NC0020664_Additional Information Received_20180312

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING. COVER SHEET '
NPDES Permit:
NC0020664
Spindale WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
:_T,
,•'"
Additional Information
Received
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 12, 2018
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resrerse side

SDNGINEERING
163 Heritage Lane, Bostic, NC 28018 • 828.245.4080 office • 828.223.2265 mobile • 828.245.2189 fax
March 5, 2018
Ms. Julie Grzyb
Supervisor
NC Department of Environmental Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: NPDES Permit Renewal, Permit NC0020664
Spindale WWTP, Rutherford County
Facility Class IV
Dear Ms. Grzyb:
RECEIVEDIDENWDWR
MAR 12 Z018
Water Res$urces
Permitting
The purpose of this letter is to submit additional data related to the NPDES permit renewal
application for the Town of Spindale, NC. I also sent you an email with this information in PDF form.
However, the PDF does not include the toxicity reports as they are too large to include in a single
email.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone]
or Kurt Wright at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Dean A. Sawyer, PE, AWAM
Project Engineer
SDG Engineering
CC: Scott Webber, Town Manager, Town of Spindale
Kim Tessneer, WWTP Supervisor, Town of Spindale
Kurt Wright, SDG Engineering

SDNGINEERING
RECE,VEDIDENWDWR
MAR 12 201$
Water ReSOLliC Section
Perm►tting
163 Heritage Lane. Bostic, NC 28018 • 828.245.4080 office • 828.223.2265 mobile • 828.245.2189 fax
Presented to:
Town of Spindale. NC
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
NC DEQ / DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Prepared by: Dean Sawyer, P.E.
SDG Engineering, Inc.
Date: March 5, 2018

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP. NC0020644
FORM
2A
NPDES
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). Sills are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Spindale Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mailing Address P. O. Box 186
Spindale. NC 28160
Contact Person Kim Tessneer
RECEIVEDIDERiRIDWR
Title Superintendent
201g
MAR o 9
Telephone Number [phone]
Water Resources
Facility Address Ecology St. Permitting Section
(not P.O. Box) Spindale. NC 28160
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following.
Applicant Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
Si owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
® facility 0 applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0020644 PSD
UIC Other W00001953 (Biosolids)
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal. private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Town of Spindale 4,248 Separate Municipal
Total population served 4,248
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 2 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
A.S. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes 0 No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12"' month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 6.0 MGD
Two Years Ago (2015) Last Year (2016) This Year (2017)
b. Annual average daily flow rate (MGD) 0.975 0.905 0.68
c. Maximum daily flow rate (MGD) 5.0
3.5 2.49
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
O Separate sanitary sewer 100
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.B. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? 0 Yes D No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? 0 Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
1
O No
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge 0 continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application
O Yes
mgd
0 No
mgd
0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
❑ Yes 0 No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale V VVTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
e.
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
RECEIVWDVVR
Contact Person MAR 0ED/DEN9 2018
Title Water Resources
Permitting Sectien
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge provide the
following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation. well
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
that receives this discharge
the receiving facility. mgd
in a manner not included
injection): ❑ Yes ® No
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.B.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Spindale 28160
(City or town, if applicable)
Rutherford
(Zip Code)
NC
(County)
(State)
35 22' 52" 81 53 18"
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) Yz of the 36' Dia. pipe is submerged
e. Average daily flow rate 0.680 (2017 average) mgd
f Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge'? ❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes CI No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Cathevs Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known) Broad Sub -basin 03-08-02
ft.
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/l of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
❑ Primary 0 Secondary
❑ Advanced 0 Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 85%
Design SS removal 85%
Design P removal NIA %
Design N removal N/A %
Other %
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? El Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? El Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QAIQC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
PARAMETER
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
7.00
s.u.
pH (Maximum)
7.90
s.u.
Flow Rate
2.49
MGD
0.68
MGD
12 months DMR
Temperature (Winter)
17.8
`C
13.0
°C
12 months DMR
Temperature (Summer)
26.7
°C
21.7
°C
12 months DMR
* For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value (min. and max. reported are for last 12 of
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLlMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
48.0
mg!L
6.51
mg/L
748 (3 yrs.)
2.0
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
360
#/100 ML
36.54
#/100 ML
748 (3 yrs.)
1.0
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
37.00
mg/L
12.09
mg/L
748 (3 yrs.)
2.5
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale V VVTP, NC0020664
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 mgd must answer questions 8.1 through 8.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
200.000 gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Smoke Testing. flow monitoring and mapping
8.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping. if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated. or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes 0 No
If yes, list the name. address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: ( )
Responsibilities of Contractor
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality. or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements. submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
001 Rehabilitation of existing treatment system and to resolve systemic NOVs.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local. State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes © No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020664
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local. State. or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction 10/27/2016 10/27/2016
- End Construction 03/11/2018 Ongoing/ /
- Begin Discharge Continuous/ / / /
- Attain Operational Level 05/13/2018 I f5D / /
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ® Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly: NC DEQ Authorization to Construct
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
10.2
mg/L
1.45
mg/L
748 (3 yrs.)
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
48.0
ug/L
11.18
ug/L
748 (3 yrs.)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
12.7
mg/L
8.23
mg/L
748 (3 yrs.)
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
31.6
mg/L
8.0
mg/L
12 (3 yrs.)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
8.1
mg/L
3.23
mg/L
12 (3 yrs.)
OIL and GREASE
<5.6
mg/L
<5.6
mg/L
3 (5 yrs.)
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
4.96
mg/L
3.38
mg/L
13 (3 yrs.)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
768
mg/L
759
mg/L
2 (5 yrs.)
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020664
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
0 Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
0 Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
0 Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
0 Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
0 Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Scott ebber
Signature l'am'
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed January 25, 2018
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QAJQC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
53
uglL
0.477
#Iday
<43
uglL
0.339
#Iday
3
EPA 200.7
0.025
ARSENIC
<5.0
ug/L
0.046
#Iday
<5
ug/L
0.039
#Iday
3
EPA 200.7
5
BERYLLIUM
<1.0
ug/L
0.009
#/day
<1.0
ug/L
0.008
#/day
3
EPA 200.7
1
CADMIUM
<2.0
ug/L
0.018
#Iday
<2.0
ug/L
0.016
#Iday
131
EPA 200.7
2
CHROMIUM
<5.0
ug/L
0.046
#/day
<5.0
uglL
0.039
#/day
13'
EPA 200.7
5
COPPER
70
ug/L
0.405
#/day
36
ug/L
0.28
#Iday
131
EPA 200.7
5
LEAD
<5.0
ug/L
0.046
#Iday
<5
uglL
0.039
#/day
13'
EPA 200.7
5
MERCURY
21.2
ng/L
0.0004
#/day
6.47
ng/L
0.00027
#Iday
122
EPA 245.1
0.2
NICKEL
13
ug/L
0.073
#/day
7.4
ug/L
0.06
#Iday
131
EPA 200.7
5
SELENIUM
5.0
ug/L
0.046
#Iday
2.9
ug/L
0.039
#Iday
14'
EPA 200.7
5
SILVER
<5.0
uglL
0.046
#/day
2.9
ug/L
0.039
#/day
141
EPA 200.7
5
THALLIUM
<5.0
ug/L
0.046
#!day
<5.0
ug/L
0.039
#Iday
3
EPA 200.7
5
ZINC
171
ug/L
0.81
#/day
92.9
ugIL
0.654
#/day
14'
EPA 200.7
10
CYANIDE
<5.0
ug/L
0.046
#Iday
<5.0
ug/L
0.039
#Iday
141
SM 4500 CN E
5
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
<5.0
ug/L
0.049
#/day
<5.0
ug/L
0.039
#Iday
3
EPA 420.1
5
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
50.5
mg/L
379.0
#/day
42.6
mg/L
331.0
#/day
3
SM 2340 C
1
Based on data contained in the ast 3 yea s of records and 3 scans. Data from 3 scans used for mass calculations with flow on day sample collected.
2 Based on results reported in the last 3 years of data. Maximum flow for past 3 years (2.49 MGD) used for mass calculation.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Outfall number 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Notes regarding the data entered in Part D.
1. Most parameters reported in Part D are less the method detection limit. In this case, the MDL is
multiplied by the flow and the conversion factor 8.34 to calculate mass. Therefore, the data is reported as
if the concentration as at the MDL. This is a conservative estimate that is higher than reality.
2. Some constituents tested in the samples have different names for the same substance. In some cases, the
name utilized by the laboratory was different than the name used by EPA in Part D of the NPDES renewal
application. The constituents for which this circumstance occurred are listed in the table below.
Name Used in NPDES Application
Form - Part D
Name Used by Research & Analytical
Laboratories, Inc.
Lab # 37701
Chlorodibromomethane
Dibromochloromethane
Dichlorobromomethane
Bromodichloromethane
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,3-Dichloropropylene
Cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl Chloride
Chloromethane
Methyl Bromide
Bromomethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethylene
Trichloroethene
P-Chloro-M-Cresol
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-O-Cresol
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
Total Phenolic Compounds
Phenols
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 11 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the Un'ted States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
<0.10o
mglL
0.917
#/day
<0.100
mg/L
0.778
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.100
ACRYLONITRILE
<0.10o
mg/L
0.917
#/day
<0.100
mg/L
0.778
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.100
BENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg1L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
BROMOFORM
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Jday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#Jday
3
EPA 624
0.010
CHLOROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
CHLOROETHANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
<0.010
mglL
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#/day
2'
EPA 624
0.010
CHLOROFORM
<a.o10
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mgIL
0.085
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<0010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<0.010
rng/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1.3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 624
0.010
ETHYLBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<o.o10
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
METHYL BROMIDE
<0.010
rng/L
0.092
#/day
<o.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
METHYL CHLORIDE
<0.010
mg!L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
<0.010
rng/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
TOLUENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale VWVTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1.1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<o.oto
rng/L
0.092
#/day
<o.oto
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
1.1.2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<o.oto
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<o.oto
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<0.010
mgfL
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 624
0.010
VINYL CHLORIDE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 624
0.010
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<0.010
mgfL
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<0.010
mglL
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<0.010
mglL
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
<0.050
mg/L
0.459
#/day
<0.05o
mg/L
0.389
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.050
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
<o.oso
mglL
0.459
#Iday
<0.05o
mg/L
0.389
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.050
2-NITROPHENOL
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<o.oto
mg?L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
4-NITROPHENOL
<0.05o
mglL
0.459
#/day
<0.05o
mg/L
0.389
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.050
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<0.050
mglL
0.459
#/day
<0.050
mg/L
0.389
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.050
PHENOL
<0.at0
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
2.4.6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<o.ot0
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
ANTHRACENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
BENZIDINE
<0.050
mg/L
0.459
#/day
<o.oso
mgfL
0.389
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.050
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Outfall number. 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
3.4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
<0.010
mglL
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
4/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
<0.010
mg!L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
<0 010
mglL
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mglL
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
<0.oto
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.oto
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/clay
3
EPA 625
0.010
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
<0.010
mglL
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
CHRYSENE
<0.010
mglL
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
DIBENZO(A.H)
ANTHRACENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mglL
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
<0.020
mg/L
0.183
#Iday
<0.020
mg/L
0.156
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.020
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.o10
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.050
1 The laboratory did not report a value for 3,4 BENZO-FLUORANTHENE. When the laboratory was contacted regarding this they indicated it might be the same as
BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE for which a value of BQL was reported in all hree (3) SCANs. (A complete copy of all three SCANs is attached.) Due to the fact that the
laboratory was not positive that these two constituents are one in the same BQL was not entered in Part D for 3,4 BENZO-FLUORANTHENE. If DENR requires
additional information from the Town of Spindale for 3.4 BENZO-FLUORANTHENE, please contact Kurt Wright, PE at 828.245.4080.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 14 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale VWVTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
FLUORENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYR ENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
ISOPHORONE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
NAPHTHALENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
NITROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
<0,010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
4/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
<a.o10
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#Iday
3
EPA 625
0.010
PHENANTHRENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mglL
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
PYRENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#Iday
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
1,2,4
TRICHLOROBENZENE
<0.010
mg/L
0.092
#/day
<0.010
mg/L
0.078
#/day
3
EPA 625
0.010
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on
other base -neutral compounds
requested
by the permit
writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g , pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale VWVTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more
facility's discharge points:
required to have one unde
• At a minimum. th
species), or then
show no apprecis
information on cc
using 40 CFR Pa
requirements for
• In addition, subm
conducted during
toxicity reduction
• If you have alreat
requested in que
If test summaries
If no biomonitoring data is
complete.
of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each
11 POTWs with a dKsinn flow rate nreater than or Kona! to 1 (1 mod. 21 POTWs with a oretrKatment nroaram (nr
of the
se that are
1um of two
' results
t include
conducted
xiate QA/QC
:ity test
s of a
ion
methods.
Irm to
Due to the complexity of the Toxicity Tests, data from the Toxicity
Tests will not be inputted in this form. Rather, copies of the
p p
Toxicity Tests are attached for reference. There are 20 toxicity
tests (two dates listed below per test) provided.
Ceriodaphnia dubia
6/6/17; 6/8/17; 9/12/17; 9/14/17; 12/5/17; 12/7/17;
3/14/17. 3/16/17;e
3/8/16; 3/10/16; 6/7/16; 6/9/16; 9/6/16; 9/8/16; 12/6/16; 12/8/16; 3/3/15;
3/5/15; 6/2/15; 6/4/15; 9/15/15; 9/17/15; 12/1/15; 12/3/15; 3/4/14; 3/6/14;
6/3/14; 6/5/14; 9/9/14; 9/11/14; 12/2/14; 12/4/14; 12/3/13; 12/5/13
Fathead Minnow
12/6/16; 12/9/16; 9/14/15; 9/18/15; 6/2/14; 6/6/14
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number
0 chronic
E.2. Individual Test Dat
column per test (wh
Allow one
a Test informatior
Test Species & test metho
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type, if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during he test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LC5a
95% C.I.
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
ok
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 17 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale VWVTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
Chronic.
NOEC
%
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
/ /
I
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes. describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page. IE. a 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to. an approved pretreatment program?
D Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 2
b. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Spindale Colormasters, LLC
Mailing Address: 101 Spindale Street
Spindale, NC 28160
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Dyed yarn, cutting and sewing tapestry fabric for wall and table top decorations.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s). Wall and tabletop decor products. dyed yarn
Raw material(s): cotton, polyester, acrylic
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
150.000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
15.000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits © Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g..
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes 0 No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATIONICORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
0 Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
Manual bar -screen for removal of rags. lint and debris
b Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
0 Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 20 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
0 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
c. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 2
d. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: The Timken Corporation
Mailing Address: 1510 Highway 221 South
Rutherfordton, NC 28139
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manganese phosphatinq, tumbling and alkaline washing, grinding, heat treatment and assembly of ball bearings and bushings.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Assembled bearings, Nital Etching Process, Black Oxide and Passivation process lines.
Raw material(s): steel stock. iron forgings
F.6. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9.000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
6.000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits 0 Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards EI Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 — Metal Finishing
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 21 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets. interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ❑x No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
0 Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply).
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER. RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
c. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
0 Yes ❑ No
If yes. describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
In-house wastewater pretreatment system Grit removal, pH adjustment, sedimentation, oil -water separation, spill protection
d. Is the discharge (or %eill the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
0 Continuous © Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 22 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
I: Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the
e. Number of non -categorical Sills
f. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
2
of each of the following types of
2
INFORMATION:
SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
SIU.
Supply the following information for each
provide the information requested for each
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Ultimate Textiles. Inc.
Mailing Address: 1437 US Highway 221 South
Rutherfordton. NC 28139
F.4. Industrial Processes- Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Custom dyeing of textile fabrics
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Dyed fabrics used in the upholstered furniture industry.
Raw material(s): cotton. poly/cotton. cotton/acetate. dyes, chemicals
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
78 107 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3.703 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑x Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 23 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes 0 No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration. if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
e. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
0 Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
Sweco vibrating screen, pH recorder, flow recorder. temp , sample collection (ISCO)
lint removal
f. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550.22.
Page 24 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
© Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the
g. Number of non -categorical Sills.
h. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
(SlUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
2
of each of the following types of
2
INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Watts-Requlater Facility closed in 2009
Mailing Address: 100 Watts Road
Spindale. NC 28160
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufactures water supply and drainage products for commercial and residential use.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Temperature and pressure relief valves. ball valves, water supply. sink and drainage products.
Raw material(s): bronze ingot. strip steel and brass, tubular brass and copper. plastic resin. copper and nickel anode and chromium flake
F.6. Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
4.650 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
h. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
19500 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits EI Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 — Metal Finishing (Electroplating)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 25 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g..
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes 0 No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATIONICORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
g. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
Pretreatment System: activated carbon. chemical precipitation filtration, flocculation, pH adjustmentsedimentation, spill protection
h. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
E Continuous E] Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Paae 26 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a c
G.1. System Map. Provide a
a. All CSO discharge
b. Sensitive use areal
outstanding natura
c. Waters that suppor
NOT APPLICABLE
sensitive aquatic ecosystems. and
G.2. System Diagram. Provice a uidyrdrrt, ertner of we reap pruvrueu III U. I or on d separate urawiny, or me conuined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
c. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (0 actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22 Page 27 of 28

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Broad
G.5.
G.6.
c. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (0 actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code
c. Name of State Management/River Basin:
(if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit
CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused
intermittent shell fish bed closings. fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational
code (if known):
by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
Attached:
1. Summary of 2017, 2016, & 2015 WWTP Data Measured in On -site lab
2. Copies of three SCANs and a summary of the data.
3. Copies of 20 Toxicity Tests.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22 Page 28 of 28

TOWN OF SPINDALE WWTP DISCHARGE POINT
ir
Map #: F11NW Sub -basin: 03-08-02
.Stream Class: C
Discharge Class: 01 55 57 58
Receiving Stream: Catheys Creek
Design Q: 6.0 MGD
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
Contour interval = 20 feet
Latitude 35* 22' 52"
Longitude 81* 53' 18"
-
/6)
•-.111/,1
/.• r'
/ - -
I 't
‘4,00.7.11411/4stk'
..,eviAtpatainAlle.trairs
aratetqw
Quad location
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Rutherford County

24• INFLUENT
DISTRIMITION
SOX NO. 5
INFLUENT
STRUCTURE
GRIT SCREW
2' GATE VALVE & SOX
ELECTRICAL
SUBSTATION
STORAGE
6UILDDIG
CONTROL
BUILDING
ISTRIBUTION
SOX NO. 4
ik •
SLUDGE
DIGESTER
T/W 674.07
LEGEND
O MAMIOIE
M YAIYEIDATE VALVI(G V 101
PUIOW00M
In OM VALVE WITH ROOREM/0
OTIANlws WWI GROUND WRM POI!
PAVOSIXT
EZM
4110
FOCI
•IROPp
MEEK
ORM
WOOOI CRUM UM
ORAVEI. MR" RN
AT FENCE
WPO RJCivI0CIVO AT OUOUOIT
PROPERTY IA!PEA AAAOREA1LlfM
CNWF•I
VALVE
(CHAIN LOCKED)
•
•
•
•
•
6ENCH MARK
CHISELED 'O' IN CONCRETE
ASSUMED ELEV. 74.00
USES ELEV. 659.37
IN DRAIN
1r SLUDGE
a
76' • OUTF AU. TO CATHY'S MET
STORM WATER
DISCHARGE
(ONLY DISCHARGE POINT)
�N
APO POST
•
AERATION OWLSI 2
U2E
GRAPI4IG SCALE,
1' ■ 40,0'
BEN
3
NNW IL
•r IN
M4•1
AMMOr
FEER mom.
SHEET
1
OF
1

J
SUPERNAT'ANt-'
RETURN LINE
T
SLUDGE
DIGESTER
T/W 874.07
AERATION BASIN
CHISELED 'O' IN CONCRETE
ASSUMED ELEV. 74.00
USGS ELEV. 859.37
AERATORS
(TYPICAL) DISTRIBUTION
BOX NO.
eemm.eox
—6" SUPERNATANT
6" DIP k5
LINE TO ASPHALT CURB TO DIVERT / ! /
DP TM ♦c RAry11P STORM WATER J
----------mar----
-BOO-
.....
- -7
-------------- -
x __ .12IRAS
SCUM — ri----1558--
------ 4• SCUM i ` _
iI
r'-SLUDGE
WITHDRAWL
J
VALVE
,(CHAIN LOCKED)
STORM 1,1AR�`
1 SSE
RGE�rTcH --
$g4--------
•
LIGHTS /��//
6 j/j L —•
NO. 1
U
CHLORINATION/
DECK-MIR1A
- BUILDING-- MANHOLE
EDGE OF WOODS
36" 0 OUTFALL TO CATHY' S CREEK
STORM WATER
DISCHARGE
(ONLY DISCHARGE POINT)

INFLUENT
MANHOLE
r rEXISTING�
90 MG -I JU BOXON I-1 JBUNCTIONI
L_1 LBOx
1.0 MGD
9.0 MGD
_ _ -
I TRASH REMOVAL SCREEN
PARSHALL FLUME =.0 MG
GRIT REMOVAL
CONVERSION TABI F
MGD GPM
0.5 347
0.75 521
1.0 694
1.25 868
1.5 1042
1.75 1215
1.575 1302
2.0 1389
2.125 1476
2.25 1563
2.5 1736
2.75 1910
3.0 2083
3.75 2604
4.0 2778
4.25 2951
4.5 3125
4.75 2199
4.8 3333
5.0 3472
6,0 4167
9.0 6250
DURING CONSTRUCTION
START-UP FLOW = 1 MGD
DESIGN AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (ADF) = 3 MGD
PEAK HOURLY FLOW (PHF) = 9 MGD
PROP.
MANHOLE
PR •P
MANH• E 2
• 1.0
9.0 MGD
PROP.
MANHOLE 1
PROP.
AERATION
JUNCTION
BOX 1
7 V
FUTURE
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
COFFERDAM
t
rTEMP
TEMP
5ORAAs"`-
PROP.
AERATION
JUNCTION
BOX 2
ii
AERATION
BASIN
SECTION 1
AERATION
BASIN
SECTION 2
7.0 1/GO
9.0 MGD
CLARIFIER \�
3
r--1
CLARIFIER
JNC 110
BOX 2
L i J
33
E ^ r -i
CLARIFIER CLAR FIER
JUNCTION O JUNCTIO9 00 MGD
0.D MGD BOX 1 0 M BOX 3 1. MGD
WAS
RA5
L�.. J L
1.0 MGD
0.0 MGD
SLUDGE
DIGESTER 1
SLUDGE 1
DIGESTER 2 /
OUT OF SERVICE DUE
TO CONSTRUCTION
10 0 MGD 1 CLARIFIER EX. MANHOLE 7
1.5 MGD
/ 1.0 MGD
9.0 r.1GD
CCC
& PA
JUNCTION
L BOX J
ICHLORINE 1CONTACT CHLORINE I
ICHAMBER I I CHAMBERT21
I POST POST
LEATIONJ I`REATIONJ
Y.
EX. MANHOLE 8 EX. MANH- OLE 9
DISCHARGE TO
CATHYS
CREEK
9.
I I
SLUDGE
PUMP
STATION I
L_ __I
EX MANHOLE 10
LEGEND
7-7
EXISTNG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
PROCESS FLOW (NOTE DOES
KIT_INDICATE PIPE, ONLY
PROCESS FLOW DIRECTION
AND MGD. FOR PIPING, REFER
TO C2.11)
ISED PLANS TO REDUCE
COST PER L.0.1 - FOR REVIEW
ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Z
0
z
cr
W
w
z
2
ere
DWG: WWIP Design Grading
DATE DRAWN: 9/18/17
DRAWN BY: CH. MK, EM, JR
FIELD CHECK:
RENEWED BY: MJW
PROJECT MANAGER:
KURT WRIGHT P.E.
1-
- J
a
J Z
▪ 2
Z Q
aW
N N
O ce
W
O <
V/r//�
/
2Q
Z
Z�
O 6
�. . • Z
MJ z
8
<0
U
W o
CC 20
W
2
H-
20
SH TITLE:
PROCESS
PIPING
SCHEMATIC
DURING
CONSTRUCTION
JOB# 2014-105
C1.03
L

CONVERSION TABLE
MGD GPM
0.5 347
0.75 521
1.0 694
1.25 868
1.5 1042
1.75 1215
1.875 1302
2.0 1389
2.125 1476
2.25 1563
2.5 1736
2.75 1910
3.0 2083
3.75 2604
4.0 2778
4.25 2951
4.5 3125
4.75 2199
4.8 3333
5.0 3472
6.0 4167
9.0 6250
E%1511NG
MANHOLE
CONCRETE PLUG
TYP.
\ r , �1rExISTING,
(1 9.0 MG
I HBO%ONC JUNCTIONI
L-J LBTJ
3.0 MGD
9.0 MGD
1
TRASH REMOVAL SCREEN
PARSHALL FLUME
GRIT RE▪ MOVAL
1
1 Al MANHO
POST CONSTRUCTION
START-UP FLOW = 1 MGD
DESIGN AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (ADP) =3 VIGD
PEAK HOURLY FLOW (PHF) = 9 MGD
PROP.
MANHOLE
9.0 MGD
PR •.
MANH LE 2
PROP.
MANHOLE 1 .
LINE CUT AND
ABANDONED IN PLACE
3.0 MGD
9.0 MGD
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
L
/
E.O.
SUMP
Z DISLUDGE
GESTER 1
'N /
SLUDGE
DIGESTER 2
MGD P
GD AERATIONROP.
JUNCTION
BOX
2
AERATION
BASIN
SECTION 2
NOTES: THE EQUALIZATION BASIN IS INTENDED AS SIDE-UNE EOUAUZATION DURING NORMAL OPERATION.
1. AT MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC PEAK FLOW EVENT CONDITIONS OF 9.0 MGD. NORMALLY 2 MGD WLL BE DIVERTED TO
THE EC BASIN. JUNCTION BOX 1 CAN DIVERT FLOW TO THE ES BASIN BY MAKING CERTAIN WEIR ADJUSTMENTS.
2. IF MORE THAN 2 MGD IS DIVERTED TO THE EQUALIZATION BASIN. THE PUMPS WILL DIRECT 2 MGD TO JUNCTION
BOX 2, WHILE THE REMAINDER FLOWS TO THE AERATION BASINS THROUGH THE OVERFLOW PIPING IN THE
NORTH -SOUTH CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE WALL. IN THIS CONDITION, THE EQUALIZATION BASIN WOULD
FUNCTION A5 IN -LINE EOUAUZAT1ON.
3. EO UFT STATION MAXIMUM FLOW 2 MGD
4. WASTEWATER STORED IN THE E.O. BASIN FROM PEAK FLOW EVENTS SHALL BE BLED BACK INTO THE NORMAL
PROCESS FLOW AFTER THE PEAK FLOW EVENT IS OVER.
5. ONLY CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER NO. 2 15 USED.
CLARIFIE
GD . 1 JUNCTION
300 MGD
4.5 MGD
a
1/ CLARIFIER
\ 3
of ▪ )
BSH ▪ ASS
MANHOLE
EX. MANHOLE 5
BOX 2 0 0 / \
J a CLARIFIER 10.75 MQ1( EX. MANHOLE 6 _
T ` 2 /2.25 MGD ('rn
;I;
SLUDGE
Z 0.0 MGD TAMP 1
1- -1 r 1 STATION
L_ - _ J
CLARIFIER CLARIFIER
JUBTIO OCN J`\
50 MG 611 J BOXTION Z•4 MGD+ CLARIFIER 2.25 M EX. MANHOLE 7
✓
L L- J 1 3.0 MGD
3.
RAS D MGO
0.0 MGD
9.0TAGD
CCC
& PA
JUNC110N
L BOX
I CHLORINE I CHLORINE I
CONTACT CONTACT
CHAMBER 1 1 CHAMBER 21
POSTAND
I POST
AND
AEEATION j L A.REATIONJ
ll
(l 0 T
T
EX. MANHOLE 8 EX. MANHOLE 9
DISCARGE TO
CATHYS
CREEK
✓
ANHOLE 10
LEGEND
I I
EXISTING STRUCTURE
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
PROCESS FLOW (NOTE: DOFS_
NOT INDICATE PIPE, ONLY
PROCESS FLOW DIRECTION
AND MGD. FOR PIPING. REFER
TO C2.11)
0
a
a
LL
0
0
ISSUED FOR CONS[RUCION
iy
DWG: MVP Design Grading
DATE DRAWN: 9/18/17
DRAWN BY: CH, MIL EM, JR
FIELD CHECK:
REVIEWED BY:
PROJECT MANAGER:
KURT WRIGHT P.E.
SHEET TITLE'
PROCESS
PIPING
SCHEMATIC I
POST
CONSTRUCTION
JOB# 2014-105
C1.04
L

)
)
)
Effluent Values Measured On -site
Discharge Monitoring Reports
January through December 2017
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
RECEIVED/DENRIDWR
MAR 09 2018
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Month
Monthly
Flow1
TEMP.
pH
TRC
Average
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
oc
ac
cc
s.u.
s.u.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Jan
0.810
1.350
0.430
10.83
13.9
6.4
7.7
7.4
3.65
25
20
Feb
0.665
0.810
0.430
11.588
14.6
9.5
7.9
7.2
24.6
25
20
Mar
0.759
1.030
0.520
13.388
17.8
8.8
7.8
7.6
15.055
32
20
Apr
0.961
2.490
0.440
17.526
19.6
14.1
7.8
7.1
10.368
37
20
May
0.770
1.300
0.520
20.468
22.7
17.5
7.6
7.2
6.0909
25
20
Jun
0.759
1.070
0.520
23.8318
25.9
22.1
7.8
7.5
10.409
26
20
Jul
0.586
0.800
0.420
25.405
26.7
20.8
7.7
7.3
12.15
37
20
Aug
0.622
0.830
0.440
23.969
26
19.9
7.5
7
16.7
30
17
Sep
0.528
1.050
0.260
21.605
23.6
18.6
7.6
7
16.35
36
17
Oct
0.610
1.550
0.370
19.05
23.9
13.2
7.8
7.2
11
29
17
Nov
0.560
1.060
0.400
12.69
8.88
17.9
11.5
8.3
5.7
7.9
7.5
7.2
7
12.6
10.22
33
31
17
17
Dec
0.535
0.910
0.410
Total
8.165
Annual Avg.
0.680
2.490
0.260
17.436
26.700
5.700
7.900
7.000
12.433
37.000
17.000
ata used for flow
Page 1 of 2

Effluent Values Measured On -site
Discharge Monitoring Reports
January through December 2017
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Month
Monthly Flow'
DO
Average
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Jan
0.810
1.350
0.430
9.2275
10.2
8.2
Feb
0.665
0.810
0.430
8.3647
9.54
6.3
Mar
0.759
1.030
0.520
8.114
9.21
6.4
Apr
0.961
2.490
0.440
7.8236
9.22
6.42
May
0.770
1.300
0.520
7.6
8.8
6.8
Jun
0.759
1.070
0.520
7.345
10.15
6.5
Jul
0.586
0.800
0.420
6.9675
9.57
6.18
Aug
0.622
0.830
0.440
7.44
9.36
6.82
Sep
0.528
1.050
0.260
8.05
10.47
6.63
Oct
0.610
1.550
0.370
7.81
11.17
6.5
Nov
0.560
1.060
0.400
9.057
9.76
10.94
11.12
7.56
8.28
Dec
0.535
0.910
0.410
Total
8.165
Annual Avg.
,_
0.680
2.490
0.260
8.130
11.170
6.180
nfluent data used for flow
Page 2 of 2

)
)
Effluent Values Measured On -site
Discharge Monitoring Reports
January through December 2016
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Month
Monthly Flow.'
TEMP.
pH
TRC
Average
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
'c
cc
.c
s.u.
s.u.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Jan
1.100
2.800
0.600
8.2
12.3
5.7
7.5
7.2
11.9
27
20
Feb
1.200
3.500
0.600
9.2
12.7
5.4
7.4
7.2
14.5
28
20
Mar
0.900
1.100
0.700
14.2
17
10.8
7.6
7.2
17.6
37
20
Apr
0.900
1.200
0.600
17.1
21
14.3
7.7
7.3
12.9
35
20
May
0.898
1.240
0.560
21.3
23.8
20.3
7.6
7.5
12
36
20
Jun
0.900
1.200
0.500
25.8
27.5
23.7
7.7
7.2
22
45
20
Jul
0.977
1.290
0.580
27.39
28.5
26.4
7.6
7.4
9.95
35
20
Aug
0.938
1.370
0.460
27.3
28.3
26
7.6
7.3
6.478
25
20
Sep
0.827
1.230
0.360
24.842857
26.4
23
7.5
7.3
0
0
0
Oct
0.773
0.950
0.410
19.0095
22.1
16.2
7.6
7.3
1.09
23
20
Nov
0.715
1.130
0.300
13.85
19
9.9
7.6
7.5
1.4
5.7
20
Dec
0.727
1.330
0.410
10.56
13.8
8.3
7.6
7
7.42
25
20
Total
10.855
Annual
,_
0.905
3.500
0.300
18.229
28.500
5.400
7.700
7.000
9.770
45.000
0.000
nfluent data used for flow
Page 1 of 2

Effluent Values Measured On -site
Discharge Monitoring Reports
January through December 2016
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Month
Monthly Flow1
DO
Average
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Jan
1.100
2.800
0.600
10.9
12
10.1
Feb
1.200
3.500
0.600
10.4
11.2
9.6
Mar
0.900
1.100
0.700
9.1
10
8.4
Apr
0.900
1.200
0.600
8.5
8.9
7.7
May
0.898
1.240
0.560
7.7
8.4
7
Jun
0.900
1.200
0.500
6.8
7.4
6.3
Jul
0.977
1.290
0.580
7.1665
8.25
6.74
Aug
0.938
1.370
0.460
6.83
7.12
6.57
Sep
0.827
1.230
0.360
6.99
7.5
6.48
Oct
0.773
0.950
0.410
7.967619
8.47
7.42
Nov
0.715
1.130
0.300
8.798
9.37
8.01
Dec
0.727
1.330
0.410
9.3389
10
7.05
Total
10.855
Annual
1 _
0.905
3.500
0.300
8.374
12.000
6.300
nfluent data used for flow
Page 2 of 2

3
Effluent Values Measured On -site
Discharge Monitoring Reports
January through December 2015
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Month
Monthly Flow1
TEMP.
pH
TRC
Average
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
oc
oc
°c
s.u.
s.u.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Jan
1.000
2.200
0.600
8.4
10.6
6.6
7.5
6.9
13
39
20
Feb
0.900
1.200
0.600
7.6
9.9
4.6
7.5
7
6
36
20
Mar
0.900
1.200
0.600
13.5
16.2
8.3
7.7
7.3
7.1
34
20
Apr
1.100
2.700
0.400
17.5
19.5
14.8
7.6
7.4
7.9
27
20
May
0.800
1.000
0.500
22.2
24.3
17.1
7.8
7.4
8.7
27
20
Jun
0.800
1.200
0.400
26.2
28.2
23.7
7.6
7.4
8.9
28
20
Jul
0.700
0.900
0.400
27.2
28.3
26
7.6
7.4
8.7
24
20
Aug
0.700
1.000
0.400
26.6
27.5
25.4
7.6
7.4
20
20
20
Sep
0.800
2.000
0.500
23.4
26
21.2
7.8
7.4
13.7
48
20
Oct
1.100
3.000
0.500
18.3
23.2
15
7.7
7.4
9.2
30
20
Nov
1.400
5.000
0.700
15.4
13.7
18.7
17.4
11.3
10.8
7.7
7.6
7.4
7.2
21.5
11.3
33
37
20
20
Dec
1.500
4.000
0.600
Total
11.700
Annual
1
0.975
5.000
'
0.400
18.333
28.300
4.600
7.800
6.900
11.333
48.000
20.000
uent data used for flow
Page 1 of 2

Effluent Values Measured On -site
Discharge Monitoring Reports
January through December 2015
Spindale WWTP NC0020664
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Month
Monthly Flow
DO
Average
Max.
Min.
Average
Max.
Min.
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Jan
1.000
2.200
0.600
10.4
12.7
7.9
Feb
0.900
1.200
0.600
10.3
11.2
9.4
Mar
0.900
1.200
0.600
9
10.7
8
Apr
1.100
2.700
0.400
8.3
9.2
7.9
May
0.800
1.000
0.500
7.4
8.1
6.7
Jun
0.800
1.200
0.400
6.7
7.2
6.3
Jul
0.700
0.900
0.400
6.5
7.1
6.2
Aug
0.700
1.000
0.400
6.5
6.9
6.2
Sep
0.800
2.000
0.500
7.5
8.4
6.6
Oct
1.100
3.000
0.500
8.1
8.7
7.6
Nov
1.400
5.000
0.700
8.6
8.8
10
9.6
8.1
8.2
Dec
1.500
4.000
0.600
Total
11.700
Annual
,
0.975
5.000
0.400
8.175
12.700
6.200
Influent data used for flow
Page 2 of 2

)
)
)
Effluent Pollutant Scans
5/29/14; 8/27/15; 11/9/16
Spindale WWTP NC0020663
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Concentration, mg/L
Avg.
Mass, #/day
Max.
Avg.
Sample date
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
BQL
Conc.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
Mass
Mass
Flow
1.10
0.80
0.90
0.93
Antimony
0.052
0.053
BQL
0.025
0.043
0.477
0.354
0.188
0.477
0.339
Arsenic
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Beryllium
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.001
0.001
0.009
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.008
Cadmium
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.002
0.002
0.018
0.013
0.015
0.018
0.016
Chromium
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Copper
0.024
0.032
0.054
0.005
0.037
0.220
0.214
0.405
0.405
0.280
Cyanide
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Hardness
39.000
38.400
50.500
1
42.633
357.8
256.2
379.1
379.05
331.01
Lead
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Nickel
0.008
0.008
0.007
0.005
0.008
0.073
0.053
0.053
0.073
0.060
Phenols
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Selenium
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Silver
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Thalium
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.005
0.005
0.046
0.033
0.038
0.046
0.039
Zinc
0.063
0.122
0.076
0.01
0.087
0.578
0.814
0.570
0.814
0.654
Page 1 of 1

Effluent Pollutant Scans
5/29/14; 8/27/15; 11/9/16
Spindale WWN'TP NC0020663
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Sample Date
Mass, #/day
Max.
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
BQL
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
Mass
Mass
ACROLEIN
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.100
0.10
0.917
0.667
0.751
0.917
0.778
ACRYLONITRILE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.100
0.10
0.917
0.667
0.751
0.917
0.778
BENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BROMOFORM
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
CHLOROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
CHLORODIBROMO-METHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
CHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
CHLOROFORM
BQL
0.013
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.087
0.075
0.092
0.085
DICHLOROBROMO-METHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
TRANS-1,2-DICHLORO-ETHYLENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,1-DICHLORO-ETHYLENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,3-DICHLORO-PROPYLENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
ETHYLBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
METHYL BROMIDE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
METHYL CHLORIDE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
Page 1 of 5

Effluent Pollutant Scans
5/29/14; 8/27/15; 11/9/16
Spindale WWTP NC0020663
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Sample Date
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
1,1,2,2-TETRA-CHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
TETRACHLORO-ETHYLENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
TOLUENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
VINYL CHLORIDE
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
2-NITROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
4-NITROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
PHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
BQL
BQL
BQL
ACENAPHTHENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
Page 2 of 5
Mass, #/day
Max.
Avg.
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
Mass
Mass
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.05
0.459
0.334
0.375
0.459
0.389
0.05
0.459
0.334
0.375
0.459
0.389
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.05
0.459
0.334
0.375
0.459
0.389
0.05
0.459
0.334
0.375
0.459
0.389
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078

Effluent Pollutant Scans
5/29/14; 8/27/15; 11/9/16
Spindale WWTP NC0020663
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Sample Date
Mass, #/day
Max.
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
BQL
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
Mass
Mass
BENZIDINE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.050
0.05
0.459
0.334
0.375
0.459
0.389
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BENZO(A)PYRENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
3,4 BENZO-FLUORANTHENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BENZO(K)
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
FLUORANTHENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-ETHER
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-PROPYL) ETHER
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
2-CHLORO-NAPHTHALENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
4-CHLORPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
CHRYSENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
DIBENZO(A,H) ANTHRACENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
Page 3 of 5

Effluent Pollutant Scans
5/29/14; 8/27/15; 11/9/16
Spindale WWTP NC0020663
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Sample Date
Mass, #/day
Max.
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
BQL
Avg.
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
Mass
Mass
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
3,3-DICHLORO-BENZIDINE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.020
0.02
0.183
0.133
0.150
0.183
0.156
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
1,2-DIPHENYL-HYDRAZINE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.050
0.05
0.459
0.334
0.375
0.459
0.389
FLUORANTHENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
FLUORENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
HEXACHLORO-BUTADIENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-PENTADIENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
INDENO(1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
ISOPHORONE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
NAPHTHALENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
NITROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
N-NITROSODI-METHYLAMINE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
N-NITROSODI-PHENYLAMINE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
PHENANTHRENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
0.092
0.078
Page 4 of 5

Effluent Pollutant Scans
5/29/14; 8/27/15; 11/9/16
Spindale WWTP NC0020663
Town of Spindale, North Carolina
Sample Date
5/29/2014
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
BQL
Avg.
5/29/2014
Mass, #/day
8/27/2015
11/9/2016
PYRENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.010
0.01
0.092
0.067
0.075
Page 5 of 5
Max.
Avg.
Mass
Mass
0.092
0.078
0.092
0.078

RESEARCk t ANA1yTiCA11.
LAb®RAToRiES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample Identified as Spindale PPA Scan
(A Water Tech Labs, Inc. Project, collected 29 May 2014)
I, Volatile Organics Qunntitatirnl Spindnlc Ill, Semi -volatile Organics Quantitntion Spindalc
EPA Method 624 Limit l'PA Scan Method 625 Limit PPA Scan
Parameter (mg/11 foe/I.) Jharnmeter (mtt/Ll (malt..)
Methylene Chloride 0.010 SQL A-C'Idora-34nrethylphenol 0.010 SQL
Triclllerolluommelhane 0.010 SQL ✓-Chlnmphcnol 0.010 SQL
✓ I,l-Dichloroetlienc 0.010 SQL ,1-Dichlorophonol 0.010 SQL,✓ ,I-Dichlerndhmrc 0.010 SQL 2,1-Dinteihylphenol 0.010 SQL
Chloroform 0.010 SQ1. AALDinitrophcnol 0.050 13%.
✓,CarbonTetrachloride 0.010 SQI. 4-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 0.050 SQL
✓�,-Dichlnraprop,,rtc 0.010 SQL ✓-Nilrophenol 0.010 SQL
✓T nchtoracihcnc 0.010 SQL Vfi Nitmplienol 0.050 SL
�1! ibrontocttloramettw>c 0.010 SQL VJp'cnlnchlorophenal 0,050 SQL
1.2-Trichlnroelhanc 0.010 SQL VPlretiol 0.010 SQL
clrachluroct ene 0.010 SQL ✓2,4,6-Trichtoropltctlol 0.010 SQL
fLhlorcknzcne 0.0(0 SQL // cewtphtltene 0.010 SQL
✓,Trans-1„3-Dichloroethere 0.010 SQL Accalpltlltylenc 0.010 SQL
L
Dichlorucllrnne 0.010 SQL ✓Amhmcene 0.010 SQL
✓1.1,1-Triehloroethnne 0.010 SQL ✓Ijenzidinc 0.050 SQr.
'ifiromudichloromethanc 0.010 SQL V/i3f nzo(a)anlhraeene 0.010 SQ(.
veis-1,3-DIchloropropene 0.010 SQL W nr.o(n)pyrcnc 0.010 SQI,
✓ Beaune 0.010 SQL 1 3,eenItzo(b)Ouoranthcne 0,010 SQL
trans-1,3•Dichloropropcae 0.010 SQL '430nzo(pltl)peryieae 0.010 SQL
romnlbrin 0.010 SQL ✓i3enzo(k)Suomntheite 0.010 SQI.
1,2,2=I'etrnldoroctlintte 0.010 SQt. ✓f enzyl butyl phthalate 0.010 SQI.
.,Toluene 0.010 SQL t/Sis(2.chloroethoxy)act anc 0.010 SQL
Ethyl Senrcnc 0.010 SQI. 'is(2•chloroethyl)elher 0.010 SQL
✓ lnromethane 0.010 SQL j(s(2.chloroisnpropygelhcr 0.010 SQL
V J)farnumclhnnc 0.010 SQL r3rs(2.-cthyl-hexyt)phthnlatc 0.010 SQL✓'myl Chloride 0.010 SQL ✓ Bromnphenyl phenyl Ohm 0.010 SQI.
VCltloroeihane 0.010 SQL V2-Chloronaphlhalene 0.010 SQI.
Total Xylcncs 0.010 SQL VI-Chlorophcnyl phenyl ether 0.010 SQI.
✓Acroldn 0.100 SQL rsene 0.010 SQL
rAcrylonitrile 0.100 SQL nzo(n.h)anthracene 0.010 SQL
✓2.CIiInrncthyl vinyl whet 0.010 SQL ,Dichlombenzene 0.010 SQL
v1,3-Dichlamhcnzcite 0.010 SQL
Di(ulion lraclor 1 14',4-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 SQL
0:i4Dlcldnmhenzidinc 0.020 SQL
Ounrititatiott Spindnle ✓bi-N-Stdyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Miscellaneous Limit I'PA Scan ✓2,4.Dinitrololuene 0.010 SQL
11. Parameters fate/L) fatt;/Ll ✓y6� Diaiuotolucne 0.010 SQL
i•N.Octyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Antimony. Total 0.025 0.I152 htuornnthenc 0.010 SQL
Arsenic. Total 0.005 SQi, VI lexachlnrnhcnzene 0.010 SQL
Beryllium, Total 0.001 SQL e'liexnchlorabntadicne 0.010
Cadmium, Total 0.002 SQL v>'ISQL exitchlarocyciopemndicnc 0.010 SQI.
Chromium, Total 0.005 SQL r llesuchloroethane 0.010 SQL
Copper, Total 0.005 0.024 vt3y11mo(1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.010 SQL
Lead, Total 0.005 SQL' f photon° 0.010 SQL
Nickel, Total 0.005 0.008 phllnticnc 0.010 SQL
Selenium, Total 0.005 SQL ilrobenzene 0.010 SQL
Silver, Total 0A115 SQL 1/ l.Mlmsodimethylwninc 0.010 SQL
Thallium, Total 0.005 SQL t.44-nitrosodi-n-propylmninc 0.010 SQL
Zinc, Total 0.010 0.063 - Nilraaodiphenyionthxr 0.010 SQI.
Cyanide 0.005 SQL v1 henanlhrene 0.010 SQL
Phenols 0.005 SQL K'yrene 0.010 SQL
hardness; rnl I DO 39,0 Iw,4-Trichlorobemmne 0.010 SQL
1/Diethyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
nnelliyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Kilunrcite 0.010 SQI.
Semple Number 786637 1,2.diphcnylhydrazinc 0.050 SQL
Semple 1)ale 05/29/14
Sample Time (hrs) 0909 Dilution Tractor I
Sample )Humber 786637
Sample Date 05129/14
Sample Time (hrs) 0909
SQL = BelowQtmntitatian I.imilt mgll. ^ milligrams per Liter •' ports per millicn (prom

16-Jan-2e18 20:16 FROM:8283965761
FAX p.2
P. CI'2
RESEARCH all ANAEyTICAE
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultatlon5
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample Identified as Spindale-PPA Scan
e Water Tech Labs, Inc. Project, collected 27Augusi 20.15_1_
I. Volatile Organics Quantitation Spindale-PPA Scao III. Semi -volatile Organics
EPA Method 624 Quaotitation Spinda[e-PPA Scan
Limit Methad 625 Limit
Parameter 031EIL1 Ilnp5d1 Parameter Ime/L1 m /I'
Methylene Chloride 0.010 SQL 4-Chlor0-3-methylphenol 0.010
Trieblorofluortmrethane 0.010 SQLBQL
1,1-Dichloroetbene 2en0l 0.010 SQL
0.010 SQL 2.4-Di4-Dicophhlnropbenol 0.010 BQL
1,1-Dichloroerhane 0.010 SQL 2,4-Dimcthylpbcnol 0.010 B Chloroform 0.010 QL
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.010 BQL 2 Meth 1-4,6 dinsenol 0.050 SQL
1,2-Dicbloropropane 0.010 SQL l itiophenodinitraphmol 0.010 SQL
Trichloroethene 0.010 SQL 4-Nitrophenol 0.010 BQL
Dibromochloromethane 0.010 SQL Pentac Joyopl 0.050 SQL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BQL Phenol Jorotrhenol 0.010 SQL
Terraehloroethene 0.010 BQL Phenol O.OlO SQL
0.010 BQL 2,4,6-Tricbloropbenol 0.010 SQL
Chlorobeozeoe 0.010
'Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.01D SQL Acenapht1 lc 0.010 BQL
1,2-Dichloroetbene 0.010 SQL A Mace hylene 0.010 SQLL
1,1,1-Tricbloroethane SQL Aenzidi a 0.0105BQL
0.010 0.050
Bramndichlorometbane 0.010 BQL 13e v()a SQL
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.010 SQL Benzo())pyren eerie 0.010 SQL
Benzene SQL Henzo(a 0.010 SQL
0,010 BQL Senzo(b)fluoranthene 0.010 SQL
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.010 SQL Benzo(gbi)peryleae 0.010 Bromofarm 0.010 BQL
1,1,2,2-Tctrachloroetbane SQL Benzyl bii yl phthalate
0.010 SQL
Toluene 0.010 SQL Benzyl butyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
EthylofBenzene 0.010 SQL Bis(2-ebJoroethmry)mothane 0.010 SQL
SQL Bis(2-ebJoroethyl)ether 0.010 SQL
Chloromethene 0.010 BQL Bis(2-ebloroisopropyl)ethu 0.010 Bromomerbane 0.010SQL
"vinyl Chloride 0.010 SQL Bis(2-ethyl-he7p•1)phthalate 0.010 SQL
Vinyl
Chloride
SQL 4-Bromopbenyl phenyl ether 0.010 SQL
0.010 SQL 2-Chtoronapbthalenc 0.010 SQL
Total einlenes 0.010 BQL 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 0.010 SQL
0.100 BQL Cluyseoe 0.010 SQL
Acrylonitrile 0.100 SQL Dibenzo(a,b)anthractne 0.010 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.010 SQL 1,2-Dichlorobenzeoe 0.010 SQL
BQL
1,3-Diehlarobenzene 0.010 SQL
Dilution Factor 1
1,4-Diehlorobcnzene 0.0I0 BQL
3,3-Diehlorobenzidine 0.020 BQL
Ouantltatlon Spiodale-PPA Scan Di-N-Butyl phthalate 0.010 BQL
II. Misce))aneous Limit 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.010
Parameters 1pte/il m SQL
%R•) 2,nitrotalue0e 0.010 SQL
Di-N-Ocry1 phthalate 0.010 BQL
Antimony 0.025 0.053 Fluoranthene
Arsenic 0.005 SQL 0.010 SQL
Beryllium 0.001 Jiexachlaobenzene 0.010 Q,
BQL Hexacblorobutadiene 0.010 BQL
Cadmnuito 0.002
Cbromiam 0.005 SQL Hexacbinroeyclopmtadiene 0.010 SQL
Copper 0.005 SQL Herachloroetbane 0.010 SQL
0.005 0.032 lndcna(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.010 SQL
Cyanide SQL
JsophoronoSQL
Hardness 1.00 38.4 0.010
Lead Naphthalene 0.010 BQL
0.005 SQL Nitrobenzene 0.010 SQL.
Nickel 0.005 0.008 N-Nitrosodimetb lamine
Phenols 0.005 BQL' y 0.010 SQL
SeleniumSeleniumN•nitrasodi-a-Propylantina 0.010 BQL
0.005 SQL N-Nitrosodi en IamiueSQL
Silver 0.005Pb Y 0.010
'thallium SQL Pbeoaothrene 0.010 BQL
0.005 SQL Pyrene 0.010 Zinc 0.010 0.122 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzeoe 0 0.10 SQL
SQL
Diethyl phthalate
0.010 SQL
Semple Number Dimetbyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
8343.01 Fluorena 0.010 SQL
Sample Date 0827/15 1,2-di hen Ih 0.050 Sample Time (her) P Y ydrazine BQL
0915
Dilution Factor 1
Semple Number 9343.0)
Sample Date 09/27/15
Sample Time (bra) 0915
mg/L - milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
BQL = Below Quentitetion Limits

16-Jan-2018 20:15 FROM:8283965761
FAX p•1
RESEARCI[ & ANALyTICA[
LAORATOR! ES, INC.
Analytical/Process consultations
Chemical Analysts for Selected Parameters and Water Swnple Identified as Spindale-PPA
(A Water Tech Labs, Inc. Project, collected 09 November 2016)
I. Volatile Organics Quanlitatinn Spind»le-PPA I1I. Semi -volatile Organics Quan Station Spindalc•PPA
EPA Method 624 Limit Method 625 Limit
,Parameter ,(rtleaa (meal Parameter (ma/L) (mOM
Melhylene Chloride 0.010 SQL 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 0.010 SQL
Trichlorafluoromethane 0,010 BQL 2-Chlorophenol 0,010 SQL
I,1-Dichloroethene 0.010 BQL 2,4•Dichlorophenol 0,010 SQL
I,l-Dichlaroethane 0.010 SQL 2,4-Dimei1,ylphenol 0.010 SQL
Chloroform 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dinitrophcnol 0.050 SQL
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.010 SQL 2-Methyl-4,6-dirtittophen0l 0.050 SQL
1,2-Dichlaropropanc 0.010 SQL 2.1•Iivoohenol 0.010 SQL
TrlehlareeUune 0.010 BQL 4-Nitrophenol 0.050 SQL
Dibtornachloromcthanc 0.010 SQL Penlachlorophenol 0.050 SQL
I,1,2-Trichloreethane 010 .
Tetrachloroethene 0.010 SQL Phenol 0SQL
SQL2,4,6-Trichlarophenol 0.010 SQL
Chlorobcnzene 0.010 SQL Acenaphthene 0.010 Q
Trans-I,LDIcltlorvcthenc 0.010 SQL Acenaphthyiene 0,010 SQL
1,_ Dichloroethane 0,010 SQL Anthrecene BQL
l,l,l•Trichloraethane 0.010 BQL 0.Benzidine 0,0050 SQL
50 SQL
Bramodichloromethene 0.010 SQL Benzo(a)anthrdccne 0.010 SQL
Cis-1,3-DIchloropropene 0.010 BQL Benzo(a)pyrene 0,010 SQL
Benzene 0.010 SQL Benzo(b)fluoranthenc 0.010 SQL
Trans-1,3-bichloroprupenu 0.010 SQL tienzo(yhi)perylene 0.010 SQL
Sromoform 0.010 SQL Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.010 SQL
1,1,2,2-Tctmchlaroethene 0,010 SQL Bentyl butyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Toluene 0.010 SQL Bis(2-ehlorocthory)metharia 0.010 SQL
Ethyl Benzene 0.010 SQL Bis(2•chloroethyl)ether 0.010 SQL
Chloromethane 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 0,010 SQL
Bromomethanc 0.010 BQI, Bia(2•athyl-hcsyl)phthalate 0.0I0 BQL
Vinyl yl Chlorie a 0.010 BQL 'l-Bromaphenyl phenyl ether 0.010 SQL
Chl0.010 SQL. 2-Chloronaphtbelene 0.010 SQL
Total Xylenes 0.010 BQL 4•Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 0.010 BQL
Acrolein 0.100 SQL Chrysene 0 010 8
Acrylonitrile 0.100SQL Dibe,uo(o,h)anthmccne 0.010
SQL LChloroethyl vinyl ether 0.010
SQL 1,2-pichlorobenzerte 0.010 BQL
1,3-Dieltlorobenzene 0.010 SQL
Dilution Factor 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 SQL
3,3-Diehlorobenzidioe 0.020 SQL
Ouantitatlon Spindale-PPA Di•N•Sutyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
11. Miscellaneous Limit 2,4-Dinitroroluene o.01D SQL
Parameters fmp/1L•1 (me/i,l 2,6•Dinitrotoluene 0.010 SQL
Di• 1.0ctyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Antimony 0.025 SQL fluorantheoe 0,010 SQL
Arsenic 0.005 SQL Herachlorabenzene 0.010 SQL
Beryllium 0,001 SQL Hexachlorobutadiene 0.010 SQL
Cadmium 0.002 BQL Eiexncblorocyclopentediene 0.010 SQL
Chromium 0.00i SQL Hexachlaroethane 0.010 Q
Copper 0.005 SQL
o.osa lndeno(1?,3•ed) pyrene 0.010 SQL Cyanide 0.005 SQL Isophotone 0.010 BQL
Hardness 1.00 50.5 Naphthalene 0.010 SQL
Lead 0.005 SQL Nitrobenzene
Nickel 0.010 SQL
0.005 0.007 N-Nirtaaadimethyltunine 0.010 SQL Phenols 0,005 SQL N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 0.010 SQL
Selenium 0.005 SQL N-Nitrosodiphenylemine 0.010 SQL
Silver 0,005 SQL Phenanthrene 0.010 SQL
T nallium 0.005 BQL Pyrene 0.010 BQL
0.010 0.076 1,2,4=rrichlorabenzene 0.010 SQL
Diethyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Dlmcthyl phthalate 0.010 SQL
Sample Number 27125.01 Fluarenc 0.010 SQL
Semple Date 11/09/16 l,2•diphenyIhydrazine 0.050 SQL
Sample Time Mrs) 1140
Dilution factor 1
Sample Number 27125.01
Sample Date 11/09/16
Sample Time (hrs) 1140
mg/L -milligrams per Liter pawl per million (ppm) SQL - Below QuantilalionLimits

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
October 02, 2015
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10900
Dear Mr. Mundy:
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
RECEIVEDJDENRIDWR
MAR 092018
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. September 15 and September 17, 2015.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase 1I Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
September 15, 2015 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
October 31, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: October 02, 2015
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC. 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments:
Project: 10900
Samples: 150915.09, 150917.06
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO5):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
09-14-15
24-1t
1640
09-16-15
24-h
1600
30, 30, 32
40, 40, 40
169. 156, 158
<0.10
1.4
< 0.10
3.4
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
09-16-15
09-23-15
1230
0813
Stan
Renewal I
Renewal 2
Sun
Renewal 1
Renewal2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.70
8.08
7.98
6.95
7.47
7.22
8.05
8.00
7.85
7.37
7.33
7.14
7.8
7.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.8
8.1
7.8
7.6
8.0
7.8
25.0
25.0
24.8
24.8
24.9
24.7
24.9
24.7
25.0
25.1
24.8
24.9
Number of Young Produced
27
31 29 31
28
30
28
27
28
30
28 9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4.75°A
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
30 29 30
31 29 33
29 31 29
29
30.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLL
LLL
LLL
L
-3.8
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
32 29 27 31 31
32
31
33 33 30
30.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLLL
L
L
LLL
-6.9
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
31
30
32
31
31 31 35 30 33 32
31.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
LLLLLL
-9.3
Effluent Percentage
38%
Treatment 5 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
32 33 35 34 32 31 30 30 35 34 32.6
L L L L L L L L L L -12.8
%Reduction
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of Young Produced
35
35
34
30
33
31
31
36 32 35
33.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LLL
-14.9
%Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.3
48 I lour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Dunnetfs
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
0.853
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
2.522
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
.
9.5%
.
19%
.
38%
.
76%
.
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
December 28, 2015
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 11055
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. December 01 and December 03, 2015.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase I1 Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
December 01, 2015 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
January 31, 2016.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: December 28, 2015
Facility: Spindalc WWTP
NPDES #: NC-0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge;
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor.
Comments: .
Project: 11055
Samples: 151201.06, 151203.04
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1623
Sample Information
Collection star date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mglL CaCO5):
Hardness (mg/L CaC05):
Conductivity (µrnhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. al Receipt Cr):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
11-30-15
12-02-I_
24-h
2:-li
34
40
930
632
156.151.160
<0.10
<0.10
4.2
3.8
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L).
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Mean
Stan date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
12-02-15
12-09-15
1400
0628
Sun
Rem all
Rrnrnat 2
sun
Rcncnal I
Rcncnal2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.91
7.90
7.90
7.55
7.73
7.54
8.12
7.92
8.03
7.68
7.69
7.76
7.9
7.6
7.8
7.6
7.7
7.7
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.8
7.9
25.0
25.0
25.0
24.8
24.8
24.7
25.0
25.1
24.9
24.9
25.0
25.0
Number of Young Produced
29
27 27 30 26
31 29 29
27
29
28 4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLLL
LLL
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4.75%
reatment 2 Organisms
1
ea 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mn
Number of Young Produced
32
28 28 29
29 31 28 32
31
32
30.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLL
LLLL
L
L
-5.6
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
% Redmion
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mon
33 32 31 33 32 30 30 31 33 33 31.8
LLLL LLLL L L -12.0
Rcdunwn
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
1
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
19%
atment 4 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
33 33 32 35 34 36 31 32 34
31
33.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
LLLLLLLLL
L
-16.5
Effluent Percentage
38%
rcatmcnt 5 Organisms
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
35 36 36 30 34 35 34 33 37 33
34.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
LLLLLLLLLL
-20.8
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
RWunnon
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Number of Young Produced
36 34 35 36
38
36
33
36
38
36
35.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
LLLL
L
L
L
L
1.
L
-26.1
R<ducoon
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.6
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant9:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Dltnnetes
Nonnal Distribution:
Yes
2.Icthod:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
0.788
Critical Value.
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
2.161
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
.
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
.
9.5%
.
19%
.
38%
.
76%
•
.
DWYQ_form AT--3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
October 02, 2015
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10890
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. September 14 through September 18, 2015.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) Larval
THP6C Survival and Growth,
Test Method 1000.0
EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV > 76%
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the
ChV value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
September 14, 2015 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
October 31, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

1. Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Date: October 02, 2015
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments:
Project: 10890
Samples: 150914.01, 150916.16, 150918.09
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
1
Replicate number
2 3
4
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
9
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Wcight/original (mg/larvae)
0.567
0.538
0.571
0.487
4.75%
% Effluent
9.5%
% Effluent
19%
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.531
0.549
0.556
0.631
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.486
0.596
0.665
0.555
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.583
0.594
0.553
0.713
Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.596
0.625
0.618
0.583
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
9
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.561
0.601
0.655
0.692
Water Quali y Data
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
High Concen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Day 0
Initial Final
Day 1
Initial Final
Day 2
Initial I Final
Stan date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
09-15-15
09-22-15
1200
1104
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Average wt /
surviving (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Day 3
Initial Final
97.5
0.541
0.554
100.0
0.567
100.0
0.576
100.0
0.611
97.5
0.606
95.0
0.627
Day 4
Initial Final
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
Aquatox, Inc.
Hatch date:
Hatch time:
Day 5
Initial I Final
09-14-15
1600-1700 ET
Day 6
Initial Final
7.48
6.88
6.95
7.02
7.40
7.09
7.47
6.75
7.30
6.97
7.17
7.24
7.22
7.05
7.8
8.0
8.0
6.8
8.0
7.1
8.0
6.7
8.0
7.8
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
24.7
24.4
24.6
24.5
24.8
24.4
24.7
24.5
24.7
24.2
24.7
24.4
24.8
24.6
8.12
7.70
7.71
7.82
8.03
7.72
8.09
7.66
8.00
7.69
7.98
7.92
7.98
7.78
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.1
8.2
7.7
8.0
6.5
8.0
7.9
7.8
8.1
8.0
8.1
24.8
24.4
24.7
24.6
25.0
24.4
24.8
24.6
24.9
24.3
24.8
24.5
24.9
24.6
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/ CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Overall Analysis:
Sample 1
09-13-15
24-h
170
Sample 2
09-15-15
24-h
190
Sample 3
09-17-15
48
1800
<0.10
3.8
40
1540
<0.10
1.8
24-h
160
40
1720
< 0.10
0.5
Control
30, 30, 32
40, 40, 40
153-169
Analyses
Normal:
Flom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
76%
76%
>76%
>76%
>76%
>76%
Visual Insp.
Dunnett's
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
4.75%
2.410
-0.676
9.5%
2.410
-0.904
19%
2.410
-1.821
38%
2.410
1.684
76%
2.410
-2.250
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
DWQform AT-5 (8/03)

•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
March 16, 2015
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10469
Dear Mr. Mundy:
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. March 03 and March 05, 2015.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
March 03, 2015 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
April 30, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincere
Y,
iheited
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: March 16, 2015
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments:
Project: 10469
Samples: 150303.10, 150305.08
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
03.02.15
24.5-h
1090
03-04-15
24-h
1070
33
40
152. 149. 152
<0.10
4.5
< 0.10
1.7
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
03-04-15
03-11-15
1017
0718
Start
Renewal 1
Renewal 2
Sun
Renewal 1
Renewal
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.69
7.81
7.89
7.58
7.80
7.81
8.01
7.95
7.85
7.76
7.72
7.67
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.7
7.7
7.9
25.1
24.9
25.0
24.7
24.8
24.8
25.1
24.9
25.2
25.2
24.8
25.2
Number of Young Produced
27
29
30
29
27
29
31
29
31
28
29 0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage,
4.75%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
32
30
33
29
33
32
29 31
28
33
31.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L_ L
L
L
-6.9
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [dean
Number of Young Produced
30
29 32 33
33
33
31
34
30
34
31.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
-10.0
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
30
33
34
32
34 32 32 33
34
33
32.7
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
LLLL
L
L
-12.8
Effluent Percentage
38%
Treatment 5 Organisms
% Reduction
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mran
Number of Young Produced
33 33 34 34 35 34
37
37
35
34
34.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLLLL
L
L
L
L
-19.3
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
Redaction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mmn
Number of Young Produced
32
35
35
37
33 37 38
33
36
37
35.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
LLL
L
L
L
-21.7
%Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.9
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Dunnen's
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
0.798
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances: '
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
3.231
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
.
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
9.5%
19%
38%
.
76%
,
D WQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
June_22,_2OES
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10655
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. June 02 and June 04, 2015.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
June 02, 2015 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
July 31, 2015.
If you have any questions conceming these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
/'►, The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: June 22, 2015
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments: .
Project: 10655
Samples: 150602.03, 150604.06
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (pmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
06-01-15
24-h
1270
06-03-15
24-h
1140
33
40
165. 156. 152
<0.10
1.7
< 0.10
2.0
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final D0 (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
06-03-15
06-10-15
1300
0720
Stan
Renewal l
Renewal2
Start
Renewal l
Ratewal2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
8.07
8.19
8.11
7.66
7.72
7.57
8.21
8.19
8.14
7.76
7.68
7.65
8.0
7.8
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.6
7.9
8.1
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.9
25.0
25.0
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.8
25.1
25.1
24.9
25.2
25.2
25.0
Number of Young Produced
27
29 29 28 28 28
29
27
29
29
•
28 3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLLLL
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4.75%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
30 31 32 30 27
29
28
33
28
30
29.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLLL
L
L
L
L
L
-5.3
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
30
32
29
31
27
30
32 31 29
30
30.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
LLL
L
-6.4
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
32
32 29 30 28 33 28 28 30 31
30.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLLLLLLLL
-6.4
Effluent Percentage
38%
Treatment 5 Ortanisms
% Rcductim
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Moan
Number of Young Produced
32 31 30 31 31
30 34 30 32 31
31.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (Djead
LLLLL
LLLLL
-10.2
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 neon
Number of Young Produced
32
33
32
32
31
32
29 33 28 31
31.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
LLLL
-10.6
Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
2.9
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant7:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Dunnetrs
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Kollnogorov D
Statistic:
0.934
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
6.900
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
.
9.5%
.
19%
38%
76%
.
DWQformAT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
March 21, 2014
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9651
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. March 04 and March 06, 2014.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method Final Result
Number
North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note.: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
March 04, 2014 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
April 30, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
im eumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

s
0
•
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: March 21, 2014
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES 4: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments:
Project: 9651
Samples: 140304.09, 140306.13
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3).
Conductivity (pmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Men
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
03-05-14
03-12-14
1415
0800
Sian
Renewal l
Renewal2
Sun
Renewal l
Renewal 2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.82
8.04
7.95
7.27
7.60
7.80
7.99
7.89
7.89
7.59
7.45
7.15
8.3
8.1
7.8
7.6
8.1
7.6
8.2
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.0
7.7
25.1
25.2
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.8
25.0
25.0
24.9
24.9
24.9
25.1
Number of Young Produced
28
28
27
26
30
29
29
29
29
31
28 6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4.75%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ma.°
Number of Young Produced
33
35
31
32
37
29
35
32
32
33
32.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-15.0
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
%Rrducoon
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
33 34 36 31
35
34
31
37
32
31
33.4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLL
L
I.
L
L
L
L
-16.8
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Man
Number of Young Produced
35 37 33 37
31
35
33 36 34 34
34.5
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLL
I.
L
LLLL
-20.6
Effluent Percentage
68%
Treatment 5 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
% Reduction
Number of Young Produced
38
37
32
39
31
35
38 34 36 34
35.4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
LLLL
-23.8
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
° Reduction
Number of Young Produced
33 34 33
32 32 35
31
35
33
34
33.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLL
LLL
L
L
L
L
-16.1
5 Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.0
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Dunnett's
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
0.482
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
6.173
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
.
9.5%
.
19%
.
68%
76%
.
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

•
s
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
June 20, 2014
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9858
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. June 03 and June 05, 2014.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
June 03, 2014 using the parameter code TIIP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
July 31, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: June 20, 2014
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC-0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments:
Project: 9858
Samples: 140603.17,140605.15
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (pmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
1050
1080
155, 150, 158
< 0.10
1.7
< 0.10
0.5
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
06.04-14
06-11-14
1508
0907
Start
Renewal 1
Renewal
Stan
Renewal 1
Rcnewal2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.98
7.92
8.07
7.99
7.61
7.55
8.08
8.11
8.14
7.69
7.66
7.64
7.6
7.5
7.8
8.2
7.6
7.6
7.7
8.0
8.1
7.8
8.0
8.0
25.0
25.0
25.1
24.8
24.8
24.8
25.0
24.9
24.8
25.1
25.3
25.2
Number of Young Produced
29
27
26 30 26 28 30 27 32 30
28 5
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
LLLLLLLL
Effluent Percentage
4.75%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
31
29
29 29 32 32 29 32
32
33
30.8
Adult Survival: (L)ivc, (D)ead
L
L
LLLLLL
L
L
-8.1
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
31
34
35 31 30
32 28 35 34
31
32.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
LLL
LLLL
L
-12.6
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
% Reduction
( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
31
31
33
27
34
30
36
35
32
34
32.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-13.3
Effluent Percentage
38%
Treatment 5 Ortanisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
32
32
32
31
29
29
32
32
30
32
31.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-9.1
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
31
29
28
26
29
29 28 29
25
29
28.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
LLL
L
L
0.7
% Rcdunion
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
7.1
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant?
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Steel's Many
Normal Distribution:
No
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
1.125
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
5.832
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Steel's Many One
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
134.0
75.0
9.5%
143.5
75.0
19%
143.0
75.0
38%
139.5
75.0
76%
101.5
75.0
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
September 24, 2014
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10096
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. September 09 and September 11, 2014.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
September 09, 2014 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
October 31, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely
Jim Sz+Imner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
•
•
•
C Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: September 24, 2014
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: /
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Ott 44w4..l.+--~�
Comments:
Project: 10096
Samples: 140909.08, 140911.06
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/[.):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
09-10-14
09-17-14
1409
0715
Stan
Rencwat l
Renewal 2
Stan
Renewal 1
Renewal
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.86
8.09
8.02
7.46
7.57
7.62
8.24
8.03
7.99
7.95
7.68
7.55
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
8.1
7.7
7.6
8.0
7.7
24.8
25.1
25.0
24.7
24.9
24.7
24.7
24.8
24.8
25.1
25.2
25.0
Number of Young Produced
28
29
29
31 29 32 31
29
27
30
29.5
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
LLLL
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4.75%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Number of Young Produced
30
29
32
33
31
31
34
33
31
32
31.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-7.1
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Number of Young Produced
34
34
34
30 33 36
33
34
32
34
33.4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
-13.2
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Number of Young Produced
30 31 31 30 30 33
32
34
33
32
31.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLLLL
L
L
L
L
-7.1
Effluent Percentage
38%
Treatment 5 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Number of Young Produced
30
33
30
30 32 30
35
35
29
29
31.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
-6.1
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
$5 Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nine
Number of Young Produced
31
32
33
33
29
29
26 30 27 29
29.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
LLLL
-1.4
Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.1
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IwC:
0
of
10
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Dunnett's Test
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
0.840
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
4.917
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
.
9.5%
19%
38%
.
76%
DWQjormAT--3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

r
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
December 22, 2014
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10272
Dear Mr. Mundy:
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. December 02 and December 04, 2014.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase 11 Chronic Whole
T11P3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
December 02, 2014 using the parameter code T1 P3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
January 31, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jirtt Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic CeriodapI nia dubia Date: December 22, 2014
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments: .
Project: 10272
Samples: 141202.10,141204.11
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
12-01-14
24.25-h
1210
Sample 2
12-03-14
24-h
1180
Control
30
40
152. 151. 158
<0.10
3.3
<0.10
1.7
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Start date:
12-03-14
End date:
12-10-14
Start time:
1320
End time:
0727
Stan
Renewal l
Renewal 2
Stan
Renewal l
Renewal2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.68
7.69
7.75
7.05
7.15
7.34
7.69
7.80
7.64
7.37
7.44
7.28
7.6
8.0
7.9
7.7
7.7
7.8
8.0
8.1
7.9
7.9
8.0
7.8
24.9
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.7
25.0
24.9
24.7
25.1
24.9
25.1
Number of Young Produced
31
29
30
33
29
33
32
30
29
30
30.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4.75 %
Treatment 2 Organisms
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of Young Produced
32 34 31
30
33 32 32
31
30
33
31.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLL
L
LLL
L
L
L
-3.9
Effluent Percentage
9.5 %
Treatment 3 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sty°
34 34 32 30 32 30 32 31 33 32 32.0
LLL LLLL LLL -4.6
-- - % Reduction
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
31 32 31 29 31 32 30 33 30 33 31.2
LLL LLLL L L L -2.0
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mann
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
38%
Treatment 5 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
29
29
33
30
29
34
31
31 31 29
30.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)cad
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LLL
0.0
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
29 28 26
30 30 28 15 30 28 31
27.5
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLL
LLLDLLL
10.1
% Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.2
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
IWC:
0
of
10
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method:
Steel's Many
Normal Distribution:
No
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
1.186
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
No
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
27.778
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Steel's Many One
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
127.5
75.0
9.5%
129.5
75.0
19%
118.0
75.0
38%
104.0
75.0
76%
76.5
75.0
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

i
•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
December 27, 2013
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9441
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. December 03 and December 05, 2013.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
THP3B Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >76%
(Ceriodaphnia Full -range Toxicity Test)
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of survival or reproduction and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of survival or reproduction.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
December 02, 2013 using the parameter code THP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
January 31, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
•
0
i
cl Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: December 27, 2013
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
144,44.
Comments:
Project: 9441
Samples: 131203.15, 131205.16
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaC05):
Conductivity (pmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
12-02-13
24.25-h
1090
Sample 2
12-04-13
24-h
1280
Control
33,33,32
40, 40, 40
160.151,156
<0.10
5.8
<0.10
1.0
Test Information
Treatment:
initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
12.04-13
12-11-13
1438
0810
Sinn
Rc,ual l
Renewal 2
Srat
Rerexal l
Reneual2
76%
76%
76%
Control
Control
Control
7.93
8.06
8.15
7.71
7.71
7.58
7.94
8.06
8.09
7.67
7.74
7.54
8.1
8.3
8.1
8.0
8.0
7.9
8.3
8.2
8.0
8.2
8.1
8.3
25.0
24.9
24.9
24.8
24.8
24.7
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.9
24.9
24.9
Number of Young Produced
33
30 30 32
32
31
32
30
28
30
30.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
4,75%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
29 35 33
29
29
31
33
35
31
34
31.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-3.6
Effluent Percentage
9.5%
Treatment 3 Organisms
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
35
31
32
34
33 33 34 33 32
35
33.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
L
L
L
L
LLLLL
L
-7.8
Effluent Percentage
19%
Treatment 4 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
35 35 33 30
38
35
34
37
37
30
34.4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
-11.7
Effluent Percentage
68%
Treatment 5 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
34 34 32 35
34 38 36 36
37
32
34.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLL
LLLL
L
L
-13.0
Effluent Percentage
76%
Treatment 6 Ort=_anisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
Number of Young Produced
38
34
36
37
37 40 32 37 34 38
36.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
LLLLLL
-17.9
%Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
Chronic Test Results.
Final Control Mortality (%):
0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.8
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
10
1WC:
0
of
10
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>76%
Reproduction NOEC:
76%
Overall Method.:
Dunnett's
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Kolmogorov D
Statistic:
0.783
Critical Value:
1.035
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
Bartlett's Test
Statistic:
6.773
Critical Value:
15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (i applicable)
Method:
.
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
4.75%
.
9.5%
.
19%
68%
76%
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

•
•
i
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
June 23, 2014
Mr. Lance Mundy
Spindale WWTP
PO Box 186
Spindale, NC 28160
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9842
Dear Mr. Mundy:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Spindale WWTP received by Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc. June 02 through June 06, 2014.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number Final Result
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
THP6C Larval Survival and Growth, EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV > 76%
Test Method 1000.0
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >76% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
June 02, 2014 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
July 31, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Date: June 23, 2014
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Spindale WWTP
NPDES 4: NC- 0020664 Pipe #: 001 County: Rutherford
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Comments:
Project: 9842
Samples: 140602.03, 140604.31, 140606.24
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
4.75%
% Effluent
9.5%
% Effluent
19%
% Effluent
38%
% Effluent
76%
Replicate number
1 2 3
4
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.684
0.755
0.721
0.653
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.846
0.724
0.775
0.733
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.696
0.675
0.731
0.892
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.981
0.807
0.789
0.868
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.781
0.965
0.863
0.961
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.900
0.899
0.893
0.981
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
High Concen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Day 0
Initial Final
Day 1
Initial Final
Day 2
Initial I Final
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
06-03-14
06-10-14
1130
1056
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Average wt /
surviving (mg) Hatch date:
Hatch time:
100.0
0.703
0.703
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Day 3
initial I Final
100.0
0.770
100.0
0.749
100.0
0.861
100.0
0.893
100.0
0.918
Da 4
Initial I Final
Day 5
Initial Final
Aquatint, Inc.
06-02-14
1600-1700
Day 6
Initial Final
7.85
7.84
7.99
7.56
7.66
7.52
7.61
7.56
7.71
7.46
7.79
7.48
7.55
7.43
7.8
8.1
8.2
7.5
7.8
7.2
7.6
6.9
7.9
6.7
7.6
7.2
7.6
7.0
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.3
24.7
24.2
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.2
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.6
8.22
8.21
8.38
7.94
8.08
7.90
8.11
7.85
8.14
7.75
8.15
8.00
8.07
7.80
8.0
8.0
8.1
7.6
7.6
7.1
7.6
6.9
7.7
6.8
7.7
7.2
7.9
7.1
24.9
24.3
24.7
24.3
24.9
24.4.
25.0
24.6
25.0
24.3
25.0
24.4
24.9
24.4
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Overall Analysis:
Sample 1
06-01-14
20.25-h
120
42
1090
<0.10
1.9
Sample 2
06-03-14
24-h
130
38
1050
<0.10
0.9
Sample 3
06-05-14
24-h
150
46
1180
< 0.10
0.9
Control
32-33
40-44
147-158
Analyses
Normal:
Hotn. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
76%
76%
>76%
>76%
>76%
>76%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnett's
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
4.75%
2.410
-1.287
9.5%
2.410
-0.879
19%
2.410
-3.070
38%
2.410
-3.677
76%
2.410
-4.173
Result: PASS LOEC: >76% NOEC: 76% ChV: >76%
DWQ fonn AT-5 (8/03)