20051952 Ver 4_More Info Received_20140122

Dennison, Laurie
From: Smith, Cherri L
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:53 PM
To: Dennison, Laurie
Subject: FW: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Attachments: DOC137.PDF
Laurie, here are the revised application pages for 05- 1952v4. Thank you.
Cherri
P.S. I'll put the email correspondence in Laserfiche.
From: Jeff Harbour [mailto:jharbour @ESINC.CC]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:29 PM
To: Smith, Cherri L
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Here you go. The changes are marked with an * on the two attached sheets. Thanks Cherri. I appreciate your
willingness to address some of the items via email in lieu of a letter. Let me know if you need anything else.
r ENVIRONMENTAL
6IM-7 SERVICES, INC.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Asst. Vice President /Senior Manager
524 S. New Hope Road I Raleigh, NC 27610
919 - 212 -1760 Phone [phone] Fax
919 - 805 -4208 Cell
ESI Website I Read ESI News I Follow Us on Twitter I ESI Green News Bloa
Confidentiality Notice The information and all attachments contained in this electronic communication are privileged and confidential information, and intended only for the
use of the intended recipient(s). if the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately of the error by return e-mail and please
permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise Thank you
From: Smith, Cherri L [mailto:cherri.smith @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:17 PM
To: Jeff Harbour
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Jeff, thanks — I've got it now.
If you could just email me the pages of the application with the revised impact tables, that would be great. That way I
can forward this information to Laurie in the Central Office so she'll have the revised information as well. Thank you.
Cherri
From: Jeff Harbour [mailto:jharbouraESINC.CC]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:56 AM

To: Smith, Cherri L
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
The new permit is for a new road crossing that was not part of the original subdivision; the new road was added
later. So the new impact is not a replacement to the original permit, it's in addition to it.
The revised impact map is attached with the corrected wetland impact. I am forwarding this revised map to James at
ACOE as well.
Thanks,
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Asst. Vice President /Senior Manager
524 5. New Hope Road I Raleigh, NC 27610
919 - 212 -1760 Phone [phone] Fax
919 - 805 -4208 Cell
ESI Website I Read ESI News I Follow Us on Twitter I ESI Green News Blog
Confidentiality Notice. The Information and all attachments contained in this electronic communication are privileged and confidential information, and intended only for the
use of the intended recipient(s) If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication In error, please notify me immediately of the error by return e-mail and please
permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise. Thank you.
From: Smith, Cherri L [mailto:cherri.smith ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11 :37 AM
To: Jeff Harbour
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Hi Jeff,
So just to make sure I understand correctly, the 401 and Buffer Authorization for the Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa
Phase 6 is not a replacement of the Phase 5 & 6 permit, it's in addition to the Phase 5 & 6 permit.
Thank you.
Cherri
From: Jeff Harbour fmailto:jharbouK@)ESINC.CC]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Smith, Cherri L
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Hey Cherri,
It is the basically the same piece, the name has changed. The Phase 5 & 6 permit authorized 89 'stream impact. This
addition is requesting 60' putting the project as a whole at 149'. 1 understand that with these impacts the applicant is at
the threshold for stream mitigation, and I have informed him of that.
You are correct on the wetland impacts. The engineer did not calculate the correct amount because of the buffer being
there. I just talked to him and he is correcting that and I will get it to you asap. Sorry for the confusion.

K ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Asst. Vice President /Senior Manager
524 S. New Hope Road ( Raleigh, NC 27610
919 - 212 -1760 Phone [phone] Fax
919 - 805 -4208 Cell
ESI Website I Read ESI News I Follow Us on Twitter I ESI Green News Bloa
Confidentiality Notice The Information and all attachments contained In this electronic communication are privileged and confidential information, and intended only for the
use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately of the error by return e-mail and please
permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise. Thank you.
From: Smith, Cherri L [ mailto:cherri.smithOncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:20 AM
To: Jeff Harbour
Subject: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Hi Jeff,
I just had a couple of things I needed your help on regarding the Manors & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6. First, is there
any overlap with this project and The Manors at Bella Casa Phases 5 & 6 or is it a completely difference piece of property
with totally new impacts? Second, could you double check the impact calculations. it looks like riparian buffer and
jurisdictional wetlands overlap. My understanding if that's the case, is that the area should be counted twice in terms of
impacts.
Just let me know and thanks very much.
Cherri
Cherri Smith
NCDENR Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628
ph. 919- 791 -4251
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records law and may be disclosed to
third parties

x
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 10721838330
000
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.70993 Longitude: 78.9034
1c. Property size:
8.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Beaver Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
C,SW,NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed road will go through an existing headwater wetland and stream. The proposed crossing site is currently undisturbed and the general
land use in the vicinity of the project is mainly for development of single family homes.
3b. Ust the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.5
3c. Ust the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 350
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
construct a road crossing to serve the Manors at Bella Cosa -Phase e
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A 48" RCP will be installed along with the necessary side slopes to stabilize the crossing; typical equipment will be utilized during construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro ect (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No Q Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the Jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company: done by S &EC ??
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Unknown; site had been delineated and surveyed prior to ESI's Involvement.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Byes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file° instructions.
Previous phases of the Manors at Bella Casa have required Section 404 authorization. Previous Impacts = 89' stream channel and 0.01 ac wetland
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
With this new phase total project Impacts are: streams 149 and wetlands 0.21ac
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts-Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ore
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
Impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.2
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
YestNo
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
we -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.2
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of Impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (I NT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
Si P
Culvert
UT to Beaver Creek
PER
Corps
6
60
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
86 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts
60
31. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Dennison, Laurie
From: Smith, Cherri L
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:51 PM
To: Dennison, Laurie
Subject: FW: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Attachments: Revised Impact Map.pdf
Laurie,
Here's a revised impact map that goes with the application for DWR# 05- 1952v4 Manor & Cottages @ Bella Casa Ph.
6. I'll be forwarding you a couple of revised application pages next. Thanks.
Cherri
From: Jeff Harbour [mailto:jharbour @ESINC.CC]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:56 AM
To: Smith, Cherri L
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
The new permit is for a new road crossing that was not part of the original subdivision; the new road was added
later. So the new impact is not a replacement to the original permit, it's in addition to it.
The revised impact map is attached with the corrected wetland impact. I am forwarding this revised map to James at
ACOE as well.
Thanks,
*ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Asst. Vice President /Senior Manager
524 S. New Hope Road 1 Raleigh, NC 27610
919 - 212 -1760 Phone [phone] Fax
919 -805 -4208 Cell
ESI Website I Read ESI News I Follow Us on Twitter I ESI Green News Bloa
Confidentiality Notice: The information and all attachments contained in this electronic communication are privileged and confidential information, and intended only for the
use of the intended recipient(s) If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately of the error by return e-mail and please
permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise. Thank you.
From: Smith, Cherri L [mailto:cherri.smith @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:37 AM
To: Jeff Harbour
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Hi Jeff,
So just to make sure I understand correctly, the 401 and Buffer Authorization for the Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa
Phase 6 is not a replacement of the Phase 5 & 6 permit, it's in addition to the Phase 5 & 6 permit.

Thank you.
Cherri
From: Jeff Harbour [mailtoJharbour(cbESINC.CC]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Smith, Cherri L
Subject: RE: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Hey Cherri,
It is the basically the same piece, the name has changed. The Phase 5 & 6 permit authorized 89 'stream impact. This
addition is requesting 60' putting the project as a whole at 149'. 1 understand that with these impacts the applicant is at
the threshold for stream mitigation, and I have informed him of that.
You are correct on the wetland impacts. The engineer did not calculate the correct amount because of the buffer being
there. I just talked to him and he is correcting that and I will get it to you asap. Sorry for the confusion.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Asst. Vice President /Senior Manager
524 S. New Hope Road I Raleigh, NC 27610
919 - 212 -1760 Phone [phone] Fax
919 - 805 -4208 Cell
ESI Website I Read ESI News I Follow Us on Twitter I ESI Green News Bloa
Confidentiality Notice The information and all attachments contained in this electronic communication are privileged and confidential information, and intended only for the
use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately of the error by return e-mail and please
permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise. Thank you.
From: Smith, Cherri L [ mailto :cherri.smith@)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:20 AM
To: Jeff Harbour
Subject: Manor & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6
Hi Jeff,
I just had a couple of things I needed your help on regarding the Manors & Cottages at Bella Casa Phase 6. First, is there
any overlap with this project and The Manors at Bella Casa Phases 5 & 6 or is it a completely difference piece of property
with totally new impacts? Second, could you double check the impact calculations. It looks like riparian buffer and
jurisdictional wetlands overlap. My understanding if that's the case, is that the area should be counted twice in terms of
impacts.
Just let me know and thanks very much.
Cherri
Cherri Smith
NCDENR Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center

Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628
ph. 919- 791 -4251
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties

' D
•
i
I '
ZONE 2
IM N •
ALL
LUVAIMW
1 i<•�••. is Y /.1 /.iY.PL':_0.4���.'�:.►Ti.ri�
" "#� rills roc• ►iin►� a_,��r�
/
I/
1 /
\ \ END C4G, PMT, I /
E 5' 51DEWACK
AT 5TA. 3 +�0 I
XXX
\
1 / N
5' EWALK
(TYPICAL)
5a JORDAN
\ \ \ \ KE BUF ER
TOP OF �(TYPICA)
NK OX)
I I \
IMPACT SUMMARY
\ 1 \ \ F °,o :: ; y� CHANNEL IMPACT - 60 FT
\ ZONE I IMPACT - 5 841 5f
ZONE 2 IMPACT - 4,664 SF
WETLANDS - 8,923 SF