20180784 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2021_20220103

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20180784 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 01/03/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/3/2022
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Lindsay Crocker [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20180784 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Arabia Bay
County: Hoke
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: ArabiaBay_100061_MY2_2021.pdf 6.11MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:*

FINAL
MONITORING REPORT (MY2)
ARABIA BAY WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Hoke County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100061
Full Delivery Contract No. 7529
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01151
DWR Project No. 2018-0784
RFP No. 16-007332
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Data Collection: January- November 2021
Submission: December 2021
ry
3
•
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St.Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone] RESTORATION
Response to Monitoring Year 2(2021) DMS Comments SYSTEMS I LLC
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site(DMS#100061)
Cape Fear River Basin 03030004, Hoke County
Contract No.7529
Comments Received (Black Text)& Responses(Rhin To..+)
Report
1. Please revise the report to reflect the growing season established in the Mitigation Plan. Growing season
approved in the Mitigation Plan is March 1-November 12 with the March 1 date supported by soil
temperature readings above 41 degrees.The direction to use dates from Mitigation Plan was confirmed in
a recent e-mail from the IRT.
The dates for the growing season have been changed to March 1-November 12.
2. The verbiage regarding growing season dates for MY1 in the MY2 report conflicts with the verbiage
regarding growing season dates in the MY1 report.
The verbiage was revised to reflect that the growing season for both MY1 and MY2 is March 1-November
12,with the March 1 start date supported by soil temperature readings above 41°F per the Mitigation Plan.
During MY1, due to a logger failure, soil temperature was not documented until March 2; therefore, the
growing season began March 2. During MY2, soil temperature was 57.56°F on March 1 and stayed well
above 41°F thereafter.
Electronic deliverables:
1. Please include the data used to create the 30-70 figure.
The Figure D1 data has been included in the digital submittal.
2. Please visualize data absence with gaps in the groundwater gauge figures and add a callout for when gauge
8 was replaced. Currently the offset is showing as a reading rather than missing data on the spreadsheet
which leads the graphs to look continuous.
Missing data are now being shown as gaps with callouts rather than continuous readings.
1101 Haynes St.,Suite 211 • Raleigh,NC 27604•www.restorationsystems.com• Ph 919.755.9490• Fx 919.755.9492

Arabia Bay Year 2,2021 Monitoring Summary
Wetlands
• All fourteen of fourteen groundwater gauges met success for the Year 2 (2021) monitoring period.
Wetland hydrology data is in Appendix D.
Soil Temperatures Monitoring Period Used for Determining 10 Percent of
Year Documented Success Monitoring Period
2020(Year 1) March 2,2020* March 2-November 12(256 days) 26 days
2021 (Year 2) March 1,2021* March 1-November 12(257 days) 26 days
*Based on data collected from a soil temperature data logger located on the Site.
Summary of Monitoring Period/Hydrology Success Criteria by Year
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season(Percentage)
Gauge Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
1 Yes-85 days Yes-77 Days
(33.2%) (30.0%)
2 Yes-72 days Yes-75 Days
(28.1%) (29.2%)
3 Yes-72 days Yes-76 Days
(28.1%) (29.6%)
4 Yes-93 days Yes-79 Days
(36.3%) (30.7%)
5 Yes-95 days Yes-82 Days
(37.1%) (31.9%)
6 Yes-36 days Yes-75 Days
(14.1%) (29.2%)
7 Yes-77 days Yes-75 Days
(30.1%) (29.2%)
8 Yes-85 days Yes-79 Days
(33.2%) (30.7%)
9 Yes-94 days Yes-81 Days
(36.7%) (31.5%)
10 Yes-69 days Yes-74 Days
(27.0%) (28.8%)
11 Yes-28 days Yes-52 Days
(10.9%) (20.2%)
12 Yes-61 days Yes-74 Days
(23.8%) (28.8%)
13 Yes-34 days Yes-69 Days
(13.3%) (26.8%)
14 Yes-31 days Yes-62 Days
(12.1%) (24.1%)
Vegetation
• Measurements of all 16 plots (14 permanent and 2 temporary transects) resulted in an average of
498 planted stems/acre.Additionally, all individual plots met success criteria except plots 1 and 12
(Tables 7-9,Appendix C). Both plots 1 and 12 were just one stem shy of meeting target goals.
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Executive Summary
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 2 (2021)
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity (i.e., heavy deer browsing) was observed.
Site Permitting/Monitoring Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Completion
Complete or Delivery
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-007332) February 8,2018 February 8,2018
Institution Date(NCDMS Contract No.7529) -- April 4,2018
Mitigation Plan October 2018 April 30th,2019
Construction Plans -- November 2018
Earthwork Completion -- August 13th,2019
Planting -- January 24,2020
As-Built Survey February 2020 March 2020
As-Built Monitoring Report February 2020 March 2020
MY1 Monitoring Report November 2020 December 2020
MY2 Monitoring Report November 2021 December 2021
Site Maintenance Report(2021)
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
4/27/2021
Cattail,Callery Pear,Chinaberry,and
Sweetgum treatment
None
7/23/2021
Cattail,Callery Pear, Sweetgum, Chineberry
Tree, Mimosa, Privet
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Executive Summary
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

FINAL
MONITORING REPORT (MY2)
ARABIA BAY WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Hoke County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100061
Full Delivery Contract No. 7529
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01151
DWR Project No. 2018-0784
RFP No. 16-007332
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Data Collection: January- November 2021
Submission: December 2021
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
Prepared by:
r2And
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Restoration Systems, LLC Axiom Environmental, Inc.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Worth Creech Contact: Grant Lewis
919-755-9490 (phone) 919-215-1693 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 1
1.1 PROJECT GOALS&OBJECTIVES 1
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1
1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE 2
1.4 SUCCESS CRITERIA 3
2.0 METHODS 3
2.1 MONITORING 4
3.0 REFERENCES 6
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables
Figure 1. Project Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 6. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 7. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 8. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9. Planted Vegetation Totals
Appendix D. Hydrology Data
Table 10. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Soil Temperature Graph
Figure D1. 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Table of Contents page i
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS)
Arabia Bay Wetland Restoration Site (Site).
1.1 Project Goals&Objectives
Project goals were based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (CFRBRP) report (NCEEP
2009). Goals are addressed by project objectives as follows:
1. CFRBRP Goal—Reduce and control sediment inputs
Site-specific objective — Cessation of row crop production and conversion of a ditched Carolina
Bay to a depressional wetland, removal of agricultural sediment outputs from the Site,and control
of sediments within the Site.
2. CFRBRP Goal— Reduce and manage nutrient inputs
Site-specific objective—Cessation of row crop production may result in a direct reduction of 160
pounds of nitrogen and 280 pounds of phosphorus per year (based on the nutrient model) from
the elimination of agricultural nutrient inputs/fertilizer application at the Site.
Site-specific mitigation goals and objectives have been developed through the North Carolina Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) analyses of preconstruction and reference wetland systems (NC WFAT
2010)as outlined in the following table.
1.2 Project Background
The Site is situated in a Carolina Bay that was historically cleared, drained, and farmed. In the NC
Geological Survey 1956 aerial photograph for Hoke County, the Site was in agricultural production,
indicating the area was cleared before 1956. The bay is an isolated depression surrounded by sand rims
along the northwest and southeast margins. Land use adjacent to the bay includes rural residential
properties, timber tracts, and additional row crops. Before construction, the Site land use was
characterized entirely by agricultural row crops. Herbaceous vegetation and a few shrubby species grew
along Site ditches, which were regularly maintained by bush hogging and herbicide application.
Wetland Targeted Functions,Goals, and Objectives
Targeted Functions Goals Objectives
(1) HYDROLOGY
• Filled agriculture ditches to restore
(2)Surface Storage& jurisdictional hydrology
Retention • Minimize • Planted native woody vegetation
downstream • Ceased row crop production within the
flooding to the easement
maximum extent • Plowed soils(6-8 inches)to reduce surface
(2)Sub-surface Storage& possible. compaction and increase surface roughness
Retention • Protected the Site with a perpetual
conservation easement
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Wetland Targeted Functions, Goals, and Objectives (continued)
(1)WATER QUALITY
• Removed agricultural land uses and
• Remove direct agricultural inputs from the Site
nutrient,sediment, • Filled the ditch network to restore ground
(2) Pollution Change and pollutant
inputs from the and surface hydrology within the Site
• Planted woody vegetation
Site. • Restored jurisdictional wetlands
(1) HABITAT
• Planted woody vegetation to provide organic
(2) Physical Structure
matter and shade
• Improve wildlife • Filled ditches to provide groundwater
(2) Landscape Patch Structure habitat within and hydrology and plant woody native vegetation
adjacent to the • Protected the Site with a perpetual
Site.
conservation easement
(2)Vegetation Composition • Restored jurisdictional wetlands
The 1956 NC Geological Survey aerial photograph and 1974 aerial photograph included in the Hoke and
Cumberland Counties Soil Survey show a historic ditch that was not present before Site restoration (USDA
1984). The ditch was located in the middle of the field and ran from the southeast to the northwest,
connecting to the westernmost primary ditch.The historical ditch appeared to be a secondary ditch that
was not necessary for agricultural production and was therefore filled in during the 1980s. A field
investigation was performed using hand tools to locate the historic ditch location and determine if the
subsurface clay layer was intact. Based on the field investigation, it appears the clay layer within the
footprint of the historic ditch is intact.
A Detailed Restoration Plan was prepared for the Site that outlined backfilling agricultural ditches and
planting native forest vegetation. In addition, an outlet structure was designed as an emergency spillway
if the bay filled during significant storm events. The detailed plan was approved by the NCDMS and
Interagency Review Team (IRT) and implemented during the summer of 2019.
1.3 Project Components and Structure
Proposed Site restoration activities generated 16.0 Non-riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs)
resulting from 16.1 acres of non-riparian wetland restoration.
Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following:
• Moving the access road off the Carolina bay bed and onto the adjacent sand rim. The road was
built according to the construction plans at an average elevation of 223 feet,
• Installation of an overflow drop structure to release water from the Carolina bay during significant
storm events (at a water depth of approximately 2.5 feet in the Carolina bay bottom),
• Excavation of shallow, elliptical depressions to form hummocks and pools for habitat variation
across the Site,
• Plant 16.1 acres of the Site with 10,300 stems(planted species and densities by zone are included
in Table 6 [Appendix C]).
• A permanent seed mix was applied across the Site.
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Site design was completed in November 2018. Construction started on August 5, 2019, and ended with a
final walkthrough on August 22, 2019. The Site was planted on January 24, 2020, and visited by IRT
members in May 2020.Completed project activities, reporting history,completion dates, project contacts,
and background information are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
1.4 Success Criteria
Project success criteria were established per the October 24, 2016, NC Interagency Review Team
Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. Monitoring and success
criteria relate to project goals and objectives. Several goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally
elevated by restoration activities without direct measurement from a mitigation perspective. Other goals
and objectives will be considered successful upon achieving success criteria. The following table
summarizes Site success criteria.
Success Criteria
Wetland Hydrology
• Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for,at a minimum, 10 percent of the
growing season,during average climatic condition based on the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update(USACE 2016),Table 1,for a Typic Paleaquult(Rains).
Vegetation
• Within planted portions of the Site,a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum
of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at
year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5,and 10 feet in height at year 7 in each plot.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the
Site; natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case-by-case basis.
• Any single species can only account for 50%of the required stems within any vegetation plot.
o Ephemeral pool"habitat areas"are a normal component of Carolina bays.Areas of freshwater marsh are
expected to be comprised of herbaceous emergent vegetation and not forested woody vegetation.
Ephemeral pool "habitat areas" are expected to encompass approximately 20% of the bay area and
should not be held to the above vegetative success criteria.
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in this plan follow the October 24, 2016, NC
Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports of the data
collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than December 31 of each
monitoring year data is collected.The monitoring schedule is summarized in the following table.
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Wetlands X X X X X X X
Vegetation X X X X X
Visual Assessment X X X X X X X
Report Submittal X X X X X X X
2.1 Monitoring
The monitoring parameters are summarized in the following table.
Monitoring Summary
Wetland Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Soil temperature* at the
As-built,Years 1,2,3, beginning of each
4,5,6,and 7 monitoring period to
14 gauges spread
throughout the year verify the start of the
Groundwater gauges with the growing throughout growing season,
season defined as restored wetlands groundwater and rain
Wetland March 1-November 12 data for each monitoring
Restoration period
Visually inspect features
As built Years 1 2 3 Terracell outlet to ensure they
Visual Assessment 5,and 7 structure and ditch are performing as
plugs designed and retaining
hydrological inputs
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Permanent vegetation
plots 0.0247 acre(100
square meters) in size; As-built,Years 1,2,3, 14 plots spread Species, height, planted
CVS-EEP Protocol for
Vegetation
Recording Vegetation, 5,and 7 across the Site vs.volunteer,stems/acre
establishment Version 4.2(Lee et al.
and vigor 2008)
Annual random
vegetation plots,
0.0247 acre(100 As needed As needed Species
square meters) in size
*Soil Temperature will be measured with a continuous recording soil probe.Temperatures will be measured from February to
the end of April in each monitoring year.
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Wetland Summary
Summary of Monitoring Period/Hydrology Success Criteria by Year
Monitoring Period Used for 10 Percent of
Year Soil Temperatures Documented Determining Success Monitoring Period
2020(Year 1) March 2,2020* March 2-November 12 26 days
(256 days)
2021 (Year 2) March 1,2021* March 1-November 12 26 days
(257 days)
*Based on data collected from a soil temperature data logger located on the Site.
All 14 groundwater gauges met the year 2 (2021) monitoring period success criteria (Appendix D).
Vegetation Summary
During quantitative vegetation sampling, 14 sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter) were surveyed within
the Site as per guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,Version 4.2 (Lee et al.
2008). Year 2 (2021) measurements occurred on July 12, 2021, and included two (2) additional random
plots (50-meter by 2-meter). Measurements of all 16 plots resulted in an average of 498 planted
stems/acre. Additionally, all permanent plots met success criteria except plots 1 and 12 (Tables 7-9,
Appendix C). Both plots were one stem shy of meeting target goals.While conducting measurements,two
dead stems were found in Plot-1; however, the remaining planted stems were extremely vigorous and
showed no signs of stress. Plot-12 had no mortality between Yr. 1 and Yr. 2 monitoring.
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online). Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9-
c72dfcb55012&groupld=60329
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). NC Wetland Assessment Method
(NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1984. Soil Survey of Cumberland and Hoke Counties,
North Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2017. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [May 8, 2018]. United States
Department of Agriculture.
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Appendix A
Background Tables and Map
Figure 1. Project Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

14141 V- 0 • . ._,.\ i 4. -i • ' „ , • -_, j
*. ',:••:':. , //17(_., . N .iiiiolliii
.... _,-45-1: .:-.,-,- L.# IL1111111 ... _,,r, ..."‘_%'=•,------.....1,16.,-L ` --- - __-- .44/ • \NN___.1
‘---1- \-:-.16-. .5-- d • Th /
MIMM11101 1 7AI Fee ___ ,'
111c121.0 111%\1-----*-0----o,.-.t-...-.
0.N..k„-.._..:•--.-.14-Z_-...d
� '- 1N 4 �'' `W41i1 ,� .e Rockfish --S , ,00r~,Environmenial,inc.
y1�1i �# -J'" - ;Creek �� �,
11WinaAgIeW40SAa1iV0"tp0Apiirl16iy -„,7F,„...--.-1-(--F1.6.,-.J4-i,-4-1--1-•e)/,r
Ar,-l4l-ehf i-l-iv.%lft- :.,,A IPv-.. m:../N1, )Y
11.-A,--\--*-v*N2-„-,ii-,w
l ___ :, _.!:$,.,.c '4.c -7
f;(7=,4_._7____.. - .r', 1OC ,f•1S Prepared for:
. V 1 j _ram ' .
I 4
o,kt.
.'/fliti/7111ti '
t' _ ., - ....., i._._;,...4./-:k .....,..,...„... .--... _„„,„
, ..,...
7---- '-'s_% -.„ — _ --7-7,---=----71:c1;--,
--ri
�_ 1 � . �� ��• _ .
ea xai _:; RESTORATION
• Iiht-4111* �r a _ SYSTEMS LLC
Co ._ .
°/ -OO�g3Wvr�ttOar�Co ,o �.-_- ,
CAL a �Cl +f!i II y7") ` ry ! ( < �� f •
• �. I/ Project:
_ a► _AI►_ »i _1K ‘ Cam_ (� 4 - 4,: 1
Off.. -1• ' � �� 4, 4 r ..
te ;�. i� r, A vidinic-,...\, �� � ji._ ARABIA BAY
_ •
WETLAND
' 71
MITIGATION SITE
'T �- r// 1, 1 ,. ter_ .. - ��Arabi - �> a r_ / { �'� M1 _ Roagr ��~ 1 � 60� a�f.Gsetip' . ; : _... ..
�r I $ r •L" - �. 4 \-; ',:. . ,.1-4° "/- i I--'-'...'---'.-
Sand 7,0 1 ti o ti�. 1?�-
r ,� }. ry ;` -+ _ . 1 •� - `� • Hoke County, NC
Shp.. '_ - :� } ��� ` % 41%;'`� raiL / i'-__` - �1 I. �zg -- •¢ — Title:
I` 4 ; a' \ Rock#is1�,Road `�F 1 r • 1If Z a
\ - " �.-. -- - E
S � �Raeford� .. fi r •>'�
_••� -� _ _ ` , �+ A �., + r)t % --s �,�_-w. SITE LOCATION
Ii:••s;.. 4 1 \� C� •�+q �V \ '\ / -Arab•:{ • '! 1 • _•'
me •. .c :+ },. .17 ) �} �' �� , A�� t a yv
co y c- I Ali a� Wil
` t1111 �v 1 ■
i .\ a.N I
irtv
...„,, ,.0, -6.. '
Is
.,4-Arabia _+� I r _ \�J �+ i
Road / f � :p `
•
i y, .-r a :::
by: KRJ
_J a .� ` ^ Legend�' _ _ -+�+•I _ _ - :� Z$') .rr
N:.ocwan - f `� 1 a ` -�� _ •[,. _ Arabia Bay Easement= 16.1 ac. JAN 2019
a f 'C` 1111840
_' ` - 1 ••� NCDOT Roads
r-.+a _ �� _ Fr iiimil ��+. • Scale:
-- _ 1:20,000
```, �Q �� _ 1� �1 i --�ti ale '. - ` USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Raeford and Parkton, NC Quads) Project No.:
-27 -� r p 18-016
�� F.. �� Directions to the Site from Raleigh:
j Ilip: - .. I . �-- . , '�� - Take I-40 E out of Raleigh;travel -30 miles
- r 1� .�-__tea_--.. --rt� - Take exit 328A to merge onto I-95 S;travel -40 miles FIGURE
�+ - .- %--
- r ' 1� �r,t 0 �ti '. - Take exit 41 for NC-59 towards Hope Mills and Parkton
_ t _ ' .� - Turn right onto NC-59 N, and after 0.7 miles, turn left onto Shipman Rd
�� �p„oi-Sfro ' , .‘":i,.. 3� �- - After 1 mile,turn right onto US-301 S; travel 2.4 miles
,� I �., ®i -�_. • Y � ��} Turn right onto NC-71 S;travel 2.7 miles
I
s - Turn right onto 3rd St and continue straight onto Barlow Rd and Chason Road; approx. 5.5 miles
/ / I �.
Turn left on Arabia Rd;travel approx. 3 miles
NOTE: No air transport facilities are located I ' r�'�ti " 3 The Site is located on the right, down a gravel driveway.
Pn�+� within 5 miles of the project area. - ♦ :' - Site Latitude, Longitude 34.9570, -79.1379(WGS84)
= : d

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Restoration or
Wetland Existing Restoration Restoration Mitigation Mitigation
Reach ID Restoration
Type Acreage Acreage Level Ratio Credits
Equivalent
Wetland
Non-riparian -- 16.000 Restoration 16.000 1:1 16.000
Restoration
Length&Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level Non-riparian Wetland(acreage)
Restoration 16.000
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall Credits
Non-riparian Wetland 16.000
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Completion
Complete or Delivery
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-007332) February 8,2018 February 8,2018
Institution Date (NCDMS Contract No.7529) -- April 4,2018
Mitigation Plan October 2018 April 30th,2019
Construction Plans -- November 2018
Earthwork Completion -- August 13th,2019
Planting -- January 24,2020
As-Built Survey February 2020 March 2020
As-Built Monitoring Report February 2020 March 2020
MY1 Monitoring Report November 2020 December 2020
MY2 Monitoring Report November 2021 December 2021
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Full Delivery Provider Construction Contractor
Restoration Systems Land Mechanic Designs
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211 780 Landmark Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Willow Spring, NC 27592
Worth Creech 919-755-9490 Lloyd Glover 919-639-6132
Designer Planting Contractor
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Restoration Systems
218 Snow Avenue 1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27603 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693 Worth Creech 919-755-9490
Construction Plans and Sediment and As-built Surveyor
Erosion Control Plans K2 Design Group
Sungate Design Group, PA 5688 US Highway 70 East
915 Jones Franklin Road Goldsboro, NC 27534
Raleigh, NC 27606 John Rudolph 919-751-0075
Joshua G. Dalton, PE 919-859-2243
Baseline&Monitoring Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Project Information
Project Name Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Project County Hoke County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres) 16.1
Project Coordinates (latitude&latitude) 34.95702N,79.13792W
Planted Area(acres) 16.1
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
Project River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project(14-digit) 03030004150011
NCDWR Sub-basin for Project 03-06-15
Project Drainage Area (acres) NA
Percentage of Project Drainage Area that is
Impervious <5%
CGIA Land Use Classification Cultivated
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetlands
Wetland acreage 16.1 acres drained
Wetland Type Non-riparian
Mapped Soil Series McColl
Drainage Class Poorly drained
Hydric Soil Status Hydric
Source of Hydrology Precipitation,groundwater
Hydrologic Impairment Ditched and drained
Native Vegetation Community Bay Forest/Small Depression Pocosin
Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation 0%
Restoration Method Hydrologic,vegetative
Enhancement Method NA
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation*
Waters of the United States-Section 401 Yes Yes Approved JD(App D)
Waters of the United States-Section 404 Yes Yes Approved JD(App D)
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes CE Document(App E)
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes CE Document(App E)
Coastal Zone Management Act No -- CE Document(App E)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No -- CE Document(App E)
Essential Fisheries Habitat No -- CE Document(App E)
*Included in the Detailed Mitigation Plan
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photographs
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

N `� 'yr ... �� , r -
ti
f4; ... ���
•
•
. , Att.** - 13 ir NO, 4 •
�. �. . ;- �•� {��i� ;: • .� � Axiom Enwiranmeniai,inc.
• 13
e' w Prepared for:
i 0.4j • 4 F".'- • ?. , ,_.,
LE2/
��♦`� # Al 3/ 1 ' ' •" tom; .
a, ••f
' . J { i` RESTORATION
a SYSTEMS I LLC
x' e. 12
' 2 „ '♦� ,4 6 ...Y Project:
w A' 9 ': I "� •�� ® ���� , s ,r.+ ,t ARABIA BAY
R '` Y +e ' t�' '* VA $ 4 6 -4, '4,t WETLAND
� _
��� - - }' MITIGATION
' y.:' ._ 11 ��� ' ♦♦. �.� SITE
11
r Y4 • ,�i� H , Hoke County, NC
. g 1 \ '
Title:
ra,• f_4. 4...0...1t_.4'.)._;4.,• „640 i.4f... Ai..k,•-.4C.•.49.'4-1
e
1 .
#" 9 ., .
04�. •�; _ - - . .,..•
, ....
CURRENT
*41
: # , ',�; ;; V
,,4 444P
� �10 s.:`:; a '.:,=, PLAN VIEW
.jirjS :21,.�.. ., ♦ 0
• • •. -, , 'ray. '•- . 10 ' -4- ;. y, 4. , . �=:
• I5� • AO.,
_„E.'•• k" �. ,4 fix. �' n .'
1per
01
IF
Ar
5 ,)',•.: - .4". t
. p,.�>" �� .♦ ♦♦j� ,. 5 x f ::., =�' -, §',• -.;-. Drawn by:
41$4 ' - KRJ
•4 ,... 44-./i . •: _ r b Date:
, • O� 4 �'. *'`•_
::"1..
`� ... Scale:
Legend P• ';. -. .c:Z :4..
'
ir
..i
t.
,ri
Arabia Bay Easement= 16.1 ac ;n .-2' '_ 0 ..w', 3 3 ,..., f` Project No.:
_ay ip r r•}: .�,J• �. �Wetland Restoration 16.1 acAtt � 18 016
�MY2 Temporary Transects -' ir 2 .
CVS Plots Meeting Success Criteria w ,, -,:,:3:....'.::. ? 'rr 2 FIGURE
- -, 3
CVS Plots Not Meeting Success Criteria '�
I , Groundwater Gauges Meeting Success CriteriaPfr,r" •y 3
�) Rain Gauge/Soil Temperature Logger ., :' '<`` 2
f'
► a aa.."..�.. • t•.. r.. -.- ea n '4 is. . ?a.. - .'. `. .L ".. .. .
0 150 300 600 '` •
Feet a. '.:.�.,.
4� O !N;G Centen,for.;Geo0r.phi-I fo m.,tio , gillb�3tr
. _ __ ___. _ — _-._ -_.� _.__ . _ "_. -
,.wg�..:$i .. -

Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Arabia Bay
Planted Acreage' 16.1
of
Mapping CCPV Number of Combined Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
1. Bare Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
Total 0 0.00 0.0%
3.Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor None 0.25 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
Cumulative Total 0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage2 16.1
of
Mapping CCPV Number of Combined Easement
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
4.Invasive Areas of Concern" None 1000 SF none 0 0.00 0.0%
5.Easement Encroachment Areas' None none none 0 0.00 0.0%
1 =Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory,the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 =The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3=Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1,2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item(i.e.,item 1,2 or 3)as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4=Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas,but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native,young,woody stems in the short-term(e.g.monitoring period or shortly thereafter)or affect the community structure for existing,more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer(e.g.1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity,but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present,their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass,and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the
projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the
potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the"watch list"designator in gray shade are of interest as well,but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics
are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However,areas of discreet,dense patches will of course be
mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and
dense,discreet patches. In any case,the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset,in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the

Arabia Bay
MY-02 (2021) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken September 2021
Plot 1 Plot 2
fflown„ 1 w �
Plot 3 Plot 4
Plot 5 Plot 6
$ p .�� ,
Ok
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.100061) Appendices
Arabia Bay Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Arabia Bay
MY-02 (2021) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken September 2021
Plot 7 Plot 8
1PlrIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11
.
` SR k1 iz . 1.�,. Y it. : x $ --
IL
Plot 9 Plot 10
o
1 11
I1
Plot 11 Plot 12
'I. d 1 ` ` „
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.100061) Appendices
Arabia Bay Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Arabia Bay
MY-02 (2021) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken September 2021
Plot 13 Plot 14
r a
II��
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.100061) Appendices
Arabia Bay Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Table 6. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 7.Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 8.Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9. Planted Vegetation Totals
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 6. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Nonriverine Wet Hardwood Forest
Species Quantity Percentage
Cephalanthus occidentalis 100 1%
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 600 6%
Magnolia virginiana 1,000 10%
Nyssa sylvatica v sylvatica 1,000 10%
Quercus bicolor 600 6%
Quercus laurifolia 1,000 10%
Quercus michauxii 600 6%
Quercus nigra 1,000 10%
Quercus pagoda 600 6%
Taxodium distichum 800 8%
7,300 71%
Cypress Savanna (Habitat Pools)
Species Quantity Percentage
Nyssa sylvatica v biflora 1,000 10%
Taxodium ascendens 2,000 19%
3,000 29%
Totals = 10,300
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 7. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 18016. Project Name:Arabia Bay
Current Plot Data (MY2 2021)
18016-01-0001 18016-01-0002 18016-01-0003 18016-01-0004 18016-01-0005 18016-01-0006 18016-01-0007 18016-01-0008
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 4 4 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Stem count 7 7 7 17 17 17 19 19 19 13 13 13 8 8 8 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 283.3 283.3 283.3 688 688 688 768.9 768.9 768.9 526.1 526.1 526.1 323.7 323.7 323.7 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2
Color for Density PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 7. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 18016. Project Name:Arabia Bay
Current Plot Data (MY2 2021)
18016-01-0009 18016-01-0010 18016-01-0011 18016-01-0012 18016-01-0013 18016-01-0014
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2
Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Stem count 10 10 10 12 12 12 11 11 11 7 7 7 9 9 9 10 10 10
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 404.7 404.7 404.7 485.6 485.6 485.6 445.2 445.2 445.2 283.3 283.3 283.3 364.2 364.2 364.2 404.7 404.7 404.7
Color for Density PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 7. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 18016. Project Name:Arabia Bay
Annual Means
MY2 (2021) MY1 (2020) MVO (2020)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay Tree 14 14 14 16 16 16 20 20 20
Nyssa tupelo Tree 16 16 16 19 19 19 26 26 26
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 17 17 17 18 18 18 22 22 22
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 20
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 16 16 16 19 19 19 29 29 29
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 24 24 24 23 23 23 26 26 26
Unknown Shrub or Tree 2 2 2
Stem count 156 156 156 161 161 161 192 192 192
size (ares) 14 14 14
size (ACRES) 0.35 0.35 0.35
Species count 13 13 13 12 12 12 14 14 14
Stems per ACRE 450.9 450.9 450.9354 465.3885 465.3885 465.3885 554.9975 554.9975 554.9975
Color for Density PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 8. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
50m x 2m Temporary Plot(Bearing)
Species T-1(45°) T-2 (37°)
Magnolia virginiana 1
Nyssa spp. 8 1
Taxodium ascendens 4 1
Taxodium distichum 10 8
Quercus biflora 1
Quercus nigra 3 3
Quercus pagoda 1
Total Stems 27 14
Total Stems/Acre 1093 567
Table 9. Planted Vegetation Totals
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot# Planted Stems/Acre Success Criteria Met?
1 283 No
2 688 Yes
3 769 Yes
4 526 Yes
5 324 Yes
6 445 Yes
7 445 Yes
8 445 Yes
9 405 Yes
10 486 Yes
11 445 Yes
12 283 No
13 364 Yes
14 405 Yes
T-1 1093 Yes
T-2 567 Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre 498 Yes
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Appendix D
Hydrology Data
Table 10. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Soil Temperature Graph
Figure D1. 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 10. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season(Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
1 Yes-85 days Yes-77 Days
(33.2%) (30.0%)
2 Yes-72 days Yes-75 Days
(28.1%) (29.2%)
3 Yes-72 days Yes-76 Days
(28.1%) (29.6%)
4 Yes-93 days Yes-79 Days
(36.3%) (30.7%)
5 Yes-95 days Yes-82 Days
(37.1%) (31.9%)
6 Yes-36 days Yes-75 Days
(14.1%) (29.2%)
7 Yes-77 days Yes-75 Days
(30.1%) (29.2%)
8 Yes-85 days Yes-79 Days
(33.2%) (30.7%)
9 Yes-94 days Yes-81 Days
(36.7%) (31.5%)
10 Yes-69 days Yes-74 Days
(27.0%) (28.8%)
11 Yes-28 days Yes-52 Days
(10.9%) (20.2%)
12 Yes-61 days Yes-74 Days
(23.8%) (28.8%)
13 Yes-34 days Yes-69 Days
(13.3%) (26.8%)
14 Yes-31 days Yes-62 Days
(12.1%) (24.1%)
MY2 Monitoring Report(Project No.100016) Appendices
Arabia Bay Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Hoke County,North Carolina December 2021

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 1
Year 2 (2021 Data)
Start Growing Season
24 March 1 End Growing Season 1.8
22 — November 12
20 —
18 r - 1.6
16 -
14
12
10 _1 - 1.4
8
5 6
4
a, - 1.2
> 2 _
_10
Tow -2 77 Days N
-4 < > - 1.0 c
v -6 0
c E
o -8 a
-10 m
-12 - 0.8 c
-14 m
cc
-16
-18 0.6
-20 I
-22
-24
-26 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - 0.2
-34 I I
III, 1 1 1 i II1 i . 1
I. L I i L I d I. I
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I— NJ NJ W W W - - - U' U' U' U' Ol of of V V V CO CO CO lO lO lO I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I-
1\-, 1\-, N W I\-L N N I--L N I--L I--L N I--L I--L N W I\-L N W I\-L N W LOO I\-L N CO I--L N \ 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ NJ
1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 NJ NJ 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I—, NJ V I—, NJ V I—, NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
1--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 2
Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 Start Growing Season End Growing Season 1.8
20 March 1 November 12
18 1 - 1.6
16
14 -
12
10 - 1.4
8
42
2 0140....erop
1.2
...
m -2 =
-a 4 1.0 E
c -6 a
o -8 75 Days ns
0 -10 < > c
-12 - - 0.8
cc
-14
1(L
-16
-18 - 0.6
-20
-22
-24
-26 - 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - 0.2
-34
-38 - , . 1 1 „I III � . ` d1� r j _
-40 0.0
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, NJ NJ CO CO CO -P -P -P U' U' U' U' Ol Ol Ol V V V CO CO CO lO lO lO I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L
1--, 1--,1\-, N W I--L NJ N N I--L N I--L I--L N I--L I--L N W I--L NJ N W I--L NJ N W LOO I--L NJ N CO I--L N 0 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ \
1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 NJ NJ 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I--L NJ V I--L NJ V I--L NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
1--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 3
Year 2 (2021 Data)
22 Start Growing Season End Growing Season 1.8
20 March 1 November 12
18 -
16 1 1.6
14 -
12 -
10 1.4
8
6 -
4
a 2 Art - 1.2
a) 0 "E.
_1 2
N
a -4 1.0 =
3 -6 0
E
c -8
'0 10 76 Days a
` '0
c7 -12 0.8 °
C
-14 m
-16 °C
-18 - f - 0.6
-20 -
-22 -
-24
-26 - 0.4
-28
-30 -
-32 - - 0.2
-34 - II
-36
.
-38 I .iIIiI Iii1 . ` iJ L L I i 1 Id I.-40
0.0
I-, I-, I-, I-, NJ NJ W W W - - - Ul Ul Ul Ul Ol Ql Ql V V V CO CO CO lD l0 lD I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-,
1--, 1--,1\-, N W 1--, NJ N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W 1--, NJ N W 1--, NJ N W l\O 1--, NJ N CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ \
1--, 1--, 1--, 0 0 NJ NJ 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I-, NJ V I-, NJ V I-, NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
1--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 4
Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 Start Growing Season End Growing Season 1.8
22 March 1
20 November 12
18 - 1.6
16 -
14
12 -10 - -I - 1.4
8
6
. 4
d 2 - 1.2 c
aa) 0
J N
-2 "
ai
m -4 - 1.0 0
3 -6 E
c -8 79 Days �,
C7 102 < > s 0.8
-14 cc
-16
-18 - 0.6
-20 I-22
-24 \."1"....."....•••••• ••-.04.1.
-26 - 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - 0.2
-34 II-40 i .iit1i11i . i1. LI 1LI1L-400.0
1-, 1-, 1-, I--, NJ NJ W W U] . . -P Ui U' U' U' Q1 Q1 Q1 V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, 1--,
I--, I--, N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LOO I--, N CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I--L I--L 0 0 NJ NJ I-L I--L I-L I-L I-L 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I-L NJ V I-L NJ V I-L NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, F-L

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 5
Start Growing Season Year 2 (2021 Data)
March 1
24 1.8
22 — End Growing Season
20 — November 12
18 1 1.6
16
14
12 '
10 1.4
8
6
4
2 1.2
J C
a`, -2 =.
3 4 1.0 3
8 82 Days
2 -10 rE
< a
0 -12 r 0.8 7
-14 n
-16 cc
-18 - 0.6
1-20
-22 ..........L._......._.f
-24
-26 — - 0.4
-28 -
-30 —
-32 - 0.2
-34 --36 -
I-38 , 1 1 1 II1 ii. �r.i r L 1 1 I. I I I.
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N) N) W W W . . -P U' U' U' U' Q1 Q1 01 V V V CO CO CO lD lD lD I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I-
I--, I--, N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LDD I--, N CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I-, I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--,

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 6
Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 Start Growing Season 1.8
22 March 1 — — End Growing Season
20 - 1—
18 November 12
16 - 1.6
14 - —
12 - I
10 - - 1.4
8 -
6
c 4
2 1.2
w 0 c
JH
-2 0
1.0 =0 E° 75Da s a
c -10 Y —
o -12 - - 0.8 co
LI -14 m
-16 °C
-18 0.6
-20 I
-22
-24
-26 * ..r - * - 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - 0.2
-34-36
I
-38 11111 II II I I . Idr.i rLIl IL I d L
-400.0
I— I- I- I- N N W W U] . . -P Ui U' U' U' Q1 Q1 Q1 V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lO I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I-
1\-, 1--, NJ N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LOO I\-L NJ CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 NJ NJ I— I—L I— I— I— 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I— NJ V I— NJ V I— NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--L

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 7
Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 Start Growing Season 1.8
22 March 1 End Growing Season
20 —
18 November 12
16 „.\\\\
1.6
14
ree.dr
12 I-
10 i
1.4
6
4
= 2 - 1.2 _
0 c
v
> 2
-4 - 1.0 =
a -6
E
a
3a 10 75 Days
70
c -12 - 0.8
•
2 -14 - co
cc
W -16
-18 - 0.6
-20 -
-22 -
-24 -
-26 - 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - - 0.2
-34 -- , 1 1 I II II 1 1 . ` idJ I. L l j I. I
-40 40 0.0
I-, I-, I-, I- N NJ W W W A A A U' U' U' U' O1 Q1 Q1 V V V CO CO CO VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I-
I--, I--, N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LOO I--, N CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ \
I- I- I- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I--� I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--,

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 8
Start Growing Season Year 2 (2021 Data)
March 1
24 1.8
22 - End Growing Season
20 - November 12
18 _ - 1.6
16
14
12 I-
10 I- - 1.4
8
6 I-
4 I-
= 2 - 1.2
0TD _
> -2 c
a) -4 - 1.0
a, -6 c
79 Datu -8ys o
-0 -10 a
3 -12 - 0.8 =
-14 c
W -16 cc
.c
-18 - 0.6
-20 I
-22
-24
-26 - 0.4
-28 - V"'
-30
32 logger failure
-
-34 - 0.2
- 1 1 1 1 i II 1 i . I iU I L I I . L I 1 I.
-40 40 0.0
1-, 1-, 1-, 1--, NJ NJ W W U] . . -P U' U' U' U1 01 Ol Ol V V V 00 CO CO l0 l0 l0 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--,
I--, I--, N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LOO I--, N CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ \
I-, I-, N 0 0 NJ NJ I-, I-, I-, N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I-L NJ V I-, NJ V I-, NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, F-,

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 9
Year 2 (2021 Data)
Start Growing Season
24 March 1 — 1.8
22 — End Growing Season
20 — November 12 —
18 - 1.6
16
14 I-12
10 - 1.4
8 rogger fails re
6
4 <—>.
c 2 1.2
a, 0 c
> -2
41 N
J• -4 1.0 c
aiia -6 =
-8 81 DaysI E
-0• -10 < > a
o -12 0.8 7
w -14 R
-16 cc
-18 0.6
-20 I
-22
-24 -
-26 - LI_ .................
- 0.4
-28 -
-30
-3 2 - 0.2
-34 - IIII11i i1ii . krill LLIl IL I0.0
- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ W W U] . . - U1 U1 U1 U1 Q1 Q1 Q1 V V V 00 CO CO lD LD lD I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I-
I\-1 I\-1 N W I--1 N N I--1 N I--1 I--1 N I--1 I--1 N W I\-1 N W I\-1 N W LOO I\-1 NJ CO I--1 N \ 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ \
1--1 1--1 1--1 0 0 NJ NJ 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I-1 NJ V I-1 NJ V I-1 NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I--1 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 1--1 NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ I--1 NJ NJ

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 10
Year 2 (2021 Data)
22 Start Growing Season 1.8
March 1 End Growing Season
20 November 12
18 1 1.6
16 '
14
12 I-
10 1.4
8
iro
6
4 —
2 1.2
c
a, -2 c
4 - 1.0 c
°1 -8-8 74 Days o
3E
-10 a
_ -12 - - 0.8 0
2 -14 =
0 -16 cc
-18 - 0.6
-20 I
-22
-24 -
-26 - - 0.4
-28 +.... ......--I
-30
-32 - 0.2
-34 i . IdJ
38 , 1I 1 1 ii III r L I 1 _ 11 I.-400.0
I-, I-, I-, I-, NJ NJ W W U] . . -P Ui U' U' U' Q1 Q1 Q1 V V V 00 00 00 lD lD lD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-,
I--, I--, N W I--, N N I--L N I--L I--L N I--L I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LOO I--L N CO I--L N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I-L 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I-L 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I-L NJ V I-L NJ V I-L NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I-L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ
I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L F-L

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 11
Year 2 (2021 Data)
22 Start Growing Season End Growing Season 1.8
20 March 1
18 November 12
16 ,_ - 1.6
14 I
12 - I—
108 I —I - 1.4
6 -
4
c 2 - 1.2
0
Tu i -2 c
cu
4 1.0
y -6 =
0
-10 52 Days E
c
3 -12 0.8
ns
2 -14 c
c7 -16 cc
-18 - 0.6
-20 I
-22 -
-24 -
-26 - - 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - 0.2
-34 --36 -
` I
-38dii1i I III I . I dial ILl 1 I. 11 I.-40 0.0
1—, 1—, 1—, I--, NJ NJ W W U] . . -P Ui U' U' U' Q1 Q1 Q1 V V V 00 00 00 lD lD lD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, 1--,
I--, I--, N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--L N W I--L N W LOO I--L N CO I--L N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I-L 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I-L 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I-L NJ V I-L NJ V I-L NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I-L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ I-L NJ NJ
I-L I-L I-L I-L I-L F-L

P
Start Growing Season
Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 12
March 1 Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 — — 1.8
22 End Growing Season
20
18 — November 12
16 _ - 1.6
14 -
12
18 —I1.4
6
c 4
2 - 1.2
w 0 c
J -2 0
-6 74 Days 1.0 0
3 _8 E
o3 -10 r 0.8 m
-12 -
LI -14 R
-16 °C
-18 - 0.6
-20 I-22 -
4,•••••~I ..........1,....._...... -....._ •
-24
-26 - 0.4
--30 -
-32 - logger-ailure
34 - II 0.2
-48 ,LI .i1Ii1i . i .61 rill i . I1-400.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P U' U' U' U' 01 al al V V V 00 00 00 1.0 1.0 1.0 I- I- I- I. I- I- I- I- I-
i-• i-• N W I--L N N I--L N I--L I--L N I--L I--L N W I--L N W I--L N W LOO I\-L N CO I--L N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I--L I--L I--L 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I-L 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I-L NJ V I-L NJ V I-L NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
I--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ
I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L I--L

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 13
Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 Start Growing Season 1.8
22 March 1 — End Growing Season
20 November 12
18 H
1.6
16
14
12
10rell
\\\\\
1.4
8
6
c 4
2 - 1.2
v 0 c
J 2 .
+, 4 1.0 3
as -6 0
a -8 69 Days ' a
-10 -
o -12 - r 0.8 m
0 -14
-16 °C
-18 - 0.6
-20 - I
-22 -
-24
-26L",-..aou-v.",.......- _ _ - 0.4
-28 `
-30 -
-32 - - 0.2
-34 --36
38 1 ill I . I III III rr.l 1111 l I .I I d
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P U' U' U' U' 01 01 01 V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lD I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I-
I—,-, I—,-, N W I--, N N I--, N I--, I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--, N W LOO 1--, NJ NJ CO I--, N \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
1-- 1-- 1-- 0 0 N N 1-- 1--� 1-- 1-- 1-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
1--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 1--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ I--, NJ NJ

Arabia Bay Groundwater Gauge 14
Year 2 (2021 Data)
24 Start Growing Season 1.8
22 March 1 End Growing Season
20 November 12
18 t - 1.6
16 I J
14
12
10 -I - 1.4
8
6
c 4
2 - 1.2
d 0 c
_.1 2 0
`w -4 - 1.0 =
*' -6 o
to
-a8 62 Days a
c -1c 10 _ < * � 0.8 m
0 -14
-16 °C
-18 - 0.6
-20
-22
-24
-26 - 0.4
-28
-30
-32 - 0.2
--36 -
34 II. L-48LI1iiI1i1ii . I ir.i 1i [ Id-400.0
I- I- I- I— NJ NJ CO CO CO - - - U' U' U' U' Ol Ol Ol V V V CO CO CO lO lO lO I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I-
1\-, 1\-, N W I\-L N N I--L N I--L I--L N I--L I--L N W I\-L N W I\-L N W LOO I\-L N CO I--L N \ 0 0 \ \ \ NJ NJ \
1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 NJ NJ 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO CO CO CO I--L NJ V I--L NJ V I--L NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ Co Co \ V V \ V V
1--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L 1--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ I--L NJ NJ

Start Growing Season Arabia Bay Soil Temperature Data
March 1 Year 2 (2021)
88
86 84
82
80
78
76 -
74
72
t 70
68
66
64 March 1:
w 62 57.56°F
60
AIL
• 58 -
• 56
• 54
Lowest temp.
a 52
w 50 VM.fM11, after March 1:
48 I V 55.93°F
46
44
42 -
40
38 -
36 —
I- I— I— I— NJ NJ W W W .P Ul Ul Ul Ul Ol Ol Ol V V V CO CO CO lO lO l0
I--, I, NJ WI-, NJ NJ I-, NJ I-, I--, NJ I-, I--, NJ W I--, NJ W I--, NJ W CD I-, NJ 00 I--, NJ \ 0 0 \ \ \
\ N N N 0 0 \ NJ NJ \ N N \ N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ lO lO \ 03 03 03 N NJ V N NJ
N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V
I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ NJ \ \ N \ \
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ
I-, I-, I-, I-,

Figure Dl: Arabia Bay
30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Current year data from onsite rain gauge
30-70th percentile data from WETS Station: Fayetteville, NC
8
7
ct
2020
U 6
2021
5 2022
4 2023
2024
3 -30th Percentile
2 -70th Percentile
111
0