HomeMy WebLinkAbout20111108 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20140121!I nn
YEAR 2 (2013)
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
SLIVER MOON NON - RIPARIAN WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP PROJECT ID: 95017
PREPARED FOR:
rY
L�OOsptem
�'�lll�lt �'lllt'llf
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
I� PREPARED BY:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
_QTY
>tradt
W ds +i n
December 2013
RECEIVED
DEC 1 0 ?013
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC has established the Sliver Moon Non - Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Site (Site) that is designed specifically to assist in fulfilling North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program wetland restoration goals The Site is located approximately 4 miles east
of Dover, North Carolina in the western portion of Craven County (Figure 1) and positioned
within the Core Creek Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03020202080010 of the Neuse River
Basin (8 -digit HUC 03020202) Core Creek has been assigned a Best Usage Classification of C;
NSW, Sw and is considered biologically impaired This report serves as the Year 2 (2013)
annual monitoring report
The 17 1 -acre project encompasses 14 acres of non - riparian wetland restoration, for a total for 14
non - npanan wetland mitigation units (WMUs) The restoration plan consisted of filling and
plugging perimeter and interior ditches followed by planting the Site with native hardwood
understory and canopy species
The project goals aim to address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following
• Remove non -point sources of pollution associated with vegetation maintenance including
a the cessation of broadcasting fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural chemicals
into and adjacent to Site drainage ditches and
b providing a vegetated wetland to aid in the treatment of runoff
• Restore wetland hydropenods that satisfy wetland Jurisdictional requirements and
approximate the Site's natural range and variation
• Promote floodwater attenuation by filling ditches and enhancing groundwater storage
capacity
• Restore and reestablish natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity
• Enhance and protect the Site's full potential of wetland functions and values in perpetuity
In order to avert hydrologic trespassing issues with the property immediately to the west, a
meandering shallow swale was constructed through the Site The swale ultimately connects into
the remaining southeastern ditch (Figure 2, Appendix B) Found during construction activities,
the 6 -inch corrugated pipe drained surface water originating from subsurface springs located
within the adjacent western property Elevations were taken of the pipe and throughout the Site
to determine the path of least resistance This approach was taken for two reasons 1) to
minimize the possible draw down from the swale and 2) to maintain and enhance the Site's
existing micro - topography, minimizing the amount of cut soil Filling the western boundary
ditch without allowing the surface hydrology to naturally flow through the Site would have
undoubtedly inundated the neighbor's road and surrounding land Ultimately, the additional
surface hydrology is a bonus to the Site and will help further the success of the wetland
restoration
Fourteen vegetation plots (10- meters by 10- meters in size) were established and permanently
monumented These plots were surveyed in July 2013 for the Year 2 (2013) monitoring season
following guidelines established in CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
(Lee et al 2008) Vegetation sampling across the Site was above the required average density
with 546 planted stems per acre surviving In addition, each individual plot was above success
criteria with the exception of Plot 5, however, when including natural recruits of red maple (Acer
rubrum) the plot was well -above success criteria
Agricultural encroachment in the southern margins of the Site occurred in the spring of 2012,
after site planting had occurred Carolina Silvics replanted the encroached area in the winter of
2012/2013 with approximately 40 -3 gallon containerized sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia
virginiana), 200 bare -root black gums (Nyssa sylvatica var sylvatica), 700 bare -root swamp
chestnut oaks (Quercus michauxii), 200 bare -root water oaks (Quercus nigra), and 200 bare -root
willow oaks (Quercus phellos) Planted trees are doing well Additionally, the southern
boundary was marked more visibly to alleviate further encroachment into the Site
Nine groundwater monitoring gauges were installed at the Site with an additional groundwater
gauge installed in a reference wetland located immediately adjacent to the western boundary of
the Site All nine monitored gauges were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of the surface for
greater than 7 5 percent of the year 2 (2013) growing season (21 days), which extends from
February 7 to November 14 (281 days)
Site vegetation and wetland hydrology met success criteria for Year 2 (2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
i
1 0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1
1 1 Location and Setting
1
1 2 Project Objectives
1
1 3 Approach
Error! Bookmark not defined.
14 Monitoring Plan View
2
2 0 ANNUAL MONITORING
2
21 Vegetation
2
2 1 1 Vegetation Success Criteria
2
2 1 2 Vegetation Monitoring Results
2
22 Hydrology
3
22 1 Hydrology Success Criteria
3
222 Hydrology Monitoring Results
4
30 CONCLUSIONS
5
40 REFERENCES
6
FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Appendix A
Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View Appendix B
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A GENERAL TABLES AND FIGURES
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2
Current Condition Plan View
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION DATA
Table 6
2013 (Year 2) Planted and Total Stems /Acre
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Vegetation Plot Photographs
APPENDIX D
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 9
Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
2013 Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page i
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
Located approximately 4 miles east of Dover, North Carolina in western Craven County, the Site
is situated within the Carolina Flatwoods section of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
physiographic province of North Carolina, United States Geological Survey (USGS) HUC
03020202 (NC Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasin Number 03- 04 -08) of the Neuse
River Basin The Site is situated within an mterstream flat north of Core Creek, NCDWQ Stream
Index Number 27 -90
Directions to the Site (Figure 1, Appendix A) from the City of Kinston
➢ Travel southeast on US 70 Bypass for 7 2 miles
➢ Turn left at SR 1005 /Dover Road
➢ Continue on Old US Highway 70 for 0 3 mile
➢ Continue onto West Komegay Street for 1 3 Miles
➢ Continue onto Old US Highway 70 for 3 7 miles
➢ Turn left at Daisy Land
➢ Point in center of Site Latitude 35 205882 °N, Longitude -77 361332 °W
1.2 Project Objectives
Project goals include the following
• Improving Water Quality
• Removing non -point sources of pollution associated with agricultural activities,
including a) eliminating the application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other
agricultural materials into ditches that flow to adjacent streams and wetlands and b)
providing a vegetated wetland to aid in the treatment of pollutants such as sediment
and/or agricultural pollutants from the adjacent landscape
• Reducing sedimentation onsite and in adjacent ditches by a) reducing ditch erosion
associated with tillage and b) planting a diverse woody vegetative to reduce runoff
• Enhancing Flood Attenuation
o Promoting floodwater attenuation by a) removing ditches to reduce the amount of
runoff that occurs during high precipitation, b) restoring wetland hydropenods that
satisfy wetland jurisdictional requirements and approximate the Site's natural range
of variation, c) restoring non - riparian wetlands, resulting in increased storage
capacity during precipitation events within the Site, d) revegetating the Site to
reduce sheet flow off the Site
• Restoring Non - riparian Habitat
o Restore and reestablish natural community structure, habitat diversity, and
functional continuity
• Enhance and protect the Site's full potential of wetland functions and values in perpetuity
Project objectives include the following
• Providing 14 non - riparian WMUs, as calculated in accordance with the requirements
stipulated in RFP #16- 003571 This will be accomplished by restoring 14 acres of non-
riparian wetland by eliminating row crop production, filling agricultural ditches, restoring
historic water table elevations, redirecting ditches located near the Site to avoid possible
draw -down, and planting the Site with native non - npanan forest vegetation
• Protecting the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 1
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
1.3 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring features (vegetation plots and groundwater gauges) are depicted in Figure 2 (Appendix
B) Tables 1 through 3 summarize project components and mitigation credits, project activities
and reporting history, and project contacts, respectively (Appendix A)
2.0 ANNUAL MONITORING
Monitoring of restoration efforts will be performed for a minimum of 7 years or until success
criteria are fulfilled The detailed monitoring plan is depicted in Figure 2 (Appendix B)
2.1 Vegetation
Monitoring of planted vegetation will follow guidelines outlined in the Carolina Vegetation
Survey (CVS) EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (Lee et al 2008) and will be
conducted annually between June 1 and September 30 until vegetation success criteria are
achieved Fourteen, 10 -meter by 10 -meter vegetation plots have been placed within restored
wetlands (Figure 2, Appendix B) Vegetation will receive a visual evaluation on a periodic basis
to ascertain the degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species
Agricultural encroachment in the southern margins of the Site occurred in the spring of 2012, after
site planting had occurred Carolina Silvics replanted the encroached area in the winter of
2012/2013 with approximately 40 -3 gallon containerized sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia
virginiana), 200 bare -root black gums (Nyssa sylvatica var sylvatica), 700 bare -root swamp
chestnut oaks (Quercus michauxii), 200 bare -root water oaks (Quercus nigra), and 200 bare -root
willow oaks (Quercus phellos) Planted trees are doing well Additionally, the southern boundary
was marked more visibly to alleviate further encroachment into the Site
2.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria
Success criteria are dependent upon the density and growth of living, planted stems throughout the
planted areas of the Site, all of which is characterized as Non- riverme Wet Hardwood Flat
(Schafale and Weakley 1990) The presence of desirable volunteer species will be considered by
the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Interagency Review Team (IRT) in
making a determination whether the Site has successfully met the stated goals and objectives An
average density of 320 stems per acre of living, planted stems must be surviving in the first three
monitoring years Subsequently, 260 living, planted stems - per -acre must be surviving in Year 5
and 210 living, planted stems - per -acre in Year 7
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring Results
Fourteen vegetation plots (10 -meter by 10 -meter in size) were established and permanently
monumented These plots were surveyed in July 2013 for the Year 2 (2013) monitoring period
Vegetation sampled across the Site exceeded the required average density with 546 planted stems -
per -acre surviving In addition, each individual plot exceeded success criteria based on planted
stems alone with the exception of Plot 5, however, when including naturally recruited red maple
(Acer rubrum) this plot was well -above success criteria
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 2
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Planted Stems /Acre Counting Towards Success Criteria
Year 1 2012
Year 2 (2013 )_
Year 3 2014
Year 4 (2015 )
Year 5 2016)
1
688
607
2
648
648
®�
3
486
364
®-
4
567
526
_-
5
324
162
6
567
486
7
607
688
8
405
364
9
486
445
10
607
607
11
567
567
648
13
769
769
14
648
688
Average of All
Plots (1 -14)
572
546
2.2 Hydrology
Measurements of wetland hydrology were performed in accordance with traditional methods as
per the April 2003 USACE Wilmington District Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE et al
2003) Nine continuously recording, groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within the 14
acres of restoration in accordance with specifications in Installing Monitoring Wells /Piezometers
in Wetlands (NCWRP 1993), in addition, one reference gauge was installed adjacent to the Site
and monitored Year 2 (2013) groundwater data are presented by gauge in Appendix D
2.2.1 Hydrology Success Criteria
Based on the Site's location and hydrology source, target hydrological characteristics include
saturation or inundation for 7 5 percent of the growing season at a minimum of 12 inches below
ground level during average rainfall conditions for a period of seven years During growing
seasons with atypical climatic conditions, groundwater gauges in reference wetlands may be used
by the USACE /IRT to evaluate hydrology success
The growing season will primarily be determined by the Unite States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Soil Survey of Craven County, North Carolina (USDA 1989) (March 18- November 14
[242 days]) In abnormally seasonable years the growing season may be based on USACE
Regional Supplement (USACE 2010), which states the following
The growing season has begun on a site in a given year when two or more
different non - evergreen vascular plant species growing in the wetland or
surrounding areas exhibit one or more of the following indicators of
biological activity
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 3
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
a Emergence of herbaceous plants from the ground
b Appearance of new growth from vegetative crowns (e g, in
graminoids, bulbs, and corms)
c Coleoptile /cotyledon emergence from seed
d Bud burst on woody plants (i e , some green foliage is visible
between spreading bud scales)
Emergence or elongation of leaves of woody plants
Emergence or opening of flowers
The end of the growing season is indicated when woody deciduous species
lose their leaves and/or the last herbaceous plants cease flowering and their
leaves become dry or brown, generally in the fall due to cold temperatures
or reduced moisture availability Early plant senescence due to the
initiation of the summer dry season in some areas does not necessarily
indicate the end of the growing season and alternative procedures (e g , soil
temperature) should be used
Summary of Hydrology Success Criteria by Year
2.2.2 Hydrology Monitoring Results
All nine monitored gauges within restoration areas were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of
the surface for greater than 7 5 percent of the monitoring period used for 2013 (Year 2) (21 days),
which extends from February 7 to November 14 (281 days)
No hydrology problem areas were identified within the Site during Year 2 (2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 4
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Soil Temperatures/Date Bud Burst
Monitoring Period Used for
7.5 Percent of
Year
Documented
Determining Success
Monitoring Period
2012 (Year 1)
__
March 18- November 14
18 days
(242 days)
Bud burst on red maple (Ater rubrum)
and elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
February 7- November 14
2013 (Year 2)
and soil temperature of 48 °F
(281 days)
21 days
documented on February 7, 2013
2014 (Year 3)
2015 (Year 4)
2016 (Year 5)
2.2.2 Hydrology Monitoring Results
All nine monitored gauges within restoration areas were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of
the surface for greater than 7 5 percent of the monitoring period used for 2013 (Year 2) (21 days),
which extends from February 7 to November 14 (281 days)
No hydrology problem areas were identified within the Site during Year 2 (2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 4
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
: Groundwater gauges were installed at the Site on March 24, six days after the published NRCS growing season start date (March
18) Therefore, Year 1 (2012) hydrology success cntena is proposed to use the USDA published growing season dates in place of
the proposed biological and physical indicators of growing season as described for the Site
"Based on biological and physical indicators for the site, February 7 was determined the start of the growing season for year 2
(2013) monitoring
3.0 CONCLUSIONS
Vegetation sampling across the Site was above the required average density with 546 planted
stems - per -acre surviving In addition, each individual plot was above success criteria with the
exception of Plot 5, however, when including natural recruits of red maple (Ater rubrum) the plot
was well -above success criteria Areas disturbed by agricultural encroachment were planted with
40, 3- gallon containerized trees and 1300 bare -roots trees, which are doing well and successfully
vegetating disturbed areas
All nine monitored gauges within restoration areas were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of
the surface for greater than 7 5 percent of the monitoring period used for 2013 (Year 2) (21 days),
which extends from February 7 to November 14 (281 days)
Site vegetation and wetland hydrology met success criteria for Year 2 (2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 5
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 (2012)*
Year 2 (2013) **
March 18
February 7
Year 3 (2014)
Year 5 (2016)
Year 7 (2018)
Growing Season
Growing
Start
Season Start
1
Yes /25 days
Yes /43 days
(10 3 percent)
(15 3 percent)
2
Yes /117 days
Yes /96 days
(48 3 percent)
(34 2 percent)
3
Yes /117 days
Yes /95 days
(48 3 percent)
(33 8 percent)
4
No/ 13 days
Yes /29 days
(5 4 percent)
(10 3 percent)
5
Yes /76 days
Yes /92 days
(31 4 percent)
(32 7 percent)
6
Yes /24 days
Yes /43 days
(9 9 percent)
(15 3 percent)
7
Yes /40 Days
Yes /93 days
16 5 percent)
33 1 percent)
8
Yes /97 days
Yes /93 days
(40 1 percent)
(33 1 percent)
9
Yes /42 days
Yes /67 days
17 4 percent
23 8 percent)
Ref
Yes /102 days
Yes /91 days
(42 1 percent)
(32 4 percent)
: Groundwater gauges were installed at the Site on March 24, six days after the published NRCS growing season start date (March
18) Therefore, Year 1 (2012) hydrology success cntena is proposed to use the USDA published growing season dates in place of
the proposed biological and physical indicators of growing season as described for the Site
"Based on biological and physical indicators for the site, February 7 was determined the start of the growing season for year 2
(2013) monitoring
3.0 CONCLUSIONS
Vegetation sampling across the Site was above the required average density with 546 planted
stems - per -acre surviving In addition, each individual plot was above success criteria with the
exception of Plot 5, however, when including natural recruits of red maple (Ater rubrum) the plot
was well -above success criteria Areas disturbed by agricultural encroachment were planted with
40, 3- gallon containerized trees and 1300 bare -roots trees, which are doing well and successfully
vegetating disturbed areas
All nine monitored gauges within restoration areas were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of
the surface for greater than 7 5 percent of the monitoring period used for 2013 (Year 2) (21 days),
which extends from February 7 to November 14 (281 days)
Site vegetation and wetland hydrology met success criteria for Year 2 (2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 5
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
4.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T , R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 42 North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh, North Carolina
NC Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) 1993 Installing Monitoring Wells/Piezometers in
Wetlands (WRP Technical Note HY -IA -3 1) Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina
Schafale, M P and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources Raleigh, North Carolina
US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2 0) U S
Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg,
MS ERDC /EL TR -10 -20 154 pp
US Army Corps of Engineers, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC Wildlife Resources
Commission, NC Division of Water Quality (USAGE et al) 2003 Stream Mitigation
Guidelines
US Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1989 Soil Survey of Craven County, North Carolina
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Page 6
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Appendix A.
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
�'j � _ - � ! I • -, 'J "io. - .� ) :. err: -
_
� —
/
Directions from the city of Kinston:
r8
-�� - Head southeast on US -70 b
• YP ass for 7.2 miles
�
r - Turn left at SR 1005 /Dover Road
A
- Continue onto old US Hwy 70 for 0.3 miles
_ _ - Continue onto W Kornegay Street for 1.3 miles
t''�
- Continue onto old US Hwy 70 for 3.7 miles
- -- - Turn left at Daisy Lane
,
4
J Pr ct Area
J
1
_
-
•
Scale: Sliver Moon Non - Riparian Wetland
1 inch = 1 0,000 feet FIGURE 1: Mitigation Site
Axiom Environmental pate. SITE LOCATION MAP RFP # 16-003571 EEP Project ID # 95017
218 Snow Ave Sept 2012 Craven Countv. North Carolina
Raleiah. NC 27603
Imagery
proicc. This figure indicates where the Site is physically USGS Topographical Map
located along with directions to the Site. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 NC FEET
Sliver Moon
AYiom Environmental, Inc.
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Sliver Moon Non- Ripanan Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven County, EEP Project ID 95017
Mitigation
Credits
Completion or Delivery
CE Document
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non-
npanan
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
March - 2012
Baseline Monitoring Document
Aril -2012
August 2012
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2012
Totals
Supplemental Planting/Easement Marking
Winter 2012/2013
Year 2 Monitoring
14
November 2013
Year 3 Monitorin
Project Components
Project
Component
-or- Reach ID
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage /Acreage
Approach
(PI,PII etc)
Restoration —
Restoration
to tio
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
Non - npanan
restoration
NA
1701
NA
Restoration
14
1 1
Comp onent Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian
Wetland (acres)
Non -
riparian
Wetland
acres
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland (acres)
Rivcnno
Non -
Rrvcnnc
Restoration
0
0
0
14
0
0
Enhancement
0
0
0
0
0
Enhancement 1
0
-
-
Enhancement II
0
-
Creation
0
0
0
Preservation
0
0
0
0
0
High Quality
Preservation
0
0
0
0
�
0
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Sliver Moon Non - Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven County, EEP Project ID 95017
Activity or Report
Data Collection Complete
Completion or Delivery
CE Document
NA
October - 2011
Conservation Easement
NA
February - 2012
Mitigation Plan
NA
February - 2012
Construction
NA
March - 2012
Bare Root Planting
NA
March - 2012
Baseline Monitoring Document
Aril -2012
August 2012
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2012
November 2012
Supplemental Planting/Easement Marking
Winter 2012/2013
Year 2 Monitoring
November 2013
November 2013
Year 3 Monitorin
Year 4 Monitorin
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitonng Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Sliver Moon Non - Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven Countv, EEP Proiect ID 95017
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Firm
POC & Address
Restoration Systems, LLC with
Grant Lewis, 919 215 1693
Designer.
preliminary consulting by Axiom
218 Snow Ave
Environmental, Inc
Raleigh, NC 27603
Lloyd Glover, 919 422 3392
Construction Contractor:
Land Mechanics, Inc
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592 -7756
Dwight McKinney 252 482 8491
Planting Contractor.
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Lloyd Glover, 919 422 3392
Seeding Contractor.
Land Mechanics, Inc
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592 -7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers:
ArborGen
1 888 888 7158
Ray Holz, 919 604 9314
Baseline Data Collection
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St
Raleigh, NC 27604
Grant Lewis, 919 215 1693
Vegetation Monitoring:
Axiom Environmental, Inc
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis, 919 215 1693
Wetland Monitoring.
Axiom Environmental, Inc
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Sliver Moon Non- Ripanan Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven County, EEP Protect ID 95017
Protect Information
Project Name
Sliver Moon
County
Craven
Project Area (acres)
1701
Project Coordinates (latitude and
longitude)
35204817,-77360605 (NAD 83/WGS 84)
Protect Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Carolina Flatwoods section of the Middle Atlantic
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020202
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-
digit
03020202080010
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -04 -08
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (acres)
+/- 130
Groundwater Treated by Site (acres)
+/-20
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
< 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cropland and Pasture
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Size of Wetland (acres)
1400
Wetland Type (non - riparian, riparian rivenne or riparian non
rivenne)
Non - riparian
Mapped Soil Series
Torhunta & Pantego
Drainage class
Poorly Drained
Soil Hydnc Status
Class A
Source of Hydrology
Rain Events
Hydrologic Impairment
Ditches
Native vegetation community
Non- Rrverine Wet Harwood Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Endangered Species Act
No
Historic Preservation Act
No
Coastal Zone Management Act [CZMA /Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)]
No
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
Sediment & Erosion Control Plan (S &EC)
Yes
Yes
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
D— by FIGURE
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW KRJ
SLIVER MOON WETLAND RESTORATION SITE Da1e
Nov. 2013 - 2
Craven County, North Carolina Project
11 10 -001 1 1
Table 5: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Sliver Moon Non- Rioarian Wetland Mitivation Site. Craven Countv. EEP Proiect ID 95017
Planted Acreage — 17 01
acres (Entire Easement)
Mapped
CCPV
Number
% of planted
Vegetation Category
Acreage
Symbol
of
Acreage
pol ons
Areas of Concern
No areas of vegetation
concern observed at the Site
NA
NA
NA
0%
during year 2 (2013)
monitoring
Exotic Invasive Species
No invasive species observed
at the Site during year 2
NA
NA
NA
0%
2013 monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION DATA
Table 6. 2013 (Year 2) Planted and Total Stems /Acre
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Table 6 2013 (Year 2) Planted and Total Stems /Acre
Sliver Moon Non - riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
wior ror uensiry
Exceeds regwrements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding Irvestakes
E ceeds requ rem nIs but y less than 10% P all = Planting including Irvestakes
Falls to meet regwrements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
F 11 t e e emen y more than 10% T i clu es natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2013)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Sliver M- RS-0001
Sliver M -RS -0002
Sliver M -RS -0003
Sliver M- RS-0004
1 Sliver M -RS -0005
Sliver M -RS -0006
Sliver M- RS-0007
Sliver M -RS -0008
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoL$
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
6
2
- 19
,22
39
23
24
Bacchans halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
1
5
Betula
birch
Tree
Betula nigra
nver birch
Tree
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
11
Uquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Uriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
1 21
2
2
1
1
-61
1
2
21
2
Morelia
bayberry
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Morelia cenfera
wax myrtle
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Persea
bay
Tree
Persea palustris
swamp bay
tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
21
2
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
7
7
7
3
3
3
Quercus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
j1j31
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Ulmus amencana
American elm
Tree
Stem count
size (area)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
15
21
16
16
19
13
13
41
4
4
43
1Z
12
36
17
17
22
9
9
33
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
0 02
7
7
8
9
9
11
6
6
9
9
9
it
4
4
5
4
4
6
6
6
7
5
5
6
1607
607
849 8
[64 5
647 5
768 9
[364`2
364 2
1214
[526�1i
526 1
1659
1 9
161 9
174
48516
485 6
1457
KM
1 6881
890 3
[36412
364 2
1335
wior ror uensiry
Exceeds regwrements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding Irvestakes
E ceeds requ rem nIs but y less than 10% P all = Planting including Irvestakes
Falls to meet regwrements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
F 11 t e e emen y more than 10% T i clu es natural recruits
Table 6. 2013 (Year 2) Planted and Total Stems /Acre (continued)
Sliver Moon Non - riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Current Plot Data (MY2 2013)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Sliver M -RS -0009
Sliver M -RS -0010 1
Sliver M -RS -0011 1
Sliver M -RS -0012 I
Sliver M -RS -0013
Sliver M -RS -0014
MY2 (2013)
MY1 (2012)
MYO (2012)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoL$
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoL$
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
3
4
8
121
1
6
9
177
6
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
16
31
1
1
28
4
Betula
birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
5
5
5
9
9
9
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
4
3
2
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
3
3
3
6
61
6
26
261
26
28
28
30
27
27
27
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
2
2
21
21
2
2
11
1
1
31
3
3
3
3
3
16
161
21
17
17
17
18
18
18
Morella
bayberry
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
9
91
9
9
9
91
1
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
71
7
1
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
6
6
6
4
4
4
1
1
1
18
18
18
15
15
15
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
11
11
11
20
20
20
Persea
bay
Tree
1
1
1
Persea palustris
swamp bay
tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
10
10
10
9
9
9
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
5
5
5
7
7
7
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
41
4
24
24
24
18
18
18
32
32
32
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
5
5
5
11
111
11
17
17
17
29
29
29
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
16
16
16
20
20
20
28
28
28
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
16
16
16
32
32
32
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
1
1
1
23
23
23
26
26
26
28
28
28
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
17ree
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
11
14
151
151
20
14
14
42
18
181
38
191
191
26
17
17
28
189
189
413
198
198
212
223
223
223
1
1
1
1
1
1
14
14
14
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.35
0.35
0.35
6
6
7
4
4
6
9
9
12
6
6
10
8
8
10
6
6
8
16
1611
16
16
19
9
9
9
445.2
445.2
566.6
607
607
809.4
566.6
566.6
1700
728.4
728.4
1538
768.9
768.9
1052
688
688
1133
546.3
S46.31
572.3
572.3
612.8
644.6
644.6
644.6
Loior Tor Uenslty
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Eneeds requirements, but by less than 10% P -all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Es)l0t*vliieeYY;6g1'* y more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment based on Planted Stems
Sliver Moon Non- Ripanan Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven County, EEP Project ID 95017
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
93%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
No*
6
Yes
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
11
Yes
12
Yes
13
Yes
14
Yes
*This plot didn't meet success criteria based on planted stems alone, however, when including naturally recruited
stems of red maple (Ater rubrum) this plot was well -above success criteria
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Sliver Moon Non- Ripanan Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven County, EEP Project ID 95017
Report Prepared By
Com Fa um
Date Prepared
8/5/2013 16 05
database name
RS- SliverMoon -Wall- 2013 -A -v2 3 1 mdb
database location
\\ AE- SBS\ RedirectedFolders \KJemigan\Deskto
computer name
KEENAN -PC
Me size
56918016
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes live stakes
Pro j, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer
stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for
each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY ----------------------------
Project Code
Sliver M
project Name
Sliver Moon Non-riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Description
14 ac Non-riparian wetland Mitigation Site in the Neuse 01 River Basin
River Basin
Neuse
length(ft)
730
stream-to-edge width ft
1100
area (s m )
56000
Required Plots calculated
13
Sampled Plots
14
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Sliver Moon
2013 (Year 2) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 2013
Plot 5
Plnt 7
Plot 4
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Sliver Moon
2013 (Year 2) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 2013
(continued)
D1-. 7
Plot 10
Dl-. 1 A
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
APPENDIX D
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 9. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
2013 Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Table 9. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Sliver Moon Non - Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site, Craven County, EEP Project ID 95017
* Groundwater gauges were installed at the Site on March 24, six days after the published NRCS growing season start date (March
18) Therefore, Year 1 (2012) hydrology success criteria is proposed to use the USDA published growing season dates in place of
the proposed biological and physical indicators of growing season as described for the Site
* *Based on biological and physical indicators for the site, February 7 was determined the start of the growing season for year 2
(2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 (2012)*
2
2013
March
Growing Season
February 7
Year 3 (2014)
Year 5 (2016)
Year 7 (2018)
Start
Growing
Season Start
1
Yes /25 days
Yes /43 days
(10 3 percent)
(15 3 percent)
2
Yes /117 days
Yes /96 days
(48 3 percent)
(34 2 percent)
3
Yes /117 days
Yes /95 days
�®
(48 3 percent)
(33 8 percent)
4
No/ 13 days
Yes /29 days
I�
(5 4 percent)
(10 3 percent)
5
Yes /76 days
Yes /92 days
(31 4 percent)
(32 7 percent)
6
Yes /24 days
Yes /43 days
(9 9 percent)
(15 3 perce nt)
7
Yes /40 Days
Yes /93 days
16 5 percent)
33 1 percent)
8
Yes /97 days
Yes /93 days
(401 percent)
(331 percent)
9
Yes /42 days
Yes /67 days
17 4 percent
23 8 percent)
Ref
Yes /102 days
Yes /91 days
(42 1 percent)
(32 4 percent)
* Groundwater gauges were installed at the Site on March 24, six days after the published NRCS growing season start date (March
18) Therefore, Year 1 (2012) hydrology success criteria is proposed to use the USDA published growing season dates in place of
the proposed biological and physical indicators of growing season as described for the Site
* *Based on biological and physical indicators for the site, February 7 was determined the start of the growing season for year 2
(2013) monitoring
Year 2 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Sliver Moon Wetland Restoration Site
(w) s;unowv Ile;uiea
v N o 00 a N o
r+ + 0 0 0 0 0
CG
=�
■
11/18/13
11/8/13
10/29/13
10/19/13
10/9/13
9/29/13
i'_;�11
9/19/13
9/9/13
8/30/13
—J�
8/20/13
m
.-.
8/10/13
�m
a-+ -W
7/31/13
m�
3 0
7/21/13
-a M
r C
iGC
7/11/13
3
O
7/1/13
(' N
L
6/21/13
C
O6/11/13
IN
I
6/1/13
L
�
5/22/13
5/12/13
5/2/13
plow
4/22/13
WIN4/12/13
4/2/13
3/23/13
3/13/13
3/3/13
2/21/13
2/11/13
2/1/13
NO 00 W� N O N �t W 00 O N� WOO O N� W 000" V W 00 O
-4 -4 1- 1 i 71 r-1 1 l N N N N N C? T T M M IT
(ui) Jan81 aazempunoa9
e
CG
=�
■
i'_;�11
—J�
■1ri
iGC
N
G1
3
m
3 °
-p M
C
3 O
O N
(7 N
C m
C0
C
L
J,
(ui) s;unowV Ile}uiea
N O 00 tD a N C
.--i -4 O O O O C
11/18/13
f ..�. .i..�_` 11/8/13
� o �
v o 10/29/13
°° m 10/19/13
.3 J:t
10/9/13
t�
w 9/29/13
9/19/13
9/9/13
8/30/13
tD
ns
8/20/13
8/10/13
7/31/13
7/21/13
7/11/13
7/1/13
p I 6/21/13
6/11/13
6/1/13
_.. - -.'.. 5/22/13
5/12/13
5/2/13
Je 4/22/13
4/12/13
i
- - - - 4/2/13
o p 3/23/13
Ln Q' 3/13/13
on y
L S N
v '3 3/3/13
u- p
(D 2/21/13
2/11/13
2/1/13
N O 00 t.0 ,t N O N V �0 00 O N q �o 00 O r-4 d' to 00 O N C to 00 O
(ui) lanaI jalempunoag
M
GJ
Cio
3
m
ate+ M
M
3
� M
C
3 O
O N
(' N
L
CO
G
LE
(ui)sjunowdpeluiea
V N O 00 lD N O
.--� .--4 1 O O O O O
11/18/13
11/8/13
c
° 10/29/13
10/19/13
3 v 10/9/13
o >
O
Z 9/29/13
c
L, - . 9/19/13
i
9/9/13
' 1 8/30/13
8/20/13
t,...: 8/10/13
7/31/13
y 7/21/13
i " L , . 7/11/13
co
0
7/1/13
IN
I 1 6/21/13
I
6/11/13
i
6/1/13
5/22/13
5/12/13
5/2/13
4/22/13
dW
4/12/13
de
4/2/13
c o 3/23/13
Ln
>, v 3/13/13
c`v t
c N j 3/3/13
v o I
1
.,::, 2/21/13
C7 i
2/11/13
-t 1 2/1/13
N O w to V N O N lD w O N [h w w O N [t lD w O N�T to w O
1 1 11 IV rl 1 i rV N N N N T M m m T T
(ui) lanal.ia3empunojg
Sliver Moon Groundwater Gauge 4
Year 2 (2013 Data)
12
10
8 February 7 End Growing Season
6 Growing Season November 14
4 Start
2
_ 0 - --
-2
a -4
n
� -6
J p
W 8
3 -10
-12
0
-14 29 DNs
t� -16
-18 --- -._... ......
-20 -
-22 1 Da
-24
-26
-28 -
-30
-32 -
-34 a
-36
N N N W W W A A A lJ, V1 l!1 01 Q1 O1 V V V V W 00 00
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O N
N N N W N N N N N N N W F+ N W W N \ \ \ \ \
W W \ N N \ N N O O O \ lD W lD N N 00 F�
lD �O \ 00
W W I--' I--' W N N W N N W N F-' W N I--' I--' N 1--' N W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W H F-` W F+
w w w
1.4
1.2
1.0
N
c
p o
0.8 a
c
oc
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Sliver Moon Groundwater Gauge 5
Year 2 (2013 Data)
12 -
10 February 7 End Growing Season
6 g Growin Season
6 November 14
4 Sta rt
2
0
-2
v -4
v
6
J p
d -8
V
3 10
c 12 92 Days 27 Days
c -14
-16
-18
-20 - -
-22 — -
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34-- —
- 36Y—._ — -- - --� -
-38 — —�—
N N N W W W A A A l!� lJ� lJ1 Q1 Q1 Q1 V V V V 00 00 W LD lD lD g F+ N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O F+ N
N N N W N N N F+ N N N N N W W N N \ \ \ \ \
O O O \ lD lD lD N N 00 N
\ \ \ i--' \ \ \ LO LO \ 00
w r W r w r w r N w r w N N N r r w r \ \ r \
WW WW W w L U W L U W W W W W W W w w w r r w N
w w W
1.4
1.2
1.0
c
3
p 0
0.8 Q
c
0.6
0.4
0.2
$
Sliver Moon Groundwater Gauge 6
Year 2 (2013 Data)
12 -
10
8
6
4
2
I
February
Growing
Start
7
Season
I
End Growing Season
November 14
—j-
0
MA 1111
-2
z
> -4
(U
-6
;D
-8
M 10
-12
43
Days
-14
I
r
I I
-16
r\
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
i
-34
-36
-38
N
Ui N
W
N
W
LU
W
W
W
W
r
W
LU A
NJ
W
W
W
A
r
LU
A
?IJ
N
r
W
U1
NJ
Uj
0
NJ
LU
Un
NJ
W
(n
W
cn
W
a)
W
V
W
--j 'i
LU W
'1
W
W
00
0
W
00
NJ
0
W
00
W
0
LU
lO lD
LD
lD
LU
W
lO
lO
LU
lD
Uj
N
LD
r
W
N co
lc 00
N LU
W LU
1.4
1.2
1.0 '2
'A
c
E
0.8 Q
J!
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
(ui)s;unowy 1je;uiem
N O 00 l0 N O
O O O O O
11/18/13
i
11/8/13
c
o
0
10/29/13
a)
a,
No,o a`)
10/19/13
c �
o E
10/9/13
LD o
Z
9/29/13
c
U-1
000
9/19/13
9/9/13
8/30/13
Mo
l
^I
j
8/20/13
L ^
....:
-.
..K
...
.:
�
8/10/13
aJ
7/31/13
i
3c
7/21/13
-p M
cc
r
L
7/11/13
3 O
o
7/1/13
I 1
6/21/13
C m
OC
�.
(
6/11/13
6/1/13
5/22/13
5/12/13
5/2/13
4/22/13
4/12/13
4/2/13
c
ru
3/23/13
o
p
Z af°i Y
rn
3/13/13
�o �
oca
3/3/13
v 3
LL °
2/21/13
2/11/13
2/1/13
N O CO lD d N O N V lD 00 O N 1* lD CO O N '7 lD 00 O r4 -It W 00 O
I I I I 1� -- .--1 :--1 .--I N N N N N Kl M M M M V
(ui) Jan01 jalempunoig
G!
txo
3
m
4j M
m
-p M
C
� O
O N
(' N
L
fC
CO
G
G1
zi
(ui) s;unowV lle;uiea
N O W lD I: N c
i �l O O O O c
i�4 Ome— p 11/18/13
wo
1 11/8/13
10/29/13
we
v. 1 10/19/13
000
c
10/9/13
Z 9/29/13
ui
9/19/13
9/9/13
8/30/13
... -, 8/20/13
0
8/10/13
N �..
i
7/31/13
7/21/13
7/11/13
0
N 7/1/13
6/21/13
Ir 1 i I 1 6/11/13
6/1/13
5/22/13
i
j 5/12/13
5/2/13
4/22/13
' I
4/12/13
. 4/2/13
c 1 3/23/13
0 0
N 3/13/13
.c n 3/3/13
3
2/21/13
I i 2/11/13
2/1/13
N O w �D V N O N V tD o0 O N [f lD W O N lD w O N V w w O
N N N e-1 e-i N r-1 N N N N N m m m m fYl V
(ui) lanalja;empunoag
0
Sliver Moon Groundwater Gauge 9
Year 2 (2013 Data)
10
February 7
1.4
8
Growing Season
End Growing Season
6
Start
November 14
4
th A
1
1.2
2
_
0
�
-2
1.0
c
y
4
«
e
-'
6
Gauge
Malfunction
67 Days
E
10
t
0.8
Q
-12
14
c
30 Days
- ..qDays
-
o'
t�
- 16
0.6
-18
-20
-22
-24
0.4
-26
-28
s
-30
-32
-
0.2
-34
a
-36
— —�---
l— =f
-38
a
— — is
N N N W W W A A A Ln
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
U'i In 01 Ql 01 V V V I w w 00 lD
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
l0 lD
\ \ O o o r
N W F+ N N 1-+ N N
\ 1-- H \ W W \ N N \
N N N N N 1--` N N W N N W lD
N N O O \
N \ \ \ \
l0 W W N N 00
\ \
N N
W r r w N w r w
WW W W w w
w w r r N w
WW W w W U J W W W W
r r N \ \
W W W P W
W W
\
�-- N \
w W
U
C
CJ
L
GJ
d!
GJ
�A
3 M
M 4-j
m
L
� M
m
3 N
C N
L
O m
L
C7 }
C
O
CO
G
L
mi
(ui) sjunowV 1je;uiea
a N o 00 U� a N o
-1 o 0 0 0 0
N O 00 �o V N O rV V T 00 O N V to 00 O N LD 00 O rV V w w O
(ui) lanaljolempunojg
11/28/13
11/18/13
11/8/13
10/29/13
10/19/13
10/9/13
9/29/13
9/19/13
9/9/13
8/30/13
8/20/13
8/10/13
7/31/13
7/21/13
7/11/13
7/1/13
6/21/13
6/11/13
6/1/13
5/22/13
5/12/13
5/2/13
4/22/13
4/12/13
4/2/13
3/23/13
3/13/13
3/3/13
2/21/13
2/11/13
2/1/13