20070494 Ver 2_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20140121

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Sit
Haywood County, North Carolina T
Cataloging Unit: 06010106 JA �`•?
EEP Contract #: D06035 -A
November 6, 2012 � N� - WATER )UALITY
W s 'A � a�
MONITORING REPORT 2012 (YEAR 4)
d�-Oq?v
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Submitted by:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Prepared by:
Wolf Creek Engineering, pllc
7 Florida Avenue
Weaverville, NC 28787
RECEIVED
DEC 2 1 2012
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
MONITORING REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table II
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
6
1 0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
1
1 I General Project Description
1
1 1 1 USGS and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
1
1 12 NCDWQ Surface Water Classification
1
1 2 Project Goals and Objectives
3
1 3 Project Structure
3
14 Restoration Type and Approach
5
1 5 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
5
Insert Table II -IV
6
20 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
8
2 1 Vegetation Assessment
8
21 1 Stem Counts
8
2 12 Vegetative Problems
8
2 1 3 Vegetation Plot Photos
9
22 Stream Assessment
9
2 2 1 Hydrology
9
2 2 2 Geomorphology
10
2 2 4 Photo Point Stations
18
2 2 5 Stability Assessment
18
23 Wetland Assessment
19
2 3 1 Hydrology
19
2 3 2 Vegetation
20
24 Conclusions
20
30 Refrences
21
LIST OF TABLES
Table I
Project Components
4
Table II
Project Activity and Reporting History
6
Table III
Project Contacts
6
Table IV
Project Attributes
7
Table V
Vegetation Summary
8
Table VI
Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
10 -11
Table VII
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
12 -16
Table VIII
Verification of Bankfull Events
9
Table IX
Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
17 -18
Table X
Wetland Criteria Attainment
18
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map 2
Morgan Creek / Restoi ation Systems Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
APPENDIX A
Monitoring Plans
APPENDIX B
Vegetation Raw Data
APPENDIX C
Geomorphic Raw Data
APPENDIX D
Wetland Raw Data
MONITORING REPORT
Morgan Creek/ Restot ation Systems 11 Monitoring Yeat 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Morgan Creek Site is located in Haywood County, North Carolina within the French Broad
River Basin, Cataloging Unit 06010106, specifically within the targeted local watershed
06010106020040 The project consisted of restoring and enhancing approximately 3,900 linear
feet of stream, restoring approximately 9 8 acres of riparian buffers, and restoring and
enhancing approximately 1 11 acres of wetlands The Site is in a rural setting in the Blue Ridge
hydrophysiographic ecoregion and was previously used to pasture cattle with woody vegetation
confined to isolated areas Prior to restoration, the channels were highly degraded due to
unrestricted livestock access, channelization activities, and lack of riparian vegetation The
restoration design was based on a Priority Level 1 and 2 approach to restore proper channel
dimension and allow for appropriate sediment transport Cross - vanes, J -Hook vanes, and in-
stream log structures have been integrated into the channel to provide grade control, maintain
stable streambanks while the riparian vegetation establishes, and provide in- stream habitat Sod
mats were harvested on -site and were used to stabilize the newly graded streambanks
Excavated materials from the existing channel were used to backfill around in- stream structures
and to build riffles with a natural substrate and function
Hydrology
Following the completion of construction in January of 2009, the Site has been subjected to at
least one bankfull event and three greater- than - bankfull events The portions of the southwest
region of the state experienced rainfall well above normal during the spring of 2009 In July of
2009 a high rainfall event resulted in high water at 0 8 ft above bankfull or 1 6 times maximum
channel depth No bankfull or greater- than - bankfull flows were recorded during the second year
of monitoring (2010) One greater- than - bankfull flow was recorded during the third year of
monitoring (2011) No greater- than - bankfull events were recorded during the fourth year of
monitoring (2012)
Stream
The stream reaches have managed the high -flow events of the first four years Visual inspection
of the Site following the bankfull event in June of 2009 revealed no noticeable adjustments in
the bed or bank The overbank event in July of 2009 resulted in noticeable adjustments in many
of the riffles The overall grade of the channel has been maintained, while there are numerous
local adjustments in the riffles and pools These adjustments appear to be consistent with the
channel form and have generally not affected structure stability or function The Year 4
monitoring visit showed that the bed has remained stable since the Year 3 monitoring visit The
one minor bank failure from the previous year was repaired and appears to be stable
Vegetation
Native woody and herbaceous species were used to establish, at minimum, a thirty -foot riparian
buffer on each side of the restored reach Herbaceous species have successfully established
throughout the entire site On -site sod transplants used to reconstruct the channel banks are well
established and show evidence of vigorous growth Riparian buffer planting exhibits a high
survival rate, with an average density for planted living stems at the end of Monitoring Year 4
of 486 stems per acre
Morgan Creek / Restor ation Systems iii Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORAT ION SITE MONITORING REPORT
Wetland
Wetland hydrology criteria was met on two out of three groundwater gauges in the first year of
monitoring, one of the three gauges in the second year and three out of four the third year and
fourth year The newly installed groundwater gauge (GW4) was installed in the spring of 2011
Although a maintenance site visit was conducted to service the groundwater gauge during Year
4, no data was recovered due to gauge failure Overall, the Site appears to be meeting wetland
hydrology criteria
Planned Action
The riparian buffer bare -root planting has remained successfully established through the fourth
year In general, herbaceous planting resulted in vigorous growth throughout the site, and no
remedial action with respect to vegetation is necessary
Continued visual monitoring is planned for stream areas that have been identified as "Areas of
Concern" No repair work is required at this time for any reaches of the channel
Morgan Creek / Restoi athon Systems IV Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
The purpose of the Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) was to restore degraded
sections of Morgan Creek and three of its tributaries located in Haywood County, North
Carolina This monitoring report presents information regarding the site and watershed
conditions, the restoration approach for the project, the monitoring results, remedial action plan
and detailed monitoring drawings of the site
1.1 General Protect Description
The site is located approximately 10 miles northeast of the City of Waynesville in rural
Haywood County, North Carolina (Figure 1 Vicinity Map) The site consists of approximately
9 8 acres of floodplam, approximately 3,900 linear feet of stream designated as Morgan Creek
and its tributaries, and 0 51 acres of existing wetlands The stream reaches consist of perennial
and intermittent, first and second order streams that have historically been impacted by riparian
and bank vegetation removal, channel straightening, unrestricted livestock access, and
agricultural land -use practices Existing land use within the site consists of forested areas and
pasture land The site is located within moderate to steep, sloping colluvial valleys and
elevations range from approximately 2500 ft to 2625 ft (NGVD) Past land management
activities have consisted of timber harvesting with subsequent land clearing for agricultural uses
including cattle grazing The land outside of the conservation easement remains in active
agricultural production
1 1 1 USGS and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
The project reach is located in the Pigeon River watershed of the French Broad River Basin
(United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010106020040) within
North Carolina Division of Water Quality ( NCDWQ) sub -basin 04 -03 -05 This sub -basin is
primarily forested, although agriculture accounts for a significant portion of the land -use
Morgan Creek drains into Fines Creek at the downstream end of the Site, which in turn flows to
the Pigeon River five miles farther downstream
1 12 NCDWQ Surface Water Classification
Morgan Creek, in the vicinity of the Site, is assigned a best usage classification of C by the
NCDWQ and as such there are no restrictions on watershed development or types of discharge
These waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary
recreation, and agriculture Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses not
involving human body contact with water on an organized or frequent basis
Fines Creek, from its source to the Pigeon River, as well as the portion of the Pigeon River
located approximately 5 miles south of the Site, are listed on the DWQ final 2006 303(d) list
Streams which are included in the 303(d) list either do not meet water quality standards or have
impaired uses Listing of these streams likely results from non -point agriculture and urban
runoff, and potentially from industrial point source discharges Specifically, the reason given
for the listing of Fines Creek and the Pigeon River is "Impaired Biological Integrity "
Morgan Creek/ Restoi ation Systems I Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

1' ,� g ✓� REFERENCE REACH 41-
SITE q
mw
M O U N T A I' N S- 1 �
H RMON �� v R26 K"°°
1334 y 'Y
kw l_ ,
I DEN Jqt`' Y ,).LIFE 1336 i
!3
KNOXVILLE Pug Knob
`•\ y MANAGEMEN no
0 T
` 1 ` Hayrm Kb \ -1 1379
_ lim ,
� rd Roa1
0 .. '
J 133 1 1334 ^ I ,
PJ S G A H MORGAN CREEK _ \ Q
MG
RESTORATION SITE l 1380 1p
8.3 , 1341 334
`.� �� `` .�•, Ch ;.-; , a 1343 lkbo►M� ,
( ar
NAT I O N A L �i3a t3a 1337
1347 Y 34 \ 1 w
1382 y<. 5 �7\ 15051 A'
_ -`338 ee Crabb Bald
134- y 13 5 ? ^ 7 1351 I Eiev 5.680
lw
THE SUBJECT PROJECT SITE IS AN ILLS
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION SITE a °'?°°
as
OF THE NCDENR ECOSYSTEM
1353 ss Mm /
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (EEP) 13x7 r ? 1338^ 1396 "' 1306
AND IS ENCOMPASSED BY A �' 1346 1386 w f 1 1507
RECORDED CONSERVATION i3sa :!' 150t a
EASEMENT, BUT IS BORDERED BY 1338 352 / - tso3
LAND UNDER PRIVATE OWNERSHIP. 138 Pevth.C,eek 7505
ACCESSING THE SITE MAY REQUIRE 1346 1z 2 1355 1 ri
TRAVERSING AREAS NEAR OR J 1348 `16246
ALONG THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY R 1 ,a 1506
AND THEREFORE ACCESS BY THE �o / ` FOREST 1338 K0 .1509
GENERAL PUBLIC IS NOT .,� j3 151d"
PERMITTED. ACCESS BY -C..kP 1
AUTHORIZED PERSONEL OF STATE
AND FEDERAL AGENCIES OR THEIR eew .5
DESIGNERS /CONTRACTORS INVOLVED 'ems` tom Cr f `°bt"°
IN THE DEVELOPMENT, OVERSIGHT
AND STEWARDSHIP OF THE ® r f '
RESTORATION SITE IS PERMITTED a•, �. Chsmb
WITHIN THE TERMS AND 1331 I
l \
TIMEFRAMES OF THEIR DEFINED
ROLES. ANY INTENDED SITE 133
VISITATION OR ACTIVITY BY ANY
PERSON OUTSIDE OF THESE /' rH ASHEVILLE
PREVIOUSLY SANCTIONED ROLES
AND ACTIVITIES REQURIES PRIOR PucheKnob - - -
COORDINATION WITH EEP. Jonoe,ee — -
J� \Ar.- - , 1319 - �� /r� y•
L
PAR K 10 .1 131�� ' 117ah Alm CLYDE
DIRECTIONS TO SITE FROM ASHEVILLE: - -
FOLLOW I -40 WEST TOWARD KNOXVILLE, TN L
FOLLOW NC -209N TOWARD HOT SPRINGS VIA EXIT 24
AFTER 8.1 MI CONTINUE STRAIGHT ON SR -1334 (MAX PATCH RD.)
AFTER 0.7 MI TURN LEFT ON SR -1338 (FINES CREEK RD.) m mus
AFTER 0.1 MI TURN RIGHT ON SR -1340 (KIRKPATRICK COVE RD.) '
PROCEED TO CUL —DE —SAC AT UPSTREAM END OF PROJECT �3
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: AND BY:
SCALE SITE VICINITY MAP
f 0 1 3
r.. i�� � MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
-�V olf free HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
l4kT)systoll " "" MILES FIGURE 1

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
MONITORING REPORT
The primary goals of the Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Project are to
• Restore aquatic and riparian habitat within portions of the Morgan Creek watershed
• Restore geomorphic stability to the subject stream reaches
These goals will be accomplished through the following objectives
• Restoration of approximately ten acres of Montane Alluvial Forest along both sides of
Morgan Creek
• Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with cattle raising and agricultural
activities including the exclusion of livestock from Morgan Creek and adjacent
floodplain and establishing a native woody riparian buffer (at least 30' wide) adjacent
to streams and wetlands to treat surface runoff which may be laden with sediment
and /or agricultural pollutants from the adjacent landscape
• Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and
sediment loads by restoring a stable dimension, pattern, and profile supported by
natural in- stream habitat and grade/bank stabilization structures
• Promoting floodwater attenuation through a) reconnecting bankfull stream flows to
the abandoned floodplam terrace, b) restoring secondary, entrenched tributaries
thereby reducing floodwater velocities, c) restoring floodplam wetlands, thereby
increasing the storage capacity for floodwaters within the Site, and d) re- vegetating
floodplams to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site
• Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability and the use of in-
stream structures
• Providing wildlife habitat including seepage slope wetlands
These accomplishments will result in
• Restoration and enhancement of 4083 Stream Mitigation Units
• Providing 0 83 Wetland Mitigation Units
• Protecting the Site with a perpetual conservation easement
1.3 Project Structure
The project is composed of four distinct stream reaches, the main channel, Morgan Creek, and
its three tributaries, North Branch, Middle Branch, and South Branch The project structure is
tabulated in Table I (See Below)
Morgan Creek /Restoration Systems 3 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
MONITORING REPORT
Restorjatio�n Reach /Area
Table
Restoration
Level
1. Pro "ect
"rzh
Components
Restoration R
Pre- NoWC
LF or AC
Station
Ran a /Lo_cation
Mor an Creek
R
P2
892
900
100 +00 — 109 +73
Morgan Creek
R
P1
340
340
108 +73 — 112 +00
Morgan Creek
R
P2
1402
1438
112+00— 126 +36
Morgan Creek
E1
E1
141
141
126 +36 —127+77
Morgan Creek
R
P2
213
212
127 +77 — 129 +72
North Branch
R
R2
288
296
200 +00 —202+96
North Branch
R
P2
63
66
203 +38 —204+02
Lower North Branch
R
P1
2
254
500 +00 —502+46
Middle Branch
E1
E1
148
148
300 +00 —301+48
Middle Branch
E1
E1
154
154
301 +48 —303+02
South Branch
R
P1
197
205
400 +00 —402+05
South Branch
E1
E1
115
115
402 +05 - 403 +20
A, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K
E
046
046
R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
R
0 6
06
A licable Non` AMP-1 able
Morgan Creek /Restoration Systems 4 Monitoring Yea► 4 (Nov 2012)
Com orient
Summation
Restoration
Stream
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non - Riparian (Ac)
Upland
Buffer
BMP
Level
(LF)
(Ac)
(Ac)
Rivenne
Non -
Rivenne
Restoration
3,711
06
Enhancement
046
Enhancement 1
558
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
mom
HQ
Preservation
106
Totals
4,269
1.06
A licable Non` AMP-1 able
Morgan Creek /Restoration Systems 4 Monitoring Yea► 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
1.4 Restoration Type and Approach
Restoration and enhancement practices implemented on this project were designed to minimize
unnecessary disturbance to adjacent land and to protect mature riparian vegetation where it
exists Consideration was given to the potential functional lift provided by restoration activities
in comparison to the functional lift that could be realized through the natural process of channel
evolution Included in this consideration was an attempt to determine the disturbance and
sedimentation that could occur as a result of this natural process Where restoration was
determined to be warranted, consideration was given to which reaches could best be served by
maintaining as much of the existing channel pattern as possible
The proposed reaches of Morgan Creek and its tributaries are designed as Type B4 and Type
134a streams This channel configuration provides the most stable and natural form in the
moderately sloping colluvial valleys that are found throughout the Site Additionally, since
broad alluvial valleys are not found within the Site, the lower sinuosity of the Type B4 streams
will result in minimizing grading and earthwork activities The proposed channel dimensions,
patterns, and profiles are based on hydraulic relationships and morphologic dimensionless ratios
of the reference reaches The installation of rock and wood structures was utilized throughout
the restored reaches of the Site Rock and log structures were installed in runs for grade control
to prevent headcut formation Log vanes with rootwads were installed in meander bends to
direct the flow away from the outside of the bend and provide toe and bank protection Sod
transplants were used extensively throughout the project to stabilize newly constructed channel
banks On -site material including sod, bed material, boulders, and logs were used to the
maximum extent possible
Proposed wetland areas are underlain by hydric soils but are non - jurisdictional due to
insufficient hydrology Channel restoration reestablished a connection between the floodplain
and the channel Overbank flooding and better utilization of nearby seepage hydrology will
provide the needed hydrology to sustain these hydric soil zones as .jurisdictional wetlands
Areas where ,jurisdictional wetlands existed have been enhanced by the planting of appropriate
woody and herbaceous species Each wetland restoration and enhancement area has been
planted with species appropriate to the ecoregion and will promote the functionality of the
wetlands as integral parts of the riparian corridor
1.5 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
Tables II and III (below) provide an overview of the project implementation timeline as well as
the individual companies responsible for managing and completing various project milestones
Information defining current land use within the watershed, Rosgen classification of the stream
reaches within the site, and various other data attributes for the site are provided in Table IV
(below)
Morgan Creek / Restoi ation Systems 5 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
MONITORING REPORT
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Morgan Creek Restoration Project / EEP Contract# D06035 -A
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Nov 2007
Jan 2008
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
Jul 2008
Construction
N/A
Jan 2009
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
Dec 2008
Permanent seed mix applied to entire site
N/A
Dec 2008
Bare -root plantings for flood lain and uplands
N/A
Jan 2009
Mitigation Plan / As -Built (Year 0 Monitoring - baseline )
Jan 2009
Feb 2009
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct 2009
Dec 2009
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 2010
Nov 2010
Year 3 Monitoring
Sept 2011
Sept 2011
Year 4 Monitoring
Sept 2012
Nov 2012
Year 5 Monitoring
Winston - Salem, NC 27101
Table III. Project Contact Table
Morgan Creek Restoration Project / EEP Contract# D06035 -A
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems, Inc
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Travis Hamrick
919 - 755 -9490
Designer
Wolf Creek Engineering, pllc
7 Florida Ave
Asheville, NC 28787
S Grant Ginn, P E
828 -658 -3649
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc
2889 Lowery St
Winston- Salem, NC 27101
Darrell Westmoreland
336 - 725 -2010
Project Manager
American Wetlands
2310 Valley Carline Court
Ruston, VA 20191
Lamar Beasley
703 - 860 -0045
Planting & Seeding Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc
2889 Lowery St
Winston - Salem, NC 27101
Stephen Joyce
336 - 725 -2010
Monitoring Performers
Stream Monitoring - Wolf Creek Engineering, pllc
S Grant Ginn, P E 828 - 658 -3649
Ve etation Monitoring -Axiom Environmental, Inc JGrant
Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Morgan Creek/ Restoration Systems b Monitoring Year 4 (914112)

MORCAN CREEK RBI1OR411ON PROJECI
MONITORING REPORI
Table IV Project Attribute Table
Mori
an Creek Restoration Project / EEP Contract# D06035 -A
Project County
Haywood
Ph sio ra hic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Southern Crystalline Ridges and Mountains
Project River Basin
French Broad River Basin
USGS HUC for Project 14 digit)
06010106020040
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
04 -03 -05
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
WRC Class Warm, Cool, Cold
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100% Demarcated Easement Comers
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
None within project site
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Morgan
North
Lower North
Middle
South
Drainage area miz
0 71
012
0 18
0 004
0 006
Stream order
Second
First
First
First
First
Restored length feet
2890
3625
254
250
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed type
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution e
Residential
15%
30%
35%
0%
0%
Ag -Row Crop
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
A -Livestock
35%
0%
0%
65%
55%
Forested
50%
70%
65%
35%
45%
Watershed impervious cover %
5
5
5
0
0
NCDWQ AU /Index number
5 -32 -7
NCDWQ classification
C C C C C
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
Yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
non-point urban and agricultural runoff, agricultural activities
Total acreage of easement
1025
Total vegetated acreage within easement
9 8
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
95
Rosgen classification of re- existing
C4b, G4
A4
A4
G4
F4
Rosgen classification of As -Built
B4
134a
B4
134a
134a
Valley type
II
11
II
11
11
Valley sloe
00376
00515
00365
0 118
01271
Valley side sloe range
4%-44%
Valley toe slope range
45%-8%
Cowardm classification
N/A
Trout waters designation
N/A
Species of concern, endangered?
small whorled pago nia, Indiana and Gray bat
Dominant sod series and characteristics
CxA
EvE, SdD, CxA
CxA
HaD2
FnE2, HaD2
Series
Cullowhee- Nikwasi
Evard - Cowee, Saunook
Cullowhee- Nikwasi
Ha esvdle Clay Loam
Fannin Loam
Depth in
0-65
0-72.0-65
0 -65
0 -60
0 -61
Clay %
-
-
-
-
0 -35
K
mod rapid -rapid
moderate - mod rapid
moderately ra id
moderate
moderate
T
-
-
-

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
MONITORING REPORT
Sampling was conducted as outlined in the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4 2 (Lee et al 2008) (http Hcvs bio unc edu/methods htm) to determine the planting
pattern of woody stems with respect to species, spacing, and density as well as to forecast
survivability and growth of planted stems in subsequent monitonng years The taxonomic
standard for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia,
Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (Weakley 2008) Following Site construction six
vegetative sampling plots (five standard [10m x 10m] plots and one [5m x 20m] plot) were
established, monumented at each corner with metal fence posts and PVC pipes, and
recorded during baseline surveys All planted stems and plot corners were marked with
orange flagging tape to facilitate relocation during subsequent monitoring years Four plots
were established in stream restoration areas and two within wetland areas (one within a
wetland enhancement area and one within a wetland restoration area) Plots were placed
within the applicable planting zones to capture the heterogeneity of the designed vegetative
communities
2 1 1 Stem Counts
Year 4 (2012) vegetation monitoring for the Site occurred in July 2012 With guidance
provided by the EEP, the site was revisited in October of 2012 to confirm the July results
No changes of note where observed Vegetation sampling across the Site was above the
required average density with 486 planted stems per acre Native herbaceous cover has
successfully established throughout the Site Volunteer woody species were documented
within two of the six the monitoring plots (Plots 2 and 6) during Year 4 (2012)
Table V: Vegetation Summary
Plot
Date Sampled
Planted
Living
Stems
Dead or
Missing
Stems
Stemser
Stems
Total
Living
Stems
Average
Stems Per
Acre
# Species
1
7/19/2012
13
1
0
13
526
7
2
7/19/2012
17
3
2
19
769
9
3
7/19/2012
10
2
0
10
405
5
4
7/19/2012
11
0
0
11
445
8
5
7/19/2012
11
3
0
11
445
6
6
1 7/19/2012
10 1
2
1
1 11
445
6
2 12 Vegetative Problems
Stem loss which occurred at the Site following baseline monitoring may be due to several
factors, including livestock encroachment in Plots 2 and 4, and mowing within Plot 5
Morgan Creek/ Restoration Systems 8 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
Supplemental planting occurred during the Year 1 (2009) monitoring season within areas
that had experienced stem loss Average overall vigor of planted stems through Year 4
(2012) was noted as good to excellent, however, planted stems should continue to be
monitored closely in subsequent monitoring years
2 13 Vegetation Plot Photos
A photo point was established in each vegetation plot Photo points are positioned for each plot
at the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite corner The photographs were
captured on the same day as the vegetation plot surveys (Appendix B)
2.2 Stream Assessment
Monitoring protocol follows that outlined within the EEP Site Specific Mitigation Plan and
detailed in the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Stream Mitigation Guidelines for
Monitoring Level I Steam monitoring included measurements of stream dimension, profile,
pattern, bed materials, photo documentation, and stream bankf ill return interval (Baseline,
Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 and Year 4 summary data are provided in Tables VI and VII below)
Most of the stream reaches have managed the extreme flow events of the first four years
reasonably well The overall bed profile of Morgan Creek has been maintained, however, there
are numerous local adjustments to riffle and pool features These adjustments appear to have
remained stable during Monitoring Year 4 (2012), and exhibit no additional degradation The
bank failure that was repaired during Year 4 appears to be stable Most of the in- stream
structures are intact and functional The few structures that were partially compromised appear
to have stabilized and are not presently in need of repair No repairs or remediation is called for
at this time
22 1 Hydrology
Since completion of construction in January of 2009, the site has been subjected to at least four
bankfull or greater events In July of 2009, a weather system crossed western North Carolina
resulting in four inches of rainfall on -site and water elevations 0 8 feet above bankfull on
Morgan Creek It is estimated that this storm was between a twenty -five and fifty -year event
Heavy rainfall in the late summer of 2009 again resulted in water elevations above bankfull No
bankfull event was recorded dunng Monitoring Year 2 (2010) One greater- than - bankfull event
occurred during the summer of 2011 No bankfull event was recorded during Monitoring Year 4
(2012)
Table Viii. Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurrence o
Bankfull Event
Height Above
Bankfull (ft)
Method of Data Collection
6/16/09
Spring 2009
At Bankfull
Debris evidence at bankfull
7/9/09
7/8/09
08
Crest Gauge
10/6/09
Summer 2009
06
Crest Gauge
9/7/11
Summer 2011
03
Crest Gauge and Debris evidence
Morgan Creek/ Restoration Systems 9 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
222 Geomorphology
MONITORING REPORT
Following the procedures established in the USDA Forest Service Manual (Harrelson et al
1994) and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification system
( Rosgen 1994, 1996), data collected consisted of detailed dimension and pattern measurements,
longitudinal profiles, and bed materials sampling
Morgan Creek/ Restot anon Systems 10 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

IGau9e

`.�
_�
���
�aa
� ®�� =:
�,

Table VII Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Reach 1 Morgan Creek
Parameter
Cross Section RFI
Riffle
Cross Section PL
Pool
Cross Section
Dimension
MY 1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MY 1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MY 1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 _ MY+
Bkf Width (ft )
129
13
142
124
Med
Min
140
139
151
152
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Flood prone Width (ft)
63
63
63
63
21
18
-
-
18
-
21
18
24
21
Bkf Cross Sectional Area (ftz
114
116
8 7
6
36
28
134
125
108
116
36
28
87
36
Bkf Mean Depth ft
09
09
06
05
72
61
10
09
07
08
72
61
84
72
Bkf Max Depth (ft)
1 3
1 3
14
1 2
1 6
14
15
14
1 7
1 7
1 6
14
1 9
1 6
Width/Depth Ratio
146
146
23 3
259
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
49
49
44
5 1
12
55
229
16
75
415
148
78
22
179
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
1 0
1
0 0342
0 0195
0 0657
0 0422
0 0117
0 1233
0 0354
0 0138
0 1073
00346
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
Pool length (ft)
3 3
165
9
-
-
-
7
165
105
5 8
46
11 7
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
15
46
37
15
1375
43
16
59
41 2
225
77
446
Substrate
Additional Reach Parameters
DS„ (mm)
94
176
67
0 1
Valley Length ft
-
740
740
-
-
740
D (mm)
207
122
81
1
Channel Length (ft)
773
-
773
773
Parameter
MY -1 (2009)
MY -2 (2010)
MY -3 (2011)
MY -4 (2012)
MY -5 (2013)
MY+ (2014)
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Beltwidth ft
18
24
21
18
24
21
18
24
21
18
24
21
Radius of Curvature (ft)
28
87
36
28
87
36
28
87
36
28
87
36
Meander Wavelength (ft)
61
84
72
61
84
72
61
84
72
61
84
72
Meander Width Ratio
1 4
19
1 6
14
1 9
1 6
1 4
1 9
1 6
14
1 9
1 6
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
85
255
12
55
229
16
75
415
148
78
22
179
Riffle Slope ft/ft
00156
0 0864
0 0342
0 0195
0 0657
0 0422
0 0117
0 1233
0 0354
0 0138
0 1073
00346
Pool length (ft)
3 3
165
9
-
-
-
7
165
105
5 8
46
11 7
Pool Spacing (ft)
15
46
37
15
1375
43
16
59
41 2
225
77
446
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
-
740
740
-
-
740
740
Channel Length (ft)
773
-
773
773
773
Sinuosity
-
104
104
-
104
-
104
Water Surface Slope ft/ft)
0 036
0 080
0 048
00355
00471
-
003
00678
00472
-
Bkf Slope ft/ft)
0 036
0 080
0 048
-
-
00444
00238
0 066
00457
00238
00660
00457
Ros en Classification
-
I -
B3a
-
133a
-
-
B3a
-
-
133a
Habitat Index
Macrobenthos

Table VII. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Reach 2 Morgan Creek
Parameter
Cross Section RF2
Riffle
Cross Section PL2
Pool
Cross Section
Dimension
MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bkf Width (ft)
133
141
136
139
152
163
156
163
Flood prone Width (ft)
33
33
33
33
Min
Max
-
-
-
-
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Bkf Cross Sectional Area (ft)
12
106
9 8
112
16
30
21 8
202
199
185
16
30
24
Bkf Mean Depth (ft )
09
07
07
08
30
88
14
12
1 3
1 1
30
88
40
Bkf Max Depth ft)
16
1 5
1 6
17
73
93
22
2 1
27
27
73
93
88
Width/Depth Ratio
148
18 8
189
172
12
23
-
-
-
-
12
23
1 8
Entrenchment Ratio
25
2 5
24
24
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
85
84
445
12
37
23
3 8
23
19
Wetted Perimeter ft)
Riffle Slope (11)
0 0261
0 0542
0 0332
0 0218
0 033
00275
00117
0 0372
0 0281
0 0165
0 0247
0 0171
Hydraulic Radius (ft
Pool length ft
8
15
95
-
-
-
7
89
9
39
144
86
Substrate
Pool Spacing (ft)
33
67
45
34
107
48
365
115
465
10
91
53
D5f) (mm)
51
26
20
127
D, (mm)l
139
1 109
1 104
1 151
Parameter
MY -1 (2009)
MY -2 (2010)
MY -3 (2011)
MY4 (2012)
MY -5 (2013)
MY+ (2014)
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Beltw)dth ft
16
30
24
16
30
24
16
30
24
16
30
24
Radius of Curvature (ft )
30
88
40
30
88
40
30
88
40
30
88
40
Meander Wavelength ft
73
93
88
73
93
88
73
93
88
73
93
88
Meander Width Ratio
1 2
2 3
1 8
12
23
1 8
12.
2 3
1 8
12
23
1 8
Profile
Riffle Length ft
14
29
21
85
84
445
12
37
23
3 8
23
19
Riffle Slope (11)
0 0261
0 0542
0 0332
0 0218
0 033
00275
00117
0 0372
0 0281
0 0165
0 0247
0 0171
Pool length ft
8
15
95
-
-
-
7
89
9
39
144
86
Pool Spacing (ft)
33
67
45
34
107
48
365
115
465
10
91
53
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft)
541
541
541
541
Channel Length (ft)
573
-
573
573
573
Sinuosity
I 1
106
1 06
-
- -
1 06
Water Surface Sloe (ft/ft)
0 037
0 043
0 037
00334
00404
-
00307
00444
00411
Bkt Slope ft/ft)
0 037
0 043
0 037
00337
-
0 1236
0 0347
0 1236
00347
Ros en Classification
-
-
B4
B4
64
B4
Habitat Index
=F-,
Macrobenthos

Table VII Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Reach 3 Morgan Creek
Parameter
Cross Section RF3
Riffle
Cross Section PL3
Pool
Cross Section
Dimension
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bkf Width ft
146
149
149
171
Maxim
Med
149
134
145
156
Max
Med *
Min
Max
Med
Min
Flood prone Width (ft)
36
36
36
36
Min
Max
Med
-
22
-
26
22
28
26
22
28
26
22
Bkf Cross Sectional Area (ft)
15 3
123
124
12 8
118
10
95
97
52
33
80
52
33
80
52
33
Bkf Mean Depth ft
1
08
08
07
08
07
07
06
101
73
122
101
73
122
101
73
Bkf Max Depth (ft)
1 9
17
1 8
1 9
12
1 1
1 5
1 5
1 8
1 1 5
1 9
1 8
1 5
1 9
1 8
1 5
Width/Depth Ratio
14
18
18
228
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
2 5
25
24
2 1
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
17
12
68
186
6
41
175
139
Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
Riffle Sloe (ft)
-
0 0359
00119
00615
00318
00138
0 1233
0 029
00044
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
0 028
Pool length (ft)
21
13
-
-
-
5 5
28
11 5
9 3
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
16 1
Pools acm ft)
76
53
3
76
48
33
67
48
44
Substrate
50
Additional Reach Parameters
1350 (mm)
44
39 1
18 3
1 7
Valley Length ft)
328
D, (mm)l
132
1 104
1 98
F 100
328
328
Channel Length (ft)
344
Parameter
MY- 1(2009)
MY -2 (2010)
MY -3 (2011)
MY4 (2012)
MY -5 (2013)
MY+ (2014)
Pattern a
Minim
Maxim
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med *
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Beltwidth ft
22
28
26
22
28
26
22
28
26
22
28
26
Radius of Curvature (ft)
33
80
52
33
80
52
33
80
52
33
80
52
Meander Wavelength (ft
73
122
101
73
122
101
73
122
101
73
122
101
Meander Width Ratio
1 5
1 9
1 8
1 1 5
1 9
1 8
1 5
1 9
1 8
1 5
1 9
1 8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
30
17
12
68
186
6
41
175
139
23
229
Riffle Sloe (ft)
0 0600
0 0359
00119
00615
00318
00138
0 1233
0 029
00044
00516
0 028
Pool length (ft)
21
13
-
-
-
5 5
28
11 5
9 3
28 8
16 1
Pools acm ft)
76
53
3
76
48
33
67
48
44
75
50
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft)
328
328
328
328
Channel Length (ft)
344
344
344
344
Sinuosity
105
105
-
105
-
105
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft )
0 030
0 037
0 030
00279
00347
-
00221
00619
00332
-
Bkf Slope ft/ft)
0 030
0 037
0 030
-
-
00313
0 018
00555
00348
0 0180
0 0555
0 0348
Ros en Classification
-
B4
B4
-
-
B4
-
-
B4
Habitat Index
Macrobenthos

Table VII. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Reach 4 Morgan Creek
Parameter
Cross Section RF4
Riffle
Cross Section PL4
Pool
Cross Section
Dimension
MY I MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MY I MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MY 1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bkf Width ft
157
157
153
161
Med
Min
154
169
169
17
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Flood prone Width ft)
44
44
44
44
23
21
-
-
-
-
23
21
30
23
Bkf Cross Sectional Area (ft)
19 1
182
18 3
175
47
33
183
208
218
192
47
33
92
47
Bkf Mean Depth ft
12
1 2
1 2
1 1
91
82
12
12
1 3
1 1
91
82
108
91
Bkf Max Depth ft)
20
19
2
1 8
1 5
1 1 3
2 1
24_
26
2 3
1 5
1 3
1 9
1 5
Width/Depth Ratio
129
13 5
12 8
148
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
28
2 8
29
27
182
14
77
185
11 5
53
245
27
494
23 3
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
l 0
10
00322
0 0181
0 0736
0 0275
0 0127
0 062
0 0282
0 0088
0 0665
00255
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
Pool length ft)
4
35
13 5
-
-
-
4
53
15
11
29
18
Hydraulic Radius (ft
Pool Spacing 11)
19
52
32
19
99
37
31
116
52
39
156
64
Substrate
Additional Reach Parameters
D50 (mm)
50
499
13 7
06
717
717
-
-
717
-
-
717
D� (mm)
144
103
63
75
741
741
741
741
Parameter
MY -1 (2009)
MY -2 (2010)
MY -3 (2011)
MY4 (2012)
MY -5 (2013)
MY+ (2014)
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Beltwidth ft
21
30
23
21
30
23
21
30
23
21
30
23
Radius of Curvature (ft)
33
92
47
33
92
47
33
92
47
33
92
47
Meander Wavelength (ft)
82
108
91
82
108
91
82
108
91
82
108
91
Meander Width Ratio
1 3
1 9
1 5
1 1 3
1 9
1 5
1 3
1 9
1 5
1 3
1 9
1 5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft )
52
28
182
14
77
185
11 5
53
245
27
494
23 3
Riffle Slope ft
00169
00700
00322
0 0181
0 0736
0 0275
0 0127
0 062
0 0282
0 0088
0 0665
00255
Pool length ft)
4
35
13 5
-
-
-
4
53
15
11
29
18
Pool Spacing 11)
19
52
32
19
99
37
31
116
52
39
156
64
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft)
-
717
717
-
-
717
-
-
717
Channel Length ft
-
741
741
741
741
Sinuosity
-
103
103
103
103
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0 020
0 032
0 031
003
00316
-
00173
00388
0 027
-
Bkt Slope ft/ft)
0 020
0 032
0 031
-
-
003
00091
00379
00275
0 009
0 038
0 027
Ros en Classification
-
B4
-
B4
-
-
B4
-
-
B4
Habitat Index
Macrobenthos

Table VII Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Reach 5• North Branch
Parameter
Cross Section RF5
Riffle
Cross Section PL5
Pool
Cross Section
Dimension
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bkf Width (ft
86
71
75
95
Med
Min
84
79
82
10
Med
Min
Max
Med
Flood prone Width (ft)
22
22
22
22
Min
Max
-
-
-
-
13
11
16
13
11
16
13
11
Bkf Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
45
3 9
3 7
41
87
67
78
42
18
16
30
18
16
30
18
16
Bkf Mean Depth (ft
05
06
05
04
10
09
1
06
39
34
41
39
34
41
39
34
Bkf Max Depth (ft)
10
09
11
11
19
14
86
11
1 5
1 3
1 9
1 5
1 3
l 9
1 5
1 3
Width/Depth Ratio
165
129
152
22 1
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
26
26
29
22
Riffle Length (ft)
-
102
45
12
27
94
3
257
6
45
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
Riffle Slope (ft)
00267
0 1171
00667
0 024
00976
00664
003
0 14
00733
0 0355
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
00456
Pool length (ft)
32
10 5
42
-
-
-
3
222
6
3
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
5
Pool Spacing (ft)
85
33
203
14 1
37
21 3
11 5
363
198
10
Substrate
23
Additional Reach Parameters
D5a (mm)
31
51
228
01
Valle Length ft
-
-
246
-
-
246
-
D84 (mm)
177
160
108
1 4
Channel Length (ft)
266
266
Parameter
MY -1 (2009)
MY -2 (2010)
MY -3 (2011)
MY4 (2012)
MY -5 (2013)
MY+ (2014)
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Beltwidth ft
11
16
13
11
16
13
11
16
13
11
16
13
Radius of Curvature (ft)
16
30
18
16
30
18
16
30
18
16
30
18
Meander Wavelength (ft)
34
41
39
34
41
39
34
41
39
34
41
39
Meander Width Ratio
1 3
1 9
1 5
1 3
1 9
1 5
1 3
l 9
1 5
1 3
1 9
1 5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3
102
45
12
27
94
3
257
6
45
182
82
Riffle Slope (ft)
00267
0 1171
00667
0 024
00976
00664
003
0 14
00733
0 0355
0 0616
00456
Pool length (ft)
32
10 5
42
-
-
-
3
222
6
3
8 8
5
Pool Spacing (ft)
85
33
203
14 1
37
21 3
11 5
363
198
10
41
23
Additional Reach Parameters
Valle Length ft
-
-
246
-
-
246
-
-
246
-
-
246
Channel Length (ft)
266
266
-
266
266
Sinuosity
108
108
-
108
108
Water Surface Slope ft/ft)
0 045
006
0 054
00508
00664
-
0 0136
0 0959
0 0535
Sloe (ft/ft
0 045
006
0 054
-
-
0 0527
0 0218
0 0808
0 0474
0 022
0 081
0 047
Ros en Glassi5cation
-
-
B4a
-
B4a
-
-
B4a
-
-
B4a
Habitat Index
Macrobenthos
III

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
Re- survey of the permanent cross sections and profile reaches have shown a few minor
alterations in local bed elevations with the bed form and the channel pattern remains consistent
with the Year 3 condition On Morgan Creek, the four riffle sections that were taken showed
slight variation from the Year 3 condition in that they are continuing to experience deposition of
material along the banks This may be due to an increase in vegetation along the riffles where
water depth is shallow and vegetation growth has occurred As vegetation increases in these
areas, lower flow velocities result in deposition of finer sediment An increase in finer material
is evident in the pebble count data described below Any changes to the riffle sections between
Year 3 and Year 4 were minor and none suggest a systemic problem at the Site The four pool
sections that were taken show slight adjustments, but are fairly consistent with conditions
present in Year 3 None of the adjustments are cause for concern regarding performance of the
stream
The riffle and pool sections that were taken on North Branch indicate minor change from the
Year 3 survey The riffle section remains consistent with Year 3 conditions There are
indications from the cross sections and the profile that there has been slight deposition once
again in the pool Overall, the channel is generally consistent with the Year 3 survey
Pebble counts were conducted at each cross - section, as well as across the overall study reach
Pebble count data was plotted by size distribution in order to assess the D50 and D84 size class
On Morgan Creek, the material size generally decreased from the Year 3 condition with the D50
decreasing from 5 mm to 0 2 mm on the upper reach, from 7 mm to 0 5 mm on the second
reach, from 33 mm to 1 5 mm on the third, and 10 mm to 14 mm on the fourth reach Likewise
the D84 decreased from 68 mm to 5 mm on the upper reach, from 86 mm to 54 mm on the
second reach, 106 mm to 68 mm on the third reach, and 98 mm to 68 mm on the fourth reach
This overall decrease in particle size may be related to the absence of a bankfull event during
the previous year that would have moved silt and smaller sediment through the system It may
also be related to a continuing increase in vegetation along the riffles as indicated by the cross
sections
On North Branch the material size decreased, with the D50 showed little change from 0 5 mm to
0 6 mm and the D84 decreased from 43 mm to 7 mm The collected data from North Branch
suggests that the gravel and cobble fractions have not changed in composition, but finer
sediment has settled along the channel
2 2 3 Problem Areas
The bank failure that was identified in Year 3 at STA 125 +00 was repaired in March of 2012
and appeared stable at the time of the Year 4 monitoring survey
There are some other minor areas of concern that should be monitored but that presently appear
to be stable These areas have been identified on the monitoring plan sheets Structure drops or
nick points, did not heal themselves during Year 4 but appear to be stable and show no further
evidence of degradation
Morgan Creek/ Restoration Systems 17 Monitoring Year 4 (1Vov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
224 Photo Point Stations
Photo Point Stations (PPSs) have been established to assist in characterizing the site and to
allow qualitative evaluation of the site conditions The location of each photo station has been
permanently marked in the field and the bearing /orientation of the photograph is indicated on
the monitoring plans to allow for consistent repetition A total of ten (10) PPSs have been
established along the restored stream (Appendix B) An additional ten (10) photo stations have
been located upstream of the permanent monitoring cross sections These photographs are
taken facing downstream looking at the section, and show as much of the banks and channel as
possible
2 2 5 Stability Assessment
The following three tables provide a summary of the stream stability assessment and the
morphologic parameters of the Site The Stability Assessment Table is a semi - quantitative
summary of the results from the visual inspection conducted of each reach using Table B2
(Appendix B) The Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary Table and the Morphology
and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Table provide the quantitative summary of data from the
cross sectional and longitudinal surveys for the As -built condition and for each subsequent
monitoring year
Tahle iX_ Cateunrical Stream Feature Visual Stahilitv Assessment
Morgan Creek I Restol ation Systems 18 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)
Performance Percenta e — Mor an Creek Reach 1 -4) 3,031 ft
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
95%
96%
97%
98%
Pools
100%
85%
82%
84%
84%
Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
98%
98%
98%
98%
Bed General
100%
93%
100%
99%
99%
Vanes / J Hooks etc
100%
97%
98%
98%
98%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Morgan Creek I Restol ation Systems 18 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)
Performance Percentage - North Branch (Reach 5 ) 616 ft
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
97%
95%
95%
95%
Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Vanes / J Hooks etc
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Morgan Creek I Restol ation Systems 18 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE MONITORING REPORT
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Evaluation of the success of restored wetland areas consists of monitoring groundwater
hydrology and vegetation survival Continuously - recording groundwater monitoring gauges
were installed in accordance with specifications in Installing Monitoring Wells /Ptezometers to
Wetlands (NCWRP 1993) Monitoring gauges were set to a depth of approximately 24 inches
below the soil surface Screened portions of each gauge were surrounded by filter fabric, buried
in screened well sand, and sealed with a bentonite cap to prevent siltation and surface flow
infiltration Four groundwater gauges were installed in wetland restoration areas to provide
representative coverage of the Site Hydrological sampling was performed in restoration areas
during the growing season at intervals necessary to satisfy the hydrology success criteria within
each physiographic landscape area (USEPA 1990)
Groundwater hydrology success criteria for the five -year monitoring period will include a
minimum regulatory criterion, comprising saturation (free water) within one foot of the soil
surface for 5 percent of the growing season or nine (9) consecutive days The growing season
in Haywood County has a duration of 175 days, beginning on April 22nd and ending on October
14 th
23 1 Hydrology
Three of the gauges installed met wetland hydrology criteria during the 2012 growing season
(Table I1I) Gauge GW I had groundwater present within 12 inches for a total of 127 days with
a peak of 37 consecutive days Gauge GW2 had groundwater present within 12 inches for a
total of 79 days with a peak of 56 consecutive days Gauge GW3 had groundwater present
within 12 inches for a total of 47 consecutive days Plots of the gauge data can be found in
Morgan Creek/ Restor ation Systems 19 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)
Performance Percenta e - Middle Branch 302 ft
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Vanes / J Hooks etc
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Performance Percentage - South Branch 320
ft
Feature
Initial MY -01 MY -02 MY -03 MY -04 MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
97%
97%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Thalwe
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
99%
99%
Vanes / J Hooks etc
100%
97%
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Evaluation of the success of restored wetland areas consists of monitoring groundwater
hydrology and vegetation survival Continuously - recording groundwater monitoring gauges
were installed in accordance with specifications in Installing Monitoring Wells /Ptezometers to
Wetlands (NCWRP 1993) Monitoring gauges were set to a depth of approximately 24 inches
below the soil surface Screened portions of each gauge were surrounded by filter fabric, buried
in screened well sand, and sealed with a bentonite cap to prevent siltation and surface flow
infiltration Four groundwater gauges were installed in wetland restoration areas to provide
representative coverage of the Site Hydrological sampling was performed in restoration areas
during the growing season at intervals necessary to satisfy the hydrology success criteria within
each physiographic landscape area (USEPA 1990)
Groundwater hydrology success criteria for the five -year monitoring period will include a
minimum regulatory criterion, comprising saturation (free water) within one foot of the soil
surface for 5 percent of the growing season or nine (9) consecutive days The growing season
in Haywood County has a duration of 175 days, beginning on April 22nd and ending on October
14 th
23 1 Hydrology
Three of the gauges installed met wetland hydrology criteria during the 2012 growing season
(Table I1I) Gauge GW I had groundwater present within 12 inches for a total of 127 days with
a peak of 37 consecutive days Gauge GW2 had groundwater present within 12 inches for a
total of 79 days with a peak of 56 consecutive days Gauge GW3 had groundwater present
within 12 inches for a total of 47 consecutive days Plots of the gauge data can be found in
Morgan Creek/ Restor ation Systems 19 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
MONITORING REPORT
Appendix C Although a maintenance visit was conducted during Year 4 to service Gauge
GW4, no data during this monitoring season due to gauge failure
Exhibit Table X. Wetland Criteria Attainment
2 3 2 Vegetation
Vegetation plots 2 and 4 are located in wetland enhancement/restoration areas in order to
represent wetland vegetation survival rates Each of these plots was well -above the
minimum 290 stems per acre required to be surviving after four years of monitoring with
688 and 445 planted stems per plot, respectively In addition, herbaceous vegetation
establishing within these areas included soft rush (Juncus effusus), tearthumb (Persicaria
saglttata), hollow doe -pye -weed (Eutrochium fistulosum), and ironweed (Vernonta
noveboracensis), all of which are FACW, OBL, or FAC+
2.4 Conclusions
The vegetation appears to be surviving at an acceptable rate and is expected to meet success
criteria in Monitoring Year 5 Continued visual observation is planned, however, no action
is recommended at this time
The wetland areas appear to have had stable hydrology during Monitoring Year 4 and issues
with gauge GW4 will be resolved prior to the Year 5 growing season
Continued visual monitoring is planned for stream areas that have been identified as "Areas
of Concern" Repair work is not warranted at this time on any of the areas This is based on
the judgment that these issues have not risen to the level of posing a threat to channel or
structure stability and are not resulting in excessive erosion It is recommended that natural
stream processes and natural re- vegetation be allowed the opportunity to mend these areas
and then re- assess their condition to the next monitoring cycle
Morgan Creek/ Restot ation Systems 20 Monrtoi ing Year 4 (Nov 2012)
Well
Consecutive
% of
Hydrology
Days of
Tract
Vegetation
Veg Survival
Tract
Tract
Well ID
Growing
Threshold
Hydrology
Mean
Plot ID
Threshold Met?
Mean
Season Met
Met"
Met
GW 1
Yes
127
94
-
-
GW2
Yes
79
59
1
63%
100%
GW3
Yes
47
35
2 3 2 Vegetation
Vegetation plots 2 and 4 are located in wetland enhancement/restoration areas in order to
represent wetland vegetation survival rates Each of these plots was well -above the
minimum 290 stems per acre required to be surviving after four years of monitoring with
688 and 445 planted stems per plot, respectively In addition, herbaceous vegetation
establishing within these areas included soft rush (Juncus effusus), tearthumb (Persicaria
saglttata), hollow doe -pye -weed (Eutrochium fistulosum), and ironweed (Vernonta
noveboracensis), all of which are FACW, OBL, or FAC+
2.4 Conclusions
The vegetation appears to be surviving at an acceptable rate and is expected to meet success
criteria in Monitoring Year 5 Continued visual observation is planned, however, no action
is recommended at this time
The wetland areas appear to have had stable hydrology during Monitoring Year 4 and issues
with gauge GW4 will be resolved prior to the Year 5 growing season
Continued visual monitoring is planned for stream areas that have been identified as "Areas
of Concern" Repair work is not warranted at this time on any of the areas This is based on
the judgment that these issues have not risen to the level of posing a threat to channel or
structure stability and are not resulting in excessive erosion It is recommended that natural
stream processes and natural re- vegetation be allowed the opportunity to mend these areas
and then re- assess their condition to the next monitoring cycle
Morgan Creek/ Restot ation Systems 20 Monrtoi ing Year 4 (Nov 2012)

MORGAN CREEK RESTORATION SITE
3.0 REFRENCES
MONITORING REPORT
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2. (online). Available:
http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
Weakley, Alan S. 2008. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(working draft) (online). Available:
http: / /www.herbarium.unc.edu/Weakle, FY lora_2008- Apr.pdf. University of North
Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
Morgan Creek/Restoration Systems 21 Monitoring Year 4 (Nov. 2012)

APPENDIX A
MONITORING PLANS

Wolf Creek EI
ENGINEERNG & ENPIRONI
7 Florid, Avenue Reo
i 1 I I \ •\♦ \ _ - - - PRONE: (828) 859 -9949
NORGAN CREEK RESTOU
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, I
1[ONTfORING PLAN
-- -_-- gym,
N As NOTED
\ \ \\\
11/5/12 9GG
X635'- -
�r
\ - - - - MONITORING REACH 1
CL OL / - -
U U Iy / li - - _ _ -_ - U_ U
Z Z O O
m -/ ''w ,z -Z o MONITORING REACH 2
Lj
_ o o ` A
CD
Lut
cn
aL
Ui
X/ �b
P
Q - - -
f -
Pi
Qc
11 —
— —
Y '
i
1 V4G PLOT II'\ ° • �__ _• �� — _ — _ _ — R' /� / P�Ll-
PLI I
l _
\ ; @G CONSTRUCTION\ MF T ` - - - - �RFI JtFt - - - \
PHOTOPOINT ,y' 9T b0 +0 ` \ 6' \\ \\ ``,' M cS ` 0 \ . ATIOt "P6 FAEN?
A Q Os, \ �\ Lrt l \\ \ SF-
N0. 7 ` \ - , POST =CON UCTION _ _. UN9
_ - -_
Yo RR -EONS `GjloN
\
\ \ 'MORR�A�I'/ CREE
LE
ORIG
1
\ ORIG
AS
AS-
1� 1
POINT NO.
POINT DESCRIPTION
NORTHING (FT)
FASTING (Fr)
ELEVATION (FT)
PP1
PHOTOPOINT NO. 1
729156.17
826117.25
2605.55
PRF 1
PHOTOPOINT RIFFLE
728807.03
826071.48
2583.49
RF1 LT
RIFFLE X.S.
728789.03
826110.51
2584.66
RF1 RT
RIFFLE X.S.
728764.74
826075.17
2581.69
PPL 1
PHOTOPOINT FOOL
728713.94
826121.16
2578.04
PL1 LT
POOL X.S.
728686.50
826146.71
2578.57
PL1 RT
POOL X.S.
728673.40
826102.02
2578.35
PP7
PHOTOPOINT NO. 7
729228.60
826039.00
2587.80
GW1
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 1
1 728891.56
826094.25
2587.80
30 0 30 90
SGLE IN FEET
NO AREAS OF CONCERN
ON THIS SHEET

POINT NO.
POINT DESCRIPTION
NORTHING (FT)
EASTING (FT)
ELEVATION (FT)
PP2
PHOTOPOINT NO. 2
728094.17
826203.48
2554.37
PRF 2
PHOTOPOINT RIFFLE
728294.27
826165.96
2563.21
RF2 LT
RIFFLE X.S.
728281.42
826202.97
2562.65
RF2 RT
RIFFLE X.S.
728261.46
826171.32
2562.41
PPL 2
PHOTOPOINT POOL
728238.80
826193.37
2560.66
PL2 LT
POOL X.S.
728204.54
826179.02
2560.35
PL2 RT
POOL X.S.
728213.76
826222.59
2559.93
PP3
PHOTOPOINT NO. 3
727779.50
826446.95
2555.50
PRF 3
PHOTOPOINT RIFFLE
727894.62
826306.28
2545.28
RF3 LT
RIFFLE X.S.
727845.51
826321.07
2544.75
RF3 RT
RIFFLE X.S.
727849.12
826282.49
2544.40
PPL 3
PHOTOPOINT POOL
727688.01
826311.19
2538.56
PL3 LT
POOL X.S.
727650.23
826355.57
2541.87
PL3 RT
POOL X.S.
727638.51
826288.18
2538.88
PP8
PHOTOPOINT NO. 8
728342.47
826112.30
-
GW2
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 2
727962.16
826321.04
2548.84
GW3
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 3
727749.93
826347.15
2542.04
MONITORING REACH 2
LOWER NORTH BRANCH
DESIGN ALIGNMENT
"2575'_ - --
BRANCH ,AS -BUILT
w o 30 90
SGLE IN FEET
2555
-
- _ PL3
Wiz±
1-1 725
NO AREAS OF CONCERN
ON THIS SHEET

MON
AS PO;i
J /
i\ \•SOUTH BRANCH
DESIGN ALIGNMENT
MONITORING REACH 4
UJ
PHOTOPOINT
N0. 4 .; EL a_ a
i i i 1 PRE- CONSTRUCTION Y Y N
SOUTH BRANCH
HEAD CUT;;`', SOUTH BRANCH z z a
(MODERATE) ,' \ •' `� AS -BUILT °
m m w
PP4
CL
CL V`
SOUTH BRANCH POST-
m PRE - CONSTRUCTION \ \
CONSTRUCTION THALWEG
MORGAN CREEK
cn
RF4; 0
PHOTOP T
- -- NO. 5
/ f -- -- K FIF4 -
PHOTflPOINT - - - -
_ -
/ a N0. 3 �s
D IGN\ ALIGNMENT
—
J - -� P T CONSTRICTION -
\ THAL G
4 M CREEK
_ AS -BUILT
VG PLOT,
------- N0lVRORING- REACH -3- -- - _ - _2535' - -- - - -- - - - - --
- - - -- - - -- -- - - -- --- - -_ -_- -- - - -_ - -_ -- __2_5_4 - -- --- - - - - -- -_ __ � .
- - _ -- _ - ---
- -- - - -- 2545'_ -- - -- - -- -- __ ---------------
- -
POINT 140.
POINT DESCRIPTION
NORTHING (FT)
EASTING (FT)
ELEVATION (FT)
PP4
PHOTOPOINT NO. 4
727502.10
826516.81
2552.50
PRF 4
PHOTOPOINT RIFFLE
727181.40
826411.45
2522.36
RF4 LT
RIFFLE X.S.
727138.95
826423.48
2522.86
RF4 RT
RIFFLE X.S.
727151.52
826379.28
2522.90
PPL 4
PHOTOPOINT POOL
-
-
-
PL4 LT
POOL X.S.
726942.40
826397.15
2515.67
PL4 RT
POOL X.S.
726931.51
826354.84
2515.99
PPS
PHOTOPOINT NO. 5
726837.41
826385.98
2514.40
PP9
PHOTOPOINT NO. 9
727536.86
826317.72
-
JO 0 70 90
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
- --
ORIGINAL CHANNEL
-- -
ORIGINAL CONTOUR
AS -BUILT THALWEG
AS -BUILT BANK
AS -BUILT F/P
DESIGN CENTERLINE
Q
WETLAND RESTORATION
®
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
ROCK STRUCTURE
Z,l
LOG STRUCTURE
e
IRON ROD
®
GAUGE
Q
STABLE
0
LOW CONCERN
Q
MODERATE CONCERN
0
HIGH CONCERN

NORTH BRANCH
AS -BUILT
POST -C
MONITORING REACH 5
eon 6 -LQ
PHC
N0. -6'
/THALWEG rrii, , „ �. PP6 - - - - - -
,,
i r/. Ill 111/
P RE -CONSTRUCTION
�
,NORTH BRANCH
— s — RF5 \ b�
-
PRF5
ii
DESIGN. ACIC�NM
2
BP2
1 2620'
262
POINT NO.
POINT DESCRIPTION
NORTHING (FT)
FASTING (FT)
ELEVATION (FT)
BP2 LT
BEGIN PROFILE
729047.60
825608.04
2616.10
BP2 RT
BEGIN PROFILE
729041.62
825589.22
2617.00
PRF 5
PHOTOPOINT RIFFLE
729011.82
825651.74
2614.40
RF5 LT
RIFFLE X.S.
729039.97
825664.74
2612.59
RF5 RT
RIFFLE X.S.
729017.39
825679.44
2613.46
PPL 5
PHOTOPOINT POOL
729052.16
825714.81
2609.26
PL5 LT
POOL X.S.
729050.69
825737.44
2609.77
PL5 RT
POOL X.S.
729024.76
825728.27
2610.39
PP6
PHOTOPOINT NO. 6
728956.37
825836.00
-
30 0 30 90
SCALE IN FEET
NO AREAS OF CONCERN
ON THIS SHEET
LEGEND
ORIGINAL CHANNEL
- - -- ORIGINAL CONTOUR
AS -BUILT THALWEG
AS -BUILT BANK
AS -BUILT F/P
DESIGN CENTERLINE
WETLAND RESTORATION
® WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
>� ROCK STRUCTURE
Lq LOG STRUCTURE
8 IRON ROD
® GAUGE
Q STABLE
0 LOW CONCERN
Q MODERATE CONCERN
0 HIGH CONCERN

PP10 PHOTOPOINT NO. 10 726527.45 826153.34 -
t
l
0
MORGAN CREEK
_ ,
ENHANCEMENT_ _= _ ___ _ ,� �- - MORGAN CREEK
AS -BUILT
ONST
PRE- CONSTRUCTION - p
MORGAN CREEK
JO 0 30 90
SCAE N FEET
\ _
V
y - - POINT
10 t;
NO AREAS OF CONCERN
ON THIS SHEET
LEGEND
ORIGINAL CHANNEL
ORIGINAL CONTOUR
AS -BUILT THALWEG
AS -BUILT BANK
AS -BUILT F/P
DESIGN CENTERLINE
WETLAND RESTORATION
® WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
ROCK STRUCTURE
-L--q LOG STRUCTURE
6 IRON ROD
® GAUGE
Q STABLE
0 LOW CONCERN
Q MODERATE CONCERN
HIGH CONCERN

APPENDIX B
VEGETATION RAW DATA

Vegetation Plot No. 1
Year 3 Photo No. 1
Year 4 Photo No. 2
Morgan Creek Monitoring Survey Year 4 7/19/2012

Vegetation Plot No. 2
Year 3 Photo No. 3
Year 4 Photo No. 4
Morgan Creek Monitoring Survey Year 4 711191,12012

Vegetation Plot No. 3
Year 3 Photo No. 5
Year 4 Photo No. 6
Morgan Creek Monitoring Survey Year 4 7 %19%2012

Vegetation Plot No. 4
Year 3 Photo No. 7
Year 4 Photo No. 8
Morgan Creek Monitoring Sure e }' Year 4 7/19/2012

Vegetation Plot No. 5
Year 3 Photo No. 9
Year 4 Photo No. 10
Morgan Creek Monitoring SUrvey Year 4 7!19,'2012

Vegetation Plot No. 6
Year 3 Photo No. 11
Year 4 Photo No. 12
Morgan Creek Monitoring, Surrey Year 7 %19/2012

Y
Plot (continual): Morgan -AXE -0001 Aug aVI I Data MIS YtAR!S DATA
map Wurce X Y ddh Height 'DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor' Damages Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm), (cm) (Gm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
IOt MOCL$Il- R-0001 Plenit fill iwany missing data and Gx,lncorreet'dota. Vejetati6fi N%ntt� oPing
- - 'Mats (V;�1D) Datashee"
VAI D fear (1 -5) 4 Date' f III / 1 j f / p� , Role• NOle$ on, lot.
'1 a�onomtc Standard `, _ __
TaYonomtc Standard DA'I'L
'Latitude or U 11 1 -N 35;63300 f Datum jIVi1►783lW
(deg dey, or ni) c
Longitude or U'1 WE: j-$z'93331 J UTM 'Lone
Coordtnaw, Accuracy (m) X -Axtc bearing (deg), '94 - -
PIOt.11tniensK)ons X 1 10 1' I0l 0 Plo },has reverse onentation,for kand,Y_axts (Yjs 90,degrees to the ri j t,yt_X
^` THIS YEAR'S DA'lA__ j
ddh Weight DBII Re- Vigor' Damage! Notes
Iinm lie I cm sprout
?A
0 «�
C-1
�t1ug 2011 Data
R 6 6 6A
Map Soun.e• X Y
ddh Height DBiI
ID
Species Name
char
q�,�M5010,
0.1m o lin
I nun' Icm• I cm-
2492
Comus amomum
o
k
- -
18 33
1
1 1406 03
Y4,9
Iltnod don
�� TMQ`
(2, „�
3;Or� A4Qx"
1 ,�,° (l0,0, D,R!!?' t
y
v rt�iip!icSyt
2496
Comus amOmum
Q
R
5.1 0,0
12 1400 02
2447,`°
Betula,nrgra
f
R
a
) ° '3 E2
A; 4(r 10,0 Ili tit
�
w
2498
Amelanchiet laMs
(D
P,
9,1 so
dlrtsrng
2491;< <
Cornus,mbmurt
`x�yj "
R
9 4. ` 0,r22 P 17Q.0 „'k
�r
2502
Sali;t putpurm
R
78 4,4
31 2600 14
2563
m n
- THemelis;g68
R
9:7 8:4
10 ,130 b
9
^` THIS YEAR'S DA'lA__ j
ddh Weight DBII Re- Vigor' Damage! Notes
Iinm lie I cm sprout
?A
0 «�
C-1
;1q,
R 6 6 6A
14 1600
49 �,1 ��4
2507 B�WI�'ng�, d� �
,(p�
�u, °T'��+�
,R. ji'j� '5, �
q�,�M5010,
«
F
LJS
u
ho'irias
2504 Comu, amomum ( R 9,0 99 10 1400 0 3 z;o at El Ii
resproui _
2505,.- ''Quercus rubral
R I J Yr *,7'6
' 10'x, 1136,0'
DB%?
2506 Amelanchiei loevis
R 6 6 6A
14 1600
03
2507 B�WI�'ng�, d� �
,(p�
�u, °T'��+�
,R. ji'j� '5, �
q�,�M5010,
«
�`
n
t
no�idennfible featufes,' t with prevlou;4i id
2509 Oucrcus rubra R 07 67 3 900
N rrems 13 New Stems, not included last }ear, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank P WS (Planted Woody Stems) homy
X Y ddh sleight DBiI
Species Name Source` (m) (m) I mm I cm` I cm VIgoe Damage* Notes
• VIGOR' 4;�v,�allent, 3 =god, 2 -fair, •DAMAGE) REM051, CUIl MOW ing,
I = unhLely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal Hut'nan IIAMpled, Site Too N
M =missing Strangulation, UNKNoWtit, speciry other
'HEIGH f PRECISION drops to IOcm if >2 5m and SOcm if>4nt
SIL.676 DRY, b"LOOD, DROLIght,
'n 1
E, LIVCSTtuk. Othcrfllnknown -.
f4Rlv1,,HUTtRtcane, DT$'eascd. VINt I
Printed ur the' Cis ECP l'nrry far! rrr 42,7 - '
a

0
Plot (continued): NV1organ- AXE =000`1 Aug 2011 Mw TIlls 1TAR °S 7A
Y
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Weight DBli Re- ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (tn (mn) (em) sprou Vigor' Damage* Notts
' F.xnlanaWmbf cut-off
;Natural Woody'Stems - tallied by'specics suhsaniriiri2cu - -
e h Cut -C1 ff 0111 stems_sh�itte'r than +this gr'e iptnred ; If>tQatt, edam Khy to the ri;fit) Gx tucm � Ermxm Cf 1 0 Crtt` 0 I c m ` -
,Species Name
m
C
S>;EDLINGS
seem
= HEIGIIT CLASSES.
t0'crn- SOcin- ]OOGrn -1
t,.
50 c 11� 1'OO,cm J 7 6m
- SAPLINGS
Su b-
5api
--- DBH
0 -1 cm 1 -2.5
2.5-
lEtEES — DBH'
5- {Kntc dAWj
• •Required We yi Qtm or
_- — - �- ---- suhsam lc �7� 10 Uf_ _ - • ' ._:,
•' �
*
!i�
6
•
!�8
0 - Ronn,WS2 dd91
I =unlikely to swvitn )tiv, OS -dead I ANlhlnl Human TRAMp[ed, Site Too V
M- missing Stmngulation, UNKVI wn, specify other
'f[C[Gtff PRECISION dropsari IOcm if>2 5ni and 50cm if >4m
STORM, HURRaeane DIS&Zd. VWE

Map of stems on,ptot Morgan- AXE -0041
111.111 r : m
!SOURCE Tr- rransukrit I =Live stake B =Bull and burlap P=Puttcd. Tu='I dbline. R =barc'Ro,&.tMzchanteally. U=Un
•VIGOR'.4= c—wcMent, 3 -good, 2-fair, •D",4IACJRTREMovSi. CUT; MOWing, BEAVer. DEER; RODen ^t "s, INSci
1 =unlibcly to curvi%c ycat, 0 =dead, ANIMnI Human fRAlvlpled, ML- Too WET Srie Too bRY, kbOD,15k
M =mums Stringulaticm, UNKNown, specify other
•HEIGIrr PRECISION drops to 10cin if >2 Sm and 50cm tr >4m
4 x *w
_94 " =1, it slams 13
map size
` A4rdium um
GAME., L.IVESTock, Mcr/Unknown
;ht STORM, HURRicanc; DIScasai, VINI;
PrmtcJ in rile Ci 8 FU Entry 7Taal rep 2 2 J
P
r
I
I
f
n5'
G
f
t
©
i
o
f
111.111 r : m
!SOURCE Tr- rransukrit I =Live stake B =Bull and burlap P=Puttcd. Tu='I dbline. R =barc'Ro,&.tMzchanteally. U=Un
•VIGOR'.4= c—wcMent, 3 -good, 2-fair, •D",4IACJRTREMovSi. CUT; MOWing, BEAVer. DEER; RODen ^t "s, INSci
1 =unlibcly to curvi%c ycat, 0 =dead, ANIMnI Human fRAlvlpled, ML- Too WET Srie Too bRY, kbOD,15k
M =mums Stringulaticm, UNKNown, specify other
•HEIGIrr PRECISION drops to 10cin if >2 Sm and 50cm tr >4m
4 x *w
_94 " =1, it slams 13
map size
` A4rdium um
GAME., L.IVESTock, Mcr/Unknown
;ht STORM, HURRicanc; DIScasai, VINI;
PrmtcJ in rile Ci 8 FU Entry 7Taal rep 2 2 J
P

Plot Morgan -AXE -0002
VNID Yes (1 -5) Date 19
raxonomic Standard:
Ta,onomii, Standard DATE -
Latitude or UTAI -N 35 68458 Datum, WA
(dcc deg or m) . 95334
Longitude Di U 17M -E 82 UTM Zone-
'Coordinate Accuracy (m) �3C -Taus bearing (deg)'
Plot Dimensions- X: 01 Y I 0 [j Plot h
Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data.
Vegetation lllbnrtoring
Diti OND) IJata'slicci
Notes on lop t-
I PWo 4�
and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the
ID
Species Name
Map Sources
char _
X Y
0 !m 0.1m
Aug 2Q I 1 Data
ddh Ileight DBff
1 mm ,icm• 1 em`
11
I
III ddh Height
Imm_ I,cm•
Tiffs Yr, AR!s D ATA
DBH Re- Vtgar• Damagt• Notes
l,em s'raut
YT
„Y7itamisucridenaiv
W jo R Q
?'2
J8
7 i� gfl?tp�
8 8
20
, 200 0 e 0 5'
e -
2522
Comus amomum
R
_
40
23
20
130.0 0.5
2529-
�Amelanchtu
2523
>1
Linder>ibengm - -
- - ft
�T, 1
il =
G
6Q p^'
❑r
,
,.
7124
Qurrrus rubm
R
8'i
1.9
12
90-0
7
119.0 DOH?
253) ' t1amant",vir- giniarm
�`tr5esp5
t'c '
b 1 aa
0,4-_
1,1
f 6
2532
A�s7n
R
a
is
1,
ro„ u t
_
2; 533 a �� I Runtime i3rsirgirtiat�ta
r
„R
; 2 I-
t0
PI`0,0 DOH?
,
Y
2526
llydrangea aiborescenc
@
R
9.8
11
bfissing `! ^
252'7r
Bepila n7gra.j
R
?,7
8 8
20
, 200 0 e 0 5'
2528
Quercus rtibra
(
R
63
9t
S
600
2529-
�Amelanchtu
$,8�
„ sip "°
f2
` =l8lri0 :r CI 5t
_
v
2330
Hamamelis virginiana
(D
R
50
6:7
7
119.0 DOH?
253) ' t1amant",vir- giniarm
R
3,7
1,1
w120�0 bihi
2532
Quercus rubra
R
3.0
8,7
12
180b,- 6,5
2; 533 a �� I Runtime i3rsirgirtiat�ta
r
„R
; 2 I-
Y 115 6
t0
PI`0,0 DOH?
2534
Quercus rubra
R
0,9
4.2
13
1200 DOH?
�594�''
Hvdiangen tubaresCet('s
R,
3 1
�l';
,�
hlirslirg
5910
Platanus occidrrit,rlLs
R
0.5
70
10
1100 DOB?
'591,10
,Acersaccliaruin
211
18r1r
5
10014= ,
12458
TY -
Platanusoccidentahs
R
5.2
61
s ^5
90,0
.1245,9
PlnWn6s pdcld'akttnits3
_
6di
a 0
5
507 U; r
9 $rent$ 19 New Stems, not included lust year but are obviously planted I f more spaceneedid, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stents)`Fonn
X Y ddh licight [)Bit
Species Name Source* (m) ,(m) 1 mm 1 cm* I em Vigar• Damage• Notes
i.riOJ&%dtt%11 F47.Tt.3
•SOURCE,'[r=7rmnsglant. l.= l.ivestake, B= 11 andbuilin �x P= Poited.lIu=Tubline. R =bug R%3&.M =Mkcht
• VIGQR, 4= excellent, 3=gtiod, 2- -fair, •DAMAGE; "I§val, CUT; tMowltng- BEAVei, DEER, R�
I= unlilely to survive year, O�ttad, ANIMal, Human TW61ed, 5tte Too �%Ffb. Site Too DRY,
M= missing_ Strangulation, UNKNaun, specify other.
•HCIGIrr'PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2 Smand 40cm if >4m
DROUght, STORM+ I7ljRRicanei Dlacased, VINE
Printed in rhr f,VS -F_4rY Cmtr loal mr. Z:7
4
t
JFT�
,” ri

Plot (continued): Morgan- AXE -0002 Aug 2011 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species m'hapr $ u6rce X Y ddh Height UPH ddh Height DBI-I Re- Vigor' Damage' Motes
(m) (m) (mm7 ;(cm) fcm) j (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woady Stems - tallied by species
Cut -Qlff � II srnns,shorter,thmt uus are I.Meed- IrAoan, 6;p1an Wkv1o,the,rtghQ* a
Fsnlnnndbngjnrto�
4sutsnmalirie"
IUCM 13 50CM O 100cffi -0 137cni 1
S ties Name
�
SEEDLQVGS
— HF,iGHT CLASSM
S,APIANGS
— QBH"
TREES, — DBH j
�d
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 ctti-
137 cm
ssa ii
p
0 -1 cm
12.5
2 5-
5-
—10
(r�rnc DB }!?
�. � ripat tv�t{�lfa �t
j
/
y
1
1
I
1
f
" Itequtredircuofl >IQmorsuh6amplc ?Ib0% 01
02
•
03
••
0I
N5
0•
r6 }�7Sd
• N
Form WS2rtics9l
I= unlikely to survive ycak,'0=dead, ANTMal, Human
'M=mtssmg Strangulation U
'HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IUcm if >21 5m and 50cm tf >4m
n
CDT, MOWrng, BEAVer, DEER, RODFhi , INSects, GAME; 1VESTocEti (hhsrlUnknown
Ipleil, Stie Too WCT, Sric Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRieane, UISLased, VINE
m,$peel other
Pnoted m the C b3.F9P Enrry roof tvr 2.2 7

11
Map of stems on plot Moran -AXE -0002
=axis: 78 ° A P +rears- 19
mt p ske:
"VICTOR 4=xcellent. 3=DOd; 2=Giir •DAiNAGEr REMtival.JJ7, I.IOWing EirlAVer, DMER, RODcnts, r
1-- unlikely to survive year, 6- -Acid, ANIWI, Numan TRAMpIcd, Sitc Tpn.WLT, Site -rho DRY, FLOOD,
Wnisamg StrangutatPan, UNKNown, specify 6ftr
•11EIGHI-PRECISION drops to 10cm if ?2Mrn and 54cm if >4m
r
D&uscd, vINr
i'ir`wed i"n tfj¢ l; VS gel F.rury 7sat/ vc,. 2 ?,T

�t
Plot Morgan- AYE -00(
VIM D Year (1 -5) M Date
'I'axonomte Standard-
Taxonomic Standard DA'Z'E
Latitude or UTM -N
'(dec deg_ Sr m)
Longitude or'U'rM -t'
Coordmatc Accuracy ('m)
Plot ptntenwons X:
I/ ot 7 -Za
Please fill in any missing data and fix incgrrect data
7 771 Partr._ _ hale. ,.t... -- --
_ ! U'rM zonZ
K -A,dts bearing (deg)
Y: 10 (I plot
J
�'egetatwn A
Data (VMD)
I Aug 2011 Data ) '114 S YEAR'S DATA
ID S CCtes Nantc Atap Source' h Y nidh Ilright 'D13 {I, l+ ddh hteia {�t DI3FI ne VygdC Damrigel Nnteq
P _ ciuu _ _o,Im 0 J'm ( mm I'cm _ 1 cm, _ L1mm tent, s 31'cm s cool_
2535 Corpus amomum R 13 1 P I4 ;170.4 0A E-D 1 . � "
33� re ,<t3efulatigm` fir, '" A ° #.ir, ' 1 ` ` a x eisao s !�U cp , Corrtu� Aniolnum Q R 0 4 2„9 12 200 0 0,6 # s � � I ,M° d°! 2 4,1 , TIN �br�2541 Querws cobra (D R 9 3 0.4 10 80,0
'2$42 4^ 'hinf lanciijet i pe�is � . R .8,�7,` 3 T l 17Q � : '0 4
t kw� s ..
2545 Undcrdk,etvoin ® R 81 92 Afu`sfn
2545 Quctcus rubs, ( -R '%64 768 ° 8, ''" 80,0' ° �P
2548 Quetcus rubra ( IZ 34- 8.8 4 goo
2549` - 'Piatanu 0— celdenwis R „0`3 8,7, °- '24'+ 4601b,� ", 03
" t a a
5914 Platbnus m6clLntabs d, R 34 7-2 7 110.0 IM11? Ilk B „� y
5915 Pl' ai us t ccidentalic - K °8,8 t%2 7r 1 Jb,d' UHF /,� = r =. R' ! Q
g rranrt- 12 New Stems, not included lastyeq, but are obvtqusiy planted If mare space bladed; uw blank PW,S,(Plant�d Woody
StctriS) ronn.,
Species Name Sourne• h M ddh Height Milt r�
(nt) ,(m) I ntm I cm` I'L' m Vigor* Damage Nubs
f�
r
•5 UKCIL Ir=Trans lant L =Lrvc sutke J3 =13411 and burly P=P
'VIGOR 4=exceilent, 3 =godd, 2 =fhu, DAMAGE, RE
I=unlikelyto`5tuvtveyev 0 =dead, AN1441'Human
M =mis§mg Strangulation, 1'
•IIEJGHI PRECISION drops td Win if-2.5m and 50cm of >4m
a
r
i Too VWr,'$tte'i'oo DRY, FE00D; DR Jgh(, STORM, HURRiane, xeased, vrNr
y other.
Printed to the C'YS-lirr terry rmw ver d 2 7
r
I
L
a

Plot (eontinu
ID Species
LXE -0003 Aug 2011'Ditta THIS YhAR'S DATA,
inap siruice X Y ddh height 0811 rfdh Height DBH Re- Vigor. Damage' IvbteS,
char (m} (m ?. (mm (cin) ice+) mm) (rma (cm) sprout -
cglan lion,q t nfr I
Natural Wdody Stems'= tallied by species .IAmnfing�.,
ei h Cut O ft' (Allsiansshortcrthmthisarcrgrmmd IF >IQan.cVlain ,toth4'right`)' p, cm IO 5(km 010 Cm _G_i'137,cnt
Sfieciek Name
SEE
DL_INCS — .HEIGHT
CtiASS6
SAPLINGS
—= DBH
e
TREES— DBH F
"sib.
seed
TO cm- '
50 cfn
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
I37 cm
S,,b;
Sapl
0 -1 cm
1 -2 5
2 5-
5=
=10
(�T�tcD�tq
I
1
pla7f00 °
• Regriiredd 'ett<sff >!(km`oisufani.o �' �'`
•ia
��i
•b s
to rormws?.v«y.l j
1
'VJGOR.0,exccllchi 3 =good 24air, - 'DAMAGE �REMoval, CUTIN!Q
1=nnlikely to survive year, ANIk4al, Human TRAMpItd, Site
M =missing. Strangiilauon, UNICNawn, spcciCy
'Fff-jGKrPRCCISION drops to 10cm iC >2.5m and 50cm if>4m,
AVgr, DE114, RODcgm INSeus, SAME P)VF4, TSck, Other/Unknown
Sitc Too DRY, FLAOD,,i)kOUght, STORM, HURRicam DlSeascd, VINE
Pr mrcd to rho k PS EEP L:nrry Pmi 4r, 22 i
ti
4

Map of stems on plot Morgan-AXE-0003
y
'- X-axis 94 ° A z slims; 12
/` ntnit vi:e
t i hlediwrt
In,i11 ;ti.5ut
*SOURCE Iv= Transplant, L =Live stake B =Ball and burlap. P= Potted: l u= TutiltnR "R =bare Roof M-M6cl nicaJl U:6UnknoHr _ _ 19
*VIGOR, 4= excellent, 3=goW, Vfnir, j #DAMAGC; KrWdvid, CU1: MOWma,BGAVer, DEER, ROQcQ INSects, GAW4 UVES7od.OtherMnknowm
1 =mdil ely in �riivivc S q=rfead, I`I A;VIMat; llum�n TR AMpleC, Sne Tt i iVC �, fine Taa pRV; FLOU , DI2QUght, S! QRM, HURRicnne, ULSeased, VINE
M=massang Strangutatfon, UNi;Nown speedy other.
'HEIGHT PRECIS ION'drops to l oem if >2 S m abd 50cm if >4m Printed in the rvXS -XliP S wy Toa w, 2 d ?
f
O
1
rD
a
as
E
I
f
o
}
f
,fin,
V
1
V
In,i11 ;ti.5ut
*SOURCE Iv= Transplant, L =Live stake B =Ball and burlap. P= Potted: l u= TutiltnR "R =bare Roof M-M6cl nicaJl U:6UnknoHr _ _ 19
*VIGOR, 4= excellent, 3=goW, Vfnir, j #DAMAGC; KrWdvid, CU1: MOWma,BGAVer, DEER, ROQcQ INSects, GAW4 UVES7od.OtherMnknowm
1 =mdil ely in �riivivc S q=rfead, I`I A;VIMat; llum�n TR AMpleC, Sne Tt i iVC �, fine Taa pRV; FLOU , DI2QUght, S! QRM, HURRicnne, ULSeased, VINE
M=massang Strangutatfon, UNi;Nown speedy other.
'HEIGHT PRECIS ION'drops to l oem if >2 S m abd 50cm if >4m Printed in the rvXS -XliP S wy Toa w, 2 d ?

Plot Morgan -AX 4004
VIN1D Year 0 -S). Date- / lq
Taxonomic Standard'
Taxonomic Standard DA fE
Latitude or UTM'N' 35.58624
(dec dogs or m) S2 -
LongitudeorU77N -f 953 _
Coordinate Accuracy (m) Y-
Plot Dimensions X: 1 IUI Y
Pleaie rill to -thy meiiitiR data and fir'Incorrect data. 'Vegetation ,1lonitona
T-1 Date (V-1 D1 DatiAhe
Datum LNAD83AV
UTtvl Zon
tang (dcg7 72
10 M plot has reve
X and Y axis CY is 9
l ;o4e 144
1 Aug 2011 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Specter Name
Map Source• X 1' ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- ,vigor` Damage• Notcc
char 0 Im 0 Im 4 men .lcm• l,em Imm lcm• I cm Sprout
2551 Platanus oc idtnlaits R 1A 0.3 2500 16 -310 Z 1
3352 4EtGI is Zgru m �k'4R'" � 2 D _ 54 Ifs "A W am M, f'
2553 Amelanchiet laevis R 49 3.7 18 180.0 1,0 �{r� { r�
d, a-- m 4 4 % � 19t I t.L.
255 Ltn6den tulept�rra r r` X12 0 <' BFI7' ��r 21j, . _
"4,�a1'�, IWIS i., n e M 2555 Aronia drbuufolia R 9 5 2 5 5 130.0 I)BH? odendion 1 2558 1limamel is vireniana R 7 D 8 7 11 150 0 0.1 �QuBrry�r S 6� r t1�1 420,0 �D�II?'^ �i � s�' z �QMA l < ,^., 2560 Aroniu atbuufolia R 2.4 52 5 90.0 hi
2561 Gnrnus ariiomum ,I2rl j om$ 2 20 .2(fU5916 Phitanus cMCidentah$ (jj R 8 2 t o 10 1 10,0 M f7 4 rremr, I f New Stems not included last year butare obviously planted if more spate needed, use blank P'%rS (Planted Woody Stemsl Fnme
Species Name Source* m M ddh IIIci * DBH vigor* ( ) (m) Imm t cm 1 cm g Damage Notes
Einlatlntion Qj Ni -0tr
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species 54w8moline "" !
let ht Cut- OffsAllsttmsshoncrthmithisaretgpoied I AMM,`plan%%k,tothenght.) 0 l0crn 0 50rm II 100cm 0 13Ycm T
Srjecies Name.
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT Ct,ASSES
SAOUAS
— DBH
a
_
TREES ='DBH j
Sub-
swd
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cni-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-,
Sapl '
0-1 cm
1-25
2.5-
5-
=10
_
-
1
_
t
3i
'Required i(cuo0' >10cmorsuti ampic ?100% •l
tit
0 3
`14
N5
6
S
I
0 Form WS2;vcr,9.1 1
•••••••.•••.••*s ue —t: i — +uu, plluv uu. ae.l�wviu, l:V,l�. MV W tng n!'..1+Ver, �JlsF.tt� K1Jt,�en S; -INSe js,
I Zit Ikely to survive year• 0 =dead, - ANiblat,, Human TRAMp1&1. Site'roo N�Bt I'; Site Too DRY, FLOOD. DROU
Wit;tWng, Suangulauon, UN"own, specify other
"HEIGHT PRLCISIUN drops to 10cm if >2 Sm and Skin ift*4m
/'nnud in thr C, t b, .? f t#2r TiW trr 3 21

Map of stems on plot Morgan- AXE -0004
Ys
X -nxrs 12- N 0 stems I f
map sat
0 Medium
(0,0) \ Y 5ttr
'VIGOR- 4-excellent 3 =goad;2 =fair, •DAMAGE "RE
I =unl►kci) to 5urvi%cycar, 0--dead, ANINfaI, l;iimar
M4duss111g Stiangulalion, 0
",1111GHT PRECISION drops to 10cm tf >2 Srn and 50cm if >4m
. ...... _.... _
r[MO ini ,'BEAVet" „DCGR, RODe6tst iNScc.4, GAME LIYHS'lock, lhhc0Nhkndwn
A, Srtr'1oo � Lt. Site Tao DRY, iL6 a), DRQUght, STARM, HbiMcane, DIScMd, VINE
specify other
Primed in du I•K}.1XP learrx hod ver 12 7
Q
r
1
sis
I
}
I
E
Of
{1
}
0
1
'
Q
(0,0) \ Y 5ttr
'VIGOR- 4-excellent 3 =goad;2 =fair, •DAMAGE "RE
I =unl►kci) to 5urvi%cycar, 0--dead, ANINfaI, l;iimar
M4duss111g Stiangulalion, 0
",1111GHT PRECISION drops to 10cm tf >2 Srn and 50cm if >4m
. ...... _.... _
r[MO ini ,'BEAVet" „DCGR, RODe6tst iNScc.4, GAME LIYHS'lock, lhhc0Nhkndwn
A, Srtr'1oo � Lt. Site Tao DRY, iL6 a), DRQUght, STARM, HbiMcane, DIScMd, VINE
specify other
Primed in du I•K}.1XP learrx hod ver 12 7

Plot Morgan- AXE:-0005 Plitise fill in any missing data and 8x incorrect data. Yegetation Monitoring
Data (VN1D) lyatashcet'
Y'i<tD -1 °ear (1 -5) F 4 � Date 7 / ( % ?LSJ - / / p Role. Noses on
Taxohomtc Standard. P101,0
'(axotionucStnndafdDATE, 12-" n Ia iii
Latitude or 0-114 -N 35,688)6 Datunr jNAD831W 1
(dee,deg, of m) — '� % na -
Longitude or UTMt -E -82.95519 UTM Zone-
CoordinMe Accuracy (m). X -Axis bearing (deg) I a • V—J?tA oA ) 04.
Plot Dimensions X- 20 Y- 5 0 Plot has reverse orientation forX and Y axis
(Y ►s 90 degre" to the right of X �
Aug 2011 Dnta '1 HI$ YEAR'S BATA
Map Source` X Y ddh Height DBII ddh tlerght DBII Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Narne _ chaff O,Im QJm 1 mm 1'cm• 1 cm Imm tern` 1 cm sprout
2563 . Platanus occidentalts
,Aonius'dmomum
R, 2, X4,
21 22 (! q . � �9�
tl 3
23
236'0, ;U
G
)11" '
, . . u
2564 Aronia arbutifoha
Q
R 28 10
5 70.0
Platimus occidentaM
+
R 166
00
30
2900, 1 7
2569
2555 'lntnrius, 6i 5rdentiilis'
Rr 9t3
I8 - 220`1�
�
A!}srt
2570
Betula nigra
1577
�.
R 178
43-
2566 Linodendron tutiptlera
(
R 9.,7 I,1
4tnd_dcndit tuliptteiva'
x '
R 16 4
3f0
� '
s
d�irsinq
dust a stump
2567
,Aonius'dmomum
M09MMEREM®
R' 136
tl 3
23
236'0, ;U
,131atanus o'ccId'entaits
F P% °yil2FtY
3,5^
2574
^ _ F4 *
2568
Platimus occidentaM
e+
R 166
00
30
2900, 1 7
2569
Lviodendron rulipifera'
Rr 9t3
2,9
�
A!}srt
2570
Betula nigra
1577
�.
R 178
43-
24
S
210.0 1 1
2571
4tnd_dcndit tuliptteiva'
x '
R 16 4
3f0
7
s
25,72
IM
M09MMEREM®
R 153
47
15 170,0 05
2573
,131atanus o'ccId'entaits
F P% °yil2FtY
3,5^
2574
Aroma arbutrfalia
mom=
R 10
33
"M
Salts purvurrea
MIMM®®M�
1125i5
,
�
MMMMIMIIM
1577
Aronia arbutifoha
e
R 35
32
25,72
Plat anus oceidentah$
R 153
47
15 170,0 05
2573
,131atanus o'ccId'entaits
F P% °yil2FtY
3,5^
2574
Aroma arbutrfalia
R 10
33
dflxrine
Salts purvurrea
R 5.9
1125i5
,
�
1577
Aronia arbutifoha
e
R 35
32
6 1000
MMM®MM_—
4 rienu 14 New Sterns, not included last year, but are obviously planted, If more space needed' use blank PWS (Planted Wood? Steins) Forni
a Y ddh Height DB
SpectesName Source* H (m) (m) 1 mm I cm* I om Vigor. Damage` Mutts
-VIGOR 4=exCel1ent, 3=gaod 2 =fan, 'DAMAGI� REMovnl, CU't, MOWmj,, +BEAVer, DEM-RODenv, INSects, GAME, L[bFSTock, OtWfUnknc+
I =rnhl,eiy to survive year, 0 =dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMplcd
Site W LOOP, UROUght, STOliM ItUlt tc�ane, DIScased, NNE Tw E , s DR, i
Wmissing Strangulation, UNl:1`Io��n,'spccitp;othert
*I IFIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2 5m and 50cm if >4m f'rinied ur rtx Ct*,'-It' ?kaliy -,r'or tlor 22.7
4 rienu 14 New Sterns, not included last year, but are obviously planted, If more space needed' use blank PWS (Planted Wood? Steins) Forni
a Y ddh Height DB
SpectesName Source* H (m) (m) 1 mm I cm* I om Vigor. Damage` Mutts
-VIGOR 4=exCel1ent, 3=gaod 2 =fan, 'DAMAGI� REMovnl, CU't, MOWmj,, +BEAVer, DEM-RODenv, INSects, GAME, L[bFSTock, OtWfUnknc+
I =rnhl,eiy to survive year, 0 =dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMplcd
Site W LOOP, UROUght, STOliM ItUlt tc�ane, DIScased, NNE Tw E , s DR, i
Wmissing Strangulation, UNl:1`Io��n,'spccitp;othert
*I IFIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2 5m and 50cm if >4m f'rinied ur rtx Ct*,'-It' ?kaliy -,r'or tlor 22.7

Plot,(continued): Morgan- AX&W05 Aug 20 I Data i illa icrtino vnr�+
map source X Y ddh height DBII ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor' Dwnaga• Notes
ID Species char (,in} Cm) (rhm) (em) (cm) (m m) (Fm) (cm) sprout
Fx11 iaiwifi6n if N( -0B
Natural Woody'Stems - tallied by species 4L sit Fnrddrne•"• i
HMM C i-0 (All stems shorteith art thisareignarcd If >l0cn %explain +vh}'totheright)'_010Cm 050CFM 0 IUUcnl ©, CM
SEEDLINGS_— HEIGHT CUSSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
10, cm- 50 cm= 100 cm- sul, =10
Species Name ;
® Seed 50 Cm 100 cIn 137 cm 5�pl 0 -1 cm 1 -2 5 2.5- 5- r (write DBH)
--
3
i
i
"RequiredifCU- off >10cmbrsuhsumple7100%
%
•!a
:.
' lorrnWS?,eer9l
W 0 I
- -
• V1CiG1K. 4=e %CtllCni, J °gnOa. L -W1r, • r • - 1—— -
I =unlikely to survive year, tl =dead, A'AIIIvial, Huin_an 1VA viplcd, ite, Too W`hT• Site Too DRY
M=m°issing StrtingulauUn, UNluvown, ipcCdy ckhm
•I IEIGIfr PRECISION drops to' 10cm if >2 5m and 50cm if>4m
Maird in P/w COS -'MP Fain, 'l rtirl ter 1 «7

Map of stems on plot Morgan- AXiAOOS
4 ° 9 Seems- 14
( i Nmap sr_e,
A4rr7r11M
4
t 1
h Gj i p r G)
u b
7 ( c�
r l
fit it i }
NIIII41 X ISnt
'vtG9R', 4= cxt.ellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, —`
•gAhiAGE RI Moval, GUl; MoWingr BEA%Wr, DEER,,'RODer;q, I
1 =uAlkely to survive years dead, AIJIMo1. Human TRAMpfed, Slic'foo wllTeSite Too DRYJUPOD,
M= missing 5tt l tlatidn. UNKNown, spcei - other,
'IIEIGH'I PRCCIS109dreps to IOCm if >2 Sm acid 56cm if >4m
rvictvt, t-IUKRicane, nlSeaaed, VINE,
YrMm :/enrhtt vS•XCil�lmry7wlvt, d_J

Plot Morkan- AXE -00
VMD Ytar (1 -5): L _ Date
T'axodomic Standard•
Taxonomic Standard'DAT1s
Latitude or UTM -N
(dv -,deg or m)
Longitude or UTM -r;
Coordinate Accuracy (m)
Plot Dimensions X
juis
68910'
9552
101 Y.
Please fill in any missing data an&Gx incorrect data.
�� done
P601 .bearing (deg,}
10 Q Plot has reverse orientation
Aug 2011 Data
r
o0
®®
om
o®
and Y
Notes on plot
Pk'�' y?-
atlon Itiloaltonng I
(N'MD) Ddtasheet!
is 90 da grikws to the nght of X
'I HIS YEAR'S DATA
ID
$pecteS Name
Wp Source, X Y ddh Height DB13
chit AIin 0.Im .1 mm, Icm' '1 cni
ddh Height
lmm fcmt
DQI1
1 cm
Re Vigor' Damage' Notes
sprout
R
60 73
12 1000
"251,7
Betul3 NgrB
2511
Accr Mccharum
(
R 4 1 39 3 600
2518
9ctuln nigru
p
2512
�Linodendrdn tuli vfeia
P -
f
� � �
k t 3 9i ,� tx° 3 13p.t�r
� j - x � ti9
Aineancfi6r laevi
.�
e
❑ wr
,
0.3 ` 'bs6
t V
15, �ltt0.00 5l I
5918
,y
2514
Vibumuni iipulus
Q
R 84 0,5 6 70.0
��
hu�u'' bra ' , ,,r M
P
3
resprout
3.5 'FEt;Q'
J'O k1'4I , 6' ab-# 1?' 4
°
-!
-
99 `}�}',�yy �+
%W
•R� , s" c` � h` '1'l 0' ��Dlilf?
fl
2516
Ltnodendron tuftpifero
p
R
60 73
12 1000
"251,7
Betul3 NgrB
(
5 3" 9st
10' IOp,O ,' r
2518
9ctuln nigru
p
R
11 9.3
30 25U 0 16
2519
Aineancfi6r laevi
.�
e
ye
Ra '
0.3 ` 'bs6
t V
15, �ltt0.00 5l I
5918
Platanus occidentatiss
R
08 33
7 110.0 DBIP,
5919
hu�u'' bra ' , ,,r M
P
w�
R'
3.5 'FEt;Q'
J'O k1'4I , 6' ab-# 1?' 4
q�
%W
�`
s�
w�
�e
fir,
°
-!
. a
v
as
D
4
ir*-aV
Y
Yd
i
i7
iu
tm
Ft. rM�t1
9 scents; � I I Nev, Sfems not included last year, but arc obviously planted. I r more space needed, u`_sc blank P W$ (Alan[[ d Woody* Stem's)`Porm
Source* X Y ddh Iicight DHI-I Vi r• Dama r' Notes
Species Name '(pi) (m) , 1 mm I cm I cm ga g
Axf 70
VIGOR' 4- ixccllent, 3=gWd, 2 =15air, •DAMAGE Rt3MC
I=uniikcly to sur-vive year, 04cad, XNIMa1, Heiman 77
M--missing, Strangulation, UNK
'I IFIGIiT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2 5m and 50cm if�4m
x1, Sde 1'oo WL"T Site Tn . RY,
specify other
DROUght. STORM, tIURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Proved is ihr C; 1•EEP Hairy Pi N ier 2_: 7
,
1,

Plot ('continued) Morgan-AXE-0066
[D S ectes map source X Y
p char (m) (m)
Aug 2011'Dala
ddh Height DBH
(mm), (cm) I (cm)
, (mm)
TIUS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DISH Re- Vigor' Damage• Notcq
;(cm), (cgt`) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species s�nsuihtmdt artatoff
Heigh t Cut-0 (All stems shorter than this are ignored, If >l0cm Wlahah%,,to,theright). 13 lcm,"k7 50em 1:1.1006m E2 137c7m E
Species Name
-
D
o
SEED
1,iNGS — HEIGHT'GLASSES
SAPLINGS
—DBH
TREES_ -ES
Sub,
sad,
10 cm-
50 em
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
Sao
0 -1 cm i
1 -215
2 5-
5-
=10
erne I)BHI
—
—
_
_
t
f
'
I
• •Re quimd ifcuolf >10cm or subSaniple Q 100:0 •J
•2
• 3
• •4
NS
$
1.13,
0 Foun t
' SOURCE Tr— TranJplam. =LiYC stake B{B ll and btitH iiii. P�Potte&- TV— l ub1mv- = Root
'
VIGOR 4- exc�lknt, 3 =good, 2 =fair, !DAMAGE; REM�ygI^ C(/T, A101�jmg BCiAVet
I- imltkely to sun ow year, 0 =dead; ANINfA Human T"t-Upled, Site Too WET. Site
!N =missing. Suangutatton, UNKNo", specify other.
' HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2 5m and Mcm d >4m
r� wee - ,
4
VS2,verp.l f'
�a
f
FL&XJt7, UROUght, SfORIM, HURRieane, DISeascd, VINE
PrmrrrJ,u� t1,a CNS -E6P Ferry 7'ao! �cr Z? 3

Map of stems on plot lytorean -AXE -0006
X -alts 69 °
(11111) X ant
I= unlikely to survive Hear, 0--dead, ANIM1 41, thunan
Wmrssmg, 5trangulaLOn, UI
'HEIGIrr PRECISION dr2ps to 10cm rf >2 5m and 50cm rf >4m.
Wmg Bt; %Ver, DEFR,�Ri
100 WT I. Site Too DRY,
other_
N 6 stems /I
�3 Wrap sere
} Afedrunr
DIScased} VINE
Prmia, in the ('11N•hF.P bany'ival ser 3? T
n I Y - d 4

APPENDIX C
GEOMORPHIC RAW DATA

REPRESENTATIVE PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS

Repaired Minor Bank Failure, Morgan Cr, Sta 125 +00
Year 4 9/4/12 Photo No. 13
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site 9/4/12

PHOTO POINTS

Photo Point 1
Morgan Creek facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 14 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 15 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 16 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 17 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 18 9/4/12
Year S
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 2
Morgan Creek perpendicular to stream
As -Built Photo No. 19 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 20 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 21 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 22 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 23 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 2
Morgan Cr. / Lower North Br. confluence facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 29 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 30 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 31 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 32 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 33 9/4/12
Year S
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 3
Middle Branch facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 34 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 35 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 36 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 37 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No.38 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 3
Middle Branch facing downstream
As -Built Photo No. 39 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 40 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 41 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 42 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 43 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 4
South Branch facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 44 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 45 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 46 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 47 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No.48 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 4
South Branch facing downstream
As -Built Photo No. 49 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 50 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 51 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 52 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 53 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 5
Morgan Creek facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 54 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No.55 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 56 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 57 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No.58 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 6
North Branch from piped crossing, facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 59 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 60 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 61 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 62 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 63 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 6
North Branch from piped crossing, facing downstream
As -Built Photo No. 64 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 65 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 66 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 67 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 68 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 7
Morgan Creek from U/S pipe outfall, facing downstream
As -Built Photo No. 69 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 70 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 71 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 72 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 73 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 8
Lower North Branch from pipe outfall, facing downstream
As -Built Photo No. 74 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 75 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 76 10/02/10
Year 2 Photo No. 76 10/02/10
Year 4 Photo No. 78 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 9
Piped crossing at easement break, facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 79 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 80 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 81 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 82 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 83 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 9
Piped crossing at easement break, facing downstream
As -Built Photo No. 84 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No. 85 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 86 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 87 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 88 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

Photo Point 10
Morgan Creek from D/S pipe inlet, facing upstream
As -Built Photo No. 89 2/3/09
Year 1 Photo No.90 10/30/09
Year 2 Photo No. 91 10/02/10
Year 3 Photo No. 92 9/14/11
Year 4 Photo No. 93 9/4/12
Year 5
Morgan Creek Restoration Site 9/4/12

GEOMORPHIC DATA

Table B2 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Morgan Creek 3,031 ft
Feature Category
Metric
(# Stable)
Number
Performing
as
Intended
Total
Number
per As
built
Total
Number /
feet in
unstable
state
%
Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Performing
Mean or
Total
A Riffles
1 Present
62
62
N/A
100%
2 Armor stable
62
62
N/A
100%
3 Facet grade appears stable
59
62
N/A
95%
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining
62
62
N/A
100%
#
5 Length appropriate
60
62
N/A
97%
98%
B Pools
11 Present
52
1 62
1 N/A
1 a 84%
B Pools
2 Sufficently deep
52
1 62
1 N/A
1 84%
3 Length appropriate
52
1 62
1 N/A
84%
84%
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend centered
62
1 62
1 N/A
100%
C Thalweg
2 Downstream of meander bend centered
62
1 62
1 N/A
100%
100%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited erosion � h
62
62
N/A u�
100%
D Meanders
2 Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation
0
N/A
N/A
100%
3 Apparent Rc within specification
62
62
N/A
100%
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief
58
62
N/A
94%
98%
E Bed General
1 General channel bed a radation areas
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
E Bed General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head - cutting
N/A
N/A
3/80
98%
99%
F Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour
62
62
N/A
100%
F VanesY «1
2 Height appropriate
59
62
N/A
95%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate
62
62
N/A
100%
4 Free of piping or other structural failures
61
62
N/A
98%
98%
G Wad Boulders
11 Free of scour m
4
4 Y
� %ate N/A
100%
G Wads /Boulders
2 Footing stable
4
4
N/A
100%
100%
Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
North Branch 616 ft
Feature Category
Metric
(# Stable)
Number
Performing
as
Intended
Total
Number
per As
built
Total
Number /
feet in
unstable
state
%
Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Performing
Mean or
Total
A Riffles
1 Present
23
23
N/A
100%
2 Armor stable
23
23
N/A
100%
3 Facet grade appears stable
23
23
N/A
100%
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining
23
23
N/A
100%
#
5 Length appropriate
23
23
N/A
100%
100%
B Pools
11 Present
25
25
N/A
100%
2 Sufficentl dee
21
25
N/A
84%
3 Length appropriate
25
25
N/A
100%
95%
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend centered
23
23
N/A
100%
2 Downstream of meander bend centered
23
23
N/A
100%
100%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited erosion
22
22
N/A
100%
2 Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation
0
N/A
N/A
100%
3 Apparent Rc within specification
1 22
22
N/A
100%
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief
22
22
N/A
100%
100%
E Bed General
11 General channel bed a radation areas
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head-cutting
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
100%
F VanesY «1
Free of back or arm scouryP "�m
25
25
N/A
100 %�
2 Height appropriate
25
25
N/A
100%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate
25
25
N/A
100%
4 Free of piping or other structural failures
25
25
N/A
100%
100%
G Wads /Boulders
11 Free of scour
2
2
N/A
100%
2 Footing stable
2
2
N/A
100%
100%

Table 62. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
Middle Branch 302 ft
Feature Category
Metric
(# Stable)
Number
Performing
as
Intended
Total
Number
per As
built
Total
Number /
feet in
unstable
state
%
Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Performing
Mean or
Total
A Riffles
1 Present
9
9
N/A
100%
2 Armor stable
9
9
N/A
100%
3 Facet grade appears stable
9
9
N/A
1000
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining
9
9
N/A
100%
5 Length appropriate
9
9
N/A
100%
100%
B Pools
11 Present
1 6
1 6
1 N/A
100 %�
9
2 Sufficently deep
6
1 6
1 N/A
100%
9
3 Length appropriate
6
1 6
1 N/A
100%
100%
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend centered
9
9
N/A
100%
C Thalweg
2 Downstream of meander bend centered
9
9
N/A
100%
100%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited erosion
6
6
N/A
100%
2 Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation
0
N/A
N/A
100%
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within specification
6
6
N/A
100%
N/A
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief
6
6
N/A
100%
100%
E Bed General
1 General channel bed a radation areas
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
N/A
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head-cutting
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
100%
F Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour
5
5
N/A
100%
0/0
2 Height appropriate
5
5
N/A
100%
1/10
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate
5
5
N/A
100%
4 Free of piping or other structural failures
5
5
N/A
100%
100%
G Wads /Boulders
11 Free of scour
6
6
N/A
100%
100%
2 Footing stable
6
6
1 N/A
100%
100%
Table B2 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site (D06035 -A)
South Branch 320 ft
Feature Category
Metric
(# Stable)
Number
Performing
as
Intended
Total
Number
per As
built
Total
Number /
feet in
unstable
state
%
Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Performing
Mean or
Total
A Riffles
1 Present
12
12
N/A
100%
2 Armor stable
1 12
1 12
1 N/A
100%
3 Facet grade appears stable
11
12
N/A
92
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining
12
12
N/A
100%
5 Length appropriate
11
12
N/A
92%
97%
B Pools
11 Present
9
9
N/A
100%
2 Sufficently deep
9
9
N/A
100%
3 Length appropriate
9
9
N/A
100%
100%
C Thalweg
11 Upstream of meander bend centered
12 12
N/A
100%
2 Downstream of meander bend centered
1 12 1 12
N/A
100%
100%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited erosion
9
9
N/A
100%
2 Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation
0
N/A
N/A
100%
3 Apparent Rc within specification
9
9
N/A
100%
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief
9
9
N/A
100%
100%
E Bed General
11 General channel bed agradation areas
N/A
N/A
0/0
100%
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head - cutting
N/A
N/A
1/10
97%
99%
F Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour
9
9
N/A
100%
2 Height appropriate
9
9
N/A
100%
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate
9
9
N/A
100%
4 Free of piping or other structural failures
9
9
N/A
100%
100%
G Wads /Boulders
11 Free of scour
2
2 N/A
100%
2 Footing stable
2
2 N/A
100%
100%

c
I �
W
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Station (ft)

0
0
m
w
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750
Station (ft)
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000

z
c
0
d
w
Morgan Creek Stream Restoratioi
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500
Station (ft)

0
d
W
_._-._ ......__..---- ..........___..., _..._....._..--- _.._ ..... _` ._.._._._ _._...... _.__...... .._._ ........
__
—As -Built Bed
—Year 2 Bed __...
- -Year 3 Bed
—Year 4 Bed
2500 2550
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
i
i
I
2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 3000
Station (ft)
I

r
c
A
d
W
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350 3400 3450
Station (ft)
3500 11
2536
2525
I
i
Air
—As -Built Bed
r
—Year 2 Bed
_--- 2505 --
—Year 3 Bed
i
—Year 4 Bed -- --
- - - -- -
- -- — r..._.. -
-
- --
- -- —
- . - - - - -- -- - - - - --
- -- -2500- -
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350 3400 3450
Station (ft)
3500 11

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
— 22530-
PrOn
- -- .- -
-
__
_.._..._..
- - - - --
T-
i - 2590 -
c
0
-
-
w
--
-As -Built Bed
Year 2 Bed
I
—Year 3 Bed
—Year 4 Bed ~ -_ ___ -- -
--- -_ -.__
- - _- -- - -- - --
---- - - - - --
- -- _
- - --
- - -
-- _... -
- __ - 2485..
3500
3550 3600 3650 3700 3750 3800 3850
3900 3950 4000
Station (h)

"0""
2525
2520
2515
x510
c
:2505
500
2495
2490
2485
2480
4000 4050 4100 4150 4200 4250 4300 4350 4400 4450
Station (ft)
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 1 - Morgan Creek
Profile
4500 11

2620
2618
2616
2614
2612
c
•°- 2610
m
w 2608
2606
2604
2602
2600
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Profile Reach 2 - North Branch
North Branch Profile
1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100
Station (ft)
1120 1140 1160 1180 1200

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
09
Date
Haywood County, NC
Date
9/7/11
Date
9/4/12
Date 0 /0 /0
Area
12.2
Area
Riffle Cross Section RF1
Area
11.6
Area
8.7
Area
5.9
Area
0.0
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 15 +14.1
13.8
Bkf W
12.9
Bkf W
13
Bkf W
14.2
a�
r,
12.23
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.6
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.2
Dmax
1.3
Dmax
1.3
Dmax
1.4
Dmax
1.2
Dmax
4
W/d
15.6
W/d
14.6
W/d
14.6
W/d
23.3
jL- fir. 4...
25.3
W/d
0.0
7_1_1119Z
_ Yi
Att
9
i
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Riffle Cross Section
2590- -
-
2588 - -
--
_ -
- - -
- - -- -- --- - --
i
-- —
- —As
-built
_
—Year
1
. °_ --
2584
TF
—Year
2
—Year
3
i
m
—Year
4
W
- - -- - 2582 - -
-
-- - — - --
--
'
I
Year 5
—BKF
- -
- -+ -580 -
�BKF
i
-20
-10
0
10
20 30 40
50 60
70
Station (ft)
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10161
09
Date
9/29/10
Date
9/7/11
Date
9/4/12
Date 0 /0 /0
Area
12.2
Area
11.4
Area
11.6
Area
8.7
Area
5.9
Area
0.0
Bkf W
13.8
Bkf W
12.9
Bkf W
13
Bkf W
14.2
Bkf W
12.23
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.6
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.2
Dmax
1.3
Dmax
1.3
Dmax
1.4
Dmax
1.2
Dmax
0.0
W/d
15.6
W/d
14.6
W/d
14.6
W/d
23.3
W/d
25.3
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF1
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 15 +14 1
IffStSttion7
As_Budt
WElev.
E)Fssc�
BM
228
Year
1
HI
258694
Year
2
245
IRSta`tlonj
■.S /BSIN
®Elev
0—es-cl=
IffStatwn7N
WF,S /BSI
WElevW
hest
WSation7B
RES /BSN
I EI-ev E
OWTAN
BM
553
2584 66
RN IR Lt
BM
564
258169
IR Lt
BM
511
2581 69
IR Rt
HI
BKF
259019
580
2581 14
HI
16
258733
258089
BNK
HI
612
258680
-20
235
258784
BED
0
288
258445
GRND
02
226
258454
GRND
-10
358
258661
EOW
221
32
336
258397
239
672
2
257
258423
GRND
0
575
258444
GRND
258042
5
408
258325
258092
BNK
4
230
258450
GRND
32
618
258401
BKF
30
82
525
258208
32
570
9
475
258205
GRND
63
752
258267
541
2581 53
93
556
2581 77
258155
GRND
12
534
2581 46
GRND
8
814
258205
105
581
2581 52
15
564
2581 16
GRND
11
874
2581 45
132
608
258125
156
568
2581 12
BKF
146
904
258115
BKF LT
153
623
2581 10
BKF
175
656
258024
TOE
158
939
258080
158
648
258085
BNK
188
667
258013
EOW
174
995
258024
EOW LT
165
671
258062
BNK
20
665
258015
BED
199
1017
258002
17
683
258050
BNK
21
657
258023
BED
21 3
1027
257992
173
709
258024
BED
21 7
689
257991
BED
232
1019
258000
185
702
258031
BED
23
694
257986
BED
248
1011
258008
19
737
257996
24
692
257988
BED
265
993
258026
EOW RT
193
688
258045
"(ROCK)
25
701
257979
BED
272
976
258043
198
721
258012
"(ROCK)
262
685
257995
BED
284
925
258094
BKF RT
205
725
258008
EOW
265
657
258023
EOW
32
909
2581 10
21 1
752
257981
BED
276
594
258086
BNK
36
908
2581 11
21 6
740
257993
286
563
2581 17
BKF
377
873
2581 46
222
700
258033
"(ROCK)
31
553
2581 27
GRND
429
876
2581 43
GRND
226
757
257976
35
545
2581 35
GRND
55
858
2581 61
233
754
257979
39
533
2581 47
GRND
58
830
2581 89
242
747
257986
"
432
533
2581 47
GRND
70
784
258235
245
739
257994
"
253
756
257977
"
26
728
258005
EOW
263
705
258028
BNK
27
68
258053
"
274
672
258061
"
278
639
258094
"
282
623
2581 1
BKF
287
623
2581 1
GRND
30
612
258121
"
32
618
258115
"
35
602
2581 31
"
37
594
2581 39
"
40
583
2581 5
"
43
586
2581 47
"
Year
3
IffStSttion7
E.S /BSIN
WElev.
E)Fssc�
BM
228
2584 66
IR Lt
HI
258694
0
245
2584 49
GRND
3
292
258402
GRND
42
343
258351
GRND
6
410
258284
GRND
10
533
258161
GRND
13
566
2581 28
GRND
147
577
2581 17
BKF
15
580
2581 14
BNK
16
605
258089
BNK
172
612
258082
18
629
258065
BED
19
621
258073
BED
20
629
258065
BED
209
672
258022
EOW
221
722
257972
THAL
239
672
258022
EOW
25
675
258019
259
652
258042
BNK
27
602
258092
BNK
28
583
2581 11
BNK
289
573
2581 21
BKF
30
569
2581 25
GRND
32
570
2581 24
GRND
36
553
2581 41
GRND
39
541
2581 53
GRND
42
539
258155
GRND
431
545
2581 49
GRND
43
526
2581 68
Year
4
ffStationj
!FS /BS'
<Elev>W
Desc
BM
000
10000
10000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
258466
286
258400
51
258326
827
258208
11 09
2581 52
1389
2581 19
BKF
1438
2581 35
1659
258099
1841
258093
1984
258083
2091
258057
222
257996
2422
258059
2542
258061
2763
258108
3006
2581 21
BKF
3252
2581 13
3623
2581 21
41 19
2581 52
4289
2581 71
Y,65
-45
&StaGon7
NF,SBSA
WElevW
Desc
BM
HI
000
10000
10000
IR Lt

O
a>
W
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PL1
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 16 +16.4
V. o
a,
1�e3 k'j
Year 4
Pool Cross Section
i
– � - -2§84- -- --
2592— �- - -- f - —
I
I i B
I � f
--25-74 -- –
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75
Station (ft)
—As -built
—Year 1
—Year 2
—Year 3
—Year 4
–Year 5
—BKF
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date
9/28/10
Date
9/13/11
Date
9/4/12
Date
0/0/0
Area
22.5
Area
13.4
Area
12.5
Area
10.8
Area
11.6
Area
0.0
Bkf W
14.4
Bkf W
14
Bkf W
13.9
Bkf W
15.1
Bkf W
15.18
Bkf W
10
Dmean
1.6
Dmean
1.0
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
2.5
Dmax
1.5
Dmax
1.4
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
0.0
W/d
9.2
W/d
14.6
W/d
15.4
W/d
21.2
W/d
19.9
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PLt
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 16 +16 4
BM
As_6'uilt
257857
IR Lt
HI
000
Y4FRO
IR Lt
0
471
257853
ea
f 2
492
■Station]
■F.S /BSA
WElevW
DesclA!
IlStatio —nN
INUIBSE
NEIev�
Desc
AStationA
AFS /BSA
AlElev4111111
Desc
BM
553
2584 66
RF1 IR Rt
BM
564
258169
PRF1 IR Rt
BM
602
257835
IR Rt
HI
BNK
259019
703
257621
HI
189
258733
257593
HI
737
258437
-25
682
258337
0
884
257849
GRND
04
583
257854
GRND
-16
1082
257937
EOW
239
1
895
257838
GRND
749
4
631
257806
GRND
-7
11 32
257887
730
257594
3
916
257817
GRND
BNK
8
679
257758
GRND
0
11 73
257846
GRND
329
4
936
257797
GRND
606
11
689
257748
GRND
31
1213
257806
514
257810
6
956
257777
GRND
GRND
13
737
257700
GRND
117
1285
257734
8
987
257746
GRND
16
754
257683
GRND
135
1324
257695
11 8
994
257739
GRND
171
779
257658
BKF
16
1350
257669
BKF LT
13
1031
257702
GRND
189
863
257574
BED
17
1388
257631
15
1044
257689
GRND
20
881
257556
BED
177
1421
257598
16
1042
257691
GRND
206
887
257550
EOW
183
1485
257534
EOW
17
1078
257655
BKF
21 5
910
257527
BED
194
1539
257480
175
11 05
257628
BNK
225
909
257528
BED
21 7
1595
257424
18
11 26
257607
BNK
237
921
257516
BED
248
1575
257444
184
11 65
257568
BNK
252
894
257543
EOW
26
1564
257455
191
11 89
257544
BNK
266
894
257543
BED
276
1478
257541
EOW
199
11 83
25755
BNK
283
861
257576
BED
291
1397
257622
204
11 94
257539
EOW
291
823
257614
BNK
304
1367
257652
BKF RT
21 2
1211
257522
BED
30
799
257638
BKF
35
1323
257696
22
1216
257517
BED
31
778
257659
GRND
428
1200
257819
227
1219
257514
BED
33
756
257681
GRND
466
1205
257814
GRND
231
1208
257525
BED
36
730
257707
GRND
61
1208
257811
235
1216
257517
BED
40
670
257767
GRND
675
1146
257873
24
11 94
257539
BED
44
625
257812
GRND
75
11 06
257913
248
11 97
257536
EOW
469
620
257817
GRND
253
11 88
257545
BED
26
1206
257527
BED
27
11 98
257535
BNK
274
11 61
257572
BNK
281
11 63
25757
BNK
287
11 17
257616
BNK
294
11 16
257617
BNK
298
1086
257647
BNK
31
1069
257664
BKF
32
1077
257656
GRND
33
1052
257681
GRND
346
1039
257694
GRND
36
1018
257715
GRND
384
983
25775
GRND
40
956
257777
GRND
42
926
257807
GRND
45
924
257809
GRND
466
912
257821
GRND
■Station'
Year
■F,S /BSA
3
WElevW
Desc
BM
467
257857
IR Lt
HI
000
258324
IR Lt
0
471
257853
GRND
1 9
492
257832
GRND
59
542
257782
GRND
99
575
257749
GRND
139
632
257692
GRND
149
632
257692
GRND
161
646
257678
BKF
169
669
257655
BNK
179
703
257621
189
731
257593
199
737
257587
209
760
257564
21 6
785
257539
EOW
225
825
257499
THAL
23
788
257536
EOW
239
766
257558
248
749
257575
259
717
257607
269
730
257594
BKF
277
733
257591
BNK
294
689
257635
BNK
31 2
657
257667
BKF
329
633
257691
GRND
359
606
257718
GRND
399
553
257771
GRND
439
514
257810
GRND
466
501
257823
GRND
15Statio'n)
Year
4
Desc
*Statwn7
rF,S/BSlIR
WElevW
Desc
BM
000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
2578 11
455
257786
768
257753
1076
2577 37
128
257710
1545
257687
1642
257668
BKF
1708
257613
1924
257593
2069
257584
21 54
257539
2229
257501
2326
257541
2439
257577
2597
257589
2777
257598
3007
257639
31 6
257655
BKF
3283
257678
3542
257719
3809
257741
4061
257779
4374
257812
4657
257841
15Statio'n)
Y,eaR
AF_S /BSA
MEle ft
Desc
BM
HI
000
10000
10000
IR Ll

As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date
9!28/10
Date
Haywood County, NC
Date
9/4/12
Date
010/0
Area
10.2
Area
12.0
Area
Riffle Cross Section RF2
Area
9.8
Area
11.2
Area
0.0
Bkf W
13.5
Bkf W
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 20 +49.1
'Bkf W
13.5
Bkf W
13.6
Bkf W
13.89
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
1.6
Dmax
1.5
Dmax
1.6
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
0.0
W/d
17.9
W/d
14.8
W/d
16.9
W/d
18.9
W/d
17.2
W/d
0.0
FRx
f
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Riffle Cross Section
457-0 -,
i
I
--
-- -
- -
-568 -
--
--
-
- - -- --
2566 - — -- �-- - - - - - -;
—As
-built
-
—Year
1
C
—Year
2
!..
._. -
- 2564 - - ;- - - -- -- ._
-
_
—Year
3
m
—Year
4
W --
-
—
- - -
- - - -- _ - r -- - - - --
-'
--*-Year 5
—BKF
- - -
- -' --
- - -'—
- -2560 - - - - --
- -- -
-
- --
-
-40
-30
-20
-10
0 10 20
30 40
50
Station (ft)
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date
9!28/10
Date
9!7/11
Date
9/4/12
Date
010/0
Area
10.2
Area
12.0
Area
10.8
Area
9.8
Area
11.2
Area
0.0
Bkf W
13.5
Bkf W
13.3
'Bkf W
13.5
Bkf W
13.6
Bkf W
13.89
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
1.6
Dmax
1.5
Dmax
1.6
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
0.0
W/d
17.9
W/d
14.8
W/d
16.9
W/d
18.9
W/d
17.2
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF2
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 20 +49 1
itSte`t&A
AS,BUIIt
WEIGAN
IDOMRW
BM
570
Year
1
HI
256835
Year
2
577
iffStatibfil
IIF.S /BSU
Ele' vW
Desc
(Sta`tto'n7
EF,SBSA
MElevW
Des-
%Station –"l
WF,SBSZ
WElev
Desc
BM
772
256265
RF2 IR Lt
BM
521
256241
RF2 IR Lt
BM
505
256241
IR Rt
HI
BNK
257037
741
256094
HI
145
256762
256075
BNK
HI
770
256746
BED
-36
577
256460
BED
0
510
256252
GRND
0
489
256257
GRND
-31
690
256347
THL
197
2
510
256252
GRND
853
35
478
256268
GRND
-14
733
256304
749
256086
5
521
256241
GRND
BNK
75
513
256233
GRND
-5
801
256236
BKF
265
8
542
256220
GRND
659
95
536
256210
GRND
0
788
256249
GRND
256189
10
559
256203
GRND
GRND
105
553
2561 93
GRND
45
786
256251
112
575
2561 87
BKF
109
560
2561 86
BKF
10
830
256207
BKF LT
12
642
2561 20
BNK
115
594
2561 52
BNK
11
856
256181
128
663
256099
BNK
13
643
256103
BNK
12
913
2561 24
138
670
256092
BNK
14
674
256072
BNK
13
967
256070
143
722
256040
BED
145
695
256051
BED
15
979
256058
EOW LT
151
737
256025
BED
155
693
256053
BED
17
1004
256033
16
733
256029
BED
167
695
256051
BED
18
1011
256026
173
739
256023
BED
177
718
256028
BED
19
995
256042
179
752
256010
EOW
18
728
256018
EOW
21
981
256056
EOW RT
186
770
255992
BED
188
752
255994
BED
22
977
256060
195
781
255981
BED
195
769
255977
BED
23
973
256064
203
785
255977
BED
208
769
255977
BED
25
897
2561 40
BKF RT
21 3
759
256003
BED
22
730
256016
EOW
27
873
256164
21 9
753
256009
EOW
228
675
256071
BNK
358
848
2561 89
229
721
256041
BANK
239
656
256090
BNK
373
820
256217
GRND
228
688
256074
BANK
25
616
2561 30
BKF
40
720
256317
232
668
256094
BANK
265
588
2561 58
GRND
46
693
256344
237
660
256102
BANK
295
574
2561 72
GRND
249
629
256133
BKF
35
566
2561 80
GRND
265
600
256162
GRND
374
521
256225
GRND
29
583
2561 79
GRND
32
575
256187
GRND
35
578
2561 84
GRND
373
539
256223
GRND
Yiear 5
3iSt5t0—nZ;jFS /BSN I REIev N Desc
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000
YW&3
4
itSte`t&A
FS /BSA
WEIGAN
IDOMRW
BM
570
256265
IR Lt
HI
256835
0
577
256258
GRND
1 5
572
256263
GRND
45
576
256259
GRND
85
616
256219
GRND
95
625
256210
GRND
99
623
256212
BKF
115
686
2561 49
BNK
135
741
256094
BNK
145
760
256075
BNK
155
770
256065
BED
165
759
256076
BED
175
774
256061
BED
184
800
256035
BED
188
849
255986
THL
197
863
255972
BKF
21 3
853
255982
EOW
21 8
833
256002
227
749
256086
235
731
2561 04
BNK
251
702
2561 33
BNK
258
677
2561 58
BKF
265
674
2561 61
GRND
275
659
2561 76
GRND
305
655
2561 80
GRND
335
646
256189
GRND
365
626
256209
GRND
Yiear 5
3iSt5t0—nZ;jFS /BSN I REIev N Desc
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000
Year
4
V$Wb—on7
OFS /BS,
WEle'vIN
Desc
BM
000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
256259
1 48
256242
451
256248
734
256220
948
256198
1161
256134
BKF
1394
256060
1632
256054
1799
256048
1872
256016
2001
255963
21 94
256013
2309
256072
2478
2561 16
266
2561 49
BKF
2875
2561 64
31 74
2561 67
3621
2561 76
3739
256239
Yiear 5
3iSt5t0—nZ;jFS /BSN I REIev N Desc
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PL2
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 21 +17.8
2.1
Dmax
2.7
Dmax
2.7
Dmax
0.0
W/d
9.0
W/d
10.6
W/d
13.2
W/d
12.2
W/d
14.3
W/d
0.0
4
SI
i.
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Pool Cross Section
"
I
- - --
— 2564-
--
-- - - - --
— —
- - --
}. -- --
--
we
- -- -
- - - - -+
--
--
—As
-built
—Year
1
c
—Year
2
>
skF l
—Year
3
°1
!
Year 4
W
- -- -- -',
-558-
--
- - - --
- - --
- --
— - -+
i
- - -
--
--&-Year
5
BKF
- --
- 2656
I
-- -
- -
I
-- -- — --
- -- -
-
- -
�
--
-25 -15 -5
5
15 25 35 45
55
65
75
Station (ft)
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date 1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date 9/28/10
Date 9/7/11
Date
9/4!12
Date
0 /0 /0
Area 26.5
Area
21.8
Area 20.2
Area 19.9
Area
18.5
Area
0.0
Bkf W 15.4
Bkf W
15.2
Bkf W 16.3
Bkf W 15.6
Bkf W
16.28
Bkf W
10
Dmean 1.7
Dmean
1.4
Dmean 1.2
Dmean 1.3
Dmean
1.1
Dmean
0.0
Dmax 2.9
Dmax
2.2
Dmax
2.1
Dmax
2.7
Dmax
2.7
Dmax
0.0
W/d
9.0
W/d
10.6
W/d
13.2
W/d
12.2
W/d
14.3
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PL2
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 21 +17 8
�As_BMI
®FSBSN
®ElevU
Desc
BM
407
Year
1
HI
t�Year
2
425
ISfa- tionl)
EFS /BSA
MEIe-v
Desc
KSfa "tion'
LF,S /BSjj
WElev�
Des-
ffStatio -7
RFSBSA
MElev'W
Desc
BM
772
256265
RF2 IR Lt
BM
521
256241
RF2 IR RT
BM
752
255993
IR Lt
HI
GRND
257037
525
255917
HI
144
256762
255896
BKF
HI
598
256745
BNK
-20
936
256101
BNK
0
739
256023
GRND
0
723
256022
GRND
-165
999
256038
191
2
753
256009
GRND
793
35
725
256020
GRND
-10
1012
256025
759
255683
5
759
256003
GRND
85
762
255983
GRND
0
1019
256018
GRND
25
9
788
255974
GRND
642
115
806
255939
GRND
6
1036
256001
586
255856
11
818
255944
GRND
BKF
135
838
255907
GRND
11
1096
255941
GRND
35
13
841
255921
GRND
506
142
849
255896
BKF
143
1126
255911
BKF LT
14
855
255907
GRND
15
885
255860
BNK
155
1188
255849
15
897
255865
BKF
16
913
255832
BNK
16
1190
255847
154
907
255855
BNK
171
973
255772
BNK
17
1284
255753
EOW
16
925
255837
BNK
182
1013
255732
BED
171
1345
255692
165
957
255805
BNK
186
1028
255717
EOW
19
1368
255669
17
1009
255753
BNK
19
1045
255700
BED
21 5
1389
255648
177
1019
255743
BNK
205
1049
255696
BED
24
1425
255612
186
1042
25572
BNK
21 5
1061
255684
BED
257
1355
255682
189
1052
25571
EOW
225
1056
255689
BED
26
1289
255748
EOW
194
1076
255686
BED
235
1042
255703
BED
282
1200
255837
203
1069
255693
BED
242
1029
255716
EOW
297
1136
255901
BKF RT
21 7
1087
255675
BED
25
986
255759
BNK
34
1156
255881
228
1086
255676
BED
265
979
255766
BNK
39
11 15
255922
238
1051
255711
EOW
271
962
255783
BNK
42
1104
255933
246
1027
255735
BNK
279
895
255850
BNK
446
1059
255978
GRND
258
1028
255734
BNK
289
864
255881
BKF
48
989
256048
27
1026
255736
BNK
305
845
255900
GRND
53
965
256072
282
903
255859
BNK
335
856
255889
GRND
292
873
255889
BKF
375
823
255922
GRND
305
863
255899
GRND
41 5
806
255939
GRND
33
880
255882
GRND
445
762
255983
GRND
36
85
255912
GRND
40
83
255932
GRND
445
783
255979
GRND
Year
3
11StdtlO5
®FSBSN
®ElevU
Desc
BM
407
256035
IR Lt
HI
256442
0
425
256017
GRND
4
428
256014
GRND
7
439
256003
GRND
9
466
255976
GRND
10
480
255962
GRND
11
494
255948
GRND
12
507
255935
GRND
13
525
255917
GRND
144
546
255896
BKF
16
598
255844
BNK
17
643
255799
BNK
18
679
255763
BED
182
729
255713
EOW
183
758
255684
191
814
255628
BKF
201
793
255649
207
799
255643
22
759
255683
23
739
255703
237
702
255740
243
687
255755
25
650
255792
26
642
255800
27
635
255807
BNK
279
586
255856
BNK
287
583
255859
BKF
30
551
255891
GRND
32
547
255895
GRND
35
531
255911
GRND
41
506
255936
GRND
447
452
25599
GRND
Year
4
WSt2tl5-n7X
■FSBSG
IIIIIIIIII[ElevW
Desc
BM
000
10000
10000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
256024
1 81
256001
396
255998
612
255984
878
255963
1115
255917
135
255887
BKF
1514
255845
1692
255790
2056
255620
21 94
255713
235
255746
2516
255794
2703
255793
2864
255861
BKF
2978
255894
31 23
255879
3368
255881
3576
255897
3778
255904
4022
255915
4284
255925
Year
5
IKStatinX
WFS /BSU
®ElevW
OescNVIIIIIIIII
BM
HI
000
10000
10000
IR Lt

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF3
12.3
Area
12.4
Area
12.8
Area
0.0
Bkf W
15
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 25 +19.6
14.6
Bkf W
14.9
Bkf W
14.9
Bkf W
is. �
N
i � Z. ♦ � � _ i ,i
g
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
1.0
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.3
Dmax
1.9
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
1.8
Dmax
1.9
Dmax
0.0
W/d
1
W/d
14.0
W/d
18.0
W/d
18.0
W/d
22.8
W/d
0.0
f�
i
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Riffle Cross Section
X558-
-
-
548
- � - -- - - -- -1
-- — -'
_
I
—As
-built
2-546
i
—Year
1
C
i
—Year
2
�
- -
--
_ _...-
-
—Year
3
eKF
—
air
—Year
4
ul
-- X5 544 -
--
- -- -
—
- --
-*-Year 5
—BKF
-
- -- �
j
-- 3!5.48 --
- - - - -
--
I - - - - -- - - -
-- -- - -----
�-- - --
- - --t
- --
-
-17
-7
3
13 23 33
43
53
Station (ft)
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date 9/28/10
Date 9!8/11
Date
9/4/12
Date
0 /0 /0
Area
13.3
Area
15.3
Are
a
12.3
Area
12.4
Area
12.8
Area
0.0
Bkf W
15
Bkf W
14.6
Bkf W
14.9
Bkf W
14.9
Bkf W
17.1
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.9
Dmean
1.0
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.3
Dmax
1.9
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
1.8
Dmax
1.9
Dmax
0.0
W/d
16.9
W/d
14.0
W/d
18.0
W/d
18.0
W/d
22.8
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF3
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 25 +19 6
BAs
^,Budt�
PlEle—VIM
Desc
BM
514
Year
1
HI
254989
Year
2
538
KStation7
■FSBS,
MEle -740
Desc
WSt'ation7
EES /BS'
®Elev
Desc
IffStatwn
EFS /BSA
®ElevW
Qesc
BM
604
254475
RF3 IR Lt
BM
445
254475
RF3 IR Lt
BM
190
254672
IR Lt
HI
BNK
255079
731
254258
HI
136
254920
254240
BNK
HI
787
254862
BED
-17
475
254604
BED
0
467
254453
GRND
0
409
254453
GRND
-12
472
254607
BED
164
2
508
254412
GRND
872
3
462
254400
GRND
-7
525
254554
831
2541 58
5
544
254376
GRND
6
498
254364
GRND
-3
593
254486
246
7
568
254352
GRND
698
68
505
254357
GRND
0
625
254454
GRND
254364
9
627
254293
GRND
GRND
83
547
254315
GRND
65
719
254360
GRND
406
10
628
254292
GRND
101
566
254296
GRND
9
786
254293
11
629
254291
BKF
112
580
254282
BKF
11
791
254288
BKF LT
12
658
254262
BNK
131
622
254240
BNK
12
828
254251
125
672
254248
BNK
138
651
254211
BNK
137
888
254191
133
695
254225
BNK
146
685
2541 77
EOW
157
888
254191
EOW LT
139
730
2541 90
BED
152
719
2541 43
BED
16
905
2541 74
148
762
2541 58
EOW
157
718
2541 44
BED
176
916
254163
157
776
254144
BED
163
747
2541 15
BED
195
915
254164
162
811
2541 09
BED
169
752
2541 10
THL
205
913
2541 66
17
817
2541 03
BED
174
747
2541 15
BED
22
900
2541 79
18
795
254125
BED
183
730
2541 32
BED
23
898
2541 81
EOW RT
189
794
254126
BED
188
719
2541 43
BED
24
883
254196
197
783
2541 37
BED
193
686
2541 76
EOW
245
851
254228
203
764
2541 56
EOW
202
677
254185
BNK
27
761
254318
BKF RT
21 3
725
254195
BANK
21 2
641
254221
BNK
29
736
254343
226
712
254208
BANK
232
641
254221
BNK
335
717
254362
24
700
254220
BANK
25
615
254247
BNK
387
665
254414
GRND
25
673
254247
BANK
261
556
254306
BKF
427
602
254477
263
618
254302
BANK
274
534
254328
GRND
55
507
254572
277
589
254331
GRND
302
516
254346
GRND
29
572
254348
GRND
337
494
254368
GRND
33
564
254356
GRND
36
474
254388
GRND
36
535
254385
GRND
388
443
254419
GRND
389
503
254417
GRND
10000
Yeart3
4
Sf b-nl♦
KF.S /BS-8
PlEle—VIM
Desc
BM
514
254475
IR Lt
HI
254989
0
538
254451
GRND
16
570
254419
GRND
46
607
254382
GRND
76
666
254323
GRND
101
692
254297
GRND
108
692
254297
BKF
11 6
712
254277
BNK
126
731
254258
BNK
136
749
254240
BNK
143
787
254202
BED
148
816
2541 73
BED
151
833
2541 56
EOW
152
849
2541 40
BED
157
867
2541 22
BED
164
875
2541 14
THL
171
872
2541 17
184
845
2541 44
185
831
2541 58
EOW
196
783
254206
206
773
254216
227
753
254236
246
751
254238
257
698
254291
BKF
276
646
254343
GRND
296
625
254364
GRND
327
634
254355
GRND
356
605
254384
GRND
376
591
254398
GRND
406
57
254419
GRND
10000
Year
4
EStatwni
WEle""v
O-e—EEVM
BM
IR Lt
HI
000
0
7254345
254464
281
254391
474
254369
677
89
254283
11 45
254261
1342
254221
1498
2541 68
1604
2541 00
1707
254095
186
2541 75
2058
254211
2268
254216
25
254236
2663
254310
BKF
2835
254321
3007
254318
3264
254348
3531
254357
3788
254375
10000

-- -2546
- 2544
c
0 A i_ --
A
d -- 3540
W
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PL3
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 27 +30.4
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Pool Cross Section
-7 3 13 23 33 43 53 63 73
Station (ft)
—As -built
—Year 1
—Year 2
—Year 3
—Year 4
—Year 5
—BKF
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date
9/28/10
Date
9/8/11
Date
9/4/12
Date
0/0/0
Area
25.5
Area
11.8
Area
10.0
Area
9.5
Area
9.7
Area
0.0
Bkf W
15.4
Bkf W
14.9
Bkf W
13.4
Bkf W
14.5
Bkf W
15.61
Bkf W
10
Dmean
1.7
Dmean
0.8
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.7
Dmean
0.6
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
2.9
Dmax
1.2
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
1.5
Dmax
1.5
Dmax
0.0
W/d
9.3
W/d
18.7
W/d
18.0
W/d
22.0
W/d
25.0
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PL3
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 27 +30 4
I[Statio`n -8
S_BUllt
MEle'v_W
DFOIM
BM
515
Year
1
HI
254702
Yea',2
0
528
KS(5 -06
EFS /BSIN
WElev M
Desc
StaUon'�I
EFS /BSN
MEle -VAN
Qesc�
itStaUOniN
EFS /BSIN
IKEle`v'M
Desc
BM
430
2541 87
PL-3 IR Lt
BM
214
2541 87
PL3 IR Lt
BM
683
253888
IR Lt
253679
GRND
254617
1018
253684
HI
179
254401
253657
BNK
HI
1100
254571
BNK
-6
373
254244
EOW
0
235
2541 66
GRND
0
400
2541 71
GRND
0
447
2541 70
GRND
233
2 6
265
2541 36
GRND
11 09
16
421
2541 50
GRND
25
580
254037
1066
253636
5
403
253998
GRND
26
434
2541 37
GRND
97
884
253733
BKF
32
8
605
253796
GRND
1004
56
604
253967
GRND
156
928
253689
BKF LT
253760
10
675
253726
GRND
GRND
86
804
253767
GRND
176
985
253632
GRND
4879
12
705
253696
GRND
106
858
253713
GRND
188
1026
253591
EOW
14
7 13
253688
GRND
146
889
253682
GRND
20
1064
253553
156
713
253688
BKF
166
904
253667
GRND
203
1214
253403
167
737
253664
BNK
174
909
253662
GRND
23
11 68
253449
177
756
253645
BNK
178
918
253653
BKF
275
11 85
253432
182
776
263626
BNK
187
971
253600
EOW
286
1027
253590
EOW
185
804
253597
EOW
196
1001
253570
BED
303
989
253628
BKF RT
188
825
253576
BED
206
990
253581
BED
31
961
253656
196
830
253571
BED
21 6
994
253577
BED
34
933
253684
21
816
253585
BED
223
1002
253569
BED
365
926
253691
225
824
253577
BED
234
991
253580
BED
404
884
253733
24
811
25359
BED
245
971
253600
EOW
435
820
253797
256
801
2536
EOW
253
960
253611
BED
47
763
253854
27
798
253603
BED
266
955
253616
BED
489
745
253872
GRND
285
797
253604
BED
276
959
253612
BED
58
699
253918
293
772
253629
BNK
29
944
253627
BED
72
743
253874
299
743
253658
BNK
299
906
253665
BNK
86
693
253924
305
730
253671
BKF
308
889
253682
BKF
31 5
724
253677
GRND
326
886
253685
GRND
325
719
253682
GRND
356
877
253694
GRND
34
711
25369
GRND
396
839
253732
GRND
36
704
253697
GRND
436
766
253805
GRND
39
673
253728
GRND
488
699
253872
GRND
42
637
253764
GRND
46
566
253835
GRND
489
531
25387
GRND
Y�eai1I5
I(StaUOfil NFS /BSN MElee-v'W O-es-EIIIIIIINI
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000
Y,e`a3'
4
I[Statio`n -8
NFS%BSA
MEle'v_W
DFOIM
BM
515
2541 87
IR Lt
HI
254702
0
528
2541 74
GRND
2
580
2541 22
GRND
4
630
254072
GRND
5
701
254001
GRND
9
939
253763
GRND
11
990
253712
GRND
148
1023
253679
GRND
158
1018
253684
BKF
179
1045
253657
BNK
191
1100
253602
BNK
196
1107
253595
EOW
197
11 26
253576
BED
205
1166
253536
BED
219
11 43
253559
THL
233
11 16
253586
BED
234
11 09
253593
EOW
243
1091
253611
BED
261
1066
253636
28
1075
253627
293
1041
253661
BNK
303
1023
253679
BKF
32
1022
253680
GRND
34
1004
253698
GRND
38
989
253713
GRND
42
942
253760
GRND
46
865
253837
GRND
48
836
253866
GRND
49
833
253869
GRND
Y�eai1I5
I(StaUOfil NFS /BSN MElee-v'W O-es-EIIIIIIINI
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000
Year
4
IlStaUon
NFS /BSW
®Ele"vW
O-es-cVN
BM
000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
2541 77
088
2541 37
206
2541 17
334
254081
497
253983
667
253862
827
253754
1024
253710
1248
253675
1455
253664
1529
253673
BKF
1639
253652
1819
253619
1929
253586
2071
253523
21 36
253590
2295
253586
2465
253611
2591
253614
2778
253615
309
253651
BKF
3284
253658
3563
253678
3829
253698
407
253728
4298
253776
4492
253805
473
253845
4879
253874
Y�eai1I5
I(StaUOfil NFS /BSN MElee-v'W O-es-EIIIIIIINI
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF4
Reach 4 - Morgan Creek - Sta 32 +57.6
0.0
A,3y .. p...
h.. x
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Riffle Cross Section
2539 - ----
-
- - -- - - - - - -_ �
-- - - -
- - --
1
-
2526
- --
- - - - -- -- - --
- -
-- —As-built
—Year
1
c
I
—Year
2
2524
- -
—Year
3
m
I
—Year
4
W
?522
- - - --
- - -
-- i
--
- -'r —
BKF
-
i
Year 5
—BKF
--
3529-- - -
-- --�
I
-- - -- � - - -
--- ' --
i
-- !- -
--
-22
-12
-2
8
18 28 38
48
58
Station (ft)
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date 9/29/10
Date 9/8111
Date
9/4/12
Date
0 /0 /0
Area
18.7
Area
19.1
Area 18.2
Area 18.3
Area
17.5
Area
0.0
Bkf W
16.5
Bkf W
15.7
Bkf W 15.7
Bkf W 15.3
Bkf W
16.1
Bkf W
10
Dmean
1.1
Dmean
1.2
Dmean 1.2
Dmean 1.2
Dmean
1.1
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
1.7
Dmax
2.0
Dmax 1.9
Dmax 2.0
Dmax
1.8
Dmax
0.0
W/d
14.5
W/d
12.9
W/d 13.5
W/d 12.8
W/d
14.8
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF4
Reach 4 - Morgan Creek - Sta 32 +57 6
�A
-
B'uli
Desc
BM
489
e
UP I
HI
252775
Y,65762
0
495
I[StatlOn
■FS /BSIN
MElev W
Desc
KStation7
WF.SBSU
NEfev
Desc
ffStatioEW
iFSBSJl
MEleev�
Desc
BM
632
252286
RF4 IR Lt
BM
419
252286
RF4 IR Lt
BM
6 46
252290
IR Lt
HI
GRND
252918
676
252099
HI
159
252705
252094
BKF
HI
743
252936
BNK
-22
618
252300
EOW
0
437
252268
GRND
0
6 58
252278
GRND
-15
599
252319
THL
21
2
438
252267
GRND
845
26
6 71
252265
GRND
-8
652
252266
817
251958
56
466
262239
GRND
BED
56
6 95
252241
GRND
0
654
252264
GRND
29
8
546
2521 59
GRND
746
76
7 60
2521 76
GRND
55
679
252239
671
2521 04
11
584
252121
GRND
GRND
96
793
2521 43
GRND
8
765
2521 53
GRND
39
147
614
252091
GRND
543
126
818
2521 18
GRND
155
823
252095
BKF LT
16
612
252093
BKF
146
841
252095
GRND
165
851
252067
163
630
252075
BNK
156
840
252096
GRND
179
943
251975
EOW LT
17
667
252038
BNK
161
846
252090
BKF
195
958
251960
176
721
251984
BNK
173
913
252023
BNK
21 4
974
251944
18
763
251942
EOW
176
985
251951
EOW
23
973
251945
182
793
251912
BED
181
1028
251908
BED
259
989
251929
188
739
251966
BED
188
1023
251913
BED
274
953
251965
EOW RT
204
743
251962
BED
191
967
251969
ROCK
29
932
251986
208
813
251892
BED
198
1032
251904
BED
296
934
251984
21 7
807
251898
BED
21
1026
251910
BED
31
843
252075
225
788
251917
BED
226
1010
251926
BED
32
823
252095
BKF RT
234
784
251921
BED
237
1006
251930
EOW
37
770
252148
245
775
251930
EOW
246
983
251953
BED
42
694
252224
257
746
251959
BED
256
964
251972
BED
46
650
252268
GRND
266
741
251964
BED
276
959
251977
BED
56
591
252327
279
729
251976
BED
286
921
252015
BNK
65
456
252462
294
692
252013
BNK
296
909
252027
BNK
301
679
252026
BNK
306
882
252054
BNK
31
627
252078
BNK
31 8
835
2521 01
BKF
31 7
611
252094
BKF
326
829
252107
GRND
33
603
2521 02
GRND
346
809
2521 27
GRND
35
583
2521 22
GRND
376
774
252162
GRND
38
547
2521 58
GRND
406
720
252216
GRND
40
514
252191
GRND
459
669
252267
GRND
42
479
252226
GRND
45
452
252253
GRND
46
438
252267
GRND
Year
3
WSta5on7
NFSBS)♦
®ElevW
Desc
BM
489
252286
IR Lt
HI
252775
0
495
252280
GRND
3
513
252262
GRND
5
519
252256
GRND
6
541
252234
GRND
69
565
252210
GRND
8
587
2521 88
GRND
11
643
252132
GRND
14
676
252099
GRND
159
681
252094
BKF
17
743
252032
BNK
173
833
251942
EOW
174
853
251922
BED
184
876
251899
BED
196
872
251903
THL
21
858
251917
BED
21 6
845
251930
BED
21 7
836
251939
EOW
23
817
251958
BED
24
812
251963
BED
26
783
251992
BKF
28
779
251996
29
760
252015
30
746
252029
31 2
685
252090
BKF
32
671
2521 04
33
664
2521 11
GRND
35
646
2521 29
GRND
37
619
252156
GRND
39
594
2521 81
GRND
43
543
252232
GRND
462
518
252257
GRND
YLear
4
I[Station7V
RFSBSJ®
I NEle'v_W1
Desc
BM
000
10000
IR Lt
HI
10000
0
252282
1 75
252269
382
252257
531
252244
72
252191
953
252146
1163
252123
1374
2521 01
1513
252095
BKF
1568
252093
1768
251955
1925
251948
2081
251951
2098
251910
2242
251969
2367
251969
2592
251984
2773
251994
3033
252012
31 59
252095
BKF
3341
2521 05
3573
2521 26
3764
2521 49
3911
2521 64
4085
252215
4299
252225
4388
252251

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Pool Cross Section PL4
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 34 +76.9
15.4
Bkf W
16.9
Bkf W
16.9
Bkf W
17
Bkf W
10
Dmean
1.7
Dmean
1.2
Dmean
1.2
Dmean
1.3
Dmean
1.1
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
2.6
Dmax
2.1
Dmax
2.4
Dmax
2.6
Dmax
2.3
Dmax
0.0
W/d
9.5
W/d
13.0
W/d
13.7
W/d
-
W/d
15.1
W/d
0.0
,� \7���
i
I
f t
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Pool Cross Section
I-
2524
I
-
I
- --
I
- --
- -540
+ - - --
—i - -- - - - - --�
..
- - ---------
I
As -built
_J -
- 1
I - - - --
—Year
—Year
1
2
o
I-
Year 3
> - -- -
-- - - --- --
-_ _ ___
...1 - - -- - i---- -� - - --
1
- - -- --
-- - - - - --
d
I.
'
—Year
4
W
514
-
-
5K
BK
F - - - -- - - -
-- -
- *--Year
5
- -BKF
—
43594-
-
'
- - - --
j
-25
-15
-5
5
15 25 35 45
55
65
75
Station (ft)
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date 9/29/10
Date 9/8/11
Date
9/4/12
Date
0 /0 /0
Area
26.1
Area
18.3
Area 20.8
Area 21.8
Area
19.2
Area
0.0
Bkf W
15.8
Bkf
W
15.4
Bkf W
16.9
Bkf W
16.9
Bkf W
17
Bkf W
10
Dmean
1.7
Dmean
1.2
Dmean
1.2
Dmean
1.3
Dmean
1.1
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
2.6
Dmax
2.1
Dmax
2.4
Dmax
2.6
Dmax
2.3
Dmax
0.0
W/d
9.5
W/d
13.0
W/d
13.7
W/d
13.1
W/d
15.1
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NIC
Pool Cross Section PL4
Reach 1 - Morgan Creek - Sta 34 +76 9
0
%1svBUllt
251543
GRND
19
515
YIkear
1
39
522
251555
Year
2
558
ViSfati-o—M
NFS /BSU
lWElevU
Desc
$Sfabon
KFSBSA
MEle"'vW
Desc
*Stabonl
NFS /BS$
MElevIN
Desc
BM
605
2515 67
PL-4 IR Lt
BM
540
251567
PL4 IR Lt
BM
779
251599
IR Lt
HI
BNK
2521 72
708
251369
HI
179
2521 07
251361
BED
HI
701
252378
BED
-20
542
251630
BED
0
563
251544
GRND
0
824
251554
GRND
-10
575
251597
BED
229
1
553
251554
GRND
895
36
824
251554
GRND
0
623
251549
GRND
2511 79
3
544
251563
GRND
BED
76
909
251469
GRND
4
620
251552
EOW
288
5
586
251521
GRND
684
106
934
251444
GRND
63
701
251471
648
251429
7
632
251475
GRND
GRND
136
942
251436
GRND
9
726
251446
GRND
399
10
652
251455
GRND
489
164
1019
251359
GRND
13
739
251433
13
673
251434
GRND
181
1035
251343
GRND
15
760
251412
BKF LT
15
682
251425
GRND
196
1046
251332
GRND
16
815
251357
153
698
251409
BKF
198
1049
251329
BKF
17
885
251287
EOW
16
735
251372
BNK
205
1087
251291
EOW
178
927
251245
17
768
251339
BNK
21 1
11 17
251261
BED
187
936
251236
174
786
251321
BED
222
11 58
251220
BED
20
983
2511 89
185
802
251305
BED
233
11 69
251209
BED
22
1017
2511 55
195
806
251301
BED
244
11 39
251239
BED
24
989
2511 83
205
820
251287
BED
261
1159
251219
BED
27
957
251215
21 1
833
251274
EOW
276
1191
2511 87
BED
284
889
251283
EOW
21 8
839
251268
BED
283
1136
251242
BED
296
810
251362
225
840
251267
BED
286
1083
251295
EOW
308
754
251418
BKF RT
236
851
251256
BED
291
1012
251366
BNK
33
719
251453
244
860
251247
BED
305
971
251407
BNK
37
683
251489
25
854
251253
BED
309
952
251426
BKF
403
592
251580
26
848
251259
BED
31 6
942
251436
GRND
437
594
251578
GRND
274
900
251207
BED
336
911
251467
GRND
55
540
251632
281
877
25123
BED
376
869
251509
GRND
65
503
251669
284
832
251275
EOW
406
798
251580
GRND
291
758
251349
BNK
437
792
251586
GRND
292
745
251362
BNK
30
718
251389
BNK
307
689
251418
BKF
31 3
673
251434
GRND
33
649
251458
GRND
35
633
251474
GRND
363
622
251485
GRND
38
588
251519
GRND
40
534
251573
GRND
42
529
251578
GRND
437
1 5 28 1
2515 79
1 GRND
BM
HI
1 510
251567
252077
IR Lt
0
534
251543
GRND
19
515
251562
GRND
39
522
251555
GRND
49
558
251519
GRND
63
583
251494
GRND
89
622
251455
GRND
11 9
630
251447
GRND
14
618
251459
BKF
149
662
251415
BNK
159
696
251381
BNK
169
708
251369
BED
179
716
251361
BED
189
701
251376
BED
199
722
251355
BED
209
777
251300
BED
21 5
795
251282
EOW
21 6
836
251241
BED
229
890
2511 87
243
895
2511 82
254
906
2511 71
THL
264
898
2511 79
BED
274
878
2511 99
BED
284
834
251243
BED
285
794
251283
EOW
288
745
251332
BNK
294
684
251393
BNK
30
661
251416
BKF
309
648
251429
BNK
31 9
632
251445
GRND
339
606
251471
GRND
374
561
251516
GRND
399
502
251575
GRND
437
489
251588
GRND
1011111111111111
Year
4
&Stabon
WES /BSA
®E16-VIN
Desc
BM
000
10000
IR Lt
HI
10000
0
251561
1 73
251543
438
251540
65
251485
881
251445
11 19
251436
1393
251426
1607
251371
1861
251351
2051
251345
2203
251266
2333
2511 94
2537
251224
2743
2511 87
287
251270
2932
251377
3093
251417
BKF
3294
251448
3489
251472
3659
251492
3819
251616
3972
251571
41 9
251578
4362
Year 5
StabonV ZFS /BSW MElev'U OFFEVOIS
BM 000 100 00 IR Lt
HI 10000

c
0
A
d
W
i 1
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF5
Reach 2 - North Branch - Sta 10 +83.0
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Riffle Cross Section
a
-10 0 10 20 30 40
Station (ft)
—As -built
—Year 1
—Year 2
—Year 3
—Year 4
—e—Year 5
BKF
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date
9/29/10
Date
9/8/11
Date
9/4/12
Date
0 /0 /0
Area
5.0
Area
4.5
Area
3.9
Area
3.7
Area
4.1
Area
0.0
Bkf W
9.4
Bkf W
8.6
Bkf W
7.1
Bkf W
7.5
Bkf W
9.5
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.6
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.4
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
0.9
Dmax
1.0
Dmax
0.9
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
0.0
W/d
17.7
W/d
16.5
W/d
12.9
W/d
15.2
W/d
22.1
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF5
Reach 2 - North Branch - Sta 10 +83 0
sfa- onN
As^ -Built
WEiev
Desc
BM
600
Year
1�
HI
261859
Y,ear
2
628
WSf0tlo-F3
MFS /BSE
®Ele'vW
Desc
WSt5tionN
IIFS /BSM
®Ele" vIN
Etesc
ISffbon
EF,S/BSiM
Elev
Desc
BM
755
261259
RF5 IR Lt
BM
231
261700
BP IR Rt
BM
270
261700
IR Lt
HI
BKF
262014
740
2611 19
HI
96
261931
2611 08
BNK
HI
760
261970
-10
286
261728
0
702
261229
GRND
0
738
261232
GRND
0
786
261228
GRND
119
2
730
261201
122
834
36
777
2611 93
GRND
1
782
261232
810
261049
5
767
261164
261051
EOW
56
826
2611 44
GRND
1 6
805
261209
143
7
797
2611 34
BKF
743
86
861
2611 09
GRND
35
826
261188
730
2611 29
77
815
2611 16
BANK
GRND
9
858
2611 12
BKF
55
878
261136
GRND
221
87
836
261095
BANK
536
10
888
261082
EOW
7
882
2611 32
BKF LT
92
834
261097
BANK
109
919
261051
BED
78
908
2611 06
10
865
261066
BANK
116
905
261065
BED
86
937
261077
104
872
261059
EOW
121
915
261055
BED
92
937
261077
11
887
261044
BED
13
911
261059
BED
10
959
261055
EOW LT
11 7
884
261047
133
913
261057
BED
11
964
261050
121
893
261038
136
888
261082
EOW
119
968
261046
123
865
261066
143
873
261097
BNK
133
953
261061
129
862
261069
153
845
2611 25
BNK
138
948
261066
EOW RT
133
887
261044
161
831
2611 39
BKF
143
943
261071
136
867
261064
EOW
176
829
261141
GRND
146
911
2611 03
144
834
261097
BANK
196
801
2611 69
GRND
164
882
2611 32
BKF RT
147
819
2611 12
BANK
21 3
792
261178
GRND
18
871
2611 43
156
804
2611 27
BKF
241
708
261262
GRND
193
850
2611 64
177
793
261138
GRND
269
642
261328
GRND
21 6
834
2611 80
196
766
2611 65
GRND
231
782
261232
21 3
753
261178
GRND
25
725
261289
24
682
261249
GRND
27
695
261319
GRND
26
621
261310
GRND
296
658
261356
27
604
261327
GRND
37
667
261347
49
665
261349
Year 5
WStationll INFSIBS WEle° v Desc
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000
Yeart3
sfa- onN
RIFS /BS§t
WEiev
Desc
BM
600
261259
IR Lt
HI
261859
0
628
261231
GRND
21
659
261200
GRND
41
672
261187
GRND
61
712
261147
GRND
71
721
2611 38
GRND
76
732
2611 27
GRND
86
734
261125
BKF
91
740
2611 19
BNK
96
751
2611 08
BNK
101
760
261099
106
772
261087
11 1
798
261061
116
809
261050
EOW
11 7
819
261040
BED
119
830
261029
BED
122
834
261025
THL
125
820
261039
BED
128
810
261049
BED
129
808
261051
EOW
131
801
261058
138
769
261090
143
752
2611 07
BNK
146
743
2611 16
BNK
153
741
2611 18
BNK
157
730
2611 29
BKF
161
722
2611 37
GRND
171
721
2611 38
GRND
191
695
2611 64
GRND
221
657
261202
GRND
261
536
261323
GRND
27
532
261327
GRND
Year 5
WStationll INFSIBS WEle° v Desc
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000
Y,eari4
J[$WbonV
WFS/BSH
WEle -vvW
[De—sVJM
BM
000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
261251
1 74
261191
463
261154
BKF
663
261128
889
261099
104
261075
1137
261067
1241
261016
1349
261066
1471
261092
1621
2611 29
1781
261131
1999
2611 62
BKF
2053
2611 58
2234
261188
2497
261275
2692
261338
Year 5
WStationll INFSIBS WEle° v Desc
BM 000 10000 IR Lt
HI 10000

c
O
.6
d
W
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF5
Reach 2 - North Branch - Sta 10 +83.0
INA�
r
_ W
Year 4
Facing Downstream
Riffle Cross Section
-10 0 10 20 30 40
Station (ft)
-As -built
-Year 1
-Year 2
-Year 3
-Year 4
Year 5
-BKF
As -Built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Date
1/8/09
Date
10/6/09
Date
9/29/10
Date
9/8/11
Date
9/4112
Date
0/0/0
Area
5.0
Area
4.5
Area
3.9
Area
3.7
Area
4.2
Area
0.0
Bkf W
9.4
Bkf W
8.6
Bkf W
7.1
Bkf W
7.5
Bkf W
10.0
Bkf W
10
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.6
Dmean
0.5
Dmean
0.4
Dmean
0.0
Dmax
0.9
Dmax
1.0
Dmax
0.9
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
1.1
Dmax
0.0
W/d
17.7
W/d
16.5
W/d
12.9
W/d
15.2
W/d
24.1
W/d
0.0

Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Riffle Cross Section RF5
Reach 2 - North Branch - Sta 10 +83 0
�As_Budt�
WFS /BSA
MElev>M
Dec"
BM
600
ear
1�
HI
261859
Year
2
628
ffSta'hn7
■FS /BSV
WEI -evv N
Rescue
aStationil
VF,S /BSA
MEievIIIN
Qesc
EStahon
OFSBSV
®Ele°v M
Desc
BM
755
261259
RF5 IR Lt
BM
231
261700
BP IR Rt
BM
270
261700
IR Lt
HI
BKF
262014
740
2611 19
HI
96
261931
261108
BNK
HI
760
261970
-10
286
261728
0
702
261229
GRND
0
738
261232
GRND
0
786
261228
GRND
11 9
2
730
261201
122
834
36
777
2611 93
GRND
1
782
261232
810
261049
5
767
2611 64
261051
EOW
56
826
2611 44
GRND
16
805
261209
143
7
797
2611 34
BKF
743
86
861
2611 09
GRND
35
826
261188
730
2611 29
77
815
2611 16
BANK
GRND
9
858
2611 12
BKF
55
878
2611 36
GRND
221
87
836
261095
BANK
536
10
888
261082
EOW
7
882
261132
BKF LT
92
834
261097
BANK
109
919
261051
BED
78
908
2611 06
10
865
261066
BANK
116
905
261065
BED
86
937
261077
104
872
261059
EOW
121
915
261055
BED
92
937
261077
11
887
261044
BED
13
911
261059
BED
10
959
261055
EOW LT
11 7
884
261047
133
913
261057
BED
11
964
261050
121
893
261038
136
888
261082
EOW
11 9
968
261046
123
865
261066
143
873
261097
BNK
133
953
261061
129
862
261069
153
845
261125
BNK
138
948
261066
EOW RT
133
887
261044
161
831
2611 39
BKF
143
943
261071
136
867
261064
EOW
176
829
2611 41
GRND
146
911
2611 03
144
834
261097
BANK
196
801
2611 69
GRND
164
882
2611 32
BKF RT
147
819
2611 12
BANK
21 3
792
2611 78
GRND
18
871
2611 43
156
804
2611 27
BKF
241
708
261262
GRND
193
850
261164
177
793
2611 38
GRND
269
642
261328
GRND
21 6
834
261180
196
766
2611 65
GRND
231
782
261232
213
753
2611 78
GRND
25
725
261289
24
682
261249
GRND
27
695
261319
GRND
26
621
261310
GRND
296
658
261356
27
604
261327
GRND
37
667
261347
49
665
261349
Year3
4
*Static—n-9
WFS /BSA
MElev>M
Dec"
BM
600
261259
IR Lt
HI
261859
0
628
261231
GRND
21
659
261200
GRND
41
672
2611 87
GRND
61
712
261147
GRND
71
721
2611 38
GRND
76
732
2611 27
GRND
86
734
261125
BKF
91
740
2611 19
BNK
96
751
261108
BNK
101
760
261099
106
772
261087
11 1
798
261061
11 6
809
261050
EOW
11 7
819
261040
BED
11 9
830
261029
BED
122
834
261025
THL
125
820
261039
BED
128
810
261049
BED
129
808
261051
EOW
131
801
261058
138
769
261090
143
752
261107
BNK
146
743
261116
BNK
153
741
2611 18
BNK
157
730
2611 29
BKF
161
722
2611 37
GRND
171
721
2611 38
GRND
191
695
2611 64
GRND
221
657
261202
GRND
261
536
261323
GRND
27
532
261327
GRND
Y,ear
4
WStati5'n
®FS /BSjl
WElevW
Qesc
BM
000
100 00
10000
IR Lt
HI
000
0
261251
1 74
261191
463
2611 54
BKF
664
2611 28
89
261099
1042
261075
11 42
261067
1248
261016
1358
261066
148
261092
1632
2611 29
1792
261131
2024
2611 62
BKF
21 18
261158
2299
2611 88
2562
261275
2758
261338
Year
5
IffStation"3
INFS /BSN
FAEle -v"W
B—OUVW
BM
HI
000
100 00
10000
IR Lt

..
Percent Riffle:
Percent Run:
Percent Pool:
Percent Glide:
Material
Size Range (mm)
weighted
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
silt/clay
0 0.062 42.8
Haywood County, NC
very fine sand
0.062 0.13 0.0
Mor an Creek: Reach 1
fine sand
0.13
0.25
15.2
Note:
Reach Data
medium sand
0.25
0.5
13.3
coarse sand
0.5
1
6.2
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration
Site
100%
45%
very coarse sand
1
2
0.0
90%
40%
very fine gravel
2 4 4.8
fine gravel
4
6
4.6
fine gravel
6
8
2.3
80%
35%
medium gravel
8
11
2.5
LD.
medium gravel
11
16
0.0
70%
30% cZ
coarse gravel
16
22
0.0
60%
a
coarse gravel
22
32
1.3
25% m
very coarse gravel
32
45
0.0
50%
m
very coarse gravel
45
64
0.0
m
40%
zo% o
small cobble
64 90 1.2
medium cobble
90
128
1.2
15%
large cobble
128
180
0.0
30%
very lar a cobble
180
256
1.2
°; 200
a
10% y
small boulder
256 362 2.2
small boulder
362
512
1.2
10%
5% :3
medium boulder
512
1024
0.0
large boulder
1024
2048
0.0
0%
0%
very large boulde
2048
4096
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10
particle size (mm) tweighted percent -riffle
100
pool
run
1000
-•- glide
10000
% of particles
F_ weighted particle Count: 100.1
bedrock
0.0
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
0.0
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65
D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
0.0
particles only
0.062 0.06 0.2 0
5
114
14.8
0.5 8.7
based on
otal count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
artificial
0.0
weighted total count: 100.1
43% 35% 16% 4%
3%
0%
0%
0% 0%

Material
Size Range (mm) Count
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Morgan Creek: Reach 1
silt/clay
0 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
Note:
'
medium sand
0.25
0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
very coarse sand
1
2
100%
90%
70
very fine gravel
2 4
fine gravel
4
6
60
fine gravel
6
8
80%
medium gravel
8
11
m 70%
50
medium gravel
11
16
w
c'
coarse gravel
16
22
60%
3
coarse gravel
22
32
w
40
very coarse gravel
32
45
—a: 50%
o
very coarse ravel
45
64
Q 40%
30 v
�
small cobble
64 90
medium cobble
90
128
30%
20 N
large cobble
128
180
very large cobble
180
256
20%
°
10%
10
small boulder
256 362
small boulder
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
0%
0
large boulder
1024
2048
0.01
0.1 1 10
100
1000
10000
very lar a boulder
2048
4096
particle size (mm)
—a— cumulative %
# of particles
total article count: 100
P
bedrock
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
articles onl
0.062 0.06 0.1 0 1
114
7.2
0.2 3.7
artificial
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
total count: 100
58% 29% 6% 6% 1%
0%
0%
0% 0%

Percent Riffle:
Percent Run:
Percent Pool:
Percent Glide:
Material
Size Range (mm)
weighted
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
silt/clay
0 0.062 41.1
Haywood County, NC
very fine sand
0.062 0.13 0.0
Mor an Creek: Reach 2
fine sand
0.13
0.25
2.3
Note:
Reach Data
medium sand
0.25
0.5
5.1
coarse sand
0.5
1
12.8
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
100%
1
45°%
very coarse sand
1
2
0.0
90%
40%
very fine gravel
2 4 2.0
fine gravel
4
6
3.0
fine gravel
6
8
4.2
80%
35%
F.
medium gravel
8
11
1.9
m
medium gravel
11
16
3.8
70%
30% Z
coarse gravel
16
22
3.6
60%
a
coarse gravel
22
32
1.3
25% m
very coarse gravel
32
45
0.0
50%
m
very coarse gravel
45
64
6.1
m
Y 40%
2oi o
small cobble
64 90 4.8
medium cobble
90
128
2.2
c
lsi
large cobble
128
180
4.0
30i
0
very large cobble
180
256
2.0
m
W 20%
0 `N°
1or
small boulder
256 362 0.0
small boulder
362
512
0.0
10%
5%
medium boulder
512
1024
0.0
D
large boulder
1024
2048
0.0
0%
()%
very large boulder
2048
4096
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10
particle size (mm) -a-weighted percent -riffle
100
� pool -run
1000
- glide
10000
%
of particles
weighted
particle count: 100.1
bedrock
0.0
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
0.0
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65
D84 D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
0.0
particles only
0.062 0.06 0.5 5
54 139
53.5
1.8 29.4
artificial
0.0
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble
boulder bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
weighted total count: 100.1
41% 20% 26% 13%
0% 0%
0%
0% 0%

..
Material
Size Range (mm) Count
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Morgan Creek: Reach 2
silt/clay
0 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
Note:
'
medium sand
0.25
0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
very coarse sand
1
2
100%
90%
20
18
very fine gravel
2 4
fine gravel
4
6
fine gravel
6
8
80%
16
medium gravel
8
11
t 70%
14
medium gravel
11
16
coarse gravel
16
22
60%
12 Q
coarse gravel
22
32
-
m
very coarse gravel
32
45
a 50%
10 0
very coarse gravel
45
64
P 40%
8
small cobble
64 90
medium cobble
90
128
30%
6 CD
large cobble
128
180
very large cobble
180
256
256
362
20%
10%
4
2
small boulder
small boulder
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
0%
0
large boulder
1024
2048
0.01
0.1 1 10
100
1000
10000
very lar a boulder
2048
4096
particle size (mm)
--*-cumulative %
# of particles
total particle count: 105
bedrock
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
articles onl
0.062 0.80 12.7 67 121
165
106.9
2.7 44.3
artificial
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
total count: 105
189% 21% 25% 35% 1%
0%
0%
0% 0%

Percent Riffle:
Percent Run:
Percent Pool:
Percent Glide:
Material
Size Range (mm)
weighted
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
silt/clay
0 0.062 26.3
Haywood County, NC
very fine sand
0.062 0.13 0.0
Morgan Creek: Reach 3
fine sand
0.13
0.25
0.7
Note:
Reach Data
medium sand
0.25
0.5
8.8
coarse sand
0.5
1
11.7
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration
Site
100%
30%
very coarse sand
1
2
4.5
90°r
very fine gravel
2 4 0.0
fine gravel
4
6
1.8
25%
fine gravel
6
8
2.9
80%
medium gravel
8
11
0.0
LD.
medium gravel
11
16
5.9
70%
to
20°r
coarse gravel
16
22
9.2
60%
coarse gravel
22
32
2.6
m
very coarse gravel
32
45
4.0
50%
15% m
very coarse gravel
45
64
4.6
m
40%
o
small cobble
64 90 5.8
medium cobble
90
128
2.4
10%
large cobble
128
180
3.6
30%
very large cobble
180
256
0.7
°;
0 20%
N
s%
small boulder
256 362 4.5
small boulder
362
512
0.0
10%
medium boulder
1024
0.0
�n
m
large boulde
1024
2048
0.0
0%
0%
ve lar a boulde
2048
4096
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10
particle size (mm) - weighted percent - riffle
100
- pool
- run
1000
- glide
10000
% of particles
weighted
particle count: 100.0
bedrock
0.0
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
0.0
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65
D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
0.0
articles onl
0.062 0.47 1.5 17
68
200
34.8
2.1 33.1
artificial
0.0
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
weighted total count: 100
26% 26% 31% 12%
5%
0%
0%
0% 0%

..
Material
Size Range (mm) Count
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
silt/clay
0 0.062
very fine sand
0.062
0.13
Morgan Creek: Reach 3
fine sand
0.13
0.25
Note:
'
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
very coarse sand
1
2
2
4
100%
90%
30
very fine gravel
fine gravel
4
6
25
fine gravel
6
8
80%
medium gravel
8
11
°
70 /°
medium gravel
11
16
y
20
coarse gravel
16
22
60%
3
coarse gravel
22
32
w
m
very coarse gravel
32
45
a 50%
15 0
very coarse 2Lave l
45
64
a 40%
10
`�°
small cobble
64 90
medium cobble
90
128
30%
large cobble
128
180
very large cobble
180
256
20%
10%
5
small boulder
256 362
small boulde
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
0%
0
large boulder
1024
2048
0.01
0.1 1 10
100
1000
10000
very large boulder
2048
4096
particle size (mm)
t cumulative %
# of particles
total particle count: 97
bedrock
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
articles only
0.062 0.45 1.7 20 100
168
42.9
2.5 40.1
artificial
based on
otal count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
total count: 97
27% 25% 29% 19% 1%
0%
0%
0% 0%

..
Percent Riffle:
:.
Percent Run:
Percent Pool:
Percent Glide:
Material
Size Range (mm)
weighted
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
silt/clay
0
0.062
25.5
Haywood County, NC
very fine sand
0.062 0.13 0.0
Mor an Creek: Reach 4
fine sand
0.13
0.25
0.7
Note:
Reach Data
medium sand
0.25
0.5
6.0
coarse sand
0.5
1
11.1
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream
Restoration
Site
100 %
30
very coarse sand
1 2 12.5
90%
very fine gravel
2 4 0.0
fine gravel
4
6
1.5
25%
fine gravel
6
8
5.3
80%
LD.
medium gravel
8
11
5.6
medium gravel
11
16
1.5
70%
20% 3
coarse gravel
16
22
1.5
80%
°
coarse gravel
22
32
2.6
m
very coarse gravel
32
45
2.2
50%
15% m
very coarse gravel
45
64
6.3
0
40%
°
small cobble
64 90 9.4
medium cobble
90
128
4.4
c
10°r
large cobble
128
180
3.0
c 30%
0
very large cobble
180
256
0.7
°;
a Z0i
y
5%
small boulder
256 362 0.0
small boulder
362
512
0.0
10%
3
medium boulde
512
1024
0.0
m
large boulder
1024
2048
0.0
0%
0%
very lar a boulder
2048
4096
0.0
0.01
particle
0.1 1 10
size (mm) -a- weighted percent riffle
100
-pool
-run
1000
-glide
10000
%of particles
weighted
particle count: 100.2
bedrock
0.0
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
0.0
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65
D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
0.0
particles only
0.062 0.60 1.4 9
68
115
35.0
2.0 33.0
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
artificial
0.0
weighted total count: 100.2
25% 30% 27% 18%
0%
0%
0%
0% 0%

Material
Size Range (mm) Count
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
Haywood County, NC
Morgan Creek: Reach 4
silt/clay
0 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
Note:
-
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
Pebble Count, Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
very coarse sand
1
2
100%
90%
30
very fine gravel
2 4
fine gravel
4
6
25
fine gravel
6
8
80%
medium gravel
8
11
C
70%
medium gravel
11
16
Y
20 c
coarse gravel
16
22
60%
S
coarse gravel
22
32
C
—
U
very coarse gravel
32
45
50%
15 0
very coarse gravel
45
64
a 40%
�
10
small cobble
64 90
medium cobble
90
128
30%
N
large cobble
128
180
very large cobble
180
256
20%
10%
5
small boulder
256 362
small boulder
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
0%
0
large boulder
1024
2048
0.01
0.1 1 10
100
1000
10000
very large boulder
2048
4096
particle size (mm)
t cumulative
%
# of particles
total article count: 101
P
bedrock
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
ediment
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
articles only
0.062 0.31 0.6 12 75
165
65.8
2.2 34.7
artificial
R101otal
ased on
Count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
total count:
28% 34% 21% 17% 1%
0%
0%
0% 0%

:..
Percent Riffle:
_. .
Percent Run:
Percent Pool:
Percent Glide:
Material
Size Range (mm)
weighted
Morgan Creek Stream Restoration Site
silt/clay
0 0.062 31.7
Haywood County, NC
very fine sand
0.062 0.13 2.2
Morgan Creek: North Branch
fine sand
0.13
0.25
9.5
Note:
Reach Data 5
medium sand
0.25
0.5
4.8
coarse sand
0.5
1
4.4
Pebble Count,- Morgan Creek Stream Restoration
Site
100%
35%
very coarse sand
1
2
20.1
90%
very fine gravel
2 4 1.9
fine gravel
4
6
4.9
30%
fine gravel
6
8
4.1
80%
medium gravel
8
11
0.8
medium gravel
11
16
3.5
°
70�
zs% cn
coarse gravel
16
22
0.0
60%
°-
coarse gravel
22
32
0.0
20%
very coarse gravel
32
45
0.0
50%
m
very coarse gravel
45
64
0.0
m
w 40%
15% °
small cobble
64 90 2.3
medium cobble
90
128
5.4
v
large cobble
128
180
2.3
30%
10%
very large cobble
180
256
0.0
°;
(D 20 °r°
y
small boulder
256 362 0.0
small boulder
362
512
0.0
CL
10%
5% v
medium boulde
512
1024
0.0
m
large boulder
1024
2048
0.0
0%
very large boulder
2048
4096
0.0
0.0� o.i i io
particle size (mm) - weighted percent -riffle
ioo
- pool
-run
i000
-glide
i0000
% of particles
weighted
particle count:
bedrock
based on
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
clay hardpan
sediment
D16 D35 D50 D65
D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
detritus /wood
]2.2
articles onl
0.062 0.13 0.6 1
7
108
11.0
0.7 10.8
artificial
based on
count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
weighted total count: 1otal
32% 41% 15% 10%
0%
2%
0%
0% 0%

snvciay
U
U.Ub[
very fine sand
0.062
0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
medium sand
0.25
0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
very coarse sand
1
2
very fine gravel
2
4
fine gravel
4
6
fine gravel
6
8
medium gravel
8
11
medium gravel
11
16
coarse gravel
16
22
coarse gravel
22
32
very coarse gravel
32
45
very coarse gravel
45
64
small cobble
64
90
medium cobble
90
128
large cobble
128
180
very lar a cobble
180
256
small boulder
256
362
small boulder
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
large bouldedl
1024
2048
very laroe boulderil
2048
4096
clay
total particle cour
Note:
100%
90%
80%
c�a 70%
60%
c 50%
U
CL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0°/
0
0.01
1
based on
- Ibased on
total count: 101 total count
t-reeK dream Kesto
d County, NC
Creek: North Branch
reMe count, morgan ureeK stream Kestoration
60
50
40
3
a-
(D
30 0
m
20
U)
Me
-�
0
0.1
1 10
100
1000
10000
particle size
(mm)
->IF- cumulative
%
# of particles
size percent less than (mm)
particle size distribution
D16
D35 D50 D65
D84
D95
gradation
geo mean std dev
0.062
0.06 0.1 0
4
101
36.6
0.5 8.5
percent by substrate type
silt/clay
sand gravel cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det artificial
54%
26% 13% 7%
0%
0%
0%
0% 0%

APPENDIX D
WETLAND RAW DATA

Depth to Groundwater (in)
o cNi+ o a, o u, CO v,
I
1 -Jan
1
O
= 16-Jan
CL
A)
,1-
0
1
r
15 -Feb
e�
1 -Mar
16 -Mar
Z
31 -Mar
N
O
CL 15 -Apr
Begin G
owing Se son
- - - --
-------- - -
- --
-
- - - --
- ---
- - - - --
s 30 -Apr
-
.
15 -May
a 30 -May
N
O
rt
fD
�
N
14 -Jun
29-Jun
14-Jul
29,Jul
13 -Aug
28 -Aug
12 -Sep
27 -Sep
End Gromfing
Sea on
12-Oct
- - --
---- - - - - --
-
-
- - --
- - --
- --
27 -Oct

Depth to Groundwater (in)
O N O N O U7 O N
1-Jan
Q
I
0
= 16-Jan
CL
f
W
°' 3Wan
0 i
r
m 15 -Feb
I
1 -Mar
16 -Mar
m 31 -Mar
U)
3
0
a 15 -Apr Begin G
owing Se
son
---------------------------
-
- - - --
- - - --
30 -Apr
ci
15 -May
--
N
30 -May
O
cD
�
N
14-Jun
29-Jun i
I
14-Jul
29-Jul
13 -Aug
28 -Aug
12 -Sep
27 -Sep
12-Oct - - - --
---- -
- - - --
- --
—
- - - --
—
27 -Oct

Depth to Groundwater (in)
1- Jan
0
= 16-Jan
a
31-Jan
m
9
r
m 15 -Feb
1 -Mar
16 -Mar
mm 31 -Mar
m
0
a 15 -Apr
Begin G owing Se
son
— — — — — — — —
— — — —
—
— — — —
- --
- --
-° 30 -Apr
ci
15 -May
W
O 30 -May
N
O
r-r
i
CD
N
14-Jun
29-Jun
14-Jul
29-Jul -
--TT
13 -Aug
28 -Aug
12 -Sep
27 -Sep
12 -Oct
- - - -- ---- -
- - - --
- --
—
- - - --
- - - --
27 -Oct