20080324 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20140121

o�-Ou
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
2013 Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Alamance County, NC
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit: 03030002
NCEEP Project Number: 92372
NCEEP Contract Number: 4998
Submitted To:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
' NR -WATER UALITY
Sk
FINAL — 2013 Monitoring Report — Year 1 of 5 W usndsar
Project Construction Completed: 2012
Data Collection for Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Report Submitted: July 2013
ern
NCDENR
osystem
PROGRAM

Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
2013 Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Alamance County, NC
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit: 03030002
NCEEP Project Number: 92372
NCEEP Contract Number: 4998
Submitted To:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
FINAL — 2013 Monitoring Report — Year 1 of 5
Project Construction Completed: 2012
Data Collection for Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Report Submitted: July 2013
ern
NCDENR
aae M a 'Y.�t
i"' 9 ?013
NC ECOSYSTEM
�?ANCEME NT PROGRAM
r�
Ecosystem
PROUVAM

Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
2013 Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Alamance County, NC
Cape Fear River Basin
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Prepared by:
EEE Consulting, Inc.
601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101
Cary, NC 27513
Project Manager:
Ray Bode, P W S
(919) 650 -2463 ext. 225
rbode@eee -consu lting.com
July 2013
FINAL
EEE Consulting, Inc.
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions

EEE Consulting, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary/Project Abstract .................................. ..............................1
2. Methodology ................................................................. ..............................3
2.1 Stream Survey Methodology ......................................... ..............................4
2.2 Vegetation Survey Methodology ..................................... ..............................4
3. References .................................................................... ..............................5
APPENDICES, FIGURES, and TABLES
Appendix A: Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1:
Vicinity Map
Table 1 a:
Project Components
Table Ib:
Component Summations
Table 2:
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3:
Project Contacts Table
Table 4:
Project Attribute Table
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2:
Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3:
Conservation Easement Marked Posts
Figure 4:
Final Conservation Easement Plat
Figure 5:
Conservation Easement Coordinate List
Table 5:
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6:
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Log 1:
Established Photo Stations
Photo Log 2:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7:
Vegetation Plot Success by Project Asset Type
Table 8:
CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with /without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Appendix D: Stream Survey
Data
Figure 6:
Cross Section with Annual Overlays
Figure 7:
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Figure 8:
Pebble Counts with Annual Overlays
Table 9:
Stream Bank Erosion Pin Data Table
Table 10a:
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b:
Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 11 a:
Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11 b:
Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: Hydrologic
Data
Table 12:
Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 9:
Monthly Rainfall Data
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of 5; Submitted: July 2013
F 1.\AL
1

EEE Consulting Inc Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The primary goals of this stream restoration project focus on improving water quality, enhancing
flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic habitat. These goals will be accomplished by the
following objectives:
• Reducing non -point sources of pollution associated with former lawn maintenance in the
park area by providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to Little Alamance Creek and its
unnamed tributary and the installation of stormwater best management practices to treat
surface runoff. The riparian buffer will remain in a State -owned conservation easement in
perpetuity.
• Reducing sedimentation on -site and in downstream receiving waters through a reduction
of bank erosion associated with current vegetation maintenance practices and by
providing a forested vegetative buffer adjacent to Little Alamance Creek and its tributary.
• Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and
sediment loads by restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile.
• Promoting floodwater attenuation through increased flood storage capacity by
construction of bankfull benches along Little Alamance Creek and its tributary.
• Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability.
The Site consists of 2,725 linear feet of enhanced (Level I and II) channel along Little Alamance
Creek and its unnamed tributary. The project is located in City Park in the City of Burlington,
Alamance County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The surrounding land use is recreational and the
project is easily accessible by the public. Little Alamance Creek and its unnamed tributary are
located in the 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030002; the 14 -digit Local Watershed
Unit HUC 03030002 - 040010; and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality ( NCDWQ)
Subbasin 03 -06 -03 ( NCDWQ, 2005). The project lies within the Southern Outer Piedmont
ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic province of NC (Griffith et al., 2002). The North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has identified the Cape Fear HUC
03030002, and in particular Little Alamance Creek, in their Local Watershed Plan as needing
repair along with conservation opportunities. Watersheds in this plan exhibit the need and
opportunity for stream and riparian buffer restoration (NCDENR, 2001). In 2000, Little
Alamance Creek was listed as impaired by the NCDWQ due to poor stream biological ratings
(NCEEP, 2008).
Little Alamance Creek was originally planted in April, 2012. On September 11, 2012, the site
was inspected by NCEEP and vegetative sampling reported higher mortality than contractually
permissible. Of the 15 inspection plots, 6 did not meet the 80 percent survival warranty. The
areas identified as needing supplemental planting were re- planted on December 12, 2012.
Monitoring Year 1 efforts showed that the site is currently meeting vegetation success criteria of
320 stems per acre at most plot locations. Vegetation plots 1 through 6 have met this
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year I of 5; Submitted: July 2013
I7N,1 L
2

EEE Consulting, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
requirement; however, vegetation plots 7 and 8 did not (Table 1). Volunteer species are
establishing on site as expected and thus increasing the overall stems per acre. The Total Mean
Density of the site is 809 stems per acre. Three areas were identified with invasive species in the
conservations easement (Figure 2). Along the upper reaches of the unnamed tributary, multiflora
rose (Rosa multiflora) was observed. These areas are negligible in size and are represented as
point features. Along the upper reach of the mainstem, Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) was
observed. This area was also negligible in size and is represented as a point feature. Individual
stems of multiflora rose and Chinese privet were observed throughout the site, but at very low
density. Both multiflora rose and Chinese privet are listed as high concern in the NCEEP
Monitoring Report Template, Version 1.5. However, the presence of invasive species is minor,
covering approximately 5 percent of the planted easement. These areas will continue to be
monitored in the upcoming monitoring years. No other problems areas were observed.
Overall, the Little Alamance Creek Stream Restoration Site is in very good condition. All
structures are intact and performing as intended. The Monitoring Year l thalweg has not
deviated from the design thalweg. There is a notable lack of bank erosion, attributable to low
bank angles and well established streamside vegetation. One small area along the unnamed
tributary downstream of cross section 14 that has minor bank erosion (Figure 2). This area will
continue to be monitored in the upcoming monitoring years. No other problems areas were
observed. Two crest gauges were installed during Monitoring Year 1; one gauge along the
mainstem of Little Alamance Creek and one gauge along the unnamed tributary. These gauges
will be checked starting in Monitoring Year 2 to record the max height of the yearly storm event.
Wetland mitigation is not a part of this project.
Summary information /data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in
the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information
formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly
Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan). These documents
are available on NCEEP's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
appendices is available from NCEEP upon request. Due to contracting issues, no Baseline
Monitoring Report was prepared for this project. As a result, the data collected during
Monitoring Year 1 will serve as baseline data.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
All monitoring methodologies follow NCEEP's 2011 Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation (NCEEP, 2011). This monitoring
report is consistent with NCEEP's Monitoring Report Template Version 1.5 adopted June 8,
2012. GPS data was collected using sub -meter accuracy Trimble Geo XH handheld unit. Stream
and vegetation problems areas were identified and noted in the field on As -Built Plan Sheets
prepared by ARCADIS G &M of North Carolina ( ARCADIS, 2012). Twenty permanent photo
stations were established during the project set up by EEE Consulting, Inc. (EEE) and
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of 5; Submitted: July 2013
/,].\. I L
3

EEE Consultiniz Inc Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
photographs were taken from these locations (Figure 2). Photographs were taken at a high
resolution using a Sony Cyber -shot 14.1 megapixel digital camera.
2.1 STREAM SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Prior to Year 1 monitoring efforts, EEE established eight permanent riffle cross - sections and six
permanent pool cross sections (Figure 2). GPS points were collected on both banks of each
established cross section. The entire length of mitigation, 2,725 linear feet of stream profile, was
surveyed. Stream monitoring and geomorphological surveys were preformed consistent with the
USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the USDA 1994 Forest Service Manual Stream
Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique ( USACE, 2003; Harrelson et
al, 1994). Stream survey data was collected using a Nikon total station with a Recon data logger
and is georeferenced in NAD83 -State Plane Feet- FIPS3200. The data were analyzed using
RIVERMorph. Pebble counts were conducted consistent with the 1954 Wolman Pebble Count
technique (modified by Rosgen, 1996). A random sample of 100 pebbles from each feature of
cross section was collected within the wetted perimeter of the channel. Samples were not taken
from the banks. Photographs were taken at each cross section. A photo was taken from the left
bank looking towards the right bank.
2.1 VEGETATION SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Prior to Year 1 monitoring efforts, EEE established eight vegetation plots per the CVS -EEP vegetation
monitoring protocol (Figure 2). Five plots are 10 meters by 10 meters in size and 2 plots, (VP 6 and
7) are 20 meters by 5 meters in size. GPS points were collected all four corners of each
established vegetation plot. Vegetation monitoring was performed in accordance with the 2008
CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation for Level 1 -2 Plot Sampling Only, Version 4.2
(Lee et al, 2008). Level 2 sampling was performed for each vegetation plot. Each corner of the
vegetation plot was marked with steel electrical metallic tubing (EMT) driven into the ground.
Because the project is within a public park, minimal flagging was used to mark the stems and no
flagging was used to mark the vegetation plot corner pins. Minimal orange flagging was used to
mark only planted stems during vegetation counts. Photographs were taken at each vegetation
plot from the southwest corner facing the northeast corner.
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of 5; Submitted: July 2013
FIA,1L
4

EEE ConsultinP, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
3.0 REFERENCES
ARCADIS G &M of North Carolina, 2012. As -Built Survey of Little Alamance Creek Stream
Restoration. Prepared for the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Griffith, Glenn, J. Omemik, J. Comstock, 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina Regional Descriptions.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Corvallis. OR.
Harrelson, Cheryl C., C.L. Rawlins, John P. Potyondy, 1994. US Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Available URL:
http: / /www.fs.fed.us /rm /pubs rm /rm gtr245.pdf. [Date Accessed: 4 January 2013].
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 Available URL: http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm. [Date Accessed: 4
January 20131.
NC Division of Water Quality, 2005. Cape Fear River Basin Water Quality Plan. Available URL:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ps/bpu/basin/capefear/2005. [Date Accessed: 4 January 2013].
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 2001. Watershed Restoration Plan for the Cape
Fear River Basin. Prepared by: NCDENR, NCDWQ, and NCWRP. Available URL:
http: / /www.nceep .net /services /restplans /cap a fear 2001.pdf. [Date Accessed: 4 January 2013].
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 2008. Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek Watershed Report
& Project Atlas: An Ecosystem Enhancement Program Funded Local Watershed Plan Phase II1.
Prepared by Piedmond Triad Council of Governments. Available URL:
http://www.ptcov-.orp-/121anninp- services/environmental planning/documents /water LATTPhaselll.
pdf. [Date Accessed: 4 January 2013].
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 2011. Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for
Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation. Available URL:
http: // portal. ncdenr .org /c /document_library /get file?p I id= 1169848 &folderld = 2288101 &name =D
LFE- 39234.pdf. [Date Accessed: 4 January 2013].
RIVERMorph Stream Restoration Software, Version 5.1.0. Rivermorph LLC.
Rosgen, D.L., 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs. CO.
US Army Corps of Engineers, 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Prepared by: USACE, NCDWQ,
USEPA, NCWRC. Available URL:
http: / /www.in.gov /idem /files /headwater nc stream mitigation guide.pdf. [Date Accessed: 4
January 2013].
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of 5; Submitted: July 2013
l• l; \,1 L
5

Appendix A:
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map
Table la: Project Components
Table lb: Component Summations
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Attribute Table

SO
Directions to the Site: r r'"a
From Raleigh, take 1-40W to exit 145 for NC 49 toward Burlington/Downtown/Liberty
Turn right into NC 49 North / Maple Avenue
Turn left onto Chapel Hill Road
Turn right onto ..
Turn right onto Overbrook Street
Take second right to stay on Overbrook Street
Slight right to stay on Overbrook Street
4.
e# 4
4 f
J
Wt
Cf��A....- .« �3a - �. i?Ii�e��.� �'( .wss.er•�raW �..•1_ ...mr� ..� /�\ . � /��-
� i -2 :� 1;' .� 1�., uj - :> � r. (. � '' xt °.r �.t ..t - • ,,-.1 �dpe�i
r 1Ir,
.p' �. � I_ - ,. :.F , � "` `'/ 9'^?`a7„ .. "fir � yli �-- 1. { ,l' , � ' . �• �� . �, � .
WO
Source: USDA Digital Raster Graphic Mosaic of Alamance County, NC; 2012
Le end N r` Figure 1: Vicinity Map
9 7 Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Project Reach j ` Alamance County
Streams NCEEP Project Number: 92372
0 750 1, 500 3,000 r EEE Consulting, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5
12 Digit HUC Feet � J Cary, NC June 2013

Table 1a. Project Components
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration /EEP Number (92372)
Project Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
Footage
or
Stationing
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP Elements'
Comment
or Reach ID
Feet/Acres
Level
Ratio
Units
Reach
425 If
El
P3
425 If
10 +25 - 11 +75
1 51
283
;I- ;Tr
12 +25 - 15 +00
Reach b
450 If
El
P3
450 If
10 +00 - 14 +50
1 51
300
Reach I I I
350 If
Ell
-
350 If
15 +50 - 19 +00
2 5 1
140
LS
Reach IV
625 If
El
P3
625 If
19 +50 - 21 +25
1 51
416
LS
21 +75 - 26 +25
Reach V
75 If
Ell
-
75 If
26 +50 - 27 +25
2 5 1
30
Reach VI
500 If
El
P3
500 If
27 +75 - 31 +50
1 51
333
31+75 - 33 +00
133+50
Reach VII
300 If
Ell
-
300 If
—36+50
2 5 1
120
1 = BR = Bioretention Cell, SF = Sand Filter, SW = Stormwater Wetland, WDP = Wet Detention Pond, DDP = Dry Detention Pond,
FS = Filter Strip, Grassed Swale = S, LS = Level Spreader, NI = Natural Infiltration Area, O = Other
CF = Cattle Fencing, WS = Watering System, CH = Livestock Housing
Table 1b. Component Summations
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration /EEP Number (92372)
Restoration Stream Riparian Non -Ripar Upland Buffer
Level (If) Wetland (AN (Ac) (Ac) (Ac) BMP
on-
Rivenne I Rivenne
Restoration
Enhancement
U, "A., °.z
r
Enhancement I 2000
Enhancement II 725
Creation
PreservationAb"
HQ Preservation
rw
Totals (Feet/Acres) 2725
MU Totals 1622' "
„�,��„ Non - Applicable
2

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration /EEP Number (92372)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 1 yrs 6 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 1 yrs 6 Months
Number of Reporting Years: 1
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Institution Date
Nov -06
N/A
Categorical Exclusion
Sep-07
N/A
404 Permit Date
Apr-08
N/A
Restoration Plan
Jan -08
N/A
Final Design — Construction Plans
Sep-10
N/A
Construction
Feb -12
Apr-12
Seeding, bare roots, and live stake planting
Feb -12
Apr -12
Bare Root - Supplemental Planting
N/A
Dec -12
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline
N/A
N/A
Year 1 Monitoring
Mar -13
Jun -13
Year 2 Monitoring
TBD
TBD
Year 3 Monitoring
TBD
TBD
Year 4 Monitoring
TBD
TBD
Year 5 Monitoring
TBD
TBD
Due to contracting delays, no baseline data was collected for this project Although there are no baseline cross sections to compare with MY1 (2013)
measurements, the 2013 cross sections will serve as an adequate baseline for the remaining monitoring period Similarly, no baseline vegetation
data was collected until March 2013, approximately 13 months after planting occurred in February 2012
Bolded items are examples of those items that are not standard, but may come up and should be included
Non - bolded items represent events that are standard components over the course of a typical project
The above are obviously not the extent of potential relevant project activities, but are dust provided as example as part of this exhibit
If planting and morphology are on split monitoring schedules that should be made clear in the table
1 = Equals the number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park ) Stream Restoration /EEP Number (92372
Designer
ARCADIS G &M of North Carolina, Inc
801 Corporate Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Primary proiect desicin POC
Robert Le sic 919 854 -1282 ext 195
Construction Contractor
Shamrock Environmental Corporation
6106 Corporate Park Drive
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Construction contractor POC
336 375 -1989
Survey Contractor
Turner Land Surveying, PLLC
3201 Glenndge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
Survev contractor POC
Elisabeth Turner 919 875 -1378
Planting Contractor
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Planting contractor POC
704 527 -1177
Seeding Contractor
Information Not available
Contractor point of contact
POC name and phone
Seed Mix Sources
Information Not available
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Native, Inc (704) 527 -1177
Monitoring Performers
EEE Consulting, Inc
601 Cascade Pointe Lane
Suite 101
Cary, NC 27513
Stream Monitoring POC
Ray Bode, PWS (919) 650 -2463 ext 225
Ve etation Monitoring POC
ITina Sekula PWS 919 650 -2463 ext 223

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Little Alamance Creek Burlin ton Park Stream Restoration /EEP Number 92372
Pro ect Information
Project Name
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
County
Alamance County
Project Area (acres)
7 06 acres
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36 083566, -79 454233
Pro ect Watershed Characteristics
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 03030002
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 3030002040010
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -06 -03
Project Drainage Area (acres)
2690 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
40 percent
CGIA Land Use Classification
Forest Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach I
Reach III - Tnb
Reach III
Reach IV
Reach V
Reach VI
Reach VII
Length of Reach (linear feet)
425 If
450 If
350 If
625 If
75 If
500 If
300 If
Valley Classification
Type VIII
Type VIII
Type VIII
Type VIII
Type VIII
Type VIII
Type VIII
Drainage area (acres)
2600 ac
124 ac
2630 ac
2650 ac
2655 ac
2680 ac
2690 ac
NCDWQ Stream Identification Score
475
33
475
475
475
475
475
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -V,NSW
WS -V,NSW
WS -V,NSW
WS -V,NSW
WS -V,NSW
WS -V,NSW
WS -V,NSW
Morphological Description (stream type)
C /E5/1
E4/1
C /E5/1
C /E5/1
C /E5/1
C /E5/1
C /E5 /1
Evolutionary Trend
C4/1
C4/1
C4/1
C4/1
C4/1
C4/1
C4/1
Underlying Mapped Soils
Cecil fine sandy loam (CbC2)
Drainage Class
Well drained
Soil Hydnc Class
Non -Hydnc
Slope
6 to 10 percent slopes
FEMA Classification
AE Floodzonel
No Study
JAE Floodzone
AE Floodzone
AE Floodzone
AE Floodzone AE Floodzone
Native Vegetation Community
Mixed Mesic Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
5 percent
Regulatory
Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
Nationwide Permit 27 (Action ID SAW- 2008 -01198 )
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
Nationwide Permit 27 (Action ID SAW- 2008 -01198 )
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
FEMA Floodplain Consistency Checklist (Categorical Exclusion)
Essential Fis` 9s Habitat
No
N/A N/A

Appendix B:
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3: Conservation Easement Marked Posts
Figure 4: Final Conservation Easement Plat
Figure 5: Conservation Easement Coordinate List
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Log 1: Established Photo Stations
Photo Log 2: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Properly Itdbrmmon
Owner Ory of Budingmn
Comsvv - EmemaOt Notes
Arta m Eaumem. 698 Aemm t
Alstrmrce Covmy Pmc J Bri gg647906] I
TempDml[el
025 Aaea! m Tempotmy Conawctlon Eaummt
0 25
"i'� ✓" \t-.('
Almnmtt County Tu Mep M 10$-442217
All of Ne ConservoW EP atemmked
consavbuon�,
N
Deed Re(unrecs Ottd Book 98 Psge 220
Book 136 Page46
CIkw
wrth Rdav erM Al— NC0)P Caps unless mtM.
Real
137t"
Deed
Refemtt Boundary Survey Phu ptepvW by
a,
C"y o(BuAmgton Engtneumg Dcpamnem
-^p
EmOed Fmg Pig Properly of 4 of Bwbngton
Crry Pad[ Mp 1'1 Decd September 14 1995
\ Mn
`6.
� • ^ °'`•- !� %It IX7&
NCGS GRID NORTH
LINE TABIE
yat1
/9 '� \rt\ 56�
°] \ 11
i CVV -
\ 380
\ \ T7 '6_ /�
�. _ w • y�", � ar=n POadmaSaMnro]i
Cornier_
N rb % E90��4ad6 au oatr. a7i yqg 174 •� \', \g Fiummt A--D
z6 iJJ1 y �__ �, h� 4 COntery Iron d - -• 111 \'r \ t. \ Y \ \bSi 039 Aue3t
Al Eamnerr Atn AG` s\ ��b• 08�tr\ Q 18]
/R /$�y o -..162 = H>J•
Tm A N>J J)Jg W 2 [
[1
151 J
\ %�•ao1 c
consavbuon�,
�j \
17s AUnt
1
137t"
CMtficme of Aeeumey
El
' -ter... ...
■ o
❑ a .�.e..rr.ay..rr
rig �' com.t�mralr
E.—I Atea C
I IOAtTert
i I •100 an bi4Whmm
AI. =��ay n,a'3 mree6t)9naTl
(I a`��3 At ®afamO TU Maps IPH4L11] NA�
I I �'y \100 /a In
I'I
1 ' I PrvpmyM
r , an�awwarm
AI®t<ew =J e.w ma eewivoail
Alwuas Cuwy TU Map 104443 )
IpOO,D
E*Inm6Lm Pp
Nr bon Pp O
demo •
Ibw b
UJwy
Vs/
- 100 '�d'�' 1
N
A70 •410 409 v
Coversmon 180
Eaacnent
099 A..:t 101•
104
rJ r Pox Gry �9wIraPT
—ewmrzwimaee4nom)t
L earn TU Myw l9w�zn
459
\ � ka� Easement Area C
vConreavulon f \ \% �74g
120A
e E Ea¢ment Arta F ���� �• nw
016 Au
• ln„ "1997
sa AlmmmCmuy 0a8460i996i1 'Z W
B Almmn(:maaY TU Mya 0441: x1] 9 �/,{��A •fit \ \yq
ISO-
157 � _ _
____________ _ • [
P
tttt
kl
" N
Paw ra �
Certiliwic o(Owver9Wp and DedmxUOn Pla g Drteam C­fcu000
mil° \� ����, !� �� ' �'" •i
XS
I
• ma
�• 770 i[55ff
• • 402
OVERBROOK ROAD - - --
te- - - ° -- i
„4'¢~
s,.
or�radmgron rtrtt6emron
°� Mrruw prrruns
t .r,mrerrerer.ermr � iwr�o� b—
�.sea`�- aarrm..yer..�. r Rev wOffittr Ce�fi+n�
AA..enr arar[s[..r
+axAtr _
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE I"= 100 d V t., ° " "— �.
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC 109 EAST HARDEN STREET GRAHAM NC27253
PHONE [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] EMAIL dylmldmJ[k @trmdn twin
Job Numb- 08.0 "1 Dro g Name Y080401 NCEEP LtNe Alomance C[eek
Fmld CLew DWM & RMW Dmw. By DRY Checked By
Revmlatm �/+p(m 9w wi"rtorin V /06 /a'Om n u r'r iar
NLae v .rsa ie [avwum [nr."i .bYean. L l6fM'm3 x >T�LOe c09� .__ _ .a rain _ni
\ � ka� Easement Area C
vConreavulon f \ \% �74g
120A
e E Ea¢ment Arta F ���� �• nw
016 Au
• ln„ "1997
sa AlmmmCmuy 0a8460i996i1 'Z W
B Almmn(:maaY TU Mya 0441: x1] 9 �/,{��A •fit \ \yq
ISO-
157 � _ _
____________ _ • [
P
tttt
kl
" N
Paw ra �
Certiliwic o(Owver9Wp and DedmxUOn Pla g Drteam C­fcu000
mil° \� ����, !� �� ' �'" •i
XS
I
• ma
�• 770 i[55ff
• • 402
OVERBROOK ROAD - - --
te- - - ° -- i
„4'¢~
s,.
or�radmgron rtrtt6emron
°� Mrruw prrruns
t .r,mrerrerer.ermr � iwr�o� b—
�.sea`�- aarrm..yer..�. r Rev wOffittr Ce�fi+n�
AA..enr arar[s[..r
+axAtr _
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE I"= 100 d V t., ° " "— �.
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC 109 EAST HARDEN STREET GRAHAM NC27253
PHONE [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] EMAIL dylmldmJ[k @trmdn twin
Job Numb- 08.0 "1 Dro g Name Y080401 NCEEP LtNe Alomance C[eek
Fmld CLew DWM & RMW Dmw. By DRY Checked By
Revmlatm �/+p(m 9w wi"rtorin V /06 /a'Om n u r'r iar
NLae v .rsa ie [avwum [nr."i .bYean. L l6fM'm3 x >T�LOe c09� .__ _ .a rain _ni
Certiliwic o(Owver9Wp and DedmxUOn Pla g Drteam C­fcu000
mil° \� ����, !� �� ' �'" •i
XS
I
• ma
�• 770 i[55ff
• • 402
OVERBROOK ROAD - - --
te- - - ° -- i
„4'¢~
s,.
or�radmgron rtrtt6emron
°� Mrruw prrruns
t .r,mrerrerer.ermr � iwr�o� b—
�.sea`�- aarrm..yer..�. r Rev wOffittr Ce�fi+n�
AA..enr arar[s[..r
+axAtr _
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE I"= 100 d V t., ° " "— �.
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC 109 EAST HARDEN STREET GRAHAM NC27253
PHONE [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] EMAIL dylmldmJ[k @trmdn twin
Job Numb- 08.0 "1 Dro g Name Y080401 NCEEP LtNe Alomance C[eek
Fmld CLew DWM & RMW Dmw. By DRY Checked By
Revmlatm �/+p(m 9w wi"rtorin V /06 /a'Om n u r'r iar
NLae v .rsa ie [avwum [nr."i .bYean. L l6fM'm3 x >T�LOe c09� .__ _ .a rain _ni

Pmpeny Infomlath- Cor . adon Ememem Notes
Own- Ctty of Burlington Total Are. m Canservaho. Eaumem 6 98 Acres t
Alamanu County Pmcel IDd 8864790671 0 25 Ameat io T mp—,y Coasnucum E m
ascme
AIasmmce Cmmty Tax Map M 104 - 442-217
N AB a mina of the Cooaervadon Emrrem are marked
Deed References Deed Book 98 Page 220 w,!h Reber and Aluminum NCEFP Cap urdeas noted
Deed Boot 136 Page46
Refemce Boundary Sl y Plm prepared by �1
City of Burlington Entwectmg Departmem %70
Gry Park Map NI Darr ptembu�l4 1995 \ 0, p 1
W E '
NCGS GRI NORTH \ \ S .\ . %''� C� t„a.• -. •'
t2ae a LIMB TABLB )i r` . - -- \ `, \ j 1
Bcu{nl DY«vm �J ,t
TY LI 9]9'2691 w 6097 -'
P-PIM Of
Easemvst
\ � 'b' 046 Araest
� : \ 3ay, a 4• 1p911 a,�
G
\ O \
\ Ra9uy aJ
\ \ AYmum Cm Pima 116179(161
\ \ AYmav¢CmOU.q Tu K" 104462 2171
\\ �O \
cTmve rABtB i °"'
Clbat U'alkwee
AYmma.Oamq Pa,re1 IDf 11&790671 \
Apure Camtl TMM.p110"2417\ ,` \
m 1� 1 ""' .rpyarY CwWC ---1
qA A
-
t�x-
Nu OT
uua..m..s ` �n«aa �qqh 664(1 `11£ a
a \ r
L — \ 'P.
P09\ t \\
Conserv�Iolr ,
Be+emem/S B
! 75 Attest
\ Col]s�vetiDD
Easemew Am. D'
039 Amps!
)A t 171 y \
D
\ 4 7J
C >a
LBGh':YD�
N.I-Pip O
Ma HeY
Ida.umm7 ■ /
Puvm
uauey q Um -
/rr
- / 1
,
h.ptm Of
Chy ar Bmlm/me
AYmmx C-91 Pared ma 8861790671
. 0 m AYm.me Comuy TU M.p. 10 4 611 217
it Rink � `V - m
m 1� 1 ""' .rpyarY CwWC ---1
qA A
g N
Nu OT
uua..m..s ` �n«aa �qqh 664(1 `11£ a
a \ r
�„ J
\CDn5Cr9 bon\
5994 Conaervenon \ @
@em yt
cm—anon II f l
Easeerem Area
1 I \ 110 A—t f .,
M
� s lil
y aBW
AM—ac -yr MVO la 2217
Cemfem of Accuracy
N-o emay. C- va.'AY®
r naar L T.tr+W .c26 r.d. a esm.l.wee«r w .. e..
dkY..kl rafm46,.bvrW �lam7r.N..aIlYMd M,.�. �
"�iO Ymemi0 °S ^'0'am° -a
1/1] C.M&.w of 0—hm aad DedwatmD
.�slb a.a.s.m 111111
ds_ ..u. a+aaWW.e:m pre �/ L(.«b17- a6o..(.gs(..Ib.MOrr
,a1�ptHURD
eeu'sfY6. mss fEl9 /d �'r/ � w. � ` 6..!2-62- �.W erwm.o�.mrglsl
SEAL
ors'— L -3395
-�.
r°:�Z
NOTARY
❑a ••- r:Y.°.:a.m.. °°°Y* ow 7t. `..- ear- .mw.....ar'3r a9a EC� "Q9
.+.. q PUBLIC
PIS a Cendicana0
.scunao �srrmss.iQ
i -40 of
,umavoan.mu
a
ov t(Badaw .
Al Cam+1 P B]a 886/790671
AYVUme Cou.c7Tatmq.1O 2217
...................... a................----
OVERBROOK ROAD
....................... — -------------
-- --
,. aaa
d
Cry ofBmI a- Certrfk tmg
m—
.w..a «rruamavm.a -r Renew Office] Cemficanon
wvo- vr..A.®
--t- Es.mst
\ u � 61
1 CC /fi�e�
9
/ nu
g sos°19zo w
1_
\ta Q Doe TO 0099+9.7000: 7yy0. n9P
FA. A.My Aeaord.d 02 /m /2oo9 It 02 24 48 Pn
\ PF... Me' 1i2� 00 Pe B. 1 a/ l
/ ��� d BP 1229TE1 tY nEE04
', /38D8a
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE V= 100'
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC - 109 EAST HARDEN STREET - GRAHAM NC 27253
PHONE. [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] - EMAIL dylandmark@h,9d.rr com
Job Numb- 09 -04 -01 - Dmwing Name Y080401 NCEEP Little Alamance Creek
F7eld Crew DWM & RMW - Drawn By DRY Checked By
Revmlom c0. � m � iii iF5j� a � �!� ,!a caa Boar.aaw a ash sYn
m /ISAa R.A b emuwaa. Fmma Banes. ,r. 11' m a m.e�s .lo [ n vP w..n••Gaa Rc7—h1 k XGD Sion
Cemfem of Accuracy
N-o emay. C- va.'AY®
r naar L T.tr+W .c26 r.d. a esm.l.wee«r w .. e..
dkY..kl rafm46,.bvrW �lam7r.N..aIlYMd M,.�. �
"�iO Ymemi0 °S ^'0'am° -a
1/1] C.M&.w of 0—hm aad DedwatmD
.�slb a.a.s.m 111111
ds_ ..u. a+aaWW.e:m pre �/ L(.«b17- a6o..(.gs(..Ib.MOrr
,a1�ptHURD
eeu'sfY6. mss fEl9 /d �'r/ � w. � ` 6..!2-62- �.W erwm.o�.mrglsl
SEAL
ors'— L -3395
-�.
r°:�Z
NOTARY
❑a ••- r:Y.°.:a.m.. °°°Y* ow 7t. `..- ear- .mw.....ar'3r a9a EC� "Q9
.+.. q PUBLIC
PIS a Cendicana0
.scunao �srrmss.iQ
i -40 of
,umavoan.mu
a
ov t(Badaw .
Al Cam+1 P B]a 886/790671
AYVUme Cou.c7Tatmq.1O 2217
...................... a................----
OVERBROOK ROAD
....................... — -------------
-- --
,. aaa
d
Cry ofBmI a- Certrfk tmg
m—
.w..a «rruamavm.a -r Renew Office] Cemficanon
wvo- vr..A.®
--t- Es.mst
\ u � 61
1 CC /fi�e�
9
/ nu
g sos°19zo w
1_
\ta Q Doe TO 0099+9.7000: 7yy0. n9P
FA. A.My Aeaord.d 02 /m /2oo9 It 02 24 48 Pn
\ PF... Me' 1i2� 00 Pe B. 1 a/ l
/ ��� d BP 1229TE1 tY nEE04
', /38D8a
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE V= 100'
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC - 109 EAST HARDEN STREET - GRAHAM NC 27253
PHONE. [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] - EMAIL dylandmark@h,9d.rr com
Job Numb- 09 -04 -01 - Dmwing Name Y080401 NCEEP Little Alamance Creek
F7eld Crew DWM & RMW - Drawn By DRY Checked By
Revmlom c0. � m � iii iF5j� a � �!� ,!a caa Boar.aaw a ash sYn
m /ISAa R.A b emuwaa. Fmma Banes. ,r. 11' m a m.e�s .lo [ n vP w..n••Gaa Rc7—h1 k XGD Sion
Cry ofBmI a- Certrfk tmg
m—
.w..a «rruamavm.a -r Renew Office] Cemficanon
wvo- vr..A.®
--t- Es.mst
\ u � 61
1 CC /fi�e�
9
/ nu
g sos°19zo w
1_
\ta Q Doe TO 0099+9.7000: 7yy0. n9P
FA. A.My Aeaord.d 02 /m /2oo9 It 02 24 48 Pn
\ PF... Me' 1i2� 00 Pe B. 1 a/ l
/ ��� d BP 1229TE1 tY nEE04
', /38D8a
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE V= 100'
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC - 109 EAST HARDEN STREET - GRAHAM NC 27253
PHONE. [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] - EMAIL dylandmark@h,9d.rr com
Job Numb- 09 -04 -01 - Dmwing Name Y080401 NCEEP Little Alamance Creek
F7eld Crew DWM & RMW - Drawn By DRY Checked By
Revmlom c0. � m � iii iF5j� a � �!� ,!a caa Boar.aaw a ash sYn
m /ISAa R.A b emuwaa. Fmma Banes. ,r. 11' m a m.e�s .lo [ n vP w..n••Gaa Rc7—h1 k XGD Sion
--t- Es.mst
\ u � 61
1 CC /fi�e�
9
/ nu
g sos°19zo w
1_
\ta Q Doe TO 0099+9.7000: 7yy0. n9P
FA. A.My Aeaord.d 02 /m /2oo9 It 02 24 48 Pn
\ PF... Me' 1i2� 00 Pe B. 1 a/ l
/ ��� d BP 1229TE1 tY nEE04
', /38D8a
Final Plat
Conservation Easement for
the State of North Carolina,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Little Alamance Creek at Burlington Park
SPO#001 -AAAG EEP#92372
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 05/01/2008 SCALE V= 100'
LANDMARK SURVEYING INC - 109 EAST HARDEN STREET - GRAHAM NC 27253
PHONE. [phone] FACSIMILE [phone] - EMAIL dylandmark@h,9d.rr com
Job Numb- 09 -04 -01 - Dmwing Name Y080401 NCEEP Little Alamance Creek
F7eld Crew DWM & RMW - Drawn By DRY Checked By
Revmlom c0. � m � iii iF5j� a � �!� ,!a caa Boar.aaw a ash sYn
m /ISAa R.A b emuwaa. Fmma Banes. ,r. 11' m a m.e�s .lo [ n vP w..n••Gaa Rc7—h1 k XGD Sion

Figure 5. Conservation Easement Coordinate List
AREA "A"
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849579 51554
1864926 55171
395
84959177729
186496138155
298
849608 22978
1865005 01204
299
849636.94197
1865054 31867
294
849589 39149
1865164 49481
129
849486 98274
1865107 29342
130
849513 45974
186500141137
131
849579 51554
1864926 55171
395
AREA "B"
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849559 40556
1865193 45108
134
849557 84265
1865237 72626
35
849479 25598
1865422 79011
136
849353 03468
1865393 66448
137
84929186683
186535817065
105
849225 45240
186527515897
l06
84922125010
1865257 53874
140
849198 64891
1865206 27156
384
849147 64645
1865167 54338
107
84908154893
1865093 68513
292
849087 74837
186507718420
293
849176 03999
1865035 54448
144
849199 39922
1865024 52791
385
849235 42971
1865096 89567
148
849299 41895
1865225 41897
149
849408 35898
1865232 57548
301
849467 50926
1865142 23314
151
849559 40556
1865193 45108
134
AREA "C"
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849462 56616
1865462 71229
152
849435 13638
1865526 69686
153
8494$2 39703
1865579 69130
155
849462 88378
1865657 23514
156
849442 70621
1865703 37024
157
849329 27516
1865707 26253
158
849260 03559
1865644 92151
159
849240 35724
1865576 32112
160
84932113162
1865434 07191
396
849339 57571
1865437 80714
161
849462 56616
1865462 71229
152
AREA "D„
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849523 67028
186553149915
162
849606 54503
1865505 41990
300
849687 60418
1865479 86867
163
849646 26097
186564217633
164
849599 23801
1865668 60583
165
849480 56349
1865700 07636
166
849523 67028
186553149915
162

AREA "E"
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849734 94933
1865506 74625
386
849777 61339
1865506 95303
168
849795 36536
1865528 39325
X69
849816 07420
1865583 36623
411
849813 56859
1865590 93079
172
84981712503
1865599 08756
173
849826 26238
1865617 68539
174
849817 46632
1865643 55279
175
849810 73250
1865653 62464
176
849811 46562
186569514176
l08
84980125856
1865780 86612
410
849810 85135
1865846 23666
409
8497H0 45763
186590616581
180
849737 93964
1865905 74732
181
84969919996
1865879 24506
182
84969417460
1865838 75955
183
849689 79904
1865727.49867
312
849685 47681
1865617 58282
184
849734 94933
1865506 74625
386
AREA "F"
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849815 92160
1865940 90924
110
849824 39775
1865999 70351
log
849710 30838
1866007 56636
187
849704 65272
186594140823
388
849815 92160
1865940 90924
110
AREA "G»
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849811 20595
1866037 84131
189
849795 76690
1866075 73608
338
84976710290
1866116 74370
191
84969612266
1866262 27953
390
849631.25699
1866395 27$23
391
84962514242
1866407 81537
79 MH
849617 01962
1866417 32501
392
84956130036
1866482 55746
393
849497 45831
1866557 29954
195
849490 28422
1866410 67696
196
84955617669
1866325 00704
197
84959111839
1866204 02424
404
849632 65737
1866156 80372
346
849702 64017
1866057 68956
199
84981120595
1866037 84131
189

AREA "H„
NORTH
EAST
Point #
849465 79522
186653105945
200
849450 23363
186654212494
201
849390 76406
1866563 46603
202
849352 71701
1866583 54506
401
849315 71724
1866580 20684
203
849204 47066
1866564 90566
402
849156 80929
1866462 67261
403
849229 09022
1866442 93365
375
849332 80632
186648141733
399
849405 63461
1866455 34439
400
849462 25590
1866412 85336
210
849465 79522
186653105945
200

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Mainstem
Assessed Length 2275 If
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub -Cate o
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1 Aggradahon -Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
# n
0
0
o
100%
;. "a
t z
J;v yaw (
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcuthn g
w
>4`��t
R F)
0
0
100%
�,' "6< ��Q��z r A,.n� ky,
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate
6
6
;?Yi `
�,) ,u
100 %
�
'
3 Meander Pool
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient ( Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth - > 1 6 )
4
4
f �
100%
'�C y o ' IN,
s 4 t
, "L�4
=i
°
2 Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
100%
upstream nffle and head of downstream riffle)
4
4
px,
>$' c•a�i�
a
4 Thalweg Position
1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
4
M'
100%
a
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
4
4
aY$wi M1
100%
� a "' � K1.;fy,"' m l.�ii� ` x ry•Ma'i�k
d
fVa ,
`
'x��>abi r't „>?fXalm l <^i%C S2 �%t
_ r'
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
r
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
scour and erosion
-
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are pro wdm habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
6
6
100%
Structures
i
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
0
0
; ` „r
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
6
6
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
0
0
100%
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
4
4
100%
Depth ratio > 1 6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow

t
Table 5 Visual Stream Morpholo-gy Stability Assessment
Reach ID Unnamed Tributary
Assessed Length 450 If
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateq2.ry
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aggradation -Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
���^8" a'e""�k'i
"~xn'
m ,yYi �_
x g
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)'
2 Degradation of downcultin
0
0
100%
wa''��
°`a Y
-Evidence g
v
J
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
2
2
100%
wzsa a,
3 Meander Pool
1 00%
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 6)
2
2
�,r zy z ip a��
Na
`aY "i m"..,',A" "�^
(>30%
2 Length appropriate of centerline distance between tad of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
2
2
aa# �, rvy d
�
s
100%
d "� �g "0A
„ �°
4 Thalweg Position
1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
2
2
y�
100%
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
2
2
100%
""
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
1
75
99%
0
0
99%
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
scour and erosion
Banks undercuttoverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
100%
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
and are pr owdm habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
1
75
99%
0
0
99%
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact month no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
2
2
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
1
1
100%
3 Bank Protection
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring gui dance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
2
2
, " v,
100 o /o
4 Habitat
Depth ratio > 1 6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow
"t
7fi'

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreage' 7.06 ac
Easement Acreacie 7.06 ac
Ve etation Cateciory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De iction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Ve etation Cateqory
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Pol ons
Acrea a
Acrea e
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
01 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
2. Low Stem Density Areas
0.1 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
1year.
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Vi or
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreacie 7.06 ac
Ve etation Cateciory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De iction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Yellow Point
3 points
0.35
5.0%
15. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
NIA
0
0.00
0.0°%
t = Enter the planted acreage within the ease ent This rudnber is c l�ulated as the e sement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory. the channel
acreage, crossings or any other elements not �irecfly plane as part o he project e o
= The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of
encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
a = .Invasiv�s ma cc r in or out of pirmed are s, but dtill within the easeme t nd will therefore be cal ulated a ainst tthhe overall eas ment a e ge. I vase. as of concern /i terestd a listed below. The lit of hi h concter
fo��es over t�ie� eekefaat�ta�e� �i gitl��onyeo lecdgm �2 hecu "�eaa§)mo e oo %m�oK(�ds rave cf�eGec J� aueea t}lgot o� sin utiat g se ape s�itnot ave �st�agenstX er fheIre e rapefed�wos ec �e�ind��ie�efsos s6lise s�oe�e�[he�
emeciiflop i6e neg �ed are sed on t�iepie r lion oflnsR ac ors bEP su h as s ewes prs nt ie�r covers e, Geist ib�pon ela{i�e.to aeve i mass,. nd�n r cii�ality of trearheant. r ex8mp�e even pde t
amouna o��^�udu�u or Japa esen twee d early if�e roectsthiso ill warranco troll but oteniall largenc(oveaq es o {Micerros{ ium in tie �erPa er,yvif{� tllb�`s aro °rntrorla esha�e of a of interedst sag we��fue
e e, i�aeect {fo /be opsler��ier acos thefstatwiea d s resuaed ��sdTheoseotry�eenti�l impnaCaseftp�aic�laarxin esea Ven their Rrempd�ljyo�k /threaPeVelspsec�ea wirhgs olatsR h /sg i5ote� p ns are fbo nd particularly eaI m a
hag � rafo o ons iu9ati nno pec tan be li f n - an are Fis�10 legeende e seF%i nournbes oef s�c sa �a� led ors tefie�har alive nc OXeo Tthe z �ut veosu�rsr�ary 'a a f cgp � syrs�bolizYZC�nt� aescr �e t�ipr j of �ce

EEE Consulting, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Photo Log 1: Established Photo Stations
Photo Station 1, rail line at bollard 172, facing east
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 3, rail line discharge, facing south
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 5,view of easement facing northwest
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 2, level spreader at bollard 410,
facing east; April 3, 2013
Photo Station 4, discharge at bollard 312,
facing west; April 3, 2013
Photo Station 6, VP 7 at bollard 401,
facing west; April 3, 2013
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year I of 5; Submitted: July 2013
1,1,\'.11.
Appendix B

EEE Consulting, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Photo Station 7, XS 1, facing right bank
March 27, 2013
Photo Station 9, XS 3, facing right bank
March 27, 2013
Photo Station 11, XS 5, facing right bank
March 27, 2013
Photo Station 8, XS 2, facing right bank
March 27, 2013
Photo Station 10, XS 4, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 12, XS 6, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year I of S; Submitted: July 2013
Appendix B

EEE Consultinz, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Photo Station 13, XS 7, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 15, XS 9, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 17, XS 11, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 14, XS 8, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 16, XS 10, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 18, XS 12, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year I of 5; Submitted: July 2013
VIN. 11,
Appendix B

EEE Consulting. Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Photo Station 19, XS 13, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Photo Station 20, XS 14, facing right bank
April 3, 2013
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of S; Submitted: July 2013
I.7 V I L
Appendix B

EEE Consulting, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Photo Log 2: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Veg Plot 1, view from southwest corner
March 27, 2013
Veg Plot 3, view from southwest corner
March 27, 2013
Veg Plot 5, view from southwest corner
March 27, 2013
Veg Plot 2, view from southwest corner
March 27, 2013
Veg Plot 4, view from southwest corner
March 27, 2013
Veg Plot 6, view from southwest corner
April 3, 2013
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year I of 5; Submitted: July 2013
Appendix B

EEE Consulting,lnc Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Veg Plot 7, view from southwest corner
April 3, 2013
Veg Plot 8, view from southwest corner
April 3, 2013
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of S; Submitted: July 2013
1.7,E A L
Appendix B

Appendix C:
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Success by Project Asset Type
Table 8: CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by
Plot and Species

Table 7: Little Alamance ( #92372)
Year 1 (27- Mar -2013 to 03- Apr -2013)
Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Stream/ Unknown
Riparian Buffer Wetland Growth
Plot # Stems' Stems2 Live Stakes Invasives Volunteers3 Total4 Form
1
n/a
9
0
0
13
22
12
2
n/a
10
0
25
38
23
0
3
n/a
8
0
1
24
31
0
4
n/a
9
0
0
0
10
1
5
n/a
9
0
0
1
10
0
6
n/a
15
0
0
12
27
1
7
n/a
3
1
0
0
4
0
8
n/a
5
0
0
2
7
0
Wetland /Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Stream/ Success
Wetland Criteria
Plot # Ste M52 Volunteers3 Total° Met?
1
364
526
890
Yes
2
405
1538
931
Yes
3
n/a
971
1255
8
4
364
0
405
Yes
5
364
40
405
Yes
6
607
486
1093
Yes
7
0
162
8
81
283
Project Aug
455
678
Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Riparian Success
Buffer Criteria
Plot # Stems' Met?
1
n/a
2
n/a
3
n/a
4
n/a
5
n/a
6
n/a
7
n/a
8
n/a
Project Avg
n/a
Stem Class characteristics
'Buffer
Stems Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
2Stream/
Wetland
Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines
3Volunteers Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines.
4 Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines.

I able e: ttF rrojecr
.,urrent
Plot Data
(MVS
2013)
..._al
Means
92372
-01 -0001
92372
-01 -0002
92372
-01 -0003
1
92372
-01 -0004
92372
-01 -0005
1
92372
-01 -0006
1
92372
-01-0007
1
92372
-01 -0008
1
MYS
(2013)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S I
P -all
T jPnoLS
I
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T jPnoLS
IP
-all
T jPnoLS
P -all IT
jPnoLS
P -all IT
jPnoLS
P -all
T
1
1
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
2
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
8
8
8
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
21
6
6
6
4
4
4
31
3
3
13
13
15
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
51
5
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
11
31
3
3
6
6
6
Corpus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
2
11
1
11
3
3
3
DONTKNOW: unsure record
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Euonymus americanus
1
1
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
21
2
2
21
2
2
Ligustrum
privet
Exotic
1
1
3
Ligustrum lucidum
glossy privet
Exotic
3
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
22
22
6
Liquldambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
1
1
1
9
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
7
Photinia
chokeberry
12
12
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
Z
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
1
20
Quercus coccinea
scarlet oak
Tree
20
91
9
9
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
31
3
3
1
2
2
21
2
2
2
11
1
1
Quercus velutma
black oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
5
5
5
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Viburnum prunifolium
blackhaw
shrub
3
3
3
;;;3
3
3
3
Stem count
91
9
22
10
10
48
8
8
32
10
10
10
9
9
10
15
15
27
4
4
5
5
7
69
70
160
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.20
71
71
9
61
61
131
51 51
10
51
51
51
51
51
6
81
81
131
31
41
41
31
31
51
151 16
31
Species countil
Stems per ACRE
1 364.21
364.21
890.31404.71
404.71
1942
323.71
12951404.71
404.71
404.71364.21
364.21
404.71
6071
6071
1093
2.1.4.
161.91
161.91;,;Z
1 202.31
283.3
IS4 11
809.4

Appendix D:
Stream Survey Data
Figure 6: Cross Sections with Annual Overlays
Figure 7: Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Figure 8: Pebble Counts with Annual Overlays
Table 9: Stream Bank Erosion Pin Data Table
Table 10a: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b: Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and
Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 11 a: Monitoring — Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11 b: Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table

F—
C
O
(Q
N
W
i
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 1, XS 1
Riffle
Station 11 +58 48
Reach 1, XS 1
C Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wokf = 19 3 Dbkf = 2 16 Pbkf = 47 4
0 10 20 30 4U au o0
Horizontal Distance (ft)

F—
C
O
M
O
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No, 92372
Reach 1, XS 2
Pool
Station 13 +23 79
Cross Section 2
C Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wb?f = 35 7 Db?f = 3 62 Abkf = 129
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

Z
C
O
Y
CU
W
W
1
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 1, XS 3
Pool
Station 13 +62 29
Cross Section 3
C Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 32 6 Dbkt = 2 74 Abkf = 89 2
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

N
C
O
N
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 4, XS 4
Riffle
Station 19 +69 54
Cross Section 4
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 25 6 Dbkf = 2 09 Abkf = 53 4
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

iR
C
O
(0
4)
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 5
Riffle
Station 27 +95 78
Cross Section 5
C Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 19 4 Dbkf = 2 1 Abkf = 40 8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Horizontal Distance (ft)

Z
r-
0
w
t0
N
n
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 6
Pool
Station 28 +83 61
Cross Section 6
C Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 36 6 DbH = 3 08 Abkf = 1122 8
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
O
O
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 7
Pool
Station 29 +17 31
Cross Section 7
G Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 31 3 Cbkf = 3 15 Abkf = 98 8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
O
N
N
P
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 8
Riffle
Station 29 +35 63
Cross Section 8
C Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 34 9 Dbkf = 3 03 Abkf = 107 3
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
O
to
O
W
f
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 9
Riffle
Station 29 +57 75
Cross Section 9
0 Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 21 8 Dckf = 2 34 Pbkf = 50 9
0 20 40 60 60
Horizontal Distance (ft)

M
C
O
N
N
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 10
Riffle
Station 30 +56 75
Cross Section 10
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 30 6 Ubkf = 2 25 Pbkf = 68 9
Horizontal Distance (ft)

M
C
O
tU
N
n
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 11
Pool
Station 10 +50 94 Cross Section 11
Q Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators
Wbkf = 15 6 Dbkf = 69
♦ Water Surface Points
Abkf = 10 7
0 10 20 30 wu 10
Horizontal Distance (ft)

M
C
O
(D
N
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 12
Riffle
Station 11+03 18 Cross Section 12
Q Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 9 91 Dbkf = 86 P.bhf = 8 5
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
O
(U
N
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 13
Pool
Station 11 +49 64 Cross Section 13
Q Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 9 26 Dokf = 1 67 Abkf = 16 S
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
O
(0
N
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 14
Riffle
Station 12 +50 43 Cross Section 14
Q Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbl,f = 10 1 Dbkf = 1 52 Abkf = 15 4
Horizontal Distance (ft)

r
C
O
M
O
W
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Main Stem
Station 0 +0 00 to 29 +68 44
Main Stem
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Distance along stream (ft)
eI&II I
• CH
Ws
• BKF
• P1
P2
* P3
P4
;Ju00

5
5
r
O
4-0 5
_N
W
5
5
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Tributary
Station 10 +0 00 to 14 +40 85
Tributary
0 100 200 300 400 500
Distance along stream (ft)
• CH
M►1►RI
M0.1M9
• P1
I P2
- P3
Z]

10
s
� s
c
c
L
W
CL
4
Little Alamance Creek (Burlml
EEP No 92372
Reach 1, XS 1
Riffle
Station 11 +58 48
D50 6 21 mm
D84 28 87 mm XS 1
D95 112 8 mm
' Park) Stream Restoration
001
01
10
Particle Size (mm)
100
1000
10000
i
III
I
I
fill
I
I
I
I
_�I
I
_
fro
I
_�__
I ► I I_�
Ij
-_t
I
I
001
01
10
Particle Size (mm)
100
1000
10000

CU
o!
U
L
^a)
LL
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 1, XS 1
Riffle
Station 11 +58 48
D50 6 21 mm
D84 28 87 mm
D95 112 8 mm Cross Section 1
0 -0062 050 -10 20 -40 57 -80 113 -160 226 -320 45 -64 90 -128 512 -1024
0062 -0125 10 -20 40 -57 80 -113 160 -226 32 -45 64 -90 128 -180
Particle Size (mm)

101
a
N 6
LL
a
Little Alamance Creek (Burlmgto' k) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372 `
Reach 4, XS 4
Riffle
Station 19 +69 54
D50 218 mm
D84 24 48 mm Cross Section 4
D95 90 0 mm
001 0 1 , , u luu
Particle Size (mm)
0000
HIM
I
!
/IH
Ii
l
�
'�
I
I
!'
i
0
001 0 1 , , u luu
Particle Size (mm)
0000

a�
a�
a�
U
N
d
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 4, XS 4
Riffle
Station 19 +69.54
D50 2 18 mm
D84 24 48 mm Cross Section 4
D95 90 0 mm
Particle Size (mm)

LL
C
CL
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) '' m Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 5
Riffle
Station 27 +95 78
D50 8 37 mm
D84 25 49 mm Cross Section 5 Pebble Count
D95 45 0 mm
00 F-IT
i I I I
I li I
I I I _
40--
I i Ell I
o
01 1 10 100 1000 10c
Particle Size (mm)

o'
a�
U
4J
a_
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No. 92372
Reach 6, XS 5
Riffle
Station 27 +95.78
D50: 8.37 mm
D84:25.49 mm Cross Section 5
D95: 45.0 mm
0.25 -0.50 0.50 -1.0 1.0 -2.0 2.0 -4.0 4.0 -5.7 5.7 -8.0 8.0 -11.3 11.3 -16.0 16.0 -22.6 22.6 -32.0 32 -45 45 -64 64 -90 90 -128 128 -180
Particle Size (mm)

10
B�
c6
a
4
2
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) in Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 8
Riffle
Station 29 +35 63
D50 5 7 mm
D84 14 72 mm Cross Section 8 Pebble Count
D95 24 95 mm
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
I
'
I
I III
I
II
I
�,
I I
I I
I
I
II
-
iii
�
►
�
;
I
r.
j
I
I
i
i
I I
I
i
I
i
j
II
;j
i I
i
i
�
i Al
i
li
►
II
il(;
l
y
�
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)

a�
m
a�
a�
U
N
CL
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 8
Riffle
Station 29 +35 63
D50 5 7 mm
D84 14 72 mm Cross Section 8
D95 24 95 mm
0 -0062 0062 - 01250125 -025 025 -050 050 -10 10 -20 20 -40 40 -57 57 -80 80 -113 113 -160 160 -226 226 -320 64 -90 90 -128
Particle Size (mm)

10
8
U-
a)
U
a
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Streat` storation
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 9
Riffle
Station 29 +57 75
D50 2 22 mm
D84 14 83 mm Cross Section 9 Pebble Count
D95 90 0 mm
001 01 1 lu
Particle Size (mm)
000
i
T
1- 11
!j
t
l
I
��!
j��i�,�
!►
i
I
I'
I
I �jl�
I
0
001 01 1 lu
Particle Size (mm)
000

a
a�
a�
a�
U
L
41
CL
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No. 92372
Reach 6, XS 9
Riffle
Station 29 +57.75
D50:2.22 mm
D84:14.83 mm Cross Section 9
D95: 90.0 mm
0 -0.062 0.125 -0.25 0.50 -1.0 2.0 -4.0 5.7 -8.0 11.3 -16.0 22.6 -32.0 64 -90 128 -180
0.062 -0.125 0.25 -0.50 1.0 -2.0 4.0 -5.7 8.0 -11.3 16.0 -22.6 32 -45 90 -128 Bedrock
Particle Size (mm)

10C
a
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stre, _estoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 10
Riffle
Station 30 +56 75
D50 3 50 mm
D84 1197 mm Cross Section 10
D95 28 87 mm
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
j
i
I!�
I
I
I
i►
I
i I
I Ij
li
I
I
j
I
li
��ii, �
i
, i
I
I'il
I
i!
�l
,I
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)

a�
m
a�
a�
U
N
a
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 6, XS 10
Riffle
Station 30 +56 75
D50 3 50 mm
D84 1197 mm Cross Section 10
D95 28 87 mm
Particle Size (mm)

10
C6
L
^W
LL
4
2
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Str ',Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 12
Riffle
Station 11 +03 18
D50 5 21 mm
D84 25 73 mm Cross Section 12 Pebble Count
D95 90 mm
i ,u ioo 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
I
I
!
I I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
'
I
�
I
I
'
I
•I
I
I
I
I
i ,u ioo 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)

a�
m
Q)
a�
U
N
a
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Regtoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 12
Riffle
Station 11 +03 18
D50 5 21 mm
D84 25 73 mm. Cross Section 12
D95 90 mm
0125 -025 025 -050 050 -10 10 -20 20 -40 40 -57 57 -80 8 0- 11 3 11 3- 16 0 160 -226 22 6-32 0 32 -45 45 -64 64 -90 90 -128 180 -256
Particle Size (mm)

101
a
U_
IL
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream ;oration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 14
Riffle
Station 12 +50 43
D50 3 3 mm
D84 10 83 mm Cross Section 14 Pebble Count
D95 27 3 mm
001 01 , lu I-
Particle Size (mm)
10000
i
�
I
,
i
!!
IIII;
�
i
!li
� I .li
I�
,I�
1
1
Ilia,
•I
�
o
001 01 , lu I-
Particle Size (mm)
10000

a
a�
c�
a�
a!
a�
U
Q)
a-
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
EEP No 92372
Reach 2, XS 14
Riffle
Station 12 +50 43
D50 3 3 mm
D84 10 83 mm Cross Section 14
D95 27 3 mm
0 -0062 0125 -025 025 -050 050 -10 10 -20 20 -40 40 -57 57 -80 80 -113 113 -160 160 -226 226 -320 32 -45 45 -64
Particle Size (mm)

EEE Consulting Inc Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Table 9: Stream Bank Erosion Pin Data Table
Per discussions with NCEEP, bank pins are not required and therefore were not installed by EEE
Consulting.
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year I of S; Submitted. July 2013
FI.\ , I I.
Appendix D

Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park Stream Restoration /EEP Number 92372 Mainstem 2275 I
Parameter
GaugeZ Regional Curve
Pre-Existing
Condition
Reference Reach es
Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimansl- n and !j:uj6i i
LL UL Eq
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
318
362
425
151
362
193
263
366
Floodprone Width (ft)
70
94
120
30
>80
472
527
657
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
22
26
29
r
1 6
26
209
253
308
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
39
4
41
26
4
296
361
46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
793
95
125
243
95
4083
6878
11277
Width /Depth Ratio
®�
116
14
17
93
138
785
1031
1226
Entrenchment Ratio
21
2 6
3 8
2
>2 2
1 645
2079
2 488
'Bank He ht Rati
1
1 12
1
1
1
032
0 66
083
Pro Ie
Riffle Length (ft)
62
15933
13716
35324
1199
5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0 003
0 013
0 025
0 003
0 013
0 025
00001
0003326
000345
0 00983
0 0033
5
Pool Length (ft)
1079
2937
5054
1079
2937
5054
3758
9932
9019
18226
4437
14
Pool Max depth (ft)
® ®_
55
6 1
69
55
61
69
303
44
4 525
591
082
10
Pool Spacing (ft)
®®
3137
4731
7495
3137
4731
7495
4885
14739
9207
34797
1155
9
Pa am
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
33
70
1
255
33
70
255
873
233
462
Radius of Curvature (ft) ® ®_ S
45
115
220
45
115
220
51 2
1188
2807
Rc Bankfull width (fUft)
1 2
32
61
1 2
32
61
2
45
107
Meander Wavelength (ft)
227
361
559
227
361
559
4362
4546
4752
Meander Width Ratio
09
1 9
7
09
19
7
77
173
241
7ynspo- rt-parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ®
30
30
026
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankful
80
557
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
ddiUonal Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C /E/5/1
C /E4
C 4/1
E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
25
25
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
2375
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
®
29684
Sinuosity (ft)
1 2
1 2
1 2
Water Surface Slope (Channeh (ft/ft)
0 0024
00024
00024
BF slope (ft/ft)
000258
Bankfull Flood lain Area (acres)
°% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded ache nd— that thorn aall Rptmlly not be filled m
I - l ho d —bumws for theeo po— o—..,hide wf mwboo fi— both the ­y, vnd We p,fit. 2 — Fur pmpu , -tb o ptu I USCS gauge m 1.. -0t the pmja ..h (.kkd bonklull —fimoun we)
3 Utilvang eaney dam ptudaae an --te u1 the bnkfull Owdplam .— w aam whe.h should be the atat fmw the top of b.k ht the bw of the wmae neu /dupe
d- Pmp—uf moah cahlbnwg ben La that= a,W gbasal un the ars 1suney lur— p —w—h —g Ita 501 aaludnccJcJ mly tf the n eaoccdv3

l I
1 -Thc dtstnbuourelosth— pummctcts can Imludc W-111 W. both thcctuss -accbansu In,I the IIMI bmt pculdc 2 -1 ut pvjoa.w apw,=IUSGS pn .m 4-x th the pmfectrtmhlcddcd bw dl.cnlcatwn mrtl
3 Utdtettp runty dam pmJmc on cxWmk ul iM1c hn11d1 Imudplmn orca m ucre. xhuM1 shudd h ih wcn W m the mp of � w IM1c Rrc nt the terrmc nscrhlupe
J- pmparltonofteachcduMtmg honks thtau cmdngbnudonthevtstd suncvmrwmpansonto m—,%d- 5 Of, xlu /2cdedodydme n.xu.ds3

Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration /EEP Number (92372) Mainstem (2275 If)
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As- builtlBaselme
RI% / Ru % I P% / G% / Sa
SC% / Sa% l G% l C% I B% / Bea
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 /dip / di" (mm)
02
07
24
138
216
Entrenchment Class <1 5 / 1 5-1 99 12 0-4 9 / 5 0-9 91 >1
Incision Class <1 211 2 -1 4911 5 -1 991 >2
Shaded rats Micah, that these vA typically not be filled in
I =Rdfle Run Pool Glide Sbp SddCby Sand Grawf Cobble Boulder Bedrock dip =max paw doi =max eubpaw
2 = Er,b—h —M Cie. Aasgrdbn the reach footage nb d classes mdioabd and provde the peroenbge of the total reach foobpe n each class m the table Th..1 recuft from the measured cross- aectione as wel ac usual esbmabc
3 = Asegnfbin Me reach footage into the classes ndnabd antl proWda the peroentege of tha fatal reach foabge in each 4ase n tln table Th..1 nasals from the measured cro —obone es eel es the WKpludwl We %
Footnotes 23 These.basesera baslay budtara,nd the Reaganclaswficatwn and h—d Mnkmg breaks but sereadjusted slightly to make fareaslor assgrinent b eamavhat coarser bap based an visual estimates in the field such that measurement of awry segment for ER vm ud not be necessary
The meant here % b proud, do reader /eanaumer of desgn and momtering aif —aon wth a good general earpe of fan — of hydrobgio aonhnment n the preamong and the nehabddabd ebtec ac —0 ac eomparpone b If. rof..— dp"--
ER and SHR haw been addressed n prior submeaone as a subsample)cro— beine as part of the desgn coney) hoes", flaeasubsamples haw often focused enbrely on Nedra" dasgn wdhout pmvding a thorough pro--bon dpMbuaon of Mesa parameters 1—ng the readodooneumar vein a sample that ai —ahted heavdy on the stable seceons of
ft reach Th, means that Me dpMbumne for these pa ramatere shoal include data from both the mesobon. —eyeeM aria lergdudnal profde aM in the rasa of ER mausl estimate. Forexampl, the typioal longNdnal profile perturb sampWV a f the B HR at nines beyond these subject b crosaeeclone and fherefore ran be readily mbg,alad and pmvde
a more complete sample dpM'bueun for If— peremabn f nilay pro,4M Me dannbueon/covarege necessary te provele meaningful compansam

Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoratlon/EEP Number (92372) Unnamed Tributary (450 If)
Condition I Reference Reach(es) Data
A % /Ru % /P % /G % /S'
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be'
d16 / d35 / d50 / dB4 / d95 / dip / Map (mn
Class <15 /15- 199/20 - 49150 -99/ >1
ncision Class <1 2 / 1 2-17911 5-1 991 >2
Shaded call Indicate that thew wd typically nat be fibed in
i =Rdfle Run Pool Glide Slap SddCby Sand Grovel Cabbie Boulder Bedrock dip =max pave de;p =max wbpave
2 = Entrenchment Cbw Assignlbm the each footage eee the cbsses odcated and provide the percentage of the tenl reach twbige In each cbw m the table Th¢ vnfl ro,uM1 fiom tln meawred crocs+ecfmre es wag as dsual esbmabs
3 = A.agNbin the reach fnobge Into ft classes ind -bed and pmvde Me parwnbge of the ..I reach footage in each cbs, in the bible TNS A wsutr from trm measured erase- eecbore as will as the brgM1W coal profile
Footnotes 23 Thaw classes are booby budt ... und tlm Reagan classificebon and hamd ranking breaks but Mn, adimed sbghdy te make ter— oar awgnmeM te somewhat martyr bins bawd on verual estimates in Me field such that meawremere of every segment ter ER MLId not be necessary
The intent here is le pm W, ft read,doonsumer of design and monitoring info nnabon w a good general sense of the edem of hydrologic conamm,m in the pre <nsbng and Me rehabilitated mates as wet as ca mparwone, te Me refer— disobubons
ER and 8 HR have been addressed in pro,submworee as a wbwmple(cros,aecwnm as part of the design survey) however thaw subwmples haw often focused ematy on beddabrg design wftw providing a fh mWh pre —tubon dainbulm n of thew N rametms lea,W the read,doo umar withawmplethat is weighted heavily on ft slable secboin of
the each The. meare net the dedninponsfor thew parameter, alcukfmclude dab tram both vie cro —cbon surveys and Ma bngmdrtal pm% and m the case of ER —1 —mates Foreample free lypczl bngdWmal profile permite eampbng of the BHR at nM.a beyond thawsubj,ctte cross- sacboru and thmebre can be readily mlegmted and provide
a more complete wmpte d —bubon for the., parameters thereby providing ft d—buborJcowage nacewary te provide meim, gful compaream

Table lla Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —Cross Sections)
Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park Stream Restoration /EEP Number 92372 Mainstem 2275 I
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Pool)
Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Rdfle)
Besedjon fixedlbaseliiw bankf`u8 elevation
Base Myt
MY2 MY3 MV4 MYS MY+
Base MYt
MY2 MYS MY4 MYS MY+
Base MYt
MY2 MV3 MY4 MY5 My+
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base MY7 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MV+
Record elevation (datum) used
NAD
83 NC State Plane feet
NAD
83 NC State Plane feet
NAD
83 NC State Plane feet
NAD 83 NC State Plane feet
NAD 83 NC State Plane feet
Bankfull Width ft
192
193
3568
3568
1
1
3255
3255
256212562
1943
1943
Flood rove Width ft
4801
4801
73 15
732
6521
6521
474614746
1
4721
4721
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
246
246
362
362
274
274
209
21
21
Bankfull Max Depth ft)
326
326
51
51
387
387
296
315
3 15
Bankfull Cross Secbonai Area ft'
4741
4741
129
129
8922
8922
5343
4083
4083
Bankfull WidthlDe th Ratio
785
785
986
986
lies
1188
1226
925
925
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
249
249
205
205
2
2
E219
185
243
243
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
106
1 06
1
1
1
1
1 75
091
095
Cross Sectional Area between end ins
176 8
176 8
2572
2572
1591
1591
219 1
141 3
141 3
d50 mm
506
re675
675
581
581
471
462
462
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 ( Rdfle)
Bt/sed on fixed basebne�bankfu9elevatlonr
Base MY7
I MY2 I MY3
MY4 MVS MY+
Base MY7
I MY2
I MY3 MY4 I MY5 MY+
Base MV7 I MY2 I MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY+
Base MYt
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
NAD
83 NC State
Plane feet
NAD
83 NC
State Plane feet
NAD 83 NC State Plane feet
NAD 83 NC State Plane feet
NAD
83 NC State Plane feet
Bankfull Width it
366
36 6
31 31
3131
13488
3488
21 79121
79
306
306
Flood prone Width it
6021
6021
568
568
6572
6572
4734
4734
4837
48371
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
308
308
3 15
3 15
308
308
234
234
225
225
Bankfull Max Depth R
46
46
421
421
46
46
111
311
381
381
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (1?)
112 8
1128
9877
9877
1073
1073
5091
5091
6886
68 86
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11 88
11 88
994
994
11 32
11 32
931
931
136
136
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
165
165
181
1 81
1 88
1 88
217
2 17
158
1 58
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 38
1 38
1 06
1 06
1 02
1 02
1
1
128
128
Cross Sectional Area between end Ins R'
295
295
210 6
21100561
271 4
271 4
245 J
245 3
1624
1624
d50 mm
624
1 624
1
1
1
1
1
1 61 7
1617
1
1
1
1
1 63
1 63
1
503
50 3
499
499
1= Widths end depths for monrtonng resurvey wig be based on the baseline bankfull datum regwdlewotdimens,o,Wdepos on,ldmlopment Input the elevation used as the datum which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquve the datimused
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP If thus cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote In this should be included that states It is uncertain it the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history which may Influence calculated values
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum d determined to be necessary

i
Table 17a Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —Cross Sections)
Little Alamance Creek (Bu rltn ton Park Stream Restoration /EEP Number 92372 Unnamed Tnbuta 450 I
Cross Section 11 (Pool)
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Base MYt MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY,
Base MY1 MY2 MY3
MY4 MYS MY+
Base MY1 MY2 Y3 M
MY4 75 MY+
Base W1 MY2 MY3
MY4 MVS MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
NAD 83 NC State Plane feet
NAD 83 State Plane
feet
NAD 83 State Plane
feet
NAD 83 State Plane
feet
Bankfull Width it
15 57
1557
991
991
986
986
1008
1008
Flood rove Width it
2474
2474
2232
22 32
4452
4452
365
362
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
069
0 69
186
0 86
1 67
167
152
152
Bankfull Max Depth f[
1 7
1 7
143
1 43
291
291
246
246
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft
10 73
10 73
tl 5
8 5
165
165
1537
1537
Bankfull Width /De th Raba
2257
22 57
1152
11 52
5 9
59
663
663
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
159
159
225
2 25
451
359
359
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
234
2 34
1
1
1
1 19
1 19
Cross Sectional Area between end ins ft
113 4
113 4
76 3
76 3
qgP12
3 6
60 3
60 3
d50 mm
73 7
737
85 8
85 8
4 i
124 8
124 8
1 =Widths and depths for momtonng resurvey wig be based on the baseline bankfuA datum regardless of dimenslonal/depostonal development Input the elevation used as the datum which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established Bthe performer has nhertled the project and cannot acque
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP If this cannot be resolved n time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states it is uncertain d the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history which may influence calculated
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary

Shad ea ceus xlalcate that these ww typlcasy not be Puled In.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the crosssecbon surveys and the kingdudinal profile
2 = Proportion of reach exhibitr g banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle Run Pool, Glide Step SIMClay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock dip =max pave disp =max subpave
4 = Of valuelneeded only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table llb Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Alamance Creek Burlin ton Park Stream Restoration/EEP Number 92372 Malnstem 2275 I
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY-3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dim_a Pops Sub5t
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SO
n -
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (fl)
193
263
366
193
263
366
Floodprone Width (fl)
472
527
657
472
627
657
Bankfull Mean Depth (fl)
209
253
308
209
253
308
'Bankfull Max Depth fl
296
361
46
296
361
46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
4083
6878
11277
4083
6878
11277
Width/Depth Ratio
785
1031
1226
785
1031
1226
Entrenchment Ratio
1 645
2 079
2 488
1 645
2 079
2 488
'Bank Hel ht Ratl
032
066
083
032
068
063
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)l
62 159 33 13716 353 24 1199
5
62
159 33 13716
35324 1199 5
Riffle Slope (filfflj
0 0001 0 003326 000345 0 00983 00033
5
0 0001
0 003326 0 00345
0 0098310003 5
Pool Length (fflj
3758 99 32 9019 18226 4437
14
37 58
99 32 90 19
182 26 14437 14
Pool Max depth (fl)
303 4 4 4 525 5 91 08265
10
3 03
4 4 4 525
5 91 10826 5 10
Pool Spacing (fflj
4885 147 39 9207 347 97 11545
9
48 85 147 39 92 07
347 97 11545 9
?'a_ftern
Channel Beltwidth(fl)
873 1 233 462
r— I —��� ®��������
elmereional data or profile data
Pattern data vnll not typically be collected unless visual data baseline
indicate sgnlfwant shifts from baseline
®A
®�
-
Radius of Curvature (ffli
512 1 1188 1 1 2807
Rc Bankfull width fl/fl
( )
2 4 5 10 7
� � _
� � �
�
�
_
Meander Wavelength (fflj
436 2 1 4646 1 4752 1
Meander Width Ratiol
77 1 173 1 241 1
dd_Klonai Reaeh Param @fern
Rosgen Classification
E4
Channel Thalweg length (fl)
Slnuosity(K)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (fl/fl)
BF slope (fVfl)
Ri %IRu %IP %IG % /S°/
SC %I Sa% I G% I C% 18% 1 Be
di6 I d35 I d501 da41 d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metn
Biological or Othe
Shad ea ceus xlalcate that these ww typlcasy not be Puled In.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the crosssecbon surveys and the kingdudinal profile
2 = Proportion of reach exhibitr g banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle Run Pool, Glide Step SIMClay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock dip =max pave disp =max subpave
4 = Of valuelneeded only if the n exceeds 3

1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross section surveys and me iongnudm u profile
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle Run Pool Glide Step Shc/Clay Send Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock dip = max pave disp = max subpave
4 = Of valuelneeded only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E:
Hydrologic Data
Table 12: Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 9: Monthly Rainfall Data

EEE Consulting, Inc. Little Alamance Creek (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration
Insert Table 12: Verification of Bankfull Events
Crest gauges were installed during Monitoring Year 1 field work. No data is available for this
report. Data will be available for the Monitoring Year 2 report and the following monitoring
years.
Little Alamance (Burlington Park) Stream Restoration; NCEEP Project No. 92372; NCEEP Contract No. 4998;
Monitoring Year 1 of S; Submitted: July 2013
FIN.-IL
Appendix E

8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
a
t:
4.00
'a
'u
i
a 3.00
2.00
1.00
30th Percentile
\ /
70th Perccnhle
U
LittleAlamance Creek 30 -70 Percentile Graph
Burlington, North Carolina
(Source NOAA Station GHCND USC00311239)
TMi
Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar'12 Apr'12 May '12 Jun '12 Jul'12 Aug'12 Sep '12 Oct '12 Nov '12 Dec '12
Date
X2012 Rainfall — —30th Percentile 70th Percentile