The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140149 Ver 1_Application_20140214�,�.� ,� � STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVERNOR February 14, 2014 Mr. John Thomas US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Dr. Suite ] OS Wake Forest, NC 27615 ANTHONY J. TATA SECREiARY SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit #14 Bridge No. 189 on SR 2564 (Shives Road) over Second Creek (Class C) WBS project no.: 17BP.9.R.20 (DWQ permit fee $570) Rowan, NC Dear Mr. Thomas, We are requesting a Nationwide 14 permit for replacement of Bridge No. 189 with a double barrel box culvert on SR 2564 (Shives Road) over Second Creek (Class C) in Rowan County. I have attached a pre-construction notification application, construction plans, erosion control plans, a stormwater management plan, and No Survey Required forms from NCDOT Cultural Resources for Historic Architecture and Archeology. The project will permanently impact 129 linear feet and temporarily impact 52 lineaz feet of Second Creek. Siream flow will be isolated into one barrel, with 2' sills and floodplain benches constructed at the inlet and outlet of the overflow barrel in order to prevenY stream over widening and facilitate aquatic passage. The low flow barrel will be buried P below the stream bed to ensure aquatic passage. The overflow barrel will be bac(dlled with class 1 rip rap to the sill elevation. The culvert site will be dewatered during construction in accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices. By copy of this letter, we also request 401 review and approval from the NC Division of Water Resources with one copy of the application package provided to Amy Chapman, Transportation Permitting Unit Supervisor, and Dave Wanucha, DOT Project Coordinator. Please charge the application fee of $570 to WBS project no. 17BP.9.R.17. By copy of this letter, we also request Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, to comment directly to the Corps concernmg The permit request. If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material please contact me at (336) 747-7802. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Division of Highways • Division Nine • 375 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27127 Telephone (336) 747-7800 • Fax (336) 703-6693 • Courier Box 13-12-04 Si erely, l�� y Euliss Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT Division 9 Attachments: Application Package CC: Amy Chapman, NCDENR-DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit Supervisor- e-copy Dave Wanucha, NCDENR-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy Matt Jones, P.E., Division Bridge Program Engineer- e-copy Phil Suggs, Division 9 Roadside Environmental Engineer- e-copy Marla Chambers, WRC- e-copy o�pF W ATP9oG � y � r O -c Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: OX Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verifed by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certifcation — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? 401 Certification: ❑ Yes OX No ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank � Yes � No or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's iwenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � yes ❑X No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes OX No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 189 with a double barrel box culvert 2b. County: Rowan 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Rockwell 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 176P.9.R.20 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 9 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if pat Ivey, P.E. Division Engineer applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 3f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7800 3g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 3h. Email address: pivey@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2�09 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: DEO 4b. Name: Amy Euliss 4c. Business name NCDOT Division 9 (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 4e. City, state, zip: Winston Salem, NC 27127 4f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7802 4g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 4h. Email address: aeuliss@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.5336 1c. Propertysize: 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 2c. River basin: � . � Longitude: 80.4706 acres Second Creek Class C Yadkin 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The existing site is a bridge. The surrounding area is sparse residential and rural. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and � 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Replace a structurally deicient bridge with a 2 barrel box culvert 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: replace a bridge with a culvert. Standard road building equipment will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 1a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � yes Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / nrnieM linclurlinn all nrinr nh�ceel in fhn nae}9 Comments: on the property: 1 S7 �X No ❑ Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type prelimina of determination was made? ❑ rY ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help fle" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? 6b. If yes, explain. ❑ Yes ❑ Yes 0 No � No ❑ Unknown Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands �X Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of number Corps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 - Choase one Choase one Yes/No - �f�/2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - �/3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/NO - W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - yy5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - �/�Ig - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3 e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number intermittent (IN�? jurisdiction stream length Permanent (P) or width (linear Temporary (T) (feet) feet) S1 P Culvert Secontl Creek PER Corps 6 129 $Z T Dewatering Second Creek PER Corps 6 52 S3 - Choase one - - S4 - Choose one - - S5 - Choose one - - S6 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts �ai 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or type Tem ora T 01 - Choose one Choose 02 - Chaose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. Sb. 5c. Sd. Se. Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland purpose of pond (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one Sf. Total: Sg. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no: Si. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 number— mitigation impact impact Permanent (P) or required? (square (square Tem ora T feet feet B� - Yes/No B2 - Yes/No B3 - Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 � YeslNo B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: rayc � ui i� D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The stream will be isolated to one barrel tluring low Flow through installation of floodplain benches and silis. This will facilitate aquatic passage and prevent ihe stream channel from ovenvidening. Further justification is provided in the stormwater management plan. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Construction runoff has been minimized by designing the erosion control plan according to NCDOT's BMP manual. 2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this x project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Type: Stream Quantity: ' 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity: Type: Choose one Quantity: re i s were purc ase a a : ra io. 3c. Comments: 4. Com lete if Makin a Pa mentto In-lieu Fee Pro ram 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑X Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 204 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: �02 linear feet at a 2:1 ratio 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan Sa. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑X No within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. � Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 20.4 % 2b. Does this ro ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? ❑X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Stormwater management plan is attached. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? owR-7Pu 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local overnmenYs urisdiction is this ro ect? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP � Water Supply Watershed � Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro rem Review �Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �pRW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review Sa. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes � No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No Page S of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds orthe use of public (federal/state) land? ❑x Yes ❑ No 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑X No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) minimum criteria available upon request ❑ Yes ❑X NO Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ❑Yes ❑X No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from NA the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑X No impacts? Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program GIS fle 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fsh habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NA 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? See attached letters of "NO Survey Required" from NCDOT cultural resources for both Archeology and Historic Archilecture 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project resulted in a no-rise condition in the floodplain. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Our determination was based on the NC Floodplain Mapping Digital maps via their website. �„�� '�.�:5 z 2 � �y � i� ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name A p icanUAgenYs Signature Date (AgenYS signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the a licant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 Prajec( Tracking No.: 14-01-0015 ' a��a„� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM ��yq`, a�� This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �� `�o.,�� valid for Aistoric Architecture and Landsca es. You must consult se azatel with the ° � �o.�� .�x P P Y � �� '" Historic Architecture and Iandscapes Group. �p�:�� i PROJECT INFORMATION Project No. N'BSNo: F.A. No.• #790189 17BP.9.R20 Federa! Permit Required? County• Document • Rowan MCS Funding: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Permit Type.• NWP14 Project Description: Thrs project prnposes to replace Bridge No. 189, which carries SR2564 (Shive Road) aver a tributary ofSecond Creek in Rowan County, North Caralina According to the environ»iental input requesy the undertaking involves the in pince replacement ofthe struchere along the existing alignment, thereby minimiying patential surface and subsurface disturbances at ttiis locwtion. A 1.0 niile long oJj-site detour route (Shuping Mill Rd to Old Betty Ford Rd to Organ Church Rd to Shive Rd) is anlicipated. The archaeologica[Area ofPotenHal E,Jjects (APE) is centered upon Bridge 189 and nieasures 600ft in length (300ft from each bridge end point) and ISOft in width (75ft from each side of the SRZ564 center-line). SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review octivities, iesults of review, and conclusions: The project area is located in the south-central portion of Rowan, roughly equidistant between Kannapolis to the west and the small Rockwell community to the east. A tributary of Second Creek flows northwest to southeast through the project APE. This section of Rowan County is characterized by a hilly and rolling Piedmont topography. 7he APE contains frequently flooded and somewhat poorly drained soil types in the western portions of the APE and moderately eroded �and surfaces east of the creek. First, construction design data and other perti�ent project information was examined for determining the character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing the bridge replacement. Once an APE was defined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSAj. No previously documented archaeological sites are located in the archaeological APE or directly adjacent. One prehistoric site is situated about a half mile southwest of Bridge No.189. Aaording to the site form, Middle Archaic projectile points were retrieved by the landowner during unsystematic surface collecting of an agricultural field. Clearly, this information demonstrates an Archaic period occupation/visitation of the vicinity, which therefore increases the likelihood of documenting similar cultural components in the project study area and APE. Historic structure locations often harbor archaeological deposits and features related to the former occupation of a property. An inspection of National Register of Historic Piaces (NRHP), State Study Llsted (SL), Locally Designated (LD�, Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources availabie on the NCSHPO website evidenced an absence of these historic resources within the immediate project area. In addition, historic maps of Rowan County were appraised to further identify former structure locations, land use patterns, or other confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were inspected as well. In general, the cultural background review established that no NRHP listed properties, archaeological sites, or cemeteries are located within the APE or directly proximal. eased on culturel-historical factors, the APE is considered to have a moderate potential for [he documentation of prehistoric archaeological resources. Further, topographic, geologic, and NRCS soil survey maps (ChA, AsC, RoC, Ce62) were referenced to evaluate pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "jornr jm' Mlnor Trmtrpor(otlai Projec(s rss Qrmllped bi (Oe7007 Aogrnnmmllc Agreenreu(. 1 oF2 i I, �� " "r� �� ' � Projed Tracking Na. (In(ernal Urcf 14-01-0015 HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: County: Rowan WBS No.: 17BP.9.R.20 Document T e: Fe�L Aid No: Funding: State Federal Federal Yes No Permit NWP 14 Permit(s): Ty e(s): Proiect Descrintion: Re lace Person Count Brid e No. 189 over tribut to Second Creek on SR 2564 (Shive Rd). OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on January 30, 2014. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, SL, or SS in the project azea. Rowan County GIS Tax Data shows two parcels with structure in the APE. The house with driveway immediately southeast of the bridge was constructed in 1988. The pazcel northwest of the bridge contains a luge historic barn; however no dwelling associated with the bam remains. A house constructed in 1994 stands on a 3-acre parcel carved from the nearly 50-acre parcel on which the barn sits. Farther southeast of the bridge is a c. 1900 house. The parcel on which that house sits is outside the project area. There are no other properties over 50 years of age that meet the minimum criteria for National Reeister ElieibiliN in the proiect APE. are no unidentired sirni�cant historic architectural or landscane resources in the nroiect area: Using HPO GIS website and the Rowan County GIS Tax Data website provides reliable information regarding the structures in the APE. These combined urilities are considered valid for the purposes of detemilning the likelihood of historic resources being present. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION �Map(s) �Previous Survey Info. �Photos ❑Coaespondence ❑Design Plans FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED NCDOT Date � Nlarorlc Ascbllecbi�e m�d Lnndstnpu NO SURVEYREQU/REDfonn for Minor �'ansyarMtian Projecli m Qvnlifeed in lht 2007 ProgrnnnnnficAgreemenf. Page 1 of4 N 0 � � 1= � � E m a O L O V 0 2 5 �a m ~ Q W a 0 W 3a og N W �.F" ; � W g O � ��FI � � � �� !� I� �� ' I � N j � N m N � � r — N N U � Z N L LL m V = N V � n T N 3 �' y N a z �i E d v U t0 N 1° o in : d 2 Y W 3 c .� U � Z^ E .0 a w C O .� U :y � C U ' U >� tC > y N W � u V '10t E 7 L h O y u W 7 9 N J W � N m d n N m N O U � N N � . N N O T N� � N N� O i] y C t L t a � t y H C O O y aLL U N p�0 O �lL � N 'e c a`n.. c".3��r 3 �-L° m� m u w F (0 C�� U I� ..L.. a N�"O Vf � C�C 3N��OCNLCN' �u � 9� V��«� U� ~ C,�O Ol N O °-o D U T" L� m'� E n!° o N � ` � o � � o �.°o a .� � � cxi °:� y C. _ a�a m "cE�ca�ai m�?`o ma c� o a� �o c� a> c r V t �> � �°.� m in m� a� m m ��v � t E� c � m �� y E� 3� m d t n 3 m�' m t m � C� d N 1 D L Q �� N d N~ Y � d y V � O~ N ip O N.L.- 6 C V O. ��"'�' v N— V— O� O L�` N 9 `� N� w y � O. � LL 6... "-' N.S N � d � E� � N N N N`L-' m°�" o �° c 3�°._ � 3� m i � 3 o t ��m � � c° :: 3 rn�° ; m �vEm'o°�`°rnE a�+i`° � � � m ~-� y m K 3� n d a ��w o m m oi Y1 N C N w .0 �% .D L Y m� o t 3 9 H � d�� o m c°� O� N N �(J,�Y N H dw U w tn N .. � f0 a w W r � H� 0 D C d 3 N C O y N K'O (Il � U N u�� y L� U N N� N T N—� C� C t> F~ 3 w 3 m E=' � a« o t c� u �� c 10 O' U= �? `� 2 U � mm� x rna min 3.0 �'w� �9" � a c�� o r:°• 'c o� E'� � o 5 �2•�i¢�t'�Z`� n�2w v3.c w N- �� N u� V ry G X y� V � y�� y� n � x t m� m � E m c°> a�i n rn �� y�° �� i E rn � 3 m�� io 2+w � a o`o c o p° a. U_ t0 U V� d � � N � � L-'� � E � +'� � � � �` � r 3 a vi c � 3 0 ��°o �� 3 m�? n m w o m c a E.K o`o m� � c° E y n y 3 n y�� a�i n in 'o � rn 3 oi 2` w=«-OO �- m a E m 3°J x c a`� D`o �`� m c� m m c� 3dm°mv'vzE�V �'6�mmn N oQ� .. "O C"' Y ..G. 6_ N m y � ci�'o t0�`o53 ��nEaw N N� T p N N� N111'O => L 3 N N N E V C y C 9 C n � K � Y U�� C� �) A y o�,�`� m 3 3 � c a$� 3 � 3 f0 m Z n o y c 9 a �• � v a o m� O c c$ m � ° " � � £ - v� m � a� '� c c� mm �'>,�c m3c£om� �'� � fn �� N(J C� m'C F A ry yl � N C��"O O� 6 N f�J O� N OI E C�" °��'a�rn`m � a�Oi 3=�rcma c p�E m �9ma a� y c E"m£u"i`o� a�i a a 3� y a o c a10i °� Ni n�� w da m.`�a mn �=E N��«mw �rnd � c � v�i =�? n�3 m-�o o. v n � E �° E o d LL K O— r L� C 3 u T� N d N� c� 01 a a3i �~ m a� m t a o H a� o� °1 c a� ' i o.� m 5 o m� w a rn m ��' m v � H N N J f. N U C C L N� J� O Q N H t o a`o rn m- ml- n 3 o U' 3� m` Ms. Amy Euliss NCDOT Division 9 Environmenta] OfScer North Cazolina Depariment of Transportation 375 Silas Creek Pazkway Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27127 Deu Ms. Euliss: rY � Ecosystem PROGBAM February 4, 2014 Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter: Division 9 Project, Replace Bridge over Second Creek on SR 2564, Rowan County; WBS Element 17BP.9.R2D The puYpose of this letter is to nofify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the compensatory stream mitiga6on for the subject project. Based on the infoimarion received from you on Febivary 4, 2014, the impacts are located in CU 03040103 of the Yadkin River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Yadkin Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.) 03040103 Non- Coastal Cp Cold Cool Warm Riparian Zone 1 Zone 2 Ri azian Marsh Impacts 0 0 129.0 0 0 0 0 0 (feeUacres) T7ris impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by [he NCDOT in the 2013 impact data. EEP will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation creclits to offset the impacts associated with this project as detemtined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Secfion F.3.c.ui of the N.C. Depariment of Environment and Nahual Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounis are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mirigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP. 8420. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Hazmon at 919-707- Sincerely, c'� , �-� � Iames . Stanfill EEP Asset Management Supervisor cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of W ater Quality Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT—PDEA File: SR 2564 — Bridge — Division 9 Re.stovir�... Fr2�Ca�,cr;�... Prot�:ctir29 Occ� Sta,te �'�� NCDENR North Camlina Ewsystem Enhancement Program, 1fi52 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-�652/91&707-8976 / http:/lportal.ncdencorglweb/eep O N � � � � ti l� W � �1 � � � V � � O U See Sheet 7-A For Zndex of 5/eets MOT INCLUDED IN R/W PLfJJ51 See 5/�el 1-B Far Symbalogy 5/�et - - - �ETOUR ROUTE ��[°�1°l[°II� �1�" I��]I$'I[[°]�[ �:A��B�d��I�� I��N �lF 1��1��IA��I'� Rou�Ax cov�z� LOCATION.• REPLACE EXISTI11iG BRIDGE 1Y0.189 SR 2564 — SHIVE RD. TYPE OF WORK.• GRADIIVG, DRAINAGE, WIDEIIIING, BOX CULVERT AND PAVEMEIVT MARKIl�'GS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT \ � f5� \-L- Sta. 11+gg.57 50� TO SHUPING MILL RD. -L- POC Sta. 10+g3.46 � 65� T f 0 \ 30' ` FOO c -TUE 95' m T E +00 45' fR BEGIN TIP PROJECT 178P.9.R.2C -L- POT Sta. 11+20.00, BEGIN RESURFACING CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LEXGTH 5a 25 0 50 loo 'd'�T Z006 = 230 V = 35 MPH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.20 = 0.044 MI PL4NS LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJEGT 17BP.9.R.20 = 0.005 MI so zs o so tqo �IIII�� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) +3� J�� st�. �z+za.s� ) BOX CULVERT 1 +32 +42 1 �0' S0' + �'' �,e ° o `3� 00 sue � �, , ,� � 30 f00 sFCO 15�\ I � 60' .�,a � C,p � Fic� \ 7ZON OF HIGH I000 BircF Ridge Dr. Ra4iBA Nq 21610 3N2 STANDAFD SPSCIFTCARONS TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 77BP.9.R.20 = 0.049 MI I�GXT OF WAY DATE:I DAVID KEISER, PE TRfI nno/acl' axci�en LETI4VG DATE: NCDOT CONT9CT: 9 "• 17BP.9.R.20 Il PERMIT DRAWING SHEETS 1 OF 4 -L- POT Sta. 13+50.00 END TIP PROJECT 176P.9.R.20 -- � TO ORGAN CHURCH +8� /30' +79 /42' / / � BRIAN LUSK, PE rxo�acr nasir�r avcameA MATTHEW JONES, PE DIV/SfON BRIDGS - PFOGAAAf MANAf.BR ��s �� ROADTVAY DESIGN fiNGINAFR 0 �� ZZ INCOMPLETE PLANS Po0. 0. PRELIMINARY^ PLANS NR Co DIVfSIOX OP EIICHA'AYS ST9TE OA NORTH CAROLINA 0 0 : �� . a ,, � � W O - m � i— m BL POINT DESC. 7 79-0189-1 2 79-0189-2 3 BL3 \ \ iFOY SxIVE \ 08 5B5 PG i9� O OO -L- JIO./IrpOJ/ � BEG/N T/P /7BP9R20 _ � -�- ro.� . . x -L- PoT S�a.1Oi00f10 40'W1YyW/x2SBW ) x_x �- IO SNI/PINL NILL fl0. � 74L x x€aw-k� +00�- -L- � Sfa.l0+�21 3p� +00 NE� 65' �oowEA +oo "_ ' ° g- 5,��TUe CONTROL POINTS NORTH EAST ELEVATIDN 652633.7820 1561988.4840 790.05 652478•1530 1562567.1670 755.67 652259•3588 1563259.8644 773.06 -�- PoT L SiAT10N OFFSET OUTSI�E PROJECT L]MITS 17+98.83 14.70 RT OUTSI�E PROJECT LIMITS lNRVO 88) BM•1 ELEVqTION • 790.05 N 652634 E 1561988 L STATION 10•00.00 TO BM•1 N77'51'00.45 M DIST 481.65' REBRR MITH RLUMINUM CiiP STHMPED •79-0189-1' (SET FLUSH WITH GROUN01. POINT LIES APPROX 6.6' FROM NORTHERN EP OF SHIVE RD. 10 11 ROWAN CaUNTY 4.�W INiPACT BRIDGE sraucruaa »a�en us os-u-iae wa5 vep.n.a.zo TIP ]9-U109 CHfliSiQPHEfl HARTt1NG FANI�D WIFE BEO6R91] vup9YNG O CU55 I RlP RRP 4N0 GEOTESI�LE EST.I<0 TONS £Si.102 SY GT ENO BOX CULI -L- Sia.12+24 BM°2 N-6525Gi E=1562606 30� � ELEV=959.29 �xs.vw xr ae �„- z..,�,�E-� 00 0 � � 6d NEN( +81 cn�R r¢ il�lON 75 . . MATTING , , JPNES 41LLEF 09 i06 PG iB6 �1 �ERT 1 57 � cuss ia�v Har J,/ 7RAN5l�lON � M'0 CEOiEXI�tE �i � ES(.I35 PONS � TERFV f.SNIVE E�'� � � LNO WIFE iEPFY F.SHIVE \ LOUFNN $HIVE PN� YIIFE GB 10)IPG 925 �WpNN SMVE \ �B 585 ✓L i95 oa n9�PG zeo � O Q \ 12 0 (NHVO 89) BM•2 ELEVATION • 773.06 N 652543 E 1562686 L STfaTION 12•92.56 82.86' LEFT R/R SPIKE SET IN BRSE OF 24' OPK qpPROx. 44' FROM ERSTERN EP OF PAVEO ORIVEMAY 13 14 Ip OFLAN CNIIFLH N0.— � / n /im / / � G� ^ qC >> 8 ��5�� N�� \ :�COMPL�E E PL�NS �REL[MIN RY PLANS PERMIT DRAWING SHEETS 2 OF 4 Jlm DATUM DESCRIPTION TNE LOCALIZEO CWRUINAiE SYSTEY UEVELOPEU FOR 7N15 PHOJEtt IS BASE� 0.Y iXE SiA�E PLANE CO[fl01NAiE5 ESTRfiLiSHEU BY NCOOi Fpq MCNOIENi '19-0199-2' MI1H NAO B3/NSflS 2Wi STRIE PLANE GRIU LOORpINRTES OF NDAiHINC: 64di8.153(ftl EASiINL: 15fi256i.1671ft) ELEVAiION: 155.6i1fi1 iHE AVENAGE CUBINED GRIU FACiOR OSEO Q� iH15 PROJECi IGROJNO i0 GRI01 I5: 0.999853C146 iNE N.C. IAABERi CNIU AEAflIXG ANU LOCALIZEO NOflIZ0.YiAL GRC4M� OISiAN[E FA011 19-01A9-1" i0 -L- SiATI0.Y 10b0•00 IS N 69'OS'06•13' M 199.15' ALL IINEAN UI�ENSIRlS AIiE LOCALIZEO H�IZONiAL �ISTANLES VEfi�ICRL DAiUN OSED IS NAVO BB CULVERT HYDRA(lUC DATA DESIGN DISCHARG£ = 700 CFS DESIGN FR£WENLY = 25 YRS DES/GN FM' ELEVAT/ON = 753! F7 BASE DISCHARGE _ 1002 CFS BASE FREWENGY = !00 YRS BASE MY ELEVATION = 75924 FT 0✓ERTOPP/NG 06CHARGE _ �600 CFS OVERTOPP/NG fREIX1ENLY= )500 YRS OVERTOPP/N6 ELEVAT/ON � 7562 FT TROY SHI`!E DB 585 PG 794 O a 0 \\ � � ,\ \ �� LIN. FT = 31 � \\ RaWAN C�UNTY L�W IMPAC"d' �RIDGE sraocrune �aiar us ov-u-ice W&5 3>BP.9.RR11 TIP ]9-0189 CHRISTOPHER HARTUNG AND WIFE BEVERLY HARTUNG DB 933 PG 971 O 1� CLASS l RlP RAP AND GEOrEXTILE EST.I40 TONS ESr.l02 SY Gr � � N� G0.�5 ZpO� Np� H3/N50. \ COIR FIBER MATTING J I �I +3 �. i51�� . 14' —�� f50 " ��, 50' � , f50 30 — � . I GRAU 350 f' F _ �` TL�2� -�— r�-r. � _� f�� 30' +00 TUE +00 65' _ 45' t00 m TUE � 95' (NAVD 88) BM•1 ELEVATION • 790.05 N 652634 E 1561968 L STATION �e•00.ee TO BM•t N77•51'00.45 W OIST 401.65' REBAR MITH ALUMINUM CAP STRMPED '79-0169-1' (SET FLUSH WITH GROUNDI. POINT LIES APPROX 6.0' FROM NOFiTHERN EP OF SHIVE R0. C \ � ^o �-r_r� = TT F F — GRAU 350 � �� TL-2 % +8/ w 30' LIN FT=129 PC � TLJN. FT = 21 � -F(g� 75' f , t 1� � f42 FN�M[Ert fPoCOMPLE E �LANS n /w n �RELIMIN RYgrPLAN'� JAMES MILLER DB 706 PG 786 , 30 50' �t� r��, f; �y `, � , ��'ue� Rl a t42 �' � .iF AT-l�r�. � �_ J�� , .,1 ��\� _ _ _ F 2 @ 10'-9' RCBC CLASS l RlP RAP `�� AND GEOTEXTILE EST.l35 TONS EST.90 SY GT CONTROL POINTS BL POINT DESC. NORTH EAST ELEVATION L STA7ION OFFSET 1 79-0189-1 652633.7820 1561988.4840 790.05 Ol1TSIDE PROJECT LIMITS 2 79-0189-2 652478.1530 1562567.1670 755.67 11+98.83 14.70 RT 3 BL3 652259.3588 7563259.8644 773.06 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS TERRY F. SHIVE AND WIFE LOUANN SHIVE DB 1191 PG 280 O �" � _ ��-r-ri�-_'°— — ' F — '- — �GRA7U 3S0 . . \L_2 .., .. . . . �nn i1 w +84 � SUE +79 30' 42' COIR FBER MATTING JS�. � �IS� \ \> � \ I TERRY F. SHI'✓E AND WIFE LOIJANN SHIVE DB 1071 PG 925 DB 585 PG 795 O PERMIT DRAWING SHEETS 3 OF 4 c� � �PERMANENT CHANNEL IMPACT �TEMPORARY CHANNEL IMPACT / i � / % i % �/ � / � / 6NAV0 89) BM•2 ELEVi1TI0N • 773.06 N 652543 E 1562686 L STATION 12•92.56 82.86' LEFT R/R SPIKE SET IN BASE OF 24' ORK APPROK. 44' FROM Ei1STERN EP OF PAVED ORIVEMl+V 25 72.5 0 25 50 SCALE: 1"=25' PERMIT DRAWING SHEETS 4 OF 4 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (FromlTo) Size/Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands inWetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 -L- STA. 10+g3.46 to -L- STA. 13+50.00 2@ 10'x9' RCBC 129 52 TOTALS: 129 52 ��V��][�I�T �lF 1H[��IE][WA�� 7[°A7[°]E �lF 1\T�][$7[°lH[ �CAlf��lf�][1�7A SDIL STABILIZATI011t TIMEFRAMES PRELIMINARY PLANS W MOI L3B SITE DESCRIPTlOIV STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRA��E EXCEPTIONS PERIMETER DIKES, SWALESo DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS NONE HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) ZONES 7 DAYS NONE SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3el 7 DAYS IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER THAN 2e1, 19 DAYS ARE ALLOWED, SLOPES 3alOR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50'IN LENGTH, ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4el 14 DAYS NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HQW ZONES. ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OP aiIGHWAYS pw1.Od(Hc 2012 5'A'ANDARD SPECIFICATIONS I iHFLH %RQSION AMI SBDGf&Y! COMROL PLfNS COMpLY WR4 lH8 RBGI/L1RON5 S6i POASH HY SIlB NCC-0IWJO G9N8RAL CONSI2UClSON PPAMR HpFHCt/V6 AlIGI/SS 3.30/( I$$U8D eY lNe NORlN GAROUNA DEPAA]'MHM OP &W➢2OKN&Yl AND NANRAL RHSOUAC&S O({TS(ON OF WASBR QUALlIY. CHARLES HEAFNER LEVEL IIIA NAME 640 LEVEL IIIA CERTIFICATION NO. NOTES: ANY DEVIATION FROM OPTIONS GIVEN WILL REQIIIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BV ENGINEER. AODITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY NEED TO BE INSTALLEO AS DIRECrED BY THE ENGINEEk I �� I'� (�) � I (�) \ Q TROY SHIVE �8 585 PG 794 TO SHUPING MILL RD. �- � 6R 25671 _ _ _ BOIl2 ST.�NID�R� IDRAWINGS 16U4.01 NmUwdFvmooCwrtalDerml 1fi32.01 Aoe41dec9WimcocTnpTypcA 1605.01 Tempo�vy9J[Fwce 1632,02 Aockldet9cdmrntT.epTyyeB 1606.01 Spxiel9dimmiGmdFmw 1632.03 RoJcldu9edimm�T.epTryeC �ca�.o� c�..:i c�,o-�;� eoo-.oa ��v.o� r�w�r �+ sa cx� rrm n 1fiY1.01 Tempo�my Bavu ma 81oce 1hmo� t633.oz impo.ay pock 5a� Chect Tme B 1�� B'°'^ 1634.01 Twyae�y Ibek Bed'orek Uem Type A I6i0.02 Si6 Bndo type 6 163A.02 impareey Aoek 9dimm� Dem Type H I610.0.1 Temw�r Sili Oire6 I635.01 Naet Ro� 1de� Sd'weue Treo Trce A 1630.04 9NIwt Baeiv 1635,02 Ibek Rpe ]dtt 8d'wm¢ Tmp Type H 1630.05 Tmvoreey Di.srion 1640.01 Coie Fiba Bdila 1630.Ofi 9periil SdOi�µ Buin 1645.01 Tempo�vy 5ueam Craeriv{ 1b3L01 Mwing innlievon Sed � Y... . S m6„I 1605.01 T=mvo�.:� S:lt Fsma.-___ ................ -„� Hi Hi 1606.01 Spe�fJ S�d.m�ot Coo[.eI ��o« ____ � 1622.01 T��po...� Be�A. .�d Slop� D..iu� �'- � 1630.02 S.1[ �..:o T�n� B........._..__________-. � Ib30.03 Tempo�se> Silt D:e�h..._..__..__...._. _,,, 1630A5 Tamno�..r ��.a..ioe__..._... ,.o 1630.06 Sp�cf.l 5611:og Bu:o � 1632.03 Ro=k Inl=t S=d;meot'T.ap T�y� C__._____ � 1633.01 Tempo...� Re=k S;lt C6e�k T�n=-A._....._....._.� T�mpo..�> Ro�k S:It C6«k T>prA ..;eh O M.er:re .od Yo1�.�.�Lmld� (PAM)________ � 1633.04 T��po�a�� R=�k S;IeCh��k T�prB_..___.� {veff�e___.._-___..__ __...__.__.._....._....._ ..............� W.ttl� .�eF Pal>.c.�l.mid� (PAM)............_.. O 163d.02 T�.�no...� Ra�4 S�d��oe D.�, T�a� B____ �T1 �t/ 1635A1 Ro�4 P�pe Iole[ Sedt.,o„t T..p T>pe-A......_........ \ ��(�)I�i �'I'I'�C�>I. _�� /-F� _"___-"__"_. l'\ ' �-'�, ' �%iSTING R/W rII I � TUE a � _- TUE � PDE CONSTFVCTIDN SWOENC[ - PHASE I INSTALL PHASE '�� SPECIdL STI�LINL BPSIN 2. PLACE PH45E IIIAPERVIOIIS �INES }, MAMTAIN CHANNEL FLOW THROl1CN E%ISTING _TREAM 9. CONSTRtICT OPSTFEaM aND DOwN STFEAM vORTI0N5 OF WEST BARREL. WINGWALL,AN� CHANNEL IMPROVCMENTS 5. REMOVE PHASE ISP'cCIAL STILLING BASIN 6. REMOVE PHA�E IIMPEFVIOUS DIKES � �N ) \ y � \ f IMPER�:IOUS DIKE � � � �� ..,._..,_ ...... \ ��. F___""' sPECU� sn�uN� PDE� - TUE IMPERVIOUS DIKE CHRISTOPHER HARTUNG AND WIFE BEVERLY HARTUNG �B 933 PG 971 1�� I . ..� \I BM'2 \\� � ...�� =i5E�686 �'----- 'a ELE�'=759,2.��-_,� ' BST HOLLY\ \\ � �� E RJE �. �4 � F Q �' �- -��--�-__��__- _..� �dPR VEMENTS �'" � �� n \ � __-F r-r�� - ..�iF-__'_____F \ CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE I `-- F ' �a_ _ PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLE'G� PLANS w ro. �� .ow ai. .,��s,,,aN CLFARING AND GROBBING EROSION CONTROL FOR CONSIRlIC710N SHEET 4 JAMES MILLER DB 706 PG 786 2564 � (SHNE ROJ 18.4' BST �" . N� �FY 5 ZpO, 63/NSft NP� \ TO ORGAN CHL'RCH RD. (SR IOCSJ � �-'__ ____'. rr�. .r�, ..,n. -`..a'.'G^��--/� W �'. . / . `e. J- tUE �� LONSTRUCTION SEOU[NCE - PHASE li PLALE PHASE IIIMPERVI011' DIXF.S 2. PLACF PHASE IISPECIAL ;iiLLING 9ASIN 3. �IVE3T CYANNEL FLOW THROIIGH WEST BARREL C. WNSiR�C' uPSiREAM orvp COwrv SLRE4M PaRTI0N5 OF EAS� 9AFREL WINGWALL.GNO CHANrvEL IMPqOV[MENTS 5. REUC'E PHASF IISPECIAL STILLING B49N 6. REMOVE PHASE IIIMPERVIOUS DIKES IMPERVIOUS DIKE � ExiSTING R/w - � NnTFi I L CULVEfT CONSTRl1CT!ON SHAL_ BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATIO�V SECTIONS OF CHANNEL. 2 IMPERVI0I1� DIKES ARE TO BE 11SED -0 ISOLATE WORK FR011 STREAM FLOW AS NECESSARY. 3. 4LL GR90F0 ARE4S SNALL BE SIABILIZED VJITHW 24 HOIJRS. 9. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE MCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLU�ES PO�YETHYLENE SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPFS, AND HOSES. 5. Pl1MPS AN� HOSES SHALL 6E SUFFICIE�T TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PIJMP SEOIIIENT- LADEN WATER DIRECTLY INTO STREAM.FOR DE-wATERING OF CUL�:ERT SITES,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RL7ER SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER THROUGH SPECIAL SEOIMENT B:.SIN. �6 �' ___F-_- F�� y_�_. F__'__F __ � � �� . W ❑ d � .\' - TUE 1 P�E iMPERVious T� DIKE \ SPECIAL STILLING BASW \�S� NLVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE II sui. r = w. sa o ao- bo� ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION mIVISION OF HIG91WAY5 R�LeNRNL. 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHQSH FROSfON AND SEDIMHNS GONlAOL PIANS GUMPLY WIIF iHH REG!/L1]IONS SHS FOA}l( BY Iffi NCGd108W (:SNHILiL GONSTAUCSfON PERM/S 8Pi£Cl(['8 AOGUSl;2B11 ISSR80 HY iHB NORR! CAAOI.INA DEPARSMBM OP LMIRONAffiM.fAm Nq]VFAL R&SOlIACHS DMSION OP WATBR 4�1ALlIS. I '. I�\ (�) � I (�) \ O TROY SHIVE �B 585 PG 794 TO CHUPING MILL RD. !SR 25C71 SM � Ala, �,�.. C•mF°I 1605.01 Tampo�..y5�1[Fenca_ �n-,�� 1606.01 $p�cie] Sedimenf Confeo� �ence ____. � 1�22.01 T��pe�.n Be..�..�d Slop� D.,.o. 1630.02 Stl['9.afo Tsv=B.._______...........__-� � 1130.03 Temv�.a�s Sfle D;m6...__..__........... ,,. 1630A5 Temno�.:� �i.anioo___ - .,.o - 1630.06 Sp��:.l St.Iliog B..�u 1632.03 Ro�k I�Iet Sedi.�enk'Q'�.e T>p= C__.._____ � 1633.01 Teapo�.:� Ro�k S;le C6e�k T�prA_.._....._..._� T�mpo.e.� Ro�k S;le C6«6 T�prA ..ieh O M.ee�a eod Pol�e�nl.mid. (PAM).__________ � 1G33.02 T��po�..� Rock S;It Ch=�k T�prB.____� Wetkl __..... ____ � W.ttl= .�t6 Pa1�.c.�Lm�d� (PAM)......_____ O 16b4.02 T��v=�.�� Ro�k S�dla�oe D.m T�prB_..._. � 1635.01 Ro<k Pfpo Iolot S�d1.�a�t T..p T�pe A......._.... \ \ ""__________� _��X �- ��---��----_�E � � C�) \ " I' I'� (�) I . -."�" ___-v'=��J� 'Jf�;� � Lk �„ � � � � w�� i�E 0� _ Exisrmc aiw �' � \ � g. CL �-� O - � n -i- i .. �� .._J_� � tUE �,, - � TUE �- �- TUE 50' rRaNS�rioN CHARLES HEAFNER LEVEL IIIA NAME 640 LEVEL IIIA CERTIFICATION NO. 0 �pDE 2d➢12 ST.2ND.�RID IDRA.WdNG5 isoa.m x�a �o� cooeoi n�w 1b05.01 Tempo�eySl�Fwa 1606.01 9p�.i9cdimm�C ouvlFmm 160].Ol Gmei^- Aowuce 1622.01 Tempon'y Bwu md 91ope Unae �630.01 e�n�r a.do 1630.02 SileBmn Trve B 1630.03 Tempar..y 6W Di[eM1 1630.04 SeOing Bedu 1630.05 Tempo-en D'neNon 1630.06 Spcad 9o'lli�µ He�iv 163L01 Ma�uW ImmO•riou CHRISTOPHER HARTUNG AND WIFE BEVERLY HARTIJNG DB 933 PG 971 I�� I �� \ BM°2 I„X N=6$2543 l� � � E=1��,�686 `--- -. [ ELF V=759 2�7 �. �, �`^'�.�-;�`� E �-�- � R1E � f7 t? � _ TERRY F. SHIVE \AND WIFE OUANN SHIVE DB 1071 PG 925 16i2.01 Rode Ivk� SM o� Teep Tyye A t6iz.oa noa� we� s�ti�'h.a 7ma e 1632.03 Nod� 1d�� 9etimm� Tmp 'fype C t633.01 Temponn � Silt (:hxk Trye A 1633.02 T.maoreer � Silt Chack Tyye B 1634.01 Taw«erv � Scdimrn[ Uem '1)pe A 1634.02 Twomefv �k 9�mmr Dm Tme 8 1635A3 Rnct Ace �N ��^e^�Tno Type A 1635.02 Foek Pipe Ide�Sdimeo�Trep Type B 16l�A1 Coie F3er Haflle 1645.01 'C�oo.uv Strnm fioeuoR '___ F JAMES MILLER DB 706 PG 786 C}��k� `'C's ,s,- , _ .:i - �R 2564�"ISHNE RD.J _ IB.4' BST _ NO. I SHE� NO. R^N SHEET NO. PL1N5 PFEPFREDBY: � �� PRELIMINetRY PLANS CO NM V CI'NM INCOMPLE'TE PLANS ai. . -0 70 ORGAN CHURCH RO.� (SR I006J �r-�u� X ' _, X -X_ ___ . .✓i.='' _;'�' �._ ,'v;-a-.?i,-"^LJ � TUE � � 50't rRANS�rioN � �\ I . NOTES: ANY DEVIATION F0.0M OPIlONS GIVEN WILL RE(7UIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER N� G;i�O Z�p'I NpQ 93�NSR \ Se.l. P = SO• ao- o aa sov BENCM MARK "1:REBAR WITH ALUMIN�M CAP STAMPED '�9-0189-1".STA.10+00.00-L- 6'LEFT,EL.T90.05 /�� i C� `f� o° � � � 0 I II II I I � J `^� v / / + / / / / . / �9 / / � CULVEF + 60°-00'-00" �' 20 VO h� i �� ,9•" �! ,// (ROADNAY �� PAY ITEM) " _�' �N / COIR FIBER MAT' (ROAOWAY DETAIL � PAY ITEMI(TYPJ STA,]p+(5.00 -L- GUARORAIL fROADWAY DETAIL AN� PAY ITEM1(TYP.) m N a � 0 � FOR OTILITY INFOR� LOCATION SKETCH TOTAL STRUCTURE OUANTITIES STACE I STACE II TOTAL CLA55 A CONCRETE BARREL (J0.809CY/FT ISTdGE I1�.563 CY/FT (STAGE II) 32.3 �,Y, 62A C.Y. 94.7 C.Y. wING EiC. 76.6 �,y, 18.6 C.Y. 35.2 C.Y. SIlLS LT C.Y. 1.7 C.Y. SUB TOTALS 50.6 C.Y. 81.0 C.Y. 131.6 �,y, REINFORCING STEEL BARREL 4936 LBS. 6971 L65. 11907 LBS. WINGS ETC. ]079 LBS. 1079 LBS, 2148 �BS. SUB TOTALS 6010 L65. 8045 L9S. 14055 LBS. FOUNDkTION CONDITIONING MATERIAL 35 TONS 27 TONS 62 TONS CULYERT E%CAVATION LUMP SUM PLAIN RIP RAP CLA55 I 90 TONS 40 TONS FEMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE LUMP SUM ASSEMBLED BY : J Y MCCAH I HA pATE CNEC8E0 BY : K.D. LA� D4iE �ESIGN ENGMEEP� P MCCARTHA OF RELORO: OATE -°-------- - --- ---•••--...--------'-°-------�------------ EL 746.5t E�. 746.4t ROADWAY DATA GRA�E PT. EL. (d STA. t2+15.00 -L- BED EL.(il STA.12+15.00 -L- ROA�WAY SLOPES HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE FREOLIENCY OF DESIGN FLOOD DESIGN HIGH WATER ELEYATION DRAINAGE AREA BASE DISCHARGE 10300) BASE HIGH WATER ELEVATION =756.17 =745.40 =2:1 =T00 C.F.S. =25 YR. =753.10 =1.57 S0. MI. =I002 C.F.S. =75424 I OVERTOPPING FLOOD DATA ANO OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE =I600 C.F.S. FREOUENCY OF OVERTOPPING FL00� =500+ YR. OVERTOPPING HIGH WATER ELEVATION =756.20 -L- 6,_0.. 2,_�,,. 9,_p,., PROFILE ALONG � CULVERT 8._0,,, = EL 796.3," 9\iiBPA.920\RBP.9A30.SD_ NOTES ASS�MED LIVE LOAO ---------- HL-93 OR ALTERNATE LOAOING. DESIGN FILL--------------- 1.88 FT. MAX DESICN FILL- -- 1.92 Fi. NIN. FOR OTHER �ESIGN �ATA AN� NOTES SEE STAN�ARD NOTE SHEET. 3"0 WEEP HOLES INOICATEO TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. CONCRETE IN CIILVERTS TO 8E POURE� IN THE FOLLOWING ORpER; STAGE I:LLYINC FOOTINCS,FLOOR SLAB INCWDING 4"OF ALL VERTICAL W4LL5, 2.THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE WALLS,SILLS.WINGS FULL NEIGHT. STAGE II:L WING FOOTINGS.FLOOR SLAB INCLUDING 4'OF VERTICAL WALL. 2.THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE WALL,WINGS FOLL HEIGHT FOLLOWEO BY ft00F SI.AB AND HEADWALLS. THE RESIDENT ENGINEER SHALL CHECK THE LENGTH OF CLILVERT BEFORE STAKING IT OUT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT IT WILL PROPERLY TAKE CARE OF THE FILL. �IMENSIONS FOft WINC LAYOl1T AS WEL� AS ADDITION4L REINFORCING STEEL EMBE�DE� IN BARREL ARE SHOWN ON WING SHEET. IHE SPLICES SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. A 3 FOOT STRIP OF FILTER FABRZC SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE FILL FACE OF THE WING COVERING THE ENTIRE LENG7H OF THE EXPANSION JOINT. FOR CULVERT OIVEftSION �ETAILS AND PAY ITEM,SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS. FOR SIJBMITTAL OF WORKING ORAWINGS.SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. FOR FALSEWORK AN� FORMWORK,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. FOR GROUT FOR STRUCTURES.SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. FOR CRANE 54FETY,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Ai THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION HE MAY Sl18MIT,TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL, DESIGN dND DETAIL ORAWINGS FOR 4 PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT IN LIEII OF THE CAST-IN-PLACE CULVERT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.THE DESIGN SHALL PROVIDE THE SAME SIZE AND NUMBER OF BARRELS AS I1SED ON THE CAST-IN-PLACE DESIGN.FOR OPTIONAL PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE 60% CULVERT,SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER THAT PREVENTS DEBRIS FROM FALLINC INTO THE WATER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SLIBMIT DEMOLITION PLANS FOR REVIEW AN� REMOVE THE BRIDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 402-2 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE EXISTING STRl1CTURE CONSISTING OF 1 SPAN Cil 25'-6", WITH 24'-5°CLEAR ROA�WAY AND TIMBER �ECK ON STEEL I-BEAMS AN� TIMBEft CAPS,POSTS AND SILLS dND TIMBER BULKHEADS ANO LOCATE� AT THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVE�. ' �oQ�N CABp��, 3 ; �SE�': E �°� i�o�i�s�oµ :S€ �y�;E',,.rt.IN4 ��•�`� �i�6� �� QU�, PROJECT N0. 17BPa9.R.20 ROWAN COUNTY STATION• 12+15.00 —L— SHEET t OF 6 REPLACES BRIDGE N0.189 SiGiE Oi NOR1N GPO�IH1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WtEI4N BARREL STANDARD DOUBLE 10 FT. X 9 FT. CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 60° SKEW DALE� fTl1 AIl1 Pqi9� SHEEi N�. pLIE� �-� �--ROADWAY FILL SLOPE 2:t �•SGl BARS (� 3"CTS. �� ARS- FILL FACE ,RS- STREAM fACE __ -L- FILL SLOPE 2:l VYING SLOPE FOR 2:l FILL a I CONST. JT. -f II ��\ ,",z o 3-•853 BARSJ �l I U a�� GRADE -0.7% `" QOw� i w¢ ' C-"`¢p •483 BARS �'^� � �u� EACH FACE � �wm a w¢a STAGCERE� � m °� ELEV.795.4 m vi�+N I NQ� U �- � I m c u � � � CONST. JT. � I _ "' __'__' ___' "�_'___' "______'� o � I -- - � 1 ' 'I �� 1 M ____r___I 3-"8"5" BARS � 3`H WEEP HOLES Q 10'-0"! CTS, � EXTERIOR WALL INTERIOR WALL CULVERT SECTION NORMAL TO ROADWAY 3- °853 (a 5"CTS. — BOTTOM OF ROOF SLAB 4_"SGI BARS_ (J 3" � W2 = 39'-11" 9\Ii9PA.930\Ii9P.9.F.20.5�_ 63-°4A200 (STAGE II _'_'__�_'_'_"'_ __ � z � � J � W ¢ p m a � ' ' " _____'_ m'___ "_' __ ' _'�"____'tiw'__' _'__ W _ N � � � m �. Q Q m J O a � _ o - LLW = � U _ a o .e o�J� P o � -�- _ _';_ _ _ _' _ _ �-CONSi _JT._ _ _ _ w "4A201 STAGE II�_STAGE I END ELEVATION NORMAL TO SKEW I) �c: , /^�^ ^^�i�i•iJ. ♦ �i4�i�i•�'.� �i ��. �i Di�i'i�i�i�i: i �' , • �� ' " � i'�'�'�'��i�i0 : , • • �� '."�"�:�'�.��J'�J` �� ■■�...-.::..=:..�:.-...::..-.-::t« � � 3-^852 BARS G7 5"CTS. j TOP OF FLOOR SLAB � CUWERT w 0 N CONSTRUCTION STAGING (LOOKING DOYINSTRE/+M� STAGE I CONSTRUCTION � STAGE II CONSTRUCTION t + at A2 2"HICH BEAM BOLSTERS 3k 9�j'�"HIGH C.H.C.II. f B.B.) (J 4,_0„CTS. A300 BARS N u 'TYP. A100 BARS - CL 2"CL. BI BARS � ALL CONTINUOUS � �� N o CONST. JT.— 82 BARS HIGH CHAIR UPPER �- w f C.H,C.O. ) Gt 3'-0' B3 BARS � � CiS. � N �w A2 6AR5 6PLICED � LL 3"� WEEP HOlES WITH B3 BAR51 m _u u¢ r�33/q"HIGH C.H.C.U. � ' A220 8AR5 A200 BARS �+ � • A900 BARS CONST.JT. pqp0 BARS V 6" CI BARS W 1'-0"CTS. STAGE I I STAGE II RIGHT ANGLE SECTION OF BARREL THERE ARE 83 "C" B4RS IN SECTION OF BARREL. fL00KING UPSTREAM) PLAN SHOWING BARREL LAYOUT WITH SILLS NOTES: PLACE SILLS AT INLET AND OUTLET OF THE NEST BARREL ONLY. BACKFILL WEST BdftREL WITH CLA55 I RIP RAP i0 A �EPTH OF 2', DRnWN BY � J.P. MCCARTHA pAiE :08/29/1 cxECaEO Br : K.D. LAYNE o<*E :09/12/l3 ]HI61on 9\IiBGF.9.204iBP.4P3�,511SU.aqn STAGE I BILL OF MATERIAL RPI��'��d.'fCll:i�'(CiiiH SiR � EdST gARREL � STAGE I OF MATE REINFORCING STEEL 4936 LBS STAGE II BILL OF MATERIAL .q � WEST BARREL 2 LAYERS OF 30 LB. ROOFING FELT TO PREVENT BONO o (TYPJ HIGH FLOW SILL o � tk ^6D1 N STAGE II OF MATERIAL nq +q _,�:g..p., AT 4 MAXIMOM SPACING OF 4'-0" 2 LAYERS OF 30 LB. ROOFING FELT TO PREVENT BOND STAGE II BILL OF MATERIAL CIC�Y REINFORCING STEEI 6911 LBS V 8AR TYPE �OYlEL � I ALL BAR �IMENSIONS ARE OUT TO OUT � (TYPd n PROJECT N0. 17BP.9.R.20 ELEVATION SECTION THROUGH SILL R O W A N �DOWELS MdY BE PUSHED INTO GREEN CONCRETE 1 C COUNTY AFTER SLAB HAS BEEN FLOAT FINISHE�. STATION7 1�+�J•OO —L— CULVERT SILL DETAILS S�EET 3 OF 6 tL00KING DOWNSTPEAMI sr..corxoarxnaouru DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION R1tEtEx BARREL STANDARD �^'""° DOUBLE SPLICE LENGTHS CHART .a°tN�ARp"� a�°`�'"''�°° 10 F T. X 9 F T. BAR $IZE SPLICE LENGTH � f2��`:_ � �, ,, ,._,,. �ot`SE« : = CONCRETE BOX CULVERT �fj�� °„0 'g� 60° SKEW A200 °4 P-9" � 9' F`,��,P.4.: A400 •5 2'-2" '��"F'•."^^`r&� 5 •8 q'-�I" a" y.� XEVt5I0N5 SxEEi NO �� xa o�rz� xo en w*u C-3 9" q � ro�ex