20050634 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20140121

Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek)
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 276
EEP Contract # DO8O285
Monitoring Year 03
JAN 2, 1 2014
Submitted to:
rIAN
. k0system
!'f:UC,KAM
RECEIVED
,JA.N 2 2.013
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: May 2010
Data Collection: June 2013
Submitted: December 2013

Monitoring Firm
�i�
�iN
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller(a- ),kci.com
KCI Project No: 1207106713_RC 12
Design Firm
EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
3808 Clifton Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 i 2013 — W03

Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary/Project Abstract
2 0 Methodology
30 References
Appendix A — Proiect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Table 1 a — Project Components
Table 1 b —Component Summations
Table 2 — Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 — Project Contacts
Table 4 — Project Attributes
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3 Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 — Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Station Photos
Problem Area Photos
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 — Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 — CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 — CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross Section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Pebble Count Plots
Table 10 — Baseline- Stream Data Summary Table
Table 11 a Monitoring - Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11 b Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E — Hydrology Data
Table 12 — Verification of Bankfull Events
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276 n
2
2
2
4
5
6
6
7
7
8
10
12
13
14
19
20
23
24
25
28
34
37
43
44
45
47
KCl Associates of North Carolina
2013 — MY03

- 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
,
The Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site, completed in May 2010, restored a
total of 2,919 linear feet of stream and 167,092 square feet of buffer restoration in the Neuse River Basin
The project is located in the USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201 -07 -0060 This HU is within the EEP's
Neuse River Basin Local Watershed Plan and is also listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in
EEP's Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010 The project goals and objectives are listed below
Project Goals
• Restore a stable channel morphology and floodplain to the project stream that is capable of
moving the flows and sediment provided by its watershed
• Improve water quality by reducing bank erosion and bed degradation
• Provide a riparian management zone that is compatible with the surroundmg uses (golf course
and electrical transmission corridor) and yet retains the ecological function of the riparian zone
• Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat in the stream corridor
Project Objectives
• Restore 2,919 linear feet of stable stream channel with the appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension that can support efficient sediment transport
• Plant native trees and shrubs throughout the site
• Grade a floodplain adjacent to the stream
The vegetation monitoring success criterion for the planted streamside area is a density of 320 stems /acre
after the third year of monitoring and an allowance for 10% mortality in the fourth and fifth years with a
final density of 260 stems /acre The success criterion for the planted riparian buffer area is a density of
320 stems /acre after the third and fifth year of monitoring The third -year vegetation monitoring was
based on the Level 2 CVS -EEP vegetation monitoring protocol The site's average density for this
monitoring period was 399 planted stems /acre, including live stakes, and 358 planted stems /acre,
excluding live stakes Including volunteers, the site averaged 7,203 total stems /acre Both of the
vegetation monitoring plots in the streamside planting area (Plots 1 and 6), had planted stem densities
below the five -year success criterion of 260 stems /acre Of the plots in the buffer restoration area (Plots 2,
3, 4, 5, and 7), Plot 7 had a planted stem density below the five -year success criterion of 320 stems /acre
The 2013 monitoring found an overall moderate vigor and low live stake survivability throughout the site
About one third of the planted stems have a vigor rating of excellent, while about half have a vigor rating
of fair to good Due to the fact that the planted vegetation is still young, however, the low vigor areas
have not been quantified There were many loblolly pine and sweetgum volunteers throughout the
easement, in certain areas these volunteers were extremely dense. In late summer of 2013, after the
vegetation monitoring, the loblolly pine density was reduced to improve the condition of the site for the
planted vegetation Plot 5 contains one stem of autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) The presence of this
invasive species is limited and is not widespread throughout the site
Third -year monitoring found Richland Creek to be mostly stable, with only minor changes from the
baseline conditions The stream has four areas of localized bank erosion since construction (2% of all
banks), and five areas displaying signs of mass wasting (1% of all banks) There is currently one headcut
located approximately at Station 5 +75, with two areas along the stream experiencing bed deposition
Please see Appendix B Problem Area Photos These areas will continue to be watched closely in
Monitoring Year Four The longitudinal and cross - sectional data also reflect the overall stability in the
project streams As a part of the stream success criterion, the stream must experience at least two bankfull
events, each in separate monitoring years The site has experienced multiple bankfull events since
construction
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276
KC1 Associates of North Carolina
2013 — MY03

Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the
Restoration Plan) documents available on the EEPs website All raw data supporting the tables and
figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument
The stationing for the longitudinal profile is based on the thalweg stationing and has been adjusted to
match grade control structures from previous longitudinal profiles The stationing was adjusted by
changing the stationing between grade control structures to match the stationing from previous surveys
The CVS -EEP protocol, Level 2 (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm) was used to collect vegetation data
from the site
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4 0 (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
NCEEP 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities
(http / /portal ncdenr org /c /document library /get fil a ?uuid= 665be84c- c193- 477b -918c-
1993778efllf& roupld= 60329)
USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACE, NCDENR -DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr4lect # 276 2 2013 — MY03

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr4lect # 276 3 2013 — MY03

GRANVILLE
�O
FRANKLIN
ORANGE DURHAM 4f m
oTRO \Q
a
U�
NASH
WAKE
CHATHAM D
0
JOHNSTON �'qQ Vie
LEE
HARNETT
u
a" Q) Q
�o
G Z
m
J ✓�y� %YS o
rn 'S'O
Z
CEDARAVE
0
a
CITY OF .�``�4:°
;0 WAKE FOREST I O�
a,
98 oURNRO 30�TygVF �FAVF
DIRECTIONS TO PASCHEL GOLF COURSE (RICHLAND CREEK):
FROM RALEIGH, TAKE US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH TOWARD WAKE
FOREST. THEN TAKE A RIGHT ONTO THE NC 98 NORTH EXIT
TOWARD WAKE FOREST. TRAVEL APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE ON NC
HOLDINGAVE 98 /DURHAM RD AND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE PROJECT
WILL BE ON THE LEFT.
I
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is encompassed
by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under
O private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or
along the easement boundary and therefore access by the general public is
W not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal
agencies or their designees /contractors involved in the development,
�y oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the
terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
< activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
O� activities requires prior coordination with EEP.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map - Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek), Project No. 276
+� Project Location w�E
tail
Roads S
Major Streams and Rivers 1:24,000
I`CO�yStf tll
KC I Municipalities oz o t o oa
Project Easement M i`s

Table Ia. Project Components
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Project
Existing
Restoration
Linear Footage
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP
Component or
Approach
Stationing
Comment
Feet /Acres
Level
or Square Feet*
Ratio
Credits+
Elements
Reach ID
In- stream structures, including offset rock cross
Richland Creek
N/A
R
P2
2,919
10 +00 - 39 +80
1 1
2,766
vanes, riffle grade controls, and rock sills, were
used to stabilize restored channel Planted a
ri arian buffer
Buffer
R
167,0922
1 1
1 167,0922
1
JBuffer was planted with native vegetation
*Linear footage does not include the stream length that runs under a golf cart bridge through an easement exception Square feet of buffer are limited to the areas of the
buffer that meet the regulatory criteria for buffer restoration credit See Figure 2 for the locations of the creditable buffer
'The credits have been reduced to account for areas where the stream flows through vegetation management zones within the easement These management areas are
depicted on Figure 2 They include a utility right of way and a play over area for the golf course Under the utility right of way the buffer will be allowed to grow to a
height of 12' Due to this restriction the 309 mitigation credits that would be generated by the stream to the right of way is reduced by 25% to 231 stream credits The
vegetation in the play over area will be trimmed to a few feet high Due to this restriction, the 151 mitigation credits that would be generated by the stream in the play
over area are reduced by 50% to 76 stream credits There is 2,459 if of stream that does not have any reductions and will generate 2,459 credits
Table lb. Component Summations
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Restoration Level Stream I Riparian Wetland Ac Non -Ri ar Ac Upland Ac Buffer Ac BMP
—,1 1 ,,1, i= Rrverme Non- Rrverme *
Restoration 2,919 3 84
Enhancement I
Enhancement lI
HQ Preservation
K, 0 0 a, ro - A
Totals (Feet /Acres) 2,919 0 0 0 3.84 0
MU Totals 2,766 0 0 0 3.84 0
Paschal GoljCourse (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276
KC/ Associates of North Carolina
6 2013 — MY03

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 3 yr 7 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 3 yr 7 months
Number of Reporting Years: 3
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
2004
June 2007
Final Design - Construction Plans
Mark Taylor, PE (336) 632 -4441
Sept 2007
Construction
_
Ma 2010
Plantin
��
May 2010
Baseline Monitoring/Report
Aug 2010
Dec 2010
Year 1 Monitoring
Aug 2011
Dec 2011
Year 2 Monitoring
Aug 2012
Nov 2012
Year 3 Monitoring
Jun 2013
Dec 2013
Table 3. Protect Contacts
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Designer
EcoLogic Associates, P C
3808 Clifton Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Primary Project Design POC
Mark Taylor, PE (336) 632 -4441
Construction Contractor
River Works
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Construction Contractor POC
William Pedersen (919) 459 -9034
Planting Contractor
H + J Forest Service
Planting Contractor POC
Matt Hitch (910) 264 -1612
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
Monitoring POC
l Adam Speller (919) 278 -2514
Paschal Golf Coarse (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 276 7 2013 — MY03

Table 4. Project Attributes
Paschal Golf Course Richland Creek / Project No. 276
Project County
Wake County
Ph siogra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Northern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC
03020201
CDWQ Sub -Basin
03 -04 -02
Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
Yes - Draft - Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010
WRC Class
Warm
% of Project Easement Demarcated
70 %, with wooden bollards
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
Yes
III V
Restoration Component Attributes
Drainage Area (sq rm
78
Stream Order
Second
Restored Length (feet)
2,919
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Tye
Suburban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Forest/Wetland
Agricultural/Managed Herbaceous
Developed
35%
35%
30%
Watershed Impervious Cover
10%
CDWQ AU /Index Number
27 -21
CDWQ Classification
C, NSW
303d Listed
U
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
U
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
U
Total Acreage of Easement
85
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
13
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
72
Rosgen Classification of Pre - Existing
C4/F4
Rosgen Classification of As -Built
C4
Valley Tye
-
Valley Slope
0 002
Valley Side Slope Range
-
alley Toe Slope Range
-
Cowardm Classification
-
rout Waters Designation
No
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc
None
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Chewacla
Deep
-
-
-
"N /A" is for items that do not apply
" -" is for items that are unavailable
"U" is for items that are unknown
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Protect # 276 8 2013 — MY03

�1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276 9
KC1 Associates of North Carolina
2013 — MY03

S f �• - • '�
yy . •' j, ri�
lt
•� '� � w� . ST
7,1' sx
mtow
LEGEND
Y
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
....
..........................
AS -BUILT STATIONED
♦�
CENTERLINE, TOP OF BANK ..................
l
AND TOP OF TERRACE ..........................
/
PHOTO POINT .......... ...............................
> U
CROSS - SECTION ..... ...............................
e
OLD STREAM CHANNEL .........................
Ff
s '117 � . �1 Y•,1:�� ,y 4 ia.�.
r
F •r , �i
t
�t
.t
VEG
PLOT 3....�J 9 �
0
Z
0
h
s
�Y
I-1 i w
- fo °az
O
Z F
z o 0
z
w
?.`' •
Y
STREAM BED DEGRADATION ... ..........
....
STREAM BED DEPOSITION
....................
�O
BANK EROSION ........ ...............................
l
MASS WASTING OF BANK ......................
/
• Q
> U
DENSITY CRITERION ... ...........................
■
VEG PLOT BELOW
PROJECT CONDITION
=Z
STREAM BED DEGRADATION ... ..........
....
STREAM BED DEPOSITION
....................
�O
BANK EROSION ........ ...............................
l
MASS WASTING OF BANK ......................
/
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
wZ
(,)o 0
DENSITY CRITERION ... ...........................
■
VEG PLOT BELOW
DENSITY CRITERION ...............................
O Y
U a
PROJECT CONDITION DETAILS
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY . ..... - . 72031358
STRUCTURE PIPING. ..... - - . P
STRUCTURE NOT PROTECTING BANK .. - - - .... B
IMAGE SOURCE: NC2010 STATEWIDE ORTHOIMAGERY
NOTE: IMAGE TAKEN DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
=Z
U z
�O
l
wZ
(,)o 0
O Y
U a
N
J � H
w
U
cr
w 0
J
�
_°
Q
U a 3
a
Nc GRID
NAB 'R3
NOV 2013
1 -- 100
FIGURE 3
CURRENT
-50 -25 0 50 100
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET 1 OF 2

co
z
s
ti
6 F aA t
LEGEND
PP>%9 �
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
W
..........................
..1x00
AS —BUILT STATIONED
U
CENTERLINE, TOP OF BANK . .................
0
AND TOP OF TERRACE ..........................
.
PHOTO POINT .......... ...............................
■
CROSS — SECTION .... ...............................
♦______�
OLD STREAM CHANNEL .........................
•. F 1H�
t �F
2243
PROJECT CONDITION
PP>%9 �
STREAM BED DEGRADATION .................
W
STREAM BED DEPOSITION ....................
..1x00
BANK EROSION ........ ...............................
U
MASS WASTING OF BANK ......................
0
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
� W
DENSITY CRITERION .............................
■
VEG PLOT BELOW
DENSITY CRITERION ..............................
U � o
Z
O
,I
�O
0
•.
w
-
-
O W
,
iL -
O
a
a
4
�F' �
l
�
-
FIGURE 3
�•I� N�f-
-50 -25 0 50 100
NG GNro
NAO'83 CONDITION
k
.ice'`
`
,
SHEET 2 of z
i
•. F 1H�
t �F
2243
PROJECT CONDITION
Y
STREAM BED DEGRADATION .................
W
STREAM BED DEPOSITION ....................
W M
BANK EROSION ........ ...............................
U
MASS WASTING OF BANK ......................
0
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
� W
DENSITY CRITERION .............................
■
VEG PLOT BELOW
DENSITY CRITERION ..............................
712
/16
PROJECT CONDITION DETAILS
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY . - 7203/358
STRUCTURE PIPING - ... ...... . . . . . ..... P
STRUCTURE NOT PROTECTING BANK B
I MAGE SOURCF_ , NC 7n 10 STATFWI nF nRTNnIAAARFR v
NOTE: IMAGE TAKEN DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
y'
0
W
occ
�n Y
O
9
FBI = w
p¢
� ¢p
ur p
Z pU
IIIII� a Np
z
Y
ARIA `
W
;?
W M
STREAM
U
0
� W
U � o
Z
O
,I
�O
0
•.
w
e
N
O W
O
a
a
4
�F' �
l
NOV 2013
FIGURE 3
CURRENT
-50 -25 0 50 100
NG GNro
NAO'83 CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET 2 of z

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Project Number and Name: 276 - Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek)
Assessed Length 2,919 Reach - Richland Creek
Number Stable,
Number of
LF-le
% Stable,
N%or Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Performing as
Cate o
Channel Sub -Cate o
Wtrrc
Intended
in As -built
Segments
Intended
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability (Riffle
and Run units)
I Aggradation -Bar formation /growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point
bars)
2
60
98%
2 De ,radation -Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
2 Riffle Condition
I Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
17
100%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
De th> 1 6)
13
13
100%
2 Length appropnate ( >30 %ofcenterlme distance
between tad of upstream riffle and head of downstrem
13
13
1000/0
riffle
4 Thalweg Position
I Thahve g centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
17
1 17
1000/0
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander Glide
17
17
1000/0
2 Bank
l Scoured Erodmg
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
growth and /or scour and erosion
4
80
990/0
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
2 Undercut
wasting appears likely Does NOT include undercuts that
0
0
1000/6
are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat
1
3 Mass Wasting
Bankslu mg calvin ,orcolla se
5
1 185
97%
Totals
9
265
95%
3 Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or
logs
16
16
100%
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill
15
15
1000/0
2a Piping
Structures Idckmg any substantial flow underneath sills or
1
2
50%
arras
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does
3 Bank Protection
not exceed 15% (See guidance forthis table in EEP
14
16
88%
monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth
4 Habitat
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 16 Rootwads /logs providing
16
16
100%
some cover at base -flow
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 12 2013 — MY03

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name 276 - Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek)
Planted Acreage 7 2 Easement Acreage 8.5
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Cat o
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Pol ons
Acrea e
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody and
Pattern and
Bare Areas
0 1 acre
0
000
00%
herbaceous material
Color'
Low Stem Density
Woody stem densities clearly below
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0 1 acre
0
000
00%
Areas
stem count criteria
Color+
,J4h. XS, }- .swM_w R. r_s.,mu.r_srxr.
�;
.rY .I..��.J....a.dc.p���r.,ycw _ _ — a i�dF - y
„ �-•�-- �-- "'•�46 --• Total
tt0
$000
_ 1 0 _
0 0, /0
Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class
Pattern and
that are obviously small given the
0 25 acre
0
000
00%
Rates or Vigor
Color
monitoring year
Cbmolatwc Tfota ll
AMP&WA9616
I I O'OOA"
0'0 %�
Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render
Pattern and
1,000 SF
0
000
00%
Concern
as polygons at map scale)
Color
5 Easement Areas or points (if too small to render
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas las polygons at map scale)
none
Color
0
000
00%
*These areas were not depicted on the CCPV Generally, the tloodplam of Richland Creek has many small scattered bare areas that are below the
mapping threshold, but are significant when combined
+These areas were not depicted on the CCPV Generally, the floodplam of Richland Creek has many scattered areas of noticable low stem densities
that are below the mapping threshold, but are significant when combined
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276
KC1 Associates of North Carolina
13 2013 — MY03

Photo Point # 1 — Looking upstream at fish ramp 8/6/2010— Photo Point #1 — Looking upstream at fish ramp
Baseline 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #2 — Looking downstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #2 — Looking upstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #2 — Looking downstream 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #2 — Looking upstream l 1/15/2013 MY -03
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC /Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 14 2013 — MY03

tA
L �7
Photo Point #3 — Looking downstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #3 — Looking upstream 8/6;2010— Baseline
Photo Point #4 — Looking downstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #3 — Looking downstream 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #3 — Looking upstream 1 1/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #4 — Looking downstream 11/15/2013 MY -03
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 15 2013 - MY03

Photo Point #4 — Looking upstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #5 — Looking upstream from bridge 8/6/2010 —
Baseline
Photo Point #6 — 8/6/2010 — Baseline
Photo Point #4 — Looking upstream 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #5 — Looking upstream from bridge
11 / 15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #6 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 276 16 2013 — MY03

1 • y .S
Photo Point #7 — 8/6/2010 — Baseline
Photo Point #8 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #9 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #7 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #8 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #9 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 17 2013 — MY03
1
4
1 • y .S
Photo Point #7 — 8/6/2010 — Baseline
Photo Point #8 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #9 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #7 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #8 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point #9 — 11/15/2013 MY -03
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 17 2013 — MY03

i
•{rte r,....� {
, r
Photo Point # 10 — 8/6/2010 — Baseline
Photo Point #11 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point # 10 — 11 / 15/2013 MY -03
Photo Point # 11 — 11 / 15/2013 MY -03
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 18 2013 — MY03

Problem Area Photos
Station 1 +00 Right Bank — 11/15/2013 Station 4 +00 Right Bank — 11/15/2013
Station 11 +75 Left Bank — 11/15/2013
Station 26 +10 Left Bank — 11/15/2013
Station 15 +65 Left Bank — 11/15/2013
Paschal Golf Coarse (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 1 9 2013 - MY03

Vegetation Plot Photos
Veg Plot # 1 — 6/10/2013
Veg Plot #2 — 6/10/2013
Veg Plot #3 — 6/10/2013
Veg Plot #4 — 6/10/2013
Veg Plot #5 — 6/10/2013
Veg Plot #6 — 6/10/2013
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 20 2013 — MY03

Veg Plot #7 — 6/10/2013
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 21 2013 — MY03

I
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276 22
KC /Associates of North Carolina
2013 — MY03

Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Stream Vegetation Totals (per acre)
Plot ID
iStream Stems
2VolunteerS
3Total
Success
Criteria
Mete
1
162
769
769
No
6
243
6,273
6,273
No
Project Avg
203
3,521
3,177
Buffer Vegetation
Totals per acre)
Plot ID
°Buffer Stems
Success
Criteria
Met9
2
526
Yes
3
486
Yes
4
526
Yes
5
405
Yes
7
162
No
Project Avg
421
Stream Stems Native planted woody stems Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes
2Volunteers Native woody stems NOT planted
3Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems Includes live stakes
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 23 2013 — MY03

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Report Prepared By
Tomm y Seelm er
Date Prepared
6/13/2013 1554
database name
cvs -ee en ool- Richland Creek mdb
database location
M\2007\12071067 2007 EEP OPEN END \Ve database\2013 Sites cvs -e(
computer name
12- 7GSWCXI
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
ro ct s and proiect data
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes live stakes
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This
includes live stakes all planted stems and all naturaVvolunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems inivacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied b for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and
SI)v
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
plot- dead and mLssmiz stems are excluded,
PROJECT
Project Code
304
project Name
Richland Creek
Description
River Bas in
Neuse
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC /Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 24 2013 — MY03

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Current Plot Data (MY3 2013)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species a
E304
-01 -0001
E304 -01 -0002
E304 -01 -0003
E304 -01 -0004
E304 -01 -0005
E304 -01 -0006
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
4
4
4
2
2
2
Aroma arbuti olia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Baccharis
bac chars s
Shrub
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
1
1
7
1
1
51
Celtrs
hackberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Celtrs occrdentalrs
common hackberry
Tree
Ce halanthus occrdentalrs
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Clethra alnr olia
coastal sweetpepperbush
Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros vrr iniana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Elaea nus umbellata
autumn olive
Exotic
I
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Li ustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
4
1
Lr uidambar styraciflua
sweetgurn
Tree
9
3
1
2
24
29
Lrriodendron tuli r era
tuli tree
Tree
I
N ssa s lvatica
blackgurn
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly ine
Tree
2
96
102
220
324
116
Platanus occrdentalrs
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
6
5
5
5
5
5
7
1
2
2
4
uercus laurr olia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
uercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
uercus nr ra
water oak
Tree
uercus phellos
willowoak
Tree
3
3
3
Salix ni ra
blackwillow
Tree
3
Salix sericea
silkymllow
Shrub
1
3
3
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
U nius alata
win ed elm
Tree
1
2
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
4
4
19
13
16
127
12
1 12
116
13
13
288
10
11
365
6
6
155
1
1
1
1
1
I
002
002
002
002
002
002
2
2
5
6
7
11
6
6
9
7
7
10
6
7
14
3
3
6
162
162
769
526
647
5,140
486
486
4,694
526
526
1 1,655
405
445
14,771
243
243
6,273
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 276 25 2013 - MY03

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E304 -01 -0007
MY3 2013
MY2 2012
MYl 2011
MYO
2010
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
8
8
Aronia arbuti olta
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
1
1
9
9
9
13
13
13
7
7
7
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
4
63
33
1
Celtis
hackberry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
Celtis occtdentalts
common hackberry
Tree
1
1
1
Ce halanthus occtdentalts
common buttonbush
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
Clethra alni olia
coastal sweetpepperbush
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
5
9
9
5
11
11
9
19
19
18
54
54
Diospyros vii iniana
common persimmon
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
Elaeajznus umbellata
autumn olive
Exotic
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
areen ash
Tree
6
6
8
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Lt ustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
5
Lt uidambar styraciflua
sweetgurn
Tree
67
135
84
2
Driodendron tuli r era
tuli tree
Tree
1
2
2
N ssa s lvatica
blackgurn
Tree
2
2
7
4
4
7
5
5
5
Pinus taeda
loblolly the
Tree
92
952
657
10
Platanus occtdentalts
Americansycamore
Tree
3
3
9
19
19
32
19
19
32
19
19
31
20
20
20
uercus lauri olta
laurel oak
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
l
uercus michauxti
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ercus ni ra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
ercus Phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
1 3
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
Salix nt ra
black willow
Tree
3
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
1
1
1
4
4
1
4
8
1
20
1 20
1
21
21
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
12
12
Ulmus alata
win ed elm
Tree
2
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
8
10
10
28
40
40
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
l
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
4
7
176
62
69
1 1246
67
76
877
79
1 1 1
141
114
193
193
1
7
7
7
7
002
0 17
0 17
0 17
0 17
2
4
7
14
14
22
14
14
19
15
16
20
17
17
17
162
283
1 7,122
L 358
1 399
1 7203
387
439
5,070
457
642 1
815
659 1
1,116
1 1 16
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 276 26 2013 - MY03

_ l
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
I1y �
l
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project 4 276 27
KCl Associates of North Carolina
2013 — MY03

Cross - Section Plots
River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS - 1, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi :
7.8
Date:
6/5/2013
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er, A. Bubel
Station
Elevation
0.0
264.34
7.3
263.44
13.3
261.55
19.9
259.98
36.4
259.71
47.0
259.44
49.4
259.03
53.3
257.55
56.1
256.55
58.6
256.42
64.1
256.06
69.4
256.30
72.7
257.60
77.3
257.63
82.1
259.68
83.4
259.72
93.6
260.09
102.9
264.08
110.2
1 264.06
110.9
1 264.15
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
259.4
Bankfull CrowSeetlemal Area:
72.1
Bankfull Width:
34.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
262.8
Flood Prone Width:
92
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
16.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.7
Bank Height Ratio:
0.9
265
264
263
262
261
260
o 259
v 258
`U 257
256
255
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY-03, XS - 1, Riffle
-------------------------
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
- - - - B3 Uun flood Pm. Area MY- 00.10 /10 MY -01.7/1 I /11
J
80
90
100
110
MY -02.8!3/12
-
MY -03.6/5/13

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek. MY -03
XS ID
XS - 2, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi :
78
Date:
6 /5/2013
Field Crew:
A. French, 1'. Seelin er, A. BUM
Station
Elevation
0.00
257 -16
0 -00
256.96
21.36
256.76
25.30
256.63
32.16
253.39
35,11
252.97
37.37
253 -03
40 -55
253 -32
4506
253.17
47.69
25342
49.31
253.50
51.99
254.50
57.14
156.82
67.96
256.86
68.80
257.17
262
261
260
259
258
257
0 256
255
w 254
253
252
SDINMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
256.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
84.0
Bankfull Width:
33.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
260.4
Flood Prone Width:
>70
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.5
W / D Ratio:
13 5
Entrenchment Ratio:
>2.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY -03, XS - 2, Riffle
------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- - -._..
------ ------------ �.��..� -------------------------------
0 10 20
- - - -13 nafull - -- -Flood Prone Am
30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
MY-00, 8/3/10 MY -0 1,7/11/11 MY -02.8/3/12 MY -03,6/5113 1
70

Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY -03, XS - 3, Pool
258
257
-- -- ------ - - - - -- ---------- -------- -- - - - - -- i - - - -- - - - - - - --
256 - i - - - -
255 - - -- -
5 254 -
o \
Q 253 - - -- - - -
`� 252
251
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
--- �BaAhm - - -- MY-0g8/4 /10 MY -01.7/11/11 MY -02.8/3/12 -� MY -03.6/5/13
River Bast: Neuse
Watershed: Richland Creek, MY -03
XS ID XS - 3, Pool
Drainage Areas ml): 7.8
Date: 6/5/2013
Field Crew: A. French, T. Seelin er, A. Bubel
Station Elevation
SUMMARY DATA
0.0
256.90
1.5
256.56
22.6
256.37
24.8
256.09
28.3
254.34
33.2
253.83
36.5
253.04
412
252.76
46.4
251.91
49.4
252.14
50.6
252.8
55.8
256.19
61.6
256.6
72.4
256.57
74.0
257.01
SUMMARY DATA
Bae{dell Elevation:
256.3
Baekfall Cross-Sectional Area:
86.3
Baekfell Width:
33.2
Flood Prose Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
-
Maz Depth at Baekfull:
4.3
Mean Depth of Baekfell:
2.6
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank He ht Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS - 4, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi :
78
Date:
6/10/2013
Field Crew:
A. I rench, T Seelin er, A. Bubel
Station
Elevation
0.00
255.41
0.24
255.19
6.76
255.32
13.71
255.36
19.49
255.58
20.50
255.41
22.66
254.57
24.63
253.57
26.91
253.14
28.70
252.66
31.21
252.42
32.46
25116
35.43
251.81
37.01
251.90
37.97
251.81
39.81
251.89
40.69
251.84
4209 .
251.88
43.23
252.14
44.14
252.36
44.85
252.55
45.91
252.91
47.44
252.97
48.37
253.28
50.13
253.31
51.85
254.27
53.55
255.01
54.73
255.12
60.01
255.26
66.01
255.40
68.39
255.55
68.67
1 255.77
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
254 9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
66.6
Bankfull Width:
31.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
258.0
Flood Prone Width:
>68
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
147-
Entrenchment Ratio:
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
260
259
258
257
256
m
255
g 254
m 253
W
252
251
250
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MV -03, XS - 4, Riffle
0 10 20
BankfuB - - - - Flood P.. A-
30 40
Station (feet)
MY-00, 814/10 MY -01.7/13/11
50 60 70
-- MY -03,8/3/12 - MY -03.6/10/13

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY-03
XS ID
XS - 5, Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi :
7.8
Date:
6/11/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelin er, A. Bubel
Station
Elevation
0.00
253.68
4.95
253.51
12.25
253.56
16.22
253.58
18.22
253.30
20.89
252.40
23.07
251.93
24.55
251.50
27.03
251.06
27.61
250.42
30.45
249.74
32.47
249.61
34.85
249.38
36.95
249.25
38.64
249.09
40.17
249.14
40.84
249.68
41.21
250.11
42.14
251.01
44.57
251.62
46.92
252.33
49.23
253.54
50.76
253.46
57.14
253.56
64.12
253.54
67.35
253.68
67.90
253.84
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfnil Elevation:
253.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
74.4
Bankfull Width:
30.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
-
Maa Depth at Bankfull:
4.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
255
I
254
253
252
Z 251
R
w 250
249
248 L
0
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY03, XS - 5, Pool
10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
- -- -Bank Wl MY- M.8/4/10 MY -0 1,7/13/11 -- -- MY -02,813/12 MY -03,6/11/13
70

River Same•
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS - 6, Riffle
Drainage Ar a (sq mi):
7.8
Date:
6/11/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelin er, A. Bubel
Stadoe
Elevation
0.0
252.58
1.3
252.49
6.1
252.37
11.6
252.55
13.3
252.55
15.8
251.35
18.6
250.36
20.1
249.63
21.6
249.42
22.7
249.15
23.8
249.09
25.5
249.15
26.7
249.06
27.8
249.12
30.0
249.02
31.6
249.05
31.5
249.04
33.4
249.04
34.5
249.55
35.7
250.12
38.2
249.92
39.8
250.31
41.4
250.56
45.5
251.90
46.6
252.32
48.8
252.36
55.2
252.38
60.1
252.37
60.7
252.56
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation•
252.2
Bankfull Cress-Sectional Area:
70.2
Bankfull Width:
32.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
255.4
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.2
W / D Ratio:
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
>1.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
256
255
254
I
253
252
e
°- 251
Ij 250
249
248
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY03, XS - 6, Riffle
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)
40
50
Badddl - - - Flood Pmre Area MY-W. 8/4/10 MY-01, 7 /13/11
-- MY-02,813/21012
MY 03.6/11/13
60

262
261
260
259
258
,., 257
G 256
H
Q 255
W
W 254
253
252
251
250
249
248
Longitudinal Profile
Richland Creek
EEP Project Number 304- MY-03
Stations 0 +00 - 10 +00
■
■
\-- - -mss_- _
SbkT — - 0.0029x + 260.86
`--------- --- - -��`
S,, _ - 0.0027x + 257.4
IOU 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
STATION (FT)
MY -00, 8/3/10 MY -01, 7/11/11 - MY-02,8/3/12 MY -03, 6/5/13 ■ Bankfull — — - Water Surface BKF Slope - - -- WS Slope
1000

H
GT*
z
0
E-�
Q
W
W
W
262
261
260
259
258
257
256
255
254
253
252
251
250
249
248
Longitudinal Profile
Richland Creek
EEP Project Number 304- MY -03
Stations 10 +00 - 20 +00
■
Sbkr = -0.0026x + 260.36
ZZ
i
SM,s = - 0.0023x + 256.64
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
STATION (FT)
— — - Water Surface MY -00, 8/3/10 - MY -01, 7/11/11 - MY -02, 8/3/12 —0 MY -03, 6/5/13 ■ Bankfull - - -- WS Slope BKF Slope

258
257
256
255
254
253
F
W
O252
Q 251
W
W
W
250
249
248
247
246
245
2000
21UU
2200
Longitudinal Profile
Richland Creek
EEP Project Number 304- MY-03
Stations 20 +00 - 30 +00
Sbkf = - 0.0036x + 262.54
- - - - -= --- -- _- _- - - - - -�
SW$ - 0.0033x + 258.8
A n
2300
2400
2500
STATION (FT)
2600
2700
2800
2900
MY -00, 8/4/10 - MY -01, 7/13/11 — — - Water Surface ■ Bankfull - -. MY -02, 8/3/2012 f MY -03, 6/11/13 - - - - Linear (Water Surface) Linear (Bankfull)
3000

Pebble Count Plots
Cross-
Section 1 Riffle
- MY -03
--
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS l Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25- .50
N
Coarse
.50- 1
D
3
;
too °i°
80%
TIME
'•���
- —e --
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
6
Very Fine
2 - 4
12
Z
r
0
OV70
Fine
4-5.7
G
5
Fine
5.7-8
R
4
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
8
Medium
1 1.3 - 16
V
4
Coarse
16-22.6
E
8
0
40%
°i°
—
X
•
Coarse
22.6-32
L
9
Very Coarse
32-45
S
11
20
.—.
0%
0.01 0.1
-MY -00
E , ■
■
1 to
Particle Size - Millimeters
• MY -01 • MY -02
too
1000 10000
MY -03
Very Coarse
45-64
7
Small
64-90
C
4
Small
90- 128
O
12
Large
128- 180
B
3
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 2.9
D35 9.2
D50 20
D65 36
D84 87
D95 120
Size Distribution
mean 15.9
dispersion 5.6
skewness -0.08
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
9%
71%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
96
Note:

Cross
- Section 2 Riffle
- MY -03
=
E
r
100 °i°
so °i°
—
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 2 Riffle
-
•
■ -a
�
■ :
-- —.•
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
2
Very Fine
.062 - .125
S
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
1
Coarse
.50- 1
D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
2
Very Fine
2 - 4
8
Fine
4-5.7
G
11
Fine
5.7- 8
R
9
Medium
8- 11.3
A
20
Medium
1 1.3 - 16
V
21
Coarse
16-22.6
E
12
rz
o
40%
20 %
0%
0.01
- - 1
0.1
t MY -00
' '
■
■
-
��
1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
-i MY -01 ■ MY -02 + MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
I
Very Coarse
32-45
S
2
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
6
Small
90- 128
O
6
Large
128- 180
B
I
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
2.8
6.4
7.9
10
21
71
Size Distribution
mean 9.1
dispersion 7.3
skewness -0.17
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
2%
3%
83%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lr
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
103
Note:

Cross
- Section 3 Pool
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 3 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
2
Fine
.125 - .25
A
2
Medium
.25- .50
N
4
d
100 °i°
80%
�.
Coarse
.50- 1
D
6
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
32
Very Fine
2 - 4
29
E
-
Fine
4-5.7
G
10
Fine
5.7-8
R
9
Medium
8- 11.3
A
6
s
d
Medium
11.3- 16
V
1
Coarse
16-22.6
E
o
40%
. ■ /
■
20% —
0 %i°
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
—• MY -00 . MY -01 ■ MY -02 MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 1
D35 1.6
D50 2.2
D65 3.2
D84 6
D95 8.9
Size Distribution
mean 1.4
dispersion 5.0
skewness -0.07
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
74%
54%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
101
Note:

Cross
- Section 4 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 4 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125 -.25
A
Medium
.25-50 .50
N
1
loo °i°
-
Coarse
.50- 1
D
2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
E
80%
- - -
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
1
r
.%
t
Medium
1 1.3 - 16
V
10
Coarse
16-22.6
E
17
a
40% -
20%
0% —
0.01 0.1
+
■
a_; ■ r■
—�
1 10 100 1 000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
— +— MY -00 A MY-01 ■ MY -02 MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
7
Very Coarse
32-45
S
22
Very Coarse
45-64
18
Small
64-90
C
10
Small
90- 128
O
4
Large
128- 180
B
1
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 21
D35 32
D50 51
D65 65
D84 93
D95 140
Size Distribution
mean 41.8
dispersion 2.4
skewness -0.12
Type
Small
362-512
L
1
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
3%
80%
16%
I%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
96
Note:

Cross - Section 5 Pool - MY -03
1000 10000
MY -03
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
silt/clay
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
1 I
Fine
.125 -.25
A
13
Medium
.25 - .50
N
cobble
Coarse
.50- 1
D
14
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
25
Very Fine
2 - 4
14
Fine
4-5.7
G
10
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
6
Medium
11.3- 16
V
4
Coarse
16-22.6
E
Coarse
22.6-32
L
1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Laze
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Small
362-512
L
Medium
512- 1024
D
1
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
90
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 5 Pool
100°x°
°Q 80%
E
Z
V
60%
L
1'-
E 40%
ii
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
Size (mm)
D16 0.31
D35 0.66
D50 1.1
D65 2.4
D84 7.2
D95 17
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
–•— MY -00 •— MY -01 ■ MY -02
1000 10000
MY -03
■
Type
■
silt/clay
0%
dispersion 5.2
1 I
58%
skewness 0.09
0%
0.01
0.1
Size (mm)
D16 0.31
D35 0.66
D50 1.1
D65 2.4
D84 7.2
D95 17
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
–•— MY -00 •— MY -01 ■ MY -02
1000 10000
MY -03
Size Distribution
Type
mean 1.7
silt/clay
0%
dispersion 5.2
sand
58%
skewness 0.09
gravel
41%
cobble
0%
boulder
1%
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood /det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section 6 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle
Millimeter
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
S
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50- 1
D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
Medium
1 1.3 - 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128-180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Small
362-512
L
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
Note:
Count
0
0
m
m
0
0
0
98
100%
80%
E
Ci
c 60%
t
U 40%
0
20%
0%
0.01
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 6 Riffle
0.1
i
Size (mm)
D16 12
D35 19
D50 23
D65 34
D84 87
D95 160
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
+ MY -00 • MY -01 • MY -02
Size Distribution
mean 24.0
dispersion 6.7
skewness 0.03
MY -03
1000 10000
silt/clay 0%
sand 3%
gravel 73%
cobble 23%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood /det 0%
artificial 0%
■
•
■4
0.1
i
Size (mm)
D16 12
D35 19
D50 23
D65 34
D84 87
D95 160
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
+ MY -00 • MY -01 • MY -02
Size Distribution
mean 24.0
dispersion 6.7
skewness 0.03
MY -03
1000 10000
silt/clay 0%
sand 3%
gravel 73%
cobble 23%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood /det 0%
artificial 0%

Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 43 2013 — MY03
C_
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary: Richland Creek - 2,919 If
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Protect No. 276
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data (Upper Richland Creek)
Design
As -built
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mtn
Med
Max
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft)
22
35 0
280
320
330
31 9
327
322
344
1 2
4
Flood prone Width ft)
28
60
>100
100
>60
>72
>69
>90
128
4
Bankfull. Mean Depth (ft)
14
28
23
24
26
24
26
26
28
02
4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
34
38
375
34
33
35
35
38
02
4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ftz)
48
72
67
75
85 0
802
842
83 7
1 893
4 1
4
Width/Depth Ratio
120
13 8
122
133
12 1
11 4
127
125
145
1 3
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1 7
1 9
3 1
3 6
30
>1 9
>2 0
>2 0
>2 0
00
4
Bank Height Ratio
1 2
1 1
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
00
4
d50 (mm)
120
120
41
127
140
200
80
4
Profile
Riffle Length ft)
14
48
30
177
42
20
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
00200
00370
00050
00090
00056
00011
00089
00075
0 0212
0'0067
20
Pool Length (ft)
23
96
5
25
41
8
74
82
150
42
19
Pool Max Depth
40
46
55
43
50
56
092
2
PoolSpacing (11)
38
258
25
90
150
230
63
153
155
216
49
19
Pool Volume W
Pattern
_
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
22
71
100
300
60
300
37
78
83
116 1
25
9
Radius of Curvature ft)
32
98
37
70
80
100
80
90
90
100
10
14
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft)
1 34
1 1
2 1
24
25
2 8
28
3 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)
110
300
110
200
220
330
259
321
312
395
45
11
Meander Width Ratio
159
93
107
90
1 1
24
25
35
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri %/Ru° /u/P %/G %/S%
SC %/ Sa %/ G %/ C %/ B %/ Be%
0%/16%/55%/ 27%/2%/0%
d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /diP /di'p (Min)
15/73/12/35/49/ -/-
19/20/34/54/87/120 / -/-
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /ft2
035
040
040
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
20 -80
20 -90
31
Stream Power (transport ca aci ) W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
78
48
78
78
Impervious cover estimate
10%
10%
10%
Ros en Classification
F4 /1
C4
C4 /1
C4 /1
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3 1-70
36-50
5 0
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
305-400
260-280
425
Valley length (ft)
2,710
2,710
Channel thalweg length (ft)
2,919
Sinuosity
1 22
1 1
1 20
1 10
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (11/11)
00028
00040
00028
00028
BF slope (ft/ft)
00028
00027
Bankfull Flood lam Area (acres)
Proportion over wide ( %)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 43 2013 — MY03
C_

Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr41ect # 276 44 2013 - MY03
Table lla. Monitoring - Cross - Section Morphology Data
Paschal Golf Course Richland Creek / Project No. 276
Dimension and Substrate
Cross - Section
1 (Riffle)
Cross - Section
2 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 3 (Pool)
Cross - Section
4 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 5 (Pool)
Based on`fized baseline'elevation= ' ` "
Bases
yy' MY1t
'MY; 1,MY3
'MW
xMYS
'MYJ
i Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY.+
Base
MY
,' MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
`MY+
Base
„MYI,
'!,W2'
MY3
MY4`
MY5
SMYt
Base
' MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
344
336
354
340
31 9
35 2
35 6
33 6;,���scr'
��"
31 4
33 9
36 1
33 2
i;� "
`r.:�l„
*•y�
32 1
31 9
31 9
31 5
'N
9
31 5
325
31 9
305
Floodprone Width (ft)
>90
>90
>90
>90
>70
>70
>70
>70
OW
1W
t-,,
QtVl",
+ A,
>68
>68
>68
>68
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
24
24
22
21
25
25
25
�a
33
29
27
26
"x
25
24
23
21
29
28
27
24
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
34
34
35
33
`'
38
38
37
37
56
50
50
43
Ur
.
33
32
32
31
43
47
41
42
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
81 7 j
799
785
72 1
893
885
876
840
;
1040
992
978
863
802
765
73 1
666
908
906
850
1 744
Iw ",
13,9ta
Bankf ill Width /Depth Ratio
145
141
160
160
114
140
145
13 5
K_ `
Z
-
-
-
-
>�
�'
128
13 3
13 9
149
Jk=
IM
W
_
_
_
_
w
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2 0
>2 0
>2 2
>2 2
>2 0
>1 8
>2 0
>2 0
-
-
-
-
,
>2 0
>2 1
>2 2
>2 2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
10
10
;
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
10
10
10
1 0
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins ftZ
477 5
478 0
477 4
460 5
,
111 4
108 6
1144
110 9
"" xA `
'^'TMW
Wit;:
fit`{
135 7
134 2
135 6
] 23 3
+ -' `
is k "ti
e�°
100 1
100 6
96 2
105 9;;
` _
�"�
"'�
106 4
110 6
107 4
99 8
d50 (mm)
20
190
200
200
u'
340
1 170
15 0
7 9
04
08
17
2 2
460
420
530
51 0
1 7
04
13
11
Cross- Section
6 (Riffle)
Based on fised7ba`s"Aie elevation' , ", ;` y�i x
EBase
VMY
rMYf
MY3)
F 4
MY-,
FMY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
322
326
33 3
323
}
,,�
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60"�
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
27
25
23
22
`
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 5
1 34
3 2
3 2
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area (ftZ)
856
822
779
702
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
121
129
142
148
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>1 9
>1 8
>1 9
>1 9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins ftZ
943
941
92 1
87 1
d50 (mm)
440
24 0
22 0
23 0
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr41ect # 276 44 2013 - MY03

C
CJ
i
1
l
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276
45
KCI Assoctates offorth Carolina
2013 — MY03
Table l lb. Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Richland Creek (2,919 ft.
Parameter
MYO1 (2011)
MY02 (2012 )
MY03 2013)
MY04 (2014 )
MY05 (2015
Dimension
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bank-fu11 Width ft
319
342
33 1
352
3 031
4
319
34 1
344
356
1 771
4
30 5
32 5
328
340
1 341
4
Flood prone Width (ft)
68
72
69
90
12 754
4
60
72
69
89
12 285
4
-
-
-
-
-
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
23
24
24
25
0082
4
22
23
23
25
0126
4
21
23
23
26
0214
4
Bank-full Max Depth ft
32
3 5
34
3 8
0 252
4
32
34
34
3 7
0 245
4
3 1
36
3 5
43
0 520
4
Bankfiill Cross - Sectional Area ft2
765
818
81 1
886
5 102
4
73 1
793
782
876
6 053
4
666
756
733
863
7 860
4
Width/Depth Ratio
129
143
13 7
168
1 756
4
139
147
144
160
0 933
4
13 5
148
149
160
1 023
4
Entrenchment Ratio
18
1 19
19
2 1
0 150
4
18
2 1
2 1
26
0 340
4
-
-
-
-
-
4
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
0 000
4
10
10
10
10
0 000
4
10
10
10
10
1 0
4
Patte rn
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
37
78
83
116
25
9
k�
ci "'
: --
, :;�Et
1G
Radius of Curvature (ft)
80
91 I
90
1OO
9
9
ra" a
�lh
� {1`1 �i
p4�Y F/�
t`i{
a
it i
��
x
��`rMk�
a �r yr
Y :.
�J �G
_
,_.� r�,,
, "'
TMn� �� F
�j_!t
Rad of Cury Bankfiill Width ( ft/ft)!
25
27
27
26
,! _
1"
; �t.'
3;�
a.—
�a� n
a+'% .. L1i
jr��E ,
J'hS'iF'
�t�•�V�.
�•IW. 7'
{{,pprsY. y.
RAO. 1'CJ.'�
�}
F}i- t Lf,
N
b _
-
- Tf
"� tY� -
>
M
� '
IZ '
_
% _
aY'
LL
R! A •�^-
4A h.A
�Z•
�. _
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
259
321
312
395
45
11
"%
b"5- Z,
Meander Width Ratio
I2
23
25
30
���'L
i }1' -
�?�
ti , -
-�
�,
a -
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
18
41
30
103
23
17
17
33
26
65
16
18
14
29
25
78
11
16
Riffle Slope ( ft/ft)
0 001
0 010
0 008
0 019
0 006
17
0 002
0 013
0 010
0 025
0 008
18
0 001
0 023
0 008
0 010
0 006
16
Pool Length (ft)
31
72
74
122
24
17
12
68
78
120
31
17
9
129
74
78
32
14
Pool Max Depth (ft)
15
15
15
1
15
15
15
1
33
3 3
33
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
86
172
1 169
262
45
16
51
161
1 159
256
54
16
130
278
165
185
1 47
13
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
2,710
2,710
2,710
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,919
2,919
2,919
Sinuosity
I l
I I
1 1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
00032
00034
00034
Bankf ill Slope ( ft/ft)
00029
00025
00025
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C5
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0 33 %/36 %/47 %/16 %/0
67%
0 %/29 %/54 %/16 % /1%
0 %/25 %/67 %/12 % /O % /0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d65/ d84 / d95
1 1/10/17/65/110
4 6/13/19/31/66/135
6 7/12/18/25/50/86
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
1%
2%
5%
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project # 276
45
KCI Assoctates offorth Carolina
2013 — MY03

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 46 2013 — MY03

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo #
5/17/2010
5/17/2010
Photographed on site
1, See Below
9/28/2011
9/16/2011
Crest gauge
None
11/5/2012
unknown
Crest gauge and indicators of storm event
None
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
Photographed on site
2, see below
11/15/2013
unknown
Photographed on site
3, see below
Photo #1 - Bankfull Event, 5/17/2010
Photo #2 — Bankfull Evidence (wrack lines), 6/10/2013
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC! Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 47 2013 — W03

Photo #3 — Bankfull Evidence (wrack lines), 11/15/2013
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 48 2013 — MY03