20140070 Ver 1_Application_20140123

eµ�o�
��
'°�w.,.w
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPAR'TN�NI' OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GO\'ERNOR
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. David Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
A�rxolvv J. TnTn
SECRETAAY
Januaiy 23, 2014
NC Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Attn: Ms. Sue Homewood
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F2E: Bridge #214 on Moorefields Road (SR 1135) over Rocky Run, Orange Couuty;
NC DOT Project No. 17.BP.7.R.60
Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Homewood:
The Narth Carolina Department of Transportation (NC DOT) is scheduled to replace
Bridge No. 214 with a single span stiucture at the same location. As the proposed project
is a bridge-to-bridge replacement wifli proposed permanent and temporary stream
impacts, the NC DOT is requesting written concurrence fi•om the US Army Coips of
Engineeis (LTSACB) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities
proposed below may proceed mider Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and General Water
Quality Certification (GC) 3886. Additionally, the project is within the Neuse Rivex
Basin and there are minor riparian buffer impacts proposed in order to complete this
project. Therefore, NC DOT is also requesting a Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Authorization Certificate for this bridge replacement. Please contact Mr. Jerry Parker at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.

PROJECT SUMMARY
IMPACT SUMMARY
Sincerely,
�:.
���.�
� J.M. Mi(Is, PE
Divisi n ngmeer, Division 7
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
USC'iS Topographic Site Vicinity Map
NRCS Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
ImpactMaps (11X17)
Impact Summary Sheet
Cultural Revie«� & Archaeological Revie�v I.etters
Cc: Tim Powers, NCDOT
Ba�ry Han•ington, Roadside Enviromnental Field Operations Engineer
Chuck Edwards, District l, District Engineer

o�pFWAtF9oc
� �
>
o �
A. Applicant Information
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Consfruction Notification (PCN) Form
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP} number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps7 � Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply);
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record I For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance Ietter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes � No
/� -
1g. Is the project Iocated in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h ❑ Yes
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)� ❑ Yes
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge No. 214 over Rocky Run
2b. County: Orange
2c. Nearest municipality! town: Hilisborough
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state ��gp 7,R.60 SF-670214
project no: � )
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N(A
����,����_�.
3d. Street address: PO Box 14996
3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27415
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
❑ No
��I .
►i .
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: NC DOT Highway Division 7
4b. Name: Division Engineer NC DOT Division 7, Mr. Mike Milis, PE
4c. Business name NC DOT
/if annlirahlcl•
4d. Street address: PO Box 14996
4e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27415
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Emailaddress: [e-mail]*nofe:pleasealsocopyMr.JerryParker,HighwayDiviston7Environmental
Supervlsoi on all correspondence - jparker(�cdof.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Mr. Jerry Parker
5b Business name NC DOT Hi hwa Division 7, Division Environmental Supervisor
(if applicable): 9 Y
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1c. Propertysize:
2. Surtace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Zb. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
N/A - Bridge Replacement
Latitude: 36.055761
NlA - Bridge
Rocky Run
acres
Longitude: - 79.138856
(-DD.DDDDDD)
27-2-6-2-(1); WS-II; HQW; NSW
Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201)
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of fhe project at the time of this
application:
The existing infrastructure consists of a two (2) lane rural highway with eight-foot travel Ianes and existing roadside
ditches. The surrounding landuse consists of a few single family residences, Cedar Ridge High School (to the east of the
proposed project area), I-85(40 to the north of the project area and undisturbed, forested areas. The total project length
is 0.046 miles.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are wetlands on either side of the existing bridge {immediately adjacent to Rocky Run), however, they are not
within the NCDOT right-of-way and will not be impacted with this proposed project.
3c. List the total estimated Iinear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Project occurs right over Rocky Run — approximately 60 LF of stream within the NC DOT right-of-way.
3d. Expiain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project is to remove the existing timber deck bridge which is on timber joints and replace it with a cored
slab, 60-foot spanning structure.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Equipment typical to roadway infrastructure construction includino dump trucks cranes back h
4. Jurlsdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including ail prior phases) in the past7 ❑ Yes � No
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary 0 Final
, oes, etc. will be utilized.
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other.
❑ tJnknown
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
� No ❑ Unknown
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
■ - i/ .
1a. Which sections were completed below foryour project (check aIl that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2a 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impacf Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temoorarv fT1
W1 ❑P�T
2h. Comments:
Yes ❑ Corps
No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdictio� Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent
Temporary (T) ��N�? �WQ - non-404, width (linear
other) (feet) feet)
S1 � P � T Bank stabilization Rocky Run � PER � Corps +/. 10 51
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 51
3i. Comments: The proposed permanent impacts only occur on one side of the stream channel and are solely for bank
stabilization purposes. Stream flow will not be impeded. Rip rap will be keyed into the bank of the channel, rather than the
tnai�n,An
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list ail o en water im acts below.
4a 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
01 ❑POT I
4g. Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construr.tinn ornnn
the
4f. Total open water Impacts
Page 4 of 10
0

5a. 5b. 5c. 5d.
5e.
Pond ID Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Proposed use or purpose of
number pond (acres)
Floode Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Ffooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ IVo If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list aIl buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑Ather:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randieman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f, gg,
Bufferimpact
number — Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
61 � P � T Road Crossing Rocky Run � Nos 1,477 2,390
B2 � P 0 T Bridge Rocky Run � Yes 1,809
� No �
63 � P � T Parallel Impact Rock Run � Yes
(Road Widening) Y � No 466 275
Driveway
B4 � P 0 T Relocation Rocky Run � Yes O
(paralle� impact) ❑ No 118
Driveway
65 � P � T Relocation UT to Rocky Run � Yes p
(parallel impact) ❑ No 34
6h. Total buffer impacts 3,752 2,817
6i. Comments: The bridge replacement necessitates the shifting of the property owner's driveway e�trance slightly to the east
of if's current location. A UT to Rocky Run is within the vicinity of this project and while the UT is not impacted, the associated
riparian buffers are. These unavoidable impacts will be mitigated for as required within Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules
(see attached EEP acceptance letter).
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The current bridge over Rocky Run is a timber deck bridge on timber joists which needs replacement based upon its
current age and associated deterioration of the structure. The existing bridge is functionally obsolete and structurally
insufficient. NC DOT proposes to replace the bridge with a 60-foot spanning structure which will span the entire stream,
however, the side slopes of the stream will need to be laid back at a 1.5:1 slope and wilf be armored with rip rap to provde
stability. On one side of the channel, rip rap is proposed to be keyed into the channel bank below the Ordinary High
Water Mark (OHWM) which will result in permanent stream impacts. The existing bridge has deck drains which discharge
sform runoff directly into the stream channel. The new proposed bridge deck will capture and convey the stormwater to
the northwest side of the road where it will discharge to an undisturbed, natural area outside the riparian buffer zone. The
existing drainage ditch, driveway and driveway pipe are being relocated to accommodate the proposed Ionger bridge
span. Ditch dimensions and drainage area are not changing and the natural drainage patterns are not being disturbed or
modified. Roadway approach work is minimized as much as is practical to reduce the overall project footprint. Impacts
to the associated protected riparian buffers has aiso been reduced by out-Ietting drainage pipes outside the riparian
buffer (where possible) and proposing rip rap aprons to reduce the flow to non-erosive velocities, as we�l as providing
grass shoulders to increase surface infiltration.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surtace waters,
restricfions agai�st the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US and coordination (including a pre-
construction meeting) with the Division Environmental Supervisor.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the Stafe
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S, or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and fetter)
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigafion, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
� Yes ❑ No
� DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
� Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type ( Quantity
� Yes
Iinear feet
❑ warm ❑ cool
466 sq.ft. Zone 1& 427
acres
acres
acres
❑cold
ft. Zone 2
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Usfng a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigatlon (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I� Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. if yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigafion. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone
Zone 2
Reason for impact
Road widening (parallel
impact)
Road widening (parallel
impact)
Driveway relocation
(parallel impact)
Driveway relocation
(parallel impact)
Driveway relocation
(parallel impact to UT to
Rocky Run)
Driveway relocation
(parallel impact to UT to
Total impact
(square feet)
466
275
0
118
0
34
Multiplier
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
1, 398
413
0
177
177
51
� 6f. Total buffer mitigation required• I 2 039
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Mitigation will be satisfied through the use of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Please see attached
acceptance letter.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWq)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules7
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The project is uti�izing existing roadside ditches and swales to capture
any stormwater from the road. The project drainage system also consists of grated
inlets and pipe outfalls that drain to the existing roadside ditches. Minimaf new
impervious surtace is being added to the area and the outlets are discharging to rip
rep aprons outside the buffer areas (where possible) at non-erosive velocities.
Additionally, the current bridge has deck drains that discharge storm runoff directly
into the stream channel. The new bridge will capture the storm flow and convey it
off the roadway the northwest side of the road where it will discharge to an
undisturbed, natural area outside the riparian buffer zone.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project7
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
2c. �f this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, expiain why:
� Yes
❑ Yes
N!A %
i�� _
■ .
�� .
■ •
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The current bridge and roadway approaches drain to existing ditches which parallel the road. Grated inlets will be added
to capture any drainage from the bridge itse�f, rather than allowing it to discharge through deck drains to the stream. The
outlets drain to roadside ditches which are designed per the NC DOT BMP Tpolbox. The ditch design will be reviewed
and approved by the Roadside Environmental Unit of NC DOT.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following Iocally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
�
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check aIl that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Certified Local Govemment
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittai requirements been met?
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentatfon (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
� Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes � No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wefland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
■ .
G .
❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Wil� this projecf (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
addifional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ❑ Yes � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a quaiitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 10, 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale public transportation projects — such
as widening projects, bridge replacements and intersection improvements — have a"Iow potential for cumulative impact
since little (if any) new impervious surtace is added and the projects are usually in already developed locales.° This
proposed project is within a somewhat developed landscape (i.e. existing residential homes in the vicinity), and while it
drains to Rocky Run which is Water Suppiy (WS) II; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSV�, High Quality Waters (HQV�, this is
not a road on a new location (i.e. there is an existing road and bridge structure and thus, the area already contains
impervious surtaces). We anticipate the NC DWQ will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
It is not anticipated that this project will generate any wastewater as it is a roadway project.
Page 9 of 10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally profected species or
habitat? ❑ Yes � No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, i�dicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Yes � No
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
http://www.ncnhp.orglweb/nhp/nhp-map-viewer Utilizing the NHP Virtual Workroom Map Viewer, a 2-miie radius search
yielded no results of Federal or State species listings.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I � Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
This bridge replacement project takes place in Orange County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would
support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.}.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or �ear an area that the state, federai or tribal
governmenfs have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes � Na
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Please see attached Cultural and Archaeological Resources letters.
8. Flood Zone Designatfon (Corps Requirement)
8a. Wili this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: MOA
� Yes ❑ No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http:/lfioodmaps.nc.govlfmis/Map.aspx?FIPS=135
Mr. Mike Mills, PE
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name
(AgenCs signature is valid only if an
Page 10 of 10
January 23,
2014
letter from lhe applicant ( Date

Bridge #214, Orange County
Buffer impact Na�7•ative
TIP No. 17BP.7.R.G0
November (, 2013
This project consists of replacing an existing 24'long steel I-beam bridge with a 60'long
cored slab bridge at flie same locatiou. The bridge project is located on Nloorefie(ds Road (SR
1 135) at Rocky Run. An Unnamed Tributa�y (UT) to Rocky Run intersects Rocky Run just soutli
of the roadway crossiug. Both Rocky Run 1nd the UT to Rocky Run are subject to veuse River
Ripnrian Buffer Ru(es.
V(inimal dearing will be required at this site, Tlie project area is current(y being mowed
and the existing driveway is gravel. There are uumetntts cedar trees aloug and within the southern
roadway right-of-�vay, however it is expected that only one ( l) of these will need to be removed
during clearing. A piclure of the existing driveway and a picture looking west along the project
1re att�ched belo�v.
There is an esisting residentill drive�vay cast of the streatn crossing that is located within
tl�e riparian buffer. T0e begim�ing of the drive«�ay �vill be relocated further away fi•om the stream
crossing to accommodate thc longer bridge and associated guardrail. The driveway will tie back
to I(ie esisting driveway once clelr of the project improvements. Portions of the "new" drive�vny
will be (ocated within the footprint of the `bld" driveway. Portions of tl�e "new" driveway will
create impacts within tlie Rocky Rim buCfer and the UT to Rocky Run buffer. Portions of the
"new" driveway will be located outside both stream buffer zones. This has bcen i(lustrated on Uie
atteche<t Buffer Impact Permit drawings.
Thc driveway pipe and associated ditcli at the southcast quadrant of t�c project will be
relocated to accommodate the longer brictge and associated improvements. The ditch dimensions
aud drainage area will not change, aud will on(y be relocated finm tlieir current location to the
cxtent nccessary.
The proposed bridge will captw•e stonn �vater rwioff ti�om tlie bridge deck via grate inlets
auc( convey the tvnoff to the northwest quadr�nt of thc projcct, outside of the bttffer zones, tvherc
it will discharge to au widisturbed, ��atural are�.

�
,,:
�� -,
> ';
:�.. ,
�--�..
�'
� , �� � ,�
� -�� - � , �
d� y
. �"' � ,aTJ' � ,, f ,
. . , .. , . . , � +.�.. . , .. . „ . . ..... x. . . .

��_
� m�
���� o
Z�o
y N
(� � U a
F- m n � 'K o
Q U � F
a
� N C -__
N N
F' t0 O- �� N N
� U � a
w
U �
LL. � � U U � O
Q.' � (/J O. @ � O
} � f � � O
� �
Q
� y y
(� � (7J �' � � O
F a � v
U
Q N
a a � D
c C
G m � C � @
F = _ �j' v
U �
�
W � m �o
a N�@
C - U
0 � � >N N
� F � U >
� U �
W a � N
� � � a
O c�o � @ @
Z U >
� X �
W
W` N
5 Q, C C
£ _ � m
H � � v
c rn
� a
c
m = N @
� LL d �
N �
a
0
a
� N
� Q
O
a3+ {� `�
U � N
� �
N �
� tn E
m
v
N
W
O �j
O �
� � O
O
� li m�
�. +
N
�
� O � Q
(� z O
f-

I �
�� •
� •
�
�" ..
"
"
"
"
"
'
"
"�
•, • ��"" """"'�
� �"��""""""""�
� ���"""""""""�
� � � ���"""""""""�
• ���""""„""""�
• , �,�"""""""""
� .
.
. •
u
. �
•
• •
�
•
•
T
N
V �
N d
O y �
% �
� � LL
= Z o Z O
V Q (D � M
2 U K� o M
N
p �aU �o
O Z m � ` w
N w
o Ow N
�
a

� �
.. �
. .
�
��'
"'
"
"
"
"
"
"
'�
•, • " """""'�
, ��"""""""""'�
• �""""""""""�
• � � �""""""""""�
. �""""""""""�
� , �"""""„"„""
.
.
� � •
•
u •
, � '
� . .
•
•
T
@
V �
N �
� N (Y
i �
a �LLZ
3 N� LL
= zo� o
C7 O `° M
= U��
o �
� W QO �o
Z � m �
O a � ° � W
N O 1- � _
O W N
O
�
a

6} Efland . r.V , , l �.
o � . /
� � ml
W .. � /,� 1 ( � / J A
W � L� � � � O
� .. . _ ` � p —I
U
�y�
� � ""'°` rt � � . ,
�
. ` � BENJOHNSTONRD� � (� �
. .... m . `, - 1 . �
2 I
O ¢
S Ri
O ^
' � � �� �,.� . . _ °i?�. . .r : , � REXOR
f g � �'�� �� / � �
� ' ( -�
� � �
� ��� � � �' J+/�,�� _ S�J , , � ( '�,�� � �'
^ ' � 6
�� � �� . rif�l ' r . . � . .
i
� ��
_ �.� ����� � �
�� � ; � , - _r
r;,iir�• c i C / — ' _ . r `sw..
g �. `'Sec�Fi . � � �� � . .. .
� �. r. . �1_'' � /�' � . �oo .
�/� � o0
� '`1�°,, �\� ���� �' 214 �� �� � �� . �
:� ,� y�\� I� %,
. i � ��� � � � � �'. �/-� � � . .
��/ ��� � \. . .
. � � -i y %� 'o -.
i
1 �-- � � � ' � � ��'.. . � '�.p � o -
1 1 � . �Q': $ C / � � �
0
_ _ � � � � �� � v � �. . 1
Q
� [�` /I � a �� o � —_'
�� 1 � z � �
:HF/ECD.RO ��;' � �� � � � ��
' " � � v NEW GFADY 6ROWN SCNOOL RD
9
-,� � ii , '�.� o '
m t
\ � I h A
( O 2
� � 6W _ � I ��1.� ��� �- w .
�\ 1 �, �' o � asu CH4NTfRfLtfCN
( l
�bY �� : ��I � � F D/XON Oq . �� .
�% I ��/�il�;� �� � _ . .
�� � 12.
�� ��� �i�._�/ � � �,
i
� r_
' �� ' v' i, : ' -' �4
� � � J
_, `. � � ' l �; � , 2 N
�� f I 1
MONADNOCN R/JGE � � � � � � � � o
Rp � � � � �
rc . b50 / � 0,�, Fv �
z,. � IJ� ,__�� � � �f .�� 1 � .. J� .
� T .,� � ' z / ..
� \ ��� J� �� SevenMills ° �
� '� � A ( \, � I � �` � �° � Farnls A /
y� C
4/.
— �. - . — . . � V ,qC � e ! , __
� ^'� +>,5 � Gartand Acres
� �
� .. ;so_ � ,- .. �.
Map Location Vicinity Map " Figure 1
NC DOT Bridge 214 over Rocky Run
� cnswe�� peRSON Moorefields Road, Hillsborough, NC „oAr„
_ i — --_ ' Orange County �of c,,po
j � - �i GRR�JVILL „< Oy�
y
' oRnNCe Efland, NC Quadrangle „ �;
?�AMANC� � `;- 2013 USGS Topographic Quad ; �
4P
I j ourtHnM % 1 inch = 2,000 feet ''t� �
i i � . ce..��...ti,..�n �n�� orrnaN`'