HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160402 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20140121FINAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 1 of 5
Hockett Dairy Site
Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID Number 003993 — EEP Site 95013
Randolph County, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030003010070
Submitted to:
r -I*--
-d�li
o stem
E amemcht
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: October 2012
Data Collection Period: October 2013
Submission Date: December 2013
I9- otk5'�
- -- - L,
DES" VA rr �uAimr
weuan � ,Z ;V- iiwmr Branch
C,
Provided by:
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
919 - 829 -9909
�WK
WDICKSON
community Infrastructure consultants
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 - 782 -0495
TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1 1 Project Goals and Objectives
12 Project Background
13 Vegetation Condition
14 Summary Information / Data
2 0 METHODOLOGY
3 0 REFERENCES
APPENDICES
1
. 1
1
2
2
2
4
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1
Project Restoration Components
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts
Table 4
Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual
Assessment Data
Figure 2
Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
e -Table
Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table
Photos
Vegetation Plot Photos
e- Photos
Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6
Vegetation Plot Success by Project Asset Type
Table 7
CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
e- Tables
Raw CVS vegetation data sheets
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
0
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The Hockett Daffy Buffer Mitigation Project is located in the 03030003 Catalog Unit (CU), in the Cape
Fear River Basin Assets of this CU include the Deep River, the Randleman Reservoir, and mayor
communities including High Point, Asheboro, Siler City, and Sanford Restoration goals for CU
03030003 as identified in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin RBRP include protection of several species of
mussel and the Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Additional goals include the improvement in
water quality to waters draining to Randleman Reservoir
The Hockett Dairy Buffer Mitigation Project was identified as an opportunity to improve water quality
and habitat within the CU The project goals address stressors identified in the CU The following table
lists the project goals and the project objectives through which the goals will be addressed
Goals Objectives
1 Nutnent removal • Restore minimum 50 -foot riparian buffer by planting
2 Sediment removal appropriate bottomland hardwood species to filter runoff
3 Runoff filtration • Convert active farm fields to forested buffers
4 Increase dissolved oxygen • Plant buffer vegetation to shade channel
concentration • Restore riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland
5 Restore riparian habitats hardwood ecosystem
6. Reduce water temperature • Restore canopy tree species in the stream buffer areas to
shade channel
• Eliminate and control exotic invasive species
• Replace two undersized and falling channel crossings with
appropriately sized culverts or ford
• Stabilize two small dams on small farm ponds
1.2 Project Background
The Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site is located on Hockett Dairy Road (SR 1938) in
Randolph County approximately 12 miles north of Asheboro, NC (Figure 1) The site is located in the
Cape Fear River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03030003010070 (NCDWQ sub -basin 03- 06 -08) The site
has five unnamed tributaries (UT) that drain into Randleman Lake The project consists of 11 82 acres of
buffer restoration
The Hockett Dairy Buffer site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and in the Carolina Slate
Belt The region is underlain by felsic metavolcanic rocks, which can be seen in the streambed of UT 2
and UT 3 The topography of the project area is generally rolling with elevations ranging from 670 to 760
feet The five unnamed tributaries to Randleman Lake comprise the principle drainage features These
tributaries have limited hardwood trees present within the buffer and lack significant ground cover The
mature trees are less than 100 stems per acres The project's watershed is primarily used for agricultural
production Much of the surrounding land use is currently dairy cows and calves or row crop production
for dairy silage Cattle have direct access to streams channels and ponds and are a source of ongoing
erosion along the banks and within the adjacent buffer Cattle are excluded from some channels with
fencing on or near the top of bank, resulting in a degraded riparian buffer The project area has been in
agricultural use for several decades
The Hockett Daffy mitigation project provides high quality riparian buffer restoration Stream buffer
mitigation for the Hockett Dairy Site involved buffering five streams that flow directly and indirectly into
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
r-
Randleman Lake The mitigation design divides the site into five distinct reaches Buffer restoration was
performed along five channels Two undersized and failing channel crossings were replaced with
appropriately sized culverts to prevent erosion Two small dams on small farm ponds have been
stabilized
1.3 Vegetation Condition
The measure of vegetative success for the site is the survival of at least 320 five -year old planted trees per
acre at the end of year five of the monitoring period Year I monitoring recorded an average of 597 stems
per acre across all vegetation plots Plots 2 and 7 each had less than 300 stems per acre All other plots
achieved the success criteria in Year I Vegetation issues included invasive species along much of UT 4
and vegetation trampled by cattle near Plot 2 on UT 2 The cattle gained access to the easement when a
tree fell onto the fence near Plot 2 This fence has been repaired, and the plot may need to be replanted
No volunteer stems were observed during Year 1 monitoring activities. CVS Level 2 will be performed
in monitoring Year 2 to document any volunteer generation Overall, vegetation across the site is in good
condition The Current Condition Plan View is provided in Appendix B, Figure 2
1.4 Summary Information / Data
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on ESP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
2.0 METHODOLOGY
In order to determine if the success criteria are achieved and the planted areas are developing toward the
target community, NCEEP -CVS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 will be utilized The
vegetation monitoring will include Level I and Level II plots distributed across the planted area An
interim vegetation monitoring will occur in spring after leaf -out has occurred The CVS monitoring will
be conducted toward the end of the growing season Individual plot data will be provided to NCEEP and
CVS following NCEEP -CVS guidance The annual monitoring requirements are summarized in the
following table
Re re
IN eter
Qaantii ,
12 Plots
re 1 L n ,
otes
will be monitored using the
X
Vegetation
Located randomly
Annual
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocols
Carolina
across the project area
Exotic and
Exotic vegetation will be evaluated and spot
X
is
nuisance
N/A
Semi- Annual
treatment applied as needed
vegetation
Locations of fence damage, vegetation
X
N/A
Semi - annual
damage, boundary encroachments, etc will be
boundary
mapped
Photographs will be used to visually document restoration success Reference photos will be taken once a
year and will be used to visually document restoration success Reference photo stations are marked with
wooden stakes Reference stations will be photographed immediately following planting and continued
annually for at least five years following construction Photographers will make every effort to maintain
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
the same area in each photo over time Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate vegetation
establishment A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation
Hockett Dairy Site — Ripanan Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
3
Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013
r,
(D
I-)
C\
CJ
3.0 REFERENCES
Lmdenmayer, D B , and J F Franklin (2002), Conserving forest biodiversity A comprehensive
multiscaled approach Island Press, Washington, DC
N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2004
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration Available online at http / /portal ncdenr org/web /eep /process-
and- protocol
N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2005 `Basmwide Planning Program
October 2005 Cape Fear River Basmwide Water Quality Plan " October 2005 Available online at
http / /portal ncdenr.org/web /wq /ps [Accessed 01 February 2012]
N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2012
Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports Available online at
http //portal ncdenr org/web /eep /fd- forms- templates
N C Division of Water Quality 2010 Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and their Origins, Version 4 11 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality Raleigh, NC
Peet, R K , Wentworth, T S , and White, P S (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure Castanea 63 262 -274
Radford, A E, H E Ahles and F R Bell 1968 Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Schafale, M P and Weakley, A S (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
United States Geological Survey 1982 7 5 Minute Topographic Map, Pleasant Garden, NC
Young, T F and Sanzone, S (editors) (2002), A frameworkfor assessing and reporting on ecological
condition Ecological Reporting Panel, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee EPA Science
Advisory Board Washington, DC
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID 4003993 -EEP Site 95013
4
Monitoring Report Year I of 5
December 2013
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -1
Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013
A
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site °
of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Therefore cz
access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees /contractors involved in the development, monitoring,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the 11 old p,
terms and timeframes of their defined, pre- approved roles. Any
intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these
previously sanctioned activities /roles requires prior coordination
with EEP.
NC -62
�I� x
a'
_a
- -- - - - - - - - — 5
6ullford
c° 'rb66
Coltran es 4a
Mill =
o
K
D
Hedgh1
ock Rd
a
a
0
•
Hockett Dalry Rd
P
ny
Po
�?6 �ybor 1_6 1�
�a
Randleman S`9
Lake
Legend
Hockett Dairy Site
6
o�
Nogan Rd
n
0
R v Davis MITI Rd
°OS'ler Ln O
Cedar Ridge Rd
Guilford County
s �andol
f
Colonial Loop ryocK °tt Rd Oe
P
6
!220'
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet
x
0
Labrador Ot Clodlelter Td
e3
0
Hockett Dairy Site
Lava
Cross
.:����'•�ti�:�rRiri���h ?I�
rY
EVAstem
ancht
PROGRAM
0
N
o`
y°
h
62
3
YC.
6
n
0
R v Davis MITI Rd
°OS'ler Ln O
Cedar Ridge Rd
Guilford County
s �andol
f
Colonial Loop ryocK °tt Rd Oe
P
6
!220'
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet
x
0
Labrador Ot Clodlelter Td
e3
0
Hockett Dairy Site
Lava
Cross
.:����'•�ti�:�rRiri���h ?I�
rY
EVAstem
ancht
PROGRAM
Made 1. Project Components and Nhti9 o Credits
Bock I Dairy, Randolph Coanty
FOP Project ID Nnmher 003993 IF.B' Site 95013
Mtigation Credits
Activity or Report
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non - npanan
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
N/A
I N/A
N/A
October2012
�N/A
N/A
Restoration
N/A
N/A
Totals*
N/A
N/A
N/A
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring - baseline
February 2013
March 2013
1182 Ac
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Reach ID
Stationuig/
location
F.wstuig
Footage (LF)
Approach
(PI, I'll, etc)
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Area (acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Reach UT2
N/A
733
N/A
Buffer Restoration
172
1 1
Reach UT3
N/A
817
N/A
Buffer Restoration
185
11
Reach UT4
N/A
1884
N/A
Buffer Restoration
462
11
Reach UT5
N/A
466
N/A
Buffer Restoration
089
11
Reach UT6
N/A
797
N/A
Buffer Restoration
184
11
Pond 2
N/A
378*
N/A
Buffer Restoration
052
11
Pond
N/A
338*
N/A
Buffer Restoration
038
11
Total
1182
Component Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream
hnear feet
Riparian Wetland
Non - Ripanan Wetland
acres
Buffer
acres
Upland
acres
Rivenne
Non- Rivenne
Restoration
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1182
N/A
*perimeter
Made 2. Project Activity and Reporting 13fistory
Aockett Dairy, Randolph County
)lam Project ID Nmnber 003993 MP Site 95013
Elapsed tune since planting complete 8 months
Number of reportirig years 1
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
January 2012
May 2012
Final Design - Constriction Plans
N/A
May 2012
Construction
N/A
October2012
Temporary S &Emixapplied to project area
N/A
June 2012
Permanent seed mixapphed to project area
N/A
June 2012
Containerized and B &B plantnigs planted in project area
N/A
February 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring - baseline
February 2013
March 2013
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2013
October 2013
Year 2 Monitoring
Fall 2014*
Fall 2014*
Year 3 Monitoring
Fall 2015*
Fall 2015*
Year 4 Monitoring
Fall 2016*
Fall 2016*
Year 5 Monitoring
Fall 2017*
Fall 2017*
*scheduled
Hockett Dairy Site — Ripanan Buffer Restoration
EEP Project M #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -3
Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013
Table 3. Project Contact TaHe
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
ITT Project ID Number 003993 FFP Site 95013
Designer WK Dickson & Co , Inc
Primary project design POC
Daniel Ingram - 919 782 -0495
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks
Construction contractor POC
Kory Strader - 33 362 -0289
Planting Contractor
Strader Fencing
Plantirip, contractor POC
Kenneth Strader - 336 697 -7005
Seeding Contractor
Strader Fencing
Planting contractor POC
Kenneth Strader - 336 697 -7005
Seed Mix Sources
Evergreen Seed, Inc
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbo Gen
Monitoring Performers
WK Dickson & Co, Inc
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Daniel Ingram - 919 782-0495
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Momtonng Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project M #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
A -4
a
Table 4. Project Baseline h�foruration andAttribates
Aockett Dairy, uanam County
1(•� Project ID Number 003993 FFP Site 95013
Project Information
Project Name
Hockett Diary Buffer Mitigation Ste
County
Randolph
Project Area acres
1299
Project Coordinates (latitude and lon etude
35° 53'55.219" N, 79° 49' 37 381 "W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sio ra hic Province
Piedmont Ph sio ra hic Province
River Basin
Ca a Fear River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03030003
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03030003010070
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -06-08
Reach UT2 19 4 acres
Reach UT3 312 acres
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Reach UT4 76 3 acres
Reach UT5 91 acres
Reach UT6 34 4 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
06%
Impervious Area
25
Residential
1443
Cropland and Pasture
CGIA Land Use Classification
126
Other Agricultural Land
191
Passively Managed Forest Stands
I
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
A -5
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitonng Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
A -6
db
Tale 4 (eons} Project Baseline Information and Attrihates
Hockett Dairy, Randolph I'�Y
U Protect ID Nnmher 003993 EEP Site 95013
Parameters
Reach UT2
Reach U13
Reach UN
Reach U70
Reach LTf6
Length of reach (lmear feet)
733
817
1884
466
797
Valley Classification
X
X
X
X
X
Drainage area acres
194
312
763
91
344
NCDWQ stream identification
29
275
19-255
21
13
score
NCDWQ Water Quality
WS -IV,CA
WS -N,CA
WS -N,CA
WS -IV,CA
WS -N,CA
Classification
Morphological Description
E
E
G
G
G
stream e
Evolutionary trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Mecklenburg CL
Wynott-Freon
Mecklenburg CL
McC2, Wynott-
Mecklenburg CL
Wynott -Freon
Underlying mapped soils
complexWvC2
McC2,
Enon complex
McC2
complexWvC2
W vC2
Drainage class
well
well
well
well
well
Sod Hydnc status
Non -hydnc
Non -hydnc
Non -hydnc
Non - hydnc
Non -hydnc
Slope (ft /ft)
00004
003%
002%
004%
002%
FEMA classification
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Native vegetation community
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
I Pasture
Percent composition of exotic
01
100/0
15%
5%
20%
mvaswevegetation
—L
Re ulato Considerations
Supporting
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) /Coastal
No
N/A
N/A
Area Management Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplam Compliance
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitonng Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
A -6
db
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
B -1
RP
-ono- --
1
1
' 1
=Mal r.
fig ff
y
r. .. � � �{ Labrador•DI '�
• 73 , � .
Legend i
Hockett Dairy Buffer Site
S
Figure 2a. Current Condition Plan View r-11�3
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
V t Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 200 400 800 F�cosstem
Feet II Il elllCllt
1 inch = 400 feet Date: October 2013 °`.....
a
F
I
❑
Figure 2b. Current Condition Plan View
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 200 400 800
Feet
1 inch = 400 feet
rY
E�comfem
,11� im
Date: October 2013 YROGR M
Tale 5. egetation Condition Assessment
Hockett Dairy, Randolph Comity
EEP No et ID 00399_3 )N3iP Site 9_5_0_1
Planted Acreage: 12.99
of
'ng • • V Number of Canil>,ned Planted
Vi etahan ! _ iDefinttions Threshold lae 'coon P_ ons Acme a Ac� e
Very limited cover of both woody
1 Bare Areas
and herbaceous material.
01 acres
N/A
0
000
00/0
Woody stem densities clearly
vertical
below target levels based on MY3,
yellow line
2 Low Stem Density Areas
14, or 5 stem count cntena
0 1 acres
fill
2
395
1 30%
Total:0
IFTNE
NFRO %
Areas with woody sterns of sae
3 Areas of Poor Growth
that are obviously small given the
1
Rates or Vigor
monitonn ear
0 25 acres
N/A
1 0
000
00/0
Cumulati-e
Total:
E2
3_9_5
3_0 /_0
Easement Acreage:
12.99
IN Mapping CCPV umber of Combrted
Defitions Threshold — 'ction P _ ons Acres_ a
horizontal
4 Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to
yellow line
Concern
render as polygons at map scale )
1000 SF
fill
2
772
59%
5 Easement Encroachment
Areas or points (if too small to
I
Areas
render as polygons at map scale )
none
N/A
0
0
0%
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
B -5
Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5
December 2013
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
B -6
�-I
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report Year I of 5
EEP Project M #003993 -EEP Site 95013 December 2013
C -1
db
Stem Class
'Buffer Sterns
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
E P Project ID Number 003993 QEP Site 95013
Plot #
Riparian Buffer
Stems,
(per acre)
Success
Criteria b1et'
1
890
Yes
2
162
No
3
647
Yes
4
809
Yes
5
688
Yes
6
526
Yes
7
283
No
8
526
Yes
9
526
Yes
10
769
Yes
11
607
Yes
12
728
Yes
Project Arg
597_
Yes
characteristics
Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -2
Monitoring Report: Year I of 5
December 2013
a
Table 7. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with /without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Color Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% ®Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% = Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% -Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Hockett Dairy Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
December 2013
Current Plot Data (MY3 2013)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
00399301- 0001
003993 -01- 0002
003993 -01- 0003
003993 -01- 0004
003993 -01- 0005
003993 -01- 0006
003993 -01 -0007
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Betulanigra
river birch
Tree
7
7
7
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cercis conadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Plotanus occidentolis
American sycamore
Tree 1
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
91
9
9
3
11
11
11
12
12
12
5
5
S.
8
8
8
2
2
2
Quercus falcoto
southern red oak
Tree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
Tree
2
2
2
9
9
9
4
4
4
15
15
15
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
15
15
2
2
2
Quercus rubro
northern red oak
Tree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
22
22
22
4
4
4
16
16
16
20
20
20
17
17
17
13
13
13
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
4
4
4
3 3
3
5
5
5
4 4
4
4 4
4
4 4
4
5 5
5
4 4
890.3
890.3
161.9
161.9
526.1
647.5
647.5
809.4
809.4
6881
688
526.11596
1
283.3
283.3
Color Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% ®Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% = Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% -Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Hockett Dairy Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
December 2013
Current Plot Data (MY1 2013)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
003993 -01- 0008
00399301- 0009
00399301- 0010
003993 -01- 0011
00399301 -0012
MY3 (2013)
MYO (2013)
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Betulanigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
27
27
27
58
58
5
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Froxinus pen nsylvo n III
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
4
4
4
2
2
2
30
30
30
28
28
28
Platanus occidentalis
Americansycamore
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
20
20
20
45
45
45
Quercus
oak
Tree
1 3
3
3
11
11
11
8
8
8
3
3
3
61
61
61
133
133
133
Quercusfalcato
southern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
15
15
15
Quercus nigro
wateroak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
15
15
15
Quercus rubro
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
13
13
13
13
13
13
19
19
19
15
15
15
18
18
18
177
177
177
264
264
264
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.30
0.30
4 4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
7 7
7
10 10
10
4 4
4
526.1
526.1
526.1
526.1
768.9
768.9
6071
607
728.4
728.4
S96.91
596.9
89D.31
890.3
Color Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% ®Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% = Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% -Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Hockett Dairy Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 1 of 5
December 2013