20160405 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2021_20220103

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20160405 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 01/03/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/3/2022
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Lindsay Crocker [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20160405 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Alliance Headwaters
County: Johnston
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Alliance Headwaters_97086_MY2_2021.pdf 8.34MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:*

FINAL
MONITORING REPORT (MY2)
ALLIANCE HEADWATERS MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, North Carolina
NCDEQ Contract No. 6832
DWR ID No. 20160405
DMS ID No. 97086
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2016-00882
RFP No. 16-006477
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Data Collection: January- October 2021
Submission: December 2021
. - - -— - —
.s
fi
F ` �
J
"^ -
n
ice.„. rs` '' c Rr .
lit
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St.Suite 211
RS
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone] RESTORATION
Response to Monitoring Year 2(2021) DMS Comments SYSTEMS I LLC
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site(DMS#97086)
Neuse River Basin 03020201,Johnston County
Contract No. 6832
Comments Received (Black Text)& Responses(Blue Text)
Report
1. Please revise the report to reflect the growing season established in the Mitigation Plan. Growing season
approved in the Mitigation Plan is March 1-November 4 with the March 1 date supported by soil
temperature readings above 41 degrees.The direction to use dates from Mitigation Plan was confirmed in
a recent e-mail from the IRT.
The growing season was updated to March 1-November 4 to reflect the approved methods described in the
mitigation plan.
2. You may omit table 13 in this and future reports.
Table 13 was omitted from the report and subsequent tables were renumbered.
Electronic Deliverables:
1. Please be sure that BHR is consistently being calculated after the areas outside of the main channel are
excluded. For example, UT2-XS1 would only have a BHR of 0.82 if the areas outside of the main channel
were included in determining the bankfull elevation that achieves the as built cross sectional area. In other
instances (e.g. UT4-XS2) it is clear that those areas outside of the main channel were excluded. Please
review these calculations and verify that the same procedure was used throughout.
All cross-sections were checked and edited if deemed necessary to exclude the areas outside of the channel
when calculating bankfull elevation. Cross-section figures and morphology tables were updated
accordingly.
2. Please submit the soil temperature data.
The raw soil temperature data is included in the hydrology folder of the digital submittal.
3. Please update Table D to reflect the number of groundwater gauges currently on site.
Table D was updated accordingly.
1101 Haynes St.,Suite 211 • Raleigh,NC 27604•www.restorationsystems.com• Ph 919.755.9490• Fx 919.755.9492

Alliance Headwaters--Year 2(2021) Monitoring Summary
General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 2 (2021)
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity (i.e., heavy deer browsing, beaver activated, etc. ) was
observed.
Streams
• Stream monitoring measurements indicate minimal changes in the cross-sections as compared to
as-built data.The channel geometry compares favorably with the proposed conditions outlined in
the Detailed Restoration Plan and as constructed.
• Across the Site, all in-stream structures are intact and functioning as designed. No stream areas of
concern were identified during year 2 (2021) monitoring.Tables for Year 2 (2021)data and annual
quantitative assessments are included in Appendix D.
• All seven flow gauges recorded continuous flow for more than the 30-days. Flow periods ranged
from 97 to 201 consecutive days (Appendix E).
• One bankfull event was documented during Year 2 (2021) monitoring for a total of three bankfull
events to date,with events occurring in each of the 2 monitoring years (Table 16,Appendix E).
Wetlands
• Twenty-seven of the thirty-five groundwater gauges met success criteria. Across the Site, the
development of herbaceous hydrophytic species is abundant.
Due to equipment malfunctions and general wetland hydrology failure during Year 1 (2021), the
original twenty-nine groundwater gauges were replaced with a standard Onset HOBO pressure-
based water level data loggers in January 2021. Also, six additional wetland gauges were installed
in areas of the Site RS felt needed additional data points(near GW19, near vegetation plot 31, near
GW 7, at the upstream portion of UT 2, and across UT 1 from GW 11-12). New gauge locations are
depicted on Figures 2A-B (Appendix B).
Vegetation
• Thirty of the 32 fixed vegetation monitoring plots met success in Year 2 with an average of 506
planted stems/acre. Additionally, 17 of 18 random transects met success with an average of 643
stems/acre. No areas of vegetation concern were identified in year 2.
Site Maintenance Report(2021)
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
8/17/21
Cattail None
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Executive Summary
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Site Monitoring Activity and Reporting History
Stream Vegetation
Wetland Data Analysis Completion
Project Millstones Monitoring Monitoring
Monitoring Complete or Delivery
Complete Complete
Construction Earthwork -- -- -- -- July 31, 2019
Planting -- -- -- -- January 16, 2020
As-Built Documentation Dec. 11-16,2020 Jan. 16-17,2020 -- January 2020 March 2020
Year 1 Monitoring July 23,2020 July 27-28,2020 Jan.—Nov.2020 November 2020 January 2021
Year 2 Monitoring March 10, 2021 July 6, 2021 Jan.—Nov. 2021 November 2021 December 2021
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Executive Summary
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

FINAL
MONITORING REPORT (MY2)
ALLIANCE HEADWATERS MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, North Carolina
NCDEQ Contract No. 6832
D W R ID No. 20160405
DMS ID No. 97086
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2016-00882
RFP No. 16-006477
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Data Collection: January-October 2021
Submission: December 2021
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
Prepared by:
ask.
And
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Restoration Systems, LLC Axiom Environmental, Inc.
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211 218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Raymond Holz Contact: Grant Lewis
919-755-9490(phone) 919-215-1693 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Executive Summary
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 1
1.1 Project Goals & Objectives 1
1.2 Project Background 1
1.3 Project Components and Structure 2
1.4 Success Criteria 2
2.0 METHODS 3
2.1 Monitoring 4
3.0 REFERENCES 6
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables and Map
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figures 2 & 2A-2B. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A-5H. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 7. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 8. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 9. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 10. MY1 Planted Vegetation Totals
Table 11. MY1 Temporary Vegetation Plot Planted Vegetation Totals
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 12A-12E. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 13A-13D. Monitoring Data-Dimensional Morphology Summary(Dimensional Parameters-
Cross-sections)
Tables 14A-14E. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross-Section Plots
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Tables 15A-G. Channel Evidence
Stream Gauge Graphs
Table 16. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure El. 30/70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Soil Temp Graph
Table 17. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Table of Contents page i
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS)
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site (Site).
1.1 Project Goals&Objectives
Project goals and associated objectives are summarized in Table A.
Table A: Summary of Goals and Objectives for the Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Project
Goals Objectives Pre-construction Post-construction
Functional Status Functional Status
Goals Specific to the Neuse River and Hannah Creek Watershed Discussed in the
RBRP(NCDMS 2010 and 2015)and Neuse River Basinwide Plan(NCDWQ 2009)
• Restoration and enhancement of minimum 50-foot
Remove Direct riparian buffers along all Project reaches
Nutrient Inputs • Protection of riparian buffers with a perpetual
from conservation easement Not Functioning Functioning
Agricultural • Reducing the amount of land in active row crop agriculture
Lands • Decreasing drainage to restore wetlands, promoting higher
water table conditions,and denitrification
Remove Direct • Restoration of stabilized headwater stream systems
Sediment • Restoration of wetlands and riparian buffers to filter runoff
Inputs from • Increase the distance between active farming operations Not Functioning Functioning
Agricultural and receiving waters
Lands • Stabilization of gullies and ditches
Additional Benefits to Hannah Creek Significant Natural Heritage Area
• Restoration of appropriate bed form diversity, headwater
Improved stream/wetland form,and in-stream structures to provide
suitable habitat
Aquatic • Restoration of self-sustaining stream/wetland headwaters Not Functioning Functioning
Habitats
• Restoration of riparian buffer vegetation to provide organic
matter and shade
Improved • Restore connectivity to historic remnant channel features.
Not Functioning Functioning
Connectivity • Improved aquatic connectivity to Hannah Creek
1.2 Project Background
The Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site (Site) is in Johnston County, approximately six miles southeast of
Four Oaks and one mile east of US 701(Figure 1,Appendix A). The Project is located within the NC Division
of Mitigation Services (DMS) targeted watershed for the Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit (HU)
03020201150020 and the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03-04-04.
A review of historic aerials of the Site, and adjacent parcels, taken in 1939, 1965, 1971, 1988, and 2005,
revealed that while agriculture was prevalent in the area, much of the Site was not converted to
agricultural uses until after 1997/1998. Additional aerial photographs from Google Earth show that before
construction,the project site had been manipulated for agricultural production numerous times between
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 1
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

1997/1998 and 2019. The channelization of perimeter ditches to carry stream flow served to undermine
the hydrologic connection between the headwaters of UT3 and UT4 (located in the forested sections of
the Site) from their downstream channels. In addition, two small impoundments were excavated on the
historical flow paths of UT1 and UT3 during this time. The Site has existed in its pre-construction condition
since approximately 2005.
Current land use near the Site is predominately agriculture (crop and livestock production) and
silviculture. While the Site is near (< 6 miles) to two major interstates (1-95 and 1-40), there are no
foreseeable signs of impending land use changes or development pressure that would impact the Project's
watershed. The conservation easement will eliminate the potential for future development and/or
agricultural use in the floodplain areas of the restored streams.
1.3 Project Components and Structure
Proposed Site restoration activities generated 6029 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 39.4 riverine
Wetland Mitigation Units(WMUs)within a 71.7-acre conservation easement as the result of the following.
• Restoration of 6,529 linear feet of stream channels that have been straightened and channelized
for agricultural purposes
• Restoration of 32.6 acres of drained hydric soil to riparian riverine wetlands as the result of stream
restoration activities and ditch plugging
• Areas of potential wetland riparian riverine restoration total approximately 7.0 acres of drained
soils with hydric inclusions
• Enhancement of 0.38 acres of jurisdictional riparian headwater forest through stream
realignment activities and supplemental wetland plantings
• Creation of 1.99 acres of riparian riverine wetlands in areas of drained hydric soil requiring bench
excavation
• Preservation of 16.39 acres of jurisdictional riparian riverine wetlands located within forested
headwater systems
Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following.
• Planting 49.9 acres of the Site with 35,200 stems (planted species and densities by zone are
included in Table 7 [Appendix C])
• Application of permanent seed mix across 49.9 acres of the Site and temporary seed mix
consisting of grain rye, millet, clover, and turnip
Site design was completed in October 2018. Construction started on May 13, 2019, and ended within a
final walkthrough on July 31, 2019. The Site was planted on January 16, 2020. Completed project
activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background information are
summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
1.4 Success Criteria
Performance criteria outlined in the NCDMS Mitigation Plan Template(ver. 10/2015), and US Army Corps
of Engineers— Wilmington District Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of Guidance for Compensatory
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District (October 24, 2016), will be followed
and are briefly outlined below. Monitoring data collected on the Site will include reference photos, plant
survival analyses, channel stability analyses, wetland hydrological analysis, and biological data if
specifically required by permit conditions.
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 2
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Monitoring will be conducted for seven years, unless the USACE, in consultation with the Interagency
Review Team (IRT), agrees that monitoring may be terminated early. Early closure will only be provided
through written approval from the USACE in consultation with the IRT. Annual monitoring reports will be
submitted to the NCDMS by RS no later than November 30 of each monitoring year.
Table B:Success Criteria
Streams
• All streams must maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark(OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
• A continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days.
• Bank height ratio (BHR)cannot exceed 1.2 for a majority of measured cross sections on a given reach.
• Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be 2.2 or above for a majority of measured riffle cross-sections on a given
reach.
• BHR and ER should not change by more than 10%in any given year for a majority of a given reach.
• Must document the occurrence of at least 4 bankfull events in separate years during the monitoring period.
Wetland Hydrology
• Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum, 10 percent of the
growing season during average climatic conditions. Note:Soil temperature for growing season establishment
will be determined using a continuously logging soil probe installed at the rain gauge. Soil temperature will
be measured from mid-February through the end of April (at a minimum).
Vegetation
• Within planted portions of the Site,a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum
of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at
year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5 and 10 feet in height at year 7.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the
Site.
• Any single species can only account for 50%of the required stems per monitoring plot.
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in this plan follow the October 24, 2016, NC
Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports of the data
collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than December 31 of each
monitoring year data is collected. The monitoring schedule is summarized in Table C.
Table C: Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Streams x x x x x
Wetlands x x x x x x x
Vegetation x x x x x
Visual Assessment x x x x x x x
Report Submittal x x x x x x x
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 3
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

2.1 Monitoring
The monitoring parameters are summarized in Table D.
Stream Summary
All streams are functioning as designed, and no stream areas of concern were observed during year 2
(2021) monitoring. Stream morphology data is available in Appendix D.
Wetland Summary
Summary of Monitoring Period/Hydrology Success Criteria by Year
Year
Soil Temperatures/Date Bud Monitoring Period Used for 10 Percent of
Burst Documented Determining Success Monitoring Period
2020(Year 1) March 2,2020* March 2-November 4 25 days
(248 days)
2021(Year 2) March 1,2021* March 1-November 4 25 days
(249 days)
*Based on observed/documented bud burst and data collected from a soil temperature data logger located on the Site.
Twenty-seven of the thirty-five groundwater gauges met success criteria for the year 2 (2021) monitoring
period (Appendix E). Across the Site, the development of herbaceous hydrophytic species is abundant.
Due to equipment malfunctions and general wetland hydrology failure during Year 1 (2021), the original
twenty-nine groundwater gauges were replaced with a standard Onset HOBO pressure-based water level
data loggers in January 2021.Also, six additional wetland gauges were installed in areas of the Site RS felt
needed additional data points (near GW19, near vegetation plot 31, near GW 7, at the upstream portion
of UT 2, and across UT 1 from GW 11-12). New gauge locations are depicted on Figures 2A-B (Appendix
B). In general, on-site observations indicate wetland re-establishment is trending towards achieving
success criteria.
Vegetation Summary
During quantitative vegetation sampling, 32 sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter) were installed within
the Site as per guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2(Lee et al.
2008).Year 2 (2021) measurements also included 18 random sample plots (a mix of 50-meter by 2-meter
and 25-meter by 4-meter). Measurements of all 50 plots resulted in an average of 555 planted stems/acre
excluding livestakes.Additionally,30 of the 32 permanent plots and 17 of the 18 temporary transects met
success criteria. Plots 28 and 29 were each one stem shy of meeting success criteria. Planted stem
mortality in these plots is likely due to localized seasonal inundation of these areas.A temporary transect
in the vicinity of these plots (Transect 11) met success criteria with 567 stems/acre. Transect 15 was 3
stems shy of meeting success criteria. This is likely due to dense herbaceous competition in this area.
Permanent plots 14 and 16 are located on either side of this transect, and they both met success criteria
with 809 and 567 stems per acre respectively.Year 2 (2021)vegetation data is summarized in Tables 8-11
(Appendix C).
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 4
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table D: Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Stream Profile Full longitudinal survey As built(unless otherwise All restored stream channels Graphic and tabular data.
required)
Stream Dimension Cross-sections Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 Total of 16 cross sections on restored Graphic and tabular data.
channels
Areas of concern to be depicted on a plan
Visual Assessments Yearly All restored stream channels view figure with a written assessment and
Channel Stability photograph of the area included in the report.
Additional Cross-sections Yearly Only if instability is documented Graphic and tabular data.
during monitoring
Total of 7 surface water gauges:
Stream Hydrology Continuous monitoring of surface Continuous recording through One gauge on UT1—R2,UT1—R3, Surface water data for each monitoring
water gauges and/or trail camera the monitoring period UT1A,UT2,UT3—R1, UT3—R2, period as depicted in Figures 2A-2B.
and UT4
Total of 7 surface water gauges:
Continuous monitoring of surface Continuous recording through One gauge on UT1—R2,UT1— Surface water data for each monitoring
Bankfull Events water gauges and/or trail camera the monitoring period R3,UT1A,UT2,UT3—R1, period
UT3—R2,and UT4
Continuous through the Visual evidence,photo documentation,
Visual/Physical Evidence All restored stream channels
monitoring period and/or rain data.
Wetland Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Years 1,2,3,4,5,6,and 7 35 gauges spread throughout Soil temperature at the beginning of each
Wetland Hydrology Groundwater gauges throughout the year,with the restored wetlands and 1 reference monitoring period to verify the start of the
growing season defined as gauge within the wetland growing season,groundwater and rain data
March 1-November 4 preservation area for each monitoring period
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Permanent vegetation plots 0.0247
acre(100 square meters)in size;CVS- As built,Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 32 plots spread across the Site Species,height,planted vs.volunteer,
EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, stems/acre
Vegetation Version 4.2(Lee et al.2008)
establishment and vigor
Annual random vegetation plots,
0.0247 acre(100 square meters)in As-built,Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 18 plots randomly selected each year Species and height
size
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 5
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

3.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., JM Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson, J.B.
Glover,and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US Geological
Survey, Reston,Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R.Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality(NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
Available:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/basin-planning/water-resource-
plans/cape-fear-2005 [December 8, 2016]. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Standard Operating Procedures for
Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Version 5.0). (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Environmental%20Sciences/BAU/NCDWRMacroin
vertebrate-SOP-February%202016 final.pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2009. Small Streams Biocriteria Development.
Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=2d54ad23-0345-4d6e-82fd-
04005f48eaa7&groupld=38364
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online). Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9-
c72dfcb55012&groupld=60329
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment Method
(NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). NC Wetland Assessment Method
(NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 6
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified Tennessee
Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest Hydrology and
Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Pub1.167.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx [August 2016].
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Alamance County, North Carolina.
Soil Conservation Service.
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) page 7
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

APPENDIX A: BACKGROUND TABLES AND MAP
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

�...m - li1
.� iiiiiib1/4 � _�� � �
NIL-
�.`'
-:,.'--,i 1f-6 1.i1 1-1nN---t11'1,1111-..-..-.O...r1 1 14
...'i
>w,ha:'k-i'•'l- lilllfir
NI«fi t iri1-)/--1c.''r'-'t::;"R----/"_-,-L-_-_\__._-.-_-..-..0r\.--l;..e.1 1N-,1 A11..1;111.r
l ( 04*A • -e J M.A.
I TLNAxiom Envmonmenla+,i.•
mc.
4wdoi 7l-4 rb k
c:=„:::„,_...__.i
a4 ��� - + Prepared for.4,..) \1111,1I.•d•
° ,-i,..•'•
----•l---
4101/2146
:4'—
i,
_l/Vr L r\--..--J_,e--,--.._--fe-b-N,,D, ,NL
•- _ +
raa peach�t 1�' { - 4 R
Crt g 1 d Road
■ �as ') _ • _ 'i /s RESTORATION
°c SYSTEMS OLLC
o s�VJq�WlAtt t4co o _o a )
c--, --' i r
fs
oS
oG i �,f� Project:
id
' r `fir ,.ya.+ , i �r� - �� i
% a _
c6 1*)
Sm`ithfieldt.'..:-; �� ��_� • . ` � x �j ALLIANCE
j- }7._ .y, ; . _. i� : °�e f , . is HEADWATERS
., �' ,;;. L•• . °IPai ......_. -- �z`� . \. MITIGATION SITE
V"
- ' '727. 7-,
t.4''`7-...... --'....--/- li, , l' _. -- , JOC. , lit all IELL.00-°".1 01_\., iii .f:14, Go_.:;t", .. A
billiH
'T.- -41111111 gips
t rarligp• A, - ri 1 „ ,-.4 4r* / .\-. , r, ler — "2110V ri .?_ ..7/5„ '
#iir
+ •� Fil t� - '' Johnston County, NC
ilL
. r Q: - Dad �� ' Title:
" 40 ' Illikrr , * ---.
'','''''.I !."..;,!"r l'ik, / Cern 1 •
-
,'� _ [ i 110c. ( i7 `. �+ J it SITE LOCATION
_-: ---
— Ilk 1 r- e --- F " '
< '.' 11. -1 #.,j 1 1'O ''' N-1 i) ' r •
l - ♦ 4�r - Ji - SUS � � I o
_ .
„..,,,.
`� `11 1 _ '� ._� r `�7 `r�' :::
by.•__, j L.,"
e-„ hair or I } •A'• ( 1 ,ti z Ssro �' - -._. .- AUG 2017
�aa
1 . . _ USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Four Oaks NE and Scale:
- I •_ - • Newton Grove North, NC Quads) 1:20,000
�a ` ,(�--_ +�.. . .. w _ ��'III �1 — _, -_5_ )71 184 .� Project No.:
TO� N .� i �; Directions to the Site from Raleigh: 17-002
' t•+� C; �`' �- - Take I-40 East out of Raleigh for approximately 27 miles,
- .- I - Take exit 328B to merge onto 1-95 North,
;. :� '`1)_:'�� ''ti , i - After 6.5 miles, take exit 87 toward Four Oaks, FIGURE
'( N, _ • i N2:
- Turn right onto Keen Road and travel 2.3 miles,
� r+ Stricklancl;� / }•�� �.� _ - Turn right onto US-701 South and travel 2.5 miles,
Gross roads' �� - Turn left onto Peach Orchard Road and travel 1.7 miles,
.-•- ' �` `� 1 v - Turn right onto Joyner Bridge Road.
'Cr- "( 1 T - �� the Site is on both sides of Jo ner Brid a 91 r Mrit ' i i8e �' - ' ' - After 0.7 miles, Y g Road,
V ^� } ;,� , t `i - Parts of the Site can be accessed via Old Williams Road.
. ) - i, �‘ __ Cropyright:©2013 National Geographic - Site Latitude, Longitude: 35.3752, -78.3410 (NAD83/WGS84)
y 1 ' r' II-,II-,, ps5' ' l Society: i-cubed - �
l Of u u.. 1
'- 1 t{l _
1 r �S r i.

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Mitigation Restoration
Existing Restoration
Stream Stationing/ Plan or Mitigation Mitigation
Reach ID Wetland Type Footage/ Footage/ Footage/ Restoration Level Restoration Ratio Credits Comment
Acreage Acreage
Acreage Equivalent
UT 1A 10+00 to 10+87 -- 87 87 Restoration 87 1:1 87
UT 1 10+00 to16+71 671 671 Restoration 671 1:1 671
Reach 1
UT 1 1362 70- 70 feet is outside of the
2 16+71 to 30+33 1362 1362 Restoration 1292 1:1 1292 easement and is therefore non-
Reach4761 credit generating.
UT 1 1463 149- 149 feet is outside of the
Reach 3 10+00 to 24+63 1463 1463 Restoration 1314 1.3:1 1011 easement and is therefore non-
credit generating.
146 feet either does not have
UT 2 10+00 to 19+97 <1 997 997 Restoration 997-146= 1.3:1 655 proper buffer width or is outside
851 of the easement and is
therefore non-credit generating.
UT 3 10+00 to 16+39 639 639 Restoration 639 1:1 639
Reach 1
3313 132 feet is outside of the
UT 3 1276-132=
16+39 to 29+15 1276 1276 Restoration 1:1 1144 easement and is therefore non-
Reach 2 1144
credit generating.
UT 4 10+00 to 15+31 1142 531 531 Restoration 531 1:1 531
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 7.11 7.108 Restoration 7.108 1:1 7.108 Wetland Restoration
R1
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 6.97 6.973 Restoration 6.973 1.3:1 5.364 Wetland Restoration
R2
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 18.47 18.473 Restoration 18.473 1:1 18.473 Wetland Restoration
R3
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.29 0.285 Restoration 0.285 1:1 0.285 Wetland Restoration
R4
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.95 0.950 Restoration 0.950 1:1 0.950 Wetland Restoration
R5
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.90 0.896 Restoration 0.896 1:1 0.896 Wetland Restoration
R6
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.28 0.284 Restoration 0.284 1:1 0.284 Wetland Restoration
R7
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits(continued)
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Mitigation Restoration
Existing Restoration
Stream Stationing/ Plan or Mitigation Mitigation
Reach ID Wetland Type Footage/ Footage/ Footage/ Restoration Level Restoration Ratio Credits Comment
Acreage Acreage Acreage Equivalent
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 1.47 1.472 Restoration 1.472 1.3:1 1.132 Wetland Restoration
R8
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.87 0.867 Restoration 0.867 1.3:1 0.667 Wetland Restoration
R9
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 1.11 1.105 Restoration 1.105 1:1 1.105 Wetland Restoration
R10
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.97 0.970 Restoration 0.970 1:1 0.970 Wetland Restoration
R11
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.17 0.170 Restoration 0.170 1:1 0.170 Wetland Restoration
R12
Wetland
E1 Riparian Riverine 0.38 0.38 0.384 Enhancement 0.384 3.25:1 0.118 Wetland Enhancement
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.54 0.540 Creation 0.540 10:1 0.054 Wetland Creation
Cl
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.55 0.546 Creation 0.546 13:1 0.042 Wetland Creation
C2
Wetland Riparian Riverine 0 0.90 0.901 Creation 0.901 10:1 0.090 Wetland Creation
C3
Wetland Riparian Riverine 16.39 16.39 16.392 Preservation 16.392 10:1 1.639 Wetland Preservation
P1
Length &Area Summations by Mitigation Category Overall Assets Summary
Restoration Level Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland(acreage) Asset Category Overall Credits
Restoration 6529* 39.553 Stream 6029.384
Enhancement -- 0.384 Riparian Riverine Wetland 39.354
Creation -- 1.987
Preservation -- 16.392
*An additional 497 linear feet of stream restoration is located outside of the conservation easement
and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation credit calculations.
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Data Collection Completion
Activity or Deliverable
Complete or Delivery
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-006477) October 15,2015 October 28,2015
Institution Date(NCDMS Contract No. 6832) -- March 21,2016
404 Permit -- December 3,2018
Mitigation Plan -- October 12,2018
Construction Plans -- October 12,2018
Site Construction -- May 13,2019-July 31,2019
Planting -- January 16,2020
As-built Baseline Stream Data Collection December 11-16,2019 --
As-built Baseline Vegetation Data Collection January 16-17,2020 --
As-built Baseline Monitoring(MYO) October 2019— March 2020
January 2020
Monitoring Year 1(2020)Stream Data Collection July 23,2020 --
Monitoring Year 1(2020)Vegetation Data Collection July 27-28,2020 --
Monitoring Year 1(MY1) January November January 2021
2020
Monitoring Year 2(2021)Stream Data Collection March 10,2021 --
Monitoring Year 2(2021)Vegetation Data Collection July 6,2021 --
Monitoring Year 2(MY2) January November, December 2021
2021
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Full Delivery Provider Construction Contractor
Restoration Systems Land Mechanic Designs
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211 780 Landmark Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Willow Spring, NC 27592
Worth Creech 919-755-9490 Lloyd Glover 919-639-6132
Designer,Construction Plans,and Planting Contractor
Sediment/Erosion Control Plans Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Ecosystem Planning&Restoration Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
1150 SE Maynard Road,Suite 140 Josh Merritt 919-755-9490
Cary, NC 27511
Kevin Tweedy, PE
919-999-0262
As-built Surveyor Baseline&Monitoring Data Collection
K2 Design Group Axiom Environmental, Inc.
5688 US Highway 70 East 218 Snow Avenue
Goldsboro, NC 27534 Raleigh, NC 27603
John Rudolph 919-751-0075 Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Project Information
Project Name Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Project County Johnston County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres) 71.7
Project Coordinates(latitude&latitude) 35.3720282N,78.3405142w
Planted area (acres) 49.9
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Coastal Plain
Project River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC for Project(14-digit) 03020201150020
NCDWR Sub-basin for Project 03-04-04
Project Drainage Area (acres) 132 to 546
Percentage of Project Drainage Area that is
Impervious <2%
CGIA Land Use Classification Agriculture& Forested/Scrubland
Reach Summary Information
Parameters UT1 UT1A UT2 UT 3 UT4
Length of reach (linear feet) 3495 87 997 1915 531
Valley Classification&
Confinement Alluvial, unconfined
Drainage Area (acres) 546 6.4 147 354 132
NCDWR Stream ID Score Blue Line NA Blue Line 27.25 27.25
Perennial/ Perennial/
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality
Classification C, NSW
Proposed Stream Classification C5 C5 C5 C5 C5
(Rosgen 1996)
Underlying Mapped Soils Leaf silt loam
Drainage Class Poorly-drained
Hydric Soil Status Hydric
FEMA Classification NA
Native Vegetation Community Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover
31%forest,67%agricultural land,<2% low density residential/impervious surface
(Site)
Percent Composition of Exotic
<2%
Invasive Vegetation
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

APPENDIX B: VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 & 2A-2B. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A-5H. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

j1.1111,114111111111M5::
'PP 5
•
.....
..__ N
),. -........_
Figure 2.B'
. .., 1.
.. A
. .
. . .
ar 111111i
i .
114114411
Axiom Envionmenial,Inc.
_ Prepared for:
'Iliilt-
Olt ,
I „117...-,,
i
.v.
4•Nip, 4.
. : I
, .• •
M k,
... Rs
,
' RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC
Project:
FigureALLIANCE
T'ili HEADWATERS
STREAM
- ' AND WETLAND
., ,j-r; , ., ___ _ -- :.-----•:. MITIGATION SITE
. ....
. Wayne County, NC
- , r Title:
_.
_ 4,
41.1, 4, .. ...+- . • 4 - -
* - .
_.. _ -- CURRENT
. ,
CONDITIONS
.... .
_ _ •
- - . :- - - • 411111.: , __•-.:
-
41011.1111111114"*""15414111"."1"411115?
....i .... ill
. . !
' '
,
—..
•
. PLAN VIEW
„.. .,.•
r --1 - v
. .
. _ .
Ili i' " t-,..-• J..'
----
. , , . ilin•
V- . ..... ...e. •
2 • ••• _44 1 . - •1
• •
Drawn by• i
•
• ... . . ..
,. t-..,:-...- e. ' ._- - ..'-,-:._:;.•=,_ . . . '_,;g4..f, _., . _ _ .. -V . ;-, .f -.. "
. -- ..
'.-,. - ,:lig. , '" • ' -4 • .s. KRJ
- -: • - - - _ i : .•i = . , 1
F.P.E.
- .`-. •
L'411 ,i,ak. ,.,_ tl si- :t• v,- f '4r''..- . , " ,'.4011;140‘.' `,,,•r 'w...4......1.--:•.'.„..•.-,i-'.-,,,p,,,i,. i,')L,:.:1,".0"-1_,-',=;--'-• _t-'--%F,'i-;.:.o/iirr'.4•''w--i,:•.-•;!-•:.----'-6-,-'1--e--.-.--I,a-',.s.I,-.:.;L_-..:.4-..,_..-'-4?--,--(::-74-...7'-1'•;•• -- ,..' • -'....'- .. . • i E, %f t'.s,'.*. Ir.'..r. 741.1,'i.p,17...,,11.P.V.-...,.... ...4 .1 .x.i,i.•..e,..Vb.- ,' ,..,1 r Date
NOV 2021
..
.....'
' ' .SY.a: :r# , '...- •••- '''- *I.,: .... . - -*--g.•-•.&-._• . . , ' 1A, . - ".. • 1 , • fl'1,' •:.• 4 a=i, :4" • Scale:
,--..
.„, AP, , _-, ii, . • .,„.....-.,.. h. . . _!kes, 4i . , 1:4500
1. -ao L.':-Ar .0 • - ••• ....-, _ ...- li. _ . •
, 1r,.... .-2_,-... • ,7.;-z..- , _ - . ...„--: '4,- " 11.-^-;. ' .
' • '' , ' '' '4, 4 ..4 .,,fit,i„, f' -.0! . •0•",e• - ''..,. : Project No.:
' .0 ..-vi,..., ...• . -., • ..4 -• ...„ _. _ .._• ,..
I
i .,..„- ,,.. .
18-035
n -A.i 1 ‘,'; .. .-I; .I:, ''- • 'r rt II. A•.+'", 4j •'‘' ' -•
....0% - -..,• P. ''..."-m.' 71,•cr.:-•.-41A:,- !` ''4' _1,1,--. ' ': ,k,.
',z- t,..= .: 44....,_,,,,.......7i1.... ..„.. , ..., • . .0, . - ' ' '4.4:'.1-,,-.1•1.4.111: 14,- •
• # s.- : . 2. , ,-._.--..,-..-,' --:•-,-, ...- '7 ' •-.?%...Fr. 4.. • '. " "
• al411141110 . _ • '• fii
- . , •o" wig k,.i. ,..... .„. .
.„.
-. 4.... .
.-
,iir ',.--..:-.- - .. ... ,-•••...e,..; 4, - - -:-.. . 1 NI.4
1 ,..,,,, :, • ... ...4 FIGURE
• - „L.-- -
i .‘,...-^ t o•-•-•t• _..:, P-+e-tes,it:f .-----e.",-44.. -: -.-.--- A."-1111 4:. .' ...,' :__ ...... .
.-=-.-.-.•.#1 . • ...- . -A: • - 1 _ •_. .._-_-:-.'--2....,,- _,- -. -i-,1,,..•,...,
.1/4... _ .
, .
, , e „. 4 i.•_.•-,r
i'? ' .1r:Ai . s' I '..\-‘•''''r.17 i lim-y _.‘f.,4 ,
2
Legend •.2t. • •....t . ;.,
=I Alliance Headwaters Easement i
, 0 250 500 1,000 1,500
-
Feet
AL i„

F' WI Lila _ais_, _ -: N
r 0 -„, A
i WR9 1 s -
di. ' . - re 3 --/J1
c� II :•g GW-02-(8.0%) o, Axiom Erwonmen.i 1,inc.
i-, 7'�'■ i; (f Prepared for:
y'' =ii' o GW-35 (16.1%) N GW-03 (33.0%,�`S 01 GW'04 (13.8%)
eesofterati--,_:4. ,
n t . 'k itti•�•r. ..fie r! ° ❑
,p:e:r4'4. 46-04 Yf . GW 07 (3.1/o) 4 C "1
-i:.• • RESTORATION
': ._�• Y �, Yti,-i.l� •7§ ter,rr• .' `?
s: • • 8 SYSTEMS I LLC
it `. V - GW-08`(19:5%)
• `? � �,• — � �R * . WR8 o
GW-05 (7.3%)
. , � Project:GW 34 (21.1%)4N •
t y
:c ; � ;60 / ( rh IAJgA ;.- F ° ALLIANCE
-i HEADWATERS
r " -I'SO4 ii' STREAM
_,-ri:: • : ..,g: .. . .. AND WETLAND
$ - 0 4,'' MITIGATION SITE
— __ . - k
14
• -; 1 1 . it ,v N :'� 4 " Johnston County, NC
-
_ -
INIXCP(•35.6 6 . .c • ,
+ _ Title:• GW-10(2 Sb95 5.•
.joi
(22.2%) :.;t• ...if' ,�'� 4 '�'
I.; r = �, 4 *I.H441-..:
;'r l'� 4:,+ . ' t CURRENT
, , �:_ - . ti `�; CONDITIONS
WR5 ' r� y�' .:.
GW°11 (s16.19WR7 y ' ..-t'..
I(�.r� { •~� s Legend PLAN VIEW
9
(a A&ea3.8%)
Amie
'r . ,'- I Q Alliance Headwaters Easement= 71.7 Acres
MI @Zing
EE �� g Stream Restoration = 7026 ft
WR1 Q
mo, ...... loot
0 I4i(22 2%) I :i N� i ,..4;01.e i'.�ij E.Wetland Restoration = 30.24 ac
f�, ® '� +�.. 2 Wetland Restoration - Lower Ratio = 9.31 ac Drawn by:
o9 KRJ
I Wetland Enhancement= 0.38 ac
•
•® ) 1 E.Wetland Creation = 1.44 ac Date: Nov 2021
ry� Wetland Creation Lower Ratio= 0.55 ac
� `'(''' Scale:
* /W -1.4 (16.9%) �`" • 4 . 4 -1 Vegetation Plots Meeting Success Criteria 1:2500
C l (26.8%) �7
i Vegetation Plots Not Meeting Success Criteria
•
A �` Project No.:
. 4 = Random 50m x 2m Vegetation Transects Meeting Success Criteria I 18-035
in m � Or _ Random 25m x 4m Vegetation Transects Meeting Success Criteria
m •WR6 .4 � :' - _ :v •,. Random 50m x 2m Vegetation Transects Not Meeting Success Criteria
Cross-Sections
Ural WArY03.8%) •
C Groundwater Wells Meeting Success Criteria FIGURE
. ' e.0
. •, '=
- -}� -. • Groundwater Wells Not Meeting Success Criteria
;+ t," Flow Gauges 2A
e 1`Jr
WR4 i •
x, - s-- . ,. . .��
:,' 12 ,. 0 250 500 1,000
+ w`I Ji __ _ Feet

4iiii:ter4411,0.' ,
`Legend - . ' * • ,a _ .
--•WC3 - -"r-' . ,, ' S• 'cam..:.,r ,
Q Alliance Headwaters Easement= 71.7 Acres ,-' .,.• _ ,
Stream Restoration = 7026 ft '' r' • .. ; r-*•. et.d' .L. ' \T i .� , _^�
_Wetland Restoration = 30.24 ac 9" r ;, ,., .o -0�. rwr r� t. • - 'T I -C
-Wetland Creation = 1.44 ac ! •- • 7' } •_ il. s.Y± �e `�' . ' `x -ti,.,
Wetland Preservation = 16.39 ac �� ` ' t.'as
Vegetation Plots Meeting Success Criteria ) m - _d z !• w,iv. �, .c Axiom Emrrronmenia+,inc.
Vegetation Plots Not Meeting Success Criteria w (�9.8%) '' .••. r ',p r
• r w�..... '"•,:. . efi,- Ai. , �• . Prepared for:
Random 50m x 2m Vegetation Transects Meeting Success Criteria 1 � �� • x- ,: . ,;�, � �,�. , �• �.�
Cross-Sections +I WO ' 0: . . .d 1
C Groundwater Wells Meeting Success Criteria °7 • * 440 rr• • , ''i';
• Groundwater Wells Not MeetingSuccess Criteria 1 ;":.. �` +
ory J - � Y .
Flow Gauges • j}y J 4
� . RESTORATION
A Rain Gauge and Soil Temperature Logger ® 18
•
® ( ICI 9 (3.8%) SYSTEMS I LLC
T �e• t. Ci (2.2.2%) Project:
:, m (e jj�(21.5%) WR12 ALLIANCE
iiiik- --. ' (31.0%) HEADWATERS
CA
STREAM
AND WETLAND
xs.03 C 3( 9 MITIGATION SITE
® ® (e/mQ(21.5%,), -.
ry�/� _ Johnston County, NC
A,L l'JIJ�;.i • •�., Title:
ES 11060 CURRENT
6
°, GW_24 CONDITIONS
*`' � t (14.6%) WR11 PLAN VIEW
c \
0 '
' • Drawn by:
Reference( 9.5%) i '' . ',.,•.,; ,... KRJ
.;11
i►r, �. '�9' Date:
Nov 2021
l ( Scale:
MUltial9 /,.: 1:2200
`' f'1'`' r Project No.:
WR100 18-035
. •� �.
_ FIGURE
r� , 2B
° .+ 3s - I (333%) +
gii
_,.,,,,,4L,_,.t. t, ,..,,,..r
,, _, , ..Y,, , ,rk ,_- . A. 0 150 300 600
Feet

Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1 Reach 1
Assessed Length 671
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 14 14 100%
3. Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 13 13 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 13 13 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 13 13 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 13 13 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 13 13 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 13 13 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 13 13 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 13 13 100%
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 13 13 100/o

Table 5B Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1373
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 27 27 100%
3. Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 28 28 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 28 28 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 28 28 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 28 28 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 25 25 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 25 25 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 25 25 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 25 25 100%
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 25 25 100/o

Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1 Reach 3
Assessed Length 1451
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 20 20 100%
3. Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 19 19 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 19 19 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 19 19 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 19 19 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 18 18 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 18 18 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 18 18 100%
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 18 18 100/o

Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1A
Assessed Length 87
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 2 2 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 2 2 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 2 2 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 2 2 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 2 2 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 2 2 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3. Bank Protection 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 2 2 100%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 2 2 100/o

Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-2
Assessed Length 997
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 15 15 100%
3. Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 14 14 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 14 14 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 14 14 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 14 14 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 14 14 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 14 14 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 14 14 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 14 14 100%
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 14 14 100/o

Table 5F Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-3 Reach 1
Assessed Length 639
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 11 11 100%
3. Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 11 11 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 11 11 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 11 11 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 11 11 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 11 11 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 11 11 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 11 11 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 11 11 100%
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 11 11 100/o

Table 5G Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-3 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1276
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 19 19 100%
3. Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 19 19 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 19 19 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 19 19 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 19 19 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 18 18 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 18 18 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 18 18 100%
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 18 18 100/o

Table 5H Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-4
Assessed Length 531
Footage Adjusted %
Number Number with with for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As-built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability 1. Aegradation- Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate 9 9 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 9 9 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of 9 9 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 9 9 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 9 9 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0
2. Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 9 9 100%
Structures
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 9 9 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 9 9 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3. Bank Protection 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 9 9 100%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull °
4. Habitat Depth ratio> 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 9 9 100/o

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Alliance Headwaters
Planted Acreage 49.9
% of
Mapping CCPV Number of Combined Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
1. Bare Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
Total 0 0.00 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor None 0.25 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
Cumulative Total 0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage2 71.7
% of
Mapping CCPV Number of Combined Easement
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern4 None 1000 SF none 0 0.00 0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3 None none none 0 0.00 0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.

Alliance Headwaters
MY-02 (2021)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 2021
Plot 171,4 Plot 2
iiir
•
Plot 3 Plot 4
•
m t
Plot 5 Plot 6 III
r;.
�• k(:di ....7 „,V f .. .: r. rend er 4
.. air• ,F. •Ii ' ',"+..i,t,...&, ,;.,- ,,, 1,.•n ,. I fr
Y-'::'ia.... .r , .Ire a i', •}.
• �I• q.,- - • :r:' ,.. D ate, '' ._ .t; r. 4, •
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Alliance Headwaters
MY-02 (2021)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(continued)
Taken July 2021
Plot 7 1111!Plot
iiimp
i
.! / l
Plot 9 .410pPlot 10
e414—Y
f.. -'-- -__ _ ' :'.—c '. - ' -
.,, a
Plot 11 Plot 12
•lit, \Ali
..
:,, S ; s -0
.. "ram:.i:. u.-' ;', �, , *I, 4 {. .. V.
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Alliance Headwaters
MY-02 (2021)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(continued)
Taken July 2021
Plot 13 Plot 14
i .{ Y' '
..tee_ _ �� V:�.. �S . .r.J..
Plot 15 Plot 16
i -�
Plot 17 Plot 18
i.
s
_ E
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Alliance Headwaters
MY-02 (2021) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (continued)
Taken July 2021
Plot 19 Plot 20
is.
ti ..�` wt ii, v ' �, • ' .:i- y 1.';..(ems: i.
1,
1 .•mod a 1'e'R. % .x;
S.. .., -..c . . ; .�y t i::' . _
Plot 21 Plot 22
.;�- }
z., y r41e.
' 1Fe ""..
' r 41 r y R ••F r" y 1 :V.q. 1 k' al y{ 7^,'`'‘i.
Plot 23 Plot 24
I
d y�
•
'' - a-y
t ,;..
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Alliance Headwaters
MY-02 (2021)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(continued)
Taken July 2021
Plot 25 Plot 26
1
11 - .�
t_- - .F.
• �. e
tom.
a 4 F :'
1. j `
S, .
Plot 27 Plot 28
• yl - i
.A'r r ' ly ............. . . .....
illittliaik
Plot 29 Plot 30
r
r
S
. ,c
d
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Alliance Headwaters
MY-02 (2021)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(continued)
Taken July 2021
Plot 31 Plot 32
I
1 '
— - _[
MY2(2021)Monitoring Report(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

APPENDIX C: VEGETATION DATA
Table 7. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 8. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 9. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 10. MY2 Planted Vegetation Totals
Table 11. MY2 Temporary Vegetation Plot Planted Vegetation Totals
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 7. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Species Upland Riparian Total Stems
Planting Planting
Betula Nigro 0 2,900 2,900
Morella cerifera 0 1,300 1,300
Carpinus caroliniana 300 0 300
Diospyros virginiana 100 0 100
Liriodendron tulipifera 500 2,800 3,300
Magnolia virginiana 0 1,600 1,600
Morus rubra 100 0 100
Nyssa sylvatica 700 300 1,000
Persea palustris 0 800 800
Prunus serotina 400 0 400
Quercus alba 800 0 800
Quercus bicolor 0 500 500
Quercus laurifolia 0 2,000 2,000
Quercus shumardii 0 200 200
Quercus lyrata 0 4,200 4,200
Quercus michauxii 800 3,900 4,700
Quercus pagoda 650 3,050 3,700
Taxodium distichum 0 4,500 4,500
Ulmus americana 0 2,800 2,800
4,350 30,850 35,200
*Some species planted on-site were not included in the mitigation plan, including Morella cerifera, Morus rubra,
Quercus bicolor, and Quercus shumardii. These were determined to be viable substitutions that were made based
on bare-root stem availability at the time of site planting.
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 8. Planted Stems by Plot and Species
CVS Project Code 18035. Project Name:Alliance Headwaters
Current Plot Data(MY2 2021)
18035-01-0001 1803 5-01-000 2 18035-01-0003 18035-01-0004 1803 5-01-000 5 1803 5-01-000 6 18035-01-0007 18035-01-0008 18035-01-0009 18035-01-0010 18035-01-0011 18035-01-0012
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree
Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis Shrub
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 1 1
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 6 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2
Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2
Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1
Persea palustris swamp bay tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 1 1 8 8 8 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 6 6 6 5 5 5 3 3 3 6 6 6
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 5 5 5 2 2 2 7 7 7 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 5 5 5 8 8 8 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 6 6 6 13 13 13 1 1 1
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1
Stem count 15 15 15 11 11 11 25 25 25 16 16 17 14 14 14 16 16 17 19 19 19 10 10 10 14 14 14 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 9 9 10 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 5 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4
Stems per ACRE 607 607 607 445.2 445.2 445.2 1012 1012 1012 647.5 647.5 688 566.6 566.6 566.6 647.5 647.5 688 768.9 768.9 768.9 404.7 404.7 404.7 566.6 566.6 566.6 445.2 445.2 445.2 485.6 485.6 485.6 445.2 445.2 445.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% P-all=Planted including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 8. Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
CVS Project Code 18035. Project Name:Alliance Headwaters
Current Plot Data(MY2 2021)
18035-01-0013 18035-01-0014 18035-01-0015 18035-01-0016 18035-01-0017 18035-01-0018 18035-01-0019 1803 5-01-002 0 18035-01-0021 1803 5-01-002 2 1803 5-01-002 3 1803 5-01-002 4
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree
Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis Shrub 4 4
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 1 10 4
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Nyssa tupelo Tree
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2
Persea palustris swamp bay tree 1 1 1
Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 5 3
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 3 3 3
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 6 6 6 2 2 2
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1
Stem count 11 11 16 20 20 20 9 9 13 14 14 14 20 20 30 14 14 14 10 10 14 9 9 9 10 10 10 14 14 14 15 15 15 9 9 17
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 8 8 9 8 8 8 6 6 8 6 6 6 7 7 8 7 7 7 6 6 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 6
Stems per ACRE 445.2 445.2 647.5 809.4 809.4 809.4 364.2 364.2 526.1 566.6 566.6 566.6 809.4 809.4 1214 566.6 566.6 566.6 404.7 404.7 566.6 364.2 364.2 364.2 404.7 404.7 404.7 566.6 566.6 566.6 607 607 607 364.2 364.2 688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% P-all=Planted including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 8. Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
CVS Project Code 18035. Project Name:Alliance Headwaters
Current Plot Data(MY2 2021) Annual Means
18035-01-0025 18035-01-0026 18035-01-0027 18035-01-0028 18035-01-0029 18035-01-0030 18035-01-0031 18035-01-0032 MY2(2021) MY1(2020) MVO(2020)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 3 4 7
Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis Shrub 4 1 13
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 30 30 30 32 32 32 36 36 36
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 2 2 2
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 2
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 9 14 40
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 12 12 12 16 16 16 26 26 26
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay Tree 1 1 1 13 13 13 16 16 16 28 28 28
Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 23 23 23 25 25 25 29 29 29
Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 12 12 12
Persea palustris swamp bay tree 1 1 1 5 5 5 8 8 8 12 12 12
Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 8
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 53 53 53 74 74 74 101 101 101
Quercus alba white oak Tree 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 10 3 3 3 2 2 2
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2 9 9 9 9 9 9 13 13 13
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 48 48 48 36 36 36 10 10 10
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 37 37 37 31 31 31 18 18 18
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 6 6 6 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 37 37 37 32 32 32 34 34 34
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 68 68 68 61 61 61 60 60 60
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 36 36 36 34 34 34 21 21 21
Unknown Shrub or Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4
Stem count 8 8 20 10 10 10 10 10 32 7 7 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 10 10 11 10 10 10 400 400 468 399 399 399 420 420 420
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 32 32 32
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.79 0.79 0.79
Species count 5 5 7 4 4 4 6 6 9 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 6 4 4 4 20 20 24 20 20 20 20 20 20
Stems per ACRE 323.7 323.7 809.4 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 1295 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 364.2 364.2 364.2 404.7 404.7 445.2 404.7 404.7 404.7 505.9 505.9 591.9 504.6 504.6 504.6 531.1 531.1 531.1
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% P-all=Planted including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 9.MY2 Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Species T-1(51°) T-2(8°) T-3(°) T-4(160°) T-5(110°) T-6(210°) T-7(28°)
Betula nigra 5 - 1 2
Liriodendron mlipfera 1
Magnolia virginiana 3 -
Morella cerifera 3 1 1
Nyssa Spp. 1
Persea palustris
Quercus spp. 3 10 2 6 - 4
Quercus alba 3 1
Quercus lyrata
Quercus michauxii 3 10 2 - 3
Quercus nigra 1 2 1 Quercus pagoda 3 2 - - 1
Taxodium distichum 1 - 3 -
Quercus rubra 4
Diospyros virginiana -
Ulmus americana 1 1 -
Prunus serotina 5 1
Total Number of Stems 13 18 23 12 19 18 17
Stems/Acre 526 728 931 486 769 728 688
Table 9.Temporary Vegetation Plot Data(continued)
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Species T-8(235°) T-9(°) T-10(129°) T-11(343°) T-12(141°) T-13(45°) T-14(241°)
Betula nigra 1 4 1 1 3
Liriodendron mlipfera 1
Magnolia virginiana 3 2
Morella cerifera 1 1
Nyssa sylvatica -
Persea palustris
Quercus spp. 8 3 3 1 3
Quercus alba 1 1
Quercus lyrata 3 3
Quercus michauxii 6 1 1
Quercus nigra 1 1 Quercus pagoda 6 2 1
Taxodium distichum - 14 2 9 6 3 -
Quercusphellos 1
Quercus bicolor 1 1 1 1
Quercus rubra 4 -
Carpinus caroliniana 1
Diospyros virginiana
Ulmus americana 1 1
Prunus serotina
Total Number of Stems 15 31 18 14 16 13 17
Stems/Acre 607 1255 728 567 647 526 688
Table 9.Temporary Vegetation Plot Data(continued)
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Species T-15(2°) T-16(102°) T-17(3°) T-18(95°)
Betula nigra 1 2 4
Liriodendron mlipifera
Magnolia virginiana 1 3 -
Morella cer fera 1 -
Nyssa Spp.
Persea palustris
Quercus spp. 1
Quercus alba
Quercus lyrata 1 2
Quercus michauxii 1
Quercus nigra 1 2
Quercus pagoda 1 1
Taxodium distichum 1 3 1 6
Quercusphellos
Quercus bicolor 1 1 2
Quercus rubra
Carpinus caroliniana
Diospyros virginiana
Ulmus americana 1
Prunes serotina
Total Number of Stems 5 11 15 11
Stems/Acre 202 445 607 445

Table 10. MY2 Planted Vegetation Totals
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Plot# Planted Stems/Acre Success Criteria Met?
1 607 Yes
2 445 Yes
3 1012 Yes
4 648 Yes
5 567 Yes
6 648 Yes
7 769 Yes
8 405 Yes
9 567 Yes
10 445 Yes
11 486 Yes
12 445 Yes
13 445 Yes
14 809 Yes
15 364 Yes
16 567 Yes
17 809 Yes
18 567 Yes
19 405 Yes
20 364 Yes
21 405 Yes
22 567 Yes
23 607 Yes
24 364 Yes
25 324 Yes
26 405 Yes
27 405 Yes
28 283 No
29 283 No
30 364 Yes
31 405 Yes
32 405 Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre 506 Yes
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 11. MY2 Temporary Vegetation Plot Planted Vegetation Totals
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Transect# Planted Stems/Acre Success Criteria Met?
T-1 526 Yes
T-2 728 Yes
T-3 931 Yes
T-4 486 Yes
T-5 769 Yes
T-6 728 Yes
T-7 688 Yes
T-8 607 Yes
T-9 1255 Yes
T-10 728 Yes
T-11 567 Yes
T-12 647 Yes
T-13 526 Yes
T-14 688 Yes
T-15 202 No
T-16 445 Yes
T-17 607 Yes
T-18 445 Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre 643 Yes
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

APPENDIX D: STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA
Tables 12A-12E. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 13A-13D. Monitoring Data-Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters-Cross-sections)
Tables 14A-14E. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross-Section Plots
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 12a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 1 &2 (2033 feet)
Parameter I Gauge2 I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Johanna Creek Ref I Still Creek Ref I Cole Property Ref I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Max Min Mean I Max Min Med Max Min I Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.4 13.3 24 9.7 7.4 6.5 6.5 - 7.5 7.1 7.9 8.6 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.43 1.68 2.25 0.8 0.82 0.6 0.50 - 0.70 0.5 0.5 0.5 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.60 - 0.71 0.9 1 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 12.9 22.2 42 8 6.1 3.8 3.0 - 4.0 3.6 4 4.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 12 9 10 14 14 15.6 17.2 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 > 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0 6.9 - 10.2 11.6 12.9 14.1 2
0.9 1 1.1 2
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 7.0 - 30.0 9 28.6 28.45 49.5 10.7 35
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.000 0.010 0.009 0.021 0.007 13
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Pool Length (ft) 4.3 10.9 9.14 39.8 7.5 27
due to straightening activities.
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.7 1.8 2 3
Pool Spacing (ft) 25.3 49.8 50.71 89.2 14.7 35
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft) 1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification Incised B5c C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 1.4 -2.1 1.4 -2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 4.2 -8.4
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 2033 2033
Sinuosity (ft) 1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.26 -1.29 1.26 -1.29
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.007 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0026 - 0.0049 0.0049
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the ten-ace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 12b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 3 (1463 feet)
Parameter Gauge2 Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref Design Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean I Max Min I Mean I Max Min I Med I Max Min I Med I Max Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 5 6 7 9.7 7.4 6.5 9.9 10.4 10.4 10.4 1
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.82 0.6 0.5 - 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.93 1.4 I 1.4 I 1.4 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1 1.75 2.5 8 6.1 3.8 7.0 8.4 8.4 8.4 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 12 9 10 14 13 13 13 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 > 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0 6.7 9.6 9.6 9.6 1
1.4 1.4 1.4 1
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 1 .0 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 14.0 - 25.0 12.2 39.6 38.7 63.2 12.7 23
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.006 0.003 0.029 0.009 10
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Pool Length (ft) 4.7 13 11.75 32 6.4 22
Pool Max depth (ft) due to straightening activities. 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2
Pool Spacing (ft) 37.3 68 73.78 87.5 13.9 22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft) 1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Meander Wavelength (ft) due to straightening activities.
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification Incised B5c C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 10.7
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 1463 1463
Sinuosity (ft) 1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.35 1.35
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.026 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0018 0.0028
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the ten-ace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 12c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT2 (996.7 feet)
Parameter Gauge2 Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref Design Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean I Max Min I Mean I Max Min I Med I Max Min I Med I Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 5 6 7 9.7 7.4 6.5 7.5 9.9 9.9 9.9 1
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.82 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1 1.75 2.5 8 6.1 3.8 4.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 12 9 10 14 16.1 16.1 16.1 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 > 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0 5.6 10.1 10.1 10.1 1
1.3 1.3 1.3 1
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 14.0 - 50.0 15.7 29.9 28.44 52.3 10.8 11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.000 0.014 0.004 0.014 0.005 8
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Pool Length (ft) 2.4 14.2 12.38 28.4 7.4 17
Pool Max depth (ft) due to straightening activities. 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1
Pool Spacing (ft) 34.5 55.6 54.92 73.1 10.7 16
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft) 1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Meander Wavelength (ft) due to straightening activities.
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification G5 C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 2.1 2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 8.4
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 997 997
Sinuosity (ft) 1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 1.22
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.004 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0049 0.0031
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the ten-ace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 12d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT3 (1914.8 feet)
Parameter Gauge2 Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref Design Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean I Max Min I Mean I Max Min I Med I Max Min I Med I Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 5 6 7 9.7 7.4 6.5 7.5 - 9.2 7.3 8.1 8.9 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.82 0.6 0.6 - 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.7 - 0.86 1 1 1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1 1.75 2.5 8 6.1 3.8 4.0 - 6.0 4.3 4.9 5.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 12 9 10 14 12.4 13.5 14.7 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 > 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0 4.3 - 5.3 11.2 12.5 13.7 2
1.0 1.0 1.0 2
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 8.0 - 29.8 22.1 39 35.67 60.9 10 29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.010 0.003 14
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Pool Length (ft) 7 10.7 10.06 16.8 2.5 28
Pool Max depth (ft) due to straightening activities. 1.6 1.65 1.65 1.7 2
Pool Spacing (ft) 45.6 63 60.35 91.7 11.3 28
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft) 1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Meander Wavelength (ft) due to straightening activities.
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification Incised B5c C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 1.9 - 2.6 1.9 - 2.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 7.5 - 15.4
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 1915 1915
Sinuosity (ft) 1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.21 - 1.38 1.21 - 1.38
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.003 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0038 - 0.0040 0.0033
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the ten-ace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 12e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT4 (530.9 feet)
Parameter Gauge2 Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref Design Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean I Max Min I Mean I Max Min I Med I Max Min I Med I Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 5 6 7 9.7 7.4 6.5 6.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 1
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.82 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.61 0.9 0.9 0.9 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1 1.75 2.5 8 6.1 3.8 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 12 9 10 14 14.8 14.8 14.8 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 > 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0 6.2 13.3 13.3 13.3 1
0.9 0.9 0.9 1
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 10.0 -11.0 17.4 36.6 31.69 74.4 16.6 9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.015 0.003 9
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Pool Length (ft) 5.2 9.5 9.34 12.3 2.3 9
Pool Max depth (ft) due to straightening activities. 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1
Pool Spacing (ft) 21.2 49.6 46.5 75.4 15.6 9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft) 1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
Meander Wavelength (ft) due to straightening activities.
Meander Width Ratio 1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 2.1 2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 6.2
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 531 531
Sinuosity (ft) 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.36 1.36
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0057 0.0051
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the ten-ace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 13a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 1,2,3 (3496 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool) Cross Section 2 (Pool) Cross Section 3 (Riffle) Cross Section 4 (Pool) Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation' Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.4 16.1 15.1 16.4 20.3 16.9 10.4 14.6 11.6 10.2 11.7 11.2 8.6 16.7 9.0
Floodprone Width (ft) NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 NA NA NA 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.1 1.0 1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 14.5 14.5 14.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 8.4 8.4 8.4 9.0 9.0 9.0 4.4 4.4 4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA 12.9 25.4 15.9 NA NA NA 16.8 63.4 18.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA 9.6 6.8 8.6 NA NA NA 11.6 6.0 11.1
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 1.05 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.02 1.00 1.08 0.98 1.00 1.13 1.04 1.00 1.00 0.99
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 23.4 26.7 23.9 20.1 24.1 23.2 11.4 11.3 15.0 16.9 14.0 13.9 8.8 12.5 11.2
d50 (mm)
Cross Section 6 (Pool) Cross Section 7 (Pool) Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation' Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.4 13.4 11.5 8.0 8.8 8.0 7.1 7.0 7.3
Floodprone Width (ft) NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 100 100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.0 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 3.6 3.6 3.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.0 13.6 14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.1 14.3 13.8
Low Bank Height (ft) 2.0 1.3 1.0 1.8 1.9 1.8 0.9 0.8 0.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.08 0.90 1.0 1.06 1.07 1.0 1.00 1.12
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 12.8 12.4 10.5 11.7 11.2 11.5 6.1 4.8 7.2
d50 (mm)
1 =Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Table 13b. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT2 (996.7 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool) Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation' Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.8 25.8 18.2 9.9 10.9 10.4
Floodprone Width (ft) NA NA NA 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 8.8 8.8 8.8 6.1 6.1 6.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA 16.1 19.5 17.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA 10.1 9.2 9.6
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.6 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 0.91 0.80 1.00 1.07 1.01
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 10.9 6.7 12.9 10.8 10.1 10.7
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 =Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Table 13c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT3 (1914.8 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool) Cross Section 2 (Riffle) Cross Section 3 (Pool) Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation' Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.0 15.8 16.6 8.9 9.0 10.2 13.6 14.8 13.5 7.3 8.0 7.9
Floodprone Width (ft) NA NA NA 100 100 100 NA NA NA 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.7 2.0 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 10.2 10.2 10.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 12.7 12.7 12.7 4.3 4.3 4.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA 14.7 15.0 19.2 NA NA NA 12.4 14.9 14.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA 11.2 11.1 9.8 NA NA NA 13.7 12.5 12.7
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.92
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 14.1 17.1 13.7 16.8 18.4 17.8 22.9 16.2 21.8 7.6 10.9 9.0
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 =Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Table 13d. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT4 (530.9 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool) Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation' Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.9 11.8 11.9 7.5 11.7 7.5
Floodprone Width (ft) NA NA NA 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.4 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 7.9 7.9 7.9 3.8 3.8 3.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA 14.8 36.0 14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA 13.3 8.5 13.4
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.4 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.90
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 13.3 13.1 14.2 8.0 5.3 5.9
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 =Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Exhibit Table 14a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 1&2 (2033 feet)
Parameter Baseline I MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.1 7.9 8.6 2 7 11.9 16.7 2 7.3 8.15 9 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 2
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9 1 1.1 2 0.8 0.9 1 2 0.8 0.95 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 3.6 4 4.4 2 3.6 4 4.4 2 3.6 4 4.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 14 15.6 17.2 2 13.8 23.6 33.4 2 14.7 16.6 18.5 2
Entrenchment Ratio 11.6 12.9 14.1 2 6 10.1 14.3 2 11.1 12.45 13.8 2
Low Bank Height (ft) 0.9 1.0 1.1 2 0.8 0.9 1.0 2 0.9 1 1.1 2
1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 0.99 1.055 1.12 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 9 28.6 28.45 49.5 10.7 35
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 1 E-04 0.01 0.009 0.021 0.007 13
Pool Length (ft) 4.3 10.9 9.14 39.8 7.5 27
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.7 1.8 2 3
Pool Spacing (ft) 25.3 49.8 50.71 89.2 14.7 35
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 2033
Sinuosity (ft) 1.26 -1.29
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0049
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% /C% / B% / Be%
3d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks 0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 14b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 3 (1463 feet)
Parameter Baseline I MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.4 10.4 10.4 1 14.6 14.6 14.6 1 11.6 11.6 1
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.7 0.7 1
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.4 I 1.4 I 1.4 1 1.2 I 1.2 I 1.2 1 1.3 1.3 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 8.4 8.4 8.4 1 8.4 8.4 8.4 1 8.4 8.4 1
Width/Depth Ratio 13 13 13 1 18.3 18.3 18.3 1 15.9 15.9 1
Entrenchment Ratio 9.6 9.6 9.6 1 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 8.6 8.6 1
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1.3 1.3 1
1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 0.98 0.98 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 12.2 39.6 38.7 63.2 12.7 23
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 8E-04 0.006 0.003 0.029 0.009 10
Pool Length (ft) 4.7 13 11.75 32 6.4 22
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2
Pool Spacing (ft) 37.3 68 73.78 87.5 13.9 22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
Meander Wavelength (ft) significant shifts from baseline
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 1463
Sinuosity (ft) 1.35
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0028
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% /C% / B% / Be%
3d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks 0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 14c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT2 (996.7 feet)
Parameter Baseline I MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.9 9.9 9.9 1 10.9 10.9 10.9 1 10.37 10.37 1
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6 0.6 0.6 1 0.6 0.6 0.6 1 0.586 0.586 1
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1.328 1.328 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 6.1 6.1 6.1 1 6.1 6.1 6.1 1 6.1 6.1 1
Width/Depth Ratio 16.1 16.1 16.1 1 19.5 19.5 19.5 1 17.7 17.7 1
Entrenchment Ratio 10.1 10.1 10.1 1 9.2 9.2 9.2 1 9.6 9.6 1
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1.34 1.34 1
1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1.009 1.009 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 15.7 29.9 28.44 52.3 10.8 11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.00 0.014 0.00 0.014 0.00 8
Pool Length (ft) 2.4 14.2 12.38 28.4 7.4 17
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1
Pool Spacing (ft) 34.5 55.6 54.92 73.1 10.7 16
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
Meander Wavelength (ft) significant shifts from baseline
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 996.7
Sinuosity (ft) 1.22
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0031
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% /C% / B% / Be%
3d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks 0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 14d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT3 (1914.8 feet)
Parameter Baseline I MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.3 8.1 8.9 2 8 8.5 9 2 7.872 9.031 10.19 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6 0.6 0.6 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 2 0.53 0.54 0.55 2
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1 1 1 2 1 1.1 1.1 2 0.98 1.045 1.11 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 4.3 4.9 5.4 2 4.3 4.9 5.4 2 4.3 4.85 5.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 12.4 13.5 14.7 2 14.9 15 15 2 14.41 16.82 19.23 2
Entrenchment Ratio 11.2 12.5 13.7 2 11.1 11.8 12.5 2 9.8 11.25 12.7 2
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.1 1.1 2 1.024 1.072 1.12 2
1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 0.921 1.03 1.138 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 22.1 39 35.67 60.9 10 29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.01 0.003 14
Pool Length (ft) 7 10.7 10.06 16.8 2.5 28
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.6 1.65 1.65 1.7 2
Pool Spacing (ft) 45.6 63 60.35 91.7 11.3 28
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
Meander Wavelength (ft) significant shifts from baseline
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 1914.8
Sinuosity (ft) 1.21 - 1.38
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0033
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% /C% / B% / Be%
3d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 14e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT4 (530.9 feet)
Parameter Baseline I MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.5 7.5 7.5 1 11.7 11.7 11.7 1 7.5 7.5 1
Floodprone Width (ft) 100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100.0 100.0 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.3 0.3 0.3 1 0.5 0.5 1
1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.9 0.9 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 3.8 3.8 3.8 1 3.8 3.8 3.8 1 3.8 3.8 1
Width/Depth Ratio 14.8 14.8 14.8 1 36 36 36 1 14.7 14.7 1
Entrenchment Ratio 13.3 13.3 13.3 1 8.5 8.5 8.5 1 13.4 13.4 1
Low Bank Height (ft) 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 1
1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0.9 0.9 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 17.4 36.6 31.69 74.4 16.6 9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.015 0.003 9
Pool Length (ft) 5.2 9.5 9.34 12.3 2.3 9
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1
Pool Spacing (ft) 21.2 49.6 46.5 75.4 15.6 9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
Meander Wavelength (ft) significant shifts from baseline
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length (ft) 530.9
Sinuosity (ft) 1.36
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0051
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% /C% / B% / Be%
3d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201 MIFF-
XS ID UT 1 Reach 3, XS- 1
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021 s,
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson , .-
f.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA •/
0.1 104.39 Bankfull Elevation: 104.0 y' . 1 .
il
2.7 104.38 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 14.5 " ''
' Y
4.7 104.05 Bankfull Width: 15.1
6.2 103.98 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA
7.1 103.61 Flood Prone Width: NA u:'+? .. ,: - ,:= 444, ¢c", ,.. ; ,i . U r;+r:.n:,.+ - w r.:. .
8.0 103.47 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1 r.; 4-:i, '
8.8 103.65 Low Bank Height: 2.1 ,;%: ! P
9.5 103.36 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 r ---,-'. u fi.' "-'�
10.3 102.86 W/D Ratio: NA .�4'
11.1 102.39 Entrenchment Ratio: NA
12.2 101.98 Bank Height Ratio: 1.04 y ik' .
12.9 101.84
15.1 102.26 Stream Type C5
16.2 102.72
17.3 102.90
18.2 103.17 Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 3, XS - 1, Pool
18.8 103.38
19.8 103.60 105 -
21.3 103.84 =
22.7 104.15 105 -
24.2 104.31
25.6 104.19 104 sss` - sssssswirsssssssrirsssssswirsss ■ -
26.7 104.21 _ •
104 - ■/■
o
103 _ /
ti \
W i
_ Bankfull
103 - MY-OOTOB
■ MY-00 12/12/19
102 MY-01 7/23/20
= \t
t MY-02 3/10/21
102 - I I • LTOB i
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201
XS ID UT 1 Reach 3, XS- 2 IIIIIMF
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - --= `' �' = -
0.3 104.89 Bankfull Elevation: 104.9 r.
2.1 105.00 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 18.5 _
3.9 104.96 Bankfull Width: 16.9
5.3 104.63 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA "
7.3 104.32 Flood Prone Width: NA ,4'1• .41' -"t: - ti`
9.1 104.07 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.4 t x
10.3 103.86 Low Bank Height: 2.4 - ; {�', '
11.3 103.61 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 ' 1' ) ';• ` 11
•
12.0 103.33 W/D Ratio: NA ��.
12.6 103.08 Entrenchment Ratio: NA r '' ' , 1N ` 2`'' r
13.5 102.74 Bank Height Ratio: 1.02 - r •' •'. ; x ` , Y f;} ..;sfr r- _: „'
14.3 102.57
14.9 102.52 Stream Type C5
15.6 102.72
16.1 102.98
16.7 103.15 Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 3, XS - 2, Pool
17.4 103.51
18.2 103.99 106 -
19.1 104.34 = ._
20.0 104.78 105 - �_
22.7 105.13 � a.wa.-ara� a-a,a a wawa-mas s ra ss-asss s s +,, s :s :s-arssaa,s s\
25.2 105.13 105 i
27.9 105.10
29.7 105.13 104
z
o
104
W = V Bankfull
103 - J
MY-00 Tos
\111%
103 ,/ MY-00 12/12/19
MY-01 7/23/20
f MY-02 3/10/21
102 , • LTOB
0 5 10 15 20 25 au 35
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201
XS ID UT 1 Reach 3, XS- 3
Feature Riffle
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA .rr ��`^_--
0.5 105.68 Bankfull Elevation: 105.6
2.9 105.62 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.4 -
5.2 105.72 Bankfull Width: 11.6 ,.a'"i`4 f'F=x"'' 't`'
7.7 105.84 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 106.9 '- ti� i'' �' A 4 _ : ' ''k"'',A '' '
't ^�r ,-'-' �'i', .?,Gil; :: :, ..r, ..A.-
9.6 105.56 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 0'f{{ 4
� 4. $.]] ' .i,T.^ .!., • I, ,'R Sys' :�4.. +.
1 21. �:�• 'k p' C ?fie - +
10.7 105.33 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 k. xt'• *' ''- '`'' ,.1' 1 "'4 ''''
11.7 105.02 Low Bank Height: 1.3 v. � '+ u ` 3 r'
13.6 104.56 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 T -.)•, } .
.'*r •fir �y ,,l : . 1r' _, a �. .,?•,:`"
15.2 104.55 W/D Ratio: 15.9 R•- AV'. _ -.a• e
15.6 104.40 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.6 .E i''., ` ^ ,` 'a'�° . ;', -
16.2 104.28 Bank Height Ratio: 0.98 1 ' *.y'�y"' ` ""'` �ti
16.9 104.28 ..,$.a/ra. ,kl:.4W ..e�...it kz ..., ....r. .4: * .. :: .i: 2,. . a-Jc.-ti--2
17.3 104.44 Stream Type C5
18.0 104.76
18.9 104.89
20.0 105.30 Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 3, XS - 3, Riffle
21.1 105.65
23.4 105.53 108 -
26.0 105.54 =
29.8 105.55 107
107
o,
106
z
1067: ".-
ti
w - Bankfull
105 %11‘-
n-lY-oo TOB
Flood Prone Area
105 --.11m.-,--
-MY-oo 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
104 7 t MY-02 3/10/21
0 5 10 15 20 25 • LTOB 35
Station (feet)

A
Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201FM .IA
XS ID UT 1 Reach 2, XS- 4
Feature Pool -
Date: 3/10/2021 r
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ,74
0.0 108.18 Bankfull Elevation: 108.3 - r r,
2.6 108.24 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 9.0 _. J{ ;i .w 3
3.9 108.07 Bankfull Width: 11.2 i' • i .. s ` ' ',-
5.8 108.41 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA ,. "' .`:
7.3 108.20 Flood Prone Width: NA r �y't':, 'YiyA' t,._-•rye; '-`� 's. a rt•
8.7 107.99 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 -� . `..r` ' `"', ' �. 1 • ''',, '-"
10.3 107.71 Low Bank Height: 1.8 ., ijr:/ ifA ` r ". .'. :''i . ,;: r 'r'
11.5 107.56 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 i,' f, �; � .. ! ., ; := :. _ :.>•:
12.1 107.21 W/D Ratio: NA ..1.,i';:;',•,.�',.F,"d .YY , . �,. ':''. "
,E• _ :,,,,;1., .;, .`'DUI i . _ . = ' �¢i':`-}
12.7 106.89 Entrenchment Ratio: NAti 9 ,.' '' '
13.4 106.72 Bank Height Ratio: 1.04Vil {?;
14.1 106.66
14.9 106.74 Stream Type C5
15.5 107.01
16.0 107.49
16.7 107.91 Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 2, XS - 4, Pool
17.6 108.44
19.6 108.56 109
21.7 108.56
24.6 108.47
-
108 1
N,..._...„, r
w 107 \ • Bankfull
MY-00 TOB
i
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-01 7/23/20
f MY-02 3/10/21
106 • LTOB
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201
XS ID UT 1 Reach 2,XS- 5
Feature Riffle
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.2 110.75 Bankfull Elevation: 110.6 - "
2.5 110.71 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.4 x • ,V.:: - y .
6.6 110.87 Bankfull Width: 9.0 t kw n°� u k " ,; s --
8.9 110.72 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 111.7 �.� :, .: ,r . ',' . .� • v ;a�' .+ N1- .
11.3 110.55 Flood Prone Width: 100.0
13.0 110.05 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1
13.9 109.44 Low Bank Height: 1.1 '� : ' ''S,;: . `K; �-^: t t
14.5 109.44 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 . ., rl,r�^ r .- i „„ :72 r i'
15.1 109.45 W/D Ratio: 18.5 't-_`' =�' �;4'.-,' 4 f F,_ ,reF _F";:
15.8 109.45 Entrenchment Ratio: 11.1 -::. .,'` ro ` ,
16.8 110.19 Bank Height Ratio: 0.99
18.1 110.50
20.4 110.58 Stream Type C5
22.1 110.61
24.8 110.61
26.7 110.49 Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 2, XS - 5, Riffle
28.6 110.28
112
111 -
o)
t
MD MD MD MD M
ti
w 110 - Bankfull
MY-00 TOB
Flood Prone Area
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
109 i -MY-02 3/10/21
0 10 20 • LTOB
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201
XS ID UT 1 Reach 2, XS- 6
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA '' - -.:i }P y ,:;> r _
0.1 113.4 Bankfull Elevation: 113.41 ,ei.� t., � 3 `1 , °'�`
2.5 113.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.1 1
6.1 113.3 Bankfull Width: 11.5
8.6 113.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA = n ;_' 3?
10.4 112.5 Flood Prone Width: NA ''.,"~� x :,t
11.1 112.4 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2 ,[., '-, '7Y. .,,
11.7 112.3 Low Bank Height: 1.0 . ; -" ` ' - tt �1 Y w•
12.2 112.2 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 '° %; =
12.9 112.3 W/D Ratio: NA j. ' _ r- 3 , N� eja;;`.t_. '; ,
13.4 112.5 Entrenchment Ratio: NA '' ,
14.9 113.0 Bank Height Ratio: 0.90 ttAd..`•'tf' 'r .''w " Ce°' ' ��' '-^. L`.1�
16.7 113.3
19.3 113.6 Stream Type C5
21.6 113.6
23.5 113.6
Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 2, XS - 6, Pool
114
LIP•em /1
113 - J177----Ae‘-
z
o N.
Bankfull
w112 MY-00 TOB
-MY-00 12/12/19
- -MY-Ol 7/23/20
f MY-02 3/10/21
111 7 I • LTOB 1
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201
XS ID UT 1 Reach 2, XS- 7
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA .. "
0.0 114.2 Bankfull Elevation: 114.0 r r,4 p", .'"•
•' ,.NI y, •fib,
3.3 114.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.8 ► "'7- �,
6.3 114.1 Bankfull Width: 8.0 _
8.2 113.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA •
8.7 112.5 Flood Prone Width: NA
9.5 112.3 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 s '' i.
10.8 112.3 Low Bank Height: 1.8 _ lip
•-J*#'�^ � ter.••Vr:. ..•�. .,e'.
11.4 112.7 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 :i '0 `l . ,;,, 0, . . ! w'
12.1 113.3 W/D Ratio: NA .. Y_ lug'' ..fir _ •' i I,,:: >':
12.7 113.6 Entrenchment Ratio: NA ,, , • '���/`` -V r •Ji" y. -_
°� - r' {• .%sac ' 4 t.•.'..•..:' 1 Y r
13.8 113.9 Bank Height Ratio: 1.07 °•. ' - ,.. ��, ` 4''3;
15.6 114.1 . ' ? > ;:.:
17.7 114.2 Stream Type C5
19.4 114.2
20.5 114.3
Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 2, XS - 7, Pool
115
114 r ----
0
Bankfull
ti 113 - MY-00 TOB
W
MY-012/12/19
MY-O /23/201 7/23/20
• MY-02 3/10/21
112 7 I • LTOB
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201
XS ID UT 1 Reach 1,XS- 8 ' '
Feature Riffle -. � '° "„
Date: 3/10/2021 T' . r ,-•
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson ''
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
r .ti'.,' a . d,.• l
0.0 115.22 Bankfull Elevation: 115.1 ``' t 4.1„,,'t r' ';F''" - 1 � '
+-
5.0 115.19 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.6 r"
7.4 115.10 Bankfull Width: 7.3 , ""N- r
8.1 114.80 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 115.9 r
8.6 114.73 Flood Prone Width: 100.0
9.3 114.51 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 T. Av.._
9.9 114.44 Low Bank Height: 0.9 - • '.z`� '`� �
10.1 114.29 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 N -
10.4 114.37 W/D Ratio: 14.7 w ,. _ -�-4 pt+ -' J - y
I y- N - { � X- y. -.Y
10.6 114.30 Entrenchment Ratio: 13.8 ^`� ‘ _ i r'' P�
10.9 114.30 Bank Height Ratio: 1.12
11.5 114.35
12.7 114.55 Stream Type C5
12.7 114.65
13.8 114.70
14.3 115.10 Alliance Headwaters, UT 1 Reach 1, XS - 8, Riffle
17.3 115.26
21.5 115.21 116 -
�ww��MI a - - ww_�MI a MINMEMMINNIMM r raw -aMPa-
0 115
wBankfull
/' MY-00 TOB
.A1/ Flood Prone Area
MY-00 12/12/19
MY-Ol 7/23/20
114 1 I MY-02 3/10/21
0 10 • LTOB
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201
XS ID UT 2,XS- 1
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021 � '
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson _ e
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
-0.1 104.1 Bankfull Elevation: 104.2
2.1 104.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.8 '
4.1 104.1 Bankfull Width: 18.2 -
6.4 104.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA
8.2 103.8 Flood Prone Width: NA
9.9 103.5 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 Y `==
11.1 103.4 Low Bank Height: 0.9 ..:.1- • -0,-- :� �` '�f 4',' •
12.1 103.3 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 .- '- P
13.4 103.3 W/D Ratio: NA ` l��'
14.7 103.1 Entrenchment Ratio: NA . .
15.6 103.3 Bank Height Ratio: 0.80
16.1 103.6
17.1 103.7 Stream Type C5
18.5 104.0
20.2 104.1
21.9 104.1
23.8 104.2 Alliance Headwaters, UT 2, XS - 1, Pool
25.1 104.4
25.9 104.1 105
i
104 • - -
103 MY-00TOB
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-017/23/20
f MY-02 3/10/21
102 - I I • LTOB
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201
XS ID UT 2,XS- 1
Feature Riffle
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - - A
0.2 106.8 Bankfull Elevation: 106.5 ____
2.5 106.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.1
4.3 106.3 Bankfull Width: 10.4
5.9 106.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 107.8
7.6 105.1 Flood Prone Width: 100.0
8.3 105.2 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3
9.0 105.4 Low Bank Height: 1.3 _ `�
9.7 105.5 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6
10.8 106.0 W/D Ratio: 17.7 ,
11.9 106.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 9.6 r •-„ _. -
13.0 106.5 Bank Height Ratio: 1.01 �-
14.0 106.5
15.1 106.5 Stream Type C5
16.3 106.5
Alliance Headwaters, UT 2, XS - 2, Riffle
108 -
107
o)
0 106
'� Bankfull
w
MY-00 TOB
105 V `
Flood Prone Area
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
104 , I MY-02 3/10/21 i
0 10 • LTOB 20
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201
XS ID UT 3 Reach 2,XS- 1
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA • '
0.0 110.5 Bankfull Elevation: 110.4 - - _ _ _
2.5 110.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.2 ' "' "- ,' '�'' '- it_ - ... ; .
5.5 110.4 Bankfull Width: 16.64i - ,.. T:,,T.:x,LL:_ :..,., _ ::- : -
8.6 109.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA
10.3 109.7 Flood Prone Width: NA 1.. /'
11.4 109.2 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6 �� -1 '
12.9 108.8 Low Bank Height: 1.6 .y ? t' •
13.8 108.8 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 i-.r `: 1.4.
14.9 109.4 W/D Ratio: NA ,01 _ M'` i� 'r
15.8 109.6 Entrenchment Ratio: NA =•''''r
17.2 110.2 Bank Height Ratio: 0.98 .._ ,y
19.1 110.3
21.5 110.4 Stream Type C5
23.6 110.2
24.7 110.1
Alliance Headwaters, UT 3 Reach 2, XS - 1, Pool
111
sUD'ir& vsss -` SssUD'ir& vssssss-arirsssss� . - - ss
110
�`
t
0
10 lk
N\ /
7
w 109 Bankfull
MY-00 TOB
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
t MY-02 3/10/21
108 7 I I • LTOB 1
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201
XS ID UT 3 Reach 2, XS- 2
Feature Riffle
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Perkinson
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.7 111.5 Bankfull Elevation: 111.4 -
5.2 111.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.4 w
9.8 111.0 Bankfull Width: 10.2 - =',a fir,.:.tr� ✓ t.
10.9 110.6 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 112.4 `': - -'' ' '
12.6 110.4 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 '•r .
14.1 110.5 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 -_: - ;rr -1- s}' " : '
15.1 110.9 Low Bank Height: 1.1 `; ° '-
s
16.2 111.3 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 1 „ �� z y�. Fti~ 4
17.5 111.7 W/D Ratio: 19.2 w ,v t; . - !i'
19.3 111.8 Entrenchment Ratio: 9.8 " cs :1,
21.8 111.9 Bank Height Ratio: 1.14 ' ��3Ii , `''''` �;, `}
24.9 112.1
Stream Type C5
Alliance Headwaters, UT 3 Reach 2, XS - 2, Riffle
113 -
112 -
o)
t
o wir
ti
W 111 - Bankfvll
/ MY-00 TOB
Flood Prone Area
'4111111111111 -
-MY-0012/12/19
-MY-01 7/23/20
1 - MY-02 3/10/21
10
0 10 20 • LTOB 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River, 03020201
XS ID UT 3 Reach 2, XS- 3
Feature Pool
Date: 3/10/2021 ;�
Field Crew: Adams, Lawson, Parkinson r,"= - •,•tz 0,1 1•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA '
0.0 113.9 Bankfull Elevation: 113.7 '� -i •'' . • * f
1.7 113.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 12.7 :' "'�'-'�''
4.0 113.6 Bankfull Width: 13.5
6.4 113.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA
8.3 113.2 Flood Prone Width: NA _ _ ,V ,s, 41 :3+.� =5
9.5 113.1 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1 ' x'
10.9 113.3 Low Bank Height: 1.8 w.. • y r °� '„ ^- " .-, , ,k -,
11.2 113.2 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 r-.r- ,.±r - �-:: ., y�' - i q _A-4. ,2.'..' 3+ti:4,
11.6 113.0 W/D Ratio: NA - c '', - - •''�'-, '�'' s "":`.
i t ram,±;,
614
12.1 112.4 Entrenchment Ratio: NA - -- ' "trs- !'� r' :y 1
:ice Y+ ' i•• , N.L.a II o,
12.9 112.1 Bank Height Ratio: 0.88 _ '. s4. „' .- ;r1r•` o� -.', t?, '_�',
13.6 111.8
14.4 111.7 Stream Type C5
15.0 111.8
15.5 112.0
16.2 112.3
17.0 112.7 Alliance Headwaters, UT 3 Reach 2, XS - 3, Pool
18.0 113.1
18.9 113.4 115 -
20.3 113.9
22.0 114.1
23.8 114.0 114 - ��
26.4 113.9 ��
� - 7
0 113 - /
I
� /
112 - � MY-00 12/12/19
MY-Ol 7/23/20
MY-02 3/10/21
111 - I • LTOB I
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters '€ -' .
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201 `*
XS ID UT 3 Reach 1,XS- 4 7 E " ' •i k' - =
iftii4.,8' t'Avep.: 3
, � . r.. gyp„ ', t` F!
Feature Riffle - -1- - _• '' • ‘, ,, �.. ,t r 4! ' ,'. '.' .' �•
Date: 3/10/2021 f ' uy
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson „t
1. _;.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ; ' t , '• ' f, ;+ , ' . ''.4
Vic; : ,. ,, ',: l
0.5 115.5 Bankfull Elevation: 115.6 '. 1 , ' ;"' r ;}j ,s �?.'f.
3.0 115.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.3 �'' r 4. ? w- • ' 'i,; ;(;,,,,,,,1 ,3•j
5.5 115.7 Bankfull Width: 7.9 - ? _ ' s N'
7.0 115.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 116.7 1. ,_;,,,::; :�r
8.8 115.7 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 ;"
9.5 115.7 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 • x ' '
10.2 115.5 Low Bank Height: 1.0 :; _.._N,_ _ ;;,' tv q
11.0 115.2 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 _ - Dik , ,
11.6 114.9 W/D Ratio: 14.3 m : ' . • ':,
12.2 114.6 Entrenchment Ratio: 12.7 ;..,�_
12.8 114.5 Bank Height Ratio: 0.92 ¢ ' -'r- 3, • s
13.4 114.5
13.9 114.6 Stream Type C5
14.7 114.9
15.3 115.2
16.6 115.4 Alliance Headwaters, UT 3 Reach 1, XS - 4, Riffle
18.0 115.7
19.8 115.9 117 -
21.2 115.9
22.9 115.9 -
24.6 116.0
116 -
t
o
Oa Bankfull
ti
115 - MY-00 TOB
Flood Prone Area
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
■ MY-02 3/10/21
114 , • LTOB
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201
XS ID UT4,XS- 1
Feature Pool t
Date: 3/10/2021
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinsoni . '- - . -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
-0.1 114.60 Bankfull Elevation: 114.2
2.0 114.19 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.9
3.7 114.47 Bankfull Width: 11.9
4.7 114.26 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA i' ,,.R: ..,
5.5 114.10 Flood Prone Width: NA ,....::;:`:A: -
6.2 114.10 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 ` gi =;- .t: "�
6.8 113.85 Low Bank Height: 1.3 `!' {'„
7.6 113.48 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 � or*,
Y " }
8.3 113.08 W/D Ratio: NA ,-
9.1 112.89 Entrenchment Ratio: NA fix . :.w�.; • .� T
,r
il
10.1 112.94 Bank Height Ratio: 0.99 = `p"'` iittit = �
10.9 113.03
11.8 113.31 Stream Type C5
12.5 113.47
13.4 113.61
14.1 113.65 Alliance Headwaters, UT 4, XS - 1, Pool
14.7 113.73
15.8 114.09 115 -
16.7 114.21
17.7 114.37 •
19.7 114.46 _ --
114 �&
L ■
w 113 ■ Bankfull
• -.
MY-00 TOB
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
t MY-02 3/10/21
112 - I • LTOB
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Alliance Headwaters '`
Watershed: Neuse River,03020201 •
XS ID UT3,XS-2
Feature Riffle ' + ,,
Date: 3/10/2021 , ! ; li .
Field Crew: Adams,Lawson,Perkinson l 11,
.4 i
-i ,.11 III .,' i i
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA 4': _ Y-_
0.3 115.56 Bankfull Elevation: 115.7 " T •y ~. t' ''
2.2 115.61 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.8 -
3.5 115.51 Bankfull Width: 7.5 .ice . - Y.'- - ,.°" _ ° =•. '-
5.0 115.57 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 116.5 ,. '`' '`
5.9 115.43 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 .
6.7 115.18 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 '= _:
7.3 115.01 Low Bank Height: 0.8
7.8 114.87 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 �. .,, , - c•
8.4 114.81 W/D Ratio: 14.7 � r. .��;. r.". ..
9.1 114.81 Entrenchment Ratio: 13.4 ;, -
9.9 114.85 Bank Height Ratio: 0.90 y
10.4 115.08
10.9 115.24 Stream Type C5
11.9 115.46
12.7 115.73
14.0 115.75 Alliance Headwaters, UT 4, XS - 2, Riffle
15.2 115.68
17.1 115.78 117
116 -
t
zimanamendm
0
o
0.) Bankfull
W 115
Flood Prone Area
-MY-00 12/12/19
-MY-Ol 7/23/20
- MY-02 3/10/21
114 , • LTOB
0 10 MY-OOTOB 20
Station (feet)

APPENDIX E: HYDROLOGY DATA
Tables 15A-G. Channel Evidence
Stream Gauge Graphs
Table 16. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure El. 30/70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Soil Temp Graph
Table 17. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 15A. UT1 Downstream Channel Evidence
UT1 Downstream Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 201 119
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Photo 1: UT1 Downstream Channel Evidence
stoiritil
•4 - ' .. .:ar- i "r-.. i f
t r` s -. , .• — - - -• ' _- ,�}`G.s' icy - '
4 1'
' am ..: ;{' #;•.;.1
s. _ ,t. s. �• -� -ti .
3 • -- 71,,,..�5' t•' -'- -� -_ - - ~- _
•
•
h i _ -
0_ ii-lit- . -,1,-- i -.4.,_---. -- - ,_
r t4.l _ Y Y : r.: fl _ =fir . ,
0 . i
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT1 Downstream
Year 2 (2021 Data)
- 4.0
39
37 -
35 1 — - 3.5
33
31
29 II
I3.0
c 25 —I�
23 2.5 m
Tu
21 pi I 119 days . E
a) 19 I Q
to
ru
ru
in'w17 2.0 c
E• 15 1
• 13
11)
I
' 4 - 0.5
3 Li Iii I. i I II I I1� II i 11kiji 1i I. J 0.0
WII
Ul Ul Ul Ul 01 01 01 V V V00N FJ FJ N W FJ N W FJ N WFJ N 00 FJ NNO O O O O Ol0 l0 00 00 00 1-\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ 00 N FJ N FJ N N N N N N N N N FJ N N FJ N N N \ \ N

Table 15B. UT1 Upstream Channel Evidence
UT1 Upstream Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 190 160
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

: ,. :;; .:.;�: ,: :; + wy;: y;:' � y ;t' Photo 2: UT1 Upstream Channel Evidence
I •
` k1 {f1. l'i i:SY�.�.II
�.R''••`k, � :l-- R• i' , -5' :.`- Sr - _ - - -
.�.. itl, r-,.'in�:�-a�-: "r -w ri.te '! ,rf,i".: •'�:�;f ���.:�,�.:: ,� ... �dS kr� :�i' '
'1 ���fl.'� ,'��: 'rr?{. • 1 �.. - ,nY a ,4;:P.t 44�•`,..'�',i,� .?�;yl, },:n • i,,i' I� � ��'� 4rS_�, - -
•
Jjc•! h .r , • ,..,. %:a '., .:, ,'.r ,:: ', '�J 1, H' .' t
+.Yl� '',},� ni tr.v ,.y 'mow.• ;i:.{ S°Sf- a'._ :•' l� kF d.,, ,,..k_d,yg"�!rt•.�'�l }i'-: ,a.. ,}}, i ..,, .r,y-T��',Af.�n rj" 5 t ?^i:. y ^,y-si;erg` ti.',A61'.....P....M-V-,44,...-.•
• �'�;/ .4 Yp {l.,llv: . ;i l .L 1J}{j _ ., -� .Y y„ .. - � y .Qi,l fi 1,'',4 ;I i 5 .( kv
'r }.. I f.:`f. � , ` '�$'a,L'''a - . .•'. ., I e 1. • fi r f y d• -'.
y, � "!�.'' • r. t 4 - I k} S� 'f 4 ..3r f '`�� ...: J.�"_1= ::...t� :raj i :--r..: '.,. i,'� •i. `„ ,� tr, * ;• "I
r F.i S ri,krr • cil. 'r - - .5 o->.{ - ,;'r � .,,t.} ',t� � 'i _ Y'�'� 'i ;'1 • :8xe. i_� 5. . ', uc
t�l hit " +'.,..r. 'l' ., ,..J .°.^ r � '. 4...!Z4'fe ••- Y . 'i`Y; ' y ia, 4r1_la}4'k_. ; ti• j,r.i.
,�F
- � •! } �.. 6 5, - .}1 .� .Pi`.5*•r.•Ir '�y �ri, = r. 4. s -,� • =y L1 q '•• �,.ji.it .I� ? i �b`, 4.1 # i i�'
'emu" iy F -':.;
"� ,: r ',F 1 ''�1'•.4,�I'sl�r ' .n��*�'' �._' I• .�y,`� '- { _ yl,` �rt?.'L' ' �.�4'. ' ill. �r - :•�.,-a��=i�•
sk, r 3h' =k i .. d P:r.Fv. V }.I' d;.�' ?.'' ., , rlh pub.., 4 ._d:'1.
1,ca 'r - .p. i t'y - ,'y �`� •i,-,,,,: _ _ - - 4. - w Y i f• k +: G�. .R c '' -,,,i,A•r#''-;v i
�j� f�' - ]��q _ , - .t. �» is w,,�..�;k"=
.'I'i't'� � { I ':��;:� �� "F HSi � '. --'r'l ,-� :phi,h r�` },t -x�"•t S ,�,3. e� �rs �',',r
,7 }� �11 }} .�i .�- '�5 �,�. f 3 �Y*'. � } - - - - .:3..J: {' - �#�F: �IF�_ .�r �i 2` �4:'. edh��• � r, �:��.}ti. �a�{•t'•�,
� Y IY7 d 'I 1-:; .�: 2 .r,r,._.:7- S -. I5 .-r'�;. 11. '2r d. { tu. i ckYeti�: 3r,..' �f
;ti I � ..& � i... '1:� - Sr I� } , }f ,,�+� n,�+t5� tS,�' ,■ 3 4„ 4 1:::ry�.
r.
k ,�4,y1}, r j t''' ;' ' i• :r' • i�c—q y .3 r & i' y,
,.::::e,Ar
AII .
-'A _°` p •, :'}J' •., 517,1 ;:.+ !,11Yi4 .,..r bi - - Y•C r tr.. yu 'gym,1�,
•
,; 1i I-. Jr I r r =.' =iS..�,r�,�r,,r: ' J71
S` si � � 4 II ! r. A 1. L
.4:4.11:kit. iy, ./ .
4,i.r.,.'. j 1 : .ti •• .'r rY'Xr S ti VA.',
_ S. { jf •
4 J.W►kr ti s { . - _ c
- i,,n , • I'I II���r'!' 1 r• ' - n'r' Tl � 4
.+� .reµ �, � ,' � �, � ,{v L'.- - -. • i 1, r T' '. • ,1' ;=-- ' --: —.-.
' I+. }; y, IIo f 1 I fJ
-'',, :%r..�1•-- {I -�* .'J �a,r cJ.
i �,. Y 1' r
eii 4 . '4,.......:, k.... .,•
�' � : '+
ti _ tit ' 1, yid ff J .T
+ < t 4 r S'. I'''.
'.+ti + .
�5• j -iL .` ti.- 4.Trlrk ., - ,w w .- -
G2 F AH Uil L+ C 0311113021 D4:16AM
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT1 Upstream
Year 2 (2021 Data)
4.5
39
37
35 4.0
33
31
IH
3.5
29 -
c 27 c
i 25 3.0
a 23 , o
m 21 E
,� 2.5 a
E 19 160 days ,�
16 lit
17 =_
a
n 15lkii 2.0 re
13divow
11
9 yNlit 1.5
7
5I ‘11\11\11\ 1.0
3
1
-hill.
I0.5
-3 _JI . 1 di 11 I IIll 111 Ii ii .J i Li I I 1,
_-51
0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . . Ul Ul Ul Ul Ol Ol Ol V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lO I-' I-. I-. I-. I-.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 N 1-
1--, I-, N W I-, N N I-, N I-, I-, N I-, I-, N W I-, N W I-, N W lO I-, N 00 I-, N -. \ \ \ \
N I- I- 0 0 N N \ I- I- \ I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO lO 00 00 00 I- N V N
N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ 00 00 - V
I-, N N N N N I-, N N I-, N N I-, N N N N N N N N N I-, N N I-, N N N -. \ N -.
1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, 1--, N N 1--, N
I-, I-, I-

Table 15C. UT1A Channel Evidence
UT1A Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 97 73
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

' �.';,.. Photo 3: UT1AChannel Evidence - :> :;��. v "
'h x/•r • J �.f::-'Yy': 'S-'i••
,1{•�.5. ','h: .'I h" • 4y�.' , 7� ' .l ,,�.���,}f�SY� y � 15`�I.
� + '.:x,' y1 _•1• ?Q'.'a� yyyrJ :�1 .. •'' ':�i�i.ZS..� . .. ll-. • 5 • I� n
,•ya� ,-7 rF -,., _ Xr +. ./" {10 _ 4-. .,?:' „,. .'i'1}.. .}= 5:. _ :3,2-*Vi.:. .,i'4 • y .7 riN'A.
.�u�4rx :�' r�'Y•F .',:' '��;'Y�'r�`�p:�� -Sgi'��r� _ }y�� ffE',aTl:ial`i � "7d+y�� .�,ry� �}::�r�'}.x +i.
��'y,��(L _ 5_L, ,` 5 .,.E ?.;;.'' '!"4 , } :FT"-:`-'!:,. .t f,f,,- •
,v: '.£� .. ' r,��}�{ ',o�-
•,��4tif ]l. �ji. .• y53,•f`Y(Fl•r,I{���,{I •.,, I'r f.,C,�.lf.. /`. ,'}1'�A �t:.�•. .7'. • -t •.F..�,. �~• JJ!.� •h�..yl5l_. pp •tv r iI - �s •,0 r.
]]]1Y ,dT'} s ,_Lal.:17.E .: •-h .4;:- 1' +•k..f.., , +`.•!i+ i p d�-}{.•.'14�,•{.S1 {.�.Y a S,'�4 } `C`
`.Y I'V' -'v# 4,'•. + E'' s y ' J43, �'. rt:}}r''° ;R.. { :• - ... 'F> : .'i� i ` �" iY' ,r �? - s r
`••i' .. dr+.• •`l' .rr' - a.} x:':r.''S k�5 f. :�S.: �•�'y''�.: _ r t.'`a `-. _ rr:. .'P _ '
' •- r ''-' i i,'. 'fir.:L r } Sd. 'filx .-1
•
if
•
' i„ - ,y .5 i: . a' Yl. i.4' t. _L" ,5 ' y- i . .: .,J... -k'.
it'll'. � Y^'t.r.`a 4 •� � '•n Z•� Y,i.n .F' l' .�.�, Y��,{I
ais .r. : . •
Ih f'''f '''.."" '., y. X n:'.'-Lrr.,',. C_ _^9G .
.q .4x'.• y • s l"�...:, • _ ,i , p ,. , .f•._ _ �r•'i �.;',�:,. `a... "L"=`'`'� •!ti.
'I ^` ,> 'RY w•6k7. '•i•-y i '' _Al,c'r.' ] }, . > •j. .r.sti:r.••-. -'r.. L�� ;, y
•
1 3 5. �qI�J"S Ii• 4= ;''SA''• * ,•��i` :Eh r t{w "LPr - • '.'� `' F.i,' �• 7 '�1• •�#�`.. ''-a ��`,' 'S' i 17 ; -.I 6 k7. ,.•1. •` A . * _ • : _ -'E - ,. {: / ''�. .� i-
1, 1. ,Ni.n f . I' '. r•1 .Y!`. 'i1..'i # 1'i. 4� ,' y. st' ". .. �..•:F . 7. •r'f.„.: �,. ��. 1" .'�I'�:''.�`'' ''�' �• ti :•��I ',,. r;.l ti �I�,,.. •__ st. �_{�.i. I ry ;�'a'�'_ ,. {.r��r�,. •�4� �'' i.' +'� i`. .' 1' ,, '1._,:. .n•t` y .if• � I ti, �{ I°R* A'i ._, • .�y• '�,'P• {t,7 • - .. .5.d _
rN. v. _ _..k • Y rr� ' °w ' M4} jr r "n,,L
pIs� � :.ri,'Pt! }r •
5f • • _ pl , !IP-4V,
-5 l r ��. a _ ` Y'I T =..1.."*..•-
+I ��� •t - y` {�5rx�f. .�, Fy,'r� 1L;1 �' ,r 'L'� __ ��w ^. xy �. �i .. 'Sr',{�-'i,"i.' r"F a ..Sl ram. i 'rl i'14' ', .2..;'.1AA.• .f l� ,f. lir.
' s'` 'a�.�
■1 -'0 -.. 1.- Y r' 0.. • ,; tr I • r "'µµ II5 -"� R•• f �.i'r'S .t" .51:h�
.. -� } '}: M1 ��• A `^`,y V�IM1 IY} • I, 1. .5, •4 F� "-'•f ? !! U `.1' " I I . • iI f v4
'• C-' •''7 � fir . y..1.'1',f'+� i,' 4' 1. .i i � 'I „,i+r. ;4.Z `-..a M1� •, ....z. f yyLr
•
•
ffl.
•.r 1' l 7',T
•
, '' a'. fin: r�. ' �'k 1''^ '* I. ! ,.: 742 4t' .° r Fry�s. . v{ •l .iti `� r}'i,.t� 0:' - ." •+• .�• } �•'.4 �''1' • 31' S' - - ,f]; f.' 'f i rK
{ 1' I•4 4.... 4} ; ?3, '�.-.` A 'I ll S 4 is'.,•
]7��! I` L r-q 9i� ZZ. .
ryw� p' .•,, 'w I.s•y+ f.:• 5 ' ''I •11 lry• Y{ a•• _ F� 'k. ice`• •'h
F 'Idr'V.. +'Y 37tP".{n 15::. f. `` J '••4::N �J ; �� •r' +.X:.I I ¢3n� • 1L .S'y J +{^
L'.' � ',�. `" 1i•d'y '111 i= I I . 4 N �#-. ' f �µ.,y Y 1
• � N} yy. i ' .f ','`• ;'ll+f,!' UU 1 IX' y� . ''•. Ri.•'' # 1",.
`' 41. .. ,;'`,7's E' r { .M1 .'x �"{' �` 1 '. •",.. ' _ :J-:="�•r ',•l -• ' i:'; 'kI,R erapa
5 a` i 7` rt' _ �, yT ll• + '' 1 • #' - '' '4#jn:ti - x1 • 4
. F ` .,r _ x� � '�• a '' , .-.r` •
..F ' II I f li IJl =� .1 yl , ,7LL °.•;.'. ,'� i 5;F' • _ dr d
S k. .+ 5r I .J'r' • I y'4 I `Y 5'1 .- -�• f' 'r{l-1.'al• 4a'• S ,.k,.' ..•.5 .1:.1 1151
ri ref "'•a q, a .'''• t;• :' i R y;' •I . 1 • _ •1,' .F ,. • $.c• .,:,t''' 3 ..4, + lt.
* ,I I , h• tr .r-r 1 '• •1..ti E-�••+� , r..1 .. ..y ? % • Fy_�; 'i e 7 .. I • : .. �'I7�' ',t +i'f ,t` - ,�• '.5
)I t . _�. 15ir1 .148E i':} rYk • yf;,•fig.k F 4" � 'F
. +dd r.. { r ,•t l Evi'i :�L' 1f r.r . I •1 ;it r..,'S; ";'. ' -„ .,,1 -.4.., #, i h jf..,'.t+........ ! 5'{
ryif
4• %j '� + 111,
• '71 •,, . ...
•
• 7I /4191)1
- + iy, k, .§' ?{ :r` •Y. �••r' I.
•
•
•
-II
1 .� Y J
7 / i�' - ' '�
I ', , r I . ,5 f. i I P r �'* . P
s. x'E.,.•
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086)
December 2021
Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT1A
Year 2 (2021 Data)
4.5
39
37
35 4.0
33
31
3.5
_ 29
27 - c
i 25 3.0
23 3
ar 0
to
ns
19 Z 73 days 2.5 a
ns
m 17 �
a
15 2.0
H
141,14
13
11
9 1.5
7 '
5 t\III 1.0
3II
\I\
1 It i 0.5
1 i
-3 I _JI I1. � � 11 il ■ Ill 1 II I. Jti
J r 1 i III
-5 0.0
F-, F-, F-, F-, N N W W W A A A Ul Ul Ul Ul Cr. O1 Cr. V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lO F-. F-. F-. F-. F-.
F- F- N W I- N N I- N I- I- N I- I- N W I- N W I- N U) lO I- N 00 I- N
F, F, F, O O N N \ F, F, \ F, F, F, O O O O O O lO lO 00 00 00 F, N V F,
N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ 00 00 \ V
FA N N N N N FA N N FA N N FA N N N N N N N N N FA N N FA N N N \ \ N \
FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA N N FA N
FA FA F-

Table 15D. UT2 Channel Evidence
UT2 Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 199 125
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Photo 4: UT2 Channel Evidence
••':7;!''''-'
_yitt• 4.
:L••-: - . _.
• • kV'L'1,1 - . '4,4L:..,0! vr-.'.r.p._.L'..t.,v•E „, ..4. '5 ..,.
.. ..a.
,. 1..
.,
A.,
- ....'• _ ...!r 71‘,•.:d r.' - . •' it '.:.'. 1 •-e • ...-_r......-
- •.,..''.0.- .'..1....H.0?-i..., At., .. .......!:•0..-.-.4
4 .._ -9p...',...ii::•.',N
. ' ...4•IVI'''''::.'irgi,'"''•-'.-.#,.';-'1,..-•-.'-','0„';10: •.•',' 7 .,-7:.! - - --;?.! • ' %4315.••:',... L.:•- -:;-_.. .4, •.- •• - •-•.,..• „,i, .
.. ..A. • „I'.4- , .•i". ''',.._AT,.,-,.'
'. '•V,:,.itibiiiki,;;1 1: ',-..• •,. '':,..;,,,t.., .,L,,6 ..,.._,- -. .1 Z. - . .A
,
' '''..ii, 4 •r" ... ---- --"4 I-..'II'..,:',. ..
. -=•-- . ''
•
' . ' . . •
' .
'
A . .•
. •
I
I.1 •-,._. I I' I. • . , :,.• 1
. 1
i. . . t .., . .
•
i I 4 ‘t• . .1.-- - .. . . - •. • - • -• . . i - . ; .•._ . I .. ...
I '. . '• • I A L
r. i
. .1"I ' ,•4 ,p,
,- •Vytt...0"1149pylifililt!'4L-''''N'A' i.r. "' , i 011i-1. .. `. :.-- Li ' • , i i ,. i -T. -.,,1
' • • rt., - • .,,, , .L_CI,..C.‘- --, r, -. L,+,. , , F,,o,,.,.. , • .. 01,01-..,i 1 . i.1,..,,, . ., ..,. ,,,,.; ._, . „.- :in..„..s-..,t.:14, .„ ,..., .6 ..
L; :u4.1..1..• 11'' '1.1,1' '. '•-' .•i 4.A L'i'4o.'''1+.';''111.1'''''''..i 1.6-!';:..F".'.1.i'.. :',.}}..'il 'i';''''..! ,....-•. .4.....,...4 4.'4C...:4 i'~01 :... i.,.041.- ,.ft•. v---4!i r .-i",::;,-'eh::...--Iii% .-.2 •.. i ..' 11.i. ; ...%
„•,....,-.,-,,-.... ..,:,...,.-ro.4.i.,,.:„...........:.. .'..,.,......kiV,1-,%,./.1...::011.101.41i....,."1-ii,l'Aj..:T.11..g 1,1 5 .4.11.. r I.I?,,::1,lii N....;....!.,,..0,-..,{-,.,-..,.. .... A.404) ." .5..-.4-4S.ille.35' it,14;Ne;!:k I..1.••I' ef Ir..'"r'..: '...'•-•,„"."'' i.ro'j :.•.:,,,i,;--i:•.
Troiti:•;,..4,.....4 •_.,....-,A....-1-Jei'.41:..f.1"-',,. '-'4:Ivo= t,..•,..q.-,..P.,i,.-cAr.-,,,.:t.t.:r,t; ,owi.,..--.,,3,74-•.: -,4740. •...!1.454. ' •-.,'1 :;,1)131 '. ,.• ,. f.ri•V-...,i.-•••1) v J.,';•1141%-,' riiktrq‘i,_.''''?'.„
?T..• r,'AO..*e.1,FA.5. 1.-r•,-.1-,..-,ik.. II. ..„d. -,.!,,,i...i.. .:,k.i.20.- ..-:,,,14,i0 1...• ,.........'17 ir:•.:....4........111-;r i:,,,,,,,,i 4..0.::_r:..%. - '').i:il.-', ',„...%ir..'• , ,;r1, ; -1..-, '',,r-ii ,
..:'7''''''f. 'I.'N.!'•.'11.44:--,-i 1 1,'4.l•.?".t,-4•i.''-.1- .,_4'I '.nc,k.,•40, ';!,0•'`:Ii•dift'14{-r•i•Ipv,:ii.'!•'-•••=7,E.2'A-.:••'••• el:...•••.4:-k.„,_-1,''''..-A•.1_., r''' ,, *;;Z•V,.,-•i•11 :,riert::', : .,,, •••..•b.,,,,.I.C. :71A r;YI:.;•''A 11;.,, .
_..,. I i., f
4
...-...e. ..__,--. ,., _ „:„.,_it,.,,,..,.:,..,.,,,:„,..;,,,,,,i.„,.,..,., ,),. ,.,,... „,,,„,E.,0 1' -9kSi.`..ir:LN -'._1:14-:::.-..' 1:-1 IV.•IV.---...A.'.'. ..Q.L.• .i-.... --.7-'1?--•-',2-4.,:".0 2 I;r4.0"-11.-.I..''' ' -!:rf.,', :'414. .% -Aq ' 4.' /J.(-
ldt.
.-„:„ .;,...elit .. ..._ 40'. - i•••-.t...)0p,)--,,g5. .. ro.A.....-r .' ;A_,.- L 01,,f4mi....,,-,;,;,.1,4441 ,....,,,,:c ,-,,,,--1. .,....-..x_...... 0 L.,,,,•;,,,i.e,. ... •.•_•,•-..,,,,rt., .,.,... ...„: .../.1 .1 -,.• 1,••
0,i,„••••,,. ....,..1., ._,,,P_,,,"4 .1r-',f1r41,.. . '4•!,...)-rt,..1.',LL, ...-.." l'A.-7-17;*frat.4„..ittp,,',- Frt_tt,...,'1 t.:'.;Ad--4,-k_.L.: -....,1-4.A.-__ :',f.....k" LIAI: ..(7` ,iq'It.' .#..,irip,i,,.,&Ai.'..."i' Zit.
r,'.',-',',!,• 1,1 1,&.1q.'' ,c, ortvi, ...-. .,..t.-.i..1 „L_. „,..A7,4.1.4z...g,:Frg.!-,„9„."'"If .-. ....1. " '''.".7.4NS...4:',..kritli_.-.11...,. .. ' : .-:•r„.4-10't,;;:.;,.,,..;,- , '0,',,,24;;;Lo.,-',.y'5004 .i..i„... ix IA--1' .r_e_4......... •..
114.0.L
-,-./.!, '4.--'1:,f !Tr:, ':.''..":„.PC.-..,,:-.11--;'4 4.--1 .1,01:;.''41,_,::"lk',7'Irzs:ki''''',.._1-. -,"!--..4%-.:.r",4--:4•-•,14,91-`,,:.p'.-.1..-,V.,-r.:,!'t..14*,.'-'7,`--.1..,...\ • ' -_-1,j.."•:_01-',.:c(F1'i.,..)..trit.Z.:-..,_:,17610,,,,,'!h-,,-,:4411.1stfr,-1.,..t.. .. i.d41.1.,A.....r.z.;.::0; 1:14.1".1 L'.:':.-.14.: "-...:.4.',..:3-',..,...:i....1
...• ,a,,....,,t,,, .., r•41 1,.._.4..,,*..--_ A.i'L. .' '`.17117.. 1.':VEI•-•o%'."7:"4- 47. r•,,--.."!;:...--.. .'qt:- --1,:•••:‘,..!:4-1,, ' _iit..14.;...." ::,Tif: . • _._...kr„,,i...2ril.,......ickot4w4i.c.,.i.i...1....,41:....:41.: i....:,.....:t. .,:,.,i.:4.i....4,0:t:c.,:......j.„.. ...ktrasiv.7.....„:„............,
.,..,,,,.. i ,.,,, .- ...,‘ 4, • •.• -.4,,, ., ......,,-,.... ..-1.,,,,,,,,t,1,-,,,,,-.. .-..ZiAAN",,,!.„1„r ,;:1A,1' 'II'..j.•,,,-(.1-4011,..':,'.. '• • - - ' .. •1.• .0.r..,..,. , .
,...: ::'.-.:,.:,........-....:10z.. .s:•....,.,5-,v.;.A-fir.-+.- .,•! i..413.%_,,--.0,fr7.%,-.,,,,t,„. 4.,:•.+,7_, .„.1..;),...7,4_;;.1.•N!„...,..:.,0 -,•1:1•••.-0. . .:-. .1 AL..' li:n-r- ''. - •".4..,-1-4t.'''''''''6':, 4 44-.2'-',6.'
;......,•,:-.1....?„,-..Ac. tT--,--._ .:. .., -..\.?"1",--14.1..9V3:1i:LT•-ekt, ,---'i'Ff1.7.IILLN:::..'.._It.'61.4A-,1 J ...'•!,'..,.••••;,h1_ • ..,_ .
, hi : „ .0....1 et. . .... ...... ,,„.i.r ,,,...4 . ...•174-. .:3-..,,,,.i-,t.,,
1:1-ilv- ---• - , •-.!--.V • -..-', .,
.--..•,_.•-":-1- 7?7,-;:-K-:0', 4-*17:t.i.i,A• 17,1t--i,lr -...r.'.-.".-SI.21-.0r.... ...i3.ii•---.!,f!...2-.":"....0.1.r.IT;.1;',),..ic i .1 , '
i .._ • ..."--._.•$-_. ,'-‘1- 'v.5'2.T.yr.40A., •''''4 14
--'-!-ZIAA.'''.- - .., -‘••.`k•-51''L,•-n•r''''F.,5.-C,f•h"6:---..t.-4:0p17.--.,...4,4;:,.--;.,,....v.i.7,..L.,1 ..,,,,,,,. i ,,f i . . _. i _ ..,,___ ., ,, iti,.
,' -s•,-,-;-- ., •.. . I. 4'. ''''''4.1C7f.:, ....
_...:,.-....A,,v,,•._....-...1-..::•„1-,!.s.,-.4f......,..', ,"--.71,,,,::,..,.- t ,.....,A): .',..?-..04%114 --,..-,It--_- 44...1....1;,• :,-,1. r../.. . i-.4 •... •.. • ,:...-Ifeetz:*,,)1:,?.:-ir ' Egt.-. .‘; - - ,i.--.1.,.i-:,:.• .,_ _ - . 1
.,. . .., ,. „„,..1,„1 .,...h.,_,....e,-.4„..••._1..1.,..1 ....1-, -•,... 1 ...• ;;., - _ • -4"rt :,r:,t,''''-'-`7,''''' .'
--":...0.'1.'1. P.,..--:-.4.-...,- ,..• ..• -...-1---• J I.•., • ..•4........-,. .4-,,._., 0,..-1.ri, p., ,, . „., .. . .
. i
t 7,.:,.:1«.4%:;,•-..,...••-. ,-......„--',.-;p. ..._„,i-v.„, ,....t.„:. : ..,!. . 1..".z.•rio ••,•S....:4- ;..„ ,..r". v,:",.• . 1.• yi ' ., -, • 1.;:-.- i' '''''., "'/.. `:47L. ,.',1,(,'-:'::-`Cr '-i•••••;""1.6., . .....:':•7 .c a•-•...
;4..t ..-:,' :. % 1.'74& .! .:-'-'7r1:1A•q '-..
rt,::-.-tr,,k r: 44._r_i_41,..:,,ii;...- -,..,,,:,1„:.. ,._ ..,,. .._:.,1 6'di;-t- 'J-1!)I :'. - i 1 - - • , •• ,''V. ) .;-; ' ,4., .„:.,-,,,,,, „.,.,„ ,:.„ ..,..7.,r,-.
...
.....,„,..2._, ....... ..„,.,.:_, .. , .,.„,,...:..,,,.,,,.,...,:,,..,.... ..,-,,,,p,,,-.1,--.....-.. ..,1,..---- \ -. 'cl..,..-.'-YN"..;-.\•• ,1 . ' •- t..j' 0. $1 A:417" t .1
'"1",..•--. .. ' -• . li...."• ,4••L!:. ',.- . _ rikk,•-.. .X, ...1.'WA...- '. ,. •
'• . .. •-'',IF:-xj1..bl...-.4.,J.i..,...4.'4.'....";...i, -1 L'.....4.:2.1 fe•-....'.• 11:IP.L'."644:':--.21.P.;1-471-.P--tl'7'''':::•-'•":1"ill li-..1:'•••-.. ! .I\1-
)
:?1'44",f(!!ir 41."-I-PW:i..1"r04.1:_r"...':11.• !-,e.N.if .-..-7--2_,.`::---e4 -...-.....;:-. ,'.:1.2.1 . ..... .. : .
3 0. 1 2 inl-Ig 1 g 6 8 QF i 01 / 07 / 2021 12 : 01PM AHUT2US . , .
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT2
Year 2 (2021 Data)
4.5
39
37
35 4.0
33
31 —
3.5
29 -
c 27 c
i 25 3.0
23Ll25days
' - :co
ns lik\\111
21 2.5 Q
o 19 —_
m 17 — m
15 2 073
ce4..,
13
11 V'
9 1.5
7
111\ L
5 1.0
3 I 1 —
0.5
IY
-111 II 11111
JI-5 _�I _ I. ■I ■ I NNI ii 'I . (C' ft1 i. J 0.0
F-� F- F- F- N N W W W A A A Ul Ul Ul Ul Ol Ol Ol V V V 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 F-• F-• F-• F-• F-•
FA FA N W FA N N FA N FA FA N FA FA N W FA N W FA N W l\O FA N W NA N \ \ \ \ \
F-, I- I- O O N N \ I- I- \ I- I- I- O O O O O O lO lO 00 00 00 I- N V I-�
I-� N N N N N I-� N N I-� N N I-� N N N N N N N N N I-� N N I-� N N N N

Table 15E. UT3 Downstream Channel Evidence
UT3 Downstream Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 119 234
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

f
Photo 5: UT3 Downstream Channel Evidence
A.. JY.
y f
ti. i
1
•
r•' I - .lit r I I. J 1y' i' • • i�v.T4.1 -:.' 1 1 ' • _
'01 ..,.. . l rl �'S • • ' ,w '�'. AR • • l V4 yF.. .�,�y 7 r .'�I� yR ,�� Y •' I. 'I
-4 1 , j [,I':. -_i_. ,� _a.r .' ' ;. ;Jr+q ..iJ ti+?.':�:!'!M1,• � fe;. _lr ''.i
''5'+ 1�f ? 4:+rt i ti' :jSr f�. ^`�'•
`'+.i ?Cy .. •
. -k.i.;;I •'• --..1.7. '•.' #.-
111A1C r:�'�k '?i' t- mot[ .Z i E'' ��.,� ry.3.
%
'+#..r r ='ri
P . t LF n „r • .Y..ima £- .~--T. F,, • .+'*: L� '� `� �`� fit'.:: . • •- -ti_ -: 4 .. {{ ~ ;yo<= �-.['
I' it `:-..:^'.
£;.1 t ,' ,. . ti ,yam 4- . T y S' --_'a s'1
•
\. •
•
•
4
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT3 Downstream
Year 2 (2021 Data)
4.5
39
37 - -
35 - 4.0
33 -
31 -
3.5
_ 29 -
27 - c
> 25 234 days 3.0
a 23 I o
N 21 2.5 Q
m
m 17 c
2
N 15 2.0 ce
\/111I
13IliVi\11 11 $11 ' jt\fl
9 ^ 1.5
7 `/
5 I I I 1.0
3
1
.4 II I J I - 0.5
5 �� Y I �. �I ■ I I r Ili ,. ., I r ` I I. J 0.0
I-, I-, I-, 1-3 NJ NJ W W W 43. -13. 43. Ul Ul Ul Ul 01 01 Ol V V V 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 I-. I-. I-. I-. I-.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I-. I- NJ I-. I-. NJ W I- NJ W I-. NJ U) lO I-. NJ 00 I-. NJ
N N N 0 0 - NJ NJ \ N N \ N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 00 00 00 N NJ V 1-
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 - V
1-3 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 1-3 NJ NJ 1-3 NJ NJ 1-3 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 1-3 NJ NJ 1-3 NJ NJ NJ \ \ NJ \
1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 NJ NJ 1-3 NJ
1-3 1-3 I-

Table 15F. UT3 Upstream Channel Evidence
UT3 Upstream Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 136 127
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

r„" 5 } ; �.p�' = Photo 6: UT3 Upstream Channel Evidence I� .. 4 r f,,�� r,3 ��'r �IN i
f t ,l'.s 4 - f TM - 5 i a- 1 - '. 4 F. t
L' ++ ! '- nr - ' 1:'' j _r -.._.e. Jt,M ! • :• p • , . 1 f I rG} ,
II
�'i; 'r�l �l 1 i '�� - r. { .�:'N,[ ':X,.ait � � .�=x- 1 - n �} - r. 'r }' E� t �1 Jlls. �1'
ce: i I .' li' - Y ,. .r t + _ 0. .f �, w - - ' Cii 1.'"i
•
,, ;r-f �', I I. ;I.
-i.. : ..: - ..', 1 r } ! r r '7 1 _- sue'/.4• .;:r,- f4 •i1q '� -[ - i' �� .i'.'?Fh'f j;i!',- _:ft
:r! :'ijd. % . y.' ti.- - ; [_, .i_ ''1 f fl •1 , _ ;kV- - ; # 4 • + !-• ja;S 1'; # �4,} ,_,' ', s. •I T 3 .[._.�,1, •p y
,� ..,,' JI. i 17 + 4',l :, , r ',. s r!g�}r ikL R..y 0. r `�%Ffr a_:"-! :.' ^F- j ,fit
(r'rt;a 3 • • +ri r"' , • .r �2 , Ir ?•1.+ I'ti•� y'f ��'. jf� a f lf,• i.fi +�� •S ,f '{y}i��i '
• -:] i tit + rJr {,�} 1 `i
•
•
�,ac r• r L� y r:i;_,i -f 1,1 A :ti ; j r .[''' .'-4i r !b!' , I}. 1:1: Y. I r +-. I
kF. k {' r -S. a..S S'i- ro.-Jo. '# Q�II --+N1' s`-,i}` `.4-• '4;+,'. • - I 7 fie+ �.▪ r�+ - f+ - •�l
•
r, II i1 .ke{r • •d_ „ i :IF' .v 1 ti. r f .T fy r� Ir Y
. -'*'Y rS5 �'' �r�r '•�Y� �:- 5q`T'•'° t f~ fi, r e r ��r. 1�,. }
:rs. ��l� r A. � ��'�-ir �� r�!'. r�'��r - K �,.1. �' i irk i�rt��'- -+ _ _ f'ri
.Ir.�:a .� • � �! ',�{� 7 . ;-r - �'� }*r i ��,�}'_ aIT���•F�-?w�x,,=ti✓<r ti� �'��'ti-�e;: '�: �ii"tt .r �
ri l.1 'I r'-' ' -Y, J - `' .i'.' Li
Y+' 0•. '^ ,r rri. -.r r _ • iTi •'a' .r !' 1 + - •1Y .' NgF � - r,`r.' ` . 'r
131;y 4 G ! r - : ,: '4'Vr ,.,� ) r. •- ' } rj..�' J Y r� ' y ' f 3e r,r /i�. j
',1 i. �ri' ' .11„/+11 .{�!. 1,``. ..... ,.. -{L's` f�4 i , - , ,. , -,' + `�4',7y�,,r1y. r `�} 3 -A ti �r�-." ".�,}.�
, .
�� { Jai' Y 'r{ Y ;: (;I_ , I i - ' ' + f 7't �, ^"r r., ;fx, ;n a
;,� . iif i- +41
l f r r S I
je1.
�'. .`1 r .l 'r+ J•, !+' rl _ - lif ▪ to _ r gyp. -ij. .ar .f�-� . 4+.
,' Ih�r.6±. k ' t. �1,.. I ..1 r 4 ' .i ` 1- �, .� k 'k K_r 3,
43' +x' ,'{. ,
I.
s! A{ !. i. M1 _r� 1�%� Fy€�R �� 1 rT. a "`". .•.•
'"�,.�r , r.' •j v *. .d1�t.� f .-':l`': ".riit[ _ 1 �` .-r 4+ - y f r I ,ry{fk y, -c -d,; -M .6f. � ' Fie• • '4i• y!". ri
;r. ,^e.. r _:,( . l '. , - ,, 5' +' L. f T 4:5f r {'S. a a: 4 y�5 • J r a►
:nr f fr'J ff 4} r- _J4rj
i r•
• fJ JJl • -, ...i.7.-.-. 'y' rl '._ilivi
j } 1 } �1 f /, - pp
.fie. : -..,-
.').
140
34 30 . 41 +nHg } 6 661E 03 l 1 1 12 21 $ : 4 AM AHUT3R1
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT3 Upstream
Year 2 (2021 Data)
4.5
39
37
35 4.0
33
31
3.5
_ 29 —
27 - - C
i 25 - 3.0
23 - — 3
ao
ns
21 2.5 Q
o 19
m
kiLij
m 17 �
ar
11(11
H
15 2.0 �
13
11
9 127 days 1.5
7
SILs5 ,v. 1.0
3
1 )
1 11 w..oi..--. 0.5
1-*\'''..-
3 JI LI I. i ■I I �� I I I :1 LTTI . I I I. 1
-5 0.0
F-, F-, F-, F-, N N W W W A A A Ul Ul Ul Ul Cr. Cr. Cr. V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lO F-• F-• F-• F-• F-•
F\-, F\-, N W FA N N FA N FA FA N FA FA N W FA N W FA N W l\O FA N W FA N \ \ \ \ \
F, F, F, O O N N \ F, F, \ F, F, F, O O O O O O lO lO 00 00 00 F, N V F,
I-� N N N N N I-� N N I-� N N I-� N N N N N N N N N I-� N N I-� N N N N
FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA N N FA N
FA FA F-

Table 15G. UT4 Channel Evidence
UT4 Channel Evidence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 130 228
Presence of litter and debris(wracking) Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes
Matted, bent,or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes
Change in plant community(absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and/or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long Yes Yes
duration, including hydrophytes)
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or channel braiding) Yes Yes
at natural topographic breaks,woody debris piles,or plant root systems
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow No No
Other:
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

�, • Photo 7: UT4 Channel Evidence
r.4.
. s.r..v, , ,....„
•
__ __ 4::, -..--1-.--'---fx,„-.. /Ir.-
,a =. - ._ .ter 'i►c y -- -• r" , - - _
ti.'414.Ar. t 4.,rr J.- . . ..- . '--- , ,
•
d f s 164 •_ 14 ' =
c i'wT 1ti'! r"
f4ixi,
s i?
] }i•.\ppt' +� ems.. . _ Z• _ 4_ .
.l.z.4.7-i
�i '140 Y j:f
4
- _,.. „----,,„..-.{,...:.: ,,.... .. _
. _.. „..._:, ,,,t,..„; - .. •
_..... . .... ..------„,..,.,. ... • _
.- i.„-,. 7.-- . ' -',F,L- ,. '..:•„`':,-:,-F,
•
•
. - y`. ' l t -jam 4-� %v St
i • r
.f ib r - - , ., �' _ 1, y
•
.r =ray,.z7+`' ' '1-. 4. ,k. : s-
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT4
Year 2 (2021 Data)
4.5
39
37
35 4.0
33
31 3.5
29 -
c 27 c
i 25 3.0
J 23 3
ar 0
N 21 2.5 Q
m
E 17 c
N 15 2.0 ce
13
11
9 1.5
7 228 days
5 I �� �1� , 1.
3
1
- 0.5
-3 _J I1 . 111 II. , 1 .I II IId . 11 , 1 II I. ii I J h i i . I I IA-50.0
F-, F-, F-, F-, N N W W W A A A Ul Ul Ul Ul Ol Ol Ol V V V 00 00 00 lO lO lO F-. F-' F-. F-. F-'
F- F- N W I- N N I- N I- I- N I- I- N W I- N W I- N U) lO I- N 00 I- N
F, F, F, O O N N \ F, F, \ F, F, F, O O O O O O lO lO 00 00 00 F, N V F,
N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ 00 00 \ V
FA N N N N N FA N N FA N N FA N N N N N N N N N FA N N FA N N N \ \ N \
FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA FA N N FA N
FA FA F-

Table 16. Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data Photo
Collection Date of Occurrence Method (if available)
Stream gauges and trail cameras captured a
April 30,2020 April 30,2020 bankfull event at UT3 after 1.17 inches of rain was 1
documented between April 30 and May 1,2020 at
an on-site rain gauge
Wrack and laid-back vegetation were observed
November 19,2020 November 12,2020 outside the TOB of UT1 after 3.61 inches of rain 2
was documented between November 12 and 13,
2020 at a nearby weather station.
Stream gauges and trail cameras captured a
March 16,2021 March 16,2021 bankfull event on UT1, UT2,and UT3 after 2.35 3-5
inches of rain was documented on March 16,
2021 at an on-site rain gauge
y
Photo 8: UT3 at bankfull stage. F -
f t l
.
i
i� � � _ ,',�� ..� d f ^rr5;x�9' .. -.1 {¢1- Jr. = � r
� _ � .� t
_. : 9 +y ~ ; �� rTRi s1` � ;
�� R j pi . �_.,.-4,'-_w=• _ _ 4 � s - _w f __ -.'" fir. `G
•
- Wi t,`-1 .:t,„.,,1 '!• ti_ _3S' .377y— +__l i w_. - '• Yr> ,t' _ ..'',.•-.ei,-F!• •
•
•
:? '• ' - - - {.l - _ ,_'" ,; r.,. 1 cry-•'_ I: ,,: .„-
? - •_•fir-. •.!,e A' y1'' i...
r�-., -.1: ter,_ -,.•.iy'-S
('ysh `-: _- =,.Fa: = --_y •_- `ma's a�. ,ti
r1' �- --=- • -- ----.7 - �'-� - ems : :;' _AFL:.-- ..__ - _ .'^DS'
per - ::_` ,a - -
y_ _„�
_ -fir - = ti '
1 _ ryeTi&á
sV �+ +d�4
fity•x` .ham •• �t:*Iti-
et:-: -�.-:. sa •-• . :w.v��.
29.67infig ' 9, 68'F Ill 04 / 30 / 2020 04 : 35PM AHUT3R1
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Photo 9:Wra TOB outside the ofck UT1and after alaid-back bankfull event.vegetation
'�•� Y����nfY � cl,3,c /1T- §k S Olt,
.yp.,r �F - 7..�4Q1 1(J+r �'•id ! I^6
L '.' s yxr1F ,r1<i�.'" 4, ^ ., - b :.�.; Olt -.1ac} �s= P 1.F 1 '� , 1
' •
- +I v<T ql �1 cn Misr', t'Yi Ftl�,
5„ riC ' 3'x- 1., F • %:f Y�.7 ' f • yr, a�1�' ',}
� `
y f 1 x J �+
x
i, , - lv d1 4 t .4)� % e y: s 'b , f F-r y --'':'
\ti
S.
1.
.5 1�'gi �;�hli It '' L 11 F7 ,'t v �t s , J sg Y , 4 . -'.f. I , yr l e f ; 1a t ;.r ,.. � Apilltia !YF pr r / -.:.Y E fi . �„ „f f i 12 ." f .. h 3y. y £ •
4' aj ' y' ,;r�v P y'; 1,0 ir. a 'y„ e,y:fi, : -4 L3 $, .i 7 .no- a -/ ,,,r , .^� - kr auh
k..,
f.- 61 'a �� ,.„ ,c "F >TrF y ` " -4 ._ 1!;-
N '�"^'-w �ig� ,z-
X 9/ f, ��jeyN'�y' ! '�,�7!`� �e"` � �yy�.‘/ •F ,. + 4 },,, f Iq I Il � 4p ��. T�`i � i3
14
,� ,- 1 '' ' p �j�,/�':�� °'t.1 I. a.� `,.ME''' r i �,,. scar- \ �.�r`A. 4.....�.. f .� \ f,may,
/'A S I S.. '.�..„ a kW 5 . �f.E-`v' li`,t r VY �.. �'. �1�'f7 ;c,
!�].qi ��I� 1,F\y �, y Y\fl?kF < I , t4Cu�:t2F.`AS 1HF3'nr_41N.aTI'a':\,d.RI�S3.x—s1 1 �'S R 1 Is •r 1 f ' I ¢ c 1 _... -. t f r 1b C 9, r}'1 ' •� 1i �� 3,,
tY i t � � I fRi I �{- �+ ��x i '4 Ni', ;4 I- ; r
�t�',Il,(;� l ,� ' �I �a ''l' 1 Photo 10: UT1 at bankfull stage gat y ',�; $�
I I fir .1 L _ 1 i }�, x �Liirkii j ` >•
IO ��'Y �J,,1�, 181 a r-. ��,,, - r. 1 -�I' ,,, Ix;1 l p{�'_' 1 ly nr 1� I{.
a V
111S�i. I r�s —x „Ile'I €
. of o • t yf
% , rk
II\ " i,i!.-It--Z: /
I
,j
\ — • • } '
48F a pHUii )03/16/202103:08PM
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

'ti j1 Photo 11: UT3 at bankfull stage. ,
I j
ti .4
l
re
• as-ti.r ,.. ?
1' ti L
isrL. - - -_ —�.,,,, iv,.4... `-,_� , y
. . _ . _ 2 ..._ _. :
re.
-'1 ' 4 ,...-3
_ __ _ ._ _
_ __ _. .... _ _ ___ PA`r r 46, f•
' lit. '' ,:-:i4. .14
'.1 . ....„.. - 4 . .".:401,:e*380.--Si.:
30.06inHg ' A 48°F ) 03 / 1 6 / 2021 03 : 05PM AHUT3R2
7 H s,r,lr.„
1115R9117. , t
1
y'`{ I,j'. f':/r'1 f Photo 12: UT4 at bankfull stage. ,`' r,, `' "'.,' '
r.
{ {I('Y �E� k `feltrii. Iiiist I r ' `,1 f ,.L.i'r r r.1-' i l p! z - i�,' I ri.,,,...&,,,,,,„.„,,,,„,:r,,.....„ ,..„'.il.!:,,
�'y r1.4�—V_V + .` ,� ^r .• ..7 r� + � r_._ 1 .,.
•!r•., •,, r r ,, ,, s77k } :'�`.. ,`f{R, lt;t�f , ; '4. .'7,.}F cy, it , . ��i. �r�` ,'>tit;-, ,irl.�r. " - � 1: � '� `bs;'•,�dyl'i'' t �Alf r� - "q t4;, .Y
11
'
_ $ rr• 1 ' ' ;a e � , F P ar )
IR,(
•
'' =� 1 ;Iti/:
..tiffs
\ .- I,.v.-..:.. __)
f. \_ `1 •
��..a, mom' -_,..• ,, . a',
30.03inH9 t 9 42°F ) 03 11 6 / 2021 03 : 05PM AHUT4
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Figure E l: Alliance Headwaters
30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Current year data from onsite rain gauge
30-70th percentile data from WETS Station: Smithfield, NC
12
m 10
(I)
2020
o
8 — 2021
' 1 2022
o I
2023
6
a 2024
4
30th Percentile
70th Percentile
2 —
0

Alliance Headwaters Soil Temperature
Year 2 (2021 Data)
90.00
88.00
86.00 -
84.00 -
82.00 -
80.00 -
78.00 -
76.00
74.00
72.00 -
70.00 -
68.00
66.00 -
64.00
LL 62.00 March 1:
a 60.00 - 53.31°F
E 56.00
a
I- 56.00 -
N 54.00 - 111
52.00
50.00
48.00 R
46.00 \ Lowest temp.
44.00 \' after March 1:
42.00 47.59°F
40.00
38.00
36.00 - -
34.00 -
I 1-, N N W W - - U"i U'7 Ol Ol v v v 00 00 lD lD
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O 0 N N
N I-, N I-, N lD N �I N I-s W I-s N I-s N \ \ \ \
U"i lD N Ol N Ol W \ Ol O W �I 0 00 N
N \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ N \ N \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ lD
I-, N N N N N N I-, N I-, N I-, N I-, N N N N N N N \ N \
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, N I-, N
I- I-
Date

Table 17. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
1 No Yes
9 days(3.6%) 37 days(14.9%)
2 No No
9 days(3.6%) 21 days(8.4%)
3 Yes Yes
55 days(22.2%) 86 days(34.5%)
4 No Yes
10 days(4.0%) 36 days(14.5%)
5 Yes No
29 days(11.7%) 19 days(7.6%)
6 No No
16 days(6.5%) 20 days(8.0%)
7 No No
7 days(2.8%) 8 days(3.2%)
8 Yes Yes
50 days(20.2%) 51 days(20.5%)
9 Yes Yes
75 days(32.7%) 93 days(37.3%)
10 Yes Yes
72 days(29.0%) 58 days(23.3%)
11 Yes Yes
64 days(25.8%) 42 days(16.9%)
12 No Yes
18 days(7.3%) 36 days(14.5%)
13 No Yes
20 days(8.1%) 58 days(23.3%)
14 No Yes
16 days(6.5%) 44 days(17.7%)
15 No No
13 days(5.2%) 18 days(7.2%)
16 Yes Yes
34 days(13.7%) 70 days(28.1%)
17 No Yes
19 days(7.7%) 36 days(14.5%)
18 No No
10 days(4.0%) 19 days(7.6%)
19 No No
8 days(3.2%) 10 days(4.0%)
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Table 17. Groundwater Hydrology Data(continued)
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
(2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026)
20 Yes Yes
36 days(14.5%) 58 days(23.3%)
21 Yes Yes
34 days(13.7%) 36 days(14.5%)
22 Yes Yes
69 days(27.8%) 56 days(22.5%)
23 Yes Yes
35 days(14.1%) 42 days(16.9%)
24 No No
5 days(2.0%) 14 days(5.6%)
25 Yes Yes
46 days(18.5%) 55 days(21.1%)
26 Yes Yes
167 days(67.3%) 88 days(35.3%)
27 Yes Yes
74 days(29.8%) 57 days(22.9%)
28 Yes Yes
45 days(18.1%) 49 days(19.7%)
29 Yes Yes
45 days(18.1%) 81 days(32.5%)
30* NA Yes
38 days(15.3%)
31* NA Yes
98 days(39.4%)
32* NA Yes
58 days(23.3%)
33* NA Yes
42 days(16.9%)
34* NA Yes
55 days(22.1%)
35* NA Yes
42 days(16.9%)
Ref* NA Yes
51 days(20.5%)
*Prior to the MY2(2021 growing season,six additional wetland gauges were installed in areas of the Site RS felt needed additional
data points(near GW19,near vegetation plot 31,near GW 7,at the upstream portion of UT 2,and across UT 1 from GW 11-12).
Additionally,a reference groundwater gauge was installed in the wetland preservation area at the headwaters of UT 3 and 4.
Monitoring Report MY2(Project No.97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems,LLC
Johnston County,North Carolina December 2021

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 1
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 I Start Growing Season — - 4.0
10 March 114.9% End GrowingSeason
8 I 37 Days -
6 —I i November 4
4 _1 Mr IV _ 1 - 3.5
2 Anil
0 1.► � 11111■I - 3.0
-2 1
v
-4
> -6
v
� -8 1 1 - 2.5 �:.
ns -10
13 -12 o
-14 2.0 a
c7 -16
4-
-18 ` .�
20 1 *ra-
ce
- 1.5
-22 10A.1 1 \ 14/11JLA - 1.0
-24
-26
28
-30
-32
-34 -1 - 0.5
-36 I
-38 JI I . I I 1 II I I II 1 IIl I 1 II J 1 iI . I I�
-40 0.0
I-- I-- I- I- NJ NJ W W W - - - U1 U1 U1 U1 01 01 01 �I v v 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 F-, F-, F-, I- I- I- I- I- I-'
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I-, 1_, 1_, N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W l0 I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ I- I- I- 0 0 \ NJ NJ \ I- I- \ I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ l0 l0 \ CO CO CO I- N v I- N v I- N
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ co co \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ NJ \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- N N
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 2
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 — 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 21 Days -8.4% November 4
6 - 3.5
4 —ir- 1 --I--
nllo• 2 1. - 3.0
a, -4 j1(Nipvi
_
- 2.5
as -6
_1a, -8
3 -10 0
- -12 Q
0 -14 1 i ' 2.0
713
0 -16 C
-18cc
0 1 k
-20 1.5
-22
-24
lf14111.. L v.
-26
-28 1.0
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-331 ,IIiI1 , 1Ilj- -n7—I , Ii . IIIli1, itIIIIi . I . I
-40 0.0
h, h, h, h, N1 N W W W Ul Ul Ul Ul Ql Ql Ql �I 00 00 00 lD lD lD I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-,
I- I- N W I- N N I- N I- I- N I- I- N W I- N W I- N W l\D I- N 0000 I- N 0 0 0 \ \ . \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD 00 00 00 I- NJ I- NJ I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- 1-s NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 3
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 — 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season — End Growing Season
8 — March 1 86 Days -34.5%
I
6 — 3.5
1
November 4
42
tiV4\0 1
- 3.0
-2
-4
1) -6
J -8 - 2.5 c
i
-10 • C
-12 o
c -14 2.0 E
a
o -16
(71
0 -18 c
-20 1.5
-22
-24
\il
-26
-28 •, 1.0
il
I
-30
-32
-34 0.5
-36
-38 .1i Uli i I I II I i Ilk 111111 11 I H ii . 111. 1
-40 0.0
I- F-, F-, F-, NJ NJ W W W - 4 4 U1 U1 U1 Ui 01 01 01 �I V V CO CO 00 <0 <0 <0 I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I--, I--,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I— I— I— N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I- NJ v I- NJ v I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ co co \ V V \ V V
I— NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I— NJ NJ I— NJ NJ I— NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I— NJ NJ I— NJ NJ NJ \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— NJ NJ I— NJ NJ I— NJ NJ
I— I— I— I— I— I—

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 4
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season
8 — End Growing Season
—
March 1 November 4
6 36 Days- 14.5% -- 3.5
4 I
2 I �► I
0-2 I i 3.0
441i A
a) -6
J g 2.5 N
+..
t -10 c
3 -12
12 -14 I 2.0 :al
0ill 1 li 1\11.L
o
-16 0 -18
-20 1.5
-22
-24
-26
-28 1.0
-30 I
-32
0.5
-34
-36 -
-38 JIli --
_ ill . 1 _ i 1 I Iv 111 Iii i. ii 1 r LI I . 1-
-40 - 0.0
1-, 1-, I- I- NJ NJ W W W A A A Ui Ui Ui Ui 6l 6l 6l �I V V CO CO CO l0 l0 l0 I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I—
......... \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - 0 0 0 N N N N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W l0 I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I— I— I— 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I— I— I— I— 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I— NJ v I— NJ v I— NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ pp Co - V V - V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-�

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 5
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 4.0
10 Start Growing Season
8 March 1 _ End Growing Season
6 November 4
3.5
I
4 I 19 Days -7.6% ■L
2
0 vii\\41
-2 I 3.0
_�—. -4
a' -6
-8 2.5 c
N r -10 '^
(a
-0 -12 0
c -14 2.0 E
° -16 a
w is
-18
I c
-20 1.5 ac
-22 r
-24 '
-26 T 1
-28 1.0
-30 I I
-32
-34 0.5
-36 II I
-38 .1I Li1. I I 1 I I l I 1 1 IIi 1Il JtiI . l .-400.0
I— I— I— I--, N N W W (A) 4 Ul U7 Ui U7 01 01 01 V V V CO CO CO l0 l0 l0 I- I- I- I- I- I- I-- I-- 1-
--..... \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lfl I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I- NJ v I- NJ v I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ CO CO \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 6
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 — 4.0
10 Start Growing Season 8 March 1
I End Growing Season . _
November 4
li i
6
4 20 Days 8.0% 3.5
2 -
At\ 01 hil 1 1
0 3.0
2
c -6
-8Tv - 2.5 c
>
-10
v1 i
=
Vs -12 - o
c -14 2.0 a
o -16 T
0 -18 =
-20 - 1.5 Ts
ac
-22
-24
-26 11
- 1.0
-287
I
-30
411\H
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 —
I ii-38
I I- . . I I 1 II _ _ I Iii III il
.1 1 1 r ■ i
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- NJ N W W W . . . Ui U'7 U'7 Ui Ql Ql Ql •v •v •v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I--� I--� I--�
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJW I- NJ NJI- NJI- I- NJI- I- NJW I- NJW I- NJW lD I- NJ00 I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 — NJ NJI- I- — I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD — CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ\ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJNJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-
L

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 7
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 November 4
6 r 8 Days-3.2% I - 3.5
4
2
0
-2 - 3.0
-4
c -6 l
_ 8 - 2.5
Tv
ai 10 1 I c
J c
a, -12 0
3 -14 2.0 a
-16 4co
o -18 co
cc
0 -20
- 1.5
-22
-24
-26 '
-28 1 - 1.0
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I I I
38 I I li ill l 11 I i II 1 I1 LI I I`�
-40 0.0
I-, I-, I-, I-, N N W W W .i. .i. .i. Ui U'I U'I Ui at C C �I v v CO CO CO l0 l0 l0 I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 N N N N N N
I- I- NJ W I-, NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I-, NJ W I-, NJ IN l0 I-, NJ CO I-, NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N N N 0 0 — NJ NJ I- N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 — CO CO CO N NJ v I- NJ v I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ I-, NJ NJ
I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-,

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 8
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 Start Growing Season End Growing Season 4.0
10 November 4
8 March 1
6 I I - 3.5
4 I-
2 " _I 51 Days -20.5% I—
'' - 3.0
4 .\lt I
6
- 2.5
-8 —
J 10 \1\ok...1 0
L -12 - c
tf, C
3 -14 2.0
c -16 ` a
o -18 ,To
co -20 - 1.5 .s
-22 °C
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36
u II I ii
I-38 .I 1_ . . 1 I I L _ I 1 I i II i ii IL . I J I J
-40 0.0
-. -. -. -. N N W W W U1 U1 U1 U1 CT) CT) 01 V V V CO CO CO lD lD lD —. —. —. —. —. I-‘ —. —. —.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 F"` F"' N N N N
F- I— Ni W I— Ni Ni I— Ni I— I— Ni I— I— Ni W I— Ni W I— Ni W lD I— Ni 00 I— N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I— I— I— 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I— I— I— I— 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I— NJ v I— NJ v I— NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 0o co - V V - V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-�

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 9
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 — — - 4.0
10
8 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
6 March 1 93 Days- 37.3% November 4
4 I - 3.5
\ t
2 \ \I\III\it A
0
2 "A"it q
- 3.0
_ -4
\IY\i\in
c 6
w -8 - 2.5c\
w -10
J -.
m -12 0
-0a -14 2.0 a
g -16
'- -18 c
LI
-20 - 1.5 cc
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-38-36
I
.11_ 1 . . II i 1 1 i i I ■ III 11 1 1d J t 1 I ■ � i J-400.0
I- I- I- I- NJ NJ W W W . . -P. Ul Ul Ul Ul 01 01 01 �I V V 00 00 00 1.0 1.0 1.0 I--, I--, I--, I-, I- I-, I--, I--, I--,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O I- F-s I- N N N
I- I- I- O O N N I- I- I- I- I- O O O O O O l0 l0 00 00 00 I- N V I- N V I- N
N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N . . \ W W \ J J \ J J
I--, N N N N N I-, N N I-, N N I-, N N N N N N N N N I-, N N I-, N N N \ \ N \ \ N . \
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, N N I-, N N I-, N N
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I--,

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 10
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 4.0
10 - Start Growing Season 58 Days - 23.3% End Growing Season
8 - March 1
i
6 November 4
3.5
4 I - 1
2 I \ I\iN
- I
0 ft°41.144411%/4•14".\- 1%4
1 1 ,_
2 r 3.0
-4
-6
-_ -g 2.5
v
-10 I I
0
_112 c
v c
3 -14 I 2.0o
-16 \11\ a
3 -18 4-
o c
-20 1.5 •
-22
-24
-26
1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36
-38 _+L _ • I. I � J 0 ' l I Ii II i II 1 ii . t iI [ 1 i
-40 0.0
1-+ 1--, 1-, 1-, NJ NJ W W W -P -P -P Ui Ui Ui Ui 01 01 01 �I V V 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 I-, I-, I-, I-, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 CO CO CO I- NJ v I- NJ v I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ CO CO \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 11
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 4.0
10 - Start Growing Season ? End Growing Season
8 - March 1 42 Days- 16.9% ill II i November 4
6 - 3.5
4
11141‘14*
0
-2 I - 3.0
-4
c -6
- 2.5
8 c
1 -10
J 1
w -12
3 14 2.0
c II 11
-16
3 N
2 -18 �
-20
- 1.5 1
-22
-24
-26
-28
il 4111 - 1.0
-30
11\r
-32
-34 I - 0.5
-38
-40
.1 _ _ J1 , 1 . 1 , _ I 1 III 1 i 1 Ill ■ I i J
0.0
I' ,-� I- . NJ NJ W W W A A A Ul Ul Ul Ul 01 01 01 �I V V CO CO CO l0 l0 l0 I--, I-, I-, I-, I-, I--, I--, I--, I--,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O I' I' I- N N N
I-, I-, N W I-, N N I-, N I-, I-, N I-, I-, N W I-, N W I-, N W l0 I-, N 00 I-, N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- O O N N I- I- I- I- I- O O O O O O W l0 00 00 00 I- N V I- N V I- N
N \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N . . \ W W \ J J \ J J
I-, N N N N N I-, N N I-, N N I-, N N N N N N N N N I-, N N I-, N N N \ \ N \ \ N . \
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, N N I-, N N I-, N N
I-, I-, I-, I-, I-, I-,

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 12
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 - -
Start Growing Season End Growing Season
- —8March 1 36 Days 14.5% November 4
6 - - 3.5
4
jfl1L
ii
I)
- 3.0
_- -6
8 - 2.5 c
if) 10
ai
I
c
-12 - o
-0 -14 1 I 2.0 E
3 -16
o ,-
w -18 =
ic\fitL6.1
-20 1 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24 J H
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 -
-38 -I I- L _ I I I I I _ I I I 1 in1 1 II ii J t LI . i1 ] --400.0
, , , , NJ NJ W W W -P -P -P Ul Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-- I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 13
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season
8 - March 1 58 Days- 23.3% End Growing Season
6 November 4
4
I \,1 - 3.5
2 ,
0 I n
r1 ' I\ 11 11\1!
- 3.0
2
c
4
_- -6
8 - 2.5c
v
-10 +'
1 i C
i -12 t' o
E
-0 -14 V 2.0
C -16 a
73
o .-
0 -18 =
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30 I I I
-32
-34 0.5
-36 II
—
-38 . i I I I I I 1 i 11 II i i I1 ii i I_ `I J
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 14
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 November 4
6 - 3.5
4 _I 44 Days - 17.7% II III
0 I �.
-2 i 1 1 i A 1. - 3.0
c
4 I !
-6 I> -8 - 2.5 c
-10 +'
i 1\\Aiill C
12 O
-14 2.0 a
C -16
•
ons
0 -18
-20 ac
- 1.5
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30 I
-32
-34 0.5
-36 L
---40 -III- . • IIIIII I II Ih i IIIIJ 1 . iii 0.0
, , , , N N W W W -P -P -P U1 Ui Ui Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-- I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 — NJ NJ I- I- — I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD — CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 Co \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 15
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 Start Growing Season - 4.0
10 March 1 -
8 End Growing Season
November 4
6 - 18WI
Days- 7.2% ! - 3.5
4 _J 11
0
2 - u ii•I1
-2 - 3.0
c
Tv
-4
-6
- 2.5 c
>
8
L -10 +'
v I 1 i =
i -12 - o
-14 2.0 a
0 -16 4-
C
0 -18
-20 1 - 1.5 °c
-22I
Il
-24
-26
28 - 1.0
-30 I
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I I —
38 .IL _ id _I. I III II _ I Ii . Ili I I1 II J 1 LI ■ ii ]-400.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W .i. .i. .i. Ui U-I U-I Ui C C C �I v v CO CO CO l0 l0 LC) I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
I--� I-� N W I-� N N I-� N I-� I-� N I-� I-� N W I-� N W I-� N W (.0 I-� N CO I-� N 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 - V J - V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 16
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season 0 i\ End Growing Season
8 March 1 70 Days - 28.1% November 4
6 - 3.5
4
2
y i
2 e - 3.0
4
c -6
8 - 2.5 c
ai
-10 ` I z
if) `
-12 - o
-14 2.0 a
z -16
o ,�
0 -18 ._
-20 \141 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-2611 \ 4+
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36
-38 1� • I 11 I I . I . III IiI11 II _ kLI iLi
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I-- I-- I--�
I-� I-� N W I-� N N I-� N I-� I-� N I-� I-� N W I-� N W I-� N W l\D I-� N CO I-� N 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 17
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 36 Days- 14.5% November 4
6 - 3.5
4 I I
i I�► I-
111�1I■ I11IEll III i_ - 3.0
-2 _11M 1E11E11 II 1—
-6 MI MI■ I I—
> -8 I - 2.5 c
ai
11-10 +'
if) C
-12 0
-0 -14 2.0 E
C a
z -16
o ,-
0 -18
-20 \od.i j111, - 1.5 cc
-22
-24
-26 w✓�
-28 - 1.0
-30 I
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I —
-38 II 11 � I I Ii . III1 �� J �� ■ i J-40 ■ 0.0
I— I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ul Ul Ul Ul Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
1-- 1-- 1- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 18
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 — March 1 I11 November 4
6 19 Days- 7.6% II IL - 3.5
4 I 1111111111
2 ,
01\11 1 1
1 - 3.0
I-6Tv
-8 - 2.5 c
a,
v
-10 I c
% -12 - o
\I\ \il
-14 2.01.0
41111.
c -16 To
-0 --18 =
-20 I - 1.5 ac
-22
ii
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I I —
-38J1 _ . I � I II I II . In t .i 1IJ `I I 1 J-40 40 l0.0
F. F-, F-, F-, NJ NJ W W W -P -P -P Ul Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-- I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-
L

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 19
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 — - 4.0
10 - Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 - March 1 , November 4
- 3.5
4
4 10 Days-4.0%
2 , eilit"" ,( f
c
-4
_- -6
> -8 - 2.5 ,c
L -10 b +�
v =
i -12 - o
c -14 2.0 a
o -16 i lirt To
I.._
0 -18 =
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26 k.... �r
-28 - 1.0
-30 I
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36
-38
-40 .11 1 . . I. I I I 1 II I I I . III 11 1 II 1 k ii ■ I 11
0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql 01 01 v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W l0 I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 20
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season i i I, End Growing Season
8 I November 4
6 March 1 58 Days-23.3% 4 - 3.5
4
-2
0 11 1 i 2 - 3.0
-6
8 - 21 ili\411 .5c
ai
-10
12
I o
> -8 0
-14 P ] 2.0
a• -16 et
o .-
0 -18 o
si
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24 ..
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 - I —
-38 .r I . . I I 1 I I I I II . Ih1iI ] LI1i ]k 1-400.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql 01 01 v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W l0 I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 21
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 - Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 - March 1 36 Days - 14.5% November 4
6 - 3.5
4 I �.
2 I 1 I
0 2
13.0
1\61%'\
6
-8 2.5 c
ai -
-10
if) =
-12 - o
-14 2.0
-16 a
o ' ,�
18 .c
-20 Irr6n1„,,,,win
- 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I I —
-38 .Il jiI. 1 I1 I _ I 11 IIi I 1 I Jill ■ Ii J-400.0
F-, F-, F-, F-, N N W W W -P -P -P Ul U'7 U'7 Ui C C CT v v v 00 00 00 l0 l0 LC) I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--,
I--� I--� N W I-� N N I-� N I-� I-� N I-� I-� N W I-� N W I-� N W (.0 I-� N CO I-� N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 - V J - V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I-, I-,

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 22
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season
8 March 1 56 Days 22.5% End Growing Season
11111
6 November 4
- 3.5
4
2 41 1
0 -
- 3.0
-2
1\nf) 1
c
-4
-6
Tv 8 - 2.5 c
ai
L -10 +'
v _
-12 — o
c -14I
2.0 a
3 -16
o I ,-
0 -18 _
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22 4UL
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 -
-38 .1r . . i I I Ii II I i Ih I1 Iii ti i1i
-400.0
I— I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ui Ui Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
I--� I-� N W I-� N N I-� N I-� I-� N I-� I-� N W I-� N W I-� N W l\D I-� N W I-� N 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 23
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 November 4
6
4 42 Days 16.9% - 3.5
2 -‘16\
2 III 1\64 i
0 - 1n - 3.0
-6
> -8 I - 2.5 c
ai
-10 '
a) SII 1II . _
co -12 -
0
etE
-14 2.0
-16
\I
o ,�
0 -18 =
-2 ./"k -11144UL 1.5 °c
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 - I —
-38 1 . a I I 1 I I l I II 1 III 1 II �iL1 i I . r 1 J
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ui Ui Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I-, I- I- I- I-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
1-- 1-- 1- 0 0 NJ NJ I- I- I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-
I_

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 24
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 November 4
6 - 3.5
4 - 14 Days -5.6% I
2 -
0
2 i li . + - 3.0
icAltiali\\141\k.
8 2.5 c
ai
1 -10
if) c
-12 o
E
-0 -14 2.0
et
= -16 Tis
o ,�
6 -18 c
-20 I - 1.5 ac
-22
1
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30 I I
-32
-34 0.5
-36 I - II I J
—
-38 .11 . ■ I I 1i I I L I Ii 1 III i 1 II J t LI . [
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ui Ui Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-
L

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 25
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8
6 March 1 55 Days- 22.1% November 4
\ - 3.5
4 \+I
2
11M
2 Alilf 1
I - 3.0
c _
_- -6
v -8 1 - 2.5 .c
L -10 V
t C
i -12 \An \IL4IR
0
-14 2.0
C a
o -16 To
0 -18o
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26 11
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 —
-38 .1L . • 11 1 II l _ I Ii . III I i I i t LI ■ I J
-40 0.0
I— I- I- I- N N) W W U.1 . . -P Ul Ul Ul Ul Ql CT) CT) v v v 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 I- I- I- I-, 1.- I- I- I- I-
I--� I-� N W I-� N N I-� N I-� I--, N I--, I--, N W I--, N W I--� N W VD I--� N CO I--� N 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 — NJ NJ I- I- — I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 — CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 Co - V J - V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 26
Year 2 (2021 Data)
Start Growing Season
12 March 1 11
10 — 88 Days - 35.3% I I� I End Growing Season 4.0
g y November 4
6 - 3.5
42
0
- 3.0
2
c
4
_.. -6
8 - 2.5 c
ai
-10 +'
v =
i -12 - o
-14 2.0
a a
z -16
144.
Ts-
2 ,
18 .c
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 Ii
I-38 .11 . • I I II II I I I IIi 1 II i I_ LI . I J
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- NJ N W W W . . . Ui Ul Ul Ui CT) CI C v •v •v CO CO CO lD (1) lD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I— I— I— N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 — NJ NJI- I- — I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD — 00 00 00 I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
\ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 Co \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 27
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 November 4
6 - 3.5
4
2 _ 57 Days- 22.9%
1 "Ili\P\tIl
- 3.0
2
4 -
441.141/4"Ncyk.4\
= -6
8 - 2.5 c
ai 'L -10 +
v a
Vs -12 0
c -14 2.0 E
0 -16To—f
0 -18 =
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24 `
I AM
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32 I-34 - 0.5
-36 —
I I I. I . i i
-38 _Jr 1 . 2 I � 1 II _ I I� 1 IIi 1 1 �I J t LI �-400.0
I— I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ul Ul Ul Ul Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 28
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 — March 1
November 4 6
- 3.5
4
2 i 49 Dvikk\\ays - 19.7%
i k )11(
0 - 3.0
-2
c
4 A
-6
• -8 - 2.5 c
ai
L -10 ii
+'
v a
11
-12 oo
c -14 2.0 a
0 -16ns
O -18 =
co
-20 ac
- 1.5
-22
-24thL—..4 1
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 i - 0.5
-36 I —
-38 i� U i I I i II1 ��i 1 �1 it J t i I i1 ]-400.0
F� F-, F-, F-, NJ NJ W W W -P -P -P Ul Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-- I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 29
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season 81 Days-32.5% End Growing Season
8 —kilfv\ March 1
6 II- 1 November 4
- 3.5
4 i 4
2
0
-2 i fi - 3.0
-4
6I/ 1 i t
-8 - 2.5 c
ai
1 -10
v =
3 121 o
E
-0 -14 2.0 et
= -16 7,3
o ,-
6- -18 =
co
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30
-32 I-34 - 0.5
-36 I II I I —
-38 .1I . . _ 11 1 l I l I Ii 1 Ili 1 1 11 I r LI ■ I i J
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ui Ui Ui C C C v v v 00 00 00 (JD (JD (JD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
I--� I-� N W I-� N N I--� N I--� I-� N I-� I-� N W I-� N W I-� N W l\D I-� N CO I-� N 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- F-,
L

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 30
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 —
8 — Start Growing Season — End Growing Season
6 — March 1 November 4
- 3.5
4
2 I 38 Days - 15.3%
o
-2 - 3.0
-4
� -6 J
a) '
-8 - 2.5 c
L -10 +
C
�p -12
illifk
0
-14 Left. • 2.0 E
C -16
ns
2 4-
t7 -18
ta
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26 11
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 .
-38 -I� i II I i Iii1 �1��� ii t LI
-40 —
0.0
I— I- I- I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 31
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 — - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 March 1 98 Days- 39.4%
6 I November 4
4
IILI11NI - 3.5
I2
0 - A
- - 3.0
2 '
c
4
_- -6 '
8 \&411
- 2.5 c
>
L -10 +'
v a
Vs -12 - o
E
-0 -14 1 2.0
o 16 '.'_'1 0" a
ca
2 4-
0 -18 o
co
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 L —
-38 .IL . • I � II II I II 1 III I II Iii IL LI J
-40 0.0
F� F-, F-, F-, NJ NJ W W W Ul Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-- I--, I--,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 32
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 Start Growing Season 4.0
10
March 1 End Growing Season
8 i i itill lift
k November 4
6
4 - � - 3.5
\V
2 I 58 Days- 23.3%
0 - I i i /
-2 - I - 3.0
c
-4
_- -6
• 8 - 2.5 c
>
L -10 I C
i -12 — o
ko.•% 1
c -14IllU 4 _ _
2.0 a
3 -16 t
o ,—
O -18 =
ca
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I I —
-38 .IL . . I _I 1 1 ii l I 1 Ii 1 III 1 i i Iii t LI . I J
-40 0.0
I— I— I— I- N N W W W . . -P Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I- I- I--, I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 33
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season - End Growing Season
8 — March 1
6 ^ November 4
4 42 Days- 16.9% - 3.5
2
0 • iiiii I lill 24St\" I - 3.0
= -4
v 8 - 2.5 c
L -10 +'I
12 -
c -14 2.0 —
o -16 • __18 ca
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26 11
- 1.0
-28 I
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36-38 i II I i I ■ II� I1 �i t iI-401 . . 11
—
I- 0.0
F� F-, F-, F-, NJ NJ W W W -P -P -P Ul Ul Ul Ui Ql 01 01 v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I-- I-- I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W l0 I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 34
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 — March 1
6 - diNovember 4
4
55 Days- 22.1% - 3.5
2
0 PAN\ • A
-2 i - 3.0
-4 I
-- -6 1
> -8 - 2.5 c
ai
-10 I C
i -12 - I
c -14 \IP \1144111UL
2.0 3 -16
o
i I
0 -18 =
co
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26 11
- 1.0
-28
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 II I I —
-38 .IL . . I. I I II I I I i1 1 Ili i II Ill J t LI . 1 1 J
-40 0.0
F. F-, F-, F-, NJ NJ W W W -P -P -P Ul Ul Ul Ui Ql 01 01 v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I--, I I-- I-
-, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W l0 I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 l0 - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 35
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 - Start Growing Season End Growing Season
8 - March 1 —
November 4 6 ^
I - 3.5
4 2 I 42 Days - 16.9%
-
0 MI
w - 3.0
2
\If 1
c
-4
-6 •
-8 - 2.5 c
ai
-10 +'
if)
i -12 0
c -14 \-..........1 2.0 a
3 -16I U -
2 -1 8 C
ca
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30
-32
-34 - 0.5
-36 I —
-38 .IL . . l _li I III II I II II IIi 1 II ii i t LI . i J-400.0
I- I- I- I- N N W W W . . . Ui Ul Ul Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I--, I- I- I- I-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-

Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Reference Gauge
Year 2 (2021 Data)
12 - 4.0
10 — Start Growing Season - End Growing Season
8 — March 1
- November 4 6
- 3.5
4
51 Days- 20.5%
2
0 \ t°1 vi,
- 3.0
I\ i
4 - l
c 6 -
a) 8 - lik \‘.
I i Tv - 2.5 c
IP‘ k
-10 -
v =
-12 - o
E
-0 -14 2.0 et
0
-16
l 6 4-
18 ._
-20 - 1.5 ac
-22
-24
-26
- 1.0
-28
-30
-32 I-34 - 0.5
-36 - I LI
J
-38 .e . • l I I 1 I I II I I 1 1 Ili 1 1 ii J I . I
-40 0.0
I- I- I- I- NJ NJ W W W . . -P Ui Ui Ui Ui Ql Ql Ql v v v 00 00 00 VD VD VD I- I- I- I--, I•, I- I- I- I-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O I- I- I- N N N
I- I- NJ W I- NJ NJ I- NJ I- I- NJ I- I- NJ W I- NJ W I- NJ W lD I- NJ CO I- NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I- I- I- 0 0 - NJ NJ I- I- - I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD lD - CO CO CO I- NJ V I- NJ V I- NJ
NJ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NJ \ \ NJ \ \ \ 00 00 \ V V \ V V
I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \
I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ I- NJ NJ
I- I- I- I- I- I-�
L