20140159 Ver 1_Application_20140214

.��
� � �� �
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVERTOR
February 14, 2014
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr.
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27615
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Nationwide Pemut #14
Bridge No. 69 on SR 1502 (Craver Road) over Reedy Creek (Class C)
WBS project no.: 17BP.9.R.18 (DWQ pernut fee $570)
Davidson County, NC
Dear Mr. Thomas,
We are requesting a Nationwide 14 permit for replacement of Bridge No. 69 with a triple barrel
box culvert on SR 1502 (Craver Road) over Reedy Creek (Class C) in Davidson County. I have
attached a preconstnxction notification application, construction plans, erosion control plans, a
stormwater management plan, and No Survey Required forms from NCDOT Cultural Resources
for Historic Architecture and Archeology. The project will permanently impact 112 linear feet
and temporarily impact 75 linear feet of Reedy Creek. Stream flow will be isolated into one
barrel, with 2' sills and floodplain benches constructed at the inlet and outlet of the overflow
barrels in order to prevent stream over widening and facilitate aquatic passage. The low flow
barrel will be buried 1' below the stream bed to ensure aquatic passage. The overflow basels
will be backfilled with class 1 rip rap to the sill elevation. The culvert site will be dewatered
during construction in accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices.
By copy of this letter, we also request 401 review and approval from the NC Division of Water
Resources with one copy of the application package provided to Amy Chapman, Transportation
Pernutting Unit Supervisor, and Dave Wanucha, DOT Project Coordinator. Please charge the
application fee of $570 to WBS project no. 17BP.9.R.18.
By copy of this letter, we also request Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, to
comment directly to the Corps conceming the pemut request.
If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material
please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Division of Highways • Division Nine • 375 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27127
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • Courier Box 13-12-04

SinCerely,
;j � _
���� �-
Amy Euliss
Division Environxnental Officer, NCDOT Division 9
Attachxnents: Application Package
CC: Amy Chapman, NCDENR-DWR, Transportation Pemutting Unit Supervisor- e-copy
Dave Wanucha, NCDENR-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy
Matt Jones, P.E., Division Bridge Program Engineer- e-copy
Phil Suggs, Division 9 Roadside Environmental Engineer- e-copy
Marla Chambers, WRC- e-copy

O�pF WA7F9oG
ti
> �
O Y
Offce Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: �X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes �X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank � Yes � No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge no. 69 on SR 1502 (Craver Road)
2b. County: Davidson
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Welcome
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 176P.9.R.18
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 9
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if pat Ivey, Division Engineer
applicable):
3d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway
3e. City, state, zip: Winston Salem NC 27127
3f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7800
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: DEO
4b. Name: Amy Euliss
4c. Business name NCDOT Division 9
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway
4e. City, state, zip: Winston Salem, NC 27127
4f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7802
4g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
Sa. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.9309 Longitude: 80.272
1c. Propertysize: 0.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Reedy Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing site has a state maintained britlge and roadway. The general land use is agriculture, with scattered residences.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.1
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 187
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace an existing bridge with a three barcel concrete 6ox culvert, with low flow isolated into one barrel through use of sills antl Floodplain henches.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replace an existing bridge with a three barrel concrete box culvert. Stantlard road builiding equipment wiil be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro'ect includin all rior hases in the ast? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type prelimina
of determination was made? ❑ rY ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for �yes �X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help fle" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
y�/1 P Fill Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.02
N/p T Fill Bottomland Hardwootl Forest Yes Corps 0.02
�/�/3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/NO -
Wq - Choose one Choose one YeslNO -
�/�/5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/g - Choose one Choose one Yes/NO -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.04
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3 b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3 g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (IN�? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (� (feet) feet)
S1 P Fill Reedy Creek PER Corps 6 112
$p T Dewatering Reedy Creek PER Corps 6 75
S3 - Choose one - -
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts ie7
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or tyPe
Tem ora T
01 - Choose one Choose
02 - Choose ane Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
Sa. 5b. Sc. 5d. Se.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
pz Choose one
5f. Total:
Sg. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? � Yes � No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
Sj. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number— mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square
Tem ora T (square
feet feet
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - YeslNo
64 - Yes/No
BS - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
rage o or iu

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifcally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Low flow will be isolated to one barrel with sills and floodplain benches. The sills and benches will prevent stream overwidening, and facilitafe aquatic
passage. Justifcation for bridge to culvert is provided in the attached Stormwater Management Plan.
1 b. Specifcally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion control will be maintained through NCDOT Erosion Control BMP manual. The instream work area will be dewatered. Surtaces waters wiil not
come into contact with uncured concrete.
2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for �X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑x Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation 8ank: NCDENR EEP
Type: Stream Quantity: 224'
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 224 linearfeet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigatio� requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: requested 112' at 2:1 ratio
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identiTy the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identifed � yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes � No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? Zp.g o�o
2b. Does this ro ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan is atlached.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? NCDWR TPU
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local overnment's'urisdiction is this ro'ect?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
� Water Supply Watershed
� Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
�Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �ORW
(check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Sb. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the 0 yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been f nalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA f nal approval
letter.) Minimum Criteria available upon request. ❑ Y@S ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes �X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
NA the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes OX No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and arohaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached signed No Historic properties presenVaffected and No Architectural Survey required form form NCDOT cultural Resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This project met the MOA requiremenfs as set forth by NC Floodplain Mapping.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
This tletermination was based �on the NC Floodplain Mapping Digital maps via their website.
,�,������:5s �� - ��1�-l��
ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name Ap I ant/ genYs Signature Date
(Agenf's signature is valid onty if an authorization
letter from the a licant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

!(l *sI;f2\'(:-1' 12I�:(lt'iltL:t3 k�41t\T
nuc�.tF.cr a�rc3iaai,a � i��;�
i'rc,id_r �'n:
Ji"Ti.\ \��,. �.%°��.�.R.�$
i' �. �.l._
h�'�Irnr7 � t.:5. i 1..T ;1 1'errriar Rr S�rtr� d:,
r.�.:rt:,� ;.rt� �..� ..
{HA)i1-tl�-Q41.6
! �.';t��,ii � Q3Vl{�s�O[1
1 �::i i<qliol r.
�'ia,4li1;'.� A,'�t�Li ('ti•.i�:r,!;
��'�; �:, ��,,,;�r �t,�,�: NWP 3 or 14
I�,�;;�, r i,,�.,�,i��r;ra,r: R�piace Bridg� No. Gl on SR 15t12 (Craver Raas!) uver Reedy �reek
with off°site detour {no impraWem�nts pl�nn�ci)
5l',lF tii:llti' C)1�` C L 1;1"192,i i. I2FSOi"F2C;rS KC!'�I_1�'
lirx�;t �,��srrrl�iiutt vi r_�i;e«r �e�rai�-ilro•�, r� �edr.� ,x1 r��i�r�ir, orrJ �»irrl,o�i<�rrs. H?C)1"�'�� rev[ev,�ed on 5 C3r_YObci
7ll`? �nd yiz:ded �o NR, .SL, L�, i�E, or SS prQper'lies in tMe �1r�ea �E Potenfial Effe�is (APF). �avi:,saa
Cpunty curr�nt GIS r.��ppini�, aerial ��hotegraphy, and tax infor.naTion ir.dica[eu' prectomin2ntly b�,'oadlaad
and cuitivatcd "r"eltis in Che APG, p:us ;?ver�l po�t-i4o� resnu.c2s {vi°�.a�e� o Cctober 2U17;, �1'he AP£
:nE<rsc:ts a pasc�l ar, �vt�icl� star.�ds �+ tirca 1925 house, iater rernodefeu, agpre.iimately E,OL� Fec��t
south�r;es� �F L?ie 2xi;tittg bti�Jge and Ceycn� pro���C r,mpacL Canstrucied in 19Ci0, Br"sdo� Vc. 09 is a 20-
Toat-lunq, sinc,,e-s,�an, steel strr�qer,'multi-beam F�rictge ar,d is �oc ellgibte `c�r the Natoa�l R�c�i�ler
accordinc� rc? t27E �dC`7.) �� Fl,stcn� Bric7c Surv�y� as iC i� nut historically, architECturally, or t�c7r.olog`�al4y
yg iifcant. t<oqg(� f•,aps "S�reet `Ji�n" co:iflrmed abser,ce cf cri;iral hista^:c ser�ctures%I���is^r,.�s ir� thr_
APt= (vie�.aed 5 Oct�bcr 2Qll]. �
No archltect�rat survey is requirad tar the prnjecY as currentiy [tefined,
dsr'frf F.�rj�1�n�<+nw1 r+/ ;� hs ;ix- ur<rPler�+i�� 1r7iurtyrr,Flr:ii pv'm�,�ai,'� <� rrlia�.lr �rlrr., irr+-,-,:�nur�errlt y;r'_./i�7ir1��
�L,•u ��z�r,. cu-e nn :rxrtkralitrreC irrs�tca�ir r*r-o�..�r;i;�� ��; ri�,=�� �d('F �,P� exiertds �QO f�ek from eacn erd af tne
exi5ticu sidye (N-�} and iG�O €eet to either � dc ef Lhe SP, 15C2 (Craver apad} center �ine ; E`c"d� tc
erv,cOnipa� : all pr�cp3sed canstrudion activilies. 7'fie epunty �rr.hir.ectural susuey arid rel�;ed ourilicatio�i
�nClcde r�n ��:�pert�zs rn th�. kPE (Pa:., h. rc.a� r, '..:..� r,_�� 5„ �,,.:a:r.r.v: an <,zr.;,.��u,ai nst� � cn-t7� ,. _� ._:,r �
p�,.:t�. Gc�,':r,ariL�=r�ng-on, NC]� 1'ie U:-a�.dsun:. i t}' I'i_iG.,'dIAcS�,C,]c.on, 1gi71i. C011:7f}` GIS;CcIX f�ldC2fl3�5 ��1�? c>,jaE?�
�..,u�ls supp�rt f.ie at�sence oc <ignific��nt arch�tec[;�ra;� rtsources. No N2cional Register-fis:ed or �lic�ib[e
prop�rYie�. are loc�ted v.,thir� thc A?E.
Stioutd any aspert of the grojett design change, incfuddng the incorporatiare of aff-site
detour improWements, please natify NCDdT Historic Aechitecture as �ddittanai revigw ifsen
rzzay be necessary,
4C�k'E'(}32�!' t)(1C�i,11�:'rT.4Ti{)Y
S�� :�;t,:�h�d: lacatian rnap
t'1V'IJ[1`t.: Bi` 1�CI)U'f [:I.I�fI�R:�L ItPti(yCftCCSI'ROFL.tiSIOtiAL
NO SURVEY REQIiiR�l� — HistorFc Struekures
''y r
; � %;--
��r5;' "�'��.i�`���—'—._r�i���°�,.Z.���
',llif) I (.�rlin;,il ke�,our�_cs Spc�lal;�C
`�_�+ � �

Project Trocking No. (lntemal Use)
11-09-0016
NO PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC PROPERTIES
PRESENT/AFFECTED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Str. #280069
WBS No:
FA. No:
17BP.9.R.18
n/a
Federa! (USACE) Permit Required?
Caunty:
Document
Davidson
PCE or CE
Funding: � State ❑ Federal
� Yes ❑ No PermitType: NWP3orNW14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 69 over Reedy Creek on SRI502 (Craver Rd) in Davidson
Counry, North Carolina. The archaeological APEjor the project measures 600jt in [englh (300ftfrom
each bridge end point) by ISOft in width (75ft laterallyfrom each side oJthe SRI502 center-line). The
project constitutes, as currently proposed, an in place replacem.ent utilizing an o.jf-site detour during
construction activities. Some minar ditch-line impacts are scheduled to occur.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) reviewed the subject project and determined:
Historic Architechue/L.andscapes -
❑ There aze no Na[ional Register-listed or Smdy Lis[ed properties willtin the projecPs azea of potential effects.
❑ There aze no properties less than fifiy years old tvhich are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G wi[hin [he
projecPs area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the projecPs area of poten[ial effects.
❑ There are properties over fifty years old within the area of poten[ial effects, but they do not meet !he criteria for
listing on the National Register.
❑ All properties greater [han 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered and al1 compliance for historic
architecNte with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been comple[ed for
this project.
❑ There are no historic properties presen[ or affected by this project. (Altach any no[es or documenLt as needetn
Archaeology
� There aze no Nationzl Register-listed or Study Listed properties wilhin the projecPs azea of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface azchaeological investigations aze required for this project.
� Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
� Subsurface invesUga[ious did no[ reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the
National Register.
❑ All idenufied Archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for
azchaeological resources with Section 106 of the Nationa] Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been
completed for this project.
� There are no historic pmperties present or affected by this project. (AUach any notes or documents as neede�
"No Huioric Prapenier Prerem"form far MinarTrantpormiion Hojecrs as Qunlified in tAe 2007 Programmaiic Agreemenr.
XCDOT Archaealogr & Huloric Archirecnve Gro �

v
O
�
m �o'm �O<�mc 01s�3 fo'co�mm.
d m � � fD m d c m� m m a m Q a�' ¢ y��
a. m m K��� o c� m c°1i 'm E d���,
mm s� y'. m� m �3 �� E m �� a°'- u°1i �c �
>> _'O O 3- N X N U.
4� N 1
�� m 3^' `° � �_. � � o rn� � � � �'o i
n�O��D ���m�y "m°-m Fm�'�o 0
� 'o � a c �. � 2 3 � _ _ � o m � c
�< fU � N ti"O N N Q O. [�(� :�
.l�-�' O- ��� O N O N O n N N N N(D N`G d(L
� d-imaa3�y��r^n� m mo� o.m� <
tl^� j S d O. �� n O N O O? N�l0 .i1Z
° � m � � 3 ° a � m � � 3 n � m °,d �
�o��Dm�'�mQm o�g,3 mmm mrooc
� . � . m a Q'< a
��`��° nm HTmo�' m3�2���� � � �z
. c- f m �c m . m o o. m c
�°c� m�-OV�°^��3�o�omoa�
30�¢o m � a oFc �o�c
ap � m 3� ma �c �� w Qd ' p¢
N N!D N O� O' N y C� p"Oj O f�l W=�' � y F N
d
0 0� � s� � m o� � y m,� ro �. c� m°n
m m �
�� ��~ F N J J O(� d`G O N N.Z C C �
� 3'� m 3 n=' � n o m m�� o° �'� n>>
�p d� y y m�;� � a � m F�� ° o'�" io m
°.� cQ°1°�m�d.mm�d ��3o°m
m� o c � ti µ w F v���� D� m m � m
An s�D.3-mo�.o`=c�i a° f o�o��y3
N� N d. ��< S� = C a. � p U N
� 3 K� N. S f� (l � y Of �i N� N 4� C � N
H�?, �� fD S� �, y�. D� p f N�.�i j O
m
� y n o � � � o m � m
-. o Q �� f�� f m n�2 a y�(� `c �� m
__ � � d—
�a ooQ� d» °'=f on�
"�.m m� v m"� s m°m y s n m o c o�
N N S N �' � y f� ¢ N � N O S d.�J (� � N(D
3�� y c f. P� a �°� ���� a f0 �' m m
n o < a� F°�� m 3� g m� m m
o� �m s QmoN�� mmo �'mms�'o
3 g�� � � m o o� m m
ot �'p 7 N y= ry l� �^ N.�. _' O. N C3i N U N
¢ c� ���? �� n m a m � d m y 3�a �
o'mm.s3� ¢p1.9 .mm�c� �m�^°-'
� N -
Q ii" � N (J O�(� j� N �.'O 6(D � Q N 7
�� o m S c m°-� a3 n+ �� tim "m
� 3 Tv°.`�;:� fD'nn-o�o�� � c
fD `N N N� N F'O O O n�� N ID 3 C(D
� O Gl N� 6 L, Q"O (,p = y j O N D � d
E = N .� N d
O t0 ��� Ov. N N S J N�' � N i��� S
n � � m o � Q � �.o � o � � � � x � m
��m�3°���=3 mn'c�'�o°����
� �m�mc �3°mmd�o:'m�am='Oc
�V �2 y. � Q n N C� f/i N y(p �� j O. �
�xm �o i.�°mf °F�o�^°^�r�.
f0 (D C � � "O S (0 � '.'Z ,O (U �, C .i � (�G O � �
N 2� �� N<=� �j N S p) 'O ��� S d`G N
O O '�]' - � .�-. y � d �. N Ol � � � � � ? �
^(0 y�� N N`.. 3 � O d� p_ � yO N
S . d
G D' � C� q'O i N O�2 �� p- Q�� O
� �➢1 � d N(� � d N d' S �(O
� m m a a p1 9°� o� m a m m� c � ra°n s
o � '- 0 3 � °x � � < o. � < m m^ !^
ay Q F o � m m m 3 0�, A a
a� 'o a =� m
m Q n o'm 3�<^ m A n m m��� o�
� c F' <° �p " n°� m f?" m m
�c�i o a.m � � �
� m n 3 a o
. � � 3 � � m m . � � m � �o
0 0 � � ; n �
ti
`C
�'
rn
m'
m
�.
J
0
m
�
�
�
N
y
0
�
�
Z
n
�
A
N
�
a
m
a
Q
N
N
N
n
N
O
�
0
v
3
m
�
m
m
�
b
b
m
�
. �
7 y
m O
m m
3 �^
F
Z �
n �
x
i m
V �
,ZJ A
d A
�' T
� �
��
Z +
n �
N _
V �
O (n
N
�
m
0
0
,z;
�_
5`
<
Q7
� �s
�:
�
3�c
� F
1d
�
�o
Z '3
� $
m .
m�
O
�1 m
93
z
.i
s
O
m
O
s
m
3
m
0
a
m
°o
�
3".� /

Ms. Amy Euliss
NCDOT Division 9 Environmental Of�icer
North Carolina Deparhnent of Transportation
375 SIlas Creek Parkway
Winston-Salem, North Cazolina 27127
DearMs. Euliss:
�.-
�
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
Febmary 4, 2014
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 9 Project, Replace Bridge over Reedy Creek on SR 1502, Davidson County;
WBS Element 17BP.9.R.19
The pucpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will pmvide the
compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information received from you on February 4,
2014, the impacts are located in CU 03040103 of the Yadkin River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region,
and aze as follows:
Yadkin Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03040103 Non- Coastal
Cp Cold Cool Warm Riparian Ri arian Marsh Zone I Zone 2
Impacu 0 0 112.0 0 0 0 0 0
(feeUacres)
This impact and associa[ed mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2013 impact data.
EEP will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the nnpacts associated
with this project as detennined by the regulatory agencies using [he delivery timeline listed in Section F3.c.iii of the
N.C. Depar[ment of Envuonment and Natura] Resources' Ecosystem Enhancemen[ Program In-Lieu Fee Insh-ument
da[ed July 28, 201 Q If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mirigation acceptance letter will
no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
8420.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-
Sincerely,
, ; , t` !
, _ i. .
James�B. Stanfill
EEP Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of Water Quality
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA
File: SR 1502 — Bridge — Division 9
Re,sto��... �r2+i�u;c�cy... Pv�otect� o�.r,Y lta,te
�'F�'�
NCDENR
North Camlina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-707-8976 / http:!/portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep

�
�
�
a
�
�
�
�
V
W
O
�
�
�
l�
U
�
�
O
V
See Sl.eet 1-A For Index of 5/eets lNOT INCLUDED IN R/W PLAN51
See Sheel 1-B For Symbolagy Shyet
� - - DETOUR ROUTE
- STA. 11+50.00
BEGIN M
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 700
PLANS
50 25 0 50 700
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
�7I°�`l[°1� �1F 1�T�lfg°][�1�[ ��l[$�1L,�l�T�
.L1/ll�ll���A\' �ll' �ll�14� V'W � ll �
DAVIDS011t C�U11tTY
LOCATIOK• REPLACE EXISTIII(G BRIDGE 1V0. 69
SR 1502 - CRAVER RD.
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, WIDENI11lG,
BOX CULVERT Al\'D PAVEMEIVT MARKIIVGS
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
TO OLD US HWY 52
/0
\
�
<' � � �
, , � � �
k � � � �
.t � t � �
+OO PUE
65'
BOX CULVERT
,. 12+01.80
\ +33 ` +4Z
� � 55 `: , 5/'
; \ .
_ �
� ti�` 0 � #.
� �
� � ;� � a 3
t t � � � �
r —
_ _ � � \` .
70
30' /
-L- STA. 12+g0.00
END MILLING & C
\\�
�—
i �
^ 17BP.9.R.18 �
Nq� 83
NC GR/D
END TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.18
CRAVER RD SR 1502
� +49.34
30' a'. 30'
PuE +49.34
END BOX CULVERT 65'
�
���F�
DESIGN DATA PROJECT LEIYGTH ruwn rrc[r'vrtu en: PLFNS PREPMEO FOR:
� DIVLSIOX OF HIGHWAYS
ADT = 840 ��F
�''��P1��°'E �ABtT 1000 Birct Ridge Dr.
V = 45 MPH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.1$ = 0.040 MI �"; „o.,",a,"" Rataigh NC, 3]610
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.18 = 0.005 MI +orz saamnxn SPBfIP(G110N5
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.18 = 0.045 MI ��T OF WAY DAT6: DAVID KEISER, PE
JANUARY,2013 PAO�Of'B"'O°'�"
LETTlNG DATE: LAUREN JACKSON, EI
PAO/bC! DHSIGN %NGINHeR
NCDOT CONTACT.• �TTHEW JONES, PE
DMSlON BAm(i8-PFOGRMI ALtNA(igR ,
RD
rd.vNi.v�r�
ROADWAY DESIGN
EXG7NEER
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 1 OF 4
INCOMPLETE PLANS
PoR R/w ANNSITION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DI['ISION OF ffiGHWAYS
STA7L OP NORTH CAROLINA
� No�
. �
i
e• nr.r

N �/1
0 �
O
0
� �
I
i0 010 u5 MV/ 52
BL POINT DESC. NORTH EAST ELEVATION
1 28-0069-1 795989.2500 1623528.7490 755.78
3 28-0069-3 796327.5020 1623473.9447 752.96
2 28-0069-2 796655.1351 1623389.2513 757.72
750
N 740
COIR FIBER
Q MATTING
RE10
I CRnvEF ±`
�t)�tl..y��nl��[y �y.'
�o����
� ��_y,____
PUE
LdRRY E. HEGE `��
O
L STATION OFFSET
OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
12+41.86 16.14 RT
�UTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
lVAIIUN = /JJbV
E �623574
11+8/JO 1071Y RIGHT
!N SOU7H 5/DE OF l2'
10
DAVIIDSI)N C�UNTY
Il,�W IMPACT BRImGE
sTnucruae rzaoonv
LS U4I1-060
WBS t>8P.9A10
TIP IlBP.9.R.I8
-CLASS IRIP RPP
AND GEOTEXTILE
EST.I40 i0N5
EST.l02 SY Gi
�
I PCP
� �\ �� MICHAEL H.CA<VER
�� � —L— STA/2+8pA
35 � �5,,. N AIILLIN
�
i5 +48 � \�` RLAY _�_
5l' +40� °� Esoe:,n� END
jd +�rq �//o raore�
. < �i Y �"¢e � nw�oEv
Y
Y�
�� SO fXlERPPoSf /VO
F
"�gg=3 �° � ^•—w +4934
+70 d 3a
uE 3a euE +4934
COIR FIBER 65
f3� 8.8g MAT7/NG
\, 65
�eFy
LAPFY E.HELE
O
CLA55 I RlP FAP
ANO GEOTEXTILE
EST.135 TONS
Esr.90 sr cr
z
11 12 13
14
I"
�
0
0
m
N
z
� in
�a�
NO.
nronnuuc
ENGINEER
roYaT paA.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 2 OF 4
DATUM DESCRIPTION
iNE LOC�LIZEO COOfl01NAiE SYSiEN DEVELOPEU FOR iN15 PROJEGi
IS B�SEU IX1 iHE SiAiE PLRNE COOA�INAiES ES7RBLISNE� BY
NC�Oi fIXi IIONNENi '2B-0069-1'
MIiH XAO B3/NSRS Y007 STpiE PIANE GRID COONUINATES Of
NORINING: i95989.250(ftl EASIING: 162152B.i491f11
ELEVAlION: i55.i01f11
iNE AVEPRGE C�I61NE� GRIU FALiqt USE� R1 iN15 PR0.1EC�
ICRqINO i0 CR101 I5: 0.9999fl5651
iNE N.G LRBERi Gfl10 BEARING ANO
LOCALIZEO XpRIZONiAL GflOUN� OIS7ANCE GROM
'28-0069-i' 10 -EL- SiAiIR! 10�00.0� IS
N ti'd5'S0.84' Y tOLBi'
ALL L1�4AR �IIENSIONS ARE LOCALIZEO NpNiZONTAL UISTRNCES
VENiILAL �AiUM USEO IS NAVp BB
CULVERT HYDRAUL/C DATA
DES/GN D/SCHFRGE = 950 CFS
DES/GN FREWENCY = 25 YRS
D£S/GN hW ELEVAT/ON = 7506 FT
BASE DISCHARGE _ 1406 CFS
BASE FREWENLY = /00 YRS
BASE HW ELEVAT/ON = 75236 FT
OVERTOPP/NG D/SCHARGE = 400 CFS
OVERTOPP/NG FREWENLY= 500— YRS
O✓ERTOPP/NG ELEVAT/ON = 7542 FT
eM�z e�evar�oN = �sz�z
N 796655 E /623389
L STATION 19+50 TO BM'2
N l5'28'25'W Dlst /3033'
REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED
'28-0069-2' 6ET FLUSH Wl7H GROUNDI
POINT LIES 5'WEST OF EGGE OF
CRAVER ROAD
760
750
730

��
•
•
•
•
TO OLD US HWY 52
BM•l ELEVATION = 755bd
N 796282 E 1623574
L 57AT/ON !l+8/JO 107.0' RIGHT
RR SPIKE !N SO(/7�H 5/OE OF l2' OAK
0
COIR FIBER
MATTING
REID
CRAVER
LIN. FT = 33
= 0.02039848 �
REID
CRAVER
` `��
�r
� fE�ES� B��SCH�ILT� � ��a �
� � �c O � � � � \ � °�� �
� � � � � � � � � �� ��� �
3EXSTING R/W� � � � � �
\ �� � �
° ��' �—`� \I'' � �
— — � —WLB— — — — — '?' . j \
� PUE
BL POINT DESC. NORTH EAST
1 28-0069-1 795989.2500 1623528.7490
3 28-0069-3 796327.5020 1623473.9447
2 28-0069-2 796655.1351 1623389.2513
DAVIDSON CmUNTY
LmW IMITACT BRIIDGiE
STRUCTUAC RBOC69
IS �9-II-MA
WB9 1IBP.9.H19
TIP 1]BP.9.0.16
SR I502 17' 85T � �
�MAycRE �LIN.�T-18 ��r
ABA�tD'oNEO -- z��cP ':. 4�
OWNER UNKNOWN T
GUY ID"402,25 � �
OWNER UNKNOWN A1
POw& � 2� LIN. FT = 22 �U
i� 3i,ao �� �
�/ ��
�� �
LARRY E. HEGE S BM�I
O
ELEVATION L STAT]ON OFFSET
755.78 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
752.96 12+41.86 16.14 RT
757.72 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
CLASS l RlP RAP
AND GEOTEXTILE
Esr. i4o roNs
EST. l02 SY GT
� �
�
i / 3�,. RC
F "- �
� �
� �
� ` LIN. FT = 90
�
. � �s,
� � ��F
� � c�
� ` 9G
\ �.F90
� � �
\
�
STOKES E.
HEGE JR
MICHAE� R. CRAVER
PEDESTAL
DESTROYED
G"9PC�` �
� �
` EXISTINC
� � �
� �1., - �1T–� i �
z
o��n
ENGINFfR ENGMEER
INCOMPLwE E PLANS
R
PRELIMIN RYA PLANS
W Nvf use {q NN9]R11Cnory
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 3 OF 4
IN
BM'2 ELEVATION = �577Z' Cp
N 796655 E 1623389 �
L 57A7/ON 14+50 TO BM'2 �
N l5'28'25'W D/si 13033'
REBAR WlrH /+LUMINUM C?P STAMPED IO
'28-0069-2'(SET FLUSN WITN GROUNDJ 6l
POlN7 UES 5'WEST OF ECGE OF �
CRAVER RO?D �
iN
OWNER 11NKNOWN
POWER ID"32542090
� �
�_ � _ GRAU 350
W _
=T 70 ENTERPRISE RD
� ---__ F�
� ��-n069-3 EX�Sr�N� R�W �
Li�.l FT = 24
c,�
FF�
w
�
E PUE —�
� COIR FBER
MAT T lNG
LARRY E. HEGE
O
CLASS l RlP RAP
AND GEOTEXTILE
Esr. i35 ToNs
EsT,90 sr �r
�PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT
z. ��;A; TEMPORARYWETLAND
IMPACT
�PERMANENT CHANNEL
IMPACT
�TEMPORARY CHANNEL
IMPACT
25 12.5 0 25 50
SCALE: 1"=25'

PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 4 OF 4
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- STA. 11+50.00 to -L- STA. 13+g6.00 3@ 8'x7' RCBC 0.02 0.02 112 75
TOTALS: 0.02 0.02 112 75

ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
uuwxxc
701Y STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
S865S BftOSION ANO 58DAf&Y! CONSROL PfANS COAIPLY
WRH 1H6 AHGlILfS(ON3 58! PoHSfl BY SAS
NLfiO/pW ' L CONSIRfICRON PHRMQ HPFELiNH AlIGl1SI l� ]OL
ISSII� BY lRH NOA1H GUfOfA'A 08PAftSA1&Y! OP &YVpONA16N]' AA9
NANAAL F&SOURCCS DMSION OP WAIPF QUALIIY.
NOTFS: ANV DEYIATON FROM OP�IONS GIVEN WILI
REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER.
ADDrt10NAL EkO510N CONTROL DP/ICES MAY
NEE� TO eE INSTALLEO AS OIRECTEO 9Y THE
ENGINEER.
20Il2 ST�tNID�LR�D ➢It.�WINGS
1605.01 Tempo�vy Sil� Feuce 1633.01 Tempo�vy Nuck �t C6wk Tme A
1606.01 8peeiel&ilima�Couo-olFeore 1630.06 9peria19tiWq�Beuu
1622.01 iempawy Be�me eud Sbce ��o•
163LO1 N.triv�imr.11euav
�, rv�e� �_.
� � � wErcANOs
- -WLB
$Fd ° n..�.,,.�;�. � , ,
1605.01 Tampa.a�y S�li F��« .. .. .�„ µ-��
1606A1 Sm�,.l Sed„�ene Cene,ol F.., . �
1622.01 Te��na..n B�.m: e�d Slope ➢r.:n.. ...... T� �
1630.02 S�la Be.;n T>c� B. ........... � i
1630.Od T�mpora.r Silt D;t�6 . ... ,„
1630.05 Ta�neo...y D;.�:.;on . ......._ - ,a _
1630.06 5����si St;ll;�g Bas��
1632.03 Ro�k I�let Seef�e�e T..p Tyye C.. .. .�
1633.01 TPmyo�..r Re�k SJe C6e�k T�a� A... .. ..�
T..myo�.,y Re�k SJe C6«k �P�yrA ,.;e6 O
J'datt�rs e�A Wolra�:ylom�de (PAi1). ...... �
1633.02 T=mpo�..� Ra�k Sile C6e�k T>p�-B..... �
Naee;e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
J
Wee�le ..Ith Pol>.���7eroide (PAMJ . �
163�.02 T�mno�•.r Aa�k Sed�Aenz Dem TrarB . �
1635.01 Ro=k P;ne Inlet Sed�me�t T..p Tya� A..
�. ��� C�> � �(�> �. � C�) .` � � ��� (�> �.
REIC
�.r � CR� -E'
f�"g:
1.�.�\�.�F. ; � \ /
�.. � � i
� � �� /��
�
O �;�,\ .
� ,,
T�P.E�� � o�HUI TZ � i `���
- -wLB- � -_�_•��'(e ��p � .
������..-'Y_. � Y' � 'Y . P
I 'Y 'Y �Y �� �Y �Y �Y i�\ � , , � .
� � � � � � � .. � �m K � �
3 �c � � .: � �. ._ � .� '� � , y�;�,�, Ai-1 .
� �i' ]� -'Y.. �Y �1' �Y 'y �Y l \��_� '� '
� �c �_ � � �k � _� . �e - 'Y �/ B .. i
-w�e- - - -
- -@ .-- . __ _._ I� _ j
- (n -
, x
_ ,- - W
-JS
�. .-,- - _._ ����
�� o,.,.Er �NKVCwv
u+ �� �v �o a 2�5
¢ GNt r U�'<NChV �MPERVIOUS
� PC'N�"EL 0lKE
IC'31,c
-- PUE --- �(S�
_,.=.F:Y E HF_G� CLASS lRIP RAP
� AND GEOiEXrILE
EST.l35 TONS
EST.90 SY GT
��� � . '� \��.
��'C`�nf.��' �. �.�h.� �'
` CLASS lRIP RAP
��aNO cEOrExn�E _ - -
Esr.i4o roNs
' Esr.io2 sr cr
i �
� �� PE�ES`-t-'--_---�/
� f�,. DESTFOVEU
'` � ��n' Ol�NER _NRVO":N
1 / . '3WEC ID'375 �2010
�✓
1 �
�AT-1
� _ _ _ - . _ . �,v �
--T (n �
_ _ I _ k GRAU 350
- - --,y - . - � -
���.� - - -- _��-------�
d
U�f � PJ,IE - PUE - PUE �
��t�' _�RV �. ��.f G�
' S10KE� � ' '� . ��.. -.,
H=GE JR � A� -
��F
F
PROJfR REFERENCE NO. I SHFE! NO.
WN SHEeT NO.
VRE➢.IMINAR:ST P7.AN5
QEARING AND GR11991NG
EROSION CONTROL f-00.
CONST0.UCIION SNEEf 4
0
c,
�_
� \ r,
�, �� -
s= �
"' o
�
�
CONSTRUCTION SEDUENCE - PHASE I � CONSTRLICTION SE�UENCE - PHASE II
I. INSTALL PHASE ISTILLING BASIN I. PLACE PHASE IIIMPERV10�5 �IKES
2. PLACE PHASE IIMPEftVI0l15 DIKES 2. ONERT CHANNEL FLOW THROUGH NORTH BARREL
3. MAIN7AIN CHANNEL FLOW THROUGH EXISTING STREAM 3. CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM AN� �OWN STREAM PORTIONS OF CENTER AND
9. CONSTR�CT lIPSTREAM AND DOWN STREAM PORTIONS OF NORTH BARREL, SOl1TH BARRELS,WINGWALLS,AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
WINGWALLS, AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS 4. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
5. REMOVE PHASE IIMPERVIOUS DIKES 5. REMOVE PHASE IIIMPERVIOl15 DIKES
`� $� � � iY� � OIKE � P�� '_ � �� _
. �l1AN�L fA(PRQKEME r5 - � �SPEC(AL� �� 7E� ��N e(MP(70��1/F�V _ _ /,ypERVl0U5 DIKE
� IMPERVf0U5
� \ � � � 'Y 571(11NG �. �� � �� '�. � } � SPECIAL� `���
�t � � � ��, � � � ��easrN ` � � � �� �� � � � ��/�\easrrv�� . �
. � � `V � �A�, oA�-7 �' � �� Y � a �� ���ohi1 � v' I � ��
� ���. -- �� -��- �-�� � - ' - , ..
-Y'-Y� �T� ��� a--' -- - � -� � .� - r
_ 'Y _� � � � AT-7 � _ � � �/ �� '� B I �- _ AT-1
�_ �
--- ,_ _ . _ ..- � � _- - _ _-- -_ -�
�_�uKNC.,w � �A7��7 �
OIKE
&TEi_ i
eC225 m � ��
�"-
��� ,�/ �
\\
\ \
CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE I
� _ -
' pIIIIES �
I. Cl1LVERT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORME�
IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATION SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2. IMPERVIOUS �IKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE
WORK FROM STREAM FLOW AS NECESSARY.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED
WITHIN 29 HOlIRS.
4. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL
BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES
POLYETHYLENE SHEETING. DIVERSION PIPES, AND
HOSES.
5. PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE SUFFICIENT 70
❑EWATER THE WORK AREA.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PUMP SEDIMENT-
LA�EN WATER �IRECTLY INTO STREAM. FOR
�E-WATERING OF CULVERT SI7E5, 7HE
CONTRACTOR SHALL FILTER SEDIMENT-LADEN
WATER THROUGH SPECIAL SE�IMENT BASIN.
� � �
AT,-7
%/ I:
�/ I
_ -\�.
\ \
�- __
4���
CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE II
� 5oale P' = 3U'
80' D SD' S0'
��rzzz :-��,

AOADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
uuion�c
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
]885H &XOS(ON A.YO S8UAIHM CONIROL PIANS COMPLY
WIS/f I)(b' A8GlIL1S(ONS SSI £ORIA BY lH6
NC(]-0IIXW Gffi�RAL CONSIAlILTlON PHAM(I PPPBLT(['b AUGUS]' ]� ]Dll
ISSII%U HY lHB NORZII CAFOIALI D�.1R .]'N8N]' OP HNVatOK1f8N! AAD
NA]'URAL RFSOfIRCES DMS(ON OF W�UBR QUAIJIY.
�wLB� —�,�
i� � � wEr�aNOs
— —WLB —
S[d R 1]n. n6en e ��
1605.01 T�mpo�e.r S�le Fe��� . .... . ...
1606.01 Sna��.] Sed�m�nt Cane,ol F���e �
1622.01 T�mne�.=� Be,.�. e�d Slon= ➢�.�ns.. ....
1630.02 Si1tBe=ImTrn=S� ��----- -�---� � �
1630.03 T�mpo:e.> S:le DIt�A .. ... . .... ,..
1630.05 T��neo�a.y Df.ar.fan....... .... _ � .� —
1630.06 Sp�aa15619.ag BESi�
1632.03 �to�k Inl�a 9�d����,e T�ep Typ� C. ... �
1633.01 T�.mno...r Ro�k Silt Ch«k T�p� .�4. .... .�
1'emn��.=r Ra�k S:le Che�k Trn='�# ..;t6 O
Msee�nx ood Polrn=.rlem�de eP.^��I7..... �
1633.02 Tempoea�� Re�k 5ilc CFo�k 'Trna Il. . �
R'.tclo_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �
�Vaecl� ..ith Po1y.���lemfAe (PAM> -- �
163A.02 T�mye.en Ro�k S�diment Dam Tyre'B .... �
1635.01 Ro�k Psa� I�l�e Sed�m��t '4'..n 'P�a=-.� . ..
�I . I �\ ��� � � ��� �.
RE D
C R ."c R
_
C?i. 'F1.
� � �
\i'i
C U
Tz.PFS,i E. �C^UL�Z (�
� — —w�a- —�'<e \i
� � � � � � � � � �
i � � � � � � � � � m`K
� � � � � � � � �. 1
� � � �c � � � � \
k � � � � � � � � � `
��—� w�e�—� �—�—� �
° � r
�
5 �
I 1
Wi
a
�
� PUE
�\
������� ����
RC'
� i �- r��CN,;tL �'.. CF2�"=�.
� �
� �
+QJ
�p_J I
m P�F '" �1 �5—�
u
�N O /
m �
/� �
� � �
W REMOVE
—JS —.. ._ �. _2d§°C�' 24„
OWNEr. JN6NON:0 —` �'�0�;~�
GLI° .[7°<CZ.ZS '�7'�;�
OWNEF UNKNOWh AT-1 q
�'WwiE�_p5 IMPEkVl0U5 d�.
i��3i,���Uh DIKE PUE �_—
_. �,�� E. NEC_
�`J
AMIT SACHAN
LEVEL III NAME
3235
LEVEL III CERTIFICATION NO.
C
;TOKfS E.
HEG� J�'
PEf7E�T..'.
CE�TROYE�
�w�,��a ��u�cmowN
PO�.�R D`32E42090
� � AT-1
��
�
X GRAU 350
7Trrr-e-ez-�
� ITII� ill III III
��
Q�
�
- PUE - — PUE
�`. ��FO
t
✓s ✓S C�FF
�
2QD12 S'Il'.�NII3.9.R� S�EBAWINGS
]605.01 Tempaeeey Sil� Fmce 1W3.02 Tempo�e.v N«k 9i1� (]�eek Type B
1606.01 9ped.ISedimev�C000-olFevce
]622.01 Tamporvy eerms md 91oce �o+
163L01 M.eengln.ml6aon
� �
x
�
W
7
PUE J
_,7P.Y _. H=G�
�
ENGINEFR
PRELIMINARY PLANS
no0. C
O
m
� �� -
� � r,
n c� -
�x i
"' c
J>
0
NOTES: ANY OEVIAPON FROM ORrIONS GIVEN WILL
REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY EN6INEER.
AD�ITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY
NEE� TO BE IN5fALLED AS DIRECrED BY THE
ENGINEER
S�al� 1" = 30'
SD' 0 30' b0'
r�rir �t—�

���V����N �]F lH[��G]H[�A��Y�
�°J[°A°]ClE �lF N�Il$°]Cl�][][ �A�$�]L�N�
SOIL STABILIZATI011t
MATTING FOR EROSI011t CONTROL
CONST LINE FROM TO SIDE ESTIMATE (SYJ
SHEET N0. STATION STATION
5U tOTAI.
MIyGEI.I-ANE U5 MAifINb 10 0E INSfA I.EO A5 OIRE fE0 6Y 1NE NbINEER
TOtAI.
5AY
PRELIMINARY FLANS
:e rox
SUMMARY SHEET
PERMANE11iT SOIL REINFORCEME11tT MAT
CONSi LINE FROM TO SIDE ESTIMATE (SYJ
SNEET N0. SrATION STATION
4 -�- 10-25 11�50 l.t 175
5U tOtAl. 175
AD01 f I ONAI- 5RM 10 6E I NSfAI.l.EO
TOtAI. I 75
5AY 175

�IVI�I�N �F HIG�IW��'S
S�[°A�'� �F N�RTH CAR�LIN.�
SOIL STABILIZATI011t TIMEFRAMES
PRELIMINARY PLANS
Po0. LON9i0.V[TON
SITE DESCRIPTION STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW) ZONES 7 DAYS NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
SLOPES 3:IOR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50'IN
LENGTH.
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1 14 DAYS NONE,EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND H�W ZONES.

0 2.5 5 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEEf NO.
f--i�-1 178P.9. R. 18 X-1
5 1 1 I 1 7 2
IN OM 9,E E 4,A 5
I'R LIM NA Y �LA 5
b, - 2.
�� `
_ _
�
ti 9
\ — —
1 .
i
� �. IN W
� — — — _ _ I
_i_
12 + �. 0
� �
c>'
. , , , ,

0 2.5 5 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEEf NO.
�E;�:� i7BP.9.R.18 X-2
1 1 1 1 2
INC M ET P AN
� RE IM NA �' LA S
I
- - \ - - -
+
� - :J
— 13+ 0. 0 -- -- --
I
� _, ��
--- --
13+ 0. 0 — --
- � 4•
i
-- � 12+ 0. 0 � -- --
> — ?�
�� � �
-- -- 12+ 0. 0 �
�—
�a£ �
5 � � 1 1

+
+
BENCH MARK "I: RAILROAO SPIKE IN NORTH EAST ROOT OF A Z9" H OAK TREE. STA. 11+qq.00-L- 35' LEFT. EL. 717.96
L -� - _
'y `° ' -_ -
b '� GUARDRAIL
� _^ y f ,� � PAYA� TEM)DTYP ll ANO - "
�
BY
�
�
�
I �
z
0
�
AND
PAY
INOIAN GRQ�
�/
X `� X�"�
A. 13+50.00 -L- '� Jj
J �`
-IS"H R.C, PIPE \
THROUGH
WING WALL ___
W \
�
' �FOR IJTILITY INFO
LOCATION SKETCH
'E -L-
� I . "'
. -
""".._."""' """"'"'_"'""_"""""""'_' ""'""'"__ __"" '" "_ "' ..
EL.705.0a EL 705.0*- EL.705A*
PROFILE ALONG � CULVERT
DAiE �
D4iE :
ROADWAY DATA
CRADE PT.EL.(il STA.13+50.00 -L
BED EL.ca STA.13+50.00 -L-
ROA�rypy SLOPES
HYDRAULIC DATA
DESICN OISCHARGE
FRE�UENCY OF DESIGN FL000
OESIGN HIGH WATER ELEVATION
DRAINAGE AREA
BASE �ISCHARGE (0t00)
BASE HIGH WATER ELEVATION
=718.32
=704.90
=2:1
=650 C.F.S,
45 YR.
=713.00
=1.6 5�. MI.
=1020 C.F.S.
=714.39
OVERTOPPINC FLOOD DATA
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE =2000 C.F.S.
FREOUENCY OF OVERTOPPING FLOOD =500+ YR.
OVERTOPPING HIGH WATER ELEVATION =717.30
TOTAL STRUCTURE OUANTITIES
STAGE I STAGE II TOTAL
CLA55 � CONCRETE
BAFFEL Q0.868�y/FT (SiAGE I)2•829CY/FT 6iAGE IU 36.9 �,Y. 120.2 C.Y. 157.1 �,y,
SILLS LT C.Y. 1.7 C.Y. 3.4 C.Y.
WING ETC. �7•9 C.Y. 22•4 C.Y. 40.3 C.Y.
SU6 TOTALS 56.5 C.Y. 1493 C.Y. 200.8 C.Y.
REINFORCING STEEL
BARREL Sl9Z L85. 14550 LBS. 20342 LBS.
WINGS ETC. 1235 LBS. 1235 LBS. Z470 LBS.
SU6 TOTALS 7027 LBS. 15785 �BS. 22H12 LBS.
FOIINOATION CONOITIONING MATERIAI, 40 TONS 67 TONS l0'/ TONS
WLVERT EXCAVATION WMP SUM
PLALN RIP RAP CLA55 I 46.8 TONS i13 TONS IIB.1 TONS
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRIICTURE WMP SUM
zs�-o°=
9\Il6P.R.9.li\ItBP.9.P.11:
NOTES
ASSUMED LIVE LOAD --------- HL-93 OR ALTERNATE LOADING.
DESIGN FILL---------------- 3.93 FT. MA%
DESIGN FILL 2.60 FT.MIN.
FOR OTHER DESIGN DATA ANO NOTES SEE STANOAR� NOTE SHEET.
3"0 WEEP HOIES INDICATED i0 BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.
CONCRETE IN CULVERTS TO BE POURED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
STdGE I:1.NING FOOTINGS,FLOOR SLAB INCLU�ING 4"OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS.
2.THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE WALLS.SILLS.WINGS FULL HEIGHT.
STACE II:I.NING FOOTINGS,FLOOR SIAB INCLU�ING 4"OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS.
2. THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF TNE VYA�LS, SIL�S, WINGS Fl1LL HEIGHT
FOLLONED 8Y ROOF SLAB AN� HEADWALLS.
THE RESIDENT ENGINEER SHALL CHECK THE LENGTH OF Ct1LVERT BEFORE STAKING
IT OUT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT IT Y7ILL PROPERLY TAKE CARE OF THE FILL.
�IMENSIONS FOR WING LAYOUT AS WELL AS ADDITIDNAL REINFORCING STEEL
EMBE��EO IN BARREL ARE SHOWN ON WING SHEET.
AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OP7ION.HE MAY SPLICE THE VERTICAL REINFORCING STEEL
A 3 FOOT STRIP OF FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE FILL FACE
OF THE WING COVERING THE ENTIftE LENGTH OF THE E%PANSION JOINT.
FOR C�LVERT �IVERSION DETAILS AND PAY ITEM,SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
FOR Sl1BMITTAL OF WORKING �RAWINGS,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR FALSEWORN AND FORMWORK,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR GROUT FOR STRUCTURES,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR CRANE SAFETY,SEE SPECIAI PROVISIONS,
AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION HE MAY SUBMIT.TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL
PROVI�E THE SAME SIZE AN� NuMBER OF OARRELS AS I15ED ON THE CAST-IN-PLACE
DESIGN.FOR OPTIONAL PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BO% Cl1LVERT,SEE SPECIAL
PROVISIONS.
REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE SHALL 8E PERFOftME� IN A MANNER THAT PREVENTS
DEBRIS FROM FALLING INTO THE WATER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT OEMOLSTION
PLANS FOR REVIEW AND REMOVE THE BRZDGE IN ACCDRDANCE WITH ARTICLE 402-2 OF
THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
THE EXISTING STRUCTl1RE CONSI5T5 OF t SPAN (d 30'-6'C WITH (9'-2°C�EAR ROADWAY AN�
TIMBER �ECK ON STEEL I-BEAMS AN� �OUBLE CHANNELS ON MA55 CONCRETE ABUTMENTS
VYITH STEEL SEATS AND LOCATEO AT THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE REMO4E0.
THE IS"O PIPE THROl1GH THE WING WALL OF THE CULVERT SHALL BE LOCATED BY THE
ENGINEER.iHE REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE FIEL� BENT AS NECESSARY TO CLEAR
THE PIPE.
,00R� uRai;`�,
,�,� ���
_ ''gsee�i `• _
_o: �0,30 :�€
�J9: �.�
'e,�;, O�CltvfF-_P; p, �c
� 4 � �41
PROJECT N0. 17BP.9.R.17
DAVIDSON CouNrY
STATION: 13+50.00 -L-
SHEET 1 �F 6 REPLACES BRI�GE N0.79
su�e or xoxrx ceaa�a�
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
R4ElGX
BARREL STANDARD
TRIPLE 11 FT. X 10 FT.
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
109° SKEW
STD. N0. C6223A
C-I

WAY FILL SLOPE 2:1
RS � =�
L FACE
AM FACE _
-L-
J I
N H
c�i ao GRADE -0.25%
TFi I
O F-F
=. zw
Q HN
N ;�
a i � EIEV.T09.9
m hm
N
e a O�
ti �i�°w¢ CONST. JT.
�`LLw
ao
m:ia
U (�JQy�j
°483 BARS
�EACH FACE STA�
�CONST.JT.
"___ �'
. � �--f— ,]I — �o I
3"0 WEEP HOLES Cil l0'-0"t CTS.�
�R WALL. INTERIOR WALL
;T SECTION NORMAL TO ROADWAY
LENGTH OF CULVERT =
19,_9"
9" 198-°4A100 BARS CJ 4"CTS.(2 BAR RUM _
�ARK) BOTTOM OF ROOF SLAB
5�/ ° 149-"4A300 BARS CJ 5� "CT5.f2 BAR Rl1N) «
TOP OF ROOF SLAB
45 t�a 7�/z"CTS.- CORNER BARS
RIOR WALL ( SEE BARREL SECTION 1~
�_i"_____'_'__ L'�_
0
O +OI
6 g
a m @ �°m�_
¢ o a i awz
� O �� NmVJI¢K
K
� Q � V m rOmQ
ON V�¢m
� � V O
=pW
O ¢ P V
a m _ _,
____ '_ o�___{_'_________'___�
FILL SLOPE 2:1
-9-°SG1 BARS � 3"C1
3-°853 BARS �y
�
I
I
I
I
I
�3-tl8"5" BARS
�
I
_____1',
I
�-'-VY2 /
/
57-4482 BARS fil 9"CTS. �" �
_ FILL FACE °1
V U�
Q Q
'° 43-6481 BARS [J I'-0"CTS. w N��
� w STREAM FACE a V 1
m v� O � �
� Q 6 `�
VI � 2 � �
Q m O O `
m
_ ,,_o� o o Q ,
N �
_ a a a
ol ¢ �
0
� STAGE I � STAGE II
END ELEVATION NORMAL TO SKEW
wfi
SKEW TRIANGLE
•5 EI
EACH
�
�.���� \ , . , � , �
.���♦
����i� � �
0'�i�i�i�i�i�i� � 1 � 1 ��
�i� �����p��� . , .. �
_O:i��y%i%_�i�R� � I

�-
+
u
�
HIGH FLOW BARREL
CONST. JTS
-.n.^ LOW FLOW BARREL
FLOW
IGH FL049 BARR
BACKFILL BAftREL—�
WITH CLAS$ I RIPRAP
PLAN SHOWING BARREL LAYOUT WITH SILLS
NOTES:
PLACE SILLS AT INLET AN� OIITLET OF EXTERIOR BARRELS ONLY.
BACKFILL E%TERIOR BARRELS WITH CLA55 I RIP RAP TO A �EPiH �F Y.
BACKFILL CENiER BARREL WITH CLASS I RIP RAP TO A DEPTH OF 1'.
c
A1 BARS
A2 BARS
ELEVATION
ORPMN 9Y � O.A.�AVENPORi p0.iE : �/� �?/��
CHECKE� 9T : A.P POiEL p4iE : �9/09/13
0
❑'-0" 8" 5'-6'
CI BARS W 1'- 0"CiS. 6"
2"HTGH BEAM BOLSTERS �
( B.BJ (J 3'-0"CTS.
��BARRELST
SYMM. ABOIIT
A300 BARS � THIS LINE 1
A100 BARS CONST. '� � I
�9}'q"HIGN JT. "
i
C.H.C.U. 2"CL 2"CL. I
� BI BARS �
B3 � I
82 BARS r w
g5 ALL C�NTINOOUS o � �
HIGH CHAIR UPPER , a I
t C.H.C.U. t cJ 3,_0" `° �^
CTS. @ � i
U I
� 4
Q
g-p� A2 BARS (SPLICEO m�, i
WEEP HOLES WITH 83 BARS � a I
STAGE I ONLY)
#3�/q"HIGH C.H.C.U. �, �. �
(
N ci A200 BARS A200 BARS�
4400 BARS A940 BARS
° CONST.JT.ISTAGE U
6" Cl BARS (a 1'- 0"CTS. 6"
RIGHT ANGLE SECTION OF BARREL
THERE ARE 139 "C" BARS IN SECTION OF BARREL.
(LOOKING DOWNSTftEAM )
MI
SECTION THROUGH SILL
�Iek�014E15 MAY 9E PUSHED INTO CREEN CONCRETE
AFTER SLAB HAS BEEN FLOAT FINISHED.
CULVERT SILL DETAILS
—�I'k `6"D" 4T A
MAXIMUM SPACING
OF 4'-0"
2 LAYERS OF 30 LB.
R�OFING FELT TO
PREVENT BONO
9\1lBPR9.IT11BP.9A.li_50 N.ppn
v
BAR TYPE
STAGE I
L OF MATERIAL
eq
.4
REINFORCING STEEL 5792 LBS
STAGE II
BILL OF MATERIAL
BILL OF MATERIAL
.q
2 9 STR IO'-1"
2 •4 STR 8•-9"
2 ^9 STR i•_6"
.q
i
REINF�RCING STEEL 14550 LBS
4 STR IB'-9" 25
PROJECT N0. 17BP.9.R.17
DAVIDSON COUNTY
SraTION: 13+50.00 -L-
SHEET 3 �F 6
Si�IE Oi NOPM Cli0.IX.1
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
nncn.
BARREL STANDARD
��" "",,.,, T R I P L E
e"oPtN C4NOq�°°
e'x.! '$Z
,o:�aSE�, � 11 FT. X 10 FT.
;,, �„o :�; CONCR 109 B� KEW LVERT
� ��&.:
PEVISIONS SNEEi NO
I'� na er, oere� xo er, oe*[� C-3
9- .. � ,�..�