Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20051877 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20140121
05- /p) Dye Branch II Stream Restoration NCEEP Project Number: 92255 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Contract Number: 004523 2013 Final Report Submitted to North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources November 2013 Ecosystem ��Pv _ LG i " I 1 'XUR . PROGRAM 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 �� GO AGE J P Enos r PjkO VON Monitoring Firm EQUINOX ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION & DESIGN 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: 828 - 253 -6856 Project Contact: Kevin Mitchell Email: kevin @equinoxenvironmental.com Dye Branch II Stream Restoration 2013 Monitoring Report (MY 3) Table of Contents 10 Executive Summary / Project Abstract 20 Methodology 30 References Page I Page 2 Page 3 Appendix A Pr Figure 1 Table la Table lb Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Appendices :)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables Vicinity Map and Directions Project Components Component Summations Project Activity and Reporting History Project Contacts Project Attributes Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Photo Station Photos Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means) Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Table 11 a Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross - Sections) Table l lb Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary Appendix E Hydrologic Data Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events Figure 3 Dye BranchWater Level Logger Chart Figure 4 Precipitation for Mooresville, North Carolina m 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT The goals and objectives stated in the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2005) are as follows • Provide a stable system of stream channels that neither aggrade nor degrade while maintaining dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the watershed's water and sediment load, • Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing sediment and waste inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass - wasting, and stormwater runoff through stabilization of the stream channel and creation of a stormwater wetland, and • Improve the overall viability of the riparian vegetative communities through establishment of native species and elimination of invasive exotic species The site includes a diverse assemblage of 21 planted species of native trees and shrubs Planted species range from 3 to 6 per plot with 4 to 10 species observed when volunteers are included Between the baseline and year 1 (MY 1) monitoring vegetation data collection efforts, two monitoring plots were impacted by repairs made to the stream channel in summer 2011 A significant number of planted stems were damaged in VP7 and all plants in VP8 were destroyed Based on the MY3 vegetation data from plots 1 through 7 the project is not meeting the 320 planted stems per acre criterion that must be achieved by the end of the year three monitoring period Average stem density for planted stems in MY3 is approximately 271 stems per acre Of the seven monitoring plots, five plots (-71 %) are not meeting the year three interim success criteria numbers per acre These include VP 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, which had 162, 243, 202, 202, 243, and 272 stems per acre, respectively However, when planted and natural stems are combined, the average stem density is 1353 stems per acre, and all seven plots meet the year three interim success criteria Regarding invasive- exotics, 32 isolated patches of high threat invasive plants have been identified, totaling 2 61 acres Generally, these areas are distributed throughout the project area Stream longitudinal profiles within the Cemetery Branch reach have remained stable among monitoring years with the exception of a few isolated areas of bed degradation and aggradation The upstream reach of Dye Branch has multiple areas of aggradation and degradation, as well as structures with compromised structural integrity The downstream reach of Dye Branch showed a significant downcutting between MY and MY2 The reach maintained relatively similar bed elevation between MY2 and MY3, however, it still shows signs of significant shifts between aggradation and degradation throughout the length of the reach A water level logger was installed in December of 2010 and has since recorded a total of 11 bankfull events including three during MY2 and five in MY3 Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request Dye Branch II Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 2.0 Methodology The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY3 replicate those employed during the previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents (Rosgen 1996, USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level 11, Version 4 2 (Lee et al 2008) Dye Branch II Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 3.0 References Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Biology NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) 2005 Dye Branch Stream Restoration Plan Raleigh Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books Pagosa Springs, Colorado USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines U S Army Corps of Engineers, U S Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality Wilmington District Dye Branch II Final 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of r• x.�� )f ,� p; ,, s ay r `;�. j - the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by Gay s / 1\ 3�"" •,+ t r t land under private ownership Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefor access by the � general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel ol'state ' rs,c and federal agencies or their designers /contractors involved in the ' •�y r 1 �" t e , - development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is } permitted within the terms and timeframes of their delined roles. Any + - - intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these f. k_ previously sanctioned roles and activities requires poor coordination with EEP Qa.. • ° r -, t�2 .tat c .ty: t� "" }.r 115 41 _- � ` �� * tdr! � y� � •152 e Y 150 r 15 F 4; ly" Dye Branch II +� 152 R y ` ' Stream Restoration Site V+� ,� I A ►� \ � t 'I 73l � 7 -�. `�„ i h i if �l '`.a 1�II `�v ;.- :' �' IL'.'•t•. a -- .v I T \\ r � 111akMiaar eetls I Qs✓.e ) \I( Figure 1 - Vicinity Map r Dye Branco II Gcn^tY &Mxa Stream RCaloraean Site GetaaY ,/ Gffia0e Dye Branch II E UINOX G°u^0' .� Rprgn Gea� Ecosystem LirCp, F,A \'In OIV'AIC \TAt. I �"" Stream Restoration Site PROGRAM Amy j Project No. 92255 N Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1 -40 towards 0 0.5 1 2 Statesville. Take Exit 152 A (1-77S) towards Charlotte. Miles Proceed on 1 -77S to Exit 36 (NC -150) towards Mooresville. Iredell Count North Carolina From NC -150 turn slight right onto McLelland Avenue/NC -152 �' for approximately 1.2 miles. The site is located on the west 7.5 Minute Series Mooresville side of• McLelland Avenue/NC- 152. Quadrangle t 1 t Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Intorma4on unavailable Non Applicable Table lb. Component Summations D ,e Btrancb III /Pro' ct No 92255 Table la Project Components Stream (10 Riparian Wetland (ac) Non Riparian ac D e ranch /Pro ect No 92255 _ Project P venne Non- Rrvenne ® Footage Dec 2010 Teml)orary S &E mix apphed Restoration 3,685 Component Existing Restoration Plantm N/A Stationing Buffer BMP Elements Comment or Feet/Acres Level Approach or Enhancement l Acres Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Reach ID Year 5 Monrtorm Acrea e 0 - Creation 00 00 - - Cemetery Branch 9681f R P3 101411' 0+00-10+14 -_ Stormwater wetlands Dye Branch HQ Preservation 0 00 00 S Upstream 1 772 If R P2 1 500 If 0 +00.15 +00 ® Storrnwatcr wetlands 1 0 Dye Branch 0 0 3 = Non - applicable Downstream 1 232 If R P2 1 171 If 16 +00 - 27 +71 Intorma4on unavailable Non Applicable Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History Dye Branch 11 / Project No. 92255 Table lb. Component Summations D ,e Btrancb III /Pro' ct No 92255 Data Collection Complete Restoration Level Stream (10 Riparian Wetland (ac) Non Riparian ac Upland (ac) Buffer (ac) BMP Aril 2006 Final Design - Repair Plans P venne Non- Rrvenne ® ® Dec 2010 Teml)orary S &E mix apphed Restoration 3,685 00 00 ®� Plantm N/A Feb 2011 Enhancement March 2011 00 00 Nov 2011 Jan 2012 Year 2 Monitormg Dec 2012 Enhancement l 0 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Year 4 Monrtorm Year 5 Monrtorm Enhancement II 0 - Creation 00 00 - - - Preservation 0 00 00 -_ HQ Preservation 0 00 00 S 00 00 Totals 3,685 1 0 0 0 0 3 = Non - applicable Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History Dye Branch 11 / Project No. 92255 Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan - Oct 2005 Final Design - Construction Plans - Aril 2006 Final Design - Repair Plans N/A July 2010 Construction Re airs N/A Dec 2010 Teml)orary S &E mix apphed N/A Summer 2010 Permanent seed mix apphed N/A Summer 2010 Plantm N/A Feb 2011 Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monrtorm - Baseline March 2011 Aug 2011 Year 1 Monitormg Nov 2011 Jan 2012 Year 2 Monitormg Dec 2012 Jan 2013 Year 3 Morutormg Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Year 4 Monrtorm Year 5 Monrtorm - Information unavailable N/A - Item does not apply Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables 7 Table 3. Project Contacts '� "' D, a Branch III / Pro'ect No_. 9225_5 >. Designer Mulkey Engineers & Consultants 6750 Tryon Road Cary NC, 27518 Primary Project Design POC Emmett Perdue (919) 858 -1874 Construction Contractor Fluvial Solutions P O Box 28749 Raleigli, NC 27611 Construction Contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134 Planting Contractor Fluvial Solutions P O Box 28749 Raleigh, NC 27611 Planting Contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134 Seeding Contractor Fluvial Solutions P O Box 28749 Raleigh, NC 27611 Seeding Contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134 Seed Mix Sources Hanes Geo Components Winston- Salem, NC 27101 Nursery Stock Suppliers North Carolina Forest Service Goldsboro, NC 27530 Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010 Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Stream M onitoring POC Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856 Vegetation M onitoring POC Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856 Monitoring Performers (Yl) - 2011 Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Stream MomtonngPOC Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856 Vegetation Monitoring POC Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856 Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2012 Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Stream M onitoring POC Kevin M itchell (828) 253 -6856 Vegetation M onitoring POC Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856 Monitonng Performers (Y3) - 2013 Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Stream Monitoring POC Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856 Vegetation MomtormgPOC Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856 Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2014 Stream M onitoring POC Vegetation Monitoring POC Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2015 Stream M onitonng POC Vegetation Momtorm POC Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 A -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Table 4. D, a Branch Project Attributes II / P,ro ect N�o. 9_Z255 Project County Iredell Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont Ecore ion Southern Outer Piedmont River Basin Yadkin - Pee Dee USGS 14UC 03040105010010 NCDW Sub -Basin 03 -07 -11 Within Extent ofEEP Watershed Plan Upper Roc River Local Watershed Plan W RC Class W ann %of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated 100% Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase No Restoration Com onent Attributes Dye Branch Cemetery Branch Drainage Area (sq rru 060 006 Stream Order First / Second First Restored Length feet 2,671 1,014 Perennial or Intemuttent Perennial Perennial Watershed Type Urban Watershed LUL.CDistnbution Urban Other 85% 15% Watershed Impervious Cover - NCDW AU /IndexNumber 13 -17 -2 NCDW Q Classification C 303d Listed Yes Upstream of 303d Listed Segment Yes Reasons for 303d Listing orStressor Poor Bioclassification Total Acreage of Easement 12 0 Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement 120 Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration 89 Ros en Classification of Pre-E)astmg E4/ G4c E4 Ros en Classification of As -Built C C Valley Type - Valley Sloe 0 0097 / 0 0125 00217 Valley Side Slope Range - Valley Toe Slope Range Cowardin Classification N/A N/A Trout Waters Designation No No Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc None Dominant Sod Series and Characteristics Series Depth Clay% K T Chewacla / Cecil / Colfax - mrormanon unavauaoic N/A - Item does not apply Dye Branch II Final A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment - Dye Branch H / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch Assessed Length 1,014 feet Number Footage Adjusted% Number Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Category Sub - Category Performing As -built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation Bed 1 Awadation -Bar formalion/growth sufficient to significantly I 9 99% 1 Vertical Stability deflect Flow lateral) (not to include point bars) Depyadat[on -Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% (Riffle and Run Units) 2 Riffle Condition 1 Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 14 14 100% 3 Meander Pool I Denth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 2 1 6) 14 15 93% Condition 2 Lerigh appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle) 15 15 100% 1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 15 15 100% 4 Thalweg Position 2 Thalweg centenngal downstream of meander bend (Glide) 14 14- 100% 2 Bank 1 Scoured /Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resultmgsimply from poor growth 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2 Undercut likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A sustainable and are providing habitat 3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving or collapse 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A Totals 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A 3 Fagineered I Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 32 32 100% Structures 2 Grade Control Grade control structures exhibit ingmaintenance of grade across the sill 28 28 100% 2a Piping Structures lacking any substantial Flow underneath sills or arms 27 28 96% 3 Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT 4 4 100% exceed 15% Pool forming structures maintaining ` Max Pool Depth Mean 4 Habitat B Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 13 13 100% base -flow N/A Item dOLs not apply Dye Branch 11 Final B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data N/A - Item do,s not apply Dye Branch II Final B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Table 5 cost M's-0 Stream Morphology Stability Assessment WON ff / Project No. 92355 -Dye ranch 1J, aimn Assessed Len h 1 500 feet Number Footage Adjusted% Number Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Category Sub Category P As -built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody nt as s Intended ed Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation 1 Bed I Aearadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly 4 189 87% , 1 Vertical Stability deflect Flow lateral) (not to include point bars) 2 Deeradation - Evidence of downcuuing 2 112 93% (Riffle and Run Units) 88% 2 Riffle Condition I Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 15 17 I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 2 1 6) 18 20 90% 3 Meander Pool 2 Lenz happropriate (> 30% of centerline distance between tail of 18 20 90% Condition upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle) I Thalwegcentenngal upstream of meander bend (Run) 14 17 82% 4 Thalweg Position 2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide) 14 16 88% 2 Bank �a I Scoured /Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simplyfrompoorgrowth� q 240 92% 5 50 94% and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wastmgappears 2 Undercut likely Does Q include undercuts that are modest appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A sustainable and are providing habitat 3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving or collapse 3 72 98% 2 0 98% Totals 12 312 90% 7 50 91% 3 Engineered 1 Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 26 30 87% Structures 2 Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 8 8 100% 2a Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms 6 8 75% 3 Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT 18 23 78% exceed 15% Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth Mean 4 Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 4 5 80% base -flow N/A - Item do,s not apply Dye Branch II Final B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data - Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment " Dye Branch H / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch - Downstream Assessed Lentath 1,171 feet Number Footage Adjusted°/ Number Total Numberof Amountof % Stable, with with for Major Channel Channel Stable, Category Sub Category Metric Ps Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Intended as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation 1 Bed 1 Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly 4 113 90% 1 Vertical Stability deflect flow lateral) (not to include omt bars) - De$Tadatnon - Evidence of downcuttmg 2 98 92% (Riffle and Run Units) 2 Riffle Condition 1 Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 1 1 1 I 100% 3 Meander Pool I Depth Sufficient (M ax Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth a 1 6) 10 10 100% Condition 2 Len happropriate(> 30% ofcenterhnedistancebetweentail of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle 10 10 100% I Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 8 10 80% 4 Thalweg Position 90% 2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide) 9 10 2 Bank 1 Scoured /Finding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simplyfrompoorgrowlh 4 128 95% 2 30 96% and/or scour and erosion Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent (hat mass wast mg appears 2 Undercut likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear 0 0 100% N/A N/A N/A sustainable and are providing habitat 3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 2 117 95% 1 22 96% Totals 6 j 245 90% 1 22 90% 3 Engineered I Overall Integntv Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 15 22 68% Structures 2 Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 6 8 75% 2a Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms 4 8 50% 3 Bank Pratechon Bank erosion H ithm the structures extent of influence does NOT 12 14 86/ exceed 15% Pool forming structures maintaining° Max Pool Depth Mean 4 Habitat JBankfuflDepth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 5 5 100% base -flow N/A Item does not apply Dye Branch II Final B -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Dye Brane6ll / Project No. 92355 Planted Acre a Q.0 Number of Combined % of Planted Vegetation Category Definitions CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acrea e 1 Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material Black Dots Snip e Background 1 001 <1% 2 Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3 N/A 0 000 0% 4, or 5 stem count criteria Totals I 001 <1% 3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Arras with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small N/A 0 000 0% vcn [hc momtonn car CumWati`e Ttotals I 001 <1% Easement Acreage 12.01 of Vegetation Category Definitions CCPV Depiction Number of Combined Easement Polygons Acreage Acreage 4 Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale) Cross Hatch 33 261 22% (Red - DenseNellow - Present) 5 Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale) Stipple Orange Dots White Background 1 006 05% N/A - Item does not apply Dye Branch 11 Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 B -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1 Downstream Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2 Upstream B -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2 Downstream Dye Branch 11 Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3 Downstream B -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4 Upstream Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5 Upstream B -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6 Upstream Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7 Downstream B -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 8 Upstream Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 9 Upstream Dye Branch 11 Final B -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Appendix C Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Vegetation Plot Data able 7. Vegetation lot Criteri"T, inment D e Branch II / ro'ect No. 92255 Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met? Tract Mean 1 No 14% 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 No 5 No 6 No 7 No C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Monitoring Year 3 — July 9, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 Monitoring Year 3 — July 9, 2013 C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 Monitoring Year 3 — July 9, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 Monitoring Year 3 — July 9, 2013 C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 Monitoring Year 3 — July 9, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 Monitoring Year 3 — July 9, 2013 C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix C Dye Branch 11 Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Vegetation Plot Data �, >� Dye Branch�I�I�/ Pro' ct No. 92255 � Report Prepared By W dham Carson Date Prepared 7/15/2013 10 39 Database Name Equinox- 2013- A- DyeBranch MY3 mdb Database Location Z \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitorwg \Dye Branch \DB -M Y3 -2013 \Data \Veg Computer Name SENIORSCIENTIST File Size 51560448 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN TUB DOCUMENT Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary ofproject(s) and project data Project Planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED sterns per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes Project Total Stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer steno Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead sterns, nussing, etc ) Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots Vigor by Species Frequency distribution of vigor classes hsted by species Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total steals impacted by each Damage by Species Damage values tallied by type for each species Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot Planted Stems by Plot and Species A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded ALL Stems by Plot and Species A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and trussing stems are excluded PROJ ECT S UMMARY Project Code 92255 Project Name Dye Branch Description River Basin Yadkin -Pee Dee Length(ft) Strearo-to-Edge Width (ft) Area (sq m) Required Plots (calculated) Sampled Plots 7 Equinox EnN@F&mental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data Table 9. Planted and Total Stem counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means) Dye Bramelill/ProjectNo.9255 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) mom Prunus serotina size (are s) species couni 0 0 ©0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 © ©=. = =l = == © ©= © ©E © ©=' © ©W- ® ®® =MM = =Mw mm MM MM m®®®® =mm Exceeds requirements by 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data 0 Appendix D 840 839 838 837 y .y 836 R v 835 834 833 832 0+00 Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch Cross - Section 1 - Pool Station 1 + 04.27 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 Station (feet) As -built l2 /6/2010 " MY16/13/2011 ---#— MY2 12/12/2012 tMY3 2/27/2013 - -- Bkf Dye Branch II Final D -I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 Dye Branch 11 Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section I — Pool Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D 830 829 828 Z 0 w C 0 827 6� W 826 825 824 0+00 Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch Cross - Section 2 - Riffle Station 6 + 40.40 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/13/2011 • MY2 12/12/2012 —9--MY3 2/27/2013 -- -- Bkf Dye Branch II Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design. Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design. Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D 825 824 823 a� w e 0 822 R W 821 820 819 0+00 Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch Cross - Section 3 - Riffle Station 8 + 77.10 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 NIY1 6/13/2011 MY2 7/25/2012 tMY3 2/27/2013 ---' Bkf Dye Branch II Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 • • • • • • • • • • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0 • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 Dye Branch 11 Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Cross- Section 3 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 27, 2013 D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D 829 828 827 826 w 825 0 > 824 v W 823 822 821 820 0+00 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Upstream Cross - Section 4 - Riffle Station 1 + 15.75 0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 Station (feet) As -built 5/10/2011 MY1 6/13/2011 • MY2 7/25/2012 f MY3 2/27/2013 — — — Bkf Dye Branch II Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 D -1 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dyc Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D 822 821 820 819 a� w 818 c 0 > 817 a� W 816 815 814 813 0+00 0+05 0 +10 O +IS 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 Station (feet) As -built 5/11/2011 MY 1 6/14/2011 MY2 7/25/2012 t MY3 2/27/2013 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Upstream Cross - Section 5 - Pool Station 7 + 74.58 0+50 Dye Branch 11 Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 n u Appendix D 821 820 819 818 817 v 816 a c 815 W W 814 813 812 811 810 0 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Upstream Cross - Section 6 - Riffle Station 10 + 75.57 +00 0+115 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +811 0 +85 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/14/2011 * MY2 7/25/2012 --E-' ! 11'3 2/27/2013 - - - l3kf Dye Branch II Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch Il Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch it Final D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D 819 818 817 816 .� 815 a� w C 0 814 a� W 813 812 811 810 809 0+011 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Upstream Cross - Section 7 - Riffle Station 13+ 85.87 Dye Branch 11 Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 0 11+115 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55 0 +60 0 +65 0 +70 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 NIYO 6/14 /2011 • MY2 7/26/2012 f I ll3 2/27/2013 — — — Bkf D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — February 28, 2013 Dye Branch II Final D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 0 Appendix D 815 814 813 812 811 w r; 0 810 ea v W 809 808 807 806 805 0+00 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Downstream Cross - Section 8 - Riffle Station 17 + 27.43 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0+30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0 +60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/14/2011 —'*-– MY2 8/1/2012 t MY3 2/27/2013 -- ` Bkf Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch 11 Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch 11 Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D 812 811 810 809 808 .y 807 c 0 806 v W 805 804 803 802 801 0+00 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Downstream Cross - Section 9 - Pool Station 19 + 80.80 0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55 0+60 0 +65 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/14/2011 — MY2 8/1/2012 —4B--MN3 2/27/2013 — — — Bkf Dye Branch 1I Final D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data . Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch II Final D -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch II Final D -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D 810 809 808 807 806 805 �r 6� c 804 0 y 803 a� W 802 801 800 799 798 797 0+00 Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Downstream Cross - Section 10 - Riffle Station 24 + 85.22 Dye Branch Il Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55 0+60 Station (feet) As -built 12/6/2010 n MY1 6/14/2011 —+— MY2 8/1/2012 MY3 2/27/2013 — — — Bkf D -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle Left Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle Right Bank Descending Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 D -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle Downstream Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle Upstream Monitoring Year 3 — March 1, 2013 Dye Branch 11 Final D -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D 840 �1I 839 1 838 837 836 835 834 833 832 831 830 v 829 828 C O 827 R i w 826 825 824 823 822 821 820 819 818 817 816 815 Stream Survey Data Cemetary Branch Longitudinal Profile 0 +00 to 9 +89.93 a 1X& O db O O 9,5O O sX* O 01, X90 d,XO O Station (feet) TW -MYO 12/6/2010 TW -MY1 6/13/2011 TW -MY2 12/12/2012 TW -MY3 2/27/2013 WS BKF O Structure a to �O Dye Branch II Final D -31 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D 826 825 824 823 822 821 820 819 818 w °0 817 :7 816 w 815 814 813 812 811 810 809 808 qb 0 Dye Branch - Upstream Longitudinal Profile 0 +30.36 to 15+03.3 • XS7 - R X-909 X -90 X-909 X -90 X -90 X -90 X -90 X 6o X -90 X -90 X-909 X -90 X-909 X bo Station (feet) TW- MY012/6/2010 - TW -MY1 6/14/2011 TW -MY2 7/25/2012 - TW -MY3 2/28/2013 WS A BKF o Structure Stream Survey Data jS 'bo Dye Branch 11 Final D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D 810 809 808 807 806 805 w 804 e 0 i+ 803 802 801 800 799 798 797 Ad' YZo Stream Survey Data Dye Branch - Downstream Longitudinal Profile 16 +52.72 to 25 +34.71 -> Po 4%9 19X 9 lobo 21,0 -2? -� ?. rif�o rs�o Station (feet) TW- MY012/6/2010 TW- MY16/15/2011 TW- MY28/1/2012 — •— TW- MY32/29/2013 WS • BKF 0 Structure Dye Branch 11 Final D -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. Project No. 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data ct 5 Momtortng Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sdUclay 0 062 2 2% 2% Sand very fine sand 0 125 0% 2% fine sand 025 00/0 2% medium sand 050 4 4% 6% coarse sand 100 0% 6% very coarse sand 200 34 32% 38% Gravel very fine gravel 40 12 11% 49% fine gravel 57 13 12% 61% fine gravel 80 5 5% 66% medium gravel 113 1 1% 67% medium gravel 160 14 13% 80% coarse gravel 223 7 7% 87% coarse gravel 32 6 6% 92% very coarse gravel 45 3 3% 95% very coarse gravel 64 3 3% 98% Cobble small cobble 90 1 1% 99% medium cobble 128 1 1% 100% large cobble 180 0% 100 ° /0 very large cobble 256 0% 1000/0 Boulder small boulder 362 0% 1000/0 small boulder 512 0% 100% medium boulder 1024 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0% 100% very large boulder 4096 0% 1000/0 Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 1000/0 TOTALS1 1 106 1 100% 100% a D50 41 D84 19 D95 43 Dye Branch II Final D -34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Cemetery Branch Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 1 -Pool 100% 90% 80 e W r F' 70% d c 60% G. e E i 40% > m 30% E 0 U 20% 10% .O = N O � � N •�i Q �O P � N `O � N Q 0% O� 'O m Particle Size (mm) MYI6/13/2011 �MY27/26/2012 _MV3 2/27/2013 Cemetery Branch Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 1 - Pool 45 40% 35 30% m 9 25% .� 'e7 20% e V L V a 15% 10% 5% 0% O N Q O 9 U 6i Particle Size (mm) ■MVI 6/13/2011 ■MV2 7/26/2012 ■MY3 2/27/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data .t Monitoring Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sdUclay 0 062 0% 0% Sand very fine sand 0 125 00/0 0% fine sand 025 0% 0% medium sand 050 5 5% 5% coarse sand 100 13 13% 18% very coarse sand 200 32 32% 50% Gravel very fine gravel 40 5 5% 54% fine gravel 57 11 11% 65% fine gravel 80 5 5% 70% medium gravel 113 7 7% 77% medium gravel 160 4 4% 81% coarse gravel 223 5 5% 86% coarse gravel 32 1 1% 87% very coarse gravel 45 1 1% 88% very coarse gravel 64 5 5% 93% small cobble 90 0% 93% medium cobble 128 3 3% 96% Cobble large cobble 180 3 3% 99% very large cobble 256 0% 99% Boulder small boulder 362 1 1% 1000/0 small boulder 512 0% 100% medium boulder 1024 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0% 100% very large boulder 4096 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 100% TOTALS1 101 100% 100% D50 21 D84 19 D95 110 Dye Branch II Final D -36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 0 Cemetery Branch Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 2 - Riffle 100% 90 80 e m L F 70% d e 60% fr. e a 50 a 40% > .W 30% E U 20 10% 0% d m Particle Size (mm) MY16113/2011 MY27/26/2012 _ MY3 2/27/2013 Cemetery Branch Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 2 -Riffle 45 40 35 30 25% ? e 20% ar u d a 15% 10% 5% 0% N 1. V, T x N N V 00 10 Y Q (21 N c o o p 01 m Particle Size (mm) ■MY1 6/13/2011 ■MY2 7/26/2012 ■MY3 2/27/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data O. ry Monttortng Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay stlt/clay 0 062 1 1% 1% Sand very fine sand 0 125 0% 1% fine sand 025 3 3% 4% medium sand 050 12 12% 16% coarse sand 100 9 9% 25% very coarse sand 200 15 15% 40% Gravel very fine gravel 40 5 5% 45% fine gravel 57 5 5% 50% fine gravel 80 8 8% 58% medium gravel 113 12 12% 70% medium gravel 160 7 7% 77% coarse gravel 223 8 8% 85% coarse gravel 32 5 5% 90% very coarse gravel 45 3 3% 93% very coarse gravel 64 2 2% 95% Cobble small cobble 90 4 4% 99% medium cobble 128 0% 99% large cobble 180 1 1% 1000/0 very large cobble 256 0% 1000/0 Boulder small boulder 362 0% 1000/0 small boulder 512 0% 100% medttum boulder 1024 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0 °/a 100% very large boulder 1 4096 1 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock >4096 1 1 0% 100% TOTALS I 1 100 1 100% 100% S �a D50 6 D84 21 D95 64 Dye Branch II Final D -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Cemetery Branch Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 3 - Riffle 100% 90 80 A, E- 70% e 60% Lr. e u 50 % is u a `> 40% 30% E 0 U 20 10% 0% d m Particle Size (mm) MVI 6113/2011 '—MY2 7/26/2012 —� MY3 2/27/2013 Cemetery Branch Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 3 - Riffle 45 40% 35 30 9 25% .� 20 V V a 15% 10% 5% 0 % N V1 to 1n 3C W, 4 R N Q Y O V 9 d m Particle Size (mm) ■MYI 6/13/2011 ■MY2 7/26/2012 ■ MY3 2/27/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data O umI a Monitoring Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sildclay 0 062 1 1% 1% Sand very fine sand 0 125 0% 1% fine sand 025 3 3% 4% medium sand 050 18 18% 22% coarse sand 100 27 27% 49% very coarse sand 200 19 19% 68% Gravel very fine gravel 40 2 2% 70% fine gravel 57 5 5% 75% fine gravel 80 3 3% 78% medium gravel 113 1 1% 79% medium gravel 160 6 6% 85% coarse gravel 223 1 1% 86% coarse gravel 32 1 1% 87% very coarse gravel 45 3 3% 90% very coarse gravel 64 1 1% 91% Cobble small cobble 90 6 6% 97% medium cobble 128 2 2% 99% large cobble 180 0% 99% very large cobble 256 0% 99% Boulder small boulder 362 0% 99% small boulder 512 1 1% 1000/0 medium boulder 1024 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0% 1000/0 very large boulder 4096 0% 1000/0 Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 1000/0 TOTALS 100 100% 100% Dye Branch II Final D -40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 umI a D50 1 D84 15 D95 80 Dye Branch II Final D -40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 4 - Riffle 100% 90 80% C r I 70% u e 60% e u u a 40% i 30% E U 20% 10% 0% d m Particle Size (mm) ° MYl 6/13/2011 �MV2 7/26/2012 } MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 4 - Riffle 45 40% 35% 30 25% c 20% u a 15% 10% $% 5130. a M 0 1 L III El 0% N O O O 7 d M Particle Size (mm) ■MYI 6/13/2011 ■MV2 7/26/2012 ■MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data �011il S 00 Monitoring Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sddclay 0 062 7 7% 7% Sand very fine sand 0 125 0% 7% fine sand 025 7 7% 13% medium sand 050 11 10% 24% coarse sand 100 6 6% 29% very coarse sand 200 2 2% 31% Gravel very fine gravel 40 2 2% 33% fine gravel 57 0% 33% fine gravel 80 4 4% 37% medium gravel 113 6 6% 42% medium gravel 160 15 14% 57% coarse gravel 223 15 14% 71% coarse gravel 32 12 11% 82% very coarse gravel 45 5 5% 87% very coarse gravel 64 4 4% 91% Cobble small cobble 90 6 6% 96% medium cobble 128 2 2% 98% large cobble 180 2 2% 1000/0 very large cobble 256 0% 1000/0 Boulder small boulder 362 0% 1000/0 small boulder 512 00/0 100% medium boulder 1024 0 °/U 1000/0 large boulder 2048 0% 100% very large boulder 4096 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 100% TOTALS1 106 100% 100% D50 13 D84 37 D95 84 Dye Branch II Final D -42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 5 -Pool 100% P 90% 80% e r 70% F' iv e 60% s c a m d 40% i is 30% E U 20 10% 0% O O O � 7 Oi Particle Size (mm) MY1 6/14/2011 �MY2 —� MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 5 - Pool 45% 40% 35% 30% m 'o 25% .� 'fl e 20 V d a 15% 10% 5% 0% O O en V1 O O N O O R 7 V m Particle Size (mm) ®MVI 6/14/2011 ■MV2 7/26/2012 EMY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data O. (noun ' umma Momtormg Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sdt/clay 0 062 4 4% 4% Sand very fine sand 0 125 2 2% 6% fine sand 025 4 4% 10% medmm sand 050 11 11% 21% coarse sand 100 12 12% 33% very coarse sand 200 25 25% 58% very fine gravel 40 6 6% 64% fine gravel 57 3 3% 67% Gravel fine gravel 80 2 2% 69% medium gravel 113 3 3% 72% medium gravel 160 4 4% 76% coarse gravel 223 6 6% 82% coarse gravel 32 5 5% 87% very coarse gravel 45 3 3% 90% very coarse gravel 64 4 4% 94% Cobble small cobble 90 3 3% 97% medium cobble 128 2 2% 99% large cobble 180 1 1% 100 ° /0 very large cobble 256 0% 100% Boulder small boulder 362 0% 1000/0 small boulder 512 0% 1000/0 medium boulder 1024 0% 1000/0 large boulder 2048 0% 100% very large boulder 4096 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 100% TOTALS 100 100% 100% u�xn �a D50 16 D84 26 D95 72 Dye Branch II Final D -44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 6 - Riffle 100% 90% 80% C A Z F' ' 70% u C 60% Z C d 50% C6 40% > 30% E U 20% 10% Vi v VI � N Y O 0p .O N N v Y O O O N N y m O Y 0% O O N < C d m Particle Size (mm) MYI6/14/2011 �MY27/26/2012 _ MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 6 - Riffle 45% 40% 35% 30 a 25% .� 9 e 20% V d 15% a 10% 5% 10% - ENO Ell C � G O •- - .-� M N O O O O Y CO Particle Size (mm) ■MYi 6/14/2011 ■MY2 712612012 �MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data ummary D50 Monttormg Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sth/clay 0 062 0% 0% Sand very fine sand 0 125 0% 0% fine sand 025 8 8% 8% medium sand 050 8 8% 15% coarse sand 100 4 4% 19% very coarse sand 200 11 10% 30% Gravel very fine gravel 40 7 7% 36% fine gravel 5 7 8 8% 44% fine gravel 80 9 9% 52% medium gravel 113 17 16% 69% median gravel 160 22 21% 90% coarse gravel 22 3 9 9% 98% coarse gravel 32 1 1% 99% very coarse gravel 45 1 1% 100% very coarse gravel 64 0% 1000/0 Cobble small cobble 90 0% 1000/0 medium cobble 128 0% 1000/0 large cobble 180 0% 100% very large cobble 256 0% 100% Boulder small boulder 362 0% 100% small boulder 512 00/0 100% medium boulder 1024 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0% 100 %. -very large boulder 4096 0% 1000/0 Bedrock bedrock >4096 0°/. 100°/. TOTALS 105 100% 100°/. ummary D50 74 D84 14 D95 20 Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 7 - Riffle 100% 90% 80% e A L 70 L d C 60% G. e d 50% d a 40% > .W 30% U 20% 10% 0% O O O T 9 d 07 Particle Size (mm) MYl 6/14/2011 MY2 7/26/2012 MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch - Upstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 7 - Riffle 45% 40% 35% 30% W 0 'o 25% .: V 20 V V a 15% Loll-- 10% 5% _ 0% D C O — N to Vi O O cz V O O O O •� N R 9 V m Particle Size (mm) ■MYI 6/14/2011 ■MY2 7/26/2012 ■MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data I I F S Monrtormg Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay sdUclay 0 062 3 3% 3% Sand very fine sand 0 125 4 4% 7% fine sand 025 22 22% 29% medium sand 050 15 15% 44% coarse sand 100 7 7% 51% very coarse sand 200 25 25% 76% very fine gravel 40 7 7% 83% fine gravel 57 11 11% 94% fine gravel 80 2 2% 96% medium gravel 113 3 3% 99% Gravel medium gravel 160 1 1% 1000/0 coarse gravel 223 0% 100% coarse gravel 32 0% 1000/0 very coarse gravel 45 0% 1000/0 very coarse gravel 64 0% 1000/0 Cobble small cobble 90 0% 1000/0 medium cobble 128 0% 100% large cobble 180 0% 100% very large cobble 256 0% 100% Boulder small boulder 362 00/0 1000/0 small boulder 512 0% 100% medium boulder 1024 0% 1000/0 large boulder 2048 0% 1000/0 very large boulder 4096 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 100% TOTALS I 1 100 100% 100% Dye Branch II Final D -48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 a �a D50 091 D84 42 D95 69 Dye Branch II Final D -48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Dye Branch - Downstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 8 - Riffle 100% 90% 80% a°a L F 70% i e 60% c u 50% i d a 40% > 30% E U 20 10% h V, h N Q .O 00 �O N N V1 O W O N N R W g 0% Y d m Particle Size (mm) MYI 3/2/2011 MY2 7/26/2012 — MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch - Downstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 8 - Riffle 45% 40% 35% 30% w a 25% .� 9 20% u d a 15% 10% f 5% - ■ fl -��_�, 0% d m Particle Size (mm) :MV1 6 /14/2011 ■MY2 7/26/2012 MY3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data M o1 D50 Monrtormg Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay silt/clay 0 062 1 1% 1% Sand very fine sand 0 125 0% 1% fine sand 025 3 3% 4% medium sand 050 1 1% 5% coarse sand 100 12 12% 17% very coarse sand 200 43 43% 60% Gravel very fine gravel 40 13 13% 73% fine gravel 57 4 4% 77% fine gravel 80 4 4% 81% medium gravel 113 5 5% 86% medium gravel 160 6 6% 92% coarse gravel 223 3 3% 95% coarse gravel 32 3 3% 98% very coarse gravel 45 1 1% 99% very coarse gravel 64 1 1% 100 ° /0 Cobble small cobble 90 0% 100 %. medium cobble 128 0% 1000/0 large cobble 180 0% 1000/0 very large cobble 256 0% 100°/. Boulder small boulder 362 0% 100. /. small boulder 512 0% 100°/. medium boulder 1024 0% 100°/. large boulder 2048 0% 100°/. very large boulder 4096 0% 100°/. Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 100°/. TOTALS I 1 100 100% 100% Summ � D �a D50 17 D84 97 D95 22 Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Dye Branch - Downstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 9 - Pool s - 100% 90% 80% e es t F 70% u e 60% e E d a 40% > 30% E U 20% 10% O C � 0% N Nf Vi O O O O d m Particle Size (mm) MVI6/14/2011 MV27126/2012 - NtV3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch - Downstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 9 - Pool 45% 40% 35% 30% m 9 25% .= 9 C e 20% d V V d a 15% 10% 5% 0% R W �O Y O O N R 9 d m Particle Size (mm) ■Mv1 6/14/2011 ■MV2 7/26/2012 ■MV3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt /Clay silticlay 0 062 32 32% 32% Sand very fine sand 0 125 1 1% 33% fine sand 025 13 13% 46% medium sand 050 2 2% 48% coarse sand 100 4 4% 52% very coarse sand 200 5 5% 57% Gravel very fine gravel 40 5 5% 62% fine gravel 5 7 4 4% 66% fine gravel 80 6 6% 72% medium gravel 113 9 9% 81% medium gravel 160 11 11% 92% coarse gravel 22 3 6 6% 98% coarse gravel 32 1 1% 99% very coarse gravel 45 1 1% 100% very coarse gravel 64 0 °/U 1000/0 Cobble small cobble 90 0% 1000/0 medium cobble 128 0 °/a 100% large cobble 180 00/0 100% very large cobble 256 0% 1000/0 Boulder small boulder 362 0% 1000/0 small boulder 512 0% 1000/0 medium boulder 1024 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0% 100% very large boulder 4096 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock >4096 0% 100% TOTALS1 100 100% 100% Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 D50 0 062 D84 12 D95 19 Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Dye Branch - Downstream Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative Cross Section 10 - Riffle 100 90 80% W F. 70% u e e d .50% i > 40% 30% E e U 20% 10% 0% C1 m Particle Size (mm) MYI 6/14/2011 MY2 7/26/2012 MV3 2/2812013 Dye Branch - Downstream Pebble Count - Percent Individual Cross Section 10 - Riffle 45% 40% 35% 30% w 0 a 25% .= e 20% V d a 15% 10% J J 5% [J.E 0% �O N N � � N M K �O O� N OD V7 b � N !► O V d m Particle Size (mm) ■MYI 6/14/2011 ■MY27/26/2012 ■MV3 2/28/2013 Dye Branch II Final Project No. 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc. November 2013 0 Appendix D Stream Survey Data F � �� � = D e Branch II / Fro'ect No. 9.2255 - Cemete . Branch 9f7�7.fe_e_t � Parameter Regional Cure Pre- FSnshng Condition Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline Dimension & S_abstrate - RIffie "ULL E Min Mea �d Maa SD �N Mln M' o Med ® SD j�N� �Mi� Me"�an ® Min Menn Med Mni SD N Bankfull Width (ft) 70 70 70 70 N/A 1 89 11 1 1 1 3 141 1 8 7 100 5 5 72 72 89 N/A 2 Floodprone Width (ft) j 142 142 142 142 N/A 1 190 540 360 1000 38 1 5 280 >30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 10 10 10 1 0 N/A 1 07 09 08 1 6 03 7 07 05 07 07 08 N/A 2 Bankfull Max Depth (fi) 1 5 l 5 l 5 1 5 N/A 1 l 0 1 5 1 3 24 05 7 08 1 1 1 6 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 4 N/A 2 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 68 68 68 6 8 N/A 1 68 96 84 184 3 9 7 - 70 30 50 50 70 N/A 2 Width/Depth R a t i o 7 2 72 72 72 N/A 1 69 11 2 1 1 7 150 NA 3 143 103 108 108 1 1 2 N/A 2 Entrenchment Ratio _a 20 20 20 20 EE Fl 3 8 68 7 7 89 NA 3 28 >3 4 >4 4 >4 4 >5 4 N/A 2 Bank Height Ratio ® 1 5 1 l 5 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 N/A I 1 I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 NA 1 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 10 1 0 1 0 N/A 2 PioBte Riffle Length (ft) _ _ _ 68 234 N 5 539 1484 14 Riffle Slope (ft /ft) _ _ _ 0 012 0 034 0 088 0 006 0 027 0 026 0 052 0 016 6 - 0 048 - 0 004 0 023 0 022 0 049 001 14 Pool Length (ft)___ 47 82 119 35 193 196 328 115 6 138 207 276 58 162 169 391 717 24 Pool Max Depth (ft)_!— - 26 18 26 29 32 05 7 - 2 - 18 30 29 37 048 18 Pool Spacing (ft) — — _ 22 8 860 12282 180 527 402 1408 41 7 7 184+2706 —32-2 4 5 387 364 I I 1 0 2440 24 t ttern Channel Belt Width (ft )[=® 5 3 10 8 22 6 26 0 49 I 40 0 119 0 29 8 9 23 0 32 2 414 11 3 306 370 467 123 16 Radius of Curvature (ft) 7= MM 39 196 370 50 23 8 220 480 146 9 184 276 368 8 3 13 7 120 299 5 7 16 Re Bankfull Width (ft /ft ) 06 28 5 3 06 2 1 1 8 43 1 3 9 1 8 2 8 3 7 24 2 4 24 24 N/A 1 Meander Wavelength (ft) a 136 420 71 0 260 729 690 1550 476 9 460 552 644 388 77 4 i9_1 1670 36 1 11 Meander Width Ratio 08 15 32 25 47 36 101 27 7 23 32 41 49 66 66 82 N/A 2 Trans rt Parameters Reach Shear Stress Com etenc Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankf ill � 45-180 Stream Power (Transport Ca acit ) W /m'' — - A itlonaljReach Parameters Rosgen Classification ® E4 E4 / C4 / C5 C4 C Bankfull Velocity (fps) 66-78 4 1- 7 0 5 5- 6 7 Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 443-528 350- 128 1 384-466 Valley Length (ft) ® - - - Channel Thalweg Length (ft) ® - - - 977 SmuositY 1 14 1 15-222 1 14 1 08 Water Surface Slope (ft /fl) 00190 0 0057 - 0 0130 00190 Bankfull Slope (fi /fl) - - 00191 Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres) % of Reach with Eroding Banks - - Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Jill wmjijll� - Information unavailable N/A - Item does not appl Non,Apphcable �i�et i er '' Dye Branch II Final D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Tattle 10a. Ba eline Stream Data Summary e Branch II / P,ro ect No. 9.2255 - D e Branch_U pstreamly.11465ifeetin Parameter Regional Curer I Pre - Existing Condition I Reference Reach Data OF to Os tin Creek Design Monitoring Baseline Dimension & Suhstrate - Riffle ® UM "Eq M Mean Med Maz SD 01 Min MMean Med I— UN ONE M Mean ® Min ff— Wd Max SD ®N Bankfull Width (fl) 112 160 185 206 - 20 1 - 25 7 284 269 327 N/A 3 Floodprone Width (ill ® ®— 895 672 702 728 709 769 88 8 544 649 586 818 N/A 3 Bankfull Mcan Depth (fl) 16 1 6 1 6 1 7 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 3 14 N/A 3 Bankfull Max Depth (fl) ®—® 28 15 19 24 15 18 22 22 28 25 36 N/A 3 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area fl'' 18 1 202 19 7 22 9 NA 3 274 303 334 31 0 295 363 325 469 N/A 3 Width/Depth Ratio MIMI=% 6 2 70 70 79 NA 3 93 11 4 127 130 203 22 6 228 246 N/A 3 Entrenchment Ratio _—_ -2 >4 4 1 >5 0 1 >5 01 NA 1 3 1 35 1 3 8 1 1 44 1 1 1 35 1 38 1 44 20 23 23 25 N/A 3 Bank Height Ratio _—_ 10 - 1 10 1 1 2 14 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 10 10 10 Profile _ Riffle Length (ft) _ _ _ 61 176 302 66 19 I 32 7 201 51 6 47 1 97 295 8 Riffle Slope (fl /ft) _ MM 0 002 0 014 0 042 0 006 0 028 0 066 0 007 003010070 0 002 0 006 0 005 0 016 0 005 8 Pool Length (fl) _ _ — 183 35 1 629 199 38 1 68 1 8 76 246 224 664 13 20 Pool Max Depth (fl)_-- 22 29 33 21 27 t 31 21 344 361 448 067 20 Pool Spacing (fl) _ _ _ 503 789 105 8 545 85 5 14 7 24 1 668 65 3 125 286 19 Pattern Channel Belt Width (fl) 66 243 569 360 670 1500 390 726 1626 285 450 484 54 i 8 34 17 Radius of Curvature (ft) 14 5 524 148 8 190 490 1150 20 6 53 1 1246 236 31 3 31 2 39 6 4 75 14 Re Bankfull Width (ft/fl) 13 47 133 10 27 62 10 27 62 23 23 1 23 23 N/A 1 Meander Wavelength (fl) 40 1 797 172 7 330 940 1550 358 102 1680 1005 13001 1382 1533 182 12 Meander Width Ratio 06 22 5 1 1 9 36 8 1 1 9 3.6 71 1 7 1 9 1 9 2 1 021 3 Trans rt P,arameteia Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /fl' Max Part Si Lc (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull — 30- 100 Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m'' — _mdl oil Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification — E4 C4 C5 C Bankfull Velocity (fps) 62-69 4 2 3 5 Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 1 12 2 - 1248 128 110 Valley Length (fl) — - - - Channel Thalweg Length (fl) — 2,086 1,034 2,405 2,455 Sinuosity — 1 104 1 20 1 20 1 21 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /fl) — 00090 00088 00080 00080 Bankfull Slope (ft /fl) — - - - 00083 Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres) — % of Reach with Eroding Banks — Channel Stability or Habitat Metric — Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other - Information unavailable N/A - Item does not apply Non - Applicable -� _ - - Dye Branch Ii Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 0 D -55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data L Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summ �±,. �4" ��.a��LiV�I'i�`t -• - e_ ;;-• t,_° Y,i t �1.,:';1' a�'k �Y' A+� e Brune 1 1, /�Pro'e_ct No. 92255 - D e_Branclrpowostreamt 870,tee_t - ;;x` ,.a c �F `' ; Parameter Regional Curve Pre - Fasting Condition Reference Reach Data iTF to Oshn Creek —T— Design Momtonng Baseline Dimension &T Sabstrate- ItlRie',f?uIIL K4-1 Mean Me d IM Min Mean [Med �MaMaz _SD n� M_ �M'az� Min Mean Med �1 �D]S tE�N� Bankfull Wt It(ft) 148 148 148 148 NA 1 160 185 206 201 - 184 186 186 188 N/A 3 Floodprone Width (ft) ;] 22 0 220 220 220 NA 1 672 702 72 8 709 769 88 8 487 61 8 61 8 748 N/A 3 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 NA 1 1 6 1 6 1 7 1 5 1 9 20 20 20 N/A 3 Bankfull Max Depth (fi) 24 24 24 24 NA 1 15 19 24 15 18 22 29 30 30 31 N/A 3 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft'' ) 174 174 174 24 NA 1 274 303 334 31 0 340 36 1 36 1 38 1 N/A 3 Width/Depth Ratio ` ® 12 S 1251 1251 24 NA 1 93 114 127 130 93 96 96 99 N/A 3 Entrenchment Ratio 1 5 1 5 24 NA 1 35 3 8 44 3 5 1 38 1 44 1 27 34 34 40 N/A 3 Bank Height Rauo ®— 4 9 49 49 24 NA I 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 N/A 3 Profile "- ss wd, ' Won I Riffle Length (ft) ®_ - - - 61 176 302 66 191 327 15 7 1 50 3 55 7 79 3 20 2 7 Riffle Slope (ft /ft) ®— ® 0 003 0 021 0 121 0 006 0 028 00661 0 00710 030 0 070 0 001 0 006 0 006 0 014 0 004 7 Pool Length (ft) _ ® 29 248 120 18 3 35 1 6291 199 38 1 68 1 101 199 159 396 891 14 Pool Max Depth (ft) - 31 - 22 29 33 21 27 31 33 391 377 505 059 12 Pool Spacing (ft) ®S 79 0 1620 1261 0 503 789 105 81 153 575 38 8 130 41 5 14 Pattern Channel Belt Width ft) ® ®® IS 6 30 6 67 7 36 0 67 0 150 0 390 726 1626 283 492 575 654 154 9 Radius of Curvature (ft) 110 42 1 81 9 190 490 1150 20 6 153 1 1246 327 407 422 1 501 56 7 Re Bankfull Width (ft /ft) —® 07 29 5 6 1 0 27 62 10 F27 62 1 7 1 7 1 7 N/A 1 Meander Wavelength (ft) O 620 1030 157 33 0 940 1550 35 8 102 1680 1389 1622 157 3 L25 27 2 6 Meander Width Ratio ®�® I 1 21 46 19 36 81 19 36 81 24 28 28 051 2 Trans R)ka —mm ete rum Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ft' M ax Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull 30- 100 Stream Power Trans ort Capacity) W /m' - Adtii_ noH al Reach Paremete;s t" 11 Rosgen Classification G4c C4 C5 C Bankfull Velocity (fps) 6 1- 7 2 42 3 5 Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 1054- 1260 128 110 Valley Length (ft) - - Channel Thalweg Length (ft) - - - 870 Sinuosity , 114 146 109 110 Water Surface Slope (ft /ft) 0 01 10 00090 00095 - Bankfull Slope (ft /ft) - - - 00106 Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres) °/ of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other - Information unavadablc N/A - Item does not apply Non -A pbcable��y �'�1 Dye Branch II Final D -56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data Information unavailable N/A it'm does not a I Noo_Apphcable T 1Ob. Basehne Stream Data Su(Substrate, Bed ank, and Hydrologic Contaimn— t Parameter Distributions) e Branch D e Branch II / 1'ro ct N-o 92255 - Cemete . Branch 927r7 feet Parameter Pre - Existing ContBhon Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline - -- Rt% /Ru% /P% /G% /S% - s _ - ®® - — — �� - - - - - - - 35% 4% 42% 13% 7% SC% /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Bc% - SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /13 /Be% SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /B% /Bc% - ® ® - - - ����(♦���_�_���� _� ®��(♦� ® ® ® ® ®��_ d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /di ° /dj' rmn) 015 04 d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 / dip /di'P(min) 09 12 20 80 101 889 - 021 05 35 139 266 450 Entrenchment Class Entrenchment Entrenchment ■® ®� �� .■■■■■■■■■■■■S■■ ■� �■■■ ®■ ■� ®�■ ® ® ®r� ® ® ®��® ® ® ®■e� - 99/> <35 /15 199/2 49/50 99/>10 - <15/15 199/2 49/50 0 99/>10 - - _ - - Inc Incision Class MEN Incision Class MEN MEN M■■■S®■■■■■■■■■■■ ®■®®MMMMMMMMMEIM� Mr■®■®®M®® ■1 - <32/12 149/15 199/>20 - - ®■E <1 2/12 149/15 199/>20 _ - - - Information unavailable N/A it'm does not a I Noo_Apphcable Information unavailable Nop- ApDhcade Table 1'Ob. Baseline Stream Date Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containffit Parameter DistrlbntIonst) e Branch / P,ro ect No. 92255 - D Branch -U tream II 465 feet Parameter Pre - Existing Conclition Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri % /Ru% /P% /G % /S% - - -- _ - _® - -_— �� - - - - - - - 28% 15% 34% 20% 3% SC% /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Bc% - SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /13 /Be% ® ����(♦���_�_���� d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /di ° /dj' rmn) 015 04 33 103 137 457 Entrenchment Class Entrenchment ■® ®� .■■■■■■■■■■■■S■■ ■� ®■ ■� ® ® ■ ® ® ®��® - <15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10 - 99/> <35 /15 199/2 49/50 99/>10 - - _ - - Inc Incision Class MEN MEN M■■■S®■■■■■■■■■■■ ®■®®MMMMMMMMMEIM� - <32/12 149/15 199/>20 - - - - - - - Information unavailable Nop- ApDhcade Information mavadablc N/A Item does not a pl Noo= ADDhca6le ... _ . �t� � _ . Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 0 D -57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Table POb. Baseline Stream Date Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) e Branch II /Pro ct No. 92255 - e rancb-Downstream 870 feet Parameter Pre - Existing Coadtion Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri % /Ru % /P% /G % /S% 43% 6% 34% 13% 3% SC% /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Bc% - ® ����(♦���_�_���� d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /din /dtx'(mm) 015 028 056 107 130 457 Entrenchment ®� ■� ®■ ■� ® ® ■ ® ® ®��® 99/> <35 /15 199/2 49/50 99/>10 Incision Class MEN ®■®®MMMMMMMMMEIM� _ <12/12 149/15 199/ >20 Information mavadablc N/A Item does not a pl Noo= ADDhca6le ... _ . �t� � _ . Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 0 D -57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data K�;�� {�� ° "�_`�''-",Table lla.'�Be`�line Morphology & Hydraulic 011"Offilng OMNI ''�' ~' "� -���" � Parameter Cross Section 1 Pool Cross Section 2 Riffle Cross Section 3 Riffle Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Record Elevation (datum) Used 8363 8363 8363 8363 MY5 Record Elevation (datum) Used 8263 8263 8263 8263 8217 8217 8217 8217 Bankfull Width (ft) 97 102 94 92 8125 89 106 80 84 Bankfull Width (ft) 55 60 65 61 Floodprone Width (ft) >50 >50 >50 >50 327 >30 >30 >30 >30 269 >30 >30 >30 >30 Floodprone Width (ft) Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 19 1 1 5 15 15 1 50 1 08 06 05 1 05 1 05 05 1 06 06 544 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3 1 27 24 22 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1 3 14 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 7 10 1 0 1 0 09 14 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 18 9 152 143 140 1 1 10 70 63 39 4 1 Bankfull M ax Depth (ft) 25 30 28 40 36 34 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 5 0 68 62 6 1 36 32 1 1 2 18 1 164 17 3 22 20 103 127 106 104 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 32 5 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >5 1 >4 9 >5 3 >5 4 288 23 7 >3 4 >2 8 >3 8 >3 6 469 375 >5 4 >5 0 >4 6 >4 9 295 242 Bankfiill Bank Height Ratio 10 1 0 10 1 0 203 209 1 0 10 1 0 10 102 122 1 0 1 0 10 10 228 220 Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ft` 189 152 143 140 240 229 1 70 63 39 1 41 2 3 22 30 2 8 1 40 36 29 28 d50 (mm) I N/A 57 48 41 27 28 1 N/A 84 1 1401 2 1 22 2 5 N/A 6 0 1 50 60 1 0 1 0 N/A - Item does not apply Table l la Baseline Morphology & Aytiraulic Monitoring Summary Dye Branch hI / Project No. 92355 -Dye Branclr_Upst>heam (Q,47�1 Feet) Parameter Cross Section 4 Riffle Cross Section 5 Pool Cross Section 6 Riffle Cross Section 7 Riffle Dimension Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Record Elevation (datum) Used 8243 8243 8243 8243 8174 8174 8174 8174 815 5 815 5 815 5 8155 8125 8125 8125 8125 Bankfull Width (ft) 257 238 229 208 171 170 168 164 327 287 277 269 269 24 1 21 3 20 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 586 528 528 528 50 47 1 471 47 1 818 782 782 782 544 526 526 526 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7 14 2 1 2 1 14 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 10 09 1 1 Bankfull M ax Depth (ft) 25 20 21 23 34 28 36 36 36 32 32 33 22 20 21 24 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 32 5 27 1 23 1 224 288 23 7 350 35 1 469 375 362 360 295 242 199 213 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 203 209 226 193 102 122 8 1 77 228 220 21 2 200 246 240 229 189 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2 3 22 23 25 29 28 28 29 25 27 28 29 20 22 2 5 26 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 1 0 1 0 10 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ft' 325 27 1 23 1 224 288 23 7 350 352 469 375 362 360 295 242 199 21 4 d50 (mm) N/A 1 2 1 2 1 0 N/A 6 0 1 7 13 0 N/A 1 9 4 5 1 6 N/A 2 7 8 0 74 N/A - Item does not apply Dye Branch 1I Final D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data KT T11 lla. Baseline Morphology & I3�yllraulic Monitoring Summary Dye Branch III /Project No. 92�2�55 -Dye Branch - ownstream (869 Feet) Parameter Cross Sechon 8 Riffle Cross Section 9 Pool Cross Sechon 10 Riffle Dimension Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Record Elevation (datum) Used 8093 8093 8093 8093 806 l 8061 8061 8061 1801 1 801 1 801 1 801 1 Bankfull Width (ft) 188 188 196 186 263 263 243 246 184 185 177 179 Floodprone Width (ft) 748 73 5 73 5 73 5 1 1 >70 >70 >70 >70 487 476 476 476 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 20 19 2 1 20 1 8 1 7 23 26 1 9 1 6 1 6 1 6 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 31 30 39 33 35 35 35 41 29 24 25 27 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz 381 359 410 368 484 436 55 3 63 5 340 295 278 294 Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 93 99 93 94 143 159 107 96 99 11 7 11 3 11 0 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 40 39 3 8 40 >2 7 >2 7 29 >2 8 27 26 27 27 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 0 1 0 10 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 l 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ftz 38 1 359 pil 0 369 484 436 553 63 5 340 295 278 294 d50 (mm) N/A 13 1 09 N/A 072 64 1 7 N/A 10 09 1 0 1 N/A - item does not apply Dye Branch 1I Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 • D -59 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data ..PP Y R.- Rdflc /Ru rURw /sP, Pool /G- Gbdc /b -S.' 5( - SII C7ey / Sk - Svnd / G- Gavel / C - Cobble / A = &rWder I Be - Bedrock Pertenteges based uv nfBe end pool pebble counts Dye Branch II Final D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 OT i " - ®� ®� ®m0000000000000000000000000 00000 •••• m ®�� ®m000 ©x0000000000000000000000000 • :, m®®®® 000000 r�000000000000000000000000 • -: ���� ®m00000000000000000000000 ©00000 • • ��mm® OO�OOO t�l�00l�Ot�OOt�I�O�O��OODOO�OO Ir . , .. .• l�( ��DDD�E��t �l�t�l�t���0�00001������ t������{ ..PP Y R.- Rdflc /Ru rURw /sP, Pool /G- Gbdc /b -S.' 5( - SII C7ey / Sk - Svnd / G- Gavel / C - Cobble / A = &rWder I Be - Bedrock Pertenteges based uv nfBe end pool pebble counts Dye Branch II Final D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix D Stream Survey Data or eppry SC = Sh Clay / S\ � banJ / G- Gas cl / C � Cobbl</ B - BuWJcr / Be - BeJrock Pcrceniagea baud nn nfBe mJ pool pebble covets Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Momtonng Year 3 of 5 D -61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 r ®® �®® 00�ODO���OD000���0�00001�0�00000 �®®® mm0000000000�0000000000000000000 m ® ® ®® 0000000000000000000000000000000 ��� ®® ®000000000000000000000000000000 ••mmmm ® ©000000000000000000 ©00000000000 _ r r• rl r ..: .: .• 000000001�000�0�000000000�����o�����t� ', or eppry SC = Sh Clay / S\ � banJ / G- Gas cl / C � Cobbl</ B - BuWJcr / Be - BeJrock Pcrceniagea baud nn nfBe mJ pool pebble covets Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Momtonng Year 3 of 5 D -61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix D Stream Survey Data x ° Sli C1s� I S4 =Send / G— (rn.el / C — Cobble I e — BnWder I Be — Bedrock • rep «e�e�e, ne,ea.,� rime eea p,,.a pebble a „wis Dye Branch II Final D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 • ® ®mm ®0� ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®m ®A® ®gym ®0������������ • • m ® ® ®�Ammmm�Ammm ®dam ®m ®�0������������ : �� ®�� ©000000000 ©000000000000 ©000000 •• ®® �® m0000000000000000000000�00000000 •:. ® mmm® 0000000000000000000000000000000 . • _ ��®®®© f�O�OOL�C�00L��DO���000� ©G= 7��O��C�t�O . .mmmm ®a00000000000000000000© ©00000000 - : • I I• I .:.`.• 00000000oo ,,x�0000�mo��o�����f������t . : I x ° Sli C1s� I S4 =Send / G— (rn.el / C — Cobble I e — BnWder I Be — Bedrock • rep «e�e�e, ne,ea.,� rime eea p,,.a pebble a „wis Dye Branch II Final D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Appendix E Hydrologic Data Appendix E Table 12. Werification of Ban Uull Events le Branch � / P,ro'ect No 92.255 Date of Occurrence Method Feet Above Average Bankfull Elevation 7/8/2011 Water level logger 1 07 9/21/2011 Water level logger 1 14 9/24/2011 Water level logger 052 5/16/2012 Water level logger 163 7/11/2012 Water level logger 021 9/29/2012 Water level logger 022 4/12/2013 Water level logger 008 6/28/2013 Water level logger 081 6/30/2013 Water level logger 072 7/9/2013 Water level logger 1 62 7/31/2013 Water level logger 053 Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Hydrologic Data E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix E 5 45 a 35 3 Q W 25 2 15 1 05 0 Average Bankfu112.8 Feet Dye Branch II Final Project No 92255 Monitoring Year 3 of 5 Figure 3. Dye Branch Water Level Logger Chart E -2 Hydrologic Data l Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc November 2013 Appendix E Hydrologic Data Figure 3. Precipitation for Mooresville, North Carolina 45 4 35 3 25 v C ~ 2 15 1 05 0 f�! r�l ��1 s►�j sal 6�! ��l d'�j -9�j 1p�1 ll�l l��, NC CRONOS (North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database) State Climate Office of North Carolina Version 2 7 2 Mooresville 1 9 SSE (NC -IR -1) httn / /www nc- climate ncsu edu/cronos/ Accessed November 2013 Dye Branch II Final E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc Project No 92255 November 2013 Monitoring Year 3 of 5