20140099 Ver 1_Application_20140128

��
�.� ��.�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPAR'I'NIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PATRICK L. MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
January 28, 2014
Ms. Lori Beckwith
US Army Corps of En�ineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRGTARY
Subject: Nationwide Permit #14
SR 2185 Carter Road
State Project No. 13C.O1 ll 86 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $240)
Buncombe County, NC
Dear Ms. Beckwith:
I have enclosed a straight-line diagram with erosion control plan, a PCN application for
NWP #14, and a vicinity map relative to the proposed secondary road project on SR 2185
Carter Road, Buncombe County, NC.
We propose to replace/extend one (1) pipe culvert on an unnamed tributary (UT) to Ivy
Creek. Total culvert extension will be 20 linear feet using a temporary impervious dike
for dewatering during installation. The UT to is an approximately 4 feet wide stream with
a predominately sand/gravel substrate with some bedrock. Ivy Creek is classified WS-II;
HQW.
Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the culvert.
The c�ivert will be placed below existing streambed elevation whenever possible;
however, bedrock is present and may prevent the pipe from being properly buried (see
Photo 3). Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with
the culvert extensions. Stormwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or
vegetated buffers prior to entering streams.
No effect on federally listed species (threatened or endangered) or their habitats is
anticipated.
Division Thirteen Office Post Office Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802
Phone:S28/251-6171 Office ofthe Division Engincer F�:828/251-6709
www.ncdot.gov/doh/operations/divis ion13

Ms. Lori Beckwith
Page —2 SR 2185, Buncombe County
January 28, 2014
As a part of the 401 Certification process, a copy of the application will be forwarded to
the NC State Historic Preservation Office as required by Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a).
By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission Western Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning
the permit request with a copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer.
By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer to
comment on the above projeck The UT to Ivy Creek is classified as WS-II; HQW. A
buffer variance will not be required for the project.
By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one copy of the application package to Sonia
Carillo, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit and an additional
copy to Kevin Barnett, NC DWQ Asheville Regional Office for review and comment.
Please charge the application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 13CA11186. Piease
forward comments directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Offrcer.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any
questions or information needs, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
(�°Z � � �,�'�-'
Roger�Bryan
Division 13 Environmental Officer
Enciosures
cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E.
Chad Bandy, P.E.
Ben DeWit, EI, CPESC
Marla Chambers
Sonia Carillo
Kevin Barnett

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: SR 2185 Carter Road _
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant:=NC DOT
3. Name of Consultant/Agent:
*Agent authori�ation needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address: N/A
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: _Barnardsville _
8. County: _Buncombe
9. Lat: _35.78503 Long: 82.48569 (Decimal Degrees Please )
10. Quadrangle Name: Barnardsville
1 I. Waterway: UT to Ivy Creek __
12. Watershed: French Broad
13. Requested Action:
X N'ationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
_ Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

�1 I
� T 7 I!�� I I'.
� J
up ev r� rt-��,
o� �.
> (i�l�:.�::�-
p. c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality CeRification — Express ❑ Riparian BuTfer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 407 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes X No
tf. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes X No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
t g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 2185 Carter Road
2b. County: Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bamardsville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state � 3C.011186
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A
applicable):
3d. Street address: N/A
3e. City, state, zip: N/A
3f. Telephone no.: N/A
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 10
.,�,.� �,..... ",._..:.... , � ,,.........ti... ,� ��„o ��,..,.:,...

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: NoRh Carolina Department of Transportation
4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer
4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279
4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802
4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171
4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394
4h. Email address: vallen(r?nr,�lntc!ov
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name N/A
(if appiicable):
5c. Street address: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
Se. Telephone no.: N/A
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: N/A
.,,,.. � � ..� , �

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Ident'rfication
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.78503° N Longitude: -82.48569°W
1 c. Property size: 0.77 acres
2. Surtace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Ivy Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-II, HQW
2c. Riverbasin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing gravel secondary road
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing we8ands on the property:
0.0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
250
3d. Expiain the purpose of the proposed project:
Increase the typical section and pave the secondary road
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Grade, drain, base and pave the roadway. Extend one pipe on jurisdictional sheam. Equipment used will include
excavators,trucks and graders,
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the pasY? ❑ Yes X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: field confirmed by NCDOT
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what rype � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. if yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): N/A Other. N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdic6onal determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
Sa. Have permits or certifica6ons been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, expiain.
Page 3 of 10
1'l/�\I C...�.. \/rw..:...� �1 �f Il......w�hnw �/� �)Il/�O \/..nr:...�

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
t a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that appiy):
❑ WeUands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond ConsVUCtion
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each weUand area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W� � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WS � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent sheam impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3 e. 3f. 3 g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) QNT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 X P❑ T Pipe Culvert UT to Ivy Creek � �NR X�Q 4 20
St ❑ P X T Dewatering UT to Ivy Creek O �NR X�Q 4 30
S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
� INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 50
3i. Comments: 20 feet of permanent and 30 feet of temporary impacts at same location.
Page 4 of 10
fl/�I�1 C...�.. \/.....:.... A 7 Ilr.......L....� 1/1 �f/1/�O \/.....:....

4. Open Water Impacts �
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the AUantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑P�T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Sa. Sb. 5c. 5d. Se.
WeUand Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, ihen complete the chaA below. If yes, then individualty list a�l buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire mfi ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Ottier:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) impact required?
B1 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
.,....., � ..� ,,.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimum pipe length used to obtain needed typical section and shoulder width for safety.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through conshuction techniques.
N/A
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mi6gation for ❑ Yes X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option wiil be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, siream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool �cold
4d. Buffer mifigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mftigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitiga6on plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
nrn� r...�.. �i,.....:.... � o n.........�.... nn nnno �i.....:....

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project resuft in an impact wiU�in a protected riparian buffer tl�at requires ❑ Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. if yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of Uie riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Muttiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
n,.,.,. -i ,.s � n

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Pian, explain why: NC DOT Project
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No.
000250 Post ConsVuction Stormwater Program.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Govemment Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � N�
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � pRW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other. N!A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
nrw� �....... �i.....:.... n n n,........�.....+n �nno v,....:....

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (75A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) resuft in ��,es � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water qualiqi?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitetive cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
nrw� �...�., v,,....:,... � o n.........�,... �n nnno �e....�,...

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFVUS Field OKce you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
field survey, USFWS county list, habitat requirements
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Current Maps/Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requireme�t)
7a. Wili this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cuRural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust desig�ation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Department of Cultural Resources website: http:1/gis.ncdcr.gov/hpowebl
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floadplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program website:
http://www.ncfloodm aps.co m/
Roger D.Bryan 1/28/2014
�
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name pplicanUAgen s Signature Date
(Agenl's signalure is valid only ii an authorization letter from 1he applicaM
fs rovided.
n....., n n ,.s � n

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.5. Army Corps of Engineers
This fonn should be completed by following the instructions provicleci in Section IV of the JD Fomi Instructional Guidelwok.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATTON
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED NRISDICTIOIVAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTR[CT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATTON AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Sta[e: NC Coiuriy/parish/borough: Runcombe City: Barnardsville
Cen[er coordinates of site (lat/long in degrce decim�l fonnat): Lal 35.78503° N, Long. 52.48569° W.
Universal Tra�vsver.se Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbaty: iTC to Iry Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigab[e Water (1NW) into which llie aquatic resource Ilows: iTT--Ivy Creek--French Broad River
Name oCwatersl�ed or Hydrologic Unit Code (H[TC): 06010105
� Check if map/diagram of review area anNor potential jmisdictional arras is/are available ufwn reqnes[.
❑ Cl�eck if other sites (e.g., ofTsite mitigation sites, disposzl sites, ete... ) are associated with this action and aze recorded on a
dilTercnt JD fonn. �
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPL1�:
❑ Office (Desk) Detern�ination. Date:
� Field Determination. Date(s): 1/27/2014
5ECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA 5ECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no `7�avigaGle waters oftlee US"witlun Rivers and Hazbors Ac[ (RHA) jiuisdiction (as defined by 33 CF'R pzrt 329) in Uie
review area [RegxiredJ
❑ Wateis subject to U�e ebb and tlow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or l�ave been ased in the past, or may be suscep[ible for iue to lransport interstate o� foreign commerce.
�xplain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of [lie US.° wi[hin Clean Water Act (CWA) jwisdiclion (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in lhe review area. [12equiredJ
1. Waters of t6e U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S in revicw area (check all that apply): �
❑ 1NWs, including temtodal seas
❑ Wetla�ids adjacenl lo TNWs
� Relatively pennanent watersZ (f2PWs) that tlow dircctly or induectly into "I'NWs
❑ Non-RP W s that ilow direc[ly or indirectly into 1'N W s
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RYWs that tlow dircctly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetla�ids adjacent to but not dveclly abntting RPWs tha[ Ilow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ WeUa�ids adjacent to non-RPWs tUat tlow d'uectly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments ofjurisdictiona] waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated �vetlands
b. Iden[ify (es[imate) size of waters ot the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 2501inear feet 4 width (R) ancUor acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limi[s (boundaries) ofjurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if ]rnown): .
2. Non-regula[ed watershvetlands (check if npplicable):'
❑ Potentiallyjurisdictional waters and/or weUa��ds were assessed willun the review area a�id detem�ined to be notjurisdictional.
Explain:
� 6oxes checked below shall be supported by comp�elingihe appropriale seclions in Section III below.
° For numnses ofthis fnmi. an RVW is AefineA ax a trihutarv lhal is nnl a'I'N W anA that tvnicallv Oo�vs vearvround or has rnn�inuons flow at leas� "seasonalld'

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacen[ to TIVWs. If the aquatic resource is a TMi', complete
Section IILA.I and Section IILD.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetlanJ adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Sec[ion IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify 71JW:
Swnmarize rationale supporting detem�iitation:
2. WetlandadjacenttoTlVW
Summarize tationale su�r�wrtuig conclusion that wctland is "adjacenP':
B. CI�ARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (TfIAT IS NOT A 7NW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANI�:
This secfion summarites information regarding characteristics of [he tributary and its adjacent wedands, if any, and i[ hclps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdic[ion es[nblished under Rapnnos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of'I'NWs where the tributaries are "rela[ively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typicaliy flow yearvrounJ or have continuuus flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that dimctly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If [he aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has yearvround
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directty abutting a tributary wi[h perennial flmv,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is aJjacent to but that does not direcdy abut an RPW requires a sigoificant nexus evaluatioa Corps districts and
EPA regions wi�l include in the record any available information that dacuments the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributaty that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a tradi[ional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the wn[erbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require aJditional data to determine if the
waterbody has a signifcant ncaus witB a TNW. Itthe tributary has aJjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluatlon must
consider the tribu[ary in combination �vith all of its aJjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analyfical purpases, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlanJs is used whether the rcview area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetiands, or both If the JD covers a tribu[aty �rith adjacent �retlands, complete Section IILB.1 for
[he tributary, 5ection IIL&2 for any ansite wetlanJs, and Section IILB.3 far all wedands adjacent to tha[ Mbutary, both onsite
and offsi[e. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Sectian III.0 beiow.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that ilow Jirectly or indirectly into TNW
O General Area Conditions:
Watershai size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Avcragc annualrainfall: inches
Average aimual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship �vith INW:
❑ Tdbutary flows directly into TNW.
❑ T�butary flows through Pick List tributa�es before e��tering TNW.
Projec[ waters are Pick List river miles from 7NW.
Yroject walers are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project wa[ers are Pick List acrial (straighQ miles from "INW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (shaight) miles &om RPW.
Project walers cross or serve as state boundaries. Explauv
Identify tlow rou[e to 7NW5:
Tributary sGeam ordcr, if known:
° Nole that lhe InsWClional Guidebook wn�ains addilional inform�lion regarding swales, dilches, washes, and erosiona� feaWres generally and in the arid
West.
' F'low route can be desmbed by identifying, e.g., Gibutary a, which Oows Ihrough the review area, to Flo�v into tributary b, which then flows into TN W.

(b) General Tributary Characterislics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (men-made). Ezcplain:
❑ Manipulated (man-altered). Explaui:
Tributary propedies with respect to lop of bank (eslimate):
Average width feet
Average depth: fce[
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary ttibutary subslrate composition (check all fhat apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Samis ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Ea�ilain: .
Tribntary condition/stabiliTy [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing ba�ilcs]. Explain:
Presence of run/rit27e1pool complexes. Lxplain: .
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (appcoximate average slope): %
(c) l�low:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average mmiber oCflow cvents in review azea/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime: .
Other infonnation on dura[ion and volume: .
Sudace flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subswface Ilo��-: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test perfonned: .
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check nll indicalors that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bvik
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shclving
❑ vegetation malted dmm, bent, or absenl
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washecl away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water s[aining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discon[inuons OfiWM.� F.xplain:
■
■
■
■
■
the prescnce of litter vid debris
des�ruction of terzestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
scdiment sorting
scour
multiple observed or pr�licted �ow events
abmpt change in plan[ conununity
If factors other than the OHWM were usal to detertnine lateral extent of CWA ju�sdiction (check all Uiat apply):
❑ High Tide I.ine indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicatcd by:
❑ oil or scmn line along shore objecls ❑ suivey Yo available dstum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposils (foreshore) ❑ physical mazkings;
❑ physical markings/characteris[ics ❑ vegetation lines/changes v� vegefation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other(list):
(iii) Chemical Chamctcris[ics:
Charac[erize iributary (e.g., water color is cicar, discolored, oily fi1m; water quality, genernl watershed charactenstics, etc J.
Explain:
Idculity s�xcific Fwllutants, if laiown: .
°A natural or man-made discontinuity in lhe OIIWM does �rot necessuily severjurisdiction (e.g., where 1he s1ream lemporarily Ilows underground, or where
thc OH W M has been removed by developmenl or agricullural praqices). Where there is a break in the OH W M 7hat is umelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., Ilow over a ra:k oulcrop or [hrough a c�lvert), �he agencies �vill look for uidicalors of tlow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Charectcristics. Channcl supports (check aIl that apply):
❑ Rip�vian corridor. Ch�acterislics (lype, avemge widtU): .
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics� .
❑ Habi[at for
❑ Federally Lis[ed sPecies. Explain findings: .
❑ Fish/spa�m areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other enviromnentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlifc divcrsity. Explain tuidnigs: .
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow Jirectly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characterisdcs:
(a) General WeUa�id Cliaracteris[ics:
Properties:
Wetl�nd size: acres
Wetland type. E�lain: .
WeUand qualily. Explavi: .
Project wellands cross or serve as s[ate boundaries. F.xplain:
(b) Geueral rlo�v Relationshio wifh Nor�-TNW:
Flow is: Pick Lis[. Eaplain: .
Surface flow is: Pick List
Charac[eristics:
SnbsiuCace flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test perfonned: .
(c) Welland Adiacencv Determivation with Non-1NW i
❑ llireclly abntting
❑ No[ directly abu[ting
❑ Discre[e wetland hydrologic connection. E�lain:
❑ Ecological comicclion. Eacplain: .
❑ Sepazated by bermlbarrier. E�cplain: .
(d) Yroximitv (Relationshio) to "IN4V
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project w�a[ers are Pick List aerial (s7aiglit) miles &om TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimafe approximate location of weUand as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Charac[erize wetland system (e.g., wat��r co(or is clear, bro�m, oil film on surCace; wa[er quality; generat watershed
cliaractcristics; e[c.). l�lain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if laiown: .
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland suppor[s (check all that app1Y):
❑ Rip�rian bu�lec Characlerislics (type, avemge width): .
❑ Vegelation type/percent cover. E�lnin: .
❑ Habital foc
❑ Federally Lisled species. L'xplain fmdings: .
❑ Fish/spa�m areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Otlter enviromnentally-sensitive species. E��lain tindings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlifc diversity. E�cplain fmdvigs: .
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary, (if an,y)
All wetland(s) bevig considered in tlie cumulalive analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in llie cumi�lative anaiysis.

For cach wetland, s��ecify the following:
Direcllv abuts7 (Y/Nl Size (in acres) � Direcllv abu�s? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize ovemll biological, cl�etnical and physical Cwiclions being perfonned: .
C. SIGNIHICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow charecteris[ics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlanJs adjacent to [he [ribu[ary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physicnl, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each af the folbwing situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effec[ on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
ConsiJerafions when evaluatiog significant nexus include, but are not Iimited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the tlow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlauds. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any speciTic threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its aJjacent wetland or behveen a tributary and the TNW} Similarly, the tact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is no[ solely determinative of significant nexus.
Drnrv wnnections be[ween the featurcs documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapniws Guidance and
discussed in [he Ins[ructional Guidebook Factors ta wnsider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination wi�h its adjacent wetlandc (if any), have Uie capacity to caay pollutan[s or �ood wa[ers to
7"NWs, or to reduce ihe amount oCpollutants or tloal waters reaching a"I'NW?
• Dces ihe tribufary, in combination wi�h iLS adjacenl weilands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle snpport fitnclions for fish and
other species, such as feeding nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the I'NW?
• Does the hibutazy, in combinalion with iLS adjacent wellancls (iCany), have [he capacity to tra�usfer �mtrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tnbutary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have olher relalionships lo the physical, chemical, or
biological integrily of [he "INW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and uther tunc[ions observed or known to occur should be documented
belmv:
1. Significant nexus finJings for non-RPW that 6as no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirecdy into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significanl nexiis below, based on ihe tribuWry iiself, then go to SecGon III.D: .
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW tlows direcdy or indirectly into
TNWs. Expiniu findings of presence or absence of sigiificant nexi�s below, bascd on the Uibutary i�i combination witli all of its
adjacen[ wetlands, then go to Section IIID: .
3. Significant nexus findings for we[lands adjacent [o an RPW but that do no[ directly abut the RPW. L'acplain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on ihe tributary in wmbination with all of its adjacent wetivids, then go to
Section III.D: .
D. DETERMINATIONS OF NRISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CIIECK ALL
THAT APPLI�:
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Clieck all lhal apply and provide size cs[imates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear Cect widUi (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wctlauds adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that ilow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
�'I'ribntaries of 1'NWs whem Vibutanes t��icalty tlow yearvrowid arejmisdictionaL Provide dnta �id rationale indicating tliat
tributary is perenniah Stream has prominent bed/ba�ilc feahues.
❑ Tribnlaries of TNW wherc tribulazies have continuotts flow "seasonally° (e.g., typically three nton[hs eacli year) are
jurisdictional. Da[a sup�wrting t}tis conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale uidicating that lribntary flows
seaswially: .

Provide estimates forjudsdictional waters in the review area (check all U�at apply):
�'Pributary watcrs: 250 linear feet 4 width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
ideutify type(s) of waters: .
3. Non-RPWsB that ilow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RI'W, but flows duectly or indirectly into a TTIW, and it lias a siguificant nexiis with a
TNW is jtuisdiclional. Ihta snppoding 11ris conclusion is proviSed at Scction IiI.C.
Provide estimates For jnrisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: ]uiear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland wa[ers: acres.
Iden[ify lype(s) of waters: .
d. Wedands direc[ly abutting an RPW that Flow directly or inUirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abnt RPW and tlius arejiuisdictional as adjacent wetlancLs.
❑ Wetlands dueclly abulting au RPW where �ributaries typically flow year-round. Rovide data and rationale
inclicating that tributary is pe�ennial in Seclion III.D2, above. Provide rationale v�dicatutg tliat wclland is
directly abutting an RPW: .
❑ Wetlands duectly abutling an RPW wliere Vibutancs typically tlow "seasonally." Provide clata indicating that tribirtary is
seasonal in Section III.B and ralionale in Section III.D2, above. l'rovide rationale 'v�dica[ing tha[ wetland is directly
abutting an I2PW: .
Provide acreage eslimales for juriscliclional wetlands in �he review azea: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW [Nat flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetla�ids that do not direclly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination witl� the lributary to whiclt tl�ey are adjacent
and with similarly sihisted adjacent wefluids, have a significant ne�au with a'I'NW are jtuisidictional. Da41 snpporting this
conclnsion is provided at Seclion III.C.
Provide acreage es[imates for jmisdictional wellands in ihe review area: acres.
6. Wetlauds xdjacent to non-RPWs that ilow directly or indirecdy into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacen[ [o such wa[ers, and have when considered in combination with the tdbutuy to which they are adjacent a�id
vrith similarly sihiated adjacent weUands, have a signit"icvit nexus with a TTIW are jwisdictional. Data sup}wrting lhis
conclnsion is provided at Section III.C.
Yrovide estimates for jurisdictional wetlattds in the review azea: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional rva[ers.'
As a general nile, the impouncimen[ of ajurisdictional iribntary remai�us jurisdictional.
❑ Demons[rate [hat impoundment was created Gom "watcrs of �he U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate tliat water meets the c�teria for one of the ca[egories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonslrate lliat waler is isolated witl� a nexi�s to conuneme (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRASTATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SOCH WATERS (CHECK ALL 1'HAT APPLYj:10
❑ wktich are or could be t�sed Uy interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other pmyoses.
❑&om wlnch £ish or shellfish a�e or could be laken and sold in uiterstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be i�sed for indnstrial pu�oses by indastries in interstate conunerce.
❑ H�terstate isolated waters. Explain: .
❑ (nher Czc[ors. Explain: .
Identify �i•ater body and summarize rationale supporting detcrminatian:
sSee Footnote q 3.
' To complete [he analysis referlo the key in Seclion IfI.D.6 of Ihe Inslruclional Guidebook.
�� Prior lo asseding or drelining CWA jurisdiction baud wlely on ihis eategory, Corps Dis�ricfs will elevale the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review mnsistent with fhe proress described in /he Corps/F.VA MemnrnnAum HegnrAing CWAAd hnisdltTian Fo(lmving Hnpaims.

Yrovide estunates forjurisdictional waters in the review area (check al] thnt apply):
❑ 1'ribatary waters: linear feet width (R).
❑ Other non-wetland watets: acres.
Idcn[ify t}pe(s) of waters: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON.J[JRISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL 1'fIAT APPL1�:
❑ If potential wet(ands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the cn[enn in the 1987 Cor��s of F.ngineers
Wetla�id Delineation Manual nnd/or appmpriate Regional Snpplements.
❑ Revicw area included isolated waters with no substaptial nexus to intersL�te (or foreign) co�runcrce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Comt decision in "SWANCC,° the review azca would have been regulated based solelv on Ute
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Wateis do no[ meet the "Signi6cant Nexus" �tandard, where si�ch a finding is requin;d for jiuisdiction. Explain: .
❑ Other:(explain,ifnotcovered above): .
Provide acreage estimates for no�i jurisdictional waters in the review area, where Ihe sole potential basis of judsdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e, presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water Cor iaigaled agriculhve), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non-wetlaud wa[crs (i.e., nvers, sVeams): linear feet width (ft). �
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-weUand waters: acres. List t}q�e of aquatic resourcc: .
❑ Wetluids: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jmisdictional waters v� lhe review area Ihat do not mee[ the "SigniFicant Nexns" standard, where snch
a finding is �equired for ju�isdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non-wetland waters (i.e., dvers, streams): lvieaz feet, width (ft). �
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-we[land waters: acres. List type of aqnatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTIOPI IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Da[a teviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked ilems shall bc included u� case file and, �vliere cliecked
and reques[ed, appropria[ely refere�ice sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultnnC .
❑ Data slieets preparecl/submitted by or on behalf of the applicanticonsulta�rt.
❑ Of3ice concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur wiUi data slieets/delinearion report.
❑ llata sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Co�ps navigable watcrs' study: .
❑ U.S. Geological Siuvey Hydrologic Allas: .
❑ USGS NI ID data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U.S. Geological Sivvey map(s). Cite scale & qi�ad namc:l:?A000, Ban�ardsville Qnadra��gle.
❑ USDA Natutxl Resources Conservation Service SoIl S�rvey. Citation: .
❑ National weQuids inven[ory map(s). Cite name: .
❑ Sttite/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
❑ FEMA/FIRM mapsNC Floodplain Mapping Program.
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Dalimi of 1929)
� Photograpl�s: ❑ Aerial (Name Fc Date): .
or � Other (Name & Date):Stream photos u� NWP Application, 1/28/2074.
❑ 1'revious detemtinatirni(s). File no. and date of response letler .
❑ Applicable/supporting case law: .
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literahue: .
❑ Other infonnation (please specify): . -
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SWPORT JD:

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SECONDARY ROAD SURVEY
SUBJECT: SR 2185 Carter Rd.
LOCATION: From SR 2162 To E.O.M
WORK TYPE: Grade, Drain, Base & Pave
WORK ORDER:13CA11186 PRIORITY :SPA. # 12
COIJNTY: Buncombe TOWNSHIP: Ivy
DATE: 1-23-14 SCALE: 1 "=50'
NOTES: R/W 60'
LENGTH: 556' = .l mi.
PREPARED BY: JMD/NKD
�

s:i�t �
Page 1 of I
PIPE DATA SR 2185, Carter Rd.
County: WO� ORDER : —` -
Buncombe
STATION PRESENT PROPOSED NOTES
SIZE SIZE
10+22 30'x15"CMI' Auried, Clean Ou[, Cruss Pipc
11+15 30'x15"CMP 40'x15" CNLP Cross Yi e
11+47 20'x15°CIViP Drive Yipe, Clogged
15+q6 10'x48"CMP 30'x48" CMP Proposed 7lamaround Pipe

au,,lc r�e r
q7656 8 25 5 9 nqQQo
47�T 3xi8�xz Tv�eer�s�a
w� ca� Fieee BA�€�£—
i yP,E �1 !�°u< CH�ck
3��I
I
I {
r I�
I ��
,� 2 � r
2tl x 15" I
�9P "Zi� �i
3�k1/�J�2''TYPE,�I3AS�N Glo9 daf'D O� . `
u/Caig �r6�E BNFF'[ES _
7YPF ARa.KCp_�I . . �
e'
l;'
I�OR
Ya�d �� '
./ ',
3zG�i %v� e BAS�u y GLF
w/ c��r <,i„�gu_FF�s �
TYPe A Rat CHEcl: �'�-
3'cona'
wa4c
5'i. T � � �
_....__.,.._...:_..__.... _�__,__ ._..
SR 2162
SR 2185� Ca�ra'e1' Roac�,
Qu�coM�e Lo
M dnsYall low Rc or endpoint measures in TSF.
*�onstruct using the 30 day option.
'� All watt�es require PAM.
* AJl basins located at a 5% or greater grade
must be tiered.
� G,.,.i uealw.fl
ai.0. 00.
j�j
I �4�0
! I 1
�,
.c
�
3o'r IS��
� cMV� Ex F �a,
LOP
Fa nb�✓
R 13}66
Oebruti)
9765689q54DDnoo
dkned �DK I5���M� .

w
` �-- �S'� /v I
. � _._____� +
4/T /5{p0 ��
_ _ ._.. .. _. --_.. . .�_.._ ._.
�
��
�
��
�
�
�
e
Ie
rJ� �.�gi� CGrit.r ��
d u�e on� be . Cn ,
* Install low & or endpoint measures in TSF.
* Construct using the 30 day option.
" All watt(es require PAM.
* All basins located at a S% or geater grade
must be tiered.
l5f56 E.o.P
g s.: l �-
—^ Ib'XNS" CMP Exi, 20'
�F— p�op, 3p'✓va' TuqNARoUwO
n` �
J � �
SI. �
.��T� �
/SfpO
� __.�_____ _

p...,
�%rv4'?�
w
3, �.- - c�:.
`. , * .
x -�v. '
",\.
N V . i
\ ..,.
G r � 1��
'.�Y M1. ���� �. �
. f /� ;
_ ��' -�'1
�;, , �
f�� r _ �;i.�-
0
�_� �
l' `�
�
,.
�^�'
:`:
- 3 a° ,'!iT p�� ✓,+..
yy� M 3 y Z
- � �E :: AG� . ,
� � � tF'1§']��i� ��s�.
� � t , . iw�'��
, ,;, � �3y a �,�aw.;� � .. .:�`
. ..... � �ar ���•. ,...� Y ' .. P�_"
t xr.�„` � , +'e �..
-� Y `M1 . 'i; �y�: _
� �, , 4� 2 A ' . .
_ y \ �. ,��q�/
.; : � *,c .2'�� ' �h'
sy - .t` ` - Q�' �
. . _ -.t . . `� f �.. L�I����-^��t`' `.
i�,. lT � q i ..r�y.rv ._.. �q ; �!
� 'f!�* � Y µ' � ���
�' �� ' t 'T` �-► ` } J
.,-_."' :' ' ' .' -" .
� � r "�a�,:- .zsF
, �,; , �
_., � �z�
'' aj-_ x„� �. +.
, z �, <., . .�,-.
- , • �;.:,+_�,;�:;�:;�'� , �, ._="
I
_ _`/ .l�' .r
�. +g�~
tf�
��:'P"'a: .
•�° `a.
i� w� �"
�` .<�� ..:.
t /
^���`.
`� i
I�
�:i'�'° "
-. . rn�.
V"i:yx ��
a
� f � - Y
k .
m � �-y. .,� - . -.
_-;.^!�. �_ _�" � . -
�r�'..`''�,"�`-:�i a )`'�* �ti�.
r ax. �.. . ...,
y �j'. .rT r t F`/ .
_ ��;.=� ` � .-
� ,rY, �:
��,r ' , ,
.�- -° :. .— �
:,� ' ��1. 27. �2Q13 �

Figure 3 Bedrock at pipe outlet

�0
!V�
�
�a f° N
Oe � fii
� fC
9� ��.,. _
/ �
9t �
I+ I�
w �
0� N
.�
.%Q
�:1
, —� ` � �a
_ / � ' �
- \
�
� ��
� rNl .- "� �
� I
! ,
. ��
� �
�
�
•�O
tiv
v
�
� � �
� t���
i
J Q�
1� �
L
:�
i
�
\
�'J% .
�
�
/
i
�
�
.,� � l,
> �"' "
N �
r
� � `
� If l
d` ` � \`
�
'3
� � V
Q
��
�
C71
m ��� N
'?. �e
: �" �
�,, ..
� .� 1�
�r,• i �
} ^ j+
i
f� � ..1'1�
U 11 � �'
� ! �.t
-:7 l°'^