HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140087 Ver 1_401 Application_20140114i4 7
CAROLINA 3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
EC YSTEMS9 INC, P:919- 606 - 1065 —F:919 -585 -5570
January 22, 2014 Dt i LrPE
Mr. James Lastinger Q
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers NR - WATER UA LITY
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 W r r3ranc
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
RE: Pre - Construction Notification: Nationwide Permit 29 & General Certification No. 3890
The Preserve at White Oak Creek
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lastinger;
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc., on behalf of Raleigh Land Fund 1, LLC and Bass, Nixon, and
Kennedy Inc., has prepared the attached pre - construction notification for the above referenced
project for a Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit 29 and a Section 401 Water
Quality Certification No. 3890. The Preserve at White Oak Creek project is a planned residential
development consisting of single and multi - family homes and a recreational center. Open space
and adequate room for stormwater BMPs have been reserved throughout the site to provide
environmental protections and a high quality of life for residents. The project will help to meet
the high demand for residences around the Town of Apex.
The attached PCN form provides information for use in your review of the impacts to streams
and wetlands associated with this site. Supplemental information is provided in this cover letter
including a detailed breakdown of proposed impacts and mitigation. Additional information is
contained in the attachments including a Project Information Sheet, Pre - Construction
Notification form, Vicinity map, USGS map, NRCS Soil Survey map, and Impact Locations
map. BNK has provided the attached overall site plan (Sheet C.1.1) and wetland and stream
impact drawings for your review of this project.
Proposed Impacts and Mitigation
Based on prior conversations with you and NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) staff and
our review of the proposed impacts, it is our professional opinion that the project qualifies for a
Nationwide Permit 29 and General Certification 3890. Please note that Impact Site C (PCN
Impact S3) was determined to be a jurisdictional stream lacking significant aquatic function.
Therefore, the impacts to this channel, 129 linear feet, are not considered to count toward the
threshold for the Nationwide Permit 29. Total linear footage of impacts to streams with
important aquatic function for this project is 287 linear feet. Impacts to waters of the U.S. total
416 linear feet of stream impacts and 0.19 acres of wetland impacts. A breakdown of permanent
and temporary impacts is provided in the attached Site Impacts and Mitigation tables, along with
Mr James Lastinger Page 2 of 3
January 22, 2014
proposed mitigation based on our discussions during the field verification visit Permanent
stream impacts include linear footage of stream within culvert areas and riprap outlet protection
areas Permanent wetland impacts include roadway and embankment fill to the toe of slopes,
and permanently maintained sewer corridor Temporary wetland impacts include areas needed
for construction access and installation of erosion and sediment control measures These
temporary impact areas will be restored to pre - construction grades and stabilized using
appropriate annual species or a wetland seed mix
Impact site C (PCN S3) was determined during field verification to not exhibit significant
aquatic function Therefore, no mitigation is proposed to satisfy Nationwide 29 requirements for
this channel However, NCDWR will require I 1 mitigation for this impact. As impact site A
(PCN S 1) was determined to be a perennial stream, requiring 2.1 mitigation by your standards
and 1 • I by NCDWR, the overall total for mitigation is similar and compensatory mitigation has
been requested to satisfy the larger amount of 439 mitigation units
No mitigation banks with available credits are present within the same basin as this project
Therefore a request for mitigation from the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program was made, and
the approval is attached. As the construction of this project will be phased, the compensatory
mitigation payments are proposed to be phased as well Payment will be made to compensate for
all Phase 1 impacts prior to construction in those areas Similarly, payment will be made for all
Phase 2 impacts prior to construction Proof of payment for each phase will be forwarded upon
receipt and prior to construction The phasing is shown on the attached Site Impacts and
Mitigation table
Riparian Buffers & Stormwater Management
The Town of Apex has authority under the Jordan Lake watershed rules for the review of
riparian buffer impacts and stormwater management plans A No Practical Alternatives
Demonstration is being submitted to the Town concurrently with this permit application for their
approval of the proposed buffer impacts, which are provided for informational purposes on the
impact drawings in this application The general location of BMPs has been provided in the
attached site plan. Final design of these measures, along with associated forms and
documentation, will be submitted to the Town for review. Approval of the stormwater
management plan for the site will be forwarded to NCDWR prior to construction in each phase
of the project
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at your earliest
convenience at (919) 606 -1065 or phil may @carolinaeco com
Mr. James Lastmger
January 22, 2014
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
1
Philip May
Senior Environmental Scientist
cc Jennifer Burdette, NCDWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
J Adam Ashbaugh, P E, AICP, LEED AP, Raleigh Land Fund 1, LLC
Robbie Bell, P E, Bass Nixon Kennedy, Inc
Page 3 of 3
TABLE I
SITE IMPACTS & MITIGATION
THE PRESERVE AT WHITE OAK CREEK
Streams all units are linear feet
Impact, nea ion
11 Permanent R-'��I,empora
""'Orr
1.41 zq
SqMv..q-, -AchELsjQAq -Acr s, Acres `�'-'-'
tt�&;_ e�
I r Ratio* 'M
Pr6p�ose d'"1v M ' itig'ation
—PCN:k0
Site mp
'
D W2 I WF
3983 009 3525 008 458 001
2 7050 016
,R
�W
A S1
I SA
152
152 0
2 1
304 152
B S2
2 SG
135
135 0
1 1
135 135
C S3
1 SD
1 129
129 0
1 0 1
1 0 129
Totals
1 416
416 0
1
1 439 416
* Mitigation ratios based on conversations during field verification
Wetlands
I pact ,,, De� Anea-6
e 0
IM FD 6,711
SI Muk
11 Permanent R-'��I,empora
""'Orr
1.41 zq
SqMv..q-, -AchELsjQAq -Acr s, Acres `�'-'-'
tt�&;_ e�
Mit, I
Ratio
B W1 2 WIL, WO, WP
3221 007 2748 006 473 001
2 5496 013
D W2 I WF
3983 009 3525 008 458 001
2 7050 016
E W3 1 WG
101 000 101 000 0 000
2 202 000
F W4 2 WN
367 001 296 001 71 000
2 592 001
G W5 I WQ
142 000 142 000 0 000
1 142 000
H W6 I WE
73 000 73 000 0 000
2 146 000
11 W6 I WF
316 001 316 001 0 000
2 632 001
ITotals
7814 019 7201 017 1002 002
14260 033
*Impact acreage rounded to 0 01 increments Totals and mitigation are based on total square footage
** Mitigation provided for permanent impacts related to construction and permanent maintained sewer corridor
Buffers* all impacts are in square feet
act "PCN i,
I ��' Y-, OITA i pi 6 TXffe'lineation!:51
i(ri—P XT'
Z
p
W1
mp
D,
'ffifi&lo n
!Wj�i as e
pa� li
C
Total ;we
Typek::O' Status IN, I
31
i
Im
A NA I SA
11,900 7,478 4,422
Road Allowable
None required
B NA 2 SG
12,339 7,706 4,633
Road Allowable
None required
C NA I SD
10,785 7,007 3,778
Road Allowable
None required
i
135,024 22,191 12,8331
1
* Included for informational purposes only Jordan Lake buffer impacts to be permitted through the Town of Apex
ids i�
L 8 s
Project Information Sheet
Project Name The Preserve at White Oak Creek
Name of Property Owner /Applicant Raleigh Land Fund 1, LLC
Consultant/Agent Carolina Ecosystems, Inc
Related /Previous Action IDs None
Site Address N/A
Subdivision Name (if applicable) N/A
City Apex, NC
County Wake County
Lat 35 7553 Long -78 9087
3040 NC 42 West, Clayton, NC 27520
P 919 - 606 -1065 — F 919 -585 -5570
Date 1/22/14
USGS Quadrangle(s) Green Level and New Hill
River Basin(s) Cape Fear
8 -Digit HUC(s) 03030002
Nearest Stream(s) White Oak Creek
Directions to Site From Raleigh, take US -1 S /US -64 W heading toward Apex Take exit 98B to US-
64 W Turn right on to NC- 1600 /Green Level Church Rd Turn left on to Jenks Rd and proceed
about 1 mile to the Site
Requested Action
❑ Pre - application Request
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ Final ❑ Preliminary
® Permit Application ® Nationwide 29
❑ General
❑ Individual
ot WA
r
> .y
O �
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 29 or General Permit (GP) number
is
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
f f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or m- lieu °fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
® Yes
❑ No
1 g
is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
The Preserve at White Oak Creek
2b
County
Wake County
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Apex
2d
Subdivision name
The Preserve at White Oak Creek
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Beverly W Hams & Charles B Harris Jr
Warren T Heirs Tunstall
3b
Deed Book and Page No
11209 pg 2199
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
J Adam Ashbaugh, P E
3d
Street address
516 N West Street
3e
City, state zip
Raleigh, NC, 27603
3f
Telephone no
(919) 256 -1981
3g
Fax no
(919) 256 -1982
3h
Email address
adam@a LStarLand corn
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h. Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Phil May
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Carolina Ecosystems Inc
5c
Street address
3040 NC Hwy 42 West
5d
City, state, zip
Clayton, NC 27520
5e
Telephone no
(919) 606 -1065
5f
Fax no
(919)- 585 -5570
5g
Email address
phd may@carolmaeco corn
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Vernon
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
0722691867, 0722695238, and 0722793375
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 7553 Longitude - 78 9089
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1 c Property size,
124 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
White Oak Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WS -IV
2c River basin
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Existing site is currently forest land with some utility infrastructure (pipeline and powerline) The surrounding land use is a
mix of light residential development and forested areas with some farmland
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
2 69 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
4205 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose ofthe project is to provide single and multi -family residences to meet the high demand for housing around
Apex
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
Land clearing will take place along with installation of erosion control devices. Road, sewer, and water infrastructure will
be built and lots graded per the attached plans Individual homes will be constructed and sedimentlerosion control basins
converted into stormwater BMPs prior to occupancy Construction will be accomplished using typical equipment including
excavators, backhoes, pans, and dumptrucks. Additional equipment may be used as required
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Preliminary JD requested November 2013
4b It the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Carolina Ecosystems Inc
Name (if known) Phil May and Brian Smith
Other
4d If yes, Mist the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Field verification performed on 11/14/13
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? I ® Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain
Phase 1 will consist of all construction south of Impact Site B Phase 2 will consist of all impacts from Site B north All
impacts from both phases are included in this permit application, however please refer to the cover letter for the proposed
phasing of compensatory mitigation in -lieu fee payments
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1 a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
21
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ®T
Road fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
007
W2 ®P ®T
Road fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
009
W3 ®P ❑ T
Road fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
<0 01
W4 ®P ®T
Road fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
<0 01
W5 ®P ❑ T
Sewer excavation
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
<0 01
W6 ®P ❑ T
Trail boardwalk
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
<0 01
2g. Total wetland impacts
019
2h Comments See attached impact table for more detailed breakdown Impact Sites H and I are combined in W6
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
UT1 White Oak
Creek (SA)
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
15
152
S2 ® P [IT
Culvert
UT2 White Oak
Creek (SG)
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
10
135
S3 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
UT3 White Oak
Creek (SD)
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWO
6
129
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑P ❑T
[I PER
❑Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
416
31 Comments See cover letter for explanation of impact totals and Nationwid Permit 29 thresholds
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number–
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P [IT
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
5 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected, riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you, MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico [I Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number –
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
T
impact
required?
—Temporary
F71 Yes
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
❑ Yes
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
61. Comments Jordan Lake buffers will be permitted through the Town of Apex.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
is Specifically descnbe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Roadway connections and extensions to adjacent properties were made as required by the Town of Apex The roadway
alignment was revised at the northerly stream crossings (impacts B & F) in order to avoid /minimize stream, buffer, and
wetland impacts Applicant worked with the Town of Apex transportation staff to reduce roadway cross section and pavement
widths at stream crossing locations in order to minimize impacts to the greatest extent allowable The lot count was reduced
from 350 (authorized zoning approval) to 310 in order to reduce wetland, stream, and buffer impacts Side slopes at stream
crossings are 2 1 to minimize stream,wetland, and buffer impacts Culverts have been embedded in the stream channels to
ensure aquatic passage A sill will be placed in the right barrel at impact site B /S2 in order to retain stream dimensions The
sill will beset at the floodplain elevation No buffer encroachment for stormwater, lot grading, or sewer lines is anticipated
Lots will not be platted in the riparian buffer Stormwater BMPs will be implemented, upon approval by the Town of Apex, and
conform to the requirements of the Jordan Lake buffer rules
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented according to NC requirements, and approved by NCDENR prior
to implementation Jurisdictional areas that are not permitted to be impacted and are adjacent to construction areas will be
clearly marked with protection fencing or other similar method to avoid inadvertent encroachment Copies of the issued
permits and impact areas will be provided to the prime contractor and all subcontractors working in or near jurisdictional areas
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
® ro Payment to in -lieu fee ram
y p g
project9
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
® Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
439 linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mingation.requested (DWQ only)
0 square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
0 5 acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
0 acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
0 acres
4h Comments See cover letter for proposed phasing of mitigation payments and detailed breakdown of proposed mitigation
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Verson
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
0
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments Jordan Lake buffer impacts are allowable (road crossings under mitigation thresholds) and will be permitted
throught the Town of Apex
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Comments A diffuse flow plan is being developed and will be submitted for approval
❑ Yes ® No
to the Town of Apex with the Stormwater Management Plan
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
TBD %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
BMPs will be constructed in compliance with the Jordan Lake watershed rules in the locations shown on the attached site
plan Review and approval of these BMPs and Stormwater Management Plan will be
performed by the Town of Apex
prior to any site construction being performed The stormwater plans and Apex approval will be provided to NCDWR prior
to any clearing or other construction activity occurring on the site
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
in which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Apex
❑ Phase 11
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information '
1. Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
1 a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
r_1 Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the protect require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter)
Comments
2. Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWO Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWO Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
E] Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWO policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The project is not anticipated to promote additional development Several developments are planned in the area
independent of this project, and the road and public utility connections being provided by this project are not anticipated
to open up significant new development areas
4. Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater from this project will be transported via proposed Town of Apex infrastructure to the Western Wake Regional
Water Reclamation Facility The Town has capacity for this project within its existing permitted limits
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you'checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate -the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Websitehttp / /www fws gov /raleigh /species /cntylist/wake html, for Wake County, North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program GIS data updated October 2013, and onsite habitat review
6. -Essential Fish-Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH mapper
7.. Historictor Prehistoric Cultural)Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a y Will this project occur =in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e g_,,, National_ Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
❑ Yes ®, No
-North Carolina historyyand archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did.you,use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPOWEB Map Service httpJ /gis ncdcr gov /hpoweb/
National Register of Historic Places http* / /www.nps gov /nr /research/
8. Flood Zone_Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA,requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Wake County GIS floodplain mapping, North Carolina
°Floodpiain`Mapping Program httpJ /www ncfloodmaps com/
16Y 14
-Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Age 's Signatur
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an au nzation lefts from the applicant
is provide
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
-,.F.cosMem
PROGRAM
January 8, 2014
J Adam Ashbaugh
L Star Management, LLC
516 N West Street
Raleigh, NC 27603 Expiration of Acceptance- July 8, 2014
Project. Preserve at White Oak County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations of authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S L 2011 -343
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification /LAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required initigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www nceep net
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq Ft )
Buffer II
(Sq Ft )
Cold
Cool Warm
Rt
Non -Ri arian
Coastal Marsh
Cape Fear
03030002
0
0 574
garian
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28 2010
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP if you have any questions or need additional mformation, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915
Sincerely,
t i
James Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands,401 Unit
James Lastinger USACE- Raleigh
Chem Smith, NCDWR - Raleigh
Phil May, agent
File
R.estor' ... f ... Protect` our sta,% ATA
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699- 1652 / 919- 707 -8976 / www nceep net
AUTHORIZATION FORM
Property Information
Proper Address
and/or Description
Parcel Identification
Number(s) (PIN)
1401 Davis Drive, Apex NC 27523 -8231
3040 NC Hwy 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
P:919- 606 -1065 - F:919 -585 -5570
0743630991 ,0743539444,0743631186
City. Apex State: NC
County-Wake
Type, of Project. Jurisdictional Determination Property Size (Acres)
Property Owner Information
Legal Owner Gary Howell - Raleigh Land Fund I, LLC has,approval to perform studies and surveys
Name
Authorizing
Owner's /Agent's Name
& Title
Owner's /Agent's
Street Address
Steven J Vining,
Manager
14.76
(Title must be listed as owner, Partner, Officer, or Authorized Agent Authorized Agent must attach proof of such status)
516 N West Street
City: Raleigh StateNC
Zip Code-27603
Please sign the appropriate line(s)below for the access being authorized to Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Property Access Authorization
I hereby grant Carolina Ecosystems, Inc (CEI) staff, their designated contractors and representatives, as well as
Federal, State or local authorities access to the above referenced properties for,the purposes of conducting
environmental consulting services. These services may include regulatory determinations of environrental
features on my property. 'I certify-that I am the legal owner, or authorized agent of the legal, owner of the above
property and have authority to grant such access.
Owner /Agent (signature)%_ il��..�� Date S? 4-
Anent Authorization
I authorize CEI to act as authorized agent. on behalf of the owner of the above listed property for the
communication, submission, and /or application to relevant government entities, including local, state, and
federal authorities, for the review, acceptance, concurrence, and /or approval of environmental information,
documents, and /or permit requests concerning the above listed property. I have made CEI aware of, and
supplied all available records related to, previous environmental investigations on the subject property -of which
I have knowledge.
Owner /Agent (signatur Date i / 2-211 f-
- - J
d lire Oak Creek - Cary
teems L J L—
I
- --
� aiich
C•"
rD
O
`G• o � it
0 �
G rr
a
`lcreS R
U
Z
C�ch L
ct'c'
C'hU.
fc
till
N 64 — - Apex yi
a C
T rhave�
Wake County, N
CAROLINA N Figure 1: Vicinity
ECOSYSTEMS, INC. O Stud% Area
3040 NC 42 West; Clayton NC, 27520 0 025 OS
USES Named Streams The Preserve at
P:(919)- 606 -9145 F:(919) -585-5570 Iles Roads White Oak Creek
NC H\\) L Star Management
January 2014 ✓ US Route Wake County
r� \di11
ac ffill I I rpDjaac 'd
Ac
CAROLINA Figure 2: USGS
ECOSYSTEMS, INC. The Preserve at
3040 N(' 42 Wcst� Cla.\lon NC, 27520: 250 500
P:(919)-606-91451::(919)-i8�-�570 NONE==== Feet Study Area White Oak Creek
L Star Management
January 2014 Green I,e\el USGS 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Wake County
lr l�
�f
' �'$lieet
a� - S6eet
�. 464 a-
3
- W,NWI
.�. A
CAROLINA N Figure 3: NRCS Soil Survey
ECOSYSTEMS, INC. The Preserve at
3040 NC 42 West; Cla%ton NC, 27520 0 250 500
P:(919 )-606 -9145 F:(919)- 585 -5570 iFeet O Study Area White Oak Creek
L Star Management
January 2014 NRCS Wake CountN Soil SurveN : Sheets 55 and 65 Wake County
., f,
ZONE 1 IMPACT ZONE 2 IMPACT AREA OF TEMP. AREA OF TEMP. AREA OF TEMP.
AREA OF INNER 30' OF OUTER 20' OF STREAM IMPACT FOR ZONE 1 IMPACT FOR ZONE 2 IMPACT FOR
IMPACT STREAM IMPACT STREAM IMPACT NEUSE BUFFER NEUSE BUFFER EROSION CONTROL EROSION CONTROL EROSION CONTROL
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT (LIN. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
A STREAM IMPACT 152 2.326 6.739 49007 160 739 415
\`\\
P\ I I I I LEGEND
\ I I �\ \ \ �\ ��;� \ 20' ZONE 2 20' ZONE 2 TEMP.
\ \` \\�' 1 I'`,Aj I �� \\ \ \ �` I , /, IMPACT IMPACT FOR
1 �� oll I •1 I i I \ \ i I i EROSION CONTROL
►� i ►\ loll I ♦� \ \ 1�� I I I '��♦I I \ \� \\ \ \ W \ I Al ;
I 30' ZONE 1
30' ZONE 1 TEMP.
I♦ I \ \ O i \ /
i�v i IMPACT
EROSIMPACT FOR
ION CONTROL
I 1
\ \� \ I ���\ �� I I ' 1 I I I I ( \\ �� \ 1 ► �♦ �� �� i /•I i
STREAM STREAM TEMP.
�� \ \ /• I , Y IMPACT IMPACT FOR
O
/ / I I i / J / I I R •i \\ �\ �\ \ \ t EROSION CONTROL
/ �// �' ' y�, /, ! / I I , � I � I tom• I Q� � �
IIIIi�/ jj TEMPORARY IMPACT ✓ �•i 335
FOR EROSION — CONTROL i`
V IN \ , \ 330
325
`\ (PER—+4CDOT 30'` 320
\ X315
�TEMe&ARY`,IMPA T- \\
\ ` • �` �� , \ ' _ PQR EROS40N`C`0\\
�\ .X ' 310
\ 305
\ \` \ 300
�\ �\ PROPOSED Q \ \ \ \\
\ \ ♦ `/ HEADWALL
(PER NCDOT m i g•'i 1
\ \ \ \ \ ♦ / _ \ \ `S\TANDARDS) �`( �\ ;;1` 295
,
I 1jl
\ \ - \ - - -- I 1 \
FLOW
285
\ � 'o I\ \
- -• -d\ 275
\ I \, � ••�. � \\ \\" 270
\ \ \ \ \� \ - I ��\ •�• \\ \\
0 15 30 60 90 120 � � � � `\ '• \
IMPACT A
12161120132:10:21 PM L :jeremy R:-* 013 *1311 - reserve of White Ook(unstoll- Harris) VIL*Con
ruc
1+00
D
2+00
km6Z6]
Y
W
W
V
4z cc
p cai
LAJ0�0
Lu
0
Q ~ u
� J 3
W
%W°Cp
WZ0u
LLJ CL
CL
W I
A
O ''l > cc
zs
>_
ow
AS$
2 W�'q
Y a g-
.66111
KF
yZ
4l
oft !�
•�j i 1 1 ii ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i� 1 1 � � /
V.
♦ ♦e • • • • 1 ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i 1
mmmmmmmmmmuzz Con
� ♦♦: 2222 _____________
♦ ♦ i .� _______ _222__22_2_2__2______222__s
1 / � ♦ ♦ �' 2222_ _________ ____________________ 22_i. ___
♦ ♦ 2222_ __________ 2222_222222222222222222.aa_
Nunn _________________
♦ ♦ ♦ ____22___2 _____ 2___2_2____2222__2_
conazzommung --- ♦ ♦ __________ _____ 222____2__ 2222__
,��••. •►•..�2:� 222222222222222222222222222 ________ _______________________ •
• • "� , iii r -,��: � ♦i• • ° ____________________________ __■�___________________________
man mm"MMUCCOMMMMMUZZ
M 1A ♦��: % /A�j ., / ♦Iii._ � : /e•"�,���i //� � •Jt♦ ♦1� ___________________________ _______________________________
common
______________________ _______________________________
IF
♦♦ ♦fit / ►•� ♦iiI , • ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ,• • , ____________________�
1' ♦ / '� t ____
_____2_2_____2_________222222_
________________ .......
_______
_ C,. � ♦ ��'q`• / / / /.Rid ♦I� ♦�. _ • ___ _______________________________
� � / ♦ / it t ♦ ' • • ________
MW fs) ♦ ♦ ♦ ___________________ ________
__________________
_________________
_ __________________________
♦ ♦� ________ 22__2__22_____22__222______iii_ ____________ 2222__
♦ ♦ 2222__________
: ♦.j ___________________________
• 2222____ 22222222222222_ 2222222 _222222222 2222222222222222_2
� 1� ♦� c ___________________________ _____________ ____________222222
• 2222 2222________22__ ____________________ ___________2__22__
• • ___22____2________ ____________ _________________222222__
/ �♦ 22222222222222222 22222222222222 ___--------_222222__ —__2
SM
�• ' ' • , ______22_22_22______ __ 22222_222222222___ _______222222_____.
� __222222222222222222 22222222222222222222 222222222222222222
________ _______________________________
______2___22__2 22__ 2____ _______________________________
____________________ _______________________________
mmmmmmmmmmm
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------
Ir
I MPAC T
DESIGNATION I TYPE I
C STREAM I
CA
I
I I I I I I I I I
I I' I I I I it I
I I I
I I i Ill
I II I I I I
/
I ~ J-, I ��
I I I
i
II I I Iii i l
14, 1
I —r I _ I
WWA
MOM
of l
t `
ZONE 1 IMPACT ZONE 2 IMPACT
INNER 30' OF OUTER 20' OF S
NEUSE BUFFER NEUSE BUFFER
(SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
60011 1 3.309
/ I 11
/
FO EEO IO1'4MC- 1,
��
AREA OF TEMP. AREA OF TEMP. AREA OF TEMP.
TREAMI IMPACT FOR ZONE 1 IMPACT FOR ZONE 2 IMPACT FOR
EROSION CONTROL EROSION CONTROL EROSION CONTROL
(SO. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
75 996 469
LEGEND
i � r
� / it I Il/♦IY��
o \ 7
I
11 I �! �� /•� �'�� �'' i' �� Ill
p) i /� • , , , ,
l II i I 1 1 1 11 1 `'' 1 I I I TF,MPORARY( 1 PA, /( '
I i' I I I 1 11 4, 11 0 1 I I �� FOR EROS�'QN CONT/iC ,
III O II I I 1 1' 11 1 1 1 ( 11 I -nIJ ` / ( QD' Z / M
11 1 I. 1 ( r . / / /
l i I II III II 1 0. 11 1 111 11 �0 301 ZONE 1 ' ONE 2,/l ^�
120 11
I i I I II I i i t
ONE 2 Z'ONE 1 i I! / 50' ,NEUSE R I V R
BUF R( ASU '
15 NE 5E R I,VER I /' FRO TOP , ByNK)
I I I I I 1 'I B �F'
F R (MEASURED 1 rFM P 0,, BANS
33 ,
I I I I SCALE IN
0 15 30 60 90 120 IMPACT C
emy R: *201 *1 11 - Preserve at White ok(unstall- Harris
IRRI . a x,, . / 1
• / U
�i
�i
C.
mi
cl
mi
CI
mi
mi
mmi
me mi
mi
mi
mi
mmmi
memi
mi
C
s�
�
'
m
�i
onstruction *Wetland irmac
pill ■
.don
2+00
3+00
Y
W
W
V
Q ~ J
0w-
a °
W z
LL
J
Lu a
�Lg
W
D
Q Z W
Lu
W Lu
�Zn.
Lu �o
W
W a c
a
W
2
o °0
a
CU
z
@12168
Hill
z _
Lu aglo
he Z1.
Lug 81oil
oz =s_
mgkz W
c6 co m
you
AREA OF
STREAM IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT
• 1 t'♦
M•
•i4
j 1•f-f �•..•i
�1
WWA
MOM
of l
t `
ZONE 1 IMPACT ZONE 2 IMPACT
INNER 30' OF OUTER 20' OF S
NEUSE BUFFER NEUSE BUFFER
(SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
60011 1 3.309
/ I 11
/
FO EEO IO1'4MC- 1,
��
AREA OF TEMP. AREA OF TEMP. AREA OF TEMP.
TREAMI IMPACT FOR ZONE 1 IMPACT FOR ZONE 2 IMPACT FOR
EROSION CONTROL EROSION CONTROL EROSION CONTROL
(SO. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
75 996 469
LEGEND
i � r
� / it I Il/♦IY��
o \ 7
I
11 I �! �� /•� �'�� �'' i' �� Ill
p) i /� • , , , ,
l II i I 1 1 1 11 1 `'' 1 I I I TF,MPORARY( 1 PA, /( '
I i' I I I 1 11 4, 11 0 1 I I �� FOR EROS�'QN CONT/iC ,
III O II I I 1 1' 11 1 1 1 ( 11 I -nIJ ` / ( QD' Z / M
11 1 I. 1 ( r . / / /
l i I II III II 1 0. 11 1 111 11 �0 301 ZONE 1 ' ONE 2,/l ^�
120 11
I i I I II I i i t
ONE 2 Z'ONE 1 i I! / 50' ,NEUSE R I V R
BUF R( ASU '
15 NE 5E R I,VER I /' FRO TOP , ByNK)
I I I I I 1 'I B �F'
F R (MEASURED 1 rFM P 0,, BANS
33 ,
I I I I SCALE IN
0 15 30 60 90 120 IMPACT C
emy R: *201 *1 11 - Preserve at White ok(unstall- Harris
IRRI . a x,, . / 1
• / U
�i
�i
C.
mi
cl
mi
CI
mi
mi
mmi
me mi
mi
mi
mi
mmmi
memi
mi
C
s�
�
'
m
�i
onstruction *Wetland irmac
pill ■
.don
2+00
3+00
Y
W
W
V
Q ~ J
0w-
a °
W z
LL
J
Lu a
�Lg
W
D
Q Z W
Lu
W Lu
�Zn.
Lu �o
W
W a c
a
W
2
o °0
a
CU
z
@12168
Hill
z _
Lu aglo
he Z1.
Lug 81oil
oz =s_
mgkz W
c6 co m
you
I MPAC T
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT
D I WETLAND IMPACT
`a
\ \
I"\
.15:
AREA OF
AREA OF TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT
(LIN. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
128 3.525 458
U
.X.,cl I i
�/---T'EMPOR`4RY ^WPAGT
W tD - -\-
,T 1
\
IMPACT D
emy K:
\
\
V
325— — -
TEMP- ORAR_Y IMPACT
FOR EROS I-ON -CONTROL - — - ' �!
LEGEND
\
\
- rreserve a
IMPACT
i '
� 1 `
� 1 `
• W � W .y W \
RIP RAP- 0VS -S IPATOR P J \
-L-=-24' ___ - --I -
i- - -9T -- - -- - -- \
SCALE IN FEET
MEM
0 15 30 60 90 120
t White Oak(unstall- Harris) V L*Construction -*Wetlar
I MPACT
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT
E WETLAND IMPACT
IMPACT E
mpact Maps M A - and E-don
AREA OF Y
WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT W
(L IN. FT.) (SO. FT.) LU
23 101 lu
�7 V
�i u �i� i /� �� W L)
p v
Wapz
I I J LL Z
dog
_350'' - H IS W
a;J3
451 W
>W°C�
Z a
340 WZOJo
W O
_ a a °
W
\\ ¢ CD
Z Z
LLJ 3c
\ \
m F Q 4.
o a ¢ a
Z
I
1 � Q
W 1 1 Z Q
1 s I I Y C7 °
Wogs
\ O \ ci
\ \ 032
\
Z :) ui
\ ` xo
W Z k'
\
1 \ mU
\
1 1
AREA OF
AREA OF TEMPORARY
IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT (LIN. FT.) (SO. FT.) (SO. FT.)
IF WETLAND IMPACT 43 296 71
LEGEND � 1
WETLAND
IMPACT
I
TEMPORARY ►
IMPACT --
\
co ` v�
2
I I
I
----- - - -- -/ - -- - -- / - - - - - -- �1 - - - -� - -/ --
i j
—293
-
__ I
I , \ �
' ' 1 EMPO ARY IMPACT
FOR E OSIO� CONTROL`,
AREA OF Y
IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT W
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT (LIN. FT.) (SO. FT.) LU
G WETLAND IMPACT 17 142 V
-----------------------
- - ------------- - - - - -- - LU a z
/ •., �' G n
y •.v, v w w w W v J fL 0
ul in
/ \ •�, �_ ``
--
LU
LU
LU
cc
LL
�2�5 �\ • —•• W Z
(n LU
W d LU �O
CL
—
LU
co
co
I II I II I \ .� W ��' /••� // O / '%`•� I I I I f W Will
♦\ v\ 1 .�' / / •1 I I I z W E155 a
••%S, ' L0 1 .1! zl l
It
1V
, I
ti \ \ ` � �'� \ •.\\ \ \ te. \ � ` �� `
IMPACT F SCALE IN FEET IMPACT G
0 15 30 60 90 120
12/JI/ZUIJZ:14:Jb FM L :jeremy : *201 *1 11 - Preserve at White Oak(unstall- Harris) VIL onstruction *Wetland Igpoct Maps*IMPACT-F and G.dan
AREA OF
IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT (SO. FT.)
TRAIL WETLAND IMPACT 73
WETLAND
IMPACT
\ 1= \ I I
I I � 1\�I N 1 LNG \\ \\ \�\� \• \ 1\ \ /.v � � a � /, r \ \ ` �
I I \ 1 \ it \ \ \\ \ !�' \\ \\,. • ��'• � —.' /- � / \ � i
\ 1ST
IMPACT
*A
1 1 1 1 i 1 I 11 I
I wl
' 1 11 1 1 i 1 1 III 1
\ \ 1 1 1 1 �
1
O
I 1 1 1 N ► \ I \ i/
I/ I I 1 II 1��•1 111 1 \ y / // / ••'�•
�1 1 I I .1 1 ► 1 \ 1 \ \ // / / /
TRAIL IMPACT H
i
Jeremy 01 *1 11 -
/
I /
/
/
AREA OF Y
IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT W
DESIGNATION TYPE IMPACT (SO. FT.) LU
TRAIL WETLAND IMPACT 316 V
`" ' ,/� / Y
a
i J Z
` ,' '`r 0 LL o
G,
_ W > z
= U
Le V_ k LL Y
LU Z d a
co Z o
W a W o
�\
WE TL�AND I� le- I I W
\ IllIPACT
Le 14
u co
1 }
Z Z
O Q 0' tL
I C Z
/ `\ >y q
Z
t 03291
Z D 1 z Z mo
V%Z.O1p1
oto;;
Ic Le- Le-
IL V I ie_
k le-
SCALE IN FEET TRAIL IMPACT I
0 15 30 60 90 120
rve at White Ook( unstall- Harris)*CIVIL-*Construction -*Wetland Impact Maps M A -H and J.don