20220061 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220110

fr.,f DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20220061
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
US 401 Asphalt Plant
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Brian Raynor
1 b. Primary Contact Email: *
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1/10/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Neills Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-Iv
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.428699
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.818909
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
14 - Linear transportation
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Highland Paving Company LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 4035 : PG 0262
2c. Contact Person:
Brian Raynor
2d.Address
Street Address
2031 Middle Road
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28321
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
U

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Krissina Newcomb
4b. Business Name:
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
PO Box 400
Address Line 2
City
Lillington
Postal / Zip Code
27546
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Lillington
2. Project Identification
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
0651-31-5031
41
2c. Project Address
Street Address
US 401 S
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Lillington
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27546
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Neills Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040501
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site was formerly in agriculture and wooded. Currently, an asphalt plant has been constructed in the northeastern corner of the site, and remainder of the land is undeveloped. Land
use in the immediate vicinity is wooded, agricultural, and residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.5
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1860

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is for commercial/industrial development. An asphalt plant has been constructed in the northeastern corner of the site with an access road from US 401 S
crossing a stream and wetland. The southeastern portion of the site is reserved for future development (commercial).
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:"
At the road crossing (impact #1), the plan calls for two pipes: 61 LF 24" RCP @ 1.47 % and 59 LF 24" RCP @ 1.53 % . The first pipe is shown to be buried 20 % of the pipe depth (0.4') so it
will serve as the primary flow path with the second pipe being activated during storm events.
A 17ft long rip -rap energy dissipator will be installed at the outlet of the culvert.
Water line was concurrently installed in the road right-of-way, the area back filled, the roadway paved, and shoulder slopes stabilized.
Typical construction equipment such as excavators, loaders, dump trucks, and graders were utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Krissina Newcomb
Agency/Consultant Company: Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
The southeastern corner of the site is reserved for future commercial development.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No. It appears the site can be developed without any additional wetland or stream impacts.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory U
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
r.) Type of Jurisdicition*
29. Impact
area
culvert
L
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.050
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.050
21. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.050
11
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
ffn.ame*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Road Crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert
S1
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
62
Qinear feet)

a2 Road Crossing Permanent Rip Rap Fill S1 Perennial Both 3 17
Average (feet) (linear (eet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
79
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
79
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The configuration of the asphalt plant was changed to avoid wetland impacts.
The road was sited perpendicular to the drainageway and at the narrowest point in order to minimize impacts. All fill slopes are 3:1
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sediment and erosion control measures, such as silt fencing, were used to protect water quality. Construction limits marked through wetlands. No
clearing occurred in wetlands outside of the proposed impact area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent and temporary wetland impacts are less than 1/10 acre.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) is not subject
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?"
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
The percent impervious for the project is 9.5
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statellocal) funds or the use of public (federallstate) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? x
Yes No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
I Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This asphalt plant was built in response to current demand (already approved subdivisions and development) in the area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Public Sewer (HARNETT REGIONAL WATER). The North Harnett Wastewater Treatment Plant has a capacity of 7.5 MGD
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/ ). NC Natural Heritage Program (https:Hncnhde.natureserve.org/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
Two properties indicated across the street were determined to be inneligle for listing.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.ne.gov/fris/ )
Miscellaneous

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
US 401 Asphalt Plant PCN Attachment.pdf 10.68MB
NCDWR Submission Completed.pdf 56.47KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Krissina Newcomb
Signature
WS&& AWAi
Date
1/10/2022

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
Contact Name*
Krissina Newcomb
Contact Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Owner*
Highland Paving
Project Name*
US 401 Asphalt Plant
Project County*
Harnett
Owner Address: *
street Address
2031 Middle Road
Address Line 2
City
FAYETTEVILLE
Postal / Zip Code
28321
Is this a transportation project?*
Yes No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
❑ Individual Permit
❑ Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?
Yes No
NORYH CAPOLINA
ERYiY0mmental QYOifly
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Modification
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below and include location information. *
The 40-acre site is located north of US Hwy 401, west of the railroad track, and east of Neill's Creek in Lillington, NC.
NCPIN 0651-31-5031, Coordinates 35.428176,-78.819580
A two lot minor subdivision (industrial) is proposed. A stream with adjacent wetlands bisects the property, and a road
crossing will be necessary to access the lot on the back of the property. The proposed road crossing will impact 0.06 acre
of wetland and about 80 linear feet of stream.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule.
I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting
location and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you
can submit an application.
Signature*
Att .04 NrUAi
Submittal Date 11/19/2021

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
7 January 2022
Mrs. Emily Greer
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
US 401 Asphalt Plant
Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Greer,
A Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
property. A site investigation was conducted for approximately 20 acres of the 41 acre site
which is located on the northern side of US 401 S, Lillington, NC. The subject site is located in
the Neill's Creek Subwatershed (HUC 12 030300040501) in the Cape Fear River Basin. A
wetland delineation was conducted for approximately 20 acres located on the eastern half of the
site by Hal Owen & Associates Inc. staff in May 2021. The western half of the site is located in
the 100 year flood plain and was not investigated.
An asphalt plant has been constructed in the northeastern corner of the site and an access
road that crosses a stream and wetland. The road crossing permanently impacts 0.05 acre of
riparian wetland and 79 linear feet of perennial stream. This is an after -the -fact notification and
is being submitted pursuant to USACE Nationwide Permit 14 and NCDWR Water Quality
General Certification 4135.
Attachments include:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Site Plans and Impact Maps
• Threatened\Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat Assessment
• NC Historic Properties map
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
/-�� �
A-V�
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
CC: Brian Raynor, Highland Paving Company LLC
Scott Brown, PE; 4D Site Solutions
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: US 401 S
City, State: Lillington, NC
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0651-31-5031
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Associ;
Mailing Address: PO BOX 400
Lillington, NC 27546
Telephone Number: 910-893-8743
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: HIGHLAND PAVING COMPANY LLC
Mailing Address: 2031 Middle Road
Fayetteville, NC 28321
Telephone Number: 910-824-1238
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina Newcomb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
10 January 2022
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
' For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 20 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.428699
Longitude:-78.818909
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Project Name:
US 401 Asphalt Plant
Address:
US 401, Lillington, NC
PIN:
0651-50-0955.000
County-
Harnett
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name:
Highland Paving Co, LLC
Mailing Address:
2031 Middle Road, Fayetteville, NC 28321
Telephone Number:
910-824-1238
E-mail Address:
BRAYNOR MGHLANDPAVING.COM
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property
identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the
property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the
undersigned in writing.
Authorized Siatur� `
(Please legibly print name here:
1,1)21
D e

B4035 - P 262
HARNETT COUNTY TAX ID #
o/o 110650 0002 01
08-26-2021 BY: ED
Prepared By and Mail To:
P. Tilghman Pope, Esquire
Pope Law Group, P.A.
Post Office Sox 928
Dunn, North Carolina 28335
Revenue: $60.00
NORTH CAROLINA
HARNETT COUNTY
For Registration Matthew S, Willis
Register of Deeds
Harnett County, NC
Electronically Recorded
2021 Aug 26 01:52 PM NG Rev Stamp: $ 60,00
Book: 4035 Page: 262 - 263 Fee: $ 26.00
Instrument Number: 2021019953
Parcel No.: Portion of 110650000201
WARRWE Y DEED
THIS DEED, made this day of August, 2021, by and between, Joseph C. Cannady,
2493 US 401, 1..,illington, North Carolina 27546, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, and, Highland
Paving Co., LLC, Post Office Box 1843, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28302 hereinafter referred to as
Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in Neill's Creek Township, Harnett County,
North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
BEING all of that 0.87 acres of land designated at Tract 1 as shown on that plat
entitled "Subdivision Survey of the John Glenn Wester & Joseph C. Cannady Parcels",
prepared by 4Dsite solutions dated June 8, 2021 and recorded in Map Book 2021,
Page 377, Harnett County Registry. See said plat reference for a greater certainty by
metes and bounds.
submitted electronically by "Pope Law Group, PA"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Harnett county Register of Deeds.

B4035 - P 263
For back title reference see Deed Book 1006, Page 793 and Book 250, Page 64, Harnett
County Registry.
THIS IS NOT THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE OF THE GRANTOR.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereunto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee
simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all
encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the tide against the lawful claims of all persons
whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is
subject to the following exceptions:
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by
context.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set their hands and seals, the day and
year first above written.
40 % 10 � -'k or; �Z - 0, �R
(SEAL)
Joseph C. Cannady
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF RNETT
I, -4 LA-4 aaesz
a Notary Public, do hereby certify that Joseph C.
Cannady personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due executions the foregoing
document.
WITNESS my hand and notarial seal this of ugust, 2021.
NOTARY P TB .IC-0"
�l7� `4.y+
`-� �c _ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
17 August 2021
Mr. Jimmy Garrett
Highland Paving Co., LLC
Reference: Wetland Delineation
US 401 Industrial Park, Lillington, NC; Portion of PIN 0651-50-0955
Dear Mr. Garrett,
A site investigation was conducted for the above referenced property, which is located on
the northern side of US Hwy 401 in Harnett County, North Carolina. (Figure 1.). The purpose of
this investigation was to determine the existence, extent, and location of areas that meet the
criteria for wetlands and surface waters. All wetland determinations were made in accordance
with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and subsequent
regional supplements. This report represents my professional opinion but does not represent the
exact wetland boundaries or concurrence by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
METHODOLOGY
This evaluation included a site investigation and review of public records for the subject
property and its immediate vicinity. The records review included aerial photographs, the Flood
Risk Information System (FRIS), the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) soil
survey, the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), United States Geological Survey (USGS)
topographic maps, and Harnett County GIS data.
The site investigation was accomplished by direct examination of the physical attributes
of the site and soil auger borings taken at various points across the site. The project boundaries
were walked and several traverses were conducted across the interior of the site. Wetland
determinations were based on the three -parameter approach involving indicators of hydrophytic
vegetative, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Under normal circumstances, positive indicators
of each of these parameters must be present for an area to satisfy the criteria for wetlands.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The project area (Figure 2) is located within the Coastal Plain physiographic province of
North Carolina. The USGS topographic map, Lillington Quadrangle (Figure 3), shows the site
drains west toward Neills Creek, which is in the Neills Creek Subwatershed (USGS HUC
03030004-0501) of the Cape Fear River Basin. The site is gently rolling with an average
elevation of approximately 140 feet above mean sea level. Center coordinates for site are
35.428699 degrees latitude and-78.818909 degrees longitude.

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
The nearest named water body to the site is Neills Creek which has a North Carolina
surface water classification of WS-IV. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or
Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. There are no Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II), or
Class SA Waters within I mile of the project study area or within I mile downstream.
The NRCS Soil Survey indicates that the site is underlain by various soil series. On the
uplands the mapped soil units include Cecil fine sandy loam, 8-15% slopes (CeD) and Norfolk
loamy sand, 2-6 % slopes (NoB). In the drainageways the mapped soil units include Rains sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Ra); Roanoke loam, occasionally flooded (Ro); and Wickham fine
sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded (WkB). Rains and Roanoke series are classified
as hydric soils. An NRCS "Custom Soil Resource Report" for the site is attached.
SURFACE WATERS AND WETLANDS INVESTIGATION
A wetland delineation was conducted for the subject property on 6 August 2021. Areas
that meet the required criteria for wetlands were observed and are shown in Figure 4. The
boundary of the wetland area was delineated on the ground by placing flagging along the
perimeter and numbering the flags consecutively as annotated on the map. The flags were GPS
located using an EOS Arrow 100 GNSS receiver with DGPS correction under medium canopy.
It is recommended that the wetland boundary be survey located for accuracy in areas where
impacts may occur.
The wetland areas observed at the site occurred along streams within the wooded portion
of the site and are of the headwater forest type. Dominant vegetation included Red maple (Acer
rubrum), Sweet gum (Liquidambar styracaflua), and Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) in
the overstory; Privet (Ligustrum sinense) in the shrub layer; Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), Jack in the pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum), and Greenbrier (smilax rotundifolia) in
the herb layer. Wetland hydrology indicators included geomorphic landscape position and
drainage patterns. Soils in the wetland were typically loamy with a depleted matrix and fine to
medium, common redoximorphic concentrations. While at the site, a representative location was
chosen along the wetland boundary at which to complete a set of Wetland Determination Data
Forms.
A perennial stream about 3-5 feet wide was observed to cross the subject site from east to
west. This stream originates offsite and is conveyed through a large culvert under the railroad
track. Another stream about 2-3 feet wide starts in the middle of the property, runs parallel to
and then joins the perennial stream before exiting the site. A third stream about 2 feet wide is
located in the drainageway at the northern end of the site.

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT PERMITTING
It is encouraged that you use care and good judgment when working in or around stream
and wetland areas. Current environmental regulations require a Clean Water Act §404 permit
from USACE and a matching §401 water quality certification (WQC) from the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) for any activity that impacts federally regulated waters
(including wetlands). Impacts may include filling, draining, and mechanized land clearing. A
permit application prior to construction must be submitted to both agencies if it is anticipated
that stream or wetland impacts will occur. Nationwide permits (NWP) are general permits
issued by USACE on a nationwide basis to streamline the authorization of activities that result in
no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects. They may be
used for activities that will impact less than 0.5 acre of wetlands or waters and less than 300
linear feet of stream, and they cover typical activities such as road crossings and building
foundations. Authorization to use NWPs and WQCs can usually be secured in about three
months. For impacts that exceed 0.5 acre of wetlands or 300 linear feet of stream, an individual
permit will be necessary. Individual permit applications are time consuming to process (6 — 12
months) because of the public review period and numerous public agencies involved.
In seeking a permit, the applicant is required to show that all measures have been taken to
minimize and avoid impacts. In some cases, the USACE or NCDWR may require compensatory
mitigation to offset losses of aquatic resources. Compensatory mitigation may include
restoration, creation, enhancement, or preservation of aquatic resources and can be accomplished
by purchasing credits from a mitigation bank or payment to an in -lieu fee program. Additional
information about regulatory requirements and permitting can be provided at your request.
I appreciate the opportunity to provide this service and trust that you will feel free to call
on me again in the future. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist II
QUALIFICATIONS OF INVESTIGATOR
Krissina Newcomb is an Environmental Scientist with Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. She
received a bachelor's degree from North Carolina State University in Natural Resources with
Coastal Concentration in 1998. She has worked for Hal Owen & Associates since 1998
specializing in wetland investigations, permitting, and state riparian buffer assessments. In
addition, she has trained under Mr. Owen to conducted Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments
and Environmental Evaluations for NCDOT Borrow/Waste Sites.

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figures:
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Map
Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4. Streams and Wetlands identified at subject site
Attachments:
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Wetland Determination Data Forms —1 upland, 1 wetland
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map
Harnett County GIS Aerial Photograph (2017)
NC Floodplain Mapping
NRCS Soil Mapping

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 1. Vicinity map
The subject property is located on the northern side of US 401, Lillington, NC
Site coordinates are 35.428699.-78.818909
14-
.a 44
Harnett County
�O
ff
E,
KFpling
O
Site
4 Cape Fear
Buses Cref
t ' ngton CepeFearPJ
5hawtown
Go gle
Z mi:
t
First Choice Commurii
Health Centers
9
Map data 02021 United Statee Terms Privacy Send Feedback 500 ft
¢a
s
x
x
is
Harnett Health Emerald Health
Sciences Center & Rehab Center
4
a e
0q fir. Central Harnett Hospitals
k
�1
i

I
I
I
I
l
1
I
1
f
I
If
I
I
ti
tc
w

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map, Lillington Quadrangle, North Carolina Harnett County
SCALE 1:24 000
1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 200C
1 0.5 0 1
MULES
1000 0 1000 20M 30M 4000 5000 6006 7000 8000 9000 1000Q
MAXI
CONTOUR INTERVAL 16 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1998

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 4. Streams and Wetlands identified at subject site.
Wetland Delineation
US 401 Industrial Park, Lillington, NC
Portion of PIN 0651-50-0955
Site Map Depicting Wetlands and surface waters
5 August 2021

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett City: Lillington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.428699 Long.:-78.818909
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: NelllS Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
35.428297
-78.819430
2.1 aC
wetland
404
B
35.429628
-78.819224
0.4 aC
wetland
404
S 1
35.428332
78.818958
870 If
stream
404
S2
35.428394
-78.818768
320 If
stream
404
S3
35.429859
-78.818738
670 If
stream
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Lillington, NC 2019
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey, Harnett Co., NC
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): Harnett County GIS (2017)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: US 401 Industrial Park City/County: Lillington, Harnett Sampling Date: 8/18/21
Applicant/Owner: Highland Paving Co, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Investigator(s): Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): shoulder Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: 35.428076 Long:-78.818055 Datum: NAD83/NC
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Near wetland flag B19
HYDROLOGY
rs:
LJ
El
Surface Water (Al)
�L- i
LJ
❑
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
❑
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
El
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X
Water Table Present? Yes
No X
Saturation Present? Yes
No X
(includes capillary frinae)
ieck all that apply)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
gauge, monitoring weu, aerial pnotos, previous
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Ligustrum sinense
40
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Liquidambar styracaflua
40
Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Celtis laevi ata
3. g
20
N FACW
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4 Acer rubrum
15
N FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
115
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 57.5
20% of total cover: 23
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Ligustrum sinense
50
Y FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
50
= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Polystichum acrostichoides
1
Y FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
3
Y FAC
2 Campsis radicans
1
Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
4
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2
20% of total cover: 0.8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1
to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/3 100 L
8 - 12 10YR 5/4
98 10YR 6/3
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑,
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q
Q,
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
✓❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
.e
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�--I
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑✓
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
✓❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑✓,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
. ✓❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: US 401 Industrial Park
Applicant/Owner: Highland Paving Co, LLC
Investigator(s): Krissina Newcomb
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLR.,,,. LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: Lillington, Harnett
State: NC
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 8/18/21
Sampling Point: 2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Lat: 35.428181 Long: -78.818381 Datum: NAD83/NC
NWI classification: riverine
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Near wetland flag B19
HYDROLOGY
rs:
LJ
Surface Water (Al)
i
El
High Water Table (A2)
�L-
LJ
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑_
✓❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
El
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
❑.
Iron Deposits (135)
❑
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X
Water Table Present? Yes
No X
Saturation Present? Yes
No X
(includes capillary frinae)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
gauge, monitoring weu, aerial pnotos, previous
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Liquidambar styracaflua
25
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
25
Y
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Acer rubrum
30
Y
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
4
Quercus nigra
15
N
FAC
5.
Magnolia vir iniana
g g
15
N
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
73
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 55
20% of total cover:
22
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Ligustrum sinense
40
Y
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Polystichum acrostichoides
2
Y
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Arisaema triphyllum
1
Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Smilax rotundifolia
1
Y
FAC
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
Arundinaria tecta
1
Y
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
Microstegium vimineum
1
Y
FAC
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
6
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3
20% of total cover:
1.2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1
Campsis radicans
1
Y
FAC
2
Lonicera japonica
1
Y
FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 1
20% of total cover:
0.4
Present? Yes Y No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 4/3 100
L
1 - 3 10YR 4/2 100
L
3 - 12 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑,
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q,
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
✓❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
.e
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑✓
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
✓❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑✓,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
. ✓❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

)�\/
{{
(\\)
�)
`
�Ft
cz
}\E
.0
)!
CL
a)
-
e
\®2/#
_]!«a
\\)
)/\\(
Llm
CLA co
2/227
.0
rA22/
0 El El

LJ
o �
— 00
• 1 Q ++
W N
M
�. M
3 Z
'f o ;
u
- =1 L
0
N
c
x a
a�
Z D Ir
J m
c
o rn
m �
n
c �
0
U Z a�
U)
a� o U)
x Q Q 00
(0 �
a 00
U)
0
m
0
0
0 U a�
Q
0 o
U d rn
U � i
cn LL U
bA
tjjCLJ
N
CF
COO
u
Ln
- r-I
LU
3sn IV931 2d03 ION

V C ,for .l(t
C
H
U
m N N N y
p x m y x M U m C�7
£ W n eo
io p O
p 0) p d _ R H O
W LL ¢ Q LL i i 00 W a0 Q� y '0,V O
>. N o p N y 00 (� N W £ C E C a+ w M
0 o Z w 7 •- u LL
p Q p o 0 0 2E� U M M Q.$Z 0 W O
LL O
LU
- R N m N N Z c� Na W CNy y
m W yo c o p c cO c ZQ H t 7�7Y J
m m ¢ ix oa a a Cv z Hy£w Z
OZ ..�0�0 Q K
N p dN i Q N._ G O 0¢ }} O N2U•=y a W�
.2 c L ¢ o a 0 LL m Vj F U z > w c 0 m
a)= II JU)i Z Z LLO 0=00 w
F , o�,.�}
in0, :� O p Op F Z zz ; wu W z o
r �o c z �� o�00. -, a N
o ¢0 R O O Q O- ow2.0Q w a r
o¢ Z- a U U x H� Z.0 0 m m y ^2 M zmn
�Lz o u�ea5oad 03ueansul pools IeuoiIeN VWJ3
M M
N N
O O
II � II
U F
W w }Y�' , { ra� U W Y
N -
O
O
r
Z ! 0
0
'c
a
a
E
a
m
_ m
} }Y
• y i y — u y
Fr # c E
a r0
OO
�u
r" w
t'ir F ax
Y y E
L IEa
of
• Ea
"'w F c 0
OE
.0
F� Eo
v V
1
a
� mE
N •y N O G
O O 0O
N N Ou
G c
G
am
Z
U m
W W o'o
� � a
N Oc
O
N 1 1'J O� � «
m YY m E
11 0-
0 0 -
t y9
0 0 ro
Z Z ra

w
0
0
Bn K �Qy
C
O
N`
Z
O
W
L
W
�
J
E
co
Z
ow
O
C L
CO
O
L
a
m m
O
L
J
2
H N
° T
c
o
m
o m
0
N N "°
C -p m
C
°_
m
0
LW/i■
°
aY
> °N
�
a
2
°,
a
OU
O L U=
p
LL
UN C
`
°N
C
__
C
C3`nya)
cu
d "p
cmN
m°
ID �— ° c
E OwE a)
yai ,
°
E N N
o
'1 O Mo
n
N
,N7
g
_
a Y
Q
a) >
a) .o
c
`T a) °
°
"
a)) Y_ m> E 3 o
g O
r U
r> 2
o
a m
ELL
c
CL
p
LLE
ZrOm
0w
O
L
N
E y
L E Y3
"?
04
°
a)
EN
Y° m
o
N 3
:y
N N
rn
cONL
U m N M
E m
N
cu
E
O
WW
m
E33
I-
oE
>
O
CL
a
N O
I-
O
p
NO
O
>FL
m
° y
E
°
oao
co
C?a)a)O
U
O
NOU
33
a0a7
f0
E
NNLL
N -0
o
N C =4
L
�
E m
E
m
E a
�o
�
:
L
O3
a0
—
aQ
—
�
La)
-p
U°-
-
O
>
Z
O
p o E Ea OmN
= o_ NU
O
a') ~r
_
> E C
-
O
C N E
CAOm
N
a
LL
m E a)
EO
L
_>
m
Z
LOE
ra
a) m
o>
U> a)
Q
_Yp
�
E cL
�
E
z°-
21
m °-o
cm
°Z°
w
O�c
°O
i/\■■�s�■�+/■
ca)W
oN
°mOarU=
L_m,,, o
o E a ° �
—
0Z
m
° a°
0p
—
O
w
a='o
)
��y//■
N
LL
'o
' '_2
NO
E ao 0N
amE)
W
m 0
= m —00 'E
a
ID
N
a o.U
YQ
0)V
E
O
N
m
w
n
Ld0aONpL
O
C m m m
0_ a
N
I'Da)
- m
= a
U O O
a
Q
LO
■ZQa
O
myo
E
a 3
z
c° o
=
a)m
raUZ)
OE
a
oZ
Uaam
:.
O N
.a)
>
°a
a
> U
c
D_
m
0_
m
m
-m
Oy
O
oL
a)
m°°E°°Z
m
=
oa
W
m
m E
m
a
yE
Lu
O
LO
=
)
)
E2
E
p
O "
° "°
d)
pdE
N
O
y
O>
O
rE
O
Z
� °N
m
°E L
°
LL Q
a m (n L
aO
J
a
J
LL
Z 2
Z
(�
� fp
W
Q N �
N
C
O
L
1■
LL
'6 N
C
>
U
L m a
>
a)
= 3
O S O
E S
O_
.0 .N
3 N a) > N
m 0_
o
O c
O
L
rn = u
Z.—
W
>
a) ,F
m a) >
E
m
2 o
-p cn
-0 'E
3
p Y Q
Q
0,
y 0
`o
0)
E L O
L B o L, —
-p =
c=
Q
E
O C
YdNm
pp
ONa)
E NU
>
U m
N
ma)
".OU
COap
0 L
O
oOE
a) N a)
�
a)
==
LL
O
N
D) X
O U)
= N
> Nm
-2a
M M
v0=
d
w
p
a
m
E
°
S N p
a
c m
O 3 Z
3
-pO 'O
N
E a)
='o m
m
o
C N
3 '�
O
C L
o o w
a)
a p
Z 0 7
in
a)
o a) N
Uo LL
N N
Z
m m s
N
N a'
N m -0 a) N
m "O
(n
0
j
J
ui
-
.m.
O N
Co 'N O
a)
y
C O E
W
LL
[O Y 'o
a a) w
a' �
LD
Z Z_
�•UL E
Z
O
,N
o
=
Y N
U 'O d>
m o
O
c
b cnaor.
O U J
m^
a) Q a)
a
a W~
m
° L
0
a) c a�
O U O)
N y0
2
m
O Z ZF O
O L m s
H j V
m
= 0
O O_ N
p m
jw
z o
W
c
N E
m=
O
m
E �
w
3)n
J
�°
o
o Y
mz
o o O
O
w
"0
N
a r
Co
a
U

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Harnett County,
North Carolina
US 401 Industrial park
August 16, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Harnett County, North Carolina.......................................................................14
CeD—Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes..................................14
ExA—Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................15
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain......................................................................................................16
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes........................................17
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................
18
Ro—Roanoke loam, occasionally flooded...................................................20
Wh—Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded...................................................22
WkB—Wickham fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded.....
23
WkD—Wickham fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, rarely flooded ...
24
References............................................................................................................
26

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

a) '0 N
oU)
m
N
_
U
N
7 y
(6 p N
U
i y mw
a)� a)
O
N
a)
O
a) O
`O
(6
C V O 2
O_
'�
2 N U O
U
3
a) 0.92 0
a)
m O O
O
N _6 U) '6
+�
U)Q
U o E
O
U)
> _._
(6
O_
m
N
— U N
Z
m
a)
O_ N O
U)N
`' N a
m (6
(n
N
U
U) O
N tl)
m
m E
C m m
(6
N
N
c
E (6 y�
L
U)
a)
m
O >
-0(UN
z
Ci NN
N
a)
U E N 'O
Q
yO
0)a)0
O_
U) U)
O d
N y 3 (UQ
L O
N
3:
'6
N
O N>
a)O
O O- 2i y
E
U W
m m O N
0
O
m
N O O
O
U m= a)
L
tl)
C N m
Z C
N
2
p N U)-0
O
0+
N
N E y
U U
m U� O_
O
O-
O
m Q E
LL
N
>
O O N
— O>
O
7
O N
a)
>, N C U
N U
3 �_
O
U)
O
E �' m y
Z
N
O L
N
O
a) 2
'� N N
7 y U O N
O
w _6
U O
".'
O_
US m E N
m
—
E
Q�
a)
U
O ��
O
C y
N
N
(6 O N
N C
aa)
y
0 O
N N
)
N
Q
Q
U
m
U) E E U
3 J
N� O
C
—
O>
_
y
L 0 0
(6
E
Q
O_ 0 O O
`°
m
z E
Q Q U
a) o
N Utl)
°'
io
(6
a)
N
m
0 N O
.E
U)
m
E C H y
>, 2
m
t N N jp
aci
O) (6
(6 6
m °)
E
0 0) N�
>,
O -0
O tl)
O- N >,
a) U (6 m 7
-U) -O
N Q
(n
�
._
T
O 76 m 0_
O
U)
C% N w
a) N E rn
O m
m 3 U)
U) °?
".' 3 C m 2
U .O
Q m
'C
O
�
L O N E
Q m
U)
O
C
E N .�
N '6 y
N E
0= (6
O C
E m� U
O a
O p U m ".'
'O
O>
m 0
a)
(6
O '6
O O
y
E
N
C (6
Q a)
N 7
y y
m U) '6
y U C N
fl- a)
7 >,
U) a)
E O
O
O)
O 'Q N C
a) N
O 'N C O U
N N
O > N O
M O n� U
Q 'O om
L Ln 46
0 7
O N
(6 Lf)
t O m L
W E— U U)
a E
u) > U
Q
H O
U) U)
(n
N
H U. U)
Q
y
d y
R O
(i U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>,
00
0
0
L
d
Q
0 J N
CL
a) .0. O
y o
O
m a
0
CL O
U) 6
Z
>
° aR
N L_ y
O (n 2 6
�
o
°
a)
R m
U
3 a Q
0
R
N
R
O
C
p
O
Z
< " }{
LU
R 4
R
5 R
fVn
�
F
m
LU
J
y
a
Q
pCL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
(p
Q
a
a
O`
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
a w
3 R
3 y
`o
O >
a >
°
w o
o w
Q
_
o
o
a R
R
R R w
LL 3
3
O T
a
w > >
=
a R w o
E
coi
O
a)
o o
Y o
U)
a
y
Q
0
(n
0 0 S o
(n (n •o m
o R
o
m 'm R E
n a)
O m
R a)
a
O
w
a
�
R ❑
R +Vy�
■
y0 ❑ a i/
®
�ap�
<> { �
y�p�
"V
`}
!
}�
y
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeD
Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15
11.8
9.9%
percent slopes
ExA
Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to
2.8
2.4%
2 percent slopes
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
0.0
0.0%
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
40.7
34.4%
percent slopes
Ra
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
8.4
7.1 %
percent slopes
Ro
Roanoke loam, occasionally
24.3
20.6%
flooded
Wh
Wehadkee loam, frequently
26.5
22.4%
flooded
WkB
Wickham fine sandy loam, 0 to
0.0
0.0%
6 percent slopes, rarely
flooded
WkD
Wickham fine sandy loam, 6 to
3.7
3.2%
15 percent slopes, rarely
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
118.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into Iandforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Harnett County, North Carolina
CeD—Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sp2
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Cecil and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cecil
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 40 inches: clay
BC - 40 to 55 inches: clay loam
C - 55 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
ExA—Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3spc
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Exum and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Exum
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: very fine sandy loam
E - 8 to 12 inches: silt loam
Bt - 12 to 70 inches: clay loam
C - 70 to 100 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grantham, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v750
Elevation: 110 to 300 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E - 9 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75y
Elevation: 30 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Wagram
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, rise
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v760
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 24 percent
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ro—Roanoke loam, occasionally flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sgf
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
BAg - 7 to 10 inches: loam
Btg - 10 to 43 inches: clay
BCg - 43 to 52 inches: clay
Cg - 52 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: Rare
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
BAg - 7 to 10 inches: loam
Btg - 10 to 43 inches: clay
BCg - 43 to 52 inches: clay
Cg - 52 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wh—Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3sgv
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wehadkee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Wehadkee, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wehadkee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Wehadkee, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
WkB—Wickham fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3sgw
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wickham and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wickham
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 6 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Roanoke, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
WkD—Wickham fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3sgx
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wickham and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Wickham
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 6 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Roanoke, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
25

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
W

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
27

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLANS AND IMPACT MAPS
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

oN
?
_
�
vim �
F
L
r
LU
Z
o
�}
V tll
Q a J
o
$$
o=Z cc
Cn Cl) J > H
. m J m
o
--
6
ss /
V J
Zz
O
W
a°
IL
CE
0a
J w
a'
W
zEr
�LL
LL
0

�I.
z
(|
R 7 |5.
LLI_
Q �|
_ -
cnOF
LU
,
B z
\
,
CD �
/\\\ z..(
` §
Cl)
k
-
j ��
|§
� a
�
-
.
N
. _
\
,
)\
\°
\^
.
z
clA
z
„
®®
ae
\\
_
/
,
&
�
�
�
\
(
/
»a
7
E
\
%
o
°®
[
_i
;
\� \-
-{
�(
-
e
<0
-
,
§.
�§
\
!:C
w}\0
(\
\00
/
&2 -
=2
S
M
_ _
i�\�
_
;
�\
LL
\\)/
\\}\|/\
W
\
\
£\)e2
\j
\z\\}

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0610
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360
Project Name: US 401 Asphalt Plant
January 10, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

01/10/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratoDLbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office atjohn—[e-mail].

01/10/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

01/10/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/10/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0610
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2022-E-01360)
Project Name: US 401 Asphalt Plant
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: US 401 S, Lillington NC
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(c►)35.42831245,-78,81894012141659,14z
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

01/10/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Clams
NAME
:V.114K.
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164

01/10/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01360 4
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Roy Cooper, Governor
❑_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
■■■
■■ ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
t< ■
■■ ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
January 10, 2022
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: US 401 Asphalt Plant
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-16762
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httls:://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler(c�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7MEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALE=IGH. NC 276D3 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH, NC 27699
& OFC 919.707.0120 • FAx 915.707.S121

4/
2 e
9
G
m
%
s
c
a
m
s
G
s
G
g
G
6
G
6
G
G±
-0/
g
/
#
/
s
/
6
R
a
a
o e
3
3
3
3
C
y ±
/
/
$
<
>
-
_0
g
g
g
_0
g
2
u
e®
�
y
4-/
a E.-
E e
I
a)
?
I
a
m
I
/±/±
2
O/
O/
e
e
2
±
0
« /
«
/ ƒ
\
u
\
0 (0
/
ƒ
$
/
\ 0
/
®
/
2
®
®
� /
c
2
2
/
®
c
/
7
3
R
L
±
R
R
±
L
2
g\
\
/
_
/ ®
® I
%
/
±
0
,
,
,
,
,
\ %
/ ±
/
/ G
-
L
2
4- \
J
4-1
E E
\
/
4
>
\
/
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
4
®
e E
0
=
0
2
%
»
4 9
o I
9
@
9
I
9
e
9
I
9
I
g
I
9
I
9
I
0
5
I
E I%
> > >
/
/
%
G
2
2
2
2
2
2
y
2
y
%»
®//
7
«
A
A
A
A
A
A
¢
A
A
/ z
\ a a
/
f ro
0 \ \
/
/
y
c
±
E
U
(0m
c
2
c
2
m
3
®
m
2
m
3
m
3
m
3
c
x
I
±
_e D
±
/ a\
�/
Q
\&/\
g
\ / 0 /
c
0
/
/
3
3
/
/
Qo N
/
\
N
m
® / > c
e
©\
e 3
s
%
m
/
%
/
%
%
g
%
/
j
® >
\
©
/ \
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
U
2
3
0
G
Co
2
w v e
m 2
)
Q
a
a
ƒ
©
7
0
a
7
ƒ
2
7
2
E
\
\ g
e
e
</
/
/
J
f
/
\
> >
2
J
7
y
k
G
4
E
%
/
�
y y
/
0
-0
©
%
)
I
/
-0
© .0)
s
0 0
\
E
_
S
%
E
/
£
J
o
�
\
c
a
a
®
2
o
s
c>
$
I
U U
» »
/
u
y
/
±
L
I
G
±
ƒ
e
I
3
%
f
£
%%
\
/
0
g
e
D
I
c
/
u
/
g
ƒ
/
/
a
2
E E
m
E
E
\
/
0
4
\
/
®
°
g
2
®
° /
$
\
E
o
0
0
0
9
J
I
±
2
o
m
e
Q
$
U
G
U
/
s
±
/
w
U
2
U
m
G
e
±
4-1
c
3
7
a
Q
m
0
/
ƒ
7
s
/
e
ca
@
/
\
\
»
®4-1
\
0
U)
D
\
0
ƒ
0
\
\
/
(
\
\
0
/
/
/
f
/
k R
ƒ
Q
3
e
U
2
._
_0®
g
g
2
a
o
e c
c o
=
/
e
@
m
o
@
m
2
c
©
/&
m
m
e
c
g
c
a_
\
%
\
/
a
e
0.9
9
)
\
°
\
\ /
u
2
/
/
a
»
E
7
Q
E
%
E
g E
m
�_
�_
o
/
E
a
0
$
o
/
«
& 2
/
f
4-1
/
/
/
/
o
\ <
/
/
/
/
%
/
/
E /
/
7
>
c
) \
e
o
E
2
m
±&
/
@
%
a
ƒ
x
O
/
y
/
/
E
%
/
/
G
_O
/
\
$
^
$
\
$
�
\
/
\
f
&
R
#
\
9
R
a
R
o
I
c
2, Q
c
> >
\
)
/
/ \ \
g
0
0
\
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
®
@ e
o 0
�©
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
E\
\\//
y\
////////////
/
%
°�
mca
oLI)0U)
«
mm
{
/ j
\ E
/
E $
> >
> >
>
>
>
/
2
@ ±
c
c E E
3
/ /
c /
\
/ ƒ
6 ± 6
±
(
3 ± 6
(
±
6 ±
6 ±
)
6 ±
(
±
/
/
- U
/
7 / /
\
\
�

\
\
2
/
/
6
+
/
z
§
\
0 \
a=
\k
§F
z
\\ /°°
/ / \ o
)
\\ \\
\33 >>
a m �%
4 / / \ (
C
_ §
:\
/c
\
:,
$ 7\
\ `C
\ ® ®
y y
'0 = «
s jj ®&
/ UU \/
© \\
\ \ 0 , ,
/ :\
f 3D
± ƒ§
I S \
E \b
\
Q ./ \
/ //
a \e
/ sD
4-1/ &
� / / « e
i \ \ C
E G G g n
= e c c \ [
/ E \ \ / \
c ° O Q -
/ z
2 §,
e 4 4 § >
/ / ®
4 « j j \ E
2gUU
e e 4- 4-®
2 7 4- 4-/ /

[J
N of
a
S
AA�s n
°b &c
0
C;¢ ryrKi�
A
m
LL
z a
= w
= z
O �— Q
N d 6
N m O N N
o Z a�
0 0 a
� = m
a m z
M❑❑❑
0,
1
Q)
n

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
NC HISTORIC PROPERTIES MAP
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

x
KU
r4q
O
ry
N
N
i.7
d
2
2-
W
4L
0
O
ME
2�
f
—
L�
r
=�
W
2
J�
I
� a
O z
z
w
E 2
Y W
N U
O Z
E
C:) C
C W W
CO o LU
W
� O =
O w
v t �
o LO
O O m
O -j- O V
E
U'
K
LU
O
0
0
U
r
z
6
U
N