Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WQCS00005_NOV-2021-DV-0419 Response_20211206
WATER MANAGEMENT CITY OF DURHAM Date: December 6, 2021 To: Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Raleigh Regional Office NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, N.C. 27609 From: Don Greeley, P.E., P.L.S., Director Subject: NOV-2020-DV-0419, Permit No. WCS00005 City of Durham Collection System, Durham County received the document addressed to (please print NAME) Raleigh Regional Office on Tuesday, December 6, 2021. Signature Date �C of _ 49er ,S fie�r$ f Pv `fie jg� eg'Oo afO f�c 0 1600 Mist Lake Dr. Durham, NC 27704 919,560.4381 DurhamNC,gov Follow Us @CityofDurhamNC 00 WATER MANAGEMENT CITY OF DURHAM December 3, 2021 Mr. Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Raleigh Regional Office NCDEQ Division of Water Resources 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, N.C. 27609 Subject: NOV-2021-DV-0419 Permit No. WQCS00005 City of Durham Collection System, Durham County Dear Mr. Vinson, Nc Deft Of F4 Ott + �menfa! pUaJr'r�, -kale! 0/nee This letter is in response toyournotice dated October5, 2021 which was received by the City of Durham on November 18, 2021. The October 5, 2021 letter states that the City of Durham is provided an opportunity to present evidence andjustification to demonstrate thatthe proposed civil penalties forthe Notice of Violation (NOV) should not be assessed forthe sanitary seweroverflows (SSOs) which occurred in the City's sewercollection system between August 1, 2021 and August 31, 2021. As requested, the Cityof Durham, Department of Water Management (DWM) is providing information about the two incidents which occurred during this timeframe which will supportthe City's position that despite meeting all the conditions of the City's Collection System permit including site visits, inspections and easement maintenance, these events were exceptional, unintentional, temporary and beyond the City's exercise of reasonable control. Incident# 202101692- 3311 Shannon Road—August3, 2021 On August 3, 2021 manhole #09023 near3311 Shannon Road overflowed with an estimated 2,400 gallons of wastewaterdischarging into New Hope Creek. This overflow occurred due to a blockage in the sewer main caused by debris. While Water and Sewer Maintenance worked to remove the blockage, they diverted flow by pumping wastewaterout of manhole #09023 around to manhole #09035. This reduced the level of wastewater in manhole #09023 and enabled staff to determine that the root cause of the blockage was due to the manhole invert becoming detached from the lid and falling into the manhole. While some staff worked to remove the manhole insert using a pickup stick, otherstaff dammed the creek downstream, flushed using a nearby hydrant (dechlorinated water) and then pumped untreated wastewater back into the collection system. The area was remediated bywashing/cleaning the area, reseeding and covering the area with straw. Crews also cleaned reaches (at least 3 manholes) above and below manhole #09023. Asper practice, staff removed the inserts of this same type in these 6 manholes and replaced them with newerand more substantial inserts. The City's Stormwate rServices Division responded and conducted ammoniatestingto help determine the extent of the spill and to advise when the site returned to normal conditions. No immediately visible adverse environmental impacts or hazards to persons or property occurred. City of Durham crews have followed up by cleaning the lines above and below the incident location and using CCTV trucks. As required, a news release was issued within the 24-hour window. The cost to remediate this spill was $3,906.17. Page 2 of 3 Incident# 202101722 —4428 Sun Valley Drive— Auigust 9 2021 On August 9, 2021, a sewer ove rf low occu rred near4428 Sun Valley Drive with approxim ate ly 500 gallons of untreated waste water flowing into Third Fork Creek. Water & Sewer Maintenance's Quick Response crew responded to the site but were unable to clear the blockage in the mainline. Additional crews responded to the site and using two VacAll Trucks were able to clear the buildup of debris (rocks and rags) in the line. Crews remediated the area around the spill, damming the creek, flushed using a nearby hydrant (dechlorinated water) and pumped the untreated wastewater back into the collection system. Crews also flushed/cleaned the collection system upstream and downstream of the event location and used CCTV to check for any other issues associated with the event. The City's StormwaterServices Division responded and conducted ammonia testingto help determine the extent of the spill and to advise when the site returned to normal conditions. No immediately visible adverse environmental impacts or hazards to persons or property occurred. City of Durham crews have followed up by cleaning the lines above and below the incident location and using CCTV trucks. As required, a news release was issued within the 24-hour window. The cost to remediate this spill was $10,078.40 Ongoing City -Wide Measuresto Reduce the Occurrence ofSSOs The city has several programs in place to reduce and/or prevent the occurrence ofSSOs. The City has implemented a CMOM plan that expands and enhances its existing programs. System Flushing and Inspection: The City routinely contracts flushing, CCTV inspection, smoke testing and manhole inspections of portions of the sewercollection system. The City is completing the inspection of the collection system systematically through City defined basins. Additionally, the City ensures the requirements of the collection system permit are met by deploying City crews to flush at least 10% of the collection system annually with a goal of exceedingthe requirement by at least 2 to 5% each year. The City measures the flushing on a fiscal year basis. For the FY 2022 year to date, the City has cleaned 4.62% of the system. As operations normalize post-Covid-19, staff will dedicate more time to this program. Sewer Rehabilitation Program: The City has an active Sewer Rehabilitation Program. The program includes flow monitoring (25 permanent monitors), CCTV inspection, manhole inspection, easement mowing, field inspections and investigations, point repairs, line replacement, root and grease abatement and cured -in-place manhole and line rehabilitation. There are 4 employee positions dedicated to the City's system rehabilitation programs in the Utility Engineering Division of DWM. This workgroup handles flow monitoring and system data management and contract preparation, administration and inspections. There are 20 employee positions in the Collections Systems Maintenance workgroup in the Water& Sewer Maintenance (WSM) Division of DWM. This group performs CCTV inspections, hydraulic cleaning activities, mowingand manhole inspection and repair. They respond to blockages and overflows. WSM does contract inspections as well. In addition, crewsfrom the Main Line workgroup of WSM perform point repairs, line replacements and some cured -in - place lining. The department established the Lift Station Maintenance Division in 2018 to focus oversight and maintenance of the 65 lift stations throughout the service area and the 136 ARVs in the system. This 18- memberworkgroup conducts the required daily/weekly inspections and associated preventive maintenance activities. The City spends more than $5,000,000 on Sewer Rehabilitation projects annually as a part of its Capital Improvements Programs. Page 3 of 3 Fat, Oils and G rease Program (FOG): The department's FOG education and outreach effort is conducted by 3.0 FTEs (staff shared 50/50 with the Industrial Waste Control Program). In addition to workingclosely with the Durham County Health Department, staff routinely inspectover 800 food service establishments (FSEs) annually to ensure appropriate cleaning and maintenance of grease interceptors. Staff participates in a numberof community events (Earth Day, CenterFest, and Landlord Workshops) as well as n eighborhood meetings to increase awareness of what is appropriate to put in the sewer system. FOG staff conducts post- SSOs follow-up education and enforcement as necessary. The City also invests more than $35,000 per year in advertising (TV commercials, social media, etc.) regarding the proper disposal of FOG and wipes. Summary: Based upon the documented information provided above regarding these incidents, the City believes that overflows were exceptional, unintentional, temporary and caused by factors beyond the City's/department's reasonable control. The City actively manages, operates and maintains its system in such a manneras to meetall the requirements of the Collection System permit. As detailed above, the City systematically inspects, flushes and rehabilitates its wastewater collection system. The department works actively to educate the community regarding what should and should not be discharged into the City's sewercollection system. Department staff welcomes the opportunity to meet with you and yourstaff to review our program and discuss constructive ways to improve whatwe are already doing in the City of Durham. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 560-4381 or via email at Do_n.Greeley@durhamnc.gov. Sincerely, Donald F. Greeley, Direcfor, Attachments c: Jason Robinson, DEQ— Water Quality Regional Operations Section, Raleigh Regional Office Junior Mobley, Superintendent, Water & Sewer Maintenance Vicki Westbrook, Assistant Director, Administration, Regulatory Compliance & Communications Scott Smart, Assistant Director, Systems & Maintenance Jerry Morrone, Utility Engineering Manager, Sr. State of North Carolina DWR t1 Department of Environment and Natural Resources DEC - 6 2021 Division of Water Resources D[vision of Water Resources Collection System Sanitary Sewer Overflow Reporting Form Raleigh Regional Office Form CS-SSO ART I: This form shall be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office within five business days of the first knowledge of the sanitary sewer overflow (SSO). Permit Number: WQCS00005 (WQCS# if active, otherwise use WQCSD#) Facility: Durham Collection System Incident #: 202101692 Owner: City of Durham City: Durham County: Durham Region: Raleigh Source of SSO (check applicable): [l Sanitary Sewer ❑ Pump Station 1 Lift Station SPECIFIC location of the SSO (be consistent in description from past reports or documentation - i.e. Pump Station 6, Manhole at Westall & Bragg Street, etc): 3311 Shannon Road Manhole #: 09023 Latitude (Decimal Degrees): Longitude (Decimal Degrees): Incident Started Dt: 08/03/2021 Time: 5:02 pm Incident End Dt: 08/04/2021 Time: 01:02 am (mm-dd-yyyy) (hh:mm AM/PM) (mm-dd-yyyy) (hh:mm AMIPM) Estimated Volume of the SSO: 2,400 gallons Estimated Duration (Round to nearest hour): 8:0 hours Describe how the volume was determined: 480mins x 5gpm Weather conditions during the SSO event: WET Did SSO reach surface waters? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Volume reaching surface waters (gals): 2400 Surface water name: New Hope Creek Did the SSO result in a fish kill? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ Unknown If Yes, what is the estimated number of fish killed? 0 SPECIFIC cause(s) of the SSO: 0 Debris in line 24 hour verbal notification (name of person contacted ): Lauren Smith ❑ DWR Z Emergency Mgmt Date (mm-dd-yyy): 08/04/2021 Time (hh:mm AMIPM): 05:03:00 am If an SSO is ongoing, please notify the appropriate Regional Office on a daily basis until SSO can be stopped. Per G.S. 143-215.1 C(b), the responsible party of a discharge of 1,000 or more of untreated wastewater to surface waters shall issue a press release within 24-hours of first knowledge to all print and electronic news media providing general coverage in the county where the discharge occurred. When 15,000 gallons or more of untreated wastewater enters surface waters, a public notice shall be published within 10 days and proof of publication shall be provided to the Division within 30 days. Refer to the reference statute for further detail. The Director Division of Water Resources may take enforcement action for SSOs that are required to be reported to Division unless it is demonstrated that: 1) the discharge was cause by sever natural conditions and there were no feasible alternative to the discharge; or 2) the discharge was exceptional, unintentional, temporary and caused by factors beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee and/or owner, and the discharge could not have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable control. Part li must be completed to provide a justification claim for either of the above situations. This information will be the basis WHETHER OR NOT PART III IS COMPLETED A SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED AT THE END OF THIS FORM CS-SSO Form Page: 1 PART II: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FOR EACH RELATED CAUSE CHECKED IN PART I OF THIS FORM AND INCLUDE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION AS REQUIRED OR DESIRED COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTONS PERTAINING TO THE CAUSE OF THE SSO AS CHECKED IN PART I {In the check boxes below, NA = Not Applicable and NE = Not Evaluated} A HARDCOPY OF THIS FORM SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE DWR REGIONAL OFFICE UNLESS IS Debris in line What type of debris has been found in the line? Debri was a dust cover that we use to keen debris from coming in from the Manhole entry point. The dust cover fell in causing blockage. Suspected cause or source of debris. Under Manhole lid dust cover Are manholes in the area secure and intact? W Yes ❑ No [] NA [] NE When was the area last checked/cleaned? 08/04/2021 Have cleaning and inspections ever been increased at this location due to previous Yes [0 No ❑ NA NE problems with debris? Explain Are appropriate educational materials being developed and distributed to prevent futi [Z Yes ❑ No [] NA [] NE similar occurrences? Comments: The dust cover used in this location were a old faulty cover that have been known to fail. We replaced all dust covers in area to avoid future incident. System Visitation ORC Yes Backup fv7 Yes Name: Kerry Sanford Cert# 992773 Date visited: 08/03/2021 Time visited: 5:02om CS-SSO Form Page: 2 How was the SSO remediated (i.e. Stopped and cleaned up)? Crews flushed for several hours to find issue with blockage. They were unable to remove blockage with flush truck. Aftei several hours of flushing crews decided to do a pump around to another Manhole in order to better view blocka a cause. They pumped the sewer into Mh09035 after Manhole was completely dry they noticed dust cover wedged in line downstream. They were able to remove dust cover with a pick up removal stick. While trying to remove dust cover we al had a crew setting up a_pump to bypass all the untreated wastewater from the creek into Mh08290. After removal we ha( crew clean up spill area with vacuum truck and 5 gallon buckets. We washed down area and reseeded and put straw do% on area around Manhole. After cleanup crew used extended „fetter to flush 3 assets up and 3 assets down to insure spill area is clear. We also removed all old dust covers in area. As a representative for the responsible party, I certify that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Person submitting claim: Kerry Evan Sanford Signature Telephone Number: Date: 08/09/21 08:05 am Title: VL 6� Any addition information desired to be submitted should be sent to the appropriate Division Regional Office within five days of I knowledge of the SSO with reference to the incident number (the incident number is only generated when electronic entry of th form is completed, if used). CS-SSO Form Page: 3 PUBLIC AFFAIRS City Manager CITY OF DURHAM News Media Contact Jtit Lunne, Sr. Public Information & Comms Analyst Water Management Dept. 919.560.4381 ext. 35255 1 919.397.6131 (mobile) Joe.Lunne@DurhamNC.gov News Release For Immediate Release, August 4, 2021 City of Durham contains sewer spill near 3311 Shannon Road DURHAM, N.C. — The City of Durham Department of Water Management reports that on August 3, 2021 staff responded to a sewer overflow near 3311 Shannon Road. Approximately 2,400 gallons of untreated wastewater flowed into the New Hope Creek Watershed. The spill was caused by the manhole insert falling into the sewer and blocking flow. Staff were notified of the overflow at 5:02 p.m. on August 3, 2021 and the blockage was cleared at 1:00 am on August 4. Crews removed the object, dammed the creek downstream, flushed the creek, pumped the untreated wastewater back into the sanitary sewer system, and remediated the spill site. There were no observed hazards to persons or property. The N.C. Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources was notified of the event on August 4, 1021, as required by state regulations/law. For more information, contact Junior Mobley, Superintendent of Water & :wer Maintenance. 101 City Hall Plaza, Second Floor, Durham, NC 27701 919.560.4123 DurhamNC.gov Follow Us @CityofDurhamNC O©1-�0 State of North Carolina DWR Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Collection System Sanitary Sewer Overflow Reporting Form Division of Water Resources Form CS-SSO ART I: This form shall be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office within five business days of the first knowledge of the sanitary sewer overflow (SSO). Permit Number: WQCS00005 (WQCS# if active, otherwise use WQCSD#) Facility: Durham Collection System Incident #: 202101692 Owner: City of Durham City: Durham County: Durham Region: Raleigh Source of SSO (check applicable): Z Sanitary Sewer ❑ Pump Station / Lift Station SPECIFIC location of the SSO (be consistent in description from past reports or documentation - i.e. Pump Station 6, Manhole at Westall & Bragg Street, etc): 3311 Shannon Road Manhole #: 09023 Latitude (Decimal Degrees): Longitude (Decimal Degrees): Incident Started Dt: 08/03/2021 Time: 5:02 pm Incident End Dt: 08/04/2021 Time: 01:02 am (mm-dd-yyyy) (hh:mm AM/PM) (mm-dd-yyyy) (hh:mm AM/PM) Estimated Volume of the SSO: 2,400 gallons Estimated Duration (Round to nearest hour): 8:0 hours Describe how the volume was determined: 480mins x 5gpm Weather conditions during the SSO event: WET Did SSO reach surface waters? 21 Yes ❑ No []Unknown Volume reaching surface waters (gals): 2400 Surface water name: New Hope Creek Did the SSO result in a fish kill? ❑ Yes QNo ❑ Unknown If Yes, what is the estimated number of fish killed? 0 SPECIFIC cause(s) of the SSO: 0 Debris in line 24 hour verbal notification (name of person contacted ): Lauren Smith ❑ DWR Z Emergency Mgmt Date (mm-dd-yyy): 08/04/2021 Time (hh:mm AM/PM): 05:03:00 am If an SSO is ongoing, please notify the appropriate Regional Office on a daily basis until SSO can be stopped. Per G.S. 143-215.1 C(b), the responsible party of a discharge of 1,000 or more of untreated wastewater to surface waters shall issue a press release within 24-hours of first knowledge to all print and electronic news media providing general coverage in the county where the discharge occurred. When 15,000 gallons or more of untreated wastewater enters surface waters, a public notice shall be published within 10 days and proof of publication shall be provided to the Division within 30 days. Refer to the reference statute for further detail. The Director Division of Water Resources may take enforcement action for SSOs that are required to be reported to Division unless it is demonstrated that: 1) the discharge was cause by sever natural conditions and there were no feasible alternative to the discharge; or 2) the discharge was exceptional, unintentional, temporary and caused by factors beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee and/or owner, and the discharge could not have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable control. Part II must be completed to provide a justification claim for either of the above situations. This information will be the basis WHETHER OR NOT PART III IS COMPLETED A SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED AT THE END OF THIS FORM CS-SSO Form Page: 1 PART II: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FOR EACH RELATED CAUSE CHECKED IN PART I OF THIS FORM AND INCLUDE THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION AS REQUIRED OR DESIRED COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTONS PERTAINING TO THE CAUSE OF THE SSO AS CHECKED IN PART I (in the check boxes below, NA = Not Applicable and NE = Not Evaluated) A HARDCOPY OF THIS FORM SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE DWR REGIONAL OFFICE UNLESS IS Debris in line What type of debris has been found in the line? Debri was a dust cover that we use to keen debris from coming in from the Manhole entry point. The dust cover fell in causing blockage. Suspected cause or source of debris. Under Manhole lid dust cover Are manholes in the area secure and intact? Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE When was the area last checked/cleaned? 08/04/2021 Have cleaning and inspections ever been increased at this location due to previous ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE problems with debris? Explain: Are appropriate educational materials being developed and distributed to prevent futi [Z Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE similar occurrences? Comments: The dust cover used in this location were a old faulty cover that have been known to fail. We replaced all dust covers in area to avoid future incident. System Visitation ORC ❑ Yes Backup W Yes Name: Kerry Sanford Cert# 992773 Date visited: 08/03/2021 Time visited: 5:02pm CS-SSO Form Page: 2 How was the SSO remediated (i.e. Stopped and cleaned up)? Crews flushed for several hours to find issue with blockacie. They were unable to remove blockage with flush truck. After several hours of Flushing crews decided to do a pump around to another Manhole in order to better view blockade cause. They pumped the sewer into Mh09035 after Manhole was compietely dry they noticed dust cover wedged in line downstream. They were able to remove dust cover with a pick up removal stick. While trying to remove dust cover we al had a crew setting up a oumo to bypass all the untreated wastewater from the creek into Mh08290. After removal we hac crew clean up spill area with vacuum truck and 5gallon buckets. We washed down area and reseeded and put straw dog on area around Manhole. After cleanup crew used extended 'etter to flush 3 assets up and 3 assets down to insures ill area is clear. We also removed all old dust covers in area. As a representative for the responsible party, I certify that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Person submitting claim: Kern Evan Sanford Signature: Telephone Number: Date: 08/09/21 08:05 am Title: tJC 6�y Any addition information desired to be submitted should be sent to the appropriate Division Regional Office within five days of i knowledge of the SSO with reference to the incident number (the incident number is only generated when electronic entry of th form is completed, if used). CS-SSO Form Page: 3 PUBLIC AFFAIRS City Manager CITY OF DURHAM News Media Contact Joe Lunne, Sr. Public Information & Comms Analyst Water Management Dept. 919.560.4381 ext. 35255 1 919.397.6131 (mobile) Joe.Lunne@DurhamNC.gov News Release For Immediate Release: August 4, 2021 City of Durham contains sewer spill near 3311 Shannon Road DURHAM, N.C. —The City of Durham Department of Water Management reports that on August 3, 2021 staff responded to a sewer overflow near 3311 Shannon Road. Approximately 2,400 gallons of untreated wastewater flowed into the New Hope Creek Watershed. The spill was caused by the manhole insert falling into the sewer and blocking flow. Staff were notified of the overflow at 5:02 p.m. on August 3, 2021 and the blockage was cleared at 1:00 am on August 4. Crews removed the object, dammed the creek downstream, flushed the creek, pumped the untreated wastewater back into the sanitary sewer system, and remediated the spill site. There were no observed hazards to persons or property. The N.C. Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources was notified of the event on August 4, -7021, as required by state regulations/law. For more information, contact Junior Mobley, Superintendent of Water & :wer Maintenance. 101 City Hall Plaza, Second Floor, Durham, NC 27701 I it 919.560 4123 DurhamNC.gov follow Us @tityo© rhamNC Ik i NC