20140067 Ver 1_401 Application_20140114

WITHERS &— RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
(910) 256 -9277
FAX [phone]
TO: NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street; 91h Floor
Raleigh, NC 276o4
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
® Attached
❑ Prints
❑ Change order
DATE 1/20/14
1 JOB NO. 0210001 .00
ATTENTION
Ms. Karen Higgins
PHONE k
919-807-6363
RE: Glen Canyon Drive Drainage Improvements
NWP 3 & 14 PCN Submittal
0210001 .00
NWP 3 & 14 PCN
1
1/20/14
0210001 .00
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Diskette ❑
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1/20/14
0210001 .00
NWP 3 & 14 PCN
1
1/20/14
0210001 .00
$240 Check for Application Fee
1
1/20/14
0210001 .00
CD of PCN
.7
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
nr \I A nVC_
COPY TO: File
SIGNED: Troy Beas
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify as at once.

WITHERS � RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
i
•R
January 20, 2014 -7
US Army Corps of Engineers NC- Division of Water Resources -- —
Regulatory Field Office Wetlands, Buffers & Streams Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Crystal Amschler Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
69 Darlington Avenue 1650 Mail Service Center.
Wilmington, NC 28403 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 rrA
� Re: Glen Canyon Drive Drainage Improvements — NWP 14 & 3 PCN Submittal 2 1 261 D
W &R Project #02100015.00
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of the City of Fayetteville, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWPs 14
& 3 for 10 if of permanent stream impacts and 106 if of temporary stream impacts for drainage
improvements to an existing culverted stream crossing on Glen Canyon Drive in Fayetteville,
Cumberland County. We are also requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from NCDWR for the
proposed impacts.
The proposed project is located ±250 if west of the intersection of Glen Canyon Drive and
Covenwood Drive (Lat: 35.o81956 1N; Long: - 78.976672 0W) in Fayetteville, Cumberland County. The
project is located in the Cape Fear River basin and onsite waters drain to Beaver Creek. The Water
Quality Classification for Beaver Creek is "C" and the Stream Index Number is: 18- 31 -24 -5. The
cataloging unit for the site is 03030004.
Project Purpose
The proposed Glen Canyon Drive Drainage Improvement project is necessary as a result of a larger
storm drainage improvement project for the Ponderosa Subdivision, located north of Yadkin Road.
The Ponderosa Subdivision was developed in the 196o's, most likely to serve Fort Bragg. Currently,
there is frequent flooding at the intersection of Santa Fe Drive and Carson Drive within the
Ponderosa Subdivision that could potentially inundate a vehicle in a flash rain event. Storm
drainage from this location is a series of reinforced concrete and corrugated metal pipes that are
inadequately sized to convey even a smaller rain event. The drainage area of the UT to Beaver Creek
is approximately 1o5 acres, most of which is impervious area. The drainage basin includes the
drainage system within the Ponderosa Subdivision. The entire drainage area discharges into a
drainage easement over the UT to Beaver Creek at Yadkin Road. The storm drain improvements
within the Ponderosa Subdivision will increase conveyance to the UTto Beaver Creek. The increased
conveyance to the UT to Beaver Creek will result in the culverts beneath Glen Canyon Drive being
inadequate to handle the increased volume and would cause localized flooding if these culverts
were not improved. The improvements to the culverts at Glen Canyon Drive are necessary to prevent
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravenel.com I License No. C -0832

r
WITHERS &; RAVEN EL
i ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
localized flooding at these crossings and alleviate flooding issues within the Ponderosa Subdivision
and the entire drainage basin in general.
Proposed Project
The project consists of the removal of the existing, undersized 54" culvert and 30" culvert within the
UT to Beaver Creek at Glen Canyon Drive and replacing them with a larger 1o' x 7'box culvert in order
to improve the stormwater drainage for the entire drainage basin and prevent a bottleneck resulting
in flooding at this crossing The project also proposes the removal of existing headwalls and
construction of new headwalls as exhibited in the attached Impact Plans.
The section of the UT to Beaver Creek within the Glen Canyon Drive Drainage Improvement project
area has been historically filled with broken concrete, creating a plunge pool, to reduce flow rates in
order to reduce erosion, as well as protect an aerial sewer crossing over the creek, see attached site
photos. The invert of the existing culverts is approximately 3' -4' above the OHW of the stream. The
project has been designed to construct an engineered plunge pool below the outfall of culverts in
order to dissipate energy and reduce flow to non - erosive rates. The project also proposes to remove
and replace existing rip -rap with suitable clean rip -rap Both the proposed plunge pool and
replacement of existing rip -rap is necessary to dissipate energy to prevent erosion, as well as protect
an existing aerial sewer crossing
Please note that the proposed drainage improvements will not serve as water quality treatment in
any capacity. The proposed drainage improvements are meant only to prevent flooding and prevent
erosion and sedimentation of downstream waters.
Project History
W &R conducted a site review in April 2013 The site review determined that the only jurisdictional
feature within the project site is a perennial stream (UT to Beaver Creek). There are no wetlands
within the proposed project site
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts for authorization consist of 10 if of permanent stream impacts and 1o6 if of
temporary stream impacts for removal of the existing 30" & 54" culverts and installation of the 1o' x
7' box culvert, construction of the plunge pool and removal and replacement of the existing rip -rap.
The 10 if of permanent stream impacts (Impact #2) and 20 if of temporary stream impacts (Impact
#1) are necessary for removal of the existing 30" & 54" culverts with a larger 1o' x 7' box culvert.
Please note that the proposed box culvert it ±1o' longer than the existing culverts, which will result
in the 10 if of permanent stream impacts These impacts are being requested under a NWP 14
The 1o6 if of temporary stream impacts for construction of the engineered plunge pool and removal
and replacement of existing rip -rap are being requested under a NWP 3 for maintenance.
WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Page 2 of 3

1,
WITHERS `� " RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Avoidance and Minimization
Since the project consists of the improvement of storm drainage within a stream that serves as a
drainage easement, stream impacts could not be avoided. However, the proposed project will
reduce stormwater flow in the stream to non - erosive rates, thereby minimizing future impacts by
preventing sedimentation of downstream waters as a result of erosion
Mitigation
Because the proposed permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If, mitigation is not proposed
Summary
The current request is for 10 if of permanent stream impacts and 126 if of temporary stream impacts
(see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments•
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quadrangle
• Cumberland County Soil Survey
• Site Photographs
• Impact Plans
WITHERS &_ RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Page 3 of 3

E y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 & 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
N Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Glen Canyon Drive Drainage Improvements
2b. County:
Cumberland County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Fayetteville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
N/A —Within existing ROW
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify City of Fayetteville
4b
Name
R W Thompson — E &I Director
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
City of Fayetteville
4d
Street address
433 Hay Street
4e
City, state, zip
Fayetteville, NC 28301
4f
Telephone no
910 -433 -1301
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
dcooper @ci fay nc us
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Troy Beasley
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Withers and Ravenel
5c
Street address
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d
City, state, zip
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e
Telephone no
910 - 256 -9277
5f
Fax no
910 - 256 -2584
5g
Email address
tbeasley @withersravenel com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A — Project located in Drainage Easement
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Lat 35 081956 °N Long -78 976672°W
1c Property size
N/A
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Beaver Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
"C" Stream Index #18- 31 -24 -5
2c River basin
Cape Fear— HUC 03030004
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project area consists of existing road crossing a UT to Beaver Creek Pictures of the stream within the project areas
have been provided as an Appendix
The surrounding land use consists of a mixture of residential and commercial development
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
None
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
±136 If of stream within project area
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The proposed Glen Canyon Drive Drainage Improvement project is necessary as a result of a larger storm drain improvement
project for the Ponderosa Subdivision, located north of Yadkin Road The Ponderosa Subdivision was developed in the
1960's, most likely to serve Fort Bragg Currently, there is frequent flooding at the intersection of Santa Fe Drive and Carson
Drive within the Ponderosa Subdivision that could potentially inundate a vehicle in a flash rain event Storm drainage from
this location is a series of reinforced concrete and corrugated metal pipes that are inadequately sized to convey even a
smaller rain event The drainage area of the UT to Beaver Creek is approximately 105 acres, most of which is impervious
area The drainage basin includes the entire drainage system within the Ponderosa Subdivision, and the entire drainage area
discharges into a drainage easement over the UT to Beaver Creek at Yadkin Road The storm drain improvements within the
Ponderosa Subdivision will increase conveyance to the UT to Beaver Creek The increased conveyance to the UT to Beaver
Creek will result in the culverts beneath Glen Canyon Drive being inadequate and would cause localized flooding if these
culverts were not improved The improvements to the culverts at Glen Canyon Drive are necessary to prevent localized
flooding at these crossings and alleviate flooding issues within the Ponderosa Subdivision and the entire drainage basin in
general
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The project consists of the replacement of existing undersized 30" & 54" culverts at Glen Canyon Drive with a larger 10' x
7' box culvert, construction of new headwalls and replacement of existing rip -rap, as well as constructing a designed
plunge pool on the downstream end of the new box culvert The plunge pool and replacement of existing rip -rap is
necessary to decrease flow velocity to prevent sedimentation, as well as protect an aerial sewer crossing just
downstream of the culvert outfall Please note that there is currently a plunge pool below the outfall of the culverts, as
documented in the photos which have been provided as an Appendix Standard commercial construction equipment will
be used to construct the proposed project
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company Withers & Ravenel
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts ,
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)
other)
(feet)
feet)
Disturbance
Impact #1
during installation
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
10'
20 If
❑ P ® T
of new culvert
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
(NWP 14)
Impact #2
Installation of New
UT to Beaver
PER
®Corps
® P ❑ T
Box Culvert
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
10'
10 If
(NWP 14)
Removal and
Impact #3
replacement of
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
10'
106 If
E:1 P ® T
existing rip -rap
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
(NWP 3)
3h Total stream and
tributary impacts
136 If
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Since the project consists of the replacement of culverts at an existing road crossing, avoidance of impacts was not possible
However, the proposed project will reduce stormwater flow in the stream to non - erosive rates, thereby minimizing future
impacts by preventing sedimentation of downstream waters as a result of erosion
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Work will be conducted in the dry
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, nurigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
projects
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
1
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

I�
t
c '
r ,
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why The proposed project will not result in
additional impervious surface Therefore, a Stormwater Management Plan is not required
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered 'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The proposed project consists of replacement of culverts at an existing road crossing and will not be a catalyst for future
development that could impact downstream water quality
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC OneMap Viewer GIS website, located at http / /www nconemap net/Default aspx ?tabid =286, to
identify if any potential occurrence of endangered species on or near the proposed project The review of the GIS
database did not identify any recent occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or
within 1 0 miles of the project The project is located within a heavily developed area of Cumberland County and potential
habitat for endangered species was not observed within the project area
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Cumberland County designated as EPH
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project is located within an existing drainage easement and ROW corridor There were no historic or archeological
resources observed within the project area
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www ncfloodmaps com
Troy Beasley
/
1/20/14
Withers & Ravenel
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

WITHERS &�-RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Municipality, City of Fayetteville (Client) does hereby appoint Troy Beasley /
Withers & Ravenel Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a)
review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications /requests for the Glenn Canyon Drive Culvert Extension.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Signature of Client:
Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel Inc • w . ) h0 E4-1 2 -z c4-of -i_
(Name - Print) (Title)
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101 �--
Wilmington, NC 28403 (Signatu
Tel. [phone] If ) -�, �A . �, 5 k t t }
Mailing Address
F��ttt��illc NC 2 5 0 \
City State Zip
Phone: L1 (0 - 4 j 3` [30\
Email: c�c eo0t, 3.4c.u5
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.wittiersravenet.com i License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 ; tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

I�
4
I
USGS QUADRANGLE MAP
CUMBERLAND CO. SOIL SURVEY

•� i GRAPHIC SCALE
• . - : ! :„ �.+r, J l ; { �. . P o 1 000 2000
'�,, /�'�`.�, l 3• - 1 inch — 2000 it.
o.
•f i✓. '. r L .. ° l
''r" 1. r• pp � r,•4 �'' •�' ;; .'.•• �•a� ,
1• � ././.1. y '� .L .' ,fit, '•`• ♦ r„ ''l •� �Yr\
1 �\J 1 _ ^,�.• �' '• • • "✓'. •' .� Iry aAg rye•} r, ,•� ,+
S • ........ f Ufa •�
{,,, e: �`; •� GLEN CANYON DR -
::' -:. �,: PROJECT AREA
%. •�.••�'. •` ,, •• �..,' "� ) ��t x,11• •�
•'i• ,��— SC�._�..y •w. •,�1 j'+ -� T_ 1 l,r'l) \li)(1 I -� �{ T�•„ ��, 1 r�'
�IAII • ice' - c+ I '4,L s ��/' J � ,Pr.%
of Aft
Par 1 % 1
at
,00h ��.•............ :.r: ,... 5 �)`7
GLEN CANYON DRIVE WITHERS RAVENEL
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS LANDSCAPE LOCATION EXHIBIT . ■.,wll.: I ►LAMA /111 I su�virc l!
'AVtill Vtllt CUMO RIMD I;UUMV NUR t I I C.AROl ice!,

• • • • • • •� �� •• • L S GRAPHIC SCALE
• • • • • • • • , • t 250 500
• • • •
' • • t • •1 • ♦ • • • • F • I t inch= 500 h.
ow
tAl
t
f + _
1 8
• • • • •
•
• •
•••• • • 1,
. • •. 06. •
to
0 • ` . * • '4 GLEN CANYON DR
• •• r PROJECT AREA
q r ♦-a • • • • .� • , • • •
•
r,
.w
GLEN CANYON DRIVE WITHERS &- RAVEN
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS USGS - FAYEI TEVILLE QUAD ■,,.1.■.Aff 1 PIAMIItIf 1 SURVIVORS
"Ifif Vlllf cumsfRIANUMI.AIV

11,E -`
�1, I
� w �
low 9 `•
%,
41
eo
M �
r ow
1
a
f
SKI
f �
AV
4# E
•
r
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch - 500 it.
+R -0
GLEN CANYON DRIVF CUMBERLAND CO SOIL SURVEY WITHERS &— RAVENEL
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 11 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
FAYF RFV11.1i CLIMU.RIAN000UNIY NOIRDICAR011NA

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Glen Canyon Drive — Existing Culvert Outfall
Site Photographs
Photo of culvert outfalls on south side of Glen Canyon Drive.
Photo of rip -rap in channel; Facing downstream. Pipe over stream is aerial sewer line.

IMPACT PLANS
a

y f ♦♦
I
\ ' I
J
�w >a,,
\1
I•
IMPACT MAP #1
R LEGEND -p
9
STREAM IMPACTS EXISTING:
a
TEMP. L.F. 126 LF
PERM. L.F. 10 LF
c
TEMP. AREA 1,389 SF (.032 AC)
c
PERM. AREA 113 SF (0.003 AC)
a
EX. SEWER SS - --
a
EX. TOP OF BANK
No.
Rcvision Datc B ir:gnrr seam
/Y U t
b
J 1�
/ �'� ♦ ♦ ' v�oN F °spG 68
`p' 982 N 5
fQx51R Se EPGfi4 Z gE
�. �` ,\ P,.6 oM�B�
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
GLEN CANYON DRIVE
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Ile Cumberland County North Carolina
G�
`'f /' ` ♦ HISIN
►� /' U 199y.8
lop INS Ioul 1 °�
�r't ♦ �FERSON
�� oRP rtnRKS'So8
�R 3-0994-
E q
FoXf _. ti66-
/
9.5 one¢
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
IMPACT MAP #2
\ 1
PROJECT LOCATION
�v
4� W
x
0 0° �NYON
OR
v0
VICINITY MAP
WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
ti�MrK:.:un Unw',.r,, unnh Can,1 -27911 .:J "1 wit- 11- 111mn. 1,:—nl,, (,M,,

S .v
EX. HEADWALL
TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED TEMPORARY i
STREAM IMPACTS, 20 LF
'; �' ,ems 5c✓ , �y�� ���
PROPOSED 10'x7' RCBC '
STORM DRAIN
Q
EX. STORM DRAINAGE
TO BE REMOVED
O EMH
BFP
Jo
PR ti`
/ \ °GT 1p
F
;.,
/ WM
A Y B
wM p f R
E
LEGEND
s PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
d
L. F. 20 LF
AREA 183 SF (0.004 AC)
EX. SEWER SS —° GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
EX. TOP OF BANK
1 inch = 20 ft.
GELN CANYON DRIVE GLEN CANON DR - NORTH WITHERS RAVENEL
e
DRAINAGE allyaaaaa 1 ►LAaa
aas 1 suavaroaa
Fa ellevdle ��,be,d „d C��� .rthca,o,;,,, STREAM IMPACT MAP 1

a
"ate ...,i'f•f`�'4: ^'� • � � V �.� •
• i•,�ri •,i+iw�lf�•1 +� Jew �1\
ya n• N ♦fa•a� f• � *..•f, r
1f 1u f�r�s fs•ay'aw..R .wc•r
-
• Y Y ♦' ca'��• �� Imo` f, I
-� ���c -rte. I •
a, • a
'' ••(•iii �a►�ir �;' ♦ t
••rV_ . 1
IMP
fflf,t�
• �w�R�f1A ��rf�r
An
-,•, , • •,, a s's��ci i
+/Jr Yy�♦
♦`asawwao.
fora ��1•+• a•Y•y�rs
1 Kam/ • • • .'�rf`,
MIN
1 � 11;rf11•J•fy Y•yC `a
If � fLt�•ff/y�ifY6i•N.
. � 1J,�Jw �f �,ir f� f♦
/ •IIfJfOY. �ailaf
�17yHu ^f'C� filyfr.
•1'fff•�•fyaf +ar
/ i•Ila�OlylOf'IC�'t���•i
Il�f�yLy�y�•�a�'
a� + >YOiC�••��a-
4/ #•1,aa�e�•�w�f�.r �a y
f lJ7y!`yC♦'a �f•ff'a ^11'1 • , ,
yow•w•••aiyfaa•of "i
.•1 JfD•G•G•i•i•afapfaa -
o w w w r a a a a •.
Ia ♦•� a a a a a
oJwwa•aJ•
1•a•ayy- a�aaafaf
Ira 111�a•1,♦ if,lifrl• V
�ff 4CLC,!• f Ia
GLEN CANYON DRIVE GLEN CANYON DR -SOUTH WITHF-RS RAvr-mE
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVITONS
Fayetteville Cumberland Counry North Cdroh STREAM IMPACT MAP 2
I aal�aaaaaafal �
a• 1•��Q��f�frl'1
J
f 1 ,