20191260 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2021_20211230

sy
STAT
Staff Review Form
NORTH CAROLINA
Envlronm¢ntcl Qvoray
Updated September 4,2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID#* Version* 1
20191260
Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes
• No
Reviewer List:* Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Select Reviewing Office:* Fayetteville Regional Office-[phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note:fields marked with a red asterisk *below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* For the Record Only(Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre-Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
Yes No
Project Contact Information
Name: Kelli Garcia
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID#: Existing Version:
20191260 1
20170001(no dashes) 1
Project Name: UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
......................................
County(ies)
Cumberland
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
UTtoCapeFearRiverStreamRestoration_MY1 Repor... 13.48MB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
DWR#19-1260
SAW#:SAW-2019-01369
Sign and Submit

By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I,the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I,the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: 12/30/2021
Is filled in automatically.

m '�'' °F
sr.
rI
R -
Z If= n •
Will.11.0 Mg 11,1611.1Plqi* is.
, 111114,00... 4,.
914
a ` - J yr - _�__ ,�""+sue~ r_y��`.:
111.
•
0.111111.1.11.1.111.1111.1111:
1111
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER
STREAM RESTORATION
Stream Monitoring Year 1 Report/ uecember 2021
IA
MCADAMS

UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER
STREAM RESTORATION
Methodist University
Fayetteville, North Carolina
Stream Monitoring Year 1 Report
Project Number: SPEC-18131
Designed By: Rebecca Stubbs, PE
Kelli Garcia, PE
Date: December 2021
1 1
MCADAMS
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
NC Lic. #C-0293

MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 2
1.1 Project Location and Description 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 2
2.0 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT 2
2.1 Channel Stability Success Criteria 2
2.2 Visual Assessment Summary 3
3.0 STREAM AND FLOODPLAIN REPAIRS 4
4.0 REFERENCES 5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Conservation Easement Map
Figure 3: As-Built Cross Section Survey
Appendix B: Stream Data
Appendix C: Repair Photos
Appendix D: Site Photo Log— Monitoring Year 1
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway,Durham,NC 27713/919.361.5000

MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Location and Description
The UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration project is a jointly funded stream restoration project by Methodist
University and the Clean Water Management Trust Fund located on the campus of Methodist University in
Fayetteville, North Carolina (Appendix 1, Figure 1).The project restored 2,244 linear feet of an unnamed tributary
(UT) to the Cape Fear River located south of Lower Field Drive and preserved an additional 771 linear feet of the
unnamed tributary. At the site the unnamed tributary receives runoff from 227 acres of urban watershed and
flows into the Cape Fear River (DWR stream index number 18-(23.5)) approximately 1,500 feet downstream of
the project limits. The site was placed under a 11.03-acre conservation easement to protect the restored site in
perpetuity (Appendix 1, Figure 2). The stream restoration project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin USGS
Hydrologic Unit 03030004 and local Cape Fear River watershed 12-digit HUC 030300040706.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The purpose of this Stream Monitoring Year 1 Report is to assess the success of the Stream Restoration project.
The monitoring plan evaluates the success of the Site and is based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2016) and the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP)
Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation (November, 2011).
Monitoring of the Site will occur for one (1) full year, and then after two (2) bankfull events. A monitoring report
documenting site conditions and maintenance activities will be generated each year until the monitoring
requirements have been fulfilled.
Construction of the Stream Restoration project occurred in the summer and fall of 2020.The site was seeded with
temporary and permanent seed mixes during construction. During December 2020, the Site was planted with live
stakes and herbaceous plugs.
The objectives of the stream restoration project are the following:
> Significantly reduce streambank erosion rates by using natural channel design techniques such as
channel realignment, floodplain grading, and planting native vegetation;
> Enhance aquatic habitat and improve biological health of stream; and
> Restore floodplain connection and function
2.0 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
2.1 Channel Stability Success Criteria
Stream geometry will be considered successful if the geometry, profile and sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic
equilibrium. It is expected that there will be minimal changes in the designed cross sections, profile and/or
substrate composition. Changes that may occur during the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if
they represent a movement toward a more unstable condition (e.g. down cutting or bank erosion) or are minor
changes that represent an increase in stability(e.g. settling,vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is possible to maintain stability and not
stay within the design geometry.
creating experiences through experience

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
Channel stability will be reflected in the surveyed permanent cross-sections,evaluation of bank stability and cover,
and evaluation of in-stream structure performance, and to a lesser degree pebble counts compared to the as-built
and any previously collected monitoring data.The general trend should reflect a stable or slightly decreasing riffle
cross-sectional area, whereas pools may increase and yet be considered relatively stable. Typically, the
constructed channel will adjust (especially in a sand-dominated bed), but it will need to function without
significant degradation (bed scour), aggradation (mid-channel bars), or bank erosion.
The Bank Height Ratio (BHR) shall not exceed 1.2 and the Entrenchment Ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within the
restored reaches.The stream shall remain stable over the first year, through two bankfull events, as indicated by
visual surveys and cross sections.
2.2 Visual Assessment Summary
Channel stability monitoring activities for Year 1 were conducted during January 11, 2021(As-built survey), March
4, 2021, July 27, 2021, and December 17, 2021. Visual stream assessments were performed during each visit and
geometric parameters were collected during the January 2021,July 2021, and December 2021 field visits. Overall,
the stream system appears stable and shows no trends of lateral or vertical instability.
At the time of as-built survey in January 2021,four cross sections, 2 riffles and 2 pools,were selected and surveyed
to establish a baseline geometry for monitoring. For all surveyed cross sections, geometry was compared from
the December 2021 visit to the as-built January 2021 stream data (see Appendix B). Cross Sections 1 and 4 were
selected at pool locations at approximately stations 5+65 and 13+20, respectively. Assessment of geometric data
collected at Cross Sections 1 and 4 during Year 1 results in dimension and geometric ratios closely aligning with
those used in the design: entrenchment ratios no less than 2.2, bank height ratios of 1.0 and 1.2 respectively, and
average depths are slightly deeper than design.Though it is visually apparent Cross Section 1 is experiencing both
aggradation (right bank) and scour (left bank) the pool maintains similar geometry to the proposed design and
data collected during the as-built survey. Cross Section 1 is most likely experiencing effects (i.e. deposition and
abrasive scour) from the upstream reach's high sediment input. Cross Section 4 displayed typical function and
geometry such outside meander scour and inside meander deposition. However,from the time of as-built survey,
entrenchment ratio decreased from 2.8 to 2.2 and bank height ratio increased from 1.0 to 1.2.Though appearing
to be stable, this cross section and the surrounding reach will continue to be monitored to confirm it is trending
towards dynamic equilibrium and not instability.
Cross Sections 2 and 3 were selected at riffle locations at approximately stations 6+70 and 10+60, respectively.
Assessment of geometric data collected at Cross Sections 2 and 3 during Year 1 results in dimension and geometric
ratios considered stable for the reach: entrenchment ratios greater than 2.2 and bank height ratios of 1.0.A slight
decrease in cross sectional area, typical of constructed riffle due to settling and bank aggradation, was noticed in
the monitoring data. No bank erosion was observed at these cross sections. Bankfull indicators were observed at
the riffle cross sections along with established bank and floodplain vegetation.
To analyze the composition of the streambed and banks,Wolman pebble count data for the restored stream reach
was collected in March 2021 and December 2021. Substrate samples were taken evenly at both riffle and pool
cross sections along the 2,224 LF reach. Bed material in March 2021 had a D50 of 0.85mm (coarse sand) and was
comprised of 67%sand, 7%gravel and 26%cobble. In December 2021, bed material had a D50 of 0.5mm (medium
sand) and was comprised of 65% sand, 15%gravel, and 20% cobble. During construction, the high sediment load
contributed from the upstream reach resulted in sandy sediment deposition within the restored/constructed
channel. Some areas of excessive in-channel deposition noted during the construction of the project reach
remained present during the December 2021 visit. Continual sediment load from the unstable upstream reach
and previous eroded bank areas that washed out bank material most likely contributed to this slight shift in
median grain size since the initial survey in March 2021. No signs of aggradation believed to be detrimental to the
creating experiences through experience

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
objectives of the project were noted. See Section 3 below for repairs to the specific instability bank issues that
have since been resolved.
Visual stream assessments were performed along the entirety of the restored reach and reflect the stream reach's
stability. Bankfull indicators such as debris lines were present throughout the entire project reach and the crest
gage installed in March 2021 recorded bankfull as of December 2021. Alluvial sediment deposits were observed
on the floodplain to further confirm floodplain connection and activation along most of the restored reach.
Stabilized vegetation on banks, floodplain and terrace were established throughout the reach. Lastly, with the
exception of a J-hook structure approximately at station 19+40, all structures used for grade control along the
reach are performing as designed, maintaining approximately 6-inches of drop across each structure.Will continue
to monitor the aforementioned J-hook and other stream structures for stability.
3.0 STREAM AND FLOODPLAIN REPAIRS
After construction, several repairs to the proposed design were required to stabilize the site.
In March of 2021, concentrated stormwater runoff from the golf course eroded the right bank terrace resulting in
the formation of a large gully (approximately station 21+00). A groundwater seep also resulted in a significant
slump of the right bank terrace near station 16+00. Additionally, it was observed that little vegetation from seed
was taking hold in several areas along the banks and terrace. The following repairs were made to address these
areas of instability: The right bank and terrace were regraded from approximately station 16+00 to 19+00 and
slope drains were installed around station 16+00 to provide a controlled outlet for the groundwater seeps.A yard
inlet and HDPE storm pipe were installed at the top of the terrace(near the end of project reach at station 21+50)
to collect runoff from the golf course and outlet flow at the floodplain in a non-erosive manner. Approximately
100 LF of double row coir logs were placed along the bank toe in area where sand had been washed out from
underneath the coir matting. An estimated 2,000 juncus plugs were installed on a 4' spacing to provide good
vegetative cover within the stream banks along the entire reach. Lastly, areas of sparse vegetation along the side
slopes of the entire reach were re-seeded using hydroseeding technique for improved survivability.
During the July 2021 site visit,a log in an angled log riffle near station 20+20 was higher than the stream bed invert
and caused instability to the right bank. As a result, the right bank scoured in this area and both the bank and
structure needed to be repaired. Corrective action in September 2021 included notching the three logs of the
structure for stream flow to travel over as designed. Additionally, double row coir logs along the right bank toe
were installed in the area adjacent to the log riffle structure where the bank had been washed out(approximately
station 20+20).The floodplain and terrace were reseeded and its coir matting was restaked.
The December 2021 visit noted these areas of repair are stable. Repair photos are included in Appendix B of this
report.
creating experiences through experience

Al
MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
4.0 REFERENCES
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration.Available
at internet site: https://erp.unc.edu/files/2014/12/buffer-restoration.pdf.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation.
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.January 2021.As-Built Monitoring Report, UT to Cape Fear Stream Restoration.
US Army Corps of Engineers April, 2013.Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
creating experiences through experience

APPENDIX A
SITE MAPS
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION
MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT

dif I'll
1- --_
g
c
i.
a N
'CU ti R d
I 1 1
Z} -r-
°s
295 'peg
PROJECT AREA
a R°
�,N wla1� '���
yr .,P,), i W
ir
ir
�otri Club Dr II W
co LL
W
al Q
$ U
9 I,
v
//
Or
e l'r
sc � n
a,
31i1,
infon Rd �-
..I`r. 1-95
h00vJd Qa
Hays �7 ?
8rans°n Cr,a4. 1 Fayettevi G:__Q .t
pn
I, r;" yt
24
I
% 4 i
\ r r
Robeson S J
•�
0
m
out P
1
0 0.5 1
'I FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP Miles
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION 1 inch= 1 miles
METHODIST UNIVERSITY VERSION: 1
SPEC
-181
FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNYT, NORTH CAROLINA DATE:
MCADAMS 12/22/2021
JOB NO: SPEC-18131
DRAWN BY: RHW

-.. • 't . 'CM," — .' ,-_ i
•
•
•
z =e �� 311
o'er'!` ��{ c ' ''yam`• � �,4',
or
� 4 , Al
Q ' ; it - `• +
�- �1 }` •4. : _ (
. it 1..N11 • ..t"..t. t.al..*Wik.
i e, , • :en -44lift : ,
.• . . . •e . ' t.
` ' v '� 1
i _ :,,
1
4.
• -I 'P -1.
:�
•
AI 2 at . "glik 0 M; . ' - , • a .
.�`� `‘ a -) 1 •. dui
e, I
` "-k; zy - , i UT TO EAR •
}
•e ' -,i ` / CAPEF I .
ti RIVER
, w
• \,..•
N, • 4 : , 11.03-ACRE V.
,:r'. CONSERVATION
'I
: . jl . �, . `.\ • _, , r. EASEMENT
,t INO ,
#.4r ..-.
lib, a 'lip 1
•
S .
N
+ ROI t 0 ••J 2
a
'1.I . 1 • • 1
1 j
r /
' ' 0 150 300
J FIGURE 2. CONSERVATION EASEMENT Feet
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION 1 inch=300 feet
METHODIST UNIVERSITY VERSION: 1
FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNYT, NORTH CAROLINA DATE: SPE
MCADAMS2/2021
JOB NO: SPEC-181-18131
DRAWN BY: RHW

Alt
\ GENERAL NOTES
Nall
mob t . \___-__ 1.) THIS IS A SURVEY OF EXISTING PARCELS OF LAND. THIS IS AN AS-BUILT
SURVEY OF STREAM CROSS-SECTIONS. NO BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. LEGEND
bj°ill's°
2.) BEARINGS ARE BASED ON NC GRID NAD 83(2011). SEE CERTIFICATE HEREON. ® EXISTING IRON PIPE/REBAR
Dr 3.) ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES. 0 IRON PIPE SET
co
Lower F 4.) FLOO NOTE:H A PORTION AO THIS APREA
FIS LOCATED WITHIN THE 0.2% ■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT II /I2I /-\ I14S
o ie� ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS DEFINED BY FEMA F.I.R.M. MAP
Alinfin
D r ;;, c ¢� NUMBER 3720054000J, DATED JANUARY 5, 2007. 0 CONCRETE MONUMENT SET
r___: �� 5.) REFERENCES: AERIAL IMAGERY AND LIDAR ACQUISITION BY GPI GEOSPATIAL, A CALCULATED POINT
INC. (JOB NO. 2019-042, MARCH 14, 2019); The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
401 0
CUMBERLAND COUNTY REID: 0530913792000 C UTILITY POLE NC GRID(NAD83) 3430 Toringdon Way
e,
x ,, 6.) WETLANDS CLASSIFICATION "PUBHH" (TRACED FROM CUMBERLAND COUNTY ou ou OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE Suite 110
Treetop Dr SITE GIs). Charlotte, NC 28277
pQ % SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
C) phone [phone]
- - - - PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED fax [phone]
license number: C-0293
0 C4
VICINITY MAPi
www.mcadamsco.com
N TS
CLIENT
tO . .: c4-.
METHODIST UNIVERSITY
8 5400 RAMSEY STREET
,; FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28311
`4 a
C4 "•4 c;1.ii. 0 il -sr
tt �e ? ? ci t??
0•
.d 0
tt
t
t
4111001.
t
C�
t
t
/• *
�O /low
��
��
jfl.,
A.
A. i c‘o : ' * A <
tt J
4:, C4 Ci 0 C? el ;
t 0
CROSS SECTION 2 (RIFFLE), STATION 7+07.96 0 0 CC
CROSS SECTION 4 (RIFFLE), STATION 13+56.28 Q'^ 4$z\Ntis COORDINATES ARE NC GRID NAD83(2011), NAVD88 0 / .P
" COORDINATES ARE NC GRID NAD83(2011), NAVD88 J U
0
co
SET PIPE:N:503,345.239, E:2,039,939.822, ELEV.:134.006 0 ♦ SET PIPE:N:503,321.079, E:2,040,612.356, ELEV.:119.250 D _
1. GROUND: ELEV.:115.00 SET PIPE 1. GROUND: ELEV.:102.03 CO
I-
*0 i 2. GROUND: ELEV.:113.10 0 o6 WITH CAP 2. GROUND: ELEV.:100.27 W > SC
3. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:112.88
4. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:111.25 /� • , 3. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:100.09
® . 5. EDGE OF WATER:ELEV.:111.26 z 4. INNER BERM: ELEV. 99.16
.0 Q41 6. THALWEG: ELEV.:110.74 / 0 5. EDGE OF WATER:ELEV.:98.58
7. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:111.13 6. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:98.01
it
if
o CREEK •CENTERLINE L' 7. THALWEG: ELEV.:97.03
Crj3 it' 8. EDGE OF WATER:ELEV.:111.15 �� CROSS SECTION 3 {RIFFLE), STATION 10+94.09 8. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:96.87 Z Z
9. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:112.74 COORDINATES ARE NC GRID NAD83(2011), NAVD88 9. INNER BERM: ELEV.:98.72 w
10. GROUND: ELEV.:113.00 0 10. INNER BERM: ELEV.:99.16 M O \ Q
Fr-
® ® 11. GROUND: ELEV.:114.86 v SET PIPE:N:503,403.034, E:2,040,355.996, ELEV.:123.147 11. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:100.18 J" ® SET PIPE: N:503,274.456, E:2,040,062.224, ELEV.:127.339 1. GROUND: ELEV.:108.27 i 12. GROUND: ELEV.:100.61 U
® �� Qr \ • - 2. GROUND: ELEV.:106.19 13. GROUND: ELEV.:103.24 H
z0SET PIPE • 3. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:106.090 WITH CAP 1Q• 4. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:104.11 SET PIPE: N:503,209.236, E:2,040,546.307, ELEV.:120.578 UIfr- Z C / 5. EDGE OF WATER:ELEV.:104.10 ICI Q
BOSS 111.
3 6. CL DROP: ELEV.:104.05
® SF o r❑2 7. THALWEG: ELEV.:103.80
® ���oy 5 ® 8. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:103.74 (n m
2 ❑ 9. EDGE OF WATER:ELEV.:104.07 SET PIPE � /�
L ❑7 , ❑5 10. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:105.42 WITH CAP 0 V l 0 2
• ❑2 - 9 ❑g x 11. GROUND: ELEV.:106.01 a
• $ 12. GROUND: ELEV.:107.77 9 ® lb_ O O C,
0 10 SET PIPE: N:503,214.953, E:2,040,326.958, ELEV.:124.866 �O �/
® "I... ' • • 10
LL
co U
0 SET PIPE • c cam, - .L co J
WITH CAP TTT"`"" 12+00 0
n� • �❑ 11 oss sFc 12 •, \ _� �+I . . . . CREEK CENTERLINE c� 2L1J w
o�� �� „Di,/ C o o• Q 2
��� �� � 0 WETH PIPE C) , r.71
L1J W
•
o ���c �' E , • a
z 5 I-
ill . �? w /) I L
3
.0 ❑ . 13 . 11 it' it' cn8 o
© • o 12 I-
❑ *
7 6 `' 0= U
® 10 c)
9 • 13 �Li
/ m
2 14 0 SET PIPE v�
r•Psr.1-v-'''''') -
/ o
'A CROSS SECTION 1 (POOL), STATION 6+01.88 `? WITH CAP SET
0iP COORDINATES ARE NC GRID NAD83(2011), NAVD88 0 PIPE WITH CAP
7
� F SET PIPE:N:503,295.585, E:2,039,901.998, ELEV.:134.246
0.,` 1. GROUND: ELEV.:117.08
o� 2. GROUND: ELEV.:115.10
yt
gt04
3. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:115.00 `~?
4. INNER BERM: ELEV.:114.51
• SET PIPE 0 5. INNER BERM: ELEV.:113.50
WITH CAP 6. INNER BERM:
7. EDGE OF WATER: ELEV.:113.32
n
l1 ELEV.:112.98 ,,• \ 0 '._.J1 8. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:112.21•
9. THALWEG: ELEV.:111.90 iiii
*
N 10. TOE OF SLOPE: ELEV.:112.15 ? `~?
11. EDGE OF WATER: ELEV.:112.85
12. TOP OF BANK: ELEV.:114.05 REVISIONS
13. GROUND: ELEV.:115.32
14. GROUND: ELEV.:116.83
N SET PIPE: N:503,174.065, E:2,039,965.220, ELEV.:129.923 NO. DATE
, /
I, KEVIN S. BAUCOM, PLS, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS
DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION WAS USED TO PERFORM THE SURVEY: PLAN INFORMATION
(1)CLASS OF SURVEY: CLASS A
(2)POSITIONAL ACCURACY: < 0.100' PROJECT NO. SPEC-18131
(3)TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE: VRS
(4)DATE OF SURVEY: 2-26-2019 FILENAME SPEC18131 12.DWG
(5)DATUM/EPOCH: NAD 83(2011) CHECKED BY KSB
(6)PUBLISHED/FIXED-CONTROL USED: NCFA
(7)GEOID MODEL: GEOID12A DRAWN BY CCG
(8)COMBINED GRID FACTOR(S): 0.99987442
(9)UNITS: METERS CONVERTED TO US SURVEY FEET SCALE 1"=30'
DATE XX. XX. XXXX
I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM .411$„$$N/44
AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM DEED 0 ��• SHEET
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK AND PAGE SHOWN; THAT THE **`�'\\\••BAR.. **•.
BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AND DRAWN FROM �.` Q�.• E S S /D•.f�•.. p
INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK AND PAGE SHOWN; THAT THE RATIO OF C 9• • CROSS-SECTION
PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1:10,000; AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS THE G : -
REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING : S SEAL _ GRAPHIC SCALE AS-BU I LTS
IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56.1600). I. L-4275 • G 30 0 15 30 60
/i• SUR •�
.�.,,,,1 .........7k %*s 1 inch=30 ft. 1 - 1
1
KEVIN S. BAUCOM, PLS L-4275 %`ta.....'t tss°

APPENDIX B
STREAM DATA
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION
MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
UT to Cape Fear CROSS-SECTION: 1 POOL
Year-0 Bankfull Event Year-1 Year-2
Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft)
4976.04 117.08 4975.54 117.28 4991.07 115.19
4987.65 115.10 4987.19 115.14 4991.57 114.95
4991.95 115.00 4991.07 115.19 4992.07 114.69
4993.88 114.51 4992.52 114.21 4992.57 114.63
4995.78 113.50 4994.82 113.89 4992.77 114.63
4997.21 113.32 4996.07 112.86 4993.07 113.43
4997.66 112.98 4996.17 112.85 4993.57 113.29
4998.02 112.21 4998.06 112.24 4994.07 113.19
5000.25 111.90 5000.22 112.95 4995.07 112.99
5000.98 112.15 5000.67 112.67 4996.07 112.51
5002.48 112.85 5003.17 113.32 4997.07 112.29
5004.22 114.05 5006.51 115.24 4998.07 112.29
5007.45 115.32 5016.89 116.90 4999.07 112.49
5017.03 116.83 4999.57 112.79
5000.07 113.59
5000.77 114.19
5001.07 114.29
5002.07 114.59
5003.07 115.11
5003.57 115.19
Year-0 As-built survey January 11, 2021
Bankfull Event July 27, 2021 bankfull event survey
Year-1 December 17, 2021 Year 1 survey
MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
XS-1 Pool
118
117
116
} 115
114
co
v
LT' 113 ie
112
111 Year-0,2021 #BKF,2021 f Year-1,2021
- - -Year-0,Bkf BKF — • -Year-1,Bkf
110
4970 4'17 4980 4985 4990 4995 5000 5005 5010 5015 5020
Station (ft)
Width from Stream Left to Right
CROSS SECTION PLOT- LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-1, 2021 SURVEY DATA CROSS-SECTION: 1
PROJECT UT TO CAPE FEAR STREAM RESTORATION FEATURE: POOL
TASK CROSS SECTION
c 1/11/2021 7/27/2021 12/17/2021
CREW KG
Summary Data
Year-0 Bankfull Year-1 Year-2
Bankfull X-sec area (sf) 22.7 25.3 20.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 14.7 15.2 12.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.5 1.7 1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.1 2.9 2.9
Width/Depth Ratio 9.5 9.2 7.6
Entrenchment Ratio 2.8 2.7 3.3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 115.00 115.19 115.19
D50(mm) --- ---
D84(mm) --- ---
W MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
UT to Cape Fear CROSS-SECTION: 2 RIFFLE
Year-0 Bankfull Event Year-1 Year-2
Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft)
4977.27 115.00 4976.38 115.59 4992.96 113.16
4988.40 113.10 4988.46 113.30 4993.96 112.86
4992.42 112.88 4992.96 113.16 4994.96 112.56
4996.16 111.25 4997.05 111.59 4995.96 112.26
4997.02 111.26 4997.80 111.45 4996.96 111.90
5000.43 110.74 5000.12 110.85 4998.36 111.36
5003.32 111.13 5003.17 111.40 4998.96 111.56
5003.74 111.15 5003.36 112.09 4999.96 111.56
5006.48 112.74 5007.17 113.26 5000.96 111.26
5010.18 113.00 5015.93 113.98 5001.36 111.00
5021.92 114.86 5001.96 111.32
5002.66 111.36
5003.66 111.24
5004.16 111.26
5004.36 112.14
5004.66 112.26
5005.26 112.36
5005.96 112.36
5006.56 112.76
5007.36 113.16
Year-0 As-built survey January 11, 2021
Bankfull Event July 27, 2021 bankfull event survey
Year-1 December 17, 2021 Year 1 survey
MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
XS-2 Riffle
116
115
114
113
co
v 112
w \ in '
111
110 f Year-0,2021 f Bankfull,2021 f Year-1,2021
— — —Year-0,Bkf BKF — • -Year-1,Bkf
109
na7n 4980 4990 5000 5010 5020 5030
Station (ft)
Width from Stream Left to Right
CROSS SECTION PLOT-LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-1, 2021 SURVEY DATA CROSS-SECTION: 2
PROJECT UT TO CAPE FEAR STREAM RESTORATION FEATURE: RIFFLE
TASK CROSS SECTION
DATES 1/11/2021 7/27/2021 12/17/2021
CREW KG
Summary Data
Year-0 Bankfull Year-1 Year-2
Bankfull X-sec area (sf) 19.9 17.4 17.2
Bankfull Width (ft) 16.1 13.9 14.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2 1.3 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1 2.3 2.2
Width/Depth Ratio 12.9 11.0 12.0
Entrenchment Ratio 2.8 2.8 3.1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 112.88 113.16 113.16
D50(mm) ---
D84(mm) ---
MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
UT to Cape Fear CROSS-SECTION: 3 RIFFLE
Year-0 Bankfull Event Year-1 Year-2
Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft)
4972.49 108.27 4968.81 108.33 4986.20 105.93
4986.79 106.19 4986.20 105.93 4988.20 105.73
4987.60 106.09 4991.15 104.36 4989.20 105.19
4992.09 104.11 4994.84 103.65 4990.20 104.83
4992.78 104.10 4999.64 102.29 4990.70 104.63
5000.00 104.05 5007.69 103.82 4991.20 104.53
5001.63 103.80 5007.89 103.54 4992.20 104.73
5005.70 103.74 5013.62 105.61 4994.10 104.43
5007.02 104.07 5025.30 107.33 4995.20 104.41
5012.57 105.42 4996.20 104.53
5016.76 106.01 4997.20 104.13
5029.94 107.77 4998.20 104.33
4999.20 104.47
5000.40 104.13
5001.90 104.33
5002.20 104.37
5002.90 105.17
5004.20 105.25
5007.20 105.61
5010.20 105.75
5011.50 105.93
Year-0 As-built survey January 11, 2021
Bankfull Event July 27, 2021 bankfull event survey
Year-1 December 17, 2021 Year 1 survey
MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
XS-3 Riffle
109
108
107
106 . _ . _ . _ .
105
0
> 104111111111/
v
103
102 —
101 +Year-0,2021 -A—Bankfull,2021 f Year-1,2021
— — —Year-0,Bkf BKF — • -Year-1,Bkf
100
4960 4970 4980 4990 5000 5010 5020 5030 5040
Station (ft)
Width from Stream Left to Right
CROSS SECTION PLOT-LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-1, 2021 SURVEY DATA CROSS-SECTION: 3
PROJECT UT TO CAPE FEAR STREAM RESTORATION FEATURE: RIFFLE
TASK CROSS SECTION
DATES 1/11/2021 7/27/2021 12/17/2021
CREW KG
Summary Data
Year-0 Bankfull Year-1 Year-2
Bankfull X-sec area (sf) 45.3 56.9 23.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 29.8 29.6 25.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.5 1.9 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9 3.6 1.8
Width/Depth Ratio 19.6 15.4 26.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 1.9 2.3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 106.09 105.93 105.93
D50(mm) ---
D84(mm) ---
W MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
UT to Cape Fear CROSS-SECTION:4 POOL
Year-0 Bankfull Event Year-1 Year-2
Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft) Station (ft) Elev. (ft)
4979.10 102.03 4975.57 103.55 4993.48 99.82
4990.12 100.27 4993.48 99.82 4995.48 99.72
4992.87 100.09 4995.81 98.36 4996.48 99.46
4993.87 99.16 4999.62 98.36 4997.48 98.84
4995.51 98.58 5002.40 97.46 4998.48 98.70
4996.75 98.01 5003.46 97.83 4999.98 97.60
5001.07 97.03 5008.15 98.64 5000.48 97.30
5001.90 96.87 5017.04 100.67 5001.48 97.20
5002.23 98.72 5001.98 97.18
5002.82 99.16 5002.48 97.42
5007.54 100.18 5003.48 97.80
5011.26 100.61 5004.48 98.00
5018.55 103.24 5005.98 98.48
5010.58 99.60
5012.48 100.24
5014.18 100.30
Year-0 As-built survey January 11, 2021
Bankfull Event July 27, 2021 bankfull event survey
Year-1 December 17, 2021 Year 1 survey
a.
MCADAMS

UT to Cape Fear River Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 1 Report • Fayetteville, North Carolina • December 2021
XS-4 Pool
104
103
102
101
F
100 • .
o
v 99
11111P—
LT1
98
97
96 Yea r-0,2021 —A—Bankfull,2021 f Year-1,2021
— — —Year-0,Bkf —BKF — • —Year-1,Bkf
95
4970 4975 4980 4985 4990 4995 5000 5005 5010 5015 5020 5025
Station (ft)
Width from Stream Left to Right
CROSS SECTION PLOT-LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-1, 2021 SURVEY DATA CROSS-SECTION: 4
PROJECT UT TO CAPE FEAR STREAM RESTORATION FEATURE: POOL
TASK CROSS SECTION
DATES 1/11/2021 7/27/2021 12/17/2021
CREW KG
Summary Data
Year-0 Bankfull Year-1 Year-2
Bankfull X-sec area (sf) 21.8 25.4 21.0
Bankfull Width (ft) 14.3 19.8 17.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.5 1.3 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.2 2.4 2.6
Width/Depth Ratio 9.3 15.5 14.9
Entrenchment Ratio 2.8 1.8 2.2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.2 1.2
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 100.09 99.82 99.82
D50(mm) ---
D84(mm) ---
MCADAMS

March 2021
100 — — — An
• • A 11---4.....4r--"A---17.41
it
60
a)
a)
2
a)
a
40
20
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size(mm)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name : UT to Cape Fear
Reach Name : ASB 1/11/2021
Sample Name: March 2021
Survey Date: 03/04/2021
Size (mm) TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0. 062 0 0. 00 0. 00
0. 062 - 0. 125 2 2 . 00 2 . 00
0. 125 - 0. 25 14 14. 00 16. 00
0. 25 - 0. 50 22 22 . 00 38 . 00
0. 50 - 1. 0 17 17. 00 55 . 00
1. 0 - 2 .0 12 12 . 00 67 . 00
2 . 0 - 4.0 1 1. 00 68 . 00
4. 0 - 5 . 7 1 1. 00 69 . 00
5 . 7 - 8.0 0 0. 00 69 . 00
8. 0 - 11. 3 0 0. 00 69 . 00
11. 3 - 16. 0 0 0. 00 69 . 00
16. 0 - 22 . 6 1 1. 00 70. 00
22 . 6 - 32 . 0 2 2 . 00 72 . 00
32 - 45 1 1. 00 73 . 00
45 - 64 1 1. 00 74. 00
64 - 90 5 5 . 00 79 . 00
90 - 128 4 4. 00 83 . 00
128 - 180 12 12 . 00 95 . 00
180 - 256 5 5 . 00 100. 00
256 - 362 0 0. 00 100. 00
362 - 512 0 0. 00 100. 00
512 - 1024 0 0. 00 100. 00
1024 - 2048 0 0. 00 100. 00
Bedrock 0 0. 00 100. 00
D16 (mm) 0. 25
D35 (mm) 0. 47
D50 (mm) 0. 85
D84 (mm) 132 . 33
D95 (mm) 180
D100 (mm) 256
Silt/Clay (%) 0
Sand (%) 67
Gravel (%) 7
Cobble (%) 26
Boulder (%) 0
Bedrock (%) 0
Total Particles = 100.

December 2021
100 — — - -
80
L
60
a)
U
a)
a
40
20
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size(mm)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name : UT to Cape Fear
Reach Name : MY1 12/17/2021
Sample Name: December 2021
Survey Date: 12/17/2021
Size (mm) TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0. 062 0 0. 00 0. 00
0. 062 - 0. 125 6 6. 00 6. 00
0. 125 - 0. 25 25 25 . 00 31. 00
0. 25 - 0. 50 19 19. 00 50. 00
0. 50 - 1. 0 9 9. 00 59 . 00
1. 0 - 2 .0 6 6. 00 65 . 00
2 . 0 - 4.0 2 2 . 00 67 . 00
4. 0 - 5 . 7 2 2 . 00 69 . 00
5 . 7 - 8.0 0 0. 00 69 . 00
8. 0 - 11. 3 2 2 . 00 71. 00
11. 3 - 16. 0 3 3 . 00 74. 00
16. 0 - 22 . 6 1 1. 00 75 . 00
22 . 6 - 32 . 0 2 2 . 00 77 . 00
32 - 45 0 0. 00 77 . 00
45 - 64 3 3 . 00 80. 00
64 - 90 3 3 . 00 83 . 00
90 - 128 9 9. 00 92 . 00
128 - 180 4 4. 00 96. 00
180 - 256 4 4. 00 100. 00
256 - 362 0 0. 00 100. 00
362 - 512 0 0. 00 100. 00
512 - 1024 0 0. 00 100. 00
1024 - 2048 0 0. 00 100. 00
Bedrock 0 0. 00 100. 00
D16 (mm) 0. 17
D35 (mm) 0. 3
D50 (mm) 0. 5
D84 (mm) 94. 22
D95 (mm) 167
D100 (mm) 256
Silt/Clay (%) 0
Sand (%) 65
Gravel (%) 15
Cobble (%) 20
Boulder (%) 0
Bedrock (%) 0
Total Particles = 100.

APPENDIX C
REPAIR PHOTOS
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION
MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
SITE REPAIR PHOTO LOG
MARCH 2021 REPAIR
mi
,
•
� �
r # ,3,� tau ly
ay
5a �.r.x �, .Y'n . �i ki+ �`rt '43T�i<a- ti.
11:
�r..d �? � � sib -'�^'n
-.
44141,
�,. �, �,i�' � > �4� srxw:.fir - �, �,..'n`• � -'-�'r��` �"�syd � 3� �-,
�ei`aa".,Yf'' 'J'p, J `"' ,� f` `,'. - E :' :; SM
M .,: x 1 YY w a + i S '+
v
���' �Z'k '�a .54 May s
'>f : �.1 '--:A.' :-''''...*:.:.'' ..
F a G 3 '9' � '.4 5�� LS 1A Y �* sy(
''or "? r �a : k it e � ' (Iy M� [}'.
Hs. & .4, '\ ' , + 1 k' a r iP a ydPyy {aP�'�x ,y.
Picture 1. March 2021.Right bank terrace rework and installation of slope drains (approx. sta 16+00).View upstream.
'y.c sY§3;3"�r+g{Ca �q �d l"7i �
• are�4 -e, fi �5.. : `*,yam -
, - y a ✓'x '`^„a�
�� rr ,>-
''
s4. ' 7 �t as
v� .3-ss n�?' `'�r�ii ''+, 4' -- 'o'er9-*I �a
��ee �a- "� a ''� 'y`, •
1 ra
� st,�� t� -
s
„rou
}-.'._of., ,, 1 . 1°yi r., ''
/ to Y.: 3til �:, a ?.
Picture 2. March 2021. Right bank terrace slope drains from golf course runoff(approx. sta 16+00).
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway,Durham,NC 27713/919.361.5000

J MCADAMs UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
:`.,,
i i ' .
4 ,...-;t ai.
im
✓ Go-.
4 "11
,,.,, y.
l i �'"4 z5': F t�, 1` .. 1 ,•
..5 ''''
--✓ ✓iX
.7
u ,i' 9 N!
w.
r
Picture 3. Ma c 1 rh 202 . Right bank terrace rk (rewoapprox. sta 16+00 to sta 17+50). View downstream.
.w 1 a 4
- .., _, i?,�;qp..- �a ,, Prr g !�t a - t ,aka sw
, ' ch�3, hw : r ett T^
r k s , - 'fir a
A42 9
' 4 ` ea (F ry, '.
�� �� -�� 1 lyRf y • ���1 � l'V.
v.
�' i
y .'�. • '� vy1' ''' ' +mot �r,99
r -
�' . u .. ." ,
y ems.- .
z �'� ; u ,, a `p4, E' ti� g ti
n r i
s
4
,�` Fes' f s
' ,4 ay=� b. :,---nr ,1�'da.` 9 is x��a .ci f , l y 1, '�? _�p
Picture 4. December 2021. Right bank established vegetation (approx. sta 15+00 to sta 17+00). View downstream.
creating experiences through experience 2 of 4

IAMCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
i, , Picture 8 � � `
c AR P
location
Ytb
r - Y `I t w`F. b
F ,
- `�
�s
'�x` „ ��$"� � "Pik 1 ,Z.t _ ai ':
,�,-.1 .�!' ..air '' w W
ir
� " . ;
irle74''-
Picture 5. March 2021. Right bank terrace repair with slope drain (approx. sta 21+50). View west.
-- ' ' 1 i ).
� 5' �'� :-•1 1"ku"Ytb',.1,,,,-,,,,,'„'.41. '!
fly. =i N .x [ PAL S i ' s Y s P a
v x 1z
'' ,-`:, ' i as W- .z. ` ,
2
-� Ya 'F� t3
f- � ..af...yro y-zYf`VS, �... l.we amikk .,
�-#a'+,...' . .-.aP""
'ram ''`�",p�'
'..
--—_-_=_E.„;„r=„: .,:. '5, ":„,,,:..* -li; -,tr..,=P:""-:',7-I-7,' :,, -,"LA
'
F kS Ty
�
Y n� a sfix "� --.:. ' -, T ,['A�€� fi
,rir:61* '''''i'r '.../'-'4:7— '7I1A-,r4:-'0"—(7''4'k...,'
Picture 6. March 2021. Sand bar (approx. sta 21+50). View west.
creating experiences through experience 3 of 4

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
SEPTEMBER 2021 REPAIR M a1�
•
45
7 y�•s i - `�.' W if wiliss,� 'µ ,..—,,,---4_,...,`,
,� d q.if '7 ' Yer. l.Y �` �T'-' !
f.
=�. i c * � Y » `^f�s` s , _ram, ;'s 4. f r[,r
y, _ _AO,
t E ('iz��1 � ,fit �� ,,,r y� > t'��"` �•�� ,'�, �•:� � '.
Notched
logs,
-.-., - ,._.?„/„...,..s ,:l: ,,,
_,v,..-ere- ,5,.4.
��ee r � ''" --r—..-7.74 _-.-., ._
'Ilk
X
Picture 7. December 2021.Repaired angled log riffle (approx. sta 20+20). View upstream.
°; �, � �' x Row of double
£ �! w p ▪ }+ coir logs
9
6? #i`a �. - ..r .7-
ce w M1 w•
r ,! �_ „� ,' 5 ▪ '`f �`
�-10 ,.�'. > �m � rpm i �1- to 4 r.
1.
� ai r L • , ,-� � '' r , r
‘,i,::,;0� '� •, Jd - t, $af,vr„ift*.y: '.:'77,,-4;,.,•.,f-'"—',-- !•�y Ili ,; - i`v. y. "M1.
Picture 8. December 2021. Right bank repair(approx. sta 20+20). Evidence of stability. View upstream.
creating experiences through experience 4 of 4

APPENDIX D
SITE PHOTO LOG - MONITORING YEAR 1
UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION
MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
DECEMBER 20, 2021
a> a t
4,.....'2-*....4 ::':'--,:t; ':„,--,.-7-. '4';:..-..r.`-..'s,.'Ittk4t ,,,,*I'0,%.37.,,''''''Z.4•.,, ;.0,-..';.."-.'4,rAlis;,' '0'i.:!` —'1!,f',-,4
�� r� �� �iwu-c. '�'- 'a- d ,•.�.+7 _3� FF • {•
.t H e
Inc_ - `L�V,�11 '11, ff • t� .'4� y� 1. y ' ._--. Q ~-
...` -er ,em f'y t
�. 4'\ r-i `'-' -:- ----' -" ` _ -,rat _tfi ` ?
I.
,., H'9Tn s1110: _,y�,y P
...!';,'''.v.kti;..,--.3.'
.t.E� � r 'mot � ? �;
. ` . "v+�
Picture 1. Rock Cascade at upstream limits of stream restoration (approx. sta 0+00). View upstream.
'S ..:'
,'i
\, 1;4..!..., ,:......,..,'.-,. •-""ja''''",re'.' - .:. ,e.,)rol
r
r ,
'� i- S
•
ai�.,`a.
Picture 2. Sand bar(approx. sta 0+40). Evidence of high sediment input from offsite. View downstream.
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway,Durham,NC 27713/919.361.5000

la MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
? 4
}
y# �„ �'
•
}r, �.,� r f •3v
9 KK" / cf 5 t -' ,A --
au � r �-firgq � I- rya.,d .Ar
-i'.*•''.'.'',,f'.Nk r.lr:.,''1,,'.4--.>0 4--,,_;1,1,,-4M-'',=.‘',.'e,,.'14q1,1,,.'.bt7.;.41,".0-'f"i:,,
yfC '
Otia,'. ,: f ,
-»: Lii ,, , -fir _,y i
£ Ti ' + '
�c ..fi t- •
i r�r -.,., ' Jam: s f tti"" .\ [• } ','TI•ti r�'� __, f
..,:4-fr-:?,... .1,k!,.,., .,_37:4.,!1.1,,, . ;::,, ...r.- 4,,,,„..,....„,,t.i . . ,.
g o,, k , .:,. , ..
' fir C.--. 7::: ::s'•;401 • c.,- r
1 ..s, a a. .�'VIP'. r .�,� I-: " m, s_.�r.� ;II' .. 'i`!�
Picture 3. Rock and roll riffle (approx. sta 3+00). View downstream.
t
..
.R'S� . y...,,;sf, " :,,,(,p1�5, .�a.is
r J y-'� -, ¢ z ,,
'
pia
� T 1z' 3
41., , , ., ,.
� °f , '.
Picture 4. Rock lined stormwater swale (approx. sta 3+00).
creating experiences through experience 2 of 13

la MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
!Q�i :
r a P _
,'4 fig. gE � t rfag�
y 7 c r ! ,1_. /L,x
1,4,-4.;",„.....111.t... r.-'• .. .,...k,
.,,i, ,,„,.........161,.,„„..f.,fr.,.v , . ...<4 .....,. _ .....„.. 7.. _..„_;,..,,,,. ._.,_z„,.____:...._.
„,_. L4s;.4„.0,,,,,4,1,1-4,...,„,..,?,sa.... _ . --,.._:_::-__,,,-,..._,,--- .. . -,7„....._ _ „A,„. .,,_,. :.,
411
kl,
�, o£zlsyyw�/ pit ° �
�' � � IAA -�'.S
ilik
,��y � !S �"! ��F�n• �� o ti& _ _ _ pep
11 s�L 4 'i lei ' -.-_.am *
I
g �
a�� ° fi as `n {{ S�F \'
iiii
.1
., ,„4-Ter/41 , /, - . . .1.,„,•,,,,.''',, ,-'., !.. . , .---- - .-1,1 .—i! '''. .
Picture 5.J-hook log vane and scour pool (typical). View downstream.
‘ .. :"..;,::2.,-,,..,,. . ,,,—/,',..„4...;_...„ ,16?),. .1'. : ... ...'-...4.tt A,...,.,.„.,,,, ,... F '11 i ' '1,8••'0
as � ,4c" ixyt t t.,,,
- '.1. 'Z1(� '"! .• .? Ks.1R b ry-�, �'_. F A Q
,t9 F _� 4 1 ' t r 1!!
g
t J � ,,:,]b^c,� v6 ,.- t ,Av. *" � ` -, , •• ,��x ,fit. - "'t' .'
}r 'f
t 4 , > ,
Picture 6. Rock and roll riffle (approx. sta 9+50). View upstream.
creating experiences through experience 3 of 13

L ii• MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
to 5 a'wtl,
^k,ki R- t N y� T ,.�4 'KFiS 'S Iy
z
t..a�d' kk Ir . 44. ?} �, . f k Y t i Cf!.V.'(4..•,....•'.•'. f-i 7
,",i „;. .ter '. �.. ( r � - � _!1 6 ‘' "1
��Li441,
to £ 3: i d!, i4�
t
•
,JR
\cs ee. a �� •
va A r W, 4 ,e �,"�^ , " , � '* f .
•
i- � Fx, .w 4s ,ra ,v v ..a
V
_ 1'4'.;' .x y. i ce" b '• ;'
y:.
. - .. '...A.! iik, ...:.,1!" "q*,0(S' .PnA4:' ''Icif L--'.... p..,,:.
icture 7. Cross section 1—pool (approx. sta 6+10).Viewl P upstream.
y
x h .�\•. i'4 +ray ii g� ti =
f'. •e� r rk r ' ) yigdq rd�y� A
�* v nab ,y.', ;e.r� 4. + 4 g,�i +k�.i'" 5 'i �,
rh c t . 'ar'r tip` ' '. ".. 5�.:C Ti,"' ri}4 w��,
It
_ h 3 40. tiu
kt .;
et v \ 'rye _�,ama'$N � A
'W`' " k - : Ik";' \f
w3, ' �� i ,� `fin ,
- d � : .sue
as - � e• e m_. -
:,,..: ,L.,,,,:.,,,,L.,..,
7
ge.•,,,,... ...... , !,7.41,. - .
Picture 8. Cross section 1—pool (approx. sta 6+10).View downstream.
creating experiences through experience 4 of 13

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
R t1
14•.:.\-4, 4„,,„`,Itl. *'''''''''. ' ,..1..t41,1k,* —, , ,-,.' . -'''..t''.1.,' /,' ,,,,,, ''.,- ' -.'t 1 __art -,-., .,;..,_..„.4.,',,
,10.,L.',4-•., ,J--44,71,"W.:,-F,. r 11,:4,,.. ,i-' ' 'v . - - ,.V., '*$
., y
r
ti
tit: : '''.**,‘-e;.:.....f.,-. . : ,,, .fi' / 1 /
'�` "� .�
1
;:t.'-'1,'I'ItS.1‘-ii- 'A :(1 , --,"'-4-4-' i'"Ak- f ..r.„ /1:-;*--',,.:41.175,;' .-J 1!". 1 "-:
f 1 fir. ! �' 1 60 £ i', .''•J'
Picture 9. Cross section 2—riffle (approx. sta 7+20). View upstream.
Ion k<l ` i
\'‘,' . —tiii,' ',. :. ' . i P;'' ,
Y� t�} yW
irp
440
y ::y yes4. y4
44.1 '.-- ,4„.,-
rpt.
^ of ' f
k--, -- -- .-,-,-,146-4.4-4, '-''e'' •' :vai,l-g:
,,, Ira, ,,, 1, } r v*t {hS t ..H r ,, y, • a 4
�v" � ' a I . Z Fa 'i :t2 ' ti r '.. , ry� ,
I
Picture 10. Cross section 2—riffle (approx. sta 7+20). View downstream.
creating experiences through experience 5 of 13

a MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
•
--_ 4'�ur f A. mo? {P"� .k x - 60..IT
;%@r a trf _ n ° '',.,it
,q {R v kY a t.e rs + , ` �Ih r a 'p
ll'
•
$ S ' a +� ' '`r . �4, '_• ' ' ` r -ua"= y'rqs.b 4 F4 9° � ' �x fi` " k. :k
�— •
¢ � I
'.; 1k . �..
- ham'
oir
- [• , r i° i s ip
;..„,..:,,.,..:.-...'2.Z.1-V1-:".".,31......,,,V-,.......V'!.,..-#';,... T7:E!.....:'*., . ".':-":1"-'4'.', . .'i.',....,?-':f.I,:fr...t''....,..„'',......,.., .f.::." :,.....-.1.:k.1 i. ,....4.
4f/ft/loot
.. �,.�_ -' � t . ,\t � ..Piture11. Crossection2::-if7;'N'fle (approx. sta 7+20). View right streambank.
j{ w,�. _-- "
" , ;,...„
t"a � '�5 ♦ ..ems 1 E ...r ��e � " �' P � � 1 r�rr5. �
'-. i' p,:`• Ia� ° _ a ..
41)
ti ,�+r tip- \� t:
-4-.-.4, . ' ' �. - SCAT `\ \' "
S IR'.p ' LJl ` R I� �
'''''Ar
Picture 12. Cross section 3— riffle (approx. sta 10+90). View downstream.
creating experiences through experience 6 of 13

la MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
ea t T i
"4, ., a*
4410
1 Y �•-S It .,
Picture 13. Cross section 3—riffle (approx. sta 10+90). View left streambank, downstream.
F
4
„e .
r •y ; - '
`ate' _— art-_-__„--------.,„_. :� - --
4110
G�s
Picture 14. Cross section 3—riffle (approx. sta 10+90). View right streambank, downstream.
creating experiences through experience 7 of 13

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
i '>d ?� ; .y r.^�� , r f1. 4 M v ^aYa
v'G + * rt '' are
�+'n��h 1 �� � ....yam 46,04 .>�t 4�+
viii� � r� �->r.,n�' y. I �5�'�'• "T''� v , '� a r y'' � 4kf/1 Y7fi x�:.
c ' 1 ''y " dy '' �' p� _„1,..,. ,ass 5 �5 .,' -aa s ,, r
tlri7,';f'"",,,',.', ,,,.. '. ;.,'.ttl.,,,A.,9?"4 -;.•:••=-, ,' '-'-/-- '-
� � :'� n �F q'FR r � i
f 4 *.
r
w1�'f'z,
,1 ,- v,-,f, \� \!-4'., Pik, lJFv ,..-< \ - -\ F
, IF S�1 \ y- Oy a 6�
IC 'F i�l � „r ! FS� If
s� F L"-s` � py,' d k r� ' -„ �.,a":,
'x�4 aid 1" v'. r r ' P t 4 l".7.-ir 1 - r'. 1 mot
..,„,1' *
% ..,qqg i� 4 46 "
,, t s- ' x� �e _ ! Ac s `
J
Picture 15. Crest gauge (approx. sta 11+60)
a s y .fir r i�4rtP
- -,:p./.,:;, '-,- , .._:. ; 4,4wir -:- ..__ , . „,,-,,„
h _
�r - �* it ,.
1Y f Is le m y --.
"3
•
Picture 16. UT to Cape Fear River(approx. sta 12+00). View upstream.
creating experiences through experience 8 of 13

la MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
$100
K - 'p5- F`.F3'rR 2 "1 ti�t �, hC)y •
:-
L ,. i-lk
/" ��y '.eL �//� %I '^3. Y :�,Y!. t 4&2�1 � �'�
�' " " ` Y; µ,u; ' seat' ,�: ,;>< 4,-am,
„. pp,,,i2, -.... >. � �'.
Picture 17. UT to Cape Fear River(approx. sta 16+75). View downstream.
{ a -1.1�. r.. - kF 1
.P,.y �a ` 'yam �/
4 vv�lam+
ti y. > tee.
,:,�— -gam�.:.�
7
� 7� { _
IP � o�r
-, "s"" A, f r 3i a
tip,
.e - `-%
Picture 18. Cross section 4— pool (approx. sta 13+50). View upstream.
creating experiences through experience 9 of 13

L ig MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
ry
2 ,. %
i 4
yy'� # e met. . Cq p��
a'C4
-
F•L� - \. -
\i4^ ?may a{c - Xy \-. '' Z �sR` d Y,�a F _ k- ��� a _oto
Iiiw
ior
/ 4
f,
Ste, l r fN 3 p Y� �4
.. _
_ „,„,,,,. .,-, ,,,., , ,... ..„. ,. ...
-fz,)-t.1--;-„,-.....:%. - --1
Picture 19. Cross section 4—pool (approx. sta 13+50). View downstream.
ye
t.
F r ' ..', ,tea if 7lg �'
�-..' .� z
%
ge1 e. f � —
`Ni � -µy / L - ' ry 1' ` r., 1V l ''
l,47�
tea;�'p+' y`$ � � f�s� � y r/j I _ � -"><� �.��Y P r oa
'i,..44-,
MP '0iE 3 SwxIF�ilkl"Atlr ��. .4 � f �F J � j I
,� F P{...#74 o- ft. �,tr '^ Y k'4�4 x � .-,
tee¢ �� � �e 1 1'' y�!a: Z�` 1�\"+ e
%; w'$'t1 - �+ ice �9, ',� �741' „ a 4 .'
*.E d. .-. ,.:�i"' �3r 5�?�' r$ } T'°'�..:, -®ef l;.�' i ^4 wA,�a:.' ?:i'�:3 Y: ^�i
Picture 20. Cross section 4— pool (approx. sta 13+50). View left stream bank.
creating experiences through experience 10 of 13

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
L,,
3 . . .
Y {
k`Y
- ,,, y' }� is
_• ,i f }
xiy r;k:':5:7-1*,)'. 'ii .
yyC [ wr f }
0,
_
I*,,.. .,--re-:,4-::',.• ..-r:,4"-',,-,..- - - -:--;- - •- -:itek-' " ' 4--
Picture 21. Cross section 4—pool (approx. sta 13+50). View right streambank.
yr . € ` #. a
s d,.1.6 ,Et,y _'• - r"
It ', `>dM gym t*
74
; 'V. • t.
R°r �Y ' [i. .Z N p �
� x�c , !!It },9II18i`ly1.
Iry i 'gym`= e
ss
't r . R
st ° r �ifi9 ' =a`s4��g a ,f ' ,� .ti V t :- .x � g rt v3 �c � ',
ytir
N
�� 'j� i 3a" {. 4 .k dr" l+^ .' N' ,;. ,n 1,1 f - .
s -" 11." :(x 8
r 3 * a ., .; " 4 ry js ,A.
. `-..`.l.. Y .,tF..: � - 4'% , td _ ..34.0 rc�.. w�Y p' _.,4
Picture 22. View Upstream (approx. sta 7+00 to 0+00).
creating experiences through experience 11 of 13

J MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
Ni, si p 1 ,y 11 ",�
jr/
�yY T` f - n
_ R / 4
__. , „ . , , ,.,:,, .1,-iftlsr, „,,, ,r.,. 1.,,
, 7, w
,,
_ ,,, , , ., „,.,,„ ,11/1„
�v
1
7.
e ? : S
P s'k ,roc- v� sfi : .. , ^z '- -q - 'r -va ; ,P 0.41 P} �P
3F �
ti; is —' �'''.: ?3 '�� "
& ' ' S ' "S ` $tom
Picture 23. View Upstream (approx. sta 8+50 to sta 10+50)." }, sue j - �
4� itkir "� 0 ,
s
' 0, 2 q° i ii', `, key ,
, , r�' .sit �'
i a
u
z"``erg b_
ilkM1 ,V
Ahi.,Y,
n L
fit
Picture 24. Bed scour at J-hook invert.
creating experiences through experience 12 of 13

•ai
MCADAMS UT TO CAPE FEAR RIVER STREAM RESTORATION > MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
I
" y� �' W art ,j X.,,,,- �� .S�'�" .,' r,.w A�
� -s'°: a -3- 4 \ ' '*'� e, e yT`h jai '" '
_fir X '"" , + .. ,a, ' y Y *41,q, ., '� •;^., ;r
I x •! *
>« A s �y a ..-
At
rl qr i ��pi' r7`' . ;.. �� v �Nt - 3,14
`' ; d A yt
,. F r F, r _ vim+ - �, i� *�'1
d
' t ''''!' .-.,..)4,, -r.-f-'-'-'
a
1kt*
!�, x g-� tFi Id y I sr,,{ -,'1',
1 •y' Egg ,.
.F` qU 4 '.. \ ; *`Y.'fir .
• 1
t f P S 1 - i, � \ i t a', :-,t ,
r t rail ` l a /'--,*--,'Hi-
`
L 7 i. .'�. w r :, s '' i e /!..`1i�. a m. 'V
Picture 25. Alluvial sediment deposition on floodplain, view upstream.
N;- _ '
, a e x r r ,� ^ "^a• i ,,q. � ,, ., . 4
s Wd. ;:: 5 ° . k 0 i7�t' -w ,, r,as fi } .• , - „`- T :y% t
a°^�' `5 Rw Ai'u, - Fr R y r! v'r r r a-,
\AS6;f . , �. •'.a d'S� C ry •..5'4 3 > �1 1 r ��y,9=
,, , 0 `�.w'�,4','.,dr 'Y. gW ; '61� { �, 1' t 1 l-z'.�
F, _ .� tt.-
p?
'' :Z r mac• � ii�#" % ��Tfi o- Lp
I
Picture 26. Debris lines for bankfull indicators (appox. sta 11+50).
creating experiences through experience 13 of 13