WQ0012796_Staff Report_20211207

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0012796
Attn: Poorva Mokashi Facility Name: Lakeview Packing Company, Inc
From: Fredric Oelrich
Choose an item. Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ❑ Yes or ® No
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Jacob Turnage Certificate #:999705 Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: 4,000 Gal grease trap with baffles and sanitary tees; a 150 GPM duplex pump
station with high water alarms and check valves; approximately 2,085 LF of 4" force main; a manual gate valve;
two 1,200 Gal baffled septic tanks in parallel; a 702 Gal baffled chlorine contact tank with metered dosing of
sodium hypochlorite; a 917,894 Gal synthetically lined treatment/storage lagoon; a 100 GPM manually operated
pump station with duplex pumps and alarms for high and low water,; a flow meter; 700 LF of 3" force main; a
spray field diverter valve box; a 9.34 acre spray irrigation area consisting of eight fields utilizing both solid -set
irrigation and hose reel irrigation; and all associated piping, valves, controls and appurtenances.
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 16,255 GPD(operating an average of 261 days per year for an annual average flow of
4,242,555 gallons.
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or n No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? n Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 3

6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes n No n N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? n Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
0 , If
0 / ll
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Systen is currently not being operated and it is thus
noted on the operating reports.
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 3

III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
SEE BELOW
SEE BELOW
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
n Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
44
Signature of regional supervisor: R'� T'`"'4.4
Date: 11/9/2021
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Item III.13. Add the word "lagoon" between storage and shall.
Item IV. 6. Add the word "lagoon" between storage and shall.
Item VI. 5. This item was repealed on 09/01/2018
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 3