640071_Inspection_20211013 (2)

■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 640071 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS640071 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Nash Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 10/13/2021 Entry Time: 08:10 am Exit Time: 10 30 am Incident #:
Farm Name: Murray Farms Inc Owner Email: [e-mail]
Owner: Keith Murray Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 5010 Ridge Rd Spring Hope NC 278828186
Physical Address: 4980 Ridge Rd Spring Hope NC 27882
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 54' 18" Longitude: 78' 04' 48"
4980 Ridge Road, Spring Hope, NC 27882
Question Areas:
▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts
▪ Records and Documents
▪ Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
▪ Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Brian K Murray
Operator Certification Number: 17498
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Jane Bernard Phone: [phone]
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Calibration 3-8-21 question coefficient (30%). If possible next time complete the calibration with a flow meter. form sent by email
10/14/21
Sludge survey 2020
Soil sample SL032063 within limits
Waste analysis viewed oon farm
Only applications on winter small grain
Sent by email 10/14/21
closure standards
Freeboard form
Calibration form using flow meter
"0" animal comparison
Time on site reflects 30 min prep and 30 min travel time
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWS640071
Inspection Date: 10/13/21
Owner: Keith Murray
Facility Number: 640071
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Yes No NA NE
0
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑• ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWS640071
Inspection Date: 10/13/21
Owner: Keith Murray
Facility Number: 640071
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ 11 ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑•❑ ❑
❑• ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page 5 of 5