20220079 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220113

fr.,f DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20220079
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Rinehardt Road Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Daniel Kuefler
1 b. Primary Contact Email: *
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1/13/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Reeds Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
WS-IV,B
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.5979
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Iredell
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-80.8304
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
MT Land Rinehardt LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Charles Myers
2d.Address
Street Address
141 Providence Road
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28207
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
U

3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Fred Matrulli
3b. Business Name:
Pulte Group, Inc
3c.Address
Street Address
11121 Carmel Commons Blvd
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28226
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:"
am bar.I [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Daniel Kuefler
4b. Business Name:
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
4c.Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address Line 2
PMB 550
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28226
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality I town:
Mooresville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
4657674630,4657661793,4657653348, 2b.Property size:
4657645948,4657755102,4657659665 124
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Postal / Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Reeds Creek

3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV,B
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011203
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is located just west Rinehardt Road and just north of Highway 150 in Mooresville, Iredell County, NC. The topography consists of gently sloping upland, grading into moderate
slopes down to the floodplain of Reeds Creek, with the elevation ranging from 810 to 890 ft. The site is covered with pine stands, disturbed woodland slopes and streams, open fields,
several single family home sites, and a small pond.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000)
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.8615
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
5,189
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed development will include impacts to two streams and two wetland due to road crossings and associated utilities.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01813
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
This site was verified by K. Stygar (USACE) on 8/24/21. A copy of the signed JD approval is included in the Jurisdictional Determination Information section. The Rapanos update is
included in this package.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicitilarsa*
?)
2g• Impact
W1
Culvert
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Corps
0.074
W2
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Corps
(acres)
0.005
W3
Culvert
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland K
Yes
Corps
(acres)
0.004
(acres)
W4
Fill
P
Isolated Wetlands
Non -Jurisdictional
Yes
DWR
0.017
Isolated Wetland L
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.005
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.100
21. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0 095
1-1
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
Type of
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
(?)
�3f.
Jurisdiction*
length*
S7
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
126
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S2
Stabilization
Permanent
Fill
Stream N
Intermittent
Corps7
20
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
Construction Access
Permanent
Workpad/Causeway
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S4
Construction Access
Permanent
Workpad/Causeway JZrn
N ��]Intermittent
Corps
E;;;]�near
feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
248
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
248
3j. Comments:
S1- 0.016 AC
S2- 0.003 AC
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and access
routes. Multiple alignments to access to the amenity were evaluated. The proposed crossing was designed to cross at the most narrow point and
retaining walls will be used to minimize impacts to other onsite waters. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts by avoiding
97 % of onsite streams and 96 % of onsite wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 3:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize crossing impacts. based on discussions between WEPG and
project enginners, multiple road and utility alignments and redesgins were considered to minimize required road crossing impacts and eliminate several
utility crossing impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes
No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Due to limited anticipated impacts to Waters of the US, that stay below the typical mitigation thresholds for this watershed, no compensatory mitigation is proposed. Please refer to the
NCSAM section for additional information on the quality of Stream N.

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Statesville
Comments:
Stormwater on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to City of Statesville but will be designed to meet their
criteria.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases are proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report. The report has been submitted to FWS for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?"
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?"
No essential habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No net grading/fill will occur in the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?"`
www.fema.gov
https://iredell.connectgis.com/Disclaimer.aspx?ReturnUrl= / 2fMap.aspx
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Rinehardt Road PCN.pdf 29.69MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
A complete PCN package is attached.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Daniel Kuefler

Signature
Date
1/13/2022

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2021 - 01573 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Rinehardt Road Subdivision
2. Work Type: Private � Institutional11
Government ❑ Commercial ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
NWP 29 for residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Pulte Group, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Daniel Kuefler
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.5979-80.8304
Rinehardt Road, Mooresville, NC
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: multiple, please see attached
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Iredell
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Mooresville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Reeds Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Catawba (03050101 )
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 �✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Oa Wks] 11[6111 1%

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
January 13, 2022
Ms. Krysta Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wcjoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: SAW-2020-01813; Pre -Construction Notification for NWP #29 for the Rinehardt
Road Subdivision site in Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina
Ms. Stygar, Messrs. Johnson, Wcjoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit 929 for the Rinehardt Road Subdivision site on
approximately 124 acres west of Rinehardt Road and north of Highway 150 in Mooresville, NC.
The site is a proposed residential development and consists of seven streams, five wetlands, one
open water pond, and one non jurisdictional isolated wetland. An Approved Jurisdictional
Determination Request was authorized in August 2021. Please refer to the JD Section for
information on onsite surface waters, including updated AJD materials that reflect the current
WOTUS definitions and surveyed project boundary.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to two
streams and two wetlands for road crossing access and fill due to grading, as well as utility
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 1
len. ri [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
installation associated with the proposed development. Overall impacts to site surface waters
associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection location, design,
and the location/orientation of the proposed lots and access routes. Headwalls are proposed and
3:1 slopes will be implemented to limit impacts to site surface waters. Total permanent impacts
proposed include 146 linear feet (0.019 AC) of stream impact (Streams A and N) and 0.0777
acres of wetland impacts (Wetlands C and K). The access crossing was necessary to connect to
the required onsite amenity. The Ordinary High Water Line was flagged and surveyed to
evaluate multiple crossing locations. Multiple alignments were evaluated to minimize impacts to
the maximum extent possible. The remaining impacts required for grading are to meet safety
requirements but have been reduced to extent possible. The applicant has demonstrated
substantial avoidance and minimization efforts in which 96% of the 1.8615 acres of onsite
wetlands and 97% of the 5,189 linear feet onsite streams will be avoided.
Due to limited anticipated impacts to Waters of the US, that stay below the typical mitigation
thresholds for this watershed, no compensatory mitigation is proposed. Please refer to the
NCSAM section for additional information on the quality of Stream N.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. This report has been submitted to Fish & Wildlife Service for concurrence. Please refer to
the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional details on the
terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you
have any questions, [phone] or email at daniel.kuefler kwetlands-epg com.
Sincerely,
i
Daniel Kuefler, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetiands-epg.com
'4'
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

C
O
V
d
d
Q
L.
N
CL
Permit Application

E
0 w c
LL O
Z a w
i
d
a
N
0 W 7
o Ci >
•07 � r
_ N
d
;~ d N
0 C
Z
� v a
C
0 0 CL w m
IL G
O O
V v
U) O
= W 3
0 z
V C O
LL .d.
V
IL
o
d
a
X
Q
W
d
O.
0
co
N
0
N
0
Li
m
E
12
C
.N
N
0
V
0
IL
II
z
d
a
N
O
z
z
d
YJ
L
U)
8
m
a
O
Z
O
}
M
A o ❑
9
E
a
7
d
C
d
a
d
O
i
O.
z
0
Q U,
>z d
x 00
c+�
v
O

�
&
■ ■
(
k
2
k
�
¥
2
P
/
,
;
�k
■
••
\
M
�
#EL
e
E
■
a
)
§ ) 3
\
) k \
E -
&
k
0
7 z§
i
»_
t- o
E
0
|
|
|
o r
(L
)_
(
C
i k c
C \ \ \
\
k
(
® §
-
L
•
m
'
—
)
, a § 2
- a 7
#:
20
_
E
§
2
7 J g f
§ ƒ k
ƒ
2
`
§ 0 )
:
L
7
d D o o
k
0:
■
§
000
�
{
E
f
0
*
ƒ
ƒ
, O
O
§
E
%
0
f
)
§
CL
§
z
CL
§a
zRD
-
!
§
B
�
§
2co
{
_
�
!
k
°
-
CL
bg
m
a
k
{
CDIL
/
E
/
§
k
2
}
c
c
£
0
§
0
§
.
k
.
§
a
#
2
2 w
£
£
_
©
CL
$!£K
�
'
±
ci
� �
-
°
�
U.
U.
O
■
k
co

*
M
9
d
d
R
7
O
M
d
R
OI
d
c_
M
td7
O
d O
z
Q O
d
:E d
� a
ccca
d
ca
Q o
m
t c
O
00
f0 U
d
5
oE
o LU
c Q
J d
MQ
W
*
Q
J
co
N
N
4
to
a
co
cM
M
U
m
a
T
cn
a
* l0
E 3
W �1
L
c CD
o N
V
m Y
E N
L
cc
3
0
c
d
t
d
6
c
co
Q
d
t
O
a
d O
c
yd
W
E
W
c
L
d
3
O
1
* U
dJ
v 2
d
P �
O �
C
c
O
C
m J
z
d
N
c L
O
IL
Z o N
d
o N
V EL
p Co
L
U
N to, V
v
0
ao

v
U U)
Z D
N d
N O
c _O o
L N O
N CO T3 N
a V a N
it
a
E O
z co
c pp
o r-
a ^
d 6
o
N
a
E
Z
LL
N
L
d
c
3
O
E
0
w
c
d
=c
c
O
E
w
c
c
v
.Q
Q.
a
M
U
C
of
� Z
L- w O
ld d d
c A
Z O m n
a
L m
6 LL W a
v
0
0

�
§
L /
E ;
■ )
< 2 f <
k) q § k 2 CO
U
\
CL
�
(9
�
E
E
IOU
_k
-
m
C
_
k
t
/
R
of
\E
§
kE
/
=/
\
B
%
Q
)
■
CL
9
)
c%§
2
2
a!
7`
/
k o
I §
2
■
o
7❑,
&
!
/
k CO
tM
| /
k)\
j�
k
A
/
/
k)\
■
A
°
■ -
g
A
e
■
a
a
■
k
co

�o
N
m
3
c
0
U
_O
N
L_
3
0
L
C
O
a
a)
N
m
a
ai ai
�a U
a
o.
Q @
a E
m U
fA d
m �
N d
U y
m �
O. N
fa N
E N
U •�
N .-
a) co
O
N
W
@ o
N
N
') fa
N C
P
N
o
0
cn 0. O
0
m
a
z
tm
a
2T
N
L
a
°
rn
CD'NO
a
N
fs
U
of
O) m
C
W •U
7
O
Na
N
oO O
T
2
MnN
CD
LD N
}�
C a
N-
.O
o
._
� U
L
co 0
IL
�a)
L
a�i i
.L
o
o.
a d
IL
a)
N
7 L_
_
� 3
N
'�(�
Ol C
_
CD
'D
of
a
O
c
of
�
O
co d
�
m
ic
E
c�
E
c
'
ld
L
0
o
!d
z
(�
Co
u
N 0
a) E
is
N
{�
_
m
�
�
w
O
to
a
L
is
E
a
C
u
�
w
7
N
L
i�
d
m
p
'u
d
'-
W
p a5i
U
z
N
d
/VA�,
C
o
o
aoi
c�
v
°
N o
C
v
W
'�
v
Q
a
O
N
'>
E
—CO
'�
v
z•
a
°
LL
t
'a
N
N
d
n
28 d
")
^
CD
.�
L.
d
'0
A
N
'0
r
o c0
d
T
$
N
c
M
E
a
z
c
N a
z
O
d
a
s
a
ry
N
ca
•O
W
w
�
'Q
, +
U
m
�.
of
xCD
z
U
y
N a
a
•O
as d
a) a)
a
a
r
N
N
N
fA a
U
a.
N
d •O
CD
O

�
(
J @
\ co
49
k \
% ■
n
49
>
R
)
\
0
to
/
V
o:
� EE
g2(D
cm
CLk 2
R>2
f $ >
@(D2
k//
�kJ
/U/
/��
k/o
2/0
�0CL
0
Ski
_k/k
>2 0
kk0
CM ,kk
2 CL2
0$
0kk
\o/
kE(D
■ o E-
2S�
oo
± � »
92=
f&(D
ƒ2k
CL c
w a o
(D CL
\- k k
>' a ■
Co C 0 cm k
Mn 2 $
Gaon
-
k�0_ 00
@o�:=
k
co

C
CD
0
to
co
CR
s
O
Z
r�
v
o
0

rn
E
E
O
V
cM
rn �
rn 00
m
a P� O
z 3 O
N
O N
a d
da
m Q
V w U)
0
c
m
E
d
z
d
>W
c
c
d
Q
s
O
v
I
r
3
d
0
v
0
Q
V
ld
O
L
Q
Co CM
C
N L
C N
.cm�
N C
O -OO
7
O_ U
O C
U '—
Q y
(D
CN CN CO
CL
N
CO N
C O
O c
.-. N
W O
cc
Q �
u) N
D
N C
c O
Cn N
N
Y c
�o
cd
o
C
N C
3 �
(D C
y E
�D
0
0
z
)
Q
O
4.0
C4
v
m
a
E
d
N
O
a
0
IL
r�
q
m
E
7
N
CL
ch
v
0
co

c
0
.y
N
E
a
7
N
7
N
N
al C
07 o
a
2
y a
C
E U
d 'O
N C
O
m a
ti
CL
E
C
N
u
CL
�
O
O
E*
w
w
w
w
d
O
O
O
O
N R
O :e
O :e
O :e
O :e
it
O
>
>
>
>
9
tl!
O
d
Q
N
N
N
U
U
U
0
*
>
>
>
>
v
w
Lo
O
U.
W
fA
fA
fA
N
}
}
}
}
C
O
U
U
Y
*
d
a
C
N
N
N
o
Z
>
>
>
>
LD
LD
LD
li
li
li
0
0
0
NO
PO
a
a
*
as
as
as
@
3
x
x
x
-
0
m
m
m
d
a
E
E
E
aDi
0
@
H
N
m
m
m
y
>
>
>
>
49
a
m
CL
E
4
d
H
d
d
U
Q
C
O
*
U
c
U
U
U
ii
*
N
m
m
CL
E
a
E
c
c
3
3
a
Z`
c
E
c
'o
c
CL
E
m
d
IL
3
FO C.
FO O
O C.
N
N
N
E
E
O
V
N
c�
CL
E
m
L
U)
M
ra
c
c
d
Q
L
d
t
cn
v
v
O
co

O
.y
Mn
E
7
N
E
7
tl1
N
CL
t
d
m
m
— m
N
O f
LO
M d
N
pp
t
d
m
m
m
v
H
m
a�i
a�i
a�i
M
to Q
I,- Q
to Q
I,- Q
it
O O
d
F
M'
U
U
U
LU
490
.
H
d
N
d
€
d
d
d
V.
a
c
a
c
rdi
icd
Q
Z
Q
Z
C
N
co
co
c0
y
M
U)
U)
U)
U)
*
co
co
d
a)
a)CD CD
N
N
c
r
T
d
Ll
Ll
m
U
LL
*d
i
i
i
i
CL
CL
co
co
co
E
M
a
a
a
a
N
y
='
N
N
ccCL
O)
Q
Q
N
C
N
O
O
O
w
LO
cc
U
U
o
U
U
E
r
0
ia
d
w
m
Q
d
c
c
d
Q
E
cLi
v
c
.c0
'O
r
O
d
E
E
CL
E
E
d
t
w
w
M
c
r
c
d
d
d
O
E
E
Q
r
V
r
r
r
co
co
M N
M O
M N
E
W
a'
r
ch
a
O
co

ti
N
c
0
C/) a
m a
E
4n
N C
N .
C
rL
E
0
CL
Q �
N
00
N
N
Cy� f
Ln
Ly
r O
44
Fey
f17 L � 7
u tp Vl7
Q c I!1
En4- `o
q
cn
9J
2E kn
= a) _ tl
m
o O
L
C US -
4
fn d
❑ _ +�y
V
�n 46 aj
run -dj Q
P 0 C �
0 f17 QL C
Lf O C:L CL O
� ri
LCL
a tl7
v a
y~ N
O [G m '
[p _
� '
O c L U�
9).° ay is m
ra o o
ul C3
C 9 0
.9 m
U3
CL
V
m m 4ti
2 0 .
CL.�
LLJ ,
-X
o
C I i�
llEnC:+ _
CD
O C1 m (1)
Ln E
U
rA
O}
u�0ao
o RL 2 z,
In _
O Q 3
CL
M M V c
4- M .
m'2.E
a D : c
CO
_ -
- �)
Ln
_ G
L V'
O O
+1 c = 0} U
0 'C7 t9r Q
[f] Cd1 Qa
— `7
V C T d Q
O L CL 2
d
n
z
2
� N
a D
c (D
3
a o
c
N p
z
U ti
a
C m
d CD
E r-
r M
ti
E N
R r-
N N
(n O
z 'a
1.�
z
v

it
Cl.
N
O
O
0
z
M
u
0
z
Lol
U
E
0
IM E
O E
Q Q
d a
E c
O c
O M E
N E
o E
d
o E s
N c
� > m
m 'e
U V E
� O m
CO d Q
> > a
O O
N
N Q 3
o Q'
m
m d
c
a) m �
E �+
Q O E
.0 E
E a
a E
N Ol T
N O
e Q o
N d O
O
N
o �
N d m
c� w Z
U R
c O
N O
c s m
e
@ > a
L O E
Oo E
7 {gyp qE
y O C
0d ciCca
N ��ff
3 E
O L 41 _m
Oa
N L E
N r
a
O U N o
c o
p c
= e _A
o m O E
aU r c •0
d
Z N 0
Q m
a 0 0
E-
E
L U O
a m
Y �
U y p
U c E n
E
aci E O L
N fN U
f0 R co c
j C d C
Q
Co R V v
d E t m „
o N
@ C L
30 E W N c w
r
a o 0 Q
0 N O Q a$
0 p } Z °
N E c
�o N 00
9
N
d
cc
0
U
0
0
m
CO
O
U
C
0.
L
U
N
Cd
O L
C L
O L
FD
N y.'
�+
N
U E
c O
o
a c
cm
C y
L �
N (D
•3 3
ca
.N W
O ya
W V/
co o
3
E E "=
oV
V � O
Aj
0
z
d
}
O
ch
a
0
ao

O
Z
CD
}
0
M
O
Z
CD
}
0
V
is
v
d
.Q
O.
w
0
a
Lo
7
o•
d
c
a Z
d 0
v
A Z
d0
d y
a OO
r •
0
•O
c m
d «
d
o �
L 41
C to
E�
LO a
v
d
to
m w
v =
c
d
m a
O
Z
cn
}
0
O
Z
}
O
O
Z
v
i
c
c
d
A
m
d
LL
d
c
to
W }
N 0
v
0
ao

49
w
—N
C
t
v
0
O
V
d
'o
a
F
O z
m
N p
N
to O
0
z
O
}
.o
E
Lo
0
cc
0
15
d
rn
v
a
c
d
.Q
O.
N 0
w z
d O
O
OCh
}
N O
m
m .t
O '
o >
In C
w
a
O
r n Q
co Q
z «
co•O
0
Z
m
=
O
c
o
G
:E
m
U)
T
9
O
N
W
Z 49
co
t
to
in
O
U
� a3
C �
� a3
N
O C
3 :o
•U 'C
a) U
a(1)
w (1)
O a
c �
L —
U d
3 x
C a)
-0 N U
a) U+' C
7 O N
C CL LO U
O c
U(1)O
y - U
(a L
3 —
c CO
aa) m 2
E-0LL
wa
ya�
o
y Co-0
m � ' r-
rn —
a�i o -0
aa)
L a)
a)O -0
Z y
p) O M
c � �
Co "+ i
L
C O O Q
ai L ai
L
U
� O �
C a3
a) E o.
N c N
N ojj
Q 2 H
w
0
z
n
cn
}
E
a
0 0
a
rl
0
rn
U
a
C
N
a
t
a
0
a
t
0
O)
U
U
c
N
tm
a
rl
0
z
O
N
}
O
ch
a
0

�o
G
E
U
N
cm
L
cq
w
O_
m
E
U
C
N
O_
L
aD
3
O
d
2
w
0
z
d
}
O
K
d
N
cq
O.
c�
G
N
0
I
L
D
E
NN7
of
X
a
N
ld
a)
E
m
tU
N
E
U
y
m
U
C
Co
O 8
rn(D
ca 0
E L
JD \
33 ai
3 a
t
2
a
a1
L
U
:d
fd
y
N
m
co
U
co
d
z
U
d
CL
a�
E
C
G 8
E
V Q
v
O
a0

�
(
�
�
m
C
0)
YZ
E
k
7
x
'
cn
E
m
�
)
m
(D
@
—
%
E 75
L
\ o
c
a
$
U.■
o
o
k
_

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6B939CE0-5FC0-4EFA-BC5F-F3435AE25557
WEPG-
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Proj ect/Site Name: Rinehardt Road Subdivision
Property Address: Rinehardt Road, Mooresville, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 4657674630, 4657659767, 4657659652, 4657659439, 4657659287, 4657755102,
4657647767, 4657645948, 4657653332, 4657664282
Select one: I am other
Name: Fred Matrulli
Company: Pulte Home Company, LLC
Mailing Address: 11121 Carmel Commons Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
—DocuSigned by:
FMI At'q
l Interested Buyer* / Other"
11/30/2021
Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg.
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
len. [e-mail]

N
_05
N
Q
05
10
Maps/Plans

4
15a
2
Mooresville
\(3 I I eyv iF5V -�6
spS -�6 W
FIGURE
1
Acres:
+/- 124
6114121
UPDATED
11118121
n
W
4
RINEHARDT ROAD SUBDIVISION
Iredell Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
IdeuI Dr
Prepared for:
MT LAND
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
BLK DCK
Edited By:
ALL
13$7,
b
N
AINk

i
PROJECTBOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS'..
r
ILL "I
F
Lancaster's -BQ a u rrlto L
O'R fl}A u o Parts
i The Pit nd oor
far acing
Walgreens
'Ilia
A
v
r S ppl} Co A
B u rger Ding
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
len. [e-mail]
[phone]
www.vvetiands-epg.com

PROJECT BOUNDARY
' STUDY LIMITS I
}
REEDS CREEKif
I
J
+ L � • � �
_ r'
%%. IF
r -
r •— %
f 1 it.L r P-1
1
5 r
�L, -- I
i
I IL
i r
r J. Y
%-1 ' 1�• r• y � � 'k r' � r -• r
74
T_z rr ter{ �-
r r '
i LOCATION- �_ _• '�•� , if
j■ Lat: 35.5979 °N '
Long:-80.8304 °W _ Dup
HUC: 03050101 USGS QUAD SCALE
N UPPER CATAWBA Mooresville NC 1:24 000�
��r
1993 r
Acres: RINEHARDT ROAD SUBDIVISION Prepared for:
+/- 124 Iredell Co., NC MT LAND
FIGURE
6114121 USGS MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
UPDATED BLK
11118121 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Edited By: DCK
ALL

UO3 HC
o n
r
r
'
4 *i�
M1
CC
�• + Y�{
f
L.
i`
+
,
�(_
PROJECT BOUNDARY
+
+' o
-
STUDY LIMITS
+
T
CW
C"IC2 CCU
s-
IpA
-06
lee
f
LC `
' `J !' y
Milo
. +
3
f _
r ! G .x.
N NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
Iredell County 1964 I
Map Unit
Description
Cw
Chewacla soils
LcD3
Lloyd clay loam, 10 - 15% slopes, severely eroded
LcC3
Lloyd clay loam, 6 - 10% slopes, severely eroded
LfC2
Lloyd fine sandy loam, 6 - 10% slopes, eroded
Lf132
Lloyd fine sandy loam, 2 - 6% slopes, eroded
Mn
Mixed alluvial land, wet
MoD
Moderately gullied land, hilly
Acres: RINEHARDT ROAD SUBDIVISION Prepared for:
+/- 124 Iredell Co., NC MT LAND
FIGURE
4 6114121 SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
UPDATED BLK DCK
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification 11/18/21 Edited By:
ALL

r jj_
III iI
_ 1
L A
P
I
• ■ - r` L 1 -
- PROJECT BOUNDARY
I STUDY LIMITS
l
1 _ f
FEMA FLOODPLAIN
r AS PER IREDELL -' +
COUNTY ONLINE GIS
r I
f
ILEA
Acres: RINEHARDT ROAD SUBDIVISION Prepared for:
+/- 124 Iredell Co., NC MT LAND
FIGURE
5 6114121 FLOODPLAIN MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
UPDATED BLK
11118121 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Edited By: DCK 1,•1,
ALL

PID:4657661793 -
MT LAND RINEHARDT LLC
I
i
"
I
I ,4
I _
I
PID:4657653348
MT LAND RINEHARDT LLC
+ PID: 4657674630
_ MT LAND RINEHARDT LLC
I
t
I '
I
• PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
I�
�y7
S�
L�
7.
�I
1
I
��• PID:4657659665
I MT LAND RINEHARDT LLC
_J I
I
LI
PID:4657645948
MT LAND RINEHARDT LLC
I I -
I SIP
I PID:4657755102
MT LAND RINEHARDT LLC
141 PROVIDENCE ROAD
CHARLOTTE, INC 28207
' N Parcel Information Provided
by Iredell County GIS 2022 J � r-• �
_ _ _ J I�; r 1] I r
Acres: RINEHARDT ROAD SUBDIVISION Prepared for:
+/- 124 Iredell Co., NC PULTE GROUP
FIGURE
6 6114121 PARCEL MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
UPDATED Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification ALL DCK
116122

�PWPaa as�sLk� °�I91Sa.4� " SNOWONOOJNIlSlx3'S,13n2ns-i:Dvsl
BLOBL JN NNPaWnH YLPL a4.nSKl wp4P4� LILB
i
®uyaaupvj LO ain,Pa,epryatlPPSP4Pl
i a „�� o LHZdS9LS9Y
�(al�uosuaH H 18lYSLL994'089YL9L99Y'L9L699L99Y'Z99699L996'6EY699L996 pool
MZY99L29Y'8Y MLS9Y'Z888S9LS91' 9LLY9L99Y:OI 1308Vd 2 8
/ NOISIAI(lonS (IV08 l(INVH3NI8
z=, z-
O= O?�
°S °5 e
r o
ci
Z`so
" O
�❑
o
_
—
o�-
ozF.
z
O
<�2
z_
o� O
m
o
w
ee
<�w
Z -
boa
a
P ogz
z
w<
>v
o �
0❑
i
r� ®
" O
\
ZLL
�Z
LLOF
w
!
OZ
Sy
Il O
IL
Q
I1
'}w
aawui w
MJ
uS
H
'g
H2
6z
U�
o ❑O
❑ —
i
1
pZ
z0
_j
O
m
w
'
0
r o
P 1i 1I
%
o� o°
z0 oa
'
WO _�
Ir F'
r
aPE�,A
!I
!j
4a'
.06
/
I /
0
O
IN

w�'�awaw i�6m,°a°a; 11S19CSL8' O a NVId IiIS d]iSVW00
eLwa �ru wevaw�Nesoasaims,a wiouaun mLe $$ ,per o-. s ;
oua9amou3 iwo a=a�uwv etlmnwoi e@ LEZ699L99V `
/(aIO�UOSUGH o 918LKLLS9Y'OE94MOV'OL6S9LS"'ZS96S9LS96'6EV6S9LS" z o of
ZBZY99LS9Y'9V6SY9LSY4'ZM99LS9Y'L9LL49LS94:OI 13U8Vd
/ NOISIAIG nS ab'0211a21b'HINId
a
a� °z Z
Q a y Z 3 w O
zo �8 ¢m O� yw
wm QwU Om U¢ O
z
V Q a z U F "�
a w<�
a <�
oz
J g V t) zsa
02
° ° 5a
O „ x
O O
wz
0
3a o
I
az <z '�,II' O w
z �r
zm C6 �o=oz
°— III 1I Zp oo
Q
w ? —o?�, — ` '�° N vUi
°= o z Owl U
YZ ow 1 I I =
Z Z o: — —' o
— zw.
I I m
L — z�i I ~¢ a�
5a i�
z o
i 3z
zQo a _ z� � z
0 z
/`,r/ 3� Qoi (D
ow 3 �i� Z s< zro
u zZ zo oz o Ium Woo
� o7
� twa /
w
za<
z zafaz c� z r Ill :'I 9%ice P"\ xgo � <� ra
°_ ° �< i
w8°8o gd �
,_
,3„ LV O I 30 O az I 'C
mo < Ii �gF 5m
s ,
° O ? ��„ to
Oo
0
o

ti
\
'NORTH
ARROW
JURISDICTIONAL
°
•. POND CCC - 1.217 AC
JURISDICTIONAL
������'•,,
CROSS �
S
WETLAND C/CC - 1.682 AC SECTION 8 (SL8)_
-JURISDICTIONAL
695 SF PERMANENT
"A" S
TRIBUTARY A - 836
LF STREAM IMPACT L
HW 2 \
H W 1 �.
I I
''••-.,.,.,.,.,., ,.......,..,.,.,.,..,.,
120 LF OF 36" RCP
.% II g
126 LF OF PERMANENT STREAM''A'' IMPACT /
TEMPORARY STREAM
^'••._-_,_-,. .•
''A'' IMPACT - 80 SF
(TO BE REPAIRED)
TEMPORARY WETLAND-
"C" IMPACT - 208 SF _�
JURISDICTIONAL
(CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE 6-12" OF
TOP SOIL IN DISTURBED AREA. TOP ✓
WETLAND B/BB 0.165 AC
i
SOIL TO BE PLACED ON FABRIC AND
/
J IRU SDICTIONAL, f
REPLACED UPON COMPLETION)
TRIBUTARY A - 836 LF
WETLAND " C " IMPACT 1
3,209 SF - 0.073 AC
TOTAL STREAM "A" LF PERMANENT IMPACT = 126 LF - 695 SF
-� TOTAL WETLAND 'C/CC" SF / AC PERMANENT IMPACT = 3,209 SF - 0.073 AC
r
r
0 20 40
80
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=40 FT.
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
40SCALE
HensonFoley
w
STREAM "A" IMPACT
DATE:11-9-2020
Landscape Architecture I Civil Engineering
121 Gilead Road, HuntersAlle NC 28078
704.875.1615f: 704.875.0959
PLAN
FILE: 217005
Q
9
p: 1 1 www.hensonfoley.com

845
845
84C
340
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
3:1 ROAD TIE
OUT SLOPE
3:1 ROAD TIE
OUT SLOPE
83
335
83
120 LF
OF
36" RCP
- 0.8%SLOPE
30
HW 1
INV OUT:829.20 (HW 2)
INV
HW 2
IN:828.20 (HW 1)
STA=1+33.76
EG ELEV= 830.00
STA=0+12.45
EG ELEV= 829.00
dEXISTING GRADE
1
1
1
82
_�_
PIPE TO BE SUMPED BY 8"
7H
25
CD
CD
Lr)
lr�'
00
O
O
N
00
"I:
0�
0`
r
CD
r
00
00
0000
00
0000
w
b
b
b
b
b
LL.I
LL.I
LL.
LL.I
LL.
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
AMENITY CREEK CROSSING PROFILE - 1 " = 40'
EXISTING CREEK TOB
SL-H (CREEK MEANDERS AWAY
FROM PIPE CENTERLINE)
PROPOSED GRADE
81
MN0MNMN.E.E.E'
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
40SCALE
N
HensonFoley
W
STREAM "A" IMPACT
DATE:11-9-2020
Landscape Architecture I Civil Engineering
121 Gilead Road, HuntersAlle NC 28078
p: 704.875.1615f: 1 704.875.0959 1 www.hensonfoley.com
PROFILE
i
Q
10
FILE: 21 7005

PVI STA: 3+00.00
PVI ELEV: 840.22
K: 30.00
LVC: 285.00
0
o
LOW 'T. STA: 3+22.50
0
+
LOW PT ELEV: 843.52
nj
+
860 >
v
>
860
sso
0
PROPOSED
GRADE
Qoo1.
00
o
o.
o
x
N
0
o
0
�
g
EXISTING GRADE
36" RCP
PIPE TO BE SUMPED
o
"
00
N
v
01
v
o
c14
o
v
ch
o
v
ch
ch
o
rn
u7
o
c�
o
co
a
o
v
CO
0,
co
co
v
v
o
-0
v
v
v
v
v
b
y
N
v
co
v
v
v
Cu
C�
Cu
C�
Cu
C�
Cu
C�
Cu
C�
Cu
C�
Cu
C�
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
1
1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50
AMENITY DRIVEWAY ALT PROFILE - 1 " = 40' H - 1 " = 4' V
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
SCALE:
co
HensonFoley
STREAM "A" DRIVEWAY
DATE:11-9-2020
W
Landscape Architecture I Civil Engineering
/ i,
121 Gilead Road, HuntersAlle NC 28078
704.875.1615f: 704.875.0959
PROFILE
FILE: 217005
V
11
p: 1 1 www.hensonfoley.com
Q

"REE
NORTH ARROW
TOTAL STREAM "N" LF PERMANENT IMPACT = 20 LF 140 SF
-.WW 1.... ..... ................. .... ........ ..... .�
.,..
�~
= TEMPORARY STREAM
JURISDICTIONAL
JURISDICTIONAL
"N" IMPACT - 610 SF
TRIBUTARY
TRIBUTARY "N" - 173 LF
"— (POTENTIAL IMPACT FROM WALL
DS CREEK" - 3,200 LF
INSTALLATION & SITE GRADING)
AERIAL SEWER CROSSING
(TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS)
i
802
j 804
806_
+
i
i
—808—
�5' POBLIC
+
+ *
810* p
+ �q
� f
—812
AERIAL FOOT PATH
CROSS
�� 814
SECTION 1 (SL1)
PROPOSED WALL
CROSS
i
�816
SECTION 2 (SL2)
\`
818
20 LF OF PERMANENT
STREAM "N" IMPACT �8z
140 SF PERMANENT a2z
—
STREAM "N" IMPACT
\
I
�
� A
AA
—�
0
20 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=40 FT.
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
40SCALE
N
H e n s o n F o l ey
x
DATE: 1 1-9-2020
Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering
STREAM " N " PLAN
(w
FILE: 217005
121 Gilead Road, Hunfersville NC 28078
p: 704.875.1615f: 1 704.875.0959 1 www.hensonfoley.com
v
Q
12

825
825
TOP
OF PROPOSED WALL
ELEV= 820.06
20
82
SMALL
TO
PROMOTE
DEPRESSION
INFILTRATIOI
AT
Wf
15
81
10
PROPOSED
GRADE
81
05
80
BOTTOM OF PROPOSED WALL
ELEV= 801.46
PERFORATED PIPE TC
INFILTRATION & COI\
FLOWS TO STREAM ''I
EXISTING GRADE
00
—tt80
APPROXIMATE
ELEVATION
800.45'
STREAM
95
79
0
o
00
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o�
o�
iL.
000
000
000
000
000
000
w
66
66
66
w
LL.
w
LL.
w
LL.
w
LL.
0+00
0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
STREAM N PROFILE - 1 " = 40'
ACCEPT
FINUE
I„
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
N
40SCALE
H e n s o n F o l ey
DATE: 1 1-9-2020
w
Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering
STREAM " N " PROFILE
/
121 Gilead Road, Hunfersville NC 28078
704.875.1615f: 704.875.0959
FILE: 217005
Q
13
p: 1 1 www.hensonfoley.com

SL-1 SL-2
PROPOSED GRADE
31 "
TOP OF BANK
RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL
EXISTING GRADE
0 a
a
-30
PROPOSED GRADE
8 �1
RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL
81 1 IF
TOP OF BANK
8 m
EXISTING GRADE
7 790
10 10
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
N
40SCALE
H e n s o n F o l ey
DATE: 1 1-9-2020
w
Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering
STREAM " N " SECTIONS
/
121 Gilead Road, Hunfersville NC 28078
704.875.1615f: 704.875.0959
FILE: 217005
Q
14
p: 1 1 www.hensonfoley.com

W
N
E
S
NORTH ARROW
TOTAL WETLAND 'K" SF / AC PERMANENT IMPACT = 170 SF - 0.0039 AC
\
PROPOSED �
EXISTING CULVERT PIPE 1
SEWER MAIN -
/
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY "J" - 38 LF
++
I
JURISDICT ON L
" ° ••�
•�,,,.,..,
"K" 0.0039 AC
(ETLAND
JI
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY:
"REEDS
CREEK" -3,200 LF ;� i
CROSS
WETLAND 'K" PERMANENT
/ SECTION 7 (SL7)
IMPACT 2 - 170 SF - 0.0039 AC
C
I
J /
o
(
I
.•
•
I
I
+
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
40SCALE
x
DATE: 1 1-9-2020
H e n s o n F o l ey
Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering
WETLAND
" I C/ \" IMPACT
(w
v
121 Gilead Road, Hunfersville NC 28078
p: 704.875.1615f: 1 704.875.0959 1 www.hensonfoley.com
FILE: 217005
Q
15

SL-7
0 -,0
,0 0530
30
8
20
PROPOSED GRADE

6+00
7+00
CROSS \
\—SECTION 3 (SL3) \\
CROSS <\
SECTION 4 (SL4) J �t
1
\ NON JURISDICTIONAL ISOLATED
\ WETLAND V- PERMANENT IMPACT_ \\\\
730SF-0.0168AC
CROSS
SECTION 5 (SL5) \\I
ed4 CROSS
SECTION 6 (SL6) 1 —
41
� I
_ _ _ _ TOTAL WETLAND V' SF PERMANENT IMPACT = 730 SF - 0.0168 AC
k
NOITIA110W
8+00
0 20 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=40 FT.
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION 40SCALE 4
HensonFoley NON JURISDICTIONAL DATE:11-9-2020 w
Landscape Architecture I Civil Engineering ( �
121 15f: 1 Road, H0959 1 ille NC 28078 ISOLATED WETLAND L v
p:704.875.1615f: 704.875.0959 www.hensonfoley.com
FILE: 21 7005 Q 1 7

S L-3 S L-4
54
-10 10 -10
4o a
10
40
PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED GRADE
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK
53
30 11
530
52
11
520
51
10 81
10
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
50
M 8
10 1 10
10
00
S L-5 S L-6
-10 10 -10
10
54
40
PROPOSED GRADE
a PROPOSED GRADE
40
53
3
xv TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK
8
30
52
2L
j-
/
82C,
520
51
10
EXISTING GRADE i
a1
10
EXISTING GRADE
Soo
M ao
05
0 0 ID 40
10
RINEHARDT SUBDIVISION
04
40SCALE
HensonFoley
W
NON JURISDICTIONAL ISOLATED
DATE:11-9-2020
Landscape Architecture I Civil Engineering
121 Gilead Road, HuntersAlle NC 28078
WETLAND "L" SECTIONS
/ i
/
p: 704.875.1615f: 1 704.875.0959 1 www.hensonfoley.com
FILE: 21 7005
Q
1
18

, m 3wNidNa 'a eNiadNE)Niisvw - 3ovsn
n(�'Ii iS66S9LS9t
F jUOSU2H o r� F 14,
13 VM99b'0£9bL9L99b"L9L65959b'Z59699L99b'6£b699LS9b _
'Z8Zt99LS9t'8t69b9L99t ZEEE99L991,'L9LL49L99t:41113bVd O
NOISInla9ns GVON ICINVHININ
a
�� \ v� ��� a� _o� �� i/ Il� ii��l/ l I I�� �111�
a t
Sao oa o
�a g 671
z
gL;t
�o
Q�
Ta\c)e/
�—
\���VA�VAII IIIII � � ���= i1p i �� I ///(�V<<AV�VI IIIIIIIII�IIIIIII
V�1�\(I\l�\III IIIII is �' � '� � I I1 AAA VAV/�II�V III IIII IIII III �
v v III i,I o z- s vv III vIv
aQ
I I
/l I I iipi i �LL �—
(/so 11-'�� — �� �Iv�vvvv�v
vv
z v v vvv vvv // IvAvIIIv I
-
-'%��I
j�il�� �'� � ,� � •' � �i'� �� �� � I III///�/��/ IIII I � o �., �
IIIIII//�%/fljll
\1I
�� w WNW II
���A��� \7 1 ;I � ,/I I IIIII/IIIIIIIIIII � ll�ll'1V o
Lr)
V1 111 V� VA \V��Ac f z o d r t� i IIII IIII I �I �I _I I
u oLu
a �,�� i 111 III�IIII�I IIII I\III 1 II\
\\\VA
a 6 l� II/I IV(1 \ A\'
I� IIII I I IVA��� \VA I \ \V o
ojQ\�
_ AlA ..fir
— I
4
1A)�J/IIIA�. U77 ao
/�/
/i
��
��
Vi ii� I lo
I �//)I /� III�J",5 I �{ _�� J'�, � �m z � �� i�GP � il� ✓ /
to I I I-
II�/_\
O O ' O
� �
I� ��
%_�
/ l\ bzI V a�l!II/� �� ��

Q
U
Z
N CSAM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user rvianuai version d.,i
USACE AID #: SAW-2021-01573 NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Rinehardt Road Subdivision
3. Applicant/owner name: Pulte Group, LLC
5. County: Iredell
7. River basin: Catawba
2. Date of evaluation: 11/18/21
Assessor name/organization: H. Caldwell, A. Li
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Reeds Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.5918,-80.8297
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream N 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4.5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, W ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) 2 E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y U)C ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ®No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ®C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Mature forest
®B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Channel originates downslope of agricultural crossing. Channel largely incised with no connectivity to adjacent floodplain

Draft NIC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Rinehardt Road Subdivision Date of Assessment 11/18/21
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization H. Caldwell, A. Lipsky
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
OMITTED
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
HIGH

O
.4-j
co
.E
w
jurisdictional
Determination Information

SAW-2021-01573
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01573 County: Iredell U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Mooresville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Requestor: MT Land
Charles Myers
Address: 141 Providence Road
Charlotte, NC 28207
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: Charles.n.myersLUmail.com
Size (acres) 35.6
Nearest Waterway Reeds Creek
Nearest Town Mooresville
RiverBasin Santee
USGS HUC 03050101 Coordinates Latitude:35.5990
Longitude:-80.8282
Location description: Parcel consists of multiple PINs in the vicinity of Rinehart Road, IredellCounty, North Carolina. PIN(s):
4657674630,4657659767,4657659652,4654659439,46576559287,4657755102,4657647767,4657645948,4657653332,
4657664282.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appearto be waters onthe above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has beenverifiedby the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation mapdatedDATE. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination
maybe used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigationrequirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat allwaters and wetlands thatwould be affected in anyway by the permitted activity onthe site as if they
are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, youmay requestan approved JD, which is an appealable
action, by contactingthe Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminaryjurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of C WA/RHA
jurisdiction over allof the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate andreliable to support anenforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation thatcan
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above describedproject area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers andHarbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 ofthe Clean WaterAct
(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waterson the above described project area/property subjectto the permit requirements of Section 404 ofthe Clean
WaterAct(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination maybe
relied upon fora period notto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may notbe able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation thatcan be verified by
the Corps.

SAW-2021-01573
® The waters on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineationmap dated 6/24/2021. We strongly suggestyou
have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this
survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination maybe relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above describedproject area/property which are subjectto the
permit requirements of Section404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period notto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of CoastalMa nagement in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill materialwithin waters of the US, in cludin g wetlands, without a Department ofthe Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the CleanWaterAct (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill ma terial, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or403). If you have any questions
rega rdin g this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
kry Lgnka.b.stygar&msace.a rmy.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the applicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the project area exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S. as defined in 33
CFR 328, Regulatory Guidance letter 05-05, the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and/or the
Regional Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0. See the approved
jurisdictional determination form dated 08/24/2021.
D. Remarks: See Delineation Map entitled, "Rinehart Road -Mooresville, Delineation map "
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determinationhas been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may notbe valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrativeappeal under Corps regulations at33CFRPart 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification ofAppealProcess (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. Ifyourequest to appealthis
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth StreetSW,FloorM9
Atlanta, Georgia 3 0303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A.SHANNIN&USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, thatit meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, andthat it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 09/21/2021.
* * It is not necessary to submit anRFAform to the Division Office if you do notobject to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:

SAW-2021-01573
Date of JD: 8/24/2021 ExpirationDate of JD: 8/24/2026
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wetlands and Environmental Plannigg Group
Daniel Kuelfer
Address: 10612-D Providence Road
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 336-554-2728
E-mail: Daniel.kueflerna wetlands-epg.com

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Iredell City: Mooresville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.5979' 1, Long.-80.8304° F.
Universal Transverse Mercator.
Name of nearest waterbody: Reeds Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Catawba River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050101
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION IL• SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are nd ,navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RIIA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
® Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 5,189 linear feet: width (ft) and/or 1.17 acres.
Wetlands: 1.8615 acres.
Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: The site contains one isolated wetland (Isolated Wetland L). No jurisdictional connection or nexus to a
jurisdictional water body was identified when classifying this feature.
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section I LAA and Section I LDA. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections I LAA and 2
and Section ULD.1.; otherwise, see Section I LB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, slap to Section IILD.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section I LB.1 for
the tributary, Section I LB.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section HLC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 219 square miles
Drainage area: 0.036 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: 0 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through I tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 10-15 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW': Site waters flow into Reeds Creek, then into Lake Norman before flowing into the Catawba
River.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
'Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 4:1 (or greater).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands
® Cobbles ® Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover.
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Streams A, D, I, 0, and Reeds Creek are perennial. Streams E, J, and N are intermittent and
feed into onsite perennial streams.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM' (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: d Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water was clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: No visable pollutants.
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the 011WM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the 011WM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the 011WM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain fmdings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Aquatic vegetation.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 1.8615 acres
Wetland type. Explain: Headwater wetland.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Overland sheetflow
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Per USACE rep on 7/29/21.
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 10-15 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable water*
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 100 - 500 year floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Water was clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain fmdings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Aquatic vegetation.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 5
Approximately ( 1.8615 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Wetland B (Y) 0.165 Wetland C (Y) 1.682
Wetland E (N) 0.0104 Wetland M(Y,offsite) 0.0002
Wetland K(Y) 0.0039
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
fmdings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain fmdings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain fmdings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Wetland E is jurisdictional by discrete hydrologic connection per the USACE site visit on 7/29/22.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Streams A, D, I, O, and Reeds Creek exhibit geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators
consistent with perennial flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream
Identification Assessment Forms.

Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Streams E, J, and N exhibit geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent with
intermittent flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification
Assessment Forms.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 5,189 linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWs' that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands B, C, and M directly abuts an onsite Perennial RPW Tributary with no break
in jurisdiction.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Wetlands K directly abut onsite Seasonal RPW Tributaries with no break in jurisdiction.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 1.8615 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.0104 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
II Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters?
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
® Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
'See Footnote # 3.
' To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (11).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: Wetland L lacks a
Significant Nexus to any jurisdictional waters. No jurisdictional connection or nexus to a jurisdictional water body was
identified when classifying this feature. This was confirmed during the 7/29/21 site visit.
❑ Other. (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
udgment (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Mooresville, NC 1993, 1:24,000 scale.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript Iredell County 1964.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure 5, Iredell Co GIS.
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter. SAW-2021-01573.
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COUNTS TO SUPPORT JD:

mom
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND B/BB
a
-0.165 AC
USACE
=f UPLAND DP1
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND E
-0.0104 AC
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY D
-301 LF
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY J
-38 LF
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY REEDS CREEK
-3,200 LF
1
5
a
WETL � WET L
4
USACE
UPLAND DP2
1
NCDEQ
STR N
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY A
E
Q
0
JURISDICTIONAL POND CCC
NCDEQ -1.17 AC
STR A JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND C/CC
-1.682 AC
USACE WET B/BB h r wF
o
NON JURISDICTIONAL
ISOLATED WETLAND L
-0.00168 AC
- a
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND K
0.0039 AC
I
JURISDICTIONAL TRIBUTARY N a
-150 LF
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY O
o -529 LF
/ — JURISDICTIONAL
)/J�
' WETLAND M
-0.0002 AC
Q
Q
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
b p
USACE VERIFICATION 7/29/21
Acres: RINEHARDT ROAD - MOORESVILLE Prepared for:
+/- 124 Iredell Co., NC MT LAND
FIGURE
7 6114121 DELINEATION MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
UPDATED NRNSubject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification Edited By: DCK
1/6/22
ALL

771 /
h...r � � J Y4� �u/` _ _ `l .. ; p" � - �_ � �_ \ � � �� � .-! r� �, �" >F ?_.1�..,-- � �' •�.�',•N. '7'`' '�`„°,3,.s-1�' � ��`'� p� .�''' �r! �,
RAto
174
�- _ �� � 7 .-,mot � �rs W_�,,.°'4�`ys' :}_ � i� �`, �•� ►:.,
_ 1
elvo
S.
n �
«
'�� �f ```� � t't�'. r fl 1• .\ , y1,,,m » ' yr 'Ly1 �,F4,�..., r -. _
ra °;•. t

PHOTO 3 — VIEW JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND B/BB
DATE/TIME 2021:06:24 — 09:05:00 COORDINATES: 35.5988,-80.8287
PHOTO 4a — VIEW NON JURISDICTIONAL ISOLATED L
DATE/TIME 2021:06:24 — 11:38:00 COORDINATES: 35.5944,-80.8287
Rinehardt Road
YYE PG Iredell Co., INC —6/24/21
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

�'Y'W
��" • . t �' 'a ,i � !' �`��•' Y�,� �.-� Ems...- >� � u .'" "j �%' `: _ �
iji?''('��•,-' j' A '!%i �� � � a • e - -y ,.- :yam -e
oe
JL
A
so
IF
'HOTO 4b — VIEW NON YMSDICTIONAL ISOLATED WETLAND
LN ��p�
iqM C 1�41

9�[�ho
Y ,
I
Y \S

a-J
L
O
Q
oC
r.
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Iredell County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
Field investigation conducted during the weeks of May10, 2021 and
October 25, 2021.
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co nn

Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The 118. 5 acre Rinehardt Road site is located just west of Rinehardt Road, and
just north of Highway 150 in Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina. The site
can be found on the Mooresville USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map-, latitude is
35.5979 ON, longitude is 80.8304 °W. The topography consists of gently sloping
upland, grading into moderate slopes down to the floodplain of Reeds Creek,
with the elevation ranging from 810 to 890 ft. The site is covered with pine
stands, disturbed woodland slopes and streams, open fields, several single
family homesites, and a small pond. Two power line rights -of -way parallel
Rinehardt Road through the site. (Figures 1-4).
Figure 1:
PRDIf...... DARY
REEDS tREEH r I
`' ,
+ 4} t
LOCATION
Lat:35.59799N
Long:-80.8304 s1A1
HUC:0305U101
USGS QUAD
`
UPPER CATAM1NBA
MoorNC
esville,
SCALE
1:24,OQ3
f,—
1, �r'J
I
1993
j _
Acres:
RINEHARDT SITE
Prepared For:
t/- 118.S
Irede!: Co., NC
MT LAND
FIGURE 1
6114,121
USGS MAP
D� I ft Reviewed By:
UPDATED
5abjea to USACF/NCDE4 ros^rofcaavn
RLL DCK
Ed rted®Y:
1I Hal
ALL
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/W4JSOKFBBRGU3JZYKF43M3DJTA/resource
s was referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and
Protected species for Iredell County North Carolina, the results of which are
listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the
site was investigated during the weeks of Mayl 0, 2021 and October 25, 2021.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Iredell County North Carolina
County: Iredell, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search updated on October 25, 2021
Group Name
Vascular Plants Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii)
Flowering Plants Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
nanif/ora)
Status
Vascular Plants
Threatened
Reptiles Bog (=Muhlenberg) turtle (Clemmys Threatened
muhlenbergii)
Mammals Northern long-eared bat (Myotis Threatened
septentrionalis)
Birds Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Protected under the
Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act
3
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Two plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Iredell County:
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
• Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora), listed as Threatened,
grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy areas next
to streams and creek heads, and along the slopes of nearby hillsides and
ravines.
Three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Iredell County:
Bog Turtle (Clemmys muhlenburgii), listed as Threatened, occurs in bogs,
fens, marshy meadows and other wetlands with emergent vegetation.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
RESULTS:
Much of the site is covered with pine stands and disturbed woodland slopes, with
gulleys, drainages, and streams feeding into Reeds Creek which flows southward
along the western project boundary. The site also has open fields, old farm
roads and trails, several single family homesites, and a small pond. Two power
line rights -of -way parallel Rinehardt Road along a portion of the site. A homesite
on the southeastern corner of the project site has a large, mowed lawn planted
with a pecan grove. The open fields and portions of the large power line on site
WEPG#00 126
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
appear to be periodically mowed, although the field on the southwestern section
of the site is overgrown with typical weedy species.
The disturbed forested uplands are dominated by pines that grade into slopes
dominated by a dry-mesic mixed hardwood community. Canopy species present
are Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), Short -leaf Pine (P. echinata), Virginia Pine (P.
virginiana), American Ash (Fraxinus americans), White Oak (Quercus alba),
Northern Red Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red Oak (Q. falcata), Black Oak (Q.
velutina), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Sweet Gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), and Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera). Lower slopes
and mesic areas also have Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis, and Cottonwood
(Populus deltoides). Subcanopy trees present are Sourwood (Oxydendrum
arboreum), Red Maple (Acer rubrum var. rubrum), Red Cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), , Flowering Dogwood (Corpus florida), Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica),
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and Redbud
(Cercis canadensis). The shrub layer includes Black Haw (Viburnum
prunifolium), Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Autumn Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate),
and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense). Vines present are Japanese
Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Trumpet Creeper (Campsis radicans), Catbrier
(Smilax sp.), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis
rotundifolia), and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). The herb layer is thin on
the drier uplands and slopes, increasing on the lower slopes and includes
Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), Elephant's Foot (Elephantopus
tomentosus), Crane -fly Orchid (Tipularia discolor), Grapefern (Botrychium sp.),
and Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). Additional herbs observed in
the more mesic areas and in the floodplains include Sedge (Carex spp.), Rush
(Juncus spp.), River Oats (Chasmanthium latifolium), False Nettle (Boehmeria
cylindrica), River Cane (Arundinaria gigantea), Swamp Rose Mallow (Hibiscus
moscheutos), and Knotweed (Polygonum sp.).
The disturbed, open, roadsides and PLROW are dominated by shrubs, vines and
herbs that typically occur in this habitat. The power line rights -of -way appear to
be sprayed with herbicide. Woody species present are small tree saplings of
Pines, Sweet -gum and Tulip Poplar, and shrubs of Blackberry (Rubus sp.),
Russian Olive, Chinese Privet, Smooth Sumac (Rhus glabra), and Groundsel
Tree (Baccharis halimifolia). Herbs present are Johnson Grass (Sorghum
halepense), Plume Grass (Erianthus contortus), Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza
cuneata), St. John's Wort (Hypericum sp.), Queen Anne's Lace (Daucus carota),
Indian Grass (Sorghastrum nutans), Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus),
Ragwort (Packera sp.) Indian Hemp (Apocynum cannabinum), Pokeweed
(Phytolacca americans), Common Milkweed (Asclepius tuberosus), Rabbit
Tobacco (Gnapthalium obtusifolium), Tickseed (Coreopsis major), Common
Clasping Aster (Symphyotrichum patens), Curly Dock (Rumex crispus), Foxtail
(Setaria sp.), Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.),
Beggars Ticks (Desmodium sp.), Thoroughwort (Eupatorium sp.), and Kudzu
(Pueraria montana var.lobata).
WEPU#00 126
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower along the roadsides, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Schweinitz's Sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) does not occur on the site.
• Potential habitat for Dwarf Flowered Heartleaf on wooded slopes and
drainages was examined, and no plants of the genus Hexastylis were
observed. WEPG concludes Dwarf Flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis
nanif/ora) does not occur on the site.
• There is no suitable habitat for Bog Turtles (C/emmys muh/enbergii) on
site, and no bog Turtles were observed. WEPG concludes Bog Turtle
(C/emmys muh/enbergii) does not occur on the site.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed. WEPG concludes Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus /eucocepha/us) does not occur on the site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http-//www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html)
WEPG concludes the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no
further action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the
Northern Long-eared Bat.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
observe any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation for the presence of protected species on this site is recommended
at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
4e, #- /*,;�/
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
October 29, 2021
31
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Rinehardt Road - Mooresville
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Discovered Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
which led to the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant
Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has
become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora).
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 55,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in both
North and South Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
7
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.