20140148 Ver 1_401 Application_20140214

WITHERS RAVEN EL
February 12, 2014
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Dave Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Resources
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams Permitting Unit
Ms. Sue Homewood
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC 27107
Re: Basil Holt - Burlington Force Main — NWP 12 PCN Submittal
W &R Project #o6130046.o1
Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Homewood,
On behalf of the Town of Green Level, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP
12 for 0.2o acres of temporary wetland impacts, and 26 if of permanent stream impacts for
construction of the ±15,850 if of 8" sewer force main. We are also requesting a 401 WQC for the
proposed impacts. The proposed project does not require a Buffer Authorization.
The proposed force main easement if ±15,850 if in length and runs from an existing pump station
east of Apple Blossom Lane (Lat: 36.118084 °N; Long: - 79.358156 °W), then runs south on the east
side of Apple Blossom Lane, then runs east along the south side of Basil Holt Road, then runs south
along the east side of Roxboro Road (NC 49), then runs west on the north side of the Haw River
Bypass (Hwy 70) where is crosses the Haw River, then runs north along the west side of the Haw
River to the existing East Burlington Waste Water Treatment Plant (Lat: 36.o96603 °N; Long: -
79.374301 °W)
The proposed project is located in the Green Level /Haw River townships, in Alamance County. The
project is located within the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030002) and onsite waters drain to the
Haw River. The Water Quality Classification for the Haw River is SW -V; NSW and the Stream Index is:
16- (10.5).
Project Purpose
The purpose for the Green Level to Burlington force main project is to replace the existing Green
Level gravity outfall which discharges into the Town of Haw River sewer system. This Green Level
sewer outfall and the Town of Haw River system have experienced periodic surcharges and backups
due to condition and age of both systems. The force main will completely replace the aged Green
Level gravity outfall and remove that flow from the Town of Haw River sewer system, reducing the
potential for spills resulting from surcharges and backups.
Project History
Onsite wetlands were delineated by Withers and Ravenel in December 2013. Due to the nature of
the project, W &R is requesting a Preliminary JD for jurisdictional features within the proposed
easement alignment in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 12. The Preliminary JD Request and
supporting documentation has been provided as an Appendix.
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravene[.com I License No. C -0832

Sue Homewood with NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the proposed alignment on
1/28/14. A copy of the Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
The project was reviewed by NC Division of Water Quality; Infrastructure Finance Section for NEPA
compliance, and issued a letter, dated April 1o, 2013, documenting that the project is exempt from
inter - agency review and preparation of additional environmental documents is not required. A copy
of the NCDWQ; Infrastructure Finance Section letterhas been provided as an Appendix.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.2o acres of temporary wetland impacts and 26 if of permanent
stream impacts for construction of the proposed force main.
The proposed 0.2o acres of temporary wetland impacts will occur from installation of the force main
by conventional trench and backfill methods, as well as the 20' temporary construction corridor
within the wetlands beyond the easement which is necessary for construction of the force main.
The proposed 26 if of permanent stream impacts (Impact #4) will occur to a small channel (26 if in
total length) which begins at the edge of the ROW as a result of erosion from runoff from the
adjacent pasture and the channel runs along the toe of slope into a 30' culvert beneath Hwy 70
which discharges directly into a farm pond. Sue Homewood with DWR determined that this feature
was an ephemeral channel for the purpose of buffer subjectivity, but indicated that she thought that
the Corps of Engineers would consider this an intermittent stream. Due to the time constraints
associated with the permitting of this project, this feature has been considered an intermittent
stream for permitting purposes. The stream consists of a small, shallow, eroded channel that does
not have typical stream structure, which would be extremely hard to "restore" in the post -
development condition. When evaluating this feature for temporary or permanent impacts, it was
determined that it would be impossible to "restore" the feature to pre- construction conditions.
Also, if this feature was only temporarily impacted and "restored ", the stream would flow down the
sewer easement and into the 30" culvert. The unstable condition of the soils after construction
could result in heavy erosion, presenting a risk of eventually exposing the force main, as well as
sedimentation of downstream waters. Therefore, it was determined that the best solution would be
to permanently impact the stream by creating a swale lined with a geotextile fabric and rip -rap to
maintain existing conveyance and permanently prevent the risk of exposure of the force main and
sedimentation of downstream waters. Please refer to Exhibit 6 for details on the swale alignment.
The project will also result in o.o9 acres of "permanent wetland conversion" impacts from the
clearing of forested wetlands for installation of the force main and perpetual maintenance of the
entire 15' easement. Please note that the "permanent wetland conversion" impacts are only
applicable to the Corps of Engineers and should not be addressed in the 401 WQC.
The proposed project has also been designed to avoid impacts to Jordan Lake riparian buffers.
Specifically, impacts to riparian buffer have been avoided by installing certain sections of the force
main within the existing fill slope of Hwy 7o, as well directional drilling the force main beneath
streams within the proposed alignment, as well as the Haw River. The directional drill entrance /exit
pits have been located beyond the riparian buffers. The connection of the force to the WWTP will
occur within the riparian buffers associated with the Haw River. However, this area is currently
maintained as ongoing use for operation of the WWTP. In an email dated 2/4/14, Sue Homewood
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 2 of
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

with NC DWR determined that the maintained area within the riparian buffers was an existing and
ongoing use for the WWTP and therefore exempt from the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Ms. Homewood
also determined that disturbance to this area for connection of the force main to the WWTP was also
exempt from Jordan Lake Buffer Rules since it will occur within an exempt area within the WWTP. A
copy of Ms. Homewood's email has been provided as an Appendix. Therefore, the proposed project
will not result in impacts to riparian buffers that require authorization.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands, "waters" and riparian buffers could be minimized.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to temporary impacts necessary for installation of the force
main. The easement through the wetlands has been reduced to 15' within the wetlands. Upon
completion of construction, the temporary wetland impact areas will be seeded with a wetland seed
mix accordingto the Sediment & Erosion Control plans.
Impacts to streams and the Haw River, as well as riparian buffers, have been avoided by
constructing the force main within the existing ROW fill slope where allowed by NCDOT. Also, the
force main will be installed via directional drilling to cross streams and the Haw River.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
Since permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If, the applicant is not proposing stream
mitigation.
Wetland Mitigation
There is no mitigation proposed fortemporary wetland impacts.
The proposed project will result in o.og acres of permanent wetland conversion impacts as a result
of the perpetual maintenance of the 15' easement through wetlands. Since the permanent wetland
conversion impacts are less than o.10 acres, no mitigation is proposed.
The current request is for 0.2o acres of temporary wetland impacts, 26 if of permanent stream
impacts and o.o9 acres of permanent wetland conversion impacts (see the attached maps and PCN
for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
S i n ce�re ly,�
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 3 of
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad
• Alamance County Soil Survey
• Preliminary JD Request (Corps Application Only)
• Corps Stream Quality Assessment Form for Impact #4 (Corps Application Only)
• DWR Buffer Determination Letter
• Email from Sue Homewood with NCDWR (DWRApplication Only)
• NC DWQ Infrastructure Finance Section Letter
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 4 of
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

o�oF w a rF9o�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Basil Holt- Burlington Force Main
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Green Level /Haw River
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NCDWQ Minor Construction Permit CS370917 -01
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
N/A — Linear Project
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Town of Green Level
4b.
Name:
Haywood N. Cloud, Jr. — Town Administrator
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Town of Green Level
4d.
Street address:
PO Box 342
4e.
City, state, zip:
Mebane, NC 27302
4f.
Telephone no.:
336- 578 -3443
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
hcloud @greenlevelnc.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e.
Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A — Linear Project
North End: Lat: 36.118084 °N Long: - 79.358156 °W
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
South End: Lat: 36.096603 °N Long: -79.374301'W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
N/A — Linear Project
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Haw River (Stream Index #16- (10.5)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SW -V;NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear - 03030002
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed sewer force main alignment is located within existing road fill slope, undeveloped woodlands and existing
cleared /maintained area at the WWTP. The general land use in the vicinity consists of a mixture of residential and
commercial land use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.20 acres of wetlands within the proposed alignment corridor.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±76 If of streams (and Haw River) within the proposed alignment corridor.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct ±15,850 If of an 8" sewer force main which will convey sewage from
an existing pump station located east of Apple Blossom Lane to the East Burlington Waste Water Treatment Plant.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of construction of a ±15,850 If sewer force main, which will begin at an existing pump station east of
Apple Blossum Lane, then runs south on the east side of Apple Blossom Lane, then runs east along the south side of
Basil Holt Road, then runs south along the east side of Roxboro Road (49), then runs west on the north side of the Haw
River (Hwy 70) Bypass where it crosses the Haw River, then runs north along the west side of the Haw River to the
existing East Burlington wastewater treatment plant
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Withers & Ravenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the proposed alignment on 1.28.14. A copy of the Buffer Determination
Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
W &R completed a wetland delineation for the proposed alignment in December 2013. A Preliminary JD is being
requested in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 12. The Preliminary JD Request and all supporting documentation
has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Headwater
Impact #1
Trench /Backfill
Forest/Herbaceous
® Yes
® Corps
0.12 acres
El ®T
(within Gas
El No
® DWQ
Easement)
Impact #2
Temporary
Temp
®Yes
®Corps
❑ P ® T
disturbance for
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.05 acres
diversion dike
Headwater
Impact #3
Trench /Backfill
Forest/Herbaceous
® Yes
® Corps
0.03 acres
El ®T
(within Gas
El No
® DWQ
Easement)
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.20 acres
2h. Comments: The proposed forcemain will also result in 0.09 acres of permanent wetland conversion impacts from regular
maintenance of the entire 15' easement through the wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #4
Conversion to
F1 PER
Corps
®P F1 T
Engineered
UT to Haw River
®INT
El DWQ
3'
26 If
Conveyance
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
26 If
3i. Comments: Proposed stream impact will occur to a small channel within the ROW that receives runoff from adjacent
pasture. The "stream" begins at the fence line along the ROW and runs along the toe of slope and into a 30" culvert beneath
Hwy 70 Bypass. Sue Homewood with DWR determined this feature to be an ephemeral channel, not subject to buffers, but
indicated she thought that the Corps may consider this feature to be an intermittent stream. Due to the time constraints
associated with this project, we are considering this feature an intermittent stream for permitting purposes. Based on the
current characteristics of the channel, it would be impossible to "restore" this feature to pre- construction conditions and
therefore, permanent impacts are being assess for this feature. The proposed permanent impact will consist of converting this
feature to a swale lined with geotextile fabric and rip -rap to maintain existing conveyance once construction is complete.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico ®Other: Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
The only disturbance within the riparian buffers will occur from the connection of the force main to the WWTP, which will occur
within the maintained area of the WWTP. This area was determined to be exempt from the JLB rules as an existing and
ongoing use in an email from Sue Homewood with DWR dated 2/4/14. Therefore the disturbance from the construction of the
force main within this area is also exempt as an existing and ongoing use. A copy of the DWR email has been provided as an
Appendix.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands,
"waters" and riparian buffers could be minimized.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to temporary impacts necessary for installation of the force main. The easement
through the wetlands has been reduced to 15' within the wetlands. Upon completion of construction, the temporary wetland
impact areas will be seeded with a wetland seed mix according to the Sediment & Erosion Control plans.
Impacts to streams and the Haw River, as well as riparian buffers, have been avoided by constructing the force main within
the existing ROW fill slope where allowed by NCDOT. Also, the force main will be installed via directional drilling to cross
streams and the Haw River.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The force main will be installed using directional drill to avoid stream impacts at the Haw River (Exhibit 2) crossing and the
stream on the south side of the Haw River (Exhibit 1) in order to avoid stream /buffer impacts at these locations.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
® Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
The only disturbance within the riparian buffers will occur from the connection of the force main to the WWTP, which will
occur within the maintained area of the WWTP. This area was determined to be exempt from the JLB rules as an existing
and ongoing use in an email from Sue Homewood with DWR dated 2/4/14. Therefore the disturbance from the
construction of the force main within this area is also exempt as an existing and ongoing use. A copy of the DWR email
has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The project consists of the construction of a sewer force main, which will
❑ Yes ® No
not result in impervious area which requires stormwater management or diffuse
flow.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
[E] /A
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project consists of the construction
of a sewer force main, which will not result in impervious area and stormwater management
is not required.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments: The NCDWQ Infrastructure Finance Section issued a letter, dated April
® Yes
❑ No
10, 2013 documenting that the project was reviewed for NEPA compliance and that
the project is exempt from inter - agency review. A copy of the NCDWQ letter has
been provided as an Appendix.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project consists of the construction of a sewer force main and will not be a catalyst for future development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
East Burlington WWTP
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the US Fish & Wildlife Service's list of Threatened and Endangered Species for Alamance County, located
at: http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntylist/alamance.htmi. Per the USFWS data, there are no federally listed
threatened or endangered species known to occur in Alamance County. Furthermore, there were no occurrences of
federally listed species or potential habitat observed within or adjacent to the proposed alignment.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Alamance County classified as EFH.
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed force main
alignment. The database review did not identify any known existing resources within the proposed alignment or
immediately adjacent to the alignment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The proposed project consists of a subsurface forcemain which will
not result in a rise in floodplain elevation.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? ww-w.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — W &R
/
Authorized Agent
2/12/14
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

I WITHERS &RAVENIEL
ERG�IN6ER i I pt,�SMWpR�s !
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
SUOVEroRS
The undersigned Municipality,T w of Gre Level (Client) does hereby appoint Troy Beasley /
Withe reel Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a)
review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the..13asil Holt- Burlington Force main prolect.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner-
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date'
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Signature of Client: .
Troy BQ$ /_!LVithers & Ravenel. Inc., d j', -
1490 Commonwealth Drive,, Suite 101 (Name _Print) (title)
_
C�AQA-
Wilmington,NG 2 ( Signature)
Tel. (990)..256 -9277 6X 3 q,(
Mailing Address
ICI &tine- �) - C 9-730.2
City State Zip
Phone: J II�D 5 -3"3
Email: iD I P)f Ve ti C a n-
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite 6 1 Green0o ►o, NC 274091 tel- 336.605.3009 1 fax: [phone]

USGS QUAD &
ALAMANCE CO. SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 400 800
1.
1 inch = 800 ft.
USGS QUAD - BURLINGTON & MEBANE
'v • • ••
• •
•
NORTH CAROLINA
BASIL HOLT- BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN
ALAMANCE COUNTY
GREEN LEVEL

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 400 BOO
1 inch = 800 ft.
•
ALAMANCE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEETS 11 & 15
• • xr
NORTH CAROLINA
Y � �
BASIL HOLT - BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN
ALAMANCE i OUNTY
GRIENLEVEL

DWR BUFFER
DETERMININATINON LETTER

J& ��j�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder
Governor Director
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
January 28, 2014
Mr. Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
1410 Commonwealth Dr. Unit 101
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject Property: Basil Holt- Burlington Forcemain, Haw River, Alamance County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Dear Mr. Beasley:
On January 23 2014, at your request and in your attendance, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site
determination to review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to
the above noted state regulations.
The attached maps depict the approximate locations of the streams that were reviewed. Feature D was
determined to be an ephemeral feature and not to be subject to the Jordan Buffer regulations, however this
feature may be considered a jurisdictional stream by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Feature B was
determined to be a perennial stream "approximately shown" on the Alamance County Soil Survey and
Feature F was determined to be an intermittent stream "approximately shown" on the Alamance County Soil
Survey, therefore both Feature B and Feature D are subject to the Jordan Buffer regulations. All other
features shown on the attached map are accurate as depicted and subject to the Jordan Buffer regulations.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all intermittent and perennial stream channels and jurisdictional
wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject
to change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any
future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from
the date of this letter.
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston - Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: 336 - 771 -5000 \ FAX [phone] \ Customer Service: 1- 877 - 623 -6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \Affirmative Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
Natura!!ff

Troy Beasley
Basil Holt- Burlington Force Main
January 28, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by
the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o
Wetlands and Buffers Permitting and Compliance Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface
water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve
any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have
any additional questions or require additional information please contact me at 336- 771 -4964 or
sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Alamance County Soil Survey
Aerial Map
cc: Haywood Cloud, Jr. Town of Green Level, PO Box 342, Mebane NC 27302
David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston -Salem Regional Office

GRAPHIC SCALE / ! ff
n 400 300 �� i f Ycil.�{� "r •.
1 inch = 800 ft. `� �� ,.� .,y ., •• •w._ • • - - •
'i
W o
FEATURE A
j '644 all
• _
,y4i' •' "�I 1' • l:, is '� ' 3►
LLJ
W a z
.r <
• m
• �,' . r W
•\� -
0. 46 z
r l 13 N.•'\YJ • D
- /rOPOSED SEWER'` r. `
ALIGNMENT ' ° ' • r U
- . _......._ . FEATURE E •, -/ ` . - •
L FE D
r' - ., POND) :.
t l •
r
z. ,L • Q
i ! FEATURElH '=' •• . ' • I� -• • •:` . K J
'
(HAW Rlly s % e - • • •
i . FEATURE G 4 . •.•'" •.•'�! •-
�: �� FEATUREy B' - . • •�= m
0.
Haw* iver
. 9
.!° fir• •S' °h •_� Y'� \. .. E � �•� -�- "' � \ i 1 -

ALAMANCE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEETS 11 &
z
O
J
0
2
J
V7
Z
O

EMAIL FROM SUE HOMEWOOD
WITH NCDWR

Beasley, Troy
From: Homewood, Sue [sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 10:03 PM
To: Koser, Michael
Cc: Beasley, Troy; Bob Patterson; Michael Layne; Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: Basil Holt - Burlington Force Main Buffer Letter
Michael,
I'm sorry it took me a few days to respond. Your documentation is sufficient to show this area as an "existing use" for
the purposes of implementing the Jordan Buffer rules the sewer line. Thank you for your attention to this matter and
confirming with DWR prior to finalizing your plans. If I can be of further assistance please let me know.
Sue
From: Koser, Michael [MKoser @withersravenel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 5:28 PM
To: Homewood, Sue
Cc: Beasley, Troy; Bob Patterson; Michael Layne
Subject: Basil Holt - Burlington Force Main Buffer Letter
Sue,
Please review the attached letter and attachment which presents the request for removal of the buffer restrictions at
the flood wall area of the Burlington East WWTP.
Because of our very strict time constraints, we are requesting that you process this as quickly as feasible and please do
not hesitate to call with any questions, clarifications, or requests for revision that you feel might be needed.
Sincerely,
Michael R. Koser, PE
WITHERS ; RA EMIEL
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Direct: 919.238.0361 1 Mobile: [phone]
mkoser withersravenel.com
www.withersravenel.com
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE: This electronic message, which includes any attachments and other
documents referred to herein, contains information from Withers & Ravenel, Inc. that may be proprietary or confidential. The
information is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copying,
printing, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please advise the
sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Copyright 2010 Withers & Ravenel, Inc. All Rights Reserved by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. This electronic
message, any attachments thereto and all documents referred to therein are provided for the recipient's information only, and no
rights are licensed, transferred or otherwise granted by the transmission of this electronic message by Withers & Raven el, Inc. or
receipt of this message by the recipient or any other party.

WITH ERS � MAVEN EL
ENGINEERS) PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
January 29, 2014
Sue Homewood
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR
585 Waughtown St
Winston - Salem, NC 27107
Subject: Basil Holt— Burlington Force Main Project
Haw River Buffer Determination
Dear Ms. Homewood:
Thank you for spending the time with Troy Beasley of our company this past Thursday, the
23rd, in very cold conditions, to review and clarify the surface water buffers for the subject
project.
At your recommendation, we are providing this letter to request your concurrence for a
determination of "existing and ongoing use" for the mowed and maintained area at the City
of Burlington East Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) between the flood wall and the
Haw River because this area is critical for maintenance and operation of the WWTP.
I met with Bob Patterson and Michael Layne at the WWTP on Friday the 24Th to review the
area and obtain their input and explanation as to why the mowed area is critical as
maintenance area for the plant. Bob Patterson is Water Resources Director and Michael
Layne is Field Operations Manager for the City of Burlington.
Please refer to the attached sketch as an aid in helping show and define the areas described
in reasons presented below that explain why the mowed area is critical as maintenance area
for the plant.
The principal reason for maintaining the area as mowed lawn is for access and maintenance
around the flood wall to protect the wall footing.
The flood wall is 10 feet high and protects critical portions of the WWTP from the I%
probability flood but it relies on the footing to keep it functional. The flood wall is
supported on a 9.5 -foot wide spread footing which extends about 6 feet on the river side of
the wall. The footing is covered by soil and resides on soil, so keeping the soil above,
along and in front of the flood wall from being compromised or eroding is crucial for
protecting the integrity of the wall. Protecting the integrity of the soil along the flood wall is
similar to the treatment that is required for maintaining the integrity of a water reservoir
earthen embankment. The area must be kept free of all trees or vegetation with large root
balls or root structures and the area must be kept fully covered with either riprap or fine,
deep- rooting vegetation to protect is from erosion. The WWTP has determined that a
suitable distance needed as a flood wall protection zone should be three times the width of
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1o1 I Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] I fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road, Suite G I Greensboro, NC 274091 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

Buffer Determination Letter Basil Holt- Burlington Force Main
Page 2 of 2 January 29, 2014
the footing which is 18 feet. Beyond that distance, WWTP staff feels that even a mature tree
would present a minimal probability for the root growth to compromise the flood wall
protection zone because of the drop off to the river. The 18400t flood wall protection zone
is shown as the green hatched area on Attachment A. Although rip rap would have been a
less maintenance intensive protective cover, WWTP staff chose to maintain the area as
grass, thus providing a more natural treatment.
Another WWTP functional requirement of the area in front of the flood wall is the
accommodation of equipment access to inspect and maintain the various pipes that connect
to the WWTP. The 2T Rules require that the easement or a suitable maintenance area
above sanitary sewer lines and sewer piping must be maintained to allow access for
inspection and maintenance. The easement or maintenance areas of the various pipes that
run through the area outside of the flood wall are shown on the attached sketch with blue
hatching and the equipment access as red hatching. The easement or prescribed
maintenance area above each pipe shown is the Burlington typical 30 feet width dedicated
for this purpose.
The Burlington Water Resources Department has determined that all of the
mowed /maintained area between the flood wall and the river is critical to the maintenance
and operation of the WWTP and the appurtenant piping. Therefore, we are requesting
concurrence from NCDWR that the entire mowed /maintained portion of the riparian buffers
between the flood wall and the Haw River be considered an "existing and ongoing use ", as
this area is critical to the operation and maintenance of the WWTP, and therefore exempt
from Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Furthermore, we are requesting concurrence that any
proposed construction within the referenced mowed /maintained portion of the riparian
buffers for installation of the Basil Holt- Burlington Forcemain line and connection to the
WWTP would also be consistent with the "existing and ongoing use" at the WWTP and
therefore considered exempt from Jordan Lake Buffer Rules.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information to
complete you review.
Sincerely,
WITHERS &RAVENEL, INC.
Michael R. Koser, P.E.
Enclosure
cc. Bob Patterson
Michael Layne

Basil Holt- Burlington Force Main
Green Level Alamance County North Carolina
Attachment A
WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1

NCDWQ INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCE SECTION LETTER

Determination of Minor Construction Activity
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Infrastructure Finance Section
Project Applicant:
Date:
Project Number:
Estimated Project Cost:
Estimated Funding Amount:
Town of Green Level
April 10, 2013
CS370917 -01
$2,327,548
$633,000
Project Description: The proposed Basil Holt Pump Station and Green Level Outfall
Replacement project will replace a pump station and construct a new forcemain to discharge to
the East Burlington WWTP. The planned work includes the following: (1) replace the existing
100 gallons per minute (gpm) Basil Holt Pump Station with a new 400 gpm pump station to mate
with the forcemain to Burlington; (2) extend the Otter Creek forcemain approximately 375 feet
to a new discharge point to gravity flow to Basil Holt Pump Station; (3) abandon approximately
2,700 linear feet (l.f.) of the Herman Johnson Pump Station forcemain and move the discharge
point to gravity flow into Basil Holt Pump Station; (4) add approximately 2601.f. of gravity
sewer to connect Hwy 49 gravity sewer discharge to Basil Holt Pump Station to redirect flow
from the Green Level Outfall and plug the outfall; and (5) construct approximately 16,3001.f. of
8 -inch forcemain from the Basil Holt Pump Station to the East Burlington WWTP.
The above named applicant intends to apply for assistance from the State Revolving Fund
program to construct the wastewater facilities described above. The North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) has conducted a review of the project in accordance with the procedures
(NCAC 15A Subchapter 1C) for conformance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act. The DWQ has determined that this project is below the minor construction activities
threshold outlined in 15A NCAC 0 1 C .0408; therefore, the project is exempt from inter - agency
review, and the preparation of additional environmental documents is not required.
This determination shall become effective upon its distribution by DWQ and will be available on
the DWQ Infrastructure Finance Section's website
(http://portal.ncdeiir.org/web/wq/ifs/er/fonsis . This determination can be revoked at any time
adverse information is made available. The documentation to support this decision will be on
file with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality, Infrastructure Finance Section, and is available for public scrutiny upon request.

Comments concerning this decision may be addressed to Ms. Jennifer Haynie, Facilities
Evaluation Unit, Infrastructure Finance Section, Division of Water Quality, 1633 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699, or she can be reached by phone at
(919) 707 -9173.
Sincerely, ,/ ®
Kim H. Colson, P.E., Chief
Infrastructure Finance Section
Division of Water Quality

IMPACT EXHIBITS

I
EXHIBIT #
IMPACT #
TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACTS (ACRES)
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
(LF)
EXHIBIT 1
N/A
0
0
0
2
N/A
0
TEMPORARY
WETLANDS IMPACTS
u�,4,�,�.M
arr .. , 4
gg06 SF (0.20 AC) PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS:
1
0.12 ACRES
5086 SF
0
3
L.F. 26 LF
0.05 ACRES
2308 SF
0
4
PERMANENT WETLANDS
®
4018 SF (0.09 AC) EXHIBIT 8
0
-
-1
0
CONVERSION IMPACTS
0
6
4
0
0
26
�
EXHIBIT 3
0
0
0
F-8
N/A
EXHIBIT 2
0
NEW SAN. SEWER
SS
0.20 ACRES
8906 SF
\
4
EXHIBIT 4
m
NEW SAN. SEWER FORCE MAIN
EX. TOP OF BANK
FM
q-
O
Q-
O
EXHIBIT 5 -
EXHIBIT 6 Vj
f e
EXHIBIT 7
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
EXHIBIT #
IMPACT #
TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACTS (ACRES)
TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT (SF)
PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
(LF)
1
N/A
0
0
0
2
N/A
0
0
0
3
1
0.12 ACRES
5086 SF
0
3
2
0.05 ACRES
2308 SF
0
4
3
0.03 ACRES
1512 SF
0
5
N/A
0
0
0
6
4
0
0
26
7
N/A
0
0
0
F-8
N/A
0
0
0
-TOTAL
0.20 ACRES
8906 SF
26 LF
PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACTS
(CORPS ONLY)
PERMANENT WETLAND
CONVERSION IMPACTS
EXHIBIT #
IMPACT #
(ACRES)
5
3
(CORPS ONLY)
0.06 ACRES
6
4
(CORPS ONLY)
0.03 ACRES
TOTAL
0.09 ACRES
0
v
I I I I I I
os
GRAPHIC SCALE
C 600 0 300 600 1200
J
O
1 inch = 600 ft.
R-i3ion ���� B o, -B WITHERS & RAVENEL
�H ' �D1• BASIL HOLT - BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN IMPACT EXHIBIT INDEX
°�`� °�� °�� INDEX
cn�ked By iob NO. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
n,e m3w46v Town of Green LeveI Alamance County North Carolina 115M .Ke,a,Dr,„ecary,NO,mca,ol,,a27511 to e9194- 3340 wwww,t h,r,r,,,Ic,mL,c NO.c -0832

11
L
o
e
AREA EXEMPT FROM
BUFFER RULES woo woo
1
SOUTHERN \ TEMPORARY SILT
TOP OF BANK'\ — FENCE, TYP.
OF HAW RIVER — — —
�) HAW RIVER
\
20' PERMANENT
\ \ \ \ EASEMENT
—x+00
Zone
INTERMITTENT I i
STREAM
8 PVC FORCE MAIN -\Zp @-2
EXIT /ENTRANCE
PIT FOR \ �' \ / /,� — , \� L
— TR Td�� \ DIRECTIONAL DRILL \ \ ,� 14+ 0
`\ ��
V r'
\\ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ �\ t►�! EAST BURLPINGTON �/�� /
A-
-,WW
\ \ \ \ R \ \ \ \ WW O GRAPHIC SCALE
I I '� 40 0 20 40 80
EX. 42 SANITARY 0 lo, 1 inch 40 ft. \ ! =
\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1" HDPE � �`- J ��/
SEWER LINE - LIMITS OF
\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ AREA EXEMPT FROM DIRECTIONAL DRILL _DISTURBANCES -� _ _ P TITFEORTRANCE
\ \�\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ \ \ BUFFER RULES NO STREAM /BUFFER SNP) i _ _ - DIRECTIONAL DRILL
IMPACTS , , _ — —
525
500
475
450
9 +50
10 +00
10 +50
zIr
�w
O
in U
11+00
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
PM NT & ENTRY P IN
11+50 12 +00
mimolmom — ON NE 1 1
IRR��IRR���
z�
�w
J
128' — 10" HDPE
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
12 +50 13 +00
13 +50
ZONE 2
14 +00
525
PROFILE SCALE
1 " =40'H
1 " =20'V
iii Im I
475
450
14 +50
No. Revision Date I by III oes1g1e1 seaie
SCX 1' � �O' Sheet NO.
Drawn ev Date WITHERS RAV E N E L
�kede �`� ,obNO ,��,. BASIL HOLT — BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN STREAM CROSSING EXHIBIT ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS EX -1
Txe suooas.m Town of Green Level Alamance County North Carolina „s MaeKe —rye c North C-1-27511 ter 9194 -3340 wwmer,r,eneicom LmenseNo 00832

11
R
e
F'
e
i
EXIT /ENTRANCE
PIT FOR
TOP OF BANK / '
I I
' ' ' ' _"I '
I. *1j+(30*
00 .
\ 11 I I DIRECTIONAL DRILL ill
\ \
18+00
I 1 �I+
7N
16 +00
1 I �
.�.
111111 \ \ ° _— �� _J -- �FM
---— �____
- - - -- . I
I. .
r
_ o
��-
--
- - - � --
j
1 ...►
I
... .
.- .�. .,
10" HDPE
► .
I I EXIT ENTRANCE
ENTRANCE
PIT FOR ,
�, •
_
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
N N
1
I PIT FOR
JACK & BORE
BELOW HAW RIVER I m m
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
t
'p '
NO IMPACTS TO
I & JACK & BORE •
• • I • • • • •
• Q 1
\ 8" PVC \ I I
HAW RIVER
\ tv
\
I
I
_ _ _ _
+
.0.
�\ FORCE MAIN � I
\\ \ \� ` I \\ I
�1
\ I
I
I
I 15'
I PERMANENT
EASEMENT .
cv
'
\\
\
o I O
\ \ \\ \ \ \ 1 TOP OF BANK
�cS' �!i
I 1
1
I ;
LIMITS OF
. I DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
.
\\ CD CD
GRAPHIC -SCALE
1�40I 0 20 �4
400.
\\ 80 ��
I 1
/
I - - -_ •
I
• • i
\ \
II
I I 1 inch = 40 ft.
\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ �\ 1
\ \ \ \\ \ \
\
I
\
1 /
at
525
525
P
O
ILE
SCALE
Z
1 "
=4
'H
EXI
/
NT
P-11
AN
FOR-
E
ZONE 2
ZONE
1
ZONE
1
ZONE
2
E
a
ENTRA
CE
DIREC
ION
L
DRILL
PI
FOR
P IT FOR
BORE
500
DIRECT
ON
L
DRI
N
u,
5
z
�w
J
O U
0
0
475
z
475
�a
w
x J
It U
N
430' — 10"
HDPE
FORCE
AI
450
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
450
13 +50 14 +00 14 +50 15 +00 15 +50 16 +00
16 +50 17 +00
17 +50 18 +00 18 +50
19 +00 19 +50
No.
Revision
Date
By 111
°,,... 1
�`"
Drawoey �"
scare
'� ""°
°d1e = „o,.
BASIL HOLT — BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN
Town of Green Level Alamance County North Carolina
HAW RIVER CROSSING
EXHIBIT
WITHERS
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS
„sMacKe�a�°,��e cary,NO,mca,on�ays„ t,l
&— RAVENEL
I SURVEYORS
- -0e —. —th— r—d— b ..... NO.-11
sh—,
EX-2
cn777
r "e
I&NO.
suooas.01

LIMITS OF '
— — DISTURBANCE —
— -- /
- -- \ \ — — -- - - - - -- (TYP.) - -- - -- -Y —
— — — — — — — -t — — — LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE _ IMPACT 2 _ _ _ TD — — V
TEMPORARY WETLAND TEMPORARY 18" HIGH
24" HIGH _
IMPACTS DIVERSION DIKE - — — — — — — —� TO — _ TEMPORARY
2308 S.F. TO BE REMOVED / r DIVERSION
0.05 Ac. AFTER CONSTRUCTION p 3' HIGH ROCK DAM
IS COMPLETE �� � � /
/ 0/ / TEMPORARY TREELINE \� 15' �O
' ' ' Y.•. a,. MEASURED FROM �0
CONSTRUCTION D � 3 / �/ /
hl
• mss''` f�fi - EASEMENT STA 19 +25 -21 +45 ` T D �+
j —,— --—- v'd.:Aa KN {, . ~ PERMANENT . ► +00 22 +0
' WETLANDS `'' `` EASEMENT 2
1
y f . r"1'•4'"'n'•Y'� • �s•f �Yi , i
• • • • • { :ate•. Xy'Sy. • tl i _.. ___ _. ._._.� «. 3. t r •
-%
" ENTRANCE ppROXIMATE LOCATION_ G . c �-
_ LL PIT FOR 4 "• GASUNE — G — TREELINE
TREELINE I _2 A G IhIIAINTQINED ' APPROXIMATE
APPROXIMATE p,.l R ,JACK & BORE - , — c = `,G . EXISITNG GLEARED LOCATION
+ . ' - — - -- DENT ( ) _
LOCATION I 60 LF OF 'S LINE•EASE
G / i (TYP) IMPACT 1 I —16" STEEL ' r �A
TEMPORARY WETLANDS I CASING PIPE - - - — — — •— — r — - LIMITS OF
5086 S.F. I IMPACT 5
0.12 Ac. • "` — — — — — ` — PERMANENT WETLAND DISTURBANCE
\\ —-------- - - - - -- _ — .CONVERSION IMPACT
(Typ) (TYP.), /'_�_� -� /
r • 2725 S.F.
0.06 Ac.
_ . �- • . (CORPS ONLY)
STONE DRAIN —
TO BE REMOVED I I EXIT /ENTRANCE
AFTER CONSTRUCTION I PIT FOR
DIRECTIONAL DRILL
IS COMPLETE O I & JACK & BORE
O
I I SEE EXHIBIT 2
I I FOR PROFILE
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i T Zone
IMPACT 1
0.12 AC
(TEMPORARY)
0.05 AC
IMPACT 2
(TEMPORARY)
0.06 AC
PERMANENT
®
WETLAND
CONVERSION
IMPACTS (CORPS
IMPACT 5
ONLY)
— _ _I_ J- TOP OF BANK GRAPHIC SCALE
_ _ _ _ _ _ I I Zone 1 40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
r Re�i3ion Date B D��g... ���I' - WITHERS RA►V E N E L
„ z, o„ BASIL HOLT — BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT ����-
Dawn By Date
—777d By iobNO. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS EX -3
n+e m3oas.m Town of Green Level Alamance Count North Carolina Ill..Iela,o, e CG, "NO,mCar,ISaz7s„ td 9194 -3340 wwtmea---m ice eNO c -0832

N�%. IMPACT 6 \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\
x� p PERMANENT WETLAND \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ yy \ \ \ \ \
\ •` ' \ CONVERSION IMPACTS
O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O Tp 1293 SF
0.03 AC
\
(CORPS ONLY) \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ `\
20 WIDE PERMANENT \ \ \ \ `
\ �• ` \ 20' TEMPORARY ` \ \ \
EASEMENT r+ \ \ \ \ \ \ CONSTRUCTION/ 15-
\ \ \ \ `\
�` \ \ ` PERMANENT EASEMENT
8" PVC FORCE MAIN ?S `� \ �\ \\ \ \ 30' TEMP. CONST. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
IMPACT 3 \ \ O \ �� \ EASEMENT \ \ \ \ \ \
TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT \
X/� 18 HIGH TEMPORARY \\ \ 1512 SF-
/I - \ \ \\ - DIVERSION
1 0.03 AC •
....�., \ \1 1 \ \\ \ \
\ \ / T _� /� / \ \`\ 505 \\ \ \ \ \ \
\ A � � � 7,// / '1 .1 STONE DRAIN ' � \�� � 20'W x 215'L \ \
r TO BE REMOVED ° t, �� \\ \ \N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ •�O \ \\ \ \ TEMP. CONST. \ \ \ \
\ \ I //// , / \ AFTER CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
IS I COMPLETE ,• \ \ �� \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \
WETLANDS • � �h I , / 0,
.4 49� �g5\ � LIMITS OF EX. RIP
_RAP LINING -_
ITS LIM OF EX. RIP RAP \ \
-- Pas VVY
7a Y'
\ \ ( \\ \\ \ r \ 40 LF 18 HDPE
- � - - DRAINAGE PIPE
12% SLOPE
IMPACT 3
0.03 AC
(TEMPORARY)
0.03 AC
PERMANENT
WETLAND
®
CONVERSION
IMPACTS (CORPS
IMPACT 6
ONLY)
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
R-i3ion ���� B ������� -1, * o
�����
Dw By Dz, BASIL HOLT BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT WITHERS RAV E N E L SCH Chxked ay lob NO. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS EX -4
n+6 6130048,01 Town of Green Level Alamance Count North Carolina „s Ma�Ke�a� r- Ca N,rthC ona2s„ tee 9194 -3340 303030 w,tmeaa,w,,Ic,m L,c NO.00—

COX/ PkE TIE
008'Po. 1 0802 1
N: / 88952432F 9 \ —
�/ E
F / I / T / / /ITH I Tr I ` —
�/� OR M N/L CA bD V XS NGI \ Mgnera
C /
R ILk OPT. �I IM A �-.S T�
P k4 D, OR R PARIAI� UFF R \ \
EX. POND / � -
J
8" PVC FORCE MAIN
43 45+0o
— — LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE -
-L /C% —7 _
- - - - -- NSF
SF-
�\ SILT FENCE, -
\ TYP.
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
No. Revision Date I by III o1119111 I same
Draw ev WITHERS RAVENEL
2/7,12014 BASIL HOLT - BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS EX -5
i„B 513oBI6 .o7 Town of Green Level Alamance County North Carolina 115 M-- Dr— Cary, North C- 1-27511 ter 91 34633340 .— th—rav dcom -- N, C0_

vvvv vv A� 111111 I��� �II� II I III II I� I \\ sX
IIII IIII . I I VIII IIII I
\ \ m II II a III I IIII I II
\ \ \tea / 1 II III III w I IIIIQ \� \Y WN
V _
w I I IIII \\ Z
W'v
kiNN o�oow � I X�z I I III \ \ \ \ dN
Xto
.2
ciwz'
�
o �rw
W o
�\ bo
\ x' \�\
� \� ••\a \��\ —__ � � � / / / \ I I III I II I I
W/
�\ w %, \ \ \�\ I \ \I I w
\ °z��
cr \\\ \� �v' \\ III \\ II w w
\ \ \
iJa Q
1\ \ \\ I I Z�
r \ \\ I Qa
a:
—a \ \ \ \
-- J \\ 1 I UN �O
- - - - -- \ \ \� \ \\ I II QN pN • w
\ \ \
\ \ \ \ \\ wN -
- - - - -�— Or rl \; \ \ \ \11 �g o w �
\ \
1111 \1111111\ IN U m N
LL: z
LLI z w \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ I w
\ a N _o N ir O
�w ° O
N co _ LL
N \ \I\ \ \\ \ \ \\ 1 \\ I O
\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ 11\ I 1 I I
1 I
u
\ \ \ \ I III \1 \\ \\ \III I E
Q
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ II \I \ \1 \\ III I \ \1 m
=1 I I— III —III ` o \ \ \ 11 \ \ I I \ 1 I
— III —III— \
II—III—III Q W
co
W� ErJ O QWWJ o oQ of
\ \ O
- III —III— W ° �> J o�Qa o ~�z �OWU�Z2 \ // \ \\ I I' = J
— III —III J O zwJo zLLa9W IY ~UZ w�
=III= x �; oO °� aaz�z Q °WU= �oz�aQ� \
=1�1 w wz�W w Q °— zoo ° w— OcnLL�W
~ O o Q z W X O F w Q z U Y Q J \ \ \ \ \\ I V7 U
II— OW ° QmO� JZUZ� �W�H� UW WUZ w \� I \ \ \ \\ \\ \ Q O
000J OJWM Q�� az I m
c� ooQ Q �a =zm >womoa� Z \ \ \ \\ \ / o
W d Q H p z m a =, Z d U° O J W Q> O O Q O O Z \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ I ~
1— o �L=L �� Q °�� wz0WZ w���;woY = \ \ 1\ \ \\ \ \\ 1 I
2 III Q W Z p Q I Y Q M z z w d Z Q W Q U
0 — z zHZ- zOw O QQ= cncnO�O >om \ \ \ \ $
o O (nw JZJ� OW� ~��2U JW d J2JZLL a \
Z W WOL�cn H�ZW ZJQUW Q >o -�JOO Q \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \
— �� �z U= QL.L Flo Q'J =Q °z�� \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I n m
O� I~i W OOm~ OZ W d >° UQm W m }��UQ�O F \ \ \ \ \ \
H - Q Om ~2�LL =U W M �0� =Q ZHOY�Z�(7
O = _ = QQ zcnopO OQ��cn ��� aoU�—
ED I— U� wz °_<Lu wQ_ u cn�~ ��zwz_QO J \ \ \ m
a —III �zz �O HQO� o w }� z�cnz� QOa =a�(7� Q \ \ \\ 1 m A
o _ ac ?o Q� ww�z Q °oaa °� °�Q �az�a } >o 0 \ \ \\ \ Uj QWQ °w cnz�O �LLCn�W w�Q o 0-1 'o =� 0 \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \I
-III
C) F- OW °= zW�OH zz�JM �QwLL(/) QJO N \ o \ \\ I
j= W- o �_�� oawzo z -z aa�WZ�w_� w \ \ \ \ \\ \1
_ —III pzW zW ~a ��,� =W <Wo J��QO� o \ \ \ \
WQU) O LLIo mwaQ� �a�U� WWJOQ�az Q \ \ \\ \ I
_ °QUZ 'Lo zoo cnz>— Q�jzw zQzcnocnzz
— III —III _� W °W� wQ�Jo �o_JQz U =�o�z_�wo \ \\
- III —III ~Q QoQ0 JwQa� of oo QUDQH�az0
o > > o�— o� ZOw � \ o
II— III —III WNP wC) C) _C) � LLJ 0 Cr JQwY w0aww�� =W \ \ \ \\ Lu — III —III �aU) XOX° �QW wO = =Q �wU) J YWU� \
Q Z C) of W LL W U <-- of ddUHH ZdZHOOY W O
IIIIIIIIIIII r°U (V d M zIr Ow� Hw \ \ \ \ \\
AWJAU '1H38W1 - Nd Y1:9Z :f 11OZ 'll AJauq&d 'AoPm*nl - BAP'Yl'9'Z�VP3 SHL 41! —IRW3 •PueMM \/�1 +ed- 90- ZO- YIOZ\NNN 30L0d \OYJ \N! w1bu!P1Q -11-H 1!-- S- 10'9f00C1 \0100- CI\CI \'N

ELORE� ICO�\ � Q I�G\
D.p.I 05 F \Ob
\ ' JURISDICTIONAL
I \ \
I RIND 189 3141 \3\4� \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ STREAM eel —
APPROXIMATE ER
I I 1 \ \ \ LOCATION 1 I I I I \ \ \ \ N 0 — — —
\\ - --
1 8" PVC FORCE MAIN \ \ \ \I 1 I 1\ \ \ \ 5-5A,
'559
$�
\ I I \\ \ \ \11
\FORtEMAIN -LOCATED WITHIN EXl_STING\ � — CHECK DAM, TYP. �— — — — — —
\\ I FILL SLOPE. —N& -4MPACTS TO 50' MAX. SPACING
WQAD F
-POND -0 _R RIPARIAN BUFFERS — _ _ _ Ole
/ I I i _ _
ITI
----- - - - - -_ -- — _ — — — — SS /
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM
1
1111 - - - --
/ � - --
/ - --- - - - --
/
_- _ —_ - --
No. Revision Date B Deslg�er scale
sc„ i . +o• shee�No
Draw ev WITHERS RAVENEL lIF
kede „ ,onNO , „ BASIL HOLT — BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS EX -7
7118 613OD4 .' Town of Green Level Alamance County North Carolina 115 MZaK— Drive Cary, North C arol -27511 [,1 9,34633340 -- th—rav doom -- No CM32

F-/
EX. GRAVITY
SEWER LINE,
TYP.
e
1
I�
I °
I° 3
I
I
I I m
I I
I I
EX. BASIL HOLT I
SANITARY SEWER
PUMP STATION
I EX. TREELINE, I
I TYR
I EX. 15" _
RCP /
PROPOSED EX. GRAVEL /
8" PVC I ACCESS DRIVE / D «
FORCE EX. 8"
a
MAIN PVC C I / --1 K rrl
m L4
0
FM FM
ss
ss / ss FM EX. 18
RCP EX. 18" —
EX. DITCHLINE RCP / ' STONE DRAIN, Zone 1 / / EX. SEWER
/ / /
SILT FENCE, TYP. TYP FORCE MAIN
Zone 1 -
/ � Zone 2
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
FORCEMAIN LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING
GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD. NO IMPACTS
� TO STREAM OR RIPARIAN BUFFERS
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
/ 1 inch = 40 ft.
No. Revision Date B oesge scale
SCX LEI o,—By Date WITHERS RAVENEL
�kede �`� ,o"' ,2D,. BASIL HOLT — BURLINGTON FORCE MAIN STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Txs suooas.m Town of Green Level Alamance County North Carolina „sMaeKe� —r-Ce North ce 1-275„ ter 9194 -3340 wwme,�,a� -com LmenseNoC083z