9,4 \ T, 318AZ �, 3 �93�
Bly 31a52
315 50 314,(8
/' \ \318.14
\ \ 31437
� � 1
75N 312 02
'co
I \�
ROOF1.3514 ® �
31 8 I i
BW' 314b1 � !
3
/ of
F3W15.50 0„PR,E a+F'S1ER �
3
'og t E50E OOOi( �3RR 1
WAREHOUSE
2 STORY
OONCREIE
sAWMALT5-
GRADING
PLAN LEGEND
�Fz
w p :
O2
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER PAD
W3
FLARED END SECTION
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
c
HEADWALL
Z
O5
O
Q
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
STANDARD FLARED END SECTION
O7
W
©
YARD INLET
CL
iu
O9
cl
14
A11
MANOR CONTOUR
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
cn
u > ¢
0
Z�
MINOR CONTOUR
°
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
G
UG ROOF LEADER MANIFOLD
w
SWALE CENTERLINE
0
O
M
DISTURBANCE LIMITS
(D
TP
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
GRADING
PLAN KEYNOTES
o
X
1 31492 1 I I I I
I � I 111
I
,SPH„
C 3
of
1
1
Ol
3:1 SLOPE TO EXISTING GRADE
�Fz
w p :
O2
RIP -RAP DISSIPATER PAD
W Q Q
m v cc
O W m
O3
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
m 7
O4
NCDOT STANDARD YARD INLET
O5
NCDOT STANDARD STORM MANHOLE
ONCDOT
STANDARD FLARED END SECTION
O7
VEGETATED DRAINAGE SWALE
O8
UNDERGROUND ROOF LEADER
O9
ROOF LEADER CLEANOUT
10
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
cn
0
Z�
G
ZOa
cr
CL
0
O
(D
a�
c!) oa
:�
FIGURE
JSK -006

-) EXISTING CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
I=
FFw,ae,
u �
MUSTRIAL / {
BUILDING
FFE -31& '
uERAM
OAS FARM .
WETLAND TO BE REMOVED = 542 SF
ROOF -=4
A4NKT
I ►
I ►
1 1 NON- JURISDICTIONAL
I DITCH
I 1
1 I
I
A110 EMS 4[
1O�I
* ,rTw
, S70RY
CONCRM
a ooa
E R.- ua
0
WAREHOUSE
2 'TORY
o
CONCRETE
S.11.T5,
�L
2014 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
8
7
c
1 �
1 I
I �
i
I
3
of II SAS
3
UTILITY PLAN LEGEND
wF FIRE WATER LINE W
SS SANITARY SEWER LINE Z
FM SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN
0 k�
r NATURAL GAS LINE W z
G7
UE ELECTRIC LINE �� a
T TELECOM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
1 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FM
►`�i GATE VALVE
�►C POST INDICATOR VALVE
® BACKFLOW PREVENTER
UTILITY PLAN KEYNOTES
U RELOCATE EXISTING 4" STEEL NATURAL GAS LINE
02 RELOCATE (3) 1 -1/4" UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES
03 RELOCATE EXISTING 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE
04 DIP FIRE WATER SERVICE
05 POST INDICATOR VALVE WITH TAMPER SWITCH
06 SANITARY WASTE LIFT STATION
OFIRE HYDRANT
08 GATE VALVE
OWALL MOUNTED FDC. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS
FOR LOCATION ON WALL.
G� AspK&T
n I
I
5
Z
XOU
�F=Z
wok
wQ=
cr Er
m Z 0
J
cn
0 H
9-
1:ir
zafIll
a
g a:
0 u-
�c UJ
a N
= Z
Q
cr
FIGURE
JSK -007

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
t ` � u I° n
Project/Site I O V`A eir t eu V%P- ` n5 Cdy /County 10`Z ( � A �t d � Sampling Date , 3
i % L State L Sampling Point
ApplicanUOwner
Investigator(s) cv,EA
v, u rfii h Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) r t e- Local relief (conc ve, convex, none) LO L9- v Slope (%) �-
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)
Lat . () 9q CD Long -797,79!q Datum
Soil Map Unit Name W V, ► +4e- Q-f— NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation, Sod or Hydrology )—( --significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
¢i iRARnARV f1F FINDINGS - Attach site maD ShoWinq samplinq point locations, transects, Important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes A
Yes �
No
No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Remark
S i
Cei` � t-,2 t-,2
p
-�j d—wt wtl' r ( e-c v`
sio.`S are
GOO V0
4�
��
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
kr•-�©
- ;S
a rem
uVrlr2lll A/_V
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
_
Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ -
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
y
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
3
Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Weiland
Hydrology
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Edstem Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

I
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Species? Status
1
2
3
4
5
6
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
2
3
4
5
6
-2-0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover IQ 20% of total cover
OQL
Shrub Stratum (Plot size i
1
2
3
4
5
6
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
2 Ca C tix w o C i ,j Z.0
3
4
5
s
7
8
9
10
11
L s = Total Cover
50% of total cover 1'�_% 520% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
US Army Corps of Engineers
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover _
ors here or on a separate sheet)
Sampling Point
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
ITotal Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL (qf6) , FACW, or FAC �V
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Pievalence Index = B/A
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

sou
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators -)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moi t 0•6 Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-('0 1® Q O S `Z, 'r to
�=tj ,'`°
'TvDe C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 'Location PL =Pore Lining M = Matrix
3
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (57)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N.
_ iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restnctive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Sort Present? Yes_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

0 i •
Kevin Martin
From: Smith, Danny < danny smith @ncdenr gov>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 2 47 PM
To: Kevin Martin, Higgins, Karen
Cc: Smith, Chern L
Subject: RE Biomerieux
Hey Kevin,
We have reviewed the file, the buffer determination letter, and the topographic map for the subject site The feature
and buffer depicted on the map (below) is not subject to buffer rule If you have any questions please do not hesitate
to give me call
Hope you are well
thanks
Danny
r/ I,
t-
e- -e"
-Z)4
Danny Smith
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
NCDENR- Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
1
1
�I 1
�, — IMPERVIOUS ARE
5552 SF
691 20 5 F
1 0747 72 S F
=0.017 aGRE`
1
i

o, %
(919) 791 -4252
Danny Smith @ncdenr gov
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carohna Pubbc Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Kevin Martin rmadto:kmartin@)sandec.coml
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 1:48 PM
To: Smith, Danny; Higgins, Karen
Cc: Smith, Chern L
Subject: RE: Biomerieux
thanks Danny I know this is a screwy one if we have to go out and look at it under an appeal I'm fine with that I
would dust prefer for the client to not have to pay me to do that if it's unnecessary
-- - - - - -- Original message -- - - - - --
From "Smith, Danny" < danny smith @ncdenr gov>
Date 11/15/2013 142 PM (GMT -05 00)
To- Kevin Martin <kmartm @sandec.com>, "Higgins, Karen" <karen higgms @ncdgnr ov>
Cc "Snuth, Cherri U <cherri smith @ncdenr gov>
Subject RE- Biomerieux
Kevin,
I will need to review the file in order to get back with you I will email a response on Monday
Danny
Danny Smith
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
NCDENR - Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 791 -4252
Danny Smith @ncdenr gov
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carohna Pubbc Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Kevin Martin rmailto:kmartmCalsandec.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 1:24 PM
To: Higgins, Karen; Smith, Danny
Subject: RE: Biomeneux
Thanks for the quick response, I have a question for you. Based on the file It appears that they
applied for a minor variance In 2007 that was granted but based on the attached 2008 buffer
letter the area they applied for is not subject to the buffers (feature D)? The reason I ask Is

% rS 1
that is that I have been asked to look into permitting impacts to about 500sgft of wetlands in
the upper reaches of feature D that according to this letter are not buffered, but they are
adjacent to the area where the minor variance was requested. I have looked at the feature
and I agree with the 2008 buffer letter as far as the area I am dealing with is a wetland and not
a stream. Please advise if you agree that I can proceed in reliance on the attached letter
regarding the subjectivity of the area to the buffers.? Thanks Kevin
From: Higgins, Karen rmailto :karen.higgins(&ncdenr.govl
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Kevin Martin; Smith, Danny
Subject: RE: Biomerieux
Kevin-
Here is a link to the project file http: / /its.enr state.nc us /Weblink8 /0 /fol /1588 /Rowl.aspx.
Thanks -
Karen
Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
NC DENR - Division of Water Resources
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Phone [phone]
Email karen hiesins @ncdenr eov
Website http / /portal ncdenr ore /web /w4 /401bufferpermittine
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
From: Kevin Martin rmadto:kmartin @sandec.coml
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:31 AM
To: Smith, Danny; Higgins, Karen
Subject: Biomeneux
Danny and Karen, I need help locating any info you may have on this project (buffer letter, the 401
etc ) It is in Durham county, in the Treyburn development. Can you help without going to too much
troubles The attached map shows the location at Red Mill road, Akzo Blvd, Teknika Blvd and
Rodolphe St, Thanks as always' Kevin Martin