20131087 Ver 1_Year 7 Monitoring Report_2021_20220106

ID#* 20131087
Select Reviewer:
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 01/06/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/6/2022
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Paul Wiesner
Project Information
ID#:* 20131087
Existing ID#
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Poplin Ridge Site
County: Union
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Poplin Ridge _95359_MY7_2021.pdf 13.21MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Paul Wiesner
Signature: *

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7
FINAL
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Contract No.: 004672
NCDMS Project No.: 95359
USACE Permit Action ID: SAW-2012-01079
DWR Project No.: 13-1087
Union County, NC
Data Collected: June and October 2021
Date Submitted: December 2021
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

fires
December 21, 2021
Paul Wiesner
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
360o Glenwood Avenue, Suite ioo
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 718.520.5400
RE: Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site: MY7 Monitoring Report (NCDMS ID 95359)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on November 5, 2021 regarding the Poplin Ridge
Stream Restoration Site: Year 7 Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
On October 28, 2021, the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) received the DRAFT Monitoring
Year 7/ closeout report for the Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project from Resource
Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES). The report establishes the year 7 monitoring and proposed
closeout conditions at the site. Anticipated mitigation on the site includes 3,697 linear feet of
stream Restoration; 3,305 linear feet of stream Enhancement (Level 1); 953 linear feet of stream
Enhancement (Level 11); and 1,192 linear feet of stream Preservation for a total of 6,107.866 Stream
Mitigation Units (SMUs) (R) and 238.400 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) (RE). The following are
our comments on the DRAFT report:
Section 1.4.1 Vegetation: RES should also inspect and complete invasive treatment along reach
UT1-13 as invasives (mainly Chinese Privet) were noted along this reach during a 9/30/2021 DMS
site visit.
RES completed invasive treatments in this area but will also complete follow up treatments prior
to closeout. This has been added to Section 1.4.1.
Section 1.4.1 Vegetation: The report notes; "In December 2020, RES inspected the entire easement
boundary and replaced all missing easement signage." During a 9/30/21 site visit, DMS observed
multiple t-posts were either missing or knocked down and other areas where the signage was less
than the current standard of every 200 ft. As requested in the 10/19/21 email from DMS, RES will
need to walk around the entire conservation easement boundary and ensure that each corner is
marked and witnessed as required. A PLS should be utilized if any easement corners are identified
as missing or damaged. This effort will need to be completed prior to DEQ stewardship acceptance
and project closeout. Please update the report text accordingly.
This section has been updated.

Section 1.4.1 Vegetation: The report notes; "There was one easement encroachment observed
along UT7-2 that will be repaired this winter." Based on a review of the CCPV maps and a
preliminary review of the site on 9/30/21, there are potentially three (3) areas of encroachment
along UT1-2. The entire conservation easement should be evaluated to confirm that no additional
areas of encroachment or scalloping remain. In all areas where farming practices have encroached
into the conservation easement through scalloping, the project would benefit from the addition
of 10 ft. conduit poles and additional marking.
Please review and update the report text accordingly. The report text should also indicate how the
project encroachment will be resolved so it does not continue (landowner meetings, additional
signage, additional plantings, 10-foot conduit poles, etc.). Please also show the encroachment
areas on the CCPV map and map legend so it is clear they are encroachment areas in MY7.
This section and the CCPV has been updated.
Section 1.4.1 Vegetation: "Planted stem densities among the plots ranged from 243 to 890 planted
stems per acre with o mean of stems per acre across all plots." Please review and include the mean.
Done.
Section 1.4.2 Stream Geomorphology: "RES will continue to monitor these areas during future
visits to assess the stability of the channel and the need for any repair." "Bank pin array data will
continue to be collected and analyzed in future monitoring years to monitor bank erosion trends."
Please review and revise these statements as 2021 is the final year of monitoring and RES is
proposing project closure in 2022.
Done.
Section 1.4.3 Stream Hydrology: This section reports a significant number of bankfull events
over the monitoring term. Does RES consider this a project issue or future concern? Please
consider and briefly discuss in the report text.
RES does not believe this is a project issue. The streams were designed to allow for frequent
floodplain access and despite the significant number of bankfull events the streams have
remained stable. This has been added to the report.
Section 1.4.3 Stream Hydrology: The report text notes stream flow results on UT2-A. Please
show this flow gauge on the applicable CCPV map (Figure 2-6). This should also be updated in
the MY7 digital support files (shapefiles).
Done.
Table 5: Please include the date that the project was visually assessed at the top of the table. This
was an IRT request at the 2021 credit release meeting. The Visual Stream Morphology Stability
Assessment reports that 100% of the project is stable and performing as intended. Please review
and confirm that this is correct or minor areas are beneath the mapping threshold. This has been
a previous IRT question on projects reporting 100% at MY7/ project closeout.
Confirmed.

Table 6: Please include the date that the project was visually assessed at the top of the table. This
was an IRT request at the 2021 credit release meeting. Once the comments above are reviewed,
please update the invasive areas of concern and encroachment areas of concern. The
encroachment areas of concern is currently reported at 0% which does not appear correct based
on the DMS 9/30/21 site visit and CCPV maps provided. Please update as necessary.
Done.
MY7 2021 Project Station Photos: Please provide dates for all project photos. If exact dates
cannot be provided, please include the month and year for each photo. Please also QA/QC the
photos and captions. As an example, the photos provided in the draft MY7 report for Stations 4,
5, 6, and 7 are the identical photos provided in the MY6 (2020) report. Photo station 10 is the
same as Veg plot 1 and no stream is visually evident. Please review and update accordingly.
Dates have provided for the photos. Photo stations that were missed in 2021 have photos from
2020 in their place. Photo station 10 is installed looking at the buffer area near VP1 not at the
stream.
Appendix C: Please include the Poplin Ridge Closeout Vegetation Table in the revised report.
Please QA/QC the table to confirm it is consistent with Table 7, Table 9 and previous monitoring
years for the project.
Done.
Cross Section #30: The cross section shows approx. bankfull below or at the bottom of the stream
bed. Please review and confirm that cross section #30 is correct.
This was a typo and has been corrected in the report.
Table 15: This table is labeled 2020 rainfall summary. Please provide the 2021 (MY7) Rainfall
Summary and confirm that the MY7 rainfall data provided is accurate.
This was 2021 rainfall data. The table was mislabeled in the report. This has been corrected.
Appendix E — Flow Gauge Graph: DMS recommends showing the start and end points of the
139 days of consecutive flow reported.
Done.
Digital Support File Comments:
• The flow gauge located at UT2-A does not appear in the CCPV. Please display this feature.
The flow gauge has been added to the CCPV.
• Please review the cross section data included throughout the report. There are instances where
data between the report and the submitted excel workbooks are conflicting and where the data
are not consistent across report tables. For example, cross section 28 has a reported BHR of 1.1,
but in the BHR workbook the calculated value is 0.3.
Done.

• Additionally, in the BHR workbook the bankfull elevation that achieves the MYO cross sectional
area for cross section 28 was calculated before excluding points outside of the main channel. The
points outside of the main channel were also not excluded for cross section 4, and this may occur
elsewhere. Note that failing to exclude these points will affect multiple parameters (e.g. BHR, cross
sectional area, etc.), so please review and ensure these points are excluded for both the BHR and
JOB workbooks.
Done.
• Also note that when comparing the cross section 28 figure and table to Table 1la, it appears
that the cross sectional areas are inconsistent. This may be caused by a mix up of data between
cross sections 28 and 29. Please review and QA/QC all cross sections to confirm that they are
reported accurately in the revised report.
Done.

Prepared by:
Ores
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612

Contents
1.0 Project Summary............................................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................................... 3
1.2. Success Criteria............................................................................................................................. 3
1.3. Project Setting and Background.................................................................................................... 4
1.4. Project Performance...................................................................................................................... 5
2.0 Methods.............................................................................................................................................7
3.0 References.........................................................................................................................................7
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 1 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figures 2. Current Conditions Plan View Maps
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
2021 Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Metadata
Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts
Stems Per Plot Across All Years
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary
Cross Section Plots
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Charts 1-11. MY7 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Table 13. Poplin Ridge Bank Pin Array Summary
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 14. Verification of Bankfull Events and Stream Flow Events
Table 15. 2021 Rainfall Summary
MY7 2021 Poplin Ridge UT2-A Flow Chart
Appendix F. Poplin Ridge 2020 Monitoring Adaptive Management
2020 Poplin Ridge Adaptive Management Work Completed Memo
Poplin Ridge MY5 2019 IRT Credit Release Site Visit Memo
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 2 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals and Objectives
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW, and include the following:
• Nutrient removal,
• Sediment removal,
• Reducing runoff from animal operations,
Filtration of runoff, and
• Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Establishing riparian buffer areas adjacent to CAFOs.
• Converting active farm fields to forested buffers,
• Stabilization of eroding stream banks,
• Reduction in streambank slope,
• Restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats, and
• Construction of in -stream structures designed to improve bedform diversity and trap detritus.
1.2. Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site follows accepted and approved success
criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and agency
guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
1.2.1. Stream Restoration
Bankfull Events - Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring
period. The two bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, stream monitoring will
continue until two bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Bankfull events will
be documented using crest gauges, auto -logging crest gauges, photographs, and visual assessments
for evidence of debris wrack lines.
Cross -Sections - There should be little change in as -built cross-section. If changes do take place,
they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition,
or minor changes that represent an increase in stability.
Bank Pin Arrays - Bank pin arrays will be used as a supplemental method to monitor erosion on
selected meander bends. Bank pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event.
Digital Image Stations- Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation
or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Longitudinal images should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel
or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or
continuing degradation of banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate
successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 3 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

1.2.2.Vegetation
Interim measures of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 three -year -old trees
per acre at the end of Year 3 and 260 five-year old trees per acre at the end of Year-5. The final vegetative
success criteria will be the survival of 210 trees per acre at the end of Year 7.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site (Site) encompasses approximately 27.17 acres, of which 4.69
acres are wooded and the remaining 22.48 acres are agricultural fields and pastures. The western and
eastern systems, UT1 and UT2 respectively, consist of unnamed tributaries to the East Fork of Stewarts
Creek. UT1 is divided into seven reaches and UT2 is divided into five reaches. The Site is located within
the Yadkin River Watershed (NCDWR sub basin 03-07-14 and I UC 03040105070050) in Union County,
North Carolina, approximately six miles north of Monroe. The Site is located within the Stewarts Creek
Watershed, a NCDMS targeted local watershed.
Following 2016 monitoring the NCIRT requested a review of the differential between the Approved
Mitigation Plan and Baseline Monitoring Report. The table below details the discrepancies by reach. The
primary cause of increased baseline SMUs is survey methodology (thalweg vs. centerline). The Mitigation
Plan lengths were based on centerline. Also, UT24 had a large decrease in SMUs due to loss of land
control. RES has reverted back to the Mitigation Plan (Proposed) SMUs.
Proposed Length
M igation
Reach
MtigationType
ProposedSMUs
BaselineSM[Js
(LF)*
Ratio
UT1-1
Preservation
572
5:1
114
114
UT1-1
Enhancement I
566
1.5:1
377
377
UT1-2
P1 Restoration
1,171
1:1
1,171
1,178
UT1-3
PI Restoration
901
1:1
901
893
UT1-4
Enhancement I
1,210
1.5:1
807
815
UT1-A
Enhancement I
217
1.5:1
145
144
UT1-13
Preservation
620
5:1
124
124
UT1-13
Enhancement I
455
1.5:1
303
303
UT1-C
Enhancement I
857
1.5:1
571
586
UT2-1
Enhancement 11
490
2.5:1
196
196
UT2-2
P1 Restoration
847
1:1
847
847
UT2-3
P1 Restoration
521
1.5:1
347
347
UT2-4*
P1 Restoration
257
1:1
257
257
UT2-A
Enhancement 11
463
2.5:1
185
184
Total 9,147 6,346 6,365
*Reach was shortened due to loss of land control.
**The contracted amount of credits for this Site was 6,944 SMUs
On July 11, 2018, the IRT, DMS, and RES had a site visit to discuss credit release at Poplin Ridge. It was
determined that credits from UT2-1, UT2-2, and UT2-A associated with the drained pond bottom would be
withheld (812.2 SMUs). Additionally, it was requested that RES submits a Remedial Action Plan to address
the issues in the drained pond bottom and that a flow gauge is to be installed on UT2-A to document at least
intermittent flow. RES repaired this reach in September 2019 and added the flow gauge to UT2-A. NCIRT,
NCDMS, and RES, had a site visit to review the pond bottom repairs in June 2020. Flow, bed and bank,
and riffle/pool sequences were observed throughout the pond repair reach. NCIRT did not note any issue
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 4 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

with releasing MY6 credits. The adaptive management work and site visit are further detailed in Appendix
F.
1.4. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 7 (MY7) data was collected throughout 2021 with the final field visit in October. Year 7
monitoring activities included visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding casement,17 permanent
photo stations, 13 permanent vegetation monitoring plots, four pond bottom repair cross sections, and one
pond bottom repair random vegetation plot. The Site has met all stream and vegetation success criteria and
is recommended for closeout.
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver activity or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found
in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information
formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly the Mitigation
Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on NCDMS' website
(https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-projects). All raw data supporting the tables
and figures in the appendices is available from NCDMS upon request.
1.4.1.Vegetation
Visual assessment of the site indicates that herbaceous vegetation has become well established on -site. The
invasive species treatments were performed in October and November 2020 and then again in November
2021. Treatments focused in the resprouting areas along UT1-I, UT1-B, and UT2-1. Follow up treatments
will be performed prior to closeout. In September 2021, DMS visited the site and observed multiple
damaged easement markers and three areas of encroachment. The areas of encroachment are minor along
UT1-2 and shown on Figure 2. The larger of the three areas was repaired in November 2021 with t-posts
and horse tape and the other two areas will be repaired the same way before closeout. RES replanted the
MY6 low stem density area in the pond bottom in January 2021. The replanting consisted of six-foot willow
poles and silky dogwood livestakes. Encroachment and invasive treatment areas are included in Table 6
and Figure 2 for reference during the closeout site visit.
Monitoring of 13 permanent vegetation plots and 1 random vegetation plot was completed in October 2021.
Summary tables and photographs associated with MY7 monitoring can be found in Appendix C. MY7
monitoring data indicates that all vegetation monitoring plots met the MY7 interim success criteria of 210
planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities among the plots ranged from 243 to 890 planted stems per
acre with a mean of 584 stems per acre across all plots. When volunteer stems are included, densities
ranged between 364 and 890 total stems per acre with a mean of 624 stems per acre across all plots. A total
of 17 plant species were documented within the monitoring plots. The average planted stem height in plots
was 14.2 feet. The data from the random vegetation plot in the pond bottom repair area showed 445 stems
per acre with an average planted stem height of 8.8 feet. This plot only documented black willows, however,
other species observed in the pond bottom included: cottonwood, willow oak, sycamore, water oak, and
river birch.
1.4.2. Stream Geomorphology
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed in order to document signs of instability, such as
eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. Small areas of bank scour, bed
aggradation, and bed degradation were reported as problem areas in previous years but are no longer
problem areas in MY7.
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 5 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

Geomorphic data for MY7 was collected during June 2021. Cross-section plots and summary tables related
to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. Geomorphic data collection for XS 3-29 was not
performed in MY6 per the approved Mitigation Plan. The MY7 stream morphology data indicate that, in
general, the stream is stable. A few small changes were noted in the cross-section dimensions; however,
these are relatively minor and do not exceed expected adjustments in channel form. Starting in MYS,
baseline cross sectional area was used to determine bankfull for riffle dimensions. No riffle cross sections
documented a BHR over 1.2.
Bank pin arrays indicate that no erosion occurred during MY7.
Substrate monitoring was performed during MY7. Pebble count D50 fell into the coarse gravel range for
UT1-I, medium gravel for UT1-2, medium gravel for UT1-3, medium gravel for UT1-4, very fine gravel
for UT1-A, coarse gravel for UT1-B, coarse gravel for UT1-C, very fine sand for UT2-3, medium gravel
for UT2-A, and coarse gravel for UT24.
Overall, documented shifts in stream morphology for the repair reach show that a defined channel is
continuing to form and maintain. The project has met success criteria regarding stable dimension as well
as substrate and sediment transport.
1.4.3.Stream Hydrology
Since project completion in April 2015, 23 bankfull events have been recorded on UT1-2, 66 on UT1-4,
and 56 on UT2-3. MY7 bankfull events were identified by transducer gauge readings. RES does not believe
the significant number of bankfull events is a project issue. The streams were designed to allow for frequent
floodplain access and the streams have remained stable throughout the seven years of monitoring. Stream
hydrology issues were identified and discussed with the NCIRT during a site visit in July 2018. RES
installed a flow gauge downstream of XS-3 on UT2-A in January 2019. The flow gauge recorded 139
consecutive days of flow and 142 total days of flow in MY7.
1.4.4.Adaptive Management
During a site visit with NCIRT and NCDMS at the Poplin Ridge Site in July 2018, several problem areas
were identified. Per the request of NCIRT, RES provided an Adaptive Management Plan to the IRT August
2019. The work proposed in the Adaptive Management Plan was completed in September 2019. The
construction was completed as designed. The pond bottom was planted in April 2020 and January 2021.
Additionally, RES installed the flow gauge discussed in the Adaptive Management Plan, in January 2019.
In response to problem areas identified in the Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site Year 5 Monitoring
Report and the 2019 Adaptive Management Plan, RES completed adaptive management work in fall 2019
and spring 2020. In September 2019, RES regraded and installed structures on UT2-2 through the pond
bottom (including the lower portion of UT2-A) and replanted the pond bottom and other low stem density
areas in April 2020. RES also installed monitoring devices in the pond bottom. The devices include Cross
Sections 30 and 31 and two random vegetation plots. The cross sections and random plot in the pond bottom
monitored since MY5 and were measured again during MY7 monitoring. The results are attached.
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 6 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

2.0 METHODS
Visual assessment of the project was performed at the beginning and end of the monitoring year. Permanent
photo station photos were also collected during the morphologic and vegetation data collection events.
Additionally, photos were taken of vegetation or stream problem areas not revealed in the permanent photo
station images.
Geomorphic measurements (MYO, MY I, MY2, MY3, MY5, MY7) were taken during low flow conditions
using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with each cross-section
data were collected in the field and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological
data was limited to 29 cross -sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS, and Excel for data
processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count as outlined in
Harrelson et al. (1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 13 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring follows
the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis
of species composition and density of planted specimens. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool.
In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot are
taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data was collected using an Onset HOBO Data Logging Rain Gauge. Bankfull events were
documented with manual crest gauges, which were installed within each of the following reaches - UT1-2,
UT1-4, and UT2-3. Crest gauge data was downloaded during quarterly site visits. The flow gauge is a
pressure transducer located in a pool. Flow data is calculated by detecting pool water elevations greater
than the elevation of the downstream riffle.
3.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Banc & Exchange. 2014. Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project Final Mitigation Plan.
North Carolina Ecosystems Enhancement Program, Raleigh.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm; accessed November 2008.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 7 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 December 2021

Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project 8 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95359 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 2021

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

00
Q
G
p
w
z
o
p
0
p
C
�
O
Q
baCi
z
5
z
on
z
s
w°
0
z
0
�
y �
w
O O
i.i
w
w
Q
d
Q
Q
w
o
ti
U �
=
W W
w
�
a
o
u
�
3
-
a
�
a
�
Q
'z
o
w
ro
m
N
a
+
+
+
M
ro
IZ
b
�
�
C
F
C
w'
O
C
0. q
�
w
w

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Deliver
Mitigation Plan
NA
Jul-14
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Oct-14
Construction Completed
Apr-15
Apr-15
Site Planting Completed
Apr-15
Apr-15
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Apr-15
Jul-15
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec-15
Jan-16
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep-16
Oct-16
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
Aug-17
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream: Sep-17
Nov-17
Vegetation: Sep-17
Invasive Species Treatment and Supplemental Planting
NA
Feb-18
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
June-18
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
Aug-18
Year 4 Monitoring
Vegetation: Sep-18
Feb-19
Beaver Dam Removal
NA
Sept-19
Stream Adaptive Management (UT2-2 Pond Bottom)
NA
Sept-19
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream: June/July-19
Jan-20
Vegetation: Aug-19
Supplemental Planting
NA
Apr-20
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
Oct-20
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
Nov-20
Year 6 Monitoring
Vegetation: Nov-20
Dec-20
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
Dec-20
Pond Supplemental Planting
NA
Jan-21
Invasive Species Treatment and Encroachment Repair
NA
Dec-21
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream: June-21
Oct-21
Vegetation: Oct-21
Invasive Species Treatment and Encroachment Repair
I NA
Jan-22

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting
PO Box 545
Siler City, NC 27344
[phone]
Joseph Wright
Planting Contractor
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
David Godley
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
PO Box 545
Siler City, NC 27344
[phone]
Joseph Wright
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Full Delivery Provider
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Project Manager:
Brad Breslow
Monitoring Performers (MYO)
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
Project Manager:
Brian Hockett, PLS
Monitoring Performers (MYl-MY2)
Equinox
2015-2016
37 Haywwod Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
Project Manager:
Drew Alderman [phone]
Monitoring Performers (MY3+)
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
2017+
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
Project Manager:
Ryan Medric

Table 4. Project Information
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project
Project Name
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project
County
Union
Project Area (acres)
27.17
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
UTl: 35° 03' 15.97" N 80° 34' 21.64" W
UT2: 35° 03' 17.99" N 80° 33' 46.77" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
3040105
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03040105070050
DWQ Sub -basin
03-07-14
Project Drainage Area (acres)
UTl: 1.14 square miles (728 acres)
UT2: 1.35 square miles (861 acres)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
UTl : 8%
UT2:5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
developed (open space, low density, med. density, high density), cultivated crops,
pasture/hay, deciduous forest, evergreen forest
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
UTI-RI
UTI-R2
UTI-R3
UTI-R4
UTI-A
UTI-B
Length of reach (linear feet)
1,138
1,178
893
1,223
216
1,075
Valley Classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
136
248
384
728
88
120
NCDWQ stream identification score
35
22.5
30
31
35
35
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
Morphological Description (stream type)
E4
I E4
E4
E4
E4/C4
Evolutionary trend
Stage I
Stage II
Stage II
Stage I
Stage IQII
Underlying mapped soils
CmB
CmB, TbB2
CmB, TbB2CmB
CmB
Drainage class
mod. well
mo . we
well
mo . we
well
mod. well
mod. well
Soil Hydric status
Not Hydre
Not Hydric
Not HydreNotHydre
JHydric
Nothydric
Slope
0.48%
0.70%
0.40%
1.20%
1.80%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
mixe
hardwood
forest,
cultivated
cultivated
cultivated
cultivated
cultivated
mixe
hardwood
forest,
cultivated
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
10%
0%
0%
0%
5%
15%
Table 4 Cont'd. Project Information
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Project
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
UTI-C
UT2-RI
U12-R2
UT2-R3
U12-R4
U12-A
Length of reach (linear feet)
880
490
847
521
257
461
Valley Classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
250
631
726
792
861
49
NCDWQ stream identification score
35
33.5
33.5
22.5
33.5
33.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
WS-III
Morphological Description (stream type)
E4
I C4c
N/A
E4
E4
C4
Evolutionary trend
Stage IV
Stage VI
N/A
Stage II
Stage II
Stage IV
Underlying mapped soils
TbB2
ChA
ChA
ChA, BaB
ChA
ChA, CmA
Drainage class
well
somewhat
poorly
somewhat
poorly
somewhat
poorly; well
somewhat
poorly
somew t
poorly; mod.
well
Soil Hydric status
Not Hydre
Partially
Hydric
Partially
Hydric
Partially
Hydric
Partially
Hydric
Not Hydric
Slope
0.80%
0.27%
0.10%
0.57%
0.31%
1.30%
FEMA classification
N/A
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
N/A
Native vegetation community
cultivated
woody cover,
cultivated
cultivated
cultivated
cultivated
cultivated
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentatio
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW-2012-01079
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR# 13-1087
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
USFWS (Con. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
SIIPO (Con. Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
EEP Floodplain
Requirements Checklist
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

Drying Directions: To access the site from the city of
Monroc, travel west on West Roosevelt Boulevard, then _.-
turn north onto Seems( Shorlsut Road. 'Ib access U11, ✓'
travel 3-6 miles on Secrest Shortcut Road, then turn right
onto a gravel farm road and drive approximately 0-6 miles.
To access UT2, trm-el north on Sccrest Shortcut Road for
2.8 miles, then turn right onto Roanoke Church Road.
After 0.8 miles, turn left onto a grave] farm road. This
private road will spit just past the pond on the ]eft- At the
split stay to the loll and novel approximately PAX) feel In
aeocss the do%vnstrevn end of UT2.
'I be ;ubjec:t project silo is an environmental restoration title
of the NCDMS and cneompasscd by a recorded
utnsenatien cawement, but is Itx)rdenal bv land with
pnvatc ownership. Acccesing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement bounday and
therefore access to the general public is not perrrmitted-
0 Poplin Ridge Stream
Mitigation Sites
UT9
UT2 str�
1` Chore>>
SO c.,l.....
�nstno
r�
i
74
'�. Roads
Mitigation Sites
Water Bodies Mon t-oe ",
Figure t H
Poplin Ridge Mitigation Site 1'.
pres
ProJect Vicinity Map '� ;. e
s
Miles

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

V% 71
W,
, to,

d .Q O o ur
m E in .. n —— a o
N NaN o w o °� EO E
o c o z
lL N ,O N O i W W O N .. .. .. .� -
I� U II O N a N ti
N N 0 6I N N O Y O r
LL
a�i I o .w E C7 � m ° d
3 w a a ur o ur L L o o m o 0
a" o m bc w2 a uv o u g
0 0 7 o x m o E) o o n
0 U �tnLfT_ wC) w w a� n iIra
o n l n !�ad5 ani,senu1
0
U
z

E�
]ƒ )
r
�
Ef! ~
m 7§& )7
\�2§!e©®
E~
:
e \:° C)
�~
2 °§
>
��®®\)k)
z, -_
0
}()a/�444®
�%%
,:
! ,
:a� {E
/
-`\})ƒ\*
::E)wE)o 0 co
ƒj \
azJzj\jjj}))3))ƒ/
)
aF1 . |se■$I
■
III
�
: ��

� �� , E�� ^ : -
m Ul ) 7 \ � 2 §EV
e a) C> z, E~
�~ ,: ,
2 LL �%% ®®\)k) }()a44®
�` II :: �
4;;/77��
�\ § b:>77§7m§!®»(
2� u azJz§a=§§:z3ozJ:w
^®;
^~ ) n■■ § .Illlleee+I °
�A

E�
]ƒ )
r �
m 7§&
E E V ^
E~
e \0 C)
�~
> z, -_
0
��®®\)k) }()a/�444®
,:
�-2
.
. , gay {®
/-`\,, 2w :: ®
4;;/77��
ƒj \
azJzjC) w0- )\))ƒ/
` rl . ||eee$I
EA
!�
�f�

r�s
F
�
_ e
m

en c
R
d
en c
�s N•a �
d
d
0
o
z
o
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a0i
o
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a
bA
7 O O
o
0
0
0
0
0
w
vi U C
Z
C
a W
0 L L
M
M
M
M
M
z
�
Y
m
m
m
m
m
Y
0
ro
01
m
Y N
bbbo
r
O2
R
'O
won
0. o
W
p
v
Q.
v
v
on �'
o f
c`tli
ou
Y
o ro
v o
>
2
z
a
>
y
x
B
Al
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
12
H
O
O
fV
O
M U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
R
en c
�s N•a �
d
d
d
0
o
z
a
bA
w
R �
c,Q
o�aro
C.i ^' ,�
�
�� o •3
N
N
N
N
N
m
m
m
m
m
v
`�
S]
Al
a1
N
O
Q ti
'd
bbo
F
0
m A
bo
bo
b
0
o
o ro
v o
Al
L
O
fV
M
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
0
d
d
d
en c
�s N•a �
0
o
z
O�
a0i
o 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
a
bA
7 O O
o
0
0
0
0
0
w
m
m
m
m
m
'O
o ro
v o
L
fV
M
0
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

L' O
en c
R
en c
0
z °
a
bA
7 O O
o
0
0
0
0
0
w
C�
C
H w
= o
° N
`'�
ro0
�
G'
�
m
'�
O
U •�
�bll
�
N
�
'.�
N
m 'O
Ey a1
z
bA
y
o
'O
0. o
W
p
v
Q.
v
v
on �'
o f won
c`tli
ou
Y
o ro
v o
>
z
a
>
y
x
B
Al
a Q
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
12
H
O
O
fV
O
M U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

L' O
en c
R
en c
0
z
a
bA
7 O O
o
0
0
0
0
0
w
� U
R
a+ �
o
�
�
�
'�
�
o
y v
�
'••
Y
�
°' v
'O
0. o
W
p
v
Q.
v
v
on �'
o f won
c`tli
ou
Y
o ro
v o
>
z
a
>
y
x
B
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
H
O
O
fV
O
M U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
R
en c
0
z
a
bA
w
L
I-y
U
41
Ra
E-I po
tl
5� A
ti
O
N
U
y
N
b�A A'
N
o ro
v o
Al
L
fV
M
O
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
R
en c
0
z
R�
a0i
o 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
a
bA
7 O O
o
0
0
0
0
0
w
� U
F �
�3
0. ti
N
F
qq
0
m �
o ro
v o
L
O
fV
M
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

L' O
en c
R
en c
0
z
o
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a0i
o
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a
bA
7 O O
o
0
0
0
0
0
w
4
w
N �
H
Chi
y
F
v,
Al
.ro
v
o
m ti
ou
o
O
m p
F,ro
a�
;�
,b
'O
o ro
v o
>
z
a
>
y
x
B
Al
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
12
H
O
O
fV
O
M U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
R
d
d
d
en c
�s N•a �
0
o
z
a
bA
w
4
'
N
N �
H
C. +' ��•
s E c
� o +j
`�
�
�
�
�
N
N
N
N
N
z
lo
'O
o ro
v o
>
z
a
>
y
x
B
Al
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
12
H
O
O
O
fV
M
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
R
d
d
d
en c
�s N•a �
0
o
z
a
bA
w
L
m
m
m
m
m
H
s E c
z
'O
o ro
v o
>
z
a
>
y
x
B
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
H
O
O
O
fV
M
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

L' O
en c
R
d
d
d
en c
�s N•a �
0
o
z
o
0
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
a
bA
w
41
L
H
o
A
U
WE3
'r
N
0
'O
0. o
W
p
v
Q.
v
v
on d
o F won
c`tli
ou
Y
o ro
v o
>
z
a
>
y
x
B
Al
r
L
Y
V�
=
i1i
py
W
12
H
O
O
fV
O
M U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

en c
R
en c
0
z
a
bA
w
L
I-y
Y Y
r� U
Y
z
R
C
41
N
I� ry
ro
0
m
o ro
v o
0 won
q
c`tli
ou
Y
L
O
fV
M
U
7
fV
M
fV
N
M
7
Y
'O
W
fV
M �

°�'�
�
o
ce
o
0
0
0
o
ce
�n
o0
w
w
Fti
Fti
ti
p
�
�
A
O
H
�
F
'cn
CC
�
0 r.+
U
�
bA
bA
y0y
�
CL
CL
U
�
N
O
O
a
O
Ey
O
U
T
ct
ct
CC
CC
U
o
U
CC
ate+
U
ate+
°
..
W
14
N

Monitoring Year 7 — 2021 Photo Station Photos
Project Reach UT1-1 — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 8+53 — Looking Upstream — 6/3/2021
Project Reach UT1-2 — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 14+58 — Looking Upstream — 6/3/2021

w

Project Reach UT1-A - Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 2+00 — Looking Downstream — 6/2/2021
Project Reach UT1-B — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 9+86 — Looking Downstream

h yy]7e r �v
Oil t A�
4
Rw`�
i ( ;�.e
E
1 !t! jr
1 �
%4p;
fib f.«.y
�L

�: nR
c
AF
i Qa
r -A
r.�

Project Reach UT2-2 — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 7+59 — Looking Upstream — 6/3/2021
_(r-
Project Reach UT2-3 — Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 13+83 — Looking Downstream — 6/3/2021

Project Reach UT24 — Permanent Photo Station 15
Station 20+39 — Looking Downstream — 6/3/2021
Project Reach UT2-A — Permanent Photo Station 16
Station 1+22 — Looking Downstream — 6/3/2021

Project Reach UT2-A — Permanent Photo Station 17
Station 2+62 — Looking Downstream — 6/3/2021

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. MY7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Criteria
Met?
Average
ve rage
Planted
Stem
Height (ft)
1
445
162
607
Yes
21.5
2
364
81
445
Yes
14.6
3
648
0
648
Yes
17.2
4
890
0
890
Yes
17.3
5
890
0
890
Yes
12.6
6
728
81
809
Yes
12.3
7
688
0
688
Yes
17.9
8
688
0
688
Yes
9.8
9
445
81
526
Yes
7.5
10
243
121
364
Yes
7.4
11
607
40
648
Yes
10.1
12
405
0
405
Yes
21.4
13
688
0
688
Yes
14.3
R1
445
0
445
Yes
8.8
Project Avg
584
40
624
Yes
14

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Ran Medric
Date Prepared
11/13/2020 0:00
database name
Poplin Ride 95359 2020 MY6 CVS Ve etation.mdb
database location
computer name
file size
DESCRIPTION
OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Descriptionof database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor bSpp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and
SPP
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and
SPP
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each lot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Prqiect Code
95359
project Name
Poplin Ride Stream Restoration Project
Description
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
len h ft
stream -to -edge width ft
areas m
Required Plots
calculated
Sampled Plots
13

��11111111�1111111111�111�1111111111���1
I�11111111�1111�11111�111�11�1111111��11
I�11111111�1111111111�111�1111111110��11
I�11111111�1111111111�111�1111111111��1�
I�11111111�1111111111�111�1111111111��11
I�11111111�1111111111�111��1�1�1111�����
I�11111111�11111111�1�111�1111�11111���1
I�11111111�111111111��111�11�1111111���0
I�11111111�1111111111�111�1111111111��11
I�11111111�1111111111�111�1111111111��11
��11111111�1111111111�111�111111111���11
1�I��II����IIIIIIII�1II���I�I��I��
II
�
II
II
�
III
�I

N
H
M
O
a
O
a
N
N
M
N
N
N
Vt
C
M
rl V1
O
N
H
V1
m N
m
N
N
W
r M
O
N
r
ci
M
a
a m
tD
tD r
C rl
tD
N
N
m V1
ci W
aa
V1
m
r M
O
M ci
C
C tmD
C��
ti
N
ti O
M tMD
O
a
N
171
D
�
H
C
N
C O
m tD
M
C
M
O
r C
N
N
V1 O^1
Ma N
C
N
N N
a
N VM1
�n
a
C
m
r C
N
N
V1 O^1
C N
a
O
N
ti V�1
J
O
a
C
m
r C
N
N
Vt m
r
M
C N
C
rl
m
O
N
rl
tD
n
H
N
N
tD
C rl
I
tD
M
M �
ci M
N_
M
a
C
r
tD C
N
M
C�
a m
C
01
M N
O
M N
y
J
O
r
tD C
N
M
C t�D
C m
a
77
01
ti N
v�
�
a
—
Q
W
H
V1
M
N
N
N
V1
C
N C
tD C
N
M
M�
Na W
N
M
N
N
m Oa
� r
N_
N
C
tD C
N
M
M�
Na W
N
01
M N
N N
O
a
a
o
1'
O
a
N
C
tD C
N
M
M
Na W
N
N
� v�
m
tD
N
N
N
N
V1
tD
m
W C
N
C C
M
M�
a r
rl
N
M
N
O�
r
a
N tD
o
a
�n
O
H
N
N
Vt
Vt rl
N
ci ^
N_
a
N
Vl
tD C
N
M
rl ��
r
N
0�1
M N
ti 0
1'
O
a
N
Vl
tD C
N
M
rl
r
N
�
rl O
D
N
H
N
^
a
a
N
V1
tD C
N
M
rl S
O W
N rl
O
Vl
ti O
N W
1'
O
a
N
Vt
tD C
r
N
M
rl M
V1
O W
V1 rl
N ci
N
O
N C
rl
z
a
'77
O1
m
1p
a
o
77 77
�
m
J
o
a
ti LF
a
a
M
O
H
N
M
tD
rl N
N
r
r�
�
p
N
M
tD
rl N
N
r
N^
W
c
m
a
O
v
u'
N
m
1/,
o
a
N
M
tD
rl N
N
r
r
N
O
H
M
M
N rl
O
V1 O
C
�
d,
m
a
M
M
N ti
O
N
o
V1 O
M
m
J
o
a
M
M
N rl
O
V1 V1
a
o $
y
v v
v v
v�
v v
v v
v v
v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v �-
o
v v
v v
v v
v v
v
a
v v
v v
v s
v v
v v
v v
v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v
o
v
o
o
E
E
o
E
o
3
Y
v
Z
`o
-
o
s
oa
cvi
v
'^
$-oo
v
v
-vo
uq
v v
E
L
�'
v
3
v E
v E
a
> �
o Q
Y
o
o
v
Y
V°
v
o
z
c
E
o
v v
E E
;;
a Z'
o
v Y
Y
o
E
o
E
E o'n
v
E �,
a
E v
3 v°
o
Y
v
E
v
o o
-° -°
3 ml
Y
o
on E
o
E
o
v—
3
--mu:—
E
-
v
0
,.
3
_
.3 °—
°
.3
o
v v
a o
E
-o
`o
0
°¢
o u
o 3
0
3
?
m
a
vum
E
v
z12
>
.E
—-
>
-
o
a
o
a
-O
'
E
--
v o
o z
Y
d
E E
v
>
N
7 V
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7-
—
j T
V V
V V
_E s
°
,. ,.
o z
o '^
' 2
`v `v
`v `v
`v `v
`v `v
v
E E
E
Q Q
Q Q
Q m
m V
V V
V V
o o
LL
6
z
a
a s
�
vi
7
7

a
��
n E
i�iiiii
0�ve�e�se
0��e���se
e!a���a�

,4 v s
fV
* �
a.
`� 5 y`";t G • - R1 dla xp, •ice
�
� tie
\ �� � � `�f, `•� - \� i } -Y y� r" � N `use, _ .
I

v0,
MA
V . �
\ tea` \ ��� 1' • t9 �. � '� �� � t -.
77,71,
IF
T� 1"'T
Ak
t
P l k'.`Ki Zlk.a
:i4t, � f 9�` :, ` ti A. a �•+
Ztl

4,
S•, +'4e tl �F,' Val A _ A f
CA-
ir
Ilk,
_ r�
�j
J• �1 p ` a �A' ,l I fug L it
E Vie, '� n rr • MID
e`��l,�� _—
� S
.•� 3q�,:, dada° as�,e�. ���e�� Yp ��' � ®�
�Ly Sar3e�'
-
Mir,
VJ-
--
f
C�
�j � 4

�,i �! .yj• f
n ►j,�
i,A v, .r bi`�r.+P{ti ••. Ste.
r
MY,

E Ya 4 � 'S y i'� � `C�i- 'aft• si
�'•
LL",
IS
NO
44
&
ra �a1 et4
41"
rC
{,y'iy 1 i j` t� r '! 1
Noll
° i

-h'G
sf � • 1
I.
�7
-a.
, - W-v

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

m
o
n N
N
n
0 0
0 0
0 0
.. O
0
�
N
0
o
a
sC
v
O
m
o
o
a N
o
0 0
¢
0
a
o
0
� �
"
o 0
m^
•O
"
M
•�
N
N^
a
N
co N
o o
W
L
O
O N
a o
o N
ry
q¢
O
a
y
s Ea
O.
o�
N
O"
�
z o
w
°
z 0
w
N a
0
R
L
O O
4.
row77
77
0-0 OU
45�
'dd
NNxx
« G
�
;�
���
O
'd $
b
a a
3
�
� a
�
a
s
U ¢
z�=
R
a
O
�
R
R
E

O
O
�p
vi
N
C1
-
ai
p,
N
A
M
M
N
N
N
��
M���
�
N
M
N
��
I
O
ON1
O
vi
N
r
vi
N
N
N
N
vi
vi
l-�
Vl
ry
O
�D
O
O
�j
AN
�
�
�
�
Vl
N
M
l�
�--i
N
�
l�
7
01
N
N
r
Cl
O
W
Cl
ClN
FG
N
.y
N
.y
Cl
=W]
y
M
O
Cl
� ICI
O
7
N
�p
N
�p
�
�
�
O
Mi
N
r
0
Cl
0
0
7
7
z
00
U
� y
�
,yU
N
G�
N
N
N
M
Vl
O
O
O
O
W
in U
U �
U
Cl
Cl
z
o
Cl
w
Cq
ti
O
N
7
7
O
s a
haw°`'
`.may
�
a
p
�O
O
�O
Vl
N
N
l�
N
O
M
O
VUi
�C
1
N
�
�
O
O
p
/yam
rOl
V y
O
O
O
y�
0 U
M
M
IC
•�
�
a�
�zN
�Na;z�
V
oW
Ol
O
O
O
GEC
O
O
O
O
O
is
N
O
N
01
4r�7y'
oil
M
°
�
o
O
z
�
a
�o
Q
o
oWo
oW
o

�11111■111
�1111111111
�11■111111
�t�e�m■�mo
��aetaoate�
��o■e0o�0�
et't�e■�o�
���'totetee
�ee■a'���e
etataa■a��
��toe�e�oee
�t�■t�e�e�
�t��oe■a�e
�te�taoa�0e
�e�■s�e00e
et�to�■eoe
��aotav0�'e
�t�■e�e0te
�te�e�■m��
����a�oeov�
�to■e�0o��
e�����■���
�����������
���■������
�IIIIB■191
�1111911111
CAB■AIBIBI
�ta���■��t
��e�t�e�t0�
���■�'a�e�
���'o've�ae
���■a���ee
etae�o■�oo
eea0oe■o'�
��t�o0vomo�
�tt■��t't�
�teOAo■�'e
���■s��eoe
����o'oeeoe
ee'o�o■m��
e�e'e'e'moe
�to■e�a0oe
eaeo�m■�a�
�teotet�t'o
���■t�e�ae
e��t�o■�'t
�t�atototo�
�te■v�o���
�ta�A�■�oo
��e�tao��oo
�t�■s�ea�e
eeatAt■ooe
�te'tavoe'e
�t�■e�eeee
���eoe■vo�
�to�eovAmo�
�t�■a�o0t�
��et't■a�e
��e'oave�oe
�t�■t�e�oe
�11111■119
�IIIIAIIIII
�11■Alllll
�11111■101
�IA1111111A
ail■A111B1
�10119■All
�111101111A
�11■111111
�IAIAI■All
�IAllllllil
�11■Al1Al1
�19811■YII
�1111111111
�11■BIBIII
111191l111
IIIIIAIIIII
111■111111
eoao�o■�eo
�����������
���■������
et0e�a■���
��oetv��tee
�em■a'��v�
�te��o■�oe
�t��tot�te�
�t�■a'e��e
eta���■ae'
�tA'eee�eee
��A■t�eao�
I��I�Itll�
III�II�II�
Il��lll�
�10Bi1■111
�1911111111
�11■019111
E
5
q
0
a
S
5
S
5
S
3
a
5
3
5
a
S
5
a
3
3
v
a
a
a 2
3
zap

�1111111111
�1111111111
IIIA1111118
eee�tveat��
�IIIIAIIIII
IIIIIIIIIA9
et�ata�otoe
�e�atototee
�oOetAtatoe
eeooateotoo
�em�e'veoee
�e���e�ee�e
ete�tao��ot
�t�ataoaooe
�o���o�oo�o
ee�ttae0�oe
�ee�tae�eae
�e���e�ee�e
�et�aeoeev�
�eoaaeoaav�
�o���e�ee�e
e����������
�����������
�����������
eetat���ty�
�oo'tae'teo
��et�m��tee
etm�tetety�
�te�toe0tot
�tamtmt�te�
eteteae��oe
�t���'veAOt
�tetoe���ee
eta�avee0o�
��o���voeo�
���0a���ao�
ete�taoaeot
�toete��eve
�te��'oae'e
et�teeve�oe
���'�0v000e
���t�a��ooe
e����������
�����������
�����������
e�eete�0tee
���et'Aetee
���t�e��too
et�ttv�atee
��eat��otee
�tmot��et0o
e�e�tooeee�
�eeaesoeee�
�t�eoo���oo
�IBIIAIAIII
��e�eevee'e
�o�tte��eoe
�1119111911
�1119A19111
IAl1A111111
��etteva�oe
IIB11111911
IIIIIIIIBII
e����������
�����������
�����������
�A111A11111
����te0at0e
��o���eot��
�IBIIIBAl1A
�IB11911119
IIIIIIIBIII
�IIIIIIIIIA
�1111011111
11111011919
�IBIIIIIIII
�IIIIAIAIII
�m�e0o�ee0e
�IBIIIIAIII
�IIIIIIIICI
IIIIIIIIBII
IIIIIA11911
11119A11911
���eem�eov�
�1111111111
�1111111111
11111111111
1111111111�
etootattt��
�eoet0t�tee
�tee�meetee
�to�t'o�tem
ete�te��t0e
�te�t0�0te�
�teetm��te�
�eeetaeete�
et�te0ve�ao
�t��t0ve�ee
�e�tte��eee
��e�e�e�e�e
�IBOI�III�
''I'�II'I�
I
IIIIIIIB�
��I�I�I�I�'
eteto0va�o�
�eo�aoveeo�
�eetam�eoo�
��e�e�e�e�e
3
v
a
a
a 2
3
z �

U)
:i
'
U
o
'
U)
O
'
f6
�
o
0)
'
V
U
G1
�
N
H
:I
M
M �
N
7
M
'
t
U
W
N
G1
04
N
N
N
�
Q
o
CF)
EI
IL
EI
N
N
N
O
N
m
N N N
O
N
(4) uol;ena13
n
�
n
y
V
N
+
vi
N
n
ID
.y
N
N
mi
oo
m
n
O
,-.
ri
N
0
0
0
N
r.
�a
w
W
w
G
O
O
�
A
G
R
�

�
\
CL
§
$
o
9
'
i
G
§
i
a
=
e
§
(
m
,
'
t
2
g
'
§
k
'
r
}
LO
2
-
/
y
cn
/
A
a
o
$ )
.
u
}
�
a
§
'To
c
co
'
'
G
/
\
7
\
7
®
'
4
\
»
!
I
uo
J
@
-
\
\)
a
a
:
'CL
r
\
\
°
)
\EL
)
\
!
i
]
)
g
§
)
=
e
e =
=
e
=
i
]
&
e
_

a
00
v
I:
LO
`m
LO
N
I
_
r
a�
E
co
a`
co
ci
o
CL
o
C
M
o
W
} �
�
M
m
II
o
M
Cl)
C
�
V
N
N OO
I
V)
} J
"NIL
0
I•
Q
U
a
"
I
04
�o
LO
}a
I`
I
I;
Q
m
M
I I
•
O
0 0
0 LO
LO LO
LO
(g) uogenel3
N
06
N
N
v
A
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
00
h
O
M
h
�
O
v
h
A
O
M
n
n
0
U
U
O
�o
N
h
C)
01
sue,
U
s
Vl
0
00
M
h
01
r-:
O
h
A
O
v
O
A
O
0
00
vl
h
vl
M
O
'cC'
A
A
Noo�
a,�
No
A
b
�
fs

§
CL
k
i!
$
:
i(LO§
\
%
\
.
.
A
\
\
i�
&
§
S
i!
a
co
§
j
�!
$
,
&
) E
-
§
co
co
|
§
�
i:
$
§
\
'
o
=
c
E
o
i!
°
\ F
0
=
m
:
)
§
\
t
/
&
f
»
@
\ \
7 3
-
§
/
]
i
\
7 %
©
CL
a
§
i!
)
o
00
0 0
0
LO
LO
LO
LO
f)
§
}
)
k u
mg

§
CL
$
&
\
i
|@
§
§
i
2
4
j;
9
CL
) }
C
i!
|
j�
_
\\
§
i(
\ n7
'
,
|}
§
i}
_
/
)
;
%
.
CL
a
a
�i|
i!
i!
)\
Cl)
||
i}
�o
o
= OD*
LO
'IT
n
V
u
mg
§
§
m
m
y
=
§
I
a
a
u
ƒ
$
5
5
/
}
2
t
±
5
)
§
§
§
)
\
�
)
k
)
3

a
a
w
Y
00
�
m
O
LO
Q
Q
I
�
I
I
o
I
rn
}
�o
I
�
I
LL
0
o
Cl)
Cl)
LO
a
I
cc
I
o
a)
}
co
I0
n
N
�
O
I
Nn
U
M
}
U
N N�
I
o
M
I
N
N
H
I
N
L
co
ci
N
L
I
N
I
m
w
m
o
I0)
O
0
LO
'IT
m
(g) uogenel3
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
0
yU
U
b
�
o
s;
fs

§
CL
\
i
$
3
)
i
&
\
i
t
j
2
j
}
�
/
|
J
co
'
\
�
CD
~
k
�
k'
m
G F
.
�
r
\
D
i
a
|§
\
§
'
i
/
|
�
\
%
|k
J
�
2
\
�
a
a
|
e
m
\
_
o
|
V u
mg
§
\
§
\
§
±
«
a
a
2
}
%
2
\
\
2
5
$
m
e
2
\
®
)
)
]
\
_
)
)
f
§
]
3

CL
INSIOMMM
ME
SEEN
WINE
ELI'
loom
loom'
71
ENRON!,']
INEFIEN
1010,11010111
INEMEN
00
CD
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
U
Ui
O
N
O
�
M
h
O
01
y
�
N
O
(+i
O
O
h
V
V
M
01
O
vi
h
O
00
O
N
O
V
O
�
00
01
N
N
a
��

co
v
II
LO
`m
L
N
I
r
N
m
N
0')
Q
C
o
ICL
W
co(0
o
-o
}
N
coco
I
I:
o
I:
Cl)
O
I:
fn
I:
U
�
m
} J
�
N
co
LO
`m Q
} Q
I:
•Q-
I
•
a°
I
I:
m
m
I I
I:
•
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
(g) uogenel3
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
00
G
0
U
M
01
M
O
m
�D
w
b
�
�S
z

§
CL
\
i
$
3
)
i
&
\
§
'
o
2
/
|
)
j
=
co
7
i
kL
'A01-
§
|
§
'
/
g
�
J
%
|i
k
2
3
'
�
'
|a
I
©
I
I
m
ƒ
]
i
CD
|
g
G
§ 8
S 3
m
V u
mg
§
}
,
a
a
�
§
_
§
\
\
Z
a
a
_
§
E
00
§
/
\
\
3
%
'
\
\
/
2
)
/
&
A
3
%
'
±
§
/
2
\
}
z
§
))
)
)
)
�
f
\
§
]
3

§
�
to
$
\
&
�
\
@
2
)
§
'
i
o
m
k
'
'
\ F
§
o
_
§
2
�
g
§
%
k
�
2
'
J
�
o
[
�
a
©
_
j
'
) \
CD
V u mg
§
§
\
A
/
/
/
/
/
�
§
/
n
f
c
9_
\
6
\
§
\
s
\
)
{
\
A
\
\
))
)
e
\
\
�
)
k
)
3

§
CL
\
i
$
3
)
i
&
\
@
i
�
:
0
2
j
2
J
/
|
/
e
i
LIN§
o
7
'
0
|.
/
�
\ f
@
2
3 \
7
�
\
§
co
�
§
�
r
%
|
�
a
�
�
2
�
}
a
'
a
|.�
©
I
m
)
o
|
V u
mg
§
§
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
pt
Q
§
\
\
/
'
e
/
R
'
2
2
§
\
n
J
R
R
m
K
m
K
g
r
»
\
_
\
\
\
k
/-
\
\
C
}
2
}
_
)
\
j
j
\
/
\
�
2
\
\
\
\
2
\
\
�
}
k
)
3

E
CL
00
:I
:I
L
LO
0
$
'I
co
a
co
2
o
co
M -o
N
°o
lL
M}
I
M
I
o
Cl)
I
o
N
•I
N �
m
fn
.I
g
N
i
tll
} J
�
N
I
H
L
:I
LO
o
a) a
rQ
rn
•I
a°
:I
m
m
o
I
rn
0
m
LO
m co
m
m m m
0 0
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
(g) uogenel3
zzzzzzzzzz
O
O
V
oR
N
o�
�
�
O
7
A
rn
'n
cV
O
-on
N
Qy
rn
O
O
N
cV
O
n
-o
-o
N
d
b
�
�
0
�
x

Y
0
�
m
O
LO
Q
Q
I'
c�
�
I
o
I
L
co
I
}
c
I
o
O
I
co
�
I
a
co
LO
�
o
m
IO
cn
0
N N
}
I
U
o
N
N
I
�
I
c
N
V
}
LO
I
I
c
I
N
}
Q
rn
I
O
I
a
I
Cl)
00
o
I
LO LO
0
0
LO
LO
LO
(g) uogenel3
zzzzzzzzzz
0
N
N
0
U
�
y
y
y
0
ctl
x
�
W
o
d
b
�
�
0
�
x

ao
v
I:
L2
L
v
}
I.
I:
N
I
I:
c
�
o
rn
L
o
I:
m
Q
y
I'
�
o
MCo
a
I
a�
`p O
O
M
O
Cl)
c
I:
O
'
I:
IA
I •
�
� 3
L
N
N
�
N
co
Y
�
ci
�
C
m
�
m
Lo
O
m Q
}CL
Q
�
I
C
I
o
a
:
Cl)
m
o
I I
rn rn
m m
rn
m
rn
m
rn rn OD
m m m
(g) uogenel3
�zzzzzzzzzz
ii
i/1
M
n
N
h
O
n
O
i.
U
�
�
'
�
'
U
c
�
W
o
U
W
m
W
d
b
�
�
�
x

§
CL
$
&
)
—
a
�
|
k
§
2
}
§
co
\ 0
\
cco
o
| �
�
o
/
k
$
\ ,
2
3\7_j
�
m
§
`
co
m
=X.
\
2
\ L
k
a
=
r
]/
o
| (
V u mg
§
§
/
/
/
/
/
/
k
§
§
_
}
_
CL
m
(\CL
2
\
\
�
)
)
�
§

R
Q
Y
JI
00
m
o
LO
�
Q
a
I
I
rn
co
I
}
LU
cow
I
o
0
co
co
uO
a
a)
r
I
o
co
}
o
I
I
V
�
N �
fn
I
"'
IA
O
(6
N N
N
}
o
I0o
N
I
c
N
N
to
�
LO
�
I
aI
�
rn
}
I
a
o
I
a
I
�
I
co
m
o
I
m
m
rn m
LO
m m
00
(g) uogenel3
O
�
0
0
Elt
A
zz
0
G
n
M
N
M
O
M
A
O
zz
�
o
A
M
O
O
N
A
A
'O
'O
N
N
U
N3
�
t
d
w
w
4
W
c
v
d
w
0
b
�
�
x

R
a
Y
0
�
m
LO
Q
Q
I
I
0
m
I
0')i
m
I
0
�
I
o
o
a
Cl)
Cl)
LO
a)
coo
I
o
}
I
o
I
IN
N
cn
m
O
N
}
U
I
o
M
N
I
I
ci
y
I
LO
I
�
N
�
I
}
a
I I
I
co
w
m
o
Io
M
LO
oo
LO
LO LO
0 0
LO LO LO
(g) uogenel3
zzzzzzzzpt
zz
0
O
N
N
0
�
M
o
A
m
o
c
U
W
m
W
d
b
�
�
0
r
x

§
k
_
$
LO
(
\
&
a
�
|§
k
2
}
}
/CL
})
�
|�
k
'
_
co
§
i:
i!
§
\
§
\ n
!
'
,
| }
9
&
�)
E
_
�!
_
%
� }
C
m
0
'(
i!
:
_
CF)
OD OD
OD
OD
OD
V u
mg
§
k
§
—
§
u
\
_
§
§
\
t
2
7'
\
\
\
2
)
\
°
)
m
)
2
�
\
\
f
�
k
/
_

A.
44.
•�h?�'
ram.
� � :x
R
a
Q
00
v
I:
LO
I:
I:
c�
I'
LO
o
0')
}
I:
y
co
N
N
co
Q
LL
co
C
I:
o
N
I.
o
M fl-
o
c
} li
Ocn
I.
IN
U)
I:
1
o
O
N MnL
m
M
N
-
CAO
I:
0
I:
00
}
V
N
N
�
•
I•
m
C
� o
C
I
°'
O
} a
a
I
I
co
O
S
OD OD
OD
OD
OD OD
LO
m }
(g) UOi;ena13
I I
zzzzzzzzzz
I�
�i
U
�
i.
7i
C
U
m
O

R
a
Q
Y
0
�
m
LO
CL
I
Q
I
0
rn
L
I
}
(0
I
o I
O
c>
a
m
LO
N
N
O
}
C
O
I
y
N
M
U1 I
U
OL
N N
}
U I
o
M
N
I
� I
c
N
a�
�
I
}
I
a
II
co
C
m
00
O
I
co
co
co co
co
LO LO
(g) uogenel3
�zzzzzzzzzz
0
�N
0
U
O
W�
�O
.O
U
m
Q
x
0
'A
�Q
m
a
o
�

§
CL
_
i
!
i
e
i
!
&
)
i
,
S
a
r
)
i
2
Cl)
Co CL
j
'
\
E
| �
q
i
CD
r
j
§
'
k
~ (
i
§
3\\\
§
g
&
�
§
'
C
g
(
)
J
%
/ \
i
�
_
'
o
CL
0
�
©
i
m
= »
i
|o
V u
mg
§
A
2
§
/
/
)
)
/
/
/
/
/
/
§
Q
§
\
2
\
,
}
r
,
A
\
2
%_
/
\
}
;
^
^
E
u
§\/
�
A
2
2
m
Z
e}
g
c
a
§
\
/
\
A
2
)}/
A
l
91
—
\\22
/
./
§
)
/
3

Y
0
�
m
0
i
I
LO
Q
Q
Q
I
I
rn
�
I
}
Ico
W
O
a
co
co
LO
I
a)
r>
N
I
o
m
a)
I
ocn
I
I
U
N �
C
(4
O
N N
}
L
I
o
I
V
N
I
r
co
N
I
L
I
}
LO
I�
a)
I
�
I
N
c
I
�
}
I
_
C.
a
I
I
m
o
Irn
rn
LO
rn
LO
LO
rn rn
LO
rn
LO LO
OD
LO
(g) uogenel3
�zzzzzzzzzz
0
0
O
U
o
n
-O
O
U
m
o
�
d

00
I:
V
LO
LO
v
}
I
I
r
a�
•
E
I
a'
co
a
f0
I
r_
C
o
_M M 0
W
� o
Cl)
0 0
}
w
m
�
I
I
v
I
o
Cl)
I
N
o
m0
N
fn
I
U
'o
ON
N
}
o
U
I
U
I
N
r
UD
c�i
100
(4
LO
O
aI
4 Q
CL
} a
�
N
�
c
I
�
O.
Cl)
m }
o
I I
OD
OD
rn OD
OD OD OD
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
(g) uogenel3
A
�zzzzzzzzzz
R
N
'n
A
/�
O
'�
M
n
O
O
O
N
V
M
CC
�D
N
-O
O
o
�
d

Y
0
�
m
O
LO
Q
Q
I
I
rn
I
}
co
I
w
I
O
a
co
co
in
I
a)
cm
N
CD}
M
I
Io
U
N �
cn
O
N m
N
}
L
I
o
I
V
N
I
H
IcoLO
L
ci
}
I�
a)
I
�
I
N
I
C.
a
I
I
co
m
o
Ico
co co 00 00
0 0 0 0
co
0 0
00
LO
(g) uogenel3
zzzzzzzzzElt
0
0
O
U
cn
M
�
�
-0-0
y
y
O
R=
R=
Q
U
'
U
a
o
Uz
m
a
o
�
d

§
CL
$
&
/
�
@
i
i
7
. �
o
g
/
&
\
a
cm
CD
7
§
\ F
m
2
§
3 \
}
�
�
|
§
/
�
\
;
%
J
|
k
2
3
)
k
�
o
|
a
=
m
)
.
oOD
|
OD
OD
OD
OD
r
V u
mg
§
§
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/Elt
/
/
m
2
r
m
7$«,««
§
\
E
u
J-0
)
22
t\
0
\
)
/
�
@
�
]
§
3

E
J
�
_
�)
I!
LO
r
�
|
cu
S
G
}
/
co
\
j�
x 0
r
co
§
I:
|
%
co
(
�!
§
�
§
�
�(
c
- e
I!
,Zr
® !
§
a 2
/ ]
�!
§
/
d
g
! I}
�
J
}
%
k
(
2
|I
_
(
m
= »
:
I(
'
o
| |
OD
OD OD
OD
r-
OD
d u
mg
k
§
)))))))))
)
k
§
§
u
§
^
z\
m
a
t
p
g
»
g
e
K
9
/0
\
\
»
§
\
\
t
t=\
;
\
0
.\
\
(
\
\
0
§
�
]
k
§
«

§
CL
$
LO
k
§
(
o
r
}
2
2
e
CL
/
7 ±
�
/
�
| �
§
/
\
kF
$
=
(
!
� �
% \
k
j
\
§
}
2
\
m
E
,
i
|
7 %
�
|
i
k
a
=
(
m
m }
,
_
|:
OD
OD r-
OD
V u mg
§
§
/
/
/
/
k
2
\
{
r §
a
7/4
/
)
)
�
/
\
j
0
./\
)
§
)
�
3

1=
Y
I
0
�
m
0
LO
Q
Q
Q
I
�
1=
�
}
m
I
W
Oco
0
co
1O
cm
0
co
cm
C
N
V
�
N
cn
m
O
L
U
_
I
N
�
c
N
N
ci
LO
I
a)
N
Q
O
I
a
�
m
o
IO
m m
OD
m
I-
m
I �
m m m
(g) uogenel3
zzzzzzzzzz
0
0
N
0
U
A
M
N
zz
O
C'
C'
O
A
A
N
N
M
M
A
-O
O
r
C
o
:'O
Q
o
a
a
o
�

�
\
k
�
�
\
D
§
$
$
#
i!
!
$
3
g
}
/
\
00
�}
'
�
k
(
t
§
§
r
\
�!
Cl)
�
(
'(
o
\
�
\
k
'
$
'
ƒ
§
/
\
/
'!-
-
k
k
:
o
_
_
5
i(
\
\))
�
�
�
°
\CD
j)
j
§
_
=
e
e
= e
e
=
2
7
§
ye- g
3
/

r,
wf
Al
�AlY'S1lr� l
R
L
C
a
D
00
LO
V
aI
r-,
Ntoo
z
z
o
r
I
rn
M �
o
I
R
I
m
e"
m
1.
o
t/!
CD
Cl)
�
Q
O
Cl)
Cl)
0
O
I
Cl)
-ID
u
M
U
r
�
U
fA
I
N 16
I
I
N
o
Ln
o
v
I
_
N
x
r
N
N
00
I
s
LO
d
�
72
72
Od
w
o
W
ch
a
a
a
I
O
o0
N
0000
N
r-
N
I
N
r
N
r
N
ONO
N
p
m
F
(11) uoilenal3

t
#
\
r
~
--°
z=
/
e)
uu
\
/
�\
\
6
\}
ƒ
-
Cl
C,
INC
y----
Cl
t
\
\
�\
6
\
z
\
INC
@\NC,
N
\z
0
�
\
z
maQ3%g=a-3
j}
/
//}%J/)%3\
0
#
/
r
\
z\zC,C=
\
0
e
)
\ ~ \ ( [ \ { +
C ®

Chart 2.
Poplin Ridge UT1-1 - Substrate Composition
90%
sa°r
70%
50°%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Mimi
Silt/Clay
Chart 3.
8M
70%
60%
50%
4C%
3C%
20%
10%
0%
r
11. kIIII 1.1.1
Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Poplin Ridge UT1-1A - Substrate Composition
Silt/ Clay
1. 1 MiLl
Sand Gravel
■M1,
__.
Cobble
Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Bedrock
Bedrock

Chart 4.
1001
90°l
80°/O
70°l
50°l
50°l
40°l
30°l
20°l
10°l
0%
120%
100 YO
80°l
50°l
40°l
20°l
0YO
Poplin Ridge UT1-2 - Substrate Composition
Silt/Clay
- = -
Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Poplin Ridge UT1-B - Substrate Composition
11M 11111 -_.-1
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder
0 MY1 0 MY2 0 MY3 0 MY5 0 MY7
Bedrock

Chart 6.
Poplin Ridge UT1-3 - Substrate Composition
1 D0l
90°l
8D°l
7 0 %,
60°l
5 D%
40°l
30°l
2 0 %,
1 D°l
0% ■ �
Silt/Clay
Chart 7.
100%
90°l
80°/0
7D°l
60%
50°l
4D°l
30°l
20%
10°l
0%
Silt/Clay
■■■ ■ _
Sand Gravel
-■A■■ -- —
Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Poplin Ridge UT1-C - Substrate Composition
Sand Gravel
Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7

Chart 8.
9 D°l
8ar/O
70°l
60%
50%
40%
30%
20°l
10°l
O%
Chart 9.
1 CAD
9 D°l
80°l
7Q°l
6 D°l
50°l
4 D°l
30°l
2 D°l
1M/0
D%
Poplin Ridge UT1-4 -Substrate Composition
III 11M.1
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel
JM—
Cobble Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Poplin Ridge UT2-A - Substrate Composition
Gravel Cobble Boulder
I MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Bedrock
Bedrock

Chart 10.
120%
1001
8 MIS
Poplin Ridge UT2-3 - Substrate Composition
6 D %
40°l
20°l
c
Silt/Clay
Chart 11.
6090
5090
4C
3090
2090
1030
0%
Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY5 ■ MY7
Poplin Ridge UT2-4 - Substrate Composition
Silt/Clay
Bedrock
1. 1116
Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
0 MY1 0 MY2 0 MY3 0 MY5 0 MY7

Table 13. Poplin Ridge Bank Pin Array Summary
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 Year 7
Bank Pin Location Position Readinff (mm) Reading (mm) Readinff (mm) Readinff (mm) Readinff (mm)
Reach UT2-2
Upper
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Middle
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lower
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach UT2-3
Upper
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Middle
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lower
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach UTl-2
Upper
0.0
44.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
Middle
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lower
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach UTl-3
Upper
44.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Middle
92.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lower
31.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach UTl-C
Upper
0.0
35.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
Middle
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lower
139.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ReachUTl-4
Upper
0.0
31.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
Middle
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lower
108.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 14. Verification of Bankfull Events and Stream Flow Events
Year Number of Bankfull Events Maximum Bankfull Height (ft)
CG1 UT1-2
MY1
1
0.50
MY2
0
N/A
MY3
4
0.49
MY4
1
0.95
MY5
0
N/A
MY6
13
2.22
MY7
4
0.46
CG2 UT 1-4
MY 1
2
2.00
MY2
5
0.80
MY3
4
2.60
MY4
14
4.86
MY5
4
1.65
MY6
22
4.59
MY7
15
2.59
CG3 UT2-3
MY1
2
4.30
MY2
5
2.00
MY3
3
2.83
MY4
6
3.70
MY5
13
1.98
MY6
16
5.17
MY7
11
1.04
Year
Consecutive now Days
Total now Days
Number of now Events
Consecutive now Day Date Range
FG UT2-A
MY5
93
155
6
---
MY6
135
307
3
---
MY7
139
142
2
1/1/2021 - 5/19/2021
Table 15.2021 Rainfall Summary
Month
Irverage
Normal
Limits
Monroe Station
Precipitation
30
Percent
70
Percent
January
4.07
2.74
4.87
3.87
February
3.49
2.39
4.17
4.59
March
4.45
3.10
5.29
2.23
April
3.07
1.82
3.72
0.62
May
3.47
2.22
4.18
1.77
June
4.57
2.91
5.50
4.84
July
4.50
2.90
5.42
2.33
August
4.71
2.78
5.18
3.39
September
4.24
2.02
5.18
2.09
October
3.81
2.00
4.57
0.41
November
3.33
1.90
4.05
---
December
3.85
2.56
4.62
---
Total
47.56
29.34
56.75
26.14
Above Normal Limits
Below Normal Limits

(ul) Ile;uleb
a m N o
rn ro r co u� v m N � o
�
I
N
O
�
I
'
I
I
�
O
N
O
I
I
I
'
'
I
N
�
�
_
N
O
�
�
N
O
I
I
I
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
^,
W
�
I
I
I
I
N
�
�
I
'
'
N
O
-
1�
I
_
Q
N
I
N
o
N
I
I
I
fA
N
0
N
�
'
N
I
O
N
G
�
O
0
I
a
cm
I
_
C
o
0
N
�
I
�
ti
I
M
C
I
I
I
'
�
N
O
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
N
�
N
N
O
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
O
\
O
N
O
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
N
O
O
N
(11) y;daa aa;eM

Appendix F
Poplin Ridge 2020 Monitoring Adaptive Management

fires
April 15, 2020
Paul Wiesner
NCDEQ — DMS
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site — 2020 Monitoring Adaptive Management
Work Completed
Mr. Wiesner,
In response to problem areas identified in the Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site Year 5
Monitoring Report and the 2019 Adaptive Management Plan, RES completed adaptive
management work in fall 2019 and spring 2020. The work included regrading and installing
structures on UT2-2 through the pond bottom (including the lower portion of UT2-A) and replanting
the pond bottom and other low stem density areas. RES also installed monitoring devices in the
pond bottom. The devices include Cross Sections 30 and 31 and a random vegetation plot. The
cross section data was included in the MY5 report and will be surveyed again in MY6 and MY7.
The random vegetation plot was measured right after planting in April 2020 and results are
attached. The random plot will also be measured again during MY6 and MY7 monitoring. More
information about the adaptive management work is detailed below:
Stream Work on UT2-2 and Lower UT2-A
Dates: August and September 2019
Method: Dimension/Profile Grading and Structure Installation as proposed in the 2019 Adaptive
Management Plan. Installed structures are shown on the attached map.
Reach Length: +/- 500 linear feet

Constructed riffle looking upstream
Newly replaced log sill at the top of the reach (Area 1 from AMP) looking upstream

Lower UT2-A in the pond bottom looking upstream
UT2-2 Bank Livestakin
Date: April 6, 2020
Reach Length: +/- 500 linear feet
# of Livestakes: 800
Species: Black willow, Buttonbush, and Cottonwood
Livestakes on UT2-2 looking upstream
c

UT2-2 Container Tree Plantina and Floodalain Livestakin
Date: April 6, 2020
Planting Area: +/- 0.50 acres
Stems/Acre: 1,060
# of Container Trees: 30
Species: Water Oak and Willow Oak
# of Livestakes: 500
Species: Black willow, Buttonbush, and Cottonwood
Random Vegetation Plot looking downstream
Low Stem Densitv Area Container Tree Plantina in and around VP9 and VP10
Date: April 6, 2020
Method: Planted container trees in areas shown as low stem density areas in MY5 vegetation
plot data.
Planting Area: +/- 0.25 acres
Stems/Acre: 280
# of Container Trees: 70
Species: Water Oak and Willow Oak
A map displaying the locations of the items mentioned above and the random plot data is
attached.
Thank you,
Ryan Medric I Ecologist

C
C
E
E
C
.1 a
N a
O
N
a w
N
(6 N N _
o w a
N
£ -
Q o c
7777
ON
o
w
T. YO f/1 f/1 C� N N
E E
J
a E E N
02 0 D�
Z 2 E 0 3D�� m
U
_ Q
N
G
>
�-
_ N O C C
0 _ O O O- t0 m M
C N N O- p a L L
la
O O !6 O p
N 0 N� � .0 p Q
O
O_
`m
m
a
p �,
d
O M M O C C
() n v (n (� m W W
N m L
a_co(� LL d H
H m
a a
Q
o
O> 1, I I I
I I I I
?adg anisenui
0
0

April 2020 Random Vegetation Plot
Random Plot 1
#
Common Name
Height (cm)
1
Cottonwood
36
2
Cottonwood
25
3
Cottonwood
37
4
Cottonwood
35
5
Cottonwood
32
6
Black Willow
60
7
Cottonwood
58
8
Black Willow
28
9
Black Willow
66
10
Water Oak
128
11
Cottonwood
22
12
Cottonwood
30
13
Cottonwood
40
14
Black Willow
69
15
Black Willow
66
16
Black Willow
60
17
Black Willow
38
18
Cottonwood
35
19
Buttonbush
38
20
Buttonbush
35
21
Willow Oak
150
22
Black Willow
38
23
Buttonbush
66
24
Willow Oak
162
25
Black Willow
65
26
Cottonwood
40
27
Cottonwood
23
28
Willow Oak
174
Stems/Acre
1133
Average Height (cm)
59
Average Height (ft)
1.9
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4

M E M O R A N D U M
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
TO: Paul Wiesner - DMS
FROM: Ryan Medric - RES
DATE: 6/11/2020
fires
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
RE: Poplin Ridge MY5 (2019) IRT Credit Release Site Visit
Attendees:
IRT: Mac Haupt (NCDWR), Erin Davis (NCDWR)
DMS: Paul Wiesner
RES: Brad Breslow, Ryan Medric
Site Visit Date: June 3, 2020
The IRT, DMS, and RES conducted a site visit at the Poplin Ridge Stream Restoration Site to discuss the
Monitoring Year 5 (2019) credit release. The main topics of discussion were the pond reach repair and
supplemental plantings that were completed in October 2019 and April 2020 respectively. Details are
bulleted below:
Flow, bed and bank, and riffle/pool sequences were observed throughout the pond reach repair
section (including Reach UT2-A). The IRT noted a small head cut forming in the middle of the
reach and commented that they would have liked to see more sills installed. RES will observe this
area and will report any issues in the MY6 (2020) report.
Live stakes were observed sprouting along the banks and in the floodplain as well as the presence
of the container trees that were planted. The IRT, however, felt that the area was not planted
sufficiently. RES replied that the pond was planted at a stem density of 1,060 stems per acre and it
was hard to see most of the livestakes due to the herbaceous layer being matted down from a recent
storm. RES will conduct a random vegetation transect in the pond bottom this fall (as proposed in
the Adaptive Management Plan) and will plant more three -gallon container trees next winter if
necessary. RES will also take photos of this pond reach repair area at the end of the 2020 growing
season and will include the photos and a synopsis of the repair and vegetation in the MY6 (2020)
report.
The IRT observed aquatic vegetation growing in the riffles of UT2-2 and UT2-3; however, in -
stream vegetation was not to a level where it was accumulating sediment or impeding flow. The
IRT did not feel it was necessary for RES to treat in -stream vegetation on the reach unless it
becomes more prevalent over the course of this growing season. RES and DMS believe that the in -
stream vegetation observed will shade out over time.
The IRT reminded RES to make sure the easement is properly marked due to a few small areas of
easement scalloping and missing/damaged signage observed during the site visit. RES agreed to
repair any easement scalloping/encroachment and agreed to ensure all required easement marking
and signage are updated and present by the end of MY6. DMS agreed to conduct a site visit to
confirm this work is complete before any payment is made for MY6 (2020) monitoring.

- Privet treatment was observed to be successful along UT2-1. Privet treatments will be administered
throughout the remainder of the monitoring period within the conservation easement.
- The full IRT was not able to attend the meeting, however, DWR staff did not note any issue with
releasing the 2019 project credit as proposed by DMS. DWR staff indicated that they would send
their site visit notes to the USACE IRT chair for review.