20220004 Ver 1_PCN Attachments_20211222

TIMMONS GROUP
December 22, 2021
Lyle Phillips
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Colleen Cohn
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
Suite 102 F 919.859.5663
Raleigh, NC 27607 www.timmons.com
Re: Electronic Pre -Construction Notification Attachments
Holly Springs Offsite Utilities
Holly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina
Project No.: 49130.002
Dear Mr. Phillips and Ms. Cohn,
On behalf of the Town of Holly Springs, we are providing additional attachments and information
to aid in the review of the electronic Pre -Construction Notification of the Holly Springs Offsite
Utilities, an approximately 36.4-acre site located in the Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina,
within Wake County (the Site).
Please review the below attachments and contact Matt Michel at [phone] or
[e-mail] if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
Matt Michel, PWS, PhD
Senior Environmental Scientist
ENGINEERING I DESIGN I TECHNOLOGY

Enclosures
ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
Figure 5 — NRCS Soil Survey Map
JD Request Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Request Form
Figure 6 - Wetlands and Waters Delineation Map
Wetland Delineation Data Forms (4 wetland & 19 upland)
NC DWR Stream Identification Form v. 4.11 (11 stream forms)
Photographic Log
Figure 7 — Preliminary Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Impacts Map
Stream/Wetland Restoration Plan Sheets
USFWS Consultation Package
SHPO Map and List

Appendix A

Path: Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\49130-JD-VIC.mxd
c
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS.
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
Feet
44L 1�
{kL
WE
—
HOLLY SPRINGS UTILITIES
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
TIMMONS GROUP
•
LMR vISMOH ACHIEvila T ROU H OURS. •
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:49130
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 253.8 ACRES
LATITUDE: 35.655595
LONGITUDE: -78.888673
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):NEW HILL & APEX
DATE(S):2019
WATERSHED(S):UPPER CAPE FEAR (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030004
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in w
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
hole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not

Path: Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\49130-JD-NRCS.mxd
Site limits are approximate.
Soils data from NRCS Web Soil Survey (Wake County, 1970)
HOLLY SPRINGS UTILITIES
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 5: NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:49130
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 253.8 ACRES
LATITUDE: 35.655595
LONGITUDE: -78.888673
Li
♦ '
TIMMONS GROUP
+'OLMR vISMOH ACHIEvEla TIIFOLJH OURS. •
•
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):NEW HILL & APEX
DATE(S):2019
WATERSHED(S):UPPER CAPE FEAR (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030004
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in w
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
hole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not

Appendix B

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Carp.
grigrmliffei
Yi+**^na►. CI!m
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Multiple parcels
City, State: Holly Springs, North Carolina
County: Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple PINS (see ePCN)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Matt Michel
Mailing Address: 428 Eastwood Road
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
LI
El
o
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Town of Holly Springs
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Matt Michel
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agents
12/22/2021
Date
/
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
Q I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
n I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓
o
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
171 Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 253.8 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H.
❑✓El
REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.655595
Longitude: -78.888673
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
nCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 12/22/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Matt Michel, Timmons Group
428 Eastwood Road, Wilmington NC 28403
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Holly Springs
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.655595
Long.: -78.888673
Universal Transverse Mercator: 691126.80 E, 3947803.25 N. 17S
Name of nearest waterbody: White Oak Creek, Utley Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 9/7, 8 & 15/2021 and 10/19 & 21/2021
■
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See
Attached
ORM
Aquatic Resources
Upload
Form

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity, NRCS soils, and delineation map
▪ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: HUC 030300040102 (Cape Fear River Basin)
❑ USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: New Hill & Apex, 2019
▪ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Wake County 1970
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI North Carolina 2018
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps: FEMA Firm Panels #3720062800J, #3720064900J, and #3720064800J (eff. 05/2/06).
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: • Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap Orthoimagery 2017
or • Other (Name & Date): Landscape
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
■
■
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
12/20/2021
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

62
PFO
2,515
1,245
626
710
677
2.298
25,814
578
1160
2,187
978
Total abeam Mee =
Total 81mm Len. •
Pal
leq
tam
148
3,25
19,719
Pfl
1,658
1,305
109
327
266
tmx
960
152
Ii0
478
556
282
126
128
257.
Siream
54,508
2.617
8,032
16,530
124
495
438
3.
Des
NiiNV
14191,
HUY
triNV
Sm6-811. Wetland: 1,0,1=1, °Woe rnergent Wetland. POW= PelusInne Open Water EIW= Esinierins
Intertl Wetlands; Upper Perm. Stream, R4=Intertninent Weems;
Legend
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.
875
1,750
Feet
3,500
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 1,750'
FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
1 of 8
N
DATE >
10/26/2021 N
(5
DRAWN BY 3
M.COOLEY
0
(5
0
d
d
0
(5
(5
(5
m
0
d
0
0 0
O CC
20
°'z
�o
072
mo
e
D
N 2
• d
0 3
01
2 n
- • d
� d
0
dt
o .3
n m
d
U N
d o
N U
N N
N O
N U
N O
U N
O �
D �
N O
@a
U -
O C
N O
N U
n 2
(6 N
mO
"
Q O
N �

s
0
in
6
62
PFO
2,515
1,245
626
710
677
1298
25,814
578
1160
978
as ni
Total abeam Ana =
Total 8.am Len. •
acnr
148
1wn
3,25
19,719
Afl
1,658
1,905
1863
109
327
45917
266
tm2
960
152
An
478
556
282
126
128
An
iwm
1279
50508
2.617
8,032
16,530
124
209
475
438
3.
111,735
Des
troNV
1,1190/
NIINV
triNV
59m6-811. Wetland:imama.i wmi.na..ai- Upper Perm Stream. r4awMen.own inent Hams er«=eaw.nm
Legend
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
= Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- -Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.
11111 11/ I I I ' I /
11 I11 11 1 / 1
a\I 1\I I\ 1 1 1 I
\I\\\1\ 1
1 1`
`♦ / / — " V )' \ / Jlil I,� •.
/
�< \ 1'_Jri-------+_�,'— - /!,—\`♦\\\\\\\\\♦\ /-ter JJ/J,,- JJJ-
�� \� ♦�♦- ) fir/—e—
/ /
- / / /
/ 1..
J
I:I : :IV: ,:e .--;: e:
: :: 1-..: .a:: •,- 11 l.;:::‘ 1 r: : 1'
1air'' —', • ;
- -/,;^ -\- •
t •t. —
•
Sri 417 , , 41\ /
f�
•
Via,. - <
^JLy����I J/
1\�,1 1��/111111J/j1'/I'1,. 111\1\\\•�1\
\\\\t\\\ ��I I I 1 111 1 / l / / - _ - + 11 1 . \ \ \ I\ 1
\\\\\\\� — 1111111'1"II
\t\♦\k.♦ 'J.kl.\II11111, 1''
11/////111 ,' ;�/ �+ \\ llar
l;l\�:——+`--
¢'t7,1111.11—
III`jJ/,
I l , l ^ -
ril
•
•
0
0
OHM
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
SCALE
ce
a.
>-
ffiA
ffelHAI:Ai9a�Ae\� 1 AND WATER elIDIWIMIMILD1ZIM1_\:
JOB NUMBER
49130
SFIEET NO.
2 of 8
CC 1,2
o

0
0
—'U
in
62
PFO
000
2,515
1,245
626
710
677
2.298
25,814
578
1160
978
a4 �i
PEM
r
2,070
148
iwn
3,25
19,719
Pfl
t^s
1,305
1863
109
327
9,917
266
Lmx
960
152
un
478
556
282
126
128
un
iwm
1279
54.508
8,032
16.530
124
253
475
438
3.
PUN
liroV
Sm1.11. Wet., PEPPPelkoldne Emergent Wetland, POW= N.V.. 06en Mar UN— EsInieNne
Intertdel Wetlands: P. Upper Perenniel Stream, 1,14tertninent Weems:
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- -Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.
I . 1,\ \ 1 ' / -I f - r \ t. -
I I /' / / ♦ 1
A/ / / f / l
434 / ' / / J%! Jr " -
1Idol
11 I ,1 /' / /'
r
I111 / /� / ' / ' J
'11,1 / • // 1 1
llll / ' r/ / \/-1/
/// / 1 I / 1J ./...„
/ —
1 Y 11 I 11 1-
/ I I I \ /
-'
, / \ I /
/ 1 \ 1 1
` 1 i ' / I 1 \
I1',r ! 1 1 \
Il
III/1 1\1I
r/ 1 1 100\
Ir, rl l'T I
rt / 1 I { 1 (
' I-1• I, Ia.
F r.
-- > • ,rJ .J. .•
............
-' '.\\ l) I. \I \:l f- . ,
` _ 1 / \ c
/ -.� `1\ -
I `\ ,� J .,
•
/J
to
/
FDS-41Z1-2.
FDS-41 Z1-3
4 '
1 1•
\ / /\ 1 Iw \ - `1 \ 1//� r r J / , ( JJ
/ I 1 1_, , / /! - • '\
/
I \ • Ii
a ,a� x J/ 1 I J N 1 1 /
/ . II I
1� 1 ♦ 11 I /- II
,� AI•! / \\ ' / r —I , • // I
• /-/ 1 1 /'' \ \ 1 —'
) i
i_16:,....„
`,` 1 i YY'
) r -
t
-
\ 1
�.1 lrJl-• \J \/\r, ♦ / I \- -I I I \
•
fSf,t •sll • )-`;l f 1 \ I I- 1 J 1• >
•
t/
1
•
r
/\ ()se.'W
\\ \ I `/ al '��_1�J a�1 � 'J �\ \ ///1 ,/ GiryU7'� •I /
1 -s� .r ., - I
11 / , 33'•
/
1 / / \ , 1 , f -1•-
1 -' // ` - .)'• \' {t��y \ `�`\\ \ / , / / \ / °
1
__ \- /' /FDS-33Z4-1 /- - 1 , \ \ \ /) L ♦1 1,,\ 11; ; /iti�?-;/ `1 1.:''
—— \ / / `t ^ �� ^ •/ gyp] %fyyl '` \J. /- \ \ . l/, �• IJ
•
\ — — 1�1-a \ -�. 1 / _1/ `1 'r\-(1 ` ��t/)�1/rr!ti�-.1
-17
Ir��, �, i 1 I t I ) -t
rS7l1L=A�-'l1C) _' ./, 1 --1 J 1 - '_, /,/\/,`/J ; / ( I / , fI ;^/- -` JI r\ r ^11 �.! \ f�l'L�'\ /I , I,
11 1/ /n. �,' ,- r`/ r �r )'/ ,/ I -J /� \;/� •r t \ ` y r- a� i '�,1 I 1
•
// ♦� / / /f_ 1 / / /r ti -,/ \ , r/ r ^ \ \tl / "J/
-, - 1 / i - 1 / - I rf - \ -!/ 17, r \ ir/ 1
1 )- 7FDS-41B2-1 l�\�'' ' �A• Y __':y 1 - - / I I' �y,y.
Stir I% , / r / ...J •' 1
I,
J/ '-' _ \/\ \\ /, _ ', J/^, /JJ/F.DS40Z1 2
// y � `\1.31 ` Wit' M1_ 4061 9 r'.1J r ,.--'
Jr C '
is
41D2-5
FDS-41 D2-2
41Z1-7
41A2-3
33D3-3
FDS-33C3-2
FDS-41 D2-1
•_,I
41G1-1
FDS-33C3-1
41 B2-10
o�'-
, J
vht1;1464,
_1
FDS-40Z1 -1
33B3-4
�.: Culvert
J-
•' I
\ - 1 1 / , 1 J
I• / \ 1 1
33A3-1
994/4M. MOM
FDS-40Z1_34.
FDS-33H231,
I
/1/4
Z PSA-33J2-2 -
. - ^ '/ • ems?
.
\/ • fir ) N
P
' . ( r`- sal IE I .ram
'
� 1: `I\t
`>; \` I. 1 f I I / /, / ) • -?._-%tits •.•
•
1, I / /1 1(r-I1 1 \ // -'-_
/ \`♦ 47 �,1�,1 / i/ 11 11\11 l-\ f 1 1 • -^ `
\ ,\ ` ` �1\ tl
f I ; 1 I I \ f rp1 j 260 •..
/ •, I \
\ I l
1490
,
1/4 r( •
♦ 1 J\ J \ I\ 8
\r
) I
3
1
/ r )
`\• t • A Ills. •,. / 'f-a, - 1 t/ .\\ ' ) I ••• r'' I
1 / ,
•
'.\.I \. \♦
�•`\� \� ;�
B2
z
I)
1♦IIti\ \
S ( ``‘• 1
0C E
c
0
w
0)
0
0
s
1-
d
0
N
`_c
c
Vi
43
a
0
m
O
CO
•
a
a
0
ed
CO)
c7
z
0
1—
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 175'
ffelHAI:Ai9a�Ae\� 1 AND WATER elIDIWIMIMILD1ZIM1_\:
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
3 of 8

s
0
in.92
6
sins MAIM: v: nieWetland,
s�'am, RwM .ont Weemsac ; .w.nm
Legend
alProject Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- -Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.

s
0
in.92
6
Sm1.11.10 Wetlant
Erna,.�'mRM Open .wm
Wert.Wetlands: Upper Wetland. Strewn;
Legend
alProject Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.

s
0
0
.92
in
6
Sm1.11.10 WetlantiMert.i Wetlands: w- Erna,.
per Perm. Wetland. w.ermii Open rewnac er«=e.w.nm
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.

s
0
in.92
6
PSA_33C4=12,
sins MAIM: v: nieWetland,
s�'am, RwM .ont Weemsac ; .w.nm
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.

s
0
in.92
6
sins MAIM: v: nieWetland,
s�'am, RwM .ont Weemsac ; .w.nm
Legend
alProject Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
= Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
6.Areas grayed out in Resource Table previously confirmed under
SAW-2015-02137.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.646563
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-08-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33A2-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3
Long: -78.859801 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within a drainageway of a Perennial stream. The point was taken in the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation
Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33A2-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Acer rubrum
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4. Carya ovate
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACU
10 No FACU
75 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Oxydendrum arboreum
3. Cornus florida
4.
5.
6.
15
15
10
Yes
Yes
Yes
40 =Total Cover
FAC
UPL
FACU
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Ilex opaca
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
10
8
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
23 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
FAC
50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Microstegium vimineum
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Leersia oryzoides
5. Smilax rotundifolia
6. Cornus florida
7. Polystichum acrostichoides
8. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
9. Carpinus caroliniana
10.
11.
30 Yes FAC
25 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACU
15 Yes OBL
10 No FAC
8 No FACU
8 No FACU
5 No FACU
3 No FAC
119 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 60
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
18
20% of total cover: 24
Yes
18 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 14 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 64.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
15 x 1 = 15
0 x2= 0
166 x 3 = 498
79 x 4 = 316
15 x5= 75
275 (A) 904 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.29
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33A2-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
Depth
(inches)
0-9 7.5YR 5/6 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Rock
Depth (inches): 9
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Auger refusal at 9 inches below the soil surface due to rock layer.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.647662
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-07-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33C1-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.867284 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: L1 UBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This point was taken within the floodplain of an off -site Perennial stream. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33C1-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
35 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
95 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover: 19
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3.
4.
5.
6.
20
10
Yes
Yes
30 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5
Yes
5 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Viola sororia
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum
4. Woodwardia areolata
5. Carex sparganioides
6. Athyrium asplenioides
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
35 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
10 No FACW
10 No FACU
5 No FAC
85 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 43
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 17
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 185 x 3 = 555
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 215 (A) 655 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.05
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33C1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel
0-14 10YR 5/2 85 7.5YR 4/6
14-18 10YR 5/1 90 7.5YR 4/6
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Red
Loc2
15 C PL
10 C PL
uced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
X
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Heavily compacted clay from 14 to 18 inches below the soil surface. The sampled area is not in an isolated depression, and therefore does not
qualify for the F8 Hydric Soil indicator.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.647679
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-07-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33C1-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.867125 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: L1 UBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken adjancent to a Palustrine Forested Wetland within the floodplain of an offside Perennial stream. The point was taken during the
wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33C1-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4. Liriodendron tulipifera
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
35 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
15 No FAC
10 No FACU
80 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Diospyros virginiana
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
15
10
Yes
Yes
25 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Dichanthelium clandestinum
3. Boehmeria cylindrica
4. Polystichum acrostichoides
5. Galium aparine
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50
12
10
10
8
Yes
No
No
No
No
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
10
FAC
FAC
FACW
FACU
FACU
20% of total cover: 18
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 177 x 3 = 531
FACU species 28 x 4 = 112
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 215 (A) 663 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.08
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33C1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
Depth
(inches)
0-9 7.5YR 5/4 82
9-12 10YR 7/1 95
7.5YR 5/3 10 C M
7.5YR 3/4 8 C PL
7.5YR 6/8 5 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
Faint redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Clay
Depth (inches): 12
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Heavily compacted from 9 to 18 inches below the soil surface. Auger refusal at 12 inches below the soil surface due to compaction.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655185
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33C3-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3
Long: -78.892992 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CaD: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This point was taken within an oxbow in a Perennial stream floodplain. Recent sediment from flooding was present. The point was taken during the
wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True _Sparsely
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
-Stained Leaves (B9) Relief
_Water _Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33C3-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
8
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Yes
8 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Dichanthelium clandestinum
3. Chasmanthium latifolium
4. Microstegium vimineum
5. Persicaria lapathifolia
6. Carpinus caroliniana
7. Symphyotrichum puniceum
8. Elephantopus carolinianus
9.
10.
11.
25 Yes FACW
15 Yes FAC
10 No FACU
8 No FAC
8 No FACW
5 No FAC
3 No OBL
3 No FACU
77 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 39
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 16
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 3 x 1 = 3
FACW species 33 x 2 = 66
FAC species 36 x 3 = 108
FACU species 13 x 4 = 52
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 85 (A) 229 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.69
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33C3-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 4/3 96 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-16 7.5YR 4/3 75 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
16-24 10YR 5/2 82 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
5YR 4/6 4 C PL
5YR 4/6 25 C PL
5YR 5/6 18 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655192
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33C3-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3
Long: -78.893099 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CaD: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within an oxbow in a Perennial stream floodplain. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
X Saturation (A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 14
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33C3-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Pinus taeda
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACU
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Carya glabra
3. Oxydendrum arboreum
4.
5.
6.
15
10
8
Yes
Yes
Yes
33 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
UPL
50% of total cover: 17 20% of total cover: 7
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Arundinaria gigantea
15
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FAC
8 20% of total cover: 3
2. Microstegium vimineum
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4. Rubus argutus
5. Carpinus caroliniana
6. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
7. Toxicodendron radicans
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 51
30 Yes FACW
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACU
10 No FAC
8 No FACU
3 No FAC
101 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 21
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 63.6% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0 x 1 = 0
30 x 2 = 60
113 x3= 339
48 x 4 = 192
8 x5= 40
199 (A) 631 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.17
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33C3-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1 7.5YR 4/3 95 Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
1-16 7.5YR 5/3 98 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
16-24 7.5YR 5/3 88 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
7.5YR 3/4 5 C PL
5YR 4/6 2 C PL
5YR 4/6 12 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655000
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33H2-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.891497 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CaD: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This point was taken within a flat area at the base of an intermittent stream, just upslope of a transmission right of way. The point was taken during
the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
X Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
-Stained Leaves (B9) Relief
_Water _Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 18
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33H2-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Platanus occidentalis 10 Yes FACW
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 =Total Cover
5 20% of total cover: 2
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Carpinus caroliniana
4. Betula nigra
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15
10
10
8
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
43 =Total Cover
FAC
FACW
FAC
FACW
22 20% of total cover: 9
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum
15 Yes
8 Yes
23 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
12 20% of total cover: 5
2. Saururus cernuus
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum
4. Campsis radicans
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
30 Yes
25 Yes
15 No
8 No
78 =Total Cover
FAC
OBL
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 39 20% of total cover: 16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Smilax rotundifolia
50% of total cover:
15 Yes
15 =Total Cover
FAC
8 20% of total cover: 3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
25 x 1 = 25
28 x 2 = 56
108 x 3 = 324
8 x4= 32
0 x5= 0
169 (A) 437 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.59
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33H2-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 92 7.5YR 4/6 8 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
3-12 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
12-20 2.5YR 5/2 70 10YR 5/2 15 D M
7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
20-24 10YR 4/1 85 5YR 3/4 15 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM
=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.647032
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-07-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.870428 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within a drainageway upslope of an offsite pond. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
8 No FAC
58 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 29 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Pinus taeda
3. Fagus grandifolia
4. Quercus falcata
5. Oxydendrum arboreum
6.
25
10
8
5
5
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
53 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FACU
FACU
UPL
50% of total cover: 27 20% of total cover: 11
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Boehmeria cylindrica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
5. Dichanthelium clandestinum
6. Polystichum acrostichoides
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
40
10
10
5
5
2
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
72 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 36
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
FAC
FACW
FAC
FACW
FAC
FACU
20% of total cover: 15
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
FAC species 163 x 3 = 489
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 198 (A) 604 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.05
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
Depth
(inches)
0-13 10YR 4/3 83
13-24 10YR 5/2 92
10YR 6/2 15 D M
7.5YR 3/4 2 C M
7.5YR 4/6 8 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
Faint redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.647439
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-07-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.866293 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: L1 UBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within the floodplain of a Perennial stream. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
-Stained Leaves (B9) Relief
_Water _Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 19
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Acer rubrum
3. Diospyros virginiana
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
15
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Diospyros virginiana 20 Yes FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC
3. Prunus serotina 5 No FACU
4.
5.
6.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Agrostis gigantea
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
60
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
20
Yes
Yes
80 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
30
FAC
FACW
20% of total cover: 16
Yes
30 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
FAC species 155 x 3 = 465
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 180 (A) 525 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.92
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-8 7.5YR 5/4 92 10YR 6/3 5 C M
7.5YR 4/6 3 C PL
8-19 7.5YR 5/4 85 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
10YR 6/3 5 C M
19-24 10YR 5/3 85 7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Faint redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.647233
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-07-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-3
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-2
Long: -78.861239 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CaD: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken in a drainageway upslope of a Perennial stream. The point was during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation
Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4. Fagus grandifolia
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
12 Yes FAC
10 No FACU
57 =Total Cover
29 20% of total cover: 12
2. Ilex opaca
3. Carya ovata
4.
5.
6.
15
10
8
Yes
Yes
Yes
33 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
FACU
50% of total cover: 17 20% of total cover: 7
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Oxydendrum arboreum
2. Ilex opaca
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Polystichum acrostichoides
8
5
Yes
Yes
13 =Total Cover
UPL
FACU
7 20% of total cover: 3
2. Microstegium vimineum
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4. Lonicera japonica
5. Vitis rotundifolia
6. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
7. Ligustrum sinense
8. Boehmeria cylindrica
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 31
15 Yes FACU
10 Yes FAC
8 Yes FAC
8 Yes FACU
5 No FAC
5 No FACU
5 No FACU
5 No FACW
61 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 13
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0 x 1 =
5 x2=
85 x3=
66 x4=
8 x5=
0
10
255
264
40
164 (A) 569 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.47
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z1-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
Depth
(inches)
0-12
10YR 4/4 80
10YR 6/3 12 C M
7.5YR 4/6 8 C M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Compact Soils
Depth (inches): 12
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Auger refusal at 12 inches below the soil surface due to compacted soils.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drawl
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.648005
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-08-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z2-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 3-5
Long: -78.857397 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CaD: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken in a drawl upslope from a Perennial stream. The point was taken during the west season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z2-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Quercus alba
2. Pinus taeda
3. Acer rubrum
4. Quercus stellate
5. Carya ovate
6.
Absolute
% Cover
40
25
15
10
5
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FACU
Yes FAC
No FAC
No UPL
No FACU
95 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover: 19
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Diospyros virginiana
3. Ilex decidua
4. Carya ovate
5. Magnolia tripetala
6.
18
8
5
5
3
Yes FAC
Yes FAC
No FACW
No FACU
No FACU
39 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer rubrum 8 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Agrostis gigantea
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4. Quercus alba
5. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
6. Dichanthelium clandestinum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
25
20
8
5
5
3
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
66 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 33
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
8
FAC
FACW
FAC
FACU
FACW
FAC
20% of total cover: 14
Yes
8 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87.5%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0 x 1 = 0
30 x 2 = 60
118 x3= 354
58 x 4 = 232
10 x5= 50
216 (A) 696 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.22
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z2-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-12 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
12-24 10YR 6/4 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.647971
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-08-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z2-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3
Long: -78.852661 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within a drainageway. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on
site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z2-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Pinus taeda 25 Yes FAC
2. Quercus alba 20 Yes FACU
3. Acer rubrum 15 No FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 No FAC
5. Carya ovata 8 No FACU
6.
83 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC
2. Cornus florida 10 Yes FACU
3. Quercus laurifolia 8 No FACW
4. Oxydendrum arboreum 5 No UPL
5. Ilex opaca 5 No FACU
6.
43 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22 20% of total cover: 9
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Vaccinium corymbosum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
5
5
Yes FACW
Yes FAC
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum 35 Yes FAC
2. Quercus alba 10 No FACU
3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 8 No FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
53 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27 20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 77.8% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 13 x 2 = 26
FAC species 135 x 3 = 405
FACU species 61 x 4 = 244
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 214 (A) 700 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.27
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z2-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel
0-5 7.5YR 6/4 100
5-17 5YR 4/6 100
17-19 10YR 6/1 82
Loc2
5YR 4/6 18 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Red
uced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Organic Matter
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Rock
Depth (inches): 19
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Organic matter present from o to 2 inches below the soil surface. Auger refusal due to rock at 19 inches below the soil surface.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Southern Cross Utilities
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, J. Denton
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.657197
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 10-20-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z4-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.892515 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RoA: Roanoke loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken between two distinct roads within a heavily disturbed pine stand. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z4-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
50
8
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes
No
58 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 29 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
20
10
Yes
Yes
30 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Ilex opaca
3.
4.
5.
6.
15
8
Yes
Yes
23 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Eupatorium capillifolium
2. Microstegium vimineum
3. Carex blanda
4. Liriodendron tulipifera
5. Rubus argutus
6. Smilax rotundifolia
7. Carex lupuliformis
8. Leersia oryzoides
9.
10.
11.
15 Yes FACU
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
8 No FACU
8 No FACU
8 No FAC
5 No FACW
5 No OBL
74 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 37
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 15
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
5 x 1 = 5
5 x2= 10
128 x 3 = 384
47 x 4 = 188
0 x5= 0
185 (A) 587 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.17
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z4-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-6 10YR 4/3
6-13 2.5Y 5/2
13-18 2.5Y 7/2
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
95 10YR 5/8 5 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
40 10YR 6/8 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
70 10YR 6/8 30 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Red
uced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Layers 6-13 contained a mixed matrix with about 35% of 2.5Y 6/4 within the matrix.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Southern Cross Utilities
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, J. Denton
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.669702
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 10-21-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Long: -78.905028 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CrD: Creedmoor-Green Level complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken in a drainageway downslope of a paved road. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 16
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Pinus taeda
4. Liriodendron tulipifera
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
35 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
10 No FAC
8 No FACU
63 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32 20% of total cover: 13
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Quercus rubra
2. Ilex opaca
3. Nyssa sylvatica
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5. Quercus alba
6. Oxydendrum arboreum
20
12
8
5
5
5
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
60 =Total Cover
FACU
FACU
FAC
FAC
FACU
UPL
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Vaccinium corymbosum
2. Quercus rubra
3.
4.
5.
6.
5
5
Yes
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FACW
FACU
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
3. Ilex opaca
4. Vaccinium corymbosum
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
15
5
3
3
Yes
No
No
No
26 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
N/a
50% of total cover:
FAC
FACW
FACU
FACW
20% of total cover: 6
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 13 x 2 = 26
FAC species 83 x 3 = 249
FACU species 58 x 4 = 232
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 159 (A) 532 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.35
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-12 7.5YR 5/6 75
12-18 10YR 6/4 80
7.5YR 4/3 15 C M
5YR 4/6 10 C PL
7.5YR 4/6 20 C M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Faint redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Southern Cross Utilities
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, J. Denton
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Top of drawl
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.668730
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 10-21-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Long: -78.905807 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CrD: Creedmoor-Green Level complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken at the top of an upland drawl. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool,
conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Pinus taeda 40 Yes FAC
2. Acer rubrum 25 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
65 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 33 20% of total cover: 13
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC
3. Quercus alba 10 Yes FACU
4.
5.
6.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Vaccinium corymbosum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5
Yes FACW
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
20 Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
Yes FACU
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 115 x 3 = 345
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 135 (A) 415 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.07
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-11
10YR 6/6 77
11-18 2.5Y 4/2 67
10YR 5/4 15 C M
7.5YR 4/6 8 C PL
7.5YR 4/4 18 C M
10YR 5/4 15 C M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): S. Law
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655718
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.891842 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken in the lowest part of an oxbow located in the active floodplain of a Perennial stream. The point waas taken during the wet
season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
X Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-1
Absolute
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover
1. Carpinus caroliniana 15
2. Carya tomentosa 15
3. Pinus taeda 10
4. Liriodendron tulipifera 10
5. Nyssa sylvatica 8
6. Liquidambar styraciflua 8
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
71 =Total Cover
FAC
UPL
FAC
FACU
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 36 20% of total cover: 15
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Ulmus americana
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10
8
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
23 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FACW
12 20% of total cover: 5
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Chasmanthium latifolium
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4. Carex blanda
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
15
8
3
2
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Yes
Yes
No
No
28 =Total Cover
FACU
FAC
FACW
FAC
14 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
8 Yes FAC
2
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FAC
5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 72.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 13 x 2 = 26
FAC species 79 x 3 = 237
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
UPL species 15 x 5 = 75
Column Totals: 132 (A) 438 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.32
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION Continued (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-1
Tree Stratum
7. Ulmus americana
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Sapling Stratum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Absolute
% Cover
5
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
No FACW
71 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 36 20% of total cover: 15
Shrub Stratum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
23 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
28 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 14 20% of total cover: 6
50% of total cover:
10 =Total Cover
5 20% of total cover: 2
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-15 7.5YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
15-24 10YR 5/3 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): S. Law
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.656132
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.890288 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken in an oxbow within an active floodplain of a Perennial stream located within a drainageway above a Palustrine Open Water
feature. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
X Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Pinus taeda 20 Yes FAC
2. Fagus grandifolia 15 Yes FACU
3. Quercus alba 10 No FACU
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 8 No FAC
5.
6.
53 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Fagus grandifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 Yes FACU
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15 Yes FACU
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Ligustrum sinense 20 Yes FACU
2. Smilax rotundifolia 15 Yes FAC
3. Chasmanthium latifolium 5 No FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Toxicodendron radicans
3.
4.
5.
20% of total cover: 8
5 Yes FAC
2
Yes FAC
7 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
FACU species 75 x 4 = 300
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 125 (A) 450 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.60
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 5/4 98 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2-24 10YR 5/4 100
10YR 5/8 2 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): S. Law
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655627
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-3
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-3
Long: -78.891102 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CaD: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken in the lowest point of the active floodplain of a Perennial stream adjacent to Friendship Road. The point was taken during the wet
season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia 20 Yes FACU
2. Carpinus caroliniana 15 Yes FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 No FAC
4. Liriodendron tulipifera 8 No FACU
5.
6.
53 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Aralia spinosa 10 Yes FAC
2. Fagus grandifolia 8 Yes FACU
3. Ligustrum sinense 5 No FACU
4. Carpinus caroliniana 3 No FAC
5.
6.
26 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Ligustrum sinense 15 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3. Chasmanthium latifolium
4. Amphicarpaea bracteata
5. Arisaema triphyllum
6. Lespedeza cuneata
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
30 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
15 No FACU
10 No FAC
10 No FACW
5
No FACU
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 123 x 3 = 369
FACU species 76 x 4 = 304
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 209 (A) 693 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.32
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-40Z1-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-10 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
10-24 7.5YR 4/4 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.656416
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-41B2-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-2
Long: -78.892548 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within a drainageway upslope of a Palustrine Open Water feature. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41B2-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia 15 Yes FACU
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Yes FACU
3. Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC
4. Acer rubrum 8 No FAC
5. Betula nigra 8 No FACW
6.
51 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 26 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana 20 Yes FAC
2. Fagus grandifolia 10 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5
Yes FAC
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Gaultheria procumbens
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
25 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACU
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 8 x 2 = 16
FAC species 68 x 3 = 204
FACU species 45 x 4 = 180
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 121 (A) 400 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.31
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-41B2-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 2.5Y 5/3 90 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
12-18 2.5Y 6/2 80 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
18-24 5Y 7/2 70 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
7.5YR 5/8 10 C PL
7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL
7.5YR 4/6 30 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
The sampled point was not taken within an isolated wetland, and therefore does not qualify for the F8 Hydric Soil indicator.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): S. Law, K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.656390
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-41D2-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.893148 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This point was taken in an isolated depression uplsope of a Palustrine Open Water wetland feature. The point was taken during the wet season.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
-Stained Leaves (B9) Relief
_Water _Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41D2-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
Absolute
% Cover
20
5
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes
Yes
25 =Total Cover
13 20% of total cover:
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.
4.
5.
6.
15
10
Yes
Yes
25 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
5
FAC
FACW
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5
Yes
5 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Carex lupuliformis
2. Dichanthelium oligosanthes
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Juncus effusus
5. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
6. Microstegium vimineum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 31
25 Yes FACW
15 Yes FACU
8 No FAC
5 No FACW
5 No FACW
3 No FAC
61 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
N/a
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 13
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0 x 1 = 0
45 x 2 = 90
56 x 3 = 168
15 x4= 60
0 x5= 0
116 (A) 318 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.74
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-41D2-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey Fine Roots and Organic Matter
1-15 5Y 5/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
15-20 5Y 5/1 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
20-24 10YR 6/1 70 7.5YR 5/8 30 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM
=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): S. Law
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Sideslope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.656279
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-41D2-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-3
Long: -78.893023 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken on a sideslope between a Palustrine Open Water feature and a Palustrine Forested Wetland. The two systems were not
connected. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41D2-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Betula nigra
2. Pinus taeda
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
15
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FACW
10 Yes FAC
5
No FAC
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer rubrum 25 Yes FAC
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FACU
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 No FAC
4. Betula nigra 5 No FACW
5. Fagus grandifolia 3 No FACU
6. Quercus laurifolia 3 No FACW
66 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 33 20% of total cover: 14
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.
4.
5.
6.
10
8
Yes
Yes
18 =Total Cover
FAC
FACW
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Cinna arundinacea
2. Dichanthelium oligosanthes
3. Microstegium vimineum
4. Lonicera japonica
5. Hypericum perforatum
6. Acer rubrum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
15 Yes FACW
10 Yes FACU
8 No FAC
5 No FACU
5 No FAC
2 No FAC
45 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Lonicera japonica
15
20% of total cover: 9
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FACU
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 46 x 2 = 92
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
FACU species 53 x 4 = 212
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 174 (A) 529 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.04
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-41D2-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-3 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-10 10YR 6/2 90
10-24 10YR 7/1 85
10YR 5/8 10 C PL
10YR 7/8 10 C M
10YR 5/8 5 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=
Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
The redox features observed were relict and had hard edges along their boundaries.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 34.644377
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-08-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-2
Long: -78.853432 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within the floodplain of a Perennial stream. The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent
Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Drift _Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-1
Absolute
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover
1. Pinus taeda 20
2. Fagus grandifolia 15
3. Acer saccharum 15
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 12
5. Oxydendrum arboreum 10
6. Liriodendron tulipifera 10
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
92 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
FACU
FAC
UPL
FACU
50% of total cover: 46 20% of total cover: 19
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer saccharum
2. Ilex opaca
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Vaccinium corymbosum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
20
15
10
Yes
Yes
Yes
45 =Total Cover
FACU
FACU
FAC
23 20% of total cover: 9
8
Yes
8 =Total Cover
FACW
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Polystichum acrostichoides
2. Dichanthelium clandestinum
3. Microstegium vimineum
4. Hexastylis arifolia
5. Lonicera japonica
6. Vitis rotundifolia
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
20 Yes FACU
15 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
5 No FAC
5 No FACU
5 No FAC
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover: 12
Yes
5 =Total Cover
FAC
3 20% of total cover: 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 8 x 2 = 16
FAC species 82 x 3 = 246
FACU species 110 x 4 = 440
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
Column Totals: 210 (A) 752 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.58
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION Continued (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-1
Tree Stratum
7. Quercus rubra
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Sapling Stratum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Absolute
% Cover
10
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
No FACU
92 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 46 20% of total cover: 19
Shrub Stratum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
45 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9
Herb Stratum
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
8 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
50% of total cover:
5 =Total Cover
3 20% of total cover: 1
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
Depth
(inches)
0-8 7.5YR 5/4 85 7.5YR 4/6
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Red
15 C M Loamy/Clayey
uced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Compact soils at 8 inches below the soil surface.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655967
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-08-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.893918 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This point was taken within the floodplain of a Perennial Stream (White Oak Creek). The point was taken during the wet season. According to the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were drier than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_Surface
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
(A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Saturation _Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
X Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
-Stained Leaves (B9) Relief
_Water _Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4. Acer rubrum
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACW
10 No FACU
10 No FAC
55 =Total Cover
28 20% of total cover: 11
10
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Persicaria hydropiperoides
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3. Boehmeria cylindrica
4. Carex blanda
5. Impatiens capensis
6. Microstegium vimineum
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
20 Yes OBL
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACW
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FACW
10 No FAC
95 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
10
20% of total cover: 19
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 95 x 3 = 285
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 170 (A) 435 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.56
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-2 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-14 7.5YR 5/4 100
14-24 10YR 5/4 95
7.5YR 5/8 5 C PL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
City/County: Holly Springs/Wake
Investigator(s): K. Hefner
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.655911
Section, Township, Range: n/a
Sampling Date: 09-15-2021
State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-3
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -78.893819 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This point was taken within a Palustrine Forested Wetland in the floodplain of a Perennial stream. The point was taken during the wet season.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_Surface
X Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_True _Sparsely
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16)
_Oxidized _Moss
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
X Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
X Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_Thin _Saturation
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_ _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
X Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Relief
_Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Standing water present at about 40 percent of the wetland area.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
25
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
45 =Total Cover
23 20% of total cover: 9
15
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. N/a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Murdannia keisak
2. Persicaria hydropiperoides
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
15 Yes OBL
8 Yes OBL
23 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
15
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 23 x 1 = 23
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 98 (A) 248 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-41Z1-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 85 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-24 10YR 5/4 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM
7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Feature A
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33A2-1
Date: 09-09-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.646396
Evaluator: M. Gilbert
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.858576
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 1 L n . 5
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill &Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
12
I
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
I 0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 2.5
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
3
** Soils: 7.5YR 4/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
I' I
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Upland plants: Lonicera japonica at 12%, Carya ovata at 2%
Sketch:

Feature F
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33A2-2
Date: 09-08-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.646391
Evaluator: M. Gilbert
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.859310
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I18.5 Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
I
1
I
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 3
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
10.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
r 0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
Soils: 10YR 5/3 with 15 /0 7.5YR 4/6, no water flow with small pools
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Multiple frogs and water striders
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33A5-1
Date: 10/21/2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.669705
Evaluator: M. Gilbet, J. Denton
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.905015
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 7.5
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other New Hill & Apex, 2019
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 2.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
I 1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
_
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1 )
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
LO
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
4
** Soils: 7.5YR 5/6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
I' I
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
Sketch:

Feature X
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33B4-1
Date: 10-19-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.648182
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, J. Denton
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.8525
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I17.5 Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
12 I
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
5
Soils: 10YR 5/1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Standing water present at the end of the reach, most likely due to rain from the previous day.
The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
Sketch:

Feature X
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-41 C 1-2
Date: 09-08-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.645099
Evaluator: K. Hefner, M. Gilbert
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.854833
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 24.5
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
Ephemeral 'Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
I
1
I
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 5.5
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
6
Soils: 10YR 4/1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
I 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1�
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: , 2 frogs found
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33C4-1
Date: 10-19-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.648270
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, J. Denton
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.858525
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 15.5
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
11
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
I No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2 )
NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
10
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
5
** Soils: 7.5YR 5/6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
The point was taken during the wet season. According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, conditions on site were normal.
Sketch:

Feature U
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33J2-1
Date: 09-15-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.654778
Evaluator: M. Gilbert
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.890755
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 21
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
Ephemeral 'Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
4
Soils: 10YR 6/2 with 12% 7.5YR 4/6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
I 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Feature M
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33J2-2
Date: 09-15-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.655004
Evaluator: M. Gilbert
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.891406
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 19.7
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other New Hill & Apex, 2019
e.g. Quad Name:LRRP, MLRA 136
Ephemeral 'Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5 )
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.75 )
** Soils: 10YR 6/3 with 18% 7.5YR 4/6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
[ACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 10% Lizard's tail vegetative cover
Sketch:

No Feature Letter
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33L1-1
Date: 09-07-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.647872
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.859947
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I13.5 Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
I
1
I
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 2.5
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
4
** Soils: 10YR 6/3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
I' I
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

No Feature Letter
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33Z1-3
Date: 09-07-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.647228
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, K. Hefner
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.861237
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 1 0.5
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other New Hill & Apex, 2019
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 2
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
2
** Soils: 10YR 4/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Upland plants: Parthenocissus quinquefolia at 5%, Ligustrum sinense at 3%, Lonicera japonica at 8%, Ilex opaca at 5%
Sketch:

Feature X
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-41 C1-1
Date: 09-08-2021
Project/Site: Holly Springs Utilities
Latitude: 35.644543
Evaluator: K. Hefner
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.855262
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 15
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
New Hill & Apex, 2019
Other
e.g. Quad Name: LRRP, MLRA 136
I Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1.5 )
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
4
** Soils: 10YR 5/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
I' I
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Holly Springs Offsite Utilities
Portion of White Oak Creek within the Site, feature
T.
Portion of Utley Creek within the Site, feature Y.
Representative ephemeral stream within the Site,
feature F.
Portion of Utley Creek within the Site, feature W.
Representative intermittent stream within the Site,
feature X.
Representative ephemeral stream within the Site,
feature U.
i.+
600
a 1.
TIMMONS GROUP

Holly Springs Offsite Utilities
•
•. tii
M r
41E4 i..__•.
Representative palustrine forested wetland within
the Site, feature E.
Representative open water within the Site, feature
C.
Additional representative upland areas within the
Site.
411 ia.
,T� f' ter-,dr
Representative palustrine emergent wetland within
the Site, feature M.
Pik 3
•
41Yr
IF
Representative upland areas within the Site.
i*+a*
a 1.
TIMMONS GROUP

Appendix C

Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
r LOD
o 001
SAN —
- X
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
© Stream Impact
0 Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
!i!i2i2i!
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
1
TFrienshipRd•
0
0
.141
1
0od'Ct
0
Copper6ead Rd�
Alto ♦
♦�
•
cb
o
Ancient•Oaks •Dr
King
O IL
Oak St •) ,n 'Qi
Climbing
Tree Tii
I♦♦
Holl}iSprings
NewHill•Rd
♦-
�5
Oa
offee
6tffLn c
vsca/is
/
/y 0
e r\e,N.
W(\f3co,A,
cry
ds•Creek•Rd
�
Je`s,Q
\o 4
,oa Silver 0\
o�
co12)
_Ancient
e Oaks Or co,
��
o
O Do � 5
ah op
v
■
o/ri pernJ
•S°' i
�& 0
Mom n9' 0
Oaks 0
•
Fv
Q
Ancient• Oaks •Or
Holly Springs
New Hill Rd
0
Ago*. ♦r
,°�s
■■ro•
Dr I oo
�'
v
3.)3 Unwater
=- /ay
r
(r),O
t�
,Ljea vent
°per Ln Meadows
)'racantha
Dr /Pyraco
°O
.6ge•Dr T
CtN a'�oe Oi R/a
r
lyall F
i
k
O
f �l cantna
v' v Pyracantha Off
co, Gruggle Dr 0
Way 6ta 4' 4)
Braxman Ln
Avent
\\: ° �j O
of
'Ao,
tf°. Oi
,�s� �ypH�ss
Ivy Arbor
n
ill Lti��
�,
!\OU,
`73 N
Holly Springs
New Hi Rd
B )
SA Oi eao
�'>Sts,-cry, y c •
0e
Sweet
Niio/et Dr
Najen
Thomas•Mill•Rd Thomas
Mill Rd
O.
o
Tradition -Td`
a,
E
a
Green 'Oak s•Pkwy-CIO
Sweet•Violet•Dr
Thomas •Mill •Rd
C''e
en s•PloNsi
j� i•• i■■ i■ ■ flop■N—� 1
lE-11 N
LO(�CN•� �t�l LODOOlS�r�5� LOaoi �AO(�*iv.au.51.ILCl 001
Magnnoo4
Meadow/yd
magnolia � y
d`k �
� n � � COS
v, y� o ~
oQc� � m �00� �• `' a
SYoa�e\o
pant Ln R�dO o 0
t P ohs oarnore m o�
Ln Meadows Ln Meaa Acorn y ��ge Ln o 0, Oakb e6
CD / Fa//, Cf a; m Ctp�
Qoqp
anlore. iOa� m j Acorn
C9 vc Cs C9'\c C�ekO is Ct Fa//s Ct
ot• Dr
.64
\�I c e dow Dr
t� Southern
Foster
Holly Ln
Aven
o�ccsont rI`�
0
°riymont Dr\
rt
0_
(D O
a
0
Q
o
0/� ° z
Como a `.5 S\\a
No
G �o\� \o Ot
0
m
R.o
Ln'
Ca°\\s.
"7
OU,
'"Oamot
mod Pl
0
Sweet
Violet Dr
0
0
a
1-Vinewooa•
..,0o
ma`s Mant/e Ln
00
c
j
0
11
Newspaper Way- 10
� I
0
T
5 - 1
co o
Q w.
1 _
Green
Oaks Pkwy
0
0
v
Z
—Berman Edge Rd
w
TIMMONS R U
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
O
O
r
'5 10
V)N0
NN
tD
i
� N
o. 0
E
W
3 .2 H
o ce
0
0
E
O
N
C
O
E
E
3
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
DATE
11 /30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
Li DAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
SCALE (FEET)
0 800 1,600
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE
H:1 "=800'
SHEET NUMBER
1 of 7
Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\WTIM\49130-PERM-WTIM.mxd

O
jr
153,
C kib at
Twe. hop CPMkd
M
9-41 CAL pry
rrjl{�
0-0
INF i Elaiii 1,Bla
i■=fr+'Usu.
CPI' C
V.
Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
�.. —
r LOD
0 001
SAN —
- X
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
© Stream Impact
O Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
�•••••_/
•
/
/
N ■
r LOD
0
i
TGO1
LOD
r
/
/
:OD
II INN I
•
LOD
�■■�on.
■■
v
■
•
001 •
•
■
■
•
1
�•
•
•
•
II(
Fnendship•Rd
I
1
■
o-
D1
L.
■
10D
■
■
O
I
1 O
■
■
1
-
1
■
1
■
1
-%AN7-
III"
1
v
001
1
•
maw
r/
•
•
• //•
♦ ci
I• //
��
• /
1•
♦°°/)
:10
:-
'♦ �/
/o
/ l�
♦ 1
•1§4
1 //&
i §Ii• •
•
I/
• °°� /
,i
1
�`'O�� /•
,•
,• ///O
• ".- /I
•
§)/
',�. AJ
`. ��
1
•
,,y
kt,
•
alaNNININSIINammias
GO
0
0
IIL25 o°l VI
•
•
•♦
•
.
�0,, O
•
• °o•
no
row
•
.
.
•
•
.`
•
�4♦
1
■
■
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
■
1
1
1
1
1
1
■
,
.
w
TIMMONS R U
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
0
0
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
co
ce
CL
co
LL
LL
DATE
11/30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study linnits have been
located using subnneter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project linnits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
SCALE (FEET)
0 150 300
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
2 of 7

M
cis
'ram 4 fJ
- ti
73.
9.3
C I1ib at
hub C iI
so K
It
yy .
yy � I* Ms • Aro
(;.• ptic tive■
P CV.
1 I me• Use*
Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
r LOD
0 001
SAN —
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
© Stream Impact
O Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
■
4 ■
1
•
• r,
■ 0
'
• ▪ 0�I
' I�
■
■
1 0 II
O
■
■ I*-
' Ig
▪ `2
„_--Cateswood'Ct, 1 LI ,■ ■
c776
■ (:) • •
• -
• X -A
g
,
`
• 0
,y�0
O
♦•
O,
•
♦
007 w
•
♦♦
�•
♦,
♦♦
♦
♦♦
•
♦♦
�.
••�
0
♦
•
400
a _
Op�(w y w 5P:
` .0 � w /pN N
O OOIO
` • 0I
00' 7 w
op/ �oo
/d#�
♦/ 1%
4
♦
•• /
•oa •
00�••*kw
••
Ns 4 iv14/ `• •
0g•
/ S 14/
0I`\ £ o`•ij`'I`\iv\`
p _ 00`s�qm
`•
•P..v.�\p
o°I`\/o\ Sq \\o
\ sw
A.
• • `••
•0 wo•
0
` 00\A' l44•♦`BOO
` \'1N�qys••
`00I"vqN\COO\•• ♦
o°I``,Oo • ♦`•.
14/ q \`
`•.O\i`` S\O •.`
••°O
`wPfr (Op
s••aft* •
OO `w` `OO •`••♦
O\A�\ ` ••�
°I `\ 014/wp
I `(S\OO `V '!Op •
007 14, Ws"ws � w �
°I /,t/ wqN
.111110.
Holly Springs
I "New Hill Rd
—�
♦v•
•
- -
�,.
•
••
♦••`
/ ••1111.
/ ••
w`
w11/ sPfrN`/o
w gNsw o
007' tq/ ANSgN w`
`qw �Op
OOI� Air
W gwOp
1 007 �w�lJJ,pp
0 z SAY�AD
S••
LOD
0
w
••
=SA
LODWW�
OOIW_
r
aol
`• •
�••
43
S N oTSAA�
LW ODW W� LOD �WLOD
W
WO/ OOlW u0 W DOOIw�W O— (pp
Seer••
11107••
Soo••
••,
N.
`w. , 11 roQ� • •
OO, w op R"y • •
•
.O�\Oo 'kt\� ••%
�'••� w aoN�c
•• °07 ww°D
`••`,� w (0p p,S,�'
`v•: o�
••`
C/imb mg -Tree 4-1-1
•• 4
w
TIMMONS R U
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
E
0
C
0
E
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
co
W
fV++
V i
z
coce
CL
J
J co
0 u-
O
DATE
11/30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
(F)
SCALE (FEET)
0 150 300
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE
H:1 "= 150'
SHEET NUMBER
3 of 7
Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\WTIM\49130-PERM-WTIM.mxd

- • M
I lie
4/1..
C km at
Timih* C rikd
nal
Xi
tit
%lb" 'rt
■
epto"
Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
•■■—J
•
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
11■ti■■�
LOD
oao�
w
SAN —
._._._._._.,
i
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
Stream Impact
Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
9
r
1
1
e
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
• amok
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS .
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
� J
Zp
D
0<
0LLJ
I—
O
Z
DATE
11/30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
(P)
SCALE (FEET)
0 60 120
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
4 of 7
Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\WTIM\49130-PERM-WTIM.mxd
SCALE
H:1"=60'

- •
= ti. F.ry
92
•
C km at
L _
HIM
'.F tpop-r
*co • Nr N.
C{
tom{• `�
447
items*IWO
Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
•11a�J
•
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
LOD
oao]
w
SAN —
._._._._._,
i
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
Stream Impact
Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
\ 9
2
eo
0
2 �
00
eO
O
\ 9
2•
00
\ 9
00
•
J9
SqN
\ ` 400
1Sq
S 400
400
•
•` 00 7 \SqN
400
00
•.` `00, SqN\ `C
\ 00
•I OOP SqN
` \ ` 400
q
••� 00 7 S N \ -
1• O0� N \ \
•
Sq
N
•
OO
•
•
`.
1`
•
•
`•�
`•1
•
•
•
•
•
•
`•�
,•i
`•i
`•i
•
1
■
■
1
■
1
■
1
■
1
1
•
1
°0I
■
1
■
■
1
■
■
1
■
1
■
1
■
■
1
•
"mil
ll p
•
11
•`
•
••`
41,
••`
11
•`
••`
•
••`
CO
SqN `�00
N 400
SqN
07
07
007
SqN
406
400
SqN
S
qN
Z
0
I
0
I
0
I
0
I
O
I
O
0
0
0
0
0
Z
• / r
I
0
z 0
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
z
Z
D 0
z o
D I
0
z I
0
n 0
0
D 0
z Iz
0
0
D Iz
0
0
I
0
0
`* *
1
■
1
•
■
1
1
•
■
1
■
1
•
1
■
1
•
•
1
■
1
•
•
1
■
1
•
•
1
•
1
■
1
•
•
1
1
■
•
•
•
•
■
1
1
■
1
■
■
1
1
■
1
■
1
■
1
■
1
•
•
• amok
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS .
O
M
Y
.5 to
f/)NO E
fC N in C)
O fn
i O 0
ca.6(4E
o E
0 co
a`) EJ�
w
• 9 H
o re
0
0
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
DATE
11/30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
(P)
SCALE (FEET)
0 25 50
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
5 of 7
Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\WTIM\49130-PERM-WTIM.mxd
SCALE
H:1"=25'

'"'+rL'}'
-4L
C lob at
TWAI CSIMI
rrjl{�
ro
.J
CO - m
we Maw KIM
I Al
f Ii Co
t11041111t
Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
r LOD
o 001
SAN —
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
© Stream Impact
O Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
/
•r♦%
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 /
•
•
• o°
♦•
/
o°
•
1 /
•
•
O°
i
•
/
♦ O°
•
i /
1
1•
/
•
•
♦ / /
O° /
•
# /
•
♦ o
• o
•
•
/ • o /
•
•
/ /• �P /
O° /
� O°
/ / /
•
• o° /
/ h
P�
h
O°
P /
/
°N
o°
/
ego
N
/
/
P� 00?
5
/ o0
P� /
/
/ 00
/
1
/
1
1
1
/
1
1
1
/
/
1
1
1
1
/
ego
N
N
/
ego
/
/
ego
N
/
/
1
1
1
1
1
J
eOo
400
/
/
/
/
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
/
r
/
ego
/
1
1
1
/
qN
sq4\
qti /
/
/
/
/
0�/ \sq L
/ ` \\s
/ °o, A4,.
0o
00,
/
6
z
z
0
0
O
0
z
Z
i
0
O
1
0
0
0
0
0
■
■
1
•
■
1
•
•
1
■
■
1
■
■
1
■
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
■
1
■
■
•
■
•
•
1
•
•
1
■
■
1
■
■
•
■
•
■
•
■
•
■
•
•
•
w
TIMMONS R U
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
O
O
N N 0
- tE N
tD
i
� N
C200
• E
W
o • re
0
0
E
O
N
C
O
E
E
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
DATE
11/30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
(F)
SCALE (FEET)
0 25 50
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE
H:1 "=25'
SHEET NUMBER
6 of 7
Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\WTIM\49130-PERM-WTIM.mxd

0
M
Vicis •__
03,
fJ .
C I1ib at
TAW * CiI
441110.1
k
�y m
e- t
%f
FI:ow :ow�•Jfi�
•
1114
i•=D+*WI*
C
Impacts Table
Impact ID
Wetland (sq. ft)
Temporary Stream
Impact
Impact
Conversion
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
If.
sq. ft.
1
347
2
35
75
3
49
145
4
130
467
5
73
422
6
62
504
7
163
376
Total
O sq ft
O sq ft
O sq ft
347 sq ft
512 If
1,989 sq ft
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
0.01 ac
Legend
• •
•
r LOD
001
w
SAN —
— X
._._._._._.,
i
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Limits of Disturbance- 36.4 Acres
Proposed Water
Proposed Sewer
Proposed Fence
Proposed Road
Proposed Grading
Stream Impact
Wetland Impact
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
Temporary Stream Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
Permanent Conversion Impact
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
JD
LOD
001
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
SAN —SAN--SAN--SAN--
aol
aol
aol
001
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
/
I
LOD
LOD
LOD
�4-i
LOD
/
/
/
/
SAN— —SAN— —SAN— —SAN— —SAN— ---05.AN--SAN--SAN--SAN--SAN--SAN—
/
/
aol
aol
aol 7/0ol
/
/
/
/
/
/
1
/
/
/
/
1
aol
001
aoi
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
ao
aol
7
LOD
aol
SAN
LOD
aol
SAN
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
♦
/
/
/
/
SAN — —SAN SAN——SAN —/LSAN--SAN SAN— —SAN— —SAN--SAN--SAN--SAN--SAN— SAN— —SAN— -SAN— —SAN—SAN--SAN— —SAN--SAN—SAN--SAN--SAN— —SAN SAN —
/
/
/
/
/
LOD +� LOD
/
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
aol aol eel aol
�-
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
aol
001
001
aol
001
001
001
ac
• amok
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS .
O
O
Y
'7 lt5
f/)NO E
fC N Lc) (.3
O fn
i O O
co E
o E
o
d E
w
0
cO
O
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
Z
� J
Zp
D
0<
00
LIJ
—
O
Z
DATE
11/30/2021
PROJECT NUMBER
49130
PROJECT NAME
HOLLY SPRINGS OFFSITE UTILITIES
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 7:
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
(P)
SCALE (FEET)
0 25 50
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
7 of 7
Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\WTIM\49130-PERM-WTIM.mxd
SCALE
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
1
H:1"=25'

L:\201\33927 - James River Water Project\DWG\Sheet\CD\JRWA #2A\33973C-PRJ2A-NTDT.dwg 1 Plotted on 11/1/2017 3:53 PM 1 by James Carter
EOSIO\ CO\TOOL LEGE\D
UTILITY STREAM CROSSING
SILT FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SURFACE ROUGHENING
STRAW BALE BARRIER
VEHICULAR STREAM CROSSING
PERMANENT SEEDING
MULCHING
CONSTRUCTION ROAD STABILIZATION
3.25
3.05
3.02
3.29
3.04
3.24
3.32
3.35
3.03
* VIRGINIA EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK
SPECIFICATION NUMBER, THIRD EDITION, 1992.
TOP OF
///j�/j�/j� STREAM BANK
/, STREAM
48"
3
- - -CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT
DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH M.J. FITTINGS, SEE TABLE
ON SHEET D1.5 FOR RESTRAINED JOINT LENGTHS
PVC PIPE MAY BE ALLOWED AS DIRECTED BY THE
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
Identifier
Raw
Waterline
STA:
Drainage
Area
(sq. mi.)
Estimated Base Flow
(CFS)
2-year
Flow
Estimate3
(CFS)
Required Pump Capacity
1
Law
a
High
MIN
(GPM)
Equivalent
inlet Size
(in)
MAX
(GPM)
Equivalent
Inlet Size
(in)
Byrd Creek
242+31
60.3
10
20
1,789 4
4,488
12
8,977
18
XS-1
295+51
1.15
0.22
0.44
171 s
99
2
197
3
XS-2
337+51
1.67
0.62
1.24
213
W
278
3
557
4
XS-3
455+08
1.85
0.25
0.5
227
` 112
2
224
3
XS-4
459+24
8.27
0.44
0.88
551
, 197
3
395
4
XS-5
460+88
8.36
1.06
2.12
554
476
4
952
6
XS-6
468+06
8.36
1.06
2.12
554
475
4
952
6
1. Low base flow based on field observed depths modeled in Bently FlowMaster V8i
2. High base flow based on factor -of -safety of 2.0 ouer base flow
3. Peak flow calculations determined using regression equations from the Peak -Flow Characteristics of Virginia Streams,
Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5144 (USGS).
PUMP SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUMP AROUND
DURING OPEN CUT STREAv UTILITY CROSSINGS
STREAM -\
f
48"
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
UTILITY STREAM CROSSING
NOT TO SCALE
FLUME PIPE CROSSING
WAVER VVIPV
0 0 , v
o
° � o
1+( o
00 D
m o
0
0 00
CREEK BANK
WATER LEVEL
WATER -W
AGGREGATE
CREEK BOTTOM
PROP. PIPELINE
A117/117 03S0d02/d
FLUME PIPE
PLAN VIEW
EXCAVATED TRENCH
SECTION "A -A"
EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE
LOCATED BELOW
APPROACH AREAS
EXCAVATED TRENCH
EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE
LOCATED BELOW
APPROACH AREAS
PROPOSED
PIPELINE
SECTION "B-B"
UTILITY STREAM CROSSING
NOT TO SCALE
COFFERDAM CROWNING
A
i
PERIMETER
CONTROLS
(D)
MINIMUM DISTANCE TO
BE 25% OF TOTAL
WIDTH (W) OF THE
STREAM.
(D)
FLOW
1/2 W
1°4""P
(MIN.-44101
I�
af6
FILTER CLOTH
PLAN
W
FILTER CLOTH
TRENCHLINE
RIPRAP OR OTHER
NON- ERODIBLE
MATERIAL
AGGREGATE OR
SAND
(DISTURBED! AREA)
A
DEWATERING DEVICE, SEE STD. & SPEC. 3.26
1/2 W
(MIN.)
PERIMETER
CONTROLS
TRENCHLINE
SECTION A -A
UTILITY STREAM CROSSING
NOT TO SCALE
DEWATERING STRUCTURE
(VA E&S STD. & SPEC. 3.26)
FLOW
DISCHARGE PUMP
INTO VELOCITY
DISSIPATER
6 OZ NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE
(ACF N060 OR EQUAL)
WORK
AREA
DISCHARGE HOSES -\
DIVERSION PUMP
(SIZED ACCORDINGLY)
INTAKE
HOSE
DEWATERING PUMP
(AS NEEDED)
WORK AREA
SANDBAG/STONE
BARRIER
WORK AREA LENGTH
NOT TO EXCEED
- THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
PLAN VIEW
FLOW
FLOW
SUMP HOLE OR
POOL 1' MIN DEPTH
2' MIN DIAMETER
NOTE:
WORKERS TO BE PRESENT DURING
PUMPING ACTIVITIES. AT NO TIME SHALL
THE PUMPING OPERATION BE IN PROCESS
WHEN THE WORK AREA IS UNATTENDED.
BASE FLOW + 1'
(2' MINIMUM)
CROSS SECTION OF SANDBAG/STONE DIVERSION
SECTION A -A
TEMPORARY UTILITY STREAM
CROSSING COFFERDAM PUMP AROUND
NOT TO SCALE
TEMPORARY BRIDGE CROSSING
ABUTMENT
STEEL CABLE
OR CHAIN
•
ACCEPTABLE ANCHOR
50'
50'
Moo -
\1\\----
SURFACE FLOW DIVERTED
BY SWALE AND/OR DIKE
STRAW BALE/SILT FENCE PIT
FILTER CLOTH
PUMP DISCHARGE
NOTE: FILTER CLOTH
COVERS ENTIRE
INSIDE FACE OF
STRAW BALE DIKES.
INSTALL AS PER STD.
& SPEC. 3.05, SILT
FENCE.
EXISTING
GROUND
tisrr-tr
p
p
▪ 0 0
�1 or-1/Y1 or- I/}^▪ _weYdrGF
CLASS Al RIPRAP
SPLASH , BLOCK 1'
Y1 rr-. I I Y_weY40 (IV Y1 rr- I Y1 rr-•{ 111.6.dNrGYd,Pg111
0 0
1'-6"
eLl
dru�
f 1 mrmrmrm yrdry�
PLAN VIEW
fi I I r ik
1.11wI1-11r ry rt.LJ'1' rs
III;III;III�III IIIIIII; II„III;III;III;
III;.
„
1 3, i 0
DEPTH
2 STAKES PER
BALE (TYP.)
VDOT #25 OR #26
AGGREGATE
CLASS AI RIPRAP
CROSS-SECTION A -A
V-6"
I�'1
VDOT #25 OR #26
AGGREGATE (4'' DEPTH)
I 1 EXCAVATED AREA
DRY RIPRAP 111111111111
CLASS AI
CROSS-SECTION B-B
DEWATERING STRUCTURE
NOT TO SCALE
TEMPORARY CULVERT CROSSING
VDOT COARSE AGGREGATE 6'' DEEP
1/2 DIAMETER
OF PIPE OR 12",
WHICHEVER IS
GREATER
VDOT COARSE
AGGREGATE
50' MIN.
TOP OF BANK
DIVERSION AND/
OR SWALE
CROSSING
NO SCALE
ELEVATION
FLOW
STREAM CHANNEL
PLAN VIEW
CAPACITY OF PIPE CULVERTS
TOGETHER = FLOW
EARTH FILL COVERED
BY LARGE ANGUL4R
ROCK
FILTER CLOTH
LARGE ANGULAR
ROCK OVER
EARTH FILL
50' MIN.
TOP OF BANK
DIVERSION AND/
OR SWALE
Lu
0
E
IL 0
Gt
ELe
ce
CL
0
CO
LD
GO
LO
CN
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
cu
Infrastructure
Residentia
o.
cu
4-1
0
Lu
0
Lu
REVISED PER FLUVANNA COUNTY COMMENTS
Lu
0
CO
01
DATE
08-18-2016
211
D
X 0
0
u
0
DRAWN BY
J. CARTER
DESIGNED BY
D. SAUNDERS
CHECKED BY
D. SAUNDERS
SCALE
AS SHOWN
co
ITe
LLJ
Et
LIJ
LLJ
GENERAL NOTES AND
JOB NO.
33927
SHEET NO.
D1.3
0
sa
CVS
co
as L• a
CC • -92
o
C7) cc
o
O • co
o
cu
• o

L:\201\33927 - James River Water Project\DWG\Sheet\CD\JRWA #2A\33973C-PRJ2A-NTDT.dwg 1 Plotted on 11/1/2017 3:54 PM 1 by James Carter
INSTALL ALONG BOTTOM OF
BANK (TOE) AND UP/OVER
BANK AS APPLICABLE
Herb (recommended)
Nodding sedge
Boneset
Wool Grass
Jewelweed
STAGGER STAKING
3' APART 0.C.
IN THREE ROWS
CUT TOP OF STAKE SQUARE
2 TO 5 BUD SCARS SHALL BE
ABOVE THE GROUND. REMOVE
ADDITIONAL LENGTH BEYOND
4" ABOVE GROUND.
TRIM BRANCHES CLOSE
1/2"-1" DIAMETER
MAKE ANGLED CUT AT
BUTT -END (BASAL).
LIVE STAKING (MULTIPLE ROW)
SPACING DETAIL FOR MAJOR
STREAM BANK RESTORATIONS
NOT TO SCALE
Shrub (recommended)
Pawpaw
Alder
Blackberry
Elderberry
Livestakes (recommended)
Black Willow
Silky Dogwood
PLANTING SCHEDULE FOR VAJOR
STREAV BANK RESTORATIONS
70' MI/V.
VDOT #1
COARSE AGGREGATE z'
.: ,41„Anikk
EXIST. GROUND
VDOT #1
COARSE AGGREGATE
6 FILTER CLOTH
M/N.
SIDE ELEVA T/ON
70' MIN.
WASHRACK
(OPT/ONAL)
12' M/N. *
POSITIVE DRAINAGE
TO SEDIMENT
TRAPP/NG DEVICE
PLAN V/EW
(SEE PLATE J. 02-1 OF THE VA.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
HANDBOOK (1992) FOR ADDITIONAL
DETAILS.)
EXIST.
5 1 PA VEMENT
MOUNTABLE BERM
(OPTIONAL)
/N ACRES)
10'
M/N.
`-PAVEMENT
10'
MIN.
STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NOT TO SCALE (.O2)
DOZER TREADS CREATE
GROOVES PERPENDICULAR
TO THE SLOPE.
NOTE:
BYRD CREEK AND HORSEPEN CREEK ARE
CONSIDERED "MAJOR" STREAM CROSSINGS.
*NOTE:
SEE PLANTING SCHEDULE
FOR SPECIES TO BE
RE—ESTABLISHED
KOIRWRAP 1,000 (NEDIA
ENTERPRISE, INC. OR
APPROVED EQUAL)
LIVE STAKES (3' OC)
AND BRUSH
CUTTINGS
9" - 18" HIGH
SOIL LIFT
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
77RA CLING
SURFACE ROUGHENING
NOT TO SCALE
SEED SURFACE
UNDER MAT
*LIVE STAKES
(TYP.) /
18" TO 36"
700g COIR
MAT
0
°o;
0
* PLANTINGS
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
UNCOMPACTED
EARTH
r
2" x 4" WEDGE
STAKES
NATIVE BACKFILL
OR TOPSOIL
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
REINFORCED SOIL LIFT DETAIL FOR
MAJOR STREAM BANK RESTORATIONS
NOT TO SCALE
0
t T '
lita 1 f t1 I
o� 0
NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED "ON CONTOUR".
2. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROPERLY INSTALL
ALL E&S DEVICES TO MAXIMIZE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS.
3. SILT FENCE INSTALLED ACROSS DRAINAGE WAYS AND STREAMS DURING
THE PIPELINE INSTALLATION IS TO BE REMOVED AS THE LAST STEP IN
RESTORATION PRIOR TO RETURNING FLOW TO THE CHANNEL.
1. SET THE STAKES.
3. STAPLE FILTER MATERIAL
TO STAKES AND EXTEND
IT INTO THE TRENCH.
2. EXCAVATE A 4"X4" TRENCH
UPSLOPE ALONG THE LINE OF
STAKES.
4. BACKFILL AND COMPACT
THE EXCAVATED SOIL.
FLOW
1
SHEET FLOW INSTALLATION
(PERSPECTIVE VIEW)
POINTS A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINT B.
DRAINAGEWAY INSTALLATION
(FRONT ELEVATION)
CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE
(WITHOUT WIRE SUPPORT)
NOT TO SCALE
1. EXCAVATE THE TRENCH.
FLOW
PALLETS
QUICK DISCONNECT
COUPLINGS (TYP.)
4" OR 6" PIPING
FROM
PUMP
4 MIL
POLYETHYLENE FILM
NOTES:
1. PIPE AND FITTINGS TO BE SIZED ACCORDINGLY.
2. PLACE PALLETS AND POLYETHYLENE FILM IN STREAMBED
DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
3. TEMPORARILY ANCHOR PALLETS AND POLYETHYLENE FILM
WITH RIP RAP.
4. SLOW DISCHARGE TO 2 FPS THROUGH EACH PIPE.
5. ADD POLYETHYLENE FILM OVER OR UNDER PALLETS.
6. 90° BENDS CAN BE TURNED OUTWARD WITH A LARGER
FOOTPRINT OF PALLETS FOR ADDITIONAL ENERGY
DISSIPATION.
7. REMOVE COMLPETELY PRIOR TO RETURNING FLOW TO
STREAM.
TEMPORARY STREAM BYPASS PUMP
DISCHARGE ENERGY DISSIPATOR
NOT TO SCALE
BINDING WIRE
OR TWINE
FILTERED RUNOFF
1S
II
II II — I = �I �I -1i1 I-1�1=1111 I-111Itll 1=
III III—(11I y
Ill►=
ill =11I =ill=1i111=1i = ill I=���1I �I _III -Jill =I
PROPERLY INSTALLED STRAW BALE
(CROSS SECTION)
2. PLACE AND STAKE STRAW BALES.
STAKED AND ENTRENCHED
STRAW BALE
COMPACTED SOIL TO
PREVENT PIPING
SEDIMENT LADEN
RUNOFF
I I
BALE
WIDTH
3. WEDGE LOOSE STRAW BETWEEN BALES.
ANGLE FIRST STAKE
TOWARD PREVIOUSLY
LAID BALE
4. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE
EXCAVATED SOIL.
STRAW SALE 3ARRIER
NOT TO SCALE C•04—�
Ln
N
N
N
E
O
U
E
x
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
cn
O
u
cu
H
Infrastructure
Residentia
z
0
0
0
LJJ
0
z
0
LJJ
REVISED PER FLUVANNA COUNTY COMMENTS
REVISED PER FLUVANNA COUNTY COMMENTS
LL
a
0
C
Co
DATE
08-18-2016
CC
I II
G2
DRAWN BY
J. CARTER
DESIGNED BY
D. SAUNDERS
CHECKED BY
D. SAUNDERS
SCALE
AS SHOWN
U)
11
w
0
GENERAL NOTES AND
JOB NO.
33927
SHEET NO.
D1.4
O
U
0
0
0
m
0
0
>.
0
m
0
O
0
m
m
0
0
0
3
O
a
a)
.1))
0
o(9
2 z
20
�2
m o
c m
m
a 0
CC • m
O 3
zN
0
2
2 x
H0
a�
o
>'
o
aw
2 .3
Q m
• c
m
c 0
m U
i
(A
m g
O
Y U
�
• o
a
E 2
0 O
0 m
-0 0i
U
o c-
�o
• U
ON
m
o
C • U
a o
cn
L_

L:\201\33927 - James River Water Project\DWG\Sheet\CD\JRWA #2A\33973C-PRJ2A-NTDT.dwg 1 Plotted on 11/1/2017 3:54 PM 1 by James Carter
1�4 i
End View
72"
54"
1
Ground
Line
wAP
AWI
NW -
AL
NTI
GDE
v
Parts List
1 - Rhino 3-Rail #FR72C-Y
1 - Rhino Decal #TBD
DECAL TO BE FACTORY PLACED
16"
DESTRUCTION OF THIS SIGN
VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW
R
p
A
I
P
w
L
AE
I
T
E
E
R
W
A
R
N
N
G
Remo 2/07 GD8-1045K
NOTES:
All materials shall be provided by
Rhino Marking and Protec
Systems Inc. l' ets ed or approved
equivalent by the engineer.
Physical Description:
The marker post shall be 4" wide
across with one supportive rib and
two decal guides. Each post must
be pointed at the end with an
overall length determined by
specific application.
Performance:
Marker post shall be Polytech
coated, UV stable and capable of
withstanding direct sunlight for at
least 10 years without cracking or
significant fading. Post driven to a
minimum depth of 18" will
withstand impacts at speeds of up
to 60 mph and return to standing.
Decals shall not significantly fade,
crack, or curl for at least 10 years.
Installation:
Post shall be installed using
manufacturer approved post
drivers and should be driven to a
depth of at least 18". Pilot hole
drivers may be used in hard
packed soils.
NOTES:
1. MARKERS TO BE PURPLE IN COLOR AND
LABELED "NON -POTABLE WATER".
2. MARKERS WILL BE INSTALLED AT EACH
VALVE, AIR RELEASE AND GAS CROSSING.
RHINO 3-RAIL FIBREGLASS
MARKER POST
(POLYTECH COATED)
MARKER POST DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
8 MIL POLYETHYLENE FILM
SLOPE /
EXISTING
GRADE
SECTION
x
x
x
x
x
x
x !D
x
c JU Jc
x
STAKED
STRAW BALES
SILT FENCE
NOTES:
INDELIBLE BLACK PANEL
W/ 1-7/16" HIGH
YELLOW CHARACTERS
YELLOW BACKGROUND
CAUTION
INDELIBLE BLACK
CHARACTERS
4 HOLES FOR 1/40 BOLTS.
EACH HOLE SHALL HAVE A
METAL GROMMET.
1. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS ARE TO BE LOCATED BY THE
CONTRACTOR AND CLEARLY MARKED.
2. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS SHALL NOT BE CLOSER THAN
50' TO ANY STREAM, DRAINAGE DITCH OR WATERWAY.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIRECT THE CONCRETE TRUCK
X X OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE WASHOUT AREAS.
• ■
■ ■
■ 0
•
■
0
•
�- SLOPE
■
■
•
■
❑ 0
0 0
0 0
oo(
PLAN
4. AT NO TIME SHALL CONCRETE TRUCK OPERATORS BE
ALLOWED TO WASH CHUTES OR HOPPERS UNLESS IT IS INTO
A DESIGNATED WASHOUT AREA.
5. THE WASHOUT AREA IS TO BE INSPECTED DAILY WHILE IN
PLACE AND THE MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY
DISPOSED OF AS NECESSARY.
STONE TO
ANCHOR FILM
8 MIL POLYETHYLENE FILM
CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION
NOT TO SCALE
NON - POTABLE
WATER
DO NOT DRINK
3 1 /2" ±
NOTES:
1. MATERIAL TO BE SEMI -RIGID BUTYRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL, AS
MFR'D BY SETON NAME PLATE CORP., NEW HAVEN, CONN., 06505;
W.H. BRADY CO., MILWAUKEE, WIS.53201 OR EQUAL.
2. COLORS & LETTER SIZES TO BE PER OSHA STD'S. FOR CAUTION
SIGNS.
3. PROVIDE THIS SIGN AT ALL HYDRANT AND BLOWOFF LOCATIONS
WHERE WATER IS NON -POTABLE.
WARNING SIGN FOR NON -POTABLE WATER
NOT TO SCALE
AQUA DAM
/
WATER FILLED
COFFERDAM
SECTION VIEW
6' MIN.
AQUA DAM
WATER FILLED
COFFERDAM
- LIMITS OF EXCAVATION
PLAN VIEW
Dimensions
(completely full)
Controllable
Mud/Water
Depth
Specifications of Inner and Outer
Tubes
Capacity
in Gallons
(gal per
ft.)
Empty
Weight
(lbs per
ft.)
1' H x 2' W*
(0.3m high)
999
(23 cm)
Same material thickness and strength as 4' high
AquaDam
12
0.75 lbs
1.5' H x 3' W*
(0.5m high)
14"
(36 cm)
Same material thickness and strength as 4' high
AquaDam
25
0.95 lbs
2.5' H x 5' W*
(0.76m high)
24"
(61 cm)
Same material thickness and strength as 4' high
AquaDam
88
1.85 lbs
3' H x 7' W
(1m high)
30"
(77 cm)
Same material thickness and strength as 4' high
AquaDam
120
2.5 lbs
4' H x 9' W
(1.2m high)
38"
(97 cm)
12 mil polyethylene inside tube.
300 lb/in2 burst strength woven polyethylene
geotextile outside tube.
240
4.25 lbs
5' H x 11' W
(1.5m high)
44"
(112 cm)
Same material thickness and strength as a 8'
high AquaDam
320
6.4 lbs
6' H x 13' W
(1.8m high)
54"
(137 cm)
Same material thickness and strength as a 8'
high AquaDam
400
8.5 lbs
8' H x 17' W
(2.4m high)
74"
(188 cm)
12 mil polyethylene inside tube.
2 plys of 300 lb/in2 burst strength woven
polyethylene geotextile outside tube.
500
12 lbs
10' H x 21' W
(3m high)
90"
(229 cm)
8 mil polyethylene inside tube.
3 plys of 300 lb/in2 burst strength woven
polyethylene geotextile outside tube.
800
25 lbs
12' H x 25' W
(3.7m high)
104"
(264 cm)
2 plys of 8 mil polyethylene inside tube
1 ply shroud surrounding inside tubes
4 plys of 300 lb/in2 burst strength woven
polyethylene geotextile outside tube.
900
31 lbs
16' H x 33' W
(4.8m high)
132"
(335 cm)
2 plys of 5 mil polyethylene inside tube
1 ply shroud surrounding inside tubes
5 plys of 300 lb/in2 burst strength woven
polyethylene geotextile outside tube.
1250
45 lbs
All AquaDams 3' and taller are manufactured with an internal baffle for added stability. Smaller AquaDams can be special ordered with a baffle. Ca11 for
pricing.
Aqua Dam Inc
"Water Controlling Water"
www.aquadam.net
1.800.682.9283
+1.707.764.1999
[e-mail]
Ln
N
N
N
E
O
O
0
E
E
0
-H
0
U-
0
0
Ln
0
0
N
0
J
uJ
H
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Infrastructure
Residentia
z
0
1-
a
U
Li)
uJ
0
z
0
In
uJ
REVISED PER FLUVANNA COUNTY COMMENTS
REVISED PER FLUVANNA COUNTY COMMENTS
Lu
a
0
1-1
CO
N
0
ti
DATE
08-18-2016
ANCHOR AQUA DAM
7 PER MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS
(TYP. EACH SIDE)
MAXIMUM DEPTH OF CONTAINMENT
FOR DEWATERED WORK SITES
STANDARD
SIZE
INFLATED
HEIGHT
INFLATED
WIDTH
MAX. CONTROLLED
WATER DEPTH
12"
12"
12"
9.5"
18"
18"
32"
14"
24"
24"
48"
19"
36"
36"
66"
30"
48"
48"
96"
38"
72"
72"
144"
50"
96"
96"
192"
68"
120"
120"
240"
88"
NOTES:
1. BYPASS PUMP OPERATION TO BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO FILLING
OF BLADDER. (SEE USC TEMPORARY UTILITY STREAM CROSSING
COFFERDAM PUMP AROUND DETAIL, SHEET D1.3)
2. BLADDER TO BE FILLED WITH UNTREATED WATER.
3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE UTILITY CROSSING AND STREAM
RESTORATION, THE BLADDER IS TO BE DRAINED AND THE
DISCHARGE RETURNED TO THE STREAM THROUGH THE BYPASS
PUMP ENERGY DISSIPATOR DOWNSTREAM OF THE WORK AREA.
4. CONTRACTOR TO SIZE BLADDER ACCORDINGLY TO ACCOMMODATE
FIELD CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
AQUA DAM BLADDER COFFERDAM DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
CCI
ILD
0
H
1
Z
u
0
a
1
DRAWN BY
J. CARTER
DESIGNED BY
J. CARTER
CHECKED BY
D. SAUNDERS
SCALE
AS SHOWN
N
Uz
O2
O-
i Q
LLJ
U>�
Oo
L.L
O O
Z
LLJLLJ
N
L.L
LLJ
W
2
11
uJ
0
GENERAL NOTES AND
JOB NO.
33927
SHEET NO.
D1.7
0
0
ai
U
0
iu
0
0
0
0
co
0
a)
0
CU
0
m
co
co
Q
0
0
3
0
-c)a
00
2 (9
L z
o
m co
Ems,
>=0
a 0
CC • 2
O 3
zN
O 1
g • x
o
r=
0
0
aw
2 .3
am
>• 0
7) CO
=N
U
2
(A
� C
V U
a
a) o
E
0_
U0 co
-o U1
,
-0
d
U �
0
N o
E-
(
nu)
• U
cca (.0
o
C U
a o
a)-0
L-

Appendix D

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Matthews, Kathryn H
Morgan Gilbert
Mann, Leigh; Ellis John; Matt Michel; Lauren Norris -Heflin
Fw: [EXTERNAL] RE: Holly Springs Utilities - Online Project Review Certification Letter Addendum
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:39:36 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Morgan,
Thanks for your submittal. Although we review all self -certification packages, we typically
don't respond unless there is a problem or issue with the determinations or other project
documents. The Corps typically accepts the self -certification letter as evidence of
coordination. The Corps (and any other federal agency) has to consult with us anyway, after
you submit your application to them. We try to avoid reviewing projects more than once, but
if for some reason, you really need a response, please make that clear in your email to our
office. In regard to this project and the additional information, we don't have any significant
comments or concerns at this time.
Sorry for any misunderstandings. I hope this is helpful. Happy Holidays,
Please note that I am teleworking almost exclusively. Email is the best way to reach me.
Thanks,
Kathy Matthews
NC Renewable Energy Coordinator &
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-856-4520, x. 27
From: Morgan Gilbert <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 1:42 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Michel <[e-mail]>; Lauren Norris -Heflin <Lauren.Norris-
[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Holly Springs Utilities - Online Project Review Certification Letter Addendum
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on
links, opening attachments, or responding.

Good morning,
I am following -up on the below Project Review Request Letter Addendum submitted on November
24, 2021, for the Holly Springs Utilities project site to ensure that your office has the information
needed
Please let me know if there are any questions or additional information needed.
Thanks in advance,
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 984.255.2351 I Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
From: Morgan Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 1:20 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Michel <[e-mail]>; Lauren Norris -Heflin <Lauren.Norris-
[e-mail]>
Subject: Holly Springs Utilities - Online Project Review Certification Letter Addendum
To whom it may concern,
On behalf of the Town of Holly Springs, Timmons Group is submitting this addendum package to you
for the purpose of obtaining your review of the updated Holly Springs Utilities project site. The
project limits were increased from 216.6-acres to 253.8, a total of 37.2-acres. A confirmation from
your office was received for the original project limits on October 25, 2021.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or morgan.gilbertPtimmons.com if you have any
additional questions or would like any additional information.
Thanks in advance,
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 984.255.2351 I Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone] morgan.gilbert(Etimmons.com
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours

� • wio
•
TIMMONS GROUP
x�iire vircai,i dr. IIF'. rj TWRi511r1i 2S11RS
From: 428 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
[e-mail]
[phone]
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
P 919.866.4951
F 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
September 28, 2021
Re: Online Project Review Request, Holly Springs Utilities, Wake County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Benjamin,
We have reviewed the referenced project using the North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review on September 28, 2021 and are submitting our project review package in
accordance with the instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of an approximately 5-mile long utility corridor to tie a commercial
and mixed -use development into public utility connections in Holly Springs, NC, within Wake
County. The anticipated impacts to wetlands and streams onsite are anticipated to be minimal
and limited to those necessary for the utility connections.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps in Appendix
C, showing the most recent USGS topographic map (Figure 1), aerial topography map (Figure
2), and Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. map (Figure 6).
The project is expected to be completed over several years. Construction is anticipated to take
place between late 2021 into 2022, potentially through 2023 and 2024.
This project review is needed as supplement to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers consultation for
use of a Nationwide Permit due to impacts to jurisdictional waters anticipated with the proposed
utility corridor.
The USFWS IPaC search for the Site (Consultation Code 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2243, Event
Code 04EN2000-2021-E-04603) identified three federally listed endangered species and one
federally listed candidate species as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the Site: red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Michaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii), and monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) respectively. No proposed critical
habitat was identified within the project area under the IPaC office's jurisdiction (see Appendix

B). Additionally, per the instructions of the Raleigh Field Office's Project Review Steps,
Timmons personnel assessed the potential for impacts to the bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) and northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
Effects to critical habitat
There is no critical habitat located within the Site boundaries or a 1-mile radius.
Effects to federally endangered species
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests with maintained grassy
areas associated with NCDOT public road right-of-ways (ROW), earthen roads, a sanitary sewer
corridor, and multiple distribution and transmission line corridors. No potentially suitable
roosting or foraging habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker is located within the project area
due to the lack of mature pine stands. Further, no occurrences of red -cockaded woodpecker were
noted during Site inspection or on the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
database search. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have
no effect on the red -cockaded woodpecker.
White Oak Creek crosses a section of the central portion of the Site and represents potentially
suitable habitat for the Cape Fear shiner. In addition, Utley Creek and an unnamed tributary of
Utley Creek are located onsite and may also represent potentially suitable habitat. Other streams
onsite lack the gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates that the Cape Fear shiner prefers. However,
the project area is located in Wake County, north of the Shearon Harris Reservoir. The Shearon
Harris Dam located north of the Cape Fear River would impede the species in its current known
distribution from traveling up the Reservoir and to tributaries located within the Site. Further,
proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during construction to avoid
and minimize impacts to potentially suitable habitat and potential species populations located
downstream. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP data revealed no known occurrence of the
Cape Fear shiner within a 1-mile radius of the Site boundaries or within the vicinity of the
proposed project. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will
have no effect on the Cape Fear shiner.
Due to the presence of potentially suitable habitat within the Site and a known occurrence (2009)
within 1-mile identified by the NCNHP, Timmons Group personnel completed a species survey
for Michaux's sumac on September 7, 8, and 15, 2021. NCNHP did not identify any known
occurrences within the project Site, or any more recent occurrences in the vicinity of the Site.
The survey consisted of walking transects through areas constituting potentially suitable habitat.
The habitats surveyed consisted of regularly maintained areas in the Holly Springs New Hill
Road, Friendship Road, and sanitary sewer ROWs, as well as well -shaded and densely vegetated
areas in the distribution and transmission ROWs. The species was not observed during the
survey. Therefore, due to the absence of observed occurrences within areas of potentially
suitable habitat, it is the opinion of Timmons that the proposed project will have no effect on
Michaux's sumac.
Effects to federally threatened endangered species
No federally threatened endangered species were listed in the IPaC report.

� • "r•
to
TIMMONS GROUP
x�iire vircai,i dr. IIF'. rj TWRi511r1i 2S11RS
Effects to federally listed candidate species.
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
P 919.866.4951
F 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests with maintained grassy
areas, earthen roads, a sanitary sewer corridor, and multiple distribution and transmission line
corridors. The areas within the road, sanitary sewer, distribution, and transmission ROWs were
searched for species of milkweed. However, due to the heavy shade and dense invasive
vegetation within these areas, milkweed species were not observed. Therefore, it is the opinion
of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have no effect on the monarch butterfly.
Effects to proposed federally protected species
No proposed federally protected species were listed in the IPaC report.
Effects to federally protected species not identified through IPaC
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests with maintained grassy
areas, earthen roads, a sanitary sewer corridor, and multiple distribution and transmission line
corridors. Forested areas observed onsite contain several trees that could represent potentially
suitable summer roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat. While a bridge in the central
portion of the Site over White Oak Creek could represent potentially suitable summer roosting
habitat, the species was not observed during Site investigation. Further, Timmons Group is not
aware of known maternity roost trees or hibernacula in the vicinity of the Site. Although
potentially suitable summer roosting habitat is present, Wake County is not identified as a county
in which the species is likely to occur. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any
development of the Site may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared
bat. Further, per the findings of Final 4(d) Rule on the northern long-eared bat, disturbance
activities associated with the Site would qualify as exempt, unintentional take.
The Raleigh Field Office Project Review steps request that reviewers assess their projects for the
potential to impact bald eagle nests. Per the NCNHP Report, there is one occurrence of a bald
eagle nest within 1.0 mile of the project area. However, this occurrence is located near the
Shearon Harris Reservoir and is greater than 660 feet from the project area. Further, no
occurrences of nests or bald eagles were observed during the Site inspections on September 7, 8,
and 15, 2021. Therefore, any disturbance of the Site is unlikely to disturb nesting bald eagles and
no Eagle Act Permit is required
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical
habitat considered in our review and includes a species conclusions table identifying the
determinations.

For additional information, please contact Matt Michel at the email address listed above.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
?,070_,,_/___
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
Matt Michel, PhD, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
1) ENTIRE PROJECT REVIEW PACKAGE

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A — Self Certification Letter
Self -Certification Letter
Project Review Checklist
Species Conclusion Table
APPENDIX B — Species Reports
Official IPaC Species Report
NCNHP Species Report
APPENDIX C - Figures
Figure 1 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2 Aerial Topography Map
Figure 6 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. map
APPENDIX D — Photo Log
Photo Log

APPENDIX A

United States Department of the Interior
AND LLD L[PE SI:K\']CE•:
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 09/28/2021
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Holly Springs Utilities
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Project Review
Checklist
Step
Item
Required
Date completed/ Notes
1 and
2
Official Species List from IPaC
(will include map showing the
action area)
Yes
09/20/2021
3
NCDENER-Heritage Program
database results or correspon-
dence.
If Applicable
09/20/2021
4
Habitat Assessments or Species
Surveys
If Applicable
09/20/2021
6
Bald Eagle Conclusion Table
Yes
09/20/2021
7
NLEB
Yes
09/20/2021
8
Species Conclusion Table
Yes
09/20/2021
9
Online project review request
letter or Online project review
certification letter
Yes
09/20/2021
10
Other documentation to support
your conclusions
If Applicable
09/20/2021
Instructions
Submit project review packages electronically to Raleigh@fws.
gov. Please indicate in your email subject title if you are submit-
ting a "Review Request Letter" or a "Self -Certification Letter."
All project reviews will receive a return receipt to inform you
that your project has been successfully submitted to this office.
Please note that any single email, including attachments, must
be smaller than 25 MB. If a single email would be larger than
25 MB, please spread out multiple attachments among several
emails (use the same subject name and project reference in all
emails related to an individual project). If this is not practical,
please mail a hard copy or DVD containing the project review
package to our office:
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Maintain a complete copy of the project review package
in your files since it will become an integral part of your official
record of compliance.
Contact us
If you have questions or
comments concerning this
process, please contact
Leigh Mann at (919)
856-4520 extension 10 or
via email at
[e-mail].
http://Raleigh.fws.gov
Federal Relay Service
for the deaf and hard -of -hearing
1 800/877 8339
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
http://www.fws.gov
1 800/344 WILD
January 2017

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Holly Springs Utilities
Date:
09/28/2021
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
The Site consists of mixed hardwood and
pine forests with maintained grassy areas,
earthen roads, a sanitary sewer corridor,
and multiple distribution and transmission
line corridors. Forested areas on -site are
primarily less than 30-years old, which
does not constitute suitable habitat.
Cape Fear Shiner
(Notropis mekistocholas)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
White Oak Creek crosses a section of the
central boundary of the Site and represents
potentially suitable habitat for the Cape
Fear shiner. In addition, Utley Creek and an
unnamed tributary of Utley Creek are
located on -site and may also represent
potentially suitable habitat. Other streams
on -site lack the gravel, cobble, and boulder
substrates that the Cape Fear shiner
prefers. Additionally, the project area is
located in Wake County, north of the
Shearon Harris Reservoir. The Shearon
Harris Dam located north of the Cape Fear
River would impede the species from
traveling up the Reservoir and to tributaries
located within our Site.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus
michauxii)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
A species survey was conducted on
September 7, 8, and 15, 2021 in areas of
potentially suitable habitat, primarily
consisting of a transmission line right-of-
way (ROW), a gas pipeline ROW, multiple
distribution line ROWs, clear-cut pine
stands, the ROW of Friendship Road and
Holly Springs New Hill Road, and edges
along forested areas. The habitats
surveyed consisted of maintained grass,

well shaded areas, densely vegetated
areas and areas of disturbance. No
occurrences of Michaux's sumac were
observed during this survey.
Monarch butterfly (Danaus
plexippus)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
The majority of the Site consists of mixed
hardwood and pine forests with maintained
grassy areas, earthen roads, a sanitary
sewer corridor, and multiple distribution and
transmission line corridors. The areas
within the road, sanitary sewer, distribution,
and transmission ROWs were searched for
species of milkweed. However, due to the
heavy shade and dense invasive
vegetation within these areas, milkweed
species necessary for breeding were not
observed.
Bald eagle
(Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus)
Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act Permit required
Per the NCNHP Report, there is one
occurrence of a bald eagle nest within 1.0
mile of the project area. However, this
occurrence is located near the Shearon
Harris Reservoir and is greater than 660
feet from the project area. Further, no
occurrences of nests or bald eagles were
observed during the Site inspections on
September 7, 8, and 15, 2021. Therefore,
any disturbance of the Site is unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles and no Eagle
Act Permit is required
Northern long-eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Suitable habitat present
May affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project specific
section 7 responsibilities.
Critical habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Per the IPaC report, there are no critical
habitats located within or in the immediate
vicinity of the Site under the IPaC Office's
Jurisdiction.

Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Morgan Gilbert, Environmental Scientist
Signature /Title
09/20/2021
Date

APPENDIX B

y},1E4rt FiSai I.eWYLI JI*
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2243
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603
Project Name: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
September 20, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

09/20/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

09/20/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

09/20/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/20/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2243
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2021-E-04603)
Project Name: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
Project Type: ** OTHER **
Project Description: Utility corridor.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.goog1e.com/maps/@35.658981999999995,-78.8969647519676,14z
Sri.
r
SF� rl
'Elk
60.:13.
. -L Men } . I
Counties: Wake County, North Carolina

09/20/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered

09/20/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04603 4
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

°ni NC DEPARTMENT OF
Fri■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
toy Coop+r. Larry hos
a Rltid iiiMon. Sec rttary
t!4IC.r (iel
17irrtirid. Ili4ikitowof lwad arui Wairi MowwdsI
September 20, 2021
Morgan Gilbert
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
Dear Morgan Gilbert:
NCNHDE-15774
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DfPi►RTra€147 ir NAT uri.44, AhO (L&!u. PM, SiffSoJ4+ACES
re T21;TENT .4 :'+till . 14.SSM.1L ,kgy): (1['.T rr i.df_{k4:04
CSC Y'_+NI' lr:L' - FAX )''r.

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Friendship Off -Site Utilities
September 20, 2021
NCNHDE-15774
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Narrrilill Representational Rating
Shearon Harris Longleaf Pine Forest R4 (Moderate)
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Harris Game Land Duke Energy Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/help. Data query generated on September 20, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q2 July 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

32281 Waterbird Colony
Managed Area Name
Harris Game Land
Town of Holly Springs
Town of Holly Springs
Cultural Center
Town of Holly Springs Open Space - Future Park
Site (Mims Property)
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
Town of Holly Springs Open Space
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Friendship Off -Site Utilities
September 20, 2021
NCNHDE-15774
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Group
Animal
Assemblage
Bird 22207 Haliaeetus
leucocephalus
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
Natural
Community
Reptile
Waterbird Colony
Bald Eagle
32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
19719 Dry Piedmont Longleaf ---
Pine Forest
35478 Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard
Sawfly, Wasp, 40032
Bee, or Ant
Vascular Plant 3172
Vascular Plant 15312
Megachile oenotherae a leafcutter bee
Rhus michauxii Michaux's Sumac
Tradescantia virginiana Virginia Spiderwort
ast
Observation
Date
2009-04-19
2011
2004-Pre
1998-12-03
1986-09-21
1961-05-15
2009
2002-05-21
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Shearon Harris Longleaf Pine Forest R4 (Moderate)
Utley Creek Slopes R4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Owner
Duke Energy
Open Space Town of Holly Springs
Open Space - Holly Springs Town of Holly Springs
Town of Holly Springs
NC Department of Transportation
Town of Holly Springs
Element
Occurrence
Rank
C
Accuracy
2-High
2-High
H? 5-Very
Low
CD 4-Low
H 3-Medium
H 4-Low
Di 2-High
B? 3-Medium
Federal
Status
Bald/Golden
Eagle
Protection
Act
Endangered
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
C5 (General)
Private
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
Local Government
State Global State
Status Rank Rank
GNR S3
Threatened G5 S3B,S3
N
Significantly G5 S2?
Rare
G2 S2
Significantly G5 S1
Rare
Significantly G1G3 SH
Rare
Endangered G2G3 S2
Threatened G5 52S3
Page 3 of 5

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam..4111111 Owner
Town of Holly Springs Open Space Town of Holly Springs
Owner Type
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on September 20, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q2 July 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

Saplcrnincr 20 2021
❑ Project Dturnlary
❑ r PrOXIct BWrICIElirf
NHP Natural Area {NHNA)
i l Managed Area IMAREM
NHDE-15774: Friendship Off -Site Utilities
1 a41_i75
o- ors
1 4 m
0 0.5
Dun
94,o4. I n. J • 0i+'+'th id++µ +4h*rt++i P 40*`. Mira. VW,
FAO. hf71 3WWar . _..... �aeiirdedaSr.ati FAIL n
Ii.I 6y brr play Kong rrBwaNap flcn oam. NM *a GIS
Dmwrkrdr
Page 5 of 5

APPENDIX C

Path: Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\49130-JD-VIC.mxd
-a
— '
• ,y
N
W*E
S
t.
• I Y _
cf�'
'
i _
lay
-_T C ��f ,.yeti- - . _ -
‘k.el .
'ke
Site Limits
ar 'L
41. ,I:.." ~
4% tit#
,ti v♦ ir
E ��
ar---i1=■■1=114
Ir4La����MNWilk ill ■r
}
>
Q ,
ti
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS.
�•'�;y
.
0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000
�L -
Feet
ti
HOLLY SPRINGS UTILITIES
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
TIMMONS R U P . • • ea
0 d
M 4 LrR w1$1Oii J1C Ml E VtC TR in1116.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:49130
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 216.6 ACRES
LATITUDE: 35.655597
LONGITUDE: -78.890971
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):NEW HILL & APEX
DATE(S):2019
WATERSHED(S):UPPER CAPE FEAR (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030004
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\49130-TE-Aerial with Topo.mxd
H II TSprings
Legend
•
- _5 Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
Topographic Contours
- Major- 10 Foot
- - - Minor- 5 Foot
W E
NOTES:
Project Limits are approximate.
Aerial imagery from NC OneMap.
0
0
a
7
•
•
d
0
Z
0
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
REVISION DESCRIPTION
DATE
08/28/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
J.DENTON
SCALE
1 "= 1,330'
CI)
co
J
No.
J
J
0
2
FIGURE 2: AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1

s
O
3
in
6
Resource
iaemMcmion
Confirmation
R4ouGe
oescnq,on
Isael
bael
(sa a)
(s46)
(5)
Im
115
D45
(sa a)
,24s
NTfV
478
1,2 9
NTNV
626
NTN
.3
NTfV
710
NTN
3,070
NTN
2,riB
.6
NTN
N
y
NTN
G
0
NTN
48
NTN
09NTfV
1,659
54.
NTINV
2.
556
2,612
632
3,32
W
,osa
1,626
229
INV
�3
16,530
NTINV
NTINV
Total
45,14
0
3,548
13,719
5,208
2,1
o
1e0,484
ToMI Stream Area •
la&�.an
za4,c
Total Stream Length ••
If
_ _ _
edPl:nwaterVs� Scrub -Shrub - Emergentw:OOW4aPome own EN• Etua.
1m6.Wetlands; ';6a4- nhte,tStre.ms;REer,n:5m;
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
®Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
0 Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
r Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
,•Ephemeral Stream (R6)
iiCulvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
C1Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
0
da
IMF
•
•
a
0
Z
0
H
REVISION DESCRIPTION
nnn
DATE
09/17/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 1,600'
FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
1 of 7

s
laemmcmi°n
�4rq,on
Isom
bym
(34 n)
(=9 n)
(5)
Im
15
D45
pe n)
7e
2.2n
NTYNV
626
663
zm6
NTN
2,nB
Me
NTN
3.
NTN'
p
0
NTN
148
NTN
09ITPV
1,659
54.
NTINV
266
556
2,617
632
3,32
1,626
229
NTIN,1
2,663
NTINV
"
Total
45,14
8
3,545
19,74 19
5,20e
3,1
,1
o
100,4e4
ToMI Stream Area •
1 ft
23c
Total Stream Length •
ae3314
• _ _ _
ed,
ted
Scrub -Shrub - Ema,9am we d:vow= rau:mse open water ENV, Estuarine
Imeh41wetlan6,. Uppera-rnennhtent6„eame.Eeem:ltm;
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
®Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
yy© Wetland Identifier
sic PSA Point
r Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
,•Ephemeral Stream (R6)
,.Culvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
C'Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
C] Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
J
aL ,
.1 r J r J
L 1 , r 5
J 1 ti
'
: f 1r-S 1 '
•
J 1
L
1'1411 I ••J 1 i
{ y _
r
' I I
s - 1
J } •
..(7"_ L 5 Lys y �y 1 r J'' r r r
_4 ry iiy f ti yy�
. _ r ti� I 1 ft.
} 1<• • • k z 1 J L-
'• ra ti - •• 'ti r I � {�
L L 4 •
1 r M1`y L k- - f {� 1 L' _ • J A J
'M1 1• + - -Y r '
X {r
1d+ y k k L r}.
'y 7L _• l f J
a r t - Y
• - 11
5 • '41
fLi1.
•a
r— •' • J • 1 u-_
r ' _
la 1 YJry.1.
FDS-41Z1-2
FDS-41Z1-3
•
1•
/ I
•
vy I } M1 S
L
'•
1
ft •L, tla
ykf �1T/
1
I _•
r1--' Jtr
•1 , J J S • I •
• 1 i K L
f- 'w:ice _. +
r• y
11 1 ' I '• •
_ I I17e YI
r•
_ } ,,
IiiI1LCti''l1CJ
r
S *ji�
4 t. 1F1F
41F1-5
41 D2-5
FDS-41
FDS-4102-2
41Z1-7
41 A2-3
41G1-1
33D3-3
FDS-33C3-2
FDS-33C3-1
r.. ••
1 , M1 rt •IM1f
•
r
55 1 e •• kJ
•
5 _ JJ
rt F' Iti t ' 1.
L
1- - • -- •
Lr t, /
rJ ir'ra rl „I .1
1 I
•y M1
1
FDS-41 B2-1
41 B2-10
rr
33B3-4
1. •
••• 7 L
y 1
�'Jf er
- J
-
I- - I .r L - • i
L L
a^ • rk
,• _
1 k
J' L
J •
1 •, i 'I • ' L Iz , eM1 f l - +-
�F 5 r 5
_ 1 IIP
l '� y"
+
F X •� Ja•1� vt
a, r• \� ' T+
•• {J+C�
- 'r 9•
•
.. r •- � r1 - j J
FDS-40Z1-1
33A3-1
J-.
FDS-33H2-1
PSA-33J2-2
40B1-9
40A1-5
FDS-40Z1-3
PSA-33J2-1
' -. _
y�- -L f- ; • y Ir '
I L -
P.
• 1.`_ k '
FDS-40Z1=2.
Holly
•
F •, t I r i rLf r�1i •5 /-+r..5'• L`Q�ti y
•a 1 1 J L - •- rN �,V2• i'a
L I ' •
• 1 .' I , ti•• -•�3R�••L~
• I IL L L • t ' i
L L + •.
1 k
r it r IL { •
,. •ti 1 I
1 L j I L• S 1• •_ 1
{ lJ , 1 1 P r- ., 1 1 1
yL[��•�y 1
I •N-• JL tol�' - 4I •'y -y •L
J L
v,„
J 1•
�J fF {'• f t'
•
�, I 5 .1' L' - F, ,- • ' 7 J I f y•
l ti r -1V. t ' r- 1 + r , 11 , J
• J r t y 1 y
1 , I
I1
rr
{
1
op
L
r , L yN •
40e1-5
'.{
rt YS iijj2���j`L�]��'�LS rI
p0
K
is ea
IMF
•
•
0
Z
0
H
REVISION DESCRIPTION
nnn
DATE
09/17/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 '•= 175'
FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
2 o f 7

s
O
3
.92
in
6
lustrios
ScrvbSM1ry - Emergent WetaM:POW= Wetland;
e PalusWne Open WaterEstuarineENV= Estuarine
Intertidal Wetlands: R. RUpper
Perennial S Streams:
ama R.M plant Streams.
Ephemeral
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
0 Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
r
Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
,•Ephemeral Stream (R6)
,.Culvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
ClPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
C] Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.

s
O
3
in
6
Resource
iaemMcmmn
Conannation
Resource
oeacngion
Ieael
bael
(sa a)
(s46)
(5)
Im
115
D45
(sa a)
,24s
NIN
478
1.229
NENV
626
NEN
.3
NEV
L7N
MN
2,298
Me
NTN
3,626
NTN'
p
0
NTN
48
NTN
09NIN
Le...
54.
NENV
2.
556
2,612
632
3,32
W
,osa
3,696
229
/NV
�3
16,530
NTINV
NTINV
Total
45,14
0
3,540
13,719
5,e08
2,1
o
1e0,484
Total Stream Area •
1
la&�1
za4 ac
Total Stream Length •_
• _ _ ns
Scrub -Shrub - Emergent we ed;d:vow= rau:mne open ted water ENV, Eetaularhs
imeN.wetlands, R'Eerem:;Streams,
t m;a4-rnemettentStreams,
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
®Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
0 Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
r Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
,•Ephemeral Stream (R6)
,.Culvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
C1Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
C] Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
0
•
•
i
0
(1)
C7
Z
0
H
REVISION DESCRIPTION
nnn
DATE
09/17/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 175'
FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
4 o f 7

s
O
3
ndvo=ra:� Wetland;
ScrenSnry - Emergentwn;wumopen tENEtuuare
Intertidal wetlands.R.�Upper Eer al iStreams:
maRa-r meni Streams:
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
®Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
0 Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
r
Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
iiEphemeral Stream (R6)
,iCulvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
ClPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
C] Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.

s
O
3
in
Resource
Identification
ag nl
PSS
00al
PEM
(.e a)
Conannagon
POW
8)
(m
Im
Bitch
Stream
Resource
Oescnotion
26
10,319
NTN
2,515
1,245
626
.3
710
677
476
2,070
546
25,814
239
478
1.229
NTN
NTV
NTN
NTN
NTN
NTN
NTN
NTN
Total
45,14
Total Wetland Area =
ToMi Stream Area •
Total Stream Length •
148
3,540
13,74
100,484
0,01311
1,659
632
1.634
1,663
5,208
266
1,876
2,142
556
225
40
126
128
1,583
54,508
2,617
3,3.
7,805
16,530
124
253
260
100,484
NTN
MTN
NTN
NTINV
NTINV
NTINV
NTNV
saNhshN - Emergent we ed;d: vow=rau:mForested
open water ENVSEstuulanree
Intertidal Wetlands, R'Ep"ennialStal r(8909 r�nnittentstreams,
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
®Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
0 Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
,•Ephemeral Stream (R6)
,.Culvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
ClPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
C] Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
0 87.5 175
Feet
350
0
a
5
E
O
W
0
s
1-
19
2
N
o.
•
30
E
d
4
to
da
•
•
d
0
l7
Z
0
DATE
09/17/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 175'
ffelHAI:Ai9a�Ae\� 1 AND WATER elIDIWIMIMILD1ZIM1_\:
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
6 of 7

s
O
3
in
6
ti
Resource
laemMcmlon
Conannation
Resource
Osacngion
Ieanl
banl
(sa a)
(sa6)
(5)
Im
115
DOP
(sa a)
1,24s
ee
1.zn
NENV
626
NEN
L7N
NTN
2,298
Me
NTN
3,525
NTN
0
0
NTN
48
NTN
09
1,659
54.
NENV
2.
556
2,612
632
W
,osa
13,7
3,696
229
/NV
E.
16,530
NT/NV
NTNV
NnNv
Total
45,14
0
3,540
13,619
5,20e
2,1
0
104484
ToMI Stream Area •
1
2.31 ac
Total Stream Length •
&4.gn
03311
PFCrcPalustrine Forested
Scrub -Shrub - Emergent WetaM:POW= Wetland; a� PalusWr.ere ne Open WatteEr. EusA
Imenitlal Wetlands, R. Upper PeremenS Hama M btenl Streams.
R
Legend
Project Study Limits- 216.6 Acres
Previously Confirmed Limits (SAW-2015-02137)
Stream Buffer
© Stream Identifier
0 Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
r
Flag
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
—Intermittent Stream (R4)
iiEphemeral Stream (R6)
,iCulvert
=Previously Confirmed Stream
C'Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
C Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
C] Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major- 10 Foot
- -Minor- 1 Foot
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.

APPENDIX D

Holly Springs Utilities
Representative upland areas characterized by
maintained invasive species within transmission
right -of ways (ROW) throughout the Site.
Representative upland areas within the Holly
Springs New Hill Road ROW within the Site.
Representative upland areas within the Friendship
Road ROW
Additional representative upland areas
characterized by thick early -successional species
within transmission ROWs within the Site.
Representative upland areas within the Holly
Springs New Hill Road ROW in front of recent
residential development.
Representative upland areas characterized by
maintained lawn within the Holly Springs Water
Quality Facility within the Site.

Holly Springs Utilities
Representative view of recently developed utility
corridor within the Site.
Representative upland areas characterized by
mesic mixed hardwood -pine forest observed within
the floodplain of White Oak Creek.
Representative view of Utley Creek.
Representative upland areas characterized by
mesic mixed hardwood forest observed throughout
the Site
Representative view of White Oak Creek.
Representative view of ephemeral stream feature
observed within the Site.
+'r+It#
mi
TIMMONS GROUP

.. ••.
die •
I •
TIMMONS GROUP
F L'7II� VI•kii'Yil L i iI 1 t7 7Nal'l,IY:N C'III�IC
From: 428 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
[e-mail]
[phone]
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
November 24, 2021
P 919.866.4951
F 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
Re: Online Project Review Request Addendum, Holly Springs Utilities, Wake County, North
Carolina.
Dear Mr. Benjamin,
We are sending this Addendum letter in order to request an expansion of the Online Project
Review Request for the Holly Springs Utilities project site. The original Online Project Review
Request was submitted to your office on September 28, 2021 and a confirmation was received
from your office on October 25, 2021. We have completed our additional review on November
22, 2021 and are submitting this updated review package in accordance with the instructions for
further review.
The project limits were expanded by 37.2-acres and Timmons Group conducted a field survey
for Michaux's sumac on October 19 and 21, 2021. No changes to our original species
determinations have been made. The original Online Project Review Request and confirmation
from your office are attached.
We have reviewed the referenced project using the North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review on November 24, 2021 and are submitting our updated project review
package in accordance with the instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of an approximately 5-mile long utility corridor to tie a commercial
and mixed -use development into public utility connections in Holly Springs, NC, within Wake
County. The anticipated impacts to wetlands and streams onsite are anticipated to be minimal
and limited to those necessary for the utility connections.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps in Appendix
C, showing the most recent USGS topographic map (Figure 1), aerial topography map (Figure
2), and Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. map (Figure 6).
The project is expected to be completed over several years. Construction is anticipated to take
place between late 2021 into 2022, potentially through 2023 and 2024.

This project review is needed as supplement to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers consultation for
use of a Nationwide Permit due to impacts to jurisdictional waters anticipated with the proposed
utility corridor.
The USFWS IPaC search for the Site (Consultation Code 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0278, Event
Code 04EN2000-2022-E-00614) identified three federally listed endangered species and one
federally listed candidate species as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the Site: red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Michaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii), and monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) respectively. No proposed critical
habitat was identified within the project area under the IPaC office's jurisdiction (see Appendix
B). Additionally, per the instructions of the Raleigh Field Office's Project Review Steps,
Timmons personnel assessed the potential for impacts to the bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) and northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
Effects to critical habitat
There is no critical habitat located within the Site boundaries or a 1-mile radius.
Effects to federally endangered species
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests with maintained grassy
areas associated with NCDOT public road right-of-ways (ROW), earthen roads, a sanitary sewer
corridor, and multiple distribution and transmission line corridors. No potentially suitable
roosting or foraging habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker is located within the project area
due to the lack of mature pine stands. Further, no occurrences of red -cockaded woodpecker were
noted during Site inspection or on the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
database search. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have
no effect on the red -cockaded woodpecker.
White Oak Creek crosses a section of the central portion of the Site and represents potentially
suitable habitat for the Cape Fear shiner. In addition, Utley Creek and an unnamed tributary of
Utley Creek are located onsite and may also represent potentially suitable habitat. Other streams
onsite lack the gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates that the Cape Fear shiner prefers. However,
the project area is located in Wake County, north of the Shearon Harris Reservoir. The Shearon
Harris Dam located north of the Cape Fear River would impede the species in its current known
distribution from traveling up the Reservoir and to tributaries located within the Site. Further,
proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during construction to avoid
and minimize impacts to potentially suitable habitat and potential species populations located
downstream. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP data revealed no known occurrence of the
Cape Fear shiner within a 1-mile radius of the Site boundaries or within the vicinity of the
proposed project. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will
have no effect on the Cape Fear shiner.
Due to the presence of potentially suitable habitat within the Site and a known occurrence (2009)
within 1-mile identified by the NCNHP, Timmons Group personnel completed a species survey
for Michaux's sumac on September 7, 8, 15, and October 19 and 21, 2021. NCNHP did not
identify any known occurrences within the project Site, or any more recent occurrences in the

vicinity of the Site. The survey consisted of walking transects through areas constituting
potentially suitable habitat. The habitats surveyed consisted of regularly maintained areas in the
Holly Springs New Hill Road, Friendship Road, and sanitary sewer ROWs, as well as well -
shaded and densely vegetated areas in the distribution and transmission ROWs. The species was
not observed during the survey. Therefore, due to the absence of observed occurrences within
areas of potentially suitable habitat, it is the opinion of Timmons that the proposed project is not
likely to adversely affect Michaux's sumac.
Effects to federally threatened endangered species
No federally threatened endangered species were listed in the IPaC report.
Effects to federally listed candidate species.
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests with maintained grassy
areas, earthen roads, a sanitary sewer corridor, and multiple distribution and transmission line
corridors. The areas within the road, sanitary sewer, distribution, and transmission ROWs were
searched for species of milkweed. However, due to the heavy shade and dense invasive
vegetation within these areas, milkweed species were not observed. Additionally, a review of the
NCNHP data revealed no known occurrence of the Monarch Butterfly within a 1-mile radius of
the Site boundaries or within the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, it is the opinion of
Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have no effect on the monarch butterfly.
Effects to proposed federally protected species
No proposed federally protected species were listed in the IPaC report.
Effects to federally protected species not identified through IPaC
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests with maintained grassy
areas, earthen roads, a sanitary sewer corridor, and multiple distribution and transmission line
corridors. Forested areas observed onsite contain several trees that could represent potentially
suitable summer roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat. While a bridge in the central
portion of the Site over White Oak Creek could represent potentially suitable summer roosting
habitat, the species was not observed during Site investigation. Further, Timmons Group is not
aware of known maternity roost trees or hibernacula in the vicinity of the Site. Although
potentially suitable summer roosting habitat is present, Wake County is not identified as a county
in which the species is likely to occur. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any
development of the Site may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared
bat. Further, per the findings of Final 4(d) Rule on the northern long-eared bat, disturbance
activities associated with the Site would qualify as exempt, unintentional take.
The Raleigh Field Office Project Review steps request that reviewers assess their projects for the
potential to impact bald eagle nests. Per the NCNHP Report, there is one occurrence of a bald
eagle nest within 1.0 mile of the project area. However, this occurrence is located near the
Shearon Harris Reservoir and is greater than 660 feet from the project area. Further, no
occurrences of nests or bald eagles were observed during the Site inspections on September 7, 8,

15, and October 19 and 21, 2021. Therefore, any disturbance of the Site is unlikely to disturb
nesting bald eagles and no Eagle Act Permit is required.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical
habitat considered in our review and includes a species conclusions table identifying the
determinations.
For additional information, please contact Matt Michel at the email address listed above.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
?.?,...__./;
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
Matt Michel, PhD, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
1) ENTIRE PROJECT REVIEW PACKAGE
2) FWS CONFIRMATION

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A — Self Certification Letter
Self -Certification Letter
Project Review Checklist
Species Conclusion Table
APPENDIX B — Species Reports
Official IPaC Species Report
NCNHP Species Report
APPENDIX C - Figures
Figure 1 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2 Aerial Map with Contours
Figure 6 WTDM
APPENDIX D — FWS Confirmation
FWS Confirmation

APPENDIX A

United States Department of the Interior
INN AND W[LDL1FESERVICL
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 1 1/24/2021
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Holly Springs Utilities
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑✓
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Project Review
Checklist
Step
Item
Required
Date completed/ Notes
1 and
2
Official Species List from IPaC
(will include map showing the
action area)
Yes
11/19/2021
3
NCDENER-Heritage Program
database results or correspon-
dence.
If Applicable
11/19/2021
4
Habitat Assessments or Species
Surveys
If Applicable
11 /19/2021
6
Bald Eagle Conclusion Table
Yes
11/19/2021
7
NLEB
Yes
11/19/2021
8
Species Conclusion Table
Yes
11/19/2021
9
Online project review request
letter or Online project review
certification letter
Yes
11/19/2021
10
Other documentation to support
your conclusions
If Applicable
11 /19/2021
Instructions
Submit project review packages electronically to Raleigh@fws.
gov. Please indicate in your email subject title if you are submit-
ting a "Review Request Letter" or a "Self -Certification Letter."
All project reviews will receive a return receipt to inform you
that your project has been successfully submitted to this office.
Please note that any single email, including attachments, must
be smaller than 25 MB. If a single email would be larger than
25 MB, please spread out multiple attachments among several
emails (use the same subject name and project reference in all
emails related to an individual project). If this is not practical,
please mail a hard copy or DVD containing the project review
package to our office:
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Maintain a complete copy of the project review package
in your files since it will become an integral part of your official
record of compliance.
Contact us
If you have questions or
comments concerning this
process, please contact
Leigh Mann at (919)
856-4520 extension 10 or
via email at
[e-mail].
http://Raleigh.fws.gov
Federal Relay Service
for the deaf and hard -of -hearing
1 800/877 8339
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
http://www.fws.gov
1 800/344 WILD
January 2017

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Holly Springs Utilities
Date:
11/24/2021
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
The Site consists of mixed hardwood and
pine forests with maintained grassy areas,
earthen roads, a sanitary sewer corridor,
and multiple distribution and transmission
line corridors. Forested areas on -site are
primarily less than 30-years old, which
does not constitute suitable habitat.
Cape Fear Shiner
(Notropis mekistocholas)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
White Oak Creek crosses a section of the
central boundary of the Site and represents
potentially suitable habitat for the Cape
Fear shiner. In addition, Utley Creek and an
unnamed tributary of Utley Creek are
located on -site and may also represent
potentially suitable habitat. Other streams
on -site lack the gravel, cobble, and boulder
substrates that the Cape Fear shiner
prefers. Additionally, the project area is
located in Wake County, north of the
Shearon Harris Reservoir. The Shearon
Harris Dam located north of the Cape Fear
River would impede the species from
traveling up the Reservoir and to tributaries
located within our Site.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus
michauxii)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
Not likely to adversely affect
A species survey was conducted on
October 19 and 21, 2021 in areas of
potentially suitable habitat, primarily
consisting of a transmission line right-of-
way (ROW), a gas pipeline ROW, multiple
distribution line ROWs, clear-cut pine
stands, the ROW of Friendship Road and
Holly Springs New Hill Road, and edges
along forested areas. The habitats
surveyed consisted of maintained grass,

well shaded areas, densely vegetated
areas and areas of disturbance. No
occurrences of Michaux's sumac were
observed during this survey.
Monarch butterfly
No suitable habitat present
No effect
The majority of the Site consists of mixed
hardwood and pine forests with maintained
grassy areas, earthen roads, a sanitary
sewer corridor, and multiple distribution and
transmission line corridors. The areas
within the road, sanitary sewer, distribution,
and transmission ROWs were searched for
species of milkweed. However, due to the
heavy shade and dense invasive
vegetation within these areas, milkweed
species necessary for breeding were not
observed.
Bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act Permit required
Per the NCNHP Report, there is one
occurrence of a bald eagle nest within 1.0
mile of the project area. However, this
occurrence is located near the Shearon
Harris Reservoir and is greater than 660
feet from the project area. Further, no
occurrences of nests or bald eagles were
observed during the Site inspections on
September 7, 8, 15, and October 19 and
21, 2021.
Northern long-eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Suitable habitat present
May affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project specific
section 7 responsibilities.
Critical habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Per the IPaC report, there are no critical
habitats located within or in the immediate
vicinity of the Site under the IPaC Office's
Jurisdiction.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.

Morgan Gilbert, Environmental Scientist 11/24/2021
Signature /Title Date

APPENDIX B

y},1E4rt FiSai I.eWYLI JI*
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0278
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614
Project Name: Holly Springs Utilities
November 19, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

11/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

11/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

11/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

11/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0278
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2022-E-00614)
Project Name: Holly Springs Utilities
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Holly Springs Utilities, 253-acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.goog1e.com/maps/@35.658981999999995,-78.8969647519676,14z
Counties: Wake County, North Carolina

11/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered

11/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00614 4
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

r� NC DEPARTMENT OF
• O':Me NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
.,rt Cam. COMPFE411
1 Rod whirl_ Socitterst
i.�,ey harw,+
Lkvu1 ti rivet ear. aleha al Heritage 'raps=
November 19, 2021
Morgan Gilbert
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Holly Springs Utilities
Dear Morgan Gilbert:
NCNHDE-16386
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
t
ti{1�4ir;1 %.T OF P.a,TI +: «,i. r.i e.T.,1311.1. relE9`+ ti xi,
;_t ;_ • 1it

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Holly Springs Utilities
November 19, 2021
NCNHDE-16386
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Narrrilill Representational Rating
Shearon Harris Longleaf Pine Forest R4 (Moderate)
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Harris Game Land Duke Energy Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/help. Data query generated on November 19, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Holly Springs Utilities
November 19, 2021
NCNHDE-16386
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Group
Animal
Assemblage
Bird 22207 Haliaeetus
leucocephalus
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
Natural
Community
Reptile
32281 Waterbird Colony
Waterbird Colony
Bald Eagle
32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
19719 Dry Piedmont Longleaf ---
Pine Forest
35478 Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard
Sawfly, Wasp, 40032
Bee, or Ant
Vascular Plant 3172
Vascular Plant 15312
Megachile oenotherae a leafcutter bee
Rhus michauxii Michaux's Sumac
Tradescantia virginiana Virginia Spiderwort
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Nam
Shearon Harris Longleaf Pine Forest
Utley Creek Slopes
ast
Observation
Date
2009-04-19
2011
2004-Pre
1998-12-03
1986-09-21
1961-05-15
2009
2002-05-21
Representational Ratin
R4 (Moderate)
R4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owne
Harris Game Land Duke Energy
Town of Holly Springs Open Space - Future Park Town of Holly Springs
Site (Mims Property)
Town of Holly Springs Open Space - Hunt Town of Holly Springs
Community Center
Town of Holly Springs Open Space - Holly Springs Town of Holly Springs
Cultural Center
Element
Occurrence
Rank
C
H?
CD
H
H
Di
B?
Accuracy
2-High
2-High
5-Very
Low
4-Low
3-Medium
4-Low
2-High
3-Medium
Federal
Status
Bald/Golden
Eagle
Protection
Act
Endangered
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
C5 (General)
Owner
Private
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State Global State
Status Rank Rank
GNR S3
Threatened G5 S3B,S3
N
Significantly G5 S2?
Rare
G2 S2
Significantly G5 S1
Rare
Significantly G1G3 SH
Rare
Endangered G2G3 S2
Significantly G5 S2S3
Rare Other
Page 3 of 5

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam..4111111 Owner
Town of Holly Springs Open Space Town of Holly Springs
Owner Type
Local Government
Town of Holly Springs Open Space Town of Holly Springs Local Government
Town of Holly Springs Open Space Town of Holly Springs Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httas://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/hela. Data query generated on November 19, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

I J NHDE-16386: Holly Springs Utilities
Nrx:I! -r r i 19, 2021
F?oje41 64Jnasn,
eileNred Pr4Jirk BoWPCIEhrf
NHP Natural Area {NHNA)
Merlaged .1:4rea iMAREM
1 a41.175
a o sa at7
d 05 1
14ri.
gym
94.1.14. Iv% 0ki++++ +yrt-f+ a. Off115100
FAO. iw ,-., ..- -_ r.,,+. F r.;pi,
6E71 Cal Corm *wag KIT41 1C1 Cipardrudillip •:errbsa ri US
u•• Oawrkr+r
Page 5 of 5

APPENDIX C

Path: Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\49130-JD-VIC.mxd
HOLLY SPRINGS UTILITIES
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:49130
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 253.8 ACRES
LATITUDE: 35.655595
LONGITUDE: -78.888673
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in w
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
TIMMONS GROUP
•
•
YOUR V11.101.4 3Cki1IVEC THROMObt i>6•
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):NEW HILL & APEX
DATE(S):2019
WATERSHED(S):UPPER CAPE FEAR (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030004
hole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not

Path: Y:\805\49130 - Friendship Off -Site Utilities\GIS\49130-TE-Aerial with Topo.mxd
08 8:04
(1
11
•
f�0
1
Legend
itO
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Topographic Contours
Major - 10ft
Minor - 5ft
i
Te)
/ 11 ,
0
1,500
3,000
6,000
Feet
ILI§ Mt%
'Thomas'Mill Rd
fte154 AA.
8.-
W<`� E
r
m
y Vinewo t
title Ln7o
db
405,
NOTES:
Project Limits are approximate.
Aerial imagery from NC OneMap.
0
✓ ▪ MP
•
•
•
a
0
cd
0
17-
REVISION DESCRIPTION
DATE
08/28/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
J.DENTON
SCALE
1 "= 1,500'
r
J
co
Z
a
J
0
2
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 2: AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1

62
2,515
625
710
677
tam
15,814
578
148
978
T.I Stream Ma =
Total a...m Len. •
iwn
9525
19,719
Afl
1659
1.5
1,869
327
9,917
366
1,903
152
AO
478
556
383
136
138
ac
3.883
59508
3.637
9033
19.0
124
3.
675
438
3.
111,735
Intertl el Wetlands; P. Upper Pe.. 51.34,1...enninent Weems;
Legend
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
Des
NWPV
NWNV
NWNV
NWNV
NWNV
411141
NWPV
NWPV
Ni
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
875 1,750
3,500
Feet
ti r i(/
f ,.. .,.4 .-�- - •r'� mar_' ,-r
1ar„iT 33
320
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 1,750'
FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
1 of 8

s
O
in
6
sins imemeei Wetlands: w-Upper v: nel Wetland.
�'amw. wM .ovM minent rewn; .w.nm
Legend
CUP roject Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.

0
in
6
62
2,515
1,245
626
710
677
2.298
25,814
578
1160
978
Total a...- u.,. •
148
3,25
19,719
Pfl
1,559
1,305
1,05,1
1863
109
327
266
Lm=
960
152
un
478
556
282
125
128
un
iwm
1279
54.508
8,032
16.530
124
253
475
438
3.
Des
81115
liroV
liroV
MINV
trINV
Sm1.11. Wetland:iMA.i wbi..e.. w°Upper v: nid s'r'emw RwM .ovM Weems; ..ens
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
DPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- -Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
•
11 / ,If/ r
'
1 1 /' / , \ .
/ ' / /
, %f
III f // /' / !'
/ / / /
11 I 1 1 ,' / . ,
' I l l l 1 /' 1\-
rl / 1 ,, / \/-l.
/ / / 1 5 1 / / / -
t 1 1 I I I I-
/ 1 1 I t ''
` ... / / 'I 1 I /
/ 1 V 1 1
• I I 1 // 1 \ 1
1ita /'' / 1 1 \
I / / 1
IIII/. 'r f / ��
1111/ ♦r - /
/
111111\ :is::
--
r11)1, 1
Ir � /.I 1 p
It/I 1A,1
I l I 1.
•
I C.
•1
\ . - 11 ;
,I `r-♦. r )1 I 1\-\�
♦1
r'
r,•\ 1- n .
`^-�,' .It.S ;
r ` / i
r \
.1 ♦ ,_ ,
i) •
,~1= Uo,•
•
t rSv 1if& r
S.
FDS-41Z1-2.
FDS-41 Z1-3
w
,•-...,; sk. tar
Vio .- 1144: Jor-!..::...r.-.-.• _ • . 1 .......,,,,,:,•,:.:rri,711,7 ,,,-‘ : : 1-,
/ � �I .1_G / - r..,',
1 1
<iy f 1 I l 11f- I/ /- -
Irl
/ ` - -
♦
•
` ^/
9/_ /<- r
,
•
41 D2-5
FDS-41 D2-2
4121-7
/ / r / ♦ / 'i. 1'
I (.. •
I ••••• ,... r
c - I:
1_ �� 1 I ♦ '\/ `; \ill /�-rii 1 f`` � I \I'�`vat 12113 �i �Vy,
•
\ 11\ 1 1\I1:•\,•:.
.' �5 ' /'fly ; L_ /^ /f •- \ `\C t 1< .1i �,
1 Ill
11
`' / \\ I f 1 \ -
1 '/ .//i 14', r/ // /'I `1 t' • "r .{ fJ
•` \ \ \ \\ `� '. r'i /, \ ' 1 /r I /�/ '-may/ �;'`.,",",
I•• - _
,...L.......„,"/- �•
1 •••/ % 00
l I f , , ,d(4-/ G1! / >. \1 \ I 1- - 1 r, 1 1 l •1• . _/' 0 Y/
1JII / j 1 , Li:P! 11Zr 1r .. I _ -l_i tr J - 1 t i \ r ,�\
fll 1 \ / I \ \ ,`fY11/7 i 1 1
I I �l ''� 1 / / i/' /
DS=33Z4-1 `, r - /' \ • \ %1 ••L " t i♦ 1 f yy�
/ 1
/
/ \ / ♦ / / .' 11 t / ` / , )
el 1 y FDS-41 B2-1 tl•%'' _ _ ' 'may• s. -f
\ — �1F - f ' I g - f'..
r
iiy /�?j1j'41B2_10 "' ` :`.� �w
r, ''117T \ i,ll �. . Ale. 40B1 9
41A2-3
33D3-3
FDS-33C3-2
FDS-41 D2-1
41G1-1
33B3-4
FDS-33C3-1
VD] i•
/7"' '''.4 ♦-I'll ''. ,l_) '/1 ? •1/1 `i,^ 1� \ ♦ f
1 ` 1
ED
•
13)
%"t 1..
-. , 230 ` - ..•`t��a{
e��i1rri�� rri(/7r�•2'§' _` .• A ..`1 \\�r I. 1\ /'Ii ,11.
FDS-40Z1 -1
33A3-1
40A1-5
ti
-lFDS-40Z1_3
FDS-33H2-1
\ / ♦- \ i ( a ,1 , 11
,\ /5 1 \
./ l
•
ot
aRa
EDS-40Z1 -2
AfP
1,2
o.
•
•
•
•
CL
0
cd
0
OHM
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
SCALE
a.
>-
ffiA
o
ffelHAI:Ai9a�Ae\� 1 AND WATER elIDIWIMIMILD1ZIM1_\:
JOB NUMBER
49130
SFIEET NO.
3 of 8

s
O
in
6
sins MAIM: v: nieWetland,
s�'am, RwM .ont Weemsac ; .w.nm
Legend
Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.

s
.92
PFO
2,515
1.245
626
710
677
2,58
25,814
578
148
1168
61
2,187
8.1
TwI Oboe Len. •
POW
508
3,525
19,719
Pfl
1,658
1,305
1.8613
109
327
8917
266
tmx
960
152
0,5
478
556
282
126
128
IStoo
Pt
Siream
1279
5.508
2.617
8,032
16,530
124
253
475
438
3.
Des
1.1115
511188
511788
511188
511788
547185/
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- -Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
I/(('1111
47,
+r.
/ • I - - _ / / T / _ / / l
- t' j l f
111I / I /, � 11 / / /' J't � - - - 11; - / ' , / , / 1 1 f 1
I / / / 1 \ \ / - ' / 1
�Il l/11111 llll 1 / /- ' _ / l \ -il\\ - ,, '1 i I 1 1
1l fl rlllllllilll I 1 - J/'\\ ,/ ; /� /\\♦-- ,I 11 I /
I),,,1/ 1111/I 1 1 1 / - : _' '' 1 tN - - - -®- / 1
,1,,/l/llll l 111 1 -'--/ - _JeY /\f/1.--- / / / I
-
///,111/, 1 1 _/-/ ♦ / -' /--,-� _ -,/ /
!fie i +teL .. r- -- _-,-� l/.4 y-'_J
' 1JJ ,. !-r,,. ny ire+ •.,
J
r. It .,/ /1
\T r( :111
, . -,, 3' • _ "V(=. \- - '�1, ♦/ )r1(+,1\,,, ♦\\\ r\ .� �I
l _ ♦ ." r;+v .5.-
.4. /` aJ I 1� I\ 111 l 1 ) /\1 \'It1\\~\1\_\\\\
\ . , , J .• hr M ' \ ` /'4. , / r 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 J ; )1 l ' �1
\\\ _ \� I. �, - - ` / 1 1 t \.I l llr r/ r11 �,,, t I'll\I\1`l� 1 \ - \ -1 ' 1' + ` •\ ` _ r , t./ / /) I l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ \ 1 out 1 \ \ /
\ Q♦ `'•' :• \ I`/ - - '\' J ( ! / I l 11 I I I I 1 111\ 1{' \\ I" 111\\ �� I / / /!r
/,,I• \-`\ " �\ / / I / I1'11I1, 11I111 ♦ \1\\1\\\ i<. \ .-- / / f f1`l
\♦♦_., / / , /11,/111 111 j111 fi\\\ \\\1,\ - / ,-J)\�
♦+ -� --,r . -\' / I f /l/I II11 111j111 �\\\;11-1rr`,, _ - -/!r'J /rl
\ `\"r/ .. / 1 / 1 1 11 1 ! 11 1111 I IJ yy,�,I\ I; 1\ \\\ ` , J�-�j�1 ,
_ - - � ' , ,1 r 11 , / r l r , f , 1 1 1 1 1 1 , i; j 1 „ ; 1; \ \ \ � - ' . / � � - l� r
I / , / / / / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 'l 1 \ \ - -� J.•--) r ..... /
J l 1If
I I 1 1 l I I t I r ' , , • ♦ , l 11 au \ \ .� a t1 .:e
`•', - \ ry/' ,/'- ,-`\\ �\. • .. • ` l'// r,f,/� � 1 1 I • .5.-!,
1 t-/,+1\j11f; 1,) , 11�r T/--' /'
13
..,/.
t ,/rl //' Jrl / , // 1 // / r11 1
'-'�_J :1.. •-' /' //lr(('J, //\11t�, //I$/'//- : : r1,1//:„..-
r 11
--_---•,-- ''\-4 \\\-\\`/r-/ / //' 1 1 //, f/, 1, rr_1i+-1/�.1',f 1,, `•`' ��3,y1
•
�1'r- {,1�,© `•J.. _ , a' i /J1 // ./. .-Jl/1(r-'_.IrJ J.J/././rT/' I /I' ,/y /.'_ / r . I^- I
/ •, ' / / . l$'. / •,(/ / / , / •, / J J / , 1 , ce' \ / 4
ItY
)! f, //, I, • l /\1 /// I/i,/// .. ^1
/ /', 1 1 I f ! / Jr '\'1Li -
II
1 1/I (, /, /) 1 ,r/'J J-40i/••
1 J 1 111111 111I 1 ( 1 / ,/, jam/- 1r o„ \ )/.. �/- . '' L t 1�'/
I r I //�,� / J /cif 6 U�
1� i 111 I t 1 1I I ) . I , ,1/..J I 11;: J•- /f4^I /•4 / �(t4•
11// 111fIf 11r/!4'J,,,, �IN3H,`.• .., _^'..-'40.% % �j,,
/ 1 11111'I I I I 1,1r f f••P.Y- `am j-/: ' , . -11t. •- -pi--;
1i,,1/,, ,/,/ iJ3�tJ/'�f r, %•,'!I /✓1'r ;�!J,/`
,'/J 1 - J. �1 ,+/,
/✓1i%/j L+1;'. ,' r�•/ C,I . IlI1r /`.
(/ //„djl, // r" a •• ,/ - J 11,/'/r��%/ /i
lNli i/
r4) elf/ F )
`�hlk///JF r .. 1\
/�11 J � � ,
/
I l\\♦ \
\\0\
1 II , `1\\\\\`\\,}
� \'
11
1\\hy-\\\�
111\11l kill
\,
1 1 \
II111 /♦N„
11 j11j111 �\�\I IFI\\
IL'7111 , 1
11�I 1 I -
\I\111 II _�
,I ,111 11
/ll1 tl 1'
fll 11 11 \\
3l1, l I f/ .• -.- : .
\I\t\\Ill 1\1 +'t\`\
1\1 \ tl 1
1`l
\E
•
, /
,
,'
/ ///'J
•• l /, 'r'
1• 1 -/ / /!
• \u \`-
`-
feir /
' 111777777 ^
8 6.
•
•
•
*_
a
0
Z
0
f
-
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.G!LBERT
SCALE
1 "= 175'
ffelHAI:Ai9a�Ae\� 1 AND WATER elIDIWIMIMILD1ZIM1_\:
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
5 of 8

s
O
3
in
61
PFO
2,515
1.245
626
710
677
1298
25,814
578
1160
978
as ni
Tote ae..m Len. •
ly1
2,070
148
wn 1
3,25
19,719
Pfl
1,305
1863
109
327
266
1,902
960
152
un
478
556
282
126
128
un
iwm
1279
54.508
2.617
8,032
16,530
124
253
475
438
3.
Des
1.1115
liroV
MINV
triNV
59n1.11. Wetland:MAI.Wetlna..�. erP:,�.Streaa-a:-Mmn.o n E«=E .m
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- -Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
87.5
175
Feet
350
7•/
_272' 3 51 fiP
._ •ire —
see
•
•
1-
NVIRINEI0*--01:1121 ]:
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
M.GILBERT
SCALE
1 "= 175'
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
6 of 8

s
O
3
in
6
Wet. wale : w Upper PercnndeStmt., w=Mamillent Hams Erv+=Eduenm
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
ENPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.

s
0
in
6
62
PFO
2,515
1,245
626
710
677
2.298
25,814
578
1160
978
T.I abeam Moo =
r>„I a-,m Lon. •
P.
148
POW
108
3,25
19,719
Pfl
1,658
1,305
1863
109
327
266
tmx
960
152
110
478
556
282
126
128
1.01
1279
50.505
2.617
8,032
16.530
124
253
475
438
3.
A
MINV
ntnnIV
styes Im.nm.l wml.ne.. w-Up, Pe.. si88. 844.8818991
4.88�ovM na.r. errv=e.w.nne
Legend
=Project Study Limits - 253.8 Acres
Stream Buffer (30 ft)
© Stream Identifier
© Wetland Identifier
* PSA Point
Flag
$ Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
- Intermittent Stream (R4)
- Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Culvert
IN Previously Confirmed Stream
DPalustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
Previously Confirmed Wetland
Topographic Contours
— Major -10ft
- —Minor- 1ft
1. Waters of the U.S. within the project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2. Waters of the U.S. have not been confirmed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers until stamped.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC DWQ
Stream Identification form version 4.11.
ji
r ♦
•
l \
11 11l I
•
♦ _
\
- ` 1 11\ \ ^ ,\♦♦�,1 lam^ _ ,�1 1 /,///IIIII y./,,ll __ -- .
1 � I 11 /1. \,�yy,-: `1\\,1�\�,�1+, ^ �`^...,`1 / Ij1l ;/// !//i///1111 �_=�_����___- _�=-/r
I\ r‘11% ,s:
I1 // 11 ,,t i-� `\/11\\)l\��`^ -`, Yr �''/rll �J// /!/11111_ _ ^ • �L4�1f
i////r/r '• 4f Y `TT.1.` \\\11`\�`\\♦i` g4p/.lei//// I��rrl/ ♦___ �=/".b ^� /'%'' 3'i�
` Jr .✓i'^,'`-1, 1; i1 �� �`` / 11 Ill l�l
r^ 11\ •\I�t�•t \+`��+i1©` _ l '� 1'I'pjliliPSA-33B4-1'.;�_ ♦�;1 �)\`�
I l/ //,' '� ?'% J,) 111 y11 II+I I(i l '///, — • . • `• 11,
``\/)// /i, �'U/11♦11111/111 i'__ ��,��11
,` ♦ �6, 1, 1 , /,l/ .._�''/� l'II//l1// / ',,__ .♦ �./
♦ N. ` O ♦ / - / / I ill 1j1 11 1 I I 323 y, / /� /;" //•� / - `,
/ / . .
\ l l / r _ /II II Ill lr I1 I ! /' /�% '// ! �,:,
\ ♦\ \I 1111 ll 1 - ••,i� ///
// / I / /
1� \ ,\\�1 / rl /I /„1 ►: 111111t 1\ 11lIl' // / '7rO i
)` / ,> 1 % I f n i ,
! I I�I 11 I I
\�''\) ®' -//111 If I/r'//'%''�:/�J/♦1+1lyI IIII 111I1\1 1'' I rl M
^/ /
'j 7.r
1111 •L,JiJ J >�"' �r �':"//.J//1 �111 � � / 1 r-^-)I,
II fIIII!
)' 1'I 11111
1 1 _111111/
l 1+\ 1111
111\1
\\\///h I11
11„
d'IY1/JJ///
;Illyy//1, J1, I', li
III/II/ ///,r
I11'11,1 'f',1/ 1,
/hill) \\ /1/4.)1 i r
/)11\/ice ,//, /,!)
1
/ i///1j 1111)1(11
1 l'111 1111I//1 /!
,I"
/ , / ' 1 / / /
/ / / / / I /
/ -' / / /
/ - / , t/1( / /
/- - / / / / /
4t^
/ /
/ , , / / I /
•
:l'
////
1
�/ '/�� f1 I1
/'
// 1/ r l/,t, I I I
/1./ 1 1 \
�
/ I, l
\ 1 1 \ \ 1
1 JI \ \ + 1
J ,Itl 1 , r,I,//r'//// ////,,J///,J/ / J) 1\\ 1. \r`
.•
A I'll 1Il lllfl IIIIII11 l ll \♦ 1 ``\1\ \
1111,I1 ,11 1 ♦ \_ ♦_,
` ""♦_\
.. .
1 I1/
t.' 1 ;I I 1 i/
lllhl l \
111, \
I 1 / , / f 1,1\ 1 1 111 \ , 11
1 1 1 , / hl,hrlll
1 11
I I I /, ,/'//ll /11
1 I1 ll/1
'/,111 I /
i `I
,"� / //I/1
'/ 1 II
/ l 1 - , ' / 1 \I
tit,' 1 I I ;.
,// I i1�•I)/ e/ 1 '\ / — = _ ` . - /,
,111// f I ,_/—_ ',
1! III ' _.■%G/.�•.,r / r l ' 1 r ,/'' ' / �e
♦•1 /�,�(iil'/) l r r; lam' PSA-38C1 2 , I / rL.,: — ,; � 1'.' —1 -- J' -
..:J1j1�\1 \�,'//IS I l•`'i'alv'_-- -. .-- /-�. /�K♦
\11
1 11111 +1
♦ 111 1 1 , 1
111111 + 1
WI111 1 \
/•lr/, // ,', / /'I ///11 It) \ /
/ //// / / / 1 I
I/)111111
1 1 + \ 1 1 \
1 I11+11 -�
'I11\1\\_--
1
1
ltfio' 11■ 1
‘11_•,♦
,an
r '
{_:,
r/,
e.
1r�
L _
\ ♦- -''/
1_. _/ . �• •
Jaw/if:, - -
1j
l I` 1 ti
1 1 )
! /r ////
1//'/1: "/1 II1\1Ij1II ifi
1•8
- -'1,
101$
if
r \-1 /111/- s. r'111111 1 ,
•
111 `♦, .. /,// `
1I (! 11 I .
11111 '. ,//11 \ ♦
//ll///1 ♦\`• r/ /, \1 ` 11."/
/I//// '. -' /.I i ` I`L11 fIII 11 /
01
•
ff
CES
•
CL
0
0
OHM
DATE
10/26/2021
DRAWN BY
M.COOLEY
DESIGNED BY
M.COOLEY
CHECKED BY
SCALE
a.
ffelHAI:Ai9a�Ae\� 1 AND WATER elIDIWIMIMILD1ZIM1_\:
JOB NUMBER
49130
SHEET NO.
8 of 8
•
2 to
o
z

APPENDIX D

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mann, Leigh on behalf of Raleigh, FW4
Morgan Gilbert
Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Holly Springs Utilities - Online Project Review Certification Letter
Monday, October 25, 2021 11:53:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Morgan,
The biologist that reviewed your submission for this project agreed with your determinations.
Respectfully,
Leigh Mann
From: Morgan Gilbert <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 3:42 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Michel <[e-mail]>; Sydni Law <[e-mail]>; Nick Tudor
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Holly Springs Utilities - Online Project Review Certification Letter
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on
links, opening attachments, or responding.
Good morning,
I am following -up on the below Project Review Request Letter submitted on September 28, 2021, for
the Holly Springs Utilities project site to ensure that your office has the information needed.
Please let me know if there are any questions or additional information needed.
Thanks in advance,
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 984.255.2351 I Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
From: Morgan Gilbert

Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 3:47 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Michel <[e-mail]>; Sydni Law <[e-mail]>; Nick Tudor
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Holly Springs Utilities - Online Project Review Certification Letter
To whom it may concern,
On behalf of the Town of Holly Springs, Timmons Group is submitting this Package to you for the
purpose of obtaining your review of the proposed project site.
The project site is an approximately 5-mile long utility corridor located in Holly Springs, North
Carolina, within Wake County and encompasses approximately 216.6-acres.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or [e-mail] if you have any
additional questions or would like any additional information.
Thanks in advance,
Morgan Gilbert
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 I Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 984.255.2351 I Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours

Appendix E

NCHPO HPOWEB
12/9/2021, 4:16:54 PM
▪ ..▪ : Local districts & boundaries
Local HD Center Point
Local individual resources & centerpoints Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints
• Local Landmark Surveyed Only
• Local Landmark, Gone Surveyed in NRHD
Surveyed Only, Gone
Surveyed in NRHD, Gone
Blockface- Multiple properties
Blockface in NRHD
0
r
0 0.75 1.5
NC CGIA, Earthstar Geographics
1:72,224
0.5 1
2 mi
3
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
Participating NC Counties, NCCGIA, NC OneMap, US EPA 1 Esri, HERE 1 NC CGIA, Earthstar Geographics

OBJECTID Id Site ID
118679 0 WA0642 NR None None
123438 0 WA0629 NR LL None
126586 0 WA0658 SO None None
126587 0 WA0657 SO None None
126590 0 WA0634 SO None None
126591 0 WA0654 SO None None
126592 0 WA0651 SO None None
126593 0 WA0653 SO None None
128797 0 WA0624 SD None None
128798 0 WA0623 SO None None
128799 0 WA0631 SO None None
128800 0 WA0650 SO None None
128801 0 WA0652 SO None None
131828 0 WA0619 SD None None
131829 0 WA0621 SO None None
131830 0 WA0617 SO None None
132193 0 WA1060 SO None None
135274 0 WA0615 SD None None
135276 0 WA0656 SO None None
135277 0 WA0640 SO None None
135619 0 WA1114 SO None None
135620 0 WA1112 SO None None
135630 0 WA1061 SO None None
154278 0 WA0620 SD None None
160132 0 WA0626 SO None None
160133 0 WA0638 SO None None
160134 0 WA0635 SD None None
160135 149216 WA0637 SO None None
160806 0 WA3685 SD None None
162831 0 WA0628 SD None None
162832 0 WA0630 SO None None
162833 0 WA0646 SO None None
162834 0 WA0639 SO None None
162835 0 WA0636 SD None None
162836 0 WA0647 SD None NRHD
186121 0 WA0641 SO None None
186122 0 WA0643 SO None None
186123 0 WA0649 SLHD None None
187124 WA0644 SO None None
187125 WA0645 SO None None
187126 WA0627 SO None NRHD
187127 WA0625 SO None None
190967 10297 WA0648 SD None None
190976 10310 WA0661 SD None None
190980 10281 WA0632 SD None None
190982 10304 WA0655 SD None None
191031 10282 WA0633 SD None None
192089 0 WA0622 SD None None
209266 150829 WA7459 SLHD None None
226058 149263 WA7469 SO None None
226656 149246 WA7450 SO None NRHD
226681 149272 WA7478 SO None None
226729 149256 WA7461 SO None None
226730 149255 WA7460 SO None None
226731 149257 WA7462 SO None None
226732 149270 WA7476 SO None None
226733 149251 WA7455 SO None None
226734 149249 WA7453 SO None None
226735 149248 WA7452 SO None None
226736 149250 WA7454 SO None None
226737 149247 WA7453 SO None None
226738 149252 WA7456 SO None None
226739 149253 WA7457 SO None None
226740 149254 WA7458 SO None None
226741 149265 WA7471 SO None None
226742 149258 WA7463 SO None None
226743 149259 WA7464 SO None None
229589 WA7779 SO None None
231155 WA---- SO None None
Status Local Statu HD status Site Name Description Notes Internal Year NR Year SL Year DOE Year Landr Year Surve NR nomina DOE Repo, County
Holly Sprin c. 18542-story frame Masonic lod 2010 https://files.nc.gov/nc Wake
Leslie-Alfo 1840s; 187 boundary decrease 19 1997
Fayette Ho c. 1890 I -house
Wheeler-SI c. 1914 Foursquare
G.B. Alford c. 1876 Traditional Commercial Form
Stinson-Gr c. 1900 I -house
Holly Sprin c. 1918 Gothic Revival
Holly Sprin c. 1919 Neoclassical Revival
Adams Ho c. 1908 Qu Gone between 2005-2010
Rev. Henry 1900-1910 Queen Anne -Colonial Revival
John Seagr c. 1880 Traditional Form
Bryant Bre c. 1900 Queen Anne -Neoclassical R
Green Prin c. 1940 Traditional Commercial Form
Ethelred Jc 1850-1860 1-story 19th-20th c. tradtional/vernacular house
House 1900-1915 1-story pyramidal roof frame 19th-20th c. tradtional/vernacular house
Walter Col c. 1875 I -house
Allen Farm 1920-1930 1 1/2-story side gable frame 19th-20th c. traditional/vernacular house
Betts-Yarb 1900-1910 Farm Complex
Douglas CI. c. 1956 Traditional Form
Holly Sprin c. 1867
(former) c. 1890 1-story front gable frame Gothic Revival church
J.R. Eanes 11900-19101-story side gable frame 19th-20th c. traditional/vernacular house
House 1910-1920 1-story hip roof frame 19th-20th c. traditional/vernacular house
Mallie J. St c. 1915 1-story Triple -A 19th-20th c. tradtional/vernacular house
Holly Sprin 1917 Gothic Revival church
Nathan Bu c. 1850 triple-A cottage
Blanch Hol c. 1880 Qu Demolished 10/2012
Dr. Brown c. 1840 2-story 3-bay low pitched hip roof frame Greek Revival I -house w/ shed roof front porch
Durham & c. 19201-s Gone before 1993 /Nearby passenger depot also gone 1979
House (Go c. 1915 bur Gone per 2009 aerial
Seagraves 1905 Traditional Commercial Form
Holly Sprin 1923 Neoclassical Revival
Haywood / c. 1906 bungalow
Bill Wheel, 1-story cro Gone per 2005 aerial
George Utl c. 1910 I -I, Gone per 2005 aerial
David Cros c. 1900 triple-A I -house
M.H. Collir c. 1920 bungalow
Holly Springs Historic I Not NR eligible per 2005 WA Co U 1990
Dr. Briton I c. 1890 Traditional Form
Paschall W c. 1890, c. 1920 Triple -A I -house
Holly Sprin c. 1923 29-foot tall monument
Joe Hollem 1900-1910 Triple -A Cottage
R. Carter H c. 1880 2-s Gone by 1998
Sherman Late 19th c Gone between 1999-2005
Seagraves 2-story do Gone between 1999-2005
Phil Wont Late 19th c Gone befo UTMs in file are off
Dr. B. W. B 2-story par Gone between 1999-2005
Cad Norris 1900-1910 Gone between 2005-2010
Grigsby Av c. 1918-c. 1965 2016
Holly Sprin 1920s-present cemetery
George Utl 19112-sto Moved here from Raleigh Road. See WA0647.
House
House
House
House
House
House
House
c. 1915 1-story Craftsman/Bungalow; Queen Anne house
c. 1932 1 1/2-story side gable Craftsman/Bungalow
c. 1963 1-story side gable brick Ranch
c. 1953 1-story hip roof brick Ranch
c. 1950 1-story side gable brick Ranch
c. 1890 1-story side gable 19th-20th c. traditional/vernacular house
c. 1948 1-story side gable Minimal Traditional house
Main Stree c. 1965 1-story flat roof Miscellaneous Modernist brick building
House c. 1900 2-story side gable 19th-20th c. traditional/vernacular house
Holly Sprin c. 1960 1-story side gable brick church
Commeri , c. 1942 1-story flat roof Miscellaneous Modernist brick building
The Pack F c. 1952 2-story hip roof brick building
Elijah Lodg c. 1960 2-story front gable concrete block building
House c. 1970 1-story hip roof brick Ranch
Store c. 1964 1-story front gable concrete block building
House c. 1967 house
Maude & ( c. 1965 1-story side gable brick Ranch
Franklin Hr 1840-1860 Moved here in March 2015 (See WA1293 for original site)
1996 https://files.nc.gov/nc Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
Wake
2017 Wake
Wake
Quad Nam Township Density Location Photo Link Spatial Acc Latitude Longitude Year Surve x y
Apex Holly Sprin H 127 Raleigh Street Hol [NRnom] 35.65197 -78.8325 -8775591
Apex Holly Sprin H 100 Avent Ferry Rd, HI [NRnom] 35.65138 -78.8348 -8775854
Apex Holly Sprin H Rhamkatte Rd 701 S. Main Street 35.64506 -78.833 -8775655
Apex Holly Sprin H 116 Rhamkatte Rd 113 Holly Sprin 35.65507 -78.8332 -8775678
Apex Holly Sprin H 147 Main St 147 N. Main Street H, 35.65138 -78.8338 -8775740
Apex Holly Sprin H 408 Griggsby St 412 Grigsby Stree 35.64705 -78.832 -8775534
Apex Holly Sprin H Griggsby St Holly Springs 35.64835 -78.8327 -8775611
Apex Holly Sprin H NC 55 Holly Springs 35.6483 -78.8334 -8775696
Apex Holly Sprin H SE side SR 1115, 0.4 mi NE of SR 1 35.64388 -78.8373 -8776126
Apex Holly Sprin H NW side SR 1115, 0.4 mi NE of SR 35.64377 -78.8382 -8776225
Apex Holly Sprin H 306 Main St 306 S. Main Street He 35.64943 -78.8335 -8775704
Apex Holly Sprin H 312 Griggsby St 201 Grigsby Avenr 35.64919 -78.8327 -8775612
Apex Holly Sprin H Griggsby St 30 Grigsby Street Holt 35.6479 -78.8327 -8775620
Apex Holly Sprin H N side SR 1115, . 1 mi Ne of SR 11 35.63296 -78.8505 -8777598
Apex Holly Sprin H NW side SR 1115 at SR 1101 1008 35.64001 -78.8435 -8776822
Apex Holly Sprin L S side SR 1115, 0.3 mi W of SR 111 35.63112 -78.8558 -8778184
New Hill Buckhorn L 3601 Friendship Rd, Apex 35.68556 -78.898 -8782888
Apex Holly Sprin H W side SR 1114, 0.6 mi SW of NC: 35.63574 -78.8371 -8776111
Apex Holly Sprin H Douglas St 201 Douglas Street Hol 35.6539 -78.8414 -8776586
Apex Holly Sprin H Sjct First & Fourth Ave Holly Sprir 35.65288 -78.8394 -8776358
New Hill Buckhorn L 8400 Old Bethel Church Ln, Holly: 35.6625 -78.9227 -8785636
New Hill Buckhorn L 4912 Friendship Rd, Holly Springs 35.66732 -78.9253 -8785925
New Hill Buckhorn L 3545 Friendship Rd, Apex 35.68725 -78.8971 -8782788
Apex Holly Sprin H SR 1101, 0.2 mi S of SR 1115 Holly 35.6363 -78.8421 -8776667
Apex Holly Sprin H Church St 108 Avent Ferry Road H 35.65094 -78.8351 -8775888
Apex Holly Sprin H 120 Main St 120 N. Main Street H, 35.65258 -78.8334 -8775696
Apex Holly Sprin H 121 N. Main Street Holly Springs 35.65264 -78.8338 -8775744
Apex Holly Sprin H 200 N Main St, Holly S [PIN/Addr] 35.65327 -78.8336 -8775715
Apex Holly Sprin H Int of Ballentine St & L [Aerial] 35.64966 -78.8343 -8775797
Apex Holly Sprin H Avent Ferry Rd 112 Avent Ferry Rc 35.6504 -78.8348 -8775845
Apex Holly Sprin H 110 Ballentine St 104 W. Ballentin 35.65 -78.8343 -8775791
Apex Holly Sprin H Raleigh St 304 Raleigh Street Holy 35.65096 -78.8328 -8775631
Apex Holly Sprin H 114 Center St 109 Center Street H 35.65149 -78.833 -8775647
Apex Holly Sprin H 103 Main St 103 N. Main Street H, 35.65334 -78.834 -8775762
Apex Holly Sprin H 219 Raleigh St Avent Ferry Road H 35.65178 -78.835 -8775875
Apex Holly Sprin H 110 Raleigh St 205 Ral [PIN] 35.65281 -78.8318 -8775517
Apex Holly Sprin H 146 Raleigh St 301 Raleigh Street 35.65139 -78.8322 -8775560
Apex Holly Sprin H Church Street at Avent Ferry Roac 35.65125 -78.8325 -8775595
Apex Holly Sprin H 148 Raleigh St [GSV] 35.65116 -78.8323 -8775572
Apex Holly Sprin H 150 Raleigh St [GSV] 35.65097 -78.8323 -8775574
Apex Holly Sprin H Church St [Web] 35.65117 -78.8352 -8775895
Apex Holly Sprin H SE side SR 1115, 0.5 m [USGS] 35.64443 -78.8367 -8776056
Apex Holly Sprin H 231 Raleigh St, Holly S [UTMs] 35.65143 -78.8326 -8775609
Apex Holly Sprin H 103 Hickory Ave, Holly [File] 35.64435 -78.8331 -8775659
Apex Holly Sprin H NW corner W ballentir [File] 35.65002 -78.8338 -8775743
Apex Holly Sprin H 410 Grigsby St [Addr] 35.64752 -78.8319 -8775533
Apex Holly Sprin H 111 Church (Center) SI [File] 35.65107 -78.8341 -8775770
Apex Holly Sprin H 35.643 -78.8382 -8776219
Apex Holly Sprin H E side Main St to Grigs [Report] 35.648 -78.8332 -8775670
Apex Holly Sprin H 300 Rogers Road, Holt [Addr] 35.64791 -78.8334 -8775693
Apex Holly Sprin H 102 Avent Ferry Road, [PIN/Addr] 35.65175 -78.8352 -8775898
Apex Holly Sprin H 300 W. Earp Street, He [PIN/Addr] 35.65345 -78.8362 -8776007
Apex Holly Sprin H 209 Alford Street, Holl [PIN/Addr] 35.65387 -78.8347 -8775839
Apex Holly Sprin H 205 Alford Street, Holl [PIN/Addr] 35.6535 -78.8348 -8775848
Apex Holly Sprin H 132 Raleigh Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.65359 -78.8321 -8775547
Apex Holly Sprin H 140 Raleigh Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.65329 -78.8322 -8775557
Apex Holly Sprin H 220 Raleigh Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.65241 -78.8323 -8775570
Apex Holly Sprin H 229 Raleigh Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.65168 -78.8321 -8775553
Apex Holly Sprin H 126 N. Main Street, He [PIN/Addr] 35.65211 -78.8332 -8775674
Apex Holly Sprin H 217 Raleigh Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.65211 -78.832 -8775541
Apex Holly Sprin H 106 Avent Ferry Road, [PIN/Addr] 35.65129 -78.8356 -8775943
Apex Holly Sprin H 213 W. Ballentine Stre [PIN/Addr] 35.64978 -78.8347 -8775842
Apex Holly Sprin H 4085. Main Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.64729 -78.8338 -8775736
Apex Holly Sprin H 100 Rogers Street, Hol [PIN] 35.64851 -78.833 -8775647
Apex Holly Sprin H 105 W. Maple Avenue [PIN/Addr] 35.64349 -78.8336 -8775718
Apex Holly Sprin H 8025. Main Street, Ho [PIN/Addr] 35.64355 -78.8329 -8775633
Apex Holly Sprin H 204 Piney Grove-Wilb, [PIN/Addr] 35.6376 -78.8425 -8776706
New Hill Buckhorn H 4501 Friendship Rd, Al [Consult] 35.66913 -78.9135 -8784610
New Hill Buckhorn H 3601 Friendship Rd, Al [Consult] 35.68429 -78.8986 -8782948
4252839
4252758
4251892
4253264
4252758
4252166
4252343
4252336
4251730
4251716
4252491
4252459
4252281
4250235
4251201
4249984
4257442
4250616
4253104
4252964
4254281
4254942
4257673
4250692
4252699
4252922
4252931
4253018
4252523
4252624
4252570
4252700
4252773
4253026
4252814
4252955
4252759
4252740
4252728
4252702
4252730
4251806
4252766
4251795
4252572
4252229
4252715
4251619
4252295
4252283
4252810
4253041
4253100
4253049
4253062
4253020
4252900
4252799
4252858
4252858
4252745
4252539
4252199
4252365
4251677
4251685
4250870
4255190
4257267