20080008 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20140121

Submitted to:
@��
Lewis Creek A N
Stream Restoration R
EEP Project No. 733
2012 Final Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5 G (90
Construction Completed: April 2011
Submission Date: March 2013
�
N 1
NCDENR -EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
r-I.- d�j
�',Il 111 'C leljt l It
A�ff*'A
NCDENR

r I
eoo�I
JJ-G
SECTION 1 — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 1 Goals and Objectives
1.2 Vegetation Assessment
1 3 Stream Assessment
14 Annual Monitoring Summary
SECTION 2 — METHODOLOGY
2 1 Methodology
SECTION 3 — REFERENCES
SECTION 4 — APPENDICES
List of Appendices
Table of Contents
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1
Project Restoration Components
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Attribute Table
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2
Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos
Stream Station Photos
Photos
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
1 -2
1 -3
1-4
2 -1
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 9 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Lews Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table of Contents
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Figure 3a -e
Cross - sections with annual overlays
Figure 4
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Figure 5a -e
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Tables 10a&b
Baseline — Stream Data Summary Tables
Table 11 a
Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11 b
Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 6 Monthly Rainfall Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PC
SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lewis Creek is located in Henderson County, North Carolina, northeast of the City of
Hendersonville The project is located within the French Broad River Basin (USGS HUC
06010105) (Appendix A, Figure 1) The watershed land use is dominated by
agricultural land and forest The primary agricultural activities range from apple orchards
to row crops Forested land in the watershed is being converted to apple orchards and
sod farms Also, many upslope areas have been developed into residential gated
communities The project area consists of approximately 1,750 linear feet of stream
Restoration within Lewis Creek, beginning at North Ridge Road and continuing
downstream 1,750 -feet to the project terminus Approximately 10 acres of forested
wetlands are located along the south side of Lewis Creek This area is owned by the
Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy (CMLC) and was not included in work conducted
in the EEP project area CMLC was involved in the preservation and conservation of the
wetland and was regularly apprised of the stream restoration efforts Prior to restoration,
the stream had been impacted by the channel izatio n/straightening and berming of Lewis
Creek and the activities associated with the apple orchards upstream of the project site
The stream restoration plan was designed by Jordan, Jones, and Goulding, Inc
Construction and seeding activities were completed in April 2011
This report serves as the first year of the five year monitoring plan for the Site
1.1 Goals and Objectives
Lewis Creek is located in Henderson County, North Carolina, northeast of the City of
Hendersonville The project is located in the French Broad River Basin, Catalog Unit
06010105, DWQ Subbasin 04 -03 -02 The watershed land use is dominated by
agriculture land and forest The primary agricultural activities surrounding the site range
from apple orchards to row crops Forested land in the watershed is being converted to
apple orchards and sod farms Also, many upslope areas have been developed into
residential gated communities Lewis Creek is a third order tributary to Clear Creek with
an approximate drainage area of four square miles at the upstream point of the project
area The segment of Lewis Creek in the project reach has been classified by the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) as Class C, Trout (Tr) waters (NCDWQ, 2007)
Restoration Goals
1. Restore a natural, stable dimension, pattern and profile along Lewis Creek using
natural channel design techniques

Page 2
Executive Summary
2 Stabilize and protect degraded or vulnerable streambanks along Lewis Creek to
reduce sediment loading and loss of land
3 Enhance floodplain connection along Lewis Creek
4 Establish a bankfull bench along Lewis Creek to reduce velocity and shear stress
associated with bankfull and higher storm flows
5. Introduce a natural meander pattern along Lewis Creek
6 Improve aquatic and riparian habitat for macro i nve rtebrate and fish communities
Restoration Objectives
1 Restoring approximately 1,750 linear feet of Lewis Creek
2 Restoration efforts will consist of constructing an appropriately sized channel for
the existing watershed and sediment load within a new naturally sinuous pattern
3 The project will include establishing a floodplam at an appropriate elevation for
the current stream bed, creating bankfull benches, stabilizing streambanks, and
grading back bank slopes
4 The streambanks and riparian zone will be replanted using native species
appropriate to the area
The existing stream length available for restoration was 1,663 linear feet of Lewis
Creek The stream restoration effort consisted of Restoration, Priority Level 2 along the
main reach of Lewis Creek to create 1,750 linear feet of restored stream (Station 0 +00 —
17 +50) The restoration plan also included replanting the streambanks and riparian
zone with native species appropriate to the area The designed dimensions were based
on a combination of the dimensionless ratios from the reference reach Raccoon Branch,
the NC Regional Curve for Rural Mountain Streams, Rosgen's stable reference reach
data ranges (Rosgen, 2004a), and existing conditions Construction of the restoration
project was completed in April of 2011 Appendix A provides more detailed project
activity, history, contact information, and watershed /site background information for this
project
1.2 Vegetation Assessment
Planted vegetation will be monitored for five years in accordance with the guidelines
and procedures developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey -NCEEP Level 2 Protocol
(Lee et al , 2006). To achieve vegetative success criteria the average number of planted
stems per acre must exceed or meet 320 stems /acre after the third year of monitoring,
290 stems /acre after four years, and 260 stems /acre after the fifth year of project
monitoring High threat invasive species as defined in Version 2 0 of the EEP Monitoring
Template should be limited in their spatial extent and density such that survival and
Levies Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Executive Summary
diversity of native woody trees and shrubs is not compromised If noxious plants are
identified as problematic on the site, the monitoring team will develop and implement a
species - specific control plan During the five -year monitoring period, the monitoring
team, where necessary, will remove, treat, or otherwise manage undesirable plant or
animal species, including physical removal and use of herbicides
The Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) 2012 vegetation monitoring results indicated that the site
has met the average stems per acre success criteria in all five plots at 688 stems per
acre Species count data consisted of native shrub /tree species that ranged from six to
eight per plot A total of 11 native species were counted across all plots Only one of the
plots (Plot 1) did not meet the planted 320 stems per acre success threshold, however,
the plot did achieve vegetation success criteria when considering recruitment of native
woody stem species that totaled 850 stems per acre The recruitment of 12 red maple
(Acer rubrum) species resulted in the plot attaining the target vegetation success criteria
of 320 stems per acre Causes for the loss of planted species within Plot 1 include
flooding, sediment deposition, and predation All planted species were accounted for in
Plots 2, 4, and 5, which also did not experience recruitment of other non - planted
species Vegetation Plot 3 did not have a loss of planted species but also gained two
recruits of hazel alder (Alnus serrulata) Therefore, the mean planted stems per acre
counts did not change from the baseline (MYO) monitoring in Plots 2, 3, 4, and 5, but the
total stems per acre count increased in Plots 1 and 3
The mean 688 stems per acre for all plots within the Site is above that of the As Built
design mean density of 607 stems per acre Recruit species and high survivability rates
are the two causes for the success Data collected in MY1 indicate that the Site has
achieved the vegetative success criteria, as the average number of planted stems per
acre exceeded or met 320 stems /acre Please refer to Appendix C for more detailed
information on the 2012 vegetation data
1.3 Stream Assessment
Results from the MY1 stream monitoring effort indicate that the Site appears stable but
has experienced bankfull and storm flow events prior to MY1 monitoring The entire
restored stream length was assessed from the project origination at the North Ridge
Road bridge to the downstream end of the restoration project at STA 17 +50 (Long Pro
end). Assessment of the restoration reach included a survey of the stream longitudinal
profile, five cross section profiles, visual stability assessment, and field verifying the
Current Condition Plan View (Appendix B, Figure 2) conditions
Overall, the present stream dimensions along the restoration reach appear stable The
median bankfull width (23 41 ft) of the three riffle cross - sections does not indicate a
significant change from the baseline data bankfull width of 23 81 feet Analysis of MY1
stream data revealed that the median bankfull cross - sectional area (38 28 sq ft),
entrenchment ratio (5 01), and width /depth ratio (15 54) remain consistent with median
baseline data parameter ranges of 41 70 sq ft, 5 00, and 14 20 respectively Success
criteria have been met for the width /depth ratio in MY1 which is defined by this
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Page 4
Executive Summary
parameter not increasing more than 10 to 15 percent Additionally, the dimension data
indicates that the restored stream length remains a C type channel which is a key
dimension success criterion Analysis of MY1 dimension data also revealed that a rod
height error had occurred in the baseline monitoring cross section 5 data set The data
set was corrected and results reflected in Table 3e, Table 11 a, and 11 b
The MY1 longitudinal profile water surface slope (0 0026 ft/ft) and bankfull slope
(0 0024 ft/ft) also remained consistent with the design parameter slope of 0 0025 ft/ft
Each cross section maintained a bank height ratio of 1 0, indicating connection with the
flood prone area and no significant incision. Mean facet riffle slopes of 0 014 ft/ft in
MY1 remain within pattern and profile success criteria thresholds (not >50 percent
change) when compared to the baseline data mean facet riffle slope of 0 0120 ft/ft The
mean longitudinal profile water surface slope of 0 0026 ft/ft in MY1 remain within the
success criteria threshold (not to increase >30 percent) when compared to baseline
data value of 0 0022 ft/ft The riffle areas were free of embedded sediment and
predominately composed of gravel and cobble
Several areas along the channel continue to exhibit areas of in- stream vegetation
growth, however, these areas did not appear to be increasing when compared to the
baseline monitoring CCPV The substrate along the reach was dominated by sand,
gravel and cobble The substrate was consolidated and contributed to a firm surface
that provided for a consistent elevation capture when compared to the baseline
monitoring data of cross - sections and profiles (Appendix D) Based on current
monitoring data and the visual inspection, the channel appears to be functioning
properly and maintaining stability No erosion failure was observed along the stream
In- stream vegetation and poor streambank vegetation cover were observed in a few
locations along the reach and noted in the MY1 CCPV All log vanes and log vane j-
hook combinations appeared intact and were still performing as intended and are not
showing any signs of erosion or piping
Cross - section results calculated during MY1 monitoring indicate the channel has
remained relatively stable throughout the monitoring period Only slight changes in
channel morphology are evident and can be attributed to natural variations Cross
section 2 shows a minor variation variation from MYO at the right bank pin (Appendix D,
Figure 3b) This variation is attributed to an equipment recording error during MYO
monitoring The illustrated variations for this cross section were not observed in the field
during the MY1 data collection effort
The Site appears stable but has experienced one documented bankfull event over the
past monitoring year The crest gauge at the Site was checked and indicated a bankfull
event had occurred since the baseline data collection effort As a result, sand and
sediment deposits have accumulated in the floodplain throughout the reach Several
other bankfull events may have occurred due to observation of wrack lines and staining
of vegetation at floodprone elevations Overall, the Site appears to be stable and is
functioning as intended in normal flow and bankfull flow conditions Two beaver dams
Lews Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Executive Summary
located dust downstream of the project were removed in May 2012 These dams had
backwatered the project to the mid -point of the restoration reach
1.4 Annual Monitoring Summary
In summary, the Site appears to be stable and has met stream and vegetation
mitigation goals for monitoring year 1 The Site has exceeded the vegetation success
requirements of 320 stems /acre by 368 stems /acre The MY1 vegetation plot monitoring
results indicate that planted and natural recruited vegetation are doing well with the
exception of Plot 1, which did not meet the criteria for planted species However, with
the inclusion of native recruit woody species, all five plots meet the success criteria for
the 2012 monitoring year
The pattern, profile, and dimension of the restored channel appear to be maintaining
vertical and lateral stability The restored reach is functioning as intended and appears
that no bank failures or mass wasting has occurred Additionally no signs of
aggradation appear evident and the substrate of sand, gravel and cobble are firm and
consolidated
The background information provided in this report is referenced from the mitigation
plan and the baseline monitoring report prepared by Jordan, Jones and Goulding
(2012) Summary information /data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring
elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in
the Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report (April 2012) and in the
Restoration Plan (December 2007) documents available on EEP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

0
SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY

SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Methodology
Methods employed for this report were a combination of those established by standard
regulatory guidance and procedures documents as well as the Baseline Monitoring
Document and As -Built Baseline Report completed by Jordan, Jones and Goulding
(2012) Survey data collected was performed via total station to establish the current
longitudinal profile and cross - section elevations. Data recorded during this monitoring
event were georeferenced using historically established positions to evaluate annual
progress Longitudinal stationing for the stream profile, cross - sectional surveys, and
additional geomorphic assessments were performed following guidelines outlined in the
Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson
et al , 1994) and in the Stream Restoration a Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et
al, 2003) Substrate analysis and particle size distribution were established using a
modified Wolman pebble count (Rosgen 1996) at each cross - section location
Vegetation monitoring for Year 1 was performed based on the Carolina Vegetation
Survey (CVS) Level 2 (Lee et al. 2006) The taxonomic standard for vegetation follows
Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas (Weakley, 2007)
Precipitation data for Figure 6 was obtained from the NC CRONOS database, Station ID
NC -HN -15 (the nearest offering daily precipitation data) through the URL below (Data
Period November 2011 through October 2012) Regional data for the 30th and 70th
percentiles was also obtained from the NC CRONOS database, Southern Mountains
region
http //www nc- climate.ncsu edu /cronos /station= NC- HN- 15&temporal =D
Lews Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

0
SECTION 3
REFERENCES

SECTION 3
REFERENCES
Doll, B A, Grabow, G L, Hall, K A, Halley, J, Harman, W A, Jennings, G D, and
Wise, D E, 2003 Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook
Harrelson, Cheryl C, Rawlins, C L, Potyondy, John P. 1994 Stream Channel
Reference Sites An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique Gen Tech Rep RM -245
Fort Collins, CO U.S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Forest and Range Experiment Station 61 p
Jordan, Jones, and Goulding, Inc 2011 Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built
Baseline Report (2011) Charlotte, NC
Lee, Michael T, Peet, Robert K, Steven D, Wentworth, Thomas R (2006) CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4 0. Retrieved from
http //www nceep net / business /monitoring/veg /datasheets.htm
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wddland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs,
CO
Weakley, A S. 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas (Draft April 2008) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel
Hill, NC
Levies Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

PC
SECTION 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data

PC
APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND
TABLES
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

A-
- 121 i t 0
0
Mile
7
L41
IN
J
L
tie
M
1 50
MOUNT
J D,,
A-
T 1851,
X_�
e
0 Project Area
.1DG
8YERS
,CQV14'RDt"
37
'Part, L FA
A
dith C
a,
00-
At. KRD
E
2%2"
, ( Mtn-
C
Y
IV
7
R,
k r- I wJ)1
V V
ZZ
Legend
To access the site from Interstate 26 in Hendersonville, NC, take the U. 64 East
exit. Travel five miles and turn right on Laycock Road. Continue 0.4 miles and Conservation Easement Boundary
turn left on North Ridge Road. Lewis Creek flows between the CMLC and Ingles
properties. Entrance is to the left just before North Ridge Road crosses Lewis Creek. 11000 1,000 0 z000
Feet
A
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Location project Li
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration, EEP Project 733 P tt.n
I 1 8t Henderson County, NC
1 ire it
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Source USGS: NCDOT GIS Submittal Date: March 2013 Henderson County, NC

A -2
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/ EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Mitigation Credits
Non - Ripanan
Nitrogen Nutrient
Phosphorus Nutrient
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Wetland
Buffer
Offset
Offset
Type
1,750
RE
R
RE
R
RE
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1,750
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Restoration -or-
Pr
Statiomng/Location
Existing Feet/Acres
Approach
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigation Ratio
Component nt
Footage or Acres
Equivalent
Lewis Creek
0+00-17+50
1,663 If
P II
Restoration
1,750 If
1 01
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (If)
Riparian Wetland (ac)
Non - Riparian
Buffer (sq ft)
Upland (ac)
Wetland ac
_
Rivenne
Non- Rivenne
Restoration R
1,750
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1,750
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell, SF = Sand Filter, SW = Stormwater Wetland, WDP = Wet Detention Pond, DDP= Dry Detention Pond, FS = Filter Strip,
S= Grass Swale, LS = Level Spreader, NI = Natural Infiltration Area, FB = Forested Buffer
SMU = Stream Mitigation Unit, WMU = Wetland Mitigation Mitigation Unit
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Lewis Creek Monitoring Report

A -3
Table 2• Project Activity and Reporting History
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/ EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Completed
Actual Completion or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Sep -07
Dec -07
Final Design - Construction Plans
Aug -09
Aug -09
Construction
Sep -10
Apr -11
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Apr -11
Apr -11
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
Apr -11
Apr -1 I
B &B plantings for reach /segments
Apr -11
Apr -11
Bare root and livestake plantings for reach/segments
Apr -11
Apr -1 I
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Momtonng - baseline)
Jul -11
Dec -11
Section 404 Permit
Sep-07
February 21 2008
Year 1 Monitoring
Jun -12
Nov -12
Year 2 Monitoring
2013
2013
Year 3 Monitoring
2014
2014
Year 4 Momtonng
2015
2015
Year 5 Monitoring
2016
2016
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Lewis Creek Monitoring Report

A -4
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/ EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Lewis Creek Monitoring Report
Jordan, Jones and Goulding, Inc
Designer
309 E Morehead Street, Suite 110
Charlotte, NC 28202
Matthew Clabaugh, PE
704 -527 -4106
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc
Construction Contractor
P O Box 1905
Mt Airy, NC 27030
Stephen James
336- 320 -3849
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc
Planting Contractor
P O Box 1905
Mt Airy, NC 27030
Stephen James
336- 320 -3849
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc
Seeding Contractor
P O Box 1905
Mt Airy, NC 27030
Stephen James
336 - 320 -3849
Green Resources
Seed Mix Sources
Rodney Montgomery
336 - 215 -3458
Mellow Marsh Farm, Inc
Nursery Stock Suppliers
919 - 742 -1200
Jordan, Jones and Goulding, Inc
Monitoring Performers:
6801 Governors Lake Pkwy
Baseline Year 0
Norcross, GA 30071
Stream Monitoring, POC
Alison Nichols, 704 - 301 -7563
Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Lewis Creek Monitoring Report

A -5
Table 4. Protect Baseline Information and Attributes
Lewes Creek Stream Restoration/ EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
*Thus site is not within an EEP planning area but is in a Targeted Local Watershed
* *Wetland mitigation was not included for this restoration project
"N /A" items do not apply/"-" items are unavailable/ "U" items are unknown
Appendix A Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Lewis Creek Monitoring Report
Project Information
Project Name
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration
Project County
Henderson County, NC
Project Area acres
253
Project Coordinates
35 022'40 5 "N 82 °20'56 1 "W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Project River Basin
French Broad
USGS HUC for Project 8 digit)
06010105
NCDW Sub -basin for Project and Reference
04 -03 -02
Project Drainage Area acres
2,560
Pro ect Drainage Area Percenta a of Im ervious Area
0
CGIA Land Use Classification
201
Reach Summary
Information*
Parameters
Length of reach linear feet
1,750
Valley classification
VIII
Drainage area acres
1,856
NCDWQ stream identification score
N/A
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
N/A
Morphological Description stream a
Perennial
Evolutionaly trend
Agricultural
Underlying mapped soils
Codorus and Hatboro loam
Drainage Class
moderate to poor
Soil H dnc status
Hatboro - h dnc
Sloe
00030
FEMA classification
100 year flood lam
Native vegetation community
Montane Alluvial Forest and Piedmont/Mountain Alluvial Forest intermediate
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
U
Wetland Summary
Information"
Parameters
Size of Wetland acres
Wetland Type (non - npanan, riparian nvenne or riparian
non - nvenne
Mapped Soil Series
Drama a class
Soil H dnc Status
Source of Hydrology
Hydrologic im airment
Native ve etation community
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
Re gulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW- 2008 -0072
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
SAW- 2008 -0072
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
SAW- 2008 -0072
Historic Preservation Act
N/A
N/A
N/A
Costal Zone Managemetn Act (CZMA) /Costal Area
Management Act CAMA
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
No
Henderson County Floodplain Development Permit
Issued 5/20/08, LOMB submitted Nov 2011,
waiting on FEMA approval
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A
*Thus site is not within an EEP planning area but is in a Targeted Local Watershed
* *Wetland mitigation was not included for this restoration project
"N /A" items do not apply/"-" items are unavailable/ "U" items are unknown
Appendix A Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Lewis Creek Monitoring Report

PC
APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos Stream Station Photos
Photos Vegetation Plot Photos
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

sr..,
J -
4
s � �
e
. ,yam � »�� • � a� � -. `► < �Fy � - -y, , t � �!,- c, �:.' °��.., � .
Figure 3 of 3 �� '• €��i ` 3'
AN
s ti rte. �4
Legend
2012 Condition
— — Stream CL
Riffle
In- Channel Bar Formation
Stationing (100' interval)
(T� Brush Mattress
In- Channel Vegetation
Edge of Water
_Stream Structure
I� Multiflora Rose
Existing Roadway
i - _ Rock
® Sparse Vegetative Cover
-- Limit of Disturbance
O Existing Bridge
— — EEP Conservation Easement
Existing Road Right of Way (60') Gate
X- section (approx)
Overhead Utility
Gravel Entrance
• Photo Point
— — Top of Bank
Trail
0 Long Pro Start/End
Root Wad /Log Vane
® Utility Pole
Q Vegetation Plot
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration Project
Henderson County, NC
j�,>item�t MONITORING YEAR 1 OF 5
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
h
4 s.
- A . r
Figure 1 of 3 L
f
4
�a
B -1
ov, F t
IL
4W
T Ah WT.,
f�
North Ride Rd
125 62.5 0 125 250 NOTES: Figure Index
Feet 1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY EEP. April 2012
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. EEP Project No: 733
1 inch = 125 feet

u �
PP 1
X� PP3
�� BEGIN LONG PRO
r� .- .—
Q
(% q
1 0
1
B -2
Legend
2012 Condition
Root Wad /Log Vane
In- Channel Bar Formation
Vegetation Plot
In- Channel Vegetation
'' Riffle
P,7� Multiflora Rose
® Brush Mattress
Sparse Vegetative Cover
Stream Structure
EEP Conservation Easement
Rode
X- section (approx)
FE_=_] Existing Bridge
• Photo Point
Gate
Long Pro Start/End
J Gravel Entrance
— — Stream CL
Trail
Stationing (100' interval)
Utility Pole
Edge of Water
Existing Roadway
— - Limit of Disturbance
Existing Road Right of Way (60')
—� Overhead Utility
— — Top of Bank
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration Project 40 20 0 40 Figure 1 of 3
Henderson County, NC NOTES:
1'� )S telll Feet 1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY EEP. April 2012
F til) 11 't1lCtit re MON ITORI NG YEAR 1 OF 5 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. EEP Project No: 733
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW 1 inch = 40 feet

B -3
Legend
2012 Condition Root Wad /Log Vane
LLB: In- Channel Bar Formation Vegetation Plot
In- Channel Vegetation Riffle
EZ� Multiflora Rose JZl Brush Mattress
® Sparse Vegetative Cover Stream Structure
EEP Conservation Easement - Rock
X- section (approx) O Existing Bridge
• Photo Point Gate
Long Pro Start/End _Gravel Entrance
Stream CL Trail
Stationing (100' interval) Utility Pole
Edge of Water
Existing Roadway
Limit of Disturbance
-AV PP 9 � Existing Road Right of Way (60')
'z
♦ A `�. `� Overhead Utility
-Ale _`'� Top of Bank
L�
t ��...:T ♦ -! r. ,.L { :ltd ♦ �/' � `�\
\ 5
PP 5
ic
0 ter
Ch
�� '� - - - - --
w
`
n
X
CA
O
4
_
m
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration Project 40 20 0 40 Figure 2 of 3
Henderson County, NC NOTES:
Ek�'.osy`ystern Feet 1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY EEP. April 2012
1'1111i111L'•e111l1t MONITORING YEAR 1 OF 5 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. EEP Project No: 733
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW 1 inch = 40 feet

Legend
2012 Condition
In- Channel Bar Formation
`; In- Channel Vegetation
Multiflora Rose
r'" Sparse Vegetative Cover
EEP Conservation Easement
X- section (approx)
• Photo Point
N Long Pro Start/End
— — Stream CL
Stationing (100' interval)
-- Edge of Water
Existing Roadway
- - — Limit of Disturbance
Existing Road Right of Way (60')
—+ Overhead Utility
Top of Bank
Root Wad /Log Vane
Vegetation Plot
>" Riffle
Brush Mattress
Stream Structure
Rock
OEx
isting Bridge
Gate
J Gravel Entrance
_ Trail
_ Utility Pole
b
.A >�iwa.v' .A>•j� 4_: e,r.;vc7.r{ b�v 7"�r�"° / �!/
.,:a >e,+v4y� <��.�''� > ;ti n�.r�v'rcti..<'dr -•r 2`''•>!' -•' 1. � / r r -` � � \ \
<Yli".it�•y'ayi1nya^
�`� •y> ~`i'4 >t — — — — — — — — — — — —
� „A� \ / nom•.: i. / \ 3r;>.'•, \
END LONG PRO a
B -4
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration Project Figure 3 of 3
�7 Henderson County, NC ao 20 o ao NOTES:
j` 'j� tCTll Feet 1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY EEP. April 201 2
lil;tilt;C'iTlc'lTt MONITORING YEAR 1 OF 5 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. EEP PfOJ2Ct NO: 733
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW 1 inch =40 feet

B -5
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Lewis Creek StreamRestoration/EEP Project No 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total
Number in
As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
�,�y
Footage
with
Stabilinng
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
I Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
Riffle and Run units
2 Riffle Condition-
Texture /Substrate
9
10
100%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
13
13
100%
Length Appropriate
13
13
100%
Condifaon
4 Thalweg Position
Thalwcg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
12
12
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
I I
I 1
100%
2 Bank
1 Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
20
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
20
99%
0
0
100%
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
13
13
100%
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
5
5
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
0
0
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
0
0
100%
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth> 1 G
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow
l3
13
100%

B -6
Appendix B
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Planted Acreage* 2.53
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(acres)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
01
0
0
000%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria
01
0
0
0%
F
Total,
- 'Or A
0`
0:00 % ?
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year
0
0
0
000%
Easement Acreage* 9.7
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000
0
0
0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
0
0
0%

B -7
:a
7
Photo Point 1 -
Photo Point 1 -
As Built — April 2011
MY 1 — June 2012
Photo Point 2 -
Photo Point 2 -
As Built — April 2011
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For:
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
I cu���tcn�
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013

I3 -K
lv't,
t � _
Photo Point 3 - Upstream
As Built — April 2011
Photo Point 3 - Downstream
As Built —April 2011
_ r �
,
Photo Point 3 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Photo Point 3 - Downstream
MY I — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
l'k,osystc•m Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013

R -9
Photo Point 4 - Upstream
As Built —April 2011
Photo Point 4 - Downstream
As Built — April 2011
Photo Point 4 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Photo Point 4 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
' Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
w�� nit Submittal Date: March 2013

B -10
env
Photo Point 5 - Upstream
Photo Point 5 - Upstream
As Built —April 2011
MY 1 — June 2012
wd"
Photo Point 5 - Downstream
Photo Point 5 - Downstream
As Built — April 2011
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For:
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
Icusy,tcl�1
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013

Photo Point 6 - Upstream
As Built — April 2011
Photo Point 6 - Downstream
As Built — April 2011
Photo Point 6 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Photo Point 6 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
B -11
Prepared For:
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
1 ' OSOCln
1`1111:11F, �
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
IV
Submittal Date: March 2013

R -12
Photo Point 7 - Upstream
As Built —April 2011
Photo Point 7 - Downstream
As Built — April 2011
Photo Point 7 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Photo Point 7 - Downstream
MY l — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
l.c�ny,t�n� Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013 Ire

B -13
Cross Section 1 - Upstream
As Built — April 2011
Cross Section 1 - Downstream
As Built —April 2011
Cross Section 1 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Cross Section 1 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
l',cusyytcnl Monitoring Year 1 of 5 ;PC Submittal Date: March 2013

B -14
Cross Section 2 - Upstream
As Built — April 2011
Cross Section 2 - Downstream
As Built — April 2011
Cross Section 2 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Cross Section 2 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
lc�n� °�tcn� Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013 PC

B -15
Cross Section 3 - Upstream
As Built —April 2011
Cross Section 3 - Downstream
As Built —April 2011
Cross Section 3 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Cross Section 3 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013 re

Cross Section 4 - Upstream
As Built — April 2011
Cross Section 4 - Downstream
As Built —April 2011
Cross Section 4 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Cross Section 4 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
B -16
Prepared For:
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
�5 tcnl
1�utitunt
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
pie
Submittal Date: March 2013

B -17
Cross Section 5 - Upstream
As Built —April 2011
Cross Section 5 - Downstream
As Built —April 2011
Cross Section 5 - Upstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Cross Section 5 - Downstream
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
l ;was Mcnl Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013 pit

11-18
,....�. _ - - —1
[ 1
Vegetation Plot 1
As Built —April 2011
Vegetation Plot 2
As Built —April 2011
g,
Vegetation Plot 1
MY I — June 2012
Vegetation Plot 2
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
r' Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
l �u�y�tcnl Monitoring Year 1 of 5 el
Submittal Date: March 2013

B -19
' Y
3
a-
� • ` `�� � ,pal;:
. ^Y.
w-
Vegetation Plot 3
As Built — April 2011
Vegetation Plot 4
As Built — April 2011
Vegetation Plot 3
MY 1 —April 2012
Vegetation Plot 4
MY 1 — June 2012
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
- Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013 Ire

Vegetation Plot 5
As Built — April 2011
Prepared For:
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
Vegetation Plot Photos
Lewis Creek/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Submittal Date: March 2013
Vegetation Plot 5
MY 1 —April 2012
Prepared By:
re
k-20
Q

PC
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 9 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

C -1
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met
(' /N)
Plot I
N
Plot 2
Y
Plot 3
Y
Plot 4
Y
Plot 5
Y

C -2
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8: CVS Vegetation Metadata Table
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Report Prepared By Jennifer Mathis
Date Prepared 12/17/2012 15 35
database name Lewis Creek CVS mdb
database location \\Charlotte-nc\JegProj ects\EIX10700\M5 -Field Monitoring Data \VEGETATION
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT--- _W____
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data
Prof, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes
Prof, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all naturaUvolunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Slip
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Slip
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY ----- ---- ------- ___ ----------- —_
Project Code
733
Project Name
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration
Description
Stream restoration in Henderson County, NC
River Basin
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
5

C -3
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9: CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Type--Shrub or Tree
P = Planted
T = Total
Current Data (MYI -2012)
Annual
Means
Species
Common Name
Type
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Current Mean
As Built
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
T
0
15
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
T
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
Asimma trdoba
pawpaw
S
2
2
0
0
5
5
3
3
0
0
2
2
2
2
Betula nmra
river birch
T
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
7
7
3
3
3
3
Car anus Carohniana
American hornbeam
T
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
T
1
1
0
0
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ilex opaca
American holly
T
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liriodendron tuhpifera
tuliptree
T
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Plantanus accidentalis
American sycamore
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
T
1
1
0
0
1 0
0
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
Rhus glabara
smooth sumac
T
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
Plot Area (acres)
Species Count
Stem Count
Stems per Acre
0.0247
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
5
21
10
10
12
13
14
14
15
15
15
17
15
15
202
850
405
405
486
526
567
567
607
607
607
688
607
607
Type--Shrub or Tree
P = Planted
T = Total

PC
APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Figures 3a -3e Cross - sections with Annual Overlays
Figure 4 Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Figures 5a -5d Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Tables 10a&b Baseline — Stream Data Summary Tables
Table 11a Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11b Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 3a: Cross - section with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Project Name
Lewis Creek
EEP Project Number
733
Cross - Section ID
XS-1, Pool, +292.52
1612012
Survey Date
2155.97
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
2151.88
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
40.61
Bankfull Width ft
25.31
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
2155.15
Flood Prone Width ft
113.96
Bankroll Mean Depth ft
1.60
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.27
W/D Ratio
15.82
Entrenchment Ratio
4.50
Bank Height Ratio
1 1.07
MI
XS-1: View Upstream
Station
Elevation
Notes
2157
2156
2155
2154
215348.73
2152
2151
2150
2149
2148
Lewis Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MYl Cross - Section 1 - Pool
-- - - - - -_
0.56
2155.97
xs1 Itop
0.81
2155.5
xsI lbop
3.18
2154.66
xsl
6.27
2153.11
xsi
8.17
2152.38
x51
14.45
215232
xsl
17.49
2152.11
xsl
24.56
2152.27
xs1
30.61
2152.44
- - -- -_-
35.72
2152.19
39.47
2152.49
41.8
2152.59
RI
45.83
2150.85
47.57
2150.01
2149.55
_ ..- _- ... -_._.. __- ....a -• ............... ..:.
.......................... ............................... .............................. .. ... ...:...........................
49.44
2148.7
l
50.78
2148.61
xs 1 tw
51.44
2148.78
xsl
52.49
2148.92
xsl
5194
2149.17
xsl
55.68
2149.34
­1
56.14
2149.55
xsl -
59.69
2150.65
xsl
65.73
2151.26
xsl
................................ ............................... ....... ................................................... ...............................
68.75
2151.88
xs] bkf
71.22
2152.14
xsl nob
73.87
2152.17
xsl
--
77.72
2152.37
xsl
82.88
2152.33
asl
87.69
2152.43
xsl
0 20 40 60 so 100 120
Station (ft)
97.82
2152.51
xsl
105.83
2152.46
xsl
111.74
2153.61
xsl
115.76
2154.65
xsl
• . • • •. Bankfull MYO -(AI Built 4/2011) MYl {62012) • • • • • • Water Surface
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restration
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 3b: Cross - section with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Project Name
Lewis Creek
EEP Project Number
733
Cross - Section ID
XS-2, Riffle +511.9
Survey Date
6/2012
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
2151.29
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft=)
34.52
Bankfull Width ft
23.16
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
215184
Flood Prone Width ft
116.14
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.49
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.55
W/D Ratio
15.54
Entrenchment Ratio
5.01
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
D -2
XS-2: View Upstream
XS-2: View Downstream
Station
Elevation
Notes
2156
2155
2154
2153
e
Y A 2152
2151
2150 -
2149
2148
2147
Lewis Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MY1 Cross - Section 2 - Riffle
0.05
2154.47
xs2 Ibo
1.96
2153.95
xs2
6.33
2152.56
xs2
- - -
8.7
2151.71
xs2
12.06
2151.42
xs2
18.33
2151.41
xs2
25.27
1 2151.51
xs2
31.05
2151.37
xs2
35.3
2151.25
xs2 tob/bkf
38
2150.41
xs2
39.09
2150.32
xs2
40.81
2149.85
xs2
42.16
2149.02
xs2 lew
4239
2148.82
xs2
45.34
2148.74
xs2 twg
47.26
2148.77
xs2
.................. .... ....... ..................... ........... ................... ... ............................... ......
48.18
2148.76
xs2
49.09
2148.82
xs2
50.51
21.49.02
xs2 rew
5133
214939
xs2
52.75
2150.14
xs2
55.5
2150.84
xs2
- -- - - - - --
........................._._.. ..........a...�.........- ... -.. �...... ...-.-........_.....................................-........_............ ...�........�.....�............
57.42
2151.4
xs2
5835
215146
xs2 nob
5938
2151.57
xs2
61.34
2151.46
xs2
63.54
215176
xs2
68.48
2151.51
xs2
73.5
2151.73
xs2
81.21
2151.5
xs2
8839
2151.5
xs2
96.56
2151.65
xs2
104.51
2151.66
xs2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Station (it)
• • • • • • water Surface ...... Bankfull MYO -(As Built 4/2011) MY2 {612012)
111.7
2152.12
xs2
116.34
2153.17
xs2
118.45
2153.47
xs2 rbo
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restration
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 3c: Cross - section with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Project Name
Lewis Creek
EEP Project Number
733
Cross - Section ID
XS-3, Riffle, +641.70
Survey Date
6/2012
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
2151.00
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
38.28
Bankfull Width ft
25.78
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
2153.63
Flood Prone Width ft
120.34
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1048
Bankfull Max Depth 00 ft
1 2.63
W/D Ratio
17.42
Entrenchment Ratio
4.67
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
XS-3: View Upstream
D -3
Station
Elevation
Notes
2155
2154
2153
e
•s
> 2(52
.2
2151
2150
2149
2148
Lewis Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MY1 Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
j
0.10
2154.04
xs3 m ,
2.65
2152.96
xs3
- -- - -- --- -
6.85
2151.53
xs3
13.72
2151.24
xs3
22.89
2151.41
xs3
32.78
2151.15
xs3
41.67
1 2151.22
xs3
48.79
2151.30
xs3
51.42
2151.08
xs3 Itob
54.31
2150.35
xs3
56.20
2149.85
xs3
"
57.45
2149.47
xs3
5832
214835
xs3 lew
59412
2148.64
xs3
61.20
2148.37
xs3tw
--
62.82
2148.42
xs3
64.48
2148.51
xs3
65.89
2148.51
xs3
66.86
2148.64
xs3
-
68.11
2148.75
xs3 rew
69.08
2149.11
xs3
69.94
2149.53
xs3
72.65
2150.05
xs3
74.84
2150.78
xs3
-- - - - -- - -- -
.............................................. ............................... ........... ...................................... ...............................
77.52
1 2151.00
xs3 rtob/bkf
80.51
1 2151.07
xs3
8415
2151607
xs3
91.03
2151.07
xs3
95.06
2151.18
xs3
107.98
2151.16
xs3
112.92
2151.18
xs3
117.92
2152.40
xs3
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Station (ft) -- --
...... Bankfull ...... Water Surface -+- MVO-(As Built 4/2011) - MYl- (6/2012)
121.72
2153.74
xs3
122.82
2153.80
xs3
123.52
2153.81
xs3 tbop
123.64
2154.23
xs3 trop
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restration
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 3d: Cross - section with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Project Name
Lewis Creek
EEP Project Number
733
Cross - Section ID
XS-4 Riffle 1 +214.24
Survey Date
6/2012
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
2149.67
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
40.85
Bankfull Width ft
23.41
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
2152.52
Flood Prone Width ft
147.75
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.75
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.85
W/D Ratio
13.38
ench
Entrment Ratio
6.31
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
D -4
XS4: View Upstream
XS -4: View Downstream
Station
Elevation
Notes
2153
2152,
2151
c
0
'a
2150
w
2149
2148
2147
2146
Lewis Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MY1 Cross - Section 4 - Riffle
-
0.74
2152.27
x54lto
0482
2152417
xs4 ibo
4.29
2152.17
xs4
7.88
2151.33
xs4
13.69
2149.92
xs4
20.3
2150.15
xs4
36.7
2149.99
xs4
43.11
2149.70
xs4
4739
2149.68
xs4
49.75
2149.67
xs4 ltob/bkf
50.75
214979
xs4
52.63
2148.64
xs4
\ - - - -
53.98
2148.42
xs4
54.%
2148.11
xs4
56.92
2147.40
xs4lew
58.12
2147.00
xs4
......................... ......... ..... ....................... .................................................. ...............................
58.89
2146.82
xs4 tw&
60.12
2146091
xs4
60.97
2146.97
xs4
62602
2146097
xs4
62.75
2146.88
xs4
64.25
2146.90
xs4
65.67
2147.40
xs4 rew
66.41
2147.86
xs4
69429
2148.16
xs4
71.14
2148.59
xs4
............................. ............................... ....... .. ........................................................ ...............................
73.23
2149.71
xs4
75.33
2149.97
xs4
77.72
2150.01
xs4 nob
82402
2149.99
xs4
93.93
2150.06
xs4
104.09
2150.16
xs4
114.14
2150.25
xs4
125.87
2150.34
xs4
138.71
2150.45
xs4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Station (ft)
145.12
2151.82
xs4
I4845
1 2151.77
xs4 rbo
148449
1 2152.38
1 xs4 rto
...... Baakfull ...... Water Surface ter-- MYO -(As Built 4/2011) --O-- MYI {6/2012)
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restration
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 3e: Cross - section with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year I of 5
Project Name
Lewis Creek
EEP Project Number
733
Cross - Section ID
XS-5, Pool, 1 +564.9
Survey Date
6/2012
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
2149.25
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
45.14
Bankfull Width (it7i
24.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
2152.85
Flood Prone Width ft
68.77
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.88
Bankfull Max Depth ft
160
W/D Ratio
12.77
Entrenchment Ratio
2.87
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
XS -5: View Upstream
D-5
XS-5: View Downstream
Station
Elevation
Notes
2153
2152
2151
a 2150
�^
a
d
,�
2149
2148
2147
2146
2145
Lewis Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MYl Cross - Section 5 - Pool
1.00
2150.39
xs5
4.32
2149.49
xs5
8008
2149.48
xs5
14.07
2149.38
xs5
18.95
2149.37
xs5
23.17
2149.25
xs5 Itob/bkf
25.55
2148.92
x55
29417
214830
xs5
31.04
2148.02
xs5
3121
2146.65
x95lew
34.41
214638
zs5
34.93
2146.49
xs5
35.64
2146.43
xs5
. .. ....... ....... ........ ... . .. .
.......... .... .................. ............................... ................. ...............................
36.64
2146.44
37.56
2146.26
38.49
2146.24
40.26
2146.13
40.9
2146.03
Mxs5twg
41.27
2145.79
42.47
2145.65
_
42.81
2146.09
43.4
2146.65
xs5 rew
43.98
2146.82
xs5
45.13
2147.36
xs5
........................................... ............................... ..................... ............... ............................... .............
47.11
214914
xs5
50.64
2149.88
xs5
51.85
2150.03
xs5 rtob
- -- - - -- - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - -- -- -- --
53.12
2150.11
xs5
56.78
2150.04
xs5
63.33
2149.99
xs5
66.43
2150.85
xs5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (ft)
6818
2151.78
xs5
69.76
2151.83
xs5 rbo
69.77
2152.25
xs5 rto
-
• • • • • • Bankfull ...... Water Surface -r- MYO -(As Built 4/2011) MYI- (6/2012)
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restration
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

D -6
Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 4: Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration, EEP Project No. 733
MY 1 - 6/2012
11GA
2153 -
A
2152 •
2151
2150
w
a
2149
a
w
2148
2147
2146
2145
2144
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Station (ft)
......••. Water Surface MY 1- (6/2012) MYO-(As Built 4/2011) MY1- (6/2012) ♦ Bankfull MY 1-(6/2012) O Cross - sections MY1- (6/2012)
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 5a: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
4
1 4°%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
4%
fine sand
0.250
0
0%
4%
medium sand
0.50
10
10°%
14%
coarse sand
1.00
16
16%
30%
very coarse sand
2.0
20
20%
50%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
6
6%
56%
fine gravel
5.7
8
8%
64%
fine gravel
8.0
3
3%
67%
medium gravel
11.3
0
0%
67%
medium gravel
16.0
4
4%
71%
course gravel
22.3
10
10%
81%
course gravel
32.0
11
11%
92%
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
97%
very coarse Pravel
64
2
2%
99%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1 %
100°%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100°%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
1 0%
100°%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100°%
TOTAL % of whole count
100
100%
100%
Summa
Data
D50
2
D84
25.16
D95
39.80
100%
90%
80%
70%
c 60%
3
I � so%
40%
z
S ^ 30% _
E 20%
V
10%
0%
ti
O�
Cumulative Percent
Individual Class Percent
80%
70%
60%
50%
g
ei 40% -- -- - --
30%
A
20%
V 10%
0%
Obti �tih Otis Oh ti ti Q y� 4 �ti� .Yb �,ti'?, �ti dh bb 90 ,vtiW
O• O
MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) ■ MY1- (6/2012)
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP 733
Monitoring Year 1
D -7

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 5b: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1
Description I
Material
Size (mm)
Total k
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
4%
fine sand
0.250
10
10%
14%
medium sand
0.50
15
15%
29%
coarse sand
1.00
10
10%
39%
very coarse sand 1
2.0
0
0%
39%
Gravel
ve r)� fine gravel
4.0
1
1%
40%
fine gravel
5.7
16
16%
56%
fine gravel
8.0
3
3%
59%
medium gravel
11.3
6
6%
65%
medium gravel
16.0
14
14%
79%
course gravel
22.3
1 10
10%
1 89%
course gravel
310
1 4
4%
93%
very coarse Aravel
45
1 3
3%
96%
very coarse Rravel
64
1 2
2%
98%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
98%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
99%
large cobble
180
1
1%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
I bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole count
100
100%
100%
Su7ry
Data
D50
5.01
D84
18.74
D95
36.55
100%
90%
80%
70%
C 60%
i 50%
i
40%
E 30%
3
zo%
10%
0%
MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) -MY1- (6/2012)
Individual Class Percent
25%
20%
c
u15%--
Y
d
810%
5% -- -- -
e 0% L
o�ti o1.y5 otih oy ti ti a h� e X17, tiro �,�g 3ti ay ea o�0 1ti� y�o tiye ,�yti ytiti
■ MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) MYl- 16/2012)
Cumulative Percent
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1
D -8

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 5c: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1
t
Description
I Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0150
13
13%
13%
medium sand
0.50
4
4%
17%
coarse sand
1.00
2
2%
19%
very coarse sand
2.0
2
2%
21%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
21%
fine gravel
5.7
0
0%
21%
fine gravel
8.0
7
7%
28%
medium gravel
11.3
14
14%
42%
medium gravel
16.0
11
11%
53%
course gravel
22.3
12
12%
65%
course gravel
32.0
14
14%
79%
very coarse gravel
45
13
13%
92%
very coarse wavel
64
3
3%
95%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1 %
96%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
98%
large cobble
180
2
2%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole count
100
100%
100%
Summa Data
D50
14.7?
D84
37.00
D95
64.00
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% -
d
d 50%
q 40%
S
E 30%
20%
30%
0%
--- MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) —MY1- (6/2012)
Cumulative Percent
Individual Class Percent
30%
25% - _-
20%
u
6
A
V
10% - - -- - _— — -
e 5% -
o %_,
OOra'L O��h Otiy Oh 1 ti h y'� �,v', ti0 ,L,y'!' 3ti Ah oi0 y,10 .1,00 .L00 .,ro'L yy'L
■ MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) MY1- (6/2012)
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project 733
Monitoring Year 1
D -9

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 5d: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1
Project Name: Lewis Creek
Data
Cumulative Percent
100%
90% - - --
', 80% --- - — - --
70% - - -- ---
S 60% ---- — -- —
g 50% - - --- -- --
40%
3
E
w 20% - -------- - - -� --
10% - - - - - -- - -
0% -- —
O MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) _ MYl- (6/2012)
.. __.___.___._.....
Individual Class Percent
30%
25% - - --
20% - - - -- - - -- - ---- -- -- -- - --
15% --- - - - - -- ----- —
5% -
111- IL IL
OOy'4 o1.yh O.ly Oh 1 '1. P y1 lb 3 ,tib ryv?� •,-v by rti' + Jb 14p ryyb
0MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) MY1- (6/2012)
Cross - Section: 4
Feature: Rime
23.38
MYI- 6/2012
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
Silt/Clay
0.062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very tine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
finesand
0.250
10
10%
10%
medium sand
0.50
3
3%
13%
coarse sand
1.00
4
4%
17%
very coarse sand
2.0
1 3
3%
1 20%
very fine gravel
4.0
8
8%
28%
Gravel
fine gravel
5.7
17
17%
45%
fine gravel
8.0
7
7%
52%
medium gravel
11.3
11
11%
63%
medium gravel
16.0
14
14%
77%
course gravel
22.3
6
6%
83 %.
course gravel
32.0
12
12%
95 %
ve coarse gravel
45
2
2%
97%
very coarse aravel
64
2
2%
99%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
99%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
larlie cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very larize cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0 o
100%
medium boulder
1024
1 0
1 0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100
Bedrock I bedrock 40096 0 0% 100%
TOTAL % of whole count 100 1 100% 100%
Summa
Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project
733
Monitoring Year 1
D -10
Data
D50 7
7.34
D84 2
23.38
D95 3
32.00
733
Monitoring Year 1
D -10

Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Figure 5e: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1
Project Name: Lewis Creek
Cross - Section: 5
Feature• Pool;
D84
MYI- 6/2012
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total 4
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
8
8%
8%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
4
4%
12%
fine sand
0.250
10
10%
22%
medium sand
0.50
18
18%
40%
coarse sand
1.00
15
15%
55%
very coarse sand
2.0
16
16%
71%
Gravel
very tine gravLl
4.0
12
12%
83%
fine gravel
5.7
7
7%
90%
fine gravel
8.0
3
3%
93%
medium mravel
11.3
2
2%
1 95%
medium gravel
16.0
4
4%
99%
course gravel
22.3
l
1%
100%
course gravel
32.0
1 0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel
45
1 0
0%
100%
very coarse aravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
1 100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very lar a cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
I bedrock
40096
0
1 0%
1 100%
TOTAL % of whole count
100
1 100%
1 100%
Summa Data
D50
0.83
D84
4.24
D95
11.30
100%
90%
80%
70%
C 60%
3
y 50%
4099
Z 30.9
E
20%
10%
0%
O� ti
Cumulative Percent
O~ •' 'y0 100
-MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) MY1- (6/2012)
Individual Class Percent
80%
70%
6099
e
g so°9
d
a 40%
3
30%
A
2099
v
c
10%
■ MYO- (4/2011) Particle Size (mm) MYI- (6/2012)
Appendix D: Stream Survey Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project 733
Monitoring Year 1
110111111

D -12
ream Survey Data
-
Table 10a: Baseline Stream Data;Summary Tables
Lewis Creek S' A m Resto^ra"tion%EEP Project:
N'%'R�it^;
J
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing
Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
-
LL
UL
Ea.
Min
Mean
Med
Max I
SD
n
I Mm
I Mean
Med
Max
SD
I n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
-
-
-
22111
-
2221
300
1 1544
1590
-
2471
2265
2398
2381
2538
108
500
Flood prone Width ft
-
-
-
-
>100
-
10000
10000
-
6000
7091
11425
11493
14886
2802
500
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
-
-
-
2 12
256
300
149
1 54
-
-
225
160
196
1 89
260
039
500
Bankfull Max Depth ft
-
-
-
-
355
458
300
240
270
-
339
264
355
309
587
131
500
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (fe)
1 5141
1
5522
300
2374
2376
_
5550
3631
47 15
4425
6597
1129
500
Width/Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
825
1 1151 1
300
1003
1067
1100
976
1256
1236
1462
1 194
500
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
1 600
1 629
648
240
279
479
495
625
1 25
500
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
1 53
179
1 25
-
1 25
1 00
100
1 00
1 00
1 00
000
500
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
-
-
-
-
2200
-
5100
2600
- 5200
4942
9883
4942
-
-
9883
-
-
Radius of Curvature ft
-
-
-
-
1437
-
69 28
2900
850 -
1580
-
4942
7660
4942
-
-
7660
Rc Bankfull vAdth ft/ft
-
-
-
-
07
-
2 75
2900
054 -
101
-
200
3 10
200
3 10
Meander Wavelength ft
-
-
-
-
40
163
2600
3000 3 32
8400
19767
29650
19767
29650
-
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
-
2
6 47
2600
-
-
200
400
200
400
Profile
Riffle Length ft
-
-
-
-
764
21 50
900
-
970
121 90
1175
34 18
5875
-
Riffle Sloe ft/ft
-
-
-
-
000
002
900
174
240
288
001
002
005
Pool Length ft
-
-
-
-
690
29411
1900
-
-
3030
12540
1492
1939
2386
Pool Max Depth R
-
-
-
-
35
47
30
-
49
54
05
08
12
Pool S acm (ft)_
-
-
-
-
3560
8458
.1600
4200
16300
-
7630
17200
6264
18830
27742
iTirans ort Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb /ft2
-
-
-
-
-
042
-
-
-
033
-
-
-
Max part size mm mobilized at bankful
-
-
-
-
1
22 16
-
7991
-
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
-
-
E5 /C5
E5
E5 /C5
C5
Bankful Velocity s
-
-
-
263
5 50
252
3146
Bankful Discharge cfs
-
-
-
-
140
131
140
-
Valley Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
1326
1379
Channel Thalweg Length ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
1750
1750
Sinuosity ft
-
-
-
-
111
130
132
129
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
-
00030
00109
00025
00022
BF slope ft/ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankful Flood lam Area acres
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Channel Stability or Habitat Memo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Biological or Other
-
I
-
-
-
-
-
-

D -13
Appendix D Stream,Survey Data
_ _ _
Table 10b Baseline,Stream,DataiSummary, (Substrate, Bed, Bankland3H'ydrologic Containment4Parameter "Distributions)
Lewis Creek StreamiRestoration/EEPIProlect No 733
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design
As- built/Baseline
Ri %/Ru %/P % /G % /S%
*
*
*
20/25/27/22/4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
*
*
*
0 01/0 53/0 13/0 29/0 02
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
0 08/0 17/0 28/5 02/13 14
0 12/0 30/0 75/64 00 /150 00
d50 =17 65
/* /* /19 30/110 18/126 39
Entrenchment Class <l 511 5 -1 99/2 0-
4 9/5 0 -9 9>101
2 0 > %100 < 4 9 (2 2)
5 0 > %100 < 9 9 (6 29,6 48)
2 0 > %100 < 4 9 (2 40)
2 0 > %100 < 9 9 (2 79,6 25)
Incision Class <1 2/12-149/1 5 -1 99/ >2 0
1 5 > %100 < 1 99 (1 53,1 79)
1 20 > %100 < 1 49 (1 25)
%100 < 1 20 (1 0)
%100 < 1 20 (1 0)

D -14
Appendix D. Stream,Survey Data
Table 11a•, Monitoring - Cross- SectiomMorphology Data -Table
Lewis CreekaStream iResfotandii/EEP'Prolect -Numbe 733
PARAMETER
Cross - Section 1 Riffle
Cross - Section
2 Pool
DIMENSION
Baseline
MYl -2012
MY2 -2013
MY3 -2014
MY4 -2015
MY5 -2016
Baseline
MY1 -2012
MY2 -2013
MY3 -2014
MY4 -2015
MY5 -2016
Bankfull Width ft
234
253
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2270
232
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Flood prone Width ft
1149
1140
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
11420
1161
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth
19
16
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 60
15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Max Depth ft
32
3 3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 10
26
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area ftZ
443
406
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3630
345
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
124
158
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1420
155
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
49
45
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
50
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bankheight Ratio
10
13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
468
468
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
347 1
347 1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 (mm)l
02
20
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 10540
50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
PARAMETER
Cross - Section
3 Pool
Cross - Section
4 Rifle
DIMENSION
Baseline
MYl -2012
MY2 -2013
MY3 -2014
MY4 -2015
MY5 -2016
Baseline
MYl -2012
MY2 -2013
MY3 -2014
MY4 -2015
MY5 -2016
Bankfull Width ft
247
258
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2380
234
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Flood prone Width ft
1223
1203
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14890
1478
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth
17
Is
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
200
18
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Max Depth ft
26
26
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
300
29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
41 7
383
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4760
409
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
146
174
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1190
134
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
50
47
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
63
63
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bankhei ht Ratio
10
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
335 7
335 7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3357
335 7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 (mm)
320
147
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
19 30
73
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Uata was not provided
PARAMETER
Cross - Section
5 Riffle
DIMENSION
Baseline
MY1 -2012
MY2 -2013
MY3 -2014
MY4 -2015
MY5 -2016
Bankfull Width ft
254
240
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Flood prone Width ft
709
688
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth
26
19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Max Depth ft
5 9
36
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ftZ )
660
451
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
98
128
1 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
28
29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bankhei ht Ratio
10
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
2172
2172
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
d50 (mm)
04
08
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

D -15
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Table l lb Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Lexix Creek Stream RatoraDunlithP Project No 733
d50-19 30/d84-1 10 18105-126 39
0 46/2 76/5 98121 70/36 73
Channel Swb,h Mcon.
e
I[
t .
.,,M.mU

PC
APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 6 Monthly Rainfall Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration March 2013
EEP Project No 733 Monitoring Year 1 of 5

E -1
Appendix E - Hydrologic Data
Table 12: Verification of Bankfull Events
Lewis Creek Stream Restorahon/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Date of Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo # (if available)
Jun -12
Unknown
Crest Gauge, visual indicators
N/A
Appendix E - Hydrologic Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix E - Hydrologic Data
Figure 6: Monthly Rainfall Data
Lewis Creek Stream Restoration Project /EEP Project No. 733
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
E -2
12
11 _ - -
10
9
v8 ......._. _....._.. — - -- —
s
U
7
Monthly Precipitation (site)
0 6
+� 30th Percentile (region)
ra
a 5 ®— 70th Percentile (region)
U
V 4
L
3 - ..._
2 _...
1
0
titi titi titi ti� ti� ti� titi titi ti� ti� ti� ti�
°, OeG >a� ��� lac PQ� �aJ >J� >J\ PJ� 5e0
*Regional rainfall data referenced from NC Cronos Database Divisonal Data for the Southern Mountains of North Carolina - Data Period November 2011 through October 2012.
Monthly precipitation referenced from the NC CRONOS database, Station NC- HN -15, November 2011 through October 2012.
Appendix E - Hydrologic Data
Lewis Creek Stream restoration
Year 1 of 5