20140073 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20140121

FINAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 1 of 5
Green Valley Farm Site
Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID Number 003994 -EEP Site 95012
Randolph County, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030003010070
Submitted to:
Q -_ D
�- D
JA -N1 1! 1 20'4
i
JENR- - V ✓F —TE—R i UALITY
o stem w .ds wa„c,
E'i afement
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: June 2012
Data Collection Period: September 2013
Submission Date: December 2013
r�L
RECEIVED
DEC 1 i 2013
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Provided by:
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
919 - 829 -9909
/MWK
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
919- 782 -0495

l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT ............... .................... . ..............................1
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives.... .................. ................... .......................1
1.2 Project Background ....... ...................... ............................... ....... ..............................1
13 Vegetation Condition ...................... ......................... .................. ............................... 2
1.4 Summary Information / Data ................. . ............................... ...... ............................... 2
2.0 METHODOLOGY ..... ................... . ......................... ................. .. ........................2
3.0 REFERENCES ......... ................................... ............................... .............................4
Appendix A Pri
Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
APPENDICES
3.ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map
Project Restoration Components
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
e -Table Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table
Photos Vegetation Plot Photos
e- Photos Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 7 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
e- Tables Raw CVS vegetation data sheets
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
0
Monitoring Report. Year 1 of 5
December 2013

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The Green Valley Buffer Mitigation Project is located in the 03030003 Catalog Unit (CU), in the Cape
Fear River Basin Assets of this CU include the Deep River, the Randleman Reservoir, and major
communities including High Point, Asheboro, Siler City, and Sanford Restoration goals for CU
03030003 as identified in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin RBRP include protection of several species of
mussel and the Cape Fear Shiner. Additional goals include the improvement in water quality to waters
draining to Randleman Reservoir.
The Green Valley Buffer Mitigation Project was identified as an opportunity to improve water quality and
habitat within the CU. The project goals address stressors identified in the CU. The following table lists
the project goals and the project objectives through which the goals will be addressed:
Goals Objectives
1 Nutrient removal • Restore minimum 50 -foot riparian buffer by planting
2 Sediment removal appropriate bottomland hardwood species to filter runoff
3. Runoff filtration 0 Convert active farm fields to forested buffers.
4 Increase dissolved oxygen • Plant buffer vegetation to shade channel
concentration • Restore riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland
5. Restore riparian habitats hardwood ecosystem
6. Reduce water temperature • Restore canopy tree species in the stream buffer areas to
shade channel.
Eliminate and control exotic invasive species
Replace three (two culverts and one ford) undersized
and/or failing channel crossings with appropriately sized
structures.
1.2 Project Background
The Green Valley Farms Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site is located on Hockett Dairy Road (SR 1938) in
Randolph County approximately 12 miles north of Asheboro, NC (Figure 1). The site is located in the
Cape Fear River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03030003010070 (NCDWQ sub -basin 03- 06 -08) The site
has four unnamed tributaries (UT) that drain into Randleman Lake The proposed project will result in
8 74 to 9 6 acres of buffer restoration. The upper 400 linear feet of UT 4, which account for the 0.86 -acre
difference in the buffer restoration acreage range, are not subject to the Randleman Buffer Rules It is
anticipated that performing buffer restoration along the entire length of UT 4 (590 linear feet) will result
in a defined channel within the five -year monitoring period, and that the Site will ultimately yield the full
9.6 acres of buffer restoration
The project site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and in the Carolina Slate Belt The
region is underlain by felsic metavolcanic rocks, which can be seen in the streambed of UT 1 and UT 3.
The topography of the project area is generally rolling with elevations ranging from 670 to 760 feet
(Figure 2). The four unnamed tributaries to Randleman Lake comprise the principle drainage features.
The project's watershed is primarily used for agricultural production Much of the site is currently used
for row crop production for dairy silage. These tributaries have limited hardwood trees present within the
buffer and lack significant ground cover The mature trees have a density of less than 100 stems per acre.
The project area has been in agricultural use for several decades (Figure 3).
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
1
0
a

The Green Valley Farms mitigation project offers an opportunity for high quality riparian buffer
restoration Stream buffer mitigation for the Green Valley Farms Site involves buffering four streams that
flow directly and indirectly into Randleman Lake. The mitigation design divides the site into four distinct
reaches (Figure 6). Buffer restoration is proposed along all four channels. Three existing farm access
crossings will be upgraded and stabilized to prevent erosion
13 Vegetation Condition
The measure of vegetative success for the site is the survival of at least 320 five -year old planted trees per
acre at the end of year five of the monitoring period. Year 1 monitoring recorded an average of 625 stems
per acre across all vegetation plots. Most plots had a high rate of mortality. In particular, Plots 7, 8, and
10 each had less than 300 stems per acre in Year 1 Other vegetation issues included invasive species and
burned vegetation within the easement. Invasive grass (Johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense) was common
and problematic across the entire site. Additionally, Plot 3 had a high density of morning glory vines that
' caused several trees to be bent over. Plot 10 had been burned and will need to be re- established. No
volunteer stems were observed during Year 1 monitoring activities. CVS Level 2 will be performed in
monitoring Year 2 to document any volunteer generation. Overall, vegetation across the site is in fair to
poor condition Due to the vegetation condition and the widespread invasive species problem, the site is
scheduled to be re- planted in February 2014 The Current Condition Plan View is provided in Appendix
B, Figure 2.
1.4 Summary Information / Data
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
i 2.0 METHODOLOGY
' In order to determine if the success criteria are achieved and the planted areas are developing toward the
target community, NCEEP -CVS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2 will be utilized. The
vegetation monitoring will include Level I and Level II plots distributed across the planted area. An
interim vegetation monitoring will occur in spring after leaf -out has occurred. The CVS monitoring will
be conducted toward the end of the growing season. Individual plot data will be provided to NCEEP and
CVS following NCEEP -CVS guidance. The annual monitoring requirements are summarized in the
following table:
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report- Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
2
r
I 1 Plots
e
N
Vegetation will be monitored using the
X
Vegetation
Located randomly
Annual
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocols
across the project area
(Level I & Level II
FxDtic and
Emtic vegetation will be evaluated and spot
X
nuisance
N/A
Senn- Annual
treatment applied as needed
vegetation
Locations of fence damage, vegetation
X
Project
N/A
Senn -annual
damage, boundary encroachments, etc will be
boundary
mapped
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report- Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
2

Photographs will be used to visually document restoration success. Reference photos will be taken once a
year and will be used to visually document restoration success. Reference photo stations are marked with
wooden stakes. Reference stations will be photographed immediately following planting and continued
annually for at least five years following construction. Photographers will make every effort to maintain
the same area in each photo over time Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate vegetation
establishment. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
3
0
F- -I

3.0 REFERENCES
Lindenmayer, D.B., and J F Franklin. (2002), Conserving forest biodiversity A comprehensive
multiscaled approach Island Press, Washington, DC.
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2004
Guidehnes for Riparian Buffer Restoration Available online at http:// portal .ncdenr.org /web /eep /process-
and- protocol
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2005. `Basinwide Planning Program :
October 2005 Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." October 2005. Available online at
http : / /portal.ncdenr.org/web /wq /ps [Accessed 01 February 2012].
N.0 Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2012.
Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports Available online at
http: / /portal.ncdenr org/web /eep /fd- forms- templates.
N C Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
_J Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality Raleigh, NC.
Peet, R K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262 -274
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
-� University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Schafale, MY and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
`J Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
United States Geological Survey. 1982. 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Pleasant Garden, NC.
( Young, T.F. and Sanzone, S. (editors). (2002), A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological
condition. Ecological Reporting Panel, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee. EPA Science
` Advisory Board Washington, DC
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
4
J
Monitoring Report. Year 1 of 5
December 2013

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID 4003994 -EEP Site 95012
� J
A -1
Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013

iew ur W14 Rdt
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site
of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Therefore
access by the general public is not permitted. Access by T
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, monitoring,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the cd4 o H °gan Rd
terms and timeframes of their defined, pre - approved roles. Any a
intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these
previously sanctioned activities /roles requires prior coordination 62
with EEP. , wc.62
ArborliOd p� ,� Z
C
0
o
Hodgin F" m Rd
n
6
V
L
Green Valley Farm's Site ROO +fe. In o
------------ s - - - - -- `
Cedar R1dg, R
RandWpA •--- _______—
Coltra— ,a a
m Mill
° Bi<
a if
Colonial Loop
b
Redg
Rd
HOGkell Dairy Rd
P.
�y
2 P t
p �
E I,
�e
Randleman
Lake n
srced
Legend
® Green Valley Farms Site
WON
oil
rA�,��= r ►��i�ti'�'�h�
- I
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Green Valley Farms Riparian Buffer Restoration Site rA�l Randolph County, North Carolina +
EEP Project ID# 003994 �atl kern
,,000 2,000 4,OFI�t elnent
1 inch = 2,000 feet Date: October 2013 PROGRAM

t Q aed atea •
Gees C
r ti93! 50 2
11 dgadon Credits
Activity or Report
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
N/A
N/A
N/A
WA
N/A
N/A
Restoration
N/A
N/A
Totals*
N/A I
N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
8 74 Ac to 9 6 Ac
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Reach ID
Stationing/
g/
Location
Ewstmg Footage
(IF)
Approach
(PI, PH, etc)
estoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration Area
(acres)
Mitigation Ratio
Reach UT
N/A
2,450
N/A
Buffer
351
11
Reach UT2
N/A
1,156
N/A
Buffer
265
11
ReachUT3
I N/A
1,105
1 N/A
Buffer 1
230
1 11
Reach UT4*
N/A
190 to 590
1 N/A
Buffer
0 28 to 1 14
11
Component S ummation
Restoration Level
Stre am
ear feet
I
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian
Wetland acres
Buffer
acres
Upland (acres)
Rrverme
Non- Rivenne
Restoration*
N/A
I N/A
N/A
I N/A
I 8 74 to 960
N/A
*Currently, the upper 400 LF of UT4 is not subject to the Randleman Buffer Rules, however, the lower 190 LF is subject to the
buffer rules and consists of 0 28 acres of proposed buffer restoration It is anticipated that performing buffer restoration along the
entire reach (590 LF) will result in a defined channel within the 5 -year monitonng penod and ultimately yield 1 14 acres of
buffer restoration
' reject snfi >s
ee. V y • ,
o _ . ■ r 003 4- Stile 'i0 2
Elapsed time since plantmg complete 1 year, 4 months
Number of reporting ears 1
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or Deliver
Mitigation Plan
January 2012
May 2012
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
May 2012
Construction
N/A
October 2012
Ternporary S&E mix applied to project area
N/A
June 2012
Permanent seed n-nxapphed to project area
N/A
June 2012
Contamena,d and B&B plantmgs planted in project area
N/A
June 2012
Baseline Monitoring Document ear 0 Monitoring - baseline
June 2012
May 2013
Replanting
N/A
February 2014*
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2013
October 2013
Year 2 Monitoring
Fan 2014*
Fall 2014*
Year 3 Monitoring
Fall 2015*
Fall 2015*
Year 4 Monitoring
Fall 2016*
Fall 2016*
Year 5 Monitoring
Fan 2017*
Fall 2017*
*scheduled
Green Valley Farm Site — Ripanan Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
A -3
0
a

e
� vane
F�
Designer
• a61e
, copy
6er W�i9 S k
WK Dickson & Co Inc
Primary project design POC
Daniel Ingram - 919 782 -0495
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks
Construction contractor POC
Kory Studer - 33 362-0289
Planting Contractor
Taylors Lawn and Landscape
Planting contractor POC
Brant Taylor - 919 606 -2431
Seedin g Contractor
Taylors Lawn and Landscape
Planting contractor POC
Brant Taylor - 919 606 -2431
Seed Mix Sources
Evergreen Seed Inc
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen
Monitoring Performers
WK Dickson & Go Inc
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Daniel Ingram- [phone]
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report- Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
A-4

4.
>lse
■ >rtey
amber YO 9SA 2
Prole t Information
Pro ect Name
(seen Valley Farm Site - Ripanan Buffer Restoration
County
Randolph
Project Area acres
1145
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude)
35° 54' 17 672" N 79° 50'3 490"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sro ra hic Province
Piedmont Ph sro ra hic Province
River Basin
Cape Fear River Basin
USES Hydrologic Unrt 8-digrt
03030003
USGS Hydrologic Unrt 14-digit
03030003010070
DWQ Sub -basm
03 -06-08
Project Drainage Area acres
3891
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Inipervious Area
1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
101 Residential
2 01 Cropland and Pasture
2 03 Confined Anunal Operations
2 99 Other Agricultural Land
3 02 Passively Managed Forest Stands
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
A -5
Monitonng Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013

�I
Tabie 4 (c aseliue snd
Altriiutes
sli Caisty
reject usher 3
l50
Parameters
Reach UI l
Reach tM
Reach UI'3
Reach Ur4*
Length of reach linear feet
2,450
1 156
1.105
190 to 590
Valley Classification
X
X
X
X
Drainage area acres
221
185
64
194
NCDWQ stream identification
38
205
23
26
score
NCDWQ Water Quality
WS -IV,CA
WS -IV,CA
WS -N,CA
WS -IV,CA
Classification
Morphological Description
C
C
C
C
(stream type)
Evolutionary trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Mecklenburg CL
Chewacla loam
McC2, Wynott-
Wynott-Enon
Wynott-Enon
Underlying mapped soils
ChA
Enon complex
complexWtC
complexWtC
WvC2
Drainage class
somewhat poorly
well dramed
well drained
well drained
dramed
Soil Hydric status
Non -h dnc
Non -h dnc
Non -h dnc
Non-h dnc
Slope ft/ft
0 002
0 024
0 014
0 010
FEMA classification
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
N/A
Native vegetation community
Cultivated
Cultivated
Cultivated
Cultivated
Percent composition of exotic
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
invasive vegetation
Re ulato Considerations
Supporting
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Waters of the United States -Section 401
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA )/Coastal
No
N/A
N/A
Area Management Act (CAMA
FEMA Flood lam Compliance
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Green Valley Farm Site — Ripanan Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID 4003994 -EEP Site 95012
A-6
Monitonng Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013

I ,
1
�1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
B -1

Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Green Valley Farms Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003994 r4ll�f
�
0 200 in - et F o to
Feet Date: October 2013 a OG e e
db

Tade 5. Vegetahaa Condition Assessment
Green Valley,liandolpb Co ®ty
F7P I;ro lD Number 00399_4 -tEEP Site 95012
Planted Acreage. 11A5
�ffitexou
Nipping
CCPV
Number of
Camnbned
PI tail
DeSmhons
T hreshold
De ehon
P,ol ons
Ac a
Ac e
Very limited cover of both woody and
I Bare Areas
herbaceous material
01 acres
N/A
0
000
0%
Woody stemdensities clearly belowtarget
vertical
2 Low Stem Density Areas
levels based on MY3 4 or 5 stem count criteria
I 01 acres
1yellowlinefill
2
293
1 26%
Total:
2M2193M
OFMORM
3 Areas of Poor Growth Areas with woody stems ofa size that are
Rates or Vigor obvious small given the monitoring ye az 025 acres
N/A
0
000
00/0
C®nl
2 1♦
2.93
26;/0
EasementAcreage. HAS
/lamed
�Cftegony
N6pp��py
Number, of
Comhoed
P
D
Threshold
De cdon
rol ons
Acre a
Ac e
Areas or pomts (dtoo small to render as
horizontal red
4 Invasive Areas ofConcem
polygons at map scale )
1000 SF
line fill
4
1145
1000/0
5 Easement Encroachment
Areas or points (dtoo small to render as
1
Areas
1polygons at map scale
none
N/A
0
000
0%
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
B -3
Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013

Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
B -4
a

Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot II
Vegetation Plot S
Vegetation Plot 10
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year I of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
B -5
r7

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
C -1
a

Tale 6. Riperia Bsdter Vegetalieu Touts
Green Valley. Raadslpb Candy
UP P t ® r 0039!4 -QEP Site 9N12
Plot#
Riparian Buffer
Stems,
Success Criteria
Met'
1
567 X
19 Yes
2
647 .-
Yes
3
1133
Yes
4
971
Yes
5
486
Yes
6
850
Yes
7
243
No
8
283
No
9
809
Yes
10
202
No
11
688
Yes
Project A
-
Yes
Stem pass . characteristics
1Buffer Stems Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
Green Valley Farm Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012 December 2013
C -2
r�

Table 7. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with /without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Green Valley, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003994 -EEP Site 95012
Color Ke for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Green Valley Farm Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
December 2013
Current Plot Data MYI 2013
Scientific Name
Commen Name
Species
T
95012 -01 -0001
95012 -01-0002
95012 -01-0003
95012 -01-0004
1 95012 -01-0005
95012 -01-0006 95012 -01-0007
Pno1S
Pall
T
PnolS
Pall
T
PeoIS
Pall
T
Pno1S
Pall
T
PoolS
Pall
T
PswIS
Pill
T PootS
Pall
T
Belulani ra
river birch
Tree
1
3
3
2
5
5
51 37
37
3
'raxinus penn.94yanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
F }axinus rnn lvonica
green ash
Tree
2
2
8
8
10
4
4
5 61
11
11
11
2
2
4
7
7
1
1
1
lutanusoccidenmUs
Americans camore
Tree
8
8
5
7
7
721 99
21
21
21
5
5
5
9
5
5
5
3
3
3
remus
oak
Tree
3
3
301 55
1
1
1
southern red oak
Tree
1
8
8
1
1
1
8
8
2
2
ercus lcaia
southern red oak
Tree
1
I
1
7
7
7
20
201
201
51
51
51
1
1
1
1
I
I
2521
25
Stemcoee
size (arcs
size (ACRES
Species com
Stems r AC
14
14
14
161
161
16
281
281
28
241
24
2
12
12
121
211
211
21 6
61
6
I
1
1
I
I
I I
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02 0.02
4 4
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
4 4
3 3
566.
566.
647.3
647.
1133.1
1133.1
971.25
971.2
485.62
485.
849841
849. J81 242.91
242.81
Color Ke for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Green Valley Farm Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
December 2013
Current Plot Data M" 2013
Amon! Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
95012 -01-0008
95012 -01 -0009
95012 -01 -0010
95012 -01 -0011
M" (201 3) I NM (2012
PwLB
P-all
T
P.1-SIP-41
T
P.1S
Pall
T
Pna1S
Pall
T
Plots
Pall
T JPodS
Pall
T
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
51 37
37
3
'raxinus penn.94yanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
11
11
11
10
10
10
58
58
5 61
61
61
latanusoccidentalis
Americansycamore
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
72
72
721 99
99
ercus
oak
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
30
30
301 55
55
5
hrercus ilcaia
southern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
Stem count
size(ares
size (ACRES
Species cone
Storm r A
7
7
7
20
201
201
51
51
51
171
17
17
170
170
1701 2521
2521
25
1
1
1
1
11 11
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.27 0.27
3 3
4 4
2 2
3 3
�5j 5
4 41
4
283.28
283.2
809.37
809.3
202.34
202.
687.97
687.
625.42
625.4 927.1
927.1
Color Ke for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Green Valley Farm Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003994 -EEP Site 95012
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
December 2013