HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140149 Ver 1_Application_20140214�,�.� ,�
�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
February 14, 2014
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr.
Suite ] OS
Wake Forest, NC 27615
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECREiARY
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit #14
Bridge No. 189 on SR 2564 (Shives Road) over Second Creek (Class C)
WBS project no.: 17BP.9.R.20 (DWQ permit fee $570)
Rowan, NC
Dear Mr. Thomas,
We are requesting a Nationwide 14 permit for replacement of Bridge No. 189 with a double
barrel box culvert on SR 2564 (Shives Road) over Second Creek (Class C) in Rowan County. I
have attached a pre-construction notification application, construction plans, erosion control
plans, a stormwater management plan, and No Survey Required forms from NCDOT Cultural
Resources for Historic Architecture and Archeology. The project will permanently impact 129
linear feet and temporarily impact 52 lineaz feet of Second Creek. Siream flow will be isolated
into one barrel, with 2' sills and floodplain benches constructed at the inlet and outlet of the
overflow barrel in order to prevenY stream over widening and facilitate aquatic passage. The low
flow barrel will be buried P below the stream bed to ensure aquatic passage. The overflow barrel
will be bac(dlled with class 1 rip rap to the sill elevation. The culvert site will be dewatered
during construction in accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices.
By copy of this letter, we also request 401 review and approval from the NC Division of Water
Resources with one copy of the application package provided to Amy Chapman, Transportation
Permitting Unit Supervisor, and Dave Wanucha, DOT Project Coordinator. Please charge the
application fee of $570 to WBS project no. 17BP.9.R.17.
By copy of this letter, we also request Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, to
comment directly to the Corps concernmg The permit request.
If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material
please contact me at (336) 747-7802. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Division of Highways • Division Nine • 375 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27127
Telephone (336) 747-7800 • Fax (336) 703-6693 • Courier Box 13-12-04
Si erely,
l��
y Euliss
Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT Division 9
Attachments: Application Package
CC: Amy Chapman, NCDENR-DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit Supervisor- e-copy
Dave Wanucha, NCDENR-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy
Matt Jones, P.E., Division Bridge Program Engineer- e-copy
Phil Suggs, Division 9 Roadside Environmental Engineer- e-copy
Marla Chambers, WRC- e-copy
o�pF W ATP9oG
� y
� r
O -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: OX Section 404 Permit
❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verifed by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certifcation — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes OX No ❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank � Yes � No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's iwenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes OX No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 189 with a double barrel box culvert
2b. County: Rowan
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Rockwell
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 176P.9.R.20
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 9
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if pat Ivey, P.E. Division Engineer
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip: 375 Silas Creek Parkway
3f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7800
3g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693
3h. Email address: pivey@ncdot.gov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2�09
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: DEO
4b. Name: Amy Euliss
4c. Business name NCDOT Division 9
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway
4e. City, state, zip: Winston Salem, NC 27127
4f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7802
4g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693
4h. Email address: aeuliss@ncdot.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.5336
1c. Propertysize:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
�
.
�
Longitude: 80.4706
acres
Second Creek
Class C
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing site is a bridge. The surrounding area is sparse residential and rural.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and �
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace a structurally deicient bridge with a 2 barrel box culvert
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
replace a bridge with a culvert. Standard road building equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
1a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � yes
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
nrnieM linclurlinn all nrinr nh�ceel in fhn nae}9 Comments:
on the property: 1 S7
�X No ❑ Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type prelimina
of determination was made? ❑ rY ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help fle" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
0 No
� No
❑ Unknown
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands �X Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 - Choase one Choase one Yes/No -
�f�/2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/NO -
W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
yy5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/�Ig - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3 e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (IN�? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert Secontl Creek PER Corps 6 129
$Z T Dewatering Second Creek PER Corps 6 52
S3 - Choase one - -
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts �ai
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Tem ora T
01 - Choose one Choose
02 - Chaose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. Sb. 5c. Sd. Se.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
Sf. Total:
Sg. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no:
Si. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number— mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square
(square
Tem ora T feet feet
B� - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 � YeslNo
B6 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
rayc � ui i�
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The stream will be isolated to one barrel tluring low Flow through installation of floodplain benches and silis. This will facilitate aquatic passage and
prevent ihe stream channel from ovenvidening. Further justification is provided in the stormwater management plan.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction runoff has been minimized by designing the erosion control plan according to NCDOT's BMP manual.
2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this x
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Stream Quantity: '
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
re i s were purc ase a a : ra io.
3c. Comments:
4. Com lete if Makin a Pa mentto In-lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 204 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: �02 linear feet at a 2:1 ratio
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Sa. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 20.4 %
2b. Does this ro ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? ❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater management plan is attached.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? owR-7Pu
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local overnmenYs urisdiction is this ro ect?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
� Water Supply Watershed
� Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro rem Review
�Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �pRW
(check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Sa. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes � No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Page S of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds orthe
use of public (federal/state) land? ❑x Yes ❑ No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) minimum criteria available upon request ❑ Yes ❑X NO
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ❑Yes ❑X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
NA the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑X No
impacts?
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program GIS fle
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fsh habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached letters of "NO Survey Required" from NCDOT cultural resources for both Archeology and Historic Archilecture
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project resulted in a no-rise condition in the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Our determination was based on the NC Floodplain Mapping Digital maps via their website.
�„�� �'�.�:5 z 2 � �y � i�
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name A p icanUAgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYS signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a licant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10
Prajec( Tracking No.:
14-01-0015
' a��a„� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
��yq`, a�� This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not ���
`�o.,�� valid for Aistoric Architecture and Landsca es. You must consult se azatel with the °
� �o.�� ��.�x P P Y � ���
���'" Historic Architecture and Iandscapes Group. �p�:��
i PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
N'BSNo:
F.A. No.•
#790189
17BP.9.R20
Federa! Permit Required?
County•
Document •
Rowan
MCS
Funding: � State ❑ Federal
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type.• NWP14
Project Description: Thrs project prnposes to replace Bridge No. 189, which carries SR2564 (Shive Road)
aver a tributary ofSecond Creek in Rowan County, North Caralina According to the environ»iental input
requesy the undertaking involves the in pince replacement ofthe struchere along the existing alignment,
thereby minimiying patential surface and subsurface disturbances at ttiis locwtion. A 1.0 niile long oJj-site
detour route (Shuping Mill Rd to Old Betty Ford Rd to Organ Church Rd to Shive Rd) is anlicipated. The
archaeologica[Area ofPotenHal E,Jjects (APE) is centered upon Bridge 189 and nieasures 600ft in length
(300ft from each bridge end point) and ISOft in width (75ft from each side of the SRZ564 center-line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review octivities, iesults of review, and conclusions:
The project area is located in the south-central portion of Rowan, roughly equidistant between Kannapolis to the
west and the small Rockwell community to the east. A tributary of Second Creek flows northwest to southeast
through the project APE. This section of Rowan County is characterized by a hilly and rolling Piedmont topography.
7he APE contains frequently flooded and somewhat poorly drained soil types in the western portions of the APE
and moderately eroded �and surfaces east of the creek.
First, construction design data and other perti�ent project information was examined for determining the
character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing the bridge replacement. Once an APE
was defined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSAj. No
previously documented archaeological sites are located in the archaeological APE or directly adjacent. One
prehistoric site is situated about a half mile southwest of Bridge No.189. Aaording to the site form, Middle
Archaic projectile points were retrieved by the landowner during unsystematic surface collecting of an agricultural
field. Clearly, this information demonstrates an Archaic period occupation/visitation of the vicinity, which
therefore increases the likelihood of documenting similar cultural components in the project study area and APE.
Historic structure locations often harbor archaeological deposits and features related to the former occupation of
a property. An inspection of National Register of Historic Piaces (NRHP), State Study Llsted (SL), Locally Designated
(LD�, Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources availabie on the NCSHPO
website evidenced an absence of these historic resources within the immediate project area. In addition, historic
maps of Rowan County were appraised to further identify former structure locations, land use patterns, or other
confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were
inspected as well. In general, the cultural background review established that no NRHP listed properties,
archaeological sites, or cemeteries are located within the APE or directly proximal. eased on culturel-historical
factors, the APE is considered to have a moderate potential for [he documentation of prehistoric archaeological
resources.
Further, topographic, geologic, and NRCS soil survey maps (ChA, AsC, RoC, Ce62) were referenced to evaluate
pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "jornr jm' Mlnor Trmtrpor(otlai Projec(s rss Qrmllped bi (Oe7007 Aogrnnmmllc Agreenreu(.
1 oF2
i
I,
��
��� " "r�
����� ��
���' �
Projed Tracking Na. (In(ernal Urcf
14-01-0015
HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: County: Rowan
WBS No.: 17BP.9.R.20 Document
T e:
Fe�L Aid No: Funding: State Federal
Federal Yes No Permit NWP 14
Permit(s): Ty e(s):
Proiect Descrintion:
Re lace Person Count Brid e No. 189 over tribut to Second Creek on SR 2564 (Shive Rd).
OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on January 30, 2014. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, SL, or SS in the project
azea. Rowan County GIS Tax Data shows two parcels with structure in the APE. The house with
driveway immediately southeast of the bridge was constructed in 1988. The pazcel northwest of the
bridge contains a luge historic barn; however no dwelling associated with the bam remains. A house
constructed in 1994 stands on a 3-acre parcel carved from the nearly 50-acre parcel on which the barn
sits. Farther southeast of the bridge is a c. 1900 house. The parcel on which that house sits is outside the
project area. There are no other properties over 50 years of age that meet the minimum criteria for
National Reeister ElieibiliN in the proiect APE.
are no unidentired sirni�cant historic architectural or landscane resources in the nroiect
area:
Using HPO GIS website and the Rowan County GIS Tax Data website provides reliable information
regarding the structures in the APE. These combined urilities are considered valid for the purposes of
detemilning the likelihood of historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
�Map(s) �Previous Survey Info. �Photos ❑Coaespondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT
Date
�
Nlarorlc Ascbllecbi�e m�d Lnndstnpu NO SURVEYREQU/REDfonn for Minor �'ansyarMtian Projecli m Qvnlifeed in lht 2007 ProgrnnnnnficAgreemenf.
Page 1 of4
N
0
�
�
1=
�
�
E
m
a
O
L
O
V
0
2
5
�a
m ~
Q W
a
0 W
3a
og
N W
�.F"
; �
W g
O
�
���FI
�
� � ��
!�
I�
�� ' I
�
N
j
�
N
m
N �
� r
— N
N U
� Z
N L
LL m
V =
N
V �
n
T N
3 �'
y N
a z
�i E
d v
U t0
N
1° o
in :
d
2
Y
W
3
c
.�
U
�
Z^
E
.0
a
w
C
O
.�
U
:y
� C
U '
U
>� tC
> y
N
W �
u V
'10t E
7 L
h
O y
u
W
7
9
N
J
W
�
N
m
d
n
N
m
N
O
U
� N N � . N
N
O T N� � N N� O i] y C t L
t a � t y H
C O O y aLL U N p�0 O �lL � N
'e c a`n.. c".3��r 3 �-L° m� m
u w F (0 C�� U I� ..L.. a N�"O Vf �
C�C 3N��OCNLCN' �u
�
9� V��«� U� ~ C,�O Ol N O
°-o D U T" L� m'� E n!° o N
� ` � o � � o �.°o a .� � � cxi °:�
y C. _
a�a m "cE�ca�ai m�?`o ma
c� o a� �o c� a> c r V t �> �
�°.� m in m� a� m m ��v � t E� c � m
�� y E� 3� m d t n 3 m�' m t m
�
C� d N 1 D L Q ��� N d N~ Y
� d y V � O~ N ip O N.L.- 6 C V O.
��"'�' v N— V— O� O L�` N 9
`� N� w y � O. � LL 6... "-' N.S N
� d � E� � N N N N`L-'
m°�" o �° c 3�°._ � 3� m i
� 3 o t ��m � � c° :: 3 rn�° ; m
�vEm'o°�`°rnE a�+i`° � � � m
~-� y m K 3� n d a ��w o m m oi
Y1 N C N w .0 �% .D L
Y m� o t 3 9 H � d�� �� o m c°�
O� N N �(J,�Y N H dw U w tn N
.. � f0 a w W r � H� 0 D C d 3 N
C O y N K'O (Il � U N u�� y L� U
N N� N T N—� C� C t> F~ 3
w 3 m E=' � a« o t c� u �� c
10 O' U= �? `� 2 U �
mm� x rna min 3.0 �'w� �9"
� a c�� o r:°• 'c o� E'� � o
5 �2•�i¢�t'�Z`� n�2w v3.c w
N- ��� N u� V ry G X y� V �
y�� y� n � x t m� m �
E m c°> a�i n rn �� y�° �� i E rn
� 3 m�� io 2+w � a o`o c o p°
a. U_ t0 U V� d
� � N � � L-'� � E � +'� � � �
�` � r 3 a vi c � 3 0
���°o ��� 3 m�? n m w o m c a
E.K o`o m� � c° E y n y 3 n y��
a�i n in 'o � rn 3 oi 2` w=«-OO �- m a E
m 3°J x c a`� D`o �`� m c� m m c�
3dm°mv'vzE�V �'6�mmn
N oQ� .. "O C"' Y ..G. 6_ N m y
� ci�'o t0�`o53 ��nEaw
N N� T p N N� N111'O => L 3 N N N E
V C y C 9 C n � K � Y U�� � C� �)
A y o�,�`� m 3 3 � c a$� 3 � 3 f0 m
Z n o y c 9 a �• � v a o m� O c c$
m � ° " � � £ - v� m � a� '� c
c� mm �'>,�c m3c£om� �'�
� fn �� �� N(J C� m'C F A ry yl �
N C��"O O� 6 N f�J O� N OI E C�"
°��'a�rn`m � a�Oi 3=�rcma c p�E m
�9ma a� y c E"m£u"i`o� a�i
a a 3� y a o c a10i °� Ni n��� w
da m.`�a mn �=E N��«mw �rnd
� c
� v�i =�? n�3 m-�o o. v n � E �° E o d
LL K O— r L� C 3 u T� N d N�
c� 01 a a3i �~ m a� m t a o H a� o� °1 c
a� ' i o.� m 5 o m� w a rn m ����' m v
� H N N J f. N U C C L N� J� O Q N
H t o a`o rn m- ml- n 3 o U' 3� m`
Ms. Amy Euliss
NCDOT Division 9 Environmenta] OfScer
North Cazolina Depariment of Transportation
375 Silas Creek Pazkway
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27127
Deu Ms. Euliss:
rY
�
Ecosystem
PROGBAM
February 4, 2014
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 9 Project, Replace Bridge over Second Creek on SR 2564, Rowan County;
WBS Element 17BP.9.R2D
The puYpose of this letter is to nofify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory stream mitiga6on for the subject project. Based on the infoimarion received from you on Febivary 4,
2014, the impacts are located in CU 03040103 of the Yadkin River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region,
and are as follows:
Yadkin Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03040103 Non- Coastal
Cp Cold Cool Warm Riparian Zone 1 Zone 2
Ri azian Marsh
Impacts 0 0 129.0 0 0 0 0 0
(feeUacres)
T7ris impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by [he NCDOT in the 2013 impact data.
EEP will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation creclits to offset the impacts associated
with this project as detemtined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Secfion F.3.c.ui of the
N.C. Depariment of Environment and Nahual Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounis are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will
no longer be valid and a new mirigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
8420.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Hazmon at 919-707-
Sincerely,
c'� ,
�-� �
Iames . Stanfill
EEP Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of W ater Quality
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT—PDEA
File: SR 2564 — Bridge — Division 9
Re.stovir�... Fr2�Ca�,cr;�... Prot�:ctir29 Occ� Sta,te
�'��
NCDENR
North Camlina Ewsystem Enhancement Program, 1fi52 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-�652/91&707-8976 / http:/lportal.ncdencorglweb/eep
O
N
�
�
�
�
ti
l�
W
�
�1
�
�
�
V
�
�
O
U
See Sheet 7-A For Zndex of 5/eets MOT INCLUDED IN R/W PLfJJ51
See 5/�el 1-B Far Symbalogy 5/�et
- - - �ETOUR ROUTE
��[°�1°l[°II� �1�" I��]I$'I[[°]�[ �:A��B�d��I��
�����I���N �lF 1����1��IA��I'�
Rou�Ax cov�z�
LOCATION.• REPLACE EXISTI11iG BRIDGE 1Y0.189
SR 2564 — SHIVE RD.
TYPE OF WORK.• GRADIIVG, DRAINAGE, WIDEIIIING, BOX
CULVERT AND PAVEMEIVT MARKIl�'GS
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
\
�
f5� \-L- Sta. 11+gg.57 50�
TO SHUPING MILL RD.
-L- POC Sta. 10+g3.46
�
65� T f 0 \
30' `
FOO c -TUE
95' m T E +00
45' fR
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 178P.9.R.2C
-L- POT Sta. 11+20.00,
BEGIN RESURFACING
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LEXGTH
5a 25 0 50 loo 'd'�T Z006 = 230
V = 35 MPH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.20 = 0.044 MI
PL4NS LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJEGT 17BP.9.R.20 = 0.005 MI
so zs o so tqo
�IIII���
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
+3�
J���
�
st�. �z+za.s�
) BOX CULVERT 1
+32 +42 1
�0' S0'
+ �''
�,e ° o `3�
00
sue
� �,
, ,�
� 30 f00 sFCO 15�\ I
� 60' .�,a
� C,p
� Fic�
\
7ZON OF HIGH
I000 BircF Ridge Dr.
Ra4iBA Nq 21610
3N2 STANDAFD SPSCIFTCARONS
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 77BP.9.R.20 = 0.049 MI I�GXT OF WAY DATE:I DAVID KEISER, PE
TRfI nno/acl' axci�en
LETI4VG DATE:
NCDOT CONT9CT:
9
"• 17BP.9.R.20 Il
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 1 OF 4
-L- POT Sta. 13+50.00
END TIP PROJECT 176P.9.R.20
-- � TO ORGAN CHURCH
+8� /30'
+79 /42'
/
/
�
BRIAN LUSK, PE
rxo�acr nasir�r avcameA
MATTHEW JONES, PE
DIV/SfON BRIDGS - PFOGAAAf MANAf.BR
�����s ���
ROADTVAY DESIGN
fiNGINAFR
0
��
ZZ
INCOMPLETE PLANS
Po0. 0.
PRELIMINARY^ PLANS
NR Co
DIVfSIOX OP EIICHA'AYS
ST9TE OA NORTH CAROLINA
0
0
:
��
. a ,, �
�
W
O -
m �
i— m
BL POINT DESC.
7 79-0189-1
2 79-0189-2
3 BL3
\
\
iFOY SxIVE \
08 5B5 PG i9�
O
OO
-L- JIO./IrpOJ/ �
BEG/N T/P /7BP9R20 _ �
-�- ro.� . . x
-L- PoT S�a.1Oi00f10
40'W1YyW/x2SBW )
x_x
�- IO SNI/PINL NILL fl0. � 74L
x x€aw-k�
+00�-
-L- � Sfa.l0+�21 3p�
+00 NE�
65' �oowEA
+oo "_ ' °
g- 5,���TUe
CONTROL POINTS
NORTH EAST ELEVATIDN
652633.7820 1561988.4840 790.05
652478•1530 1562567.1670 755.67
652259•3588 1563259.8644 773.06
-�- PoT
L SiAT10N OFFSET
OUTSI�E PROJECT L]MITS
17+98.83 14.70 RT
OUTSI�E PROJECT LIMITS
lNRVO 88)
BM•1 ELEVqTION • 790.05
N 652634 E 1561988
L STATION 10•00.00 TO BM•1
N77'51'00.45 M DIST 481.65'
REBRR MITH RLUMINUM CiiP STHMPED
•79-0189-1' (SET FLUSH WITH GROUN01.
POINT LIES APPROX 6.6' FROM NORTHERN
EP OF SHIVE RD.
10 11
ROWAN CaUNTY
4.�W INiPACT BRIDGE
sraucruaa »a�en
us os-u-iae
wa5 vep.n.a.zo
TIP ]9-U109
CHfliSiQPHEfl HARTt1NG
FANI�D WIFE
BEO6R91] vup9YNG
O
CU55 I RlP RRP
4N0 GEOTESI�LE
EST.I<0 TONS
£Si.102 SY GT
ENO BOX CULI
-L- Sia.12+24
BM°2
N-6525Gi
E=1562606
30� � ELEV=959.29
�xs.vw xr ae �„-
z..,�,�E-�
00 0
� � 6d
NEN( +81 cn�R r¢
il�lON 75 . . MATTING
,
, JPNES 41LLEF
09 i06 PG iB6
�1
�ERT 1
57
�
cuss ia�v Har J,/ 7RAN5l�lON �
M'0 CEOiEXI�tE �i �
ES(.I35 PONS � TERFV f.SNIVE
E�'� � � LNO WIFE
iEPFY F.SHIVE \ LOUFNN $HIVE
PN� YIIFE GB 10)IPG 925
�WpNN SMVE \ �B 585 ✓L i95
oa n9�PG zeo � O
Q \
12
0
(NHVO 89)
BM•2 ELEVATION • 773.06
N 652543 E 1562686
L STfaTION 12•92.56 82.86' LEFT
R/R SPIKE SET IN BRSE OF 24' OPK
qpPROx. 44' FROM ERSTERN EP OF
PAVEO ORIVEMAY
13 14
Ip OFLAN CNIIFLH N0.—
� /
n /im
/
/
� G� ^ qC >>
8 ��5��
N�� \
:�COMPL�E E PL�NS
�REL[MIN RY PLANS
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 2 OF 4
Jlm
DATUM DESCRIPTION
TNE LOCALIZEO CWRUINAiE SYSTEY UEVELOPEU FOR 7N15 PHOJEtt
IS BASE� 0.Y iXE SiA�E PLANE CO[fl01NAiE5 ESTRfiLiSHEU BY
NCOOi Fpq MCNOIENi '19-0199-2'
MI1H NAO B3/NSflS 2Wi STRIE PLANE GRIU LOORpINRTES OF
NDAiHINC: 64di8.153(ftl EASiINL: 15fi256i.1671ft)
ELEVAiION: 155.6i1fi1
iHE AVENAGE CUBINED GRIU FACiOR OSEO Q� iH15 PROJECi
IGROJNO i0 GRI01 I5: 0.999853C146
iNE N.C. IAABERi CNIU AEAflIXG ANU
LOCALIZEO NOflIZ0.YiAL GRC4M� OISiAN[E FA011
19-01A9-1" i0 -L- SiATI0.Y 10b0•00 IS
N 69'OS'06•13' M 199.15'
ALL IINEAN UI�ENSIRlS AIiE LOCALIZEO H�IZONiAL �ISTANLES
VEfi�ICRL DAiUN OSED IS NAVO BB
CULVERT HYDRA(lUC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARG£ = 700 CFS
DESIGN FR£WENLY = 25 YRS
DES/GN FM' ELEVAT/ON = 753! F7
BASE DISCHARGE _ 1002 CFS
BASE FREWENGY = !00 YRS
BASE MY ELEVATION = 75924 FT
0✓ERTOPP/NG 06CHARGE _ �600 CFS
OVERTOPP/NG fREIX1ENLY= )500 YRS
OVERTOPP/N6 ELEVAT/ON � 7562 FT
TROY SHI`!E
DB 585 PG 794
O
a
0
\\
�
�
,\
\
��
LIN. FT = 31
�
\\
RaWAN C�UNTY
L�W IMPAC"d' �RIDGE
sraocrune �aiar
us ov-u-ice
W&5 3>BP.9.RR11
TIP ]9-0189
CHRISTOPHER HARTUNG
AND WIFE
BEVERLY HARTUNG
DB 933 PG 971
O
1�
CLASS l RlP RAP
AND GEOrEXTILE
EST.I40 TONS
ESr.l02 SY Gr �
� N� G0.�5 ZpO�
Np� H3/N50.
\
COIR FIBER
MATTING J I
�I +3
�. i51�� . 14' —��
f50 " ���,
50' � ,
f50
30 — � . I
GRAU 350 f' F _ �`
TL�2� -�— r�-r.
� _�
f��
30'
+00 TUE +00
65' _ 45'
t00 m TUE �
95'
(NAVD 88)
BM•1 ELEVATION • 790.05
N 652634 E 1561968
L STATION �e•00.ee TO BM•t
N77•51'00.45 W OIST 401.65'
REBAR MITH ALUMINUM CAP STRMPED
'79-0169-1' (SET FLUSH WITH GROUNDI.
POINT LIES APPROX 6.0' FROM NOFiTHERN
EP OF SHIVE R0.
C \
� ^o �-r_r� = TT
F F —
GRAU 350 � ��
TL-2 %
+8/ w
30'
LIN FT=129 PC
� TLJN. FT = 21 �
-F(g�
75'
f
,
t
1�
�
f42
FN�M[Ert
fPoCOMPLE E �LANS
n /w n
�RELIMIN RYgrPLAN'�
JAMES MILLER
DB 706 PG 786
,
30 50' �t� r��,
f; �y `, � ,
��'ue� Rl a t42 �'
� .iF AT-l�r�. � �_ J��� , .,1
���\� _ _ _ F 2 @ 10'-9' RCBC
CLASS l RlP RAP `��
AND GEOTEXTILE
EST.l35 TONS
EST.90 SY GT
CONTROL POINTS
BL POINT DESC. NORTH EAST ELEVATION L STA7ION OFFSET
1 79-0189-1 652633.7820 1561988.4840 790.05 Ol1TSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
2 79-0189-2 652478.1530 1562567.1670 755.67 11+98.83 14.70 RT
3 BL3 652259.3588 7563259.8644 773.06 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
TERRY F. SHIVE
AND WIFE
LOUANN SHIVE
DB 1191 PG 280
O
�" � _
��-r-ri�-_'°— — ' F
— '- — �GRA7U 3S0
. . \L_2 .., .. . . .
�nn i1
w +84
� SUE +79 30'
42'
COIR FBER
MATTING
JS�. �
�IS� \
\> �
\ I
TERRY F. SHI'✓E
AND WIFE
LOIJANN SHIVE
DB 1071 PG 925
DB 585 PG 795
O
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 3 OF 4
c�
�
�PERMANENT CHANNEL
IMPACT
�TEMPORARY CHANNEL
IMPACT
/
i
�
/
%
i
%
�/
�
/ �
/
6NAV0 89)
BM•2 ELEVi1TI0N • 773.06
N 652543 E 1562686
L STATION 12•92.56 82.86' LEFT
R/R SPIKE SET IN BASE OF 24' ORK
APPROK. 44' FROM Ei1STERN EP OF
PAVED ORIVEMl+V
25 72.5 0 25 50
SCALE: 1"=25'
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEETS 4 OF 4
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (FromlTo) Size/Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands inWetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- STA. 10+g3.46 to -L- STA. 13+50.00 2@ 10'x9' RCBC 129 52
TOTALS: 129 52
���V��][�I�T �lF 1H[��IE][WA��
�7[°A7[°]E �lF 1\T�][$7[°lH[ �CAlf��lf�][1�7A
SDIL STABILIZATI011t TIMEFRAMES
PRELIMINARY PLANS
W MOI L3B
SITE DESCRIPTlOIV STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRA��E EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALESo DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) ZONES 7 DAYS NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3el 7 DAYS IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2e1, 19 DAYS ARE ALLOWED,
SLOPES 3alOR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50'IN
LENGTH,
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4el 14 DAYS NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HQW ZONES.
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OP aiIGHWAYS
pw1.Od(Hc
2012 5'A'ANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
I iHFLH %RQSION AMI SBDGf&Y! COMROL PLfNS COMpLY
WR4 lH8 RBGI/L1RON5 S6i POASH HY SIlB
NCC-0IWJO G9N8RAL CONSI2UClSON PPAMR HpFHCt/V6 AlIGI/SS 3.30/(
I$$U8D eY lNe NORlN GAROUNA DEPAA]'MHM OP &W➢2OKN&Yl AND
NANRAL RHSOUAC&S O({TS(ON OF WASBR QUALlIY.
CHARLES HEAFNER
LEVEL IIIA NAME
640
LEVEL IIIA CERTIFICATION NO.
NOTES: ANY DEVIATION FROM OPTIONS GIVEN WILL
REQIIIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BV ENGINEER.
AODITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY
NEED TO BE INSTALLEO AS DIRECrED BY THE
ENGINEEk
I �� I'� (�) � I (�) \
Q
TROY SHIVE
�8 585 PG 794
TO SHUPING MILL RD. �-
� 6R 25671 _ _ _
BOIl2 ST.�NID�R� IDRAWINGS
16U4.01 NmUwdFvmooCwrtalDerml 1fi32.01 Aoe41dec9WimcocTnpTypcA
1605.01 Tempo�vy9J[Fwce 1632,02 Aockldet9cdmrntT.epTyyeB
1606.01 Spxiel9dimmiGmdFmw 1632.03 RoJcldu9edimm�T.epTryeC
�ca�.o� c�..:i c�,o-�;� eoo-.oa ��v.o� r�w�r �+ sa cx� rrm n
1fiY1.01 Tempo�my Bavu ma 81oce 1hmo� t633.oz impo.ay pock 5a� Chect Tme B
1�� � B'°'^ 1634.01 Twyae�y Ibek Bed'orek Uem Type A
I6i0.02 Si6 Bndo type 6 163A.02 impareey Aoek 9dimm� Dem Type H
I610.0.1 Temw�r Sili Oire6 I635.01 Naet Ro� 1de� Sd'weue Treo Trce A
1630.04 9NIwt Baeiv 1635,02 Ibek Rpe ]dtt 8d'wm¢ Tmp Type H
1630.05 Tmvoreey Di.srion 1640.01 Coie Fiba Bdila
1630.Ofi 9periil SdOi�µ Buin 1645.01 Tempo�vy 5ueam Craeriv{
1b3L01 Mwing innlievon
Sed � Y... .
S m6„I
1605.01 T=mvo�.:� S:lt Fsma.-___ ................ -„� Hi Hi
1606.01 Spe�fJ S�d.m�ot Coo[.eI ��o« ____ �
1622.01 T��po...� Be�A. .�d Slop� D..iu� �'- �
1630.02 S.1[ �..:o T�n� B........._..__________-. �
Ib30.03 Tempo�se> Silt D:e�h..._..__..__...._. _,,,
1630A5 Tamno�..r ��.a..ioe__..._... ,.o
1630.06 Sp�cf.l 5611:og Bu:o �
1632.03 Ro=k Inl=t S=d;meot'T.ap T�y� C__._____ �
1633.01 Tempo...� Re=k S;lt C6e�k T�n=-A._....._....._.�
T�mpo..�> Ro�k S:It C6«k T>prA ..;eh O
M.er:re .od Yo1�.�.�Lmld� (PAM)________ �
1633.04 T��po�a�� R=�k S;IeCh��k T�prB_..___.�
{veff�e___.._-___..__ __...__.__.._....._....._ ..............�
W.ttl� .�eF Pal>.c.�l.mid� (PAM)............_.. O
163d.02 T�.�no...� Ra�4 S�d���oe D.�, T�a� B____ �T1
�t/
1635A1 Ro�4 P�pe Iole[ Sedt.,o„t T..p T>pe-A......_........
\
��(�)I�i �'I'I'�C�>I.
_�� /-F�
_"___-"__"_. l'\ ' �-'�,
' �%iSTING R/W rII
I
� TUE a
� _- TUE � PDE
CONSTFVCTIDN SWOENC[ - PHASE I
INSTALL PHASE '�� SPECIdL STI�LINL BPSIN
2. PLACE PH45E IIIAPERVIOIIS �INES
}, MAMTAIN CHANNEL FLOW THROl1CN E%ISTING _TREAM
9. CONSTRtICT OPSTFEaM aND DOwN STFEAM vORTI0N5 OF WEST BARREL.
WINGWALL,AN� CHANNEL IMPROVCMENTS
5. REMOVE PHASE ISP'cCIAL STILLING BASIN
6. REMOVE PHA�E IIMPEFVIOUS DIKES
� �N )
\ y �
\
f
IMPER�:IOUS DIKE � � �
��
..,._..,_ ...... \ ��.
F___""'
sPECU� sn�uN� PDE�
- TUE IMPERVIOUS
DIKE
CHRISTOPHER HARTUNG
AND WIFE
BEVERLY HARTUNG
�B 933 PG 971
1�� I . ..� \I
BM'2
\\� � ...�� �=i5E�686 �'-----
'a ELE�'=759,2.���-_,� '
BST
HOLLY\ \\ � ��
E RJE
�. �4 � F Q �' �-
-��--�-__��__- _..�
�dPR VEMENTS �'"
� �� n \
� __-F
r-r�� -
..�iF-__'_____F
\
CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE I
`-- F
'
�a_ _
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLE'G� PLANS
w ro. �� .ow ai. .,��s,,,aN
CLFARING AND GROBBING
EROSION CONTROL FOR
CONSIRlIC710N SHEET 4
JAMES MILLER
DB 706 PG 786
2564 � (SHNE ROJ
18.4' BST �"
.
N� �FY 5 ZpO,
63/NSft
NP� \
TO ORGAN CHL'RCH RD.
(SR IOCSJ �
�-'__ ____'. rr�. .r�, ..,n. -`..a'.'G^��--/�
W �'. . / . `e.
J- tUE ��
LONSTRUCTION SEOU[NCE - PHASE li
PLALE PHASE IIIMPERVI011' DIXF.S
2. PLACF PHASE IISPECIAL ;iiLLING 9ASIN
3. �IVE3T CYANNEL FLOW THROIIGH WEST BARREL
C. WNSiR�C' uPSiREAM orvp COwrv SLRE4M PaRTI0N5 OF
EAS� 9AFREL WINGWALL.GNO CHANrvEL IMPqOV[MENTS
5. REUC'E PHASF IISPECIAL STILLING B49N
6. REMOVE PHASE IIIMPERVIOUS DIKES
IMPERVIOUS DIKE �
ExiSTING R/w
- � NnTFi I
L CULVEfT CONSTRl1CT!ON SHAL_ BE PERFORMED
IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATIO�V SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2 IMPERVI0I1� DIKES ARE TO BE 11SED -0 ISOLATE
WORK FR011 STREAM FLOW AS NECESSARY.
3. 4LL GR90F0 ARE4S SNALL BE SIABILIZED
VJITHW 24 HOIJRS.
9. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL
BE MCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLU�ES
PO�YETHYLENE SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPFS, AND
HOSES.
5. Pl1MPS AN� HOSES SHALL 6E SUFFICIE�T TO
DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PIJMP SEOIIIENT-
LADEN WATER DIRECTLY INTO STREAM.FOR
DE-wATERING OF CUL�:ERT SITES,THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL RL7ER SEDIMENT-LADEN
WATER THROUGH SPECIAL SEOIMENT B:.SIN.
�6
�'
___F-_- F�� y_�_. F__'__F __
� � ��
� . W
❑
d
� .\'
- TUE 1 P�E iMPERVious T�
DIKE \
SPECIAL STILLING BASW \�S�
NLVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE II
sui. r = w.
sa o ao- bo�
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
mIVISION OF HIG91WAY5
R�LeNRNL.
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
SHQSH FROSfON AND SEDIMHNS GONlAOL PIANS GUMPLY
WIIF iHH REG!/L1]IONS SHS FOA}l( BY Iffi
NCGd108W (:SNHILiL GONSTAUCSfON PERM/S 8Pi£Cl(['8 AOGUSl;2B11
ISSR80 HY iHB NORR! CAAOI.INA DEPARSMBM OP LMIRONAffiM.fAm
Nq]VFAL R&SOlIACHS DMSION OP WATBR 4�1ALlIS.
I '. I�\ (�) � I (�) \
O
TROY SHIVE
�B 585 PG 794
TO CHUPING MILL RD.
!SR 25C71
SM � Ala, �,�.. C•mF°I
1605.01 Tampo�..y5�1[Fenca_ �n-,���
1606.01 $p�cie] Sedimenf Confeo� �ence ____. �
1�22.01 T��pe�.n Be..�..�d Slop� D.,.o.
1630.02 Stl['9.afo Tsv=B.._______...........__-� �
1130.03 Temv�.a�s Sfle D;m6...__..__........... ,,.
1630A5 Temno�.:� �i.anioo___ - .,.o -
1630.06 Sp��:.l St.Iliog B..�u
1632.03 Ro�k I�Iet Sedi.�enk'Q'�.e T>p= C__.._____ �
1633.01 Teapo�.:� Ro�k S;le C6e�k T�prA_.._....._..._�
T�mpo.e.� Ro�k S;le C6«6 T�prA ..ieh O
M.ee�a eod Pol�e�nl.mid. (PAM).__________ �
1G33.02 T��po�..� Rock S;It Ch=�k T�prB.____�
Wetkl __..... ____ �
W.ttl= .�t6 Pa1�.c.�Lm�d� (PAM)......_____ O
16b4.02 T��v=�.�� Ro�k S�dla�oe D.m T�prB_..._. �
1635.01 Ro<k Pfpo Iolot S�d1.�a�t T..p T�pe A......._....
\
\
""__________�
_��X
�-
��---��----_�E
� � C�) \ " I' I'� (�) I .
-."�" ___-v'=��J� 'Jf�;�
� Lk �„ �
�
�
� w�� i�E
0� _
Exisrmc aiw �' � \
� g.
CL �-� O
- � n
-i- i .. �� .._J_�
� tUE
�,, - � TUE �-
�- TUE
50'
rRaNS�rioN
CHARLES HEAFNER
LEVEL IIIA NAME
640
LEVEL IIIA CERTIFICATION NO.
0
�pDE
2d➢12 ST.2ND.�RID IDRA.WdNG5
isoa.m x�a �o� cooeoi n�w
1b05.01 Tempo�eySl�Fwa
1606.01 9p�.i9cdimm�C ouvlFmm
160].Ol Gmei^- Aowuce
1622.01 Tempon'y Bwu md 91ope Unae
�630.01 e�n�r a.do
1630.02 SileBmn Trve B
1630.03 Tempar..y 6W Di[eM1
1630.04 SeOing Bedu
1630.05 Tempo-en D'neNon
1630.06 Spcad 9o'lli�µ He�iv
163L01 Ma�uW ImmO•riou
CHRISTOPHER HARTUNG
AND WIFE
BEVERLY HARTIJNG
DB 933 PG 971
I�� I �� \
BM°2 I„X
N=6$2543 l� �
� E=1��,�686 `--- -. [
ELF V=759 2�7 �. �,
�`^'�.�-;�`�
E �-�- � R1E
� f7 t? � _
TERRY F. SHIVE
\AND WIFE
OUANN SHIVE
DB 1071 PG 925
16i2.01 Rode Ivk� SM o� Teep Tyye A
t6iz.oa noa� we� s�ti�'h.a 7ma e
1632.03 Nod� 1d�� 9etimm� Tmp 'fype C
t633.01 Temponn � Silt (:hxk Trye A
1633.02 T.maoreer � Silt Chack Tyye B
1634.01 Taw«erv � Scdimrn[ Uem '1)pe A
1634.02 Twomefv �k 9�mmr Dm Tme 8
1635A3 Rnct Ace �N ��^e^�Tno Type A
1635.02 Foek Pipe Ide�Sdimeo�Trep Type B
16l�A1 Coie F3er Haflle
1645.01 'C�oo.uv Strnm fioeuoR
'___ F
JAMES MILLER
DB 706 PG 786
C}��k�
`'C's ,s,- , _ .:i
- �R 2564�"ISHNE RD.J
_ IB.4' BST _
NO. I SHE� NO.
R^N SHEET NO.
PL1N5 PFEPFREDBY:
� ��
PRELIMINetRY PLANS
CO NM V CI'NM
INCOMPLE'TE PLANS
ai. .
-0 70 ORGAN CHURCH RO.�
(SR I006J
�r-�u� X ' _, X -X_
___ . .✓i.='' _;'�' �._ ,'v;-a-.?i,-"^LJ
� TUE � �
50't
rRANS�rioN
�
�\ I .
NOTES: ANY DEVIATION F0.0M OPIlONS GIVEN WILL
RE(7UIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER
ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY
NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER
N� G;i�O Z�p'I
NpQ 93�NSR
\
Se.l. P = SO•
ao- o aa sov
BENCM MARK "1:REBAR WITH ALUMIN�M CAP STAMPED '�9-0189-1".STA.10+00.00-L- 6'LEFT,EL.T90.05
/����
i
C� `f� o°
� �
�
0
I
II
II
I I �
J `^� v / /
+ / /
/ / .
/ �9
/
/ � CULVEF
+
60°-00'-00"
�' 20
VO
h� i
�� �
,9•" �! ,// (ROADNAY
�� PAY ITEM)
" _�' �N
/ COIR FIBER MAT'
(ROAOWAY DETAIL
� PAY ITEMI(TYPJ
STA,]p+(5.00 -L-
GUARORAIL
fROADWAY DETAIL AN�
PAY ITEM1(TYP.)
m
N
a
�
0
� FOR OTILITY INFOR�
LOCATION SKETCH
TOTAL STRUCTURE OUANTITIES
STACE I STACE II TOTAL
CLA55 A CONCRETE
BARREL (J0.809CY/FT ISTdGE I1�.563 CY/FT (STAGE II) 32.3 �,Y, 62A C.Y. 94.7 C.Y.
wING EiC. 76.6 �,y, 18.6 C.Y. 35.2 C.Y.
SIlLS LT C.Y. 1.7 C.Y.
SUB TOTALS 50.6 C.Y. 81.0 C.Y. 131.6 �,y,
REINFORCING STEEL
BARREL 4936 LBS. 6971 L65. 11907 LBS.
WINGS ETC. ]079 LBS. 1079 LBS, 2148 �BS.
SUB TOTALS 6010 L65. 8045 L9S. 14055 LBS.
FOUNDkTION CONDITIONING MATERIAL 35 TONS 27 TONS 62 TONS
CULYERT E%CAVATION LUMP SUM
PLAIN RIP RAP CLA55 I 90 TONS 40 TONS
FEMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE LUMP SUM
ASSEMBLED BY : J Y MCCAH I HA pATE
CNEC8E0 BY : K.D. LA� D4iE
�ESIGN ENGMEEP� P MCCARTHA
OF RELORO: OATE
-°-------- - --- ---•••--...--------'-°-------�------------
EL 746.5t E�. 746.4t
ROADWAY DATA
GRA�E PT. EL. (d STA. t2+15.00 -L-
BED EL.(il STA.12+15.00 -L-
ROA�WAY SLOPES
HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE
FREOLIENCY OF DESIGN FLOOD
DESIGN HIGH WATER ELEYATION
DRAINAGE AREA
BASE DISCHARGE 10300)
BASE HIGH WATER ELEVATION
=756.17
=745.40
=2:1
=T00 C.F.S.
=25 YR.
=753.10
=1.57 S0. MI.
=I002 C.F.S.
=75424
I OVERTOPPING FLOOD DATA
ANO OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE =I600 C.F.S.
FREOUENCY OF OVERTOPPING FL00� =500+ YR.
OVERTOPPING HIGH WATER ELEVATION =756.20
-L-
6,_0.. 2,_�,,. 9,_p,.,
PROFILE ALONG � CULVERT
8._0,,,
= EL 796.3,"
9\iiBPA.920\RBP.9A30.SD_
NOTES
ASS�MED LIVE LOAO ---------- HL-93 OR ALTERNATE LOAOING.
DESIGN FILL--------------- 1.88 FT. MAX
DESICN FILL- -- 1.92 Fi. NIN.
FOR OTHER �ESIGN �ATA AN� NOTES SEE STAN�ARD NOTE SHEET.
3"0 WEEP HOLES INOICATEO TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.
CONCRETE IN CIILVERTS TO 8E POURE� IN THE FOLLOWING ORpER;
STAGE I:LLYINC FOOTINCS,FLOOR SLAB INCWDING 4"OF ALL VERTICAL W4LL5,
2.THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE WALLS,SILLS.WINGS FULL NEIGHT.
STAGE II:L WING FOOTINGS.FLOOR SLAB INCLUDING 4'OF VERTICAL WALL.
2.THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE WALL,WINGS FOLL HEIGHT
FOLLOWEO BY ft00F SI.AB AND HEADWALLS.
THE RESIDENT ENGINEER SHALL CHECK THE LENGTH OF CLILVERT BEFORE STAKING
IT OUT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT IT WILL PROPERLY TAKE CARE OF THE FILL.
�IMENSIONS FOft WINC LAYOl1T AS WEL� AS ADDITION4L REINFORCING STEEL
EMBE�DE� IN BARREL ARE SHOWN ON WING SHEET.
IHE SPLICES SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR.
A 3 FOOT STRIP OF FILTER FABRZC SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE FILL FACE
OF THE WING COVERING THE ENTIRE LENG7H OF THE EXPANSION JOINT.
FOR CULVERT OIVEftSION �ETAILS AND PAY ITEM,SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
FOR SIJBMITTAL OF WORKING ORAWINGS.SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR FALSEWORK AN� FORMWORK,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR GROUT FOR STRUCTURES.SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
FOR CRANE 54FETY,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
Ai THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION HE MAY Sl18MIT,TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL,
DESIGN dND DETAIL ORAWINGS FOR 4 PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
IN LIEII OF THE CAST-IN-PLACE CULVERT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.THE DESIGN SHALL
PROVIDE THE SAME SIZE AND NUMBER OF BARRELS AS I1SED ON THE CAST-IN-PLACE
DESIGN.FOR OPTIONAL PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE 60% CULVERT,SEE SPECIAL
PROVISIONS.
REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER THAT PREVENTS
DEBRIS FROM FALLINC INTO THE WATER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SLIBMIT DEMOLITION
PLANS FOR REVIEW AN� REMOVE THE BRIDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 402-2 OF
THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
THE EXISTING STRl1CTURE CONSISTING OF 1 SPAN Cil 25'-6", WITH 24'-5°CLEAR ROA�WAY
AND TIMBER �ECK ON STEEL I-BEAMS AN� TIMBEft CAPS,POSTS AND SILLS dND TIMBER
BULKHEADS ANO LOCATE� AT THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVE�.
' �oQ�N CABp���,
3 ; �SE�': E
�°� i�o�i�s�oµ :S€
�y�;E',,.rt.IN4 ���•�`�
�i�6� ��
QU�,
PROJECT N0. 17BPa9.R.20
ROWAN COUNTY
STATION• 12+15.00 —L—
SHEET t OF 6 REPLACES BRIDGE N0.189
SiGiE Oi NOR1N GPO�IH1
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WtEI4N
BARREL STANDARD
DOUBLE 10 FT. X 9 FT.
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
60° SKEW
DALE�
fTl1 AIl1 Pqi9�
SHEEi N�.
pLIE� �-�
�--ROADWAY FILL SLOPE 2:t
�•SGl BARS (� 3"CTS. ��
ARS- FILL FACE
,RS- STREAM fACE __
-L-
FILL SLOPE 2:l
VYING SLOPE
FOR 2:l FILL
a I CONST. JT. -f II ��\
,",z o 3-•853 BARSJ �l
I U
a�� GRADE -0.7% `" QOw� i
w¢ ' C-"`¢p •483 BARS
�'^� � �u� EACH FACE �
�wm a w¢a STAGCERE� �
m
°� ELEV.795.4 m vi�+N I
NQ� U �- � I
m c u �
� � CONST. JT. � I
_ "' __'__' ___' "�_'___' "______'�
o � I -- - � 1
' 'I �� � 1
M ____r___I
3-"8"5" BARS �
3`H WEEP HOLES Q 10'-0"! CTS, �
EXTERIOR WALL INTERIOR WALL
CULVERT SECTION NORMAL TO ROADWAY
3- °853 (a 5"CTS. —
BOTTOM OF ROOF SLAB
4_"SGI BARS_ (J 3" �
W2
= 39'-11"
9\Ii9PA.930\Ii9P.9.F.20.5�_
63-°4A200 (STAGE II
_'_'__�_'_'_"'_ __
� z �
� J
� W
¢ p
m a
� ' ' " _____'_ m'___ "_'
__ ' _'�"____'tiw'__' _'__
W
_ N �
� � m
�. Q Q
m J
O a �
_ o - LLW = � U
_ a o .e o�J� P o �
-�-
_ _';_ _ _ _' _ _ �-CONSi _JT._ _ _ _
w
"4A201
STAGE II�_STAGE I
END ELEVATION NORMAL TO SKEW
I)
�c:
, /^�^ ^^�i�i•iJ.
♦ �i4�i�i•�'.�
�i �������.
�i Di�i'i�i�i�i:
i �' , • �� ' " � i'�'�'�'��i�i0
: , • • �� �������������
�'."�"�:�'�.��J'�J`
�� ■■�...-.::..=:..�:.-...::..-.-::t«
� � 3-^852 BARS G7 5"CTS.
j TOP OF FLOOR SLAB
� CUWERT
w
0
N
CONSTRUCTION STAGING
(LOOKING DOYINSTRE/+M�
STAGE I CONSTRUCTION
� STAGE II CONSTRUCTION
t
+
at
A2
2"HICH BEAM BOLSTERS
3k 9�j'�"HIGH C.H.C.II. f B.B.) (J 4,_0„CTS.
A300 BARS N u
'TYP. A100 BARS -
CL 2"CL.
BI BARS � ALL CONTINUOUS � ��� N o CONST. JT.—
82 BARS HIGH CHAIR UPPER �- w
f C.H,C.O. ) Gt 3'-0' B3 BARS � �
CiS.
� N
�w
A2 6AR5 6PLICED � LL 3"� WEEP HOlES
WITH B3 BAR51 m
_u
u¢
r�33/q"HIGH C.H.C.U.
� ' A220 8AR5
A200 BARS �+ �
• A900 BARS CONST.JT. pqp0 BARS
V
6" CI BARS W 1'-0"CTS.
STAGE I I STAGE II
RIGHT ANGLE SECTION OF BARREL
THERE ARE 83 "C" B4RS IN SECTION OF BARREL.
fL00KING UPSTREAM)
PLAN SHOWING BARREL LAYOUT WITH SILLS
NOTES:
PLACE SILLS AT INLET AND OUTLET OF THE NEST BARREL ONLY.
BACKFILL WEST BdftREL WITH CLA55 I RIP RAP i0 A �EPTH OF 2',
DRnWN BY � J.P. MCCARTHA pAiE :08/29/1
cxECaEO Br : K.D. LAYNE o<*E :09/12/l3
]HI61on 9\IiBGF.9.204iBP.4P3�,511SU.aqn
STAGE I
BILL OF MATERIAL
RPI��'��d.'fCll:i�'(CiiiH
SiR
� EdST gARREL �
STAGE I
OF MATE
REINFORCING STEEL 4936 LBS
STAGE II
BILL OF MATERIAL
.q
�
WEST BARREL
2 LAYERS OF 30 LB.
ROOFING FELT TO
PREVENT BONO o
(TYPJ
HIGH FLOW
SILL
o �
tk ^6D1 N
STAGE II
OF MATERIAL
nq
+q
_,�:g..p., AT 4
MAXIMOM SPACING
OF 4'-0"
2 LAYERS OF 30 LB.
ROOFING FELT TO
PREVENT BOND
STAGE II
BILL OF MATERIAL
CIC�Y
REINFORCING STEEI 6911 LBS
V
8AR TYPE
�OYlEL � I ALL BAR �IMENSIONS ARE OUT TO OUT �
(TYPd n
PROJECT N0. 17BP.9.R.20
ELEVATION SECTION THROUGH SILL R O W A N
�DOWELS MdY BE PUSHED INTO GREEN CONCRETE 1 C COUNTY
AFTER SLAB HAS BEEN FLOAT FINISHE�. STATION7 1�+�J•OO —L—
CULVERT SILL DETAILS S�EET 3 OF 6
tL00KING DOWNSTPEAMI sr..corxoarxnaouru
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
R1tEtEx
BARREL STANDARD
�^'""° DOUBLE
SPLICE LENGTHS CHART .a°tN�ARp"�
a�°`�'"''�°° 10 F T. X 9 F T.
BAR $IZE SPLICE LENGTH � f2��`:_ �
�, ,, ,._,,. �ot`SE« : = CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
�fj�� �°„0 'g� 60° SKEW
A200 °4 P-9" � 9' F`,��,P.4.:
A400 •5 2'-2" '��"F'•."^^`r&�
5 •8 q'-�I" a" y.� XEVt5I0N5 SxEEi NO
�� xa o�rz� xo en w*u C-3
9" q � ro�ex