960182_Inspection_20211123

Facility %T'tfniber
•
/762-
Dfi'islop ot WitterResources
0 Dl~vision of Soil anla Water •Coms xvatIOU •
O Other Aged
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
/l-613 o1
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Farm Name: 41,614,tivytj / �LJyYwJ j y�,t,�1 ]j 5--
Owner Name: aJv",,t�'
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: i
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
412)--t-Q
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region: 1,(Jc,.ed
Phone:
�.�iN,ldC�GL�
Latitude:
Integrator: 5f
Certification Number: /do 09v
Certification Number: mQ r7902-
Longitude:
Design . Cureut
Caliae pow
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
/7y
,61
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
'Dslgn: •Curmitt ' • • •
•
Wet?ouJtry Capiclty . Roil.: , • :. Cs831e.
Layer
Non -Layer
' •Destgti Current
Poirttry Oacity `Pop•
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
•
Turkey Poults
Other
"bga .carGe1 t
Cpai� 'op.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 4170 - / ?TX
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Date of Inspection: //— 0/.3 - 02�
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA El NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
/9
L3 4,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme 1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists El Design ❑ Maps El Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectio ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/201 S Continued
❑ Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE

F.cility Number: 9 - / 7' (9—
Date of Inspection: // - aj - /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
E Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes © No
g(No
No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
OtanteRti e$5304:1- u4t oi. ; cp ainVES answcrsand/or any plematoulaticent ollylititq
dgs o ae zieftex Plaln� situatigns (tiSa:atWo al, pages ug nece ky), •
= , 0 7 oin-jitia_ixe/
14Ltif
-6474
006rgi
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: o
�r.0a-/
5/12/2020
Date: